reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@gekaminsky - Gabe Kaminsky
A NEW @dcexaminer analysis of federal documents reveals the Tides Center — a massive left-wing dark money group financing recent pro-Hamas protests — has been routed over $81 million in taxpayer-backed contracts/grants since 2006. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/democratic-dark-money-giant-anti-israel-activism-millions
Democratic dark money giant behind anti-Israel protests has scored $81M in taxpayer dollars
An influential liberal dark money group propping up anti-Israel activism across the United States has pocketed massive amounts in taxpayer-backed grants and contracts in recent years, according to a Washington Examiner analysis of federal spending records.
washingtonexaminer.com
@TheMossadIL - The Mossad: Satirical, Yet Awesome
Well, well, well. They followed the money, and look what they found! $50,000,000 in unaudited US taxpayer money in one month alone went to a pro-terrorist group disguised as a climate change organization. @SenCapito https://t.co/LQZnDlzkE3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker raises concerns about $50 million in taxpayer money granted to the Climate Justice Alliance by the EPA. They criticize the organization's radical initiatives, including defunding the police and military, and anti-American and anti-Israel sentiments. The speaker questions if the funds will truly be used for environmental purposes or for protests. They express disappointment in the lack of oversight by the EPA and the Biden administration. The speaker plans to investigate further in the environment and public works committee.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I wanted to bring to everybody's attention, something that doesn't get much attention. And you've heard the term follow the money. So I looked up where did follow the money. I thought it was from a Tom Cruise movie, but it wasn't. It was from Watergate.
And follow the money is what they did in Watergate. And and we saw what happened. So my young staffer who's very bright, and I see him over there, Adam Pack, followed the money. And the money is from the so called inflation reduction act. So in the name of green and environmental justice, there's over $40,000,000,000 that are gonna be granted out through the EPA.
So with this great research that was done, what was discovered that in December, the EPA granted $50,000,000 to an organization called Climate Justice Alliance. So we went to the website of plus of Climate Justice Alliance. This is what we found on the website that our taxpayer dollars are going to organizations such as this. This, at the bottom, is a picture of the bulldozer that went through the fence when Hamas attacked Israel in on October 7th. They have a rendering on their website.
It says decolonized Palestine, and it has a picture of that same bulldozer going through that fence. If you dig deeper, they wanna defund the police, defund the military, either them or their affiliates want to want to have very radical, drastic, initiatives that I think are anti American. And they're certainly anti Israel and anti Semitic. So the Biden administration doesn't seem to care. $50,000,000 in December.
Who knows how much more in the future and other like groups because there are other associated groups with this group. There's no inspector general for EPA to follow the money because they don't care. Because all they care about is the mission, the climate mission, no matter what the radical ideas that are associated with the groups. So then you could ask yourself, is this group really going to be funding climate you know, cleaning up the water and cleaning up the soil and cleaning up the air? Or are they gonna be funding things like the protests they had in heart just several weeks ago where several of them were arrested?
So follow the money. We're gonna be doing that in the environment and public works committee. That's where the derivation of this was. And I I find it rather startling to me that the EPA is not doing and the administration are not doing any better research as to where our American taxpayer dollars are going.
@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga
State Department mistakenly gives $239 million to Taliban. https://www.judicialwatch.org/taliban-gets-239-mil/
Taliban Gets $239 Mil in U.S. Afghanistan Aid after State Dept. Fails to Vet Awardees - Judicial Watch
Less than a year after Judicial Watch reported that the Taliban has established fake nonprofits to steal millions of dollars in U.S. aid to Afghanistan, a new investigation reveals that the terrorist group has also received hundreds of millions in development assistance from Uncle Sam because the State Department fails to properly vet award recipients. At least $239 million have likely filled the coffers of the extremists running the Islamic republic since the 2021 U.S. military withdraw, according to a report published this month by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR). The money was disbursed by State Department divisions known as Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) and International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) to implement development projects intended to help achieve American foreign policy and national security goals in Afghanistan.
judicialwatch.org
@CrusherWinston - The Garbage Man™
@TaraBull808 Tim Walz Caught Sponsoring Radical Isis Cleric, records show Terrorist organization received $123,000 In Funding in 2021 after Walz relationship turns into Taxpayer Cash for Terrorist Group. https://t.co/hfU5hlkMkb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Under a Waltz Harris ticket, Waltz's embrace of radicals within the Muslim community would be replicated at the White House level. Waltz seemingly doesn't want to know about the extremists he embraces.
State records show the Muslim American Society of Minnesota has received grants totaling over $123,000 starting in 2021 through the next fiscal year. The Washington Examiner reports the United Arab Emirates designated the Muslim American Society as a terrorist organization in 2014. Federal prosecutors described the Muslim American Society as a direct arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, which assassinated Anwar Sadat and gave birth to Hamas. The Harris Waltz campaign has not responded to requests for comment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a serious problem. Under a Waltz Harris ticket, given Waltz's ability to embrace really just the worst kind of radicals within the Muslim community, one can only imagine this would be replicated at the White House level. Waltz clearly doesn't want to know about the extremist he embraces.
Speaker 1: The state records we've tracked down show the Muslim American Society of Minnesota has received grants totaling over a $123,000 starting into the year 2021 through next fiscal year. Reporting from the Washington Examiner says the United Arab Emirates designated the Muslim American Society as a terrorist organization back in 2014 and that federal prosecutors described the Muslim American Society as a direct arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, the same Muslim Brotherhood that assassinated Anwar Sadat and gave birth to Hamas. Now the Harris Waltz campaign has not responded to our request for a
reSee.it AI Summary
The Republican Oversight Investigation reveals that since January 20, 2021, the U.S. government is allegedly being run by a "terrorist organization," specifically the Biden/Harris administration. It claims that the Inflation Reduction Act uses taxpayer money to fund domestic terrorism under the guise of addressing climate change. The post lists various organizations receiving substantial funds, suggesting they promote anti-law enforcement and open-border agendas. It also criticizes Vice President Harris for prioritizing equity in climate investments, labeling these initiatives as part of a broader conspiracy since 2008.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, the Republican Oversight Investigation, CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT, Holy fuck, Since January 20, 2021, the United States government is being run by a terrorist organization. The BIDEN/HARRIS TERRORIST ORGANIZATION through the “Inflation Reduction Act” using American tax payers money to fund DOMESTIC TERRORISM on United States soil in the name of the greatest criminal conspiracy ever perpetrated on humanity, Climate Change, “In fact, there’s been a recent rush to get this money out. And that’s because they know there’s a likelihood that the administration will change to come November.” And here is the follow the money, A: Climate Justice: $100 million to one terrorist organization to glorify another, Hamas, B: NDN Collective: $100 million to defund law enforcement and obliterate the United States military. C: NY Immigration Coalition/NJ Alliance for Immigrant Justice: $50 million for open borders and annihilate citizenship. D: Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs: $50 million to abolish police and abolish prisons. E: Ella Baker Center for Humam Rights: $1 to $3 million to defund the police, decriminalize shoplifting and abolish prisons. “I'm going to say that Vice President Harris…is quoted here, ‘I put equity at the center of our nation's largest investment in climate in history, to reach the organizations that know their community best.’ That's what she said when they rolled out and actually named these terror organizations.” In other words, A: these are the domestic terrorist organizations who RULE Kamala Harris. And B: these are the types of terror programs unfolding across United States and western civilization since 2008 under the chief of terror Barack Obama in the name of Climate Change, the weapon of mass destruction.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers are concerned about the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which they call the "Invest in Radical Activities Act," and the EPA's distribution of $3 billion in grants. They claim that much of this money is going to groups engaged in anti-American activities, including anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, anti-police, and anti-border security stances.
Specific examples include the Climate Justice Alliance ($100 million), which has allegedly glorified Hamas and denies Israel's right to exist; the NDN Collective, which calls the U.S. a "so-called country" and advocates defunding the police and military; New York and New Jersey coalitions ($50 million) that view borders and citizenship as racist; Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs ($50 million) who want to abolish police and prisons; and the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights ($1.3 billion) who advocate defunding police, decriminalizing shoplifting, and abolishing prisons.
They criticize the EPA's lack of oversight and accountability, noting that the agency claims political beliefs aren't considered in grant decisions. The speakers argue that money is fungible and that funding these groups frees up other funds for political activities. They are urging the EPA not to disperse the money and plan to defund these initiatives and increase oversight when they regain control of Congress.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think this should be in an outrage, really, to every tax paying citizen. We're talking about the inflation reduction act, which is almost 2 years old as of, this August. And it also, I noticed in the president's schedule that he was getting briefed on the inflation reduction act. So I'm sure he got this briefing while he was, being briefed on the inflation reduction act, which we have renamed invest in radical activities act because that's what this is about. So we've really been digging into who is getting these massive amounts of grants through the EPA.
There's $3,000,000,000 in the in the inflation reduction act, the IRA, that will go for climate different climate kind of buckets. And in our investigation, we found that a lot of this money that's going out really has little to do with the environment and a lot to do with funding groups that are basically engaged in what I characterize as anti American, activities. They're anti American, anti Semitic, anti Israel, anti police, and anti border security. So the first one I'm gonna go to is, and and before I do that, I'm also going to say that vice president, Harris, who is now the nominee for the Democrat presidential race, is quoted here. I put equity at the center of our nation's largest investment in climate in history to reach the organizations that know their community best.
That's what she said when they rolled out and actually named these organizations. And interestingly today, there was a news article today saying that the green groups have now formed a coalition today, and guess who they're endorsing for president? Vice president Harris. So let's go over to the following one. I I say follow the money, because I think that's where you find out.
The first one is, climate justice. It's up on the top right hand bar there. A $100,000,000. They have glorified Hamas, in a lot of their social media, on their websites, and other things. And they think Israel has no right to exist.
They're getting a $100,000,000. This is a direct grant to them. The next one is the NDN, Collective. Collective. Do you you know them?
Yes. They're a partner. Yes. They, on their social media, call the United States a so called country and also call for the defunding of the police and our United States military. Imagine that in these times right now.
Next, we have, 2 New York and New Jersey coalitions that are getting $50,000,000. They're actually going to be participating in granting $50,000,000. Their quotes are the border and concept of citizenship is racist, and wants no collaboration with federal immigration officials, and the ICE agenda is racist as well. Then we have the social and environmental, entrepreneurs, $50,000,000. Again, abolish police, abolish prisons.
The the latest one, these were all those previous ones I'm talking about were all announced in December by the vice president, and named on, the EPA's, materials as they as they rolled them out through the press. The Ella Baker Center For, Human Rights, the most recent funding was announced last week as getting between $1,300,000,000, And they are actively advocating to defund police, decriminalize shoplifting, and abolish our prisons. So I think that, that this uncovers quite a bit of the 3,000,000,000. We're up to 200,000,000, actually a little bit more than that, if if you count everything all in. And this is just, the lack of accountability.
The administrator of the EPA has been questioned about this. He says the money hasn't gone out. That's their fur that was their first name. Well, they haven't gotten the money yet. Now they're saying, well, we don't we don't, check out the partner organizations.
So this NDN would be a partner organization as opposed to an actual grantee. So why aren't you vetting these people? I mean, this is taxpayers dollars. And what do they have to do with, telling people how to, live and cope better and clean up their environment? So I think that we need to know that these are, appalling to me and to many of us who, work hard to make sure that we're not just paying our taxes, but we're also making sure that we're making good investments from from the federal government.
So what are we doing about it? Well, we're shining a light on it and urging the EPA to not disperse this money. And and, coincidentally, they haven't dispersed all of this money yet, so we'll see what happens. We're I pushed in the appropriations committee for more money for the EPA inspector general, somebody to follow the money within the EPA because they know best, an inspector general would be able to do that. And then I think the most important thing is when we take control of congress after January, we will be able to defund a lot of this, but we also be able to follow it and do much more oversight.
So I'm gonna turn it over to my friend from, Nebraska and see his perspective on this.
Speaker 1: Well, thank you, senator Capito, for highlighting this and showing some transparency and some sunlight on what's going on here with regard to these grants through the inflation reduction act. But as you all more aptly named it, the Investment and Radical Activist Act
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: Because that's exactly what we're doing here. When you're giving money to organizations like the Climate Justice Alliance and they are funding the wash on march, march on Washington. And they are waving the free Palestinian flags and so forth. We're paying them to lobby our government. I gotta tell you, everyday Nebraskans don't think that's a good idea.
Like, that our tax dollars should go to radical organizations to lobby our own government. That's just crazy. And you're talking about the NDN collective and the things they wanna do, like abolishing the military, abolishing the police, abolishing customs and border protection, abolishing immigration and customs enforcement. Again, everyday Americans think those organizations are important organizations, and we wanna keep them to keep us safe. They are way out of step with what everyday Americans wanna see.
This is really, really radical stuff that they're they're promoting. And then we have organizations like the, social and environmental entrepreneurs who are spreading climate alarmism and, again, funding left wing groups. This is not what our tax dollars are supposed to go for. And to your point about the EPA, because all this money is going through the EPA, I was just talking to a company yesterday who said, hey. We need more help with getting permits done.
We can't get permits fast enough, frankly, for some of these environmental projects even. And it's because the money is going to fund these radical organizations and not nobody's paying attention to how many people have got work in their different regions to be able to help get these permits processed. So on the one hand, the EPA's got legitimate business they're not getting done. On the other hand, they're funding these radical and, environmentalists and other sorts of organizations. And, again, it just gets back to everyday Americans, that's not how they want their money spent.
They want their money spent here in Washington, DC wisely. And when you see the frustration that people have Washington, DC, this is a prime example of why they have that frustration. So I wanna, again, thank, senator Capito for highlighting this, for shining some sunshine on this so that we can get some changes made. We are now sitting at $35,000,000,000,000 in debt. We have got to get our spending under control, and spending on this kind of radical activism is not the way we should be spending our tax dollars.
Alright. I'll turn it over to you.
Speaker 0: Well said. Well said. So any questions? Yeah. Josh?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Thanks for doing this. Yeah. Just got I mean, as far as you said, you know, up and saying that you're all kind of, you know, go back to sort of, I mean, as as far as in the in the universe of IRA components, do you view this as as what I'm trying to rightly start? Is that they you think Trump should prioritize?
Well Well, I mean, because he's he's talking about almost entirely just
Speaker 0: Okay. We we know well, number 1, there's there's been a recent rush to get this money out. And that's because they know that there's a likelihood. We like to think a high likelihood that the administration will change come November. And so they're rushing to get the money out, and you see who they're sending it to.
So we have that how in in this pot of money, in the $3,000,000,000 for EPA, it would probably be predicated on how much is left. We would certainly try to claw that back. But but at at the minimum, we would have more opportunity for sunlight here and more opportunity for oversight. In terms of other parts of the IRA, I think some of the tax provisions I mean, it was just such a bloated, you know, Pete's talked about our our debt. We talked about the inflation.
Everybody who knows anything attributes, our inflationary rise over the last 2 years to this IRA and the bloated spending, and then cap that with the expansion of, of our debt. So I think, I think this is something that would be a top priority for all of us. And I don't know if you wanna say anything about what we could and would do.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, when you look at partisan bills that are passed that include reckless spending, it's one of the things that's driving inflation. We've got to control that in if we're going to get inflation under control. There's other things that we have to do, like being able to use our own energy resources to help bring prices down, but we've got to get the spending under control. And so if we have a new administration and new opportunity, we gotta be able to start raising some of this money in, especially when it's being wasted on radical political activities, which is not what the American taxpayers signed up for.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Do you
Speaker 2: have any do you have any recourse more immediately to, try to figure out what these groups are doing with this money? Like, are you sending letters to EPA or or the groups?
Speaker 0: Well, EPA is well aware of our, extreme concern on this. I mean, here's a small victory. Climate's just Climate Justice Alliance redid their website and took all that down. I mean, what is that? Oh, is that okay now?
I mean, so I I feel like we're our voices are being heard, at least in a small way. No response from the administration at all. No response from the administrator, on this. And, and so right now, we're just I think our best path is to just shine a light on it and talk about it. And this isn't gonna be the end of this.
I think this is just the beginning. Yes?
Speaker 2: So in the past, in response to your investigation of these groups and uncovering what exactly they stand for, the EPA has said, you know, political message or political beliefs are not in our criteria. They don't play a role in
Speaker 0: how we choose and how
Speaker 2: we score, these, grants. And they've also said, that the specific money of the grants that are pending or go out, can't be used for messaging activities. It can only be used for the specific purpose that's outlined. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: My response, but do you wanna
Speaker 2: Go ahead.
Speaker 0: You wanna go first? Well, I mean, common sense tells you. If you have a $100,000,000 coming into your, nonprofit organization and you have certain political beliefs that you've been espousing all through your, existence, not just in your social media, but for for years. To say that you would never use that money in, in, in, to to be guided towards, anti police or anti what happens? It frees up the anti police money so you have more anti police money.
I mean, that just makes sense to me. If somebody's gonna get a $100,000,000, you're gonna have much more to do your political events or your political espousing, through that. And there's no coincidence that just today, they've announced they're gonna, endorse the person who announced them. And the EPA administrators, I like him. But his response to this has been very, very deficit.
He told the house members when questioned about this, because they got the information from us. He told the house members, well, they haven't gotten it yet. Well, why are you putting a press release out that these are the people that are gonna get it? These are the organizations that are gonna get it if you don't intend to actually give them the money? I mean, that to me is either at the least sloppy or at the most deceptive and, oh, you got kinda got caught, being unaware or try to slip something through.
So I don't know.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I would just build upon that. Money is fungible. Right? You can move money around.
And so if you've got money that covers administrative expenses, you're paying part of the rent, that part of the rent means that you don't have to go up and raise the money to do your political activities. Right? So the money's fungible. The only thing I'd point out is that there's been such a lack of diligence from the EPA that allows the money to go to these groups. Why would we have any confidence that they're doing any sort of audit to make sure the grant money is being spent in the way that it's supposed to be spent?
I don't have any confidence the EPA is checking up on these groups after even just seeing the groups they've gone to. So zero confidence the EPA actually knows how this money is being spent.
Speaker 2: Do you believe that when they say that political affiliation or messaging has nothing to do with their criteria, not involved?
Speaker 1: I would say the I would question that back and say, why are we paying for any political activity? It should be a criteria. You should say, you cannot have this if you are going to, you know, lobby the federal government with the money that we're giving. Right? And then, again, unless you're actually auditing to find that out, we can't have any confidence in that.
Speaker 0: I mean, I'll go back to what I said earlier. If you have no, if you have no political messaging and you're not supposed to be a political group, why are you endorsing somebody for president if you're not interested in the political, environment yet?
Speaker 2: Is this something that you've asked the EPA inspector general EPA inspector general or GAO to look into?
Speaker 0: We haven't asked yet. I don't believe. I got my staff back here. But I will tell you this. In the in the IRA, the, authors of the bill did not include while they're getting $3,000,000,000 did not include 1 single dollar for extra oversight of those dollars.
So the EPA has an inspector general. And what we get back from the inspector general is or from the EPA is, well, we need more resources in, within our, agency to be able to move forward on this. So we did get $5,000,000, through, senator Murkowski's bill, of the I think it's 30 that they get, for their IG. 5,000,000 is directed towards this. So that's a minor victory.
I had an amendment that would have said we need to move this up to 20,000,000, because to try to follow the money of $3,000,000,000, that's a pretty hefty load. And that's what happens when you pour so much money in so fast, it gets wasted. And we see it all the time. Why don't we learn the lesson of this? And now it's not only getting wasted, it's getting poured into radical activists.
So thanks.
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe what I just heard. An NGO is receiving $600 million every 2-3 months from US taxpayer money for illegal migrants. I spoke to someone at DHS who handles the electronic fund transfers. This is happening consistently, and it's shocking.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
I can’t believe what I just heard NGO being cut a check for $600 Million Dollars EVERY 2-3 MONTHS “I spoke to a gentleman that works in DHS. He actually sends the electronic fund transfers” LET ME REPEAT: $600,000,000 of US taxpayer money sent to an NGO, EVERY 2-3 MONTHS for illegal migrants - House Homeland Security Committee Hearing
Video Transcript AI Summary
Can you name some NGOs that have misused funds meant to protect children? Catholic Charities, Lutheran Family Services, and Jewish Family Services were mentioned. I spoke with a DHS employee who handles electronic fund transfers. He revealed that he oversees Jewish Family Services and has issued a check for $600 million. When I asked if that amount was for three years, he clarified that it was actually for just two or three months, and it’s renewable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd like to ask mister Carroll and anybody else who would like to answer this. Can you name some of these NGOs that have specifically taken these 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars and not used it to protect these children? Catholic Charities, Lutheran family services, Jewish family services. I had spoke to a gentleman that works in DHS. He actually sends the electronic fund transfers, and I asked him, sir, tell me, who you who do you send who who are you responsible for, and how much is the largest check you cut?
He said, I'm over Jewish family services, and I cut a check for $600,000,000. And I said, is that for, like, 3 years? And he told me, JJ, get in the game. That's 2 or 3 months, and it's renewable.
@DOGE - Department of Government Efficiency
The United States gives more in aid to foreign countries than the next 9 countries combined. Where exactly is that money going and how is it being spent? https://t.co/bNG0tGd8jc
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
BREAKING! USAID Was Secretly Funding The BBC To Run Anti-Trump/Musk Reporting Similar To The $300 Million Given By The Biden Administration To Reuters To Target Musk! MUST-WATCH https://t.co/GCUQKk5zmj
@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy
BREAKING: George Soros received $260M from USAID. He didn't spend his own money to destroy the American justice system. He used ours. https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/it-was-shuttered-usaid-routed-funds-soros-causes-terrorists-and
Before it was shuttered, USAID routed funds to Soros-aligned causes, terrorists and drag queens
The development agency for years also funneled money to several nonprofit groups that also received substantial backing from components of George Soros’ empire.
justthenews.com
@amuse - @amuse
DOGE: Biden funneled billions into far left NGOs like the Climate Justice Alliance. The CJA received $50M from the EPA under the guise of fighting climate change. The group uses the money to promote pro-Palestine and anti-Israel propaganda in the US. h/t @epaleezeldin
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe USAID is deeply corrupt, having funneled vast amounts of taxpayer money to various controversial causes. They've allocated hundreds of millions to Soros-linked nonprofits and supported initiatives in countries like Afghanistan, Yemen, and Syria. Notably, funds went to electric vehicles in Vietnam, a transgender clinic in India, and LGBTQ advocacy in multiple countries. USAID has also financed media organizations and projects that align with political agendas. This is just the beginning of exposing what I see as a network of money laundering agencies.
@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil
USAID is an edless pit of corruption: https://t.co/qRoNXBpqbL -USAID funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to Soros-linked nonprofits -The American taxpayers are giving money to Afghanistan,Yeman and Syria. -USAID has 10,000 people employees, and every year they give away $40 billion -USAID gave money from US taxpayers to support electric vehicles in Vietnam. -USAID gave money from US to a transgender clinic in India. -USAID gave $1.5 million to a Serbian LGBTQ group -USAID spent $164 million to support radical organizations around the world -They gave $122 million of that to groups aligned with foreign terrorist organizations -USAID has given millions of dollars to quote organizations in Gaza controlled by Hamas -$2 million USAID gave money for sex changes in Guatemala -$20 million to produce a new Sesame Street show in Iraq -$4.5 million of taxpayer money to combat misinformation in Kazakhstan -$7.9 million of taxpayer money to a project that would teach Sri Lankan journalists to avoid binary gendered language. (The USAID took 8 million bucks and gave it to a bunch of journalists in Sri Lanka to teach them how to avoid binary gendered language) -USAID gave $1.5 million to promote LGBT advocacy in Jamaica -They gave $1.5 million to rebuild the Cuban media ecosystem -They gave $1.5 million for quote, art for inclusion of people with disabilities in Belarus -Another $3.9 million for LGBT causes in Macedonia - $8.3 million for equity and inclusion education in Nepal -USAID, gifted in 2016, $310 million of taxpayer money to start a Palestinian cement factory project. -USAID's biggest contract recepient of over $17 billion over years CHEMONICS connected to the Clintons, Podesta. -USAID funneled money to BLM -USAID funded Epoch Times -USAID funded Politico -USAID funded the BBC -USAID funded gain of function -USAID has given over $2,000,000,000 to GAVI, the front organization for Bill Gates -UK taxpayers were charged £100 MILLION for USAID -USAID funded 707 Media organizations, 279 "NGO" media outlets, and 6,200 propagandists. Including nine out of ten media outlets in Ukraine. -USAID paid Hollywood stars to travel to Ukraine. -USAID and the CIA secretly worked to impeach Donald Trump from office in 2019 -USAID were spending $40 billion dollars a year This USAID corruption is just the start of exposing these cabal money laundering agencies, wait until we get to the likes of the Red Cross.
reSee.it AI Summary
In the final days of the Biden administration, a $50 million grant was awarded to the Tribal Energy Consortium, a nonprofit led by Roger Fragua, who has a questionable financial history. The Trump administration has since launched an investigation into this funding. Fragua also runs the Flower Hill Institute, which shares an address with the Consortium and has faced audits revealing significant financial mismanagement and conflicts of interest. The USDA has received a corrective action plan from Fragua's group, but concerns remain about the potential disbursement of the grant.
@gekaminsky - Gabe Kaminsky
EXCLUSIVE: In its final days, the Biden administration awarded $50 million to an obscure nonprofit whose leader has a history of self-dealing and financial mismanagement, documents show. Now, the Trump administration has launched an investigation and not yet disbursed the funding, officials shared w/ me.🧵
@gekaminsky - Gabe Kaminsky
The $50M grant — from the Department of Energy — was approved on Jan. 13 for the Tribal Energy Consortium. It is a 501(c)(3) charity on Indian tribal land focused on energy and mineral development.
@gekaminsky - Gabe Kaminsky
IRS records show the charity’s leader is Roger Fragua, a former Enron Corporation manager and consultant who wears different hats.
@gekaminsky - Gabe Kaminsky
Fragua is also the founder and executive director of the Flower Hill Institute, a charity on tribal land that, in fact, shares a mailing address with the $50 million awardee and Fragua’s LLC, Cota Holdings.
@gekaminsky - Gabe Kaminsky
Here’s why that’s notable: Fragua’s other charity, also a federal grantee, was found through an independent third-party audit to lack internal controls and violate federal rules. Among other issues, it did not test to see if other contractors could fulfill its needs other than a trio of companies tied to its board members — including Cota Holdings.
@gekaminsky - Gabe Kaminsky
Fragua’s Cota Holdings raked in hundreds of thousands from his charity, while it also overbilled the Department of Agriculture for reimbursements, the audit documents say.
@gekaminsky - Gabe Kaminsky
The USDA told me it later received a corrective actions plan from Fragua’s group to address its issues, though tax experts still said these are red flags for the Trump administration to critically investigate before potentially handing the $50M to Fragua’s Tribal Energy Consortium.
@gekaminsky - Gabe Kaminsky
Read more here @dcexaminer https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/investigations/3311236/in-final-days-biden-awarded-50-million-to-self-dealing-charity-leader/
Biden awarded $50M to self-dealing activist - Washington Examiner
Along with other Energy Department grants under Biden, the Trump administration is investigating the $50 million handout to the Tribal Energy Consortium.
washingtonexaminer.com
@glennbeck - Glenn Beck
Why was the Tides Foundation - a progressive dark money machine - receiving US tax dollars? When you follow the money trail, it reveals Tides and other NGOs spread those dollars to each other and then spit it out around the world. Auditing USAID is NOT ENOUGH. https://t.co/aYAlivr71H
Video Transcript AI Summary
A lot of your tax dollars are going to organizations you may have never heard of. The Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening, or SEPs, gets $165 million. The East West Management Institute receives $25 million annually. The National Endowment for Democracy and its affiliates, like NDI, get $167.3 million, while Freedom House gets $93 million.
The Tides Foundation, known for being a progressive left-wing dark money machine, also receives tax dollars. Money donated to Tides goes dark, so you can't trace who's giving it. A money trail search on Tides reveals connections to Freedom House, NED, SEPs, East West, and Intra News. These organizations are spreading tax dollars to each other, and then to places like Soros.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The names that keep popping up, the consortium for elections and political process strengthening. SEPs, where is that? Right here. K. They get a hundred and $65,000,000 of your tax money.
Have you ever heard of them? How about East West Management Institute? Because, they're getting $25,000,000 every year. The National Endowment for Democracy and their affiliates like NDI. Right here.
Right here, a hundred and 67, 3 hundred and 60 2 million. Then you have Freedom House, which is right here, another $93,000,000. And oddly enough, we notice that the Tides Foundation, our old friends, show up on the chart clearly showing the Tides Foundation is receiving US tax dollars. Now back in the old days at Fox, I showed you the entire purpose of Tides is to be a progressive left wing dark money machine. It is it's money laundering, legal, but money laundering nonetheless.
You cannot trace money. Once it goes in, it goes dark. You can see what's coming out, but you don't know who's giving it. Leftist billionaires, organizations, they all donate to Tide specifically so their money can go dark. So why is the Tides Foundation getting tax dollars?
Well, maybe this is a one off. Let's do a money trail search on tides and see what pops up. Are they involved in anything else? The Tide Center. Oh, holy cow.
Now, this is, again, we're going to find deeper levels here soon. But, this is showing the entire money trail for Tides. On the chalkboard, again, I have a few notable ones. Oh, Freedom House, NED, SEPs, East West, Intra News. Wow.
They show up again. So they're spreading tax dollars to each other and then they spit out to places like Soros.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
People need to be prosecuted and go to jail for this. It’s pure corruption and theft. You should be infuriated.
@nypost - New York Post
Exclusive | $375B EPA slush fund handled by John Podesta gave billions to charities founded only months earlier https://trib.al/gemu04j
Exclusive | $375B EPA slush fund handled by John Podesta gave billions to charities founded only months earlier
The Biden administration funneled at least $20 billion dollars into environmental groups, most of which had only recently been founded, The Post has discovered.
nypost.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I exposed the GREEN SLUSH FUND, revealing that $20 billion was allocated to 8 NGOs towards the end of the Biden administration. Many of these organizations were established solely to receive this funding, benefiting Democrat donors and friends of Biden and Obama.
@JesseBWatters - Jesse Watters
EXCLUSIVE: @LeeMZeldin exposes the GREEN SLUSH FUND. $20 billion given to 8 NGOs towards the end of the @JoeBiden administration. Many of them were created JUST to get this money. And the money was going to Democrat donors and Biden and @BarackObama’s friends. Zeldin says that with the right connections, people were getting billions of your dollars.
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a green slush fund. The Biden administration parked $20 billion in an outside bank, giving it to eight NGOs, many created just to get this money. The EPA entered into an agreement with these entities, designed to tie the government's hands, so we don't know where the money is going.
Only about 5% actually goes towards the environment. One CEO, serving on the White House Environmental Justice Council, received $20 million. Account control agreements were amended to reduce EPA oversight. The Justice Department and FBI are working with us, and we must ensure accountability. There should be zero tolerance for wasted money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lee Zeldin, Trump's EPA administrator. Is this a kickback? Is it theft? Is it graft? What would you call it?
Speaker 1: All of the above. It's a green slush fund. $20,000,000,000 parked in outside bank towards the end of the Biden administration given to just eight NGOs. You just named a bunch of them. These NGOs were created for the first time, many of them just to get this money, and they're pass throughs.
And so the EPA entered into this account control agreement with these entities. Treasury enters into a financial agent agreement with the bank, and they design it to tie the EPA's hands behind their back, to tie the federal government's hands behind its back. So when the money goes through the NGOs to subgrantees, many of them also pass throughs. We don't know where it's going. We don't have the proper amount of of oversight.
And as you pointed out, it's going to people who are in the Obama and Biden administrations. It's going to donors. It's not going directly. As you pointed out, thankfully, you did, it's not going directly to remediate that environmental issue to deliver clean air, land, and water. It's billions, tens of billions of dollars going through their friends.
Speaker 0: Well, they're gonna say they didn't steal it. They're just gonna say they got paid salaries, and then they donated it to some other subcontractor who got paid salaries, and it eventually went to some kid to pick up litter. Right? Because, like, at the end of this, what's it like, 5% of this money actually goes towards the environment? How much actually goes towards the environment after it's been just stripped out for salaries?
Speaker 1: Right. And stripped out for salaries of middleman after middleman going through these multiple added layers. I'll give you an example. On the other end of this, there was one CEO who was serving on the White House Environmental Justice Council for the Biden administration. While she was serving on this council, she was CEO of an organization that applied for and received $20,000,000.
So some people were able to, with the right connections, be on the the receiving end of billions of dollars. Others on the other end of this getting tens of millions of dollars and the federal government not having oversight. And, you know, I just mentioned the account control agreements that were entered into EPA and these prime recipients. They were amending the account control agreements right up to the inauguration. Oh, They were amended account control agreements we found January 13.
Speaker 0: So they were scrambling before you guys got in there and and some tires.
Speaker 1: They amended it. So so Yeah. They amended these account control agreements to reduce EPA oversight and to make it easier for them to pass through the money without getting caught. So you caught them.
Speaker 0: And have you kicked this over to Pam Bondi at justice?
Speaker 1: Yeah. The justice department and FBI have been working very closely with us. They've been working hard on this. My conversations with the attorney general, she seems very focused and motivated. Same thing when I had an opportunity to speak to our our great new FBI director.
We have to ensure that there's accountability here, and we have to make sure that the federal government reestablishes oversight. We can't have we can't afford as a country to have this kind of money wasted. We should have zero tolerance for even a penny of waste and abuse. Wow. Mean, there should be no way that tens of billions are going up.
One
Speaker 0: a lot of scandals in the Biden administration, but this seems like a whopper. Glad you found it out. Lee Zellman, we really appreciate it. Let's get to the bottom of it. Thanks, Jesse.
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
It was just discovered that the Biden Administration had been paying the press for the last 4 years. Political received $26 MILLION! 🤬 You can't make this up! SMH https://t.co/xjPCnH669U
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Biden administration reportedly paid POLITICO $26 million over four years, including $8 million last year. The government claims this was for subscriptions to Politico Pro, which offers exclusive reporting about the federal government. Subscriptions cost between $10,000 to $75,000 a year.
Politico Pro is allegedly not for government employees but for lobbyists seeking contact information for regulators. The speaker questions why government officials would need to pay for inside information about their own departments. The speaker claims the payments were a bailout and a payoff.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we just found out the Biden administration was paying the press. During the last four years, POLITICO received $26,000,000 from the federal government. $8,000,000 just last year. The Biden administration was paying a DC insider publication that happened to never report anything bad about the Biden administration. But what did they pay for besides good press?
The government says it was for subscriptions to Politico Pro. Well, what's Politico Pro? Supposed to give you inside scoops or exclusive reporting about the federal government. It's been around since 2010, but all of a sudden in 2021, the Biden administration starts buying hundreds of Politico Pro subscriptions, and a subscription runs anywhere from 10,000 to $75,000 a year. Those are like top tier country club dues.
For $75,000, this exclusive reporting must be pretty good. Right? Now, no one ever read in Politico Pro that Biden was brain dead. Now if I'm gonna pay $75 for journalism, I wanna know whose Coke was in the White House. Politico Pro isn't even for people in government.
It's for lobbyists. You pay $75 a year for the name and email address of a regulator at the FDA. So you can email them, wine them and dine them at Cafe Milano, and then grease the regs for Pfizer or Kraft or whoever your client is. You find that when the farm bill's about to pass, so you can send your lobbyists into the backroom and write the bill. It's not for people in the government.
What do people at the Department of Energy need to pay $75 for to find out what's going on in the Department of Energy? Mayorkas needs to know what's going on with the border bill. All he has to do is call Chuck Schumer. The phone call's free. This doesn't make any sense.
The whole thing is a racket. This was a bailout. Biden's government didn't need this. It's a payoff product.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered what might be the largest political money laundering scheme in U.S. history, overseen by John Podesta, involving $375 billion in climate funds. Shockingly, $20 billion has gone to environmental groups, some created just before receiving funds, and a $7 billion check was signed by Kamala Harris for a Maryland climate group that isn’t even listed with the IRS. There’s a complete lack of transparency and oversight, raising concerns about potential fraud and whether this is a slush fund for political insiders. This isn’t about climate policy; it’s about misusing taxpayer money.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 BREAKING: THE BIGGEST POLITICAL MONEY LAUNDERING SCHEME IN AMERICAN HISTORY? 🚨 🔴 John Podesta is overseeing $375 BILLION in climate funds—billions of which are flowing to mystery organizations with no federal filings and zero public accountability. 🔥 THE SHOCKING DETAILS: 💰 $20 BILLION handed to environmental groups—some created just months before receiving the cash. 💸 $7 BILLION check signed off by Kamala Harris to a Maryland climate group that doesn’t even appear in the IRS database. ⚠️ NO transparency. NO oversight. Just billions disappearing into thin air. 🚨 WHY THIS MATTERS: 🔎 Your tax dollars are funding organizations that don’t officially exist. 🔎 Massive money transfers with no paper trail = potential fraud on a historic scale. 🔎 Is this a slush fund for Democrat donors, activists, and corrupt insiders? 💥 THE BOTTOM LINE: This isn’t climate policy—it’s a political payday. The Biden administration is playing fast and loose with YOUR MONEY, and the people behind it MUST be held accountable.
@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️
Obama pretended to send USAID money to aid foreign countries but was actually funneling it to Cayman Islands to be used for “Rent-a-Riots https://t.co/GCQfbSvUDH
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the Obama administration, USAID reportedly ran rogue operations in Cuba, including a Twitter knockoff called Zunzanillo, marketed to Cuban users. The goal was to create an Arab Spring-style social media revolution. Because Cuba didn't allow US social media, USAID created a platform with the same user interface as Twitter, using the Cuban slang word for hummingbird.
Millions of dollars were concealed as humanitarian funds designated for Pakistan and funneled through Creative Associates International (CAI), using Cayman Islands bank accounts and unsuspecting business executives. The network reached 60,000 Cuban subscribers and gathered data on users' demographics and political tendencies.
The plan was to initially use noncontroversial content like sports, music, and hurricane updates to build a subscriber base, then introduce political messages to encourage dissent. The aim was to organize "smart mobs" to trigger a "Cuban spring." USAID documents show the US government planned to build a subscriber base through noncontroversial news content, later introducing political content aimed at inspiring Cubans to organize.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was a scandal during Obama the Obama USAID era. Now we were running a number of of rogue USAID operations in Cuba at the time. By the way, I have to say for the record, I'm no fan of the Cuban government. I I I'm and I'm not even weighing in on whether it's the right or wrong thing to do, you know, in terms of regime change there or, you know, liberating people there from autocratic excess by that government. I'm simply showing the American people where your tax dollars are going and how these things are structured in order to systematically fool you and to fool congress and to fool the White House.
So for example so this is this is and and and I'll I'll show a couple other things in a second here, but it so this is Zunzanillo. If yeah. So if you just scroll for a second, we'll start with this. Right? So it was an online social media just scroll up one second.
We'll start at the top here. It was an online social social networking microblogging service created by USAID and marketed to Cuban users. This was a a Twitter knockoff. See, the background of this is this is 02/2009, '2 thousand '14, that period. The state department in USAID were gangbusters gung ho on the promise of Arab Spring style social media revolutions to topple other governments.
You know, that the Arab Spring was a Facebook revolution and a Twitter revolution. USA pumped $1,200,000,000 in, you know, and we we sponsored these activist groups and these civil society organizations to learn how to use Facebook, learn how to use Twitter, lose learn how to use hashtags, learn how to coordinate street protests so that everyone knows where to go, what street to show up on, you know, what kind of slogans to, you know, to to use in order to create the pro democracy, you know, predicate for it. But the problem was at the time Cuba did not allow US social media in. So they said, so they're not allowing Twitter in. How can we get a Twitter there but without calling it Twitter, without making it look like it's coming from The US?
So what they did is they took the exact same thing as Twitter. Same user interface, same like and retweet button. Is is the Cuban slang word for for hummingbird. So just it means it's it's bird. It was the the Twitter bird, the whole thing.
But the whole trick about it was you have to make it look like it's coming from the Cubans if you're going to do this operation. So what you'll see is it began running so this is 2010. This is right, you know, during the Arab Spring. And what you'll see is they took funds, millions of dollars of funds that were concealed as humanitarian funds designated for Pakistan. Now I don't know if, Joe or or the audience, if you looked at a map lately, but Pakistan is not exactly a next door neighbor of Cuba.
Right? So and this is the this is the Wikipedia whitewashing, and we can get into the deeper layers of this. But contractors funded by USAID, I should note the main contractor was Creative Associates International, who's a frequent one. It's CAI CAI, not CIA. I promise.
So they they concealed in the budget from senate, from congress, from the White House National Security Council. They said that that these were humanitarian funds for Pakistan, and then they ran that to their contractor, CAI, to, quote, set up a Byzantine system of front companies using Cayman Islands bank accounts and recruiting unsuspecting business executives who would not be told of the company's ties to the US government according to the AP. Private companies like Creative Associates International, designed the network. The idea arose after, they were given 500,000 stolen Cuban cell phones that are available on the black market. And then what you'll see if you scroll down is, okay.
The network dubbed the the Cuban Twitter reached about 60,000 Cuban subscribers. The initiative appears to also have had a surveillance dimension allowing a, quote, vast database of Cuban Zunzanillo subscribers, including gender, age, and receptiveness and political tendencies to be built with the Associated Press noting such data would could be used in the future for political purpose. By the way, these are all in quotes from the internal documents, and we can go through that. The data would then be used for micro targeting efforts towards anti and pro government users in Cuba. The developers aim to, at first, use noncontroversial content such as sports and music and hurricane updates, by the way.
They they used hurricane updates in the internal things. You know, basically, a humanitarian front that if you sign up to this app, you'll you'll know about natural disasters in the area. Meanwhile, what was the plan the whole time? Once they built up enough subscribers, they would begin to introduce political messages through social bots and encourage descent in this in this astroturfing. There's a great Guardian write up on this.
If you if you go to Guardian Zunzanio so you can see see how crazy just type in Zunzanio smart mob Guardian. You'll see the internal files explicitly said, we're gonna lure them in with music, sports, and hurricane updates. You have to join you have to join, you know, this you know, Twitter in Cuba if you want, you know, to be relevant in the culture and see what's trending in sports and music. If you wanna be safe in your homes, if you wanna know where hurricanes are going, Twitter you know, Cuban Twitter is the the fastest place to get this. It's humanitarian work for you know, that's we're saving lives by doing this.
But the whole point is once they hit a critical mass, they would create rental riots. And and they would use this the same way they used it in Egypt and Tunisia to topple those governments under the Obama administration. They would organize smart mobs, rental riots. And if and if you if you scroll down, there's some you know, this this is a fantastic article. Highly recommend.
There's a lot more there. But but okay. Stop right there. Scroll up a little bit. Scroll up a little bit.
Okay. Documents show the US government plan to build a subscriber base through noncontroversial news content, news messages on soccer music and hurricane updates. This is in the Guardian. Later, when the network reached a critical mass, perhaps hundreds of thousands, operators would introduce political content aimed at inspiring Cubans to to organize, quote, smart mobs. Mass gatherings called at a moment's notice that might trigger a Cuban spring or as one USA document put it, quote, renegotiate the balance of power between state and society.
And, you know one more thing if if you wanna look up on this to see how they how they conceal it. If you just type in USAID, Zunzanillo, and the word and discrete or or discrete action. And you'll see how USAID when when this scandal popped off, everyone said, what the hell? How did this happen? This is classic CIA work.
You're using Cayman Islands bank accounts. You're saying it's you're earmarking it for Pakistan you know, Pakistani aid. This has clear implications for US statecraft if this gets busted. This is what the c this is why we tasked the CIA to do this. Plausible viability.
If something has diplomatic blowback and we don't want US fingerprints on it, we need a formal intelligence agency because there's diplomatic blowback if US fingerprints are revealed.
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
🧵 How USAID funds are being used to train Democrat’s Trump/Tesla protests https://t.co/3d8eVlcoRZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
A member of Congress is allegedly using tactics promoted by a Harvard Ash Center partner and calling on supporters to be "strike ready," promising violent protests. This partner is the nonviolent action lab, and its leader, Erica Chenoweth, uses they/them pronouns and has ties to USAID, the State Department, and the United States Institute of Peace.
Chenoweth has lectured at USAID and authored reports on nonviolent resistance, focusing on how to topple dictatorial regimes. Their research analyzes revolutions, concluding that nonviolent resistance is the most effective tactic, not due to moral objections to violence, but because it's empirically superior. Chenoweth has written extensively on topics like how to topple a dictator, the role of violence in nonviolent resistance, and terrorism.
The Ash Center, despite deleting its donor list, is reportedly funded by USAID and the State Department. Chenoweth has also lectured at and consulted for the United States Institute of Peace, receiving grants to promote regime change, not just peaceful protest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was a member of congress who has pledged to use these exact tactics and spread them among her colleagues. The very same tactics were, like I said, she's calling on her supporters to be, quote, strike ready and promising that violent protests are coming. That's a direct quote from her. She was speaking to the nation. But to understand who exactly is is funding this, who's behind it, this is a partner of the Harvard Ash Center's nonviolent action lab.
Like I said, it's very stochastically terroristic in its namesake in the sense that they really want you to know that they're nonviolent. I'd ask you why are they working overtime to demonstrate that they're so nonviolent. But this is a group who is sort of hosting these training sessions in conjunction with Democrat members of Congress. And the person who leads this entity is someone by the name of Erica Chenoweth. Now she uses theythem pronouns, so do with that what she will, but this is someone who has deep, deep ties to USAID, the State Department, and the United States Institute of Peace.
Her resume shows that she has lectured repeatedly at USAID in 2015, '20 '16, and as recently as 2022. She's also authored several reports sort of from this nonviolent resistance revolution, color revolution framework for USAID as the lead investigator and a recipient of several 5 figure grants. Some of these topics, these papers include youth and LGBTQ participation in nonviolent action, struggles from below, human rights struggles by domestic actors, and civil resistance and corporate behavior, mapping trends and assessing impact. But why this character is, I think, so particularly interesting and important is because her entire career is essentially about analyzing the most effective tools, not for protest, but for toppling dictatorial or autocratic regimes. And she wrote this whole long book where they analyze case by case hundreds of revolutions, and they come to the conclusion that nonviolent resistance is the most effective tactic or playbook, not because they disavow terrorism or violent action, but simply because they think it's just empirically a better tactic.
Right? What you're talking about is essentially the raw materials from an academic and literature perspective for creating bombs, or maybe in this case, it's more, you know, firebombing. But I just wanna read for the audience just to get a sense some of the books or journal papers that this individual has written, quote, how to topple a dictator, the role of violence in nonviolent resistance, resilient republics, why terrorism does not destroy democracy, the study of terrorism, achievements and analytical challenges ahead. To Bribe or to Bomb? Do Corruption and Terrorism Go Together?
And also she wrote the, seminal Oxford Handbook on Terrorism, including participating in panel discussions on events titled, quote, Is Terrorism Ever Legitimate? But I think this one piece of work really articulates the threat of this center, which is, quote, why civil resistance works, the strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. Where I said, the reason why they're disavowing, at least right now, terrorism and violent action is not because they find anything morally, ethically, or principally wrong with it, just because they think it's not an effective tool. And to sort of broaden out this USAID critique, which I think the Mike Benzas of the world have accurately identified, where they essentially identify a regime that they don't like, that's populist. They then say, oh, well, you're autocratic.
You're dictatorial. So therefore, we can use outside the system changes. Go after your pillars of support. Well, if you can believe it or not, the ASH Center, which we've actually reported on War Room years ago through a different lens, which we can get into on the Chinese Communist Party funded angle of it. But this group, though, despite the fact that they deleted their web page showing who they're funded by, their top donors are USAID and the State Department.
And one last point on Erica Chenoweth, she also has lectured repeatedly at the United States Institute of Peace. She served as a consultant to the United States Institute of Peace from 2017 to 2019 and similarly has authored a host of papers receiving 5 and 6 figure or six, sorry, 4 and 5 figure grants from this now defunct institution to spread, again, not protests, not women's march, not let's celebrate democracy, but full blown regime change.
Speaker 1: Natalie, hang right there. I'm gonna hold you into the next break. Two things I wanna say as we go to break here with Modern Day Holy War. Of course, Caroline Levy gave that great interview to
Speaker 0: David
reSee.it AI Summary
I attended a Republican House Homeland Security Committee Hearing where it was revealed that a NGO receives $600 million every 2-3 months to facilitate illegal migration. I spoke with a DHS employee who confirmed that he handles the electronic fund transfers. This means that $600 million of taxpayer money is being funneled to a government-funded NGO, which I believe is undermining western civilization. I'm baffled that Congress, the FBI, and the DOJ are not investigating this situation.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And this is, Republican House Homeland Security Committee Hearing, a NGO got paid $600 million EVERY 2-3 MONTHS to facilitate illegal migration, “I spoke to a gentleman that works in DHS. He actually sends the electronic fund transfers” In other words, $600,000,000 of U.S. taxpayer money is sent to a government-funded non-governmental organization (NGO) every 2-3 months to destroy western civilization. How the fuck this is not being investigated by Congress, the FBI, and the DOJ is beyond me.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Catholic Charities, Lutheran Family Services, and Jewish Family Services are NGOs that have allegedly taken hundreds of millions of dollars without using it to protect children. A DHS employee who sends electronic fund transfers claimed he oversees Jewish Family Services and cuts checks for $600,000,000. This amount is reportedly for two to three months and is renewable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Carol and anybody else would like to answer this, can you name some of these NGOs that have specifically taken these hundreds of millions of dollars
Speaker 1: and not used it to protect these children? Catholic Charities, Lutheran Family Services, Jewish Family Services. I spoke to a gentleman that works in DHS. He actually sends the electronic fund transfers and I asked him, sir, tell me, who you were who do you send who who are you responsible for and how much is the largest check you cut? He said, I'm over Jewish Family Services and I cut a check for $600,000,000.
And I said, is that for, like, three years? And he told me, JJ, get in the game. That's two or three months, and it's renewable.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Holy crap!! One TRILLION American taxpayer dollars were stolen during the pandemic & 70% PERCENT of that money went overseas. This is unreal!! https://t.co/Be4R6kwCCL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks for examples of how taxpayer dollars are funding transnational fraud rings, terrorist organizations, and adversarial nations like North Korea, China, Nigeria, Iran, Romania, and Russia.
Speaker 1 states that during the pandemic, one trillion dollars was stolen, with 70% going overseas. In one Western state, unemployment insurance applications exceeded the number of adults. Romanian criminals used stolen funds to facilitate fraud schemes involving fentanyl and attempts to impact democracy. While most public servants are honest, data and technology are needed to identify insider threats. Recent examples include a $50 million Medicaid theft in a Western state within four months. These thefts are attributed to organized criminal groups, both domestic and transnational.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Transnational fraud rings, terrorist organizationals, nations, nation states, North Korea, nuclear weapons programs funded by our tax dollars, China, Nigeria, Iran, Romania, Russia, not our friends necessarily that are being funded by taxpayer dollars. Could you give us some examples of how this is happening?
Speaker 1: Got it. Yeah. So when you think about what happened during the pandemic, one trillion dollars was stolen. 70% of that money went overseas. And I can give you some examples.
In a western state, they had more people applying for unemployment insurance benefits than they had individuals over 18. The people that were stealing the money from Romania were using it to facilitate other fraud schemes that include fentanyl, that include doing things to impact our democracy. On the insider threat, right, the the first thing you have to say, and my dad was a public servant, is 99% of people that work in the public sector are honest, hardworking individuals. But there are some, and what you need is data and technology to root that out. There were examples during the pandemic.
There were some examples even of last week where people got into the Medicaid system in a southern in a Western state and stole $50,000,000 in less than four months. So you have to have these controls in place. Right? These aren't individuals stealing, mister Cloud. These are organized criminal groups, both domestic and transnational.
@BarryOue21536 - Beirut Barry
https://t.co/GhhBPtSscu ARE YOU FNG kidding Me ... the Hell 🔥with UNITED NATIONS 🚨 All tax payers NEED to listen to this US Politicians are being paid off to not vet US Taxpayer money being sent overseas “I was the senior vetting officer at USAID .
Video Transcript AI Summary
International NGOs and UN agencies allegedly lobby in Washington D.C. against vetting policies that would prevent foreign aid from reaching terrorists. USAID effectively self-funds its own external private lobby that asks Congress for more money for USAID. This lobby brings together groups that work with groups that kill Americans. USAID programs have not been aligned with U.S. national security interests and have helped China. USAID pushes much of the world towards China on the green energy agenda and causes resentment through social reengineering. Lobbyists have tried to kill legislation like H.R. 160, which was meant to increase transparency in USAID's funding of overseas organizations and give US Lawmakers the ability to have higher transparency in terror financing investigations aimed at scrutinizing extremist groups. A regulation requiring names of those handling money in terrorist areas to be checked against terrorist databases was overturned by Biden.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How do terrorists explored our foreign aid loopholes?
Speaker 1: Well, we have we have a lot of our international
Speaker 0: Can you pull your mic up? I'm sorry. I'm
Speaker 1: Can you hear me?
Speaker 0: Yes,
Speaker 1: sir. You have international NGOs and UN agencies actively lobby here in Washington DC against vetting vetting policies that would prevent it. I was the senior vetting officer at USAID.
Speaker 0: And what But I'm saying, did you say United Nations is doing this? The UN?
Speaker 1: Sure. They everybody's everybody's getting money lobbies here.
Speaker 0: That they're lobbying against us. I'm sorry, mister Roman. You're
Speaker 2: There's actually someone who used to work for one of those lobbies. The largest NGO lobby, Interxion. One of our co witnesses here worked for them from 2018 to 2023. USAID effectively self funds its own external private lobby that then goes back to congress and asks for more money for USAID. So the taxpayers fund this lobbyist who's working against American interests Correct.
Speaker 0: Possibly killing our allies and possibly Americans.
Speaker 2: They bring together groups in Washington that overseas work with groups that kill Americans. Yeah. I don't
Speaker 0: need a flowchart to show that. I appreciate it. Do you think USA programs have been aligned with the national security interest of The US?
Speaker 1: No. They have not. They have actually helped China.
Speaker 2: Mister Roman? No. Okay.
Speaker 0: How do these programs compromise our national security, mister Primerich?
Speaker 1: They actually push China. They actually push much of the world towards China on the green energy agenda. They push people ordinary people, billions of people towards China because of the resentment caused by our social reengineering.
Speaker 0: Are we being lobbied by these pro communist China groups currently?
Speaker 1: Well, a lot of these countries don't even have to lobby because they get the money anyway like South Africa.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And in fact, these lobbyists have come to the house and have tried to kill legislation like h r one sixty, which was meant to increase transparency in USAID's funding of overseas organizations.
Speaker 0: Is that a current piece of legislation?
Speaker 2: That's from the last session.
Speaker 0: Last and give me that number again.
Speaker 2: HR one sixty. And what does it do? It was meant to give US Lawmakers the ability to have higher transparency in terror financing investigations aimed at scrutinizing extremist groups. Mister Primark?
Speaker 1: We had a regulation before we left in the last administration that anybody who touches money in area in countries where there's terrorists, those names have to go through databases terrorist databases. That was overturned by Biden.
Speaker 0: Overturned by Biden.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
WOW 🚨 Before leaving office Democrats sent $260 MILLION DOLLARS TO GEORGE SOROS American taxpayers are literally paying for our own ICE riots thanks to Democrats https://t.co/YerHm2b62j
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump claims George Soros interfered in multiple countries' political landscapes, alleging Soros used $260 million from USAID to spread chaos, change governments, and pursue personal gain in India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Ukraine. Trump stated that his administration continues to freeze USAID's budget because its initiatives are misaligned with American interests and destabilize global peace. He described USAID as a disaster with radical lunatics, citing fraud and money going to undeserving groups. Trump also expressed interest in potential kickbacks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Donald Trump claims Hungarian American billionaire George Soros is responsible for interfering in the political landscape of many countries. The account claims that Soros used a hefty $260,000,000 from USA to spread chaos, change governments, and pursue personal gain in countries such as India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Ukraine. Now this comes as the Trump administration continues to freeze USAID's budget, describing its initiatives as misaligned with American interest and accusing them of destabilizing global peace.
Speaker 1: Well, many ideas, but look, he's done a great job. Look at all the fraud that he's found in this US AID. It's a disaster what the people, radical lunatics. They have things that nobody would have even believed. The whole thing with a 100,000,000 spent on, you know what, with money going to all sorts of groups that shouldn't deserve to get any money with the money.
I'd like to see what the kickbacks are.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 WOW. Sen. Josh Hawley just confirmed the Democrats secretly sent MILLIONS of dollars to the Islamist organization Council on American Islamic Relations - CAIR - in blue states... ...and the funds were used to import Muslim terrorist migrants. TREASON.https://t.co/GqvCPuZNcr
@TheSCIF - The SCIF
$3 BILLION worth of TAXPAYER DOLLARS funneled to protesters and rioters through corrupt front companies and NGOs. Neville Roy Singham tied to over 2k organizations, with 200 of them solely dedicated to producing anti-American propaganda. https://t.co/XDvG3S0bRH