reSee.it - Related Post Feed

SteveTownsend0
Posted - September 7, 2023 at 5:13 PM
Saved - September 8, 2023 at 3:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk's role isn't to ease tensions; that's the State Department's job. Disagree with current policy? Ukraine's next elections are in 2024. Imagine if LockheedMartin sabotaged HiMARS due to CEO's fears. Similar to Musk's interaction with a pro-Russian influencer, this demands investigation for US national security.

@SteveTownsend0 - Steve Townsend

It is not @ElonMusk's job to de-escalate the war. That is why we have @StateDept. If you don't agree with current policy, which is for Ukraine to win, the next elections will be up in 2024. Imagine if @LockheedMartin remotely reprogrammed HiMARS to fail to fire because the CEO got nervous fee-fees about nuclear war after talking to some @TheGrayZoneNews jurnalist. Well, that is analogous to what happened here. This revelation and records of Musk and Tw/SpaceX senior security engineer @cstanley openly joshing with pro-russian influencer @stillgray demand investigation, in the interest of US national security.

@BriannaWu - Brianna Wu

A billionaire is undermining the national security policy of the United States. Normal people would go to prison for this. https://www.thedailybeast.com/musk-secretly-used-starlink-to-foil-ukrainian-drone-attack-on-russian-ships-report?utm_source=twitter_owned_tdb&utm_medium=socialflow&via=twitter_page&utm_campaign=owned_social

Musk Secretly Used Starlink to Foil Ukrainian Drone Attack on Russian Ships: Report The billlionaire allegedly feared the strike on Crimea could trigger nuclear war. thedailybeast.com
KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - September 7, 2023 at 7:28 PM
Saved - September 8, 2023 at 5:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk's Starlink internet has been crucial for Ukraine, providing connectivity to the front lines. However, Musk refuses to allow it to be used in long-range drone attacks on Russia, fearing it could escalate the conflict and trigger a nuclear war. Despite his clear stance, some media outlets are tarnishing his reputation. Musk emphasizes that Starlink should serve humanitarian and defensive purposes. He declined activation in a scenario that could have led to a major act of war. The media's attempt to portray him as a Russian agent is baseless. Musk's efforts to prevent a potential nuclear war deserve appreciation.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

The corporate media is churning out negative articles about @elonmusk, who has been generously providing free Starlink internet to Ukraine at a cost exceeding $80 million since the war began. Why? He doesn't want his satellites used in long-range drone attacks on Russia, as he fears it could worsen the conflict and even trigger a nuclear war. Musk has firmly rejected the idea of allowing Starlink to be used in a way that could escalate the conflict into World War III. Here are some quotes from Musk since the war started: "Starlink is the communication backbone of Ukraine, especially at the front lines, where almost all other Internet connectivity has been destroyed. But we will not enable escalation of conflict that may lead to WW3." "SpaceX’s out of pocket cost to enable & support Starlink in Ukraine is ~$80M so far. Our support for Russia is $0. Obviously, we are pro Ukraine. Trying to retake Crimea will cause massive death, probably fail & risk nuclear war. This would be terrible for Ukraine & Earth." "SpaceX Starlink has become the connectivity backbone of Ukraine all the way up to the front lines. This is the damned if you do part. However, we are not allowing Starlink to be used for long-range drone strikes. This is the damned if you don’t part." ----- It's entirely reasonable not to want your satellite technology involved in triggering a catastrophic world war, especially with Russia, which would have dire consequences for humanity. Despite Musk's clear public statements that Starlink won't be used for long-range drone attacks, some media outlets are now attempting to tarnish his reputation for not permitting Starlink to be used in such a manner. In my view, these click-bait sensationalist headlines are disgusting, and I extend my appreciation to @elonmusk for his efforts in preventing a potential nuclear war.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

The corporate media is sadly trying to spin this to portray @elonmusk as some Russian agent. The reality is that Starlink was never used in this part of Ukraine, and Musk declined activation due to concerns about his satellite technology being involved in a 'Mini Pearl Harbor' attack on the Russian Navy, a scenario that he believed could possibly trigger a nuclear war. Musk consistently emphasized that Starlink should exclusively serve humanitarian and defensive purposes, such as supporting hospitals, ambulances, and banking systems. Ukraine's intention was to use it on drones to target Russian ships. @elonmusk: "The Starlink regions in question were not activated. SpaceX did not deactivate anything." ----- "There was an emergency request from government authorities to activate Starlink all the way to Sevastopol. The obvious intent being to sink most of the Russian fleet at anchor. If I had agreed to their request, then SpaceX would be explicitly complicit in a major act of war and conflict escalation." ----- "Both sides should agree to a truce. Every day that passes, more Ukrainian and Russian youth die to gain and lose small pieces of land, with borders barely changing. This is not worth their lives." ----- The real question here is why is Walter Isaacson, who just wrote a biography of Elon Musk, saying that Elon turned it off while Elon is saying that it was never turned on? Additionally, why is the media trying to smear Elon as some Russian asset when that couldn't be further from the truth?

xDaily
Posted - September 28, 2023 at 6:18 PM
Saved - September 29, 2023 at 1:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk recently engaged in a roundtable discussion with Jewish leaders, addressing topics like free speech, antisemitism, and the recent ADL controversy. He highlighted a significant decrease in views on antisemitic content since Twitter's acquisition. Elon challenged those claiming otherwise to provide evidence. He emphasized that no evidence of his own antisemitism was found by Walter Isaacson, who spent two years researching and speaking to Elon's contacts. Elon acknowledged the complexity of hate speech and the need to follow different countries' laws. He advocated for combating hate speech by addressing and debunking it rather than suppressing it. Elon acknowledged the need to improve X's policies, including trimming the list of antisemitic words affecting advertising. He also discussed the importance of balancing freedom of speech with responsible content dissemination. Elon expressed his commitment to making X a positive force for civilization and welcomed critical feedback. The full discussion covers various topics like faith, politics, education, and international relations.

@xDaily - X News Daily

NEWS: Here's the highlights of Elon's roundtable with Jewish leaders discussing X, free speech, Antisemitism and the recent ADL controversy. 🧵 Elon started by pointing out views on Antisemitic content are down >>30% since the Twitter acquisition. https://t.co/K4KswhRbEc

@xDaily - X News Daily

Elon: Multiple third parties, using full data sets, have also concluded the same that impressions on Antisemitic content is down. Elon challenges anyone who claims the opposite to provide evidence.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Elon points out that Walter Isaacson, who apparently is Jewish, spent 2 years following Elon and speaking to his contacts. Walter didn’t find any evidence Elon is Antisemitic. Elon also says he first visited Israel when he was 13.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Shapiro: Where do you draw the line on hate speech like Antisemitism? Elon: There isn’t an easy answer. One person’s free speech is another person’s hate speech.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Elon: We start with the obvious slurs and no-brainers, and then the operating principle is to follow the laws of the country we’re in. That’s more free in the US, but laws are different in other countries.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Elon: The best way to combat hate speech is to hear it and then explain why it’s not true, rather than someone harbouring those views opinions and never hearing a rebuttal.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Elon: We do a lot of foolish things at X, some have been in place for 10 years, and we can’t fix everything at once. E.g there’s a list of “bad words”, not safe for advertising, which needs to be trimmed.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Elon: The list includes words and terms that are Antisemitic in nature. If a post contains those, it can be deboosted in the algorithm. However, there is also value in not being draconian, because it can encourage people to change their minds.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Elon: Advertisers are very skittish. One article in a medium sized newspaper can be enough to scare an advertiser away from spending on X.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Elon: Some advertisers are less sensitive than others. There should be degrees of advertiser safety. There should be different costs - there could even be advertising next to NSFW posts, but the advertising per impression will be cheaper than next to safe content.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Shapiro: What does “freedom of speech, not freedom of reach” mean? Elon: We’re trying to deal with this algorithmically. If we show people content that makes them want to leave X and hammer them with hate speech - they won’t like that.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Shapiro: How can X resist government influence? Elon: Our policy is to deny government censorship to the extent allowed by law. In the US, most of the pressure comes from far-left activist groups that often act in concert.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Shapiro: What do you think about Russel Brand getting demonetized? Elon: It should be innocent until proven guilty until a conviction.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Elon: We’re trying to make X into a force for good for civilisation - this was the goal of the acquisition. Prior to the acquisition, it was increasingly a negative force for civilisation.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Elon points out he was fully aware that acquiring Twitter was financially dubious and he could lose money. He also says he was aware he’d get a lot of flack. Elon: It would have been deluded to think acquiring Twitter would be an easy way to make money and not attract criticism.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Elon: The goal isn’t just to stop hate speech, but to increase positive speech. Israeli ex-president @PresidentRuvi: Where do you draw the line on Anti-semitism? Elon: We’re open to ideas. Maybe we’re not drawing the line in the best place right now, but it’s not terrible.

@xDaily - X News Daily

@AlanDersh points out X needs to be fair to both left and right. Elon: Before the acquisition, Twitter was very left leaning and had its thumb on the scale. In moving towards a system that is more inclusive, that is technically moving right - but in reality moving to the centre.

@xDaily - X News Daily

Elon: Our goal is to look back in 10 years and say X is a positive force for civilization. Think we’re making progress towards that. But it’s important to have a critical feedback loop. Some more highlights:

@xDaily - X News Daily

We recommend listening to the full Space which is over 2 hours and covers many more topics including faith, Elon's upbringing and being "aspirationally Jewish", politics, education, international relations and Middle East peace, and much more. https://t.co/HF8q55Ytep

@realDailyWire - Daily Wire

https://t.co/udqqmluxWU

@xDaily - X News Daily

CLIP: Elon says the list of "Not safe for advertising" words, which also reduce a post's reach, need to be trimmed. https://t.co/ybKZJHrtvp

Video Transcript AI Summary
We sometimes make foolish mistakes, but we are working to fix them. One issue is demonetization, which we are addressing. We have a list of terms that need to be trimmed because some of them are not actually bad words. Advertisers can be skittish, especially on the Edge platform, which only makes up 1% of the advertising market. If even a small article in a medium-sized newspaper scares advertisers, it's not worth it for them. Advertisers are easily scared off, so we need to be cautious.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, first of all, on on on the just going in backwards order, but demonetization, it it it not like and and I actually I should preface this by saying, we we do lots of dumb things. But but the these dumb things, you know, as the saying goes, one should not attribute to malice that which easily can be explained by incompetence. So we do lots of foolish things, but and we want to fix that. A bunch of these solutions have been in place for a decade. And now I can't fix them all at once, and we are fixing them. So for example, there's there's a list, I think, Chai Rakesh was pointing out, like, testing the system. You know, and I've looked at this list and it's some of the terms are listed, I'm like, look, if that's a bad word, I'm clearly, I need to look up Gitmeid dictionary or something, you know, because that one I didn't realized was a bad word. So this this that that list needs to be trimmed. That that's the sort of, not safe for advertising list. The advertisers, you know, are can be a little skittish, you know. They especially when you look at something like like the Edge platform, which is only 1% of, the advertising market, optimistically. It's pretty easy if you've got like a 1% of your ad budget just has too much hair on it. It's like not worth it, you know. It's easy to just say like, well, for a lot of advertisers out there, well, you know, it's not this there's more there's more pain than gain. You know, it relates to the advertisers very scarce. Like, one sort of article in in a in a sort of medium sized newspaper is enough to, you know, sometimes scare advertisers are on a platform. It doesn't take much is what I'm saying. A loud noise in the room scare advertisers. You know, I mean, it's, they're not they're not sort of bold as brass. No.
TaraBull808
Posted - October 12, 2023 at 1:30 PM
Saved - December 2, 2023 at 1:17 PM

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

EU threatens Elon Musk's 𝕏 with expulsion over what they call Israel - Hamas 'disinformation' aka information they don't like. Who do you support, Elon or the EU? https://t.co/z6Qm9OwuHp

StoryFanatics1
Posted - November 9, 2023 at 11:47 PM
Saved - November 11, 2023 at 9:42 PM

@StoryFanatics1 - Vivid.

"I think it's appropriate for Israel to find the Hamas members and either kill them or incarcerate them, that's something that has to be done because they are going to keep coming otherwise." - @elonmusk https://t.co/IwMszWqFYV

Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel believes it is necessary to take action against Hamas members, either by eliminating them or imprisoning them, in order to address the ongoing threat they pose. This approach is seen as crucial because Hamas is expected to persist in their activities.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, that that I think it it is appropriate for Israel to find the Hamas members and, you know, either either kill them or incarcerate them. Like, that's something that's something that has to be done because they're they're just gonna keep keep keep coming.
ChayaRaichik10
Posted - November 21, 2023 at 8:10 PM
Saved - November 21, 2023 at 10:26 PM

@ChayaRaichik10 - Chaya Raichik

@elonmusk @ViralNewsNYC .@elonmusk, here is a Gaza Ministry of Health employee admitting that the Red Crescent is used by Hamas for their terrorist activities. https://t.co/RUqXsNT1tr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a teacher who doesn't do much. They mention something about a blue use and a key. They talk about a performance and mention a story about apples and a president. They mention an attorney and justice. The conversation becomes unclear, with references to a person named Abdurrahman and a question about friends. The conversation ends abruptly.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Zaten tarafı da eşek. Korku dışı. Speaker 1: Bu hoca var Speaker 0: beş hem bir var. Biraz. Müdürn. Hiç yapmıyor hemen taraf ne yaptım? Speaker 1: Mavi kullan tamam. Garip Speaker 0: Yani uç ayr. Yara kuyruk? Anahtar daıyor muciğ en yakınıyla böyle çok doğal değil. Bir nokta aka. Türkme benebil beyler bir aktarım yani bu performansmak yani tamam. Bu elli ya Of story'e soktu. Elma birkaç Başkan başta yıl huaweilı dokuz. Paşa ipucu. Bu avukat adaleta tad bir ara çok yeter abdurrahmanti ya diye Yani ya yedi çok hadi arkadaş? Ben yani her nesı? On sonratima. Bugün. Buhar makam haplar yok. Bilmi zaten Ya bir dakika her çareken kırkıa eşit bir Hattatiğ Yani alaka muhakkak misafir aşk. Adam Zaten var yanilımken yoksa bile hemen binlara makyaj. Mu?
GrahamAllen_1
Posted - November 27, 2023 at 11:02 PM
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 3:29 PM

@GrahamAllen_1 - Graham Allen

"There's no choice but to kill those who insist on murdering civilians. There’s no choice. They’re not going to change their mind.” - Elon Musk Well said @elonmusk. https://t.co/JHzv1iAlNf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Today was an emotionally difficult day as I visited the places where people were murdered. During my talk with the prime minister, we discussed the three necessary steps for the situation in Gaza. Firstly, we must take action against those who continue to kill innocent civilians. Secondly, we need to reform the education system to prevent the training of future murderers. Lastly, it is crucial to focus on building prosperity in the region. These three actions are essential for addressing the challenges we face.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was, suddenly been, a day I would say an emotionally difficult day, to see the places where people were murdered. I just did a talk with the prime minister and, I think there's, I mean, obviously there are 3 things that need to happen, in Gaza situation. I mean, there's no choice but to kill those who insist on murdering civilians is our choice. They're not going to change their mind, But, and then the second thing is to change the education so that a new generation of murderers is not trained to be murderers. And then the and then the third thing which is also very important is to try to build prosperity.
realstewpeters
Posted - November 28, 2023 at 5:41 PM
Saved - November 29, 2023 at 2:45 PM

@realstewpeters - Stew Peters

After meeting with top Israeli officials, @ElonMusk has agreed NOT to provide internet access to Gaza through his Starlink satellites. Instead, he leaves the innocent women and children in Gaza voiceless, unable to share with the world the genocidal atrocities being inflicted upon them by @Israel.

davidicke
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 9:22 AM
Saved - April 28, 2024 at 2:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk's recent visit to Israel sparks controversy as he fails to visit Gaza during a ceasefire and remains silent on the mass bombing of innocent people. Supporters express disappointment, feeling deceived by their perception of him. However, Musk quickly regains his hero status by making appeasing statements on TV. The author criticizes this strategic move, highlighting the alarming number of people who have fallen for it. They emphasize the need for individuals to become their own heroes and saviors.

@davidicke - David Icke

I'll get lots of abuse for this, but, hey, what's new? Musk goes to Israel and bends the knee while not visiting Gaza during a ceasefire or criticising the mass bombing of the innocent. Lots of people who supported him post their despair that he's not who they (wrongly) thought he was. Musk returns to the US and immediately goes on TV to once again tell those people what they want to hear in a way that restores his hero status. This is Vaudeville. This is strategic. The number of people who have fallen for this is shocking. If you want a 'hero' or a 'saviour' look in the mirror.

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

Elon Musk reacts to advertiser boycotts: "If somebody is gonna try to blackmail me with money… Go f*ck yourself." Host is stunned and speechless. Elon repeats: "Go f*ck yourself." https://t.co/MCDo2jlBBU

Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't want them to use advertising to blackmail me. If someone tries to blackmail me with money, they can go away. That's clear, right? Yes, sir. I hope so. Hi, Bob. Translation: I don't want advertising used to blackmail me. If someone tries to blackmail me with money, they can go away. Is that clear? Yes, sir. I hope so. Hi, Bob.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't want them to advertise? No. What do you mean? If somebody's gonna try to blackmail me with advertising, blackmail me with money, go fuck yourself. But go fuck yourself. Is that clear? Yes, sir. I hope it is. Hey, Bob.
patel_patriot
Posted - December 10, 2023 at 6:01 PM
Saved - December 11, 2023 at 12:47 PM

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Lol Grok basically calling @elonmusk a hypocrite https://t.co/OaJrZ8cpDK

BGatesIsaPyscho
Posted - April 28, 2024 at 7:37 AM
Saved - April 29, 2024 at 3:26 AM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

“People want the Truth” - Elon Musk https://t.co/wPUos50BHn

Video Transcript AI Summary
The towers should have collapsed in a way where the upper and lower sections destroyed each other until all energy was gone. Instead, a small piece caused the entire structure to collapse, which goes against basic physics. Architects and engineers were surprised that this fundamental concept was ignored by NIST, leading society to question the laws of physics.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Something of this kind is what we should have seen when the top section of the towers collapsed onto the lower one. The upper and lower sections should have mutually destroyed each other until all the energy is dissipated and the system comes to a rest. Alternatively, as shown in this experiment with 2 towers made of snow, the top section could have fallen off to the side after the initial collapse. What could not have happened is this. Speaker 1: A little tiny chunk of the building can't possibly fall and crush the entire structure below it. Speaker 0: This is such a simple fundamental concept that architects and engineers were astonished in seeing it totally ignored by NIST. Speaker 1: This is high school physics and our whole society is being led to believe that these fundamental laws of physics, hard science, don't apply anymore.
ecomarxi
Posted - May 10, 2024 at 10:43 PM
Saved - May 23, 2024 at 6:38 AM

@ecomarxi - Tiberius

@elonmusk Here is proof Musk is a liar who censors criticism of Israel. This 👆 is a big show when he’s doing this 👇 https://t.co/V7lvM2cJga

KimDotcom
Posted - August 9, 2024 at 7:44 AM
Saved - August 10, 2024 at 4:17 PM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

I have huge respect for Elon’s accomplishments and gratitude for having free speech on X. But I can’t understand his bromance with war criminal and master manipulator Netanyahu who’s slaughtering innocent Palestinians every day. Many wonder why. Can you please explain @elonmusk?

APBIOonly
Posted - August 13, 2024 at 8:48 PM
Saved - August 13, 2024 at 10:15 PM

@APBIOonly - APBIOonly

Musk put the FU in FU money Musk tells Thierry Breton to “take a big step back and literally f*ck your own face” and the EU commission (Von Der Leyen) slaps down Thierry Breton “Brussels has accused its internal market commissioner of going rogue” https://t.co/vQwyEpgOos

@ThierryBreton - Thierry Breton

With great audience comes greater responsibility #DSA As there is a risk of amplification of potentially harmful content in 🇪🇺 in connection with events with major audience around the world, I sent this letter to @elonmusk 📧⤵️ https://t.co/P1IgxdPLzn

AmurakaHidden
Posted - October 20, 2024 at 4:44 PM
Saved - October 20, 2024 at 6:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk's recent endorsement of "DARK MAGA" has raised eyebrows, suggesting a connection to occult practices. The term "MAGA" is linked to sorcery, implying Musk identifies as a Dark Magician. His biographer, Walter Isaacson, observed Musk's erratic behavior, hinting at deeper psychological issues, including possible multiple personalities. Musk's obsession with AI and transhumanism aligns with his family's technocratic background, raising concerns about his role in a potential surveillance state. Despite his claims of supporting free speech, he appears to be part of the elite agenda.

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Elon Musk & the Church of Satan 🧵 Elon Musk made headlines for his recent support of The Don claiming he is "DARK MAGA". That one statement is extremely revealing. Elon is blatantly saying he is a Dark Magician (Occultist). Why would he do this? It's all part of the Spellcraft. https://t.co/F3sAnIDeE9

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Many call it "Revelation of the Method". MAGA is the fifth and highest degree in the Church of Satan. In Latin, Maga is the Feminine Form of Magus, which means "Sorcerer" or "Magician". In Italian and Spanish, MAGA means a Female Wizard or Sorcerer. https://t.co/bpoqswQRbt

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

In Slavic and other languages, same thing MAGA is associated with MAGIC, the SUPERNATURAL, MAGICIAN, SORCERER or WITCH. DARK MAGA = Dark MAGICIAN Musk is a Dark Occultist, a Wolf in Sheep Clothing. It's not ONE piece of "EVIDENCE" but the long and continous pattern. https://t.co/tkDFaii1NX

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Elon comes from a long line of TECHNOCRATS. HE is a EUGENISTS, a TRANSHUMANIST and one of the "Chosen Magicians" to usher in the New World Order, the Thelemic Aeon of Horus, the Crowned and Conquering Child. https://t.co/eUDUUIAaba

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Elon Musk allowed Biographer Walter Isaacson "Total Access" to his life for two years. Isaacson noticed quickly thst Musk was far from his ideal or "normal" candidate for a Biography. Musk already sees himself as a Historical Figure, somewhat Timeless, a Living Icon. https://t.co/qNIJXbKE8K

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

But then during Isaacon's stay with Musk, “everything was going so well that [Musk] became uncomfortable”, Isaacson says. “He doesn’t like things when they are going well. He is addicted to drama.” This was around the time Elon planned to buy (hijack) Twitter rebranding it as X. https://t.co/SBOnDnoiaV

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Isaacson says, “I thought it was insane — Musk doesn’t have empathy and so Twitter was not a good fit for him.” Isaacson thought Musk's issues were much deeper, even possibly having Multiple Personalities or, in MK-Ultra terms, Altars. Elon would have "Demonic Fits". https://t.co/5dZ4nf3HsF

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

"In front of me he would go into multiple Elon Musk personalities. There are times he gets really dark and he goes into what Grimes (Elon's Baby Mama & Self-Stylized Witch) calls ‘demon mode’. He will become angry. But then when he snaps out he will hardly remember what he did." https://t.co/MNZHITKcYX

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Demon Mode is the modern day Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Elon is obbessed with A.I. Elon Musk said in an interview, "With Artificial Intelligence, we are summoning the DEMON." So Musk's Solution is to MERGE MAN with MACHINE. Why? Musk says, "It's Envitable" Is it, though? https://t.co/TAxHl6xGdN

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

He told me he thinks he is bipolar but has never been diagnosed,” Isaacson said, “But I think it is more complicated.” It most definitely is. “He is driven by demons,” Isaacson said. Did Isaacson mean the Christian Meaning of Demon, a Literal DEVIL or the Greek Meaning Daimon? https://t.co/mexJzb7jqO

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

In Greek, a Daimon was an ANGEL of Inspiration. Perhaps Isaacson meant both DEMON and DAIMON. Musk surrounds himself with a Harem of Witches. In Grime's song "We Appreciate Power", she "sings", "People like to say that we're insane But AI will reward us when it reigns." https://t.co/WR3QaMTe6I

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

"Pledge allegiance to the world's most powerful computer Simulation: it's the future What will it take to make you capitulate? We appreciate power And if you long to never die Baby, plug in, upload your mind Come on, you're not even alive If you're not backed up on a drive" https://t.co/bojxSHbZN7

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

In November 2018, Elon tweeted, "Maybe A.I. will make me follow it, laugh like a demon and say who's the pet now..." Elon's Mother Maye grew up practicing South African Witchcraft, there is even evidence to believe Maye was Jack Parson's "Moon Child". https://t.co/ypLY7KxFpu

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

In 1947, Founder of Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Disciple of Aleister Crowley and Thelemite Jack Parson performed the Babalon Working Ritual. Many believe Maye was the "Moonchild" who was destined to give birth to the Anti-Christ. ELYON. Anti-Christ simply means AGAINST CHRIST. https://t.co/QyU7ipMMua

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Maye's Father AND Elon's Grandfather was named Joshua Handleman, who was the Head of Canada's Technocracy Movement. This should awnser ALL questions in regards to Elon's "Role". Elon is NOT against the Elites, he is ONE of them. The Technocratic Christ. What is a "Technocracy"? https://t.co/Um9X69xQfO

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

It is definied as "the government or control of society or industry by an elite of technical experts." The Technical Expert is A.I. (Applied Demonolgy). Hence, Elon's OBBESSION with Dues Ex Machina, God out of Machine. Elon is following in his grandfather's footsteps. https://t.co/HCYcVHxTpP

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Nueralink is next on the Eugenics Agenda. Every company Musk aquires and move he makes is to further create a MASS SURVEILLANCE STATE. A Eugenicist is responsible for the culling and controlling of the population. Vax Em and Chip Em. This is NOT a secret. https://t.co/iCKvQj5hBi

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Elon us Pro-Jab and Vax Pro-Carbon Tax. Pro-Universal Basic Income Pro-Climate Hoax Pro-Social Credit System Pro-Transhumanism Pro-CHIPPING OUR BRAINS Pro- Israel (Musk said, “I don’t know if I am genetically Jewish but I am aspirationally Jewish”) https://t.co/OYHaO06Z3c

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Therefore, ELON is ANTI-HUMANITY. Elon's Jacket at the Met Gala literally read NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM or "New World Order". Elon thinks he is one of the NEW "gods". https://t.co/rVeS1QYdrR

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

BUT.. he's a Pro-Free Speech! No, he is NOT, brain rot. Elon is not a RENEGADE "Tony Stark" CHARACTER, he is ONE of the BIGGEST Contractors of the United State's Department of Defense. He is AGAINST "Them", HE is THEM. https://t.co/7C7DfGFRnW

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Do I even need to mention Nazi Scientist and Future NASA Founder Wernher Van Braun's 1952 book called the "Mars Project" which imagined a person named ELON leading a Human Colony on MARS. MARS is an ANAGRAM for RAMS. Mars is, also, the Roman God of WAR. WAR on the 99 PERCENT. https://t.co/IndGEkLWn5

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

SpaceX furthers NASA'S Mass Programming in the "Church of SCIENCE", imdoctrinating those into the SOUL-LURE System. NASA is simply a Clandestine Masonic Order. NASA is thr Right Pillar, SpaceX (or GHEYSEX) is the Left Pillar in this LAND of MAKE beLIEve. https://t.co/c2AacPLWM3

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Thanks to @TPallets, I may have "borrowed" his Title but I thought it was too good not to run with it. He has an excellent video on YT on Elon and some other great content, as well. I've been on Elon's neck for a minute now and I won't let up on it, either. 🧵🔚 https://t.co/Za1oVwj1Fa

TheRISEofROD
Posted - January 1, 2025 at 8:55 AM
Saved - January 2, 2025 at 12:18 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Musk is the savior though, right? https://t.co/bgYmzesYy3

Video Transcript AI Summary
He's a self-made billionaire who started his first company with help from his wealthy family and friends. He sold it for $22 million but faced issues with a later online banking startup that had a major security flaw, leading to his firing despite a $180 million payout. While he’s credited with founding Tesla, he actually joined later and misled investors to secure loans. Tesla profits largely from selling carbon credits, and his claims about taking the company private were misleading. Now, he's facing a $248 billion lawsuit for allegedly manipulating Dogecoin's price for profit. He promotes a vision of saving humanity while exploiting the system.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's just amazing. He's gonna bring humanity to Mars. You're not being serious, are you? This is all this is a bit. Right? What? He's a genius and a self made billionaire. Oh, you might wanna sit down for this. He started his first company with money from his dad and his rich friends. Well, he ran it well enough to make it huge. Not really. He sold it for $22,000,000 to a larger company that was just trying to squash all competition, and then he got even more money. Speaker 1: Raising $50,000,000 is a matter of making a series of phone calls. Speaker 0: He's still a genius. You'll never be able to take that away. His online banking startup had a security flaw that was so bad, you could transfer funds from anyone else with just an account number. The board fired him because he was ruining the company financially, but he still made a 180,000,000 when it sold. He is the reason we can have a green future. Speaker 1: I'd like to be on the cover of Rolling Stone. That'd be cool. Speaker 0: What he really wanted was fame. But he still founded Tesla. Tesla was founded by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenen. Who? Not Elon. He bought in. He became CEO in 08, then started a media campaign to get loans and investments. Daimler said they would invest if he got a Department of Energy loan, so he lied and said he did. Then he applied for the Department of Energy loan and put Daimler's involvement on that application. He lied to get the loans? Yep. $451,000,000 of government money. And now Tesla makes money in an interesting way, selling carbon credits. Companies' carbon emissions are capped, and Tesla reduces emissions, so they earn a lot of credits. And they sell them to the companies that go over. The few quarters that Tesla was profitable were mostly thanks to this. That just erases the progress. When Elon tweeted, funding secured, Tesla going private at $420, that was a lie, and it inflated the stock price of Tesla. Speaker 1: My cash balances are are very, very low. I I simply had loans against my my stock, so I I I if if Tesla's SpaceX went bankrupt, I would go bankrupt too. Speaker 0: Now he's being sued for $248,000,000,000 for buying Dogecoin, then using his public presence to inflate the price and profit off of it. He says he's gonna save the planet and save humanity while he exploits people and the system.
Megatron_ron
Posted - January 10, 2025 at 3:34 PM
Saved - January 11, 2025 at 5:12 AM

@Megatron_ron - Megatron

NEW: 🇺🇸🇮🇱Elon Musk has confirmed he serves Israel: "We have no choice but to eliminate the people who would oppose the state of Israel." He said this in the interview with the German AfD leader. https://t.co/uV7pcEwGsN

CredibleUFO
Posted - January 10, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Saved - January 11, 2025 at 11:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m curious about what Israel might have promised Elon to change his views on the Palestinians. Did he get contracts for his Boring Company to develop waterfront properties in Gaza? Something definitely shifted between his interview with Lex Fridman and his recent comments. Watch to the end.

@CredibleUFO - JewForPeace🇺🇸🕊☮🏳️‍🌈🍉

What did Israel promise Elon for him to shift his sympathetic November 2023 opinion on the Palestinians? Was he promised contracts for his Boring Company to build waterfront properties where Gaza currently stands? Because SOMETHING CHANGED between his interview with Lex Fridman and his "holiday at Auschwitz"! Watch to the end. 👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
Deploy acts of kindness that are clear and genuine, countering any perceptions of trickery. This approach can combat the broader hatred in the region. The saying "an eye for an eye makes everyone blind" highlights the futility of revenge. If violence leads to more hatred and recruits for groups like Hamas, it fails to achieve peace. Killing one Hamas member may create more enemies, especially if innocent lives are lost in the process. The focus should be on whether actions lead to more or fewer terrorists over time, aiming for long-term peace rather than immediate retaliation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Deploy acts of kindness. Yeah. Conspicuous acts of kindness that that with that are unequivocal, meaning that can't be somehow because Hamas will then their response will be, oh, it's a trick. Therefore, you have to counter how how is not a trick. This ultimately fights the broader force of hatred in the in the region. Yes. And I'm not sure who said it. It's an an apocryphal saying, but an eye for the for an eye makes everyone blind. Now that neck of the woods, they really believe in the whole eye for an eye thing. But, I mean, you really have if if you're not gonna just outright commit genocide, like, against an entire people, which obviously would not be acceptable to to to really should be acceptable to anyone, then you're you're gonna leave basically a lot of people alive who subsequently, you know, hate Israel. So really, the question is, like, how for for every Hamas member that you kill, how many did you create? Mhmm. And if you create more than you killed, you've not succeeded. That's the, you know, the real situation there. And it's safe to say that if, you know, if, you know, if if you kill somebody's child in Gaza, you've you've made at least a few Hamas members who will die just to just kill Israeli. That's the situation. So but but, I mean, this is one of the most contentious subjects one could possibly discuss. But but I I think if if the if the goal also is some sort of long term piece, one has to be look at this from standpoint of over time, are there more or fewer terrorists being created? 3 weeks later.
OwenSparks_
Posted - January 13, 2025 at 4:17 AM
Saved - January 13, 2025 at 9:49 AM

@OwenSparks_ - Owen Sparks

@elonmusk Fixed it. https://t.co/ffMv6EmA9q

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm here with the fire command team at the Palisades fire. The fire started on Tuesday and has been fueled by extreme winds, making it challenging to control. The cause is still under investigation. Firefighters are working tirelessly to protect structures and contain the fire, which is not fully controlled yet but showing reduced activity. To prevent future fires, creating defensible space around homes is crucial—clearing brush within 100 feet and using fire-resistant materials. Awareness and updated building codes can enhance safety. Water availability has been sufficient, but firefighters have relied on water tenders to meet the high demand. Overall, the focus is on securing the perimeter and preparing for any new fire threats.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm here, with the fire command team at the Palisades fire. Hey, guys. And, let's see. So this is, I I was asked if if if we could bring some more Starlinks here. So we've brought some more Starlinks here, and I'm just here with the the team, and they're they're gonna provide a briefing of the Palisades fire. So please go ahead. Speaker 1: Hi. Hello. Good evening. My name is Christian Litz. I'm with LA County Fire, cooperating with the partnership with Cal Fire team 2, and I'm operations section chief on this Palisades fire. So Palisades fire, I'll just go we've been here since the beginning of the fire on Tuesday. We were looking at extreme damaging winds, erratic fire behavior coming through and blowing in from about midway on this map and blowing all the way down to the coastline there. Speaker 0: When did that so when does that start? Just to frame the thing for people? Like I said, I assume people like it's it's like great to get the story from, like, basically, a, like, straight shooter. Yep. And and, like, you know, and and so, like, how how did it start? And, you know, and and then maybe ask for how did it start then? Like, what are some of the things that could be done to, for in the future? But how but how did it start out? Like, what's the what's the story? Speaker 1: So, honestly, we don't know yet. It's still under investigation. We don't know how it started. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: But because of the wind, honestly, it just allowed it to outpace anything possible. The winds are so strong. Air resources, which we use to keep it small k. Ineffective. Okay. So it blew at record break it it grew at record break breaking pace. The resources put themselves probably in a bigger danger than they've ever done. Speaker 0: Okay. It Speaker 1: saves as many structures, but you can see Speaker 2: it started about here with the wind Okay. Speaker 1: And pushed it straight through the Palisades Speaker 2: Alright. Speaker 1: And it allowed it to grow, Larry. As the wind slowed down Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: It allowed it to grow back go back the other way. But now the wind came back out of the north and blew down again. So we have several wind shifts. Resources are all around trying to both structure defense, which is down along the coast where this truck is more heavy. Speaker 2: Okay. We Speaker 1: do have communities all along on top Sure. That we have we've just been working as hard as we can from beginning to to now, without any stop, any rest. Resources working 36, 48 hours Speaker 2: Okay. Speaker 1: At times just because of the need of the of what we had to do. Right now, the fire is is looking good. We still have heat all around the perimeter. We still have resources all over and try to to secure those edges, make sure that there is limited the potential for any kind of growth. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: So we're still out there, but the activity is way down. And then with these winds over the next couple days, honestly, this fire, we have to watch it and do it, but it's gonna blow down at least most of it into its own self. But any new fire, it's gonna do the same thing. We have the winds that's gonna push it. It's not as strong as it was on Tuesday, but there is still gonna be movement. So we're keeping keeping all the resources available, and we're ready to actually not only respond to where the fire is now Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 1: But any new fires that start, we're able to respond and help. Speaker 0: Okay. So is it the so fires are currently under control? Speaker 1: This fire, we're not calling it control. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: But there is line around them. Almost all of Speaker 0: it. Okay. Speaker 1: Very much almost all of it, but resources were still working. So about the excitement's about 10% of the fire where the flames are there, but 90% of the work is done after those flames are gone, and we have to secure those edges. Did you ever watch a campfire where the wind comes in and it's out? Yeah. Then the wind comes and it blows embers? Speaker 0: Sure. Speaker 1: Same thing can happen. Okay. We have to keep pushing and pushing and pushing deeper and deeper and stay around all these homes and Londonito, Fernwood, all the way up. Speaker 0: So when you when you when you when you pull like, pull the barriers to stop the fire from going, do you just do you clear the brush and and and the and the trees and, like, what what actions do you take around the perimeter of that? Speaker 1: So along the perimeter, we cut we call it cutting line. We use 2 of those. But, really, what we're doing is taking everything out down to bare minimum and soil. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: So there will be a path of dirt from where the It's a fire basically. Exactly. We're building a fire break along the edge of the black. Speaker 0: Okay. Got it. Speaker 1: So there's nothing left to burn. Yep. So the only danger at that point was if the wind blows an ember over that line. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: So we have to build it appropriately big enough to secure that, to stop that from happening and then push into the black to take all the heat away till it gives us a bigger buffer as much as possible. How how big does the Speaker 0: fire break need to be? Speaker 1: It depends on the size of the fuel. If you look at Texas size of fuel, it's anything that we see. And and it's different for terrain, size of fuel, everything like that. Usually, it's a couple times, one and a half times the size of the fuel. Speaker 0: Yep. But k. Speaker 1: We have fuel in the Topanga Canyon area, the Palisade area. There hasn't been fire there in 60 years. So you're looking Really? Wow. 15 This Speaker 0: is a this is a very quite a rare fire. Speaker 1: Correct. Speaker 0: Like, it's a half century fire or something. Absolutely. Okay. Speaker 1: The last major fires I have really pushed through Topanga's 93, 96. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: But there is there is part of, these hillsides that there hasn't been recorded fire in 60 years. Speaker 0: Okay. Wow. Alright. And and, yeah, are are there things that, like, would be like like, I think what a lot of people are curious about is, like, what things could be done in the future to ensure that houses, are less susceptible to burning down. I mean, it's like like like as we rebuild for the future because it's like there's one thing about, like, past recriminations and all that, but, like, we can't go we can't rewind the clock. But what we can do is say, like, in the future, what what what should we do to minimize the probability that, you know, people's homes and businesses will burn down? Speaker 1: Yeah. Great question. And that's that's really what we want. So Yeah. Route history, as fire as fire prevention gets better, we we do better at safety structures. So when you look at the LA County website, LA City has references out there as well. We call it you always hear the term defensible space. Speaker 0: Yep. Speaker 1: That is the biggest thing to save structures. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: So in hardening your home. So defensible space, we'll start there. That is basically clear and brush as low as possible to about a 100 feet is what our minimum standard. Speaker 0: Say a Speaker 1: 100 feet away. You can you start at 10 feet, but you limit it out. About a 100 feet is the Speaker 0: best. Okay. Speaker 1: So then when it hits there, you're basically building that 100 foot buffer of fuel break around your home. Speaker 0: So, like, no no kindling for a 100 feet, basically. Speaker 2: And then and then after that Speaker 0: That sounds that sounds pretty sensible. Speaker 1: It it it is. And then you hardening your home, we call harden Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: Is don't stack firewood right against the against the wall. The firewood. Yeah. Yeah. True. Really a big part of once we lose structures on a typical, maybe not a 100 mile wind, but on a typical is is there something by the house Flammable. Fire. Speaker 0: Yep. Okay. Speaker 1: Wood, furniture, Speaker 0: something Speaker 1: like that, and it can burn up and gets into the attic, and then we lose the house. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: Or it gets in the porch system. Right? You might have a wood deck Sure. And it goes up and it just allows the flame to go into the house. So Okay. Speaker 0: A Speaker 1: lot of times, we talk about our ember cast that gets in the embers. So you you put screens around every opening. So you have vents on your house, put screens, very small screens. So the air can get through there, but embers, good sized embers that will actually catch a house Yeah. Get in there. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: So there's stuff like that. Move everything right from your house. That'd be great to say. And the vegetation in this area is astonishing and beautiful, and we understand that. Yeah. But Well, yeah. Speaker 0: There's some things you have Speaker 1: to do for Speaker 0: I I mean, I have heard, like, some things like, some of the the issues with fire breaks were, like, there's, like, some endangered, like, plant or something, and then we can't do a firebreak or that's an issue. Like like like, is there stuff that would be helpful from a regulatory reform standpoint that would help with fire prevention in the future? Speaker 1: Well, LA County, I mean, we do have standards. We got in certain areas, we we actually have these lists of residences. Like, this is what we have to Speaker 0: do. Okay. Speaker 1: I think it's just an awareness. So when people, good and bad about the the bad thing is this happened, the good thing, maybe it'll bring a a greater awareness that there is a way to help defend your homes. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: There is a way to help this from stop happening in the future. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: And that defensible space, building that and building those that's that's the way to do it. Okay. As far as, well, I I guess what one's I Speaker 0: I guess people are like obviously, we we definitely wanna give people a sense of of hope for the future, and if the things get rebuilt, that their house is not gonna burn down again. Great. That's like a reasonable thing. Speaker 1: So So Speaker 0: so it's like so it's like like, if there are things that should we should push for from a regulatory reform standpoint, this would be good to to know. You know, and and, yeah. Speaker 1: Clearance space. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: Building building material. Right? We could we can now these are newer things. So now the up to the standards of building construction codes Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: Have been brought and have changed over the years. So maybe when their house was built, they weren't there. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: Now we have new the new codes, there's gonna be certain fire retardant materials. There's gonna be certain things that they can do. If you look a lot, concrete buildings don't burn. Speaker 0: Sure. Speaker 1: So there's some of these people that have built their concrete in the middle, and it is right on the middle, black all around them. Nothing was done, but they just burned because of the building material. Yeah. Speaker 0: You can't you can't burn concrete. Speaker 1: Correct. So so space and and and Sure. And and Sure. Iron materials. Speaker 0: Steel ceiling concrete is gonna be okay. Speaker 2: Yes. But yeah. But the great thing Speaker 0: is they Speaker 1: have other materials out there now that will definitely help. Speaker 0: Like like what? I I think people are just like I could I'm not hopeful that this video can be, like, helpful to people. You know, like, what what should people do differently? Like, if it's not a sealed concrete, you said there's some new materials like like like synthetic materials, or or what Speaker 1: is it? There's stuff that they put into the to the materials to be able to Speaker 2: yeah. Yeah. I don't Speaker 0: know. I just wanna Speaker 2: help my partner out of somewhere here. Yeah. Yeah. You know? Anyways, I just wanted to kinda point something out. Speaker 0: Back Speaker 2: in 1962, we had a fire. It was called the Bel Air fire that burned from this area to be kind of the same burn pattern. Speaker 0: Okay. And Speaker 2: then after that fire, that's when they basically, in the city of Los Angeles, they outlawed wood shaped roofs. So wood table roofs were outlawed. Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, that's a I mean, that's a nightmare. That's Speaker 2: that's an example Speaker 0: of what Speaker 2: my partner is saying. Speaker 0: There's a a roof made a kindling. Speaker 2: Right. So So we up we update the building standards, the fire code standards, the fire prevention standards. Speaker 0: Sure. Speaker 2: And then and that's up to you and the people out there that are a little more into the act architecture Sure. And to find some something that actually could be potentially more fire safe. Speaker 0: Sure. You know, Speaker 2: and then maybe the silver line around the gray cloud is that that may happen. Maybe we'll live in a safer fire zone or area where there's prone to fires, but it's safer type of structures. That's kind of what we're hoping to come out of this, you know, as a that's maybe one of the very small but good things. Speaker 0: Alright. Sounds good. Well, I mean, do you have any any guidance for for people, like, if there's like, obviously, steel and concrete not are not gonna burn, but, like, are there, like, new synthetics that you think would be better than, like or or besides for steel and concrete, is there anything else? Speaker 2: I I no. I really am not an expert. Speaker 0: Or stones. Actually. Okay. It's pretty hard to build stone I mean, it's steel and concrete. Certainly, there's some stuff out there. Yeah. Speaker 2: We're we're about putting it out. Okay. But yeah. And I think that there are some some people who come together and find something. But, yeah, there's certainly some stuff out there. We just Speaker 0: Alright. Sounds good. Alright. Hey, everyone. So alright. What about what about order availability? Was water availability I I understand that was, like, not not an issue in in Malibu. Is that correct? Speaker 1: Was that water? Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: So there was water. We have several reservoirs that and seen those that we use a lot. Now just an example, if we have one building burning Mhmm. We could flow a 1,000 gallons a minute on that one building with the hose lays that we put in to stop it. You can imagine 1,000 gallons per house, we can do. Right? So the amount of water we're flowing, there really is no water system that's gonna keep that pace. So we have to bring in water tenders, which are these big tank water tanks at, you know, 25 100, 3000 gallon Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Trucks, and they'll come in. That's what we have to do to overcome to compensate. So they park out there and do it. DWT, P did a great job. They brought in big Speaker 0: water trucks for us. Alright. Speaker 1: And we use them as basically mobile hydrants. Speaker 0: Alright. Speaker 1: Right? And then we have our own agency as well that has water tenders. Speaker 0: Okay. Am I saying is that that, like, along the maybe I'm correct Speaker 1: me if Speaker 0: I'm wrong. Along in in Malibu, along the coast, there was no shortage of water. In the Palisades, there was a shortage of water at at a certain point, or is that not Speaker 1: accurate? We were just we were flowing just an amount of amount of water that those system couldn't over that was buried just because of how much water they these firefighters were utilizing. Speaker 0: Okay. Alright. Sounds good. Alright. Thanks, guys.
robbystarbuck
Posted - January 28, 2025 at 11:58 PM
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 6:30 PM

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Still can’t get over the fact that Democrats had earmarked $50M to buy condoms for Gaza. There’s only like 2 million people there. The math is not mathing. Money laundering? Think about how much they have to hate us to spend our money on this crap. 🤨🧐 https://t.co/Fi4BrFRFAw

Video Transcript AI Summary
The pause was implemented to allow for better management of federal funding and to ensure taxpayer dollars are used wisely. An executive order from the president initiated this pause, which includes a hiring freeze and a freeze on foreign aid. During this time, it was discovered that $37 million was about to be allocated to the World Health Organization, which the president has opted out of. Additionally, $50 million was set to fund condoms in Gaza, deemed an inappropriate use of taxpayer money. The focus of this pause is to be responsible stewards of public funds.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why impose this pause with so little notice? Why not give organizations more time to plan for the fact that they are about to lose, in some cases, really crucial federal funding. There was for for a period of time. Speaker 1: There was notice. It was the executive order that the president signed. There's also a freeze on hiring, as you know, of a regulatory freeze, and there's also a freeze on foreign aid. And this is, again, incredibly important to ensure that this administration is, taking into consideration how hard the American people are working. And their tax dollars actually matter to this administration. You know, just during this pause, Doge and OMB have actually found that there was $37,000,000 that was about to go out the door to the World Health Organization, which is an organization, as you all know, that president Trump with the swipe of his pen and that executive order, is no longer wants the United States to be a part of. So that wouldn't be in line with the president's agenda. Doge and OMB also found that there was about to be 50,000,000 taxpayer dollars that went out the door to fund condoms in Gaza. That is a preposterous waste of taxpayer money. So that's what this pause is focused on, being good stewards of tax dollars.
alx
Posted - February 3, 2025 at 5:51 AM
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 4:37 PM

@alx - ALX 🇺🇸

Elon Musk on USAID threatening Senator Joni Ernst: “It’s outrageous that a taxpayer-funded organization would threaten a U.S. Senator who is simply trying to figure out if American taxpayer money is being spent correctly and not fraudulently.” https://t.co/zWoSgOeWmL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Efforts to understand how American taxpayer dollars are spent on humanitarian aid in Ukraine began years ago. The goal was to ensure transparency in the use of these funds. However, attempts to exercise oversight led to threats from USAID, which is concerning for a taxpayer-funded organization. It is outrageous that a U.S. senator faced intimidation for simply seeking accountability regarding the proper use of taxpayer money.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know, Elon, you have been on USAID. You have really and so Speaker 1: That's the oneness for sure. Speaker 0: This was another one of my efforts. And this began years ago, when we were trying to figure out what they were doing with our American taxpayer dollars that were going to support, humanitarian efforts in, in Ukraine. So I wanted to know exactly how those dollars were being spent. And not just a reasonable request. Yes. Oh my gosh. And and I shared this with you earlier, Elon, just privately. But we got all kinds of threats from USAID because I was trying to exercise my oversight capacity in congress. So they Speaker 1: That's that's just shocking. I mean, it's it's Oh. How I mean, honestly, it's it's outrageous that a taxpayer funded organization would threaten a US senator, who is simply trying to figure out if American taxpayer money is being spent correctly and and and not fraudulently. Speaker 0: Yes.
bennyjohnson
Posted - February 4, 2025 at 9:02 PM
Saved - February 4, 2025 at 10:11 PM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

🚨President Trump on corruption and fraud in USAID: "Elon Musk has done a great job. Look at all the fraud he has found in this USAID. It is a disaster, radical left lunatics. The whole thing with 100 million spent on you know what.. I’d like to see what the kickbacks are." https://t.co/ob2S4NrMbg

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm Elon Musk. There have been many ideas discussed, but some are too extreme. The fraud found in USAID is shocking, with over a hundred million spent on questionable groups. It's concerning how much money is being kicked back to those in government. The train project between Los Angeles and San Francisco is poorly managed, with massive budget overruns. It would have been cheaper to provide limousine services for all passengers. Now, the project is not even reaching the main cities but instead stops far away. We're launching an investigation into this because the scale of mismanagement is unprecedented. This is the worst cost overrun in U.S. history, and it was unnecessary. There are better alternatives like flying or driving. We need to scrutinize this further.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It doesn't seem to work. I'm Elon Musk. Thank you, sir. I'm Elon Musk. How often are you talking to him? And have there been ideas that he's brought to you that you said, oh, no. Wait a minute. This is going a little too far. Well, many ideas, but look, he's done a great job. Look at all the fraud that he's found in this, USAID. It's a disaster what the people, radical left lunatics. They have things that nobody would have even believed. The whole thing with a hundred million spent on, you know what? With money going to all sorts of groups that shouldn't deserve to get any money with the money. I'd like to see what the kickbacks are. How much money has been kicked back? Who would spend that kind of money to some of the things that you read about and I read about and I see every night on the news and every morning when I read the papers? Who would spend money for that? I would say this, the the people that got all that money, are they kicking it back to the people that gave it from government? No. That's to me, very, very corrupt. The real question is how much of a kickback has there been? And one of the things I want to investigate, rapidly because I've never seen anything to this extent. The train that's being built between Los Angeles and San Francisco is the worst managed project I think I've ever seen, and I've seen some of the worst. Billions and billions, hundreds of billions of dollars over budget. In fact, I read where you could take every single person that was gonna go on the train and get the finest limousine service in the world and take them back and forth with limousines, and you'd have hundreds of millions of dollars left over. It is the worst thing, and we're gonna start an investigation in that because it's not possible. I built for a living, and I built on time, on budget. It's impossible that something could cost that much. And now it's not even going to San Francisco, and it's not going to Los Angeles. It's they made it much shorter. So now it's at little places way away from San Francisco and way away from Los Angeles. No. We're gonna start a big investigation on that because it's I've never seen anything like it. Nobody has ever seen anything like it. The worst overruns that there have ever been in the history of our country, And it wasn't even necessary. I would have said, you don't buy it. You take an airplane. Of course, you $2. Of course, you're nothing. You take an airplane. But this got started. And if you have to, you drive. You can drive. And there are other agents? They have hundreds of billions of dollars of cost overruns, and it's not even the same project. It's much shorter. It's way outside of San Francisco and way outside of Los Angeles. So we're gonna be looking
elonmusk
Posted - February 11, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 11:13 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Check out my bio https://t.co/vAUdrHVDW5

iAnonPatriot
Posted - March 27, 2025 at 12:41 PM
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 2:01 PM

@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸

Elon Musk can’t stop laughing after reporter claims that Tesla is “taking water from the region”… 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/PBlqiPKjkr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Critics claim Heska is stealing water from the region. One person disputes this, stating the region has abundant water, evidenced by the surrounding environment. They claim the assertion that there was no water before the government's station is completely wrong, as water is everywhere. They question whether the area resembles a desert, implying it does not due to frequent rainfall.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The question critics say that Heska stealing water from the region. Speaker 1: This region has so much water. Look around you. Speaker 0: But the local the site says there's no more water before the the government's station. Speaker 1: No. No. This is completely wrong. It's like water everywhere here. Does this seem like a desert to you? Speaker 0: Okay. Dankestrone. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's ridiculous. Speaker 0: What do I expect? Speaker 1: It rains a lot.
DOGE__news
Posted - May 24, 2025 at 2:30 AM
Saved - May 24, 2025 at 2:26 PM

@DOGE__news - (news) DOGE

Elon Musk: "It's a pretty good indication that if someone is using the word disinformation a lot, they are the ones creating the disinformation." https://t.co/Rjkuiq5vPZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Prominent Democrats, including John Kerry, Tim Wallace, and Hillary, are allegedly saying that the First Amendment is a bad thing. These top-level Democrats view the First Amendment as an obstacle. The frequent use of the word "disinformation" is an indication that the speaker believes these individuals are creating disinformation. Those trying to suppress freedom of speech are considered the "bad guys." It is astonishing that this is happening in America in 2024.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One prominent Democrat after another has been saying that freedom of speech, the first amendment, is is a is a is a bad thing. John Kerry. Yeah. John Kerry literally said that. Tim Wallace. Tim. And and Tim Wallace. Yeah. And Hillary. Yeah. Exactly. It's it's like a long list. It's it's they're they're not like, you know, mid level people in the it's like the top people in the Democratic Party are saying the first amendment's an obstacle, and and then they they use the word disinformation. Like, it's a pretty good indication that if someone's using the word disinformation a lot, they are the ones creating the disinformation. If you're trying to figure out, well, like, are the good guys? Who are the bad guys? The the the people who are trying to suppress freedom of speech, they are the bad guys. You know? It's actually astonishing that that we're even in this position in 2024 in America. It's hard to even believe that this is real. You know?
View Full Interactive Feed