reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - October 5, 2023 at 3:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Covid disrupted life, revealing the Gates Foundation's immense influence in the pandemic response. Their 2019 IRS 990 form exposes their plans for more illness and vaccines. Grants poured into vaccine manufacturers, media, and population control. Johns Hopkins University received 55 grants. UNC Chapel Hill, Vir Biotech, and Global Health Fund were also funded. Vaccines and family planning dominated their agenda. The Gates Foundation's power and intentions are clear. Receipts: [link].

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

1🧵Covid disrupted life as we knew it & since the first lock-down things haven't been the same. We went into 2020 w/ Bill & Melinda Gates a happily married couple-no more by 2021. I got a hold of their foundations 2019 IRS 990 to see what the happy Ex's were up.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

2🧵For a quick recap: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, a "philanthropic" powerhouse since 2000 was a lead stakeholder in the C19 response- landing a $200Billion ROI on a $2Billion dollar investment into vaccines. Though C19 is fading away the couple gleefully looks to the future.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

3🧵In June of 202 watch the couple smirk & say that the next Pandemic "will get attention this time!" @CSPAN https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5010580/user-clip-bill-gates-pandemic-will-attention-time A scene straight out of a "Get out" style dystopian nightmare.

User Clip: Bill Gates says the next Pandemic "will get attention this time" Eugenicist Gates will make sure that the next Plandemic is potent enough to put the fear of God into everyone, so that they ALL get vaccinated. c-span.org

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

4🧵So, what did they know that we didn't? According to their Foundation's 990 they see much more illness ahead & they are assuring much more vaccines too. The 1143 page tax form reveals how their spending their Billions. https://t.co/rTS4jJlVJJ

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

5🧵Of grant money going toward specific C19 manufacturers in 2019, millions were poured into all the US marketed jabs; Moderna [4 grants], Pfizer [2 grants] & Janssen [7 grants] https://t.co/xNaoSZeddd

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

6🧵Cancer[15 grants], Aspen Institute [8 grants], Grants containing the word "Genome"- 14 grants. Even efforts relating to the media were among the investments w/"news" receiving 9 grants. https://t.co/GaE1WGQKIM

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

7🧵A whopping 24 grants for the Wellcome Trust, , and 13 grants for the Scripps Institute. "Therpeutics" saw 19 grants, and "Pharma" had 37 grants. Its clear what the agenda is already, Illness. https://t.co/lA8RahKtpb

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

8🧵The US funded biolab in Tiblisi recieves 2 grants from the BMGF, but that's nothing in the face of the 55 grants made out to Johns Hopkins University. Aren't they who hosted Event 201 for the BMGF & the WEF?🤫 https://t.co/u7DmpFauXo

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

9🧵The word "population" was a constant theme, ranging from the Population Council, to population services all in all there were 57 grants. What was scary was that for "Family planning" there were a terrifying 335 grants. https://t.co/yEd7lFgoMn

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

10🧵Ralph Baric's University, UNC Chapel Hill has long been funded by the BMGF so I was not surprised that UNC Chapel hill landed 31 grants for 2019. Pandemic response funds were seen in Vir Biotech and the Global Health Fun as well. https://t.co/hK36SaPtWC

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

11🧵Last but not least the term "Vaccine" came up for 465 times! Insane. It doesn't take a genius to see the BMGF's agenda. Vaccines and Family Planning come up a combined 800 times in the grants! Has this gotten your attention? Because as Bill said, "It will next time!" https://t.co/5bI42QXkl4

Saved - November 21, 2024 at 2:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I broke down the extensive FY2024 Federal Budget Omnibus bill into key sections. The budget allocates significant funding across various departments, including the Department of Defense, Judiciary, Homeland Security, and Health and Human Services. For instance, the Department of Defense receives over $50 billion for military personnel, while the Department of Health and Human Services is allocated $406 billion for Medicaid. Each section details specific programs and their funding amounts, highlighting the government's financial priorities for the upcoming fiscal year.

@RobertJSalvador - Robert J Salvador

Here is the full 1000 page Omnibus bill broken down by AI into 10 paragraphs. The FY2024 Federal Budget covers a wide range of government agencies, departments, and programs. The Department of Defense (pages 1-100) receives funding for military personnel, operation and maintenance, procurement, and research and development, with allocations such as $50,041,206,000 for Army military personnel (page 5) and $58,604,854,000 for Army operation and maintenance (page 11). The budget also provides funding for the Judiciary (pages 100-200), including $129,323,000 for the Supreme Court (page 197) and $5,995,055,000 for Courts of Appeals, District Courts, and Other Judicial Services (page 198). Various independent agencies (pages 200-300) receive funding, such as $9,470,022,000 for the GSA Federal Buildings Fund (pages 229-235) and $361,235,000 for the Small Business Administration Salaries and Expenses (page 255). The Department of Homeland Security (pages 300-400) receives funding for border security, immigration enforcement, cybersecurity, and disaster response, with allocations like $18,426,870,000 for U.S. Customs and Border Protection Operations and Support (pages 347-349) and $20,261,000,000 for the FEMA Disaster Relief Fund (pages 371-375). The Department of Health and Human Services (pages 400-600) receives funding for various agencies and programs, including $7,224,159,000 for the National Cancer Institute (pages 495-500) and $406,956,850,000 for Grants to States for Medicaid (page 509). The Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs (pages 600-900) receive allocations such as $9,413,107,000 for Diplomatic Programs (pages 675-676) and $6,133,397,000 for the Foreign Military Financing Program (page 722). The budget also includes funding for international assistance programs (pages 700-800) such as $6,045,000,000 for HIV/AIDS programs (pages 703-704) and $3,931,000,000 for Development Assistance (page 704). Additionally, the budget covers funding for various initiatives and programs (pages 800-1012) such as $1,425,000,000 for assistance to Egypt (pages 861-862), $1,800,000,000 to support the Indo-Pacific Strategy (page 885), and $451,000,000 for water supply and sanitation projects (page 962). Pages 1-100 This file contains the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2024, which provides funding for various military departments, personnel, and operations. The act allocates funds for military personnel, operation and maintenance, procurement, research and development, and other defense-related activities. The appropriations aim to support the U.S. military in maintaining readiness, modernizing equipment, and carrying out missions globally. The act also includes funding for specific programs, such as the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative and the Counter-ISIS Train and Equip Fund. Bullet point list of items and their allocated amounts: Military Personnel (pages 5-10): Army: $50,041,206,000 Navy: $36,707,388,000 Marine Corps: $15,268,629,000 Air Force: $36,204,130,000 Space Force: $1,256,973,000 Reserve Personnel: $11,147,635,000 National Guard Personnel: $15,063,378,000 Operation and Maintenance (pages 11-25): Army: $58,604,854,000 Navy: $71,972,007,000 Marine Corps: $10,184,529,000 Air Force: $61,471,101,000 Space Force: $4,895,818,000 Defense-Wide: $52,599,068,000 Environmental Restoration: $1,278,615,000 Procurement (pages 27-39): Aircraft: $43,943,212,000 Missiles: $9,315,860,000 Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles: $4,244,226,000 Ammunition: $4,684,723,000 Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy: $33,665,493,000 Other Procurement: $81,699,581,000 National Guard and Reserve Equipment: $1,000,000,000 Defense Production Act Purchases: $587,905,000 Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (pages 41-43): Army: $17,115,037,000 Navy: $27,964,807,000 Air Force: $47,340,416,000 Space Force: $18,669,844,000 Defense-Wide: $36,892,886,000 Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense: $337,489,000 Other Department of Defense Programs (pages 45-47): Defense Health Program: $39,898,624,000 Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction: $1,091,844,000 Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense: $1,177,061,000 Office of the Inspector General: $528,565,000 Related Agencies (page 49): Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System Fund: $514,000,000 Intelligence Community Management Account: $625,419,000 Pages: 100-200 This file contains appropriations for the Judiciary for the fiscal year 2024. It provides funding for the Supreme Court of the United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the United States Court of International Trade, and various other courts and judicial services. The appropriations cover salaries and expenses for judges, justices, and court employees, as well as necessary expenses for court operations. The file also includes funding for specific programs, such as Defender Services, which provides legal representation for defendants in criminal cases, and Fees of Jurors and Commissioners, which covers the costs associated with jury trials and land condemnation cases. Bullet point list of items and their allocated amounts: - Supreme Court of the United States (pages 197-198): - Salaries and Expenses: $129,323,000 - Care of the Building and Grounds: $20,688,000 - United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (page 198): - Salaries and Expenses: $36,735,000 - United States Court of International Trade (page 198): - Salaries and Expenses: $21,260,000 - Courts of Appeals, District Courts, and Other Judicial Services (pages 198-200): - Salaries and Expenses: $5,995,055,000 - Up to $27,817,000 to remain available until expended for space alteration projects and related furniture and furnishings - Up to $9,975,000 from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund for processing cases under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 - Defender Services: $1,450,680,000 - Fees of Jurors and Commissioners: $58,239,000 Pages: 200-300 The document appears to be a portion of a larger appropriations bill for fiscal year 2024, specifically covering appropriations for the Judiciary, District of Columbia, and various independent agencies such as the General Services Administration, Office of Personnel Management, and Small Business Administration. The excerpt also includes general provisions that apply government-wide. The bill allocates funds for a wide range of purposes, from basic agency operations to specific initiatives and construction projects. Key allocations in this portion of the bill include: - Salaries and expenses for the Supreme Court: $118,945,000 (page 199) - Salaries and expenses for the Courts of Appeals, District Courts, and other Judicial Services: $5,820,566,000 (page 199-200) - Defender Services: $1,450,680,000 (page 200) - Fees of Jurors and Commissioners: $58,239,000 (page 200-201) - Court Security: $750,163,000 (page 201) - Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts: $102,673,000 (page 202) - Federal Judicial Center: $34,261,000 (page 202) - U.S. Sentencing Commission: $21,641,000 (page 203) - District of Columbia resident tuition support: $40,000,000 (page 208) - District of Columbia Courts: $292,068,000 (page 210) - GSA Federal Buildings Fund: $9,470,022,000 (page 229-235) - GSA Pre-Election Presidential Transition: $10,413,000 (page 238) - Office of Personnel Management: $219,076,000 (page 247-248) - Small Business Administration Salaries and Expenses: $361,235,000 (page 255) - Small Business Administration initiatives: $116,541,000 (page 260-261) The excerpt also includes various administrative provisions and general provisions that place limitations or conditions on the use of the appropriated funds. Pages: 300-400 The Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2024 provides funding for various agencies and programs within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The act allocates funds for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Transportation Security Administration, the Coast Guard, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, among others. The appropriations support a wide range of activities, including border security, immigration enforcement, cybersecurity, disaster response, and research and development. Bullet point list of items and their allocated amounts: - U.S. Customs and Border Protection (pages 347-349): - Operations and Support: $18,426,870,000 - Procurement, Construction, and Improvements: $850,170,000 - U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (pages 349-350): - Operations and Support: $9,501,542,000 - Procurement, Construction, and Improvements: $55,520,000 - Transportation Security Administration (pages 351-352): - Operations and Support: $10,164,968,000 - Procurement, Construction, and Improvements: $40,678,000 - Research and Development: $14,641,000 - Coast Guard (pages 352-354): - Operations and Support: $10,054,771,000 - Procurement, Construction, and Improvements: $1,413,950,000 - Research and Development: $7,476,000 - Retired Pay: $1,147,244,000 - United States Secret Service (pages 354-356): - Operations and Support: $3,007,982,000 - Procurement, Construction, and Improvements: $75,598,000 - Research and Development: $4,217,000 - Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (page 370): - Operations and Support: $2,382,814,000 - Procurement, Construction, and Improvements: $489,401,000 - Research and Development: $793,000 - Federal Emergency Management Agency (pages 371-375): - Operations and Support: $1,483,990,000 - Procurement, Construction, and Improvements: $99,528,000 - Federal Assistance: $3,497,019,369 - Disaster Relief Fund: $20,261,000,000 - National Flood Insurance Fund: $239,983,000 - U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (page 384): - Operations and Support: $271,140,000 - Federal Assistance: $10,000,000 - Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (pages 384-385): - Operations and Support: $357,100,000 - Procurement, Construction, and Improvements: $20,100,000 - Science and Technology Directorate (pages 385-386): - Operations and Support: $369,811,000 - Procurement, Construction, and Improvements: $61,000,000 - Research and Development: $310,823,000 - Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office (pages 386-387): - Operations and Support: $163,280,000 - Procurement, Construction, and Improvements: $42,338,000 - Research and Development: $60,938,000 - Federal Assistance: $142,885,000 Pages: 400-500 Here is a 1-2 paragraph summary of the Department of Health and Human Services Appropriations Act, 2024, followed by a bullet point list of each major item along with the amount allocated for it and the pages on which the item is described: The Department of Health and Human Services Appropriations Act, 2024 provides funding for various agencies and programs within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The act allocates funds for the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Administration for Community Living (ACL), and the Office of the Secretary. The appropriations support a wide range of health-related activities, including primary health care, health workforce development, disease prevention and control, biomedical research, mental health and substance abuse treatment, healthcare quality improvement, Medicare and Medicaid, social services, and community support programs. Bullet point list of items and their allocated amounts: - Health Resources and Services Administration (pages 479-488): - Primary Health Care: $1,858,772,000 - Health Workforce: $1,404,376,000 - Maternal and Child Health: $1,170,430,000 - Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program: $2,571,041,000 - Health Systems: $122,009,000 - Rural Health: $364,607,000 - Family Planning: $286,479,000 - HRSA-Wide Activities and Program Support: $1,110,376,000 - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (pages 488-495): - Immunization and Respiratory Diseases: $237,358,000 - HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, and Tuberculosis Prevention: $1,391,056,000 - Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases: $708,272,000 - Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: $1,192,647,000 - Birth Defects, Developmental Disabilities, Disabilities and Health: $206,060,000 - Public Health Scientific Services: $711,553,000 - Environmental Health: $191,850,000 - Injury Prevention and Control: $761,379,000 - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: $362,800,000 - Global Health: $692,843,000 - Public Health Preparedness and Response: $938,200,000 - Buildings and Facilities: $40,000,000 - CDC-Wide Activities and Program Support: $503,570,000 - National Institutes of Health (pages 495-500): - National Cancer Institute: $7,224,159,000 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: $3,982,345,000 - National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research: $520,163,000 - National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases: $2,310,721,000 - National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke: $2,603,925,000 - National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases: $6,562,279,000 - National Institute of General Medical Sciences: $3,244,679,000 - Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: $1,759,078,000 - National Eye Institute: $896,549,000 - National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences: $913,979,000 - National Institute on Aging: $4,507,623,000 - National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases: $685,465,000 - National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders: $534,333,000 - National Institute of Nursing Research: $197,693,000 - National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism: $595,318,000 - National Institute on Drug Abuse: $1,662,695,000 - National Institute of Mental Health: $2,187,843,000 - National Human Genome Research Institute: $663,200,000 - National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering: $440,627,000 - National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health: $170,384,000 - National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities: $534,395,000 - John E. Fogarty International Center: $95,162,000 - National Library of Medicine: $497,548,000 - National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: $928,323,000 - Office of the Director: $2,592,914,000 Pages: 500-600 - National Library of Medicine: $497,548,000 (p. 500) - National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: $928,323,000 (p. 500) - Office of the Director, NIH: $2,592,914,000 (p. 500-502) - Buildings and Facilities, NIH: $350,000,000 (p. 502) - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (Mental Health): $2,775,507,000 (p. 504-505) - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (Substance Abuse Treatment): $4,078,098,000 (p. 505-506) - Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: $369,000,000 (p. 508) - Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (Grants to States for Medicaid): $406,956,850,000 (p. 509) - Administration for Children and Families (Payments to States for the Child Care and Development Block Grant): $8,746,387,000 (p. 516-517) - Administration for Children and Families (Children and Families Services Programs): $14,829,100,000 (p. 518-522) - Corporation for National and Community Service (Operating Expenses): $975,525,000 (p. 590-591) - Corporation for Public Broadcasting: $535,000,000 for FY2026 (p. 595) The bill also includes funding for other related agencies such as: - Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled: $13,124,000 (p. 589-590) - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service: $53,705,000 (p. 596) - National Labor Relations Board: $299,224,000 (p. 598) - Railroad Retirement Board: Varying allocations for different accounts (p. 599-600) Pages: 600-700 - Diplomatic Programs: $9,413,107,000 (p. 675-676) - Office of Inspector General: $131,670,000 (p. 677) - Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs: $741,000,000 (p. 678) - Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance: $902,615,000 (p. 679) - Contributions to International Organizations: $1,543,452,000 (p. 681-682) - Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities: $1,367,407,000 (p. 683-684) - International Boundary and Water Commission (Salaries and Expenses): $64,800,000 (p. 685) - International Boundary and Water Commission (Construction): $156,050,000 (p. 685-686) - United States Agency for Global Media (International Broadcasting Operations): $857,214,000 (p. 687-689) - Operating Expenses for USAID: $1,695,000,000 (p. 696-697) - Global Health Programs: $3,985,450,000 (p. 699-700) The bill also includes funding for other related agencies, commissions, and programs such as: - The Asia Foundation: $22,000,000 (p. 690) - United States Institute of Peace: $55,000,000 (p. 690) - National Endowment for Democracy: $315,000,000 (p. 692) - Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad: $770,000 (p. 693) Pages: 700-800 - $6,045,000,000 for HIV/AIDS programs, including a $1,650,000,000 contribution to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (p. 703-704) - $3,931,000,000 for Development Assistance (p. 704) - $4,779,000,000 for International Disaster Assistance, of which $750,000,000 is designated as emergency funding (p. 705) - $3,890,400,000 for the Economic Support Fund, of which $300,000,000 is designated as emergency funding (p. 707) - $205,200,000 for the Democracy Fund under the Department of State (p. 707) - $140,000,000 for the Democracy Fund under USAID (p. 708) - $770,334,000 for Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia, of which $310,000,000 is designated as emergency funding (p. 708) - $3,928,000,000 for Migration and Refugee Assistance, of which $750,000,000 is designated as emergency funding (p. 709-710) - $1,400,000,000 for International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement, of which $115,000,000 is designated as emergency funding (p. 717) - $410,458,000 for Peacekeeping Operations (p. 720) - $6,133,397,000 for the Foreign Military Financing Program, of which $275,000,000 is designated as emergency funding (p. 722) Pages: 800-900 - $1,425,000,000 for assistance to Egypt, including $125,000,000 from Economic Support Fund and not less than $1,300,000,000 from Foreign Military Financing Program (p. 861-862) - $121,000,000 for assistance to Burma under Economic Support Fund (p. 882-883) - Not less than $1,800,000,000 to support implementation of the Indo-Pacific Strategy (p. 885) - $400,000,000 for a Countering PRC Influence Fund (p. 885) - Not less than $93,000,000 for assistance to Laos (p. 888) - Not less than $160,000,000 for assistance to Pacific Islands countries (p. 891) - Not less than $40,000,000 under Foreign Military Financing Program for the Philippines (p. 892) - Not less than $300,000,000 under Foreign Military Financing Program for Taiwan (p. 893) - Not less than $197,000,000 for assistance to Vietnam (p. 896) Pages: 900-1012 - $135,000,000 for the Prevention and Stabilization Fund to support countries with governments demonstrating the will to strengthen legitimacy (p. 980-981) - $10,000,000 for programs to promote accountability for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes (p. 981) - $94,000,000 for programs to promote Internet freedom globally (p. 942) - $365,750,000 for biodiversity conservation programs (p. 963) - $118,750,000 to combat wildlife poaching and trafficking (p. 963) - $175,750,000 for sustainable landscapes programs (p. 964) - $256,500,000 for adaptation programs, including for the Indo-Pacific Strategy (p. 965) - $247,000,000 for clean energy programs, including the Power Africa initiative (p. 965) - $451,000,000 for water supply and sanitation projects (p. 962)

@RobertJSalvador - Robert J Salvador

@RepThomasMassie @chiproytx @mattgaetz @justinamash @WarrenDavidson @HarrietHarman

Saved - April 10, 2024 at 10:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) is a trade group representing pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. They have significant influence over healthcare policy and engage in lobbying efforts. PhRMA has spent millions on lobbying and its board of directors consists of industry leaders. Many PhRMA members have paid billions in fines for breaking the law. The PhRMA Network provides grants to various beneficiaries, including patient advocacy groups, which may influence research outcomes. Notably, the American Heart Association, American Cancer Society, American Diabetes Association, and Cure SMA have received substantial funding from PhRMA members. Op-ed authors who received grants have criticized drug pricing regulations. PhRMA's actions demonstrate a focus on profit rather than the best interest of the public.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

A Thread 🧵 The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) is a trade group that represents the leading pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in the United States.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

It was established to advocate for public policies that support the development of innovative medical treatments and pharmaceuticals. PhRMA plays an outsized role in shaping healthcare policy, regulation, pricing while maintaining its members stranglehold on the industry. As you will see, they wield a massive amount of influence over the “healthcare” of Americans and yet they are barely known by the average person.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here is a recent commercial they released to convince you that they are helping to fight those nasty insurance companies and benefits managers. You didn't know? Pharmaceutical companies are on our side.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm your insurance company's pharmacy benefit manager. This medicine isn't covered because it's not profitable for me. Hope you feel better. Translation: I am the pharmacy benefit manager for your insurance company. This medication is not covered because it is not financially beneficial for me. I hope you feel better.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. This medicine isn't covered by your insurance. Yeah. I decide which medicines you do get. Wait. You're not my doctor. That's right. I'm your insurance company's pharmacy benefit manager or PBM, and I don't make as much money off this one. Hope you feel better.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

PhRMA bills itself as focusing on a variety of areas, including research and development (R&D) funding, intellectual property protections, and access to medicines. The organization also engages in massive lobbying efforts to influence legislation and regulation that affect the pharmaceutical industry, aiming to create and with great success, a favorable environment for the medicalization of American life.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

According to Open Secrets, since 2019 PhRMA has spent $142,517,000 in lobbying alone. I’d imagine that can buy a lot of influence. A collective of 740 lobbyists were employed by both the beneficiaries of the grants and the PhRMA Network members, with these beneficiaries receiving $577 million from the Network. 392 lobbyists were engaged by both a beneficiary and at least one of their specific PhRMA Network benefactors. Among these, 128 lobbyists were retained by a grant beneficiary and by one of their PhRMA Network benefactors to advocate on the same legislative proposals.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

For instance, during the first quarter of 2020, the lobbying firm Tarplin, Downs, and Young represented the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) in Congress on ten different bills, including H.R. 3 and other drug pricing legislations, while also lobbying for JDRF donors PhRMA and/or insulin producers Eli Lilly and Sanofi on nine of the same bills. Virtually everywhere you look in this industry you find immense conflicts of interest all there for the explicit purpose of currying favor with lawmakers and establishing market dominance in their particular area of the biomedical pharmaceutical complex.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

A graph showing their lobbying spending throughout the years. Source: https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/clients/summary?cycle=2023&id=d000000504

Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America Lobbying Profile Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America spent $27,628,000 lobbying in 2023. See the details. opensecrets.org

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The PhRMA Board of Directors is a who’s who of world pharmaceutical power players. It has Daniel O'Day, the CEO of Gilead Sciences, serving as its chair. This leadership role was previously held by Vas Narasimhan from Novartis. Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, has taken the position of board chair-elect, and Paul Hudson, CEO of Sanofi, is serving as the treasurer for PhRMA. It is a veritable revolving door network of insiders. Here is a sampling of the 28 PhRMA leaders and board of directors according to their website. You may notice a few. To see the full list head here: https://phrma.org/en/About

About The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, PhRMA, represents the nation’s leading biopharmaceutical research companies. We strive to conduct effective advocacy for public policies that encourage the discovery of important, new medicines for patients by biopharmaceutical research companies. phrma.org

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

I wonder if all of these individuals could work together to ensure they maximize profits for shareholders at the expense of the American people? After all that is every single person on the boards professional mandate isn’t it? Aside from the board of directors, PhRMA also has 30 companies listed as members. What they all essentially amount to is a price fixing scheme who do their best, litigate, lobby and monopolize all aspects the industry. Upon reviewing the list I became curious about the member history as it relates to fines they have paid for various illegal actions. Of course this is something they wouldn’t dare divulge to the public whom they undermine for their own personal gain year after year. However, I'm happy to divulge it for you.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Using the website Violation Tracker I went through each one and totaled up their overall “penalties” paid due to various “violations” since 2000. Violation Tracker Source: https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org It turns out 28 out of the 30 members have been forced to fork out billions for breaking the law and yet they all continue business as usual. It is just the cost of doing business.

Violation Tracker Violation Tracker, produced by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First, is a wide-ranging database on misconduct by large and small corporations throughout the United States. violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Try and wrap your head around this. Combined, the PhRMA Members have had to pay a Grand Total of $98,499,302,572 Billion in penalties since the year 2000. Obviously we should allow them to shape our healthcare policy, fix prices and maintain their stranglehold on lobbying, research/development and advertising expenditures in media because they are clearly trustworthy.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here is the full list of the total money PhRMA Members have been forced to pay for violating US Law. Alkermes - none Amgen - 22 Penalties total since 2000: $931,844,837 Astellas Pharma - 11 Penalties total since 2000: $329,802,884 Bayer - 124 Penalties total since 2000: $15,782,107,495 Biogen - 7 Penalties total since 2000: $931,824,034 BioMarin Pharmaceutical - 1 Penalty: $169,987 Boehringer Ingelheim - 14 Penalties total since 2000: $885,844,089 Bristol Myers Squibb - 49 Penalties total since 2000: $2,159,062,755 CSL Behring - 7 Penalties total since 2000: $84,120,730 Daiichi Sankyo - 8 Penalties total since 2000: $414,097,967 Eisai - 8 Penalties total since 2000: $44,297,143 Eli Lilly and Company - 26 Penalties total since 2000: $2,831,299,676 EMD Serono - 1 Penalty: $44,300,000 Genentech (owned by Roche) - 8 Penalties total since 2000: $57,627,657 Gilead Sciences - 5 Penalties total since 2000: $344,015,701 GlaxoSmithKline - 50 Penalties total since 2000: $9,572,803,406 Incyte - 1 Penalty total since 2000: $12,600,000 Ipsen - 2 Penalties total since 2000: $51,150 Johnson & Johnson - 88 Penalties total since 2000: $24,497,162,770 Lundbeck - 1 Penalty total since 2000: $52,600,000 Merck & Co. - 89 Penalties total since 2000: $10,710,400,031 Novartis - 36 Penalties total since 2000: $2,449,415,337 Novo Nordisk - 15 Penalties total since 2000: $129,887,792 Otsuka Pharmaceutical - 12 Penalties total since 2000: $132,846,595 Pfizer - 98 Penalties total since 2000: $10,948,368,523 Sanofi - 37 Penalties total since 2000: $890,816,885 Sunovion - none Takeda Pharmaceutical Company - 32 Penalties total since 2000: $3,987,516,447 Teva Pharmaceutical Company - 96 Penalties total since 2000: $10,242,576,796 UCB (Union Chimique Belge) - 10 Penalties total since 2000: $76,139,028 Quite the list isn’t it?

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

So far we have covered lobbying and members fines they were forced to pay for breaking the law but that isn’t everything. The PhRMA Network doesn’t just lobby, they also use their influence to provide Grants throughout the industry and in turn securing a monopoly on research and patient advocacy. Here are the details about how they go about doing this thanks to the fine folks at Public Citizen who complied all of this information on the network. (https://www.citizen.org/news/96876-2/)

$6 Billion in PhRMA Network Grants Flood the Non-Profit World, Muddying the Advocacy Landscape - Public Citizen WASHINGTON, D.C. — A new report by Public Citizen has uncovered that the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)… citizen.org

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

From 2010 to 2022, the PhRMA Network allocated over $6 billion in grants to upwards of 20,000 distinct beneficiaries. This figure is more than triple the amount spent on lobbying and seventyfold the political contributions made by the PhRMA Network during the same period. In the year 2021 alone, grants exceeding $720 million were distributed, with an annual average of nearly $600 million in grants from 2018 to 2022. Over 460 entities received funding from at least five different PhRMA Network sources. Furthermore, upwards of 70 entities were funded by ten or more sources within the Network. Thirteen prominent patient advocacy groups in the country received in excess of $10 million each from the PhRMA Network, cumulating to $266 million in total. I'm sure spreading around all this money has had little influence on research outcomes and patient advocacy. You know all of those “Societies” who are paraded in front of the public as independent organizations who specialize in finding treatments and cures for various diseases? Yeah they are bought by PhRMA as well. I know, I know a complete shocker.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Notably, the American Heart Association and the American Cancer Society were granted $64 million and $23 million, respectively, by the PhRMA Network. The American Heart Association's benefactors include Pfizer with a donation of $8.3 million, AstraZeneca contributing $29 million, and Sanofi with $17 million, all known for manufacturing costly medications, particularly in the cardiovascular domain. The American Cancer Society benefited from contributions of $6 million from AstraZeneca, $4.7 million from Merck, and $3.4 million from Pfizer, each a producer of high-priced cancer treatments.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The American Diabetes Association received over $11 million from Sanofi and more than $7 million from Eli Lilly, which, alongside Novo Nordisk, dominate the global insulin market, holding a 90% share. https://t.co/5osrFeRlrk

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Cure SMA, a leading spinal muscular atrophy organization, was endowed with over $5.8 million from Novartis, creators of a gene therapy for SMA priced at an astonishing $2.25 million per dose. https://t.co/fGHEHFTRPt

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

UsAgainstAlzheimer’s supported the FDA's contentious endorsement of the Alzheimer's medication Aducanumab, despite widespread opposition by the FDA’s advisory panel. The organization was funded $300,000 by Biogen in 2022, with consistent support from both Biogen and Eisai, the medication's manufacturers, in preceding years, situating both companies in the organization’s premier donor category, as per annual reports.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Public Citizen also uncovered numerous op-eds by recipients of PhRMA Network grants critiquing governmental measures to regulate drug pricing, often mirroring PhRMA Network rhetoric. Occasionally, these op-ed authors had received a grant close to the time of publication for "advocacy" purposes. It's funny how that tends to work out. This is the corrupt game being played with peoples lives on a daily basis. Lies on top of lies that are all presented under the guise of the best interest of American citizens. Nothing could be further from the truth. PhRMA is just one prong in the colossus that is Biopharmaceutical industry. They are a great case study in understanding the intersecting incestuous interests and front organizations that operate as monopoly managers. There to ensure the chips remained stacked against the public, keeping us dependent on their products, paying with our hard earned cash and collective health.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

If you have found the information provided of value, please consider giving me a follow so you don't miss future threads like these. https://t.co/7JFILZYhKX

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here is a list of all of my threads so far for ease of access. I appreciate the support, more to come. Thread Topics 🧵 1. COVID-19 Vaccines 💉 2. VAERS📉 3. The PCR “Test”🧪 4. Masks 😷 5. Lockdowns 🔒 6. mRNA Approval for Kids 💉 7. Post 💉 Autopsies 8. Excess Death💀

Saved - June 5, 2024 at 7:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Anthony Fauci's financial entanglements with the pharmaceutical industry have raised concerns. NIH scientists earned $710 million in royalties, with $690 million going to NIAID led by Dr. Fauci. His $6 billion budget has allowed him to dominate health agencies and organizations. Critics argue that his focus on drug development has overshadowed public health concerns, leading to high drug prices and worse health outcomes. Controversies surrounding Dr. Fauci include allegations of obstructing access to off-patent AIDS treatments and funding risky research in the Wuhan Laboratory. Critics question the influence of politicians and the corporate media, who are also funded by big pharma.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Dr. Anthony Fauci's Financial Entanglements with the Pharmaceutical Industry NIH scientists secretly earned $710 million in royalties from drug makers during the pandemic, with $690 million going to the NIAID, led by Dr. Anthony Fauci and 260 of its scientists. In The Real Anthony Fauci, @RobertKennedyJr details how Dr. Fauci cultivated intricate financial connections between pharmaceutical companies, NIAID, and its employees, turning big government into a seamless subsidiary of big pharma during his five-decade career. Financial Entanglements: Dr. Fauci’s $6 billion annual budget has been used to dominate various health agencies and organizations, including the CDC, FDA, HHS, NIH, the Pentagon, the WHO, and more. Additionally, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has contributed $1.7 billion annually for biological weapons research, raising his total grant budget to $7.7 billion. Control Over Scientific Research: Dr. Fauci wields substantial control over the scientific community by funding and influencing research outcomes. He rewards scientists who support his pharma-centric agenda and marginalizes those who challenge it. This has led to a biased focus on patented medicines and vaccines, sidelining off-patented therapies and preventive measures. Corrupt Practices: NIAID officials often supplement their income through private projects for drug companies, creating conflicts of interest. This practice has been criticized for ethical lapses and lack of transparency, with many NIH patents generating millions in revenue for government-funded scientists without proper disclosure. Impact on Public Health: Under Dr. Fauci's leadership, the pharmaceutical industry's influence has led to high drug prices and worse health outcomes in the U.S. Adverse drug reactions have become a leading cause of death. Despite significant funding, there has been little progress in addressing chronic allergic and autoimmune diseases, which have skyrocketed during his tenure. Pharma-Centric Agenda: Dr. Fauci's focus on drug development has overshadowed the core mission of advancing science and public health. His management has transformed NIAID into a vehicle for promoting pharmaceutical products, often at the expense of addressing environmental and lifestyle factors contributing to chronic diseases. Public Health Neglect: Dr. Fauci has been criticized for ignoring the links between environmental factors and health issues, such as glyphosate in food, pesticide residues, and vaccine adjuvants. His tenure has been marked by a focus on profitable drug development rather than genuine public health advocacy. A Legacy of Controversy: In 1990, AIDS activists stormed the NIH in a dramatic protest against Dr. Anthony Fauci. They lit smoke bombs, carried an effigy of Fauci's head on a stick, and brandished coffins with the defiant slogan, "F**K YOU FAUCI." Fauci was accused of deliberately obstructing access to safe, effective, off-patent treatments for AIDS while promoting a costly and dangerous chemotherapy drug that benefited big pharma. Hundreds of affordable treatments were ignored as Fauci focused on AZT, a discarded cancer drug known for its fatal toxicity, priced at $8,000 per year. Controversy During COVID-19: Three decades later, during the COVID-19 pandemic, criticism of Dr. Fauci has only grown louder. Millions, including thousands of scientists, doctors, and medical professionals, accuse Fauci of funding dangerous gain-of-function research with Chinese military scientists at the Wuhan Laboratory, promoting devastating lockdowns and blocking access to safe, effective off-patent treatments. Conclusion: For over five decades, Dr. Fauci has prioritized pharmaceutical profits over public health, creating a system rife with conflicts of interest and ethical concerns. His tenure has seen a deterioration in American health despite his portrayal as a committed public servant. Critics compare his management style to historical figures like J. Edgar Hoover, who used their power for personal and industry gain rather than the public good. Quotes: "During his half-century as America's health czar, Dr. Fauci has played a central role in crafting a world where Americans pay the highest price for medicine and suffer worse health outcomes compared to other wealthy countries." "Dr. Fauci has done almost nothing to advance NIAID's core obligation of researching the causes of the devastating explosions and epidemics of chronic allergic and autoimmune diseases that under his tenure have mushroomed to afflict 54% of children, up from 12.8% when he took charge of NIAID in 1984." "While ignoring the explosion of allergic conditions, Dr. Fauci has instead reshaped NIAID into the leading incubator for new pharmaceutical products, many of which, ironically, profit from the cascading chronic disease pandemic." "Under his watch, drug companies engineered the opioid crisis and made American citizens the globe's most overmedicated population." ----- How did politicians and the corporate media convince millions of Americans that Dr. Anthony Fauci, who turned big government into a seamless subsidiary of big pharma, is a hero of public health? Oh yeah, politicians and the corporate media are also funded by big pharma.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Michael Petrellas expresses frustration with the National Institutes of Health for not testing life-saving drugs like peptide t and compound q. Protesters criticize NIH for favoring pharmaceutical companies, excluding people of color and women from trials, and focusing on toxic and expensive drugs like AZT. They accuse NIH of a conflict of interest and question the objectivity of drug trial decisions. Fauci, head of NIH, is singled out for criticism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Michael Petrellas, and I'm pissed. You know? The whole thing with the National Institutes of Health is they won't test any of these drugs that'll keep people alive. And and I got this thing. No peptide t, no compound q. Anthony Fauci, I piss on you. Speaker 1: We're protesting testing out here for the fucking NIH because they cannot they're not hiding all drugs, and they're not coming out with the cure, and they're not doing their job. We're talking about their conflict of interest with the pharmaceutical companies. We're talking about the fact that they don't allow people of color into their trials. We're talking about the fact that they don't care about women. They don't care about children. Speaker 2: There's a blatant conflict of interest, and this runs rampant through all of NIH. And this is the history of how AZT became the subject of over 80% today of the studies being done by NIH for AIDS treatments. This one drug that's already shown itself to be highly toxic, very expensive, and of, at best, extremely limited effectiveness. Speaker 3: It's too toxic for me, and there's nothing which I can take. And the only drug which these people seem to have any Friday. Any concern with is AZT. Obviously, there's something going on here between the makers of AZT and and the Speaker 2: NIH. Speaker 4: Pauci is the head of the NIH, and, he hasn't done much in that area. 80% of the drugs are still dealing with AZT, and the NIH runs the drug trial system. Speaker 2: Assort the NIH. Assort the NIH. Assort the NIH. Staff of NIH, the very people that make the decisions about which treatments are gonna get studied and which treatments are gonna be ignored are getting money from the leading drug companies to do testing of those drugs. How can those people possibly be objective? Speaker 0: No peptide t. No compound q. Anthony Fauci, I piss on you.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Anthony Fauci has been in a position of power for 50 years, promoting the pharmaceutical industry's growth and influence. He has nurtured financial ties between pharmaceutical companies and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), making NIAID essentially a subsidiary of the industry. Fauci has control over various agencies and organizations, including the CDC, FDA, and WHO, and has the power to manipulate scientific research outcomes. He rewards loyalty and punishes dissent among scientists. Fauci's management style allows NIAID employees to profit from pharmaceutical companies, and he himself benefits from royalties and patents. His focus on profitable drugs and vaccines has overshadowed NIAID's mission to research chronic diseases. Critics argue that Fauci prioritizes industry profits over public health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pharma profits over public health. Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep. His cupidity may at some point be satiated. But those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. C s Lewis. For 5 decades, doctor Anthony Fauci has wielded formidable power to fortify the pharmaceutical industry's explosive growth and its corrosive influence over our government regulatory agencies and public health policy. During his 50 year career, doctor Fauci has nurtured a complex web of financial entanglements among pharmaceutical companies and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIAID, and its employees that has transformed NIAID into a seamless subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry. Doctor Fauci unabashedly promotes his sweetheart relationship with pharma as a public private partnership. From his perch at NIAID, doctor Fauci has used his $6,000,000,000 annual budget to achieve dominance and control over a long list of agencies and governing bodies, including the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention, CDC, the Food and Drug Administration, FDA, Health and Human Services Agencies, HHS, the National Institutes of Health, NIH, the Pentagon, the White House, the World Health Organization, WHO, the United Nations Organizations, and into the deep pockets of the Clinton and Gates Foundations, and Britain's The Welcome Trust. A Leviathan yearly grant budget gives doctor Fauci power to make and break careers, enrich or punish university research centers, manipulate scientific journals, and to dictate not just the subject matter and study protocols, but also the outcome of scientific research across the globe. Since 2005, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, DARPA, has funneled an additional one point $7,000,000,000 into doctor Fauci's annual discretionary budget to launder sketchy funding for biological weapons research, often of dubious legality. This Pentagon funding brings the annual total of grants that doctor Fauci dispenses to an astonishing $7,700,000,000, almost twice the annual donations of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Working in close collaboration with pharmaceutical companies and other large grant makers, including Bill Gates, the biggest funder of vaccines in the world, doctor Fauci has consistently used his awesome power to defund, bully, silence, delicence, and ruin scientists whose research threatens the pharmaceutical paradigm and to reward those scientists who support him. Doctor Fauci rewards loyalty with prestigious sinocures on key HHS committees when they continue to advance his interests, when the so called independent expert panels license and recommend new pharmaceuticals. Doctor Fauci's control over these panels gives him the power to fast track his pet drugs and vaccines through the regulatory hurdles, often skipping key milestones, like animal testing or functional human safety studies. Doctor Fauci's funding strategies evince a bias for developing and promoting patented medicines and vaccines and for sabotaging and discrediting off patent therapeutic drugs, nutrition, vitamins, and natural, functional, and integrative medicines. Under his watch, drug companies engineered the opioid crisis and made American citizens the globe's most overmedicated population. During his half century as America's health czar, doctor Fauci has played a central role in crafting a world where Americans pay the highest prices for medicine and suffer worse health outcomes compared to other wealthy countries. Adverse drug reactions are among the nation's top four leading causes of death after cancer and heart attacks. Doctor Fauci's impressive longevity at NIAID is largely due to his enthusiasm for promoting this pharmacentric agenda. NIAID, a pharma subsidiary. Under doctor Fauci's management, NIAID has become the center of a web of corrupting financial ties with the pharmaceutical industry. Doctor Fauci's NIAID looks much more like a drug company than any sort of agency to advance science. I've been interviewing scientists for a long time in this country, and let me tell you something. There are two kinds, those who are serfs of Anthony Fauci and those who are genuine scientists. The SERF class will refract whatever the latest Lysenkoism is from Fauci and NIAID. They are protecting their grants, says Celia Farber, whose 2006 Harper's article, out of control, aids, and the destruction of medical science, laid bare the culture of squalor, corruption, and violence at the vendetta driven division of AIDS, d a I d s. She wrote, the latter, genuine scientists, are the minority. They look, sound, and behave like scientists. And to varying degrees, they all live in a climate of both economic and reputational persecution. Peter Duisburg is one very famous example, but there are others. Fauci's vendetta system has many ways of crushing the natural scientific impulse to question and to demand proof, Breathtakingly, because of Fauci's impact since 1984, this tradition has been all but snuffed out in the US. Everybody is afraid. How many times have I heard that line? By all accounts, Anthony Fauci has implemented a system of dysfunctional conflicts and a transactional culture that have made NIAID a seamless appendage of big pharma. There is simply no daylight between NIAID and the drug makers. It's impossible to say where pharma ends, and NIAID begins. It's like Ozark, says Farber. Researchers in NIAID's labs supplement their income with honoraria they earn by attending pharmaceminars and briefing pharmaceutical company personnel with inside information about research progress on new drugs in NIAID's pipeline. Doctor Fauci's underlings routinely perform private projects for drug companies in their NIAID labs and take contract work running clinical trials for pharma's new drugs. Journalist and author Bruce Nussbaum reports that it is standard practice for doctor Fauci's employees to pocket enough gravy from the deal flow to add 10 to 20% to their NIAID salaries from this sort of work. NIAID officials justify this controversial practice, arguing that the influx of pharmaceutical dollars strengthens NIAID's labs and allows the agency to retain talented staff. NIAID also deducts 40, 50, or 60% off the top of these contracts for overhead, cementing the agency's partnership with the industry. It's no surprise that a 2,004 Office of Government Ethics Investigation chided doctor Fauci for failing to control the corrupting entanglements between his staffers and pharmaceutical companies. That report cited NIAID for failing to review and resolve possible ethical conflicts affecting 2 thirds of NIAID's workers who were moonlighting in private industry. The investigators also found that NIAID had failed to obtain approval for a full 66% of outside activities the institute had undertaken over the review period. Outside activities, according to the NIH, are undertakings that generally involve providing a service to or a function for an outside organization with or without pay or other compensation. That could include generating income from a pharmaceutical patent from a drug company, consulting for industry, obtaining silent or equity involvement with biotech firms, or conducting paid lectures and seminars. Doctor Fauci's management style thrives on creating many such opportunities for his agency and its employees to participate in profitable ventures with pharmaceutical companies. Doctor Fauci's drug development enterprise is rife with other corrupting conflicts. Most Americans would be surprised to learn, for example, that pharmaceutical companies routinely pay extravagant royalties to doctor Fauci and his employees and to NIAID itself. Here is how the royalty system works. Instead of researching the causes of the mushrooming epidemics of allergic and autoimmune diseases, the function for which US taxpayers pay his salary, doctor Fauci funnels the bulk of his $6,000,000,000 budget to the research and development of new drugs. He often begins the process by funding initial mechanistic studies of promising molecules in NIAID's own laboratories before forming the clinical trials out to an old boys network of some 1,300 academic principal investigators or PIs who conduct human trials at university affiliated research centers and training hospitals as well as foreign research sites. After these NIAID funded researchers develop a potential new drug, NIAID transfers some or all of its share of the intellectual property to private pharmaceutical companies through HHS's Office of Technology Transfer. The university and its PIs can also claim their share of patent and royalty rights, cementing the loyalty of academic medicine to doctor Fauci. Once the product gets to market, the pharmaceutical company pays royalties, a form of legalized kickbacks, through an informal scheme that allows pharma to funnel its profits from drug sales to NIAID and to the NIAID officials who worked on the product. Under a secretive, unpromogated HHS policy, doctor Fauci and his NIAID underlings may personally pocket up to $150,000 annually from drugs they help develop at taxpayers' expense. The United States Department of Health and Human Services, HHS, is the named owner of at least 4,400 patents. On October 22, 2020, the United States Government Accountability Office, GAO, published a report titled biomedical research, NIH should publicly report more information about the licensing of its intellectual property. In this document, the authors reported that the NIH has received up to $2,000,000,000 in royalty revenue for NIH since 1991 when FDA approved the first of these drugs. Three licenses generated more than $100,000,000 each for the agency. However, doctor David Martin has reported that the NIH Office of Technology Transfer Licensing Records suggest that NIH was less than transparent with the GAO investigators. Conspicuously absent from the GAO report are over 130 NIH patents associated with active compounds generating 1,000,000,000 of dollars in revenue. NIAID grants have resulted in 2,655 patents and patent applications, of which only 95 include an assignment to the Department of Health and Human Services as an owner. Doctor Fauci assigned most of these patents to universities, thereby making the ultimate commercial beneficiaries entirely opaque while binding the invaluable loyalty of American medical schools and the nation's most influential physicians to doctor Fauci and his policies. Somewhat fishily, one of the largest holders of NIAID generated patents is SIGA Technologies, NASDAQ SIGA. SIGA publicly acknowledges a close affiliation with NIAID, but the GAO omits all mention of CIGA in its report. CIGA's CEO, doctor Philip l Gomez, spent 9 years working for doctor Fauci at NIAID, developing doctor Fauci's signature vaccine programs for HIV, SARS, Ebola, West Nile virus, and influenza before exiting to commercial ventures. While NIAID clearly developed CIGA's technology, the company reports revenue from NIAID, but no royalty or commercial payments to NIH or any of its programs. 8 US patents list doctor Anthony Fauci as an inventor. However, NIAID, NIH, and GAO do not list any of them in their reports of active licensing despite the fact that doctor Fauci has acknowledged collecting patent royalties on his interleukin 2 invention. Furthermore, GAO reported none of NIAID's patents despite clear evidence that Gilead Sciences and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a division of Johnson and Johnson, have generated over $2,000,000,000 annually from sales directly resulting from NIAID funded technologies. Missing from the GAO report are 2 patents for Janssen's Velcade that have generated sales in excess of $2,180,000,000 annually for many years. The GAO report also omits any mention of the patents for Yescarta, Lumoxiti, or kepivance in violation of 37 USC section 410.10 and 35 USC section 202 a. At least 13 of the 21 patents in the GAO report, including doctor Fauci's Moderna vaccine, illegally failed to disclose government interest despite their indisputable NIH pedigrees. How big is doctor Fauci's drug development enterprise? Since doctor Fauci arrived at NIH, the agency has spent approximately $856,900,000,000 Between 2,010,016, every single drug that won approval from the FDA, 210 different pharmaceuticals, originated, at least in part, from research funded by the NIH. Following drug approval, doctor Fauci continues to collaborate with his pharmaceutical partners on promoting and pricing and profiting from their new product. Over the decades since doctor Fauci took over NIAID, the agency has formalized an elaborate process of negotiating against US taxpayers to allow pharma to extract maximum profits back from NIAID's germinated drugs. With NIAID's help, the lucky pharmaceutical company walks the new drug through accelerated FDA approval. The CDC then sets obscene retail prices for these collaborative products in secretive negotiations. Such sweetheart deals at taxpayer and consumer expense and accelerated approvals can yield direct financial benefits to NIAID, to doctor Fauci's favorite employees, and even to doctor Fauci himself. Doctor Fauci launched his career by allowing Burroughs Welcome, now GlaxoSmithKline, to charge $10,000 annually for Azithothymidine, AZT, an antiretroviral medication developed exclusively by NIH and tested and approved by doctor Fauci himself. Doctor Fauci knew that the product cost Burroughs Wellcome a mere $5 per dose to manufacture. Higher profit for industry partners often means more extravagant royalty payments for his NIAID and NIH cronies. Another antiviral drug developed by doctor Fauci's shop, remdesivir, provides a recent example of a similar pharma money making scheme facilitated by NIAID NIH. While remdesivir proved worthless against COVID, doctor Fauci altered the study protocols to give his pet drug the illusion of efficacy. Despite opposition from FDA and w h o, doctor Fauci declared from the white house that remdesivir will be the standard of care for covid guaranteeing the company a massive global market. Doctor Fauci then overlooked Gilead's price gouging. The company sold remdesivir for $3,300 to $5,000 per dose during the COVID pandemic. The raw materials to make remdesivir cost Gilead under $10. Medicaid must, by law, cover all FDA approved drugs, so taxpayers again foot the bill. Through these boondoggles, Anthony Fauci has made himself the leading angel investor of the pharmaceutical industry. The disparate treatment of patented versus less expensive off patent COVID 19 drug treatments by federal health agencies clearly exposes doctor Fauci's historic bias for high ticket patent medicines that favor extravagant pharmaceutical industry profits over public health. A 2017 study in the Emory Corporate Governance and Accountability Review summarizes how compromised federal public health officials, like doctor Fauci have transformed NIAID, NIH, CDC, and FDA into pharmaceutical marketing machines. The Emory researchers paint drug and vaccine makers as thick as thieves, with HHS officials acting not as regulators but as enablers, or perhaps worse still, they are complicit in questionable or ethically unsound activity as a result of being driven by self serving motives. According to doctor Michael, a former HHS official and a director of the advocacy group public citizen, instead of a regulator and a regulated industry, we now have a partnership. That relationship has tilted the agency, HHS, away from a public health perspective to an industry friendly perspective. Doctor Fauci is the human face of this corrupt dynamic. Under doctor Fauci's leadership, the commercial features of this partnership have eclipsed his agency's mission to advance science. At NIAID, the pharma tail now wags the public health dog. Doctor Fauci has done almost nothing to advance NIAID's core obligation of researching the causes of the devastating explosions and epidemics of chronic allergic and autoimmune diseases that, under his tenure, have mushroomed to afflict 54% of children, up from 12.8% when he took charge of NIAID in 1984. While ignoring the explosion of allergic conditions, doctor Fauci has instead reshaped NIAID into the leading incubator for new pharmaceutical products, many of which, ironically, profit from the cascading chronic disease pandemic. Over the last 50 years at NIH, doctor Fauci has played a leading role in big pharma's engineered demolition of American health and democracy, working hand in glove with pharmaceutical companies to overcome federal regulatory obstacles and transform the NIH and NIAID into a single-minded vehicle for development, promotion, and marketing of patented pharmaceutical products, including vaccines and vaccine like products. Most of us would like America's doctor to properly diagnose our illnesses using the best science and then instruct us on how to get healthy. What if, instead of spending their entire budgets developing profitable pharmaceutical products, doctor Fauci and the heads of other NIH institutes deployed researchers to explore the links between glyphosate in food and the explosion of gluten allergies, the link between pesticide residues and the epidemic of neurological diseases and cancers, the causal connections between aluminum and Alzheimer's disease, between mercury from coal plants and escalating autism rates and the association of airborne particulates with the asthma epidemic? What if NIH financed research to explore the association between childhood vaccines and the explosion of juvenile diabetes, asthma, and rheumatoid arthritis, and the links between aluminum vaccine adjuvants and the epidemics of food allergies and allergic rhinitis? What if they studied the impacts of sugar and soft drinks on obesity and diabetes and the association between endocrine disruptors, processed foods, factory farms, and GMO's on the dramatic decline in public health. What would Americans look like if for 50 years we had a public health advocate running one of our top health agencies instead of a pharma shill? What would have happened if we'd spent that 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars on real science instead of drug development? Doctor Fauci seems willing only to give us diagnoses and cures that benefit big pharma instead of public health and to cover his trail with artifice. His critics have compared doctor Fauci to a similarly long lived federal agency bureaucrat, J. Edgar Hoover, who used his 5 decade dictatorial control of the FBI to transform the agency into a vehicle for shielding organized crime, fortifying his corrupt political partners, oppressing black Americans, surveilling his political enemies, suppressing free speech and dissent, and as a platform for building a cult of personality around his own inflated ego. More recently, doctor Fauci's perennial biographer, Charles Ortleb, analogized doctor Fauci's career and pathological mendacity to the sociopathic con men Bernie Madoff and Charles Ponzi. Another critic, author j b Handley, labeled doctor Fauci a snake oil salesman and a bigger medical charlatan than Rasputin. Economist and author Peter Navarro, former director of trade and manufacturing policy, observed during a National Network Television interview in April 2021 that Fauci is a sociopath and a liar. His white lab coat, his official title, and his groaning bookshelves crowded with awards from his medical cartel collaborators allow doctor Fauci to masquerade as a neutral, disinterested scientist and selfless public servant driven by a relentless commitment to public health. But doctor Fauci doesn't really do public health. By every metric, his 50 year regime has been a catastrophe for American health. But as a businessman, his success has been boundless. In 2010, doctor Fauci told adoring New Yorker writer Michael Spector that his go to political playbook is Mario Puzo's novel, The Godfather. He spontaneously recited his favorite line from Puzo's epic. It's nothing personal. It's strictly business. Please go to the Children's Health Defense website for the acknowledgments and notes by chapter, updates to data, and new information that becomes available on any of the subject matter covered in this audiobook.
Saved - December 9, 2024 at 5:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that the Canadian federal government allocates $102 billion annually to a fund called "Other Transfer Payments," which is tax-free and largely opaque. The budget documents barely mention it, projecting an increase to $112.8 billion by 2029. I found a detailed list on a rarely visited government webpage that reveals where this money goes, including support for dance studios, random companies, and millions to global banks and the UN. This fund exceeds Canada's OAS and GIS programs and could potentially address healthcare needs.

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

🔥THE CANADIAN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DOLES OUT $102B PER YEAR (1/4 OF THE TOTAL BUDGET) IN A OPAQUE SLUSH FUND TITLED "OTHER TRANSFER PAYMENTS" This money is TAX-FREE, and only 1 list exists online....and its hard to find. Heres where the money is going .....BUCKLE UP... a 🧵 https://t.co/7Ik1YrIfOS

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Virtually no information exists on where this money is going. Budget documents include ONE paragraph on this fund: "Other transfer payments by departments are projected to increase to $112.8 billion in 2029. Growth reflects growing profiles, such as Canadian Dental Care Plan benefits and support for electric vehicle batteries"

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

But I found the motherlode! A virtually never-visited Public Accounts of Canada webpage titled: Volume III, Section 6: Transfer payments lists where every department is sending this money: https://t.co/dhF5CSUxTM

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

This website contains a NEVER-ENDING list of government favoritism -- its a $100B slush fund. Here are some examples: https://t.co/qFnwd2LPtN

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Dance studios https://t.co/Ivf5Wdynk4

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Random companies? https://t.co/ZNuc4sZDgG

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

McCain Foods? https://t.co/lDXbE4gBTo

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

23M for police in other countries? https://t.co/vslW1yfhEX

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

you guys the list is so long that when I try to figure out how many pages it is by trying to print it it crashes my PC

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

MILLION UPON MILLIONS TO GLOBAL BANKS https://t.co/4jhSHaMTuT

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Let me in there ill DOGE the f*ck out of this organization

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Here is proof this fund exists this is right from the 2024 budget "other transfer payments" https://t.co/h89q49u9rl

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

900M to the UN https://t.co/pZFomX4fHK

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

70 more million for the UN, and the one above ⬆ has the Aga Khan foundation in it at the bottom. bonus. https://t.co/i2zQi048FA

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

millions more to the UN https://t.co/pVmMZkqP5K

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

190M to the "Canadian Media Fund Corporation" https://t.co/Q7h16OY4tI

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

$102B/yr is more than Canada's OAS and GIS program it could also solve health care

Saved - December 14, 2024 at 5:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I brought up Sandy Hook and Adam Lanza, suggesting it was a psyop aimed at disarming Americans. I referenced a post that agreed with this view. Then, I mentioned my friend Steven Young, who has impressive credentials, and I trust his insights. To be thorough, I'm considering reaching out to various organizations and individuals, including Eugene and Maxine Rosenfeld, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, NIH, DoD, and some connections at Duke University, to gather their perspectives as well.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Speaking of Sandy Hook, Adam Lanza & J psyops…. Fact check this, cunts.✌️ https://t.co/aFdu7hdhnY

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Yup. Sandy Hook = another J psyop to disarm Americans. https://t.co/6CAoVbwZ6n

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

My buddy, STEVEN YOUNG, the PRESIDENT & CEO of SARC, and former DIRECTOR OF CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTERS at MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE and CORNELL UNIVERSITY MEDICAL COLLEGE, tells me you won’t. (For some reason, I tend to believe him.) But just to be safe, I may go ahead and ask… EUGENE & MAXINE ROSENFELD GLAXOSMITHKLINE (Wellcome Trust) MERCK (BlueVoyant, Duke Energy, Johns Hopkins) NIH DoD …and the fine MOSSAD/GCHQ folks over at DUKE UNIVERSITY their thoughts too.

Saved - January 11, 2025 at 1:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss the financial implications of Covid-19, highlighting the staggering costs, particularly from the Paycheck Protection Program, which totaled $953 billion. I point out that EcoHealth Alliance, linked to the origins of Covid-19, received two PPP loans. Metabiota, associated with the CIA and partially owned by Hunter Biden, also benefited from PPP funding. Additionally, Ology, which was rebranded by intelligence agencies to support Moderna's vaccine, received $2.1 million. Overall, I emphasize how taxpayer dollars have funded these entities while they profited from the pandemic.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

1🧵Covid-19 was the most expensive event in the history of the world. A large contributor to this debt was the Paycheck Protection Program [PPP] which spent $953billion. 💰 Some of that went to fund the very same people implicated in the origins of C19. A lot actually. 😳

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

2🧵EcoHealth Alliance [EHA], middle man company responsible for flowing NIH funds into the WIV for GOF work on CoVs were granted 2 PPP loans. Yes, the same EHA that published a paper condemning all who questioned the origins of C19 as conspiracy theorists. Drastic-DARPA -GOF pushing slugs who were also found to be working w/ the CIA leading up to C19.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

3🧵Metabiota, the co. founded by Nathan Wolfe, an advisor to EHA, whom Metabiota worked hand in hand w/ leading up to the pandemic. Total PPP? $1.6 million. Oh, and they're funded by the CIA's In-Q-Tel.. ...and Hunter Biden had 14% ownership of Metabiota.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

4🧵Ology, aka Resilience also received a generous chunk of change at $2.1 million thru the PPP. Although marketed as a new CDMO, Ology was taken over by the Intelligence agencies & rebranded to make Moderna's C19 vaccines. On the board of directors for Resilience/Ology is Chris Darby, the [at the time] president of the CIA's In-Q-Tel. Another board member is Joe Lonsdale, the co-founder of Palantir...which ran the Tiberius software that tracked ALL the C19 jabs in the nation..🤔

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

5🧵Palantir, btw also got its startup funding by the CIA's In-Q-Tel, just like Metabiota, just like Resilience.. The bio-pharmaceutical nepotism is a never ending stream of money-but not for the people of the nation.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

6🧵Not only did tax dollars fund all these entities from the start, & the unhinged intelligence agencies have infiltrated, & were the entities that are most to blame & most to profit... but they were then handed $5.2 million dollars as a "thank you" from the USG for constructing such a profitable scam. 💰💰💰💰💰 ..and WE PAID FOR IT!

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

https://projects.propublica.org/coronavirus/bailouts/loans/resilience-inc-9799547004 https://projects.propublica.org/coronavirus/bailouts/loans/metabiota-inc-1919957204 https://projects.propublica.org/coronavirus/bailouts/loans/metabiota-inc-7425808307 https://projects.propublica.org/coronavirus/bailouts/loans/ecohealth-alliance-1177998506 https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2022/03/02/relationship-between-darpa-and-moderna-exposes-the-real-threat-of-private-public-partnerships-against-humanity/

Security Check — ProPublicaCloseCommentCreative CommonsDonateEmailAdd EmailFacebookInstagramFacebook MessengerMobilePodcastPrintProPublicaRSSSearchSecureTwitterWhatsAppYouTube ProPublica is an independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. projects.propublica.org
Relationship between DARPA and Moderna exposes the real threat of Private Public Partnerships against humanity. – Civilian Intelligence Network civilianintelligencenetwork.ca
Security Check — ProPublicaCloseCommentCreative CommonsDonateEmailAdd EmailFacebookInstagramFacebook MessengerMobilePodcastPrintProPublicaRSSSearchSecureTwitterWhatsAppYouTube ProPublica is an independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. projects.propublica.org
Security Check — ProPublicaCloseCommentCreative CommonsDonateEmailAdd EmailFacebookInstagramFacebook MessengerMobilePodcastPrintProPublicaRSSSearchSecureTwitterWhatsAppYouTube ProPublica is an independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. projects.propublica.org
Security Check — ProPublicaCloseCommentCreative CommonsDonateEmailAdd EmailFacebookInstagramFacebook MessengerMobilePodcastPrintProPublicaRSSSearchSecureTwitterWhatsAppYouTube ProPublica is an independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. projects.propublica.org
Saved - January 14, 2025 at 3:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I spot-checked my code and discovered that the largest single 501(c)(3) recipient of taxpayer money is Battelle Memorial Institute, which received nearly $10 billion in government grants last year. I'm curious about what they actually do, as their website isn't very informative.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

I had to spot check this to make sure I didn't have a bug in my code. But the largest single 501(c)(3) recipient of taxpayer money is an entity I've never heard of, Battelle Memorial Institute, EIN 314379427. It accepted $9,821,317,836 in government grants last year - almost ten billion dollars. And it takes relatively few other contributions. I can't tell what they do from their website. Can anyone provide any insight?

Saved - January 25, 2025 at 3:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a detailed thread about the funding sources for senators on the finance committee ahead of RFK Jr.'s confirmation hearing. Each senator's financial ties to the healthcare industry were highlighted, revealing significant donations from major companies like United Health Group, Pfizer, and Novo Nordisk. Some senators, like John Cornyn and Tim Scott, received over 2 million, while others, like Peter Welch, received much less. I encouraged reaching out to senators to support RFK Jr.'s confirmation, emphasizing that constituents outnumber their donors.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Here is a thread of each senator in the finance committee and who funds them. RFK Jr's confirmation hearing is next week. Before the whole senate votes to confirm him, the Finance Committee questions and votes for him. Keep in mind, they will put on quite the show for their donors. See if any of your senators are below. 🧵

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Mike Crapo (R - Idaho) Not only has Crapo received almost a million from the health care industry, his biggest donor is United Health Group. Additional donors include Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, and Gilead Sciences.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Ron Wyden (D- Oregon) Wyden has received 1.5 million from the health care industry. Notable donors include, Molina Healthcare, Quest Diagnostics, and Novo Nordisk.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Chuck Grassley (R- Iowa) Grassley has received 716k from the healthcare industry. Donors include Cencora, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Ecolab.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

John Cornyn (R- Texas) Cornyn has received over 2 million dollars from the healthcare industry. Donors include Novo Nordisk, Cigna, GE Healthcare, Molina Healthcare, and P&G. Already said is a yes vote.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

John Thune (R- South Dakota) Not only has Thune received about a million from the healthcare industry, Sanford Health is his second biggest donor. Additonal donors are Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Quest Diagonstics, and GE Healthcare. Already said is a yes vote.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Tim Scott (R- South Carolina) Scott has received 2.3 million from the healthcare industry. Some of these donors include HCA Healthcare, Metlife, P&G, and Gilead Sciences.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Bill Cassidy (R- Louisiana) Cassidy has received 2.8 million from the healthcare industry with his second biggest donor being from Ochsner Health System. Other donors include Humana, Ecolab, Johnson & Johnson, Cardinal Health and more.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

James Lankford (R - Oklahoma) Lankford has received about 800k from the healthcare industry. Donors include GE Healthcare, P&G, and Johnson & Johnson.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Steve Daines (R - Montana) Daines has received 1.5 million from the healthcare industry. Donors include Amgen, Regeneron Pharm., and Novo Nordisk.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Todd Young (R - Indiana) Young received 1.5 million from the healthcare industry including Elevance Health as his third biggest donor. Additional donors include Cencora, Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, and GE Healthcare.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

John Barrasso (R- Wyoming) Barrasso has received about a million dollars from the healthcare industry. Donors include Edwards Lifesciences, Tenet Healthcare, Humana, and GE Healthcare. Already a yes vote.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Ron Johnson (R - Wisconsin) Johnson has been very outspoken about Big Pharma. He has received about a million from the healthcare industry but I believe most of this is pre pandemic or from individual health care professionals. The only pharma donor I see post-pandemic is Elevance Health. Already a yes vote.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Thom Tillis (R- North Carolina) Tillis has received about 2 million from the healthcare industry. Donors include Edwards Lifesciences, Quest Diagnostics, Neurocrine, P&G, and Metlife.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Marsha Blackburn (R- Tennessee) Blackburn accepts about 1.6 million from the healthcare industry. Donors include Neurocrine Bioscience, Edwards Lifesciences, and GE Healthcare. Already a yes vote.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Roger Marshall (R- Kansas) Marshall received a million dollars from the healthcare industry. Donors include Gilead Sciences, Abbvie, Pfizer and more. Already said he is a yes vote.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Maria Cantwell (D - Washington) Cantwell has received 447k from the healthcare industry. Donors include Gilead and Davita.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Michael Bennet (D- Colorado) Bennet has received 737k from the healthcare industry. Donors include Novo Nordisk, Gilead Sciences, and Johnson & Johnson.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Mark Warner (D- Virgina) Warner received a million dollars from the healthcare industry. Donors include Metlife, Option Care Health, and United Health Group.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Sheldon Whitehouse (D- Rhode Island) Whitehouse has received only 241k from the healthcare industry. His last corporate pharma donations were in 2018 from Acadia Healthcare, Johnson & Johnson, and Amgen. I haven't gone through all these senators stock purchases but I did notice Whitehouse has stock in Eli Lilly - as big pharma as it gets.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Maggie Hassan (D- New Hampshire) Hassan has received 2 million from the healthcare industry. Donors include Grail, Option Care Health, Metlife, Elevance Health, Molina Healthcare, Gilead, and so many more.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Catherine Cortez Masto (D- Nevada) Masto has recieved 2.7 million from the healthcare industry. Donors include Humana, Grail, Regeneron Pharm., Pfizer, HCA Healthcare, and many more.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Elizabeth Warren (D- Massachussets) Warren is an interesting one. She has received 748k from the healthcare industry but she has no corporate donors...that we know of. This made me dive deeper into some strange connections since she has been the most outspoken over Kennedy by repeated common propaganda points. View my findings at the bottom of the thread.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Bernie Sanders (D- Vermont) Bernie has received almost 1.3 million from the healthcare industry. However, Sanders does not have any corporate donors. These donations are from individual people who work in healthcare.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Tina Smith (D- Minnesota) Smith has received about a million from the healthcare industry. Donors include Grail, Quest Diagnostics, Metlife, and P&G.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Ben Lujan (D- New Mexico) Lujan has received 773k from the healthcare industry. Donors include Davita, Humana, Amgen, and Pfizer.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Raphael Warnock (D- Georgia) Warnock has received 194k from the healthcare industry. I do not see any pharma related corporate donors. These are individual donations from healthcare workers or pharma employees.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Peter Welch (D- Vermont) I guess best for last. Welch has only received 53,000 from the healthcare industry mainly through a seperate pac. I honestly think that opensecrets might not have their data synced properly for this one- but who knows. Donors include Teladoc Health, Ecolab, and P&G.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Please, reach out to your senators to ask them to confirm RFK Jr. We outnumber their donors. Stand for Health Freedom made it super easy to send your senators a letter. I have no incentives with this organization. I have just met some of their team. @standforhealth1 https://standforhealthfreedom.com/actions/kennedy/

We support Kennedy: Tell your US Senator to support him too - STAND FOR HEALTH FREEDOM Facebook Twitter Pinterest Print standforhealthfreedom.com

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

My sources: I used @OpenSecretsDC and @QuiverQuant to review each senator. Sorry for the double photo on the top of the thread. X isn't giving me an option to edit it.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

@OpenSecretsDC @QuiverQuant And here is more information about Senator Warren

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Is Elizabeth Warren really worried about Polio and people’s teeth rotting, or is she worried about her donors? Not only has she received: $491,595 from Health Professionals $125,721 from Pharmaceuticals $108,240 from Hospitals For a total of $871,412 from the healthcare industry. She also has been funded by Karla Jurvetson by only 14.6 million… Interestingly enough, this all ties back to Stanford Medical Center where Pfizer and Eli Lilly have “donated.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hey, Massachusetts! How did you end up with two pharma-friendly senators? Elizabeth Warren recently claimed that RFK Junior as HHS secretary could bring back polio, but let's look at her funding. She's received $491,000 from health professionals, $125,000 from pharmaceuticals, and $108,000 from hospitals, totaling $871,000 from the healthcare industry. Interestingly, she condemned super PACs while benefiting from one funded by Carla Jerviset, who donated $1.46 million. Jerviset has ties to Stanford, which also has connections to Pfizer. Pfizer previously granted Stanford $3 million for curriculum development. Many Stanford professors have received money from big pharma, raising questions about their motives. So, is Warren genuinely concerned about public health, or is she protecting her donors? Let me know your thoughts and follow for more updates!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, Massachusetts. Are you good? How in the hell did you end up with 2 pharma shells as your senators? Both of these senators have been very outspoken about RFK Junior, and we are going to do what we do best. We're gonna see who's bribing I mean, funding them, starting with Elizabeth Warren. But this is what she posted today. Say goodbye to your smile and say hello to polio. That's what's on the horizon if RFK Junior becomes a secretary of HHS and puts out this scripted video. And she even mentions how she's terrified of losing her fluoride from her water. But let's see if she really just cares about our health. She's received $491,000 from health professional and a hundred and $25,000 from pharmaceuticals or health product. Oh, and don't forget about the hundred and $8,000 from hospitals and nursing homes for a grand total of $871,000 from the health care industry. And this is actually her cheapest selection out of all of them. And by the way, I always get asked where I find my data. This is OpenSecrets. They do an amazing job. They collect their data right from the FEC website. The FEC website looks like this. This is where all the candidates have to report what they bring in and what they spend. And then OpenSecrets takes this data and puts it together. So it's easy for us to digest. And as I was digging through all of this data, there's something else that caught my attention. I found this article that said that Elizabeth Warren condemned super packs. Now she's benefiting from 1. And this article talks about this persist pack. And at the time, they had no idea who was funding the pack. But now we do. Carla Jerviset gave a whopping $1,460,000,0.0 to support Elizabeth Warren for the senate. This is her, and she is a physician. Not only did she attend Stanford, her father was a professor there for over fifty years. And to honor her father, she helped fund the construction of the new Stanford Medical Center. You know who else has ties to Stanford? Pfizer. Back in 2010, they gave a grant to Stanford saying that there's no strings attached. Put your hand up if you actually think that's true. I'm sure nobody. And the grant was $3,000,000 to back new curriculum. But wait, there's more. Pfizer funded an independent educational grant program through, surprise, Stanford. How do all of these dots connect? Well, honestly, that's kind of difficult. As I was doing research, it is very clear that a lot has been hidden here, but this article may give us a hint. Looks like Stanford professors have been found to receive money right from big pharma companies like Eli Lilly. Why does this all matter? Funny enough, I think doctor Casey Means has already given us the answer. She went to Stanford and was top of her class. She talks about how there was never a class about nutrition, about exercise. She exercise. She simply learned a diagnosis and a pill to solve it. Because the minute that we find out that we can heal ourselves with food, think about whose bottom line is gonna hurt real bad. So to summarize, in addition to all of the money that Elizabeth Warren receives through the health care industry, she also has some funny ties to Carla here. Do you think she's actually really concerned about him bringing back polio, or is he just gonna hurt her donors bottom line? Let me know your thoughts, of course, and make sure you're following me for more.
Saved - January 26, 2025 at 6:25 PM

@BlackTomThePyr8 - Tom Czerniawski

Here's Bill Gates funding the developers of SARS-CoV-2 in order to profit from the vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, which he had invested in, prior to the pandemic, while having the WHO and Gavi - whom he also heavily invested in - push those vaccines on the world. Neat arrangement! https://t.co/zILO1ZtDqQ

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Gates on RFK Jr.'s Vaccine Allegations: 'People Can Judge for Themselves' "Well, he wrote a book saying that Tony Fauci and I, kill millions of children and make billions of dollars with vaccines. And, you know, people can judge for themselves whether that's that's correct or not." Source: The Wall Street Journal (YouTube)

Video Transcript AI Summary
RFK has made controversial claims about vaccines, suggesting that Tony Fauci and others are responsible for the deaths of a million children and profiting significantly from vaccines. People can form their own opinions on the validity of these statements.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you make of of RFK and vaccines and what he's saying about it and the position he's been given in this incoming administration? Speaker 1: Well, he wrote a book saying that Tony Fauci and I, kill 1,000,000 of children and make 1,000,000,000 of dollars with vaccines, and, you know, people can judge for themselves whether that's that's correct or not.
Saved - January 30, 2025 at 12:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm questioning why American taxpayers are funding Catholic Charities, which I believe is misusing these funds. Recent grants from the Department of Health and Human Services, awarded after the election and before Trump's inauguration, raise concerns about the integrity of HHS and Catholic Charities. Notably, many of these organizations are in districts represented by those opposing Trump. I urge Congress to confirm Robert Kennedy Jr. to address these issues and investigate potential misuse of taxpayer dollars, which amount to billions.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

I’m a Catholic and I want to know why are American taxpayers funding Catholic Charities? This organization is ripping off American taxpayers. The data below outlines recent grants awarded by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). HHS established most of these grants AFTER the election and BEFORE @realDonaldTrump ‘s inauguration. Something is VERY ROTTEN in HHS and most definitely at Catholic Charities. And, please take notice that most of these "Catholic Charities" are located in areas that are represented by members of Congress who oppose President Trump and his agenda. Congress MUST CONFIRM @RobertKennedyJr immediately AND then he should crush these organizations ripping off American taxpayers and likely supporting child sex and slave trafficking. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops: $200,205,406.69 Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth Endowment: $277,112,002.00 Catholic Charities Community Services: $56,438,404.70 To name a few. There are many others and they’re not just in “democrat” districts. Again, these are American Taxpayer dollars…it’s in the billions! 😡 @CforCatholics @Amerifuture @CarloMVigano https://www.usaspending.gov/

Saved - February 2, 2025 at 5:59 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The @DOGE team is rapidly shutting down these illegal payments

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Now it’s the “Lutheran” faith (this use of “religion” as a money laundering operation must end): Lutheran Family Services and affiliated organizations receive massive amounts of taxpayer dollars, and the numbers speak for themselves. These funds, total BILLIONS of American taxpayer dollars. Here are just a few of the recent grants awarded (pre @RobertKennedyJr ) by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS): LUTHERAN IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE SERVICE INC: $367,612,906 LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH, INC: $134,190,472.95 LUTHERAN SERVICES FLORIDA, INC.: $82,937,819.95 There are MANY more organizations cashing in on our hard-earned money. These entities are receiving huge sums, which raise serious questions about how taxpayer funds are being spent and who’s benefiting. It’s time to hold these organizations accountable. American taxpayers deserve transparency. Enough is enough! And there is much more where these screen shots below came from.

Saved - February 4, 2025 at 10:35 AM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

$3.6 BILLION in a single year and $6.3 BILLION total seems aggressive AF, USAID.😳 CHEMONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. https://t.co/LtAHJi56SN

@canam1967 - nun yo biz

who the bleep is Chemonics @DecentBackup ?

Saved - February 6, 2025 at 3:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m zooming in on some troubling information that’s making me angry. I shared a clearer photo for context and want to thank @0hRisks for bringing this to light. It’s shocking to learn about @KrishVignarajah’s past roles and the significant government funding received in 2023 to facilitate border traffic. The connections to high-profile figures like Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton add another layer of complexity to this situation.

@SarahisCensored - Sarah Fields

Zoom in on this. If you’re not angry yet, you should be. https://t.co/NRCy766Xg5

@SarahisCensored - Sarah Fields

Bottom of page https://t.co/c73j9te2ac

@SarahisCensored - Sarah Fields

Clearer photo https://t.co/KDJbfxWxxN

@SarahisCensored - Sarah Fields

Thank for sharing @0hRisks https://t.co/e1XGoyZDvq

@SarahisCensored - Sarah Fields

@0hRisks Oh boy

@ProblemGirl_13 - Ashley

.@KrishVignarajah, who worked as policy director for Michelle Obama during the Obama White House, who accepted over $100,000,000 in 2023 from the government to help traffic people into the country, also served as senior advisor to the State Department under Hillary Clinton developing the policies to help traffic people across the border. How wild.

Saved - February 5, 2025 at 11:59 PM

@SarahisCensored - Sarah Fields

Absolute INSANITY. https://t.co/WSWtE5M2xS

@SarahisCensored - Sarah Fields

Zoom in on this. If you’re not angry yet, you should be. https://t.co/NRCy766Xg5

Saved - February 7, 2025 at 4:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated to see that while Americans in North Carolina faced dire conditions, we allocated $584 million to support illegal immigrants. Organizations like Lutheran Family Services are receiving billions in taxpayer dollars, raising concerns about accountability and transparency. Recent grants to various Lutheran organizations total staggering amounts, and it's crucial to question how this money is being used. After the news broke, one organization even changed its name to Global Refuge, which feels like an attempt to evade scrutiny.

@teameffujoe - The Older Millennial

At the same time Americans in NC were freezing to death in tents, we were giving $584,000,000 to support illegal immigrants! https://t.co/qcFSvCpJzA

Video Transcript AI Summary
The government allocated $584 million to assist illegal immigrants through Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services while claiming they couldn't find funds to help American victims of hurricanes and wildfires. During this time, families in North Carolina were living in tents, and those in Los Angeles were facing wildfires, yet the government couldn't provide them with housing. This stark contrast raises serious concerns about priorities. Regardless of political affiliation, if you think this is acceptable, it reflects a disregard for American citizens. Complaining about the exposure of this issue only shows a lack of concern for the situation at hand.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At the exact same time that our government was telling us they couldn't find the money to help the victims of the hurricane and the wildfires, they were giving $584,000,000 to help illegal immigrants. Yeah. I showed you that list in my prior video where over the last two months, the United States government through USAID has doled out $584,000,000 to Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services. Now Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service does exactly what it sounds like they do, but it's it's not even the fact that we're spending half a billion dollars to support illegal immigrants. It's the fact that while we were able to spend that half a billion dollars, while we just cut those fucking checks, sometimes more than one a day for tens of millions a week, at that exact same time, we were telling Americans living in fucking tents in North Carolina, we couldn't find the money to help them. We were telling people in LA dealing with multiple wildfires, we couldn't find the money to help them. Like, there were American families literally freezing to death in fucking tents because our government couldn't put together the money to get them into real fucking housing. And at the same time, we were given 584,000,000 fucking dollars to illegal immigrants or at least to support illegal immigrants. I don't give a shit if you're a democrat, republican, libertarian. I don't fucking care what you are. If you think that's okay, you hate America. Just fucking admit it. Stop complaining on x. Stop complaining on TikTok about us looking into this money. Stop complaining about us revealing this ridiculous amount of fucking corruption. If you have a problem with this information coming to light, then you just hate America. It really is that fucking simple.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Now it’s the “Lutheran” faith (this use of “religion” as a money laundering operation must end): Lutheran Family Services and affiliated organizations receive massive amounts of taxpayer dollars, and the numbers speak for themselves. These funds, total BILLIONS of American taxpayer dollars. Here are just a few of the recent grants awarded (pre @RobertKennedyJr ) by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS): LUTHERAN IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE SERVICE INC: $367,612,906 LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH, INC: $134,190,472.95 LUTHERAN SERVICES FLORIDA, INC.: $82,937,819.95 There are MANY more organizations cashing in on our hard-earned money. These entities are receiving huge sums, which raise serious questions about how taxpayer funds are being spent and who’s benefiting. It’s time to hold these organizations accountable. American taxpayers deserve transparency. Enough is enough! And there is much more where these screen shots below came from.

@teameffujoe - The Older Millennial

By the way, after all this news broke they changed their name to @GlobalRefuge Don’t let them slip into the shadows. https://t.co/37Xb5AgliY

Saved - February 9, 2025 at 4:13 AM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Save the Children, your presence is requested. We’d like a word with all of you.🫡

@CMichaelsShow - The Chris Michaels Show

Did @SavetheChildren and its subordinates get $1,154,906,315 from USAID? In the US, they got $482,375,116 from US taxpayers with over $7M going to payroll for c-suite staff, but what about individual nations too? This is about 53% of their funding 1/ https://t.co/RQ2QYFcwsP

Saved - February 17, 2025 at 1:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered significant concerns regarding Judge John McConnell's potential conflict of interest. He has been involved with Crossroads Rhode Island, a non-profit that has received over $128 million in government funding during his tenure on its board. His recent ruling, which favored continued federal funding to Rhode Island, raises questions about his impartiality, especially given his fiduciary responsibilities to the organization. Federal law mandates judges to recuse themselves when their impartiality could be questioned, and it appears Judge McConnell should have done so in this case.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — FEDERAL JUDGE McCONNELL MUST RECUSE HIMSELF IMMEDIATELY. AFL has uncovered a major potential conflict of interest for Judge John McConnell, Chief Judge of the federal district court of Rhode Island, who halted President Trump’s temporary spending freeze. READ ⬇️ https://t.co/mDEBDxd5hX

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/2 AFL has uncovered evidence suggesting that Judge McConnell appears to be currently serving on the Board of Directors for the non-profit NGO Crossroads Rhode Island, where he was previously the Chair of the Board and is still currently listed as the Chair-Emeritus. https://t.co/rXmdVMN3as

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/3 In fact, Judge McConnell has appeared as a Director on Crossroads’ IRS Form 990 every year since he took the federal bench in 2013. https://t.co/JfbKk7RrJC

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/4 And, for much of that time, he served as Chair of the Board, a position he held from 2011 through 2021.  Prior to serving as Chair, he was the Vice Chair in 2009 and 2010 and a board member from 2006 to 2008. https://t.co/rDjsWaJlY8

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/5 According to Crossroads’ 2023 Form 990, Crossroads Rhode Island received over $18.6 million in government funding that year alone. That accounted for over half of its $30 million of revenue. https://t.co/GARJD4iQGH

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/6 AFL’s review of required disclosure forms reveals that since Judge McConnell became Vice Chair of the Board of Crossroads Rhode Island in 2009, the organization has received over $117.6 million in government funding (accounting to the end of 2023). Crossroads received over $42 million from 2020 to 2023 from government sources, including the state of Rhode Island, a named plaintiff in the lawsuit.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/7 This year, Rhode Island government records show that Crossroads Rhode Island has already received just under $2.9 million in FY2025 to provide various programs and services to Rhode Island, one of the plaintiffs. https://t.co/GjgK4LW59t

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/8 Why is this significant? Keep reading. ⬇️

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/9 It is common practice for the federal government to disburse money to the states, which then hand it out to NGOs like Crossroads Rhode Island. Here, Judge McConnell ordered taxpayer dollars to continue flowing to the states, including Rhode Island, writing, “[s]tates rely on federal funds to provide and maintain vital programs.”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/10 USA Spending shows that in the past 15 years, 155 federal grants to Rhode Island state and local governments list Crossroads Rhode Island as a sub-awardee. In FY2023 alone, the organization’s audit shows that more than $10 million in federal funding flowed through Rhode Island to Crossroads.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/11 In short, in the 18 years Judge McConnell has been on the board of Crossroads Rhode Island, it has received over $128 million in government funding.  When Judge McConnell ruled against the Trump Administration and required federal taxpayers to continue funding the State of Rhode Island, it seems that he also required continued funding for his pet “non-profit,” Crossroads Rhode Island.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/12 Federal law, 28 U.S.C. § 455, requires judges to disqualify themselves “in any proceeding in which [their] impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” https://t.co/mOSomMgwUc

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/13 The law further requires judges to disqualify themselves when they are a fiduciary or have any other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding. https://t.co/snm1gzo8bW

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/14 Directors of non-profits have fiduciary responsibilities to their organizations under Rhode Island Law. 7 R.I. Gen. Laws § 7-6-22(b). The Judicial Conference of the United States imposes the same rules in the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges. https://t.co/fFsWaKTFuq

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/15 But that’s not all… ⬇️

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/16 Judges must avoid even the appearance of bias.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/17 In the words of the Supreme Court, ​​“An insistence on the appearance of neutrality is not some artificial attempt to mask imperfection in the judicial process, but rather an essential means of ensuring the reality of a fair adjudication. Both the appearance and reality of impartial justice are necessary to the public legitimacy of judicial pronouncements and thus to the rule of law itself.”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/18 To recap: Judge McConnell has been on the board of an NGO for nearly 20 years, a board he still apparently sits on. In that time, that NGO has received over $128 million dollars in government funding from the state, a recipient of federal taxpayer dollars. This NGO, to which he owes a fiduciary duty, stood to lose millions of dollars based on the outcome of his decision in the case.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/19 Given the heightened public scrutiny of this case and the profound constitutional implications inherent in binding the actions of the President of the United States, the appearance of a conflict of interest is highly problematic, to say the least.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/20 If, as the documents suggest, Judge McConnell has been a leader of Crossroads Rhode Island, and if, as the documents also suggest, he knew or should have known that Crossroads Rhode Island would stand to benefit from his ruling against the federal taxpayers, then it seems he should have fully disclosed his entanglement with this federally funded organization up front and recused himself from the matter.  He did not do these things. Now, it appears he should immediately vacate his TRO and swiftly recuse himself from this case without delay to comply with his ethical obligations.

Saved - March 25, 2025 at 7:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Left has built a vast censorship enterprise over the past decade, leveraging a coalition of NGOs, tech companies, and government agencies to suppress dissent, particularly targeting conservative voices. The Biden administration intensified this effort, creating a system where former officials and private groups collaborate closely. This includes funding organizations that blacklist conservative media and pressure tech platforms to alter their algorithms. While some government entities have been dismantled under President Trump, many private censorship groups remain active, and the investigation into their operations continues.

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

The Left spent the past decade building a vast censorship enterprise. A shadowy network of NGOs, tech groups and governments working to censor the Left's enemies—not just in America, but across the West. Over the next four years, the GOP must expose + dismantle this system. 🧵 https://t.co/XH2EkdGaoM

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

The censorship-industrial complex wasn't built overnight. It's been festering for years. But the Biden administration mobilized an unholy alliance of government power, taxpayer dollars, NGOs and Big Tech companies to build it into a global censorship powerhouse.

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

Seemingly every agency was a partner in building this system: FBI, CIA, NSA, DHS, State Department, Department of Education, the National Science Foundation, USAID—even FEMA. Through grants and partnerships, these agencies funneled countless tax dollars to censorship groups. https://t.co/GahTDypN0Z

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

What you have to understand is that these groups operate as one cohesive class. There's a revolving door between the "public" and "private" spheres. Former government officials populate the advisory boards of these "disinformation" groups—and vice versa. https://t.co/jspbxJHAIW

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The groups behind the X/Twitter ad boycott say they're "nongovernmental," but they're not. They're funded by governments, work with intel agencies, and/or were caught spying for governments. Congress & UK Parliament must investigate this government-backed assault on free speech. https://t.co/bl3T3zwSv7

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

Biden's transition team was STACKED with tech insiders. They staffed the entire executive branch—State, Treasury, EPA, OMB, etc. Many of them were Obama alumni. When Obama left office, they went to work in tech. When Biden's presidency began, they transitioned right back in. https://t.co/JLJxbD0amy

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

So it should come as no surprise that these worlds are in constant communication with one another. Remember Jen Psaki boasting that they were "flagging problematic posts" for Facebook? These weren't independent actors. Under the Biden administration, it was one system. https://t.co/m2HyXSkZo4

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

And Biden officials didn't just "flag" content. They pushed platforms to transform their algorithms to suppress ideas they disliked. In an email, Biden's Digital Director told YouTube that "this is a concern that is shared at the highest (and I mean highest) levels of the WH." https://t.co/ygBLdqFIuX

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

Those are just a few minor examples of a trend that accelerated over the past decade: Western governments creating, funding or coordinating with powerful outside groups to clamp down on (mostly right-wing) dissent. Just look at the State Department's "Global Engagement Center." https://t.co/ea8PHzxanq

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

Between 2020 and 2021, two State Department-backed entities—the Global Engagement Center (GEC) and the National Endowment for Democracy—funneled $665,000 to the Global Disinformation Index (GDI), a British nonprofit which creates secretive blacklists of conservative media. https://t.co/ApmALKOYPr

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

GDI's blacklists were stealthily fed to advertising companies to financially cripple targeted news outlets. The top 10 outlets on its "disinformation" list are all conservative. GDI's CEO openly boasted that this had "a significant impact on" the outlets' "advertising revenue." https://t.co/k37XXgyPVF

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

The GEC was created to combat FOREIGN propaganda aimed at undermining US security. But instead, it was turned inwards on our own citizens. We've seen this stuff happen across our intelligence and security agencies. I fought to shutter the GEC—for good. https://t.co/Zfmi7fDlIU

@SenEricSchmitt - Senator Eric Schmitt

The Global Engagement Center must be excluded from any subsequent piece of legislation for the remainder of the 118th Congress. The American people deserve to know their First Amendment rights are being protected. https://t.co/dxU8V5clAz

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

During the 2020 election—under President Trump's first term—the Department of Homeland Security's CISA formed a "counter-disinformation" coalition with powerful outside censorship groups. Here's what that network did during that election cycle alone, per @FFO_Freedom's analysis: https://t.co/XbeAfYln84

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

This system operates across the borders of the West—giving it yet another way around our Constitution. When their censorship machine faced legal challenges in the US, Biden officials and their nonprofit allies began using foreign censorship laws to crack down on American speech. https://t.co/pvZ3tMoSAt

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

At least 23 US-funded NGOs, nonprofits and "disinformation" groups have received nearly $15.5 million of your tax dollars to help enforce the EU's draconian new Digital Services Act—which levies hefty fines on tech platforms (including US platforms) for allowing "disinformation." https://t.co/mCcBfjMSiH

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

In other words: Using these groups, our government was helping European bureaucrats bully US tech companies into censoring American speech. That includes groups like NewsGuard—whose advisory board has boasted the former heads of the CIA and NSA, DHS, and the GEC, respectively. https://t.co/WQekCCwPVl

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

To sum things up: American and European bureaucrats, along with their friends in the NGOs and the tech companies, have been working together to wage a war of censorship and suppression against their own citizens across the West.

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

I fought this censorship-industrial complex as Attorney General of Missouri, where I sued the Biden admin for pressuring tech platforms into censoring conservatives—and took them to the Supreme Court. Now it's time to work with President Trump to end this once and for all. https://t.co/hUPYmxdyX2

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

Thankfully, President Trump is dismantling the government arm of this regime. The State Department's Global Engagement Center has been shut down. Funding streams for "disinformation" groups have been cut. But many of the "private" censorship NGOs are still operating as we speak. https://t.co/jX9d5Nkri2

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

The stories I've shared in this thread are just the tip of the iceberg. Stay tuned. This fight is just getting started.

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

We’re going to continue this NGO investigation. I discussed today with @dbongino: https://t.co/XY7a1DdVm2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Government officials allegedly coerced Facebook and Twitter to censor posts via threatening emails, according to the transcript. A Biden White House official, Rob Flaherty, purportedly sent explicit threats to Facebook demanding content removal. High-ranking government officials had a special portal to flag content to senior executives at Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter, outsourcing censorship. Universities like Stanford and the University of Washington were allegedly used to flag "wrong think," which then led to government pressure on social media companies. The speaker asserts this network, like the "story of COVID," was about power and control, with entities exceeding their authority. The OSHA vaccine mandate is cited as an example of an agency overstepping its original purpose.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some of the coercion that was coming from government officials, to Facebook and and and Twitter now at the time, now acts pre Elon. We have the emails. What was his name? Rob Flaherty. He was a Biden White House official who was sending I'm not just gonna say implicitly threatening emails, explicitly threatening emails to Facebook, basically saying, hey. Be a real shame, you know, if your place burned down, if you don't take this post down. I mean, it was almost like organized crime mob like tactics. You can read the emails yourself, folks. They're all public, but that's what you were dealing with in this case. Speaker 1: And they had a special portal, Dan, that a special portal between high ranking government officials and senior executives at Instagram and Facebook and Twitter, where they were flagging things, they were using the full force of the government to to outsource their censorship. And, you know, talking about the NGOs, and we're gonna I had a I had a thread, if anybody wants to go on X today, a thread laying some of this stuff out. We're gonna continue this NGO investigation because even in that case, we discovered that that universities like Stanford and the University of Washington were being used, to to flag some of this, what they believed was wrong think, and then the government would put pressure on social media companies. So this was a vast network that was all about much like the story of COVID, really, was all about power and control. That's what this was. And people who never should have had it in the first place had way too much of it, and they were willing to exercise it in ways that were unimaginable. Think about the OSHA vaccine mandate, Dan. Like, you know Yeah. That was a that was an agency created to make sure forklifts beeped when they back up, not force a medical procedure on a hundred million people.
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 5:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
AFL is investigating the selection of Judge John McConnell to preside over a lawsuit challenging President Trump’s spending freeze, given his history of anti-Trump rhetoric and ties to a nonprofit that could benefit financially from his ruling. The lawsuit was filed in Rhode Island, raising questions about the choice of jurisdiction and judge. AFL has called for McConnell to recuse himself due to potential conflicts of interest and is committed to uncovering the reasons behind these decisions to ensure judicial impartiality.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — AFL is investigating why Judge John McConnell was selected to preside over the lawsuit challenging President Trump’s spending freeze — despite his public opposition to the President and long-time ties to a group that now stands to receive millions after his ruling.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/2 On January 28, 2025, the District of Columbia and 22 states, including Rhode Island, sued the Trump Administration over President Trump’s temporary spending freeze.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/3 This lawsuit could have been brought in any number of jurisdictions — but it was filed in Rhode Island and assigned to Judge McConnell. The question is, why?

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/4 Judge McConnell has a long history of anti-Trump rhetoric and has been an outspoken critic of President Trump.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: The Obama-appointed judge that threatened the Trump administration with arrest if funding was not restored to USAID previously likened Trump's first term to the Civil War and Jim Crow and compared Trump to a tyrant in 2021 video footage uncovered by @nataliegwinters. Judge McConnell is an activist who has no business sitting in judgement of the president or his administration.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that American constitutional values have been tested in recent years, reminiscent of challenges during the Civil War, Reconstruction, and Jim Crow era. They liken this testing to inflating a balloon, suggesting the rule of law was stretched to its limit, nearly bursting. The speaker emphasizes the importance of courts in upholding the rule of law against arbitrary actions, referencing recent examples. They stress that the Constitution embodies American values in a legal sense. When sentencing, one must consider the defendant's background, acknowledging their unique experiences as a woman, Black individual, transgender person, or someone from a different socioeconomic background. The law must be applied with this understanding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, what's happened over the last four years or so, and at other times in our country's history, going back to the Civil War and Reconstruction and Jim Crow laws, the Civil Rights and during the last four years is that the values that we live by, the constitutional values that form the basis of our country have been tested and our institutions have been tested in ways that I don't think a lot of folks thought would survive. It got tested in the 1800s by a war, and we survived the war, sometimes well and sometimes not so well, but that's for another story. So what we saw the last four years in my mind was a new testing of it. And how I think about it is, it's like a balloon, you know, and and you're blowing up a balloon and and you and you keep pushing that air in. Well, at some point, the balloon's gonna pop. Right? And and and and and it feels like over the last four years with the challenges that have occurred to the rule of law in this country, that we came very close to that balloon popping. But where courts stand and enforce the rule of law that is against arbitrary and capricious actions by, what could be a tyrant or could be what happened. We saw plenty of examples of that recently. And it enforces our values. Our values, in a legal sense, the Constitution. And it's that reason that, and we find there are plenty of examples of a history and there's plenty of examples over the last four years through government actions when you're sentencing someone, when we talk about sentencing, that you have to take a moment and realize that this, you know, middle class white male, privileged person, needs to understand the human being that comes before us that maybe a woman and maybe black, maybe transgender, maybe poor, maybe rich, maybe whatever, may have experiences that aren't yours and you have to walk in their shoes and understand that the law applies to them where they are. And then you have to apply the law accordingly.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: Obama-appointed judge threatened Trump and his team with arrest if they don't restore every last dime of funding that has been paused or cancelled. If the president wants to delay any payment he will need to justify his request to the judge's personal satisfaction.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/5 Last month, AFL uncovered that Judge McConnell has served nearly two decades on the Board of Crossroads Rhode Island, an organization that has received at least $128 million in government funding during that time.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — FEDERAL JUDGE McCONNELL MUST RECUSE HIMSELF IMMEDIATELY. AFL has uncovered a major potential conflict of interest for Judge John McConnell, Chief Judge of the federal district court of Rhode Island, who halted President Trump’s temporary spending freeze. READ ⬇️

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/6 AFL called for Judge McConnell to recuse himself from the case, given his history of opposition to President Trump and long-standing involvement with an organization that, after his ruling to keep federal funds flowing, stands to receive millions more in government funding.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

ICYMI — Judge McConnell, the federal judge blocking President Trump’s spending freeze, has served for 18 years on the board of a nonprofit that has received $128M in government funding during that time. Now, after his ruling to keep federal funds flowing, his nonprofit stands to receive millions more. Judge McConnell must recuse himself IMMEDIATELY.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — FEDERAL JUDGE McCONNELL MUST RECUSE HIMSELF IMMEDIATELY. AFL has uncovered a major potential conflict of interest for Judge John McConnell, Chief Judge of the federal district court of Rhode Island, who halted President Trump’s temporary spending freeze. READ ⬇️

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/7 Now, AFL is expanding its investigation into how Judge McConnell was selected for this case in the first place. Out of the 22 states and D.C., why was the lawsuit filed in Rhode Island? And why was Judge McConnell selected to hear the case? We intend to find out.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/8 An impartial judiciary is the cornerstone of America’s judicial system. AFL remains steadfast in its commitment to exposing the left’s lawfare against President Trump — and holding those behind it accountable.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/9 Read more here: https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-expands-investigation-into-forum-shopping-effort-to-bring-lawsuits-against-trump-administration-before-activist-judges/

America First Legal Expands Investigation into Forum-Shopping Effort to Bring Lawsuits Against Trump Administration Before Activist Judges WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, America First Legal (AFL) expanded its investigation into Judge John McConnell, the Chief Judge of Rhode Island’s Federal District Court. Judge […] aflegal.org
Saved - May 3, 2025 at 4:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been exploring the US Global Leadership Corporation, which claims to represent 400 NGOs and businesses. Their mission promotes a blend of diplomacy, development, and defense, suggesting a push for increased NGO influence in military matters. The organization is backed by notable figures and foundations, including George Soros and the Bill Gates Foundation. Their advisory board features a mix of political heavyweights, and they have been involved in lobbying for significant spending bills and refugee resettlement. The connections between this group and government initiatives raise concerns about conflicts of interest and the extent of their influence.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

🧵 THREAD - US Global Leadership Corporation, representing 400 NGOs Nicolas Turza, the person who got exposed by @JamesOKeefeIII and OMG, was featured in the following YouTube video by an interesting super-NGO - the US Global Leadership Corporation. In the video, he argues for the involvement of USAID and Department of State in military operations.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nicholas Terza, a former US Army officer, served as a field artillery officer with deployments to Korea and Iraq after joining in 1999. He joined for the opportunity and adventure, also believing in serving his country. Terza defines smart power as leveraging all US federal government tools to achieve national security, business, and growth objectives. He observed in Iraq and Afghanistan that the Department of Defense, despite being well-funded, lacked subject matter experts and skills, needing support from entities like the Department of State, USAID, Agriculture, or Transportation. Modern warfare requires more than just the Department of Defense. In Afghanistan, cooperation with the Department of State and NATO allies was crucial for counterinsurgency. The insufficient presence of the Department of State, particularly in southern and western Afghanistan, hindered the growth of governance, which was essential for counterinsurgency success. Terza identifies as a veteran for Smart Power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Nicholas Terza. I was a US army officer for about eight years. I served first part of that as a field artillery officer. I served about a year in Korea, and then I served about a year in Iraq. I joined in about 1999, I guess officially when I signed on the dotted line to join Army ROTC at the university level and then officially became second lieutenant in February. And I joined I think for the reason a lot of people joined. It was a great opportunity. There's a lot of adventure. Of course, in 1999, we had no idea how much adventure would be entailed for us over the next ten years, but I also just wanted to serve my country. I grew up believing that serving in the military was the right thing to do. I believe smart power is simply leveraging all the the tools that America has throughout the federal government to achieve national security objectives, business objectives, growth objectives, all those things that are in the the national interest and even at times for national values and not just sticking with one set of tools when you have a wide variety at your disposal. I think what I saw personally in Iraq and Afghanistan is so often the Department of Defense, mainly the military was very well funded and we had a lot of assets at our disposal and sometimes almost a blank check, but we didn't have the kind of subject matter expert. We didn't have the skills, and we really needed and wanted people from the Department of State, people from USAID, sometimes even from places like the Department of Agriculture or the Department of Transportation to be working with us on the ground because the nature of warfare as it is today requires far more than just the Department of Defense. In Afghanistan, in trying to pursue counterinsurgency strategy, we all the time would cooperate with the Department of State and often Department of State counterparts from other countries, from our NATO allies. But because the Department of State for so long had not had enough of a presence, especially specifically in the South and in the West Of Afghanistan, it hindered our ability to grow governance. Because there was no way we were going to be successful in counter insurgency unless we were also successful in growing the governance of Afghanistan. My name is Nicholas Ryan Terza. I was a captain in the United States Army, and I'm a veteran for Smart Power.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

US Global Leadership Corporation on its Youtube Channel describes itself as representing 400 NGOs and businesses. Its mission - "support the smart power approach of elevating diplomacy and development alongside defense in order to build a better, safer world." If you've been with me long enough, you know that is code word for increasing NGO influence in military affairs.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

The US Global Leadership Corporation is broken into two nonprofits: Center For Us Global Leadership, a 501(c)(3) with EIN 743093659, with a budget of 10MM. That is the so-called "education arm." Us Global Leadership Campaign, a 501(c)(4) with EIN 522024493, with a budget of 2MM - their "advocacy arm." Neither report taking in any government grants, but they've got plenty of political influence.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

The roster of the advisory board is like an Uniparty Who's Who, including Hillary Clinton. ⚪ Admiral Mike Mullen – Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, 2007–2011 🔴 George Allen – Governor of Virginia (1994-1998), U.S. Senate (2001-2007) 🔴 James A. Baker, III – Secretary of State (Bush Sr., 1992–1993) 🔵 Howard Berman – U.S. House of Representatives (CA-28, 1983-2013) 🔵 James J. Blanchard – U.S. House of Representatives (MI-18, 1975-1983) 🔵 Bill Bradley – U.S. Senate (NJ, 1979-1997) 🔵 David Cicilline – U.S. House of Representatives (RI-1, 2011-2023) 🔵 Hillary Clinton – Secretary of State 🔴 William Cohen – Secretary of Defense (Republican who served in a Democratic administration) 🔴 Norm Coleman – U.S. Senate (MN, 2003-2009) 🔴 Bob Corker – U.S. Senate (TN, 2007-2019) 🔵 Tom Daschle – U.S. Senate (SD, 1987-2005) 🔴 Charlie Dent – U.S. House of Representatives (PA-15, 2005-2018) 🔵 Christopher J. Dodd – U.S. Senate (CT, 1981-2011) 🔵 Thomas Donilon – National Security Advisor (2010, Obama) 🔴 Mickey Edwards – U.S. House of Representatives (OK-5, 1977-1993) 🔴 Mark Esper – Secretary of Defense (2019-2020) 🔴 Bill Frist – U.S. Senate (TN, 1995-2007) ⚪ Robert Gates – Secretary of Defense (served under both GWB and Obama administrations, registered Republican) 🔵 Sam Gejdenson – U.S. House of Representatives (CT-2, 1981-2001) 🔴 Mike Johanns – U.S. Senate (NE, 2009-2015) 🔴 Robert Kasten, Jr. – U.S. Senate (WI, 1981-1993) 🔴 Tom Kean – Governor of New Jersey (1982-1990) 🔴 Bob Livingston – U.S. House of Representatives (LA-1, 1977-1999) 🔴 Connie Mack, III – U.S. Senate (FL, 1981-2001) 🔵 Sam Nunn – U.S. Senate (GA, 1972-1997) 🔴 Robert O’Brien – National Security Advisor (2019-2021) 🔴 Tim Pawlenty – Governor of Minnesota (2003-2011) 🔵 William J. Perry – Secretary of Defense (1994-1997) 🔴 Condoleezza Rice – Secretary of State (2005-2009) 🔴 Tom Ridge – Secretary of Homeland Security (2003-2005) 🔵 Chuck Robb – U.S. Senate (VA, 1981-2001) 🔴 Mike Rogers – U.S. House of Representatives (MI-8, 2001-2015) 🔴 Ed Royce – U.S. House of Representatives (CA-39, 1993-2019) 🔴 Rick Santorum – U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives (PA, 1995-2007) 🔵 David E. Skaggs – U.S. House of Representatives (CO-2, 1987-1999) 🔴 Gordon Smith – U.S. Senate (OR, 1997-2009) 🔵 Timothy E. Wirth – U.S. Senate (CO, 1987-1993) 🔴 Robert B. Zoellick – World Bank President, Deputy Chief of Staff under GWB

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII In addition, Madeleine Bright was a founding member and Colin Powell served as honorary chairman of the Advisory Council.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

There is plenty of private sector interest. For example, Karan Bhatia, who serves an active position on US Global Leadership Campaign, currently is serving as head of government affairs and public policy at Google. The co-chair is none other than Sean Callahan, who is the CEO of Catholic Relief Services, an organization which receives substantial taxpayer support in facilitating refugees.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII Of more local interest, @BasedMikeLee might want to know that Utah's junior senator is already getting involved in this super-NGO.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee The biggest backers of @USGLC - Bill Gates Foundation and George Soros Open Society Foundation.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC The importance of this cannot be understated. TThis is the first solid confirmation I've seen that George Soros and Bill Gates are backers of the so-called "Uniparty" network.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC Liz Schrayer, the President and CEO of USGLC, also claims to serve on USAID’s Advisory Committee. In the past, she also served as political director of AIPAC. I found a 2024 article where she took credit for circumventing USAID and getting her own 95 billion dollar bill passed.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

USGLC is a Who's Who of the Uniparty - and also of the private sector (compiling the list right now), and it is so powerful that it takes credit for a 95 billion spending bill in a Congress that otherwise ignored Helene victims. And its backers are George Soros and Bill Gates. I am reeling.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC In case you didn't expand my post above, here's a partial listing on who's on their advisory board:

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC Here's a listing of Open Society Foundation (George Soros) grants:

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC But the Bill Gates Foundation provided the vast majority of funding - 71 million over the years, if my math is right:

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

The private sector involvement is rampant - including Johnson & Johnson, Walt Disney Company, Sesame Workshop, Walmart, Google, Chemonics, P&G, Coca-Cola, Pfizer, and more. ⚪ Stephen K. Benjamin – President & CEO, The Benjamin Firm, LLC ⚪ Andrew H. Tisch – Co-Chairman of the Board & Chairman of the Executive Committee, Loews Corporation ⚪ Jane M. Adams – Vice President, U.S. Federal Government Affairs & Head of Washington Office, Johnson & Johnson ⚪ Carrie Hessler-Radelet – President & CEO, Global Communities ⚪ Roslyn M. Brock – Chief Global Equity Officer, Abt Associates ⚪ Dr. Evelyn Farkas – Executive Director, McCain Institute at Arizona State University ⚪ Susan L. Fox – Senior Vice President, Head of U.S. Government Relations, The Walt Disney Company ⚪ Brigitte Schmidt Gwyn – Senior Vice President, North America Public Policy & Government Affairs, PepsiCo ⚪ George Ingram – Senior Fellow, Center for Sustainable Development, Brookings Institution ⚪ William Moore – President & CEO, Eleanor Crook Foundation ⚪ Heather Nauert – Advisory Board Member, BGR Group; Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute ⚪ Norman J. Ornstein – Emeritus Scholar, American Enterprise Institute ⚪ Peter J. Roskam – Partner, BakerHostetler (Federal Policy Team Lead) ⚪ Sherrie Rollins Westin – President & CEO, Sesame Workshop ⚪ Sean Callahan – President & CEO, Catholic Relief Services ⚪ Candida “Candi” Wolff – Executive Vice President, Global Government Affairs, Citigroup ⚪ Amb. Karl Hofmann – President & CEO, Population Services International (PSI) ⚪ Paul Weisenfeld – Executive Vice President, International Development, RTI International ⚪ Sarah Thorn – Vice President, Global Government Affairs (International Sourcing), Walmart ⚪ Bill Lane – Chairman Emeritus, U.S. Global Leadership Coalition (retired Caterpillar executive) ⚪ Amb. Karan K. Bhatia – VP, Government Affairs & Public Policy (Global), Google ⚪ Myron Brilliant – Founder, Brilliant Impact Group; Senior Counselor, Dentons Global Advisors ⚪ Jamey Butcher – President & CEO, Chemonics International ⚪ Jeffrey Colman – Deputy Director, Policy and Government Affairs, AIPAC ⚪ Selina Jackson – VP, Global Government Relations and Public Policy, Procter & Gamble ⚪ Maria Pica Karp – VP, Global Government Relations, ADM ⚪ Jenelle Krishnamoorthy, Ph.D. – VP & Head, Global Public Policy, Merck ⚪ Jessica Kruvant – Vice President, External Relations, Creative Associates International ⚪ James A. McGreevy III – VP, Public Policy, Government & Regulatory Affairs, Coca-Cola ⚪ Tjada D’Oyen McKenna – CEO, Mercy Corps ⚪ Rt. Hon. David Miliband – President & CEO, International Rescue Committee ⚪ Michelle Nunn – President & CEO, CARE USA ⚪ Kathleen O’Dell – Principal, Deloitte Consulting LLP (Leader, International Development Practice) ⚪ Caroline Roan – Chief Sustainability Officer & SVP, Global Health & Social Impact, Pfizer; President, The Pfizer Foundation

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

There is significant Uniparty NGO crossover between USGLC and other US government financed NGOs. 🔵 Howard Berman 🔹 USGLC Role: Advisory Council Member 🔸 Board Member, NDI (since 2013) 🔴 Norm Coleman 🔹 USGLC Role: Co-Chair, Board of Directors & Advisory Council Member 🔸 Board Member, NED (~2011–2019) 🔵 Tom Daschle 🔹 USGLC Role: Advisory Council Member 🔸 Vice Chair & current Chair, NDI (Chair since 2022) 🔵 Sam Gejdenson 🔹 USGLC Role: Advisory Council Member 🔸 Board Member, NDI 🔴 Bill Frist 🔹 USGLC Role: Advisory Council Member 🔹 Democracy NGO Role: 🔸 Board Member, NED (~2001–2007) 🔵 Madeleine Albright (-2022) 🔹 USGLC Role: Founding Advisory Council Member 🔸 Founding Vice Chair & Chair, National Democratic Institute (NDI) (2001–2022) 🔸 Board Member, National Endowment for Democracy (NED) (1991–1993)

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC To be honest, I wrote this thread while I was collating the findings. I'm just shocked. This is quite possibly the missing link we've all been looking for.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC Separately, I was looking at CHIPS Act, an odd bipartisan bill which provided a windfall for colleges and universities. And, presto, USGLC was involved in its lobbying.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC Other prominent issues they have lobbied on involved the IRA (which was a big NGO windfall). It seems they generally enjoy lobbying for vague spending bills rather than focused ones.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

USGLC have also been major promoters of refugee resettlement and migrant financing in the United States. Sean Callahan, the co-chair of USGLC advocacy arm and also the CEO of Catholic Refugee Services, has outright said that taxpayer dollars should be used to support resettlement of refugees to the United States.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC President and CEO of Chemonics, Jamey Butcher, is on the board of USGLC as well.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC President and CEO of Global Communities, Carrie Hessler-Radelet, is the secretary of Center for U.S. Global Leadership (USGLC education arm).

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

In fact, USGLC and International Republican Institute (IRI) shared a "Security Event" spot at the 2024 Republican Convention. The IRI includes the following sitting members: 🔴 Mitt Romney – Director; Former U.S. Senator from Utah, 2012 GOP presidential nominee. 🔴 Lindsey Graham – Director; U.S. Senator from South Carolina. 🔴 Joni Ernst – Director; U.S. Senator from Iowa. 🔴 Tom Cotton – Director; U.S. Senator from Arkansas. 🔴 Marco Rubio (Formerly) 🔴 Dan Sullivan – Chairman; U.S. Senator from Alaska. 🔴 Kelly Ayotte – Director; former U.S. Senator from New Hampshire. 🔴 Mark Kirk – Director; former U.S. Senator from Illinois.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A group of NGOs, business and community leaders, and former military leaders are united by a shared vision in the value of American leadership. They believe the world is more dangerous than it has been since World War II, with authoritarians on the march. Dictators in Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea are allegedly working together to undermine America's interests. Speakers claim that US global leadership is about economic and security interests. Food security and economic security are national security. A strong military, diplomacy, and soft power are needed to make a difference. America needs to lead by leveraging diplomatic ties and allies. Defeating the Russians in Ukraine would send a message to President Xi. Speakers advocate for fair and reciprocal trade. They envision free people, free markets, a confident country, and a booming economy working with neighbors, friends, and allies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are a group of of NGOs, business leaders, community leaders, former military leaders, and what brings us together is a shared vision in the value of American leadership. Speaker 1: We are looking out at a world that perhaps is more dangerous than at any time since the second world war, where authoritarians are on the march. Dictators in Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea are working together to undermine America's interest and those of our allies. Speaker 2: If the world better understands the threat of Russia's expansionism Speaker 3: It's a nasty world with nasty dictators. And if we actually all care about this rules based order that we been talking about for so long, if we actually care about the West leading, then we need to get serious, not just in rhetoric, but in policy. Speaker 4: America needs to show up. We have the tools to show up. US global leadership is about kitchen table issues, our economic interests, our security interests, our values. Speaker 5: Food security is national security. Speaker 3: The economic security is national security. And so the partnership across government with industry, it's just absolutely essential. Speaker 0: And in order to make a difference, it takes a strong military, hard power, but it also takes diplomacy. It takes soft power. Speaker 4: We need to lead. America needs to lead. That's why we talk about leveraging diplomatic ties, leveraging friends and allies. Speaker 5: It is peace through strength. But if you want peace through strength, that's a moment to celebrate the State Department. We need to be able to recognize that the State Department people sign up to solve problems. They are public servants, and they really wanna be out front. Speaker 2: Anyway, you look at the world today, the most important thing is to defeat the Russians in Ukraine. Speaker 6: If you wanna send president Xi a message, beat Putin in Ukraine. Speaker 0: This is our armor, not just against China, but to support American interests and American companies throughout the world and to counter autocratic governments. Speaker 7: So we have to have fair and reciprocal trade, Speaker 8: you know, with China. I and we do need trade partners. Speaker 0: And this is where diplomacy is really important in the work that you guys do as well as IRI. Speaker 9: I see in the future is is free men and free women and free markets being promoted by this country. I see a a country that's that's confident and and an economy that's booming and and working with our neighbors and Speaker 1: our friends and our allies, and I see the freedom back on the March.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC I was disappointed to find @SenJoniErnst to be involved as well

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC @SenJoniErnst They were so powerful, they got a rare speaking appearance from the sitting President Biden at an event they hosted:

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

They are deeply involved in knowing how the government works - download and save this PDF. It is literally a playbook as to the positions to fill to create impact, which was written for the Obama administration and, given the funding sources of Soros and Gates Foundation, likely influenced how our migrant programs scaled so massively. https://www.usglc.org/media/2016/09/USGLC-The-Global-Plum-Book.pdf

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC @SenJoniErnst I also found this Facebook video where they review each nominee for the Biden administration (sorry, I couldn't get the auto-subtitles).

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

I'm digging through Congressional testimonies and came across one where both Admiral James G. Stavridis, USN (Ret.), testifying as Co-Chair of the USGLC’s National Security Advisory Council, and Bill Gates testified at the same Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing. The policy impact sought was increased public-private (NGO) partnerships in global development, increased funding for global health initiative, increased foreign aid funding. Talk about a conflict of interest! https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-114shrg59104631/html/CHRG-114shrg59104631.htm

Page Not Found Error occurred. The page you requested cannot be found. Please report this error to askGPO. Provide the following information to help us resolve this problem: the URL of the page you were trying to access, the steps you followed to produce the error, specific search or browse terms, and/or a screenshot of the page where the error occurred. Thank you for your patience. Homepage govinfo.gov

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC @SenJoniErnst Here is another one where Liz Schrayer CEO of USGLC, Howard Kohr, AIPAC CEO, Natasha Bilimoria, Director of US Strategy for GAVI Alliance all testified together to increase funding for International Affairs Budget (think USAID) : https://www.congress.gov/event/116th-congress/house-event/LC65893/text

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Liz Schrayer (CEO of USGLC) loves invoking Reagan's memory to make the case for more USAID involvement - If you've followed my posts... you know these Uniparty NGOs have their roots in the Cold War and truly, honestly believe that without themselves, the Western world would fall apart - which is why they call themselves "Democracy": https://www.usglc.org/media/2025/04/USGLC-FY26-Outside-Witness-Testimony_House-NSRP.pdf

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC @SenJoniErnst I'm going to sign off for now... but this is probably the wildest rabbit hole I've ever gone down.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Last thing - don't forget how this whole thread started. It started by @JamesOKeefeIII busting DoD Branch Chief Nicolas Turza who outright stated his intent to obstruct the Presidential administration. This is the same person which USGLC featured in a video. https://t.co/oRoq7yjqn2

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC @SenJoniErnst And last last thing - don't forget, USGLC is bankrolled by Soros' OSF and Bill Gates Foundation. Repeat: This could very well be the missing link between the Uniparty and the Soros/Gates alignment.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC @SenJoniErnst Funny - I hit the Grok button on this thread and got this, anyone else?: https://t.co/c4DsbXRbIY

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC @SenJoniErnst Oh, this is the gift that never stops giving. Of course Don Bacon is deeply involved. https://t.co/m6QFXoLnmr

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@JamesOKeefeIII @BasedMikeLee @USGLC @SenJoniErnst This is only a small organization by revenue (10MM budget) yet it is able to host events in most states on a recurring basis with super prominent names. Just go to the website and look up your local state. @MikeBenzCyber what gives? https://t.co/VlnS81pR40

Saved - April 25, 2025 at 12:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user highlighted the removal of the "Our Board" page from the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition, sharing saved information and additional names. They listed members from both the Center for U.S. Global Leadership and the U.S. Global Leadership Campaign boards, detailing their positions and affiliations. The user pointed out that many of these organizations receive substantial government funding, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest. They provided an example of Arizona State University, which received $1.7 billion in federal grants in 2024.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Oh, fun. USGLC removed their "Our Board" page. But I saved it all. I'll add some extra mentions that weren't in the last thread. https://t.co/Z6a7lzCwdU

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

This one contains many of the names already, which I verified through Google: https://t.co/SqLIoJLFO5

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

The private sector involvement is rampant - including Johnson & Johnson, Walt Disney Company, Sesame Workshop, Walmart, Google, Chemonics, P&G, Coca-Cola, Pfizer, and more. ⚪ Stephen K. Benjamin – President & CEO, The Benjamin Firm, LLC ⚪ Andrew H. Tisch – Co-Chairman of the Board & Chairman of the Executive Committee, Loews Corporation ⚪ Jane M. Adams – Vice President, U.S. Federal Government Affairs & Head of Washington Office, Johnson & Johnson ⚪ Carrie Hessler-Radelet – President & CEO, Global Communities ⚪ Roslyn M. Brock – Chief Global Equity Officer, Abt Associates ⚪ Dr. Evelyn Farkas – Executive Director, McCain Institute at Arizona State University ⚪ Susan L. Fox – Senior Vice President, Head of U.S. Government Relations, The Walt Disney Company ⚪ Brigitte Schmidt Gwyn – Senior Vice President, North America Public Policy & Government Affairs, PepsiCo ⚪ George Ingram – Senior Fellow, Center for Sustainable Development, Brookings Institution ⚪ William Moore – President & CEO, Eleanor Crook Foundation ⚪ Heather Nauert – Advisory Board Member, BGR Group; Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute ⚪ Norman J. Ornstein – Emeritus Scholar, American Enterprise Institute ⚪ Peter J. Roskam – Partner, BakerHostetler (Federal Policy Team Lead) ⚪ Sherrie Rollins Westin – President & CEO, Sesame Workshop ⚪ Sean Callahan – President & CEO, Catholic Relief Services ⚪ Candida “Candi” Wolff – Executive Vice President, Global Government Affairs, Citigroup ⚪ Amb. Karl Hofmann – President & CEO, Population Services International (PSI) ⚪ Paul Weisenfeld – Executive Vice President, International Development, RTI International ⚪ Sarah Thorn – Vice President, Global Government Affairs (International Sourcing), Walmart ⚪ Bill Lane – Chairman Emeritus, U.S. Global Leadership Coalition (retired Caterpillar executive) ⚪ Amb. Karan K. Bhatia – VP, Government Affairs & Public Policy (Global), Google ⚪ Myron Brilliant – Founder, Brilliant Impact Group; Senior Counselor, Dentons Global Advisors ⚪ Jamey Butcher – President & CEO, Chemonics International ⚪ Jeffrey Colman – Deputy Director, Policy and Government Affairs, AIPAC ⚪ Selina Jackson – VP, Global Government Relations and Public Policy, Procter & Gamble ⚪ Maria Pica Karp – VP, Global Government Relations, ADM ⚪ Jenelle Krishnamoorthy, Ph.D. – VP & Head, Global Public Policy, Merck ⚪ Jessica Kruvant – Vice President, External Relations, Creative Associates International ⚪ James A. McGreevy III – VP, Public Policy, Government & Regulatory Affairs, Coca-Cola ⚪ Tjada D’Oyen McKenna – CEO, Mercy Corps ⚪ Rt. Hon. David Miliband – President & CEO, International Rescue Committee ⚪ Michelle Nunn – President & CEO, CARE USA ⚪ Kathleen O’Dell – Principal, Deloitte Consulting LLP (Leader, International Development Practice) ⚪ Caroline Roan – Chief Sustainability Officer & SVP, Global Health & Social Impact, Pfizer; President, The Pfizer Foundation

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Here is the archive link: https://archive.is/ofzHY

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Center for U.S. Global Leadership Board ⚪ Norm Coleman (Co-Chair) – Former MN Senator, current Senior Counsel for Hogan Lovells ⚪ Stephen K. Benjamin (Co-Chair) – President & CEO, The Benjamin Firm, LLC ⚪ Andrew H. Tisch (Vice Chair) – Co-Chairman of the Board & Chairman of the Executive Committee, Loews Corporation ⚪ Jane M. Adams (Treasurer) – Vice President, U.S. Federal Government Affairs & Head of Washington Office, Johnson & Johnson ⚪ Carrie Hessler-Radelet (Secretary) – President & CEO, Global Communities ⚪ Roslyn M. Brock – Chief Global Equity Officer, Abt Associates ⚪ Dr. Evelyn Farkas – Executive Director, McCain Institute at Arizona State University ⚪ Susan L. Fox – Senior Vice President, Head of U.S. Government Relations, The Walt Disney Company ⚪ Brigitte Schmidt Gwyn – Senior Vice President, North America Public Policy & Government Affairs, PepsiCo ⚪ George Ingram – Senior Fellow, Center for Sustainable Development, Brookings Institution ⚪ William Moore – President & CEO, Eleanor Crook Foundation ⚪ Heather Nauert – Advisory Board Member, BGR Group; Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute ⚪ Norman J. Ornstein – Emeritus Scholar, American Enterprise Institute ⚪ Peter J. Roskam – Partner, Baker Hostetler (Federal Policy Team Lead) ⚪ Sherrie Rollins Westin – President & CEO, Sesame Workshop

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

U.S. Global Leadership Campaign Board ⚪ Sean Callahan (Co-Chair) – President & CEO, Catholic Relief Services ⚪ Candida “Candi” Wolff (Co-Chair) – Executive Vice President, Global Government Affairs, Citigroup ⚪ Amb. Karl Hofmann (Vice Chair) – President & CEO, Population Services International (PSI) ⚪ Paul Weisenfeld (Treasurer) – Executive Vice President, International Development, RTI International ⚪ Sarah Thorn (Secretary) – Vice President, Global Government Affairs (International Sourcing), Walmart ⚪ Bill Lane (Chair Emeritus) – Chairman Emeritus, U.S. Global Leadership Coalition (retired Caterpillar executive) ⚪ Amb. Karan K. Bhatia – VP, Government Affairs & Public Policy (Global), Google ⚪ Myron Brilliant – Founder, Brilliant Impact Group; Senior Counselor, Dentons Global Advisors ⚪ Jamey Butcher – President & CEO, Chemonics International ⚪ Jeffrey Colman – Deputy Director, Policy and Government Affairs, AIPAC ⚪ Selina Jackson – VP, Global Government Relations and Public Policy, Procter & Gamble ⚪ Maria Pica Karp – VP, Global Government Relations, ADM ⚪ Jenelle Krishnamoorthy, Ph.D. – VP & Head, Global Public Policy, Merck ⚪ Jessica Kruvant – Vice President, External Relations, Creative Associates International ⚪ James A. McGreevy III – VP, Public Policy, Government & Regulatory Affairs, Coca-Cola ⚪ Tjada D’Oyen McKenna – CEO, Mercy Corps ⚪ Rt. Hon. David Miliband – President & CEO, International Rescue Committee ⚪ Michelle Nunn – President & CEO, CARE USA ⚪ Kathleen O’Dell – Principal, Deloitte Consulting LLP (Leader, International Development Practice) ⚪ Caroline Roan – Chief Sustainability Officer & SVP, Global Health & Social Impact, Pfizer; President, The Pfizer Foundation ⚪ Edgar Sandoval – President & CEO, World Vision US ⚪ Janti Soeripto – CEO, Save the Children US ⚪ Matthew Wohlman – Vice President, Government Relations, Land O'Lakes Inc. ⚪ Peter Yeo – Senior Vice President, UN Foundation; President, Better World Campaign

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Also, most of these entities take in huge amounts of government money, often USAID. Talk about conflict of interest!

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

For instance, here's what Arizona State University (represented by Dr. Evelyn Farkas) looks like - they received 1.7B in federal grants alone in 2024. https://t.co/HSnpLmotJR

Saved - September 3, 2025 at 8:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
There's a significant effort underway to oust RFK Jr., backed by a $2 million plan from the pharmaceutical industry. A leaked memo revealed that former CDC Directors, Senators, and public health experts are targeting him due to his stance against vaccines, which they view as a threat. Critics, including Senator Bernie Sanders, have called for his resignation, citing concerns over his views. Meanwhile, former CDC Directors defend their record, but many argue that public trust in these authorities has eroded. The situation is escalating as RFK Jr. prepares to testify before the Senate.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

There is a $2 million effort to get RFK Jr. ousted happening right in front of us. A leaked memo EXPOSED the whole plan. Now, it’s happening—and Pharma is holding NOTHING back. CDC bureaucrats are subverting Kennedy. Senators are demanding his resignation. The vaccine industry is lobbying to get him fired. And it’s all about to reach a fever pitch: 🧵THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

First, bookmark this thread above. There is concerted effort from Pharma to get RFK Jr. OUSTED. 2 months ago, a leaked memo EXPOSED the plan. Former CDC Directors, Pharma, Senators, public health “experts,” and the media just launched an all-out assault on MAHA:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

In July, the Brownstone Institute EXPOSED a leaked memo from BIO, the lobbying arm for Pfizer, Moderna, Merck, Eli Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson. The memo made their goal clear: “It’s time to go to The Hill and lobby that it is time for RFK Jr. to go.” Why? Because RFK Jr. and MAHA are a threat to the corrupt vaccine industry. Vaccyte EVP/COO Jim Wassil allegedly stated there is “no opportunity to raise capital in the current environment.” “Investors are sitting on the sidelines for next 6-9 months.” “Vaccine pathway to approval is unpredictable.” @brownstoneinst

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

BIO’s leaked memo REVEALED that they set aside $2 million—half of its $4 million cash reserve—to stop RFK Jr. They planned to target legislators and influencers. The Brownstone Institute noted that the plan “reveals a timeline racing toward” September. It’s now September, and we’re now seeing an all-out PR war from Senators like Bernie Sanders, former CDC Directors, and the media to try and get RFK Jr. ousted from the Trump Administration. Read the Brownstone Institute’s full article exposing this memo here: https://brownstone.org/articles/the-plot-to-get-rfk/ @brownstoneinst

The Plot to Get RFK ⋆ Brownstone Institute On the eve before US Senate reconvenes, a memo plotting removal of US Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. leaked. brownstone.org

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

On August 30, Senator Bernie Sanders called for RFK Jr. to resign. His whole argument revolves around Kennedy’s “anti-vaccine views.” He cited the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, and the World Health Organization to make his case. What do these organizations have in common?🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The American Academy of Pediatrics has received $50K+ from Pfizer, Moderna, Merck, and Sanofi, between $25K - $49K from Eli Lilly, and tens of thousands more from other Pharma companies. The American Medical Association has received $1M+ from Pfizer, between $500K - $999K from Merck, AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly, between $250K - $499K from Novo Nordisk and GSK, and hundreds of thousands more from other Pharma companies. The heart of RFK Jr. and MAHA’s argument against these “expert” public health organizations is that they’re corrupted by Pharma. But Sanders made no attempt to address these concerns. He just regurgitated their talking points.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Now, 9 former CDC Directors just wrote an article slamming RFK Jr. for “endangering every American’s health.” It’s your typical appeal to authority—despite the total collapse of trust in public health authorities since 2020. “Collectively, we spent more than 100 years working at the CDC, the world’s pre-eminent public health agency.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Guess what they held up as a “shining example” of success at HHS and CDC? Operation Warp Speed. But the American people have woken up to the TRUTH: The Covid-19 shots are an unmitigated disaster that ruined countless lives. Even President Trump, who spent 5 years touting Operation Warp Speed as a “brilliant” success, is now listening to RFK Jr. and questioning the lies he was told by Pfizer and Moderna.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The evidence against the safety of Covid-19 shots is now overwhelming. Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo just declared they are “not fit for human use.” Bookmark the thread below—he EXPOSED the TRUTH that no “expert” dares to study:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Florida is going to WAR with Pfizer and Moderna. Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo just declared Covid-19 shots are “not fit for human use.” He EXPOSED the truth—and held nothing back. “They should NOT be going into human beings.” And he has a warning for the Republican Party: “Trying to protect President Trump is not a reason to not take care of MILLIONS of people who have been injured by these mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.” 🧵THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Next, these 9 former CDC Directors credited the CDC with several major public health accomplishments. This is worth breaking down point by point—because they’re all lies, coverups, or half-truths:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

First, they claim that US life expectancy rose from 66 years to 78 years since the CDC was created in 1946. Here’s what they didn’t tell you: They’re using outdated numbers. Since 2020, US life expectancy has taken a sharp downward turn, erasing 25 years of slow progress—and it still hasn’t recovered, 5 years later.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Second, they credit the CDC with significantly reducing smoking rates. But there is a much darker side to this story … RFK Jr. has EXPOSED that tobacco companies are responsible for turning our food into addictive “poison.” When smoking rates dropped, tobacco companies started buying up food companies. Then, they engineered our food into the chemical-laden, poisonous, addictive catastrophe that it is today. Kennedy: “By the mid-1990s, the two biggest food companies in the world were R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris.” “They transferred thousands of scientists that were engaged in making tobacco more addictive to do the same thing with food.” “They developed in the lab all of these chemicals that are unknown in nature, that make food more attractive.” “It doesn’t give you nutrition, but you want to eat more and more, so you get obese.” “But at the same time, you get malnourished.” So, while Americans don’t smoke at the rate we did 50 years ago … The same companies that were responsible for that public health issue just turned around and created a much, much larger public health crisis by mass poisoning us with food. That is hardly a “success” for the CDC or public health.

Video Transcript AI Summary
And we have something that is unique in human history. We have people who are obese who are at the same time malnourished because the food that we're eating does not is is not nutrient dense anymore. I was involved in tobacco litigation back in the 1980s, late 1980s, and the tobacco companies at that point were the most cash rich companies on earth and they saw the writing on the wall. They saw the regulatory headwinds, and their consumers were were walking away from their product, and they decided to diversify. So they started buying up the food companies. By the mid nineteen nineties, the two biggest food companies in the world were RJ Reynolds and Philip Morris, and they transferred thousands of scientists that were engaged in making tobacco more addictive to do the same thing with food.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we have something that is unique in human history. We have people who are obese who are at the same time malnourished because the food that we're eating does not is is not nutrient dense anymore. I was involved in tobacco litigation back in the 1980s, late 1980s, and the tobacco companies at that point were the most cash rich companies on earth and they saw the writing on the wall. They saw the regulatory headwinds, and their consumers were were walking away from their product, and they decided to diversify. So they started buying up the food companies. By the mid nineteen nineties, the two biggest food companies in the world were RJ Reynolds and Philip Morris, and they transferred thousands of scientists that were engaged in making tobacco more addictive to do the same thing with food. And they developed in the lab all of these chemicals that are unknown in nature that make food more attractive. It's not food. It's food like substances. So they'll put a strawberry flavor in the food but there is no nutrients that you'd find in a strawberry. Your body is craving that and but it doesn't get filled up and it doesn't give you nutrition, but you wanna eat more and more so you got obese, but at the same time you get malnourished. And they put addictive substances like sugar and sodium and others, monosodium glutinate in our foods and make use so that you don't get satiated and that you constantly want to have more. They realized at some point through all these you know that they could hijack the human brain and different all these nefarious ways, but one of them is that they realize that one of the ways that your brain tells your stomach that it's full is how many times you chew. Oh, they began adding food softeners to our food so that your your brain would be under the illusion that you weren't full. You can inhale 20 Twinkies and still want more as you're not chewing them. And so they've they figured out all these things and they changed our food system in this country. So it is poison to us, and it is poisoning the American people.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Third, they held up the East Palestine chemical spill by Norfolk Southern as a success. This one is SHOCKING. East Palestine is an unmitigated disaster—and top health officials regurgitated Norfolk Southern’s LIES. Reporter Jordan Chariton called it Flint, Michigan 2.0. “They brought people back to town within days of chemically detonating over a million pounds of vinyl chloride.” “That’s linked to all sorts of cancers, leukemia, reproductive issues in women.” “We’re starting to see cancers including male breast cancer, which is fairly rare.” “I’ve talked to fathers who their daughters as young as 7 or 8 are starting to have early puberty and menstrual cycles … and young boys are starting to get hair that you wouldn’t get until you’re 12, 13, 14.” “The EPA, the federal government, and the state agencies are basically saying, all good, nothing to see here—but the proof is in the residents.” “They’re sick.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
EPA official in East Palestine said, "the railroad company that chemically nuked the town was lying to you, but the EPA echoed those lies." He cited "over a million pounds of vinyl chloride" detonated, "linked to all sorts of cancers, leukemia, reproductive issues in women." He argued the EPA should have offered temporary relocation "pretty much right away," noting it’s "totally unknowable how many people got sick unnecessarily because they weren't relocated sooner." He has visited twice in six months and says, "I've gotten sick both times, and residents are sick, both in Ohio and Pennsylvania." We're "already starting to see cancers, including in men, male breast cancer," with fathers reporting daughters "as young as seven or eight" starting early puberty and menstrual cycles, and boys getting hair earlier. "Flint two point zero," the agencies are saying, "All good, nothing to see here," but the residents are sick and not getting help.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. And here is the top EPA official who's been on the ground in East Palestine basically saying, yeah. The railroad company that chemically nuked the town was lying to you, but the EPA echoed those lies. They they said the same thing. So it's very illuminating because they brought people back to town within days of chemically detonating over a million pounds of vinyl chloride that's linked to all sorts of cancers, leukemia, reproductive issues in women. So he's saying, Yeah, when I saw that, I was like, Oh my God, you never say that. But the EPA was echoing the same things. He also acknowledged that the EPA should have offered temporary relocation pretty much right away. Waited a So it's totally unknowable how many people got sick unnecessarily because they weren't relocated sooner. And I'll just say, I mean, I could speak for myself. I've been there twice in the last six months. I've gotten sick both times, and residents are sick, both in Ohio and Pennsylvania. We're already starting to see cancers, including in men, male breast cancer, which is fairly rare. I've talked to fathers who their young daughters, as young as seven or eight, are starting to have early puberty and menstrual cycles, and young boys are starting to get, you know, hair that you wouldn't get until you're like 12, 13, 14. There's all sorts of health issues, but we're seeing kind of, I think, Flint two point zero, where the EPA and the federal government and the state agencies are basically saying, All good, nothing to see here, but the proof is in the residents. They're sick and really they're not getting much help.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Meanwhile, Calley Means just EXPOSED that corrupt CDC bureaucrats are circulating a memo on how to “SUBVERT” RFK Jr. They think the bureaucracy can just overrule the MAHA agenda that Americans voted for. “There is a memo going around at the CDC and HHS about how to subvert President Trump and Secretary Kennedy.” “They are saying that we’re gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan.” @calleymeans

Video Transcript AI Summary
- it's that he took the COVID vaccine off the recommended schedule for children. - 95% of parents were already rejecting that advice, and actually 85% of healthcare workers rejecting that advice. - when these people in the media say that they are standing up for science, they are saying they're going against 95% of parents, and they want every single six month old in this country to have a mandated mRNA COVID injection. - There is a memo going around at the CDC and throughout HHS about how to subvert president Trump and how to subvert secretary Kennedy. - They're saying we're gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you get past the rhetoric and actually look at why these people are resigning, look what they're listing that Bobby Kennedy did, it's that he took the COVID vaccine off the recommended schedule for children. 95% of parents were already rejecting that advice, and actually 85% of healthcare workers rejecting that advice. So when these people in the media say that they are standing up for science, they are saying they're going against 95% of parents, and they want every single six month old in this country to have a mandated mRNA COVID injection. I want everyone watching to know this. There is a memo going around at the CDC and throughout HHS about how to subvert president Trump and how to subvert secretary Kennedy. They are saying we're gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan. The American people have a very, very clear choice. Do you accept their argument that the status quo when it comes to health care in this country is acceptable, or do you support president Trump and Bobby Kennedy who are fighting for reform?

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

There is more evil under the surface of the CDC’s history than you can imagine. This is not just a fight to reform a misguided system—it’s a spiritual war:🧵

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

🚨 Is the CDC a DEATH CULT? RFK Jr.’s firing of Susan Monarez exposed what’s been hiding in plain sight for 100 years: A much darker agenda of eugenics, sterilization, and depopulation. The mask is finally DOWN. This is war — and it’s spiritual. 🧵 THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

RFK Jr. is set to testify before the Senate on Thursday. The firing of CDC Director Dr. Susan Monarez opened the door to the CDC adopting Kennedy’s vaccine reforms—meaning that Pharma’s push to get him ousted is about to reach a fever pitch. This is a make or break moment for MAHA. Kennedy’s biggest and boldest reforms are finally on the table—and Pharma is throwing millions of dollars into blocking them.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Thanks for making it to the end. Before you go, follow me @Holden_Culotta and Subscribe for $3/month to support my work! I’m a Gen Z Independent who covers everything from MAHA and health freedom to UFOs and ancient civilizations. https://t.co/ocRnXE30Du

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

@Fynnderella1 @RobertKennedyJr Thank you 🙏

Saved - October 24, 2025 at 4:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Oh boy… Sounds like 2026 is gonna be lit. A memo online claims a National Guard Response Force will train for crowd control and civil unrest, deployed in all 50 states by April 2026. Pete Hegseth: I’m not going to answer anything on the particulars of something that may be in the planning process.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Oh boy… Sounds like 2026 is gonna be lit 👀 A Memo circulating on Social Media details a National Guard Response Force that’s going to be trained in crowd control and civil unrest, and will be deployed in all 50 states by April of 2026. Pete Hegseth: “I’m not going to answer anything on the particulars of something that may be in the planning process.” https://rumble.com/v70p01g-national-guard-response-force-april-of-2026..html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asked Secretary Hagsteth about a memo circulating on social media detailing the establishment of a National Guard Response Force trained in crowd control and civil unrest and deployed in all 50 states by April 2026, requesting verification of authenticity and more information on operations. Speaker 1 responded that they will not answer particulars on something that may be in the planning process, but noted that there are multiple layers of National Guard Response Forces, including in each state, regionally, and across Title 10 active duty and Washington DC. He stated there are a lot of different ways constitutionally and legally to employ Title X and Title 32 forces, and they will do so when necessary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Question for secretary Hagsteth. Sir, a memo circulating on social media, details the establishment of a National Guard Response Force that's gonna be trained in crowd control and civil unrest and deployed in all 50 states by April 2026. Can you verify the authenticity of that memo? And do you have any more information on the operations? Speaker 1: I'm not going to answer particulars on something that may be in the planning process, but we definitely do have multiple layers of National Guard Response Forces, whether it's in each state, whether it's regionally, whether it's Title 10 active duty, whether it's Washington DC. We've got a lot of different ways that constitutionally and legally we can employ Title X and Title 32 forces, and we will do so when necessary.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

HOLEE SHIZZLES‼️ President Trump says he will keep his Promise to EXPOSE the Politicians and Billionaires involved with Financing Domestic Terrorism “We have a lot of information about who they are. You’re going to be VERY surprised when you find out.” https://rumble.com/v70ozns-trump-will-expose-the-politicians-and-billionaires-involved-with-financing-.html https://t.co/J7FHAcYPrE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 asks about a 2024 reelection video in which the speaker promised to show no mercy on the cartels and to employ every military asset to combat them, and to expose all bribes and corruptions involving politicians and the cartels. Speaker 0 confirms, saying they are pursuing that course. They mention investigating where money comes from, noting a recent weekend “garbage deal” as embarrassing to the opposition and that the crowds were not large. They observe that the signs for the protests—yellow and blue—appear professionally made, as if produced in a printing shop, suggesting someone is paying for them. They acknowledge they do not mind protest and sometimes protest themselves, but claim some protesters are “professional agitators” being paid, implying there is a source behind them. Speaker 0 states they have a lot of information about who these agitators are and that the public will be very surprised when they find out who is paying them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go ahead. Speaker 1: Thank you, sir. When when you were running for reelection in 2024, you released a video statement where you did this you made this exact promise to show no mercy on the cartels and employ every military asset necessary to combat them. In that same video, you also said that you plan to expose all the bribes and corruptions with politicians and the cartels. Speaker 0: I'm doing that. That's your kind to do that. Speaker 1: Looking into that in American politicians. Speaker 0: Yeah. Where the money's coming from. Because you see it. Like, even that garbage deal they had this weekend, which was embarrassing to them, and the crowds were much more the crowds were not big. Those crowds were not big at all. But when you look at signs, and they're all made beautifully, the yellow signs, I saw the yellows, the blues, but they're all made professionally in a printing shop, looks like on Madison Avenue someplace. Some guy is paying for all that stuff, and we don't mind protest. Protest is a good thing. I protest. I'm always protesting. Right? But but when you see some of these people, these people are going crazy. They're they're going crazy because they're getting paid because there's no reason for them to be going crazy. But you watch some of them, and they're professional agitators, and we are finding out who's paying them. Yeah. We we have a lot of information about who they are. You're gonna be very surprised when you find out.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

HOLEE SHIZZLES! NO KINGS Financials Released! The Financers: - Arabella: $79M - Warren Buffet: $16M - Ford: $51M - Rockefeller: $26M - Soros: $72M - Tides: $45M $294,487,641 MILLION Source @realannapaulina

Saved - February 5, 2026 at 5:08 PM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

NO KINGS Financials Released! The Financers: - Arabella: $79M - Warren Buffet: $16M - Ford: $51M - Rockefeller: $26M - Soros: $72M - Tides: $45M $294,487,641 MILLION Source @realannapaulina https://t.co/Op4Z28GUGN

View Full Interactive Feed