reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - May 10, 2023 at 9:58 PM

@NowPammsy - PammsyNow

And this folks is why they want no term limits!👇🏻🧐🤬But they’re definitely needed! 👊🏻

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, Mitt Romney, and Joe Manchin are all wealthy politicians with high monthly incomes. Pelosi is worth $135 million with a $1 million monthly income, while McConnell is worth $150 million with a $900,000 monthly income. Schumer has a net worth of $69 million and earns $400,000 per month. Graham is worth $150 million and earns $1 million monthly. Romney's net worth is $450 million, and he earns $6 million per month. Lastly, Manchin is worth $12 million and earns $620,000 monthly. The speaker highlights the stark contrast between their wealth and the struggles faced by ordinary families.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nancy Pelosi worth $135,000,000 with a $1,000,000 a month income. How does that happen? Old Moscow Mitch, $150,000,000 he's worth with a $900,000 a month income. Chuck Schumer, $69,000,000, $400,000 a month income. Lindsey Graham worth 150,000,000 With a $1,000,000 a month income. This one really gets me. Mitt Romney is worth $450,000,000 with a $6,000,000 a month income. How does that even happen? I mean, I know how it happens. I'm being facetious. Joe Manchin, $12,000,000 a month $12,000,000 he's worth with $620,000 a month. Are you mad yet? You're struggling to put Food on your family's table, and they're making 1,000,000 of dollars a year and almost $1,000,000 a month on some of them. Wake up.
Saved - September 8, 2023 at 6:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell's combined net worth skyrocketed from 44 million to 360 million since their election. Despite earning 193k annually, they outperformed the stock market and hedge funds. Exploiting their authority, they engaged in insider trading and secretive deals. Remarkably, both over 80, they hold influential positions while most retirees their age step back. To combat such corruption, enforcing term limits for Congress members is crucial. It's time to say "enough" to these career politicians.

@WSBChairman - Chairman

Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell were only worth $4.4 million when elected to Congress. Today, they are worth a combined $360 million. So, with an annual salary of only $193k, how did they increase their net worth by a staggering 8081.82%? They abused their authority as the most influential members of Congress to solicit insider information and negotiate backroom deals, outperforming the stock market and top hedge funds. Nearly 100% of Americans age 80 or higher are retired, yet Pelosi and McConnell, who are both over 80, continue to hold some of the most powerful positions in the world. Corrupt career politicians like this can be eliminated by enforcing term limits for members of Congress. When is enough enough?

Saved - September 13, 2023 at 3:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Our country is in crisis, crumbling under the weight of corruption and division. The powerful few control the media, courts, and government, treating us like mere cattle. It's time for us, the people, to reclaim our power. We must reelect nobody, impose term limits, and guard the vote against corruption. Let's take back our country and protect our constitutional freedoms. The choice is ours. #ReElectNobody #GuardTheVote

@NHWhiteWolf - Feed The White Wolf

Our Country is crumbling, and it is falling hard. Using “X” and other platforms to continuously define the problems, which most of us can see by the evidence to substantiate this RICO corruption & criminal acts is not resolving anything. Our world is boiling into an “Us versus Them” culture or condition on all fronts. The Co-Conspirators-In-Power are pushing that envelope, so you know they are stepping up their game for a reason. It is time for “We The People”, to form a plan and begin pushing back. Repeatedly defining the problem is no longer viable for any real change. They own the media, the courts, the alphabets, and the power. But the fact that they think they own it all is the answer – it is their Achille’s heel. They are unguarded because we are considered mere cattle. Their plan is obvious. People always toggle between parties when life gets hard. Left versus Right, hoping life gets better if we switch to that other party. They used Biden to make life very hard - medially, socially, core values, financially and even liberties. Knowing historically, the people will probably switch controlled parties, they indicted Trump in an attempt to remove that opposition. Then, in comes Vivek Ramaswamy, who they have dubbed, "Trump Lite". He is young, new and likely does not have the vote nor the name for the nomination - and he has too many ties to WEF & that old controlling money. Meanwhile, Biden's health fails at the last minute and they push Michelle Obama on the ticket, since she had little political baggage to attack.(They already came right out and told RFK, JR they are blocking him from the nomination!) Bam, the deep state cabal, thru 16-years of Obama's shadow government rule takes the chessboard - guess who will be their pawns. With that said, the answer is simple - take our power back – the Constitution gave it to us, so we need to be proactive enough to take what is ours. We are the managers of our country & they are the employees. If we don't manage, then they overtake the rule, and we crumble. We let them manage themselves and they are destroying us. So, that is the Who, What, Where & Why. All we need is the “How”. RE-ELECT…NOBODY, (#ReElectNobody = #TermLimits), both within the Washington, DC Beltway AND heavily scrutinize every governorship, as most of these “chosen-ones” will then reach & apply the presidency from the governor’s mansions. Scrutinize every congress rep, senate rep, governor, presidential candidate before deciding. "Drain The Swamp Via The People" Then, #GUARDTHEVOTE. Make sure all local voting establishments have a watch committee from all parties. The People versus corruption. Ever election we have had in recent history has been tampered with by those in power because we don't watch. It is our house, so lets watch our own front door. #GuardTheVote ! These RICO criminal & corrupt politicians will not ever enact term limits, but we can. #ReElectNobody and remove the disease, then become a voting watchdog and #guardTheVote and the process from corruption. https://twitter.com/i/status/1686583679865262080 If you love your country, your freedom, your children and your legacy, the choice is a simple equation! #ReElectNobody + #GuardTheVote (Psst, it isn't about them, nor the party anymore. It is about you.) is the sum of #ConstitutionalFreedoms!

Saved - September 16, 2023 at 4:17 AM

@ElonMuskAOC - Elon Musk (Parody)

Congress members annual salary and net worth… Nancy Pelosi Annual salary: $223,000 Net worth: $202 million Mitch McConnell Annual salary: $200,000 Net worth: $95 million How does this make any sense at all? Trading stocks should not be allowed for them or their spouses. It’s horrible.

@WatcherGuru - Watcher.Guru

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US Congressman introduces plan to ban Congress & their spouses from trading stocks.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I propose a 5 point plan to reform our government. Firstly, we should prohibit PAC and lobbyist money in congressional campaigns, as I personally do not accept any of it. Secondly, we must ban stock trading by members of Congress and prevent them from becoming lobbyists. Notable activists and organizations like Unusual Whales, Quiver Quantitative, and CREW support this cause. Thirdly, we need term limits for both members of Congress and Supreme Court Justices. Lastly, an ethics code should be established for Supreme Court Justices. These changes are necessary and demanded by the people. It's time for bipartisan support to restore our government. Thank you, Madam Speaker.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That is why I'm introducing a 5 point plan. 1st, ban all PAC and lobbyist money to congressional campaigns. I don't take a dime of it. Second, ban completely stock trading and members of Congress from ever becoming lobbyists, Activists like Unusual Whales, Quiver Quantitative, and the leaders at CREW have been mobilizing for this. 3rd, term limits for members of Congress, 4th, term limits for Supreme Court Justices, and 5th, an ethics code for Supreme Court Justices. This is common sense. The people demand it. It's time we give them back their government and we reform in Washington. We should have bipartisan support for this 5 point plan. Thank you, Madam Speaker. I yield back.
Saved - September 28, 2023 at 1:10 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Seriously, it’s time for Mitch to move on https://t.co/lkpfwiLJya

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

🧐 https://t.co/FYXCsO9ofN

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks the senator if they heard the question about running for reelection in 2026. The speaker apologizes and asks if anyone else has a question.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you hear the question, senator? Running for reelection in 2020 6? Alright. I'm sorry. You all working a minute? 6? 6. Okay. 6. Somebody else have a question? Please speak up.
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 12:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Warren Buffett suggests a solution to the national debt problem: if the deficit exceeds 3% of GDP, congress members should be ineligible for re-election. Politicians should prioritize their country over money and lobbyists. Accountability is crucial for a country's integrity and trust. Serious changes are needed to combat political corruption.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

🚨🚨🚨@patrickbetdavid has an excellent quote from Warren Buffett about fixing a bigger issue in the political system : “I can fix the national debt problem in 5 minutes!! You make a LAW that states : anytime the DEFICIT is larger than 3% of GDP, all members of congress are ineligible for re-election”🔥🔥🔥 Politicians NEED to abide by the highest standards for their country - This is a JOB that requires LOVE and DEDICATION to your country, NOT to MONEY and LOBBYISTS!!!! Accountability for politicians is one of the MOST important things for a country’s integrity and TRUST!!! We need serious changes to STOP this current political corruption #Politicians #Sellouts

Saved - December 24, 2023 at 1:14 PM

@Sadie_NC - Sadie 🇺🇸 👩‍🌾

This is what we need more of in our representatives!🔥 https://t.co/tPlKEonYsX

Video Transcript AI Summary
I propose reducing the salary of White House press secretary Corinne Jean Pierre to $1. Throughout her tenure, she has been accused of lying to the American people, displaying condescension towards reporters, and violating the Hatch Act. Some of her alleged lies include stating that illegal immigration is down under the Biden administration, denying people are crossing the southern border, claiming the 2016 election was stolen, asserting that Governor Brian Kemp stole the 2018 governor's race from Stacey Abrams, denying that Biden's stimulus bill impacted inflation, and denying the teaching of critical race theory in schools. Given her history of deceit, it is questioned how she can continue to serve as the president's liaison.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I rise today to offer an amendment to reduce the salary of Corinne Jean Pierre, the White House press secretary, to $1. Mister speaker, during miss Jean Pierre's tenure as press secretary, she has repeatedly lied to the American people and acted in a condescending manner toward reporters and also violated the Hatch Act. Just to name a few of her lies, miss Jean Pierre has claimed, one, illegal immigration is down under the Biden administration. She also claimed nobody is just walking in across the southern border, she also claimed that the 2016 election was stolen. She also claimed that governor Brian Kemp stole the 2018 governor's race from Stacey Abrams. She also claimed that Biden's stimulus bill did not impact inflation. She also claimed that critical race theory or its equivalent isn't being taught in our schools. She also claimed that nobody has done more for the southern border or our border in general than Joe Biden, how can somebody with such a history of deceit continue to serve as the liaison for the president
Saved - December 29, 2023 at 12:23 AM

@Sadie_NC - Sadie 🇺🇸 👩‍🌾

You will never see democrats doing this. https://t.co/HuUoVASPgf

Saved - February 7, 2024 at 9:50 PM

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

More of this. Representatives representing. https://t.co/cxYJmD8yg6

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the government covered up the truth about the events on January 6th, with social media platforms like Google, Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram suppressing information. They suggest that these platforms are against the president because he is not controlled by Washington, and they endorse him for re-election. The speaker questions whether Hillary Clinton and Stacey Abrams should be charged with insurrection for claiming they won elections. They mention the lack of evidence for Russian collusion and criticize those who continue to push this narrative. The speaker commends representative Gates and warns that those who persist in spreading the lie will be guilty of breaching house privileges. They emphasize that there is evidence to support their claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have the ability and at our disposal tools to find terrorists in caves in the Middle East that you can't find someone who planted a pipe bomb. That's pretty egregious, but we have evidence that the government really helped to cover up what was happening. And I will just point all of you to what happened at Oversight where we actually questioned Twitter 1.0. We saw that under the Department of Homeland Security, Saisa was actually working to not only suppress information to include the president's statement to remain peaceful on January 6th. Remember how he said that? Yet it was nowhere on social media. It's because these outlets, whether it was Google, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram. They're all working to suppress that information, but I wonder why. I wonder why they would wanna do that, and it's because this president is truly a man that is outside of the DC control, and frankly, that's why every single person, I'm pretty sure, up here has endorsed him for reelection, and he's going to win in November. But I want honest to ask you all questions on whether or not you think that we should be charging someone like Hillary Clinton with insurrection. Someone like Stacey Abrams with insurrection because they all claimed that they won elections. We know that Hillary Clinton was full of it. We know that because we saw what come out. In fact, you guys know the aisle censored Adam Schiff over it. There was no evidence of Russia collusion. So wanna close with saying this. What we've seen happen over the last couple of years has not only been depressing as a member of Congress to witness how much people up here have actually used that lie, used that narrative, not just to smear president Trump, but to tear apart this country. But I do applaud what representative Gates has done, and what I will say is that those sociopaths that continue to push this lie. Once we have this on the floor, if you continue to push this, you guys are all going to be guilty of breaching house privileges. Okay? Because we're saying that it didn't happen. We have evidence to back it up. So just think on that for a little bit.
Saved - August 30, 2024 at 5:36 AM

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

It’s funny how Congress doesn’t know how to balance the federal budget, but somehow many of them are multi-millionaire stock traders. 🔊 https://t.co/dfKbRbxZEK

Saved - November 22, 2024 at 1:21 PM

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

These 5 republicans are going to be infamous. https://t.co/89qAFkpx6z

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump informed Gates that he lacked the necessary votes, with at least five Republicans firmly opposing him. Gates intended to shake up the department but faced setbacks due to a hacker allegedly leaking damaging files related to him. The narrative suggests that this was orchestrated by Democrats, with the DOJ leaking classified information. Despite the chaos, the FBI is not investigating the hack, and Gates faced no charges after a two-year inquiry. There’s relief over Gates stepping down, but concerns remain about Pam Bondi, who is expected to be confirmed and has a similar agenda to Gates. Bondi is seen as competent and capable, raising fears among those who value liberty and justice that she may effectively pursue her objectives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump called Gates and told him he didn't have the votes. And NBC reports at least 5 Republicans were a firm no on Gates, as in nothing was changing their minds, as in even if Gaetz recited the bible from memory at his hearing. Those senators are Mitch McConnell, Murkowski, Collins, Mullen, and Curtis. Fetterman, not surprised. Speaker 1: What was your reaction to Matt Gaetz dropping out? Speaker 2: Holy I didn't see that coming. I mean, like, yes. He was the ultimate troll, and people have the opportunity. They can freak out over a thing and respond. And if you wanna do that, you don't have to. You better pace yourself, though, because it's not even Thanksgiving. Speaker 0: Gates was gonna shake up the department, and then he got whacked. The story is a hacker stole files with testimony from a 17 year old that's said to be damaging to Gates. But what it really looks like is a Democrat lawyer, oops, let it get out there and claimed he was hacked. And Biden's justice department and the Democrats on the House Ethics Committee are leaking classified files to the press like crazy. Leaks and hacks, that's what the deep state does when they want someone gone. Is the FBI investigating this hack? Definitely not. Remember, Gates was investigated by Biden's Department of Justice for 2 years, and they didn't bring a single charge. It was about dirtying them up. Now that Gates is out, the DOJ is high fiving. Speaker 1: Now there's, I think, a lot of a lot of relief that, Matt Gates is no longer, the nominee. One person said that certain events like the sun chasing away the dark of night are not surprising. They're expected, but that doesn't stop me from being grateful for each sunrise. I don't I now know what is going to be the first feather of my gratitude handprint turkey this Thanksgiving. Speaker 0: They shouldn't get too excited because Pam Bondi will definitely get confirmed and has the same attitude as Gaetz. She'll be going there to clean house, smoke out the bandits, and declassify what they've been trying to hide. MSNBC realized later that they didn't dodge a bullet. Speaker 3: Pam Bondi is exactly what I was saying in the last segment that we should all fear because she's competent. We may not agree with her ideologically, but she actually knows how to do this job. So if anyone on the Democratic side or anyone who cared about liberty or justice was thinking, well, maybe Matt Gaetz will screw this up, and that'll give us some time. No. Pam Bondi knows what she's doing.
Saved - December 12, 2024 at 7:24 PM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

BREAKING: Leaked photo of disgraced Senator Mitch McConnell needing to be carted around by staff in a wheelchair after crippling health scares. McConnell, 82, has been hiding his condition from the public for years. We must pass term limits in America. Source: @emilyjashinsky https://t.co/cHKOsCrQK4

Saved - January 14, 2025 at 10:30 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

MN Democrats have refused to show up for two weeks in an attempt to prevent legislative work from being done because Republicans currently control the House. These Democrats work for us. We pay their salaries. And they’re refusing to show up to work. https://t.co/j9NSjIax75

Video Transcript AI Summary
A ruling of no quorum on the Macy's 504 paragraph 5 was made, and a roll call was requested. The house is not adjourned, and we lack authority over the House of Representatives. Minnesota law mandates that House members meet at noon on Tuesday in the chamber. The DFL caucus has violated this law to obstruct the organization and commencement of the House's work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A ruling of no quorum on the Macy's 504 paragraph 5 and request a roll call. Hands up. Hands up. Mister secretary, the house is not adjourned. We do not have authority over the house of representatives. Minnesota law requires the members of the house of representatives to meet at noon on Tuesday in the house chamber. As you can see, the DFL caucus has violated the law for the express purpose of preventing the house for organizing and beginning its work.
Saved - February 7, 2025 at 10:08 PM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

Another great advertisement for term limits. https://t.co/0qihEiJkQ0

Saved - February 9, 2025 at 10:56 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

This is what we’re dealing with everywhere in government https://t.co/ObsfvINEQ2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Failing to account for $850 billion in the DOD budget is concerning. While a failed audit doesn't automatically mean waste, fraud, or abuse, it raises questions about accountability and responsible spending. The inability to track how this money was spent leads to justifiable concerns, especially when considering issues like food insecurity on military bases. The contrast between a massive military budget and struggles to provide basic services highlights a disconnect for many. Seeing a $50 billion increase in the Pentagon budget after twenty years of war, while service members rely on food stamps, fuels perceptions of corruption. This isn't about personal attacks, but about the disconnect between massive spending and the realities faced by those in the military.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To be doing. Like, there is a lot of waste, fraud, and abuse within a system. Speaker 1: Audits and waste, fraud, and abuse are not the same thing. So let's, decompose these things. Speaker 0: Please educate me on on what Speaker 1: the is exactly what you just described, Speaker 0: which Speaker 1: is, do I know what was delivered to which place? Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: The ability to pass an audit or in a the fact that the DOD has not passed an audit is not suggestive of waste, fraud, and abuse. That is completely false right there. So Speaker 0: So what is Now Speaker 1: is a question of it's suggestive that we can't we don't have an accurate inventory that we can pull up of what we have where. That is not the same as saying we can't do that because waste, fraud, and abuse has occurred. Speaker 0: So in my world Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: That's waste. Speaker 1: How is that waste? Speaker 0: If I give you a billion dollars and you can't tell me what happened to it, that to me is wasteful. That that means you are Speaker 1: not responsible. Speaker 0: But if you can't tell me where it went, then what am I supposed to think? And when there has been reporting I mean, this is not look. I'm not I'm not saying this is on you and that you caused this, but I think it's it's a tough argument to make that Speaker 1: cause it. Speaker 0: An an $850,000,000,000 budget to an organization that can't pass an audit and tell you where that money went, like, I think most people would consider that somewhere in the realm of waste, fraud, or abuse because they would wonder why that money isn't well accounted for. And especially when they see food insecurity on military bases and they see Speaker 1: Wanna talk about that? Because that's a good we should be talking. I mean, I'm trying to understand where where where you're trying to go other than the dollars, which really bother Speaker 0: you. I think it doesn't really bother me. I think it's all connected. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: I think when I Tell me Speaker 1: that story. Tell tell me how you're thinking Speaker 0: about that. When I see, a state department get a certain amount of money and a military budget be 10 times that, and I see a struggle within government to get people, like, more basic services, and then that, department that got that I mean, we got out of twenty years of war, and the Pentagon got a $50,000,000,000 raise. Like, that's shocking to me. Now I may not understand exactly the ins and outs and and the incredible, magic of an audit, but I'm a human being who lives on the Earth and can't figure out how $850,000,000,000 to a department means that the rank and file still have to be on food stamps. Like, to me, that's fucking corruption. I'm sorry. And if, like, if that blows your mind and if you think, like, that's, like, a crazy agenda for me to have, I really think that that's institutional thinking and that it's not looking at the day to day reality of the people that you call the greatest fighting force in the world. So I just again, I get back to this idea of, like, I'm not looking to pick a fight with you, but I am surprised at that the reaction to these questions are, you don't know what an audit is, bucko. Like, that's just weird to me. Speaker 1: Okay.
Saved - February 28, 2025 at 12:01 AM

@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up

The vast majority of Democrats—not just Republicans—support DOGE’s budget cuts. https://t.co/TyOTdTNYtW

Video Transcript AI Summary
A recent poll reveals that 67% of people believe the US federal debt is unsustainable, and 60% think Doge is helping make major cuts in government expenditures. Robert Blouie notes that people are fired up about Elon Musk making cuts that politicians have only promised. Dan Turrentine agrees, stating Democrats are too focused on how Musk is doing it. The poll shows 72% of Democrats want reduced government expenditures, but creating that change can be chaotic. Turrentine believes Democrats need to be more open to cuts and not just raising taxes. Blouie thinks Musk could be more aggressive given the massive deficit, as it is a spending problem, not revenue. Turrentine says the real test will come when Congress starts trying to pass the reconciliation bill because it is the only way to get real deficit and debt reduction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Brand new polling, which shows overwhelming support for the Doge cuts. When asked if the US federal government debt is unsustainable, 67% say, heck, yeah, it is. It's unsustainable. 33%, no, man. We got this. But when asked if DOGE is helping make major cuts in government expenditures, 60% say, heck, yeah, it's helping. 40% say, no, it's not helping. And finally, when asked if Doge should have access to the sensitive data, remember that one? 50 eight percent say, heck, yeah, give him the access, compared to 42% who say, no. Don't give them the access. So we wanna dive further into this now with Robert Blouie. He's president and executive director of The Daily Signal and also Dan Turrentine, cohost of Morning Meeting. Also, Dan served as chief of staff for then congressman Jared Polis, who's now the governor of Colorado. Thank you both for being here. So, Robert, it seems like Elon's doing what Trump promised, but it's really who's doing it and how it's being done that has people all fired up. Am I wrong? Speaker 1: This time around is you actually have somebody who is serious about cutting spending in Washington DC. For years, politicians have made promises. They have not followed through on those promises, and Elon Musk is doing that. He's doing so at the direction of Donald Trump, which as the exec the commander in chief and the CEO of the executive branch has the authority to designate an individual in his under his direction to do exactly what Elon is doing. So I think that American people should get used to this. We're not going to see the end of it until DOGE has finished its work. Speaker 0: Dan, what are your thoughts? Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, I think you said it well. There's been, I think, too much focus by Democrats on who's doing it and and how he's going about it. Right? You know, he didn't give him thirty days notice, so it's like a footfall in tennis. But I I think, look, there is polling that shows that people have concerns with Musk. So I think to some extent, you're going to hear more about it. And I think at times it's coming across as a little chaotic like today. I think this evening, the office of personnel management put out word that people don't have to follow what Musk said. But Yep. Look, I I think as as Robert just said, overall, Trump ran on this, and common sense tells everyone there is some spending that shouldn't be happening. And where they find it, democrats should say, you know, good on them, and let's fix it. Speaker 0: Well, let let's talk about the poll I just referenced. Alright? It also asked respondents take a look. Walk with me here. I wanna show you. It asked respondents, should US reduce debt by increasing taxes or reducing government expenditures? Simple question. Right? Take a look at what Democrats had to say. Reduce government expenditures. 72% of Democrats say, heck, yeah. No surprise. 94% of the GOP said that as well. So so, again, think think about that, guys. When when you see that, Dan, and how are we supposed to reduce government expenditures, which 72% of the Democrats in this poll say, yep, we want done, without creating chaos, without having issues when you're bucking the norm? Speaker 2: Look. That that's the that's the the the the million dollar question. And I think this is where democrats have made a mistake because every time Musk says anything, we scream about him. We scream about the process, and we scream about every single cut. When there is something legitimate, then people don't hear us, right? Because we're constantly complaining. And I think what that survey shows is every household has to make cuts at varying points, you know, in the arc of its lifetime. Every business has to make cuts. So Americans understand this. So for the Democratic party to always say, just raise taxes is crazy. It's one of the reasons we find ourselves where we are in the minority. Yeah. Speaker 0: Robert, president Trump posted on True Social that he wants Elon to be more aggressive. So my question to you is, is there a world where Elon could could maybe go too far with this? Speaker 1: Not with the massive debt problem that we have. And and as we we all know, in in talking about this issue, the government is running a $2,000,000,000,000 deficit, and there is a lot of work just to be done. This is not a revenue problem as Dan was just talking about. This is a spending problem. And so I think that there is a lot that Elon can do. There are 2,400,000 federal employees. There are a lot of government programs that just haven't delivered on they don't match the return on investment that you would have in the private sector. And so I think that there is a lot more that Elon Musk can do, and I would hope that Democrats can work collaboratively with Republicans to try to streamline and make government more efficient. At the end of the day, I think that is a goal that hopefully most Americans can get behind. Speaker 0: Wouldn't that be something, Dan? I mean, why why won't democrats say, we saw what the voters said in November, and we agree there is waste that needs to be cut. Let us work with you to make that happen. Speaker 2: Yeah. I think this is where a little bit of kind of how Musk has gone about it. He he he didn't endear himself, you know, very early on with some of his taunts and and and brash statements. Now you can make the argument that's what was needed to get this done. But look, the rubber's gonna meet the road here for both parties when congress starts trying to pass, this reconciliation bill. Because the only way you'll ultimately get the type of deficit, and debt reduction is to look at entitlements and defense. And that, you know, even Republicans are saying, wait a second. We're a little nervous about Medicaid or Medicare. And I think Democrats will, you know, sit there and say, is that the trade off that you wanna make? The country may say yes, but I think we're about to have that conversation. Speaker 0: We're having the conversation now. Robert Bluhey, Dan Turrentine, thank you both for sharing your thoughts with us tonight. We do appreciate it. You know, as as Elon chips away at this excess spending, Doge hasn't gotten it all right every step of the way, something Elon admits isn't realistic. Listen here. Speaker 1: Some of the things that I say will be incorrect and and should be correct.
Saved - February 27, 2025 at 8:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been following the Senate DOGE Caucus and their efforts to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse in government. We're actively working to make government more efficient, with members like Senator Lankford calling out federal missteps and Senator Blackburn focusing on cutting unnecessary spending. Former Navy Seal Tim Sheehy is ensuring our tax dollars don't fund terrorism, while others like Senator Risch and Senator Cornyn are tackling national debt and student loan issues. Overall, we're committed to accountability and transparency for taxpayers.

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

🧵What’s the Senate DOGE Caucus been up to? Working alongside @DOGE to root out waste, fraud, and abuse and ensure government is working for Americans! We have hit the ground running 👇

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

Flag on the play! 🏈 @SenatorLankford is playing ref and calling out the federal government’s fumbles! https://www.lankford.senate.gov/news/press-releases/lankford-releases-latest-federal-fumbles-as-playbook-for-doge/

Lankford Releases Latest Federal Fumbles as Playbook for DOGE - Senator James Lankford WASHINGTON, DC – Senator James Lankford (R-OK) today released the latest edition of his government waste book, Federal Fumbles: A Playbook for DOGE. Lankford reveals billions of dollars lost to wasteful spending, inefficiencies, fraud, and improper payments. The book also exposes the 30 different agencies involved in disaster relief and $2 billon that was given to the Taliban through […] lankford.senate.gov

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

🔪@MarshaBlackburn is prioritizing making government more efficient by slashing wasteful spending. Learn more here👇 https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/jobs-and-economy/blackburn-introduces-doge-acts-to-make-federal-government-more-efficient-and-slash-wasteful-spending

Blackburn Introduces “DOGE Acts” to Make Federal Government More Efficient and Slash Wasteful Spending blackburn.senate.gov

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

🫡 Former Navy Seal @TimSheehyMT is stopping the flow of every penny through the No Tax Dollars to Terrorists Act. Our citizens should never have been funding terrorists in the first place! This common sense is exactly why we need @DOGE👇 https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6369316347112

We have seen four years of theft from Americans, GOP lawmaker says | Fox Business Video Sen. Tim Sheehy, R-Mont., unpacks DOGE's efforts to uncover government waste on 'Kudlow.' foxbusiness.com

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

❌@RogerMarshallMD is prohibiting federal funds from going to institutions conducting gain-of-function research. American taxpayers should not be on the hook for dangerous experiments – especially after what happened in Wuhan! https://nypost.com/2025/02/26/us-news/sen-roger-marshall-introduces-bill-to-ban-federal-grants-for-dangerous-gain-of-function-research/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

Exclusive | Sen. Roger Marshall introduces bill to ban federal grants for ‘dangerous’ gain-of-function research Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) introduced a bill Wednesday to prohibit federal grants going toward all "dangerous" gain-of-function research on viruses, according to a copy of the legislation exclusively obtained by The Post. nypost.com

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

📉@SenatorRisch is working to drive down our national debt with his Zero-Based Budget Act. https://www.risch.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/pressreleases?ID=420ED50A-64C1-48C5-9F27-857E6B709CF5

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

💰@JohnCornyn knows Biden’s student loan scam was taxpayer theft. He’s working to address it on behalf of hardworking Americans! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPisIodBoW0

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

🚫@SenEricSchmitt knows Democrats have racked up wasteful spending and is setting the record straight for why we need @DOGE! https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/02/07/sen_schmitt_on_cutting_waste_democrats_are_guardians_of_permanent_washington_we_should_welcome_this_fight.html

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

🔎@ChuckGrassley sets the pace for congressional efforts to hold Washington accountable! With over 600 oversight efforts, nothing is getting past him👇 https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/remarks/grassley-highlights-oversight-achievements-on-senate-floor

Grassley Highlights Oversight Achievements on Senate Floor | U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa Floor Remarks by Senator Chuck Grassley of IowaSenate President Pro Tempore grassley.senate.gov

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

🇺🇸@SenatorHagerty knows American taxpayer dollars should support our citizens – never those who come here illegally. He’s holding the government accountable for this waste! https://www.hagerty.senate.gov/press-releases/2025/02/10/hagerty-introduces-legislation-to-hold-ngos-accountable-for-facilitating-illegal-immigration/

Hagerty Introduces Legislation to Hold NGOs Accountable for Facilitating Illegal Immigration - Senator Bill Hagerty WASHINGTON—United States Senator Bill Hagerty (R-TN), a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, today introduced the Fixing Exemptions for Networks Choosing to Enable Illegal Migration (FENCE) Act, legislation to revoke the tax-exempt status of organizations that engage in a consistent pattern of providing financial assistance, benefits, services, or other forms of material support to individuals […] hagerty.senate.gov

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

📣Preach, @SenRonJohnson! He’s shining a light on @DOGE’s commitment to transparency! https://t.co/StL1iLyTdr

@SenRonJohnson - Senator Ron Johnson

All $7,000 billion of federal spending needs this kind of scrutiny. If given, the public will demand much lower spending levels. Will we listen to hard-working Americans who are paying for the waste, fraud, and abuse, or the caterwauling big government leftists and their allies in the legacy media?

@PaddyMacMke - Patrick McIlheran

Key tidbit from this story: For every $1 million in taxpayer money sent to @UWMadison for vital researcher, $555,000 is skimmed off for administrative overhead -- according to the university's own figures. Seems like a lot. https://t.co/FLFEHSRCaY

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

And there’s more where that came from! Our members are committed to saving taxpayer dollars and getting government to work for the people!💪

Saved - March 26, 2025 at 2:30 PM

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

Virginia Sen @MarkWarner will run for a 4th term in 2026 He promised he would only serve 2 terms “I don’t want to be a lifelong politician. If I’m elected to US Senate, I will serve no more than 2 terms. I think our system is renewed by new ideas and fresh people” @MarkWarnerVA https://t.co/1NyMfQhdzW

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they do not want to be a lifelong politician and views public service as a limited-time commitment. They pledge to serve no more than two terms if elected to the U.S. Senate. The speaker believes the U.S. system benefits from constant renewal through new and fresh ideas and people. The speaker concludes by asserting their understanding of the role of a U.S. Senator.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't wanna be a lifelong politician. My view of public service is something you do for part of your life, not all of your life. That's why I've said that if I'm elected to the United States Senate, I will serve no more than two terms. Because I think the value of our system is that it's constantly renewed by new ideas, fresh ideas, and fresh people. So, senator, don't lecture me about what the role of The United States Senator is. I know that role.
Saved - June 2, 2025 at 12:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated with Congress, which is getting 18 weeks of vacation this year while earning $174,000 annually, translating to $1,300 a day for only 133 workdays in 2025. This lack of urgency is concerning, especially with the current political climate. While I see a strong push from the presidency, I worry about the potential reversal of executive orders if a far-left Democrat takes office in 2028. Additionally, I’m puzzled by the discussions around the DOGE cuts and the apparent inaction from some Republicans. As taxpayers, we deserve more accountability and effort from our representatives.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This post has almost 20k likes in under 24 hours. Americans have had enough of US Congress “Let me tell you what makes absolutely no sense” - The United States Congress is getting 18 weeks of vacation this year - They get paid $174,000 a year - Only 133 work days for the entire 2025 - They get paid $1,300 a day “Do you see a sense of urgency? — This is a big time for us, right? I mean, we have the House, we have the Senate, we have the presidency.This should be a huge year. But I don't see that same sense of urgency in Congress. Now I see the presidency having a huge sense of urgency. Donald Trump has had a very good presidency so far. But my concern is that he's had a lot of executive orders. And as you know, if we get a far left Democrat in 2028, they could go in in 2029, in January 2029, and reverse a lot of those executive orders and wash away a lot of the good things that Trump has done.” “My other concern is that I keep hearing about these DOGE cuts being codified in Congress about some Republicans aren't even before making these things permanent, the Doge cuts. What the hell's going on with that?” “We’re paying, American taxpayer, you and I are paying a lot of money to these people, and I don't see a big sense of urgency on the calendar. Nobody gets 18 weeks off a year, and they're getting paid very high dollars. So it's very concerning. I wish we had a bigger sense of urgency. I wish they worked more. I think we deserve that”

Saved - June 5, 2025 at 6:49 PM

@JessePeltan - Jesse Peltan

Man. This guy would win in a landslide. https://t.co/T4aie0ACtj

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

No member of Congress should be eligible for re-election if our country's budget is not balanced---deficits not allowed!

Saved - June 24, 2025 at 4:13 AM

@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸

Hey democrats remember this https://t.co/UNU9hYiAMK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker authorized airstrikes in Iraq to protect American personnel and initiated strikes against ISIL targets in Syria. The United States launched an operation against a compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and authorized limited military action in Libya. The speaker questions whether criticism of these actions is directed at the actions themselves or at the person who authorized them, claiming Obama did the same thing without similar backlash. Military operations are what the armed forces and their equipment are for. The speaker accuses liberals of being disingenuous.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, I authorized two operations in Iraq, targeted airstrikes to protect our American personnel. Last night, on my orders, America's armed forces began strikes against ISIL targets in Syria. Today, at my direction, The United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Speaker 1: They did what? Speaker 0: Today, I authorized the armed forces of the United States to begin a limited military action in Libya. Speaker 1: Because in Libya bullshit. I ain't never heard of Libya. Speaker 0: Were national security. They can take the diplomatic Speaker 1: So at the end of the day, the question all it comes down to is, is y'all really mad at the strikes, or is y'all just mad at the person who did it? Because Obama did the same goddamn thing, but we didn't hear nobody talking about he bombed the country and shit. He didn't bomb no fucking body. These are military operations that go on throughout our country. This is why we have a military, the armed forces, the marines, and all this shit. It have all these this equipment that's worth billions of dollars. This is this is what this is for, to do stuff like this. Operations. Where do you think they came up with the game Call of Duty, nigga? Like, y'all liberal think y'all slick, though. But best believe, though, I'm on y'all last all day, though.
Saved - July 30, 2025 at 1:12 PM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

President Trump just posted this on Truth Social, advocating for term limits of uniparty politicians who have been in office for over 30 years. This further exposes the insanity of the radical left’s “No Kings” movement. Congress is just hospice with better amenities. https://t.co/xrN9z576p3

Saved - August 3, 2025 at 4:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a speech from 1958, the year I was born, reflecting on my service to our country in the fight against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. Now, 66 years later, I feel we are on the verge of losing everything. It's crucial that people are held accountable for how we arrived at this point. I believe we need term limits for Congress, as many current leaders have been in government for nearly six decades.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

The below speech was given in 1958, the year I was born. I served our country more than half that time to help America stand against ALL ENEMIES FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC. Yet here we are…66 years later. And we are on the brink of losing everything. PEOPLE MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR GETTING US TO THIS POINT. I would add, we need term limits on Congress. Many of these current “leaders” have been in the USG damn near most of the past 6 decades. @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @RobertKennedyJr @DNIGabbard

@RealLTCRicBosi - Riccardo Bosi

Robert Welsh 1958 https://t.co/wKN83VSqdO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The plan involves inducing a gradual surrender of American sovereignty to international organizations, with the United Nations as a primary example. Aims for the United States include: expanded government spending, higher taxes, an unbalanced budget, currency inflation, and government controls on prices, wages, and materials. Increased socialistic controls over the economy and daily life would be accompanied by a larger bureaucracy and increased government reach. More centralization of power in Washington aims to eliminate the significance of state lines. Further goals involve federal aid to and control over education, leading to federalization. Constant emphasis on the horrors of war promotes the necessity of peace, but on communist terms. This would lead to American people allowing appeasement by the government, resulting in a piecemeal surrender of the free world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A part of that plan, of course, is to induce the gradual surrender of American sovereignty piece by piece and step by step to various international organizations of which the United Nations is the outstanding but far from the only example. Now here are the aims for The United States. One, greatly expanded government spending for every conceivable means of getting rid of ever larger sums of American money as wastefully as possible. Two, higher and then much higher taxes. Three. An increasingly unbalanced budget, despite the higher taxes four. Wild inflation of our currency five. Government controls of prices, wages, and materials supposedly to combat inflation. Six, greatly increased socialistic controls over every operation of our economy and every activity of our daily lives. This is to be accompanied, naturally and automatically, by a correspondingly huge increase in the size of our bureaucracy and in both the cost and reach of our domestic Government. Far more centralization of power in Washington and the practical elimination of our State lines. There is a many faceted drive at work to have our State lines eventually mean no more within the Nation than our County lines do now within The States. Eight, the steady advance of Federal aid to and control over our educational system, leading to complete federalization of our public education. Nine, a constant hammering into the American consciousness of the horror of modern warfare. The beauties and the absolute necessity of peace. Peace always on communist terms, of course. And 10, the consequent willingness of the American people to allow the steps of appeasement by our government which amount to a piecemeal surrender of the rest of the free world
Saved - September 4, 2025 at 12:34 AM

@Breaking911 - Breaking911

Meanwhile in the United States Congress... https://t.co/qh0ELoYeeB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mister president, this is a photograph of the alien from the movie Alien. In late August, the FDA found that raw frozen shrimp from Indonesia was being sold in Walmart. It was being sold under the Walmart label called the great value label. the shrimp was radioactive. cesium one thirty seven. It'll kill you. Even if it doesn't turn you into the alien if you eat this stuff, I guarantee you will grow an extra year. The FDA issued a recall. A few days later, it happened again. The FDA and NOAH, which I'll talk about in a second, found that there were 26,460 packages of shrimp cocktail and 18,000 bags of frozen cooked shrimp being sold again. It's not being inspected. It's supposed to be inspected by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The United Kingdom inspects 50% of the foreign seafood coming into its nation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister president, this is a photograph of the alien from the movie Alien. This is what you could end up looking like if you eat some of the raw frozen shrimp being sent to The United States by other countries. Now, let me tell you what I'm talking about. In late August, the FDA found that raw frozen shrimp from Indonesia was being sold in Walmart. Specifically in Walmart stores in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, and West Virginia. It was being sold under the Walmart label called the great value label. If you eat it, why could you end up looking like the alien in the alien? Because the shrimp was radioactive. I kid you not. It had a radioactive isotope in it called cesium one thirty seven. It'll kill you. Even if it doesn't turn you into the alien if you eat this stuff, I guarantee you will grow an extra year. That was bad enough. Obviously, the FDA issued a recall. A few days later, it happened again. The FDA and Noah, which I'll talk about in a second, found that there were 26,460 packages of shrimp cocktail and 18,000 bags of frozen cooked shrimp being sold once again at Walmart and at Kroger's throughout The United States containing the same radioactive isotope. How could this happen in America? This is unconscionable. I'll tell you how. Because that shrimp that that shrimp from other countries which don't abide by the same rules that we abide by in America, which if you eat it will turn you, it may turn you into the alien, and at a minimum will you, will cause you to grow an extra ear. It's not being inspected. It's supposed to be. It's supposed to be inspected by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. We call it NOAA. It's part of the Department of Commerce. And yes, they're they're inspecting some of it, about 1%. On a good day, 2%. The United Kingdom inspects 50% of the foreign seafood coming into its nation. Even China does a better job than The United States Of America. This is unconscionable, mister president. There is no excuse for it.
Saved - October 22, 2025 at 1:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m told the real reason the government remains shut down is an anonymous Democrat Senator who says they’d face the guillotine if they vote to open it—these are THEIR words. Receipts:

@ScottJenningsKY - Scott Jennings

The REAL reason the government is still shut down: A Democrat Senator anonymously said they are afraid to vote to open the government because "we'd face the guillotine." These are THEIR words 👇 https://t.co/sDjje9vpfv

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker presents a conditional scenario directed at the president: if the president said today that he would be happy to meet with the Democrats if they stop holding the government hostage, then Democrats could walk in tonight, pass the continuing resolution (CR), and provide seven weeks. The speaker believes the president could then bring everyone together, and that the Democrats would likely negotiate on a number of issues and reach an agreement. The speaker emphasizes that the president does not want to negotiate under duress. This point is tied to a claim about Democratic sentiment: anonymously, a Democrat senator told the speaker that none of them want to vote to open the government because, in their words, “we’d face the guillotine.” The speaker notes that these words came “from our base,” suggesting this is the view of the president’s political allies or supporters. In summarizing the exchange, the speaker asserts that this line of reasoning reflects a critical dynamic in the current standoff: the possibility that a straightforward, pressure-free offer from the president to engage with Democrats could break the deadlock and lead to a constructive dialogue on policy issues. The implication is that the threat or perception of political duress is a barrier to reaching a resolution, and that a different approach—one that signals openness to negotiation without coercion—might unlock bipartisan progress. The transcript includes the assertion that if the president were to publicly welcome negotiations under a non-duress framework, there would be movement toward a compromise on multiple issues, facilitated by a temporary timeline (seven weeks) and a renewed, inclusive negotiation process. The speaker underscores the idea that such an approach could shift dynamics away from fear of political punishment within the base toward substantive agreement. Towards the end, the speaker remarks, “Look. Think you just made a very important,” indicating that the argument is intended to highlight a potentially pivotal point about how the administration’s stance could influence willingness to engage and resolve the government funding impasse. The transcript ends with this incomplete thought, leaving the broader implications implied but not fully explicit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's what I think. If the president said today, be happy to meet with the Democrats if they stop holding the government hostage. They could easily walk in there tonight, pass the CR, give us seven weeks, the president brings everybody together. And my strong belief is that they would wind up negotiating on a number of issues and they would come to an agreement. The president doesn't wanna negotiate under duress and the hill today, democrat senator anonymously said, none of us wanna vote to open the government because quote, we'd face the guillotine. That's their words from our base. Yeah. That's what Look. Think you just made a very important
View Full Interactive Feed