@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
Here is Donald Trump’s rape accuser E. Jean Carroll that the left won’t stop talking about. She doesn’t appear to know what rape means: “I think most people think of rape as being sexy.” “The word ‘rape’ carries so many sexual connotations, this was not sexual.” Even Anderson Cooper was appalled with these answers.
@Sharpcut - Political World Network
BREAKING NEWS: Here is the full 2016 testimony of a girl who claimed she was raped by Donald Trump (with Jeffrey Epstein) when she was 13 years old. It is explicit. Please watch the entire video. If you believe her, please share. https://t.co/tnhybi8tPz
@genuke1 - genuke1🦊🐎
Judge Lewis Kaplan presided over the Trump Civil Trial. He is a Clinton appointee. Several noted legal scalars, included Johnathan Turley stated that judge Kaplan allowed evidence to be presented to the jury that had nothing to do with the event in question. (He stacked the evidence unfavorable to Trump). This will help Trump's defense upon appeal. The plaintiff E. Jean Carroll could not even remember the date when her alleged event occurred or have a reason for not reporting it to authorities.
@sues86453 - Sue Knows Best
E. Jean Carroll says she “just completely forgot” to disclose in her deposition that a billionaire Democrat donor was funding part of her case against Trump… Of course she did.. wink… wink. Listen carefully. What’s the word she almost says?
@LizCrokin - LIZ CROKIN
NEW EPSTEIN FILES REVEAL UNFOUNDED CLAIMS AGAINST TRUMP THAT WERE RETRACTED AND DEBUNKED YEARS AGO & MADE BY A VICTIM REPRESENTED BY LAW FIRM THAT USED FORMER ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE AGENTS TO SPY ON REPORTERS EXPOSING HARVEY WEINSTEIN! The new Jeffrey Epstein documents expose Sarah Ransome sent e-mails to a reporter claiming her friend, Jen, had sex with Donald Trump at Epstein’s New York home. She has retracted this and other statements. “She confided in me about her casual ‘friendship’ with Donald. Mr. Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her ‘pert nipples,’” Ransome wrote in a 2016 e-mail. “I also know she had sexual relations with Trump at Jeffery’s NY mansion on regular occasions,” she added. Ransome walked back the allegations against Trump in an Oct. 23, 2016 e-mail with New York Post columnist Maureen Callahan writing, “I would like to retract everything I have said to you and walk away from this,” according to the filing. In the fall of 2016, Ransome also suggested to the New York Post that she had sex tapes of half a dozen prominent people including Bill Clinton and Trump—but couldn’t provide the tapes when asked. Ransome told reporter Connie Bruck of The New Yorker she had invented the tapes to draw attention to Epstein’s behavior, and to make him believe that she had evidence that would come out if he harmed her. It should be noted that Ransome’s attorney was David Boies. Bradley Edwards wrote in his book Relentless Pursuit he noticed red flags with Boies that gave him pause including that Boies had a relationship with Epstein. In October of 2017, The New Yorker and the New York Times were investigating accusations of sexual abuse against Harvey Weinstein who was Boies’s client at that time. Boies’s firm hired Black Cube, a private intelligence company run by former Israeli military operatives, to disrupt the reporting. In the process, Black Cube operatives impersonated a source and assumed other false identities to gather information on the reporters. Boies said that he regretted not supervising Black Cube more closely. The New York Times severed its ties with Boies after he was linked to the clandestine effort to spy on their reporters and prevent the publication of a damaging story about Weinstein. “We never contemplated that the law firm would contract with an intelligence firm to conduct a secret spying operation aimed at our reporting and our reporters,” the newspaper said in a statement. It’s also interesting that Ransome’s claims about Trump were at the time Wikileaks was releasing the Podesta E-mails exposing Pizzagate in 2016 and before that year’s presidential Election Day. It also should be emphasized that Edwards — who represented dozens of victims — said none of the witnesses he interviewed claimed there was inappropriate sexual behavior by Trump nor was he ever around when minors were present. The more you know! 💥
@TimRunsHisMouth - Tim Young
Just a reminder that Trump's accuser E. Jean Carroll once told Anderson Cooper that rape is "sexy" and a "fantasy." ...and it creeped him out so much that he cut her off and threw to commercial. https://t.co/KU9Ir6KJ2u
@MrReaganUSA - Mr Reagan 🇺🇸
This is E Jean Carroll, the woman that the left believes has "credibly" accused Trump of sexual assault in the dressing room of the Bergdorf Goodman Department store. 😳 https://t.co/QZ0A44NmAm
@MrReaganUSA - Mr Reagan 🇺🇸
It's amazing how many gullible leftists claim to actually believe the E Jean Carroll sham. I wonder if they really believe it or if they're just pretending because it's politically convenient. 🤔
@WojPawelczyk - Wojciech Pawelczyk
E. Jean Carroll is completely nuts and has zero credibility. Watch the full video😵 https://t.co/DSlo4cKJut
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
The woman who is accusing Trump of sexual assault: -named her dog “Tits” & “Vagina” -told Anderson Cooper that rape is “sexy” -lives in a cabin in the woods called the “Mouse House” -paints trees and rocks blue -lined up her entire allegation with the plot of an SVU episode -called sluts “sexual geniuses” -tweeted about learning sex tips from her dog The Left says we should believe all woman, but this woman does not seem stable. Do you believe E. Jean Carroll?
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Here is E. Jean Carroll calling rape “sexy” and making Anderson Cooper so uncomfortable that he went to commercial break. https://t.co/OTA8oeHJbl
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Here is E. Jean Carroll’s bizarre “Mouse House” in the middle of the forest with painted rocks and trees around it. https://t.co/dDPWRPESaY
@greg_price11 - Greg Price
I just want to remind everyone that in addition to once saying on CNN that "rape is sexy," E. Jean Carroll's accusation against Trump is an exact plot line from a 2012 Law & Order SVU episode. She claimed that this was a complete coincidence when asked about it. Her lawyers also tried to get the judge to instruct jurors that there's no evidence in the record that the episode "actually exists."
@southdintegrity - South Dakotans for Political Integrity
THE EVIDENCE THAT LED A JURY TO DETERMINE TRUMP IS A SEX PREDATOR: (1) Trump was on tape saying he assaults people all the time. (2) 26 flesh & blood humans accused Trump of sexual assault. Two testified about their experience under oath and were subject to cross examination. The jury found them credible. (3) The victim, Jean Carrol, testified under oath as to her experience and was subject to cross examination. The jury found her credible. (4) Two people corroborated Jean Carrol's version of events, testifying under oath that Jean Carrol told them about her experience immediately after it happened. They too were subject to cross examination, and the jury found them credible. (5) Trump, in a deposition, denied ever knowing Jean Carrol, but there were photos of them together. (6) When asked in a deposition, Trump said he would not assault Jean Carrol, not because assault is bad, but because she is not his type. (7) When Trump was presented a photo of Jean Carrol in his deposition, he actually thought it was his second wife. (8) Trump did not call a single witness that said he was a good person who would not assault anyone. It's not a mystery why a jury of US citizens determined Trump a SEX PREDATOR and LIAR. THE EVIDENCE WAS OVERWHELMING!
@VDHanson - Victor Davis Hanson
83 million? Donald Trump in furor stormed out of a New York courtroom for a while, in the defamation suit brought by author and dating/boyfriend/sex-advice columnist E. Jean Carroll. It was just settled against Trump for $83.3 million! The Carroll suit was largely subsidized by Reid Hoffman the billionaire capitalist, and mega-donor to the Democratic Party and leftwing causes. The subtext of Trump’s rage, aside from the outrageous monetary size of the defamation ruling, is that he was facing—and angered—a leftwing claimant, a quite hostile leftwing judge, and a leftwing New York jury. The civil suit serves as a mere preview of four additional leftwing criminal prosecutions, leftwing judges, and leftwing juries to come—all on charges that would never had been filed if Trump either had not run for president or been a liberal progressive. Yet here we are. The E. Jean Carroll case is the most baffling of all five. She, the alleged victim, did not remember even the year in which the purported sexual assault took place, nearly three decades ago. Observers have pointed out dozens of inconsistencies in her story. It was never clear what were the preliminaries that supposedly (Trump denies meeting her) led both, allegedly, willingly to retreat together to a department store dressing room, where during normal business hours the alleged violence took place. Moreover, the sexual assault complaint came forward decades post facto—and only after Trump was running for and then president. Carroll eventually sued him for battery, but well after the statute of limitations had expired and thus the case seemed defunct. Her claims of defamation injuries arise from being fired from her advice column job at ELLE magazine. She claimed that Trump’s sharp denials and ad hominem retorts led to her career ruin. But the loss for anyone of a column at 76 does not seem such a rare occurrence, and the absence of a salaried job in one’s late seventies for four years does not seem to equate to a $83 million hit. And note the allegation that her dispute with Trump led to her firing was strongly denied by the very magazine that cut her loose. But then another strange thing happened. In 2022, a new law (“The Adult Survivors Act”) was passed in the New York legislature. It also post facto established a twelve-month window (beginning six months from the signing of bill) that permitted survivors of long ago alleged sexual assaults suddenly to sue the accused long-ago perpetrator—regardless of the previous statute of limitations. That unexpected opening suddenly gave Carroll’s prior unsuccessful efforts a rebirth. And she quickly refiled with the help of arch-Trump hating billionaire Hoffman. Yet the bill may have been introduced with Trump particularly in mind—given the legislator who introduced it, Brad Hoylman-Siga, was known as another Trump antagonist. More interestingly, he had earlier introduced and had passed another Trump-targeted bill. That “TRUST” act had empowered particular federal Congressional committees to have access to the New York State once sealed tax returns of high-ranking government officials—such as Trump. That bill’s generally agreed subtext was a green light for anti-Trump members of Congress to obtain legal access to Donald J. Trump's tax returns. So there is an eerie feeling that the New York legislature may have abruptly passed legislation that was aimed at the past conduct of Donald Trump but only after he entered the political arena. While these are not quite bills of attainder, there is something unsettling if they are post facto laws aimed at targeting the most famous and controversial man in America and the leading candidate for the presidency. In essence they were targeted statutes designed to make Trump’s prior legally unactionable behavior suddenly quite legally actionable. Trump will be subject to such special treatment all summer and fall. Prosecutors Bragg, James, Smith, and Willis will synchronize their court business for maximum effect. Trump again will face leftwing prosecutors, judges, and juries on charges that are politically driven, involving alleged behavior that is either usually not criminalized or not to the same degree as Trump’s case. (Do we remember the nearly $375,000 federal fine belatedly leveled at an exempt Obama but only five years after his 2008 illegal garnering of, and not reporting, foreign campaign contributions?) The stakes are higher each day as Trump closes in on the nomination and thus becomes the hope of half the country to end the Biden madness. Somehow Trump will have to stay calm, give no opening to his legion of hostile prosecutors, while conducting a nonstop campaign against Biden (and for a while Hayley), and while fighting to keep his name on various state ballots. So what we are witnessing is not even the extralegal efforts of Steele/Fusion GPS, Perkins Coie/DNC/Hillary Clinton in 2016, or the 2020 “Russian disinformation” ruse/change the voting laws/infuse half a billion dollars to absorb the work of the registrar machinations against Trump. We are way beyond all that. The legal system itself, hand-in-glove with leftwing politicos (compare campaign boasts of James and Willis, or prosecutorial visits to the January 6 committee and the White House) is turning the process of balloting and elections into an embarrassing farce. Still, Trump will have to soldier on. He must stay controlled amid the tsunamis, not play into the hands of his accusers, and remember that he may soon be the only eleventh-hour hope to stop this mockery of American law, customs and traditions.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
This isn’t some random woman. This is E. Jean Carroll, the woman who sued Trump for defamation and won over $83 million. https://t.co/i6mcA7c8zf
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
This isn’t some random woman. This is E. Jean Carroll, the woman who sued Trump for defamation and won over $83 million. Does she seem reliable, or sane to you? They used to institutionalize people like this instead of awarding them for their delusions. https://t.co/pJI9NlQ3UR
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
If you seen and heard it already, then LISTEN TO HER AGAIN 😱 CLOSELY Defending Donald Trump from this bullshit legal system is the PROUDEST THING I’VE EVER DONE 😲 E. Jean Carroll says she was “defamed” 🤔. We’ll here’s is a little more… E. Jean Carroll is a self righteous, lying POS druggie & she will NEVER get the $83 million after Trumps Counter Suit 😎. Save the post 👊🏻
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
It's so obvious that E Jean Carrol is lying. Rape victims don't act like this and everyone knows it. She admitted George Conway put her up to this. https://t.co/RySKQz6h9Q
@simonateba - Simon Ateba
BREAKING: Tara Reade (@ReadeAlexandra), the woman who accused President Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) of sexually assaulting her in 1993, has just filed a $10 million tort complaint with the US Department of Justice. NOTE: She alleges invasion of privacy, emotional distress, and a violation of her rights. NOTE: Reade also accuses the FBI of conducting a secret operation, "Operation Cassandra," to stalk, discredit, intimidate, and potentially harm her to eliminate her as a threat to @JoeBiden.
@simonateba - Simon Ateba
I doubt anyone would believe Tara Reade, she should have accused Trump! She should have said four decades ago, one night in New York, she met this man who grabbed her, she can now identify him, it was Donald John Trump!
@VDHanson - Victor Davis Hanson
How To Destroy the American Legal System By either listening to testimonies or reading transcripts of the various 2024 Trump election-related court cases and testimonies, what we are left with is an epidemic of lies. 1) Hunter Biden’s current testimonies are contradicted by his own text messages, bank records, phone records, and testimonies of some of his associates. Anytime he is trapped in inconsistencies, he falls back on his addiction. Translated, that means we are sometimes supposed to believe he is a Yale-trained lawyer, experienced corporate grandee, and skilled negotiator, and thus carefully avoided involving his father in the family’s various schemes. And then again, sometimes when the evidence is damning and overwhelming, he simply cannot remember, or claims he was addled at the time in question due to his medical “addiction”. 2) In the Georgia Trump case, lawyers Terence Bradley, Nathan Wade, and Prosecutor Fani Willis all testified under oath to events that are contradicted by either prior other witness testimonies, or their own previous statements, or electronic phone records, and thus, to square the record, either have claimed amnesia, ignorance, or larger racist forces at work. Two of the three are leading the effort to indict a former president and current leading candidate for the presidency on a racketeering charge never before used in a Georgia election interference case, and to be tried by prosecutors who have either zero experience in felony criminal cases or no experience in racketeering cases or both. 3) Letitia James, the New York Attorney General, ran for office on promises to use her office to go after Donald Trump. She used an obscure consumer fraud law to claim Trump overvalued assets to obtain a loan that was paid back with interest and on time to a bank that audited his financial statement prior to the loan and had zero complaints about its profitable loan after it was paid off. Trump now is fined $355 million for a crime that has no victim, and has lost control of his New York businesses to a court-appointed judge. No one in New York history has ever been tried under this statute for allegedly exaggerating assets to get a loan that was paid back and over which the lending agency had no complaints. 4) Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg also boasted in his campaign for office he would go after Donald Trump. He is trying Trump on multiple felonies in a state court surrounding a supposed campaign finance violation over a nondisclosure agreement that the proper federal attorneys earlier felt did not merit prosecution. 5) Special Prosecutor Jack Smith is trying Trump for removing classified files to his estate at Mar-a-Lago. Note that twin special prosecutor Robert Hur found that President Biden also removed classified files to more and less secure residences for far longer (over 30 years) but as a senator and Vice President without Trump’s statutory presidential authority to declassify such documents. Biden admitted in 2017 he possessed such classified files and yet knowingly waited years to notify authorities. He did so only on the expectation that prosecutor Smith would soon indict Trump for the same alleged crime. Smith is also trying Trump on “insurrectionary” conduct despite Trump never having been charged in the prior three years by any federal or state authority for such an offense. 6) E. Jean Carrol (won $83.3 million in a “defamation” civil suit against Trump) won her case despite: 1) having no idea what year the alleged sexual assault took place some 30 years ago; 2) claiming she remembered the assault by the designer dress she wore that did not exist at the time; 3) advancing a narrative of events nearly identical to an episode of Law and Order that aired in 2012; 4) tweeting roughly two decades later that her supposed assailant’s TV show The Apprentice was one of her favorites; 5) her ELLE editor denying Carroll was fired from the magazine due to the Carroll-Trump dispute; 6) creating an app about how to break up couples through various machinations; 7) refiling her case beyond the statute of limitations, but only once a leftwing New York legislator strangely passed a bill allowing claimants of sexual abuse to have a one time, one year window to refile beyond the statute of limitations. 7) Blue or purple states such as Colorado, Illinois, and Maine are currently all attempting to remove Donald Trump from their presidential ballots on allegations of insurrectionary activity despite the fact he has never been convicted of any such charge and there is no precedent for such presidential disqualification. 8) Note the following: All the prosecutors, and litigants are either Democratic partisans or liberals. The trials have and will take place largely in Atlanta, New York, or Washington among leftwing prosecutors, judges, and jury pools. The majority of the charges and suits—the various states’ misuse of 14th Amendment, Bragg’s bootstrapping a state indictment onto a federal charge, James’s contortion of using a consumer fraud law to try Trump for a crime without a victim, Willis’s misuse of a racketeering statute to concoct an election interference charge, Carroll refiling once a leftwing jurist passed a special law that allowed her to do so postfacto, Smith’s effort to indict a president for insurrection and removing classified files—have either never been used before in these ways, or are in the wrong jurisdiction, or could equally apply to Democratic targets such as Joe Biden (found culpable by a special counsel but exempt by cognitive disability, named in various testimonies and texts as recipient of illicit foreign payments, accused of prior sexual assault), Hillary Clinton (fined for campaign finance violations), or Barack Obama (fined for campaign finance violations). So what is the reason for all this lying, these legal contortions, and egregious prosecutor and judicial misbehavior? Five simple facts alone: 1) The Left both fears and detests Donald Trump. 2) Donald Trump chose to run for the presidency in 2024. 3) Donald Trump is not a man of the Left. 4) Donald Trump is currently ahead of Joe Biden in both national polls and in the majority of swing state polls. 5) The Left feels barring Trump from the presidency is worth destroying 235 years of American jurisprudence.
@Prolotario1 - Ariel
The Supreme Court Rules: Donald Trump Back On The Ballot Option 1- Assassinate Donald Trump. Option 2- Bring Down Power Grid. Option 3- Create Fake Alien Invasion. Option 4- Create False Flag Option 5- Cancel Presidential Election The Deep State is now firmly up against the wall at this point. They are going to be forced to make a final move. D. Trump being put back on the ballot 24 hours before Super Tuesday was basically the last straw. People have to understand how dire the situation is for many who have committed treason. Media Pundits Political Figures Hollywood Celebrities Wallstreet Bankers Law Enforcement 3 Letter Agencies The list goes on for all those who conspired to bring down the CIC. D. Trump is basically the grim reaper. And to watch him slowly regain political power while knowing you are on the chopping block has got to be the most gut-wrenching feeling anyone can have. We have watched them throw everything at him. We have also watched everything fail. And we have seen D. Trump keeps his composure throughout all of it. Being unphased by it all. Why? Is it because he knew all along that he was holding "The Trump Card"? Everyone that we have seen comes into the spotlight as the one person that will take D. Trump down has been met with their own legal challenges and sometime ended up in prison themselves. Do you all remember Michael Avenatti? He was the star player for a hot minute. He promised the raging liberal on "The View" that he and him alone will bring down this tax evading MAGA tyrant that has wrecked havoc on American freedoms. And that he will not rest until this great foe of our time has tasted the defeat by his legal prowess and prosecution. Now, where does M. Avenatti sit currently? In a Metropolitan Correctional Center. Basically, to defraud Nike and stealing about 300k from Stormy Daniels. And you know what's the kicker in all of this. M. Avenatti was only allowed to read one book in prison. Do you all want to know what that book is? "The Art Of The Deal" by Donald Trump. But no, the Cabal had someone else up their sleeve who was also supposed to bring about the destruction of the orange man. Fani Willis. Someone who is also facing legal issues because of some of her rendezvous with Nathan Wade. Records show special prosecutor Nathan Wade paid for flights with Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to Miami in 2022 and San Francisco in 2023, according to court documents. I mean we all know the charges by Fani. Willis was DOA. Everyone with commonsense knows Joe Biden didn't legally win 2020 election. Even Ivan Raiklin knows this sense he helped J. Biden win a couple of states. Especially Pennsylvania. This was nothing more than the liberal establishment being the pot while calling the kettle black. They knew this entire charade was going to be something with diminishing returns. Just as everything before it that fell flat. • Russian Collusion • Tax Evasion Fraud • Stormy Daniels Case • The Insurrection • Covid-19 But no they were still going to attempt this Hail Mary on the 4th & 50 with 4 seconds on the clock down by 8 with all the star players injured and contracts expiring. What do they throw? E. Jean Carroll into end zone. The most delusional play they could muster up as if it was going to be this game winning touchdown to bring them back into the game that was already over before they even threw the ball. What in the world were they trying to accomplish with that attempt? Everyone knows this woman is looney and a bafooney. Her entire sexual assault plot was grabbed right from Law & Order: Special Victims Unit. She tried to pretend she was clueless about this entire similar case in the 2012 episode. Plot: "A brief moment of the episode — titled “Theatre and Tricks” — involves a character talking about role-playing a rape fantasy in Bergdorf Goodman. “Role-play took place in the dressing room of Bergdorf’s. While she was trying on lingerie I would burst in,” the character says. So what does E. Jean Carroll do in order to convince the nation that this actually happened? She uses the exact plot by claiming that the former commander-in-chief raped her in a fitting room in the lingerie section of the Fifth Avenue department store most likely in 1996. People do you see how low on ammo the Deep State is? Do you see how everything they have tried has not worked out to delay the inevitable? Do you see that at this point there is no way out for them? They are going to be forced to initiate their own demise. And D. Trump knows this move is coming up soon. Which is why the military has things in place for this last straw. This is something we all need to prepare for. These psychopaths will not go down quietly. They didn't spend decades in those secret underground bases building and creating every monstrosity they could think of and to let them go to waste. "The time to prepare is before you need it; waiting until the storm hits only ensures you'll weather it poorly." Think Wisely-
@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver
@Travis_4_Trump The psychopath admitted LIVE on CNN that her allegations were a fraud, and the judge wouldn’t allow the footage to be used in court. https://t.co/acMBbqCIib
@atensnut - Juanita Broaddrick
THIS is the real E. Jean Carroll. She is a delusional pervert!! https://t.co/fA91WnkcPu
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
E. Jean Carroll said she didn't believe she was a victim of her "3-minute" encounter she claims to have had with Donald Trump. "I think most people think of rape as sexy. They think of the fantasies." Let's hope the Supreme Court overturns the civil verdict in this case, too. https://t.co/M1qGku6Hfb
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
I can’t believe how many democrats still don’t realize that the only reason E. Jean Carroll was allowed to file charges against Trump was because democrat billionaires funded her effort to get a one year temporary law added just so she could. She was the first person in the state to file under the new temporary law. 12 months later the law expired.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
Carroll also lied and testified under oath that she wasn’t having her legal fees paid for by someone else and faced no repercussions when it was exposed as a lie. https://t.co/OW6eGMMZic
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
👇👇
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
The so-called "witness" who backed Carroll's outlandish claims in court? Well, emails from 2017 between her and Carroll expose the truth. In September of that year, Carol Martin sent E. Jean Carroll an article mocking Trump, referring to him as "Orange Crush," and urged, "this has to stop." She suggested, "as soon as we’re both well enough to scheme, we must both do our patriotic duty." Carroll eagerly replied, "TOTALLY!!! I have something special for you when we meet." Fast forward 15 months, and Carroll conveniently releases a book accusing Trump of assault. Martin didn’t want to be involved at first saying Carroll made the lawsuit a “lifestyle”.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
The main witness, Carol Martin, texted her daughter that E. Jean Carroll was a drug addict and that the drug was herself. https://t.co/STSYNr5sPR
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
And the thing I find strangest of all…. What true victim of the crime she claimed would post a question like this? https://t.co/4bSZSvkLV9
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
For the people asking why Trump didn’t give his DNA https://t.co/A8I9YSritt
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@MxCl74613523 YUP
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@AngelLee2194 If only she had evidence.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@AndrewLBElms A claim like that requires proof. She has yet to present any.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@KaostheDog2 If this would true she would have had went against him criminally. If it was true she would have had evidence Democrats are disgusting and support false rape claims as long as it’s against their opponent..
@C_3C_3 - C3
E. Jean Carroll didnt mention allegations in: 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Then pervert REID HOFFMAN funded her 3 days after Trump announced his re-election campaign. https://t.co/WSme7aDmFL
@simonateba - Simon Ateba
BREAKING: Tara Reade (@ReadeAlexandra), the woman who accused President Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) of sexually assaulting her in 1993, has just filed a $10 million tort complaint with the US Department of Justice. NOTE: She alleges invasion of privacy, emotional distress, and a violation of her rights. NOTE: Reade also accuses the FBI of conducting a secret operation, "Operation Cassandra," to stalk, discredit, intimidate, and potentially harm her to eliminate her as a threat to @JoeBiden.