TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - July 3, 2025 at 1:30 AM

@colinflaherty - ColinFlaherty

Fella hates white people. Kills them. Must be contagious. https://t.co/tekMvDNS8a

Video Transcript AI Summary
Corey Ali Mohamed in Fresno, California, decided to kill four white people due to racism. In Brooklyn, a man is wanted for an unprovoked attack on a 78-year-old woman, punching her in the head after acting like she instigated it. The woman reported substantial pain but refused medical attention. In New York City, a man delivering Asian food on a bicycle was beaten. The speaker suggests this may be due to white racism as reflected in the Asian man trying to make a living and not wanting to anger black kids.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Say hello to my man, Corey Ali Mohamed. Couple years ago in Fresno, California, he got sick and tired of all the racism that was keeping him down, stopping him from reaching his full potential as a great human being on this planet. So instead of throwing rocks and bricks and bottles at cops, instead of pulling down statues, instead of looting stores, instead of setting fires, he went right to the source. He said he was just gonna start killing white people, kill four of them. And, man, it must be contagious. Speaker 1: Morning shows a man wanted for an unprovoked attack on a woman in Brooklyn, and it appears that he made it seem like she instigated it. The 78 year old victim was walking in Bushwick when the suspect without warning punched her in the head after acting like she did something to him. The man then took off. The woman reported having substantial pain, but she refused further medical attention. Speaker 0: Up in New York City, this little dude was delivering some Asian food on a bicycle. Don't know why anybody would give him the idea that you could do that in Brooklyn. But, hey, what the hell? The guy's gotta make a living. That's what he's doing. That's what these fellas that's why they came and beat the hell out of them. Maybe they were just tired of all the white racism as reflected in this little old Asian dude trying to make a living, to deliver some food on a bicycle, just trying not to make the black kids angry.
Saved - October 30, 2023 at 4:46 AM

@GBNEWS - GB News

'The “be kind” militia, call everyone they don't like Nazis, except actual Nazis. And now with a twisted and heartless response to the human horrors of October 7th, they have revealed their true nature, the mask has slipped!' @MrMarkDolan https://t.co/Lw5BD6h1Tp

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the response of the "woke left" to the recent terror attack in Israel, accusing them of supporting the murder, rape, and torture of innocent civilians. They argue that the left has turned a blind eye to the actions of Hamas and effectively supported their goals. The speaker believes that calling for a ceasefire demonstrates ignorance of the Middle East's history and politics and a lack of empathy for the threat faced by Jews and Israel. They claim that Hamas wants to wipe out all Jews and that the war in Israel is everyone's war. The speaker also criticizes those in Britain who march in support of Palestine, calling it an assault on the values of democracy and tolerance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Any crisis reveals someone's true character. We saw it during the pandemic, those who backed common sense, individual liberty, and evidence based science versus dogma, ideology, and ultimately, tyranny. And in just 3 weeks since the horrific terror attack on Israel, the death of over 1400 people, including 260 at a music festival, So the woke left, the be kind crowd, who are much better humans than you and me, have shown their true colors, attending marches and by implication, cheering on the murder, rape, and torture of innocent civilians. Abandoned psychopaths, Our national broadcaster can't even bring themselves to call terrorists even though they have only one goal. Hamas want genocide. This is rebadged Nazism, to which the liberal progressives have either turned a blind eye or effectively supported. The be kind militia call everyone that they don't like Nazis, except actual Nazis. And now with a twisted and heartless response to the human horrors of October 7th, they've revealed their true nature. The mask has slipped. This is the moment that wokeism jumped the shark and truly lost the plot. The historian Niall Ferguson points out in today's mail newspaper, that the response progressives have made to the kidnapping of holocaust survivors, the burning alive of bodies, the gouging out of eyes, the rape of women, the parading of corpses on the back of pickup trucks, and the beheading of babies has dramatically increased awareness of this toxic brand of leftism. With its de facto support for these medieval murderers in the Middle East, wokeism has both revealed itself and overplayed its hand. Now it may well be true that Israel has a case to answer for its treatment of Palestinian people and a two state solution in which Israelis and Palestinians can live in harmony must be the Holy Grail. But calling for a ceasefire is another chilling maneuver from those caring, sharing types because it demonstrates a total ignorance of the history and politics of the Middle East, and a total lack of empathy for the existential threat that Jews and Israel now face. Hamas don't have a strategic goal in the region. They don't want a 2 state solution. They want a no state solution. They want to wipe all Jews off the planet. And what these idiots marching in Western cities don't realize is that the people who hate Jews and hate Israel, hate us, too. So Israel's war is our war. If Hamas and their ilk cannot be eliminated, We will be next in line for their murder spree. Take those queers for Palestine. Have you ever seen anything more ridiculous in your life? If Hamas got hold of these gay and trans people, they would be eliminated faster than you can say vegan sausage roll. This talk of ceasefire is a total red herring and up there with the appeasement of Hitler in the 19 thirties. Nazism had to be defeated, and so does this. A ceasefire is effectively asking Israel to be a sitting duck to more terror. A ceasefire is snake oil language. It's doublespeak for Israel, suck it up. Now I have a bit of sympathy for Keir Starmer who believes in Israel's right to self defense, whilst many in his party do not. Starmer is between a rocket and a hard place. But what's clear is that the thousands of people in Britain marching on the streets every weekend, some of whom are calling for a holy war, is a direct assault on the values of this country, of democracy, of the rule of law, of tolerance and of decency. Those woke idiots don't realize that by cheering it on, they'll be next. They are turkeys voting for Christmas, and, eventually, they'll get
Saved - November 9, 2023 at 1:40 AM

@mandala_mandy - mandala

This is what the left supports 😞 this is not freedom this is murder !https://t.co/rqfrMFhVaX

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains the process of a surgical abortion. They mention that a suction tube is used to remove the fetus from the uterus. The limbs, intestines, spine, heart, and lungs are removed, followed by the head, which is crushed. The abortionist removes the skull pieces, placenta, and any remaining tissue. Once all the parts are accounted for, the abortion is considered complete.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Once the cervix has been stretched open, the suction tube is placed inside. The suction machine is turned on, and pale yellow This is a sofa clamp. When it gets a hold of something, it does not let go. This is a sofa clamp, and when it gets a hold of something, it does not let go. The abortionist uses this clamp to grasp an arm or leg. M once he has a firm grip, the abortionist pulls hard in order to tear the limb from the baby's body. 1 by 1, the rest of the limbs are removed, along with the intestines, the spine, and the heart and lungs. Usually, the most difficult part of the procedure is extracting the baby's head, which is about the size of a large plum at 20 weeks. The head is grasped and crushed. The abortionist knows he has crushed the skull, when a white substance comes out of the cervix, this was the baby's brains. The abortionist then removes skull pieces. He removes the placenta and any leftover parts of the baby with a curette, scraping the lining of the uterus for any remaining tissue. Once all the parts have been accounted for, the abortion is complete.
Saved - November 13, 2023 at 1:55 PM

@TheGeneral_0 - General™️👀🇺🇸🦅

People like this used to be placed in Mental Institutions, now they walk amongst us.https://t.co/HnvADPiog2

Saved - December 17, 2023 at 10:20 PM

@CensoredMen - Censored Men

🇵🇸🇮🇱 "People in Gaza need to die 😁" Psycho... https://t.co/UxeHFUeqRN

Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation involves two individuals discussing a controversial topic. One person claims to have killed two Palestinians while serving in the Israeli army and expresses happiness about it. The other person questions their beliefs and mentions the world will witness their actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oxyfluid Gaza. Why? Why did they hear you? People in Gaza need to die. Is that seriously what you think? I am I am kill a 2 people Palestinian. I don't believe you did that. I am in the army in Israel. Are you actually in the army? Yes. I Okay. I am in the army, and now, boom, boom, 2 people. 2 Palestinians? Yes. And you're happy about it? Yes. Of course. I watch Kill 4. No. World War two. The world's gonna see your actions.
Saved - February 2, 2024 at 3:56 AM

@RonEng1ish - 🇬🇧RonEnglish🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Palestinians - Here they are tonight signing a song about killing all Jews because it's what Muhammed wants 🇵🇸 https://t.co/CzFwZgAyr8

Saved - February 29, 2024 at 4:17 PM

@taztazneem - Tasneem🔻

Genocidal maniacs on the loose. https://t.co/yXdEmJWwlG

Saved - April 15, 2024 at 5:21 AM

@_NicoleNonya - 🇵🇸Nicole 🇵🇸 dignity is a human right.

If my ideology promotes genocide and I carry one out, perhaps I'm the problem and not the rest of the world. #zionismisevil https://t.co/cO3RlY4ZNu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The entire nation is responsible, not just civilians who claim ignorance. Companies like Hashmal, Amazon, and Delek are puzzled by the world's focus on the worst atrocities of this century.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's an entire nation out there that is responsible. It's not true. This rhetoric about civilians not where where not aware, not involved, is absolutely not true. Speaker 1: And Hashmal and Amazon and mine and Delek. Very puzzled by the constant, concern which the world is showing for the the worst atrocities that this century has seen.
Saved - April 30, 2024 at 3:20 PM

@NoaMagid - נועה מגיד | Noa magid

After he slaughtered people in their homes, he then drinks orange juice from their refrigerator. https://t.co/6HeL312qbT

Saved - July 18, 2024 at 10:51 PM

@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong

Destiny: "I'm ready for the f**king great cleansing... when we genocide conservatives in this country" Holy crap. https://t.co/G9ln6n3IPB

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm ready for the great cleansing, where we genocide conservatives in this country. Will you be on the streets with your clock? Maybe, I need to go back to Nebraska and get it. Translation: I am prepared for the great cleansing, where we eliminate conservatives in this country. Will you join me on the streets with your weapon? Possibly, I must return to Nebraska to retrieve it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm ready for the fucking the great cleansing, dude. Cleansing? The cleansing. What cleansing? When we genocide conservatives in this country. Are you gonna be on the streets with your clock? Maybe. I gotta go back to Nebraska and grab it.
Saved - August 18, 2024 at 4:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I express my outrage over the ongoing situation in Britain, where discussions about the rise of anti-Semitism and the actions of Hamas are overshadowed by claims of "Islamophobia." Videos reveal alarming rhetoric from some Muslims in the UK supporting violence against Jews, while social media platforms censor critical perspectives on the conflict. I highlight the disturbing narratives promoted by Palestinian leaders and the manipulation of public sentiment to shield Islam from legitimate criticism. The silence surrounding Israel's defense against terrorism is equally troubling.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

After witnessing the atrocities committed by Hamas Muslim terrorists in southern Israel on October 7th, the Mayor of London and the British Prime Minister still insist that the greater issue that Britain is facing is "Islamophobia".

Video Transcript AI Summary
Islamophobia is rising, particularly since October 7th, but it was already too high before then. Islamophobia is intolerable, can never be justified, and requires a zero-tolerance approach. More action is needed from the government, especially regarding online content. The speaker hopes to leverage the prosecutor's experience to develop strategies for taking action against those who break the law. Islamophobia significantly impacts people's lives, affecting their ability to move freely in their communities, workplaces, and streets. The impact is not low level.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the things that is coming up over and over again is Islamophobia and when you can see the stats, you can see the numbers rising particularly since October 7th, although we shouldn't fall into the trap of thinking that before October 7th, this was all heading in the right direction. It's been far too high for far too long. Clearly, we need to just say over and over again, Islamophobia is intolerable. It can never ever be justified and we have to continue with the 0 tolerance approach. And I think there's more we can do in government. There's certainly stuff online, which I think needs tackling much more robustly than it is at the moment. What I'm hoping, Kerry, is your experience as a prosecutor means you'll be thinking about the strategy we can use to make sure we take action against those who break the law. There's a massive impact on people and their lives. They're feeling about being able to walk around their own, you know, communities, their streets, their places of work or whatever it may be, it is certainly not low level, it really, really impacts because I've seen so many cases for Marcel.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

2 This is Britain, not Iran or Pakistan!

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

Shocking video which went viral on social media shows a Pakistani Muslim migrant in the UK speaks his mind on Israel and Jews during a "Pro-Palestinian" rally on the streets of London, England: "Hitler knew how to deal with these people". This shocking rhetoric has no place in the twenty-first century!!!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why Western countries don't offer land in Germany for Israelis instead of Palestine. They suggest Israelis should occupy Hitler's Baghdad to understand the nature of those they are dealing with. The speaker claims Zionists are repeatedly slaughtered every few hundred years because Hitler knew how to deal with them. They allege Zionists created a program to establish Israel at the expense of Palestinian Muslim blood.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If the west feels so sorry for the Israeli Zionists, why don't they give a place in Germany? Why don't they go to Hitler's Baghdad and make occupation there? Then they will know what kind of people these are. Why every so many 100 years, the Zionists get slaughtered because Hitler knew how to deal with these people. They probably made a program so they can create a state of Israel in the expense of Palestinian Muslims blood.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

This is London, not Islamabad!

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

🧵 1/3 Watch: Muslims in Britain say they support Hamas even after it broadcast all over social media the atrocities they committed against Jews in southern Israel on October 7. Sadly, YouTube continues to censor the Jewish filmmaker Pierre Rehov over his new documentary "Pogrom(s)" which not only exposes the pogroms committed by Palestinian terrorists against Jews in Israel on October 7, but also provides accurate, fair and unbiased information about the historical background of the conflict in the Middle East. On the other hand, Palestinian propagandists are allowed to use social media including YouTube to spread horrific propaganda videos of dead Hamas human shields to demonize Israel.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some individuals believe Hamas are freedom fighters, while others acknowledge their classification as a prescribed terrorist organization in the UK. One person stated the UK government made the wrong decision in classifying Hamas as such. Another stated that Israel, not Hamas, is the terrorist. One person's initial reaction to the October 7th invasion of Israel by Hamas was that it showed resistance against the occupation of Palestinians and was a beacon of hope. Another person expressed disgust at the unverified stories of 40 beheaded babies. One person stated that the continued existence of Israel is a war crime. One person stated they don't believe Hamas was responsible for the invasion and felt unqualified to comment. Another stated they haven't seen anything to prove the invasion actually happened or is correct. One person stated Hamas are freedom fighters fighting for the right to their land and self-defense, and are not terrorists.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Controversial, but I think Hamas are freedom fighters. Speaker 1: Hamas are they're classed as a prescribed terrorist organization. Do you think the UK has made the wrong decision? Speaker 2: Of course. Speaker 3: It's not Hamas the terrorist. It's America the terrorist. Speaker 2: No. And the Israel is terrorist, not Hamas. Speaker 1: In in the UK, Hamas are a prescribed terrorist organization. Do you think the government has made the right or the wrong decision in doing that? Speaker 0: Well, it's controversial, but I think Hamas are freedom fighters. Speaker 1: On the 7th October when Hamas invaded Israel, what was your initial reaction to that? Speaker 4: To honestly, it showed signs this was resistance against the occupation, against the Palestinians. Honestly, it was a beacon of hope for me. It was not it was to me, it was them fighting back and showing resistance. Speaker 5: I think the fact that everyone ran with the 40 beheaded babies stories without any any ounce of verification, any ounce of integrity is disgusting. Speaker 0: The continued existence of Israel is a war crime. Speaker 1: When Hamas invaded Israel on the 7th October, what was your initial reaction to them? Speaker 0: I don't believe they did it though, Hamas. I think so. Honestly, I I think I need to be a bit more clued up in, like, everything that's going on. So I feel like I'm not really qualified to answer that too, Speaker 4: for sure. Speaker 0: I'm not sure if I I've seen anything that show show you that that's actually happened or actually correct. Speaker 1: So in the UK, Hamas are regarded as a prescribed terrorist organization officially. What what do you think of that? Speaker 4: They are freedom fighters. They are not terrorists as the media portrays them to be. They're fighting for the right to their land. It's their land. They have the right to self defense, and they're not what that's no. They're not terrorists. They are absolutely not.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

4.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

This is not Iran. This is Great Britain! Watch: Muslims in several UK mosques worship Allah by calling for the killing of Jews. Is this what a religion of peace looks like?

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

5. On October 7 2023, thousands of Hamas terrorists invaded Israel and carried out pogroms against the Jews! Over 1200 innocent people were murdered by the Palestinian terrorists. Hundreds more were kidnapped into Gaza! Hamas can end the current war by releasing all the Israeli hostages! Why is the world silent

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

Pro-Palestinians on social media are in panic mode over Pierre Rehov's new documentary which is going to completely destroy the false narrative of the Palestinians and expose the atrocities that Hamas committed against Jews on October 7, 2023. Hamas sympathizers are trying to take down the trailer for this documentary. After pro-Palestinian activists mass reported the video, YouTube removed it and limited the possibility to watch the trailer. Even after they restored the video, people still can't watch it on YouTube due to alleged "errors" on the site. After the video was censored by YouTube, filmmaker Pierre Rehov uploaded it to an alternative platform called Rumble (@rumblevideo). This platform was developed by @chrispavlovski in order to guarantee our right to freedom of expression on the Internet. Link to the trailer: https://rumble.com/v55nmrr-pogroms-promo-real.html The documentary film will be released soon on Rumble and X (formerly Twitter), please everyone stay tuned and follow the the filmmaker on both Rumble (via the video link) and here on X : @rehoov

Pogrom(s) Promo Real www.Pogroms.info Gaza's Nazi Palestinians committed a massacre on October 7. Families exterminated. Children burned alive. Babies beheaded. More than 1,300 dead, thousands wounded, more than 400 innoc rumble.com

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

6.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

This female Hamas "journalist" who murdered 16 innocent people, half of them Jewish children, insists that she is a Palestinian hero. During this interview, she explains that the conflict in the Middle East has nothing to do with a land dispute. She says the Palestinians are simply Muslims who kill Jews as an act of worship for Allah (the God of Islam). When asked if she regrets having murdered so many innocent children, she said she wanted to kill Jews including children as a human sacrifice for Allah (the God of Islam). Ahlam Tamimi was the mastermind behind Sbarro restaurant suicide bombing in Jerusalem. As you can see in the video, she explains how she chose the restaurant as a target because it was near Jewish elementary school. She planned the terror attack by using her journalist ID in order to enter Israel and find the target. She used her journalist ID once again to smuggle the suicide bomber into the restaurant in Jerusalem, the capital of Israel. This terror attack caused 145 casualties, including 16 fatalities, half of them children. As you can see in the video, at the end of the interview she says she doesn't regret anything, but felt sorry for the suicide bomber who had to blow himself up. She expressed no sorrow or remorse for the Jewish victims. After the attack, she received political asylum in Jordan. Among the victims were American citizens. That is why she is on the FBI's list of most wanted terrorists, but Jordan refuses to extradite her to the US. Please retweet this post and tag your members of Congress to call on them to cut off $1.4 billion in US foreign aid to Jordan over its support for terrorism. Link to the video: https://youtu.be/_-WTx7k4baw?si=GeteiXRGLp5LvVN6

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

7.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

Offended Muslims cry "Islamophobia" over this viral lecture by Douglas Murray. As you can see, Douglas dared to criticize Islam and the practice of Sharia law which includes human rights violations, oppression, and hostility towards non-Muslims, gay people and other social groups. Douglas also explained why political Islam (Sharia laws) is incompatible with the culture, values ​​and way of life of Western nations. Do you agree with him? Yes or no and why?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Muslims in Britain and Western Europe have more rights, including freedom of worship, than in any Islamic country. However, problems arise when failures of Islamic societies, such as intolerance of freedom of conscience, apostates, expression, minorities, and women, are imported. The call for a parallel legal system is considered monstrous, as no other group demands such a thing. A fundamental problem exists between Western Europe, where laws are based on reason, and Islam, where laws are based on revelation. It is argued that Muslims in Europe have let down Europe. Muslims need to understand they have no right not to be offended and cannot justify violence or censorship because they dislike something. They cannot demand more hate laws to defend Islam. A society where even the deepest feelings can be challenged is the only one worth living in. Islam has failed Europe and its own Muslims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dealt with this much better than some would. Certainly, Muslims coming to live in Britain and in Western Europe enjoy more rights and better rights, among them freedom of worship, than they do in any Islamic country in the Earth here today. We do have a problem. We have a problem when the failures of Islam throughout the world, the failures of all Islamic societies come here into Britain. Their intolerance of freedom of conscience, their intolerance of apostates, their intolerance of freedom of expression and freedom, of speech, their intolerance of minorities, other religious minorities, sexual minorities, their intolerance of gays, their dislike and distrust of half of the population, women, and many, many other things. And the call, what's more, and the call, what's more, for a parallel legal system within Britain and European societies. This is monstrous. No other group behaves like this, asks for parallel laws. This is a fundamental problem, and it's one we're going to have to deal with. It's a problem between a society, Western Europe, that believes that laws are based on reason and Islam that believes that they are based on revelation. Between these two ideas, I'm not sure there is very much compromise for Europe. It is not Europe that has let down its Muslims, but the Muslims of Europe that have let down Europe. This is not solely something which we have to say we can never reconcile. Of course, we can reconcile this, but we need to be honest about it. We need to be frank about it, and we cannot avoid things just because they are unpleasant. And if there were one thing I would wish Muslims in Europe could learn today as fast as possible, it would be this, that you have no right in this society not to be offended. You have no right to say that because you don't like something, you can commit violence or you would like something to be stopped or censored. You have no right to have more hate laws or hate crime laws or hate speech laws just to defend Islam. You have to realize the Muslims of Europe have to realize that a society in which even your deepest feelings can be trodden upon is the only society worth living in. And the sooner we can learn that, the sooner that Islam can learn that within Europe, the better. It is not Europe that has failed its Muslims. It is Islam that has failed Europe. I'd argue Islam has failed its Muslims. Thank you.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

8.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

Watch: Pat Condell breaks the rules of political correctness and dares to offend the worshipers of Allah (the God of Islam). He reveals how "Islamophobia" accusations are being used to shield the religion of Islam from legitimate criticism in what appears to be an attempt to impose informal blasphemy law in the West under the guise of ״hate crime״. This video was uploaded to YouTube in 2013, but nothing has changed since then. Criticism of Islam is still treated as a "thought crime" by the political left in the West. Please comment below: Do you agree with Pat Condell? Do you support his right to criticize Islam? Please follow him here on X: @patcondell

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses skepticism about Islamophobia Awareness Month, arguing that "Islamophobia" is a cynical weapon used by Islamists and leftists to censor truths about Islam. They believe the term is used to portray a "fascist ideology" as a victim. They claim many Muslims have "special needs" due to double standards and that Islamic doctrine is incompatible with Western values, citing its views on freedom, women, gay people, and non-Muslims. The speaker asserts that Islam's arrival in the West has not enriched society but has instead brought division and mistrust. They state that there are fewer attacks on Muslims than by Muslims on gay people and Jews, and that some Muslim immigrants have made Jews and gays feel unsafe in Europe. The speaker suggests Muslims should admit their religion is the problem, as it preaches universal Islamic domination, hatred, and violence. They compare Islamophobia to Naziphobia and argue that Muslims are a pushy minority who become oppressors when in the majority. The speaker concludes that the word Islamophobia should be abandoned and replaced with something like "hatred and violence in the Koran awareness month."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, here we are on the last day of the month, and, I've only just become aware that it's Islamophobia Awareness Month. How terribly unaware of me. Still, better late than never. I think it's important to be aware of Islamophobia, don't you? Not the concept, obviously, because that doesn't exist, but the word which does exist and has been growing like a tumour on the language for some years now. Happily, the last 2 decades of relentless Muslim grievance mongering and knee jerk offence have made many of us keenly aware of the word Islamophobia as a cynical weapon of cultural terrorism and an outrageous attempt to portray common sense as a mental illness. We're aware that it's a poisonous lie peddled by Islamists and leftists for the purpose of censoring the ugly truth about Islam and bludgeoning people into guilt ridden silence, and we're aware that it's a sneaky way for a fascist ideology to depict itself as a victim and not as what it actually is, a predator. We're also aware that the word leaves an ugly stain on the character of everyone who uses it because each time it is used a transparent and deliberate lie is told. However, Islamophobia is not the only thing we're aware of, not anymore, because thanks to those same 2 decades of shameless privilege seeking and groundless complaining, we become aware that many Muslims have, well, special needs in that they are psychologically chained to a raft of appalling double standards that we have to indulge if we're to avoid tantrums and violence. We're also aware of the default Islamic grievance mongers' position that only their feelings are important and nobody else's feelings are worth a damn. We're aware of all this and we take it on board. Of course we do. Yeah, right. However, we're also aware that Islamic doctrine, with its disdain for freedom, its primitive view of women and gay people, its anti Semitism and general hatred of all things non Muslim, is entirely incompatible with all our fundamental beliefs and values, unfortunately. We're also aware that Islamic values are aggressively non negotiable, which essentially offers us a choice between submission and permanent conflict. Thanks for that. We're aware that the arrival of Islam in the west has not enriched our society in the slightest. It has poisoned it and set us at each other's throats over fundamental freedoms we used to take for granted. And we're aware that Islam is being imposed upon us in the name of diversity, but it hasn't brought diversity. It's brought division and mistrust, and every time we hear the word Islamophobia the divide gets wider and the mistrust grows. We're aware that there are far fewer violent physical attacks on Muslims than there are by Muslims on gay people and Jews, and that thanks to repeated unprovoked attacks by ignorant and uncivilised Muslim immigrants, Jews and gays no longer feel safe in several European countries, but nobody wants to do anything about it because it might be Islamophobic. We're aware that the professional complainers of Islam are quick to be offended by a movie trailer nobody's ever seen, but not when a young girl is shot in the head for wanting an education, nor by the thousands of other disgusting Muslim crimes against women, and we're aware that that makes them look like callous opportunistic hypocrites, which in turn makes it impossible for us to take seriously anything they say. That's such a shame, isn't it? Muslims who find that their religion is viewed negatively should have the good grace to stop skulking behind this slanderous word, show a little honesty for once and admit that your religion is the problem, because it is. It's a religion that doesn't preach universal brotherhood, but universal Islamic domination, and there's a huge difference. It preaches hatred and violence in its holy scriptures, not just once or twice, but page after page. It shows open contempt for other beliefs and values. It defines itself in aggressively divisive terms between Muslims and infidels who must be conquered and converted, between the house of Islam and the house of war, no less. It urges Muslims not to take infidels as friends, to force their social values into the lives of those around them, and to shove their religion down everybody's throat as soon as they're strong enough to do so. It's ultra sensitive to the point of paranoia on a permanent hair trigger for possible imagined offence, and many of its followers regard violence as a legitimate response to criticism. Yet we're the ones with a mental illness? I don't think so. Hearing about the poor, downtrodden Muslims as victims of Islamophobia is enough to bring tears to your eyes, tears of laughter at the brazen effrontery of it. Islamophobia is no more real than Naziphobia. There are very good reasons to beware of both ideologies, and they are the same reasons. Far from being an oppressed minority, the evidence shows that Muslims are a pushy and aggressive minority, and when they're in a majority they quickly become enthusiastic oppressors, driven by a laughable delusion of divinely ordained supremacism, which itself would be offensive if it wasn't such a sick joke, because, frankly, Islam is equipped to rule the world the way Mike Tyson is equipped to run NASA. I really think it's time the word Islamophobia was put out of its misery once and for all, because, frankly, it's getting embarrassing now. That word is just so discredited and so provably statistically false that anyone still using it with a straight face merely shows the depth of their own dishonesty and their absolute contempt for the intelligence of everyone else. I still think an awareness month would be a good idea. I just think it would be more helpful to call it something else like a cultural terrorism awareness month, or even better, a hatred and violence in the Koran awareness month, because, unlike Islamophobia, that's something that really does exist in black and white for everyone to read.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

9. @TRobinsonNewEra

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

In this video, the mainstream journalist and TV host Piers Morgan tried to censor the independent journalist Tommy Robinson who dared to express his concerns about the threat posed by the practice of Jihad in the religion of Islam. Morgan expressed outrage and decided to ignore Robinson's legitimate claims while pretending that expressing critical thinking of religious idea, belief or ideology are "racism" (ie, prejudice against people based on their race). As you can clearly see in the video, Robinson was portrayed as a "racist" after he did not bow down and continued to violate the rules of political correctness (ie, the informal blasphemy law under the guise of "Islamophobia"). This video demonstrates the special treatment of Piers Morgan towards the religion of Islam, the same religion that Hamas based its charter on. According to Hamas Charter the Palestinians' obligation to destroy the State of Israel is a religious commandment and an act of worship for the sake of Allah (God of Islam). Perhaps Piers Morgan's cognitive bias towards Islam has influenced his tendency to treat Hamas as a reliable source of information. Since the beginning of the current ongoing war between Israel and Hamas, Piers Morgan has not questioned most of the data, claims and information that Hamas has published regarding Israeli military activity in Gaza. Sadly, most journalists in the West and even the UN tend to question every official statement by Israel, but when it comes to Hamas no one bothers to examine the reliability of the claims and data even after the terrorist organization repeatedly lied to the media and the UN. As you can see in this video, Piers Morgan tried to silence the independent journalist Tommy Robinson to prevent damage to the image of Islam and to avoid offending Muslims. Conversely, when it comes to Jews and the Jewish state, Morgan ignores and even slams Jewish people who repeatedly raise concerns on X (formerly Twitter) about his irresponsible inflammatory rhetoric that deliberately portrays Israel and its people as immoral and "indefensible" over false assumption that people of Israel (Jews) want to hunt down non-Jewish children and women in Gaza. At a time when anti-Semitism reached unprecedented heights, politicians, world leaders and even journalists just escalate the situation. In recent days Israeli forces were forced to enter Rafah where Hamas is holding over 100 Israelis as hostages. Hamas, which uses civilians as human shields, is deliberately trying to maximize civilian casualties in Gaza in order to demonize Israel. Sadly, too many journalists and politicians in the West cooperate with Hamas, which sacrifices the civilians in Gaza, and demonize the Jewish state. Instead of condemning Hamas, they blame Israel and bring about an absurd situation in which Jews around the world are being demonized and dehumanized over the resurgence of the medieval blood libel according to which Jews kill non-Jewish children in religious rituals.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker says they would temporarily halt Muslim immigration to the UK until the country gets a grip on the problem. They differentiate Muslims from Islam, calling Islam a "bad idea" akin to Scientology, not a faith. Another speaker insists Islam is a faith and asks if the speaker is Islamophobic. The first speaker denies this, stating there is no such word as Islamophobia, as it is not irrational to fear Islam. They claim the book has over 100 verses that incite violent murder. Another speaker demands respect for religious beliefs and calls the first speaker's words inflammatory and poisonous, accusing them of stirring up hatred and abusing people's religion. The first speaker quotes Sir William Gladstone, who called the book violent and cursed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you have a ban like Donald Trump suggested in America? Would you have a ban on Muslims entering the country, new Muslims trying to have a home in this country? Speaker 1: I believe I believe we need to protect the British public. Right now, we're What's Speaker 2: what's the answer to the question? British Muslims? Yeah. We need yeah. Speaker 1: The British public. I didn't say British non Muslim public. I said the British public. We've had we've had What Speaker 0: what do you mean by the government? Speaker 1: We've had free straight talker. Children are being killed. Speaker 0: Yes. We all know what's been happening. Yes. I would. I would stop. You would ban all Muslims? Speaker 1: I would temporarily halt Muslim immigration to this country until we get a grip of the problem. I differentiate Muslims from Islam. Right? Speaker 0: But what you what you don't Speaker 2: do differentiate Muslims Speaker 1: Muslims are people. Islam is no idea. Yeah. Islam is an idea. A bad idea. And Islam is a faith. Follow. It's an idea. It's an Speaker 2: faith. Follow. No. Speaker 1: It's an idea. Speaker 2: It's a faith. Speaker 1: It's an idea that you can change your mind. Speaker 0: No. It's a faith. Like Christianity, Speaker 1: like Scientology. It's like all faith. So religion. It's a faith. Like Scientology? Speaker 2: So if tell Speaker 1: me if you accept ideology. Speaker 2: If you're saying that the problem is with Islam, are you accepting that you're Islamophobic? Speaker 0: Because where Speaker 1: there are a 100 verses in this Speaker 2: on it. Are you Islamophobic? Speaker 1: There's no such word as Islamophobia. A phobia is an irrational fear. It's not irrational to fear these things. Now if I hold this book up and say, there will never be peace on this earth so long as we have this book, it's a violent and cursed book. Speaker 2: That's a violent and cursed book. That's a violent and cursed book. Speaker 1: How did you say that? Can I tell Speaker 2: you who said that? Can you put the star? Speaker 1: Sir William Gladstone. Right. You wouldn't do that with Sir William Gladstone. Do that with Speaker 0: the bible. Show some respect. Speaker 1: Show some respect. Speaker 2: Show some respect. Speaker 0: Show some respect. Speaker 1: Have you read this book? Have you read this book? There are over 100 There are a 100 verses in this book that incite violent Speaker 2: murder against us. Put show some damn respect for people's religious beliefs. Right? I should show some respect for a Speaker 1: book that decides Speaker 0: murder against me Put it down. Speaker 2: And Speaker 0: calls me this is not why I put it down. Speaker 1: Sir William Gladstone held this Speaker 2: book above his Speaker 1: head in parliament, and he said there will never be peace on this earth so long as we have this book. It's a violent and cursed book. Was sir William Gladstone, who we have statues across our capital city, was he a bigoted or an Islamic party? Speaker 0: Winston Churchill sounding like a complete Speaker 1: Winston Churchill no. I'm I'm quoting previous some of the best leaders in Speaker 2: this country. Speaker 1: You're sounding Speaker 0: like a bigoted lunatic. No. Speaker 1: I'm not. Speaker 0: Somebody that basically Winston Churchill. You are an Islamist who hates Islam. No. I don't think all Muslims are to blame. We've seen you on video saying it. What you're doing now is deliberately inflammatory. It is deliberately poisonous. Speaker 1: How does this impact your Speaker 0: immune response? Opposite effect to the one that you say Speaker 1: you William Glass you Speaker 0: are stirring up hatred. You are abusing people's religion. You're abusing their faith.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 10.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

Flashback: Islamic sermon on Hamas TV features Palestinian religious leader promoting jihad against Jews while explaining that death through jihad is an act of the worship for Allah. He also claims that the Jews were led by Allah to this land to make it easier for Muslims to slaughter and kill them. He then describes how his son who is only two years old, tortures his teddy bear with a toy gun while pretending the teddy bear is a Zionist hostage in Gaza. This is how Palestinian religious leaders used radical Islamic rhetoric to promote war and hatred against Israel and the Jewish people. This incitement must be stopped! Link to the video: https://www.memri.org/tv/hamas-sermon-we-pledged-commanders-jihad-die-sake-allah

Hamas Sermon: We Pledged before the Commanders of the Jihad to Die for the Sake of Allah MEMRI's archive of Middle East reports includes translations, Special Dispatches, and Inquiry and Analysis papers from and about media and events in the region on a wide range of topics, from 1998 to the present. memri.org

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 11.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

The world is silent when Israel is under attack, but screams when Israel defends itself! In this video Pat Condell calls out the Pro-Palestinian useful idiots in the West who play into the hands Hamas and even encourage the terrorists in Gaza to continue to initiate wars against Israel while using the civilians of Gaza as human shields. He exposes everything the mainstream media does not shows you about the conflict in the Middle East - so please retweet. This video was uploaded to YouTube in 2007, but nothing has changed since then as Hamas continued to initiate wars against Israel while using the civilians in Gaza as human shields.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Peace in the Middle East requires acknowledging that Hamas is not a rational actor interested in negotiation. Hamas turned Gaza into a war zone and views its own people as expendable for jihad, lacking bomb shelters for civilians while building luxury hotels for Western journalists. Hamas's agenda is comparable to the Nazis, but unlike the Nazis, Hamas uses its own people as human shields, valuing the propaganda of dead children. Israel desires peace and prosperity for Gaza, but Hamas prefers misery and blaming Jews. Hamas's charter calls for the killing or expulsion of all Jews in the Middle East, forbidding peace negotiations. Attempts at territorial concessions and mediation have failed, as Hamas breaks ceasefires and seeks Jewish blood. Defeating Hamas is necessary for Palestinian liberation and lasting peace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If we're serious about peace in the Middle East, then we need to stop pretending that the Israelis are dealing with a rational enemy they can negotiate with, because in doing that we're helping to feed a massive political lie whose gravitational force has become so great it has warped reality. It's Hamas who turned Gaza into a war zone recently, not Israel, and it's Hamas who will do so again and again and again. They don't care about the people there. They regard them as expendable in the cause of jihad. Why do you think there are no bomb shelters in Gaza, except, of course, for the brave Hamas fighters who keep telling us they love death more than we love life, yet who scuttle away to safety as soon as the bombs come in, leaving the women and children to fend for themselves? Wouldn't you suppose, as they were lobbing rockets over the border every day, that they would have given some thought to protecting ordinary people from possible retaliation? No. They'd rather build luxury hotels to accommodate gullible western journalists who can be trusted to portray them as heroic victims and the Israelis as neo Nazi oppressors. In fact, it's Hamas who are the Nazis. Their political agenda is virtually identical, with the same genocidal supremacist delusions and the same irrational violent hatred of Jews for being Jews. Actually, the Nazis have a moral edge on Hamas. They were psychotic murdering scumbags as well, but at least they didn't use their own people as human shields. Hamas don't give a damn about the people of Gaza. They want them to be killed, especially the children whose bodies make wonderful propaganda. That's why they deliberately put them in the firing line as fodder, as just another weapon to be used and discarded, or martyred, which is the Islamic euphemism for somebody whose life has been thrown away for absolutely nothing. Israel wants peace and has always wanted peace. It's a modern civilised country and a world technological leader. The last thing it needs is war. That should be obvious to everyone. Israel would like nothing better than for Gaza to be thriving and prosperous and the people to be happy and free. They would even bankroll it if they thought it would work. But Hamas don't want the people happy and free. They want them miserable and blaming Jews for it, because Hamas are Islamic fanatics, jihadis, the same mentality that flew into the Twin Towers and then blamed, guess who, the Jews. They bribed the people of Gaza to elect them on a political platform, but once in power they enforced their religion with an iron fist. Does anyone seriously think they'd be elected again? We'll never know, because once elected an Islamist government is elected forever, and anybody who wants to argue about it can expect to be murdered and their corpse dragged through the streets behind a motorcycle, as happened last week in Gaza. These are men who are so hypnotised by their callous and violent religion and so bereft of any semblance of moral decency or compassion that they'll happily murder someone for expressing a moment of joy by singing at a wedding, as happened last week in Gaza. Singing is outlawed in their Islamic paradise. Joy is forbidden. Happiness is haram. They invoke the Koran in their founding charter, especially the passage about killing Jews. That's a big favourite. And they teach their children that the highest thing they can aspire to is to kill themselves by killing Jews. And these are the people the Israelis are supposed to negotiate with. It would be easier to reason with a rattlesnake. So let's say you're the Israeli prime minister. What do you do? How do you deal with people who want you and everybody like you dead at any price and whose position is not negotiable. Give up territory, dismantle settlements, that's been tried and it doesn't work, or didn't anybody notice? Israel dismantled settlements and uprooted thousands of people when it withdrew from Gaza. And what did it get? A barrage of rockets and bombs that hasn't stopped to this day. So clearly dismantling settlements doesn't work. What else have we got? Mediation? Diplomacy? Restart the peace process? Yeah, in your dreams. There is no peace process, and there never will be as long as Hamas is around, because there's no such thing as a one-sided coin. And Hamas have made it clear they have no intention of negotiating peace ever. It's written right into their charter. Look it up. Peace would be un Islamic. No negotiation and no let up in jihad, also enshrined in the charter until every Jew in the Middle East has been driven out or killed. That's what they want, and it's not negotiable. Why do we keep pretending that they want something else? The charter also forbids anybody else from negotiating peace, so if peace ever does break out we can be sure Hamas will put a stop to it in double quick time. But let's ignore all that and pretend that it's all about territory and politics, and have another round of negotiations anyway. Let's hammer out another worthless accord. Let's get round a table and go through the motions again, and then hand out Nobel Prizes all round. We have to be seen to be doing something even if it's nothing. And nothing is what it will be in spades, because negotiating with the likes of Hamas is like pouring light into a black hole. They don't want peace at any price. They want Jewish blood. End of story. That's why they break every ceasefire. That's why their own people are expendable. That's why no agreement with them is worth the paper it's written on. That's why there is no 2 state solution and never will be as long as they're around, and that's why they need to be defeated decisively and permanently, or this madness will never ever stop. Shaking off these fanatical violent barbarians is the only way the Palestinian people will ever be truly liberated, and if the rest of us really care about peace, we should be honest enough to admit that.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 12.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

During an interview on Turkish TV, popular Palestinian Muslim preacher described Muslims as miserable oppressed victims who experience sadness in life and feel insecure because of Jews. He explained that in Islam the Quran and the Hadith teach Muslims that the Jews are responsible for all their problems. He then assured the audience that the Muslims will experience their best days after they kill all the Jews. He promised that after the worshipers of Islam finish sacrificing all the Jews for the sake of Allah (God of Islam): "Earth will bring forth its blessings, the sky will send down rain in abundance, people will live in peace, even if someone would put his hand in the mouth of a snake, it would not harm him, and wolves will graze with his sheep. There will be an amazing atmosphere of abundance and prosperity. No one will need charity, because the world will have been cleansed of the Jews." Link to the video: https://www.memri.org/tv/palestinian-islamic-scholar-mraweh-nassar-muslims-live-peace-security-get-rid-jews This is how the Palestinian leaders use their religion to promote war against Jews and Israel. This rhetoric has no place in the twenty-first century!

Palestinian Islamic Scholar Mraweh Nassar: If Muslims Want To Live In Peace And Security, They Must Get Rid Of The Jews Palestinian Islamic Scholar, Mraweh Nassar, Secretary-General of the Jerusalem Committee of the IUMS said during a show that aired on Channel 9 (Turkey) on February 10, 2021, that the Jews are the most dangerous enemy of the Muslims. memri.org

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 13.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

During this debate at Oxford Union, British politician Anne-Marie Waters claimed that Islam is not a religion of peace because it promotes violence, intolerance and terrorism. What do you think about this? Do you agree with her? Please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the burden of proof lies on those claiming Islam is a religion of peace, stating actions by Muslims globally cause fear of Islam, not critics. Examples cited include 9/11, bombings, and various forms of oppression in Islamic states like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Yemen. The speaker questions the notion that these are extreme fringes, comparing it to calling the Vatican the extreme fringe of Catholicism. They highlight issues like unequal rights for women, child marriage, and executions for blasphemy and apostasy. The speaker states they are under no obligation to respect Islam and sees brutality and violence in countries where Islam dictates. While acknowledging peaceful Muslims exist, the speaker contends that Islam itself is not peaceful, citing literal interpretations of the Quran, such as the command to beat women. The speaker concludes that the evidence shows Islam is not a religion of peace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, good evening everyone. Thank you for having me. I hope everyone can hear me. How to respond, to to a lot of this? First of all, on on the the bar, you said you admitted yourself that the the bar had been set quite high. I would suggest, though, that the burden of proof is on the proposer rather than or not. It quite clearly says Islam is a religion of peace. I suggest you prove it. I've also been told we've also been told here tonight when we opened, that we need this debate must take place in the real world. Well, absolutely yes, it must. It must take place in the real world. And I will describe what Islam is doing in the real world. We can sit and we can debate theocracy day in, day out. We will never agree. We can debate, is there a God? Isn't there a God? Is the Koran real? Isn't it? None of it actually matters. What matters is what happens in the real world as my opponent quite rightly said. My side of of the argument is regularly told that we are we've heard it again tonight. We were described somewhat as hate. We were told that we are demonizing Islam, whipping up fear of Islam. Not the first time I've been accused of this. Probably won't be the last. But let me just say and let's take this into the real world as we've been advised to do. Let me tell you what actually whips up fears of Islam. We would take it from the top, 911, the London underground bombings, Madrid, Mumbai, Mali, Bali, Northern Nigeria, Sudan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Yemen, Pakistan, death for apostasy, death for blasphemy, death for adultery, death for homosexuality, gender segregation, gender discrimination, unequal testimony between men and women in legal proceedings, child marriage, amputations, beheadings, imprisonment for being raped, antisemitism, burkas, execution, as I've said, for this, that and the other, the slaughter of Theo van Gogh on the streets of Amsterdam, death threats on the streets of London, butcher those who insult Islam, Muslim patrols in East London telling people they are entering Sharia controlled zones, polygamous marriages, marriage not requiring the consent of the bride. This is what causes fear of Islam. It is not me. It is not my, my colleagues on this side. Speaker 1: What information on that point? If Islam Speaker 0: So I Speaker 1: If Islam and Muslims are responsible for the Muslim patrols Speaker 0: I'm not I'm I'm not gonna accept you. I'm not. No. I'm not. I'm let let me speak on. But the point is that it is not I, all my fellow debaters on this side, who are causing fear of Islam. It is the actions of Muslims that are causing fear of Islam. That is the real world. That is where we actually live. Then we will be told that this is just the extreme fringe of Islam. Well, let me have a look at Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is the birthplace of Islam, the custodian of its holy sites. In Saudi Arabia, a woman is not allowed to drive. She is not allowed to leave the house without a maharam. She is not allowed to vote although they've been incredibly generous by allowing some votes in the next elections. You know, this is apparently the extreme fringe of of, you know, people are executed for blasphemy, executed for apostasy. In in Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Islam, we'll be told that's the extreme fringe of Islam. No, it is not. Calling Saudi Arabia the extreme fringe of Islam is like calling the Vatican the extreme fringe of Catholicism. Sorry. It just doesn't work. Then we'll be told that it's we've misunderstood. Violent Muslims have misunderstood. This Saudi Arabia has misunderstood. Iran, which stones people to death for adultery, has misunderstood. Yemen, which marries children at the age of 9, has misunderstood. Has there ever been a more spectacularly misunderstood religion than Islam? It seems that everyone, these nations who apply it as their laws, nations which have the Koran as their constitution, innumerable, innumerable nations where there is no free speech, where there is no freedom of religion, they've all got it wrong. They've all got it wrong. It's quite a spectacularly misunderstood religion. You know, it's there's just there's just so much that, you know, I'm constantly told as well that I need to respect Islam. I've never quite given a good enough reason why. I don't I don't I am under no greater obligation to respect Islam than I am than I am any other beliefs. I'm under no more obligation to respect a woman oppressed under in the name of Islam than if she is oppressed by the BNP or anyone else. I am under no obligation to make to make compromises with an ideology I simply don't see as peaceful. Why don't I see it as peaceful? Because of the evidence. If I look around the world and I see the countries where Islam calls the shots, all I see What's Speaker 1: defamation? Speaker 0: Is is brutality and violence imposed by the state. Someone of someone taught we were told that peace is not just the absence of violence, but the presence of justice. Absolutely. I do not see how in a nation where as the only woman here as the only woman here, I have some particular issues, with the way women are treated in Islamic states. Now you can argue that they've got it wrong. It's tell them that because they seem to think that's what it is. Yes. I mean I mean, there's so it's there's so much to say about it. But are there is there a peaceful Islam? Yes. There is. It's in the hearts of peaceful Muslims. Unfortunately, though, there's also a rather more objective Islam and peaceful Muslims have to do some really rather creative interpretation like the command to beat her. I've seen Muslim women I didn't stand up for you. You're allowed to hear. Well, I didn't. So if you could just have a I knew this would happen. I knew this would happen by the way. I knew this would happen. What I'm saying, what I'm saying is completely controversial and will be booed and shouted down. And I have no doubt my colleagues the same. I knew this would happen. You say anything negative, you'll get the boos. I am, I'm actually going to leave it there. But I will finish just by saying this. There are 100 of millions of peaceful Muslims. That is a fact, but that does not mean that Islam itself is peaceful. People, peaceful Muslims interpret verses of the Quran so almost beyond recognition it's reinterpreted. Like the command to beat her. It's there in the Quran and I've seen Muslim women try to dance around it. They put words in there that simply aren't there. That's what it says. It says beat her. And in the countries where the Quran calls the shots, that is exactly what they do. This is not peace. This is not justice. Islam is not a religion of peace as the evidence shows us. Thank you.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 14.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

Mosab Hassan Yousef, the son of Hamas founder, explains how the Palestinians destroyed their own lives over their ambition to destroy Israel "from the river to the sea". Israel built a wall, security fences and checkpoints on its borders after the Palestinians started advocating for the murder of Jews as legitimate way to destroy Israel during the first and second intifadas. Israel is simply defending itself against Islamic terrorism. Describing it as "apartheid" is a blood libel.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Before the First Intifada, the speaker recalls freely traveling from Ramallah to Tel Aviv. This changed with the Intifada, which began with the chant "from the river to the sea" and escalated to violence, including suicide bombings. The speaker opposed the praise of suicide bombers, who targeted civilians in universities, schools, buses, markets, and beaches. Israel implemented security measures in response to these threats, similar to emergency laws enacted by the United States during the war on terror. The speaker questions whether terrorists in prison deserve the same rights as law-abiding citizens. They argue that Western values cannot be imposed on Israel, which faces constant threats like suicide bombings and missile attacks. Outsiders should not dictate Israel's actions or risk the lives of its soldiers to minimize civilian casualties, especially since Israel is already working to do so.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before this war, my memory as a child, my father and I were able to drive our car from the town of Ramallah all the way to Yafo, to Tel Aviv, to the beach, to the zoo, pretty much every weekend. And nobody harassed us. We are able to just shop. We are able to enjoy the beach. This is my early memory as a child. There was not even one checkpoint. Things start changing immediately after the beginning of the 1st Palestinian intifada. It started with the chant from the river to the sea. Very romantic. Soon later, it became stabbing. Shortly later, it became mass shooting. Within no time, it became suicide bombing attacks. What a democracy should do in a situation when they are not able to stop the people and entire society. I don't want to say complicit, but the Palestinians praised suicide bombers as murderers, as heroes of the nation. Look at my case. When I oppose that, I said, no. It's not good. It's bad. It's very bad to kill people indiscriminately. You know, Hamas did not kill people only on October 7th. Hamas has a long history of suicide bombing attacks. They blow up universities, schools, buses, markets, beaches. They targeted everywhere. So Israel had to take some security measures. And again, even in the best democracy, when you when you are under consistent threat, there are exceptions. And some of the civil laws could be actually replaced with some emergency laws. Even the United States did this during the war against terror, against, terrorism. So when you are under consistent threat, it's very different. But somebody can sit in comfort and say, hey. How about we take some of the western values, the democratic values, and say, oh, look at Israel. They claim to be a democracy, but look how they're treating the Palestinians. Well, terrorists in prison, have they earned equal rights to decent citizens in civilization who know their responsibility and their obligation towards the other, who don't harm the others? Of course not. So sometimes when we are dealing with emergency situation, we cannot say and force the people in the Middle East to just act, according our values. We sit here in the United States. We don't have suicide bombing attacks. We don't have missile attacks. We don't have infiltration on a regular basis. So we cannot take our values and force Israel to do the same while they are under war. We cannot force Israel to send and risk the lives of thousands of foot soldiers in order for us, to reduce or minimize, the civilian casualty which Israel is already doing. But who are we to force Israel how to do the job? It's not it's not our right.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 15.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

Watch: Palestinian mother on TV says she is a big fan of Hamas and its leaders. This is why she named her son Mashal, after top Hamas leader Khaled Mashal. Her little daughter then explains that she wants to follow in her father's footsteps and launch rockets at Israel to kill Jews and sacrifice her soul as a martyr for the sake of Allah (the God of Islam). This is an interview that was broadcast a few years ago on Palestinian TV with the family members of a top Hamas terrorist who was hit by an Israeli airstrike and died alongside the mass murderers Ahmed al-Jabari. Link to the video: https://www.memri.org/tv/young-children-hamas-member-muhammad-al-homs-killed-ahmad-jaabari-we-want-be-martyred-our-dad

Young Children of Hamas Member Muhammad Al-Homs, Killed with Ahmad Jaabari: We Want to Be Martyred Like Our Dad MEMRI's archive of Middle East reports includes translations, Special Dispatches, and Inquiry and Analysis papers from and about media and events in the region on a wide range of topics, from 1998 to the present. memri.org

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 16.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

Watch: Palestinian terrorist says he is ready to die and blow himself up to kill Jews for the sake of Allah (God of Islam). He wishes his own children to die as well while waging jihad against Jews in Islam's name. He has 3 children, his eldest son is just 5 years old. His poor son is being told by his own father that he (at the age of 5!!!) should sacrifice his soul for the sake of Allah in order to kill Jews in Israel. The introduction of Palestinian children to Jihad must be stopped! Please watch and share the following documentary which exposes the Palestinians' war against the Jews. Link to the video: https://youtu.be/S1_0zDD1i3A?feature=shared If you want to better understand the conflict in the Middle East, I highly recommend following the filmmaker Pierre Rehov here on X: @rehoov

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 17.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

Douglas Murray explains that unlike most people in the West, in Israel the Jewish people realized a long time ago that Muslim jihadists would do anything to kill them for being infidels. Mosab Hassan Yousef (son of Hamas founder) adds that the leftists in the West serve as useful idiots for promoting Islam and Jihad. Moreover, conservatives in the West are intimidated into silence and cannot speak to voice their concerns about the threat of jihad without facing Islamophobia charges or being called "racists". Please share your thoughts in the comments below: Do you agree with them? What do you think is the solution to these problems?

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 18.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

Mosab Hassan Yousef, the son of Hamas' founder, is fed up with the victim mentality of the Palestinians. First they attack the Jews, then they play the victim when the Jews defend themselves and fight back. The Palestinians are the ones who started all the wars against Israel while refusing to recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state. Please retweet this video if you support Israel's right to defend itself!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that Palestinians play the victim card and have done so for 70 years. They state that Israel was willing to withdraw from the West Bank and Gaza in 2000, but Yasser Arafat rejected the offer because the revolution has no purpose other than itself. The speaker accuses some individuals of being con artists seeking money and power, using Arab and Jewish children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Instead of saying we were defeated and Israel won, now they played the victim card. They have been playing the victim card for 70 years. And instead of accepting what is on the table to coexist with Israel, basically Israel was willing to withdraw from the West Bank and Gaza. That offer was on the table in 2000, and Yasser Arafat rejected that because the revolution has no purpose. The revolution is only for the sake of revolution. Bunch of con artists who only want to gain money and power, this is their game, and they have been using Arab children, Arab and Jews. Assassinated after all billboards or Please please let me please let me finish. Please please don't interrupt me. Please. I did not interrupt you.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 19.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

Mosab Hassan Yousef, the son of Hamas founder, destroys the political narrative which always portrays Jews and Israel as "aggressors and oppressors" and Palestinian terrorists as "oppressed victims". Hamas is not a liberation movement, but an Islamic oppression movement, whose goal is to commit genocide against Jews. Before October 7, 2023, Hamas murdered thousands of Israelis and Palestinians. Hamas is the obstacle to peace in the Middle East.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hamas has committed attacks prior to October 7, killing thousands of Israelis and hundreds of Palestinians, sabotaging the peace process. Hamas is more than a terrorist organization; it is a religious, ideological movement waging a holy war against a race, not a national resistance movement to liberate Palestine. Hamas does not believe in political borders, but wants a global state. Supporting pro-Palestine groups gives support to a savage group that committed genocide against Jewish communities. Having lived with Hamas members in prison for 27 months, the speaker witnessed them torturing Palestinians. The speaker believes October 7 could be the worst crime of modern day. Hamas is a radical religious movement with global ambition that does not value human life and does not believe in democracy. Israel, in contrast, is a democratic nation that has extended its hand to the region for peace for over 70 years. Since 1948, Arab nations have tried to annihilate Israel. 95% of wars between Arabs and Israel were initiated by Arab countries. On October 7, Israel suffered genocide, not just a terrorist attack.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Few years later, Hamas was committing suicide bombing attacks. Maybe some of you weren't even there. What we witnessed on October 7th, that was not the first attack by Hamas. Prior to that, Hamas killed thousands of Palestinians of Israelis and hundreds of Palestinians, and Hamas is responsible for the retaliation and sabotaging the entire peace process in the Middle East. Many call them terrorists, but as a person who witnessed their birth, their development, and the atrocities committed by them today, I tell you something. They are beyond a terrorist organization. They pose as a national resistant movement with the intention to liberate what so called Palestine. And I think this is Hamas' first lie, because they are not a resistant movement. Hamas is a religious, ideological movement raging a war, a holy war, against a race, against a nation. They are not a political party. If they were a political party, then they would believe in political borders, but they want a global state. So there is no such a thing as Palestine, the Hamas movement, and all the pro Palestine group, which, of course, they have the right to express themselves. I'm not against freedom of speech, that everyone have their own independent opinion. But unfortunately, they are given directly and indirectly support to a savage group that just committed genocide against entire communities. They wiped out everything in their way, killing children, women, raping, burning, systematically, ethnically cleansing a race only because they are Jewish. I saw that firsthand documented by Hamas themselves. I was not surprised by Hamas brutality, because I lived with them in prison for about 27 months. And if you want to get to know someone, spend with them time in prison for 27 months. They tortured Palestinian people, and that was in Israeli prison. Because Hamas Hamas had suspicion that some Palestinians gave information to the Israeli intelligence, so they didn't know who it was, and they tortured many people in the process. During the time I was spending in prison, especially the first imprisonment, dozens were killed and tortured on the hand of Hamas. But October 7, that was completely different. What they did was or could be the worst crime in our modern day. And, of course, when people see the war victims happening in Gaza. The free world also don't like to see bloodshed. And people are having hard time, which side do I take? Is it Palestine or Israel? And, of course, we took sides, and we created division. But are we seeing things for what they are? Are we seeing Hamas for what it is? A radical religious movement with global ambition that does not value the human life, that does not respect anything that is different, does not believe in dialogue, does not believe in democracy, does not believe in any philosophy or constitution outside of Islam, outside of Quran, very narrow minded people, but in the meantime, very dangerous. On the other hand, we see the democratic model of the state of Israel, a very creative and productive nation that has contributed so much to life. Israel has been extending its hands to the region for more than 70 years since its establishment, trying to build bridges of understanding, to build peace with the Arab nations, but the Arab nations insisted since 1948, since the establishment of the state of Israel, to annihilate the state of Israel first before they establish an Arab state. The international community offered the Arabs to build an Arab state side by side, the state of Israel back in 1948, but the Arabs refused. They came back in 1967 with the intention to annihilate the state of Israel, and they failed. Israel was extremely outnumbered by the Arabs. Hundreds of millions of Arabs surrounding the state of Israel, newborn, very small state. And when they lost the war, Israel controlled the West Bank, Sinai, and the Golan Heights. Since then, the Arabs have been trying so hard to destroy the state of Israel. 95% of the wars between Arabs and Israel were initiated by Arab countries against Israel, where Israel is always at defense. So we have a big problem, and we cannot just take sides without educating ourselves on what's really going on. Because if we end up supporting savages who just committed genocide, not just a terrorist attack. A terrorist attack usually is committed by a terrorist organization with political hatred. This is what motivates them. But to go and ethnically cleanse more than 20 communities, killing everything in your way, and everything is documented, this is what Israel suffered on October 7th.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 20. Is this a religion of peace?

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

Watch: Palestinian Hamas terrorist explains his desire to go into a nursery in Israel and slaughter all the Jewish children and babies as a human sacrifice for the sake of Allah (God of Islam). As you can see in this documentary, Palestinian Muslims believe that murdering Jews and other non-Muslims for the sake of Allah gives them a one-way ticket to the Muslim paradise where each "martyr" receives 72 slave virgins. Link to the full documentary film: https://rumble.com/v55xh0e-palestinian-jihad.html Please everyone follow the filmmaker here on X (formerly Twitter): @rehoov

Palestinian Jihad Exclusive interviews of terrorists. Shilling and disturbing. rumble.com

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 21

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

https://t.co/Xot6yHKijf This is not Gaza‼️This is London‼️ Muslims warn the entire Jewish community in Britain that their turn to be beheaded as a human sacrifice for Allah’ sake is coming soon. As you can see in the video the Muslims chanted in Arabic: "Khaybar Khaybar, ya yahud, Jaish Muhammad, sa yahud (Translation: Jews, remember Khaybar the army of Muhammad is coming to kill you too)." They literally telling Jews that the “army of Islam (ie, Muslims)” is returning in order to kill them for being Non-Muslims, just like they beheaded all the Jews in "Battle of Khaybar". Please check out this entire thread 🧵!

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 22

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

https://t.co/GxqVBg3Opt "Anti-Zionist" Muslims in Britain terrorize the local Jewish community and then cry about "Islamophobia" to maintain their victim status. Thread 🧵 1/3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on whether pro-Palestinian marches and symbols intimidate Jewish people. One speaker claims the marches have terrorized Jewish people and the Palestinian flag symbolizes hatred of Jews, not support for Palestinians. They assert "from the river to the sea" means the end of Israel and possibly murdering Jews. They also state that the Hamas attack on October 7th cannot be compared to anything since the Holocaust. Another speaker disagrees, stating many Jewish people support the Palestinian flag, which represents a country, not terrorism. They argue focusing on the flag distracts from atrocities committed against Palestinians for decades. They also point out that Israeli figures use the phrase "from the river to the sea." They condemn the rhetoric as dangerous propaganda that puts lives at risk. They deny condoning the October 7th attack, but insist it did not start there.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The overwhelming majority of Jewish people have been intimidated and, in some cases, even feeling terrorized by the marches that have been taking place on a regular basis over the last 11 months. And, quite frankly, Sadiq Khan has responsibilities there and we want to see these marches brought to an end, quite frankly. And also, the waving of the Palestinian flag is actually a terror flag because that flag symbolizes not support for a Palestinian country because if there was, there would have been massive demonstrations when Bashar Assad was massacring tens of thousands of Palestinians a few years ago. No. That flag symbolizes hatred of Jews, pure and simple. Speaker 1: Perma. That is so incorrect, and I cannot believe you're actually saying that. There are so many Jewish people that holds that flag up. I know of people personally that would do that. That is a it's, you know, a flag of a country, not of a group on one particular region in the actual, area. So that is a real misinformation that is being put out there, and it's stuff like this that actually goes out there and causes the disruption and the misrepresentation of people that are going out there innocently just in solidarity does not mean that Speaker 0: we are Speaker 2: Fatima. Sorry. Sorry to interrupt you. Speaker 3: Do you accept though that Jewish people since October 7th Speaker 4: in this country and indeed around the world have felt very unsafe? Speaker 1: If they have that experience of it and feeling that way, I'm not going to disregard that. Absolutely. But the fact that what's being said that, you know, the Palestinian flag represents terrorism and is out there, you know, in in that sort of way is really, really wrong to say. At the end of the day, even I will stand by and say that most people that have attended there are from a variety of backgrounds, and that's just not being reported clearly. And it's really it's absurd Speaker 0: to be honest. We understand Speaker 5: that lots of people are from different backgrounds. But, again, the point is a lot of Jewish people find the flag intimidating, and there there was some a lot of chanting from the river to the sea. I mean, would you not acknowledge that that in the protests is somewhat, intimidatory to many Jewish people? Speaker 1: Well, then why is Netanyahu saying the same thing? You know, he's been mentioned that river to the sea most of the time. Again, we are just polarizing and, using certain people focusing on that as if to say that that is something which is there to demonize and scare people. If you feel that way, completely, you know, have your right to say that, but that's not the meaning of what it really represents. And if the president himself from the his his own country talks about it, then no one addresses that. I'm really appalled as to way in which people are speaking and getting away with it. This is the kind of, you know, propaganda and the kind of dangerous kind of rhetoric and language and terminology and distinctions that are put out there that are putting lives at risk every single day. Speaker 0: What? Let's speak to can we Gary, mom, please. Can we be clear on what from the river to the sea actually means? It means the end of the state of Israel, probably throwing all the Jews out of Israel, possibly murdering them. That is what that expression means, and the terror flag that goes with it supports that view. Terrorist attacks by Palestinian groups have been committed for many, many years now on a regular basis. Speaker 1: I mean, if you think about that, then maybe we should talk about looking at the Israeli channels right now who is actually advocating for hideous crimes. Maybe we should talk about that, not just one side. It is so much atrocities happening right now, which is not in line with any civilization, with any kind of human or international law. We cannot sit here and just talk about, you know, a flag being terrorists when people are committing atrocities every single day against even civilized law and all that. How can you completely abhorrent. Speaker 0: How can you compare anything to what happened on the 7th October when 1200 innocent people were massacred by Hamas, a Palestinian group which has large scale support from the so called Palestinian people. You can't compare anything with that since the Holocaust. Speaker 1: I'm sorry to interrupt, but I'm just trying to tell you that no one has actually said that, you know, we are approving of 7th October, but it did not start there. And at the same time, you know, that's the only point that people point across. There has been atrocities for decades against the Palestinian people, and nobody speaks about that. There has been Hamas is only in one region. What about the West Bank? What about the other areas in the whole of that area and that region? And if you don't speak like that. Speaker 5: The Palestinians No. You're not. I'm gonna have to stop you, though, Speaker 1: terrorist society.

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

@TRobinsonNewEra 23

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

https://t.co/lNcuto5t9u Offended Muslims are outraged over this statement of British journalist, destroying ‘Islamophobia’ on live TV: “You can’t have a phobia of a set of ideas”. 🚨🚨🚨🧵👇‼️ Is Britain about to adopt Sharia blasphemy law? British PM seeks to criminalize offensive thoughts and speech against Islam by adopting new controversial definition of “Islamophobia”. Please check out this thread 🧵 👇 if you want to better understand the meaning of “jihad”!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Keir Starmer is reportedly pushing for a new definition of Islamophobia. Islam encompasses metaphysics, legal codes, and social practices, all of which constitute ideas. Ideas can be praised, lived by, or challenged, but one cannot have a phobia of ideas. Defining Islamophobia could hinder criticism. Questioning the Prophet Mohammed's revelations does not make one Islamophobic, just as not believing in Hindu or Sikh ideas doesn't. Serious conversations are needed when different cultures come together. In the 1920s, Zohawi's great grand uncle wrote poetry attacking the hijab in Baghdad. When Starmer spoke about protecting Muslim communities, it highlighted the problem of singling out specific groups. Instead of creating specific rules for each religion, a general law protecting people from abuse would suffice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Also, Labour looking at a couple of interesting stories this morning. One is that, Starmer is now pushing for a new definition of Islamophobia, and the other one, is in The Telegraph in which they say the actual benefit from the winter fuel payment cancellation by Rachael Reeves might be a third less than they thought. Speaker 1: Yeah. Let's let's take each of those in turn. The the the the problem you've got, obviously, with this Islamophobic definition is that Islam is a religious set of ideas about both the metaphysics of reality. You know, what what what is God? Is there a God? Who is his messenger? Does he have a son or not? Things like that. And then a set of legal codes and a set of social practices as to how to live your life as well. Right. Right? Those are ideas and those ideas can be praised, they can be lived by, or they can be challenged. You can't have a a phobia of a set of ideas. Right. And when you start having a definition of this, then you start making it very difficult to criticize things. Now I'm not a Muslim, so I don't necessarily think that the prophet Mohammed had these revelations in the year 632 and 636. But that Speaker 0: doesn't make you Islamophobic to question whether or not they're worth listening to. Speaker 1: Correct. In the same way that I don't necessarily believe in the full set of of Hindu ideas Speaker 0: No. Of course. Speaker 1: Or Sikh or anything else. I Speaker 0: mean, there are plenty of people who, you can find walking around the streets of London or Britain, who don't believe in God of of any kind. You know, does that make you Islamophobic? Right. Speaker 1: And and and given that there are, again, difficulties when you have different cultures coming together and that we should be able to have serious conversations about this. I mentioned my old boss, Zohawi, just now Yeah. Born in Baghdad Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Grew up there. His great grand uncle was a poet. Right. In the 19 twenties, Baghdad used to write poetry attacking the veil Yeah. Using the hijab and saying this is a terribly backward thing. We don't need to have this. If he could do that in the 19 twenties, Baghdad, we should be able to have conversations of things associated with Islam and and cultural things around today. Speaker 0: And and as Keir Sama has found out, much to his cost at the early part of the sort of riots last week when he was talking about protecting Muslim communities, you can't do it as a sort of single, you know, one shop only kind of situation. If you got a rule against people being racist, that's fine. Leave it at that. Don't pick out that you have to have a special second ruling for people who are Islamic or people who are Hindus or people who are, you know, Christians or people who are, you know, I don't know, worshipers of of the pagan god, Odin or whatever. You know, they go to stonehenge every day. You know, have just a regular law, if you wish, which protects people from being abused, but you don't have to be specific about every single religion.
Saved - September 4, 2024 at 5:41 AM

@AlanRMacLeod - Alan MacLeod

What kind of psychotic, genocidal nonsense is this? https://t.co/2Tanw2C8aI

Saved - October 23, 2024 at 4:36 AM

@umyaznemo - Rania

That's what happens when a lawless group of illegal thugs rule the government! And they seem to echo the general sentiments of most 1sr@elis. Ethnic cleansing, massacres, and land theft. https://t.co/azH0F91rqe

Video Transcript AI Summary
Following the October 7th attacks, settlers in Israel held a two-day event near Gaza, planning Jewish outposts in the territory. Organizers spoke of "cleaning out the infection" of Palestinians, suggesting mass deportations to other countries, similar to those in Ukraine and Russia. When asked if the idea of mass deportations offended his sense of Jewishness, one organizer said no, because "when the evil is so bad, you have to do something with it to make peace with evil." Settler families, including children, set up for the night overlooking Gaza, committed to resettling their "promised land." Daniela Weiss, considered the grandmother of the settler movement and a friend of ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gavir, attended the event. One speaker stated that the rise of the right is "not a moment...it's the beginning of an era." Minister Miri Regev wants all Gazans to leave the strip but when asked about those who don't want to leave, she declined to answer. Ben Gavir, now minister for security, also declined to answer questions about plans for Gazans who don't want to leave.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanted to preface what you're about to see by saying that the views you will hear don't, represent the majority of people who live in Israel. Although, that said, there is some reliable polling that suggests that between 25 40% of the population here supports some form of settlement inside Gaza. The awful trauma of October 7th attacks have pushed those figure figures towards the upper end. Also, want to preface it by saying that while we were at this event, a group of protesters showed up outside. They were friends and family of hostages still being kept inside Gaza, and they were scathing about politicians on the right who they perceive are weaponizing the events of October 7th for political reasons. Blowing bubbles as Gaza burns. This weekend, over 100 people died in the north of the strip. And as that was happening, not far away in southern Israel, settlers held a 2 day event. Speaker 1: This whole area is is 1 big terror cell. It has infection. Speaker 2: You have to take out the infection. Speaker 0: They set out their plans for Jewish outposts inside what will be left of Gaza if they get in. Celebrated the festival of Sukkot as the smell of homes on fire wafted in from the west. We spoke to one of the organizers. What you're about to hear is hate speech. We decided to broadcast it because as you'll see, these people have some very powerful friends in the Israeli government. Speaker 1: That is when you have to when you have a, a cut in your body, and that cut, it has an infection. Speaker 2: You have to take out the infection. Speaker 1: When you take out the infection, then it'll be clean again. Speaker 0: In terms of cleaning out this infection as you call it, what do you what would you like to see happen to the over a 1000000 Palestinians that live there? Speaker 1: I think there are many nations, including Ireland and England, who would welcome them to come and live in their own Speaker 0: mass deportations to other countries. Speaker 1: Yeah. Just like happens in Ukraine, in Russia, and any other place in the world, you have a war. Does that idea not offend Speaker 0: You have residues. Idea of mass deportations and cleansing the wound, not not offend your sense of Jewishness given your people's history? Speaker 1: No. No. Because when the evil is so bad, you have to have to do something with it to Speaker 0: to to Speaker 1: make peace with evil. Speaker 0: That sound that has very dark historical resonance, that sentence you've just said in terms of of Jewish people. Speaker 1: The dark the dark I know was what what happened a year ago here in the roots. That was very dark. Speaker 0: That evening at the main event, settler families set up their sukkahs overlooking the strip. There's been an exponential rise both in the number of settlements and in violence directed by them against Palestinians in the West Bank since the October 7th attacks. These people see the war in Gaza as the ultimate supplanting of Palestinians there. We meet and their children bedding down for the night. They're so committed to the idea of resettling that part of their promised land. They bring the children to live in Gaza today. I understand your beliefs and I understand your ideology, but you're not honestly telling me that you would bring your 7 children into a war zone today to live. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: Daniela Weiss holds court that evening. She's seen as the grandmother of the modern day settler movement, and now she's something else as well. Friends with Israel's new far right settler power elite, Bezalel Smotrich, the finance minister, and Itamar Ben Gavir, minister of national Security, who we'll meet later. They're the settlers champions no longer manning outposts driving ministerial cars. Do you feel like this is your political moment? Speaker 3: It's not a moment. It's the beginning of an era. It's the beginning of a period. It's a big change. The left is losing its Speaker 4: rule, Speaker 3: and the the right came to power, and this is and to stay. Speaker 0: The main event the following day, a showcase of political muscle. When Danielle LaVoy says this is a new era, this is what she means. Settlers are no longer a fringe group of militant zealots that are irrelevant. They are sharing the stage with government ministers and MPs. This is what real power looks like. Meg O'Lan is minister for social equality. She is from Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud party. She wants all Gazans to leave the strip. But what of those who don't want to leave? If it ever gets to that point, what's the government's plan? Speaker 4: Yeah. Well, I'm not talking about plans right now. Speaker 0: So you don't have a plan Speaker 4: for that. Just to be Speaker 0: clear, you're bombing Gaza No. But you do not have a plan to get to move to people who don't want to leave. Speaker 4: I said one question, but no problem. We're doing and we will do everything that we need in order to protect the lives of our people, women that were slaughtered. Speaker 0: No. I get that. Sorry. You said one question. This is still the same question. What I need to ask you is talking. Do you have a plan? Do you have a plan Speaker 4: We have Speaker 1: a plan. To move Speaker 0: the Gazans who do not want to leave. Everything. And I'm still here. Speaker 4: Plan. That just like in your democracy, these people have the right to speak their mind. They have the freedom of speech. And those people that the bomb bombs that you just heard are the monsters that are trying to kill us for the last year. That was out there actually. That was slaughtered. There was tons thousands of bombs. And while we're talking, there are rockets at the south and the north of of of our country. Speaker 0: But you have a plan. Speaker 4: Should deal with the fact Speaker 0: that we have Speaker 1: have free ride to go. Speaker 4: Protect us But Speaker 0: you won't tell Speaker 4: us what Speaker 0: the plan is. Possible. Other politicians, the warm up acts for Bendavir. Convicted of terror related activities as a young man, now minister for security, the British government reportedly considered sanctions against him. I'm saying British television, are you worried about British sanctions? Are you worried about certain sanctions? I Speaker 1: don't know, man. Can I quickly ask you also? Speaker 0: For the Gazans who don't want to leave, Speaker 1: that's your plan for them. For the Gazans Speaker 0: who don't want to leave, what Speaker 1: is your plan for them? No. No. No. I'm not. Excuse me. Speaker 0: Sir? We left them to the dancing, to the drum and the base of religious fervor and power. The music echoed across the field, probably didn't reach northern Gaza, drowned out there by the sounds of something else entirely.
Saved - December 22, 2024 at 8:40 PM

@AdameMedia - ADAM

What kind of society produces people who do this? https://t.co/1y5VdYi7Lq

Saved - January 7, 2025 at 4:39 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Nurse celebrates the m*rder of a CEO, father, and husband, and suggests there should be more violence https://t.co/6bly8Jknk2

Saved - January 20, 2025 at 11:42 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

These feral human beings need to be put down like a rabid dog. https://t.co/Vxb38oolKo

Saved - March 24, 2025 at 7:00 PM

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

Unhinged leftist is urging people to start rioting and “burn sh*t to the ground.” https://t.co/D6CQTGykaN

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes people are underreacting and should be rioting instead of protesting. They advocate for burning things down. The speaker urges someone to be a hero, implying that inaction would be akin to being a "rat."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dude, some we're under reacting. We need to be rioting, not protesting. We need to be, like, burning shit to the ground. Somebody needs to be a hero. Somebody needs to be a a fucking hero. We'd all think you were a rat. Be a hero.
Saved - April 29, 2025 at 11:20 AM

@DerrickEvans4WV - Derrick Evans

Those on the left have completely lost it. I seriously wonder how long we can peacefully co-exist with people like this. https://t.co/TL5xybRjrn

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states they are a proud American, but that doesn't mean they have to be proud of the "Cheeto" in charge. Speaker 1 repeats the sentiment, referring to the "Cheeto" in charge and telling them to "get off" the idea of "making America great." Speaker 0 questions if what is currently happening is "making America great," asking, "Are you serious?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm a proud American too. That doesn't mean you have to be proud of the Cheeto that's Speaker 1: in charge right now. Of the Cheeto. Speaker 0: Of the Cheeto that's in charge. Speaker 1: Seriously. To be off. You get off. Making America great. Speaker 0: Do you think what's happening right now is making America great? Are you serious?
Saved - May 23, 2025 at 12:49 PM

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

UJA-FEDERATION is so fucking embarrassing.

@Darkiora - Isabelle

@TheCradleMedia After he killed 2 people, they guided him gently inside and let him sit there alone. Because this is what you do to someone who just killed 2 people lol https://t.co/aX72IJziiR

Saved - May 27, 2025 at 7:54 PM

@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore

“We love killing and raping Palestinian women and children.” An instant anti-Christ classic. Are you seeing clearly yet? 🙋‍♂️ https://t.co/kyLRMXDnGO

Saved - June 2, 2025 at 11:48 AM

@katee_K1 - Kate❤️‍🔥💕

We're dealing with a cult of mentally disturbed individuals... https://t.co/9jd1hNyhJe

Saved - June 17, 2025 at 6:04 PM

@TimcastNews - Timcast News

It’s wild watching Jon Stewart attack those opposing violence and destruction, while turning a blind eye to far-left agitators who’ve literally gunned down innocent people. https://t.co/lp1XSMDsDp

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some believe the president is being cagey because not all MAGA embrace Netanyahu's "bomb fetishes." Some within the MAGA base do not want the U.S. engaged in foreign conflicts, prioritizing American interests. While acknowledging policy differences, one speaker applauds any group steadfast in a diplomacy-first posture. However, this group's reluctance to commit the military overseas doesn't extend to America, as some believe President Trump should deploy the military in the streets of LA. The MAGA mindset appears to be, "We didn't vote for foreign wars. We voted for civil war." Some believe the battle for America will take place in Los Angeles and that the city is occupied, requiring force to retake it. The strategy is to inflate the threat the country faces to rile up the base, making the left a legitimate military target. They are looking for any pretense to use force against Democrats.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Perhaps the reason why the president is being cagey about all this is because not all of the MAGA are embracing Netanyahu's bomb fetishes. Speaker 1: We cannot be dragged into inexorably dragged into a war in The Middle East. We put America first, and that means American interests Speaker 0: first. Speaker 2: Our MAGA base, they do not want The United States to be engaged in this. Speaker 3: I don't know anyone that wakes up and and thinks about bombing Iran. Speaker 0: She doesn't know anyone who wakes up and thinks about bombing Iran. I gotta tell you. I don't think she knows anyone who wakes up and thinks. But credit. They enjoy that. But you know what? I'm gonna say this. This may surprise some people, credit where credit is due. I certainly have tremendous policy and in some instances, space laser differences with these folks. But I applaud any group that is steadfast in a diplomacy first posture. The only problem with their posture that I see with it is their reluctance to commit America's military to fighting drawn out and often pointless wars doesn't seem to extend to America. Speaker 2: President Trump should fully deploy the military in the streets. Take back the streets of LA. Do it and do it fast. Speaker 0: Doesn't wanna be in Iran. He wants to be in LA. He doesn't wanna deploy the military overseas. He wants to save the military for the real threat, us. He's not being hypocritical, just fucking mind blowing. The MAGA mindset appears to be we didn't vote for foreign wars. We voted for civil war. Speaker 1: This is a war. The battle for America was gonna take place in in Los Angeles. The only way to win here is to double and triple down. Speaker 3: The current war that we are seeing waged by the Democrats, by the foreign nationals waving Mexican flags. Speaker 1: The city of Los Angeles is an occupied city. It is time to retake the cities of this country. It is time to use force. What the Speaker 0: They are looking for any pretense. They are looking for any pretense to sick their robot dogs on Democrats. And the strategy that they're using is to inflate the threat that this country now faces. To so rile up their base as to make the left in this country represented by over 75,000,000 votes in the past presidential election as a legitimate military target for The United States Of America. It's a strategy that's been used before to gin up military conflict.
Saved - September 14, 2025 at 9:14 PM

@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong

This liberal might be the worst one yet. The Left doesn't just want you dead, they want your children, your family, and everything you care about dead. This creature is completely possessed. I don't say this lightly: demonic. https://t.co/M9lezTouFI

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: We're gonna push it. We're gonna see how far we can push it. I was not kidding when I said, If you were gonna get the job done, there were two better candidates. And furthermore, when that happens, and it will. Speaker 1: It will. Speaker 0: Not only will we be insensitive, Speaker 1: that's gonna be the biggest fucking celebration. The biggest, most beautiful celebration on planet Earth, on planet Earth right now. The entire planet is gonna celebrate when he takes a turn. Finally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're gonna push it. We're gonna see how far we can push it. I was not kidding when I said, If you were gonna get the job done, there were two better candidates. And furthermore, when that happens, and it will. Speaker 1: It will. Speaker 0: Not only will we be insensitive, Speaker 1: that'll be the least of your worries. But it's gonna be the biggest fucking celebration. The biggest, most beautiful celebration on planet Earth, on planet Earth right now. The entire planet is gonna celebrate when he takes a turn. Finally.
Saved - September 15, 2025 at 5:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the way communists communicate needs to shift. Their base, which I see as struggling with mental health issues, interprets violent rhetoric as directives due to their medication. Words have power; they can ignite dangerous actions.

@JakeCan72 - Jake

The communists have to change how they talk. Their base is mentally ill and when they talk with violent rhetoric, their base takes it as an order since they’re on SSRI’s. Your words aren’t harmless. You’re striking the match. @IlhanMN @RashidaTlaib @GovKathyHochul @CoryBooker @CNN @MSNBC @nytimes @washingtonpost @SenWarren

Video Transcript AI Summary
The communists have to change how they talk. They have to. The elite communists continue to use the most apocalyptic rhetoric. You're giving them orders. These people hear these words and they take them as orders. They hear orders, marching orders. And it's not going to change. Democrats are more inclined to political violence anyway because they're godless scum. It is their religion, and historically evil religions have killed people who are of the opposite religion. Democrat rhetoric combined with a mentally ill base, combined with the fact that Democrats believe political violence is justified. They do. 55% of Democrats come out and say it would be justified if Donald Trump gets killed. Add in some antidepressants. Add in some tranny ideology which shatters your mind.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The communists have to change how they talk. They have to. The elite communists continue to use the most apocalyptic rhetoric. They've been doing this for ten years now, ten years plus, and their base, so many of them are mentally ill, SSRIs. You're giving them orders. These people hear these words and they take them as orders. Street communists hear orders when elite communists call you a Nazi. They hear orders, marching orders. Eventually those orders are going to be received by violent subhuman beast and that subhuman beast is going to go kill people. And it's not going to change. I'm sorry. It simply will not. What causes that? Well, when you have a mentally ill violent base combined with the fact Democrats are more inclined to political violence anyway because they're godless scum. It is their religion, and historically evil religions have killed people who are of the opposite religion. Democrat rhetoric combined with a mentally ill base, combined with the fact that Democrats believe political violence is justified. They do. And you can you can yell at me all you want. They do. The the all the polling shows, it's the majority of them during COVID. They wanted you thrown in camps. They're okay if Elon Musk gets assassinated. 55% of Democrats come out and say it would be justified if Donald Trump gets killed. So they're naturally violent anyway. Add in some antidepressants. Add in some tranny ideology which shatters your mind.
Saved - January 26, 2026 at 7:08 AM

@lady_annihilate - LadyAnnihilate

Awesome Jews says, part of my Sampson Opinion where I am at right now is OFF WITH THEIR HEADS and I WILL DO IT MYSELF. This is FREE SPEECH! https://t.co/GfQwfeEEvs

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 vents intense anger about the Israel-Gaza crisis and U.S. involvement. He says: we pivoted to the IDF and after two years of war, with brothers and sisters killed and hostages liberated, “for these sick fucks” to turn it into Disneyland and give it to the Palestinians is unacceptable; he cannot pay for it. He notes Qatar and Turkey’s involvement, and a comment by BB that if Qatar can’t come, they’ll bring them; then “Qatar’s on the board of peace,” which enrages him. He proclaims, “We have nuclear missiles,” and threatens North Korea, claiming he will show them a “Jewish North Korea.” He declares “Gaza is biblically ours” and says the new board of peace has pushed him over the edge; he does not want to come back, and wants “full deportation” of Palestinians. He argues for shutting borders for us and our friends only, envisioning Gaza becoming a banking and tax haven, free of wars. He expresses confusion over the Iran situation and asserts that their weaponry is so advanced they can “melt their flesh with our lasers,” yet laments giving Gaza to their enemies and asks, “What the actual fuck?” He ends by saying, “So I’d like to get” before the transcript cuts off. Speaker 1 adds, “to pay for it,” and then, “you forgot about the part where we pay the price tag because nobody else wants to fucking pay for it.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. And since we pivoted to the IDF and it got brought up, thank you, Alonzo and Yael, I'd want I just, like, have been like, part of my Sampson option that I am at right now where, like, I just don't give a fuck and I have no empathy, and I'm, like, off with their heads and I'll do it myself, is that, like, we just went to war for two years, and my brothers and sisters killed and were killed to liberate these hostages only for these sick fucks to go turn it into Disneyland and give it to the fucking Palestinians? I'm sorry, but I can't Speaker 1: to pay for it. You forgot about the part where we pay the price tag because nobody else wants to fucking pay for it. Thank you. Speaker 0: I'm so pissed off at the I'm like, Qatar is coming, and all of our enemies are coming out. And BB's like, if Qatar can't come and Turkey can't come. And next thing you know, they're like, and Qatar's on the board of peace. And I'm like, fuck you. We have nuclear missiles. You want fucking North Korea? I'll show you North Korea. This is gonna be Jewish North Korea. Don't fuck with the Jews. End of story. Gaza is biblically ours. This new board of peace has sent me over the edge in a place that I just don't ever wanna come back from. I just don't ever wanna come back. I wanna remove them all. I want there to be a full deportation. I don't want any peace. Deportation is because I have empathy and I don't wanna kill people, but they all need to go. We need to shut down the borders. It needs to be for us and our friends only. It'll become a a banking haven, a tax haven for all of our friends. You know, no wars and I don't understand the Iran situation either. Our weaponry is so out of this world advanced. We can melt their flesh with our lasers and we instead give Gaza to our enemies. What the actual fuck? I'm done. So I'd like to get
View Full Interactive Feed