TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

JDVance
Posted - September 4, 2021 at 1:27 PM
Saved - July 12, 2025 at 11:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I often reflect on the @matthewwalther column. It’s striking to recall how our wealthiest and most powerful were linked to a man running a child sex trafficking ring, who then died mysteriously in jail, and yet we just move on without discussing it.

@JDVance - JD Vance

I think about this @matthewwalther column about once a month: https://theweek.com/articles/851426/jeffrey-epstein-case-why-people-believe-pizzagate

The Jeffrey Epstein case is why people believe in Pizzagate A mysterious cabal of billionaires and politicians and Hollywood bigwigs running an international sex trafficking ring — ridiculous, right? theweek.com

@JDVance - JD Vance

Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring? And then that guy died mysteriously in a jail? And now we just don't talk about it.

LizCrokin
Posted - May 24, 2023 at 9:58 PM
Saved - May 25, 2023 at 12:31 PM

@LizCrokin - LIZ CROKIN

Laurene Powell Jobs is the majority stake owner in The Atlantic. She’s been photographed looking super chummy with Ghislaine Maxwell and The Atlantic actually had the audacity to put out a story during Maxwell’s trial for sex trafficking charges claiming that there’s no child sex… https://t.co/RmjMUb9hLj

@TheAtlantic - The Atlantic

Elon Musk has transformed Twitter into a right-wing, alt-tech platform that has much in common with the likes of Truth Social and Rumble, @cwarzel writes: on.theatln.tc/eMD7IkL

im_1776
Posted - November 21, 2023 at 7:07 PM
Saved - November 22, 2023 at 2:29 PM

@im_1776 - IM—1776

Darryl Cooper @martyrmade wrote the best piece on PizzaGate this summer. Still very much a must-read if you haven’t.

@im_1776 - IM—1776

MUST-READ: "How could a prominent man like Jeffrey Epstein carrying around a very public child prostitution conviction have remained in the good graces of high society? A satisfying answer emerges from the PizzaGate conspiracy theory." — @martyrmade https://im1776.com/prints/issue-3/anatomy-of-a-conspiracy-theory/

Anatomy of a Conspiracy Theory Since the end of World War II, government operations have acquired a level of secrecy that would not have been tolerated in previous eras. During the Cold War, strategists on both sides of the Iron Curtain knew that images and words counted as much as deeds and facts, and waged a propaganda battle for the hearts and minds of the Third World. NATO and the Warsaw Pact only engaged in active military conflicts over client states a few times – in places like Korea, Vietnam, and Afghanistan – but information operations to incite, confuse, and demoralize were ongoing. im1776.com
robertdunlap947
Posted - November 27, 2023 at 10:49 PM
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 10:51 AM

@robertdunlap947 - Bobby D🎙

Wait, didn’t the guy who “supposedly” debunked pizza gate as a right wing nut job theory JUST GOT ARRESTED FOR PEDOPHILIA😳! Let’s face it, the Elite Scum Bags are ALL PEDOPHILES🤬! https://t.co/oxx8bir9nL

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the connection between the media and the cover-up of Pizzagate, a conspiracy theory involving the Clintons and a supposed sex ring. The speaker highlights the arrest of Slade Summer, the former editor-in-chief of The Recount, who was charged with child porn and discusses the media's role in covering up Pizzagate. They also mention other media figures involved in child porn or covering up Pizzagate, such as James Gordon Meek and John Griffin. The speaker accuses the media of projecting and gaslighting, and emphasizes the need for justice and exposure of pedophiles in the media. They also promote MyPillow and a doctor who opposes vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pizzagate, the bogus news story suggesting that Bill and Hillary Clinton were running a sex ring. Speaker 1: A lot of uninformed gullible people. This? Don't think to believe that. The Twitter fight hit its supermodel, Chrissy Teigen, against Liz Crokin, a self described journalist. I filed the complaint. Speaker 2: Hi, guys. I'm going to just focus on 1 topic tonight that's a really important topic and I'm gonna do an in-depth analysis on this. And the topic is the media is pizzagate. So What I'm going to cover is that and explain is that the media Has not only covered up Pizzagate for over 7 years now, I'm going to also explain to you how the media is Pizzagate. So A bombshell story broke the other day. And it is about a man named Slade Summer who is arrested for child porn charges. So let me just start off by going through the details of this case. Slade had over a 1000 videos and or images of child porn, Including child porn that involved children as young as 3 4 years old. He was in chats, including on social media platforms such as Snapchat, discussing how to rape and kidnap children and exchanging child porn. He also produced A child porn video. And authorities said that this is one of the most egregious cases they've ever seen. And they also said that the investigation is still ongoing, and they expect there to be more charges. Well, gee, if a guy is producing child porn, do you think maybe he's also raped a child? And, gee, do you think that if a guy is exchanging messages with people explaining to them in detail How you rape a child and how you kidnap a child? Do you think maybe he's kidnapped a child to rape a child? Is this man a trafficker? Is this man instructing people on how to become traffickers? Because it sure seems to be going that way. So the details of the case are horrific. The porn's horrific. The children are very young. This guy's a monster. Right? So Slate, where does Slade Summer work? Well, guess what? He was, up until the time of his arrest, the editor in Chief of a media organization called The Recounts. And The Recount has, you know, video shows and So online stories. They have a Twitter page. And I gotta tell you, every single time there's been someone in media who has been arrested for child porn or for raping children, There's always a formula that never fails. So when I read that this guy was the editor in chief of the recount, which by the way, I'd never heard of, I I knew where this was going. So shirt office started investigating the recount, their Twitter page, their Instagram page. And, of course, It's a left wing organization that's hysterically anti Trump and they've invested a lot of time trying to convince you that pizza gate is not real. That there's no elite, satanic, pedophile ring. And they've also propped up people who are involved in child sex trafficking that we know, thanks to the IG report that came out 2018 and tons of other evidence that Hillary Clinton is involved in crimes against children. So they're propping up People like Hillary Clinton, and they're hysterically, you know, trashing Trump, and they're also trashing other Men who do not toe the line for the mainstream media narrative. They trashed Matt Gaetz, Trump, and Andrew Tate. And they were all about, You know, pushing narratives that were not real involving them and potential sex crimes. And that all turned out to be bull. Meanwhile, they're ignoring the real traffickers and pedophiles Like Hillary Clinton. And on top of that, they're trying to tell you that pizza, it's not real, and there's no illegal ball Of pedophiles involved in the rape, torture, and trafficking and children. But, oh, look at these fake sex crimes, you know, that that these crazy women made up about President Donald Trump. Look over here, but don't look don't look over there. So okay. So this media organization, they also have Tried to convince you that president Trump was not taking down child sex trafficking, which is ridiculous because One of the first things that president Trump did when he got into office in 2017 was have a listening session, And he discussed how he was gonna make human trafficking or combating human trafficking a priority. And I have I Covered everything that he did to combat human trafficking, over the course of his presidency, and I've done multiple reports on this. And there's one on my remote Channel, if you wanna look at it, it's called, Trump's War on Human Trafficking. But that's an absolute fact. So it's just absolutely ridiculous that they try to tell you that This stuff isn't real and that president Trump wasn't taking down child sex traffickers because he was. And there was more Arrests for child sex trafficking under Trump than any other president. And furthermore, Jeffrey Epstein and Glenn Maxwell went down Under president Trump's DOJ, which we all know never would have happened if Hillary became president. So okay. Let's what let's learn more about who this slaved summer scumbag is. He was Actually featured on Buzzfeed, another left wing organization that's lied to you and told you pizza gay is not real. He's featured on Buzz And they glorified him and praised him for talking about his sexuality to children. So after it came out that he was arrested for child born, BuzzFeed scrubbed that story. This guy also Worked as a camp counselor. So he infiltrated himself in an venue where he knew he would have access to children. So that should be looked into. Did he rape any of those children? Did he abuse any of those children? Like, that should be thoroughly investigated. Here is the best part of summer that I learned. So after he was arrested, I was trying to find his x handle. And I finally found it, And his account had been deactivated. And I don't know when his account was deactivated. I don't know if He maybe got tipped off. He was under an investigation, so he deactivated it. Or I don't know. Maybe he doesn't like Elon Musk. Probably doesn't like Elon Musk. Maybe he deactivated it when Elon Musk Took over Twitter slash x. I don't know. But he deactivated it, which is really frustrating for me because I have a feeling that that Twitter timeline would be a gold mine for me. But what I was able to do, I was able to see some tweets, not many. But I also was able to, do some searches to see what the replies to some of his tweets that are no longer there were. And that led me to discovering that, guess what, back in 2017, John Podesta posted a tweet, thinking Slade. So and this was a quote Tweets. So I couldn't see what he was what John Podesta was, quote, tweeting since Slate took down his Twitter slash x account. Right? But I can see what John Podesta wrote and what he wrote is thanks, Slay, for sleuthing out the origin of this sinkhole. So I don't know what the tweet was. I don't know if it was a story or a link to a story or just Speaker 3: a tweet. I don't know. But Speaker 2: This is a really good example of how, number 1, All these elite pedophiles, they're most of them are pals. Like, they're in bed with each other. Alright? And they cover for each other. So you have John Podesta most likely friends with this Slade guy, Possibly working together to traffic children. That wouldn't surprise me because we all know about John Podesta. Right? And You have someone like John Podesta who's involved in trafficking. You have him who has all these media people, some who are actual Pedophiles running cover for him because these people are the ones telling you that Pizzagate's not real. John Podesta just likes just likes to cut the pedophile code words In his emails that weren't in the context that applied to food, oh, no. No. No. It was a context of fluid. Like, John Podesta has all these reporters in his pocket, Some who are actual pedophiles themselves. Clearly, this is a perfect example, who run cover for him. So it's not Shocking that he's thanking Slade because Slade is his bitch. A bunch of these people are little bitches for people like John Podesta and Hillary Clinton. These people all work together. They're all in on it. And they're all conspiring, and they've all conspired to cover up Pizzagate. Okay? So, I dug deeper into the recount. And what did I find out? Oh, oh, guess who the recounts, like, big experts are that they constantly use on their shows. Ben Collins and Mike Rothschild. Well, who are Ben Collins and Mike Rothschild? They are the 2 main reporters that have dedicated their careers to lying about Pizzagate, to covering up Pizzagate. These 2 clowns have been lying about Pizzagate to cover up crimes against children. They're caught think about that. They're covering up for people who are raping, torturing, and trafficking children, and they're making money doing this. Okay? This is called blood money. So Ben Collins and Mike Rothschild, they were the experts on the recount that was run by a man we now know is a pedophile. Ben, where the hell are you at? Mike, where are you at? You guys have been awfully silent. Are you gonna do an exclusive report on how your buddy at the recount had thousands of images of child porn and was potentially raping and trafficking and kidnapping them? They haven't said anything today. So far, they have said absolutely nothing. Nothing. Okay? So let me talk about the pattern here. There's been Many people who have been arrested for either raping children or possessing child porn who work in media. And I'll give you Speaker 3: a few other examples. Okay? Speaker 2: James Gordon Meek, who was a journalist for ABC, John Griffin, Who, by the way, raped a 9 year old He not only worked for pedophile CNN He worked for guess who? Chris Cuomo. Well, what did Chris Cuomo tell you back in 2016? If you've watched Auto Shadows, You know and by the way, you can watch Auto Shadows still at auto shadows.org for free. If you watch Auto Shadows, you know that it was Chris Cuomo that told you that when the Podesta emails came out and the DNC emails came out, He told you that you cannot read those Podesta emails because it's illegal for you to obtain them. Only we can possess these emails. So everything you're learning, you're learning from us. That's that's what he said. Okay? That was a lie. As I reported in Outer Shadows many times, that was a lie. So the guy that was lying to you and telling you can't read the emails that prove Clinton Hillary Clinton and associates and the podastas are involved in trafficking, and their emails are littered with pedophile code words. The guy that told you that you couldn't read that those emails that prove pizza guy is real, his producer was a pedophile. And then one more example. There was a reporter named Peter Wright who was a tech reporter. Okay? Guess what his Twitter handle was? At Doctor. Pizza. I'm not kidding. You cannot Make this stuff up. Okay? So let me tell you a little bit about this pedo, Peter. Peter Wright Was convicted in 2020 of attempting to solicit sex from a 7 9 year old. He was sentenced to a 144 months in prison. And guess what he wrote in 2018? 2018, He did a tweet mocking Pizzagate. And this is what he wrote. Yes. Apparently, pizza is now the international symbol of pedophilia, Question mark. Because pedos like to advertise that they're pedos. Question mark. So this guy Who is a pedophile, who is using confirmed pedophile symbolism, was gaslighting you, telling you That no pizza is not a pedophile code word. He was mocking Pizzagate. And next thing we know, Turns out the guy's actually a pedophile. More proof that Pizzagate is real. So again, The media is not just covering up Pizzagate. There are many members Of the media that are pedophiles. And I just laid out all the proof. And I actually did a tweet In July of this year, when the story broke on oh, wait. Was it I can't remember what story it was. Can't remember if it was Peter or James Gordon, but I did one tweet saying, this mark my words now, there'll be more Members in the media who are exposed for being pedophiles. Like, mark mark my words now. It'll happen. And here we are. Here we are. And I'm gonna say it right now. This is still just the tip of the iceberg. There's gonna be more. And so far, they're all leftists. They all work for leftist organizations. But that doesn't mean that there aren't pedophiles working at conservative news organizations. And, so it would not surprise me if It comes out that, you know, someone at a conservative news outlet, turns out to be a pedophile or multiple people do. Honestly, I think the mainstream media is absolutely littered with pedophiles. These people are propped up and put into positions of power to be gatekeepers to cover up stories like Pizzagate. Pedophiles are propped up on purpose to protect the bigger fish pedophiles. That's how the game works. That's how the system works. And as I reported many times before, in my opinion, there was no one that did more damage to cover up Pizzagate than Fox News via Megyn Kelly's ridiculous interview with James Alephonsis from Comet Ping Pong. Okay? So actually, that's a good segue because I'm gonna get into talking about James Alphonse a little bit and, David Brock and Media Matters. Okay. So the other day, Elon Musk tweeted that Media Matters is evil. Well, thank you, Elon, for bringing up Media Matters. And, yes, you are absolutely right. Media Matters is very evil. So What is Media Matters? Media Matters is an organization that is has been run by David Brock for many years. And this media company has just been slandering, conservative media, conservative journalists, And frantically covering up Pizzagate probably more than any media organization out there. And so let me just tell you about a little bit more about David Brock, who was the founder and the guy that ran Meaning Matters. So This is an organization that has lied to you about PTA and covered it up. And, like, you you can actually go on their website And type in my name, and there you can see there's, like, 2 pages of hit pieces they've done on me. Okay? So Okay. So they spend a ton of resources covering a pizza game. Again, like, another bitch for Podesta, another bitch for Hillary Clinton. Right? So okay. Who is David Brock? So David Brock, who who resigns not too long ago, but he ran it for years, he actually used to date James Alphontes. And who's James Alphontes? So James Alphontes is the owner of Comet Ping Pong. And the media tried to make all Pizzagate about him, and it wasn't really about him. He's a part of it. But Pizzagate, the main Crocs of pizzagate is that was the Podesta emails and that they were littered with code words that were pedophile code words. And there was other evidence with within the emails that These people are involved in trafficking children. So they couldn't have you read the emails though. They had to distract from the emails because the emails were so damning. So they ran a sigh up. And the sigh up was, oh, like, Pizzagate really is, you know, crazy people like Liz Crookin saying that Hillary Clinton Is running a trafficking ring out of the basement of comet ping pong, which I've never said. Any real person, truther journalist who was exposed to Pizzagate never said that. Right? That was the psyops. So you would start looking at comet ping pong instead of looking at The emails that Chris Cuomo told you were illegal to read. Gaslighting, Gaslighting, Gaslighting. Okay. So A lot of people. A lot of people. A lot of people. A lot of people. A lot of people. A lot of people. A lot of people. A lot of people. Tell you that Comet Ping Pong is a quote unquote family friendly restaurant. Well, James rampage, as I've said millions of times before, was absolutely littered with disturbing images, images of children sexualized, you know, captions that weren't even just pedophile call words, like actual pedophile slang, like chicken lovers. There was children on there, like, you know, taped to a there was a child taped to, like, a table. It was just all kinds of horrific stuff, and there was kids on there that looked abused, and there was captions that Absolutely disgusting. Okay? So that was his Instagram page. But what a lot of people don't talk about is how James Alefantis at his restaurant, Comet Ping Pong, hosted bands. And one of the bands that he hosted at his Family friendly restaurant was a band called Heavy Breathing. And Heavy Breathing, there's there's videos that have come out of their Performances at comet ping pong, heavy breathing, the lead singer would promote child rape, Like, during the performances and talk about sacrificing babies. And furthermore, their website had, you know, Images that depicted the sexualization of children. And on top of that, Comet Ping Pong's website back then linked to Heavy Breathing's website. So it's like there you know, the the rabbit hole is like go go gets deeper and deeper. And there was just so much evidence that there was really sick and depraved stuff going on At Comet Ping Pong, I mean, there there was plenty on James Aliphantus' Instagram page. And, like, the evidence that was on his Instagram page should have been enough for There's been immediate investigation into him, but, you know, hopefully, maybe one day that will happen. So okay. Back to David Brock. So David Brock, this is what a winner this guy is. So the organ David Brock, who runs Media Matters, He's such a winner that this guy paid a gay ex lover 850,000 And after being allegedly threatened with damaging information involving the organization's donors and the IRS, Brock actually had to sell one of his homes for this pay to make this payment. And, you know, this happened back in 2012. But when I when I read things like this, it's it's just, Okay. The guy dated James Alefantis, and the other guy he dated was was demanding a blackmail payment. If he's innocent, why why did he pay it? Like, why did he just go to authorities? Right? So, like, nothing adds up here. Right? And so all this was cited in a lawsuit. And, you know, over the years, Brock has been under fire from Fox News, because media matters is closely aligned with democratic donors and policymakers, and There's been question on whether he should be able to keep his nonprofit tax exempt status, which prohibits it from directly engaging in partisan politics. And that's a really good point because media matters could not be more partisan. So anyways, in conclusion, The point here I'm trying to make is everything that I detailed On the show tonight proves that the media is not just lying to you about Pizzagate They're not just covering up Pizzagate, they're also projecting. They're gaslighting. And they are pizzagate. There are people in mainstream media, we have all the proof right here, who are telling you Pizzagate is not real because they're pedophiles. Because they are Pizzagate. It's that simple. All the evidence Is there. It's been there for years, and it keeps pouring out, and it'll continue to keep pouring out. And And you know what drives me crazy? Like, this is a huge story. This guy, this pedophile, ran a news organization that was lying about Pizzagate for years, Covering it up, appears that he was buddy buddy with John Podesta. You know, he's this little bitch, you know, covering up for John Podesta. The guy was not only had child porn, he most likely was raping, trafficking, kidnapping kids. Okay? And his organization told you pizza gets not real. Where's Con Inc? Con Inc, hello? I haven't seen 1 big conservative account talk about this story From Con Inc. Not 1. Not 1. It's just it's so crazy to me with all the evidence coming out. The pizza gate's real. None of these big influence will influencers will will touch it still It's insane to me that with all the proof, they still won't touch it. Like, where's where's their soul? Where's their morality? Like, Do they not care about kids? I don't understand it. It's really frustrating and it's sad and it's disturbing. But Anyways, so that's it. There will be another show I do. One day, probably soon, we'll be talking about another pedophile media who is arrested. So I look forward to that day. I hope all these people will continue to get the justice they deserve, and I hope they continue to get exposed. Please share this video, you guys. If you're watching on Rumble, please subscribe to my channel. I'm trying to build up my following after losing my YouTube channel And hundreds of 1,000 followers over there. You can find all my information, where to find me and all my work on lizcroken.net. So I hope you guys all have a wonderful Thanksgiving. And I'll see you next week. Thanks. Speaker 3: My name is Liz Brokin, and I'm fired up about my pillow for multiple reasons. Number 1, I love that Mike Lindell is such a patriot. He's been running an extremely successful business for years, and he could so easily just enjoy the fruits of his labors and, you know, go on lavish vacations and live his life. But instead, he chooses to not only run his business, But he chooses to fight for America, and he's a strong supporter of president Trump and always has been. And I have a lot of respect for anyone that takes personal time to give back to this country, and that's what he does. Now his products, I love because number 1, they're Made in America, but I also love his products because I personally live in warm weather, and I love the beach. And lot of people don't realize that Mike Lindell has amazing beach towels, and they also have Speaker 2: Really comfy women's wear, sweatshirts, sweatpants. I work Speaker 3: from home, so I don't wear suits every day. I wear sweatpants usually and slippers, and they have amazing products for comfy, casual where that are amazing and they're American and they're super comfortable. So when you go to my bill .com and buy products using my promo code Crokin, c r o k I n. You are supporting Mike Lindell and his patriot. You're also supporting my work, this show, and independent journalism. And as most of you know, I have been canceled from many platforms, many stores and other places Because of the work that I do with my investigative journalism, and so this is one way that you can support me and so I can continue to do the reporting that I do best. As many of you know, there are a lot of doctors out there that are, in my opinion, corrupt or they're just unethical, or they are pressured by the pharmaceutical companies to push perhaps medications on you or vaccines on you that are potentially dangerous. So wouldn't it be nice to have a doctor that is not pushing Big pharma products on you. If you're looking for a doctor that is still seeking alternative treatments that are not gonna harm you, like The COVID vaccine, doctor Troy Spierl is the doctor for you. Not only is he against the COVID seen. He treats people who have vaccine injuries. If you go to official synapse.com and use the Oh, you're welcome. Liz, s y n. Not only are Speaker 2: you going to be receiving treatments that Speaker 3: are gonna be extremely beneficial to your And that are not toxic for you, you'll be supporting me, and you'll be supporting the show, and you'll be supporting my investigative journalism. So again, go to official synapse.com, and please use the promo code liz, s y n. So what we're dealing with in this economy is called inflation, and I'm not a financial expert. However, I am an And cancellation. And there's a lot of people who have been canceled from different businesses because those businesses do not like Their point of views, their speech, and they're accused of wrong thing. And if the you're looking for a way to protect your wealth It's just wise to invest in precious metals. One more time, you can go to bhprm.com. Use the promo code Broken, and you'll be saving money, and you'll also be supporting my investigative journalism.
shaneyyricch
Posted - January 4, 2024 at 5:03 PM
Saved - January 4, 2024 at 10:53 PM

@shaneyyricch - shaneyyricch

FLASHBACK: Alex Jones was right about Jeffery Epstein. Here is Joe Rogan explaining how he was talking about this over a DECADE ago. 🔥🔥🔥 Someone owes him an apology. https://t.co/KiKzbt3vxk

Video Transcript AI Summary
People's perception of Alex Jones has changed over time. While some find him hilarious and acknowledge that he made a mistake with the Sandy Hook incident, they believe he is generally right about things. He has faced mental health issues, alcoholism, and substance abuse problems, which have affected his thinking. However, those who know him personally, like the speaker who has known him for over 20 years, believe he genuinely tries to uncover disturbing truths. For instance, he talked about Epstein's island years ago, revealing that elites were involved in compromising underage girls. The speaker mentions a Clinton adviser who was killed, raising suspicions about the island. Elon Musk also questions the lack of a clientele list.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look at the way people look at Alex Jones now, because Alex Jones has been on my podcast a few times. Yeah. How do they which direction? The people that have watched those podcasts Yeah. Think he's hilarious, and they think that he definitely fucked up with that whole Sandy Hook thing, but he's right more than he's wrong, and he's not an evil guy. He's just a guy who's Had some psychotic breaks in his life. He's had some genuine mental health issues that he's addressed. He's had some serious bouts of alcoholism, Some serious bouts of, you know, substance abuse, and they've contributed to some very poor thinking. But if you know the guy, If you get to know him like I have I've known him for more than 20 years. And if you know him on podcasts, you realize, like, he is genuinely trying to Unearth some things that are genuinely disturbing for most people. Like, is the guy that was telling me about Epstein's, island fucking decade ago, at least. He was telling me about it. I was like, what? You're telling me there's a place where they bring elites to compromise them with underage girls, and they film them. Really? Like, what? Get the fuck out of here. Yeah. Like, no. President Clinton's been there. Everyone's been there. Like, but it sounds like nonsense. And not only is it true, But people keep getting fucking murdered for it. Did you see that latest Clinton adviser that got murdered about it? Yep. Yeah. Yep. Hung with an extension cord, Shot himself in the chest 30 miles from his house, and they're calling into suicide. And I even Elon Musk is asking, where's the clientele list? Yeah. We should we should probably see who's been to that island.
WarClandestine
Posted - January 9, 2024 at 10:24 PM
Saved - January 9, 2024 at 11:14 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

WOW… Politico is running cover for Epstein and the Clintons! Catherine Kim interviews our favorite pedo-sympathizer, Mike Rothschild, who says it’s all still just a QAnon/Far-Right conspiracy theory. This same guy is running cover for pedos on every MSM outlet! https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/01/09/why-maga-is-obsessed-with-jeffrey-epstein-00134394

Pizzagate, QAnon and the ‘Epstein List’: Why the Far Right Is Obsessed with Sex Trafficking An expert on conspiracy theories explains why MAGA figures are embracing the latest twist in the Jeffrey Epstein saga. politico.com
libsoftiktok
Posted - July 4, 2024 at 3:22 PM
Saved - July 4, 2024 at 3:32 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

The Economist was part of the coverup. Biden was a dottering old senile grandpa for years. They’re pretending to be shocked by it and by the coverup now. They knew all along and were complicit in the coverup. https://t.co/9Uqt927o5O

JasonBassler1
Posted - December 17, 2024 at 5:49 PM
Saved - December 19, 2024 at 12:36 AM

@JasonBassler1 - Jason Bassler

Remember when over 100 hours of Epstein recordings came out revealing that Trump was Epstein's "closest friend for 10 years," and Epstein had pics of Trump surrounded by "topless young women" at his Palm Beach home and no one cared and forgot within a week? https://t.co/tz52E2yczy

fijcberg8200
Posted - March 3, 2025 at 3:47 AM
Saved - March 3, 2025 at 5:37 AM

@fijcberg8200 - Juan FiJCzelberg

I’ve just about had my fill of this see you next Tuesday. And all these fucking fraudster anon Jews in her orbit stealing money via crypto as they run interference for pedos. https://t.co/TSHmS13YOJ

@RedTeamActual - R E D

There’s nothing groundbreaking about this. This isn’t some “overlooked” question. There’s legal barriers, elite protection and the biggest elephant in the room the Intel agencies. The idea that child sex abuse is widespread isn’t new either. It’s more common than people like to admit. Definitely not “new insight.” LE, investigative journalist and Johnny’s grandma have been saying that decades. Also suggesting that high numbers of abusers also means widespread blackmail doesn’t require some holy shit “dark theory”, which to me sound like your are trying to convey the illusion of depth in all this. All it requires is basic understanding of power dynamics and control mechanisms. Again, the “ many people involved ” is just a statement and not ground breaking analysis. This is not an awareness issue, but a lack of consequences ones. Why hasn’t the list been released? Wait, let me ask my goldfish as I am pretty sure even he can come up with a reasonable “dark theory” answer as to why. Of course you have “no proof of this” is just mental zigzags avoiding any risks and positioning your persona as critical thinker. I could have just said this is nothing more than an “influencer” tactic, repackaging obvious points for clout. However, I didn’t want to do the subject a disservice.

Truthtellerftm
Posted - July 7, 2025 at 11:47 PM
Saved - November 26, 2025 at 3:16 AM

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

The FBI has known about Epstein and Maxwell’s extensive pedo, sex ring activities since as far back as 1994, and brought one charge in 2008! https://t.co/5ncvLTIa1s

goddeketal
Posted - July 8, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Saved - July 27, 2025 at 3:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation discusses suspicions surrounding the circumstances of Jeffrey Epstein's death, suggesting the scene appeared staged. Key points include discrepancies in photo timestamps, the positioning of Epstein's body, and the sudden replacement of paramedics. Observers note inconsistencies in autopsy images and the presence of two vans leaving the hospital, implying a cover-up. The release of cell footage with missing segments raises further doubts. The discussion posits that Epstein's death was orchestrated, linking him to intelligence operations and broader systemic issues.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

THREAD: There’s something deeply off with those infamous photos of Jeffrey Epstein being wheeled out of the ambulance. The whole scene looks staged. That man didn’t kill himself. Hell, he might not even be dead. Let’s break it down. 🧵

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#2 The timestamps on the photos tell the whole story. First shot was taken at 7:24:12 AM. Epstein has no tube in his mouth. Eight seconds later, new photo, suddenly there’s a tube. Then the edited version hits the media by 9:49 AM.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#3 This means that the @nypost reversed the photo order. The image with the breathing tube came after the one without it. That alone proves the narrative was scripted. The media didn’t document what happened. They helped stage what didn’t.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #4 Also Epstein’s arm is bent in a way no unconscious body could hold. The tube looks misplaced, if it’s even real. The guy doing “CPR” wasn’t in the shot seconds earlier. It’s looking rather like a staged performance, and clearly not a resuscitation.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #5 The whole thing happened in the ambulance bay. Look at the red boards, electrical panel, sliding door. No movement. No hallway. He was never taken inside. He was displayed, photographed, and mysteriously disappeared.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #6 What’s astonishing is that, within 11 seconds, the real paramedics are replaced by clean-cut guys without EMS patches. Remember these FBI sightseeing tourists at the “Justice for J6” in Sept 2021? Same vibes.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #7 Months later, Bill Farrington quietly drops another photo. It shows the original medics, seconds earlier. Why hold it back? Because it shows the swap. The original crew was real. The ones who followed weren’t.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #8 The autopsy pics are also a joke. The face has a clear mask line by the ear. The body is hairier, slimmer, wrong. The tube is back in his mouth, reinserted just for the shot. This doesn’t make any sense.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #9 What matters most is this: two vans left the hospital that day. One out front, one out back. The press followed the decoy. The real handoff happened where no one was watching. They didn’t kill—they moved him. And the footage they dropped yesterday only makes that more obvious.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #10 Yesterday, the DOJ released 10 hours of Epstein cell footage, and got caught cutting out a full 60 seconds. The feed jumps clean from 11:59:00 to 12:00:00. No explanation… just gone. That’s probably the exact moment he was calmly walked out of his cell. Alive.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #11 First they broke the cams, then they faked the pics and lost the footage. And years later, they still can’t explain who signed off on what, or why someone is still using Epstein’s bank account. And @nypost’s Bill Farrington never wanted to talk about his world famous coup.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #12 If you still think the official story holds up, watch the clip of Dan Bongino and Kash Patel saying Epstein killed himself. Look at their faces. They don’t believe a word of what they’re saying. Someone told them to say it. Someone else is holding the strings.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #13 This was never just about Epstein. He worked for intelligence. He ran a blackmail operation using sex trafficking, same playbook as Robert Maxwell. Mossad asset, just like the man who made Ghislaine. The people in charge aren’t Bongino or Patel. They’re puppets too.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #14 Still think Epstein is dead? Start here. This article breaks it all down: photo by photo, frame by frame, argument by argument. The media lied. The government staged it. Pedophiles are running the system. https://www.arkmedic.info/p/william-farrington-and-the-pedophile

William Farrington and the Pedophile Why did William Farrington cover up for Jeffrey Epstein, the world's most famous child trafficker? A forensic review of "those" pictures. arkmedic.info

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #15 Stay sharp. Stay skeptical. Use your eyes, your logic, and your gut. Nothing about this story adds up, and it was never meant to. If you agree that no politician deserves blind trust, and believe that Epstein is still alive, give me a follow. We’re just getting started. 🙏🏼

RebelcastDC
Posted - July 9, 2025 at 6:20 PM
Saved - July 14, 2025 at 6:17 AM

@RebelcastDC - Rebelcast

Is The Media About To Memory-Hole Jeffrey Epstein? @Dylan_Housman & @reaganreese_ answer: https://t.co/k0RikM4WQD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss conservative media's coverage of the Epstein files, noting that Newsmax and Fox asked about it at a briefing. They emphasize the importance of conservative media pursuing this story to differentiate themselves from legacy media and address a topic of high interest to their audience. There are connections between the administration and the Epstein case that are worth investigating. The briefing room is described as "reality TV" and not a place to get real answers. The administration may downplay the issue, but many Americans are interested in the Epstein files. Conservatives should be open to internal debate and discussion, even if it involves criticizing the Trump administration. Both sides tend to accuse each other of being unified and always winning, which isn't true. The Democratic Party had internal debates on issues like Gaza. Conservatives need to discuss the Epstein situation and decide if they are satisfied with the current answers. Winning elections is important, but it's also important to deliver on promises. The Trump administration has kept many promises, which makes the lack of progress on the Epstein files stand out.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ray, can you just mention Newsmax and Fox both getting questions and asking about this at the briefing? I'll point out to people that you had questions prepared about the Epstein situation but didn't get called on. You've asked questions probably more often than anybody else in the briefing room that I can think of about the Epstein documents as that story's progressed throughout this administration. And I don't wanna get too hard on conservative media here and be too critical. We but we spent a lot of time criticizing legacy media and their shortcomings, especially under the Biden administration, which were egregious. And so I think it's fair to say, you know, there are a lot of conservative reporters in that room, in that briefing room, a lot more than there used to be. Thanks to the administration opening up press access for more people, which is great. I'm glad that Newsmax and Fox with Peter Doocy both asked about the Epstein files. When I look at our readers and conservative Americans more broadly that are engaged with the news, I can look at the traffic on our site. I can look at the social media engagement. I can look at all this stuff, these metrics. So I know for a fact, it's not speculation. I know for a fact that this is something they care a lot about and this is something they're very engaged with. If you're conservative media right now and you want to prove that you're different from legacy media, you want to prove that you can do a good job, that alternative media is worth investing in, worth paying attention to, this is a story that you can sink your teeth into. There is reporting to do on the story of how this all happened, what the reactions have been, what further steps might happen. Is it really case closed or is there more stuff that's coming? There's a lot of threads. There are people in the administration that are connected to the Epstein case going back years in various capacities. There's a lot of threads that can be pulled on regarding the situation, and I just think it's interesting. I didn't watch the whole briefing yesterday, so I don't know how many other conservative media outlets got called on and did not ask about the Epstein files and the Epstein situation. And I don't know what conversations may or may not be happening about, you know, the White House not wanting people to ask about that, but I think if you are a conservative this is a great opportunity. We talk all the time about how conservative media criticizes legacy media. Their criticisms are often correct and well placed, but they don't always fill the void themselves by doing good work themselves. In response, this is a prime opportunity where you can do actual good work on this and hold people to account and ask questions and try to get more of the stories hold, as conservative media and try to try to fill that void. I just think it's going to be very interesting. We've already seen this happen online. I'm sure you've seen some of this where some of the influencers are fighting with each other about some of them are trying to move on very quickly from it, and some of them are saying, oh, hold on. Wait a second. Like, we deserve to know more about this. I think it's gonna be very interesting to watch who in conservative media is making the decision to roll over on this and let it go and who's making the decision to say, hey, let's try to do a little more reporting on this and see what we can uncover. Speaker 1: Well, I would say two things. I would say one part of the problem is that the briefing room is not a place to get answers or to genuinely be informed on things that are happening behind closed doors. It's reality TV. It's essentially where everyone auditions for their big network show. And so that's part of the reason why I think you Speaker 0: failed We've to see seen it from both sides. It's, you know, Jim Acosta got a show. Eugene Daniels got a show. This is a bipartisan issue. Speaker 1: Yeah. And so it's not really a place where it's, you know, giving Caroline Levin an opportunity to slam the mainstream media because that clip goes absolutely viral on Twitter. And so I don't think there's I mean, it's unfortunate. It's probably a really great it would be a really great place to get answers to grill the administration, but I think that's essentially the fact of the matter is how the briefing room has evolved over the years. It's become this reality TV entertainment space to get these clips that go viral to, you know, catch the press secretary tripping up in her words rather than actually being curious and learning about policy. The other thing I would just say is that I don't know. I think the administration's gonna be in a a tough place with all of this, with the Epstein files. And it's I think I could see them reasoning through all of this and just saying, well, Twitter is not real life and getting a lot of pressure on Twitter, through all of this. But I do think that when you speak to everyday Americans, I get a ton of text from people who are asking me to ask about the Epstein files, who wanna know answers. And we have even gotten, praise from left leaning outlets for being one of the few outlets who is constantly pressing the administration on the Epstein files. And I think that is proof that this is something that's not just touching the online right. And also to that point, I would say that conservatives should also be more welcoming of, arguing with each other, talking things out, discussing things. Just because one conservative influencer or a couple of conservative influencers think it's not great that the Trump administration really didn't get them this answer on the Epstein files or it seems a little fishy doesn't mean that they can be against the Trump administration or, that there's a huge fracture in the party. This is leadership. This is a part of what happens when your party takes the White House, takes the government. You talk these issues out. And I think that the more the conservative party can work through these issues, the better the conservative party can be post Trump, post 2024 when he's you know, someone inevitably has to run other than Donald Trump. It's probably not gonna be Donald Trump who runs in 2028 no matter how many times he tells us. And so I I think that the the unwillingness to, like, talk things out and kind of duke it out over these things because it might be seen as a weakness or whatever is, the wrong posture towards these things, but I'm just a journalist. So that's just my 2¢ for any conservative MAGA influencers listening. Speaker 0: Yeah. No. I I think it's totally fair and it's reasonable, and there are two things that brings to mind for me is one, we do see this on the left sometimes. I think there's this this belief kind of among conservatives. I it's interesting. Both sides say two things about each other. One is that they never criticize each other. They're always united. Conservatives are like, well, the Democrats never criticize each other and vice versa. Democrats are like, well, conservatives, you know, when the time comes to vote, all the Republicans vote the right way. We've seen that's not true on either side, frankly. I mean, the left was very critical of Joe Biden, particularly over, like, Gaza stuff and Palestine and Israel. And we just saw with, like, Thomas Massie and certain other Republicans on the big beautiful bill, like, there's plenty of instances where the rights aren't all on the same page. So that's a criticism that that each side makes of each other is that they're always on the same page, and why can't we be on the same page all the time? And they also accuse the other side of winning all the time. Both sides feel like they're perpetually losing on every issue, which is obviously not possible. So that's another thing that always gets thrown out there. But we saw this, so I think a lot of conservatives will have this aversion to, you know, having these kind of conversations because they have that view of the left, like, the left's united, and that's how the left wins. And so we have to be united all the time no matter what. But Joe Biden got raked over the Colts relentlessly over the Gaza, Palestine, Israel stuff and, you know, it was tough at times for him to deal with it, but like that's how the party, the Democratic Party determined where they were gonna go on that issue. Now a lot of people will look at that issue and be like, they don't like how they decided to go on it. They've gotten very anti Israel and and some would say anti Semitic in a lot of instances, but the party had to have that discussion and that debate about what they were doing. And so I think this is an example where conservatives have to have a discussion with what they're what they're doing and and what they think about this amongst themselves of, are we satisfied with this answer? Are we satisfied with this conclusion to the story, or do we think it is important to try to get more out of it? And the other thing that that comes to mind for me here is that conservatives conservatives have a strong, you know, desire to win. They have a strong desire that that we need to win elections. We need to beat the left. It's all about winning. That's the main goal for everything, and that's obviously very important in politics. But you have to ask yourself also at a certain point, you know, what is the point of winning? The point of winning is to get things done, get certain things done, and do accomplish certain goals. And, you know, if you're gonna win and then not, you know, deliver on things that that people want you to deliver on, it's you know, you're kind of putting the cart before the horse, I think. And you made a great point, which is that the Trump admin has kept a lot of its promises. If you had told me six months ago that they were actually gonna pass no tax on tips and no tax on overtime and and reducing taxes on Social Security, I would have been like, that's crazy. Like, that's just one of those things people say on the campaign trail. That's not actually gonna happen, and it it happened. They were able to do it. They did shut down the border. Border crossings are more or less at zero. They've accomplished all they're they are deporting a lot of criminals and and violent people that that they said they were gonna deport. So a lot of these goals, tariffs as well. You could just keep going down the list. A lot of these things that Trump said, we're gonna do this, have been happening. And so I think that shines even more of a light on this one as something where it's like, you know, so far, you guys have been sticking to your word on everything, and here's one where we we want a little bit more out of it. It's a normal reaction for people to have.
GuntherEagleman
Posted - July 12, 2025 at 12:49 AM
Saved - July 12, 2025 at 5:59 AM

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

Tucker Carlson just went on a 10 minute rant and said that Epstein worked on behalf of the Israeli government on stage at SAS 2025. Do you think Jeffery Epstein worked for the Israeli government/Mossad? https://t.co/VkhutShD2n

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker voted for Trump despite disliking voting, because they felt the alternative was "totalitarian and stupid." Their primary issue was the dismissive style of argument, characterized by accusations of racism instead of direct answers. They believe citizens deserve answers from those in charge. The speaker is distressed by the Epstein case, feeling the government avoided serious questions. They suspect the initial search warrant was designed to protect Epstein and that he was working on behalf of foreign intelligence services, possibly Mossad, running a blackmail operation. They question how Epstein amassed his wealth and connections, and why these questions are avoided. They argue that criticizing a government, including Israel, is not hateful but a right of free citizens. They demand transparency and answers regarding Epstein's activities and connections, rejecting dismissals and insults in place of legitimate responses. They insist on direct answers to direct questions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't like to vote, and, but I did vote this time. And, I don't like to vote because I don't believe in any of them. And this time, I I really felt like I know Trump well. I love Trump personally. And what we were looking at was just so awful and totalitarian and stupid. And it wasn't even the arguments that I disagreed with from the Kamala Harris. It's weird to even say her name now. Who was that exactly? It was like a bad dream. But it wasn't even so much the arguments I disagreed with, though I definitely disagree with the arguments. It was the style of argument that drove me completely bonkers, summarized most crisply by shut up racist. Whatever you said, it was shut up racist. It's like, but wait, you know, first of I'm not a racist, but that's not even the point. The point is I just told you what I think. I just asked you an entirely legitimate question, mostly, what the hell are you doing? And rather than answer it, you didn't pay me the respect that you would a human being. You treated me like a slave or an animal by telling me to stop barking. Shut up, racist. And I won't put up with that because I'm not a slave for an animal. I'm an American citizen and an adult man who pays his taxes. So, you know, I ask people questions for a living, and very often, get answers that I don't care for, that I disagree with, that I think are stupid, but at least they're answers. At least the person responding is treating me like a human being with a soul created in the image of the creator. He's paying me the respect that every human being is due. When you ask a direct question to someone in charge, you are due. That person is morally bound to give you an answer. He's not bound to agree with you, but he's bound to stop and answer your question. And the left never did that. They would dismiss you out of hand. You are not worth listening to. Be quiet. And that's, of course, where the impulse to censorship comes from. It comes from the belief that you don't deserve to speak because you're not fully human. They own you. And that's what I voted against above all. And I voted against a million different things that I hated about the last administration. Their insane desire to start pointless wars around the world, their total unwillingness to protect this country domestically, to protect the people who live here, to protect the territorial integrity of the country, bringing in tens of millions of people illegally, giving them free stuff the second they get here, making a mockery of citizenship. I hated all of that. I hated all of that. But the thing I hated most was their total unwillingness to answer any question about why they were doing what they were doing because it was just too insulting. And every single time, I would just feel like raising the middle finger and screaming obscenities, which is not an adult response, I'll I'll concede, but that's how I felt. And I think that's really at the heart of why the Epstein thing is so distressing. I mean, the guy was some weird sex freak who was abusing girls. We knew that. But the fact that the US government, the one that I voted for, refused to take my question seriously and instead said, case closed, shut up conspiracy theorist, was too much for me. And I I don't think the rest of us should be satisfied with that. And by the way, let me just say really quickly because I was so mad about it that I think I found out part of what's going on. I think we are going to find out more. And I think the truth, for whatever it's worth, in case you're interested, is that the DOJ didn't release lots of incriminating sex videos with Epstein and his billionaire pals because they don't have them. They don't have them because when the original search warrant was served 02/2007, I think, possibly 02/2006, I think, '7, it was basically designed to protect Epstein. The search warrant was written in such a way to make sure that the feds never got their hands on on the actually incriminating evidence. It's another way of saying the cover up has been going on since 02/2007, almost twenty years. And so the real question is not, was Jeffrey Epstein a weirdo who was abusing girls? Yes. We can answer that. The real question is, why was he doing this on whose behalf and where did the money come from? And those are the questions that need to be answered. And I think it's entirely fair to ask them. And it's not adequate to say anyone who asked them is somehow desecrating the memory of little girls who died in Texas. I'm not gonna put up with that answer. I don't care who gives that answer. That is not acceptable. And I think the real answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of Intel Services, probably not American. And we have every right to ask on whose behalf was he working. How does a guy go from being a math teacher at the Dalton School in the late seventies with no college degree to having multiple airplanes, a private island, and the largest residential house in Manhattan. Where did all the money come from? And no one has ever gotten to the bottom of that because no one has ever tried. And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who watches that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government. Now no one's allowed to say that that foreign government is Israel because we have been somehow cowed into thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that. There is nothing hateful about saying that. There's nothing anti Semitic about saying that. There's nothing even anti Israel about saying that. I've spent my entire life pretty much in Washington where I knew and loved a number of people, including one very close person who worked at CIA. That has never prohibited me from saying, I think the CIA has done some horrible things, murdered a bunch of people, participated in the murder of a sitting US president. It's got a whole trail of crimes. That doesn't make me a disloyal American. It doesn't make me anti American in any sense. I was born here. My family has been here for hundreds of years. I love this country. That's why I live here. So criticizing the behavior of a government agency does not make you a hater. It makes you a free person. It makes you a citizen. You're allowed to do that because you're not a slave, you're a citizen. And you have a right to expect that your government will not act against your interest, and you have a right to demand that foreign governments not be allowed to act against your interest. That's not creepy. It shouldn't be forbidden. And yet all of us have trained ourselves to believe that you can't say that somehow. But that's like too naughty and forbidden, and the effect of making that off limits has been to create a lot of resentment, and I'll say it, hate online, where people feel like they can't just say, like, what the hell is this? You have the former Israeli prime minister living in your house. You have had all this contact with the foreign government. Were you working on behalf of Mossad? Were you running a blackmail operation on behalf of foreign government? By the way, every single person in Washington DC thinks that. I've never met anyone who doesn't think that. I don't know any of them that hate Israel, but no one feels they can say that. Why? And I think the longer that we play along with it, the more subterranean and creepy and hateful the conversation actually becomes. So I think it's better just to say it right out loud. Did this happen? And of course, that question has been asked to the government of Israel, and their answer is we're not going to tell you. And I think our answer should be no or no. As long as we're sending you money, if you are committing crimes on our soil, we have an absolute right to know, did you do this or not? And yet everybody has been so brainwashed into thinking that's somehow an expression of hate or bigotry. When it's not, it's a baseline question that every U. S. Citizen has a right to an answer on. What the hell was this? And by the way, if it turns out that it was nothing at all, that somehow Jeffrey Epstein really did earn $165,000,000 giving tax advice to somebody, which is, for the record, a lot more than most people pay their accountants, and that none of this was actually a foreign intel operation and that there was no blackmail involved, that actually Bill Gates was just hanging on the island because the weather was especially good. No one was videotaped doing anything immoral or illegal, and then that was used against them to get them to obey. If all of that is false, then just tell me how it's false. But don't call me a lunatic. And when Fox News runs a piece as they did yesterday by Hugh Hewitt saying that anybody who's got even more questions about Epstein is some kind of nutcase with an unhappy personal life who's spending too much time on Twitter in the fervent fever swamps of conspiracies, You know, up yours, buddy. Why don't you answer the question then? Don't let anybody insult you, anybody, and I mean anybody ever get away with insulting you instead of answering a legitimate question, okay, ever. And by the way, you will hear certain people say, well, that means you hate the per No, it doesn't. I I've got a bunch of kids. I would never let them get away with that. If I caught one of my kids, you know, smoking weed in the bathroom at my house, and I was like, are you smoking weed in the bathroom? Shut up, racist. You hate me. No. You're my child. I don't hate you. Answer the freaking question. Were you smoking weed in the bathroom or not? I'm not the criminal here. You seem to be.
JoshWalkos
Posted - July 14, 2025 at 7:44 PM
Saved - July 14, 2025 at 10:10 PM

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

If you want to know why the Epstein story is being covered up look no further than The Jeffrey Epstein Foundation. This is the oldest way back screengrab I could find. Look at what groups/organizations he was a member of… 👉🏻 web.archive.org/web/2012040100… https://t.co/M43ch9DI1s

DickAlupinya247
Posted - July 16, 2025 at 6:55 AM
Saved - July 16, 2025 at 2:05 PM

@DickAlupinya247 - Richard Allupinya

Fuck you, fa***t.

@WarlordDilley - Brenden Dilley

We've officially reached peak MAGA "virtue signaling" over Epstein. 90% of you disingenuous fucks didn't say one goddamn word the last 7 years about this topic, but now it's fashionable to scream that "you're all about protecting the children." You're about clicks, bitch.

holabackup2
Posted - September 5, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Saved - September 5, 2025 at 5:30 PM

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

No, Chabad/IDF. Get fucked.

@AFpost - AF Post

President Trump reiterated that the Epstein files are a “Democrat HOAX” and said it’s time to “end the Democrat Epstein Hoax, and give the Republicans credit” for the “great” job they’re doing. Follow: @AFpost https://t.co/SXz56UT8TN

jakeshieldsajj
Posted - September 5, 2025 at 4:52 PM
Saved - September 6, 2025 at 2:30 AM

@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields

Master Trump said we don't want to mess with Jewish billionaire pedo’s If you real MAGA you will support the pedos like our president Trust the plan and trust our president He says Jewish pedos are good and do you really think you know more than our God Trump?

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

BREAKING: President Trump just now: “It's time to end the Democrat Epstein Hoax, and give the Republicans credit for the great, even legendary, job that they are doing.” https://t.co/BnJGVF0NFi

BasedSamParker
Posted - September 9, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Saved - September 11, 2025 at 5:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been discussing the account EndWokeness, which I believe serves as a tool for promoting division and racial hatred while masking its true agenda. I argue that it distracts from real issues by focusing on racial conflicts without addressing the underlying Jewish influence in these narratives. I’ve compared it to other accounts like Libsoftiktok, suggesting they both manipulate their audiences. I also highlight the disparity in government responses to violence against different racial groups, questioning who the government truly serves.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ 6 millionth reminder that EndWokeness is a jewish spy account. It will post about Black p3d0 rpists & complain the MSM didn't cover the murder of Iryna Zarutska—all while never posting about Netanyahu's p3d0 rpist Tom Alexandrovich released back to israel. It exists to stoke racial hatred between Whites & Blacks (jewish), cynically sell racism to the Right in exchange for its support for israel (jewish), and serve as a vacuum cleaner for eyeballs, money & influence—hoovering attention & resources away from actual Nationalist influencers who actually oppose israel & jewish power. It's similar to Libsoftiktok Chaya Raichik who runs the same scam but focuses on the "woke" instead of Blacks. Neither account ever exposes the jewish role in either of these problem areas. They feed you slop while hiding the meat. By supporting this account, you think you're helping solve the "Black problem," but all you're really doing is enabling the jewish problem.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ EndWokeness and Libsoftiktok are both what I call "Chayanim," the online influencer version of the Sayanim. There are many such accounts. https://t.co/f37N0BQwAA

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Here's my original exposé of EndWokeness dating back to he events of 10-7: https://t.co/FJLIURUYGH

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

🚨🇮🇱 EVIDENCE "@ENDWOKENESS" IS JEWISH: 🔹After you retweeted Robby Starbuck on Thursday, October 5th, you didn't tweet again until Sunday, 5:05 PM (Pacific). Even though the biggest event of the year popped off on Saturday, October 7th, you were nowhere to be found. Why? 🔹Libs of TikTok, who is known to be jewish, also was offline during that same time frame--and returned to Twitter at about the same time as you on Sunday. Why was she gone? As she said, "the jewish holiday." 🔹Within an hour of being back on Twitter, you were promoting the "decolonization" messaging--a talking point known to be popular amongst, and promoted by, other prominent jewish/zionist accounts. Question: Are you indeed jewish?

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

These are actual images from a pro-terror celebration in Times Square today

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ "Won't someone think of the poor jewish man who left America and joined the IDF to help israel commit genocide?!" EndWokeness is a jewish spy. https://t.co/7kVdvtbtvg https://t.co/aF7B2mgKg8

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@EndWokeness I knew you were jewish. Lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ You think EndWokeness is helping White people by feeding you your Black-on-White racism exposés, but here's what it's helping secure for jews and israel instead: https://t.co/Qm3DXVucpq

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Federal Government Actions to Specifically Protect White Americans After These White Americans (Below) Were Senselessy Murdered: NONE Federal Government Actions to Specifically Protect jews Post‑October 7, 2023: ▪️Condemnatory and Declaratory Resolutions (non‑binding) •Oct  25 , 2023 – H.Res. 819 (Passed House) – Recognizes Tree of Life anniversary and condemns rising antisemitism. •Oct  26 , 2023 – S.Res. 437 (Passed Senate) – Condemns campus antisemitism and urges leaders to speak out. •Dec  5,  2023 – H.Res. 894 (Passed House) – Condemns global surge in antisemitism and equates anti‑Zionism with antisemitism. •Dec  13 , 2023 – H.Res. 927 (Passed House) – Condemns campus antisemitism and university presidents’ testimony. •Dec  13 , 2023 – S.Res. 497 (Introduced Senate) – Declares “from the river to the sea” slogan antisemitic and genocidal. •Nov  20 , 2024 – H.Res. 1449 (Passed House) – Condemns global rise and calls for international cooperation. •May  14 , 2025 – H.Res. 352 (Passed House) – Urges leaders to counter antisemitism and highlight Jewish contributions. •May  22 , 2025 – S.Res. 246 (Passed Senate) – Recognizes Jewish American Heritage Month and notes record‑high incidents. •Jun  9 , 2025 – H.Res. 481 (Passed House) – Condemns ideologically motivated attacks on Jewish individuals. •Jun  18 , 2025 – S.Res. 288 (Introduced Senate) – Condemns rise in ideologically motivated attacks on Jews. •Jun  23,  2025 – S.Res. 296 (Introduced Senate) – Condemns recent antisemitic attacks and praises NSGP role. ▪️Funding and Appropriations Acts (NSGP security dollars) •Mar  9 , 2024 – Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118‑42) – Allocates $274.5 million for NSGP security enhancements. •Apr  24,  2024 – Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118‑50) – Provides emergency $400 million for NSGP. •Mar  15 , 2025 – Full‑Year Continuing Appropriations & Extensions Act, 2025 (P.L. 119‑4) – Maintains NSGP funding at $274.5 million for FY‑2025. ▪️Definitional and Anti‑Discrimination Bills (IHRA Title VI enforcement) •May  1 2, 2024 – H.R. 6090 “Antisemitism Awareness Act” (Passed House) – Requires Dept. of Education to apply IHRA definition. •Feb  5 , 2025 – H.R. 1007 “Antisemitism Awareness Act” (Introduced House) – Re‑introduces IHRA definition for federal enforcement. •Feb  13 , 2025 – S. 558 “Antisemitism Awareness Act” (Introduced Senate) – Senate counterpart mandating IHRA definition. ▪️Coordination, Education, and Oversight Bills (systemic safeguards) •Apr  9,  2024 – S. 4091 “Countering Antisemitism Act” (Introduced Senate) – Creates White House coordinator, federal data collection, task forces. •Jul y 2024 – H.R. 7891 (Introduced House) – Companion to S. 4091 with similar coordinator and data mandates. •Jan  28,  2025 – H.R. 768 “Holocaust Education & Antisemitism Lessons (HEAL) Act” (Introduced House) – Directs Holocaust Museum to survey nationwide education standards. ▪️Policy Directives and Executive Orders •Nov  7 , 2023 – ED Office for Civil Rights (OCR) Dear Colleague Letter reminding schools of Title VI obligations to protect students perceived as Jewish. •May  7 , 2024 – White House “National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism” Year‑2 rollout adds campus‑safety toolkits, DHS guides, and DOE Title VI guidance. •May  7 , 2024 – ED OCR Dear Colleague Letter gives examples of antisemitic discrimination that violate Title VI. •May  3 , 2024 – ED Secretary letter to 5,000+ higher‑ed leaders reiterating Title VI protections and sharing a Campus Safety Resource Guide. •Jan  29 , 2025 – Executive Order 14188 “Additional Measures to Combat Anti‑Semitism” requires agencies to inventory authorities and intensify campus enforcement. ▪️Agency Enforcement, Investigations, and Resource Provision •Oct  30 , 2023 – DOJ & DHS disseminate safety info and host campus‑police calls on threats. •Nov  2023 → – ED hosts listening sessions and launches webinars on preventing antisemitic threats (first on Dec 6 2023). •Post‑Oct  7 , 2023 – ED OCR opens 100+ Title VI antisemitism probes; complaint form now explicitly covers those perceived as Jewish. •Post‑Oct  7,  2023 – Eight Cabinet agencies issue fact sheets (incl. Hebrew/Yiddish) clarifying Title VI antisemitism bans in funded programs. •Nov  16,  2023 – USDA webinar on countering antisemitism on rural campuses. •Post‑Oct  7,  2023 – DOJ grants $38 M+ for hate‑crime investigation & prosecution, incl. Jewish orgs. •Aug  2024 – DOJ pilot curriculum for grades 6‑12 on preventing hate crimes and bullying. •Mar  10 , 2025 – ED OCR warns 60 universities of potential funding loss over antisemitism failures. •May  7 , 2024 – State Dept. convenes tech firms to curb online antisemitic content. •May  22 , 2025 – HHS OCR & ED find Columbia University in Title VI violation, impose corrective plan. ▪️Task Force Initiatives •Feb  3 , 2025 – DOJ forms Federal Task Force to Combat Anti‑Semitism (school focus + prosecutions). •Feb  28 , 2025 – Task Force announces visits to 10 antisemitism‑plagued campuses. •Mar  7,  2025 – Task Force revokes $400 M in grants/contracts from Columbia University. •Mar  13,  2025 – Task Force meets leaders in NYC, LA, Chicago, Boston on incidents. •Mar  19 , 2025 – Agencies revoke all Columbia University grants/contracts amid allegations. •May  13 , 2025 – Joint Task Force signals additional actions against Harvard. ▪️Security Enhancements and Funding •Post‑Oct  7,  2023 – FBI/DHS expand campus‑police engagement; DHS posts resources on SchoolSafety(dot)gov. •Post‑Oct  7,  2023 – DHS CISA makes 400+ in‑person visits to Jewish institutions for risk assessments & training. •Post‑Oct  7 , 2023 – DHS awards $397 M to 2,960 Jewish institutions via Nonprofit Security Grant Program. •May  7 , 2024 – DHS publishes online campus‑safety guide & violence‑prevention best practices. •Oct  31 , 2023 – FBI Director flags historic antisemitism risk, urges threat reporting. •Jun  23 , 2025 – DHS terrorism advisory cites elevated antisemitic threats, directs users to new safety hub. ▪️Immigration‑Related Measures (Deportations & Visa Revocations) •Jan  29 , 2025 – EO 14188 orders monitoring of foreign students/staff for inadmissibility, enabling removals. •Feb  6 , 2025 – Administration moves to deport international students protesting Israel over antisemitism concerns. •Feb  20 , 2025 – Student visas canceled for “Hamas sympathizers” or protestors linked to antisemitism. •Mar  7 , 2025 – Planned deportations of “pro‑Hamas” students under antisemitism‑related laws. •Apr  9 , 2025 – DHS begins social‑media screening for antisemitic activity; USCIS denies benefits, refers to ICE. •May  2 , 2025 – USCIS formalizes social‑media reviews for antisemitic ties when adjudicating benefits. Who does our government work for?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ Notice its sly Epstein diversion: https://t.co/ZpWr0rP6vA https://t.co/YiOccBM0l7

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

Gee, I wonder why. https://t.co/OxPv5ZYMsm

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

7/ Couldn't help itself on October 8, 2023 https://t.co/1zyMZdTwON https://t.co/8xAv3ncWRK

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

These are actual images from a pro-terror celebration in Times Square today

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

8/ Remember the kosher sandwich to divide and conquer the Gentiles. Accounts like EndWokeness, Libsoftiktok & Laura Loomer are zionist jews who team up with Republicans, White people & Christians to attack Black/Brown people & Muslims. Torah jews, Jewish Voices For Peace, and many other "anti-zionist" jewish accounts team up with Democrats, Black/Brown people & Muslims to attack White people & Christians. No jew on either side will expose the jewish role on any side of the conflicts.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@goddeketal @EndWokeness Hey EndWokeness https://t.co/mTut3GhglP

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@RedPillMediaX https://t.co/tgCc471j8q

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Villgecrazylady Or create in the first place.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@strikermodel13 Of course it is, but that jewish account will never tell its audience the root problem, though, will it?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@hippyresident Probably a team of guys that look like that running the account

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@BrianDPeek https://t.co/vPSJKYa12A

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

An old GF used to tell me mutual hatreds were a stronger bond than mutual interests. I don't know if that's true, but maybe if we make hating their supremacy our mutual interest, we'll capture both energies. https://t.co/5QkvsjPpa0

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Who did it best?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Americaonly9 @EndWokeness 💯🎯

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@ash_p_17 Good work

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@andrewj081981 Lol. FFIA award.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@FuryAF1 @EndWokeness @JackPosobiec No, it's not. But congrats on falling for the diversion.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Piliriqatigiinn @SamParkerSenate @JackPosobiec Of course you did. That video is slop and got debunked.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@trvepatr1ot Many jewish influencer accounts follow me, just as I follow them, dumbfuck. But it never responds to me, retweets me or boosts me, so "support" is the wrong word here.

JakeG_Official
Posted - October 24, 2025 at 11:48 PM
Saved - October 25, 2025 at 7:15 AM

@JakeG_Official - JAKEGTV

“Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?” Yes. We are. And will continue to talk about Jeffrey Epstein until they admit it’s IsraeI. https://t.co/bBpCs0Wogm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Investigators say they found no incriminating client list of Epstein's, no credible evidence that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals, and no evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. Epstein used edge.org to slip into the world's smartest circles. Not politics or Hollywood this time, but the thinkers who shape reality. This guy, John Brockman, a literary agent who ran it, hosted secret billionaires dinners with people like Bezos, Musk, and Google's founders all in the same room. Epstein bankrolled the operation with over half a million dollars, acting like he was funding science for the good of humanity. In reality, those dinners were access points where Brockman would personally introduce Epstein to Nobel Prize winners, brain researchers, and AI pioneers. He pitch Epstein as this genius investor in future minds. When behind the scenes, Epstein was collecting names, influence, and secrets. Emails later showed Brockman bragging about Epstein's connections, even sending photos of Epstein with world leaders right after his first conviction. Edge wasn't just a science salon. It was a social front that let Epstein rub shoulders with the people designing humanity's future. When it all came out, the question wasn't just how Epstein got away with it, but who helped open the doors? Epstein surrounded himself with women who helped him operate his network. Two of the most visible were Ghislain Maxwell and Nadia Marchenko. Maxwell played the polished recruiter, one who groomed, scheduled, and normalized Epstein's behavior to young girls. Marchenko, who came from Eastern Europe as a teenager, became part of his inner circle, flying on his private jets and living in his homes. She was seen as both victim and accomplice, allegedly bringing in other girls while still under his control. Together, they created a system that looked glamorous on the private planes, luxury estates, global connections. But underneath, it was built on trafficking and abuse. Epstein didn't just get off easy. He got one of the sketchiest deals in modern history. Prosecutors quietly gave him a secret plea deal. He pled guilty to minor state charges, served just thirteen months in a Cushy County jail, was even allowed to leave six days a week for work release. To him being an agent, I have no knowledge about that. We can get back to you on that. Was even allowed to leave six days a week for work release. The victims weren't even told until the entire thing was done.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? Yep. Speaker 1: Investigators say they found no incriminating client list of Epstein's, no credible evidence that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals, and no evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. Speaker 0: Epstein used edge.org to slip into the world's smartest circles. Not politics or Hollywood this time, but the thinkers who shape reality. This guy, John Brockman, a literary agent who ran it, hosted secret billionaires dinners with people like Bezos, Musk, and Google's founders all in the same room. Epstein bankrolled the operation with over half a million dollars, acting like he was funding science for the good of humanity. In reality, those dinners were access points where Brockman would personally introduce Epstein to Nobel Prize winners, brain researchers, and AI pioneers. He pitch Epstein as this genius investor in future minds. When behind the scenes, Epstein was collecting names, influence, and secrets. Emails later showed Brockman bragging about Epstein's connections, even sending photos of Epstein with world leaders right after his first conviction. Edge wasn't just a science salon. It was a social front that let Epstein rub shoulders with the people designing humanity's future. When it all came out, the question wasn't just how Epstein got away with it, but who helped open the doors? Epstein surrounded himself with women who helped him operate his network. Two of the most visible were Ghislain Maxwell and Nadia Marchenko. Maxwell played the polished recruiter, one who groomed, scheduled, and normalized Epstein's behavior to young girls. Marchenko, who came from Eastern Europe as a teenager, became part of his inner circle, flying on his private jets and living in his homes. She was seen as both victim and accomplice, allegedly bringing in other girls while still under his control. Together, they created a system that looked glamorous on the Private planes, luxury estates, global connections. But underneath, it was built on trafficking and abuse. Epstein didn't just get off easy. He got one of the sketchiest deals in modern history. Prosecutors quietly gave him a secret plea deal. He pled guilty to minor state charges, served just thirteen months in a Cushy County jail, was even allowed to leave six days a week for work release. To him being an agent, I have no knowledge about that. We can get back to you on that. Was even allowed to leave six days a week for work release. The victims weren't even told until the entire thing was done.
Villgecrazylady
Posted - October 25, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Saved - October 25, 2025 at 6:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user accuses Sloan Rachmuth of deleting most tweets about Charlie Kirk, then harassing Gabe Guidarini to push TPUSA to cancel Tucker Carlson. She allegedly missed a pre-murder reply showing contempt for Kirk. In replies, she’s described as hating Charlie Kirk, claiming he wasn’t a friend of Israel, and labeling Gabe Guidarini a sociopath while demanding his firing and Tucker Carlson’s removal from AmFest.

@Villgecrazylady - Mel

Sloan Rachmuth, who deleted (almost) every tweet she ever made about Charlie Kirk before he was murdered, is now harassing @GabeGuidarini for pushing back on her demands that TPUSA cancel Tucker Carlson. Too bad for Sloan, she missed one from before Charlie’s murder, that shows you just how much contempt she had for him.

@Villgecrazylady - Mel

The dumbass forgot to delete her replies to his handle. This bitch literally hated Charlie Kirk. https://t.co/DklZDRqxVb

@Villgecrazylady - Mel

This is the woman demanding that Andrew Kolvet submit to her demands, fire @GabeGuidarini and kick Tucker Carlson off the AmFest lineup. She carried a *seething* hate for Charlie for years and routinely said he wasn’t a friend of Israel. https://t.co/OjacMH9rdV

@Villgecrazylady - Mel

@GabeGuidarini Unbelievable. What an absolute sociopath.

@Hal9000_T1 - KHAL

@Villgecrazylady @GabeGuidarini ... oh yeah and the crocodile tears https://t.co/mU0CulKwDr

SenseReceptor
Posted - November 16, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Saved - November 17, 2025 at 1:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize Xueqin’s clip: Epstein emails show power as an elite network beyond party lines; in public they fight, in private they stay close. The elite feel untouchable, speak freely, and rely on a hidden network to keep trust. Epstein Island’s ritual-like secrecy is cited, with blackmail and transgressions, including sexual ones, linking elites. The revelations challenge prior conspiracy ideas about the American elite.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Yale grad and professor Jiang Xueqin: "These Epstein... emails... illuminate... how power works... the elite [are]... all friends with each other... [and stick] together... through... secret society rituals... [so] the entire American elite are just a bunch of pedophiles." This clip of Xueqin (@xueqinjiang), known in large part because of his Predictive History YouTube channel, is taken from an interview with Danny Haiphong (@GeopoliticsDH) posted to Haiphong's eponymous YouTube channel on November 14, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So these Epstein files, these emails, they're being released, and they're really enlightening and they really illuminate for us how power works. So I will give a structural overview of what these emails reveal to us, okay? "The first thing it reveals to us is that all these people in power, the elite, they're all friends with each other. So in public, the Democrats and Republicans, they can be fighting each other, but in reality, they go to the same schools, they go to the same parties. They— they're just friends with each other. So what you're seeing in public is sort of like, political struggle in public. It's all just fake. It's like wrestling. It's reality TV. These— the elite are all friends with each other. "That's the first thing. Second thing that we've noticed about the emails is how cavalier the elite are. They think that they're above everyone else. They think they're untouchable, so they just speak their minds freely. I mean, Jeffrey Epstein, he was using Gmail in order to make all these sensitive communications. There was absolutely no operational security. He didn't really care because he believed he was untouchable. And that's how the elite think and behave. They live in a bubble. They think that they control the world, and they're untouchable, so they can do whatever they want. And all that matters is staying within this bubble, staying close to each other. "The third thing I will say is that these emails don't tell us, but we can assume that there are many layers of networking among the elite. So Jeffrey Epstein, why was he so popular among the elite? Well, I mean, first of all, he was just a friendly guy who did a lot of networking and was able to bring the elite together. But if you look at go to Epstein island, you will find that there's a temple there that's almost designed for ritual sacrifice. "So, what I've researched and what I've discovered is that the way that the elite stay together is through rituals, secret society rituals. Why? Because at the end of the day, if you're part of the elite, your biggest problem is trust. How can you trust that person to not rat you out in this political struggle? And the answer is, well, you blackmail each other, right? So, so you do acts together that we consider taboo, including, you know, s— with underage children. I mean, there are lots of transgressions that you can do. And the more transgressions you do, the more cohesive the elite is. "So, unfortunately, if you dig deeper into Jeffrey Epstein, what you'll find is a lot of transgressions, both sexual and violent as well. Bring these social taboos— I mean... what's really astonishing about the Jeffrey Epstein case is that slowly the inner workings of the elite are being revealed to the public. And all these conspiracy theories that we once believed couldn't possibly be true, including that the entire American elite are just a bunch of pedophiles. I mean, they're slowly turning out to be true. And this marks a radical turning point in American history."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents the following content: It asserts that the released Epson emails illuminate how power operates. It claims that all people in power, the elite, are friends with each other; in public, Democrats and Republicans appear to fight, but in reality they go to the same schools and parties and are just friends. What the public sees is described as political struggle in public, akin to fake wrestling or reality TV, with the elite remaining connected. A second major point is that the elite are cavalier and think they are above everyone else and untouchable, speaking their minds freely. The example given is Jeffrey Epstein, who allegedly used Gmail for sensitive communications with absolutely no operational security, reflecting a belief that he was untouchable and that the elite live in a bubble, focusing on staying within that bubble and close to each other. A third assertion is that there are many layers of networking among the elite. Jeffrey Epstein is said to have been popular among the elite because he was a friendly networker who brought the elite together. It is claimed that Epstein Island contains a temple designed for ritual sacrifice, and that the elite stay together through civil society rituals. The underlying rationale given is that trust is the biggest problem for the elite in political struggles, and trust is maintained by blackmail—people performing acts together, including taboo transgressions such as sex with underage children. The transcript states that there are numerous sexual and violent transgressions that reinforce cohesion by bringing social taboos into play. It notes that, when digging deeper into Jeffrey Epstein, one will find many transgressions—both sexual and violent—that reinforce group cohesion through taboos. It contrasts public perception with what it describes as the inner workings of the elite. Finally, the transcript asserts that the public is gradually being shown the inner workings of the elite, and that conspiracy theories formerly believed—such as the idea that the entire American elite are a bunch of pedophiles—are slowly turning out to be true, marking a radical turning point in American history.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So these Epson files, these emails, they're being released, and they're really enlightening, and they really illuminate for us how power works. So I will give a structural overview of what these emails reveal to us. First thing it reveals to us is that all these people in power, the elite, they're all friends with each other. So in public, the Democrats and Republicans, they can be fighting each other. But in reality, they go to the same schools, they go to the same parties, they're they're just friends with each other. So what you're seeing in public is sort of like political struggle in public. It's all just fake. It's like wrestling. It's reality TV. These the elite are all friends with each other. That's the first thing. Second thing that we've noticed about the emails is how cavalier the elite are. They think that they're above everyone else. They think they're untouchable, so they just they just speak their minds freely. You know? I mean, Jeffrey Epstein, he was using Gmail in order to make all these sensitive communications. There was absolutely no operational security. He didn't really care because he believed he was untouchable. And that's how the elite think and behave. They live in a bubble. They think that they control the world and they're untouchable, so they can do whatever they want. And all that matters is staying within this bubble, staying close to each other. The third thing I will say is that these emails don't tell us, but we can assume that there are many layers of networking among the elite. Jeffrey So Epstein, why was he so popular among the elite? Well, I mean, first of all, he was just a friendly guy who did a lot of networking and was able to bring the elite together. But if you go to Epstein Island, you will find that there's a temple there that's almost designed for ritual sacrifice. So what I've researched and what I've discovered is that the way that the elite stay together is through rituals, civil society rituals. Why? Because at the end of the day, if you're probably elite, your biggest problem is trust. How can you trust that person to not rat you out in this political struggle? And the answer is, well, you blackmail each other. So you do acts together, that would consider taboo, including sex with underage children. I mean, there are lots of transgressions that you can do, and the more transgressions you do, the more cohesive the elite is. So unfortunately, if you dig deeper into Jeffrey Epstein, what you will find is a lot of transgressions, both sexual and violent as well, bringing these social taboos. I mean, like like like the public, I mean, it it like, what's really astonishing about the Jeffrey Epstein case is that slowly, the inner workings of the elite are being revealed to the public. And all these conspiracy theories that we once believed couldn't possibly be true, including that the entire American elite are just a bunch of pedophiles. I mean, they're slowly turning out to be true, and this marks a radical turning point in American history.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Full source video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVJ4mxQU2qk

goddek
Posted - January 31, 2026 at 11:15 AM
Saved - February 1, 2026 at 5:27 PM

@goddek - Dr. Simon Goddek

Half a year ago, @benshapiro insisted there was no Epstein list, no Epstein files, and no human trafficking. He even mocked Tucker Carlson and claimed Mossad had nothing to do with it. Now that the files are out, he’s suddenly silent. Why? https://t.co/WLn9wd9kyt

RedactedNews
Posted - February 10, 2026 at 12:30 PM
Saved - February 10, 2026 at 2:55 PM

@RedactedNews - Redacted

🚨 WAIT. How did Epstein really function as an intelligence asset and for whom? Now, pro-Israel media are scrambling to rebrand him as a Russian asset. Why the sudden rewrite, and who are they protecting? @JohnKiriakou is w/us. https://t.co/cjiQhRGhHw

Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on Jeffrey Epstein as an intelligence asset and how such arrangements work across multiple agencies. Speaker 0 questions how Epstein operated as an intelligence asset for the CIA, Mossad, MI6, SBU, and others, noting a media narrative that portrays Epstein as a Russian intelligence asset while allegedly overlooking other connections. John Kiriakou, a former CIA officer, explains his view that Epstein was likely an access agent—most probably recruited by Mossad—to provide access to people the Israelis were interested in. An access agent is someone who can grant access to target individuals rather than possessing direct access to classified information. Still, such an agent can be a free agent who can trade information or favors with various intelligence services (FBI, CIA, MI6, MI5, French services, etc.) in exchange for potential future assistance. Kiriakou emphasizes Epstein could barter with different agencies to build goodwill if he ever faced trouble. Regarding Epstein’s lenient 2008 sentence, Kiriakou notes that former US Attorney Alex Acosta said the order came from the top and, when asked why, stated it was intelligence-related. He questions who has authority over a US attorney, suggesting possible involvement of higher-level figures in the Bush administration (President or Vice President) and invites scrutiny of who ordered the lenient deal. The discussion then shifts to the mechanism of clandestine work. Kiriakou describes a covert environment where meetings occur without an overt trail: if Epstein were treated as a normal source, a meeting might be arranged at a yacht-club parking lot at 02:00, with arrangements made in advance to avoid written records. He contrasts this with cases where some elements are written (as in Watergate, where signals and pre-arranged triggers prompt meetings) but otherwise relies on verbal cues or signals to avoid paper trails. The panel explores the relationship between Epstein’s sexual offenses and his espionage role. They agree these were parallel issues: recruiters identified Epstein’s vulnerability as a pedophile to compel him to provide information, financing his operations while turning a blind eye to his activities. They discuss whether Epstein evolved into a honeypot operation over time, recognizing that decades of activity could allow intelligence services to entrap or manipulate many powerful individuals. Peter Mandelson’s case is cited as an example of a British figure deeply entangled, raising concerns about state secrets and possible exposure; Mendelson’s ties threaten political stability in the UK, with potential lifetime imprisonment if implicated in treason-like activities or heavy state-secrecy violations. The dialogue touches on the perception of Israeli diplomacy as flexible and sometimes aligned with adversaries when convenient, asserting that Israelis are “free agents” who act in Israel’s best interests, even if that means sharing information with hostile or competing intelligence services. This is illustrated by a debate with Alan Dershowitz about Epstein’s possible Israeli ties and the broader implications for extradition and sentencing. Toward the end, the speakers reflect on public accountability and transparency. They emphasize that no one should be granted a pass in crimes involving children, and they advocate for openness about investigations, including calls for Trump to release more information. They contrast the push for transparency with a desire to avoid premature judgments, urging scrutiny of all prominent figures involved. Finally, John Kiriakou promotes his shows—Deprogram, Deep Focus, and Dead Drop—as platforms for continued discussion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How exactly did Epstein operate as an intelligence asset for the CIA, Mossad, MI six, SBU, all of them, quite honestly? How does this work exactly? Well, if you listen to the Zionist controlled media, they are now bending over backwards to paint Epstein as a Russian intelligence asset, ignoring all of the other connections. Here is Barry Weiss's CBS News. Watch. Speaker 1: Poland says it's looking into possible connections between convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Russian intelligence services. The announcement came after the US justice department last week released millions more files related to the federal investigation into Epstein. Polish prime minister Donald Tusk said Tuesday, quote, more and more leads, more and more information, and more and more commentary in the global press all relate to the suspicion that this unprecedented pedophilia scandal was co organized by Russian intelligence services. Speaker 0: Oh, okay. Any links between By the way, by the way, I love how CBS knew you don't even know that the Polish the leader I'm sorry, the the leader is named Tusk, but okay. Tusk. Anyway, how does all of how does all this come together? John Kiriakou is a CIA whistleblower. Of course, the Obama administration went after him big time and, as he was trying to expose everything that the Obama administration was doing. John, welcome back to the show. Great to see you as always. Speaker 2: Thank you. Great to see you. Thanks for having me. Speaker 0: I wanted to have a lot to talk about here. And I know Natalie wants to unpack specifically like the KGB side of this in a second. But I wanna first kind of start off and understand like the mechanics, if you could, maybe helping us understand how exactly would because people saying, oh, he's Mossad or he's CIA. And I think you have said to us in the past that he's probably just an asset associated or in alignment with them. How does how exactly does that work? How exactly did it work for him, you believe? Speaker 2: Well, I've been I'm proud to say I've been consistent that from the beginning, I said that I thought he was what was called, an access agent, most likely for the Mossad. An access agent is somebody who can give you access to people that you're really interested in. It's not necessarily gonna be Jeffrey Epstein that has access to classified, information, but Peter Mendelson certainly does, and Bill Clinton does, and, the former prince, Andrew certainly did, and maybe you get some business, information, business secrets, or economic secrets from the likes of Bill Gates. So I think that Jeffrey Epstein was was probably recruited by the Israelis to provide access to the targets that the Israelis were really interested in. But with that said, an access agent is somebody who also can still be a free agent. And so if the FBI has a question and maybe you can you can establish a quid pro quo with the FBI, maybe you answer the FBI's question or the CIA or the MI six or MI five or the French or whomever. Because you wanna bank those, those favors and, maybe have some goodwill down the line in case you get jammed up. He got jammed up, and he didn't have anybody to help him. Speaker 0: Can I just follow-up on that real quick, which is one of the big questions that congressman Thomas Massey wanted he he see he told me earlier in the week, he said that among the missing things that they demanded as part of the Epstein Transparency Act was the name of the person or persons who were responsible for giving him such a lenient sentence in 02/2008? Right. Would that be intelligence related, do you believe? Speaker 2: I think it's 100% intelligence related. Alex Acosta has said Alex Acosta, the former secretary of labor, who at the time was the US attorney who prosecuted Jeffrey Epstein, said that the order to give Epstein a sweetheart sentence came from the top. And when asked why, all he said was intelligence. So make of that what you will. But then you have to think, who has authority over a US attorney? Well, frankly, the only person who has authority, direct authority over a US attorney is, is the attorney general. At the time, that was, Alberto Gonzales. Alberto Gonzales, god bless him, was a lightweight. It wasn't up to Alberto Gonzales. So who was above Alberto Gonzales? It was the president and the vice president. So what do we make of that? Was it George w Bush that ordered this? If so, why? Was it Dick Cheney? If so, why? But I think we have a right to know. Speaker 0: What if that sore throat or fever that hits you overnight didn't actually have to cancel your family trip or miss work or waste hours at an urgent care? Instead, you could actually just open your medical emergency kit from the wellness company, match your symptoms to the doctor recommended guide, and then start treatment immediately right in your house. This is not a first aid kit. It's a mini urgent care right at your fingertips. Inside, you're gonna find eight core prescriptions to treat over 30 conditions like COVID, strep throat, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and more. No more waiting rooms, no more pharmacy lines. Modernized medicine right when you need it. We have one right upstairs in our own medicine cabinet. Ordering it is simple. At checkout, simply complete a short intake form and a licensed doctor will review, fill your scripts, and preventative peace of mind arrives at your home in one week. No one wants to be sick during the holidays or any other time, so be prepared. Save yourself time and money. The medical emergency kit puts urgent care in your hands anytime you need it. So go to twc.health/redacted right now and use that code redacted to save a nice discount and free shipping. Again, twc.health/redacted. Speaker 3: What do you make of this media narrative that, oh, definitely he's KGB? I mean, set aside the fact that the KGB has been dissolved since the nineties, and Epstein was doing most of his work in the February. The way Daryl Cooper explained it on Tucker Tucker Carlson, I I thought was great because he could move between governments. If if Mossad Speaker 2: That's right. Speaker 3: You know, wanted an introduction to somebody in the KGB, then you have these shadow actors that can act as a liaison. That's what, Robert Maxwell, in fact, did. Speaker 2: That's Speaker 3: right. So can you extrapolate on that role, and are there people still doing it? Speaker 2: Oh, I think that is exactly correct. I think that that he really has has nailed it. You know, the Israelis I'm I'm gonna get threats from the Israelis again. Every time I say something like this, I get threats, but I'm gonna say it again anyway. The Israelis are free agents. The Israelis are not necessarily our friends. They are when it suits them, but when it suits them to be friendly with the Russians, they go with the Russians or with the Chinese or the Germans or, you know, anybody. It doesn't make any difference. The Israelis do what's best for the Israelis. And if that means using a a source like like Jeffrey Epstein and and passing information on to a hostile intelligence service or at least one that's hostile to The United States, that's exactly what they're going to do. I got into a spirited debate with, Alan Dershowitz about this on the Pierce Morgan show a few weeks ago, and I thought the man was gonna have a stroke when I said that Jeffrey Epstein was most likely working on behalf of the Israelis. And then he said something that was completely backward. He said that he had been Epstein's, attorney, and if Epstein had been working for the Israelis, he would have told Dershowitz, and Dershowitz would have used that information to get Epstein an even lighter sentence. And I said, wait a minute, professor. If you're saying that you would have gone to the White House to say, my client is committing espionage for the Israeli government, you think that would have gotten him a lighter sentence? I think he would have been hanging from a tree. Right. It would have been trees removed. On from there. Speaker 0: Yeah. He would have been put in prison for the rest of his life or put to death. Exactly. Speaker 3: Well, that's how it's supposed to work. We're we're seeing that it doesn't. Right? Now you can meet with former Israeli or former US traders and Speaker 2: that's time. Pollard well, Jonathan Pollard got he did every day of his thirty years. Of course, he's, you know, he's a hero in Israel now, he's running for the Knesset. But but he did every single day of his thirty years. Speaker 3: Oh, good point. Good point. Speaker 0: Yeah. Now and then now he gets to hang out with, ambassador Mike Huckabee, who's apparently friends with them. So that's how Speaker 2: it It's VIP treatment in the American embassy. Speaker 0: Unbelievable. So the mechanics of this, I'm just still trying to wrap my head around. Like, Jeffrey Epstein's just like sitting there in his in his sex lair or whatever, and he just like gets a, you know, gets some like a phone call. He gets like a pager. Come meet me in the park. We want you to do this. You know, shake shake this hand because the other hand is shaking it back. Like, what does that look like for somebody like Jeffrey Epstein? Speaker 2: Well, if Jeffrey Epstein were treated as a normal source, then the answer is yes. You get a you get a phone call saying, hey. How was how's your mom doing? And the answer is, my mom is feeling much better. Thank you. And that means meet me at the parking lot of the yacht club at 02:00 in the morning. You you have this all set up in advance. And then he goes and and does his meeting and gets his marching orders. Speaker 0: And so there wouldn't be an email trail here. Right, John? I guess that's Speaker 2: Oh, no. No. No. There would never be an email trail. This is all done verbally or just using signals. You remember during, during Watergate, Deepthroat would would, react to Bob Woodward putting an American flag in a flower pot on his apartment balcony. That triggered a meeting that night at 09:00 in a parking garage in Roslyn the Roslyn neighborhood of Arlington, Virginia. So all of this is always set up in advance, so you never have to actually put anything in writing or say, meet me at 08:00. Speaker 3: So okay. That is covert. It's done by signals. But all the sex stuff was overt and written out Speaker 2: And it's in writing. Speaker 3: And in writing. So okay. Speaker 0: Yeah. Good point. Speaker 3: Explain that to me. And then can you please or or just take an opinion because I don't think you're doing that. I don't think you can personally explain it. And then also, I would like to know how you think this international spy espionage relates to this demonic sex predator. Are they related, or is it just that one allowed the other, or did one actually give leverage for the other? Because or are they unrelated? Speaker 2: Yeah. No. That that's a great question and a very important one. And I think that they were two issues running parallel with one another. I think that the Israelis or whomever, was the recruiter of Jeffrey Epstein said this guy has a major vulnerability, and his vulnerability is that he's a pedophile. We can use that to our advantage. He can get us information. We'll continue to supply him with money, and we'll just turn a blind eye to his pedophilia. So they they were able to identify that vulnerability, that hook, in order to to hook him and reel him in, and then they just let him do his thing with with girls and and important world leaders and just let the cards fall where they fell. Speaker 0: How much of it do you think was a honeypot operation? Speaker 2: You know, I think it probably became a honeypot operation. You know, I'm I'm wondering. The you you have to figure this was going on for decades. And I'm wondering if if any intelligence service, even one as good as the Israelis, was able to see so far in advance that they could turn this into a honeypot. I mean, of course, it's it's obvious by the late nineteen nineties or the early two thousands, that's exactly what it is, that you can entrap as many of of these movers and shakers as you possibly want to. Look at Peter Mendelson. You know, I I've been thinking about this all day today. Peter Mendelson, the former British ambassador to The United States, the the the member until earlier this week of the the House of Lords, he's in so deep now after lying and lying and lying that he barely knew Jeffrey Epstein. He's in so deep that this risks collapsing the British government. There were calls by members of the Labour Party today for the Labour prime minister, Kirstjarmer, to resign because he had been so easily duped by Peter Mendelson. So the stakes are very, very high here. This is really serious. Speaker 0: Giving him state secrets. Yeah. Funneling state secrets to Jeffrey Epstein. Like, I mean, that's treasonous. I don't know how he avoids prison at this point. I mean, I Speaker 2: And and the laws, the state the state secrecy act law in The UK is far, far tougher than the espionage act is here in The United States. Wow. Peter Manerson could find himself spending the rest of his natural life in prison. Speaker 0: Oh my gosh. I guess, John, we'll get you out here on that. I'm just curious from your perspective, having worked at the CIA, blowing the whistle at the CIA. When you're seeing all these documents and you're a guest on our show and we're specifically talking about the intelligence side, is there something you think that, like, people are missing? That people haven't looked at more closely? Something that's been, like, keeping you up at night or wringing your hands that you think people need to pay attention to? Speaker 2: You know, one of one of the things that bothers me very much is that the more important people become in their lives, the more we as a society are willing to cut them slack. And we shouldn't do that. People are people, and people are sexual beings. God knows what's in their hearts. God knows what they do behind closed doors. And so nobody should be given the benefit of the doubt in crimes where children are the victims. Speaker 3: Right. I I just got upset because Roger Stone was on the show, and he said, absolutely, Trump didn't do anything. And I said, well, these documents, you know, are not favorable. Did somebody look into them? Because I don't have any kind of preconceived notion whether Trump is innocent or guilty. I would like to see proof. I would like to see them be transparent with us. And now that we have more allegations, a valid question is, anybody follow-up on that? Is there any Speaker 2: That's right. Speaker 3: Anything there? Anybody new. Right. And so Still Speaker 2: far new. Speaker 3: How do so I I take your answer to be nobody is above scrutiny, especially because our jobs as the adults of the world is to protect children. Speaker 2: And that's did right there. Speaker 3: Right. Speaker 2: I have five children of my own. And if this had happened to one of them, I'm not sure I could control myself. Speaker 3: John Wick level. Yeah. Yeah. John Wick. Speaker 0: I mean, I guess we what about Trump? I mean, there's a lot of going back and forth here on this. Right? You have Speaker 2: Yeah. You know, if if I were Donald Trump and I were confident in my innocence, I would just release everything. Just release it. Yeah. Yeah. I mean put it to bed. Speaker 0: Alex Jones was saying, you know, he was saying, look, the the big the big rub here for Trump is that he waited so long to release it. And that if if he if he releases everything, that he'll be absolved of everything. Mhmm. So if that's the case, then release it all. Why are you continue to insult and insult reporters like Caitlyn I mean, I don't have any love for whatever any of these reporters from CNN, but, like, like, just release everything then. So no one has to ask any questions. Like, what is there to hide? If you're so innocent, release everything. Speaker 2: That's exactly right. I I just don't understand why it has taken this long, and it's not even done yet. Speaker 0: Right. No. He's shooting himself in the foot if he's truly, truly, truly innocent. Speaker 3: Well, John, it's so good to talk to you. You run cover for nobody. Yeah. No. Yeah. We don't do that. Speaker 2: The show. Thanks for having me. Speaker 3: We love you. Speaker 0: Thank you, John. Always good to John, tell people where people can find tell people where people can find your show. Speaker 2: Oh, thanks. I've got three, actually. I've got deprogram every day Monday through Friday at 9AM on both YouTube and Rumble. I have deep focus, which drops twice a week on YouTube. And on Apple podcasts, I have John Kiriaku's dead drop, what makes a spy tick. Speaker 0: Alright. Love it. John, great to see you as always. Thanks so much for taking Speaker 2: time today. Thanks, Dan. Thank you.
myhiddenvalue
Posted - February 16, 2026 at 1:11 PM
Saved - February 17, 2026 at 7:04 PM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

Jeffery Epstein’s butler was caught in an FBI sting in 2009 trying to sell the client & victim list. He told them the entire operation, 17 years ago. And the FBI did NOTHING. https://t.co/VPfw5DULaj

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 asks, “Who created this book?” Speaker 0 explains that it’s there because he’s also his computer, but it “just gives it power of failure.” He then references Eastern countries in Europe and finding girls there, saying he knew that because he went with his wife. He states they used to have a computer so powerful, and they used to have a waterfront vehicle to call the computer, because they downloaded pictures that fast.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You told me to. Come on in. How are you? Speaker 1: Good. Good. Good. Yeah. The, documents. Who created this book? Speaker 0: It's, I have it there because I'm also my computer, but just gives it power of failure. East Eastern countries in Europe and find girls where it's and I knew that because I went with my wife. They used to have a computer so powerful. They used to have a waterfront vehicle to call the computer because they used to download pictures like that so fast.
newstart_2024
Posted - March 13, 2026 at 4:27 PM
Saved - March 14, 2026 at 2:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I fire a 9-minute take on the Epstein memo: “no client list, no blackmail, no murder—suicide by hanging” as a display of naked power in action, a test of submission to accept nonsense as truth. I cite Orwell, flag Maxwell, warn we’re being herded across a Rubicon—truth as whatever the powerful say. The memo isn’t closure but a gauntlet: accept what we’re told, even when it makes no sense. Do you feel betrayal, or is I overreaching? Credit: @thecoastguy

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Neil Oliver unleashes a devastating 9-minute monologue on the Epstein memo from the FBI and DOJ: “No client list, no blackmail, no murder — just suicide by hanging while sitting on the floor.” He calls it naked power in action — a deliberate test of submission where we’re expected to accept nonsense as truth. Key lines that cut deep: - “The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” (Orwell, 1984) - “Ghislaine Maxwell is in jail for trafficking underage girls… to no one at all?” - “We’re being herded across a Rubicon — from truth in violet to truth being whatever the powerful say it is.” - “The hoped-for promise of a new regime in the White House is desiccating and crumbling like a sandcastle in the summer wind.” He sees the memo not as closure, but as a gauntlet thrown down: accept what we say — even when we know you know it makes no sense. This is post-truth power on full display. Do you feel the same sense of betrayal watching the Epstein story fold this way? Or is Oliver overreaching?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FBI and the Department of Justice released a two-page memo stating there is no evidence of a client list associated with Jeffrey Epstein, no evidence that anyone was blackmailed on account of such a list, and no evidence that Epstein was murdered in his Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial. The memo supports the medical examiner’s judgment that Epstein committed suicide by hanging himself “effectively while sitting down on the floor of his cell with something tied around his neck,” a feat described as a one-of-a-kind phenomenon in suicide-watch prisoners. The FBI and DOJ also released eleven hours of videotape they say proves no one entered the cell or the area around it overnight before Epstein was found dead. The term “unresponsive” is referenced prior to a medical examiner declaring them dead. The speaker recalls that, earlier this year, when Attorney General Pam Bondi was asked about releasing the Epstein client list promised by the incoming Trump administration, she replied, “it's sitting on my desk right now for review.” The memo’s contents are portrayed as a gauntlet from those who wield power, insisting there is no list, no evidence of blackmail, and no evidence of murder, presented as conclusions rather than outcomes of evidence review. The speaker argues the point is less about truth and more about opposing disbelief of the powerful, framing it as demonstrations of naked power. The discussion references a post by Cash Patel and Dan Bongino about the Epstein client list and blackmail, noting their transition to high-profile roles and subsequent stance: no list, no blackmail, no murder. There is also mention of a public exchange between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, wherein Musk suggested real Epstein files were the reason they had not been made public; Musk later deleted the tweet, and Trump said he had cut ties with Epstein two decades ago and that Epstein’s lawyer cleared him of wrongdoing. The speaker invokes George Orwell, noting the party’s command to reject the evidence of eyes and ears, and suggests we are moving toward a post-truth world where truth is whatever the self-declared powerful say it is. The text emphasizes that, despite Epstein’s trafficking convictions and Maxwell’s conviction for trafficking underage girls, the memo asserts no guilty party existed among those connected. The speaker questions the consistency of Maxwell’s charge given the claimed absence of victims and participants. Toward the end, the speaker laments a hoped-for White House regime crumbling and questions whether recent developments are a deliberate test of loyalty to authority, implying a broader move toward a new regime’s post-truth reality, where memory and inconvenient knowledge are manipulated and “double speak” reframes war as peace and freedom as slavery. The overall arc suggests a dispiriting trend of sameness amid signals of change.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now the Federal Bureau of Intelligence, the FBI, and the Department of Justice, the DOJ, have joined forces to tell the people of The United States Of America and the wider world indeed that in the case of Jeffrey Epstein, financier and convicted sex offender, the world's most infamous pedophile, there is no evidence of a client list, no evidence that anyone was blackmailed on account of such a list and no evidence that he was murdered in his Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial. It's all contained in a two page memo, that also backs the medical examiner's judgment that Epstein committed suicide by hanging himself so effectively while sitting down on the floor of his cell with something tied around his neck that he broke his neck. Such a feat not being achieved by a prisoner in a cell in similar circumstances on suicide watch ever before or ever since. It's a one of a kind, almost a phenomenon. The FBI and DOJ released eleven hours of videotape they say proves no one at all entered the cell or the area around it overnight before he was found dead. Unresponsive was actually the word used before a medical examiner declared them dead. So let's just go over that, let's just make all of that clear with repetition. No incriminating client list, no credible evidence that Epstein blackmailed prominent men and women, and no evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. For those whose memories may have somehow been wiped in recent months it's worth remembering that earlier this year when Attorney General Pam Bondi was asked on camera if she would release the fabled Epstein client list, an action that had already previously been promised by incoming President Donald Trump, she replied quote it's sitting on my desk right now for review. It's sitting on my desk right now for review. She only said it once. Whatever was being referred to then as the Epstein client list, an entity at that time sitting on the desk of Pam Bondi apparently does not exist and so presumably never existed, begging the question precisely what was it that Pam Bondi had on her desk then to which she referred when asked directly about the Epstein client list but which is non existent now. This aforementioned two page memo seems to me a gauntlet thrown down by those insisting they and they alone wield power. I say the insistence of there being no list, the insistence that there's no evidence of blackmail, the insistence that there's no evidence of murder is less a conclusion based on the review of evidence and more about daring anyone to disbelieve what the powerful are saying at any given moment, far less to dispute what they're being told. As I say this is not about truth rather a demonstration of power, naked power that must be accepted as all the justification that is needed for any action taken by the powerful. It's all so utterly depressing. It's another piece in a picture of the new world order. How long ago seems the excitement around the promises made by the incoming Trump administration that once and for all there would be a draining of the swamp of corruption and lies. It seems like only five minutes ago that Cash Patel and Dan Bongino, before being crowned and deputy director of the FBI respectively, had shouted from the rooftops about the existence of the Epstein client list and all it would reveal about blackmail of prominent people and about the suicide in custody of the man in question. But from the moment their high profile bottoms began polishing seats of power, seats so recently vacated by others the pair had seemed to hold in contempt, both Patel and Bongino began singing the song of no list, no blackmail, no murder'. And what about the spat between Elon Musk and sometime but not any longer BFF President Trump in the hours days and weeks that have passed since the pair abruptly ended their living? Who still remembers the post Musk made on his own ex platform that read quote time to drop the really big bomb at real Donald Trump is in Epstein files that is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day DJT. Musk later deleted the tweet saying he had quote gone too far. For his own part Donald Trump added that he had cut ties with Epstein two decades ago and that even Epstein's lawyer had cleared him of any wrongdoing. And so with hopes in shreds we must remind ourselves as previously mentioned of the sage words of George Orwell in his novel about a totalitarian dystopia. The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears it was their final and most essential command. The profound nature of the shift in reality made plain by the most recent maneuvers and posturing of the would be powerful must not be overlooked. We've been herded across a Rubicon. On the side of 'before' is 'truth inviolate', truth understood by one and all, truth underscored by evidence, on the side upon which we now find ourselves the truth is whatever the self declared powerful might say it is. After all the years of talk of Epstein, convicted child trafficker, convicted sex offender and word of a list a little or large black book of the names of prominent people who abused those children. After all of that only one person has ever been convicted Ghislain Maxwell, sometime partner of Epstein is doing jail time for trafficking underage girls at the behest of her boyfriend. But as things stand and as they have been emphatically underlined most recently by that memo from the FBI and the DOJ, we're expected to accept that while both he and she were in the business of trafficking underage girls that those girls being abused by well, one would have to assume that since Maxwell sits now in jail as punishment for exposing said girls to abuse, one would have to assume that somewhere and at some point they had to have been abused by someone. Now we're expected to accept that no such guilty someone's ever existed. Is it just me or is it the case that Maxwell is in jail for trafficking underage girls to no one at all. Certainly no one that Jeffrey Epstein knew about. If none of this seems to you to make sense, I say that's because it's deliberately intended to make no sense. I say it making no sense is the whole point. You, me, we're being handed something that makes no sense as what you might call a test of our loyalty to or at least our silent unquestioning submission to whatever we are told, even when we know what we are being told is nonsense, even when we know that the powerful know we know it's nonsense. It is in this way or something very like this that we will be seen to accept the advent of a post truth world. All of the ideas laid out in 1984 by George Orwell are coming to pass. The memory holding of inconvenient knowledge even when, especially when, it's the truth. The double speak that makes war into peace, freedom into slavery, ignorance into strength. The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final and most essential command. The hoped for, indeed ecstatically worshipped promise and potential of a new regime in the White House is desiccating and crumbling like a sandcastle left high and dry in the summer wind. A person might wonder if this too was part of the point. How much more dispiriting than an unbroken sequence of 'Same old same old' is a glimpse of hope that can be snatched away like a rug from beneath the feet?

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Credit: @thecoastguy; https://www.youtube.com/@Neil-Oliver

View Full Interactive Feed