TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
@brikeilarcnn - Brianna Keilar
Twice in one day, top Biden administration officials suggested that reporters who are asking legitimate questions are siding with enemies of America. They're not. They're doing their jobs. #RollTheTape https://t.co/WTI21J5gFq
Video Transcript AI Summary
State Department spokesperson and a reporter clash over lack of evidence for Russian propaganda claims. Another exchange questions US military's assessment of civilian casualties in Syria raid. Administration admits mistake in drone strike that killed civilians. Journalists must ask questions to hold officials accountable and protect civilians, reflecting American values.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So twice in one day, top administration officials have suggested that reporters who are asking legitimate questions are siding with enemies of America. At yesterday's state department briefing, this heated exchange between state department spokesperson Ned Price and the AP's Matt Lee, who, by the way, has covered the last eight secretaries of state.
Speaker 1: It's an action that you say that they have taken, but you have shown no evidence to to to confirm that. And I'm gonna get to the next question here, which is what is the evidence that they I mean, this is like crisis actors, really. This is like Alex Jones territory you're getting into then. What evidence do you have to support the idea that there is some propaganda film in the making?
Speaker 2: Matt, this is derived, from information known to the US government, intelligence information that we have declassified. I think you have Okay.
Speaker 1: Well, where where is it? Where where is this information?
Speaker 2: It is intelligence information that we have declassified.
Speaker 1: Well, where is it? Where is the declassified information?
Speaker 2: I just delivered it.
Speaker 1: No. You made a series of allegations and statement.
Speaker 2: Would you like us to print out the topper? Because you will see a transcript of this briefing that you can print out for yourself. That's not
Speaker 1: evidence, Ned. That's you saying it. That's not evidence. I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: What would you like, Matt?
Speaker 1: I I would like to see some proof that you that that that that that you can show that that
Speaker 2: that
Speaker 1: that that shows that that that shows that the Russians are doing it. Ned, I've been doing this for a while.
Speaker 2: I know. That was my pleasure. You you have you you have been doing this for quite a while. You know that when we declassify intelligence information, we do so in in a means we do so we do so with an eye to protecting possible methods.
Speaker 1: Not gonna fall. I I remember a lot of things. So where where where is the declassified information other than you coming out here and saying?
Speaker 2: Matt, I'm sorry you don't like the format, but we have de
Speaker 1: classified format. It's the content.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry you don't like the content. I'm sorry you I'm sorry you are doubting the information that is in the possession of the US government.
Speaker 1: But you don't have any any evidence to back it up other than what you're saying. It's like you're saying we think we we have information. The Russians may do this, but you won't tell us what the information is.
Speaker 2: And then when that is the idea behind deterrence, Matt. That is the idea behind deterrence. It is our hope that the Russians don't go forward with this.
Speaker 1: You say, I just gave it to you. But that's not what
Speaker 2: You you seem not to understand you seem not to understand the idea of deterrence.
Speaker 1: We are trying to observe. The Russians
Speaker 2: are moving forward with this type of activity. That is why we're making it public today. If the Russians don't go forward with this, that is not, ipso facto, an indication that they never had plans to do so.
Speaker 1: But But then it's unprovable. My my god. What is the evidence that you have that suggests that that the Russians are even planning this?
Speaker 3: Matt, you're not.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm not saying that they're not, but you just come out and say this and expect us just to to to believe it without you showing a shred of evidence that it's actually true other than when I asked or when anyone else asked what's the information? You said, well, I just gave it to you, which was just you making a statement.
Speaker 2: Matt, you said yourself, you've been in this business for quite a long time. You know that when we make information, intelligence information public, we do so, in a in a way that protects sensitive sources and methods. You also know that we do so, we declassify information only when we're confident in that information. If you doubt the the credibility of the US government, of the British government, of other governments and wanna, you know, find, solace in information that the Russians are putting out, that is, that is for you to do. I know that.
Speaker 0: Alright. Let's be clear. That was the state department spokesman suggesting that an American reporter is siding with Russian propaganda, finding comfort with Russian propaganda. He's not. He's asking a question.
It is our job as journalists to ask questions and to verify claims. You heard that reporter clearly explaining why. Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and more recently, whether Kabul would fall to the Taliban. This was president Biden in July.
Speaker 1: Is the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan now inevitable?
Speaker 3: No. It is not. Because you have the Afghan troops at 300,000 well equipped as well as equipped as any army in the world and an air force against something like 75,000 Taliban. It is not inevitable, but the likelihood there's going to be the Taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country is highly unlikely.
Speaker 0: It happened less than a month later. Kabul fell. So, yes, it is important to question claims and intelligence. The other exchange yesterday over a reporter just doing their job, asking about the raid in Syria that killed the leader of ISIS. NPR reporter Ayesha Roscoe questioned White House press secretary Jen Psaki onboard Air Force 1.
Speaker 4: I mean, I know the US has put out a statement that the the that the you know, they've detonated the bomb themselves. But will the US provide any evidence? Because there may be people that are skeptical of the events that took place and what happened to the civilians.
Speaker 5: Skeptical of the US military's assessment when they went and took out an ISIS terror the leader of ISIS Yeah. That they are not providing accurate information and ISIS is providing accurate information? Well, not
Speaker 4: ISIS, but, I mean, the US has not always been, straightforward about what happens with civilians. And, I mean, that is a fact.
Speaker 1: Well, as
Speaker 5: you know, there's an extensive process that the Department of Defense undergoes. The president made clear from the beginning at every point in this process that doing everything possible to avoid civilian casualties was his priority and his preference.
Speaker 0: She went on to say it's a fact. Right? That information has not always been correct when it comes to civilians. Following the ISIS k attack at the airport in Kabul, you'll remember it killed 13 service members. The US targeted what it thought was ISIS k with a drone strike in Kabul on August 29th.
Now that strike killed 10 civilians, including 7 children.
Speaker 6: Were there others killed? Yes. There are others killed. Who they are? We don't know.
We'll try to sort through all that. But we believe that the procedures at this point, I don't want to influence the outcome of an investigation. But at this point, we think that the procedures were correctly followed, and it was a righteous strike.
Speaker 0: The administration insisted that the intelligence was good.
Speaker 6: We had very good intelligence, that ISIS k was preparing, a specific type vehicle, at a specific type location. We monitored that through various means, and all of the engagement criteria were being met. We went through the same level of rigor that we've done
Speaker 0: for years. The administration explained that civilian casualties, appeared to be because of explosives that were carried by the purported terrorist.
Speaker 6: Explosions. Because there were secondary explosions, there's a reasonable conclusion to be made that there was explosives in that vehicle.
Speaker 0: It turned out that was wrong. The administration later admitted it had made a horrible mistake. So when we look at the failures of journalism, many times the failures are questions that were not asked. That is why reporters question officials because government officials have been wrong. It happens a lot, and this administration specifically has been wrong.
As you see, they're dead wrong in the recent past when talking about civilian casualties. It is entirely plausible that the leader of ISIS did blow himself up and killed people doing so. His predecessor, al Baghdadi, did. He killed 2 of his own children when he did it. Just last week, the US defense secretary, though, ordered top Pentagon officials to come up with a plan to protect civilians.
Secretary Lloyd Austin called it, quote, a strategic and moral imperative. He said that efforts to mitigate and respond to civilian harm are a diff a direct reflection of US values. So, yes, journalists will keep asking questions, hopefully undeterred by these suggestions. To do so is not siding with America's enemies. It is, as secretary Austin himself said, a moral imperative and a reflection of US values, not Russian values, not ISIS values, American values.
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
Tucker Carlson on the Deep State: "Unelected lifers in the federal agencies make the biggest decisions in American government and crush anyone who tries to rein them in and in the process our Democracy becomes a joke." https://t.co/kT3l2tMIOM
Video Transcript AI Summary
To understand the American government, consider Richard Nixon, the most popular president, who was ousted without a vote, replaced by Gerald Ford, the only unelected president. Nixon, reelected in 1972 by a historic margin, believed federal agencies were undermining the government. In June 1972, he suggested to CIA Director Richard Helms that the CIA was involved in JFK's assassination, but Helms remained silent. The Watergate scandal began with a break-in, involving CIA operatives. Bob Woodward, a former naval officer with ties to intelligence, reported on Watergate, using FBI Deputy Director Mark Felt as his source. Meanwhile, Nixon's vice president, Spiro Agnew, resigned, leading to Ford's appointment. This series of events illustrates how unelected officials influence American politics, undermining democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if you wanna understand, if you really wanna understand how the American government actually works at the highest levels, and if you wanna know why they don't teach history anymore, one thing you should know is that the most popular president in American history was Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon. Yet somehow without a single vote being cast by a single American voter, Richard Nixon was kicked out of office and replaced by the only unelected president in American history. So we went from the most popular president to a president nobody voted for. Wait a minute, you may ask.
Why didn't I know that? Wasn't Richard Nixon a criminal? Wasn't he despised by all decent people? No. He wasn't.
In fact, if any president could claim to be the people's choice, it was Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon was reelected in 1972 by the largest margin of the popular vote ever recorded before or since. Nixon got 17,000,000 more votes than his opponent. Less than 2 years later, he was gone. He was forced to resign, and in his place, an obedient servant of the federal agencies called Gerald Ford took over the White House.
How did that happen? Well, it's a long story, but here are the highlights, and they tell you a lot. Richard Nixon believed that elements in the federal bureaucracy were working to undermine the American system of government, and had been doing that for a long time. He often said that. He was absolutely right.
On June 23, 1972, Nixon met with the then CIA director, Richard Helms at the White House. During the conversation, which thankfully was tape recorded, Nixon suggested he knew quote, who shot John, meaning President John F Kennedy. Nixon further implied that the CIA was directly involved in Kennedy's assassination, which we now know it was. Helms' telling response, total silence. But for Nixon, it didn't matter because it was already over.
4 days before, on June 19th, the Washington Post had published the first of many stories about a break in at the Watergate office building. Unbeknownst to Nixon and unreported by the Washington Post, 4 of the 5 burglars worked for the CIA. The first of many dishonest Watergate stories was written by a 29 year old metro reporter called Bob Woodward. Who exactly was Bob Woodward? Well, he wasn't a journalist.
Bob Woodward had no background whatsoever in the news business. Instead, Bob Woodward came directly from the classified areas of the federal government. Shortly before Watergate, Woodward was a naval officer at the Pentagon. He had a top secret clearance. He worked regularly with the intel agencies.
At times, Woodward was even detailed to the Nixon White House, where he interacted with Richard Nixon's top aids. Soon after leaving the Navy for reasons that have never been clear, Woodward was hired by the most powerful news outlet in Washington and assigned the biggest story in the country. And just to make it crystal clear what was actually happening, Woodward's main source for his Watergate series was the deputy director of the FBI, Mark Felt. And Mark Felt ran, and we're not making this up, the FBI's COINTELPRO program, which was designed to secretly discredit political actors the federal agencies wanted to destroy. People like Richard Nixon.
And at the same time, those same agencies were also working to take down Nixon's elected vice president, Spiro Agnew. In the fall of 1973, Agnew was indicted for tax evasion and forced to resign. His replacement was a colorless congressman from Grand Rapids called Gerald Ford. What was Ford's qualification for the job? Well, he had served on the Warren Commission, which absolved the CIA of responsibility for president Kennedy's murder.
Nixon was strong armed into accepting Gerald Ford by Democrats in Congress. Quote, we gave Nixon no choice but Ford, speaker of the house, Carl Albert later boasted. 8 months later, Gerald Ford of the Warren Commission was the president of the United States. See how that works? So those are the facts, not speculation.
All of that actually happened. None of it's secret. Most of it actually is on Wikipedia. But no mainstream news organization has ever told that story. It's so obvious, yet it's intentionally ignored.
And as a result, permanent Washington remains in charge of our political system. Unelected lifers in the federal agencies make the biggest decisions in American government and crush anyone who tries to reign them in. And in the process, our democracy becomes a joke.
@DontWalkRUN - Andrew @ Don’t Walk, RUN!
WATCH: Joe Biden's staff cuts off a rambling Joe Biden mid-sentence and abruptly ends his news conference. I have never seen this occur with any other president.
@StephenM - Stephen Miller
Who is running the country? Not Joe, not Kamala. https://t.co/c01QONqfWE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Biden will not drop out of the race. He is determined to win and will continue running.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's Joe Biden gonna do? Is he gonna stay in the race? He's gonna drop out? Here's my I am running, and we're gonna win. I'm not gonna change that.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just learned that unelected Pentagon officials are secretly meeting to discuss how to handle potential orders from Trump that they disagree with, including using the military for mass deportations. It's concerning that these bureaucrats hold such power. I hope Trump takes action against them!
@Travis_4_Trump - 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸
JUST IN: It was just leaked to CNN that unelected officials at the Pentagon are already holding secret meetings on what to do if Donald Trump issues orders they don’t agree with. Some of those orders include using active military to assign in carrying out mass deportations and “fire corrupt actors” currently in the US government. Why have our politicians allowed these unelected bureaucrats to hold so much power? I hope Trump fires them all!
@VivekGRamaswamy - Vivek Ramaswamy
The people who waxed eloquently about “threats to our democracy” were really most worried about threats to our bureaucracy - which is the *actual* threat to democracy itself. https://t.co/5kVfMYwDyE
Video Transcript AI Summary
To reduce the federal bureaucracy, we must recognize that many regulations are illegitimate. The executive branch has created numerous rules unlawfully, and acknowledging this is key to shrinking its size. This approach could effectively curb the bureaucracy's illegal actions and ultimately save the country.
The growth of the federal government is relentless, as institutions inherently aim to protect and expand themselves. It's rare to hear suggestions about significantly reducing its size, but even a modest cut could transform foreign policy, the economy, and culture. There is potential for meaningful change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You gotta get rid of the presence of the people who populate that bureaucracy. But in order to do that, you need this industrial logic. And that industrial logic, in my opinion, is what the supreme court has already given us, which is this mandate to say the executive branch, the fake executive branch, the administer to state, has written all these rules by Fiat. Most of them are illegal. Like, they're actually unlawful.
They're illegitimate. And so if you have an executive branch that says, okay. We're gonna recognize that most of these regulations are illegitimate. There's your blueprint for then shaving down the size of the federal bureaucracy, which is then the permanent solution to stop that bureaucracy from perpetuating this kind of illegal rampant action. And I think that's the stuff of how you actually save a country, boring as that might sound.
Speaker 1: It's not boring, and I think, I I've never heard in all the you know, my whole life in Washington, anybody suggest that this is a process that could really be stalled or reversed. The process being the growth of the federal government, which is just inexorable because the purpose of the institution is to protect protect itself and expand. That's the law.
Speaker 0: Take a law of physics. It's a the debt.
Speaker 1: Government. Every institution exists to protect itself for its own benefit. That's its purpose, and it's demonstrable in its behavior. So, but it's it's so obvious. It's so overwhelming.
It's the largest institution in human history. I've never heard anybody say, you know, we have a shot of, like, lopping off 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, like 8%. Yeah. That I mean, that would change everything from our foreign policy to our economy, to our culture. You really think that's that could happen?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I think it could
@JDVance - JD Vance
Memo to the press: When a president is elected by the People and then does what he promised to do, that’s democracy. When a president is thwarted by unelected bureaucrats, that’s oligarchy. President Trump refuses to bend the knee to that oligarchy. Buckle up!
@atensnut - Juanita Broaddrick
This is one of the best press briefings in the last few days. Stephen Miller is absolutely Brilliant!! https://t.co/E9GUorN7P1
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are no exact numbers yet on how many federal workers have accepted the buyout offer, but initial briefings suggest a significant response. The goal is to reform the hiring process to ensure dedicated federal employees. Regarding directives on pronouns in emails, this aligns with the president's stance on biological sex. There are ongoing concerns about trade imbalances with Mexico and Canada, particularly related to national security and fentanyl trafficking. The administration acknowledges the weaponization of law enforcement against Trump and his supporters. There are no current negotiations to avoid tariffs. If government employees are relieved of duty, they lose access to payment systems to prevent unauthorized transactions. The president supports pro-American immigration that benefits the economy and promotes social cohesion, while illegal immigration is not tolerated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Accept it.
Speaker 1: Oh, you have any numbers yet? On the number of people who've accepted the buyout, do you have any even big number of how many people are accepting it? Any any numbers at all?
Speaker 0: I don't have an exact number for you, and I wouldn't wanna give you an inaccurate estimate. That's a good question, and you should get a number soon, I hope, but I will tell you that I the initial briefings that I've received suggested a large number of federal workers have accepted the buyout offer, and I think the point here to really underscore is that federal workers who are not happy in their jobs, who don't want to show up at work, who do not want to be in the office, who are not passionate about what they're doing, or obviously not the kind of federal worker you want, responsible for, having enormous authority over the lives of the American people. And so this is happening in conjunction with a wholesale reform of the hiring process in the federal government to find people who are really dedicated to service at the absolute highest level.
Speaker 1: And Steve, I have another question. Can you confirm that the administration has ordered some federal workers across some agencies to drop pronouns in your emails as, of course, part of the, the deep text orders that represent your
Speaker 0: Yes. I believe that the directive you're referring to is consistent with the president's day one executive order on recognizing that there are only male and female sexes in the country and that well, in the world, for all of humanity, but his story is just on this country. And that your sex is your biological sex that is 1 and the second.
Speaker 1: So you don't have that in the, the president is meeting with,
Speaker 2: the president of New Media today?
Speaker 1: I don't
Speaker 0: have any update on that. Sorry.
Speaker 1: Can you explain the circumstances surrounding the departure of a top ranking treasury department official today, long time career service service?
Speaker 0: No. Nothing to add on that subject.
Speaker 1: Oh, Larry, I'm sorry. I didn't say anything. Yes. On how you're viewing the rollout of tomorrow's tariffs and how conversations with Mexico and Canada in particular are progressing at this point given some of the comments we've heard from their leaders today in preparation for their own plans?
Speaker 0: Well, I mean, as far as the the rollout, I mean, just to clarify what you mean by the rollout.
Speaker 1: Are you considering are you considering section 232 tariffs as part of this?
Speaker 0: Oh, I don't wanna get into the details. It's not for me to brief on what the details of how this can be done are, but there have obviously been long standing trade imbalances with these trading partners that have been long running in the systemic and that affect our national security by eroding our defense industrial base and eroding our manufacturing base. And also, there are even greater concerns with national security and public safety, particular, in particular, they're not limited to fentanyl, which of course is a weapon of mass destruction in this country and is killing more Americans than have died in our wars overseas, throughout our nation's history. And we know that there's a sophisticated network of criminal cartels operating on our border that traffic fentanyl in the United States. And we also know that the precursors to make that fentanyl, is coming from overseas.
And so, a, you have a a wide array of entities and organizations that have infiltrated our country and are killing our citizens in mass. And we know as well that cartels have functional control, like a government, over a large swaths of Mexican Mexican territory, which bravely imperils our own national security and public safety.
Speaker 1: From Canada. From Canada. To security. The FBI and the intelligence of investigating president Trump.
Speaker 0: Well, with respect to the FBI, and I would just say to the law enforcement intelligence community in general, it's clear that there has been vast weaponization of the law enforcement apparatus against president Trump, against president Trump's family, his staff, conservatives in general, republicans in general, and the American people. This was litigated for 4 years, right, from 2021 through the election. The question of the weaponization of the justice system. Of course, it started back in 2017. But there was a whole period of the Biden presidency.
This was probably the most discussed and litigated issue, and the American people read there an overwhelming verdict on the question of whether or not we need to clean ranks in our law enforcement intelligence communities and ensure that the partisan weaponization of our justice system ends. Are there
Speaker 1: any tools underway right now to try and avoid those tariffs? Any negotiations underway with Canada and Mexico?
Speaker 0: Nothing to add, Amasa. Let me take 2 more questions.
Speaker 1: Can I be back on the economic impact of the career officials are being locked out of payment systems at various government agencies? Can you explain what's going on?
Speaker 0: Well, I would say just as a general matter, that if somebody is trying to send money to, for example, a foreign country that is not authorized, that would be obviously a grave violation, not only of the agency rules, not only of an executive order, but potentially even the law. And if an individual has been relieved of duty, hypothetically, or has been placed on leave and is still trying to send taxpayer dollars overseas, that obviously would be an extremely serious infraction. But a standard protocol, of course, if someone has been placed on leave to lose access to your devices, we're talking about people who have the ability with the press of a button to send 1,000,000,000 of dollars to foreign countries. Alright. One more question.
Speaker 1: Can we get a here. Can you take it? Yesterday, the, president said that the situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo is very serious. Can you elaborate a little more?
Speaker 0: I can't add anything to his statement this time, but we should follow-up with you on that.
Speaker 1: And we'll have to wait for
Speaker 0: a few questions.
Speaker 1: So would you
Speaker 3: say that part of the administration's goal is, goal is, of course, to crack down on illegal immigration, but to curb legal immigration as well?
Speaker 0: The president has been clear with respect to legal immigration that his view is he wants pro American immigration. Immigration that supports the economy, that assimilates to our national values, in which there's no welfare use, there's no drain on taxpayers, and it promotes social cohesion, patriotism, and assimilation in the country. In other words, we as a nation, like any nation, have the right to select newcomers based on who will provide the most value to the country and the citizens who are already living here. That's the president's policy. And, of course, with illegal immigration, the answer is none.
0. No illegal immigrants have lied to the country at all. Thank you, everybody.
reSee.it AI Summary
Stephen Miller just gave a compelling critique of USAID, highlighting it as a powerful center of unelected bureaucrats with minimal accountability. He pointed out how they distribute funds through a questionable network of NGOs, often involved in regime change and destabilization efforts. Additionally, he argued that Donald Trump is not undermining democracy as many on the left assert, but rather working to restore it.
@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk
Stephen Miller just delivered the single most powerful EVISCERATION of USAID you will hear 🔥🔥 "There is probably no entity in the government that is more of an entrenched power center of unelected bureaucrats with less accountability, less oversight than USAID. They funnel money to their cronies all over the world through a swampy network of NGOs and cutouts, including some very troubling elements of focusing on things like regime change and destabilizing foreign countries." Donald Trump isn't "destroying Democracy" like the hyperventilating left claims. He's restoring it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
USAID operates as an entrenched power center with minimal accountability, channeling funds through a network of NGOs and potentially engaging in destabilizing activities abroad. This situation diverges from America's interests. Donald Trump is working to restore democracy, as the Constitution grants executive power solely to the president, not to bureaucrats. Americans elected Trump to ensure government accountability to taxpayers, not to unelected officials at USAID. If Democrats claim Trump cannot implement his agenda or remove bureaucrats, they are opposing democracy itself. This conflict represents the will of the people, as expressed through President Trump, against the interests of an unelected federal bureaucracy. Trump and his supporters stand for democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is probably no entity in the government that is more of an entrenched power center of unelected bureaucrats with less accountability, less oversight than USAID. They funnel money to their cronies all over the world through a swampy network of NGOs, nongovernmental organizations, and cutouts, including potentially some very troubling elements of focusing on things like regime change and destabilizing foreign countries. But this is not about America's interests. Donald Trump is courageously restoring democracy. Article two of the executive branch vests all power by the Constitution sorry, Article two of the Constitution vests all power of the executive branch in a president.
It's known as the vesting clause. It says the executive power shall be vested in a president, singular, not in the bureaucracy, not in unelected lifetime tenured career civil servants. Americans voted for one man, Donald j Trump. They didn't vote for a single bureaucrat at USAID. They voted for Donald Trump to make government accountable to the taxpayer, to make government accountable for them.
If the Democrats are saying, as they are, that president Trump cannot implement his agenda at USAID, that Donald Trump cannot fire or Carlson bureaucrats, what they are saying what Democrats are saying is they oppose democracy itself. They oppose the idea that the American people can elect a man, in this case, our president Donald Trump, to reform the government according to the will of the people. This is a battle between the will of the people through their president Donald Trump and the will of an unelected federal bureaucracy. So we and president Trump are on the side of democracy.
@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand
WOW: Stephen Miller goes SCORCHED EARTH on Democrat complaints that @elonmusk is ‘unelected’ “The unelected power in this country is the rogue bureaucracy. USAID is unelected! The FBI that persecuted President Trump for 8 years is unelected!” He’s exactly right. https://t.co/7OinXcGxLU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The term "unelected" used by Democrats is misleading. Donald Trump was elected in a landslide, and his staff, including the national security adviser and chief of staff, serve at his pleasure. They are implementing the agenda chosen by the American people. The real unelected power lies within the bureaucracy, such as USAID, the FBI, and the CIA, which have acted against Trump. President Trump is working to restore democracy by asserting control over the federal bureaucracy. He is the only individual elected by the entire nation to carry out the agenda that reflects the voters' wishes, while other officials are elected at local or state levels. Ultimately, the president is in charge of the federal executive branch.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The the Democrat use of the term unelected is really quite remarkable here. Donald Trump was elected in an overwhelming landslide. These are Donald Trump staffers. In the sense, like, saying that Mike Walls, the national security adviser, is unelected or Susie Wiles, the chief of staff, is unelected or Donald Trump's communications team is unelected. This is presidential staff that serves at the pleasure and for the president just as I do.
I am a staffer for the president of The United States. He is elected. He is the one that American people have chosen to implement his agenda. This is the agenda the American people voted for that he is asking his staff, his subordinates, his employees to implement. The unelected power in this country is the rogue bureaucracy.
USAID is unelected. The FBI that persecuted president Trump for eight years is unelected. The CIA and those who have laundered intelligence to try to change the foreign policy of The United States are unelected. President Trump is restoring democracy by controlling the federal bureaucracy. There is one man in the country who is elected by the whole American people to implement an agenda they support.
That is the president. Every other officer in this country Yep. Members of congress and senators are elected at the state or local level. Let me ask you something. I have to continue.
One man in charge of the federal executive branch, and that's the president. I understood.
@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
NEW: MSNBC’s Alicia Menendez is urging Americans to contact their representatives and push back against Musk and Trump, claiming they are dismantling critical parts of Washington’s “bureaucracy.” Do these people even hear themselves? Since when has bureaucracy ever been a good thing?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The biggest question I'm getting is "What can I do?" A recent New York Times headline highlights the answer: constituents are flooding congressional lines, outraged by Trump's actions and Musk's influence on the federal bureaucracy. This isn't Trump's, or anyone else's government; it's *ours*. They need to hear from us. Keep calling, keep faxing—that's what we can do.
I agree completely. It's not *their* government to dismantle. Musk is unelected, and Trump's appointees are accountable to us. The election might have been a shock, but what's happening now is real. Don't get discouraged—raise your voices and make them listen.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Number one question I get from folks post election is that what can I do? What am I supposed to be doing? And this headline from the New York Times sort of drove the answer home to me as Trump and Musk upend Washington, congressional phones can't keep up, calls are pouring in from constituents outraged about mister Trump's unilateral moves and how he has allowed mister Musk to gain access to and begin dismantling critical parts of the federal bureaucracy. It goes on and on. And that's the answer.
You keep calling because it's not Donald Trump's government and it's not Russell votes government and it's not Stephen Miller's government and it certainly is not Elon Musk's government. It's your government, it's my government and they need to hear from you. So you keep calling them, you keep faxing them at this moment. That's what we all can do.
Speaker 1: No. I I agree with that and and I love the way you frame it because it's not their government, it's our government and they don't get to tear it down. They don't get to take it apart. You know, Elon Musk is unelected. Donald Trump appointed Vought.
They are accountable, each of them. They're they're all accountable to us, and he, Trump, is ultimately accountable to us to the extent citizens feel, and know it's important for them to raise their voices, please do. Because, you know, I get it. You know? Oh, the election was a shocker, and I didn't think this was gonna happen.
Okay. Fine. Get over it because what you're seeing happening now is real.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
There is a massive effort by the UNELECTED bureaucracy to oppose the ELECTED President, House & Senate!! This is why I say the true & noble battle is to restore DEMOcracy, rule of the people, from the BUREAUcracy, rule of the bureaucrats.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw Stephen Miller laughing at CNN's Brianna Keilar while explaining government workings in a condescending manner. He mentioned that even a brief halt in federal employment is a significant crisis for her and CNN. He emphasized that the American people are witnessing accountability under President Trump. He also challenged her on transparency, asking if she knew where the $22 billion given to illegal aliens by the Department of Health and Human Services under Biden currently is.
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
JUST IN: Stephen Miller starts laughing at CNN's Brianna Keilar while explaining to her how the government works as if she's a child. "I understand that even a temporary interruption in federal employment is a great crisis, a catastrophe for you and for CNN." "What the American people see is a government that is finally delivering a promise of accountability under President Trump." "You wanna have a conversation about transparency? Let me ask you a question: Do you have any idea where the $22,000,000,000 that the Department of Health and Human Services provided to illegal aliens under Joe Biden is right now?"
Video Transcript AI Summary
The President of the United States is in charge of the government. He appoints advisors, like Elon Musk and others at the White House, to execute his commands across federal agencies.
Recently, Elon Musk claimed transparency at Doge, stating their actions are posted on X and their website. Regarding the termination and subsequent rescinding of 300 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration, the Secretary of Energy would be responsible for those decisions.
Under President Trump, the goal is accountability and transparency in federal spending. For example, where did the $22 billion that the Department of Health and Human Services provided to illegal aliens go? That's enough to provide a free house to every homeless veteran in America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Chief of staff for policy. Steven, thank you so much for taking time for us. So who is in charge of DOSH?
Speaker 1: The president of The United States.
Speaker 0: He's the administrator of DOSH?
Speaker 1: No. The Doge is the what was formerly US Digital Services. It's an agency of the federal government that reports into the office of the executive office of the president, which reports to the president of The United States. States.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: The way that article two works is a president wins an election, and then he appoints staff, including myself, including Mike Waltz, including Susie Wiles
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: Including Elon Musk, and those staff report to him.
Speaker 0: Okay. Well aware. So Elon Musk, a week ago, answered a question about transparency at Doge. This is how he spoke about Doge.
Speaker 2: Well, we we actually are trying to be as transparent as possible. In fact, our actions we post our actions to the the Doge handle, on x, and to the the Doge website. So all of our actions are are maximally transparent.
Speaker 0: But you hear him there. We post our actions. All of our actions are maximally transparent. Does Elon Musk know he's not in charge of Doge?
Speaker 1: Again, the president runs the government, then the president appoints advisors including Elon, including myself, including all the other staff here at the White House, and then those staff in turn execute the president's commands and directions to all the agencies of the federal government. This is how democracy works, something that we treasure in America. The whole American people go to the ballot box, they elect the president, the president appoint staff, the staff that administer his orders and directives across the whole US government.
Speaker 0: Okay, Stephen. I get that, but this is important because we wanna talk about who's making the decisions here. There were 300 employees, the National Nuclear Security Administration, you know about this. They were fired. The agency had to rescind those terminations because these were employees who were critical to maintaining the nation's nuclear stockpile.
So then who is it making those decisions of which federal employees are terminated?
Speaker 1: Well, in that case, the secretary of energy would be the one. So what you're describing, with the the cuts in the Department of Energy, those are directed by the senate confirmed Secretary of Energy.
Speaker 0: Okay. So that was the Secretary of Energy's mistake? Secretary of Energy's mistake.
Speaker 1: Well, I wouldn't use the term mistake. I would say that it's pretty standard when you're down rehired, who needs to be kept, who needs to be
Speaker 0: That's not what happened here. Devalued and
Speaker 2: devalued all
Speaker 0: of that. They were rescinded. I under These these aren't normal things.
Speaker 1: These are termination. I understand
Speaker 2: that the
Speaker 1: I understand that a that even a temporary interruption in federal employment is a great crisis and catastrophe for you and for CNN. What the American people see is a government that is finally delivering a promise of accountability under president Trump. You wanna have a conversation about transparency. Let me ask you a question. Do you have any idea where the $22,000,000,000 that the Department of Health and Human Services provided to illegal aliens under Joe Biden is right now.
22,000,000,000 with the b. That's enough to provide a free house to every homeless veteran in America. Where's the $22,000,000,000? I don't know. You don't know.
Nobody knows. Joe Biden just spent it, and now it's gone. Transparency begins with having an accounting of where every federal dollar is spent. And God bless president Trump for leading this effort.
Speaker 0: Steven, it seems like the crisis here had to do with the nation's nuclear stockpile and for these particular federal workers, which which I'm not, so this isn't my personal crisis. Military members of
Speaker 2: the guard during the pandemic. Crisis in
Speaker 0: New York City. You about this. Hold on. Well, this I don't
Speaker 1: think it's a crisis, and you don't think it's a crisis. So why are we talking about it?
Speaker 0: Military
reSee.it AI Summary
I just witnessed Stephen Miller confront the media, accusing them of lying about Joe Biden's mental state for years. He emphasized that many in the room ignored Biden's incompetence. He also praised President Trump for removing federal bureaucrats who resist his lawful orders, asserting it's what the American people want.
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
JUST IN: Stephen Miller slams the media to their faces for lying about Joe Biden's mental decline for years before calling out federal bureaucrats. "Many of the people in this room for four years failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent and was not running the country." "What President Trump is doing is he is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many of you failed to acknowledge Joe Biden's mental state and questioned Elon Musk's authority, revealing a misunderstanding of government. The President, elected by the entire nation, embodies the will of the American people.
He appoints staff to implement this democratic will throughout the government. The real threat to democracy comes from unelected, tenured bureaucrats who disregard the people's vote. They resist change, whether it's FBI reform, energy policies, or ending DEI, undermining the democratic process. President Trump is removing these officials who defy democracy by not implementing his lawful orders, which represent the will of the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is true that many of the people in this room for four years failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent and was not running the country. It is also true that many people in this room who have used this talking point that Elon is not elected fail to understand how government works. So I'm glad for the opportunity for a brief civics lesson. A president is elected by the whole American people. He's the only official in the entire government that is elected by the entire nation.
Right? Judges are appointed. Members of congress are elected at the district or state level, which is one man. And the constitution article two has a clause known as the vesting clause, and it says the executive power shall be vested in a president, singular. The whole will of democracy is imbued into the elected president.
That president then appoints staff to then impose that democratic will onto the government. The threat to democracy, indeed the existential threat to democracy, is the unelected bureaucracy of lifetime tenured civil servants who believe they answer to no one, who believe they can do whatever they want without consequence, who believe they can set their own agenda no matter what Americans vote for. So Americans vote for radical FBI reform and FBI agents say they don't wanna change, or Americans vote for radical reform under energy policies, but EPA bureaucrats say they don't wanna change, or Americans vote to end DEI, racist DEI policies, and lawyers at the Department of Justice say they don't want to change. What president Trump is doing is he is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people.
@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk
MUST WATCH 🔥🔥 White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller gives a civics lesson to hyperventilating leftwingers fear mongering out about the cost and waste-cutting work of DOGE. H/T: @ConradsonJordan for the excellent question. https://t.co/HkBHZoFfoE
Video Transcript AI Summary
**Speaker 0:** Regarding tariff revenue, President Trump considered replacing income tax with it, especially to cut waste, fraud, and abuse. Is that a possibility? Also, considering Elon Musk, isn't one of Doge's objectives to get rid of the federal bureaucracy? Who was really running the White House when Joe Biden was in office?
**Speaker 1:** China tariff revenue could bring in between $500 billion and $1 trillion over ten years. We expect this tariff revenue will make it much easier for Republicans to pass a bill.
**Speaker 2:** Many people failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent and was not running the country. A president is elected by the whole American people. The existential threat to democracy is the unelected bureaucracy of lifetime tenured civil servants who believe they answer to no one. President Trump is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I follow-up. In 2017, then Jordan and Trump
Speaker 1: go ahead.
Speaker 0: I just wanted leave you because you had two questions. Can
Speaker 1: you please go ahead?
Speaker 0: Mister mister you were speaking about tariff revenue and you also addressed a question about the IRS. President Trump has spoken about replacing income tax with tariff revenue, especially with all this waste, fraud, and abuse that we're seeing cut. Is that a possibility?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. And in fact, if you think about the China tariff revenue that we're estimating is coming in from the 10% that we just added plus the de minimis thing that it's between $500,000,000,000 and a trillion dollars over ten years is our estimate. And that's something that is outside of the reductions that markets are seeing through the negotiations up on the hill. And so we expect that the tariff revenue is actually gonna make it much easier for Republicans to pass a bill and that was the president's plan all along.
Speaker 0: And then I have a question for Steven Miller about Doge. So you you spoke about Doge. You said roughly $50,000,000,000 is set to be cut in a year of waste, fraud, and abuse by unelected bureaucrats. We're hearing this ironic narrative from the president's critics and the left wing media that Elon Musk is an unelected bureaucrat and he's doing all this terrible stuff, isn't one of Doge's objectives to get get rid of the federal bureaucracy, the the deep state? And also, who was running the White House when Joe Biden was in office?
Because I don't know a single person who believes it was Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: You're you're tempting me to say some very, harsh things about some of our media friends. The yes. It is true that many of the people in this room for four years failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent and was not running the country. It is also true that many people in this room who have used this talking point that Elon is not elected fail to understand how government works. So I'm glad for the opportunity for a brief civics lesson.
A president is elected by the whole American people. He's the only official in the entire government that is elected by the entire nation. Right? Judges are appointed. Members of congress are elected at the district or state level, just one man.
And the constitution article two has a clause known as the vesting clause, and it says the executive power shall be vested in a president, singular. The whole will of democracy is imbued into the elected president. That president then appoints staff to then impose that democratic will onto the government. The threat to democracy, indeed the existential threat to democracy, is the unelected bureaucracy of lifetime tenured civil servants who believe they answer to no one, who believe they can do whatever they want without consequence, who believe they can set their own agenda no matter what Americans vote for. So Americans vote for radical FBI reform, and FBI agents say they don't wanna change.
Or Americans vote for radical reform under energy policies, but EPA bureaucrats say they don't wanna change. Or Americans vote to end DEI, racist DEI policies, and lawyers at the Department of Justice say they don't want to change. What president Trump is doing is he is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people.
Speaker 1: Thank
Speaker 2: you. Thanks,
Speaker 0: Steve. I'm glad you're Thank you.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Want to see a murder? Libs in the White House press corps screamed at Trump’s Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller that Elon Musk is “unelected!” What happens next is a fatality. I promise you - this is the single best video on the internet today: https://t.co/Nxcw0qTtj1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many of you failed to acknowledge Joe Biden's mental state and his role in leading the country. You also misunderstand how government works by saying Elon isn't elected. A president is elected by all Americans, unlike judges or members of Congress.
The Constitution vests executive power in the president. This president appoints staff to carry out the democratic will. The real threat to democracy comes from unelected, tenured civil servants who ignore the will of the people. When Americans vote for change, like FBI reform or ending DEI, these bureaucrats resist. President Trump is removing those defying democracy by not implementing his lawful orders, which reflect the will of the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is true that many of the people in this room for four years failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent and was not running the country. It is also true that many people in this room who have used this talking point that Elon is not elected fail to understand how government works. So I'm glad for the opportunity for a brief civics lesson. A president is elected by the whole American people. He's the only official in the entire government that is elected by the entire nation.
Right? Judges are appointed. Members of congress are elected at the district or state level, which is one man. And the constitution article two has a clause known as the vesting clause, and it says the executive power shall be vested in a president, singular. The whole will of democracy is imbued into the elected president.
That president then appoints staff to then impose that democratic will onto the government. The threat to democracy, indeed the existential threat to democracy, is the unelected bureaucracy of lifetime tenured civil servants who believe they answer to no one, who believe they can do whatever they want without consequence, who believe they can set their own agenda no matter what Americans vote for. So Americans vote for radical FBI reform and FBI agents say they don't wanna change, or Americans vote for radical reform under energy policies, but EPA bureaucrats say they don't wanna change, Or Americans vote to end DEI, racist DEI policies, and lawyers at the Department of Justice say they don't want to change. What president Trump is doing is he is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people.
@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸
He's like the raptor watching the human from the bushes waiting for the final moment to strike
@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸
God Bless Stephen Miller He has taken it up on himself to restore civics in America, one legacy media journalist at a time https://t.co/J43LZSrL01
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker defends government cuts and reforms, questioning why they aren't celebrated if waste, abuse, and corruption are acknowledged. They claim many failed to cover Joe Biden's mental incompetence and misunderstand Elon Musk's role in government.
President Trump is removing federal bureaucrats defying democracy by not implementing his lawful orders, which represent the will of the American people. Taxpayer-funded, empty government buildings are criticized. The speaker asserts that illegal aliens brought in by Joe Biden are not doing farm work but are collecting welfare.
The speaker supports a guest worker program and automation for farms. They oppose allowing the previous president to flood the nation with millions of illegal aliens, especially those who rape and murder citizens. USAID is described as an entrenched power center of unelected bureaucrats funneling money to cronies. Democrats are accused of opposing democracy by opposing President Trump's reforms. The speaker states that President Trump is on the side of democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You may assert there's no waste in the Pentagon. You may assert there's no waste in treasury. I'm not Steven. Steven, I don't think anyone are you not celebrating these cuts? If you agree there is waste, if you agree there is abuse, if you agree there is corruption, why are you not celebrating the cuts, the reforms that are being instituted?
It is true that many of the people in this room for four years failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent. It is also true that many people in this room who have used this talking point that Elon is not elected failed to understand how government works. So I'm glad for the opportunity for a brief civics lesson. What president Trump is doing is he is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people. You have these giant cavernous office buildings in Washington DC carved out of marble stone and granite in the Greek classical style, some of those gorgeous buildings on earth.
The taxpayers fund that they pay for, they upkeep, they provide electricity to, and no one's showing up. And what what are they doing at home? Watching their favorite streaming shows? It's crazy. Of course, they have to get back into the office because they work for everyone watching me today Pat and Pat Pat and Pat.
Today. The illegal aliens that Joe Biden brought into our country are not full stop doing farm work. They are not. The illegal aliens he brought in from Venezuela, from Haiti, from Nicaragua, they are not doing farm work. Are in our cities collecting welfare.
As for the farmers, there is a guest worker program that president Trump supports. Over time as well, you will transition into automation, so we'll never have to have this conversation ever again. But there's no universe in which this nation is going to allow the previous president to flood our nation with millions and millions of illegal aliens who just get to stay here, and we are especially not going to allow a subset of those illegal aliens to rape and murder our citizens. There is probably no entity in the government that is more of an entrenched power center of unelected bureaucrats with less accountability, less oversight than USAID. They funnel money to their cronies all over the world through a swampy network of NGOs, nongovernmental nongovernmental organizations.
What Democrats are saying is they oppose democracy itself. They oppose the idea that the American people can elect a man, in this case, our president Donald Trump, to reform the government according to the will of the people. This a battle between the will of the people through their president Donald Trump. No. And the will of an unelected federal bureaucracy.
So we and president Trump are on the side of democracy.
@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸
Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller has a message for the activist judges trying to usurp the power of the presidency: “You cannot have a democracy where single individual district court judges can assume the full total powers of the Commander in Chief.” https://t.co/D6giqR9O7z
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states the president stands by his comments, as does the entire administration. They claim a democracy cannot exist if a single district court judge can assume the powers of the commander in chief. They contrast this with the Supreme Court, where it takes five justices to change federal policy.
The speaker asserts that a single district court judge out of 700 cannot set policy for the entire nation, especially on national security and public safety issues. The president has tremendous respect for Justice Roberts and believes the Supreme Court should crack down and stop the assault on democracy from radical rogue judges. These judges are allegedly usurping the powers of the presidency and laying waste to the constitutional system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of course, the president stands by his comments absolutely as do we all, as does the entire administration. You cannot have a democracy where single individual district court judges can assume the full total powers the commander in chief. Even on the supreme court, it takes the agreement of five supreme court justices to change a federal policy. Five. A single district court judge out of 700 cannot set policy for the entire nation, let alone on national security and public safety issues.
President's been clear, that he is of his tremendous respect for justice Roberts and believes it's essential the supreme court crack down and stop his assault in our democracy from these radical rogue judges that are resurping the powers of the presidency and laying waste to our entire constitutional system. Last question
reSee.it AI Summary
Stephen Miller delivered a powerful defense of Trump’s agenda, attacking critics of the former president and highlighting the challenges faced during the previous administration. He emphasized the negative impacts of lockdowns, border policies, and foreign relations, asserting that Trump is actively repairing the damage. Miller praised the significant reduction in illegal crossings at the southern border and stressed the importance of manufacturing security for national security. He concluded by stating that Trump is restoring democracy and freedom in America.
@overton_news - Overton
WATCH: Stephen Miller Just Annihilated What’s Left of the Anti-Trump Crowd—Unleashing a Historic Defense of Trump’s ‘Golden Age’ Agenda Stephen Miller didn’t just defend Trump—he took a proverbial flamethrower every remaining critic still clinging to the old regime. @StephenM released pure fire: “The same people who are criticizing President Trump's agenda to restore America, to usher in this new golden age, are the ones who ordered us to lock down during Covid and close all the schools.” “They are the ones who opened the borders and flooded our cities with illegal aliens.” “They are the ones who brought us nothing but death and destruction in the Middle East, one disaster after another.” “They are the ones who empowered a federal bureaucracy to steal our rights and voices as citizens, crush dissent, crush fresh free speech, crush industry.” “They are the ones who allowed China and foreign countries to take our most essential industries out of the United States, gravely imperiling our national security, and destroying that working and middle classes of this country.” That’s the America Trump inherited, Miller said—and it’s the one he’s been fixing since day one. “That is what President Trump inherited. That is what he is boldly and bravely repairing every single day.” He pointed to the border as proof of results: “The southern border now under his leadership, has the lowest number of illegal crossings in the history of the lancets of America.” “Not in the last 10 years or 20 years or 30 years, in the HISTORY of these United States.” And it’s not just about immigration—it’s about survival: “Under President Trump, for the first time since the rise of China we are protecting and defending our jobs and our manufacturing base, and we are preventing foreign countries from making it impossible to defend ourselves in the event of a national emergency.” “Manufacturing security is national security,” he added. “And he is taking on the rogue bureaucracy and rogue judiciary that have sapped and stolen and frittered away the rights of our people and pushed them into the hands of unelected power centers.” Miller closed with a line that could define Trump's second term: “He is, in every sense of the word, restoring national democracy and popular sovereignty. He is making America free again.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that critics of President Trump's agenda are responsible for COVID lockdowns, open borders, Middle East failures, federal overreach, and the offshoring of essential industries to China.
The speaker claims Trump inherited these problems and is actively fixing them. According to the speaker, under Trump, the Southern Border has the lowest number of illegal crossings in US history. The speaker says Trump is protecting American jobs and manufacturing, preventing foreign countries from undermining national defense.
The speaker states that manufacturing security is national security, and Trump is confronting the bureaucracy and judiciary that have taken away citizens' rights. The speaker concludes that Trump is restoring national democracy and popular sovereignty, making America free again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The same people that are criticizing president Trump's agenda to restore America, to usher in this new golden age, are the ones who ordered us to lock down during COVID and close all of the schools. They're the ones who opened the borders and flooded our cities with illegal aliens. They're the ones who brought us nothing but death and destruction in The Middle East, 1 disaster after another. They are the ones who empowered a federal bureaucracy to steal our rights and our voices as citizens, crush dissent, crush free speech, crush industry. They're the ones who allowed China and foreign countries to take our most essential industries out of The United States, gravely imperiling our national security, and destroying the working and middle classes of this country.
That is what president Trump inherited. That is what he is boldly and bravely repairing every single day. The Southern Border now, under his leadership, has the lowest number of legal crossings in the history of The United States Of America. Not in the last ten years or twenty years or thirty years, in the history of These United States. Under president Trump, for the first time since the rise of China, we are protecting and defending our jobs and our manufacturing base, and we are preventing foreign countries from making it impossible to defend ourselves in the event of a national emergency.
Manufacturing security is national security, and he is taking on the rogue bureaucracy and the rogue judiciary that have sapped and stolen and frittered away the rights of our people and pushed them into the hands of unelected power centers. He is, in every sense of the word, restoring national democracy and popular sovereignty. He is making America free again, Mark.
@overton_news - Overton
If you enjoyed this Overton original production, make sure to follow @overton_news and turn on notifications for real-time breaking news updates. If you appreciate our work and want to support decentralized, unfiltered news, consider subscribing here on X for just the price of a coffee each month. As an entirely independent network, your support helps us continue offering an alternative to mainstream media. Thank you for being part of this movement!
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Bureaucracy undermines democracy
reSee.it AI Summary
I just learned from Stephen Miller about a "massive scandal" in Washington DC. He claims the Democrat-run police department has been hiding crime statistics, even reporting homicides as accidents. He promises that the truth will be revealed soon. This is significant.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: Stephen Miller just revealed that a "massive scandal" has been uncovered in Washington DC. The Democrat-run police department has been extensively hiding crime statistics, going so far as reporting homicides as "accidents instead of m*rders." "It will all be brought to light." Whoa. This is big. @StephenM
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes "a massive scandal in Washington DC with the doctoring of crime stats," noting that "the Department of Justice under the attorney general is leading the effort to uncover this." "But when we ultimately share the results, results, it will it will stun you." They state that "the extent to which even though DC had the worst crime in America, honestly measured, it dramatically understated how bad it was," and claim "There's even accusations that murders and homicides were reported as accidents instead of murders." "I mean, this is how severe the manipulation of the crime data has been in this city." "And it will all be uncovered, it will all be brought to light." The speaker adds: "I've had a chance to spend some time, as to everyone here, with the police officers in the city." "Members of the public are going up to them and thanking them, just overflowing with gratitude."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the president spoke about this before. We've uncovered and the process of uncovering a massive scandal in Washington DC with the doctoring of crime stats, and the Department of Justice under the attorney general is leading the effort to uncover this. But when we ultimately share the results, results, it will it will stun you. The extent to which even though DC had the worst crime in America, honestly measured, it dramatically understated how bad it was. There's even accusations that murders and homicides were reported as accidents instead of murders.
I mean, this is how severe the manipulation of the crime data has been in this city. And it will all be uncovered, it will all be brought to light. You know, I've had a chance to spend some time, as to everyone here, with the police officers in the city. Members of the public are going up to them and thanking them, just overflowing with gratitude.
@Geiger_Capital - Geiger Capital
Stephen Miller is going nuclear… “This is not fringe anymore. Tape, after tape. Federal workers, bureaucrats, educators, professors, nurses… people celebrating and cheering the assassination of Charlie Kirk! There is a domestic terrorist movement growing in this country.” https://t.co/dZZN4UFwyK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Where the left calls people enemies of the republic, calls them fascists, says they're Nazis, says they're evil, says they have to be removed, and then prints their addresses. They are trying to inspire someone to murder them. Tape of federal workers celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk. And we are gonna do that under president Trump's leadership. I don't care how it could be a RICO charge, a conspiracy charge, conspiracy against The United States, insurrection, but we are going to do what it takes to dismantle the organizations and the entities that are fomenting riots, that are doxing, that are trying to inspire terrorism, that are committing acts of wanton violence. It has to stop. To all domestic terrorists spreading this evil hate: you want us to live in fear? We will not live in fear, but you will live in exile.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where the left calls people enemies of the republic, calls them fascists, says they're Nazis, says they're evil, says they have to be removed, and then prints their addresses. What do you think they're trying to do? They are trying to inspire someone to murder them. That is their objective. That is their intent.
And when you see online, Sean, as we've seen for the last few days, tape after tape after tape of federal workers, bureaucrats, staffers in the Pentagon, educators, professors, health care workers, nurse nurses, celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk. These are radicalized people. There is a domestic terrorism movement in this country. And let me tell you something I'd not share with anybody, but the last message that Charlie Kirk gave to me before he joined his creator in heaven was he said that we have to dismantle and take on the radical left organizations in this country that are fomenting violence. That was the last message that he sent me before that assassin stole him from all of us.
And we are gonna do that under president Trump's leadership. I don't care how it could be a RICO charge, a conspiracy charge, conspiracy against The United States, insurrection, but we are going to do what it takes to dismantle the organizations and the entities that are fomenting riots, that are doxing, that are trying to inspire terrorism, that are committing acts of wanton violence. It has to stop. And my message is to all of the domestic terrorists in this country spreading this evil hate, you want us to live in fear? We will not live in fear, but you will live in exile.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
The media hates Stephen Miller. I wonder why. https://t.co/CarSAncfKQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
"You may assert there's no waste in the Pentagon. You may assert there's no waste in treasury."
"If you agree there is corruption, why are you not celebrating the cuts, the reforms that are being instituted?"
"The taxpayers fund it. They pay for it."
"The illegal aliens he brought in from Venezuela, from Haiti, from Nicaragua, they are not doing farm work."
"Are in our cities collecting welfare."
"They funnel money to their cronies all over the world through a swampy network of NGOs, nongovernmental organizations."
"What Democrats are saying is they oppose democracy itself."
"We and president Trump are on the side of democracy."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You may assert there's no waste in the Pentagon. You may assert there's no waste in treasury.
Speaker 1: I'm not You may assert
Speaker 0: there's no waste in the HHS.
Speaker 1: That, Steven. Steven, I don't think anyone
Speaker 0: Then why are you not celebrating these cuts if you agree there is waste? If you agree there is abuse? If you agree there is corruption, why are you not celebrating the cuts, the reforms that are being instituted? It is true that many of the people in this room for four years failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent. It is also true that many people in this room who have used this talking point that Elon is not elected failed to understand how government works.
So I'd like for the opportunity for a brief civics lesson. What president Trump is doing is he is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people. You have these giant cavernous office buildings Washington DC carved out of marble stone and granite in the Greek classical style, some of most gorgeous buildings on earth. The taxpayers fund it. They pay for it.
They upkeep it. They provide electricity to. And no one's showing up? And what what are they doing at home? Watching their favorite streaming shows?
It's crazy. Of course, they have to get back into the office because they work for everyone watching me today.
Speaker 1: They've had a very good day.
Speaker 0: The illegal aliens that Joe Biden brought into our country are not full stop doing farm work. They are not. The illegal aliens he brought in from Venezuela, from Haiti, from Nicaragua, they are not doing farm work. Are in our cities collecting welfare. As for the farmers, there is a guest worker program that president Trump supports.
Over time as well, you will transition into automation, so we'll never have to have this conversation ever again. But there's no universe in which this nation is going to allow the previous president to flood our nation with millions and millions of illegal aliens who just get to stay here, and we are especially not going to allow a subset of those illegal aliens to rape and murder our citizens. There is probably no entity in the government that is more of an entrenched power center of unelected bureaucrats with less accountability, less oversight than USAID. They funnel money to their cronies all over the world through a swampy network of NGOs, nongovernmental organizations. What Democrats are saying is they oppose democracy itself.
They oppose the idea that the American people can elect a man, in this case, our president Donald Trump, to reform the government according to the will of the people. This is a battle between the will of the people through their president Donald Trump. And the will of an unelected federal bureaucracy. We and president Trump are on the side of democracy.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that I get death threats every day, and my wife faces them too, along with extensive doxxing campaigns. The Democrat Party has become dangerously radicalized. Across the country, across government and law enforcement, people fighting for safety deal with radical left threats. We confront a party that treats opponents as mortal enemies, dehumanizes them, and justifies violence against federal officers and ICE. They praised the MS-13 ‘Maryland dad’ as a hero. This is a dangerous party and movement.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 JUST IN: STEPHEN MILLER drops a TRUTH NUKE on the entire Democrat Party "I get death threats every day. My wife gets death threats every day. We've had to deal with pretty extensive doxing campaigns!" "The Democrat Party has become dangerously, violently RADICALIZED." "But the truth is, people across the country, across the government, across law enforcement, who are fighting for safety, security, prosperity, are dealing with radical left communist threats and attacks all day long." "We are dealing with a party that is so extreme that considers its opponents to be its mortal enemies, that dehumanizes its opposition, that justifies violent attacks against federal law enforcement, assaults against ICE and Border Patrol, that sides over and over again with criminal aliens, MS-13 gang bangers." "Look at how they venerated and WORSHIPPED and PRAISED the MS-13 child smuggler that they dubbed the 'Maryland dad,' somebody who beat his wife and smuggled children, and was a member of a terrorist organization - and they held them up as their HERO." "This is a dangerous party. This is a dangerous movement!" @StephenM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker: The Democrat party has become dangerously, violently radicalized. And you're right, Sean. I get death threats every day. My wife gets death threats every day. We've obviously had to deal with pretty extensive doxing campaigns. But the truth is, Sean, that people across the country, across the government, across law enforcement who are fighting for safety, security, prosperity are dealing with radical left communist threats and attacks all day long. And President Trump, of course, came within inches sorry, centimeters of A millimeter. Assassinated one millimeter. On during the middle of his rally on live television by a wicked evil assassin and then only weeks later, a second assassin, if not for a secret service agent spotting the burial of that gun, would have taken president Trump's life, saved by the by the hand of God himself. We are dealing with a party that is so extreme that considers its opponents to be its mortal enemies, that dehumanizes its opposition, that justifies violent attacks against federal law enforcement, assaults against ICE and border patrol that sides over and over again with criminal aliens, MS 13 gang bangers. Look at how they look at how they venerated and worshipped and praised the MS 13 child smuggler that they dubbed the Maryland dad, somebody who beat his wife and smuggled children and was a member of a terrorist organization and they held him up as their hero. This is a dangerous party. This is a dangerous movement. And when you're singing New York City with Mamdani, that is the future. A party that believes in no bail, a party believes in no jail, a party that believes in no borders, but here's one group they do wanna put in jail, their political enemies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Democrat party has become dangerously, violently radicalized. And you're right, Sean. I get death threats every day. My wife gets death threats every day. We've obviously had to deal with pretty extensive doxing campaigns.
But the truth is, Sean, that people across the country, across the government, across law enforcement who are fighting for safety, security, prosperity are dealing with radical left communist threats and attacks all day long. And President Trump, of course, came within inches sorry, centimeters of A millimeter. Assassinated one millimeter. On during the middle of his rally on live television by a wicked evil assassin and then only weeks later, a second assassin, if not for a secret service agent spotting the burial of that gun, would have taken president Trump's life, saved by the by the hand of God himself. We are dealing with a party that is so extreme that considers its opponents to be its mortal enemies, that dehumanizes its opposition, that justifies violent attacks against federal law enforcement, assaults against ICE and border patrol that sides over and over again with criminal aliens, MS 13 gang bangers.
Look at how they look at how they venerated and worshipped and praised the MS 13 child smuggler that they dubbed the Maryland dad, somebody who beat his wife and smuggled children and was a member of a terrorist organization and they held him up as their hero. This is a dangerous party. This is a dangerous movement. And when you're singing New York City with Mamdani, that is the future. A party that believes in no bail, a party believes in no jail, a party that believes in no borders, but here's one group they do wanna put in jail, their political enemies.