reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@EpochTimes - The Epoch Times
BREAKING: For the first time ever, the most comprehensive overview of the 'Spygate' collusion compiled, vindicating @realDonaldTrump and @DonaldJTrumpJr. See more: https://www.theepochtimes.com/spygate-the-true-story-of-collusion_2684629.html
Spygate: The True Story of Collusion
theepochtimes.com
@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™
CORRUPTION EXPOSED: Vice President Joe Biden and Victoria Nuland illegally overthrew the Ukrainian government with the help of the CIA, IMF and George Soros. Learn the true reason why they want war with Russia. You have been lied to about everything. https://twitter.com/SpartaJustice/status/1622539989102780416/video/1
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses US interference in Ukraine and its implications. It highlights the CIA's involvement with Ukrainian Nazis after World War 2 and the emergence of extremist groups supported by the US State Department and IMF. The leaked phone calls reveal the US State Department's orchestration of a coup against Yanukovych. The speaker argues that supporting a war against Russia makes one a pawn of the globalist banking cartel. It is mentioned that the war in Ukraine has disrupted globalization and may lead to a reevaluation of supply chains. The video also touches on the deep state's interest in Ukraine's resources and the alleged plan for war with Russia. The speaker emphasizes Putin's request for security guarantees and the threat posed by Ukraine's corruption and infiltration by neo-Nazis. The need for dialogue and a "great reset" is mentioned, with speculation about the impact of a change in the White House. The transcript ends with a call for true global citizenship.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The first casualty of war is the truth. And if the American people knew the truth about US interference in Ukraine, they might not be so eager to start World War 3. During World War 2, Western Ukraine sided with the Nazis. After to the war. The CIA helped Ukrainian Nazis evade the Nuremberg trials and began operating with them within the Ukraine.
After decades of CIA infiltration, the Ukrainian People's Movement emerged in 1989 and gave birth to extremist groups, Swoboda, Trident, and Right Sector. Neo Nazi groups pushing for the ethnic cleansing of Ukraine. Extremist groups cultivated by the CIA, supported by the US State Department, and used by the IMF to bring Ukraine in to heal. When Yanukovych beat NATO backed entered into signing an EU association agreement by the International Monetary Fund in their typical conquer by debt offer that would financially ruin the Ukraine and place them at the mercy of the World Bank. Yanukovych declined their offer.
And in today's corrupt world, you're not allowed to say no to the IMF. Funded by Western NGOs associated with George Soros and the CIA, a highly organized color revolution was immediately deployed against Yanukovych. Leaked phone calls reveal that the US State Department was orchestrating this coup d'etat from within the US embassy with support from vice president Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Come back to me, VFR saying you need Biden. And I said probably tomorrow for an attaboy and I get the deeds to stick. So Biden's willing.
Speaker 0: So you had this remarkable phone call where you have these 2 senior officials of the US government apparently talking about a coup or how they Planning to restructure the government of Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Fuck the EU. No. Exactly.
Speaker 0: Supporting a criminal war against Russia does not make you a patriot. It makes you a useful idiot of the globalist banking cartel. The very same entities waging war on all of humanity with vaccine passports and experimental jam.
Speaker 2: World's biggest investment fund says the war in Ukraine has put an end to globalization as we know it. Larry Fink is the chief executive of BlackRock. Countries and businesses are cutting ties with Russia. They're also imposing sanctions against the country, Including cutting off its central bank from its foreign reserves. Fink predicts that with Russia's decoupling from the world, governments and companies will reevaluate their supply chains And even consider reconsider the dependency on other nations.
Speaker 3: See, the truth is slowly gonna come out about what's really going on. And what's really going on in is this. Ukraine has been the center of, of the globalists for decades decades decades, 70 years at least. CIA, which is not a good organization. They're they're the the implementers of deep state, let's say.
They've been working this in the Ukraine for 70 years, building up A resistance to everybody and everything. Why? Because they needed to bring the Soviet Union down, but they also want the resources that are in the Ukraine. That's what this is all about. Particularly Eastern Ukraine, massive natural resources that CIA goes in, gets control of, and American business interests, and they're not business, they're just robber barons.
They're not legitimate businessmen. They just wanna steal, and that's what goes on. And so they're taking that away from from the from Russia and the Ukraine. And on top of that, it's the center of the deep state. And so by Vlad Putin going in, he's cutting the head off the snake.
Once the head comes off, The whole beast will die. So that's what's actually going on, folks. So please, they are gonna tell you their stories about, possible nuclear war, and Vlad's the bad man. This is the war with Russia that they wanted with Hillary Clinton as president because she lost. The whole war against Russia was postponed.
This is the plan they always had.
Speaker 4: This has been in the works Going back to at least 2015, 2016, it was somewhat set back by the election of Donald Trump in the United States because Trump was not a globalist, But he was opposed to many of these schemes. What we're seeing now is a merger Of the Great Reset, the Green New Deal, the policies on on COVID, and a number of other aspects of of Government policy which is being directed not on behalf of sovereign governments, but against sovereign governments. And this is why we're seeing the situation in Ukraine. And what is Russia's crime? Putin has asked for 20 years for security guarantees for Russia.
And these guarantees include no further eastward expansion of NATO, Which was promised to Gorbachev in 1990, which was promised again to Yeltsin in 1994. And yet NATO keeps moving to the very borders of Russia. Now they're talking about, as Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, did at the Munich Security Conference, That Ukraine has the right to develop nuclear weapons. And for Putin, Russia's security is directly threatened by two aspects of the Ukraine situation. The corruption, which includes prominent Nazis in positions of the defense and security forces of Ukraine, The European Union actually acknowledged in 2018 that the defense and security forces of Ukraine were heavily infiltrated by Neo Nazis marching behind the banners of the Ukrainian SS which joined Hitler in the 19 forties.
And when Putin said you need of Ukraine, he was called crazy. But the idea of a government, corrupt government, being used not To defend the Ukrainian people's freedom and sovereignty. And I hate to see what's being done to the people of Ukraine right now in this war, But they are the cannon fodder for a NATO and US and British drive to bring down Russia and China. Why? Because they're the 2 leading powers in the world that oppose giving up sovereignty to this Green New Deal and the Great Reset.
Speaker 5: I I don't have too many remedies. The the remedies have to be discussed through dialogue by the stakeholders of our global system, But, I just see the need for such a dialogue and I see the need for action. I see the need for a great reset.
Speaker 1: To what extent would a reset be brought about by a change in the White House, the election of Joe Biden, for instance?
Speaker 5: I don't know. We first, we shouldn't speculate about the outcome of the election. We will see, beginning of November and some we we We can. In any case, we can and the World Economic Forum, is a very open and And as a open platform to integrate everybody who is willing to address those issues In a spirit, which means, to exercise here, true global citizenship.
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
2024 Election interference is happening. https://t.co/iQhTgF5aNM
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a trial to remove my name from the ballot. I believe the 2024 election is crucial because our country is being destroyed by people who may hate it. If they succeed in removing my name, there will never be a free election in America again. We are at risk of becoming a dictatorship where the president is chosen for us. This is our final chance to save America. The 2024 election is less than a year away, and it's an opportunity to stand against tyrants and make America great again. Winning is essential for our country's survival and to make it greater than ever before.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trial is currently taking place to try and illegally remove my name from the ballot. I often say that 2020 four will be the most important election in the history of our country. The reason for that and that statement is that our country is being destroyed by people who have no idea what they're doing or even worse, they may very well have an idea. They may hate our country and they may want to see it destroyed. But it may also be the last election we ever have.
If this election doesn't work, if this election is rigged and stolen, if bad things happen, our country will not survive. If Crooked Joe and the Democrats get away with removing my name from the ballot. Then there will never be a free election in America again. We will have become a dictatorship where your president is chosen for you, you will no longer have a vote or certainly won't have a meaningful vote and you could say frankly that that has already begun. This truly is our final chance to save America and with the 2024 election now less than 1 year away, this is your chance to take a stand against tyrants that support the one and only movement that can save our country and make America great again, we must win in 2024.
If we don't win, we will not have a country. If we do win, we will make America greater than it's ever been before.
@arneeeeeeeeeee - arneeeeeeeee
Please watch this #pizzagate #Trump2024 https://t.co/WlRXJ6k6If
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if the theory about saving the world from a satanic cult of pedophiles and cannibals is something Speaker 1 supports. Speaker 1 responds that they haven't heard of it, but questions whether it is a bad or good thing. They express their willingness to help save the world from problems and put themselves out there. Speaker 1 believes they are currently saving the world from a radical left philosophy that could destroy the country, and if the country falls, the rest of the world will follow suit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The theory it is this belief that you are secretly saving the world from this satanic cult of pedophiles and cannibals. Does that sound like something you are behind?
Speaker 1: Well, I haven't I haven't heard that, but, is that supposed to be a bad thing or a good thing? I mean, you know. If, if I can help save the world from problems, I'm Willing to do it. I'm willing to put myself out there, and we are, actually. We're saving the world from a radical left philosophy that will destroy this country.
And when this country is gone, the rest of the world will follow. The rest of the world will try and that's
reSee.it AI Summary
The Republican-controlled House is pushing for expanded spying powers on Americans, allowing the government to collect intelligence on non-U.S. persons. However, this provision is being used to indirectly spy on Americans by claiming they were monitoring foreign nationals. This controversial move raises concerns about privacy and potential abuse. Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) is at the center of this issue, and it is set to be renewed. Rather than improving it, the proposed changes would expand surveillance capabilities, including monitoring internet communications in public places. Watch Glenn Greenwald's detailed explanation for more information.
@simonateba - Simon Ateba
BREAKING - SPYING ON TRUMP - CONTROVERSIAL FLOOR VOTE IN WASHINGTON TODAY TO MASSIVELY SPY ON AMERICANS AHEAD OF 2024 ELECTIONS: I found someone who could explain this better than me, @ggreenwald of @SystemUpdate_. I post part of what he said here and add the link to his Rumble channel to watch everything there, follow him, and subscribe to his channel. Believe me when I say that this is the most important piece of news that you might watch today, an attempt by the Republican-controlled House to give President Biden and the deep state the power to expand their spying reach on Americans. This explains how they were able to spy on Trump and might again spy on his campaign ahead of the next election. Here is Glenn Greenwald's channel on Rumble, I recommend you watch him, follow him, and subscribe to his channel. https://rumble.com/v40s5v1-system-update-196.html. At the center of it all is Section 702 in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows the U.S. government to collect intelligence information on non-U.S. persons located outside the United States, often through the surveillance of internet communications. But that section is being indirectly used to spy on Americans right here in the United States by claiming that they were simply spying on a foreign national who was communicating with an American, which technically means, they spied on that American by accident. An ex-husband, an ex-wife, a jilted girlfriend or boyfriend, a political opponent, a member of Congress, 'a white supremacist', a 'domestic terrorist' who was on the US Capitol, everyone. They renew it every five years. The last time was in 2018 when Trump was in power, and now it's time to renew it again. But rather than improve it, they are making it worse by expanding the ability to spy on everyone, everywhere, including using WIFI at coffee shops, restaurants, libraries, and schools, everywhere. One would therefore think that since Trump is leading in the polls and they claim he will be Hitler 2.0, they will not want to hand over these powers to him. No, not Washington... But I'm not as good as Glenn Greenwald to explain this, so watch him to the very end.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the issue of illegal domestic spying by the US government on its own citizens. They explain that after 9/11, the powers of the NSA, CIA, and FBI were focused on the domestic population, despite assurances that it would be temporary. The speaker highlights the bipartisan effort to extend and expand these spying powers, including the potential expansion of surveillance on public Wi-Fi networks. They also mention the history of abuse and the need for reforms. Senator Mike Lee is mentioned as a proponent of limiting these powers. The speaker concludes by discussing the possibility of bipartisan reform and the need to stop the extension of these powers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's probably no issue on which I have focused more as a journalist than the issue of illegal, warrantless domestic spying in mass perpetrated by the United States government on the American population. And as we've recounted before the history of the US security state embedded in it was the idea that the US security state will always be directed exclusively to foreign countries and never directed inward. And it was after 911 when really for the first time in mass, The US security state, the powers of the NSA and the CIA and the FBI started being focused overwhelmingly on the domestic population. Obviously, the FBI had abused its as domestic before, but never in the systemic way that 911 permitted. And it wasn't just in a year or 2 when fears were high when that happened.
That was when those fears were exploited to justify the imposition of these new powers, and yet they never went away. The assurance at the time was, oh, don't worry, this is very temporary just to get this crisis of terrorism under control. And once we do, we gonna give those powers back. And of course, that never happened. Then we're gonna have senator Mike Lee on in just a little bit because it's time for a very important new vote about whether to extend these warrantless spying powers used against American citizens for another 5 years, and there's a real chance this time just stop it.
But at the same time, there's a bipartisan effort underway in conjunction with the White House, the Biden White House, not only to extend those powers, but to dangerously expand them even further than they've ever been up until this point. Just to give you the critical context for what we're talking about here, this was the story that happened just a month, basically, maybe a little bit longer after I first began working as a journalist and writing about politics, and it became the thing on which I focused for the next year and a half. It was an expose by the New York Times at the end of December 2005. The headline of which was Bush lets the United States spy on callers without courts. And you can see the headline up on that screen if we go ahead and put that up there.
The core of the story was exactly this, that for the first time, the United States government was ordered by the White House to spy on the calls of American citizens without going to courts first, without getting warrants. That's the fundamental safeguard of the 4th Amendment to the United States. Yes, of course, our government sometimes needs to spy on citizens. But they have to go first to get a warrant in order to justify that. And yet in the weeks months up 911.
As the article points out, the government under George Bush authorized it to spy on Americans' international calls, or emails with no warrant, quote, months after the September 11th attacks, President Bush secretly authorized the NSA to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States to search for evidence of terrorist activity without the court approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying according to government officials. Under a presidential order signed in 2002, the intelligence agency has monitored the international telephone calls and international emails of hundreds, perhaps thousands of people inside the United States without warrants over the past 3 years. And, of course, their effort was their claim to be to stop terrorism. And we, of course, found out that it was used in far more pervasive ways than that, quote, under a presidential order signed in 2002, the intelligence agency has monitored the international telephone calls and international email messages of hundreds, perhaps thousands of people. The previously undisclosed decision to permit some eavesdropping inside the country without court approval was a major shift in American intelligence gathering practices, particularly for the NSA whose mission is to bioncommunications abroad.
As a result, some officials familiar with the continuing operation have questioned whether the surveillance has stretched, if not crossed constitutional limits on legal searches, quote, this is really a sea change, senate former senior official who specializes in national security quote. It's almost a mainstream of the a mainstay of this country that the NSA only does foreign searches. And so many of the whistleblowers of the war on terror who came forward to reveal incriminating secrets to journalists, including Edward Snowden, but many others as well, did so primarily because they were so offended. Having been inculcated with this principle that the NSA was never going to be turned on the American citizenry that it has now been and in such a gray violation of the constitution in his most basic sense that that was why so many of them came forward. In Snowden's case, it was also because James Clapper got caught lying directly to the senate by denying the mass spying programs that Edward Snowden had the evidence of in his hands.
In 2008, when the Democrats controlled the house under the house leadership of Nancy Pelosi, Instead of holding George Bush and Dick Cheney and those officials liable, accountable for having fight on Americans without the warrants required by the constitutional law. They instead enacted a law designed to retroactively legalize that program, knowing that it was likely a democratic president was coming in 2009. We were at the end of the Bush administration. There you see it. Controversial FISA Amendments Act of 2008 signed into law.
One of the things it did was it gave immunity to the telecoms for having handed over huge amounts of our data to the government without any subpoena or warrants, even though that was illegal. It just immunized telecoms, which of course were financing both parties. But what it also did was enact section 702, which allows the government to spy on the international calls of Americans and read their emails without warrants As long as they claim that the American is not the target. Oh, we were just targeting a foreign national, but just so happened we kept reading the emails of this American citizen. And we therefore, we didn't need a warrant under section 702.
Because of how controversial it was, it was intended to expire 5 years. It expired and then was renewed under president Obama in 2013. It was renewed again in 2018 under Donald Trump by a bipartisan vote. And now it's time to have it renewed again. Earlier this year, the New York Times anticipated this fight.
And there you see the headline, security agencies and congress brace for fight over expiring surveillance law. Let's get that headline up on the screen. Quote, skepticism about security agencies and surveillance by Republicans allied with former president Donald Trump may bolster traditional liberal and libertarian critics of a post September 11th law. Attacking the Russia investigation, mister Trump has stoked his supporters to distrust national security agencies and FISA. Applications for court orders to wiretap Carter Page, a former adviser to his campaign, were riddled with errors and omissions, an inspector general found.
Think out the New York Times goes out of its way to defend the FBI. A FBI lawyer actually plead guilty for those omissions to try and get a warrant to spy on Donald Trump's former campaign advisor, Carter Page, and has been caught abusing this law over and over. That's the reason why so many Republicans are now joining traditional liberals in wanting reforms on this law. Quote, The House Judiciary Committee, which shares jurisdiction over FISA with the Intelligence Committee, is led by representative Jim Jordan, an Ohio Republican and ally. He told Fox News last fall, quote, I think we should not even reauthorize FISA, which is going to come in the next congress.
This is why these changes on the American right ushered in by Donald Trump are so crucial. They opened up for the first time since the end of World War II, a very serious faction that is highly skeptical of the US security state. And that makes real reform quite plausible, quite viable. And that's the reason why we're gonna have a Republican senator on in just a few minutes, not a democratic senator talk about the urgency of limiting these spying powers. Here from Lawfare in May 2023, and Lawfare is one of the most pro FBI, pro NSA sites around unsealed surveillance court document reveals how much there has been of misuse of these seven zero two powers, these warrantless buying powers.
Over and over these powers have been misused. On May 19th, the Ford Intelligence Surveillance Court, which oversees the FBI surveillance authority known as 702, unsealed memorandum opinion in order revealing that the FBI improperly used the 702 database 278,000 times. The FBI improperly queried crime victims, suspects in the January 6th insurrection, And people arrested at protests stemming from the police killing of George Floyd in according to unsealed documents. So both left and right anti establishment protests. That's always who the targets are, of US security state abuses, spying abuses.
Another case included a batch query of 19,000 donors to an unnamed and ultimately unsuccessful congressional candidate. Now, in 2013, in 2018, what happened was the house of Representatives on a bipartisan basis overcame opposition, and they just renewed this law with no reforms. What's happening now is even more pernicious. As I said, when we had congress with Massillon, our show, he warned us, he said, I'm on the judiciary committee. There's bipartisan support court in the Judiciary Committee for imposing serious limits on this power and not renewing it until it has that.
The intelligence committee, however, and these are my words, which is always captured by the intelligence community. They always make sure to staff the intelligence community with the loyalists to the CIA and the FBI. The Republicans have Michael McCall there, who's a big supporter of the war in Ukraine, a big CIA supporter. He supports wars all the time. Congressman Massie warned that the Intelligence Committee, which has dual authority over this process is preparing a bill that will extend, if not strengthen these powers without any reforms.
And that's exactly what happening here from these WillGen blog which covers these issues very very much in detail. The House Intelligence Committee Fiserv reform bill would greatly expand class of businesses and other entities required to assist in FISA seven zero two surveillance. So they're issuing this warning That it's not just this time that the bill might extend it for another 5 years with 0 reforms despite how much evidence there is of how often the FBI abuses it. Instead, they seem like they're looking to expand it even more. Now, What has happened is every single time there's a cycle of this bill, I'll tell you the same exact thing happens.
First you have enormous evidence that the FBI and other agencies have radically abused these powers. And And then they go to the congress and they say we need these legislative authorities renewed. We need to keep spying on Americans with no warrants. And some members of congress say, what do you mean you need a extension of these powers? We have all this evidence that you've Been abusing it, not in a few cases, but in huge numbers.
Why would we give you these powers again? And they always say the same thing. Oh! The FBI has instituted reforms to prevent it from happening again. And then they get the powers and again there's evidence that they abused it.
So Christopher Wray, the FBI director, was before the senate and Mike Lee, who you're about to hear from, questioned him on exactly this point. You always say the FBI has now reformed these powers. Why should we believe you this time?
Speaker 1: Don't worry about it. We've got this taken care of. We've got new procedures. It's going to be different now. It's never different.
You haven't changed. And you keep referring to these policies, these new procedures. We haven't seen that. We're not even allowed to have access to it. And we have absolutely no reason to trust you because you haven't behaved in a manner that's trustworthy.
You can't even, as we sit here, Tell me that people who intentionally, knowingly, deliberately violated the civil rights of American citizens, That they were fired or that they had their security clearance stripped. Now in 2022, FBI And other agencies searched Americans' communications over 200,000 times, only 16 of which were evidence of a crime only searches that returned information. I'd like to ask you to give a yes or a no answer to these questions. Were the 3 related batch queries consisting of over 23,000 separate queries relating to the events of January 6th, Were those evidence of a crime only queries? Yes or no?
Speaker 2: I don't know the answer to that.
Speaker 1: The answer is no. I do know the answer. The answer is no. With a 121 queries for the activists arrested in connection with the George Floyd protests, here in Washington, DC, evidence of a crime only queries?
Speaker 2: Those were noncompliant queries. And again, they all predate the reforms that we've put in place. Switch.
Speaker 0: So non compliant queries mean illegal queries. What he's saying is those are ways the FBI used these spying powers, warrantless spying powers, non compliantly, meaning it didn't comply with the law, meaning it was illegal, it was a crime. And they always try and describe it that way. Oh, these are just noncompliant. And Senator Lee went through all these different instances of the FBI director admitting that the FBI abused his powers in these non compliant ways, meaning illegal ways.
Let's listen to the rest.
Speaker 1: Is that a work requirement Were prohibition relating donors to a political campaign? The answer there is no. Washington DC evidence of a crime only queries?
Speaker 2: Those were noncompliant queries. And again, they all predate the reforms that we've put in place, which
Speaker 1: before we There will go other reforms that Every other FBI directors just told me about every darn year, if I may. 19,000 donors to a political campaign, the answer there is no. What about the query for a sitting member of Congress? The answer there is no. What about the query involving a US senator, which for all we know could be any one of us?
The answer is no. And so what what does that tell me? Well, what I'm hearing and what these data points all point to is that a warrant requirement Where prohibition relating to quote unquote evidence of a crime only queries would not have been, something that would have prevented any of the most egregious examples Of the abuse that we've seen under Section 702. So the FBI is already required to obtain a court order in some circumstances before accessing the contents of Americans' communications in the context of 702.
Speaker 2: Are you talking about the so called F2? Yes. How many times has it been triggered? Yes.
Speaker 0: This has always been the crux of the issue. The Bush administration said, you know what? The reason we're gonna start spying on Americans, The reality is there's nothing easier than going to get a warrant. If you go and look at how many times the FISA court, which is the court, the secret court, it meets in secret, it's inside the justice department, it has only the justice department there, only the FBI there. And as a result, it's a bizarre court.
It's a court that is intended to rubber stamp the government's request for warrants. It has given and approved warrants in something like 99.8% of the cases since this process began. And the only times it rejected it, it didn't say no. It just said, oh, you have some more information you have to provide in your form. Come back to us.
And then it rubber stamps it. There's nothing easier in the world than the FBI spying on Americans by telling the FISA court it needs to because there's no one there to contest what the FBI is saying. The all the incentives are for the FISA judge to say yes because if a judge ever says no on a warrant and something happens, the FBI will go and say they have blood on their hands. It's a rubber stamping process as it is. And the FBI insists and the executive branch insists that it can't even comply with those very minimal safeguards.
And, of course, when you give up agency spying power with no safeguards, You know it's going to happen. It's going to abuse it continuously. And that is what the FBI has been doing since the very first moment it got its hands on these powers. Here is one of the experts who follows this legislation as closely as anybody, Elizabeth Goethein, who's with the Brennan Center. And she went on to Twitter yesterday along with Senator Lee and others and warn that this House Intelligence Bill presented by the Republican majority together with Democrats who are on that committee House Intelligence Committee section 702, quote, reform bill, which is scheduled for a floor vote as soon as tomorrow, is the biggest expansion of surveillance inside the United States since the Patriot Act.
That's what that Senate the House Intelligence Committee is trying to do. Because they put people on that committee captured by the Intelligence Committee. Here is Senator Ron Wyden, who has long time been a defender of civil liberties, he but from the Democratic Party, he's the one who asked James Clapper in 2013, whether the NSA was spying on American citizens en masse, and that's what provoked Clapper to eye, which in turn is what caused Edward Snowden to come forward. Senator Wyden said the same thing, quote, right now, the government has to go through a phone or email provider to spy using 702. The House Intelligence Bill would change that by forcing anyone providing public Wi Fi, hotels, coffee shops, bookstores, to unknowingly help the government do this without a warrant.
And he goes and says the potential for abuse here is staggering. Now the last time this was brought up for a vote was in 2018. And Republicans are split on it because you had a lot of Republicans who were concerned about FBI CIA spying because they had seen it be used illegally, weaponized as part of the election. And there was no way the Republicans could get This legislation passed, the executive branch always wants this warrantless spying. These weren't warrantless spying powers extended.
The FBI, the CIA, The NSA starts saying, oh, if you don't give us these spying powers, you're all gonna die in a terrorist attack. Today, 45 former intelligence agency, operatives of the intelligence agencies. Many of whom were the same people who signed that letter by 51 former intelligence operatives right before the 2020 election spreading the lie that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. Today Signed a letter warning that we were all gonna be in danger. If we didn't extend this immediately.
This was exactly argument they used in 2018. And you had enough Democrats including Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff at the time claiming that Donald Trump was a fascist and he knew Hitler, voting to give the Trump administration, the executive branch, the same warrantless spying programs. So we'll see if 2023 and 2024 is going to be different. There seems to be a lot more of a momentum to stop at this time. Although there's a clear movement underway working with the Biden White House in conjunction with the Intelligence Committee to do something worse, not just extend it, but to make it even more pervasive.
These spying powers even more potent with no safeguards. Now Mike Lee is a United state senator. He is the senior senator representing the state of Utah as a Republican. It's an office he's held since 2011. And as part of his position on the Senate Judiciary Committee, as well as with his substantial background in constitutional law, including clerking for the US Supreme Court, Sonderly has long been a vocal proponent of individual privacy and an opponent of unlimited domestic government spying, particularly without warrants, his 702 permit.
So he signed he sounded the alarm. He was one of the people to sound the alarm today about just how dangerous this new House Intelligence legislation would be if it were passed. And we are delighted to welcome him to the program to talk to us about all of this tonight. We have him by audio only, but You're able to hear him perfectly. Senator, thank you so much for taking the time to talk to us.
Speaker 1: Oh, thank you, Glenn. It's good to be with you.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Good to have you. So I had on my program last week, Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who, like you, is an opponent of renewing these authorities without reforms. And he was warning. He said, look, there's a lot of bipartisan support for reforms on the House Judiciary Committee.
The problem is the House Intelligence Committee seems to be working very hard to extend it without reforms. And it turns out their bill would do something far worse than that. Far worse than simply extending it. You sounded the alarm. What is it about this bill that you find so problematic?
Speaker 1: Okay, so the House Intelligence Committee bill, that HIPC, as we come to that committee, is doubly bad. Number 1, it extends out the Authorization period for FISA seven zero two by 9 years. To my knowledge, we've never had an authorization for FISA that long. Number 2, It does so without any generally applicable warrant requirement. It purports to have a warrant requirement for a narrow subset Of backdoor searches on American citizens, but they've written it in such a way that it would have practically zero effect.
It wouldn't really have any practical effect because they can always get around this very narrow type of search, Where it's focused exclusively on evidence of a crime with nothing having to do with an actual Security investigation. But it's so much worse than that. The 3rd big problem with the HIPSI Bill, and this is the granddaddy of them all, is found at section 504 of the HIPAA bill. In section 504, this would vastly magnify The domestic surveillance capability and the ability of our intelligence gathering agencies To collect warrantless surveillance on American citizens without probable cause in the United States by expanding the reach of 702 Into things like public Wi Fis at hotels, restaurants, coffee shops, bookstores, anything like that. All of a sudden, the intelligence gathering agencies could go to those entities that offer public Wi Fi service, demand without a warrant, All the data that that, that crossed through those public Wi Fi stations.
And they they could do that without ever going to court, without ever having to demonstrate Probable cause or otherwise going through the steps of acquiring a warrant. This is bad. They're claiming that they're fixing the problem And they're actually making the problem worse. And this is appalling. This is why this bill is something I've been describing as a Trojan horse, Appropriately so.
And it needs to be dismissed as such.
Speaker 0: Senator, one of the, experiences that I've had as a journalist, most frustrating, is I've been following this program since it was first revealed in 2005, this warrantless eavesdropping program. And the history of it is always the same. You have years of reports, and I don't mean media reports, but inside the government, inspectors general and the like, proving abuse of these spying powers, major abuse. And then every year when the FBI comes or the US government, the executive branch comes congress and says we need a renewal of it immediately, no reforms. They're asked, well, you you keep abusing the law.
Why would it be different? And every And they say, oh, no. Don't worry. We instituted internal reforms that will prevent any abuses this time. And then the cycle repeats itself.
We showed your exchange part of it with FBI director Christopher Wray. But what are some of the abuses, a, that you've seen recently? And then, b, that you are concerned about it for the law in that form gets enacted?
Speaker 1: Okay. So some of the abuses that we know happened that have been verified include doing backdoor searches On at least 1 member of the United States Senate, at least 1 member of the US House of Representatives, backdoor searches Also, just to the tune of hundreds of thousands, some of the said we're now up to millions of documented, warrantless Backdoor searches on American citizens. And I assume, you know what I mean when I refer to that, a backdoor search on the seven zero two database Is directed at communication, electronic communications stored by NSA, collected under 702, ostensibly Under the auspices of a foreign intelligence surveillance investigation. But when they've got the substantive contents of what an American said of those conversations, If they go in and search specifically for what the Americans said using that American's phone number or email address or something like that, that ought to require a warrant. Now under their procedures, they're not supposed to be able to do that willy nilly just for kicks and giggles, and yet they do.
And they have done it millions and millions of times. As you correctly pointed out, I'm glad you showed some of the exchange I had with Christopher Wray. When I cross examined him on that last week, it did not go particularly well for him. In part because he had the audacity to make the same darn argument these guys have been making to me for 13 years, which is to say we've got internal procedures That will make sure that those are not misused. And yet every year they say the same thing and every year more of these illegal searches happen.
And in fact, I caught him pointing out some of the examples that he pointed to for some of these illegal searches. He said these All happened before we adopted these procedures. We went in and looked those up after the hearing and we concluded that There were several instances that he pointed to that actually had happened after his most recent policies. As far as the hypothetical ones, the ones that we can't yet prove, But that I fear either are occurring regularly or might well happen in the future or some combination of those 2 things. Involve what we might call reverse targeting.
You can't target an American citizen to be the target Under FISA seven zero two. That has to be a foreign national operating on foreign soil. But you can incidentally collect communications With the foreign national who is on foreign soil of an American citizen on American soil. And so it's entirely possible what they could be doing or what they could do in the future Is reverse target by saying, oh, look, we know that Glenn talks to foreign nationals A, B, C and D. Let's open up a a FISA seven zero two, set of searches, an investigation under FISA seven zero two On individuals a, b, c, and d, knowing that Glenn talks to them.
On that basis, they pull in any conversations you may have with those foreign nationals And then they can go back in and do a backdoor search of your communications with them when that may have been their intent all along is to get your communications without a warrant.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Exactly. That this was, of course, something that was talked about a lot when it was first enacted in 2008. They said, no. Don't worry.
There's provisions in there that prevent us from doing this, and yet they've gotten caught doing it so many times. And the question of intent, What are they really looking for? The people with whom I'm speaking and they just happen to be finding mine all the time? Or they're really just looking through mine in the backdoor kinda way is almost impossible to prove. But what we know is they end up spying on Americans and reading our communications with no warrants of any kind.
Let me ask you about the politics of this. I remember right when we did this Snowden reporting there was a lot of momentum for bipartisan reform. It was sponsored by Justin Amash and John Conyers in the house. It picked up a lot of support quickly. And at the last second, president Obama got Nancy Pelosi to whip just enough democratic votes to sabotage reform.
And there's an article in foreign policy, the headline of which is how Nancy Pelosi saved the NSA. There's always been this bipartisan component, this willingness on a bipartisan basis to extend these powers. With the kind of increased skepticism of the US security state, the FBI, the CIA, and the like, on the part of large parts of the Republican Party and the American right after they saw what they were willing to do in our elections. Is there a possible
Speaker 1: Yeah. Look, I think there is a plausible chance here that we could get something actually done, because of the fact that they're running out of excuses. All of their arguments that they've used in the past have turned out to be red herrings. And so I think we could get it done this time. Let me tell you what worries me most About what could interfere with that this time around.
Number 1, the fact that they've Put in a temporary extension into the National Defense Authorization Act that would extend this thing to, I think, April 19, 2024 Is troubling. We need to stop that. We need to push back on that in part because, There is a certification that's done by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that I'm told once it's put in place, it can run for 3 65 continuous days. Even if Pfizer expires during that time period. That suggests that this extension, taking this thing to April 19, 2024, I believe, could in practical effect End up being an extension until April 19, 2025.
We've got to stop that from happening and and get rid of that language. And if we can get that out, replace it at a fair minimum. If we want a short term extension so that we can iron out exactly what the details ought to look like. I mean, my first choice would be to just pass The, bill that came out of the House Judiciary Committee bill. If we can't get that done before we have to leave for Christmas, we we could consider extending it, But only with the additional caveat not found
Biden WH Seeks to Renew & Expand Domestic Spying—With Sen. Mike Lee. The US’ Long History of Silencing Israel Critics—on Campus, Media, & Beyond | SYSTEM UPDATE #196
Become part of our Locals community: https://greenwald.locals.com/ Follow Glenn: Twitter: https://twitter.com/ggreenwald Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glenn.11.greenwald/ Facebook: https://www.
rumble.com
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here is the greatest criminal conspiracy and the coverup ever devised to overthrow the United States government in American history. https://t.co/9Zu0yBheEd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 1.5 million fraudulent votes were counted in Pennsylvania, including votes from dead voters, early received ballots, and electronic spikes from voting machines. There were also 205,000 more votes than registered voters and 682,000 ballots processed without oversight. In Georgia, there were 66,248 underage voters, 10,315 dead voters, and 2,500 convicted felons who voted. Additionally, nearly 200,000 fraudulent votes were inserted into the count. Democrats are trying to cover up this fraud and change the narrative. Independent groups have found millions of fraudulently changed or deleted votes across the country in favor of Joe Biden. Governors and secretaries of state have participated in the cover-up by removing accessible information and preventing conservative audits. Arizona had 36,400 noncitizens voting and experienced phantom spikes benefiting Biden. This information comes from publicly available sources.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Had over 1,500,000 fraudulent votes counted, and the spread is less than 82,000 votes. These fraudulent votes come from dead voters, ballots that were received before they were supposedly mailed out, and over 330,000 electronic spikes from the voting machine. Vote, 205,000 over votes, meaning there were 205,000 more votes than registered voters, and 682,000 ballots that were vocally processed without any oversight whatsoever. More than 1,500,000 votes in Pennsylvania is apparently what it took for Joe Biden to steal the state. Vote.
Georgia has a similar phenomenon that Democrats are failing to account for. 66,248 underage voters voted in Georgia. 10,315 dead people voted. 2,500 convicted felons voted. Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted into the vote count instantaneously.
4,500 votes come from unregistered voters. These numbers show vote clear pattern that a variety of types of fraud occurred in this election and that Democrats are desperately trying to cover it up. They're going to great lengths to change the narrative of the election fraud in an effort to run up the clock to January 20, 2020. In addition to president Trump's vote team. Many independent groups have completed research on the fraud, and the results are staggering.
Totaling across the country, millions of votes were fraudulently covered up, changed, or deleted in favor of Joe Biden. The governors and secretaries of state have actively participated in the cover removing information from their website that is normally easily accessible to the public and depriving conservatives a chance to audit or review the results are just some of their tactics. In Arizona, the final result is only a difference of 10,457, yet 36,400 noncitizens voted in the state. Vote. Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from the voting machines to the tune of roughly 50,000 additional votes going to Joe Biden.
Vote. These numbers come from information that is publicly available, whether from the Secretary of State's website before the content was removed or from the raw data that was pushed out on election night.
@MediaRival - Darrin McBreen
Obama and the CIA had foreign Intel Agencies Spy On Trump's 2016 Campaign, Setting Russiagate Trap. Here's a flashback look at the Deep State and establishment media hype over the now "debunked" Trump Russian Collusion. https://t.co/5624hJ2h4W
Video Transcript AI Summary
Breaking news: ABC News reports that Michael Flynn is cooperating with the Mueller team and will testify that Donald Trump directed contact with the Russians during his campaign. This revelation has led to speculation about Trump's possible impeachment. CNN also reported on a dossier that claimed Russian intelligence had compromising information on Trump. Trump vehemently denied the allegations, calling it fake news. The dossier included salacious claims about Trump's activities in a Moscow hotel room. Despite ongoing investigations, there is no concrete evidence yet of collusion between Trump and Russia. However, some believe that Trump's associates may face legal consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Breaking news.
Speaker 1: Oh, my god. Oh, breaking news. ABC News Brian Ross is reporting Michael Flynn promised full cooperation to the Mueller team and is prepared to testify that as a candidate, Donald Trump directed to make contact with the Russians.
Speaker 2: Wow. I'm confident now, even more so than I have been throughout the last Fear that this nightmare presidency of Donald John Trump will end prematurely and end soon.
Speaker 3: If we discover that Donald Trump or his advocates Played a role in helping to devise strategy. If they are the ones who came up with Crooked Hillary
Speaker 0: Crooked Hillary.
Speaker 3: I think that is Something that would put the question squarely on the table whether or not he should be impeached.
Speaker 4: It supposedly happened in 2013, The year Trump posted the miss universe pageant in Moscow.
Speaker 5: The bombshell burst Tuesday evening when CNN reported the president-elect and president Obama were briefed on the matter last week. The report included unsubstantiated claims that Russian intelligence compiled a dossier on mister Trump during visits to Moscow.
Speaker 4: He dismissed outright the very idea that he would take part in the sorted acts described In the report, he denied everything. He called it all fake news.
Speaker 6: The 35 page dossier on the so called Russian connection to Trump With some very salacious allegations, including unsubstantiated claims about Trump in a Moscow hotel room, was not completed Until just before the election, and then provided to journalists, the Clinton campaign, and the FBI.
Speaker 7: It claims that Donald Trump once visited Russia, Stayed in the Ritz Carlton in Moscow and then hired prostitutes to perform a golden shower, and that Russia might have the whole thing on tape.
Speaker 8: There were Surveillance cameras in this room because
Speaker 9: the building is wired and that the FSB has this because they automatically have cameras in the room And they caught this happening.
Speaker 4: Donald Trump engaged in perverted acts with prostitutes.
Speaker 8: Trump immediately denied the report.
Speaker 4: I'd like to ask you about your big Russian pee pee party.
Speaker 10: No. No. I am not talking about the pee pee because it didn't happen.
Speaker 5: From there, the president-elect lit into the news media again. He condemned BuzzFeed.
Speaker 0: It's a failing pile of garbage writing it. I think they're gonna suffer the and
Speaker 5: he accused CNN of being fake news and brushed off persistent attempts by its correspondent to ask a question. Later, CNN's parent company, Time Warner, defended its reporting, and BuzzFeed said it published what it called a news worthy document.
Speaker 4: It claims Trump set out to defile the suite because president Obama and the first family had once stayed there, and Trump, quote, hated the Obamas.
Speaker 11: Everything that that I had written in the, you know, in in the months prior to, that dossier coming out Was almost identical to what the CIA had written because we're intelligence officers. This is what we do.
Speaker 10: That corroboration based on intercepted communications has given US Intelligence and law enforcement, quote, greater confidence in the credibility of some aspects of the dossier.
Speaker 12: The most salacious and unverified claims are that the Russian Secret Service or FSB secretly filmed mister Trump with prostitutes in this Moscow hotel room 3 years ago.
Speaker 6: Allegations to special counsel continues to investigate, George.
Speaker 13: And so far, it is us as American citizens. It is us in the press who are connecting the dots on the Story, we're figuring this out.
Speaker 14: Did the Trump campaign, did the candidate at the heart of it conspire with Russia to subvert American democracy? Or and Does Russia have some kind of leverage over Donald Trump?
Speaker 1: If this BuzzFeed News report is true, then we are likely on our way to possible impeachment proceedings.
Speaker 14: If this story is true, we must begin impeachment proceedings.
Speaker 0: This is suborning perjury. I think there's no question it's an impeachable offense.
Speaker 1: Man, At that point, we are in high crimes and misdemeanor, and we are in impeachment territory.
Speaker 3: This president needs to be impeached. Impeachment is
Speaker 14: the remedy. I mean, the president Can't
Speaker 4: It's the only remedy.
Speaker 0: The spirit of what Trump did is clearly treasonous. This is moving into perjury, false statements, and even in a Potentially treason.
Speaker 4: There's outright treason. I mean, there is no question.
Speaker 7: I think he's feeling the noose around his neck.
Speaker 5: The the noose is tightening,
Speaker 0: and
Speaker 13: I think they're shocked That the noose is tightening.
Speaker 14: That he feels the noose is tightening. The noose is tightening.
Speaker 1: The sound of hoof beats of all those investigations Catching up with Donald Trump must be loud in his ears.
Speaker 0: He may be the 1st president, in quite some time to face the real prospect of jail time.
Speaker 13: People might go to jail
Speaker 10: You're exactly right.
Speaker 14: For the
Speaker 13: rest of their lives.
Speaker 1: I think they're all going to jail. Well, I think they're all gonna end up together in prison, and maybe that's a good question.
Speaker 0: He has no idea that Right. He's going down.
Speaker 2: You're confident that at least some Trump associates will wind up in jail? If I was betting, I would say yes.
Speaker 14: Donald Trump has been a Russian intelligence asset since 1987.
Speaker 2: We are at war with Russia. The nation and all of our freedoms hang by a thread, And the military apparatus of this country is about to be handed over to scum who are beholden to scum, Russian scum. Infowars, tomorrow's news, today.
@RonPaul - Ron Paul
Trump Was Right -- They Were Spying On Him! Watch the whole show here: https://rumble.com/v4ddpji-coup-obamas-spooks-outsourced-spying-on-trump-to-foreign-services.html?mref=jcwo5&mc=2sdbb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses a report revealing that the CIA and foreign allies spied on Trump's team, triggering the Russia collusion hoax. The mainstream media's lack of coverage on this important story is attributed to their loss of trust. The US intelligence community, including the CIA, allegedly mobilized foreign intelligence agencies to target Trump's advisers before the supposed triggering meeting. The FBI's investigation was believed to have started after an Australian intelligence official informed US officials, but it is now revealed that the US intelligence community initiated contact with the foreign agencies. John Brennan, the former CIA director, is implicated in this alleged coup to prevent Trump from becoming president. The video suggests that the media's strategy is to ignore these revelations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, anywhere else, a report like this would have been at the top of the news because it's a massively important story. But in today's day and age, with the mainstream media being what it is and there's a reason why nobody trusts it at all anymore, it's relegated to what used to be sort of, oh, that's just a blog, but now these are sub stacks and and this particular one, there are 2 that we're collaborating on the story, Public and Racket, and our our, our viewers will know the authors behind it, Michael Shellenberger, Nat Taibbi, and Alex Guttentag, these are the 3 that were heavily involved in the Twitter files. They're the ones who expose the fact, that the US government was colluding with the social media to censor the American people, which was illegal would have been illegal for them to do. Well, here's a blockbuster story, that came out.
CIA had foreign allies spy on Trump team, as you said, doctor Paul, triggering Russia collusion hoax, say sources. Now if we go to the next clip from this piece so essentially, what had happened is originally, the, the the reporting was originally that a Trump campaign adviser spoke to an Australian former diplomat, and everyone remembers the story. It said something about how we've got some dirt on Hillary or something thing from the Russians, and that triggered the FBI investigation. Well, that wasn't the case. Multiple credible sources tell Public and Racket, those are the 2 different substacks, that the United States intelligence community, including the CIA, illegally mobilized foreign intelligence agencies to target Trump advisers long before the summer of 16, that's when the meeting was supposed to take place in the summer of 16, which triggered it.
Go to the next one now. The official story, as I mentioned, until now had been that the FBI began investigating only after the Australian intelligence official told US officials. So if it originated overseas and it came back to the US intelligence community, well, that would have been different. But in truth, as they found out in the reporting, the US intelligence agency, in, intelligence community asked the 5 eyes, and you pointed out the former British Empire Spook Agencies, they asked them they initiated the contact. They asked them to surveil Trump's associates and share that intel back with the US agencies.
Now go back to and let's look at the face of the person who would most likely spearheaded this. The person on the right, John Brennan, this is the guy behind what you rightly called doctor Paul a coup. This US intelligence community trying to prevent president Trump from becoming president Trump, and this is what they did. It's astonishing.
Speaker 1: We're seeing bits and Put pieces in places where people are throwing their hands up and say, You're a bunch of liars.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And, you know, and, and we're we're not gonna buy this. And, it's I think I think that's why even if The truth comes out like this, and it doesn't get a lot of attention elsewhere. You you we're we're actually you know, when Taibi does it and a few others, When they bring that up, they're more credible.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: You know, if it were out there, some, you know, in the regular meeting, people say, Well, these are the guys that lied it's a lot
Speaker 0: of stress all the time.
Speaker 1: Why should we lie? Why should we believe it? But you know what's their I think their technique now is not confronting this But to ignore it the best I can.
Speaker 0: That's what they wanna do. Yeah. But you remember, you know, in the early days of Trump, and I think it was even in the campaign, when Trump was saying, they're spying on my campaign. They're spying on my campaign. And the other side, the Obama people, including the spooks, they would go on and say, see, this man is clearly paranoid.
He's he's got conspiracy theories about people spying on him. Well, in fact, it turns out they were spying on him, and that's a that's a fact. And we know they've done this in history, we know that the FBI spied on Martin Luther King Junior and caused him a lot of distress. They spied on Ernest Ernest Hemingway and probably caused him to blow his brains out. This is what they do, but they were spying on the campaign.
And guess what? It was John Brennan himself who was up to his eyeballs in this. Now put on the next one. This will tell you, the details about it this is the one, after public and racket had been told here we go. One more forward if we can.
After public and racket, these are 2 substacks that printed about it, had been told that president Barack Obama CIA director John Brennan had identified 26 Trump associates for the 5 eyes to target a source. Their source confirmed that the intelligence community had identified them as people to bump, which means to make contact with or manipulate. They were targets of our own intelligence community and law enforcement. Targets for collection and misinformation. So they were the ones doing the misinformation.
It really looks to me like John Brennan should be in jail. You know? Yeah. This is a coup.
Speaker 1: You know, this started out, in a more subtle way, but look at how many people are involved. These various countries are involved, And then they get involved really in more recently into the media and into, social media, and, the propaganda machine they have is Unbelievable.
Coup! Obama's Spooks Outsourced Spying On Trump To FOREIGN Services!
A new bombshell report by Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger shows that the Obama Administration intelligence agencies used their foreign counterparts to spy on the Trump campaign and its personnel
rumble.com
@StephenGardnerX - Stephen Gardner
🚨BREAKING🚨Deep State ALREADY RIGGING The Election Against Trump Explained! https://t.co/NDLrH050PA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mike Benz, a former State Department official and cybersecurity expert, discusses how the US government has weaponized its power to control media and censor citizens. He explains that the foreign policy establishment, including the State Department, CIA, and Pentagon, has historically used these tactics against foreign governments but has now turned them on the American people. Benz outlines the chronology of how the government established censorship centers within agencies like the Global Engagement Center and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to control social media and suppress populist political movements. He also raises questions about the government's role in COVID-19 censorship and the origins of the virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Next to the US border crisis, one of the top things in people's minds are, you know, are our elections free and fair? Also, are we being censored by our own government? If you live in Brazil, the answer is yes. If you live in the United States, I don't know. That's why I have special guest Mike Benz with me.
Mike, thank you so much for joining me today. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me.
Speaker 0: So just some brat some, background on you. You're a former state department official with the Trump administration, cybersecurity expert. You've been interviewed, by Vivek Ramaswamy, Tucker Carlson. I believe you just crossed 34,000,000 views on that. What what I wanna know as a as somebody who specializes in cyber, help my audience understand how the government is being weaponized against us and specifically against, conservatives?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, this basically the the story here is about the US government's foreign policy establishment turning the powers that it has to be able to control media abroad, basically towards the citizens of the homeland. So we in the US since World War 2 have had a foreign policy establishment deputized with a department of dirty tricks power to be able to do things to foreign governments and foreign citizens that they're not allowed to do to our own citizens because, ostensibly, it's for the benefit of us living here. For example, the Central Intelligence Agency has a power, to to overthrow governments, to bribe foreign media organizations, to set up its own media organizations. This is this is a power they've had for a very long time.
There's there was Wizzner's Wurlitzer, you know, so called in the 19 forties fifties, which Frank Wizzner got, you know, sort of godfather of the CIA bragging that there were 800 different proprietary news outlets that the that the Central Intelligence Agency was able to play like a Wurlitzer, like an organ to create a symphony of news cycles in whatever region of the globe they want to pipe in. We established things like Voice of America, Radio Free Liberty, Radio Free Europe, Radio Free Asia, to have, you know, state department and CIA news propaganda piped into other countries around the world. And it's the job of the US state department to essentially put its thumb on the press of every election around the world so that the right parties rise to power to advance US national interests so that we can pry open their market so that our companies, so that Coke and co yo, so that Coke and Pepsi can export there, so that we can have our own oil and gas companies, you know, exploit the, the shale in the region. Same thing, you know, with the the rare earth minerals, with the precious metals, with, you know, the copper, the aluminum, everything that it takes to make a modern economy, it requires the plots of dirt that exist, you know, primarily outside the US.
So we have this empire managerial class in this in this country. The Pentagon, the state department, and our intelligence services. They face outside. They're not supposed to face in. And they're deputized to be able to do these nasty things to foreign countries for the greater good essentially of the Americans who live here, so that we have cheap gas, so that we have lots of jobs because our multinational companies are are have favorable operating conditions because foreign governments essentially do their bidding because they can sick the state department and Pentagon and CIA on them essentially.
The issue was is the 2016 election created a crisis in the foreign policy establishment. Now it goes back a little bit before that. Really, this goes back to the Crimea annexation and the state department orchestrated overthrow of the Ukrainian government in 2014. The state department, the CIA, the DOD, all backed the Maidan coup against the Ukrainian government, but they were not expecting the countercoup when the Donbas broke away in Eastern Ukraine and Crimea broke away and declared itself in an in a referendum voted for by its own people to join the Russian Federation. NATO was not prepared for that counter coup.
And at that point, they despite piping $5,000,000,000 worth of US taxpayer money into Ukrainian CIA and state department cutouts, it was still not enough to sway the hearts and minds of people in Eastern Ukraine to join NATO rather than to join Russia. And this this was also a pattern that was playing out across Central and Eastern Europe from Germany through Moldova, through through Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia. And in 2014, NATO declared a basically new doctrine called the hybrid warfare doctrine that basically said control over the media is now a very important military concern because the media determines elections, elections determine the military posture of a country. And so, basically, the military needs to make a much stronger move into the media. And that was something that was not all that controversial at the time in the United States because it was Central and Eastern Europe.
It was as Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, you know, and, Germany who the c you know, was was the the central pivot point of the Cold War. If you if you recall, the sort of spy versus spy of control over Germany. The issue was when Brexit happened in June 2016, Western Europe then became you know, the the threat was now the hybrid warfare doctrine has to extend into Western Europe. And then when Trump won the 2016 election, in November 2016, it was it became a sort of fait accompli that the US government needed to move into control over social media because now elections were being determined not by legacy media outlets picking the winner winners or losers, with those legacy media outlets having essentially a backdoor relationship with the intelligence services, with the state department, with the Pentagon. But I can go over the history of that if you're if you're curious.
But essentially what happened was is in there there's there's 2 things that deter that determine news. There's there's propaganda, there's saturation of our message, and there's censorship, which is the suppression of counter messages. When the power for censorship was discovered essentially in 2016, 2017 through the use of artificial intelligence technology, like natural language processing, these AI censorship techniques, and the ability to just hire tons and tons and tons of these content moderators, especially starting in Europe where it was not all that controversial because they don't have a first amendment. The foreign policy establishment established a plan to basically create a censorship center nerve center within the United States to be able to quarterback censorship to stop the rise of populous political movements all across NATO, here in the US with the Trump movement, also with the Bernie Sanders left in 2016 because left wing anti imperialism is also something that's, you know, they can they can be flanked from both the right and the left, but the the populist right has been much more ascended electorally. But basically, this this censorship, this government censorship apparatus was installed by the foreign policy establishment to stop Trumpism in the US, to stop the Brexit folks in, in the UK, to stop Marine Le Pen in France, to stop Matteo Salvini in Italy, to stop the Vox party in Spain.
It's all across NATO. And the issue is is they thought that if they continue to lose elections, the entire international rules based order would fall apart. And so it became a national security imperative to kill free speech on the Internet.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: And I can go through the chronology if you want of of of of agency by agency how this all happened, if you want.
Speaker 0: Yeah. My brain my brain is trying to understand all of this because, you know, as as I've covered the Russia, Ukraine war, I I've seen more and more how the United States uses NATO to really control these other European countries. But the the infiltration through social media companies, this is new to me. Yes. I I would love from myself and the audience to better understand the chronology of that.
Speaker 1: Right. So what they wanted was an ability to kill social media parties and social media movements and proxies in election here in the US, there is really only one government agency that had a license to do something similar, and that was something called the Global Engagement Center out of the state department. So, again, the the the job of the state department is to rule the rest of the world. That is to now the so, again, when you think about the state department, always think about the the interagency. The the the state department is inseparable from the CIA.
It's inseparable from the DOD. Those 3 nodes always move together. They're coordinated through an interagency process. And so because the state department, the ambassador there, and the senior staff at for over for the desk of a particular region, they represent the overt side of US diplomacy. They're the ones who are doing the negotiations.
They're the ones who are threatening, sending a delegation to threaten the government or to offer incentives to the foreign government. They're the ones they that's the that's the oversight of the iceberg, so to speak, our overt diplomacy. But we have covert diplomacy. We have covert action that's that's going on in the region. And the state department has to be able to to quarterback both the overt and covert roles, and those covert roles are delegated to the the Central Intelligence Agency with support from from the Pentagon.
So we created a censorship capacity within the US government in the state department in 2014 through something called the Global Engagement Center, engaging globally, in in the tech space. Initially, under a national security predicate, around the around the time that ISIS was said to be recruiting on Facebook and Twitter. This was this was supposedly this novel threat on social media that ISIS was on the rise, and they were recruiting impressionable young Americans. This was, you know, we had the first homegrown ISIS attack, Garland, Texas, if you remember.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: 20 2015. And, you know, there was a lot of there's a lot of strangeness about that event, by the way, that that came out that I'll just leave as as an aside. But, essentially, the the state department was permitted to be able to liaise with Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and all the other platforms to advise them on the different accounts that they should censor and take down, the different narratives that should be suppressed, the different word key keyword databases that should be algorithmically throttled, because they were leveraging a DARPA technology. It was called natural language processing. There had been 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars poured into the r and d on this AI censorship technique, which involved network mapping, social media interlinkages.
So you may have seen, for example, just in the news or in various reports, what some of these social media network graphs look like, where it'll have, you know, a circle and it'll have someone's name on it, someone's account, and then it'll have a line to 3 different circles that that person connects to, and that will have those will all have lines to 10 other accounts that they connect to. And it'll look like a big spherical ball with with nodes and links that describe the the social media network map of a particular movement. Now at the time, this was this was developed by the Pentagon for use by the state department to be able to then tell the social media platforms everyone in this network gets nuked. That was 2014 to 2016. The problem was when the foreign policy establishment decided and declared effectively that this tanks from tanks to tweets doctrine, this was the NATO doctrine.
They formally call this from tanks to tweets, that NATO was extending its mandate from tanks to tweets. And when when that when that was set in motion, that technique of network mapping narratives and and, terrorist groups was then set about on political groups and domestic political groups, populous groups in Europe and and the Trump movement here in the US. So it's it's it's really not so much about conservatives and the GOP because there's a civil war that broke out with the 2016 election. It's important to keep this in mind. Trump did not just defeat Hillary Clinton.
He didn't defeat just the Clinton dynasty. He defeated the Bush dynasty. And the Bush dynasty had been the dynasty, you know, that had lorded over the GOP for multiple Bushes. Right? I mean, we had 8 years of of, you know, of George w.
We had we had basically 12 years of of George senior because not only was he the president of the United States from, you know, 88 to to 92, he was the vice president for from from 1980 to 1988, and he was the CIA director before that. And this this foreign policy and what he what was he doing at the CIA before he was the CIA director? He was the CIA oil intelligence liaison to Latin America and to Saudi Arabia. So so there's this GOP power base extending from the military, the energy to the Chamber of Commerce spheres that the populist right went to war with when when nat populist nationalist conservatives rallied around Trump and said, we care more about America first than than about essentially what we're doing around the world and what the rest of the world is doing. Now at the time, they didn't really understand the trip wire they were setting off, which was which was how much of a threat that concept of focusing on domestic priorities over foreign policy truly represented, which is why there became an immediate alliance between the Bush blob wing of the foreign policy.
Now the blob is is the sort of the Obama administration's moniker for the foreign policy establishment.
Speaker 0: So if
Speaker 1: you hear me use that term, that's what blob means. It just means the foreign policy establishment.
Speaker 0: K. But, but, you
Speaker 1: know, so what happened was is, for example, in the in the so the the groups that that were the the primary consensus builders for how to establish a government role in US censorship because they they recognize the size of the task that this would involve what they call the whole of society effort that would tie together 4 different categories of institutions. Government institutions, private sector institutions like the social media platforms, civil society institutions, which is the NGO swarm army, the university centers, the nonprofits, the foundations, and all the different community and activist groups they need to onboard, as well as the media institutions. So, again, whole society means 4 different categories, government, private sector, civil society, and media. And what they what they what they said early on in their own internal meetings, which I've I've put a million times and is all over my my Twitter account, is they constructed this idea that in order to get a whole society in motion, they need to have a government quarterback. A they wouldn't you know, the Stanford one of the one of the main universities associated with the censorship apparatus.
It doesn't have the clout on its own to go into a $1,000,000,000,000 corporation like Google and tell them what policies to to do. They don't they can't just march into the media and get news cycles there. But they're very good at, you know, network mapping and being able to do some of the the the technical, you know, you know, construction of that sphere, for example, that that they want Google to censor and Facebook and YouTube. They all have their own roles. But that quarterback role, only the government would have the clout to be able to do that herding of cats process.
So in so in early 2017, they set about in these stakeholder meetings the question of how they could actually pull this off within the US government given that there is a first amendment. And given the restrictions on the foreign policy establishment institutions that they had under their control. So they were contemplating, well, you know, the best place would be the state department's global engagement center. We already have the network there, but they said, oh, that's foreign facing. We couldn't really we couldn't really park it there.
So then they they they considered the parking it at the Central Intelligence Agency. But not only does that have a foreign facing predicate and you can't just sic the CIA on domestic tweets about mail in ballots, but, also, doing this as a clandestine operation is is is is very, very difficult. In the 19 eighties, the intelligence community developed a technique for using front companies and and public facing NGOs to serve as the liaison point to be able to greatly expand the scale of a clandestine action. Because if you are, say, running a color revolution and you need hundreds of thousands of people to take to the streets in order to overthrow their government. For example, with the Arab Spring in Egypt and Tunisia and, you know, this is this is our our tried and true tactic.
You do need 100 of thousands of people involved. Those people can't all have security clearances. Those people can't, you know, all have top secret special compartmentalized information, you know, sort of, you know, buying on a need to know basis about their particular role in it. So these pro democracy groups, and these pro democracy NGOs popped up and were capacity built by taxpayer funded state department funds to be able to create these pro democracy NGOs that would serve to you know, as a sort of open sourcing of what at root was a CIA or state department, you know, classified initiative. So in this case, you know, they said, well, we can't really make this in a classical sort of intelligence type thing because it's going to involve Facebook, Google, Twitter, The New York Times, The Washington Post, the Poynter Institute fact checking network.
It's gonna involve all these so we we need it to serve the above. So I said we can't do as a CIA thing. They said, well, you know, the FBI would be a great place to park this because the FBI has a domestic it is a domestic intelligence agency, but the issue is the intel the the FBI is the intelligence arm of the justice department. And what we're what we're targeting here is not law breaking. It's not illegal to tweet, you know, about about, your your support for Donald Trump.
So he said there's only one other domestic intelligence equity in the US, and we have 17 intelligence agencies. Only 2 of them are domestic. The other one is DHS. So they said, perfect. DHS has has a real we can do a really cute thing out DHS, which is we can combine the foreign facing classical type of media control, activities that are that are delegated to the CIA with the domestic jurisdiction of the FBI because DHS is not attached to the justice department.
It's its own independent intelligence agency. And so in 2018, they established an office within within DHS called CISA. The now they gave it they didn't call it the censorship agency. They did a very, very dirty, dirty, dirty trick that frankly they should never be forgiven for, and frankly they should be wholly disbanded on the basis of. Because it's one of the craziest scandals in American history.
What they did is they by giving themselves this dull, boring name, CISA, the cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency, which its founder Chris Krebs said, you know, we we called it that because we just we we just care so much about security. We put it in in our name twice. It had nothing to do with that. What they did is they said because at the time, there was no offensive capability in the online realm to be able to censor. The only cyber capacity that had any legitimacy, that had any funding, that had any legal mandate in this country was cybersecurity.
That was all you could do online as a government agency. That was the only offensive action you could take. So they said, well, you know, we can't just call it the censorship agency. We're gonna call this cybersecurity, but we're gonna do a couple of cute things in the definition in order to in order to get away with it. We're going to say that misdis and malinformation on social media is a cybersecurity attack on US critical infrastructure.
It's cyber because it's online, the social media posts, and critical infrastructure. Our elections are critical infrastructure, Public health, so we can censor whatever you say in an election cycle. Public health is critical infrastructure. We so we can censor whatever you say about COVID 19. Do you oppose vaccines?
Do you oppose masks? Do you oppose mandates? Are you casting conspiracy theories on Tony Fauci that undermine public faith and confidence in in our in our public health regime? Well, that's an attack on the critic that's a cyber attack on the critical infrastructure of our public health. So they did this with every issue, and it ballooned into saying, well, you know, if you if you talk about the open border, well, now you are, you know, you're jeopardizing you know, this is a cyber threat to you to US critical infrastructure, on on on immigration issues, on energy issues, on the Ukraine war.
It became this Eldorado gold mine, a god button to be able to control the rise and fall of political movements. And so it started at DHS. And when DHS got away with it for 4 straight years from 2018 to 2022, they got overconfident and they started being more and more explicit about it. And this is where they they they rolled out the disinformation governance board. If you remember at the time, they they were saying, well, it's not it's not, you know, it's not the censorship agency, and that's that's true.
It was not the ministry of truth. The the Ministry of Truth was CISA, but but this but CISA and and the and the other DHS, it's called INA, intelligence analysis. The other, intelligence equities at DHS had sprawled and spawned into such a Leviathan monster with so many touch points into so many different whole of society actors that it by 2022, they needed a management board for the bureaucracy of the Ministry of Truth that had already existed for 4 years there. That's what the disinformation governance board was, by the way. Anyway but at by that point, they they the whole society expanded to whole of government.
So the FBI set up censorship offices, the state department, the Pentagon, the National Science Foundation, issue by issue, HHS did, FDA did. It became something that was said to be necessary to control to censor social media in the name of democracy, which is basically a CIA watchword for for, regime change of a government. So I know that's a lot there, and I'll so I'll just stop.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. This is, like a fire hose. Couple of things. Number 1, everything you just said, you you just, like, described my entire channel, which leads me to believe I'm probably being censored and and monitored by the government because of the topics I cover.
And number 2, wasn't Chris Krebs and CISA the the the group and the person that said the 2020 election was the most safe and secure election in American history?
Speaker 1: Yes. And there's a lot of nastiness there. Because think about the conflict of interest there. On January 6, 2017, the last act of Obama's outgoing DHS secretary, Jeh Johnson, was to federalize national elections and put their administration in the hands of DHS. This is the executive order passed 2 weeks before Trump was inaugurated.
And then tragically, the Trump administration ratified that order under under John Kelly in March 2017 even though all 50 states had opposed it because it was usurping the traditional independence the states have, over over their independent administration of elections. But DHS was basically given federal control over over election administration, And they were the ones who were supposed to be safeguarding the, the US from election fraud. And they were simultaneously put in charge of censorship of tens of millions of of of tweets and and YouTube videos and Facebook posts, Discord, Twitch, they went after 15 different social media platforms. By their own math, 22,000,000 tweets were, were targeted for censorship, under under CISA just in the 5 months, lead up to the 2020 election. 22,000,000.
That's just that's just tweets alone. And then add in all the the 14 other platforms, you know, which included major forms like Reddit. So the same agency that was supposed to be guarding the hen house was the executioner of anyone who had questions about the about what happened inside the head the hen house, so to speak. Now this is particularly nasty because what what what CISA, what DHS did, what Chris Krebs' office did is they rung the necks and threatened government pressure and crisis PR and advertiser boycotts, using essentially this whole society model as as the threat behind it on all the tech platforms, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube. And they sent these attack dogs called the election integrity partnership on them as well as as well as many others that I I can get into if you're curious for more detail, To to threaten them to all in lockstep install a brand new terms of service violation policy in the run to 2020 called delegitimization.
So and what delegitimization meant is that any information that anyone posted on social media for 5 months in the run up to the to the 2020 election that delegitimized a hypothetical upcoming red mirage blue shift event. That is a an event where Trump appeared to win on election day, the red mirage, but it would shift blue in the in the subsequent days because of mail in ballots. They knew that that would look illegitimate. Nothing like that had ever happened in this country. This country's never used mass mail in mass mail in ballots like that.
It had been a contentious issue since the civil war in 18/62. You know, it it was an election, you know, an election year scandal around mail in ballots. The the democrats had been highly, you know, opposing them for for years. But then suddenly, that became, that became the way that we were going to vote starting basically in between April June 2020. And what DHS did is is they said, well, listen.
If Biden's gonna win, it's going to be through this red mirage blue shift. It's gonna look really, really fishy at the time. And there's and the perceptions of illegitimacy are going to be a nightmare, to to litigate. It's gonna be a a nightmare, you know, shadow hanging over the the the Biden government. It's going to what happens in the in that, you know, inter month period of if there if there is a crisis sense of of perceived illegitimacy is going to potentially get out of our control.
And they know this because the foreign policy establishment's job is to induce election crises when when it orchestrates color revolutions abroad. You know, when we declare when we say, you know, you know, Lukashenko didn't really win the the election. Even though he got 85% of the vote on paper, we declared our CIA backed candidate during the summer of 2020 20 in Belarus. We said, oh, our our candidate actually won, and then we used our NGO blob, our swarm army, our paid army to take to the streets to try to overthrow the government. This is how we overthrew the government of Ukraine in 2014.
You know, we, you know, illegitimate government, take to the streets, yada yada. So what they did is they precensored 5 months ahead of the 2020 election any social media post that that that, quote, delegitimized the idea of mail in ballots not being safe and secure, that delegitimized the, you know, leaving leaving, early voting drop boxes open for 6 to 8 months, that delegitimized any questions about the administration of electronic voting machines, that any any questions about ballot tabulation issues. So the same the same DHS nucleus, which which was staffed to the gills with CIA and NSA and DOD folks, that was that was basically the mind creation of this of the foreign policy establishment's response to losing the 2016 election was put in charge of the technical administration of the voting machines, the the technical administration of the of the 50 state, you know, sort of administration of the of the election. And in protecting the legitimacy at the tech and administering the legitimacy at the technical level, we're in charge of censoring any questions about their administration of the election. I mean, that is that is the perfect, you know, blank check for stealing an election that you could ever conceive of.
So I don't know. I'm not as technically versed on what, you know, what happened. There's a lot of open questions on the on the technical fraud issues. So I but my domain is on the censorship one, but there's so much smoke from the censorship side that it, let's just say, it begs a lot of questions.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, even even now, I I was told through Facebook that anything that I put up about the election might be taken down between now November, that they're not going to boost any posts about politics. They and now they do this in countries around the world. Then you have Mark Zuckerberg randomly handing over $400,000,000 and most of that ends up over 90% of it ends up in the hands of people getting Joe Biden elected. So there there's just, like and, the COVID thing.
You know, none of us were allowed to openly talk about COVID, have no opinion on COVID. If you wanted to, you know, promote something that fit the narrative, it's almost like you would be boosted, but I had videos that were demonetized. I had videos that I can see right in the analytics that they didn't show me to people, and, like, there's nothing I can do about it except for just in my heart know that I'm being screwed over because they're trying to control the the truth that I'm able to share with my audience.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The government put its boot on the neck of the tech platforms to do that, and the wing of the government is the nastiest wing. It's the it's the it's the it's the sections of the US government that for 80 years in this country has had a license to do crimes, a license to do dirty tricks, a license to rig elections, a license to rig media. This is, you know, the the foreign policy establishment is able to do that to, you know, to to foreign countries. And, essentially, after the 2016 election, they they simply imported it here.
And that was exactly those sections that that did that for COVID censorship. So, you know, a great example of this is is who was it who was doing this network mapping, for misinformation communities and and getting the social media companies to take that all down. Well, you know, one of the chief actors in the space was a group called the Virality Project, which was the literally the the second name of the Election Integrity Partnership. It's the it's the same institutions, Stanford University's, the Stanford Internet Observatory, which was, you know, the technical operations there came came from the CIA. And and the head of the department was, Obama's state department ambassador to Russia.
You know, just to understand how these ops are are interconnected. You know, the University of Washington Center For Informed Public, which was, you know, run by someone who basically, had serviced the Pentagon for social media network mapping, for crisis informatics for for, the whole career there. The it was the Atlantic Council, which is 7 CIA directors on its board and gets annual funding every year from the Pentagon, the state department, and CIA cutouts like the National Endowment for Democracy. And it was Graphica. And Graphica got has gotten $7,000,000 in Pentagon contracts.
They do social media network mapping for the Pentagon to be able to suppress the rise of insurgent groups in places where the Pentagon's operating. And they came straight out of the Minerva Initiative, which is the Pentagon's Psychological Warfare Research Center. So you literally had all 4 of these institutions were CIA, Pentagon, state department controlled, civil society cutouts. And, you know, it begs a lot of questions about the role of those same agencies in the COVID origin story. There's a lot of very strange aspects of the role of the DOD and CIA in in the COVID origin story.
Avril Haines, for example, was one of the stars of event 201, which was the simulation jointly held by the Johns Hopkins. You know, Saint Johns Hopkins is is a is a huge attache is at the university level of the of the defense department, and it's jointly held by them, though, the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. And it brought together the head of Chinese intelligence. It brought together Avril Haines, who at the time was deputy director of the CIA under Obama, and she's now the boss of bosses at the CIA. As she's the ODM she's the director of National Intelligence.
So yeah. And, you know, what she was doing at a coronavirus simulator with a segment on how to social how to censor social media conspiracy theories about the outbreak of a of a China based bat coronavirus in October 2019, just 2 months before said virus from said region, from said origins. You know, what was the CIA director doing, you know, coordinating a whole society censorship response to the outbreak of a virus that wouldn't break out for for 60 more days? What was USAID, which is one of the classic conduits for CIA clandestine activity? Why was USAID giving a $53,000,000 grant to the Wuhan lab?
What was DARPA doing funding the the sub, you know, technology for the for the spike protein virus that ends up being the main thing that gives COVID its damage. You know, what was the Rocky Mountain Laboratory doing, you know, as the as the precursor conduit to that when the Rocky Mountain Laboratory was basically you know, is is there's a lot of credible evidence around that very same lab in in Montana having a very strong role in the in the construction of tick borne viruses, in that were that were souped up through through gain of function and deployed on on Cuba in the 19 sixties and in the Korean war in the 19 fifties. I mean, the the the Pentagon fingerprints over the over the COVID origin story looks very bad when you when you see that actually the censorship of COVID came from them as well. It looks looks like they're covering up their own crimes. And just one last thing I'll say on that, who were the first movers of of COVID?
What were the very first institutions to censor COVID origins? Graphica, this firm I just described to you, chief strategy officer, 25 years in the CIA, $77,000,000 of Pentagon funding coming coming into COVID. And they they literally were formally in house at the Pentagon Psychological Warfare Research Center. This same firm began sent began writing white papers and memos and doing work to censor social media narratives about COVID origins on December December 16th, 2019. That's just 4 days after the pneumonia like symptoms broke out.
Now when I broke that story, they responded and said, actually, we started in January 2020. We had a 30 day look back. Now they didn't provide any receipts on that, but that's still even by their own words. This is before coronavirus was even called is it it's wasn't even called COVID 19 yet. It hadn't come to America yet.
It was this was still just 1 month then. Within 1 month, the Pentagon's psychological operations warfare unit is deployed to create these vast sprawling network maps of who on social media is asking inconvenient questions about about a lab origin? What the hell is the Pentagon's SIOP center doing deployed like a like a white blood cell to censor first amendment protected speech by the by the citizens funding the Pentagon about what the Pentagon was really doing.
Speaker 0: You're blowing my mind. I know I know I know you have to jump on to an another interview, but, yeah, go go ahead. I this is
Speaker 1: I was gonna say and you know who GraphQL was partnered with on that? The NATO Center of Excellence, which was the exact hybrid warfare group set up remember when I told you when NATO declared the tanks to tweets doctrine? Well and they set down all this censorship institutional infrastructure to coordinate with Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and all those those private sector, tech social media companies after the Crimea annexation in 2014. They set down all these centers of excellence across NATO. Well, Graphik was partnered with the NATO Center of Excellence.
You know, when it was when it was doing this work. And this is, and again, that was a psychological warfare. The center of excellence, the center of excellence in strategic communications, in in control over the communications infrastructure in NATO NATO countries. This was it was explicitly set up as a censorship center to be able to censor Russian propaganda over hearts and minds in Eastern Europe so that we could fold them into NATO. But that exact same psyops center for the for the Ukraine war and for for controlling the the fate of elections and European parliamentary elections to stop the rise of populist groups.
Those are the same centers running COVID, the military centers.
Speaker 0: Oh my gosh. Okay. We're gonna have to have you back on, Mike. I know you've gotta jump. I only got to 2 of my 8 questions, but this this has been mind blowing.
I hope my audience appreciates all the research you've done. If Trump can get back into the White House, are you gonna be a part of his administration?
Speaker 1: We'll see. You know, my my role is, you know, as a political appointee, I you know, what what they're doing to Trump is absolutely is absolutely criminal, and in history, we'll remember. You know? Hopefully, we you know, there's a there'll be accountability for for what's been done. You know?
I consider myself to be fundamentally, you know, apolitical on on on this and that, you know, my job is to fight for the principles of free speech on the Internet and, you know, my foundation, Foundation for Freedom Online. So everyone you can best place to follow me is on Twitter, you know, at x@mikebencyber. That's all one word, at mikebencyber. Also have a Rumble channel, Mikebencyber. I'm I'm highly active there.
If you want my daily thoughts on on all of this and all the receipts and and things, stories that I post, just at Mike Ben Cyber on, on Twitter.
Speaker 0: Okay. I'll put that down. I know you gotta get on to another show. Thank you so much. I hope you have a great rest of your day.
@MattWallace888 - Matt Wallace
🚨🚨🚨 INSANE NEW ANGLE OF TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT RELEASED ⚠️ What do you notice? https://t.co/4XbSJxfDbL
@FinanceWolves - WolvesAndFinance
PROOF of a Second Shooter. Trump's in Trouble! https://t.co/piyUO8N057
@TheQuartering - TheQuartering
Newsweek Romania interviews Trump Assassin. (Before Youtube Deletes it) https://t.co/Pu2LClwk5s
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
BREAKING: There are FIVE ASSASSINATION TEAMS targeting TRUMP. Rep @MattGaetz explains this new developing information. #assasinationattempt @JackPosobiec Watch this Human Events Ep.👇 https://rumble.com/v5fj15g-human-events-with-jack-posobiec.html WATCH RAV 24/7 ▶ bit.ly/plutorav
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, an individual from Homeland Security informed his office before the second assassination attempt that there were 5 known assassination teams in the United States: 3 inspired by foreign governments and 2 domestic. This individual was concerned that President Trump's force protection was insufficient.
The speaker clarified that all 5 teams were targeting Trump. This raised questions about why security teams were being pulled from Trump's detail to be assigned to Joe Biden, John Bolton, and others, despite the threat level to Trump being substantially higher. The speaker also claimed that requests from the Trump detail and campaign for more security were being ignored.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of Homeland Security in my office before the second assassination attempt saying that, what he has assessed is that there are 5 known assassination teams in the United States. 3 inspired by other governments, 2 that are here that are known domestic assassination teams. And with that, this individual was coming to me concerned that the force protection around president Trump even prior to that sec second assassination attempt was not sufficient for what it needed to be. And the coordination at that level, at the dignitary protection level, is like the the bare minimum that we have to do to keep our presidents, our presidential candidates safe while they're on the trail. So there are 5 I just wanted to follow-up.
5 assassination teams, are they all targeting Trump? Is it other officials? No. I should have been clear about that. Five teams that we know are targeting Trump.
And so that raises real questions about why certain, teams were being pulled off of the Trump deal detail and put on, for example, the Joe Biden detail. Now we don't want anything bad to happen to Joe Biden, but at the same time, the threat envelope for her was substantially different than the threat envelope around president Trump, and it would not have necessitated pulling assets away from the Trump detail for the Joe Biden detail or the John Bolton detail or any other details that were beefed up. At the same time, the requests from the Trump detail and from the Trump campaign for more security were going unanswered.
HUMAN EVENTS DAILY WITH GUEST HOST JOHN SOLOMON
The real events of the world are out there, but it all depends on who you listen to. Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec brings you unfiltered and factual updates on how current events will impact o
rumble.com
@TulsiGabbard - Tulsi Gabbard 🌺
Here’s what they DON’T want you to know about Trump https://t.co/3hDc0JUtLn
Video Transcript AI Summary
I joined the Democratic Party over 20 years ago, but I left because it no longer defends free speech or represents the values of freedom and liberty. Today, Americans feel they must self-censor, and we are closer to World War III due to the current administration's foreign policy. Many Americans struggle to afford basic necessities, yet the administration claims that "Bidenomics" is working. This election isn't about left versus right; it's about choosing freedom over tyranny. I endorse Donald Trump because he embodies the party of the people and has the courage to confront corruption. A vote for Trump is a vote for a welcoming party, secure borders, and peace. Now is the time for all Americans, regardless of political affiliation, to unite and save our country. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tulsi Gabbard. Aloha. I joined the Democratic party over 20 years ago. I was 21 years old in Hawaii. And at that time, it welcomed people from all different backgrounds, different views, celebrated free speech, and and actually defended those whose speech was being attacked even if they disagreed with their views.
It was a party that stood up for the little guy and represented our values of freedom and liberty in America. I left the Democrat party because now it stands for the exact opposite of all of those things. Free speech is not an absolute. Social media sites, they aren't speaking to millions of people without oversight or regulation, and that has to stop. I never would have imagined as an American and as a soldier that we would live in a country in my lifetime where we would feel like we have to self censor what we say, that we couldn't criticize our own government for fear of them labeling us as a domestic terrorist.
We are closer to the brink of World War 3 and nuclear war today than we ever have been before directly because of the Harris Biden administration's foreign policy. Too many Americans are struggling just to afford the basic necessities of life. No matter how many times we've heard Kamala Harris and Joe Biden over these last 4 years tout and celebrate how Bidenomics has been great for America. America's economy is strong.
Speaker 1: Polls consistently show that a majority of the American people disapprove of the president's handling of the economy. Guess what? It's working.
Speaker 0: Over half of Americans earning a 6 figure salary report that they're actually living paycheck to paycheck. Bionomics is working. It is actually working.
Speaker 1: The number of homeless people on the streets and in shelters across the US increased significantly this year.
Speaker 0: Bionomics is working. It's almost as though they're speaking from an ivory tower saying how great they are and patting themselves on the back while people are struggling for crumbs on the streets. This election really isn't about the left versus the right. It's about choosing. We, the people, choosing our government and the choice between freedom versus tyranny.
Speaker 2: The Department of Defense under Biden's authority quietly codified its right to deploy lethal force against its own citizens on American soil.
Speaker 0: I'm proud to endorse Donald Trump in this election because he is our best hope, specifically because of the leadership that president Trump has brought to transform the Republican Party and bring it back to the party of the people, the party of equality, the party that was founded to fight against and end slavery in this country. It is the party of common sense and the party that is led by a president who has the courage and strength to fight for peace. Mister Trump became the 1st sitting US president to ever set foot inside North Korea yesterday. And this is why they will do everything possible to try to destroy him because this man has the courage to take them on and root out the deep rot of corruption in Washington. My message to my fellow Americans, regardless of your political affiliation, now is the time for us to stand together to save our country.
A vote for president Trump is a vote for a big open tent party that welcomes people from all backgrounds and all walks of life. A vote for president Trump is a vote to express our deep love for our country and our appreciation for our god given rights and freedoms enshrined in the constitution. A vote for president Trump is a vote for secure borders and safe communities, and a vote for president Trump is a vote for peace here in America and around the world. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Paid for by Maha Alliance and not authorized by any candidate or candidates committee.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
The Pentagon is secretly working to sabotage our new Commander-in-Chief, President Donald J. Trump! This is TREASON, plain and simple! From James O’Keefe👇 https://t.co/RFT77jqK4g
Video Transcript AI Summary
I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I have meetings with military leaders about these topics, emphasizing the need for better information sharing and collaboration. I also express concerns about Trump, describing him as a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own gain. I’ve been working with retired generals to address potential threats from his presidency. My past experience includes being an FBI special agent focused on counterintelligence, particularly against Russian and Chinese spies. I was involved in efforts to defeat Trump during the election, writing extensively under various names. I predict he may attempt to extend his term, despite constitutional limits.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I work at this, top consulting firm, and my, client is the Pentagon. So I'm embedded in the Pentagon. I work in the joint staff, which is the, top military commands. Once you lost, I went into the intelligence community, and I became an FBI special agent. So I became a spy on tour.
So I I was a counterintelligence agent, special agent of the FBI.
Speaker 1: What's your, like, overall assessment of Trump?
Speaker 0: He's a sociopathic narcissist who is only interested in advancing his name, his wealth, and his, bank.
Speaker 1: Is there anything you can do to, like, protect American people from stuff that he might try to do?
Speaker 0: I'm, in conversation with a couple of, retired generals to try to explore what we can do.
Speaker 1: There were the the retired generals that you were gonna talk to.
Speaker 0: They're like 1, 2, or 3 star generals and admirals. You probably know maybe 4 stars. So I also have a big day tomorrow, probably the biggest day of all. So we have this huge, huge meeting, with military leaders, in a in a very secure room called the tank. Oh.
So we have a tank meeting with, like, all of the top top leaders in the I see some military tomorrow on my on my topic that I I prepared.
Speaker 1: So it went well.
Speaker 0: I think it went well. You got a sense of information. Keep it between us. Nice. Specialized in artificial intelligence and, emerging technologies like quantum, cybersecurity.
Speaker 1: What's quantum? I haven't heard
Speaker 2: of that.
Speaker 0: Quantum is incredibly fast supercomputing that doesn't yet exist but will soon exist. And when it does, it will it will change, everything.
Speaker 1: HEXAP.
Speaker 0: HEXAP.
Speaker 1: HEXAP. Who's that?
Speaker 0: Secretary of defense. He's cheated on all these wild bones over. He's had some sexual assault malady. He's an alcoholic. There's a lot of observations of him drinking.
You're not a spy. You're not trying to, like, collect information from me.
Speaker 2: I wish I was. That'd be cool.
Speaker 0: Well, with me, literally with a former FBI agent, so you're gonna you can hear me say it. I became an FBI special agent, so I became a spy hunter.
Speaker 3: You're a spy hunter, you say. Well, I'm a spy hunter too, but I'm evidently a better spy hunter than you. Jamie Mannerino describes how he met Hillary Clinton in the mid 2000 when he was here at George Washington University pursuing a master's degree. He then followed Hillary Clinton to the state department where he worked.
Speaker 0: This person I met in college is Hillary Clinton. So I met her in college, and I worked for her since college. And then when she became secretary of state, I followed her to the state department, and that's how I worked there. Yeah. And then she almost won again, right, in 2016.
Speaker 3: So after Jamie Mannarino worked for Hillary Clinton, he then became a special agent here at the FBI to, in his words, catch Russian spies because according to Jamie, he's a spy hunter who specializes in counterintelligence.
Speaker 0: When she lost, I went into the intelligence community, and I became an FBI special agent because I was so upset. I was really angry. I wanted to catch Russian spies, Chinese spies,
Speaker 1: and police.
Speaker 0: They had really affected the outcome I felt in 2016. So I became a spy hunter. So I I was a counterintelligence agent, special agent of the FBI.
Speaker 3: After experiencing 4 years of a volatile economy, America is facing record inflation and a massive threat to the US dollar. Experts are warning the stock market could crash, and we could be facing a recession. In these uncertain times, I recommend gold to my audience, and I trust Fisher Capital as my official gold partner. Not only have my friends at Fisher delivered 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars in gold to their clients, they have also proven to be vigilant and right on the front line, supporting causes that make our country stronger and better. Fisher Capital is the largest corporate partner for Turning Point USA, close friends of OMG.
We appear at their events every December and continues to make sure the new administration is successful. Based on my experience and client testimonials, the team at Fisher Capital consists of some of the most caring and compassionate individuals in finance today. And when you click the link, you will qualify for an exclusive offer only available to my listeners where you can get up to $20,000 of free silver with your qualifying purchase. When you speak with Fisher, make sure to mention that James O'Keefe sent you. Our portfolios are too important to trust to stocks and bonds alone.
Protect yourself with gold today and get it from Fisher Capital. Go to fisheromg.com. That's fisheromg.com. Fisheromg.com. Jamie Mannarino, after working at the state department, got a job as a special advisor to the joint chiefs of staff at the Pentagon as a consultant.
Speaker 0: I work at this, top consulting firm, and my, client is the Pentagon. So I'm embedded in the Pentagon. I work in the joint staff, which is the, top military command.
Speaker 1: So your boss is the joint chief. Is that what you said?
Speaker 0: Yeah. The chairman Did I say
Speaker 2: it right?
Speaker 0: The chairman of the joint chiefs?
Speaker 3: Jamie works at the Pentagon with senior officials there regarding artificial intelligence technologies that, to quote Jamie, don't yet exist. He says they're going to, quote, change everything, and he talks about secret tank meetings there with senior officials. He mentioned one meeting that was going to happen literally the next day.
Speaker 0: Nice. Specialized artificial intelligence and, emerging technologies like quantum, cyber security.
Speaker 1: What's quantum? I haven't heard
Speaker 2: of that.
Speaker 0: Quantum is incredibly fast supercomputing No. That doesn't yet exist but will soon exist. And when it does, it will it will change, everything. So that's that's what I do.
Speaker 3: In their first encounter, our undercover reporter met with Jamie inside this Spanish restaurant where we set up a hidden camera inside. I, myself, was in disguise sitting at the bar, getting camera b, and the spy who hunts spies disclosed all the information about the secret meetings with our undercover journalist.
Speaker 0: So I also have a big day tomorrow, probably the biggest day of all. So we have this huge, huge meeting, with military leaders, in a in a very secure room called the tank. Right. So we have a tank meeting with, like, all of the top top leaders in the I see this military tomorrow on my on my topic that I I prepared.
Speaker 1: Are you serious?
Speaker 0: So I have to go to that meeting, and it's I've waited Wait.
Speaker 1: I'm getting nervous for you.
Speaker 0: Waited 3 years. 3 years. Yeah. It's finally gonna happen. Yeah.
So, like, the chairman of the joint chiefs is the number one military officer for United States.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 0: He's leading the meeting. The vice chairman, the director of the joint staff, every commander of all the command commands. So European Command, African Command, Northern Command, Southern Command, Pacific Command, Cyber Command, Strategic Command, and Trans Transportation. Oh, then special forces. Wow.
Yeah. And space command. So I'll be there. The chiefs of the army, the navy, the air force, the space force, and then OSD policy. So that's that's we're gonna talk about AI.
Speaker 1: So what are your talking points gonna be?
Speaker 0: That, that this is a very serious subject. We need to take it seriously. We need to overcome a lot of bureaucratic obstacles.
Speaker 2: We need
Speaker 0: to work better with partners, international partners. We need to, you know, think creatively to avoid over classification, which really prohibits the ability to share information across very quickly. Everyone has a habit in the intelligence world to over classify something because they don't wanna get in trouble. So once you once you label it as top secret, no one's gonna see it. Oh.
And we have to share this with another country because we need to fight together. Mhmm. And you can't fight together with this kind of inability to share Yeah. War fighting information.
Speaker 3: Jamie, the adviser to the joint chiefs, attacked incoming defense department boss Pete Hegseth, stating Hegseth has a drinking problem and has cheated on all his wives.
Speaker 1: Hegseth. Hegseth. Hegseth.
Speaker 2: Who's that?
Speaker 0: He is a Fox News TV correspondent on Saturday.
Speaker 1: So what is he gonna do in the government?
Speaker 0: Great question.
Speaker 1: What's his job gonna be?
Speaker 0: Secretary of Defense. Yes. It's possible he'll make it in. Yeah. It's possible.
He also has a drinking problem. He's also cheated. He's been married 3 times.
Speaker 1: Oh, no.
Speaker 0: He's cheated on all his wives, all his girlfriends.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 0: He's had some central assault allegations.
Speaker 2: What?
Speaker 0: Yep. This is all the news. Yeah. Yeah. He's an alcoholic.
There's a lot of, like, observations of him drinking.
Speaker 3: Jamie Mannarino, adviser to the Pentagon, former special agent with the FBI, makes it clear what he thinks about incoming president Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: What's your, like, overall assessment of trafficking? Like, if you were to do a broad take on him.
Speaker 0: He's a sociopathic narcissist who is only interested in advancing his name, his wealth, and his, bank. He's had a lifetime of cheating. He's, habitually addicted to lying about about himself to advance his personal interests.
Speaker 2: And my fault.
Speaker 0: And I question his loyalty to anyone but himself.
Speaker 1: Oh, what does it look like for you, you know, moving forward and he's the president? Does that impede what you do? Are you are you concerned about what's gonna happen with that?
Speaker 0: So far, I'll be fine. But, yeah, I'm not gonna lie. I'm a I'm a little worried. But I'll be, for now, fine.
Speaker 1: Is there anything you can do to, like, I don't know, protect American people from stuff that he might try to do?
Speaker 0: I mean, I can't do anything other than my job, which is, you know, protecting American interests on artificial intelligence. Outside of that, I'm, in conversation with a couple of retired generals Mhmm. To try to explore what we can do. I have a meeting in fact tomorrow about it.
Speaker 1: Really?
Speaker 0: Got me opening up myself to you already. Telling you things I wouldn't normally tell.
Speaker 3: In recent months, many of our fellow Americans experienced unprecedented natural disasters and damaged infrastructure, making access to health care essentials impossible at the very moment it was needed. When disaster strikes, being prepared is your best defense. And now I'm excited to share with you the brand new field emergency kit from our friends at the wellness company, the ultimate survival kit for any situation where medical help is not an option. Inside this rugged waterproof case, you'll find essential medications that cover over 60 conditions that you can encounter along with a detailed 85 page doctor written guidebook. This ultimate kit includes amoxicillin, an essential for treating bacterial infections and antivirals and antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, medications that are critical in situations where you're exposed to respiratory viruses or parasites.
And for those facing potentially life threatening allergic reactions, the field kit includes epinephrine, the generic EpiPen, along with vital first aid supplies such as tourniquet and wound and burn treatments. Natural disasters are happening at record rates, so I urge everyone to get the ultimate field emergency kit from our friends and supporters at The Wellness Company by going to TWC. Health/omg. That's TWC. Health/omg.
And now you can save 50% just by using code OMG at checkout. During the next meeting, our undercover reporter asked about how the meeting inside the tank at the Pentagon went.
Speaker 1: So it went well? Were there, I
Speaker 0: think it went well. Very sensitive information. You gotta have to keep it between us. You're gonna go vlog it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I threw in the key. I'm just gonna talk.
Speaker 0: Just so that we over classify. And I think I may have said this to you during exams. We over classify, information. So when we over classify information, it doesn't allow us to actually, you know, communicate effectively when we're actually trying to implement implement some sort of operation. Right?
So we're playing a team sport, and we're both, like, representing a part of the field. Right? And we both have different pieces of information as to how we're gonna do our job to play the game and win. But we're not coordinated because we don't tell each other we need to know information. And then the second one was, you know, the enemy is we're not the only ones using science.
So the enemy is using science too. You're not a spy? You're not trying to, like, collect information from me?
Speaker 2: I'm with that. I'm with that recall.
Speaker 0: Well, with me, literally with a former FBI agent, so you're gonna you're gonna be saying it.
Speaker 3: Jamie Menina reveals he has been working with 2, 3, and 4 star generals to see what they can do about president Trump's upcoming term.
Speaker 1: There were the the retired generals that you were gonna talk to.
Speaker 0: There's many of them, but, this rear admiral, I know there's a major general the army. So those are the 2 that I talk to the most. But, yeah, I talk to quite a few. Like
Speaker 2: a few. In a
Speaker 0: in a whole
Speaker 1: or do I know any of them?
Speaker 0: No. They're like 2, 3 2 1, 2, or 3 star Generals and admirals. You probably know him maybe 4 stars.
Speaker 1: Is there one named Billy? Is that
Speaker 2: a name?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. I he was my former boss. He doesn't know me. Oh.
And he'll probably not be involved in something like this. Oh. But, yeah. He's around. Yeah?
Yeah. Billy is around.
Speaker 3: Jamie Menina told us that he was working day and night to defeat president Trump and that had Kamala won, Jamie would have received a pretty big job.
Speaker 0: I will also confess to you that, over the last, most of the year, since this spring, I was working with these retired generals, retired ambassadors, and this organization, this nonprofit called National Leaders National Security Leaders for America. And what we were doing was we were trying to, like, explain to the American people the national security consequences of another Trump presidency. And I'm usually reluctant to kinda lead with this or explain this because I don't wanna sound too political. This organization tried to defeat Donald Trump. We tried to engage the American public.
We, you know, conducted hundreds of interviews. I myself wrote and published a 110, a 120 op eds and newspapers across the country. We did a lot of writing.
Speaker 4: The most writing I've done in my life.
Speaker 0: And I would write not in my name, but I would be a ghostwriter, and I would let the other general, like, you know, put their name on it. Yeah. So, some articles landed in some pretty big papers, The Wall Street Journal, the National Journal, and all these other stuff. So we're literally working day and night nonstop. So when ultimately, when he won, I was really, frankly depressed.
Like, really sad, really depressed, not only in terms of the mission failure, the mission failure, But, of course,
Speaker 4: I was hoping to advance my my career.
Speaker 0: Had she won, I would've gotten a pretty big job.
Speaker 3: Jamie Menina, the adviser to the joint chief, stated that president Trump will entertain the idea of staying past his 4 year term.
Speaker 0: I predict Trump will probably entertain publicly the idea of staying in office changing the laws, which he's not allowed to do. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's crazy.
Speaker 0: By constitution. But he'll probably suggest this, and there'll probably be an effort to try. Yes. And then there'll be pressure and anger, and then, you
Speaker 2: know, the Republicans will try to they'll
Speaker 0: try to definitely anoint the meter out there to maintain
Speaker 2: his
Speaker 0: Right. That's all that matters there.
Speaker 3: If you're on the inside of the Pentagon or any government institution and notice corruption, reach out to us via email tips at o'keeffemediagrip.com, or text us at 914-491-9395, and an OMG journalist will get back to you soon. Thank you, and stay tuned.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
Learn How "The Devil's Bishop" Attack On President Trump Is Part Of A Larger Agenda To Enslave The American People » WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE: https://t.co/eGm62tA6dw https://t.co/LQTVlXdqaa
Video Transcript AI Summary
The so-called bishop promotes open borders and claims that most immigrants are not criminals, but this narrative ignores the legal definition of immigration. We must focus on the mercy owed to our homeless veterans and children affected by harmful ideologies. The push for open borders and transgender agendas is seen as a tactic to create a permanent underclass, undermining American values and traditions. The message is a corporate agenda that aims to control and manipulate society. True charity begins at home, and we must prioritize the needs of our citizens before those from other countries. The fight against these ideologies continues, and we must remain vigilant in defending our republic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, first of all, that bishop yeah. The devil's bishop. Let's be honest. The devil's bishop. You notice that this this person said she referred to them as immigrants.
We gotta stop using that word. These folks who are invading our republic are not immigrants. The word immigrant by definition means someone who is coming into a country legally following that country's that nation's immigration laws. So we need to stop it. And I took note of how this devil's bishop said immigrants.
Furthermore furthermore, yes, we need to have mercy. Mercy on our homeless veterans. Mercy on the children that are being butchered by her very narrative, by the narrative that this devil's bishop got up there and talked about.
Speaker 1: The government is Alex Jones, who has the largest audience in the country, bigger than any of the, networks, the biggest megaphone in the country.
Speaker 2: The deep state hates Alex Jones with a vengeance.
Speaker 3: Alex Jones is the most extraordinary person I've ever met. Then yesterday, he's at the National Cathedral, and they put this so called, woman, bishop up there. And then she says, you've gotta have totally open borders, and you've gotta bring everybody in or you're bad. And you gotta give us access to transgender, you know, to to the kids to make them transgender. The reason they're committing suicide in all the studies is because they're giving them chemicals and chopping their body parts off.
And then with the illegals, most a lot of them little kids, they've been in sex slavery and slave labor, and the Democrats have helped cover up where they've been given. There's the abuse. It's abusive to bring in a permanent underclass and then and then and then make them literally serve and work, for the system. It's abusive to target the children with the transgenerism. So instead of just saying this lady is a whacked out liberal, we need to expose that they know exactly what they're doing, and it's the BlackRock and the UN that's funding and doing all of this to tear our civilization and our society apart of the transgender movement was started.
I don't hate individuals that think they're that. The point is they're being brainwashed into depopulation, into sterilization. Mi 6, the Tavistock Institute developed this plan in the sixties. It's declassified, and the biggest money in the world is pushing this. And they're not telling parents in public and private schools that they're fast tracking them and putting them into a sexual cult to then tie them to the politics that go with that.
This is mind control. Here's the clip. I wanna get your response to
Speaker 0: it. K.
Speaker 2: In the name of our god, I ask you to have mercy upon the people in our country who are scared now. There are gay, lesbian, and transgender children in democratic, republican, and independent families. Some who fear for their lives. And the people the people who pick our crops and clean our office buildings, who labor in poultry farms and meat packing plants, who wash the dishes after we eat in restaurants and work the night shifts in hospitals, they they may not be citizens or have the proper documentation. But the vast majority of immigrants are not criminals.
They pay taxes and are good neighbors. They are faithful members of our churches and mosques, synagogues, wadara, and temples. I ask you to have mercy, mister president, on those in our communities whose children fear that their parents will be taken away. And that you help those who are fleeing war zones and persecution in their own lands to find compassion and welcome here. Our god teaches us that we are to be merciful to the stranger.
For we were all once strangers in this land. May God grant us the strength and courage to honor the dignity of every human being, to speak the truth to one another in love, and walk humbly with each other and our God for the good of all people. Good of all people in this nation and the world. Amen.
Speaker 3: The condescension, the self appointedness when this is a corporate message she's putting out, the poison Hollywood message of bringing this permanent underclass that they could abuse and control and our children they're targeting. And then they sit there from a so called place of authority when it's a UN replacement migration to collapse the 3rd world with the COVID lockdowns and bring these poor people here and then use them and control them and have them outvote American citizens. It it's it's time to absolutely repudiate these people. Larry Pinkett, your take on that.
Speaker 0: You know, first of all, that bishop yeah. The devil's bishop. Let's be honest. The devil's bishop. You notice that this this person said she referred to them as immigrants.
We gotta stop using that word. These folks who are invading our republic are not immigrants. The word immigrant by definition means someone who is coming into a country legally following that country, that nation's immigration laws. So we need to stop it. And I took note of how this devil's bishop said immigrants.
Furthermore furthermore, yes, we need to have mercy. Mercy on our homeless veterans. Mercy on the children that are being butchered by her very narrative, by the narrative that this devil's bishop got up there and talked about. Oh, yes. The most merciful thing to do would be to expose this devil's bishop and all of them.
That would be merciful merciful to them, to us, to our republic, to the world. Enough is enough. Enough. They are destroying or attempting to destroy our traditions, our values, our families. Our republic.
As I've said before, they are treacherous, traitors, treason, treasonous in high places, and we will not be fooled again. You remember that song? We don't get fooled again, and we're not gonna be fooled again. They this this devil's bishop has distorted the very meaning of mercy. This devil's bishop forgets that America, Americans, meaning US citizens, must take care of home.
What did they say? Charity begins where?
Speaker 3: At home.
Speaker 0: In some other country? No.
Speaker 3: We put out 5 previous collectible Infowars coins, and they're all amazing and people love them. And folks are buying them on the collectible market. In many cases, 3 times what we sold them for. But I gotta say this new one is my favorite by far because it lets me remember and savor the victory against the deep state, the corporate media, how they tried to kill Trump twice, and how we got him elected. It is the battle for the republic, 2024 commemorative coin on one side, and the other side commemorates the 47th president of the United States, Donald Trump, getting inaugurated on January 20, 2025.
There are only 4,000 of this coin, and they'll never be more made again, and they fund this operation in the ongoing fight against the globalist. Ladies and gentlemen, get your piece of history and help fund the info war as we continue to win major battles against the globalist because we won a huge battle, but the war goes on and we're close to winning. Get your coin now at the Alksham store dot com.
@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy
CNN cameraman admits to being a part of the cabal trying to overthrow Trump while secretly being filmed. https://t.co/bxjhx9x54K
Video Transcript AI Summary
Carrie Porch, a satellite uplink technician and CNN contractor, secretly recorded the 9AM rundown calls run by CNN President Jeff Zucker. She says her "dream job" at CNN turned into a "nightmare."
According to Porch, Zucker has a personal vendetta against Trump and CNN will be negative towards him. She says Zucker wants media to be creative with Trump. Porch says Zucker called Fox News a fake news and propaganda machine, but she believes CNN is pumping out propaganda.
Another speaker says they don't care about the MSOB event and want to stay focused on impeachment. They claim Fox News spreads fake news and conspiracy nonsense that is destructive to America. Porch says she wants news organizations to be transparent about their leanings so people can make up their own minds.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I I don't care about the MSOB event. Okay? I don't care about them. Let's just stay very focused on impeachment.
Speaker 1: My name is Carrie Porch. I'm a satellite uplink technician. I'm a contractor at the CNN Washington DC bureau.
Speaker 0: But Jeff Zucker, yeah, basically president of CNN, has a personal vendetta against Trump. It's not gonna be positive for Trump. He hates it. He's gonna be negative.
Speaker 1: I decided to wear a hidden camera. I'm even creative with Trump, sir. I'm gonna need a camera before we play it every single day. Yeah. Media creative with Trump.
I decided to secretly record the 9AM rundown call meetings, and it's basically run by Jeff Zucker, the president of CNN. When I came to work at CNN, I mean, it was my dream job. And that dream actually just turned into a nightmare.
Speaker 0: I know that there's lot of people at CNN that are friendly with the scrum. Time to knock that off, and it's time to calm them out. I think what's going on in America now is really fundamentally the result of years of fake news, conspiracy nonsense from fake from Fox News.
Speaker 1: He was calling Fox News fake news and a propaganda machine. And with what I saw, I'm like, that's pretty much what CNN was. Like, it's just pumping out propaganda.
Speaker 0: The the the fake conspiracy nonsense that Fox has spread for years is now deeply embedded in American society. And, frankly, that is a destructive to America, and I do not think we should be scared to to say so.
Speaker 1: I just wanted to own where they're at. Like, hey. If we if we lean left, cool. Let's just say we lean left. If we lean right, let it be known.
But again, it just dovetails back to that thing. I just want people to have the information to make up their own minds.
@mazemoore - MAZE
Conspiracy theorists were right.https://t.co/78KI7ntFLm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Conspiracy theories arise during public health crises and are distractions. A video alleging masks don't work was removed from social media for spreading misinformation. A study found mask mandates were an utter failure, according to the New York Times, citing a British review of 78 randomized studies. Lockdowns' effect on mortality was basically irrelevant, according to economists from Johns Hopkins, who warned against their future use.
There is absolutely no evidence of an overcount of COVID fatalities, but the LA County health director acknowledged the county may be overcounting COVID deaths by as much as twenty percent. COVID can be a contributing or incidental cause of death.
Initially, Dr. Fauci rejected the theory that coronavirus was man-made in a lab in Wuhan, China, but an intelligence arm of the US Energy Department has joined the FBI in concluding that COVID began with a lab leak in China. The Wuhan Institute of Virology worked on coronaviruses, which some find to be a large coincidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You will always have conspiracy theories when you have, very challenging public health crises. They are nothing but distractions.
Speaker 1: President retweeting a conspiracy video alleging that masks do not work. The video was then removed by Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube because it violated rules against spreading misinformation.
Speaker 2: The second most powerful man in the world revealing himself in this video as a mask truther.
Speaker 3: A major study finding masks made no difference in stopping the spread. Mask mandates, it turns out, were an utter failure. It's not me saying it, but the New York Times. The mask mandates did nothing. Will any lessons be learned?
Brett Stevens cites a comprehensive British review of 78 randomized studies with more than 600,000 participants.
Speaker 4: So that wasn't scientifically fair. Effective. The the mass guidance was
Speaker 5: not It wasn't science based, and the six feet of distancing has was arbitrary.
Speaker 4: All around the country, over the weekend, protests popped up. These morons and Internet conspiracy theories demanding an immediate end to lockdowns. And let's be honest, people. This is both insane and counter productive. Because the more you gather in groups, the longer the lockdown will have to go on.
Did lockdowns during COVID prevent severe effects from COVID nineteen? Did it help in the arc of the pandemic? Economists from Johns Hopkins say no. The report warned against using lockdowns as a pandemic measure in the future because of the low effectiveness on mortality and the consequences for the economy.
Speaker 6: The the lockdowns in terms of their effects on mortality, we measured it against mortality, were were basically irrelevant. They destroyed people. They literally killed people. When you shut down medical care, in spring of twenty twenty alone, there were six hundred and fifty thousand cancer chemotherapy patients in this country alone. Half of them didn't get their chemo because they were afraid.
They were told it was dangerous to go to a medical facility.
Speaker 7: We weighed in on a theory that's been floating around that perhaps the number of fatalities related COVID nineteen is being inflated because people are actually dying of other things. Can what's your read on that theory?
Speaker 0: You know, Savannah, there is absolutely no evidence that that's the case at all. You know, it it I think it falls under the category of something that's very unfortunate, these conspiracy theories that we hear about.
Speaker 8: Even though wackos, Trump wackos are are are doing conspiracy theories saying those numbers are padded.
Speaker 0: What should we say to people who conspiracy theorize about an overcount of the deaths?
Speaker 2: Follow-up now to my conversation with LA County health director Barbara Ferrer who last week acknowledged the county may be overcounting COVID deaths by as much as twenty percent.
Speaker 9: Could it be a secondary contributing cause? So for example, somebody with kidney disease, COVID then pushes them over the edge to have kidney failure. That's COVID as a contributing cause. And then the third is COVID as an incidental finding. So somebody coming in with a gunshot wound or a heart attack, and they happen to test positive.
Speaker 4: Now part of the conspiracy theory is that the disease started in a laboratory in Wuhan.
Speaker 10: Just weeks ago, doctor Anthony Fauci rejected the conspiracy that coronavirus was man made in a lab in Wuhan, China. And yet this week, Donald Trump is still pushing the debunked bunkum.
Speaker 4: A lot of people on the right love that phrase escape from
Speaker 6: the lab because it sounds like something from Marvel movie or comic book.
Speaker 11: Everyone who believes in the conspiracy is saying that it came out of a lab in Wuhan Wuhan rather than, through food at a market.
Speaker 12: And, he continued to push a conspiracy theory that has already been debunked by our intelligence community. This whole notion that the coronavirus was developed in a Chinese lab. That has been debunked.
Speaker 13: There's a report today that another intelligence arm of the US government, this is inside our energy department, has joined the FBI in concluding that COVID began with a lab leak in China.
Speaker 12: Is that I don't know who to trust. Yeah. Right? I certainly don't trust reporters Mhmm. Because reporters treated this initially as if it was nothing more than a crazy unhinged conspiracy theory.
Speaker 14: Yeah.
Speaker 12: So who do you trust? Right? You can't trust the legacy media outlets because that was their narrative.
Speaker 11: It came out of the city that has a Wuhan Institute of Virology,
Speaker 8: a Chinese lab that worked on coronaviruses. And that
Speaker 15: is an awfully large coincidence. And and that's what I've thought
Speaker 14: throughout that that was an awfully large coincidence.
@SeosQuinn - Joe Quinn
Tucker exposes the Epstein/Israeli spy/blackmail ring at Turning Point USA. https://t.co/vHzFPTIVmw
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration with the official narrative surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, believing the US government dismissed legitimate questions. They claim the DOJ didn't release incriminating sex videos because they don't exist, alleging the original search warrant was designed to protect Epstein, suggesting a cover-up since 2007.
The speaker questions the source of Epstein's wealth and whether he was working on behalf of intelligence services, possibly foreign, and specifically mentions Israel. They argue that asking these questions is not anti-Semitic or hateful, but a right of citizens to understand if foreign governments were acting against US interests.
They highlight the need to openly discuss Epstein's connections and address the possibility of blackmail operations. The speaker demands answers from the government, asserting that citizens deserve transparency and should not be insulted for seeking it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Feel like raising the middle finger and screaming obscenities, which is not an adult response, I'll I'll concede, but that's how I felt. And I think that's really at the heart of why the Epstein thing is so distressing. I mean, the guy was some weird sex freak who was abusing girls. We knew that. But the fact that the US government, the one that I voted for, refused to take my question seriously and instead said, case closed, shut up conspiracy theorist, was too much for me.
And I I don't think the rest of us should be satisfied with that. And by the way, let me just say really quickly because I was so mad about it that I think I found out part of what's going on. I think we are going to find out more. And I think the truth, for whatever it's worth, in case you're interested, is that the DOJ didn't release lots of incriminating sex videos with Epstein and his billionaire pals because they don't have them. They don't have them because when the original search warrant was served thousand and seven, I think possibly 02/2006, I think 02/07, it was basically designed to protect Epstein.
The search warrant was written in such a way to make sure that the feds never got their hands on the actually incriminating evidence. It's another way of saying the cover up has been going on since 02/2007, almost twenty years. And so the real question is not, was Jeffrey Epstein a weirdo who's abusing girls? Yes, we can answer that. The real question is, why was he doing this on whose behalf and where did the money come from?
And those are the questions that need to be answered. And I think it's entirely fair to ask them. And it's not adequate to say anyone who asked them is somehow desecrating the memory of little girls who died in Texas. They're not gonna put up with that answer. I don't care who gives that answer.
That is not acceptable. And I think the real answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of Intel Services, probably not American. And we have every right to ask on whose behalf was he working. How does a guy go from being a math teacher at the Dalton School in the late seventies with no college degree to having multiple airplanes, a private island, and the largest residential house in Manhattan. Where did all the money come from?
And no one has ever gotten to the bottom of that because no one has ever tried. And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who watches that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government. Now no one's allowed to say that that foreign government is Israel because we have been somehow cowed into thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that. There is nothing hateful about saying that.
There's nothing anti Semitic about saying that. There's nothing even anti Israel about saying that. I've spent my entire life pretty much in Washington where I knew and loved a number of people, including one very close person who worked at CIA. That has never prohibited me from saying, I think the CIA has done some horrible things. Murdered a bunch of people, participated in the murder of a sitting US president.
It's got a whole trail of crimes. That doesn't make me a disloyal American. It doesn't make me anti American in any sense. I was born here. My family's been here for hundreds of years.
I love this country. That's why I live here. So criticizing the behavior of a government agency does not make you a hater. It makes you a free person. It makes you a citizen.
You're allowed to do that because you're not a slave. You're a citizen. And you have a right to expect that your government will not act against your interest, and you have a right to demand that foreign governments not be allowed to act against your interest. That's not creepy. It shouldn't be forbidden.
And yet all of us have trained ourselves to believe that you can't say that somehow. But that's, like, too naughty and forbidden, and the effect of making that off limits has been to create a lot of resentment, and I'll say it, hate online, where people feel like they can't just say, like, what the hell is this? You have the former Israeli prime minister living in your house. You have all this contact with the foreign government. Were you working on behalf of Mossad?
Were you running a blackmail operation on behalf of foreign government? By the way, every single person in Washington DC thinks that. I've never met anyone who doesn't think that. I don't know any of them that hate Israel, but no one feels they can say that. Why?
And I think the longer that we play along with it, the more subterranean and creepy and hateful the conversation actually becomes. So I think it's better just to say it right out loud. Did this happen? And, of course, that question has been asked to the government of Israel, their answer is we're not gonna tell you. And I think our answer should be no or no.
As long as we're sending you money, if you were committing crimes on our soil, we have an absolute right to know. Did you do this or not? And yet everybody has been so brainwashed into thinking that's somehow an expression of hate or bigotry. When it's not, it's a baseline question that every US citizen has a right to an answer on. What the hell was this?
And by the way, if it turns out that it was nothing at all, that somehow Jeffrey Epstein really did earn a $165,000,000 giving tax advice to somebody, which is, for the record, a lot more than most people pay their accountants, and that none of this was actually a foreign intel operation, and that there was no blackmail involved, that actually Bill Gates was just hanging on the island because the weather was especially good. No one was videotaped doing anything immoral or illegal, and then that was used against them to get them to obey. If all of that is false, then just tell me how it's false. But don't call me a lunatic. And when Fox News runs a piece as they did yesterday by Hugh Hewitt saying that anybody who's got even more questions about Epstein is some kind of nutcase with an unhappy personal life who's spending too much time on Twitter in the fervent fever swamps of conspiracies.
You know, up yours, buddy. The one who answered the question then. Don't let anybody insult you. Anybody. And I mean anybody ever get away with insulting you instead of answering a legitimate question.
K? Ever. And by the way, you will hear certain people say, well, you know, that means you hate the per no. It doesn't. I I've got a bunch of kids.
I would never let them get away with that. I caught one of my kids, you know, smoking weed in the bathroom at my house, and I was like, you smoking weed in the bathroom? Shut up, racist. You hate me. No.
You're my child. I don't hate you. Answer the freaking question. Were you smoking weed in the bathroom or not? I'm not the criminal here.
You seem to be.
@JesseBWatters - Jesse Watters
🚨BREAKING: DNI GABBARD declassifies docs showing Obama ‘MANUFACTURED’ the RUSSIA HOAX to SABOTAGE the Trump presidency🚨 https://t.co/4k9cR97w5F
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
BREAKING VIDEO: General Flynn Calls for Obama’s Immediate Arrest After Gabbard Releases Documents Proving Democrats Ran Treasonous Coup Operation Against Trump and America - PLUS: Watch Video of Coup Plotter James Clapper Confess that Obama Was In Charge https://t.co/c3SsFStQH9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Here's a summary of the provided transcript:
The speaker calls for the passports of individuals implicated in undermining the U.S. government to be confiscated, preventing their departure from the country. They claim James Clapper admitted the Russia probe was initiated by Barack Obama and that Clapper knew there was no collusion between Trump and Russia as early as March.
The speaker alleges a coup against Trump and voters, claiming election theft in 2020. They say Obama "quarterbacked" the spying on Trump's campaign, with Comey leading on the ground. They claim there is a criminal investigation into Brennan, Clapper, and Comey for treason, with indictments expected soon.
The speaker references General Flynn's case dismissal due to government misconduct and expresses hope for Obama's arrest. They promote products from the Alex Jones Store, including a tactical dagger and methylene blue capsules, with Roger Stone endorsing the latter for its energy and focus-enhancing effects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now, if I were in the Department of Justice or if I were in if I was in the White House, I would demand that the attorney general immediately take away the passports from these individuals who we know have already been named. And there's some others that have not been named yet. Take away the passports. Do not allow them to leave this country because I guarantee they're waking up, you know, this morning saying, where's you know, where can I go? We gotta get the hell out of here.
Speaker 1: In a recent CNN interview, Klapar discussed the findings of special counsel Robert Mueller who found no collusion between Russians and president Trump. Klaper suggested he knew there was no collusion as early as in March, but that didn't stop the mainstream media from spinning false collusion narratives.
Speaker 2: And I consistently said we didn't have the evidence at the time contemporaneously, and it was my great hope that the Mueller investigation would resolve that once and for all, and apparently, did.
Speaker 1: This is not the first time Klaper makes controversial remarks about the alleged use of national intelligence for political purposes.
Speaker 3: So I see Gabbard doing great interviews on Fox for twenty minutes of pop and everywhere else. And she's like, well, this is proof they knew Russiagate was all a lie, and they still let the persecution go forward and try to impeach him and remove him, and that's treason. Yeah. That alone enough is is to put these people in prison for life. Trying to overthrow the government, overthrow the election, a coup against you, not just Trump, a coup against the voters.
Talk about election meddling. This is election theft attempt. They did it in 2020. Same crap, same group, same story. And j six, they stayed on top of it.
It's icing, which I they sucked me into. People go, oh, no. Trump did saying lead the march. No. They just told him, mister Jones will lead the march, and the insiders and as an admin were gonna set him up and me up all at the same time.
So that a lot of people didn't make it out of the trap I did, but not unbloody. And now without some of the crew going to the huskow, the clinker, the prison. So now you're getting see, I'm just telling you about a few of the bullet holes here, few of the scars. When I tell you about this stuff, I've been in the trenches. It's not like I'm back here reporting on the war, you know, overseas and telling you what I heard.
No. I'm coming back telling you what I saw and everything I just told you is on record. Published. So it's a lot worse than that. It's not that they knew that it wasn't true.
And and no. They're the ones that created it, and that's on record, not steel. They went and told them what they wanted, and that's all in there. And there's a bunch of classified stuff that she's given the DOJ that is beyond smoking gun. This stuff's all smoking gun.
So you have to have indictments for these people now. It it it absolutely has to happen. So the White House has put out a video. We're gonna play it right now to get some of the testimony dealing with this hardcore insane level of treason. They've been caught red handed and treason is the name of the video.
Here it is.
Speaker 4: Well, look, the Obama campaign spied on our campaign, and they've been caught. Alright? And now let's see what happens to them. But they have been caught. They've been caught red handed.
It's probably treason. It's a horrible thing they did. It probably never happened before. At least nobody got caught doing it. But they use intelligence agencies of our country to spy on my campaign.
Speaker 3: I I think there's a spying did occur. Yes. I think
Speaker 4: spying did occur. President Obama knew about it. Joe Biden knew about it. Comey knew about it. Brennan Plapper, the whole group, they all knew about it.
Lisa Page, the lover struck, they all knew about it. And we have it documented. We have it in text. We have it in all sorts of forms. They knew about it.
It was a terrible thing. Should never happen and should never be allowed to happen again. To a president, it should never happen again. This was a setup like we've never seen. I think it's a political crime of the century, and they've been caught.
So let's see what happens to them all.
Speaker 3: Wanted for treason, Barack Obama definitely quarterbacked and commanded the whole thing. He was the field marshal. He was the head chef. But notice even Trump's statement, they knew about it. That's like saying Jeffrey Dahmer knew about somebody in his apartment eating victims.
No. He ate them. It's like saying Adolf Hitler knew about the Nazis. No. He ran them.
It's like saying when a killer whale eats a seal, it knows about a seal getting eating. No. It ate the seal. So they ran it. They did it.
We all experienced it. I personally and it's ongoing. They still got their people all over the government. In the judge department involved in my bankruptcy, still trying to shut us down right now. We're fighting them, suing them, everything.
And the Democrats haven't given up. They're just moving forward, attacking, attacking, attacking. And and you notice Trump giggled when he said, oh, Comey knew. Because Comey was the quarterback on the ground with the fake leaking and all of it. He went on TV shows two years ago.
We played him many times and said, we made the decision to try to get rid of Flynn and Trump. So I sent the FBI over to set up Flynn. They claimed off their written notes, he perjured himself, which he didn't, and then they induct indicted him. Remember? Nothing with Russia, nothing with anything illegal, just made up.
Oh, he didn't do anything wrong. They just said he lied about something. See how they work? So we have Comey bragging he leaked, and he lied to Congress. We have Comey bragging that he sent the FBI over part across for hurricane in early January, like two days in the administration.
Late January, but early administration. And we have all the emails because these guys all cover their asses. That's why we have a clip of clapper, former head of the NSA, heavily involved in all of this. He's one of the top four guys, Obama, Brennan, Clapper, Comey. And when he testified to Congress and we went on TV shows, he learned that one time lines in the NSA's ever spotted an American one time in America, total lie.
He had to later apologize that he got it wrong. Well, the NSA to record it. No. They spawned Americans. Oh, boy.
Yeah. Yeah. Everything's recorded for decades on record. It's like saying again there the ocean has no water in it. I mean, it's it's it's the most preposterous lie.
It's just bizarro. Like, you're watching me on TV, and I'm saying I'm wearing a white shirt. You're like, no, you're not. It's black. No, it's white.
I have black eyes. No. You got blue eyes, Jones. Well, that matters. They're black.
I've got a white blonde beard. No. It's it's dark brown. Doesn't matter. I just say so.
Okay? My watch is gold. No. It's stainless steel. So I'll play a clip coming up of Brennan getting ahead of this over like, this is two years ago.
And and and Clapper, they've all gone on TV now and said, well, told us to do it. Ah, so their excuse when it all comes out will be presidential immunity. Obama told me to. Well, guess what? He doesn't have presidential immunity on this because you he would've had to pardon you like they did with the auto pen for all the crooks of the Biden administration.
See how it works? So they're out getting ahead of it. Getting ahead of it. Epiologist criminal investigation of John Brennan, James Comey, DOJ sources. That broke three days into the scandal.
We can have a government people thought, oh, they're just saying that to change the story. Well, that's true from the ridiculous don't look into Epstein stuff from Trump. But now I told you three months ago, there's a criminal investigation of all these guys for treason. Because I've talked to people just part of it are running. And I love how I break something massive like that.
It's just like, I can make a joke 50,000,000 views. Tell you the most hardcore breaking info. It's like, yeah. Who's this guy? No.
He ever told something that came through. So, no, I so, see, when I see these stories, have to gauge each one. And I made some calls and found out from the actual whistleblower, does Ana Paulina Luna really have this whistleblower on them destroying Jeffrey Epstein files in New York? I have the answer on that directly from the whistleblower. I'll tell you next hour.
See, you're not getting BS here. This is a lot of work goes into this. There's not spend time on my methods and things now is because I didn't used to do that. People keep asking, how's this guy know this? How's this guy know that?
Well, I work my freaking ass off. This is all I do other than get in the pool with my daughter for a couple hours or, you know, play a board game here or there or go to church or, you know, go see a movie once a month or maybe a you know, I I this is all I do to people. Alright. So you just saw that, you know, this is treason, which it is. Here's general Flynn.
He was totally targeted. He's been totally vindicated. It's admitted he was the main target he was telling Trump who was good, was bad, giving him good advice by Comey. And he says, arrest their asses now. Here it is.
Speaker 0: I was convicted, you know, my case was dismissed because of egregious government misconduct. So we now you know, I do I feel vindicated? I will I will feel vindicated when I see Barack Obama get you know, have have
Speaker 4: Amen.
Speaker 0: Handcuffs on, being escorted from his house, and being brought into jail. I would say right now, if I were in the Department of Justice or if I were in if I was in the White House, I would demand that the attorney general immediately take away the passports from these individuals who we know have already been named, and there's some others that have not been named yet. Take away the passports. Do not allow them to leave this country because I guarantee they're waking up, you know, this morning saying, where's you know, where can I go? We gotta get the hell out of here because they're they committed a massive, massive conspiracy to to under undermine and overthrow The United States Of America, The United States Government, the president of The United States, and the presidency, and they left a wake in their path that is unprecedented.
Speaker 3: We're alright. Now Mark Dowell, I'm about to say to you this is major news, and I've said this the last few weeks that people haven't paid attention. I've learned the last few months from sources in the White House high up, DOJ high up, and others. Like Roger Stone has been talking to certain people, and they are doing a real serious criminal investigation at the DOJ, a Brendan Clapper coming in Obama. They have the total proof.
They've already published it. They have even worse stuff. It's classified, and they are intending to indict Brennan, Clapper, and Comey very soon. And the decisions to go ahead with it, just get the final touches, has been the last thirty days. That's why you see them rolling out their cooked Epstein file, which the Democrats, the very same group did have control of.
And that's why Trump blew up and threw a fit because now he knows he's faces a whole another fiasco. And I I'm not saying they're not it's not something bad in there on him, but it would have already been out if that was the case. I don't think that, but the jury's open. I'll go over the truth test. But we know the Democrats human trafficking mass.
We know they ran a coup against America. We know they're trying to start World War three. We know they wanna bankrupt the country. We know the private Federal Reserve won't cut interest rates to sabotage economy. We know they're the bad guys.
So I'm proud of populist conservatives not being in a cult, and when Trump gaslights us getting outraged at him. But let's spend time on that as I do. This is my opinion, my advice to you. But let's also remember the Democrats and how evil they are and how bad they are. And let's remember all the good people administration and the great things they're doing on the economy and the border and the human trafficking stopping that.
And let's support the good people administration. And let's wait to see what they're able to cook up a release. I predict it's made up, watered down, hot air. And I'll get to that next hour. But regardless, we have the meat and potatoes of the millions trafficked, 300,000 kids.
We have the proof. We have mayorkers disappearing their identities. And and and now senate and house reports and eyewitnesses, that's coming up next hour. Incredible hearings this week that got almost no coverage because the independent media, that's the dominant media, and I'm I wanna say I'm guilty, but I was 80% on this Epstein stuff because I was so pissed off by the way Trump was behaving. I didn't drop the ball.
It was the right thing to do. I'm just saying now we need to also cover the other things. And I'm talking to myself when I'm saying that. So this is just amazing. And they are scared and and and people are like, oh, we always hear Libyan diamonds never happens.
They tried to kill Trump twice. They're still coming after him now. They're coming after all us. You've seen all the stuff Trump's done pulling us out of the WHO. All this stuff, ice rage.
The is a totally different ballgame now, And the ice raids are escalating. There's the the the there's populist right wing attacks on Trump. He's not doing enough. They dismantled the entire enforcement system. They disappeared 20,000,000 people.
They got rid they set hearings for immigration status for seven years on average. They can you imagine the manhunt of it's probably 25,000,000 the White House believes Tom Homan. Way more than the 12 that they've confirmed. Conservatively 20,000,000. They are massive hiring.
They're grabbing and commandeering people from federal agencies everywhere. No. This is real. These are real people. We can now say, oh, Trump's little suspect.
That's fine. But not Tulsi Gabbard, not Tom Homan, not RFK junior, not his informal advisers like general Flynn, not all these other not not not Ed Martin. I know these people. I've known Ed Martin twenty five years. The Democrats are scared to death of it.
He's already running two task forces. And Trump has said, release the grand juries, release it all. That's good. Now here's James Clapper I mentioned on Obama's national security advisers covering his ass trying to say, well, he did it under Obama's orders, which is true, but that's what they're trying to hide under. Here it is.
Speaker 2: Jim Comey and I are part of the group that were tasked by president Obama to re put together all the reporting we had on the Russian interference.
Speaker 1: Former director of national intelligence James Clapper appears to admit the Russia probe was initiated by none other than former president Barack Obama. In a recent CNN interview, Clapper discussed the findings of special counsel Robert Mueller who found no collusion between Russians and president Trump. Clapper suggested he knew there was no collusion as early as in March, but that didn't stop the mainstream media from spinning false collusion narratives.
Speaker 2: And I consistently said we didn't have the evidence at the time contemporaneously, and it was my great hope that the Mueller investigation would resolve that once and for all, and apparently, did.
Speaker 1: This is not the first time Klaper makes controversial remarks about the alleged use of national intelligence for political purposes. In his senate testimony back in '20
Speaker 3: Let let's stop there. Again, so they did this years ago. This is all to cover their ass. We have the emails, the text messages, all of it where they created it. And then they were later, oh, we're worried the Democrats are using it, and it's not real.
Unbelievable. Unbelievable. Alright. We're going to break. Listen.
I need your support. You see this right here? This is two weeks ago. The receiver of the Democrat judge has appointed to seize and shut down info wars. And, yeah, we've survived.
We're countersuing. We're in federal and state court battling. It and we've been winning. It takes a lot of money, though, to fight these people. I need your support a red shop, please.
Plus, you need to understand that we have amazing products, ladies and gentlemen. So this is a limited edition badass tactical dagger, stainless steel, six inches, amazing hard rubber, olive drab handle, the very best combat dagger. Comes in a beautiful gift box with my signature. These sell for $100 in stores, but we bought 5,000 of them. So we're able to get a big discount on them and sell them for you for $70 and still make a profit, but we need funds.
Get yours now while you still can at the alexjonesstore.com. Also, our best selling ultra methylene blue capsules that sold out for a month are back in stock, and there's a big limited time sale right now at the alexjonesstore.com. We have the best methylene blue, supercharges your mitochondria, your oxidation process. So good for you. It is the energy is incredible.
The the the this is not a stimulant, but it boosts all other natural stimulants you would take. The ultrasylane blue capsules, the very same medical grade that's in the liquid is now back in stock, it's a liquid tincture. You got big discounts, a lot of 50% off right now, and so many other great products. The very best Shilogy capsules and gummies, the very best Irish Sea Moss, the very best natural fat burn combo. It's all there at the alexshowstore.com.
Be sure to become a VIP for $30 a month. Cancel any time. Get $40 from the store. Special deal special offers special sales.
Speaker 5: How do I explain to people that my tongue is blue? Because I love this stuff, methylene blue. I'm able to work, like, eighteen hour days sometimes. This stuff is like rocket fuel.
Speaker 3: I didn't know you were gonna plug this. You even ordered it yourself, I later learned. What is the effect of our medical grade methylene blue been on you, Roger?
Speaker 5: Incredible both physical and mental energy and focus. I mean, it really is like rocket fuel.
Speaker 3: You know, I used
Speaker 5: to like Brain Force. Back when I did the show with Owen Schroyer, the original, the real War Room, I was a big aficionado of Brain Force and Brain Force Force Plus. This is even a greater product. I cannot recommend it highly enough.
Speaker 3: Well, I've not had any since Friday.
Speaker 5: I only
Speaker 3: take it every couple days. So I'm gonna take my dose of left one blue of my Topachico. It is amazing.
Speaker 5: And people ask me, what does it do? It cleans out
Speaker 3: your mitochondria. It skips the oxidation process of the cell. It's like I and I'm at the next level. It is such a game changer. Roger Stone, thank you so much for being with us.
Speaker 5: Thank you. God bless you.
@FFT1776 - Sheri™🕊️
The missing CIA document exposes SPYING ON TRUMP by Former CIA Director John Brennan. Barack Obama led a covert operation targeting 26 Trump associates through the Five Eyes alliance which severely impacted Trump's presidency. https://t.co/4ugx6xk1rQ
@PrometheanActn - Promethean Action
🚨 EXPOSED: Five months before the 2020 election, military intelligence & political elites secretly war-gamed how to jail Trump and destroy his movement. @MikeBenzCyber and @BarbaraMBoyd the Transition Integrity Project conspiracy they don't want you to know about. Watch now: https://t.co/oFJRFhJDpl
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mike Benz outlines a conspiracy tied to the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) and a June 2020 war game that purportedly sought “a way to use riots, nationwide riots, and do favors to the Black Lives Matter movement so that they would owe them favors back to take to the streets against Trump if Trump won the election fair and square,” while also needing “a robust, intentional, and specific strategy to go after the networks that enabled Trump's rise to power” so they could be jailed after Trump left office. Bubba Boyd, who has written about the event since August 2020, explains that the discussion will cover the key players in TIP, the plan to subvert the 2020 election, how rigging the election and four prosecutions of Trump flow from the June 2020 conspirators’ meeting, and excerpts from a January 2020 Donald Trump speech to the World Economic Forum that allegedly signals why Trump and Trumpism had to be eliminated.
The publicly named sponsors of the war game are Rosa Brooks and Niles Gilman of the Berggruen Institute in Los Angeles, described as the “globalist home of Silicon Valley’s anti-Trump billionaires,” with branches in Venice and Beijing and a China branch in direct dialogue with Xi Jinping. Michael Anton is cited as the author of a Trump national security document who criticized TIP’s war game, stating they were planning a coup against the election and publicizing the war game to normalize the idea. Brooks’s background is summarized as a lawyer for George Shullis at the Open Society Institute, then a State Department attorney for regime change, then a Pentagon policy lawyer under Obama, while teaching at Georgetown Law. The narrative asserts she advocated impeaching Trump and a potential 25th Amendment move, and even a military coup, in a 2017 Foreign Policy piece titled “three ways to get rid of president Trump before 2020,” including the sentence: “For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officers might simply tell the president, no, sir. We’re not doing that.” The claim is that she “couldn’t wait to launch a coup against Trump,” a portrayal attributed to a New York Times editorial response.
In June 2020, Brooks and Gilman allegedly convened TIP’s war game about the 2020 election and its possible aftermath, with over 100 participants and 76 role players drawn from former Pentagon officials, the intelligence community, Silicon Valley, Wall Street, the media, and Republican and Democratic institutions. Names publicly associated with anti-Trump activity are listed, including John Podesta, Donna Brazile, Bill Kristol, Michael Steele, Jennifer Granholm, and other unnamed figures, all described as major players in attempts to nullify the 2016 election and overthrow the government. Benz is said to detail the TIP war games and concludes that to prevent a second Trump term, Biden would need a large victory margin to overcome fraud perceptions, with the insurrectionist scenario calling for control of the military, Black Lives Matter, and other street rioters. The narrative asserts that BLM raised about 90 million in 2020 with donors like the Democracy Alliance and the Ford Foundation, and that Mark Elias led financial filings associated with the effort.
The discussion further cites Defense One articles from August 2020 that reportedly called for a military coup and a subsequent open debate within the military about accepting orders, and claims that Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley “was not about to obey any order from the president.” The appendix to TIP’s report allegedly debated criminally proceeding against Trump after leaving office and wiping out his “white supremacist and extremist base,” with a quote describing the need for a strategy to challenge networks that enabled Trump’s rise and remained “imbecible to the kind of pluralist democracy the founders intended,” implying a path toward removing Trump’s influence even after his presidency. The transcript also notes contemporary references to Arctic Frost, an FBI investigation linked to 2022 midterms, and alleged targeting of Republican election operations and other figures by the FBI. Excerpts from Trump’s World Economic Forum address and a January 2020 speech are presented to illustrate a moral and strategic framing against globalism and “radical socialists.” The presentation ends by inviting audience support and promoting further engagement, including a free newsletter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So five months before the election, the highest levels of military intelligence and political power in The United States Of America all got together, did a secret war game to to find a way to use riots, nationwide riots, and do favors to the Black Lives Matter movement so that they would owe them favors back to take to the streets against Trump if Trump won the election fair and square, but that they also needed a reason to throw Trump and his family in jail, and they needed a robust, intentional, and specific strategy to go after the networks that enabled Trump's rise to power because they will not automatically demobilize when Trump leaves office, and they can't be in this country anymore. We need a way to mass arrest them.
Speaker 1: That's Mike Benz on Saturday outlining in detail a big chunk of the conspiracy that put Joe Biden in office. It involved a group which most people have never heard of, the transition integrity project. And I share Mike Bens' obsession with their June twenty twenty war game. I'm Bubba Boyd, and I've been writing about this event ever since August 2020. I checked.
I'm also the coauthor of a police dossier. It's the British who murder our presidents. To get your copy, follow the link in the description. Today, I'm gonna first talk about the key players in the tip exercise and their shocking, very public plan to subvert the twenty twenty election. Then I'm gonna detail how the rigging of the election, the four attempts to jail Trump and wipe out his entire movement, which started on January 6, all flow from this June twenty twenty conspirators meeting.
Finally, I'm gonna show you excerpts from a speech by Donald Trump to the World Economic Forum in January 2020. It's why this nation's enemies decided long ago that Trump and Trumpism had to be eliminated. It echoes Trump's condemnation of globalism and the Europeans in the new national security policy we talked about on Saturday. But before we get started, please like and share this video. You know it increases our reach on YouTube.
The publicly named sponsors of the war game were Rosa Brooks and Niles Gilman from the Berggruen Institute in LA. The Berggruen Institute is the globalist home of Silicon Valley's really crazy anti Trump billionaires, like Reid Hoffman and Eric Schmidt, Google's former chairman. It has additional branches in Venice and Beijing. They claim their China branch is in direct dialogue with Xi Jinping. Saturday, I told you about Michael Anton, who wrote the revolutionary new Trump national security doctor.
Anton called out Tipp's war game when it happened. He said, accurately, they were planning a coup against the election, and their publicized war game were to normalize the idea in the public's mind. For that insight, Niels Gillman tweeted that Antoine deserved to be executed by a firing squad. Rosa Brooks started out as a lawyer for George Shullis at the Open Society Institute, went to Bill Clinton's state department to conduct regime change operations, then worked for Obama as a lawyer for the undersecretary of defense for policy at the Pentagon. All the time, she was a tenured law professor at Georgetown, one of the nation's preeminent law schools.
That's why I don't wonder where our current radical judges came from. She couldn't wait to launch a coup against Trump. In January 2017, just seven days after the inauguration, she wrote a piece for Foreign Policy Magazine titled three ways to get rid of president Trump before 2020. She dismissed the idea, of course, of waiting until the next election and winning it. Instead, she advocated the twenty fifth amendment and impeachment.
Both of those, of course, were tried in Trump's first term and failed. The fourth idea not mentioned incidentally in the title is a military coup. She ends this 2017 manifesto with the following. For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officers might simply tell the president, no, sir. We're not doing that.
Two, thunderous applause from the New York Times editorial board. That's the lawyer for the third most powerful person in Obama's Pentagon speaking. You might ask what role is she playing now as Democrats foolishly replay the very same game. In June 2020, Brooks and Gilman convened the tip war game about the twenty twenty election and its potential aftermath. It had over 100 active participants and 76 role players drawn from former Pentagon officials, the intelligence community, Silicon Valley, Wall Street, the media, and the Republican and Democratic Party and institutions.
In short, the corrupt Washington establishment. While some names have been made public like John Podesta, Donna Brazile, Bill Crystal, Michael Steele, Jennifer Granholm, many others, of course, have not. All of them were anti Trump. All of them, like Brooks and Gilman, were big players in the attempt to nullify Trump's twenty sixteen election and overthrow the government. Mike Bens does a very good job detailing the various war games in the TIP exercise.
I'll just leave it at the conclusion. The insurrectionist concluded that in order to prevent Trump from having a second term, Biden needs to somehow roll up a huge victory margin in the election and overcome the obvious perception of fraud. In all their scenarios, including overturning a Trump win, they need to control the military, Black Lives Matter, and FIFA, and similar street rioters. Well, BLM got 90,000,000 in 2020 with donors like the Democracy Alliance and the Ford Foundation. And Mark Elias, the lawyer who practically led the first coup, was in charge of all their financial filings.
The military, on 08/11/2020, defense one published an article by retired colonels John Nagel and Paul Yingling blatantly calling for a military coup. Defense one followed that up on August 18 with a call to make this a matter of reasoned debate within the military rather than rejecting the idea of a coup out of hand. Mark Milley, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, was not about to obey any order from the president to quell an insurrection. He was already in open revolt against president Trump in June 2020. Now on Saturday, I got a few comments about where to find the national security strategy I was talking about.
It's on the White House website. But if you subscribe to our newsletter, we provide you with all the research which backs up what I'm saying. If you haven't already, go there and subscribe now. The link is in the description. The most overlooked part of the tips exercise is the appendix to the report.
It debates the idea to criminally proceed against Trump even after he leaves office and to totally wipe out his, quote, white supremacist and extremist base, end quote. Here's the money quote. More broadly, there needs to be a robust intentional and specific strategy to challenge the white supremacists and extremist networks that enabled Trump's rise to power and were in turn enabled by Trump's administration. This base will not automatically demobilize if and when Trump leaves office, and it is inimicable to the kind of pluralist democracy the founders intended. Doesn't that sound like the setup for 01/06/2021?
Recently, senator Chuck Grassley and others disclosed that Arctic Frost, an FBI investigation opened in April 2022 ahead of the twenty twenty two midterms, sought to take out huge chunks of the elect Republican Party's election organization, spied on 10 sitting senators, and targeted citizens Trump for no less than four prosecutions. Like their current European counterparts, these Democrats slandered the electoral majorities who oppose them not as citizens, but as white supremacists and extremists. If you think about the institutions they said they need to wage a coup in this document, the justice department, the Pentagon, and a mobilized radical base that they control, you get a lot of insight as to why Kash Patel, Don Bugino, and Pete Hegseth are being so relentlessly targeted even by people who say they support the president. And it's why Antifa has been allowed to run loose and grow since the 2020. The only other institution you really need here is the media.
But, hey, they were already fully treasonous when Trump came down that escalator in 2015. So what engenders this hate against Trump and Americans, quite frankly? On 01/21/2020, president Trump went right to the belly of the beast, the World Economic Forum, and presented the same spiritual agenda, which is in his new national security strategy. I just wanna play two excerpts for you, and you'll see my point.
Speaker 2: This is not a time for pessimism. This is a time for optimism. Fear and doubt is not a good thought process because this is a time for tremendous hope and joy and optimism and action. But to embrace the possibilities of tomorrow, we must reject the perennial prophets of doom and their predictions of the apocalypse. They are the heirs of yesterday's foolish fortune fortune tellers, and I have them, and you have them, and we all have them.
And they wanna see us do badly, but we don't let that happen. They predicted an overpopulation crisis in the nineteen sixties, mass starvation in the seventies, and an end of oil in the nineteen nineties. These alarmists always demand the same thing, absolute power to dominate, transform, and control every aspect of our lives. We will never let radical socialists destroy our economy, wreck our country, or eradicate our liberty. Centuries ago, at the time of the Renaissance, skilled craftsmen and laborers looked upwards and built the structures that still touch the human heart.
To this day, some of the greatest structures in the world have been built hundreds of years ago. In Italy, the citizens once started construction on what would be a one hundred and forty year project, the Duomo Of Florence. Incredible, incredible place. While the technology did not yet exist to complete their design, city fathers forged ahead anyway, certain that they would figure it out someday. These citizens of Florence did not accept limits to their high aspirations.
And so the Great Dome was finally built.
Speaker 1: That tradition of optimism, building things, and exploring ever new frontiers of human knowledge is what our founders instilled in this country. It's in our bones. They understood that oligarchical imperial interests were in the process of wiping out that Renaissance tradition in Europe, a process which has almost reached its awful climax today. In conspiracy law, you have to prove that the defendants came to an agreement and then proceeded to act on it criminally. I agree with Mike Benz.
The agreement was made in the June war game, and the overt acts included the rigged election, 01/06/2021, the four Trump prosecutions, and those of his supporters who challenged the election, and the attempt to dismantle the president's constitutional controls of the military. It's now well past time to investigate all the participants for potential prosecution. I think you already know that we're not supported by anybody except our audience. People comment all the time that we need to have more influence. Well, there's only one way we can do that, and that is to build ourselves and to expand.
That's why we ask you to contribute as much as you can to help us do that. I'll see you on Thursday for our show where Susan and I will answer your questions. Until then, stay alert and get your questions in for the show. Thanks for watching. Please take a moment and subscribe to our free newsletter at prometheanaction.com.
@Milajoy - Mila Joy
CNN cameraman admits to being a part of the cabal trying to overthrow Trump while secretly being filmed. https://t.co/bxjhx9xCUi