reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Posted - March 30, 2023 at 3:23 PM

Saved - March 30, 2023 at 3:39 PM

@SebGorka - Sebastian Gorka DrG

BREAKING Jacob Chansley, has been released 14 months early after @SpeakerMcCarthy released January 6th footage that proved he committed no crime.

@Prolotario1 — Ariel

Posted - March 19, 2024 at 6:50 PM

Saved - March 19, 2024 at 11:57 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A pardon does not establish innocence, but rather acknowledges guilt. Michael Flynn, despite claiming innocence, accepted a pardon. However, there have been cases where innocent individuals settled for a pardon. Flynn faced penalties for failing to disclose financial advances from foreign entities, including $450,000 from Turkish and Russian interests. The Army sought to recoup money from him. Flynn attended a gala dinner with Vladimir Putin, who later claimed they didn't really talk. This situation could be seen as insulting.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

A Turncoat's Receipt: Tracking The Wire People, I do not know if you knew this. But when someone is pardoned it's an admission of guilt not innocence. Anyone that knows they are not guilty of anything will not settle for being pardoned. Especially if you are someone like Michael Flynn who claimed innocence while being a military general. Legally speaking, a pardon is an act of executive clemency that forgives a crime and removes the associated penalties, but it does not necessarily erase the conviction or establish innocence. In some cases, individuals who maintain their innocence may refuse a pardon because they believe it would be seen as an admission of wrongdoing. This perspective was famously articulated by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Joseph McKenna in the 1915 case Burdick v. United States, where he stated, "a pardon carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it." This opinion suggests that by accepting a pardon, an individual is implicitly acknowledging their guilt. You all have to understand M. Flynn was not requesting any pardons. He was ready to testify with immunities that he was looking to request from prosecution. There are only two cases where someone was truly innocent and settled for a pardon. One of the most well-known examples is the case of the Groveland Four, four young African American men who were wrongfully accused and convicted of raping a white woman in Florida in 1949. Two of the men were posthumously pardoned in 2019, while the other two had their convictions overturned in 2021. Another example is the case of Clyde Kennard, an African American man who was wrongfully convicted of stealing chicken feed in Mississippi in 1960, in what was believed to be a racially motivated prosecution. Kennard was posthumously pardoned in 2006, decades after his conviction and years after his death. I would never allow this. I would want full exoneration. But that's impossible if you are on record accepting foreign financial advances from a opposing government. He was was cited by the Defense Department inspector general for failing to disclose lucrative speaking engagements and other business arrangements with foreign entities. Which prompted the U.S. government to pursue tens of thousands of dollars in penalties against him, according to documents. Investigators determined that Flynn received nearly $450,000 from Turkish and Russian interests in 2015, including for an appearance in Moscow alongside President Vladimir Putin, but found no records that he had sought government approval beforehand. Their findings are detailed in a January 2021 memo to the Army released through the Freedom of Information Act. As reported by Dan Lamonthe & Craig Whitlock. Did you all know The Army notified Flynn in a May 2 letter, obtained by The Washington Post, that it would seek to recoup $38,557.06 from him, zeroing in on money and in-kind compensation he received for a gala dinner celebrating the 10th anniversary of RT, the Kremlin-run news agency? Did you also know that V. Putin sat beside Flynn at the event and later told NBC News that he “didn’t even really talk to” him? Do you know how insulting that had to be? I would feel so little if V. Putin burned me without lighting any matches even though alcohol is basically gasoline if you are short on using 100% fuel.

@QueenDarbyy — ⚜️💎 Queen Katerina💎⚜️

Posted - June 28, 2024 at 3:07 PM

Saved - June 28, 2024 at 3:23 PM

@QueenDarbyy - ⚜️💎 Queen Katerina💎⚜️

🔥BREAKING‼️SCOTUS sides with Trump & Jan 6th political prisoners who were illegally charged with obstruction! RELEASE THEM NOW!!! https://t.co/2fuEd78xr7

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Department's charges against January 6 defendants, including Trump, are deemed invalid due to an inappropriate statute. The statute, passed post-Enron, is seen as unfit for Capitol events. Justice Barrett dissents in this unique case.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Department used to charge 100 of different January 6 defendants is no good. And that includes president Donald Trump because he has actually had 2 of these counts against him in the Jack Smith DC case against him, that federal criminal case that has been on hold here. So what essentially they say is this statute, which was passed in the wake of Enron, they say it doesn't fit here. He says, given that the subsection was enacted to address the Enron disaster, not some other far flung set of dangers like what happened just right over here at the Capitol, it is unlikely that Congress responded with such an unfocused and grossly incommensurate patch in English that essentially means that all of these people who were charged under this particular obstruction statute for January 6th, that is no good. The dissent, this is a very interesting vote makeup because the dissent is actually written by justice Barrett, and she is

@THeinrich22 — Todd With Trump

Posted - June 28, 2024 at 5:25 PM

Saved - June 28, 2024 at 6:14 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The J6r's are soon going to be free as SCOTUS ruled in favor of the Patriots. The Biden DOJ improperly charged them and weaponized the law, but now those charges are being dropped. It's a confirmation of what many already believed.

@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump

If you haven’t heard yet, you’re gonna wanna listen to this 👇🏻😱 THE J6r’s are SOON GONNA BE FREE 😲 SCOTUS ruled in favor of the Patriots that the POS Biden DOJ improperly charged them in their court cases and they deliberately weaponized the law against them - now they’re forced to drop those charges 😳 We all knew it - but now it’s real 👏🏻👊🏻

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Supreme Court ruled that the statute used in the January 6th prosecutions was misinterpreted and not meant for protests. They applied ancient canons of interpretation to reach this decision. The Biden administration misused the statute, but the Court upheld the rule of law. There are concerns about the abuse of power and oversight is needed to understand how this happened. The speaker, a former law professor, criticizes the cynical and biased use of the statute, highlighting the double standards in prosecution. The focus is on the need for fair application of the law.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Fisher's great, Steve. It's a tremendous statutory interpretation case, and it was the obvious statutory interpretation all along. It's a statute that's directed at obstruction of justice. That's even in the title. It's all over the place. It was only designed to be, changed after the Enron debacle because of the the so called Enron loophole, and it's easily construed that addition to the statute to mean that you're talking about forms of obstruction that are like the existing forms of obstruction, like tearing up a document, like hiding a document, etcetera, or, you know, witness intimidation or the like. It's not designed for protests. And so the supreme court says, you know, that that's not what the statute is for, and they apply, you know, I'll I'll give your your audience 2 quick, little Latin lessons that applies these 2 classic ancient canons of interpretation, nositora socius and the jusdem generis, and they mean that words are known by the company they keep and that, if you have a list of things, the list, you can strew it, to mean that everything on the list is of a like kind or character. That's what the Latin means. They apply those canons. They say that out rule outlaws what happened with these January 6th prosecutions, and, you know, that's that's the end of it. They made short work of it, Steve. It's a big victory for justice for the j sixers, but it's a great upholding of the rule of law because the Biden administration, the Garland Justice Department, they weaponized this statute. They totally misinterpreted it. They abused their prosecutorial discretion, and the Supreme Court smacked it down. Speaker 1: But that's that's the the point the part of the matter is their abuse of this and their their knowing abuse of the system. They knowingly went and did this. This is Andrew Weisman. This is why Weisman John Hollman's not on the list. Weisman's on the list. They knowingly knowingly went in and used this. And the the the federal bench, you gotta ask some questions here. Gotta be some you gotta be some tough questions. Am I wrong in that, Jeff Clark? Speaker 0: No. You have to pursue this with maximum energy in oversight to see how we got to this very twisted place. Look. We haven't talked about it before, I think, in any of my appearances with you, Steve, but, you know, I was a a law professor for, you know, a decade while I was, in private practice and while I was in the Bush administration. And I also guest lecture from time to time on constitutional law, including last year in in Europe. And this is the kind of interpretation of this statute 18 USC 1512 c 2. That if 1 of my law students came up with it, I would say, like, oh, you know, oh, you're very clever. You're trying to use the text of the statute, but come on. You know remotely that's not what the statute is intended to do. You're forgetting about these 2 canons that I just described. Yeah. You're forgetting about the fact that this was designed to plug a specific loophole. You're just trying to use the statute in a cynical and results oriented way to go after people who you think you should be able to put on the hook. Even if it destroys their families, even if you're not using the statute against the same conduct by the left. Right? We had the whole summer of 2020 with the, Antifa BLM Summer of Love.

@JohnStrandUSA — 𝐉𝐎𝐇𝐍⚔️𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐃

Posted - July 15, 2024 at 8:32 PM

Saved - July 16, 2024 at 3:39 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - 𝐉𝐎𝐇𝐍⚔️𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐃

IT’S OFFICIAL — I am being released from prison after my Motion for Release was approved by the Judge. I am so thankful for everyone who supported me during this difficult time. #JusticeforJ6! https://t.co/icnTpdcRS5

@BehizyTweets — George

Posted - August 6, 2024 at 9:00 PM

Saved - August 6, 2024 at 11:08 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Judge Reggie Walton has dismissed the 1512 obstruction charge against Ohio pastor William Dunfee, citing a Supreme Court ruling. This decision could lead to the release of many January 6 defendants, as it sets a precedent that may impact their convictions.

@BehizyTweets - George

BREAKING: Judge Reggie Walton of the DC Circuit Court has DISMISSED the 1512 obstruction charge that Ohio pastor William Dunfee was convicted with for January 6th, saying the Supreme Court's ruling requires him to This is the first domino to fall; hundreds of J6ers will be freed because, for many, this was their only "felony" conviction. Some judges coordinating with the DOJ have tried to find a way around SCOTUS's ruling, but this case now sets a precedent for all the other J6ers

@JohnStrandUSA — John Strand

Posted - December 15, 2024 at 6:56 AM

Saved - December 15, 2024 at 3:51 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

January 6 defendants don’t actually need a pardon, we need FULL exoneration. The DOJ must file motions to vacate convictions, admit wrongdoing, and offer compensation for ruining lives and incarcerating innocent people under fraudulent and manufactured pretenses. https://t.co/zraeOGBHLp

Video Transcript AI Summary

There are two levels to consider. The first involves clear constitutional violations that need addressing, affecting everyone prosecuted by the DOJ. The second concerns the majority of protesters who are innocent and do not require a pardon. Instead, they need exoneration, which is distinct from a pardon that implies some guilt. A pardon limits their legal recourse and prevents them from suing a corrupt government. Innocent individuals should be fully restored, and I believe President Trump has the authority to grant this exoneration as outlined in my letter.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: There are kinda 2 levels. 1 is the broad constitutional level where there is just clear and and overt, evidence of broad sweeping constitutional violations, which must be addressed, and those affected everyone prosecuted by the Garland and Graves DOJ. And then the second level is that the vast majority of protesters, as I said, are completely innocent, and they actually don't need a pardon. They need exoneration, which is very different actually. A standard pardon does carry the implicit, indication that there was some level of guilt or at least due process, which a president has the constitutional authority to, pardon out of mercy. But someone who is not guilty does not need a pardon, which also ends any legal recourse they have and prevents them from suing a corrupt government. But they rather need exoneration and to be completely restored. And that's something that I believe president Trump can and must do with his executive authority as I've outlined in the letter.

@amuse — @amuse

Posted - January 20, 2025 at 4:34 PM

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 3:18 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Dr. Fauci allegedly lied under oath about funding gain of function research in Wuhan. While he can't be prosecuted for that now, should Congress call him to testify again? He also mentioned he would accept a preemptive pardon from Biden, which some interpret as an admission of guilt.

@amuse - @amuse

PARDON: Dr. Fauci lied under oath to Congress about funding gain of function research in Wuhan. While he can't be prosecuted for that crime now should Congress call him to testify again and have him either admit to his crimes or lie under oath once again? If he lies again he can be prosecuted for the new lie.

@amuse - @amuse

PARDON: Fauci says he will accept preemptive pardon from Biden. In doing so he is admitting his guilt according to the Supreme Court. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5095299-fauci-says-he-will-accept-preemptive-pardon-from-biden/

@JakeLangJ6 — Jake Lang - January 6 Political Prisoner 🇺🇸

Posted - January 20, 2025 at 8:35 PM

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 10:04 AM

@JakeLangJ6 - Jake Lang - January 6 Political Prisoner 🇺🇸

JUST ANNOUNCED THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS DROPPING MY JANUARY 6 CASE!!!!!! 4 YEAR AND 4 DAYS IN THE GULAG WITHOUT A TRIAL IM FINALLY COMING HOME!!!! GOD BE MAGNIFIED!!! MOUNTAINS DO REALLY MOVE IN JESUS NAME!!!

@DerrickEvans4WV — Derrick Evans

Posted - January 21, 2025 at 12:47 AM

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 1:42 AM

@DerrickEvans4WV - Derrick Evans

I’m pardoned. Praise the Lord. We won. My name is cleared. I have my rights back. I have my life back. GOD IS GOOD. Thank you President Trump

@amuse — @amuse

Posted - January 21, 2025 at 1:03 AM

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 3:06 AM

@amuse - @amuse

PARDON: 1500 pardons of January 6th defendants (6 commutations awaiting further research). Trump wants them ALL out of jail TONIGHT!

Video Transcript AI Summary

We have a list of pardons and commutations related to the events of January 6, 2021. This order will apply to approximately 1,500 individuals, with full pardons being granted. There are also about six commutations under further review. This is a significant development, and we hope to see the outcomes tonight.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Sir, first, we have a list of, of pardons and commutations relating to events that occurred on January 6, 2021. Okay. Speaker 1: And how many people are this? Speaker 0: I think this order will apply to approximately 1500 people. Speaker 1: So this is January 6th. These are the hostages. Approximately 1500 for a pardon. Yes. Full pardon. Speaker 0: Full pardon or commutation? Speaker 1: Full pardon. We have about 6 commutations in there where we're doing further research. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: Nice to see you in here. So this is a big one. Anything you want to explain me about this? We we hope they get them we hope they come out tonight, frankly. We're expecting it. Approximately 1500 people. Yes, sir. Six six commutations.

@DonaldJTrumpJr — Donald Trump Jr.

Posted - January 21, 2025 at 1:08 AM

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 1:25 AM

@DonaldJTrumpJr - Donald Trump Jr.

Promises Made, Promises Kept… And we are only just starting 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 President Trump has just signed an executive order granting full pardons to about 1,500 J6 prisoners! https://t.co/W5iJh3jjXx

Video Transcript AI Summary

On January 6th, there are approximately 1500 hostages involved in discussions about a full pardon. The focus is on securing a full pardon rather than a commutation.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So this is January 6th. These are the hostages. Approximately 1500 for a pardon. Yes. Full pardon. Full pardon or commutation? Full pardon.

@drsimonegold — Dr. Simone Gold

Posted - January 21, 2025 at 1:13 AM

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 2:51 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

I have just received notice that I was granted a full and unconditional pardon for January 6th. I have wept tears of joy. The severe abuses of power from the Biden DOJ have finally been acknowledged and rectified. Thank you @realDonaldTrump for standing with us. 🇺🇸 https://t.co/4AvYMItU49

@charliekirk11 — Charlie Kirk

Posted - January 21, 2025 at 1:59 AM

Saved - January 22, 2025 at 1:28 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

If you are a family member of a J6 hostage go to the prison and show a copy. They have to release the prisoner. Pardon power is absolute total and immediate. Don’t let them delay - we demand immediate release! Bring them home! https://t.co/gqgA09HNSu

@mericanaf7 — ‘Merican AF 🇺🇸

Posted - January 21, 2025 at 4:19 AM

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 5:58 PM

@mericanaf7 - ‘Merican AF 🇺🇸

I have officially been pardoned!! 🇺🇸 Thank you, @realDonaldTrump! 🙏🏼 https://t.co/pM90ioSknM

@julie_kelly2 — Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Posted - January 21, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 2:18 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Someone pinch me. My friend ⁦@EagleEdMartin⁩ is the new DC US attorney and he’s dismissing existing J6 proceedings. Jared Wise was on trial last week and his case expected to go to the jury today https://t.co/mSzHhRVqhf

@VoteHarrisOut — Philip Anderson

Posted - January 22, 2025 at 11:15 PM

Saved - January 23, 2025 at 2:45 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The January 6th case against me has been dismissed, and I feel like a free man after everything I've endured. I'm grateful I fought for myself and the other J6ers. Thanks to our team's efforts, Donald Trump has expanded the pardon net to include all J6ers. We did it!

@VoteHarrisOut - Philip Anderson

🚨BREAKING: The January 6th case against me has been dismissed. After everything I have suffered I AM FINALLY A FREE MAN

@VoteHarrisOut - Philip Anderson

I am so glad that I chose to fight for my life and the lives of all the other J6ers. Because of the work of our team on Twitter and the our close friends’ work behind the scenes we got Donald Trump to expand the pardon net for J6ers to pardons for ALL of the J6ers. WE FUCKING DID IT

@JohnStrandUSA — John Strand

Posted - January 28, 2025 at 6:25 PM

Saved - January 28, 2025 at 9:24 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

The DOJ has vacated all of my J6 convictions—I’m now fully, legally exonerated. I refused the plea deal, fought all charges, and maintained my innocence from start to finish. This isn’t just my victory—it’s a victory for everyone who has faced weaponized government abuse. https://t.co/EHiy13jUcK

@laralogan — Lara Logan

Posted - February 6, 2025 at 10:56 PM

Saved - February 7, 2025 at 12:23 PM

@laralogan - Lara Logan

Jeremy Brown has been pardoned by the President - why is he still in jail? Rotting in a transition pod in a prison in Atlanta… https://t.co/F4h6y0BM3e

@MrCostianes — Elias Costianes

Posted - February 12, 2025 at 4:53 PM

Saved - February 13, 2025 at 3:31 PM

@MrCostianes - Elias Costianes

J6 defendant turning myself in to the US Marshals. I have been pardoned but my judge doesn’t care and wants me in prison. Please share, God Bless!! ❤️🙏🇺🇸 https://t.co/qJ6SY9JLMy

Video Transcript AI Summary

It's Elias Costianas, and today, 02/12/2025, marks four years since the FBI raided me for peacefully walking around. Despite a pardon I received yesterday from President Trump, I'm turning myself in to the marshals at the federal courthouse due to a judge's order. The charges stem from the unlawful raid on my home. Through this ordeal, my faith has deepened, and Jesus Christ is my lord. I hope my experience can lead to positive change. Please share my story and pray for a resolution. The spirit of President Trump's executive order is clear, but the judge in my federal case is not honoring it. Thank you all, and God bless.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hey, guys. Elias Costianas here. It is 02/12/2025. Four years to the date that I was violently rated by the FBI for walking around peacefully for a half an hour. Now four years later, I'm here at the marshals at the federal courthouse to turn myself in for charges that they obtained as a result of the unlawful warrant and raid on my home. I've got a pardon that was issued to me yesterday from president Trump, and I have a unlawful order from the judge requiring me to report to prison today. So that's what I'm about to do. And I just wanna thank everybody for your attention to this. You know, through the strife and pain and suffering, I've never been closer to God than I am now. And Jesus Christ is my lord and savior, and it's been a blessing. Hopefully, we can get changed from this experience. If you guys could please share my story and say some prayers, hopefully, something will change. This is obviously fruits of the poisonous tree. The spirit of what president Trump wrote, in his executive order is very clear, but, the judge in the federal case, that I have isn't willing to accept that. So, thanks everyone, and hope to see you soon. God bless.

@RogerJStoneJr — Roger Stone

Posted - February 23, 2025 at 5:58 AM

Saved - February 23, 2025 at 8:50 PM

@RogerJStoneJr - Roger Stone

How much longer must we wait for justice in the case of Jeremy Brown? His full and unconditional presidential pardon most certainly addresses any charge that arose from the illegal search of his home after he refused to become an informant for the FBI on January 6th

@HanneBlaze64 - Joe Hanneman 🇺🇸

🚨BREAKING🚨 An attorney for pardoned #Jan6 defendant and #OathKeeper Jeremy Brown files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in Atlanta federal court, demanding his release under presidential pardon.

@JohnStrandUSA — John Strand

Posted - February 24, 2025 at 4:15 AM

Saved - February 24, 2025 at 3:03 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m baffled that Jeremy Brown is still a political hostage. He deserves to be set free immediately. Justice for him is long overdue, especially since he was targeted after refusing to inform on others. As a J6er, I believe in upholding the rule of law, which is essential to our constitutional republic. While rebellion against tyranny is a moral duty, it’s crucial to distinguish it from aggression. True patriots know that liberty comes with responsibility and respect for others.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Honestly, how in the hell is Jeremy Brown STILL a political hostage? Set him free NOW! @PamBondi https://t.co/HWRVRvZAZZ

@RogerJStoneJr - Roger Stone

How much longer must we wait for justice in the case of Jeremy Brown? His full and unconditional presidential pardon most certainly addresses any charge that arose from the illegal search of his home after he refused to become an informant for the FBI on January 6th

@HanneBlaze64 - Joe Hanneman 🇺🇸

🚨BREAKING🚨 An attorney for pardoned #Jan6 defendant and #OathKeeper Jeremy Brown files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in Atlanta federal court, demanding his release under presidential pardon.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Unite and hold the line, J6 🇺🇸

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

I just want to say, as a J6er, that legitimate rule of law is the bedrock of our constitutional republic. Rebellion against tyranny is obedience to God—but this should not be confused with belligerence. True patriots understand that liberty requires responsibility & respect 🇺🇸

@JohnStrandUSA — John Strand

Posted - February 24, 2025 at 4:29 PM

Saved - February 24, 2025 at 9:08 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I'm excited to share that Jeremy Brown is being released today from Atlanta FCI, thanks to a Habeus Corpus petition challenging the search warrant. This marks another victory for those advocating for January 6th hostages. While I'm thrilled for Jeremy, I remain concerned about the others still imprisoned despite President Trump's pardons. We need to keep the pressure on to bring our heroes home.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: Jeremy Brown is being released today from Atlanta FCI, his attorney is on site H/T @ProudArmymom66 Habeus Corpus was filed, challenging “constitutionally infirm search warrant” - @dbongino can’t reign in the FBI fast enough Another J6 hostage victory! 🇺🇸 https://t.co/UJA6P7vLhh

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Honestly, how in the hell is Jeremy Brown STILL a political hostage? Set him free NOW! @PamBondi https://t.co/HWRVRvZAZZ

@RogerJStoneJr - Roger Stone

How much longer must we wait for justice in the case of Jeremy Brown? His full and unconditional presidential pardon most certainly addresses any charge that arose from the illegal search of his home after he refused to become an informant for the FBI on January 6th https://t.co/296uY0TuwF

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: Jeremy Brown is being released from prison today, with outstanding Habeus Corpus petition filed — seems like @PamBondi is aware of these lingering issues But several other hostages are still held in defiance of President Trump’s full and unconditional pardons—keep the pressure on! BRING OUR HEROES HOME 🇺🇸

@WeThePeople021 — Constitutional Gator

Posted - February 28, 2025 at 7:28 PM

Saved - February 28, 2025 at 10:50 PM

@WeThePeople021 - Constitutional Gator

Look what I received via email today. My official certificate of pardon. 🥳🥳🥳 https://t.co/Y2sd62vJc8

@ItsYourGov — Oversight Project

Posted - August 19, 2025 at 8:24 PM

Saved - August 20, 2025 at 11:00 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I shared concerns about President Biden's autopenned clemency awards, which granted pardons to nearly 2,500 individuals, including those with violent histories. The DOJ flagged these actions as "highly problematic," indicating a lack of clarity on Biden's intentions. He admitted to not approving each name individually, which raises legal issues. Despite claims that the pardons were for non-violent offenders, evidence suggests otherwise. An investigation is underway, and I believe the Trump Administration should take action regarding those pardoned.