reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Posted - February 18, 2023 at 5:11 PM

Saved - February 19, 2023 at 1:28 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Undercover MPD officers allegedly urged protestors to advance up the Capitol steps on January 6. Videos show these officers, but the government is hiding video they recorded. Armed undercover DOJ/DEA agents were also seen moving towards the Capitol during Trump's speech. An FBI informant claimed Proud Boys were helping police. Michael Sherwin, US Attorney for DC, was also allegedly undercover. Ray Epps pushed a sign into police.

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

Why hasn't the government informed the public that undercover MPD officers were chanting "our house!" and repeatedly urging protestors to advance up the northwest steps of the Capitol on January 6? Officer 2 said someone would get shot and went up right behind Ashli Babbitt.

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

Public videos show these undercover officers, but the government continues to hide video these officers recorded under seal in the January 6 discovery. American's deserve to see the truth! Why is our government hiding it? https://archive.org/details/7KkqYoKFqnsbynahS https://archive.org/details/u99Cpca4ayCEbwEhu

Internet Archive: ErrorInternet Archive logoSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon archive.org

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

Why were armed undercover DOJ/DEA agents moving east from the Ellipse area (in the direction of the Capitol) during President Trump's speech on January 6? Why were MPD telling people to keep marching towards the Capitol? Source Video Exhibits: https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all

Login rumble.com

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

"Let them take this motherfucker" I'm being told I posted a bad rumble link to the bodycam exhibits. Try this one: https://rumble.com/c/c-2407734

Video Transcript AI Summary

They set us up. They set up 64 and asked us to come up 2 hours later. They needed everyone immediately. We're doing away with the game. They set us up for failure.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: They set us the fuck up. That's what they did. They set us up. They set up 64. Oh, absolutely. And then they asked you to come up 2 hours later. They set us up. They needed everybody right away. No. Right away. They set us the fuck up. Oh, my way ain't got shit. We're doing we're doing away here with home that game. We ain't got a motherfucker. They set us up for fuck up.

21-cr-128 Exhibits Browse the most recent videos from channel "21-cr-128 Exhibits" uploaded to Rumble.com rumble.com

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

"Keep the march going" . . . as the officer waves them to the Capitol

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 urges the crowd to keep marching and not stop. Speaker 1 expresses support. Speaker 0 continues to encourage the march and thanks the participants. They emphasize the need to keep going and express gratitude for the quick response.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Guys, help me out. Don't do that. This is not a look. Walk on. I got it. Hey, Todd. Speaker 1: I love you there. I'm listening to your Speaker 0: Let's go. Let's back it up. Come on, guys. Let's keep the march going. Let's keep it going. Let's keep it going. Let's keep the march going. Let's keep it going. Guys, let's keep the march going. Speaker 1: That's right. Speaker 0: Please, Come on. Come on. Keep the march going. Hey. Let's go. Let's go. Let's go. Speaker 1: Here you Speaker 0: go, my friend. Take it. Let's go. Keep the march going. Come on, guys. Let's go. Let's go. Keep it going. Come on. Keep the march going. You got a great march going here. Let's go. Big, stable. I understand. I understand. Oh my goodness. I understand. Let's go. Thank you, guys. Let's keep the march going. Yes, sir. Let's go. Let's keep it going. Let's keep it going. Let's keep the launch going, guys. Let's go. Come on. Thank you. Let's go. Let's go. Speaker 1: Let's go. Speaker 0: Fucking go. Good response. That was quick because it was it was going the other way really quickly. I heard you guys

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

Officer Brown and other MPD bike police stop armed suspects who are heading from the Ellipse area east towards the Capitol during President Trump's speech on January 6. The suspects then produce DOJ/DEA agency credentials.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 asks if anyone is present and mentions that they are conducting an investigation related to an accident. They inquire about the presence of law enforcement and request credentials. After receiving the necessary information, Speaker 0 concludes by advising the listener to improve their hiding skills.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hey. How you guys doing? Quick question. Yes. Give me a second. Just doing one investigation. Mhmm. Accident, respectively. Is anyone on? Anyone else Yeah. Police. Police? Yeah. Law enforcement. Yeah. Yeah. Can you tell me your credentials? K. Appreciate it. Appreciate it. Okay. That's all I need. The one last time. You you gotta do a little bit better at hiding

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

"Do your non-uniformed guys have any identifiers?"

Video Transcript AI Summary

A person with dark hair, wearing a black vest and pink blue line, was seen carrying something resembling a gun. They did not have any police identification. Another person, a white male with white or dark hair, was also present. They appeared to have grayish black clothing, possibly a digital futon. The individuals may have wristbands, but the color is unknown. Additionally, their guns may have a candy stripe on the barrel.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Guys, dark hair, black vest, pink blue line, big on, dark gear, and he's kinda like a look a little 27 or something on his hip. No police identification at all. Speaker 1: You couldn't get to him because there were so many people there. Speaker 0: White male. White hair, dark hair. Alright. Look like a grayish black maybe. Maybe a, digital futon. Guys have any identifiers? Like, they will have a wristband. Their guns will have a candy stripe on the barrel. Okay. I don't know the wristband color, but they'll have a wristband somewhere. Okay?

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

An FBI informant in the Capitol tells an officer that Proud Boys inside the Capitol were helping police. For more on this informant see:

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

Ryan Samsel (jean jacket and red hat) who pushed the gates at the Peace Circle can be seen walking past an undercover Michael Sherwin (U.S. Attorney for D.C.) at 15th and Constitution Ave prior to President Trump's speech.

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

Update. I've just been informed the man in the gargoyle mask is not "Plain Clothes Tim" but defendant Fi Duong. Fi seemed to be who Officer 1 was speaking to, but it's possible "Tim" was #Pushy1776 Tim Davis who was right next to Fi Duong on the steps.

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

Another possibility is that Officer 1 says "Jim" not "Tim" which is another name used for Fi Duong in his charging documents.

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

If you think all this is crazy, wait until you read this thread:

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

More quality reporting by @EpochJoe64. https://www.theepochtimes.com/undercover-dc-police-officer-pushed-protesters-toward-capitol-climbed-over-barricade-court-filing_5067663.html

Undercover DC Police Officer Pushed Protesters Toward Capitol, Climbed Over Barricade: Court Filing Three undercover Metropolitan Police Department officers joined the march of protesters up the northwest side of the Capitol ... theepochtimes.com

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

Here's a short video I made a while back on the DOJ's Michael Sherwin being undercover at the fake rifle incident during Trump's speech. https://t.co/5T3l3SnpMM

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

Oh and Ray Epps pushed the sign into police...🧵 https://t.co/lJpfa3lROg

@SharylAttkisson — Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋

Posted - November 5, 2023 at 7:21 PM

Saved - November 6, 2023 at 7:28 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Sharyl Attkisson shared a document in her lawsuit, revealing an agent who admitted to spying on her had worked as an informant for Rod Rosenstein. Later, the informant died, hindering further details. Bill Swiggart questioned if Rosenstein's disclosure led to the informant's death. Attkisson hadn't considered that possibility. Swiggart wondered why Rosenstein revealed the informant's name if he intended to conceal it.

@SharylAttkisson - Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋

I wish I were making this up. In my ongoing lawsuit over the govt. spying on my computers, I submitted this document to the court. It proved that one agent who admitted spying on me (and many others) had, indeed, worked as an informant for US Atty. Rod Rosenstein, as he'd claimed. About a week later, the informant was reported dead. Which of course means he can't provide more details of the operation. And the historic clerk's default I received against him in my lawsuit-- the first known such decision in a case of govt. spying on a journalist--pretty much will go nowhere.

@BillSwiggart - William F. Swiggart

@SharylAttkisson Shockingly, you seem to be implying that Rosenstein filed the motion for the purpose of revealing the White's status as a confidential informant, and that he did so for the purpose of getting him killed.

@SharylAttkisson - Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋

@BillSwiggart I hadn't thought of that...

@BillSwiggart - William F. Swiggart

@SharylAttkisson What other reason could he have had for publicly revealing the man's name and alias even while ostensibly seeking to conceal it?

@JesseBWatters — Jesse Watters

Posted - November 15, 2023 at 1:51 AM

Saved - November 17, 2023 at 4:38 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The Secret Service's response to our FOIA reveals their deception. Despite claiming no DNA was found and destroying the cocaine, documents show three tubes of DNA were preserved. The baggie's DNA was processed and stored as evidence. Their actions raise suspicions.

@JesseBWatters - Jesse Watters

EXCLUSIVE: the Secret Service has responded to Primetime’s FOIA over the White House cocaine investigation. We now know they’ve been lying to you about everything. After telling us they didn’t find any DNA and destroying the bag of coke, the documents tell us there’s three tubes of DNA that they didn’t destroy. They did find DNA on the baggie- it was processed and moved to an evidence vault for preservation. They now have an insurance policy.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Secret Service has been accused of lying about the cocaine investigation. Initially, they claimed the cocaine was found in the library where the First Family lives, but later reports suggested it was found outside the situation room. The Secret Service then said it was found in a cubby with a blind spot, but the location of the cocaine remains unclear. The documents obtained through a FOIA request reveal inconsistencies and redactions. DNA was found on the baggie, despite initial denials by the Secret Service. The DNA sample is being preserved, but there are concerns that it may be destroyed in the future. The investigation has raised suspicions of a cover-up.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Fox News alert prime time FOIA the Secret Service over the cocaine investigation, and we just got back over a 100 pages of documents. And the Secret Service has been lying to you about everything. Here's why. When the cocaine was first found, they said it was in the library where the first Family lives. Speaker 1: We have a yellow bar stating cocaine, hydrochloride, a match found in the library. Speaker 0: Then there were reports that the cocaine was actually found outside the situation room. Speaker 1: Now that the investigation has progressed and so they're The West executive entrance, which as you noted is closer to the situation room. Speaker 0: The Secret Service then said no. It was in a cubby with a lot of foot traffic around it. And yes, there are cameras, but that particular cubby was in a blind spot. How do you mistake the library for the situation room and the situation room for the cubbies? Because when I'm in a library, I know I'm in a library because there's books everywhere. Does it look like there's books everywhere? That's a wall of cubbies. They say the coke was found in locker number 50, right there in the middle. And there's a key missing. And what do you think the chances are that the Secret Service has the key? Because prime time Thanks to coke, may have been planted in the cubby after it was found in the library. Good thing we have the documents from the Secret Service right here. But here's the thing, the Secret Service redacted where the cocaine was first found. Now if the cocaine was actually first found in the cubby and they photographed it in the cubby, why would they redact that? And then at one point, the Secret Service says this suspicious substance is a white powder in a small ziplock bag on the redacted lobby floor. What lobby floor? The lobby into what room? The library? And I thought they found the cocaine in the cubby. Well, the cubby's not on the floor. The cubby's on the wall. Later on in the night, they said it was in the cubby and they didn't redact that. They want us to think it was found in that little locker. And initially, after the HazMat team tested it, the white powder came back positive for opioids and amphetamines. It was only after additional tests that they determined it to be cocaine. And that's confusing because on the audio you heard from Hazmat, It was cocaine. A white powdery opioid? That's Fentanyl. Maybe. I thought these tests were supposed to be accurate. So far, this bag has tested positive for opioids, amphetamines, cocaine, Caffeine and baking soda. But here's where it gets even more suspicious. They told us they didn't find any DNA, but the documents say they did. Remember, the coke baggy's Been blown up. The Secret Service took the evidence from Quantico and they destroyed it. They didn't want the FBI to have it, but There's more evidence that they didn't destroy. An envelope with 3 tubes of DNA. Where'd they get the DNA from? They got the DNA off the baggie. So the Secret Service lied, and so did the White House. They did find DNA on the baggie, and the DNA was processed and has been moved to an evidence vault for preservation. So the Secret Service has an insurance policy. We asked The Secret Service for an explanation, and they said, oh, it's secondary DNA. But the initial Secret Service report clearly said there was no DNA found, and there is no physical evidence. But the documents show they're keeping a DNA sample in an evidence locker. As if is this so Biden's dog bites another agent? They have something? We don't know. And the Secret Service told Primetime they may end up destroying the DNA evidence at some point down the road. You know, protocol. Primetime asked the Secret Service, why didn't you take DNA samples from your suspect list? They said they would have needed a court order. This tells me 2 things. The Secret Service didn't want to crack the case, or the Secret Service knew the coke was found in the library and put it in a cubby, and closed the case. James Fitzgerald is a retired FBI criminal profiler and a forensic linguist. James, so they had DNA, and they've had it the whole time, and they're preserving it. What's going on here? Speaker 1: I think you'd almost have to do a few lines of cocaine, Jesse, you don't understand all Speaker 0: that Speaker 1: you went through and all this investigation has been happening happening with this investigation over the last few months. It seems like obfuscation is the is the prime operating word here. Confuse everyone as much as possible. I'll leave out the clue game references with the library to, to Cubby, and who knows where Colonel Mustard may be or someone like that. But this is just, This should be a very simple investigation. A bag is found somewhere. Police, secret service are called. Here's the evidence. Send it to the lab. But there's just so much going on here, you can't help but ask yourself, and any you don't even be an experienced profiler, just ask yourself, there's just too much gone wrong here. No investigator is that bad. Even a crack investigator, no pun intended, would somehow get the basic information right here, get it off to the right lab, And get the primary, DNA from the baggie if it if the baggie still exists, and that could still be very valuable. All you need is 1 to 10 nanograms of, of DNA material for touch DNA, and you have your suspect. You have the suspect, people give the swabs, and you should narrow this down within days. Speaker 0: Does it seem like to you that they found it on the floor of the library? Because that's what it sounds like to me. They found it on the floor of the library, and then they moved it all around, and it wound up in a cubby where there was no camera and 500 suspects. Isn't that what it is? It's a cover up. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's, who knows? The person on the floor there might have been a person on the floor of the library where this cocaine was found. And they had to take it off of his hand, Then put it into the cubby. There's all kinds of counter and and triple counter moves going on here to again somehow confuse Those of us in the public, and certainly some investigators, I I I was wrong with you back in July about this. I am sure there are some investigators chomping at the bit, Secret service FBI that really wanna get to the bottom of this, but they're being told by their appointed bosses that no, this is, You know, keep the littleness whole matter and, it'll just go away. Would it make sense? Guys getting your foyer request back. For sure. Speaker 0: I mean, we got a thick stack here, and we're just going through it. Would it make sense for the Secret Service to hold on to this DNA sample just in case, you know, just in case anything happened or anything needed to happen. Speaker 1: There's never a reason to get rid of evidence certainly within weeks or months of a crime. 10 years down the line, maybe. But, but not at this point in time. There's just it's just no rationale for that. Speaker 0: Yeah. They blew up the coke bag, and then they kept the DNA. Very, very interesting.

@DecentFiJC — Jonathan

Posted - January 22, 2024 at 2:59 PM

Saved - January 22, 2024 at 11:48 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Michael Chertoff's connections to Mossad, as well as his involvement in various organizations, are highlighted in these posts. The posts also mention Bryan Cunningham's affiliations and question his lack of interaction. Additionally, the posts discuss the connection between Chertoff and Ehud Barak, emphasizing the significance of their relationship. Lastly, Chertoff's mother's ties to Mossad, his role in investigating the 9/11 attacks, and his profiteering from security scanners are mentioned.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Now THIS is a phenomenal find, @AzPinkLady!🤯 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 Especially now that we know MICHAEL CHERTOFF is literally MOSSAD! Incredible dig, my friend! 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 Give @AzPinkLady a follow immediately and PLEASE, share this ENTIRE THREAD!!!

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Would you believe, the CEO of the company Be Toma is invested in Black Mountain Incestment who bought Runbeck, Is Senior advisor at the Chertoff Group…THE Chertoff link to Susan Spaulding & usurping our courts. Thanks @DecentFiJC for prompting me to look at your Toma research. It lead me to this gem.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥Speaking of assholes, that reminds me of another Senior Advisor at The Chertoff Group: 💥💥💥💥BRYAN CUNNINGHAM💥💥💥💥 I can’t BELIEVE I initially forgot to mention that he’s also VICE-CHAIR of the @ABAesq’s… “CYBERSECURITY PRIVACY TASK FORCE”

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

@denvercunning, why’d just block me? And why have I never seen you interact with any of our dozens of network forensics reports that we’ve put out which DIRECTLY DEMONSTRATE NETWORK COMPROMISE in our “ELECTIONS CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE” NETWORKS?🤔 Gosh, I’d think someone like yourself with your extensive background and who’s such an elite “cybersecurity, national security and CIA guru” and a “former-White House advisor” would’ve made contact with someone like me months ago. You know, for the love of America and whatnot. Oh, wait. I bet I know what it is… 🖕🏼Would it have something to do with you being f*cking SENIOR COUNSEL for PALANTIR? and… 🖕🏼SENIOR ADVISOR to THE CHERTOFF GROUP? and… 🖕🏼Member of the BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER “NATIONAL SECURITY TASK FORCE”? OR… perhaps it’s simpler than that. 💥Perhaps it’s the fact that YOU ALREADY KNOW EXACTLY WHO TF I AM, you traitorous POS. 💥Which means you ALSO know WE’RE COMING TO DESTROY EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE F*CKING TREASONOUS ORGANIZATIONS CURRENTLY HELPING STEAL AMERICAN ELECTIONS ON BEHALF OF FOREIGN INTERESTS. See you soon. Get COMPLETELY f*cking rekt.✌️

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Wait, Michael Chertoff sits on the BOARD for EHUD BARAK’S COMPANY?!?!🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯 💥Ehud BARAK is who pleaded with BILL CLINTON TO GIVE MARC RICH a last-minute pardon on his way out the door! 💥If you’re not familiar with MARC RICH, here’s the CLIFFS NOTES on that humongous fagit: 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 He went behind the United States’ back to help the Ayatollah, Iranians and Israelis bypass (circumvent) US oil sanctions against IRAN by helping MOSSAD agents secure contracts in IRAN… while living in SWITZERLAND. 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 😳🤯🫢😒😡🤬😤 (This connection is a muuuuuuch bigger deal than most people realize. SERIOUS 9/11 implications.)

@BettyeG88548245 - CithWillNotComply

@DecentFiJC @cancersucks49 @AzPinkLady https://t.co/2SatmpxUxG

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

@ABAesq Louis Freeh, eh?🤔 https://t.co/z96kLhufnF

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries

@DecentFiJC @ABAesq Louis Freeh - One Eye is mentioned 👇 https://t.co/X841tSp7VB

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

✅Chertoff’s MOTHER was MOSSAD. ✅Chertoff “investigated” and then “cleared Israel of any wrongdoing” in the 9/11 attacks. ✅Chertoff then authored the PATRIOT ACT and “baked in” PROTECTIONS FOR ISRAEL into it. ✅Chertoff (and his family) THEN profiteered GAZILLIONS OF DOLLARS when new security scanners (he was heavily invested in) were installed in airports all across the country, following the heightened TSA security requirements post-9/11.

@Deece5555 - Deece

@DecentFiJC @ABAesq What’s the 9/11 connection? Sorry if I missed something when I looked over the thread but that’s the specific part I’m not gettin. Not doubting you, just not sure of the specific connection.

@JamesOKeefeIII — James O'Keefe

Posted - February 26, 2024 at 9:22 PM

Saved - February 26, 2024 at 10:38 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

IRS official Alex Mena was caught on camera calling IRS AI programs 'unconstitutional'. He tried to hide but was found by O'Keefe and denied his identity. When confronted with the footage, Mena apologized.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

IRS Official Alex Mena SPRINTS a mile down 7th avenue in NYC after O’Keefe shows footage of him calling the IRS AI programs 'unconstitutional’ Mena then attempted to hide by standing in a shadowy doorway on Commerce Street, before O’Keefe found him and Mena began running again. Mena, who said he works with Criminal Investigations for the IRS, denied his own identity to O’Keefe, saying “that’s not me.” When he was confronted with the hidden camera footage, Mena added, “I’m really sorry”

Video Transcript AI Summary

A man from the IRS was caught on hidden camera during a criminal investigation, denying his identity and running away in New York City. He claimed unconstitutional warrantless searches. The cameraman struggled to keep up, even stopping to catch his breath. The man was eventually found hiding in a building. The incident was documented by James O'Keefe for OMG. The video was sponsored by the wellness company, offering a discount on medical emergency kits.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Are you Alex Maina with the IRS? Are you Alex Maina with the IRS, sir? You're part of an undercover investigation. Okay. A on hidden camera as part of a hidden camera investigation. Speaker 1: They all had any empathy at all towards it? It was at this moment that he knew. He up. Sir? There's no empathy. Speaker 0: You're on camera, sir. Speaker 1: I don't know what you're talking about. I'm sorry. Yeah. I really, really sorry. Speaker 0: Sir? This Speaker 1: is a criminal investigation Is Speaker 0: is this you on camera, sir? Speaker 1: No. That's not me. Speaker 0: That's not you. That's not you? I don't know. Speaker 1: You denied his identity. Speaker 0: That is certainly you, sir. Speaker 1: It's you on hidden camera. People. I'm even harassing you. Speaker 0: Sir, what what you said that it's unconstitutional He Speaker 1: went into Speaker 0: the the warrantless searches at the IRS, sir? Speaker 1: No. No. Sir? Speaker 0: Sir, you say sir sir, you're running. We have a runner here. We have a runner at the IRS. Where are you going? Sir, this is not you said it's not you. Is this not you? Sir? Sir, we have a runner. We have a runner at the IRS. We're we're going for a jog here in New York City with criminal investigations unit at the IRS. We're running woah. This way, guys. This way. We're running. We got a runner at the IRS. I got my chocolate chip cookies. I got my cookies. My chocolate Speaker 1: chip cookies. That's a few moments later. Speaker 0: He's hiding. He's hiding. Get him. Get him. Get him. Get him. He's hiding. Are you filming? Where are you going? He hid. You're trying to hide from me. We're in New York City in the West Village. There's an IRS guy working in the criminal division who's running away. K? There's a marathon. I drive on chocolate chip cookies, and then he's running away from me. Then he says it's unconstitutional. It's unconstitutional. Watch out, doggy. Uh-huh. Okay. We are on Hudson Street, Hudson in New York City in Barrow. Speaker 1: I give you no part of the Speaker 0: gym. Okay. Our cameraman's winded. We're gonna throw up. Speaker 1: I have no fear of fainting in the gym. Speaker 0: I always throw up in the gym. Speaker 1: I threw up many times while I was working out. Speaker 0: Let's go. Oh, Oh, yeah. Come on. Speaker 1: James. I got everything. Hold on. Okay. I can't breathe. Speaker 0: I understand. I know. It's kinda tough. Speaker 1: Jeez. Speaker 0: Come on, man. Uh-huh. I know. You're doing great. You're good. You're good. You're you're survived. You're surviving. Alright? Speaker 1: I just can't breathe. Speaker 0: I'm James O'Keefe in the West Village in New York City. The individual, Alex Mina, inside the IRS in the criminal investigations division has ran inside there, and he's hiding from us. Speaker 1: He's hiding. He's hiding. Speaker 0: He was randomly draped into a building. That was not a job. That was a flat out it was all out sprint. He sprinted. He denied his own identity. That's right. The official for the IRS denied that he was who he was. Speaker 1: It's just the changes. Speaker 0: I mean, I I've I've seen some crazy things in my life. But an IRS individual running like Forrest Gump after he's caught on camera saying that the warrant program is unconstitutional, and I dropped my chocolate chip cookies. So guess what we're doing? We're going back to get some more chocolate chip cookies because you got to eat the cookie camera person, and I did not. And that's why you almost threw up, and I didn't. God works in mysterious ways. Reporting from the West Village Speaker 1: in Speaker 0: New York City, this is James O'Keefe with OMG. It takes a lot of money to do this kind of work, and I wanted to thank the wellness company for being a great supporter and for offering us a 15% discount on their medical emergency kit. Who knows what the crazies at the CDC are going to pull next? Be sure and get your medical emergency kit and 15% discount by going to twc.health/omg. That's twc.health/omg. And huge thanks again to our friends at the wellness company for supporting our work here at OMG.

@JamesOKeefeIII — James O'Keefe

Posted - March 20, 2024 at 7:56 PM

Saved - March 20, 2024 at 10:00 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

In a series of posts, I discuss a video featuring a Pentagon official discussing open borders and banning guns, as well as leaked documents revealing potential risks in identifying individuals within the Department of Defense. Additionally, culture surveys within the DoD raise concerns about tracking and targeting conservative Americans. The full story will be revealed later. In another post, the Pima Sheriff's department mentions the effectiveness of a teaspoon of sugar.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

BREAKING: O’Keefe sits down with Pentagon Official “Aidan Grey” and shows him a Netflix-style episode featuring himself on hidden camera discussing open borders and banning guns, as if in a ‘Black Mirror’ episode. More Insiders at @DeptofDefense have come forward with documents from Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) showing Pentagon employees can change their name to whatever they want. Our insider believes this is a potential risk in not being able to identify who people truly are. In response to the video of the Pentagon official advocating bringing in the National Guard to “repeal the 2nd amendment and take all the guns away,” insiders have leaked documents from culture surveys within The Defense Organizational Climate Survey (DEOCS). The survey shows all employees at DOD have to enter their unique ID and disclose personal information on their stance on Second Amendment Rights which is raising major concerns. Our source believes this is a way for the DoD to track and target conservative Americans working at the DoD. The insiders will appear ON THE INSIDE 4-6 ET. FULL STORY BELOW…

Video Transcript AI Summary

The video shows an undercover investigation exposing a Pentagon official's radical views on open borders and gun confiscation. The official, Jason Beck aka Aiden Gray, is caught on tape by James O'Keefe. The video also discusses concerns about phone tracking and introduces a secure smartphone called Unplugged. To protect privacy, viewers are encouraged to switch to Unplugged by visiting unplugged.com/omg.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I wanna show you something, on the show that premieres in a minute. So, Yeah. I looked for a a show, for us to for us to watch here. So you've seen Black Mirror. Have you ever seen Jane is Awful? No. You've heard of this guy. What's his name? James O'Keefe or James O'Keefe? Yeah. I think so. You've heard of that? I actually found the episode that was based upon something he did in, actually, the Department of Defense. Really? Yeah. Check this out. Speaker 1: After we expose Jason Beck, who goes by Aden Gray, he's the associate director of Total Force Requirements in sourcing policy, office of the secretary of defense, who talked about open borders Speaker 0: Why not just have an open border? Border? Speaker 1: And repealing the second amendment Speaker 2: I think we should repeal it and take them all away. Speaker 1: We decided to be creative in how we asked him for comment. I sat down with him and told him there was a new show on Netflix all about this guy named James O'Keefe exposing the Department of Defense. Aidan Gray knew who James O'Keefe was. Speaker 2: He would, like, go undercover and, like, try to trick Democrats into saying stuff. Speaker 1: But the Pentagon official who has a security clearance didn't initially put 2 and 2 together that I was James O'Keefe. I told him we're going to watch the new investigation that James O'Keefe did about the Department of Defense together. Speaker 0: I actually found the episode that was based upon something he did in, actually, the Department of Defense. Really? Speaker 1: Then my plan was to reveal that I was James O'Keefe. Speaker 0: The person that recorded you is actually James O'Keefe. Gotcha. Speaker 1: Watch the interaction unfold right after this quick message. Not a week goes by without a news headline about potential medical supply shortages, threats to our infrastructure, or power grid. And you remember what they pulled during the last pandemic. Certain medications were mysteriously out of stock. No way will I ever let that happen again. In today's unpredictable world, it's all about being prepared for who knows what they have in store for the next pandemic. Our friends and supporters at the wellness company have designed this unique prescription based medical emergency kit that is packed with 8 potentially life saving prescription only medications, including z Pak and ivermectin, which I used myself while out on the road and starting to feel a bit under the weather. Health is everything, and this is a great opportunity to order a wellness company medical emergency kit. The wellness company medical emergency kit stands ready to treat over 30 common ailments, ensuring you'll have access to vital medications when you need them most. And now save $45 per kit when you order using the code o m g. Get ready to write this down. Get your wellness company medical emergency kit at twc.health/omg. That's twc.health/omg. That's twc.health/omg, and save $45 per kit today when you use code o m g. Speaker 0: So this is the show that's based upon, like, what he does, and it's I thought you'd find it very interesting given who you are. So I just wanna show a few minutes of it and get your thoughts. And it's based upon this guy, James O'Keefe. Yeah. And I think the organization was Project Thoritis? Oh, Project Veritas. Speaker 2: Yeah. That's what it was. Speaker 0: Yeah. Have you heard of that? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. But he's a terrible person. He's a terrible person. Yeah. He's horrible. Yeah. He, like, sets people up, and they, like, confess all these things that they're doing and stuff like that. I think he founded a new organization. It's called, like, O'Keefe Media or something like that. He actually found the episode that was based upon something he did in, actually, the Department of Defense. Really? Yeah. It's called Inside the Pentagon, and you're in the episode, and you're caught on tape as part of this undercover investigation, and the person that recorded you is actually James O'Keefe. Gotcha. So is your name really needed? And, do you really wanna ban the senate, top the scale of guns from everybody? Speaker 2: Repealing the second amendment for sure. Yeah. Abolishing the senate. There's so many things that you could do. Very interesting. Yeah. Speaker 0: And then you have this guy inside the Department of Defense walking away down the stairs. He's walking pretty fast, actually. Come on, guys. There he is. He's walking away. So, Aiden, what's your real name? It's Jason. Is that your name? Aiden, is your name Jason? Aiden, is your name Jason? I'm walking down the street in Washington, DC. Aiden, is your real name Jason? Is it Jason Beck or Aiden Gray? Speaker 1: After we published our story, an insider within the Department of Defense provided a screenshot Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System. You can change your name within the system, called DEERS, Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System. You can change your name to whatever you want. So Aiden Gray appears to be the name Jason Beck changed his name to when he transitioned. Speaker 2: So I have, I had problems with you. The plumbing's different. Speaker 1: Insiders within the Pentagon told us this poses a security risk because people can change their identity to whatever they want. The insider joins us on our weekly show Wednesday on the inside at 5 o'clock. Speaker 0: What do you think that the secretary of defense is gonna say about all the things that you disclosed? You don't have any comments? You've been making a lot of comments to me, and I have a question for you. You got a security clearance inside the Pentagon, inside the Department of Defense. What type of people are working in the Pentagon? I think you have 3 meetings with Speaker 2: James O'Keefe. And you Speaker 0: know who James O'Keefe is? What type of security operation are they running in the department? Jason? Who is Aidan Gray? Is that your num de plume? Is that your pseudonym? Why are you laughing? Speaker 2: I don't know who works for me. Speaker 0: K. Well, I just wanna know why you lied about your name. Your name is not Jason? Oh, we're here with Jason Beck, aka Aiden Gray, who's saying that he has no more comments on the streets of Washington DC. Part of an undercover investigation exposing the Pentagon, the Department of Defense. You also said that you wanted to confiscate all guns, ban them all, and steal the second amendment. Those are pretty crazy views for someone that works inside the Department of Defense. Pretty radical, I would say. Speaker 1: The insider also provided a screenshot, a survey that comes from within DEOCS, the Defense Organizational Climate Survey. It's a culture survey done every year, and the insider tells us all employees had to enter their unique ID to access the survey. While there isn't proof that it's being used to track pro second amendment employees, it sure looks that way and is alerting many of the people that work for the Department of Defense. Speaker 0: Well, quiet, unable to make a comment, rendered completely mute after talking to us nonstop for hours about his political views. He wants to have an open border open border at the Department of Defense. Pretty outside the views of mainstream Americans, but very revealing, very enlightening here in Washington, DC. We're gonna let him walk, let him walk away. There he is. Get get a good view of him. Just completely shocked. I was sitting on the couch, and he said, I've heard of James O'Keefe. I've heard of Project Veritas. We showed the episode, and he was so shocked, and you guys came out. Speaker 1: Unbelievable. Because we're doing investigations into the White House, the IRS, and now the secretary of defense, Pentagon personnel, I'm personally very concerned about how every move and communication of my journalism team is being tracked by our phones. The people who support us, millions of you, are rightfully concerned and worried about being tracked and having your private information compromised. One of the things I know for sure is that with the smartphone you are likely using, you are being listened to and tracked 247. They can see our texts. They can see our emails. They know where we go, who we call, which apps we use, and what we buy and what we browse. And by having an ad ID running on your phone, the apps you're using are constantly gathering and storing your personal information and using it to monitor you and to monetize our data. We thought our phone is the product, but the reality is the product is us, and our personal information is the product. Speaker 0: And, by the way, even when Speaker 1: we think our phone is off, it's still listening. I'm excited to announce that the days of our phones harvesting our personal private information for the benefit of big tech and big government ends right now. Because of a new smartphone developed by Erik Prince, the phone is called Unplugged. Unplugged is built with a totally independent operating system that is absolutely secure. No tracking us in apps. Every call and text is end to end encrypted. They can't listen in or follow our online activity. And if we were ever under threat, we can send a code, and our data is totally white. And I love that it has the camera, speed storage, and chipset that rival the iPhone and Android. If you're like me, I've had it as a journalist or any citizen that wants to protect their privacy. I've had it with all of my personal and private information being exposed and exploited by big tech and big government. So I'm joining Eric Prince, mister Pentagon guy, and I'm switching to my new unplugged phone. And I'm also gonna tell you how you can also. So grab a pen, write this down. To protect your privacy and get your very own unplugged phone, that's unplugged.com/omg. That's unplugged.com/omg. Take your privacy back. Unplugged.com/omg.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

Pima Sheriff's department says, "...have you heard a teaspoon of sugar goes a long way?" https://t.co/U7YG5BGJNf

@kyleisbased — Kyle - Undercover

Posted - March 21, 2024 at 4:15 PM

Saved - March 21, 2024 at 9:26 PM

@kyleisbased - Kyle - Undercover

🚫🦉 PART 2: I went undercover with a hidden camera to meet with a Bohemian Grove Member. I was there under the guise of a curious college student to ensure I could safely ask personal questions. https://t.co/Kb1XsivDLZ

Video Transcript AI Summary

I met Bill Clinton, who was stiff. Obama visited Bohemian Grove discreetly. John McCain wasn't there. It's a male club, no families. Richard Nixon called it "faggiest." Entry is based on acceptance, not money. Not a Freemason, but similar. Started by San Franciscans. Democrats are preferred over Republicans.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So you got to meet Bill Clinton? Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Oh, that's cool. What was bill Bill Clinton like? Is he a nice guy? Speaker 1: Stiff. Speaker 0: Yeah. Stiff. Speaker 1: Stiff. Stiff. Speaker 0: Does he go to Bohemian Grove, Donald Trump? Speaker 1: We've seen him right now. I doubt he'd be invited. Speaker 0: Does Obama? Speaker 1: Obama's been there. I don't know about mine. Speaker 0: Interesting. Speaker 1: Obama came up there very quickly because he didn't want it to get a big deal. So he flew in and picked him up. You know, the lakeside talk and then an evening event. And so he was front end, received a evening event. Speaker 0: John McCain? No. Speaker 1: I just, just knew John that year. Yeah. It's a good demographic. We got a number of Yeah. Secret service. Absolutely not. No secret service. Absolutely not. Do you Speaker 0: go with family? Speaker 1: Good lord. It's a male club. Do you have sons? Yeah. My sons are never. Speaker 0: Oh, okay. He's a Speaker 1: member now. Just got him after, 11 years. Wow. And that was only because I made you call. Speaker 0: Do you know anyone Do you know Speaker 1: anyone that would be willing to invite us to the to the event to see it? Absolutely not. There's no way I'd be able to to evaluate you and what you do and how you do it, where you came from, why are you doing what you're doing now. That's why I've gotten over by and invite someone. Speaker 0: Oh, gotcha. Speaker 1: Gotcha. I'm just gonna say, hi, good, a great guy. They say, oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Especially since you usually stayed with the camp of some sort. Well, when you stay at the camp, do you have to stay at that camp and not wander around at nighttime? There there were 32 camps. So some one camp has 2 people. 1 camp has 50. So it all depends where it is. Speaker 0: Richard Nixon, he he was actually quoted talking about the Bohemian Grove. One of his tapes that got released in the nineties or 2000, he said it's the the faggiest club he's ever been a part of. Speaker 1: That would make sense. Yeah. That would make sense because he was definitely an outlier. Yeah. He's definitely the outlier. Speaker 0: How much is the is it to get into the Bohemian Grove? Because I know you have to pay, like, a upfront fee and then a yearly dues. Speaker 1: Money is no object. Yeah. It's what you're accepted. Speaker 0: Oh, okay. Speaker 1: Many, many, many very rich people will never get it. Wow. Is what's the reason for that? Because they're not there for money. It's not how much money you have is totally immaterial. Okay. You know yourself. Anytime you're with an organization, it's top, people want in. Speaker 0: Yeah. Are you a freemason Speaker 1: also or no? No. No. No. No. But he is basically or gypsies. Mhmm. They're gypsies. Yeah. I'm sorry. It's my San Franciscans that said, let's go after the let's go after the woods out there and start something. Mhmm. That's how it started. Right. And their whole batch is scattered around different parts of the world. Speaker 0: Yeah. The hillbillies, they're the biggest one. Right? Speaker 1: The band is the biggest. Speaker 0: The band. Speaker 1: Bandcamp. Bandcamp. I see that. Right. Hillbillies is probably in the top dirt that's on. Speaker 0: What's your political affiliation? Speaker 1: I'm a, Democrat. Okay. Have you been a lifelong Democrat? Absolutely. Okay. Absolutely. The the Democrats are more friendly than hurricanes. Yeah.

@JamesOKeefeIII — James O'Keefe

Posted - May 1, 2024 at 9:24 PM

Saved - May 2, 2024 at 11:34 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

A contractor working for the CIA and Deloitte, Amjad Fseisi, is caught on undercover cameras claiming that the CIA kept information from President Trump and spied on him using FISA. He also alleges that Trump is a Russian asset. The footage supports previous reports of illegal spying on Trump's campaign. Fseisi denies his statements when confronted. The CIA denies the claims, stating Fseisi is a former contractor who does not represent the agency. A correction is made regarding Fseisi's job title.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

BREAKING – EXPOSING THE CIA: “So the agencies kind of, like, all got together and said, we’re not gonna tell Trump…Director of the CIA would keep [information from Trump]…” A project manager working in Cyber Operations for the @CIA and an @NSAGov contractor with top-secret clearance working for @Deloitte, Amjad Fseisi, is caught on undercover cameras implicating the highest levels of the intelligence agencies, including “The executive staff. We’re talking about the director and his subordinates,” former CIA Directors “Gina Haspel....And I believe Mike Pompeo did the same thing too,” “kept information from him [Trump] because we knew he’d fucking disclose it.” Amjad reasons “There are certain people that would…give him a high-level overview but never give him any details. You know why? Because he’ll leak those details...He’s a Russian asset. He’s owned by the fucking Russians.” @mikepompeo Amjad reveals to OMG’s Undercover American Swiper that intel agencies not only kept intelligence information from a sitting United States President and Commander-In-Chief, they also used FISA to spy on @realDonaldTrump and his team and are still monitoring President Trump according to Amjad who says, “We monitor everything.” Amjad adds “we also have people that monitor his ex-wife. He likes to use burner phones” – information only an insider with access to highly sensitive information would state. “We steal it [information]” and “We hack other countries just like that,” Amjad, who states he currently works on the CIA’s China Mission Center, explains how intel agencies obtain information. He also describes a broken intelligence system where “We don’t share information across agencies” because the CIA is “very reluctant” to share information with the “careless” NSA. O’Keefe Media Group’s bombshell undercover footage supports earlier reports by investigative journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi, and Alex Gutentag that revealed how the American intelligence community illegally ran a spy operation against then-candidate Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016 and illegally acquired intelligence that was later used to justify the Federal Bureau of Investigation (@FBI) official probe, “Crossfire Hurricane,” which in turn led to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation that ultimately did not find evidence of Russia collusion by the 2016 Trump campaign. @shellenberger @mtaibbi @galexybrane Contractors like Fseisi hold the duty to withhold sharing confidential or national security information. In denying his statements, Fseisi may have realized he could be held liable for violating internal agency provisions and federal laws like the Executive Agency ethics provisions, which restrict what he may share with others outside of his contracted-to agency. Additionally, any government worker or agency head who withheld information from a superior (i.e. President Trump) may violate: (a) obstruction of justice by deception (18 USC 1512); (b) conspiracy to obstruct (18 USC 371); and false statements (18 USC 1001). Agency regulations may also provide offenses related to insubordination, reflecting poorly on the agency in public, or misrepresentation or dishonesty. When James O’Keefe caught up with Amjad Fseisi on the streets of Washington, D.C., Fseisi could not tell O’Keefe whether he had top secret clearance, denied making statements clearly caught on camera, and would not even confirm it was him on the video saying only “It looks like me.” When asked directly if he works at the CIA, Fseisi said, “I can’t tell you that.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Amjad Fassisi, a CIA contractor, claims in a hidden camera video that the CIA and other intelligence agencies withheld information from President Trump. Fassisi also alleges that the CIA directors colluded to keep information from Trump. He further states that Trump is under constant surveillance and that they are spying on his ex-wife. Fassisi mentions that the CIA does not trust the NSA and other agencies, and that they do not share information. He also expresses his negative opinion of Trump and his supporters. The video raises questions about the legality and ethics of withholding information from a sitting president.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Okay. I Speaker 1: also worked at NSA. Yeah. Uh-huh. And then I have a TSSCI with a full scope polygraph. That means that I'm I believe that is. Speaker 2: Amjad Vassisi shows her his CIA identification badge. Speaker 3: No. Where does it say this? Speaker 1: It doesn't. Speaker 4: Hey. That's the point. Speaker 1: That's the point. What's CMC? China Mission Center, Valerie. China Mission Center. Gotcha. Speaker 2: Amjad talks about how the CIA kept information from Trump. Speaker 1: Not working. We kept information from him. Say one more time. Speaker 5: We kept information from him. Speaker 0: From Trump? Speaker 2: Amjad Fisisi states the higher ups within the intel community, including CIA directors Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, and the upper levels of their staffs colluded to withhold information from sitting president Trump. Speaker 0: So the agencies kind of, like, all got together and said, we're not gonna tell Trump To hire us. The higher ups. Speaker 6: We we put it this way. Speaker 1: The the executive staff, we're talking about the director and his subordinates. Speaker 0: Like, what titles are they? Speaker 1: Director of the CIA. Speaker 0: Director of the CIA would keep Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Are you guys still watching him? Speaker 7: I would say yes. Speaker 0: It sounds like you guys are still watching him and his team. Of course Speaker 8: of course we are. Speaker 1: Nothing goes wild about somebody watching. Speaker 2: Jed Fasisi also states as fact that Trump is under constant surveillance and even claims they are spying on his ex wife. Speaker 1: And you also have people that monitor and says that's a lot of people. Speaker 0: So you guys have human sources. Speaker 1: How do you think we're getting the money? Speaker 0: Like wire tapping? Is that did you guys figure out that Trump was colluding with the Russians? Did you guys use So intel community was able to use Pfizer to spy on Trump and his team. And that's how we found out that he was colluding with the Russians. Was it the CIA or the NSA that spied on Trump? We have So Speaker 1: it should be all over. Speaker 9: So you're you're saying that we Speaker 10: We have a choice here. Speaker 1: Do I not like democracy or do I need some fucking mad man? Yeah. What's being fixated? Speaker 0: Does it say the CIA on your LinkedIn? Speaker 1: Fuck no. No. I can't do that. And then I worked at NSA for 2 year for a year. Speaker 2: I'm James O'Keefe reporting on location outside the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. Right behind me, the CIA, the police officers here. Speaker 1: We figured we'd come up and just say hello. Speaker 2: No problem. We're we're allowed to stand here? Speaker 1: A 100%. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 1: Absolutely. Absolutely. Everything you guys are doing is a 100% okay from where you're at right now. Speaker 2: Okay. If Speaker 1: we proceed forward of the crosswalk Yeah. That's where we may have to come up and have another discussion. Speaker 2: Yeah. We're gonna stand right Speaker 1: on the sidewalk. Percent. Absolutely. Speaker 2: I appreciate it. Alright. Alright. Very good. Thank you. Just a moment ago, officers coming out from Langley, Virginia to warn me not to set foot across that line right there. It's obviously dangerous for us to be here. It's dangerous for us to do this reporting. But thanks to a brave OMG undercover swiper, we present to you the O'Keefe Media Group Blockbuster investigation inside the CIA. A few months ago, journalists Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger released a story making several claims, including the CIA illegally mobilizing foreign intelligence agencies to target Trump advisers before the 2016 election. Barack Obama's CIA Director John Brennan identified 26 Trump associates for the intelligence community to target and bump, make contact with or manipulate. And what bumping means is literally bumping into people making contact with them, communicating with them, and spreading misinformation to divert their attention. The US intelligence community also asked its foreign allies, United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, and the Israeli Mossad to target these 26 members of Trump's team going all the way back to March of 2016, well before the 2016 presidential election. Multiple instances that the US intelligence officials likely broke laws against spying and election interference. Former CIA director Gina Haspel blocked the release of a binder that included evidence that may have identified her role in the Trump Russia collusion hoax. This activity was illegal, both because US law prohibits such intelligence gathering unless authorized by a foreign intelligence surveillance act, that's FISA warrant, and because the weaponization of the intelligence community for political purposes constitutes election interference. The first of the intelligence community's surveillance targets appeared to be a former Defense Intelligence Agency, that's DIA, head and would be Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Another target was staffer George Papadopoulos. In 2018, HPFCI, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, released a 243 page report clearing Trump of allegations that he and his team colluded with Russia to interfere with the 20 16 election. However, sources close to the House Permanent Select Committee, led by Adam Schiff, covertly continued working out of a small room in Langley and he had access to raw logs and communications from agencies like the CIA and the National Security Council. You're probably wondering, how did the CIA respond to this? Well, former CIA Director John Brennan under Barack Obama did not respond, nor did the Justice Department. The US FBI and UK's equivalent to the NSA, that's the GCHQ, however, responded that wiretapping the president-elect claims were nonsense, they were utterly ridiculous, and should be ignored. What's most interesting about that is Taibi and Shellenberger didn't even ask about wiretapping. The FBI and GCHQ just included it in their response. Even more interesting is how did the mainstream media report it? The mainstream narrative was that the UK government GCHQ, again that's the United Kingdom's NSA equivalent, was the whistleblower in the investigation into the alleged ties between Trump and the Russian government, and other narratives that have all turned out to be false. As it turns out, not only was Taibi and Schellenberg's reporting accurate, we can now provide proof on camera, thanks to one of our OMG undercover American Swiper citizen investigative journalists. Using the dating app Bumble and hidden cameras, our OMG journalists set up a series of meetings and phone calls with Amjad Fassisi, a CIA contractor with top level government security clearances. Now as it turns out, the corruption at the CIA, FBI, and Department of Justice is probably even worse than you thought. And now you can see it with your own eyes. We're reporting that Amjad Fassisi, a senior intelligence officer with a top secret sensitive compartmentalized information clearance, has worked at the CIA for over a decade, and his knowledge and his position and access show he has a high level awareness about the agency, its current culture, and how it has been corrupted by bureaucratic politics, and how it has over the years and continues to use its powers to weaponize the CIA to spy on President Trump. Let's meet Amjad Fassisi. Amjad Fassisi is a CIA contractor working with Deloitte. He has a high level top secret government security clearance and works within the CIA and its China Mission Center on cyber operations. According to the CIA's website, the China Mission Center was formed to address the global challenge posed by the People's Republic of China that cuts across all of the CIA's mission areas. Through his work over the years with the CIA, NSA and various defense contractors, Amjad Vassisi is well connected to high level government officials. What you're about to see in this video is truly incredible. Amjet Vassisi divulges on camera that the directors of the CIA, including Gina Haskell and Mike Pompeo, and other high ranking members of the intelligence community, purposely colluded to withhold information from Donald Trump, then the sitting president of the United States. I greenlit the hidden camera date as we were initially under the impression that he was working for defense contractor Lockheed Martin. But during the first meeting, our American swiper noticed that Vassisi was in fact CIA, at which point our undercover investigation took on a whole new angle. Our brave American Swiper citizen journalist cultivated a rapport with Vassisi, and from there, the rest is history. Speaker 1: What wait. What do you think? Speaker 0: I work for the CIA. Speaker 1: That's awesome. What do you do for them? I do cyber accolades. I've been doing a rollout business. Speaker 0: How long have you worked there? Speaker 1: Oh, god. It's I work for Deloitte. Deloitte Consulting. Okay. So I'm a contractor to the CIA. Okay. I'm a contractor. That's good. I'm a contractor. That's good. I'm a I am a program manager. I'm a program manager. I'm a program manager. I talk to the mission center across all the across the entire enterprise. Everything. Speaker 2: After telling our undercover American swiper citizen journalist his role with the CIA, Amjad Vassisi shows her his CIA identification badge. Speaker 1: Alright. So here you go. Okay. Speaker 0: Let me see. Let's go. Speaker 1: You just screwed it up, please. Speaker 0: Oh, I'm sorry. Speaker 1: How have you worked for? So that was about 2,008. So that was the last picture I think was from 2013. Speaker 0: This is from 2013, which is more than a decade ago. Yes. Wait. Hold on. Speaker 3: Where does it say Speaker 1: It doesn't. Speaker 0: Why is that? Speaker 1: It does. Why would why would it shut up? Speaker 0: But how do you keep moving up? Speaker 1: Oh, I Speaker 0: guess I guess. Speaker 4: That's the point. Right? That's the point. Speaker 1: That's the point. Yeah. One sec. Speaker 0: Is there like Speaker 1: that. Speaker 0: What's CMC? Speaker 1: China Mission Center, darling. Oh. Oh. Oh. Oh. Okay. I'm I'm getting a little nervous now. Speaker 0: Okay. This is oh, oh, so this is the agent your your your division. Speaker 1: That's my mission center. Speaker 0: Gotcha. Gotcha. Speaker 1: Like, you believe me now? Speaker 0: Yes. This is very legit. I like it. I got it. Speaker 1: Because we have to go through training. We're like, we leave a very low carbon cyber or Internet or social media footprint. Uh-huh. Oh, I'm on LinkedIn. Speaker 0: Okay. I'm Speaker 1: on Facebook. My name is. Okay. And And the company that I work for, that's it. Speaker 0: Do you does it say the CIA on your LinkedIn? Speaker 1: No. No. We can't do that. No. No. No. No. Speaker 0: They don't allow you guys Speaker 1: to do that? Oh, hell no. Speaker 2: Amjad Fisisi also describes how you obtain top secret clearance called TSSCI. TSSCI is a subset of top secret clearance and is required for access to highly sensitive information known as sensitive compartmented information, SCI. SCI is classified information concerning intelligent sources, methods and other sensitive matters. Speaker 1: Fully vetted. Speaker 0: So how long have you been working at the CIA? Speaker 1: Since 2008. Speaker 0: That's when you were at Lockheed. Speaker 1: Correct. And then and then I worked at NSA for 2 year for a Speaker 0: year. Okay. Speaker 1: And I was doing some really cool cyber stuff, which I can not tell you about. Then I went back to CIA in 2011. Yes. Then went to north of Grumman right down the street. Okay. Managed to be the cybersecurity package nurse. And then I went to the office of director of National Intelligence. And so I helped them stand there inside our platform. Yeah. Speaker 0: What exactly is insider threat programs? Speaker 11: It's it's usually the the biggest thing with insider threat is if somebody clicks on a link that they're not supposed to or whatever and then they affect their entire network. So as I'm getting assessed so so the the biggest threat of all is is the carelessness of people within your organization. So you put rules, governance rules, you know, things that they have to follow Speaker 1: and so Speaker 11: that they don't do anything stupid. Speaker 2: Not a week goes by without a news headline about potential medical supply shortages, threats to our infrastructure, or power grid. And you remember what they pulled during the last pandemic. Certain medications were mysteriously out of stock. No way will I ever let that happen again. In today's unpredictable world, it's all about being prepared for who knows what they have in store for the next pandemic. Our friends and supporters at the wellness company have designed this unique prescription based medical emergency kit that is packed with 8 potentially life saving prescription only medications, including z pack and ivermectin, which I used myself while out on the road and starting to feel a bit under the weather. Health is everything, and this is a great opportunity to order a wellness company medical emergency kit. The wellness company medical emergency kit stands ready to treat over 30 common ailments, ensuring you'll have access to vital medications when you need them most. And now, save $45 per kit when you order using the code o m g. Get ready to write this down. Get your wellness company medical emergency kit@twc.health/omg. That's t w c dot health slash o m g. That's twc.health/omg. And save $45 per kit today when you use code o m g. I'm John Fasisi states as fact that the higher ups within the intel community, including CIA directors, Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, and the upper levels of their staffs colluded to withhold information from sitting president Trump. Speaker 0: You said that Mhmm. Is what way do you think? Mike Pompeo was working with the heads of the other intel agencies. Speaker 1: Mike Pompeo was a Northrop receiver. Speaker 0: Right. And he was working with the heads of the other intel agencies to That's correct. Speaker 1: To withhold information from China. This predecessor, Gina Askel Yeah. Speaker 0: To withhold would give it away. Yeah. Speaker 1: All black and white people can tell him this. I'm not sure Speaker 2: if he's Speaker 1: He would give it away. Yeah. He'd call Biden and Putin and tell him that he would have a guy. No. I'm being serious. You have me Speaker 0: Yeah. I'm sorry Speaker 1: the I'm talking so I mean Speaker 0: to withhold information from Trump. Speaker 1: Yeah. So the Speaker 0: agencies kind of like all got together and said, we're not gonna tell Trump The higher ups. The higher ups. Speaker 6: You you put it this way. Speaker 1: The the executive staff, we're talking about the director and his subordinates. Okay. These are Speaker 10: very smart people. Speaker 0: Like, what titles are they? Speaker 1: Director of the CIA. Speaker 0: Director of the CIA would Speaker 1: keep Yes. Speaker 0: So if they decided Speaker 1: to get Yeah. It it would it's it's up it's up to him to share what he wants to share Yeah. With the director. Speaker 0: How do you keep information away from Tom? Speaker 1: Don't give it to Speaker 0: us. But wouldn't he ask? Speaker 1: I believe he doesn't know even. Speaker 2: Amjad Fassisi also states as fact that Trump is under surveillance and even claims they are spying on his ex wife. We are assuming Amjad is speaking of Marla Maples. Speaker 0: How did you guys figure out that Trump was colluding with the Russians? Did you guys use Speaker 1: Burner, fellas. Burner, fellas. Burner, fellas. Speaker 0: What does that mean? Speaker 1: That means a prepaid phone card that's not a taxi. It's not on the network. It doesn't ping the fan. Like a Speaker 0: dummy phone? Like a dumb phone? Like flip phone? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's called a friend, though. Speaker 2: I've had it with all my personal and private information being exposed and exploited by big tech and big government. So I'm joining my friend Eric France and I'm switching to my new unplugged phone. Protect your privacy. Get your very own unplugged phone. Go to unplug.com/omg. That's unplug.com/omg. Take your privacy back. Unplug.com/om Speaker 0: g. Was the Intel community able to use Pfizer to spy on Trump Speaker 1: and his team? I don't know. So But they get a thorough investigation. The the outcome of that is is in the middle of the court. Speaker 0: Was it the CIA or the NSA that's fight on Trump? We have So Speaker 1: it should be all over. Speaker 0: So you guys had human sources. Speaker 2: Already enough controversy around Israel, Amjad Fassisi, again, a high level government contractor, states he doesn't trust Israel, and they, quote, steal intelligence from us. Like Speaker 1: So for example, food with our our allies. Speaker 0: Who? Israel. Okay. Israel, our allies. Uh-huh. Like what? Speaker 1: Promotion. So do we, by the way. Speaker 0: So what kind of information? Like weapons or Speaker 1: Weapons. Stuff we don't wanna know. Speaker 0: So they're not really our friends? Speaker 1: Nobody's really for a lot of friends besides Nobody. Speaker 0: So the intel community was able to use Pfizer to spy on Trump and his team. And that's how we found out that he was colluding with the Russians. Speaker 2: And as any good spy would do, Fasisi makes it clear that, quote, this conversation didn't happen. Speaker 1: This conversation didn't happen. I Of course. I get completely denied. Speaker 0: Yep. That's so badass. Are you guys still watching him? Speaker 1: The wall Speaker 7: I would say yes. It's just Speaker 0: the intel community is still monitoring him at 5 o'clock. We we are not. It sounds like you guys are still watching him and his team. Of course Speaker 8: of course we are. Speaker 1: Nothing goes wild without somebody watching. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Just to stress it short. I promise. Speaker 2: Amjad Fassisi, a program manager contracted at the CIA, talks about how the CIA kept information from Trump. Amjad also discloses that the directors of the CIA would give Trump high level overviews, but never give him any details. Vassisi also spills that all the intelligence agencies thought that President Trump was a quote, fucking dumbass and would disclose information, unquote. When asked, how do you keep information from president Trump? Our subject says, quote, don't give it to him. Speaker 1: Not working. So we kept information from him. If we knew the fucking disclosure Wait. Say that one more time. Speaker 5: We took information from him. Speaker 1: From Trump? Yes. He said he did it. There are so many people that would Speaker 0: Do we have proof for that? Speaker 1: No. But we all believe because he's a it is fucking idiot. Speaker 9: So you're you're saying that we Speaker 0: you your agency. Speaker 1: Yep. All of the agencies. Yeah. Speaker 0: Kept information away. Not us. Speaker 1: Because we knew that it would we'd be careless with Yeah. A store has been a bad shower for a long time. Exactly. So Speaker 0: So you guys would, on purpose, keep certain information away from Trump. Speaker 1: You said either. You said not so good. Speaker 0: So the generals are, like Every everybody. Yeah. They would just not share anything with him. Speaker 1: We all did. We all thought he was fucking down on us. Speaker 0: Who's we? Speaker 1: I'll be I'll be I'll be I'll be Speaker 2: In full on bureaucratic elitist fashion, Amjad Fassisi describes the only people in the CIA that support Trump are rednecks that live in the sticks and brainwashed stupid idiots. Speaker 1: Yeah. There are some people that have good good blood on his side. Like, who? Speaker 0: Are you kidding me? Speaker 1: Right next to the bottom and back of the awareness x. Speaker 0: Like, how would you describe those people who still support Chong, these like, after what happened on Speaker 1: Trump? Brainwashed? Brainwashed. Stupid. Illiterate. Speaker 2: Amjad Fassisi with the CIA states there is, quote, no way Trump will get elected again. He's not gonna get it. Speaker 1: I'll be elected again. I've I've done the math. I think Speaker 0: it's possible. Yeah. Speaker 1: But there are more of less than there are the Speaker 10: We have a choice here. Speaker 1: Do we not have democracy or do we need some fucking madman? Yeah. Most can't fixate it. Speaker 2: Jen Vassisi states as fact that the NSA, CIA, and other departments within the intel community don't trust each other, therefore, don't share information. Speaker 0: Does the CIA work with the NSA? Speaker 1: No. Because they're very territorial because they don't make sure you information. That is a fucking problem. We don't share information of hate. And they're saying you have powdered, Speaker 0: So the NSA is careless? Speaker 2: Yeah. Possible violations of the law here include obstruction of justice by deception, conspiracy to obstruct, false statements, that's 18 USC 1,001. The actions of the directors and the executive staff of the CIA might even trigger violations of the Espionage Act. Some of these trigger felony provisions, other trigger misdemeanors that depends upon how serious the prosecutor thinks the violation is, Depends upon what his exact contracting status was, within which federal silo he really was, other specific regulations specific to the agency he worked under, CIA, etcetera, may be triggered, which could include things like insubordination or engaging in misrepresentation. He has no problem divulging all this to a strange woman after a few cocktails, but clammed up when I asked him. We had a chance to review your badge, and it this the one that you, says you worked for the CIA. And, you know, Michael Shellenberger and Matt Plavey did some reporting about the information that was held from Trump from Trump. It's actually a crime for the director of the CIA to withhold information from Trump. No. Speaker 1: I I I have no idea. Everything everything is I don't know. I have no intel. I have no knowledge. Speaker 2: You said that we quote keep information from him, Trump. Speaker 1: I I I never You Speaker 2: didn't say that. Speaker 1: I did not. Speaker 2: Quote, we kept information from Trump. He's a fucking idiot, quote, unquote. Those are your words. Speaker 1: Well, I can I can have a opinion, but I I don't know? Can I Speaker 2: talk can I sit down and talk Speaker 1: to someone about this, please? Speaker 2: I think it's important that I get your comment. Speaker 1: That's everything is untrue. Speaker 2: It's untrue? Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't I have no idea. I how why would I know? Why would you know? Do you do you work do you work at CIO? I can't tell you that. Do you work at Deloitte? Yes. Okay. Are you a program manager at Deloitte? Yes. Do you work at the Chinese Mission Center in Langley, Virginia? I can't tell you that. You can't tell me that. Speaker 2: Have you told other people that? Speaker 1: I can't tell you that either. Speaker 2: And stay tuned for follow-up, including my conversation and interaction with Amjad Fassisi released soon. The fact that our intelligence agencies withheld high level information to a sitting US president poses more questions than answers. It would be completely illegal for them to do this. It corroborates the reporting done by intrepid investigative reporters Michael Schallberger and Matt Taibbi. But rarely do you get this sort of thing on tape so that everyone can see it. The American people are being left in the dark because of the agencies, the leadership, the administrative state we have in place are at war and odds with each other. We need more people like this citizen journalist, this brave American swiper. We need more whistleblowers and sources inside these agencies to come forward and really expose what's going on with incontrovertible evidence, like documents and video recordings. The time for sitting on the sidelines is over. To quote Edmund Burke, All that is required for the triumph of evil is for good people, that's you, to do nothing. You can sign up today to become a citizen journalist in American Swiper by going to o'keefe mediagroup.com/swiper. You could donate to us. We have a new 5 1 c three nonprofit called Citizen You could DM us tips at tips.okiefmediagroup.com. You could DM us tips at tips. O'keefemediagroup.com and to our signal number 914-315-9415. You can DM us on Instagram and x. All this goes far beyond the point of partisan politics. The powers that be ask us to focus on what divides us. But as I said after I was raided by the FBI, what unites us is so much more powerful than what divides us. And we should all be united that this is wrong. The enemy might be out there, but corruption is alive and well in our country. America, our war is here. To quote Abraham Lincoln, America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter or lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

CIA COMMENT: The official appears to have been terminated as a result of our reporting today. When the CIA was asked for comment, O'Keefe Media received an exclusive statement on the record from a CIA spokesperson today: “These claims about CIA are absolutely false and ridiculous. CIA is a resolutely apolitical institution that provides intelligence support to policymakers including the President of the United States, irrespective of who occupies the office. We are a foreign intelligence focused Agency and do not monitor the former President. The individual making these allegations is a former contractor who does not represent CIA.” In the video which was taken last week, the CIA official waves his intelligence community green badge. Green Badges are specifically hired for those contracted by the agency. Kash Patel, former Deputy Director of National Intelligence, said "An individual possessing a contractor Green badge is only allowed to lawfully possess it while official employed as a contractor to the intelligence community. Upon any termination, credentials are returned to the home agency and destroyed immediately."

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

Correction: Amjad Fseisi was a "Program Manager" not "Project Manager."

@RepMattGaetz — Rep. Matt Gaetz

Posted - May 1, 2024 at 10:45 PM

Saved - May 2, 2024 at 12:07 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I urge the Weaponization Subcommittee to investigate @OKeefeMedia Group's report. It reveals video evidence suggesting intelligence agencies withheld information from President Trump and used FISA authorities to spy on him. This is a significant development that requires immediate attention.

@RepMattGaetz - Rep. Matt Gaetz

BREAKING: I’m formally calling on the @Weaponization Subcommittee to immediately launch an investigation into @OKeefeMedia Group’s bombshell report containing video evidence that American intelligence agencies withheld intelligence from President Donald Trump before & during his presidency and used Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) authorities to spy on President Trump.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

BREAKING – EXPOSING THE CIA: “So the agencies kind of, like, all got together and said, we’re not gonna tell Trump…Director of the CIA would keep [information from Trump]…” A project manager working in Cyber Operations for the @CIA and an @NSAGov contractor with top-secret clearance working for @Deloitte, Amjad Fseisi, is caught on undercover cameras implicating the highest levels of the intelligence agencies, including “The executive staff. We’re talking about the director and his subordinates,” former CIA Directors “Gina Haspel....And I believe Mike Pompeo did the same thing too,” “kept information from him [Trump] because we knew he’d fucking disclose it.” Amjad reasons “There are certain people that would…give him a high-level overview but never give him any details. You know why? Because he’ll leak those details...He’s a Russian asset. He’s owned by the fucking Russians.” @mikepompeo Amjad reveals to OMG’s Undercover American Swiper that intel agencies not only kept intelligence information from a sitting United States President and Commander-In-Chief, they also used FISA to spy on @realDonaldTrump and his team and are still monitoring President Trump according to Amjad who says, “We monitor everything.” Amjad adds “we also have people that monitor his ex-wife. He likes to use burner phones” – information only an insider with access to highly sensitive information would state. “We steal it [information]” and “We hack other countries just like that,” Amjad, who states he currently works on the CIA’s China Mission Center, explains how intel agencies obtain information. He also describes a broken intelligence system where “We don’t share information across agencies” because the CIA is “very reluctant” to share information with the “careless” NSA. O’Keefe Media Group’s bombshell undercover footage supports earlier reports by investigative journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi, and Alex Gutentag that revealed how the American intelligence community illegally ran a spy operation against then-candidate Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016 and illegally acquired intelligence that was later used to justify the Federal Bureau of Investigation (@FBI) official probe, “Crossfire Hurricane,” which in turn led to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation that ultimately did not find evidence of Russia collusion by the 2016 Trump campaign. @shellenberger @mtaibbi @galexybrane Contractors like Fseisi hold the duty to withhold sharing confidential or national security information. In denying his statements, Fseisi may have realized he could be held liable for violating internal agency provisions and federal laws like the Executive Agency ethics provisions, which restrict what he may share with others outside of his contracted-to agency. Additionally, any government worker or agency head who withheld information from a superior (i.e. President Trump) may violate: (a) obstruction of justice by deception (18 USC 1512); (b) conspiracy to obstruct (18 USC 371); and false statements (18 USC 1001). Agency regulations may also provide offenses related to insubordination, reflecting poorly on the agency in public, or misrepresentation or dishonesty. When James O’Keefe caught up with Amjad Fseisi on the streets of Washington, D.C., Fseisi could not tell O’Keefe whether he had top secret clearance, denied making statements clearly caught on camera, and would not even confirm it was him on the video saying only “It looks like me.” When asked directly if he works at the CIA, Fseisi said, “I can’t tell you that.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Amjad Fassisi, a CIA contractor, claims in an undercover video that the CIA withheld information from President Trump and spied on him. He also alleges that the directors of the CIA colluded to keep information from Trump. Fassisi states that Trump is under constant surveillance and that they even spy on his ex-wife. He suggests that the intelligence community does not trust each other and does not share information. Fassisi expresses a negative opinion of Trump, calling him a "fucking dumbass" and stating that the only people who support him are "rednecks" and "brainwashed idiots." Fassisi's claims are controversial and raise questions about the actions of the intelligence community.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Okay. I Speaker 1: also worked at NSA. Yeah. Uh-huh. And then I have a TSSCI with a full scope polygraph. That means that I'm I believe that is. Speaker 2: Amjad Vassisi shows her his CIA identification badge. Speaker 3: No. Where does it say this? Speaker 1: It doesn't. Speaker 4: Hey. That's the point. Speaker 1: That's the point. What's CMC? China Mission Center, Valerie. China Mission Center. Gotcha. Speaker 2: Amjad talks about how the CIA kept information from Trump. Speaker 1: Not working. We kept information from him. Say one more time. Speaker 5: We kept information from him. Speaker 0: From Trump? Speaker 2: Amjad Fisisi states the higher ups within the intel community, including CIA directors Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, and the upper levels of their staffs colluded to withhold information from sitting president Trump. Speaker 0: So the agencies kind of, like, all got together and said, we're not gonna tell Trump To hire us. The higher ups. Speaker 6: We we put it this way. Speaker 1: The the executive staff, we're talking about the director and his subordinates. Speaker 0: Like, what titles are they? Speaker 1: Director of the CIA. Speaker 0: Director of the CIA would keep Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Are you guys still watching him? Speaker 7: I would say yes. Speaker 0: It sounds like you guys are still watching him and his team. Of course Speaker 8: of course we are. Speaker 1: Nothing goes wild about somebody watching. Speaker 2: Jed Fasisi also states as fact that Trump is under constant surveillance and even claims they are spying on his ex wife. Speaker 1: And you also have people that monitor and says that's a lot of people. Speaker 0: So you guys have human sources. Speaker 1: How do you think we're getting the money? Speaker 0: Like wire tapping? Is that did you guys figure out that Trump was colluding with the Russians? Did you guys use So intel community was able to use Pfizer to spy on Trump and his team. And that's how we found out that he was colluding with the Russians. Was it the CIA or the NSA that spied on Trump? We have So Speaker 1: it should be all over. Speaker 9: So you're you're saying that we Speaker 10: We have a choice here. Speaker 1: Do I not like democracy or do I need some fucking mad man? Yeah. What's being fixated? Speaker 0: Does it say the CIA on your LinkedIn? Speaker 1: Fuck no. No. I can't do that. And then I worked at NSA for 2 year for a year. Speaker 2: I'm James O'Keefe reporting on location outside the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. Right behind me, the CIA, the police officers here. Speaker 1: We figured we'd come up and just say hello. Speaker 2: No problem. We're we're allowed to stand here? Speaker 1: A 100%. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 1: Absolutely. Absolutely. Everything you guys are doing is a 100% okay from where you're at right now. Speaker 2: Okay. If Speaker 1: we proceed forward of the crosswalk Yeah. That's where we may have to come up and have another discussion. Speaker 2: Yeah. We're gonna stand right Speaker 1: on the sidewalk. Percent. Absolutely. Speaker 2: I appreciate it. Alright. Alright. Very good. Thank you. Just a moment ago, officers coming out from Langley, Virginia to warn me not to set foot across that line right there. It's obviously dangerous for us to be here. It's dangerous for us to do this reporting. But thanks to a brave OMG undercover swiper, we present to you the O'Keefe Media Group Blockbuster investigation inside the CIA. A few months ago, journalists Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger released a story making several claims, including the CIA illegally mobilizing foreign intelligence agencies to target Trump advisers before the 2016 election. Barack Obama's CIA Director John Brennan identified 26 Trump associates for the intelligence community to target and bump, make contact with or manipulate. And what bumping means is literally bumping into people making contact with them, communicating with them, and spreading misinformation to divert their attention. The US intelligence community also asked its foreign allies, United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, and the Israeli Mossad to target these 26 members of Trump's team going all the way back to March of 2016, well before the 2016 presidential election. Multiple instances that the US intelligence officials likely broke laws against spying and election interference. Former CIA director Gina Haspel blocked the release of a binder that included evidence that may have identified her role in the Trump Russia collusion hoax. This activity was illegal, both because US law prohibits such intelligence gathering unless authorized by a foreign intelligence surveillance act, that's FISA warrant, and because the weaponization of the intelligence community for political purposes constitutes election interference. The first of the intelligence community's surveillance targets appeared to be a former Defense Intelligence Agency, that's DIA, head and would be Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Another target was staffer George Papadopoulos. In 2018, HPFCI, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, released a 243 page report clearing Trump of allegations that he and his team colluded with Russia to interfere with the 20 16 election. However, sources close to the House Permanent Select Committee, led by Adam Schiff, covertly continued working out of a small room in Langley and he had access to raw logs and communications from agencies like the CIA and the National Security Council. You're probably wondering, how did the CIA respond to this? Well, former CIA Director John Brennan under Barack Obama did not respond, nor did the Justice Department. The US FBI and UK's equivalent to the NSA, that's the GCHQ, however, responded that wiretapping the president-elect claims were nonsense, they were utterly ridiculous, and should be ignored. What's most interesting about that is Taibi and Shellenberger didn't even ask about wiretapping. The FBI and GCHQ just included it in their response. Even more interesting is how did the mainstream media report it? The mainstream narrative was that the UK government GCHQ, again that's the United Kingdom's NSA equivalent, was the whistleblower in the investigation into the alleged ties between Trump and the Russian government, and other narratives that have all turned out to be false. As it turns out, not only was Taibi and Schellenberg's reporting accurate, we can now provide proof on camera, thanks to one of our OMG undercover American Swiper citizen investigative journalists. Using the dating app Bumble and hidden cameras, our OMG journalists set up a series of meetings and phone calls with Amjad Fassisi, a CIA contractor with top level government security clearances. Now as it turns out, the corruption at the CIA, FBI, and Department of Justice is probably even worse than you thought. And now you can see it with your own eyes. We're reporting that Amjad Fassisi, a senior intelligence officer with a top secret sensitive compartmentalized information clearance, has worked at the CIA for over a decade, and his knowledge and his position and access show he has a high level awareness about the agency, its current culture, and how it has been corrupted by bureaucratic politics, and how it has over the years and continues to use its powers to weaponize the CIA to spy on President Trump. Let's meet Amjad Fassisi. Amjad Fassisi is a CIA contractor working with Deloitte. He has a high level top secret government security clearance and works within the CIA and its China Mission Center on cyber operations. According to the CIA's website, the China Mission Center was formed to address the global challenge posed by the People's Republic of China that cuts across all of the CIA's mission areas. Through his work over the years with the CIA, NSA and various defense contractors, Amjad Vassisi is well connected to high level government officials. What you're about to see in this video is truly incredible. Amjet Vassisi divulges on camera that the directors of the CIA, including Gina Haskell and Mike Pompeo, and other high ranking members of the intelligence community, purposely colluded to withhold information from Donald Trump, then the sitting president of the United States. I greenlit the hidden camera date as we were initially under the impression that he was working for defense contractor Lockheed Martin. But during the first meeting, our American swiper noticed that Vassisi was in fact CIA, at which point our undercover investigation took on a whole new angle. Our brave American Swiper citizen journalist cultivated a rapport with Vassisi, and from there, the rest is history. Speaker 1: What wait. What do you think? Speaker 0: I work for the CIA. Speaker 1: That's awesome. What do you do for them? I do cyber accolades. I've been doing a rollout business. Speaker 0: How long have you worked there? Speaker 1: Oh, god. It's I work for Deloitte. Deloitte Consulting. Okay. So I'm a contractor to the CIA. Okay. I'm a contractor. That's good. I'm a contractor. That's good. I'm a I am a program manager. I'm a program manager. I'm a program manager. I talk to the mission center across all the across the entire enterprise. Everything. Speaker 2: After telling our undercover American swiper citizen journalist his role with the CIA, Amjad Vassisi shows her his CIA identification badge. Speaker 1: Alright. So here you go. Okay. Speaker 0: Let me see. Let's go. Speaker 1: You just screwed it up, please. Speaker 0: Oh, I'm sorry. Speaker 1: How have you worked for? So that was about 2,008. So that was the last picture I think was from 2013. Speaker 0: This is from 2013, which is more than a decade ago. Yes. Wait. Hold on. Speaker 3: Where does it say Speaker 1: It doesn't. Speaker 0: Why is that? Speaker 1: It does. Why would why would it shut up? Speaker 0: But how do you keep moving up? Speaker 1: Oh, I Speaker 0: guess I guess. Speaker 4: That's the point. Right? That's the point. Speaker 1: That's the point. Yeah. One sec. Speaker 0: Is there like Speaker 1: that. Speaker 0: What's CMC? Speaker 1: China Mission Center, darling. Oh. Oh. Oh. Oh. Okay. I'm I'm getting a little nervous now. Speaker 0: Okay. This is oh, oh, so this is the agent your your your division. Speaker 1: That's my mission center. Speaker 0: Gotcha. Gotcha. Speaker 1: Like, you believe me now? Speaker 0: Yes. This is very legit. I like it. I got it. Speaker 1: Because we have to go through training. We're like, we leave a very low carbon cyber or Internet or social media footprint. Uh-huh. Oh, I'm on LinkedIn. Speaker 0: Okay. I'm Speaker 1: on Facebook. My name is. Okay. And And the company that I work for, that's it. Speaker 0: Do you does it say the CIA on your LinkedIn? Speaker 1: No. No. We can't do that. No. No. No. No. Speaker 0: They don't allow you guys Speaker 1: to do that? Oh, hell no. Speaker 2: Amjad Fisisi also describes how you obtain top secret clearance called TSSCI. TSSCI is a subset of top secret clearance and is required for access to highly sensitive information known as sensitive compartmented information, SCI. SCI is classified information concerning intelligent sources, methods and other sensitive matters. Speaker 1: Fully vetted. Speaker 0: So how long have you been working at the CIA? Speaker 1: Since 2008. Speaker 0: That's when you were at Lockheed. Speaker 1: Correct. And then and then I worked at NSA for 2 year for a Speaker 0: year. Okay. Speaker 1: And I was doing some really cool cyber stuff, which I can not tell you about. Then I went back to CIA in 2011. Yes. Then went to north of Grumman right down the street. Okay. Managed to be the cybersecurity package nurse. And then I went to the office of director of National Intelligence. And so I helped them stand there inside our platform. Yeah. Speaker 0: What exactly is insider threat programs? Speaker 11: It's it's usually the the biggest thing with insider threat is if somebody clicks on a link that they're not supposed to or whatever and then they affect their entire network. So as I'm getting assessed so so the the biggest threat of all is is the carelessness of people within your organization. So you put rules, governance rules, you know, things that they have to follow Speaker 1: and so Speaker 11: that they don't do anything stupid. Speaker 2: Not a week goes by without a news headline about potential medical supply shortages, threats to our infrastructure, or power grid. And you remember what they pulled during the last pandemic. Certain medications were mysteriously out of stock. No way will I ever let that happen again. In today's unpredictable world, it's all about being prepared for who knows what they have in store for the next pandemic. Our friends and supporters at the wellness company have designed this unique prescription based medical emergency kit that is packed with 8 potentially life saving prescription only medications, including z pack and ivermectin, which I used myself while out on the road and starting to feel a bit under the weather. Health is everything, and this is a great opportunity to order a wellness company medical emergency kit. The wellness company medical emergency kit stands ready to treat over 30 common ailments, ensuring you'll have access to vital medications when you need them most. And now, save $45 per kit when you order using the code o m g. Get ready to write this down. Get your wellness company medical emergency kit@twc.health/omg. That's t w c dot health slash o m g. That's twc.health/omg. And save $45 per kit today when you use code o m g. I'm John Fasisi states as fact that the higher ups within the intel community, including CIA directors, Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, and the upper levels of their staffs colluded to withhold information from sitting president Trump. Speaker 0: You said that Mhmm. Is what way do you think? Mike Pompeo was working with the heads of the other intel agencies. Speaker 1: Mike Pompeo was a Northrop receiver. Speaker 0: Right. And he was working with the heads of the other intel agencies to That's correct. Speaker 1: To withhold information from China. This predecessor, Gina Askel Yeah. Speaker 0: To withhold would give it away. Yeah. Speaker 1: All black and white people can tell him this. I'm not sure Speaker 2: if he's Speaker 1: He would give it away. Yeah. He'd call Biden and Putin and tell him that he would have a guy. No. I'm being serious. You have me Speaker 0: Yeah. I'm sorry Speaker 1: the I'm talking so I mean Speaker 0: to withhold information from Trump. Speaker 1: Yeah. So the Speaker 0: agencies kind of like all got together and said, we're not gonna tell Trump The higher ups. The higher ups. Speaker 6: You you put it this way. Speaker 1: The the executive staff, we're talking about the director and his subordinates. Okay. These are Speaker 10: very smart people. Speaker 0: Like, what titles are they? Speaker 1: Director of the CIA. Speaker 0: Director of the CIA would Speaker 1: keep Yes. Speaker 0: So if they decided Speaker 1: to get Yeah. It it would it's it's up it's up to him to share what he wants to share Yeah. With the director. Speaker 0: How do you keep information away from Tom? Speaker 1: Don't give it to Speaker 0: us. But wouldn't he ask? Speaker 1: I believe he doesn't know even. Speaker 2: Amjad Fassisi also states as fact that Trump is under surveillance and even claims they are spying on his ex wife. We are assuming Amjad is speaking of Marla Maples. Speaker 0: How did you guys figure out that Trump was colluding with the Russians? Did you guys use Speaker 1: Burner, fellas. Burner, fellas. Burner, fellas. Speaker 0: What does that mean? Speaker 1: That means a prepaid phone card that's not a taxi. It's not on the network. It doesn't ping the fan. Like a Speaker 0: dummy phone? Like a dumb phone? Like flip phone? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's called a friend, though. Speaker 2: I've had it with all my personal and private information being exposed and exploited by big tech and big government. So I'm joining my friend Eric France and I'm switching to my new unplugged phone. Protect your privacy. Get your very own unplugged phone. Go to unplug.com/omg. That's unplug.com/omg. Take your privacy back. Unplug.com/om Speaker 0: g. Was the Intel community able to use Pfizer to spy on Trump Speaker 1: and his team? I don't know. So But they get a thorough investigation. The the outcome of that is is in the middle of the court. Speaker 0: Was it the CIA or the NSA that's fight on Trump? We have So Speaker 1: it should be all over. Speaker 0: So you guys had human sources. Speaker 2: Already enough controversy around Israel, Amjad Fassisi, again, a high level government contractor, states he doesn't trust Israel, and they, quote, steal intelligence from us. Like Speaker 1: So for example, food with our our allies. Speaker 0: Who? Israel. Okay. Israel, our allies. Uh-huh. Like what? Speaker 1: Promotion. So do we, by the way. Speaker 0: So what kind of information? Like weapons or Speaker 1: Weapons. Stuff we don't wanna know. Speaker 0: So they're not really our friends? Speaker 1: Nobody's really for a lot of friends besides Nobody. Speaker 0: So the intel community was able to use Pfizer to spy on Trump and his team. And that's how we found out that he was colluding with the Russians. Speaker 2: And as any good spy would do, Fasisi makes it clear that, quote, this conversation didn't happen. Speaker 1: This conversation didn't happen. I Of course. I get completely denied. Speaker 0: Yep. That's so badass. Are you guys still watching him? Speaker 1: The wall Speaker 7: I would say yes. It's just Speaker 0: the intel community is still monitoring him at 5 o'clock. We we are not. It sounds like you guys are still watching him and his team. Of course Speaker 8: of course we are. Speaker 1: Nothing goes wild without somebody watching. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Just to stress it short. I promise. Speaker 2: Amjad Fassisi, a program manager contracted at the CIA, talks about how the CIA kept information from Trump. Amjad also discloses that the directors of the CIA would give Trump high level overviews, but never give him any details. Vassisi also spills that all the intelligence agencies thought that President Trump was a quote, fucking dumbass and would disclose information, unquote. When asked, how do you keep information from president Trump? Our subject says, quote, don't give it to him. Speaker 1: Not working. So we kept information from him. If we knew the fucking disclosure Wait. Say that one more time. Speaker 5: We took information from him. Speaker 1: From Trump? Yes. He said he did it. There are so many people that would Speaker 0: Do we have proof for that? Speaker 1: No. But we all believe because he's a it is fucking idiot. Speaker 9: So you're you're saying that we Speaker 0: you your agency. Speaker 1: Yep. All of the agencies. Yeah. Speaker 0: Kept information away. Not us. Speaker 1: Because we knew that it would we'd be careless with Yeah. A store has been a bad shower for a long time. Exactly. So Speaker 0: So you guys would, on purpose, keep certain information away from Trump. Speaker 1: You said either. You said not so good. Speaker 0: So the generals are, like Every everybody. Yeah. They would just not share anything with him. Speaker 1: We all did. We all thought he was fucking down on us. Speaker 0: Who's we? Speaker 1: I'll be I'll be I'll be I'll be Speaker 2: In full on bureaucratic elitist fashion, Amjad Fassisi describes the only people in the CIA that support Trump are rednecks that live in the sticks and brainwashed stupid idiots. Speaker 1: Yeah. There are some people that have good good blood on his side. Like, who? Speaker 0: Are you kidding me? Speaker 1: Right next to the bottom and back of the awareness x. Speaker 0: Like, how would you describe those people who still support Chong, these like, after what happened on Speaker 1: Trump? Brainwashed? Brainwashed. Stupid. Illiterate. Speaker 2: Amjad Fassisi with the CIA states there is, quote, no way Trump will get elected again. He's not gonna get it. Speaker 1: I'll be elected again. I've I've done the math. I think Speaker 0: it's possible. Yeah. Speaker 1: But there are more of less than there are the Speaker 10: We have a choice here. Speaker 1: Do we not have democracy or do we need some fucking madman? Yeah. Most can't fixate it. Speaker 2: Jen Vassisi states as fact that the NSA, CIA, and other departments within the intel community don't trust each other, therefore, don't share information. Speaker 0: Does the CIA work with the NSA? Speaker 1: No. Because they're very territorial because they don't make sure you information. That is a fucking problem. We don't share information of hate. And they're saying you have powdered, Speaker 0: So the NSA is careless? Speaker 2: Yeah. Possible violations of the law here include obstruction of justice by deception, conspiracy to obstruct, false statements, that's 18 USC 1,001. The actions of the directors and the executive staff of the CIA might even trigger violations of the Espionage Act. Some of these trigger felony provisions, other trigger misdemeanors that depends upon how serious the prosecutor thinks the violation is, Depends upon what his exact contracting status was, within which federal silo he really was, other specific regulations specific to the agency he worked under, CIA, etcetera, may be triggered, which could include things like insubordination or engaging in misrepresentation. He has no problem divulging all this to a strange woman after a few cocktails, but clammed up when I asked him. We had a chance to review your badge, and it this the one that you, says you worked for the CIA. And, you know, Michael Shellenberger and Matt Plavey did some reporting about the information that was held from Trump from Trump. It's actually a crime for the director of the CIA to withhold information from Trump. No. Speaker 1: I I I have no idea. Everything everything is I don't know. I have no intel. I have no knowledge. Speaker 2: You said that we quote keep information from him, Trump. Speaker 1: I I I never You Speaker 2: didn't say that. Speaker 1: I did not. Speaker 2: Quote, we kept information from Trump. He's a fucking idiot, quote, unquote. Those are your words. Speaker 1: Well, I can I can have a opinion, but I I don't know? Can I Speaker 2: talk can I sit down and talk Speaker 1: to someone about this, please? Speaker 2: I think it's important that I get your comment. Speaker 1: That's everything is untrue. Speaker 2: It's untrue? Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't I have no idea. I how why would I know? Why would you know? Do you do you work do you work at CIO? I can't tell you that. Do you work at Deloitte? Yes. Okay. Are you a program manager at Deloitte? Yes. Do you work at the Chinese Mission Center in Langley, Virginia? I can't tell you that. You can't tell me that. Speaker 2: Have you told other people that? Speaker 1: I can't tell you that either. Speaker 2: And stay tuned for follow-up, including my conversation and interaction with Amjad Fassisi released soon. The fact that our intelligence agencies withheld high level information to a sitting US president poses more questions than answers. It would be completely illegal for them to do this. It corroborates the reporting done by intrepid investigative reporters Michael Schallberger and Matt Taibbi. But rarely do you get this sort of thing on tape so that everyone can see it. The American people are being left in the dark because of the agencies, the leadership, the administrative state we have in place are at war and odds with each other. We need more people like this citizen journalist, this brave American swiper. We need more whistleblowers and sources inside these agencies to come forward and really expose what's going on with incontrovertible evidence, like documents and video recordings. The time for sitting on the sidelines is over. To quote Edmund Burke, All that is required for the triumph of evil is for good people, that's you, to do nothing. You can sign up today to become a citizen journalist in American Swiper by going to o'keefe mediagroup.com/swiper. You could donate to us. We have a new 5 1 c three nonprofit called Citizen You could DM us tips at tips.okiefmediagroup.com. You could DM us tips at tips. O'keefemediagroup.com and to our signal number 914-315-9415. You can DM us on Instagram and x. All this goes far beyond the point of partisan politics. The powers that be ask us to focus on what divides us. But as I said after I was raided by the FBI, what unites us is so much more powerful than what divides us. And we should all be united that this is wrong. The enemy might be out there, but corruption is alive and well in our country. America, our war is here. To quote Abraham Lincoln, America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter or lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.

@JamesOKeefeIII — James O'Keefe

Posted - May 2, 2024 at 12:35 AM

Saved - May 2, 2024 at 6:04 PM

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

ON THE PHONE WITH THE CIA PRESS SECRETARY: Spokesperson at CIA gives me a statement saying that the Program Manager at the Chinese Mission Center caught on tape talking about the higher-ups withholding information from the President, is no longer working at the CIA. https://t.co/ekDAmLm2tW

Video Transcript AI Summary

Chelsea Ross, press secretary, and Judge Annie Thorpe deny false CIA monitoring allegations by a former contractor. They emphasize CIA's non-political, foreign intelligence focus. They refuse to disclose the contractor's termination status.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hi, James. I'm glad to to meet you like this. I am Chelsea Ross, and I'm the press secretary. And, the judge roping Annie Thorpe will also be engaging on this. We are preparing we have a we have a statement that we would like to provide. We will be sharing it verbally as well in a written format. We are to the impression based on your email response that we had until 5 o'clock. Speaker 1: Yes. We Speaker 0: will make that work. Speaker 1: Yes. Yes, ma'am. Hey, Chelsea. You got me and James here. Speaker 0: Hi, James. Is it is it okay time to call you back? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Okay. I am I Speaker 2: just wanted to read you this statement, and Speaker 0: then I'm gonna hit on it on it to you. It'll populate in your inbox here. Speaker 1: You're gonna be sending it to my email. Correct? Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. I'll be about CIA are absolutely false and ridiculous. CIA is irisolutely a political institution that provides objective intelligence support to policymakers, including the President of the United States, irrespective of who occupies his office. We are a foreign intelligence focused agency and do not monitor the former president. The individual making these allegations is a former contractor who does not represent CIA. Speaker 1: Got it. Got it. So he he's a former contractor. When was he terminated? Was it after we gave the quotes to you and Deloitte? Speaker 0: I I I don't wanna I don't I don't are we speaking can we speak out to Mark at any moment? Speaker 1: We would like to know, has this individual been terminated in the last 48 hours as a result of what we've uncovered? Speaker 0: The only on the record that I have for you right now is is the statement that I I've provided. To the nature of the case. Okay. Speaker 1: Obviously, the individual being terminated as a result of these findings would be newsworthy. Can you get back to us on that? Speaker 0: I I the the only thing that I'm comfortable saying on the record is will be provided. Okay.

@GenFlynn — General Mike Flynn

Posted - May 2, 2024 at 2:06 PM

Saved - May 2, 2024 at 3:13 PM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

This is not an “I told you so…” but if you watch the film, FLYNN, Deliver the Truth, Whatever the Cost at http://flynnmovie.com you’ll gain an even greater sense of how corrupt and how weaponized various elements of our government have become (principally the CIA and the FBI). @FlynnMovie

Flynn Movie: Deliver the Truth. Whatever the Cost. Flynn Movie - A gripping and revealing true film exploring the life of General Michael Flynn, from his rise in the US Military, to severe political persecution he faced exposing corruption as the National Security Advisor to the POTUS. flynnmovie.com

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

BREAKING – EXPOSING THE CIA: “So the agencies kind of, like, all got together and said, we’re not gonna tell Trump…Director of the CIA would keep [information from Trump]…” A project manager working in Cyber Operations for the @CIA and an @NSAGov contractor with top-secret clearance working for @Deloitte, Amjad Fseisi, is caught on undercover cameras implicating the highest levels of the intelligence agencies, including “The executive staff. We’re talking about the director and his subordinates,” former CIA Directors “Gina Haspel....And I believe Mike Pompeo did the same thing too,” “kept information from him [Trump] because we knew he’d fucking disclose it.” Amjad reasons “There are certain people that would…give him a high-level overview but never give him any details. You know why? Because he’ll leak those details...He’s a Russian asset. He’s owned by the fucking Russians.” @mikepompeo Amjad reveals to OMG’s Undercover American Swiper that intel agencies not only kept intelligence information from a sitting United States President and Commander-In-Chief, they also used FISA to spy on @realDonaldTrump and his team and are still monitoring President Trump according to Amjad who says, “We monitor everything.” Amjad adds “we also have people that monitor his ex-wife. He likes to use burner phones” – information only an insider with access to highly sensitive information would state. “We steal it [information]” and “We hack other countries just like that,” Amjad, who states he currently works on the CIA’s China Mission Center, explains how intel agencies obtain information. He also describes a broken intelligence system where “We don’t share information across agencies” because the CIA is “very reluctant” to share information with the “careless” NSA. O’Keefe Media Group’s bombshell undercover footage supports earlier reports by investigative journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi, and Alex Gutentag that revealed how the American intelligence community illegally ran a spy operation against then-candidate Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016 and illegally acquired intelligence that was later used to justify the Federal Bureau of Investigation (@FBI) official probe, “Crossfire Hurricane,” which in turn led to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation that ultimately did not find evidence of Russia collusion by the 2016 Trump campaign. @shellenberger @mtaibbi @galexybrane Contractors like Fseisi hold the duty to withhold sharing confidential or national security information. In denying his statements, Fseisi may have realized he could be held liable for violating internal agency provisions and federal laws like the Executive Agency ethics provisions, which restrict what he may share with others outside of his contracted-to agency. Additionally, any government worker or agency head who withheld information from a superior (i.e. President Trump) may violate: (a) obstruction of justice by deception (18 USC 1512); (b) conspiracy to obstruct (18 USC 371); and false statements (18 USC 1001). Agency regulations may also provide offenses related to insubordination, reflecting poorly on the agency in public, or misrepresentation or dishonesty. When James O’Keefe caught up with Amjad Fseisi on the streets of Washington, D.C., Fseisi could not tell O’Keefe whether he had top secret clearance, denied making statements clearly caught on camera, and would not even confirm it was him on the video saying only “It looks like me.” When asked directly if he works at the CIA, Fseisi said, “I can’t tell you that.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Amjad Fassisi, a CIA contractor, claims that the CIA and other intelligence agencies withheld information from President Trump. He also alleges that the agencies colluded to keep information from him and that Trump is under constant surveillance. Fassisi states that the directors of the CIA, including Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, were involved in this effort. He further suggests that Trump was viewed as a "fucking dumbass" by the intelligence community. Fassisi's statements raise questions about the legality and transparency of the intelligence agencies' actions.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Okay. I Speaker 1: also worked at NSA. Yeah. Uh-huh. And then I have a TSSCI with a full scope polygraph. That means that I'm I believe that is. Speaker 2: Amjad Vassisi shows her his CIA identification badge. Speaker 3: No. Where does it say this? Speaker 1: It doesn't. Speaker 4: Hey. That's the point. Speaker 1: That's the point. What's CMC? China Mission Center, Valerie. China Mission Center. Gotcha. Speaker 2: Amjad talks about how the CIA kept information from Trump. Speaker 1: Not working. We kept information from him. Say one more time. Speaker 5: We kept information from him. Speaker 0: From Trump? Speaker 2: Amjad Fisisi states the higher ups within the intel community, including CIA directors Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, and the upper levels of their staffs colluded to withhold information from sitting president Trump. Speaker 0: So the agencies kind of, like, all got together and said, we're not gonna tell Trump To hire us. The higher ups. Speaker 6: We we put it this way. Speaker 1: The the executive staff, we're talking about the director and his subordinates. Speaker 0: Like, what titles are they? Speaker 1: Director of the CIA. Speaker 0: Director of the CIA would keep Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Are you guys still watching him? Speaker 7: I would say yes. Speaker 0: It sounds like you guys are still watching him and his team. Of course Speaker 8: of course we are. Speaker 1: Nothing goes wild about somebody watching. Speaker 2: Jed Fasisi also states as fact that Trump is under constant surveillance and even claims they are spying on his ex wife. Speaker 1: And you also have people that monitor and says that's a lot of people. Speaker 0: So you guys have human sources. Speaker 1: How do you think we're getting the money? Speaker 0: Like wire tapping? Is that did you guys figure out that Trump was colluding with the Russians? Did you guys use So intel community was able to use Pfizer to spy on Trump and his team. And that's how we found out that he was colluding with the Russians. Was it the CIA or the NSA that spied on Trump? We have So Speaker 1: it should be all over. Speaker 9: So you're you're saying that we Speaker 10: We have a choice here. Speaker 1: Do I not like democracy or do I need some fucking mad man? Yeah. What's being fixated? Speaker 0: Does it say the CIA on your LinkedIn? Speaker 1: Fuck no. No. I can't do that. And then I worked at NSA for 2 year for a year. Speaker 2: I'm James O'Keefe reporting on location outside the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. Right behind me, the CIA, the police officers here. Speaker 1: We figured we'd come up and just say hello. Speaker 2: No problem. We're we're allowed to stand here? Speaker 1: A 100%. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 1: Absolutely. Absolutely. Everything you guys are doing is a 100% okay from where you're at right now. Speaker 2: Okay. If Speaker 1: we proceed forward of the crosswalk Yeah. That's where we may have to come up and have another discussion. Speaker 2: Yeah. We're gonna stand right Speaker 1: on the sidewalk. Percent. Absolutely. Speaker 2: I appreciate it. Alright. Alright. Very good. Thank you. Just a moment ago, officers coming out from Langley, Virginia to warn me not to set foot across that line right there. It's obviously dangerous for us to be here. It's dangerous for us to do this reporting. But thanks to a brave OMG undercover swiper, we present to you the O'Keefe Media Group Blockbuster investigation inside the CIA. A few months ago, journalists Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger released a story making several claims, including the CIA illegally mobilizing foreign intelligence agencies to target Trump advisers before the 2016 election. Barack Obama's CIA Director John Brennan identified 26 Trump associates for the intelligence community to target and bump, make contact with or manipulate. And what bumping means is literally bumping into people making contact with them, communicating with them, and spreading misinformation to divert their attention. The US intelligence community also asked its foreign allies, United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, and the Israeli Mossad to target these 26 members of Trump's team going all the way back to March of 2016, well before the 2016 presidential election. Multiple instances that the US intelligence officials likely broke laws against spying and election interference. Former CIA director Gina Haspel blocked the release of a binder that included evidence that may have identified her role in the Trump Russia collusion hoax. This activity was illegal, both because US law prohibits such intelligence gathering unless authorized by a foreign intelligence surveillance act, that's FISA warrant, and because the weaponization of the intelligence community for political purposes constitutes election interference. The first of the intelligence community's surveillance targets appeared to be a former Defense Intelligence Agency, that's DIA, head and would be Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Another target was staffer George Papadopoulos. In 2018, HPFCI, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, released a 243 page report clearing Trump of allegations that he and his team colluded with Russia to interfere with the 20 16 election. However, sources close to the House Permanent Select Committee, led by Adam Schiff, covertly continued working out of a small room in Langley and he had access to raw logs and communications from agencies like the CIA and the National Security Council. You're probably wondering, how did the CIA respond to this? Well, former CIA Director John Brennan under Barack Obama did not respond, nor did the Justice Department. The US FBI and UK's equivalent to the NSA, that's the GCHQ, however, responded that wiretapping the president-elect claims were nonsense, they were utterly ridiculous, and should be ignored. What's most interesting about that is Taibi and Shellenberger didn't even ask about wiretapping. The FBI and GCHQ just included it in their response. Even more interesting is how did the mainstream media report it? The mainstream narrative was that the UK government GCHQ, again that's the United Kingdom's NSA equivalent, was the whistleblower in the investigation into the alleged ties between Trump and the Russian government, and other narratives that have all turned out to be false. As it turns out, not only was Taibi and Schellenberg's reporting accurate, we can now provide proof on camera, thanks to one of our OMG undercover American Swiper citizen investigative journalists. Using the dating app Bumble and hidden cameras, our OMG journalists set up a series of meetings and phone calls with Amjad Fassisi, a CIA contractor with top level government security clearances. Now as it turns out, the corruption at the CIA, FBI, and Department of Justice is probably even worse than you thought. And now you can see it with your own eyes. We're reporting that Amjad Fassisi, a senior intelligence officer with a top secret sensitive compartmentalized information clearance, has worked at the CIA for over a decade, and his knowledge and his position and access show he has a high level awareness about the agency, its current culture, and how it has been corrupted by bureaucratic politics, and how it has over the years and continues to use its powers to weaponize the CIA to spy on President Trump. Let's meet Amjad Fassisi. Amjad Fassisi is a CIA contractor working with Deloitte. He has a high level top secret government security clearance and works within the CIA and its China Mission Center on cyber operations. According to the CIA's website, the China Mission Center was formed to address the global challenge posed by the People's Republic of China that cuts across all of the CIA's mission areas. Through his work over the years with the CIA, NSA and various defense contractors, Amjad Vassisi is well connected to high level government officials. What you're about to see in this video is truly incredible. Amjet Vassisi divulges on camera that the directors of the CIA, including Gina Haskell and Mike Pompeo, and other high ranking members of the intelligence community, purposely colluded to withhold information from Donald Trump, then the sitting president of the United States. I greenlit the hidden camera date as we were initially under the impression that he was working for defense contractor Lockheed Martin. But during the first meeting, our American swiper noticed that Vassisi was in fact CIA, at which point our undercover investigation took on a whole new angle. Our brave American Swiper citizen journalist cultivated a rapport with Vassisi, and from there, the rest is history. Speaker 1: What wait. What do you think? Speaker 0: I work for the CIA. Speaker 1: That's awesome. What do you do for them? I do cyber accolades. I've been doing a rollout business. Speaker 0: How long have you worked there? Speaker 1: Oh, god. It's I work for Deloitte. Deloitte Consulting. Okay. So I'm a contractor to the CIA. Okay. I'm a contractor. That's good. I'm a contractor. That's good. I'm a I am a program manager. I'm a program manager. I'm a program manager. I talk to the mission center across all the across the entire enterprise. Everything. Speaker 2: After telling our undercover American swiper citizen journalist his role with the CIA, Amjad Vassisi shows her his CIA identification badge. Speaker 1: Alright. So here you go. Okay. Speaker 0: Let me see. Let's go. Speaker 1: You just screwed it up, please. Speaker 0: Oh, I'm sorry. Speaker 1: How have you worked for? So that was about 2,008. So that was the last picture I think was from 2013. Speaker 0: This is from 2013, which is more than a decade ago. Yes. Wait. Hold on. Speaker 3: Where does it say Speaker 1: It doesn't. Speaker 0: Why is that? Speaker 1: It does. Why would why would it shut up? Speaker 0: But how do you keep moving up? Speaker 1: Oh, I Speaker 0: guess I guess. Speaker 4: That's the point. Right? That's the point. Speaker 1: That's the point. Yeah. One sec. Speaker 0: Is there like Speaker 1: that. Speaker 0: What's CMC? Speaker 1: China Mission Center, darling. Oh. Oh. Oh. Oh. Okay. I'm I'm getting a little nervous now. Speaker 0: Okay. This is oh, oh, so this is the agent your your your division. Speaker 1: That's my mission center. Speaker 0: Gotcha. Gotcha. Speaker 1: Like, you believe me now? Speaker 0: Yes. This is very legit. I like it. I got it. Speaker 1: Because we have to go through training. We're like, we leave a very low carbon cyber or Internet or social media footprint. Uh-huh. Oh, I'm on LinkedIn. Speaker 0: Okay. I'm Speaker 1: on Facebook. My name is. Okay. And And the company that I work for, that's it. Speaker 0: Do you does it say the CIA on your LinkedIn? Speaker 1: No. No. We can't do that. No. No. No. No. Speaker 0: They don't allow you guys Speaker 1: to do that? Oh, hell no. Speaker 2: Amjad Fisisi also describes how you obtain top secret clearance called TSSCI. TSSCI is a subset of top secret clearance and is required for access to highly sensitive information known as sensitive compartmented information, SCI. SCI is classified information concerning intelligent sources, methods and other sensitive matters. Speaker 1: Fully vetted. Speaker 0: So how long have you been working at the CIA? Speaker 1: Since 2008. Speaker 0: That's when you were at Lockheed. Speaker 1: Correct. And then and then I worked at NSA for 2 year for a Speaker 0: year. Okay. Speaker 1: And I was doing some really cool cyber stuff, which I can not tell you about. Then I went back to CIA in 2011. Yes. Then went to north of Grumman right down the street. Okay. Managed to be the cybersecurity package nurse. And then I went to the office of director of National Intelligence. And so I helped them stand there inside our platform. Yeah. Speaker 0: What exactly is insider threat programs? Speaker 11: It's it's usually the the biggest thing with insider threat is if somebody clicks on a link that they're not supposed to or whatever and then they affect their entire network. So as I'm getting assessed so so the the biggest threat of all is is the carelessness of people within your organization. So you put rules, governance rules, you know, things that they have to follow Speaker 1: and so Speaker 11: that they don't do anything stupid. Speaker 2: Not a week goes by without a news headline about potential medical supply shortages, threats to our infrastructure, or power grid. And you remember what they pulled during the last pandemic. Certain medications were mysteriously out of stock. No way will I ever let that happen again. In today's unpredictable world, it's all about being prepared for who knows what they have in store for the next pandemic. Our friends and supporters at the wellness company have designed this unique prescription based medical emergency kit that is packed with 8 potentially life saving prescription only medications, including z pack and ivermectin, which I used myself while out on the road and starting to feel a bit under the weather. Health is everything, and this is a great opportunity to order a wellness company medical emergency kit. The wellness company medical emergency kit stands ready to treat over 30 common ailments, ensuring you'll have access to vital medications when you need them most. And now, save $45 per kit when you order using the code o m g. Get ready to write this down. Get your wellness company medical emergency kit@twc.health/omg. That's t w c dot health slash o m g. That's twc.health/omg. And save $45 per kit today when you use code o m g. I'm John Fasisi states as fact that the higher ups within the intel community, including CIA directors, Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, and the upper levels of their staffs colluded to withhold information from sitting president Trump. Speaker 0: You said that Mhmm. Is what way do you think? Mike Pompeo was working with the heads of the other intel agencies. Speaker 1: Mike Pompeo was a Northrop receiver. Speaker 0: Right. And he was working with the heads of the other intel agencies to That's correct. Speaker 1: To withhold information from China. This predecessor, Gina Askel Yeah. Speaker 0: To withhold would give it away. Yeah. Speaker 1: All black and white people can tell him this. I'm not sure Speaker 2: if he's Speaker 1: He would give it away. Yeah. He'd call Biden and Putin and tell him that he would have a guy. No. I'm being serious. You have me Speaker 0: Yeah. I'm sorry Speaker 1: the I'm talking so I mean Speaker 0: to withhold information from Trump. Speaker 1: Yeah. So the Speaker 0: agencies kind of like all got together and said, we're not gonna tell Trump The higher ups. The higher ups. Speaker 6: You you put it this way. Speaker 1: The the executive staff, we're talking about the director and his subordinates. Okay. These are Speaker 10: very smart people. Speaker 0: Like, what titles are they? Speaker 1: Director of the CIA. Speaker 0: Director of the CIA would Speaker 1: keep Yes. Speaker 0: So if they decided Speaker 1: to get Yeah. It it would it's it's up it's up to him to share what he wants to share Yeah. With the director. Speaker 0: How do you keep information away from Tom? Speaker 1: Don't give it to Speaker 0: us. But wouldn't he ask? Speaker 1: I believe he doesn't know even. Speaker 2: Amjad Fassisi also states as fact that Trump is under surveillance and even claims they are spying on his ex wife. We are assuming Amjad is speaking of Marla Maples. Speaker 0: How did you guys figure out that Trump was colluding with the Russians? Did you guys use Speaker 1: Burner, fellas. Burner, fellas. Burner, fellas. Speaker 0: What does that mean? Speaker 1: That means a prepaid phone card that's not a taxi. It's not on the network. It doesn't ping the fan. Like a Speaker 0: dummy phone? Like a dumb phone? Like flip phone? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's called a friend, though. Speaker 2: I've had it with all my personal and private information being exposed and exploited by big tech and big government. So I'm joining my friend Eric France and I'm switching to my new unplugged phone. Protect your privacy. Get your very own unplugged phone. Go to unplug.com/omg. That's unplug.com/omg. Take your privacy back. Unplug.com/om Speaker 0: g. Was the Intel community able to use Pfizer to spy on Trump Speaker 1: and his team? I don't know. So But they get a thorough investigation. The the outcome of that is is in the middle of the court. Speaker 0: Was it the CIA or the NSA that's fight on Trump? We have So Speaker 1: it should be all over. Speaker 0: So you guys had human sources. Speaker 2: Already enough controversy around Israel, Amjad Fassisi, again, a high level government contractor, states he doesn't trust Israel, and they, quote, steal intelligence from us. Like Speaker 1: So for example, food with our our allies. Speaker 0: Who? Israel. Okay. Israel, our allies. Uh-huh. Like what? Speaker 1: Promotion. So do we, by the way. Speaker 0: So what kind of information? Like weapons or Speaker 1: Weapons. Stuff we don't wanna know. Speaker 0: So they're not really our friends? Speaker 1: Nobody's really for a lot of friends besides Nobody. Speaker 0: So the intel community was able to use Pfizer to spy on Trump and his team. And that's how we found out that he was colluding with the Russians. Speaker 2: And as any good spy would do, Fasisi makes it clear that, quote, this conversation didn't happen. Speaker 1: This conversation didn't happen. I Of course. I get completely denied. Speaker 0: Yep. That's so badass. Are you guys still watching him? Speaker 1: The wall Speaker 7: I would say yes. It's just Speaker 0: the intel community is still monitoring him at 5 o'clock. We we are not. It sounds like you guys are still watching him and his team. Of course Speaker 8: of course we are. Speaker 1: Nothing goes wild without somebody watching. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Just to stress it short. I promise. Speaker 2: Amjad Fassisi, a program manager contracted at the CIA, talks about how the CIA kept information from Trump. Amjad also discloses that the directors of the CIA would give Trump high level overviews, but never give him any details. Vassisi also spills that all the intelligence agencies thought that President Trump was a quote, fucking dumbass and would disclose information, unquote. When asked, how do you keep information from president Trump? Our subject says, quote, don't give it to him. Speaker 1: Not working. So we kept information from him. If we knew the fucking disclosure Wait. Say that one more time. Speaker 5: We took information from him. Speaker 1: From Trump? Yes. He said he did it. There are so many people that would Speaker 0: Do we have proof for that? Speaker 1: No. But we all believe because he's a it is fucking idiot. Speaker 9: So you're you're saying that we Speaker 0: you your agency. Speaker 1: Yep. All of the agencies. Yeah. Speaker 0: Kept information away. Not us. Speaker 1: Because we knew that it would we'd be careless with Yeah. A store has been a bad shower for a long time. Exactly. So Speaker 0: So you guys would, on purpose, keep certain information away from Trump. Speaker 1: You said either. You said not so good. Speaker 0: So the generals are, like Every everybody. Yeah. They would just not share anything with him. Speaker 1: We all did. We all thought he was fucking down on us. Speaker 0: Who's we? Speaker 1: I'll be I'll be I'll be I'll be Speaker 2: In full on bureaucratic elitist fashion, Amjad Fassisi describes the only people in the CIA that support Trump are rednecks that live in the sticks and brainwashed stupid idiots. Speaker 1: Yeah. There are some people that have good good blood on his side. Like, who? Speaker 0: Are you kidding me? Speaker 1: Right next to the bottom and back of the awareness x. Speaker 0: Like, how would you describe those people who still support Chong, these like, after what happened on Speaker 1: Trump? Brainwashed? Brainwashed. Stupid. Illiterate. Speaker 2: Amjad Fassisi with the CIA states there is, quote, no way Trump will get elected again. He's not gonna get it. Speaker 1: I'll be elected again. I've I've done the math. I think Speaker 0: it's possible. Yeah. Speaker 1: But there are more of less than there are the Speaker 10: We have a choice here. Speaker 1: Do we not have democracy or do we need some fucking madman? Yeah. Most can't fixate it. Speaker 2: Jen Vassisi states as fact that the NSA, CIA, and other departments within the intel community don't trust each other, therefore, don't share information. Speaker 0: Does the CIA work with the NSA? Speaker 1: No. Because they're very territorial because they don't make sure you information. That is a fucking problem. We don't share information of hate. And they're saying you have powdered, Speaker 0: So the NSA is careless? Speaker 2: Yeah. Possible violations of the law here include obstruction of justice by deception, conspiracy to obstruct, false statements, that's 18 USC 1,001. The actions of the directors and the executive staff of the CIA might even trigger violations of the Espionage Act. Some of these trigger felony provisions, other trigger misdemeanors that depends upon how serious the prosecutor thinks the violation is, Depends upon what his exact contracting status was, within which federal silo he really was, other specific regulations specific to the agency he worked under, CIA, etcetera, may be triggered, which could include things like insubordination or engaging in misrepresentation. He has no problem divulging all this to a strange woman after a few cocktails, but clammed up when I asked him. We had a chance to review your badge, and it this the one that you, says you worked for the CIA. And, you know, Michael Shellenberger and Matt Plavey did some reporting about the information that was held from Trump from Trump. It's actually a crime for the director of the CIA to withhold information from Trump. No. Speaker 1: I I I have no idea. Everything everything is I don't know. I have no intel. I have no knowledge. Speaker 2: You said that we quote keep information from him, Trump. Speaker 1: I I I never You Speaker 2: didn't say that. Speaker 1: I did not. Speaker 2: Quote, we kept information from Trump. He's a fucking idiot, quote, unquote. Those are your words. Speaker 1: Well, I can I can have a opinion, but I I don't know? Can I Speaker 2: talk can I sit down and talk Speaker 1: to someone about this, please? Speaker 2: I think it's important that I get your comment. Speaker 1: That's everything is untrue. Speaker 2: It's untrue? Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't I have no idea. I how why would I know? Why would you know? Do you do you work do you work at CIO? I can't tell you that. Do you work at Deloitte? Yes. Okay. Are you a program manager at Deloitte? Yes. Do you work at the Chinese Mission Center in Langley, Virginia? I can't tell you that. You can't tell me that. Speaker 2: Have you told other people that? Speaker 1: I can't tell you that either. Speaker 2: And stay tuned for follow-up, including my conversation and interaction with Amjad Fassisi released soon. The fact that our intelligence agencies withheld high level information to a sitting US president poses more questions than answers. It would be completely illegal for them to do this. It corroborates the reporting done by intrepid investigative reporters Michael Schallberger and Matt Taibbi. But rarely do you get this sort of thing on tape so that everyone can see it. The American people are being left in the dark because of the agencies, the leadership, the administrative state we have in place are at war and odds with each other. We need more people like this citizen journalist, this brave American swiper. We need more whistleblowers and sources inside these agencies to come forward and really expose what's going on with incontrovertible evidence, like documents and video recordings. The time for sitting on the sidelines is over. To quote Edmund Burke, All that is required for the triumph of evil is for good people, that's you, to do nothing. You can sign up today to become a citizen journalist in American Swiper by going to o'keefe mediagroup.com/swiper. You could donate to us. We have a new 5 1 c three nonprofit called Citizen You could DM us tips at tips.okiefmediagroup.com. You could DM us tips at tips. O'keefemediagroup.com and to our signal number 914-315-9415. You can DM us on Instagram and x. All this goes far beyond the point of partisan politics. The powers that be ask us to focus on what divides us. But as I said after I was raided by the FBI, what unites us is so much more powerful than what divides us. And we should all be united that this is wrong. The enemy might be out there, but corruption is alive and well in our country. America, our war is here. To quote Abraham Lincoln, America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter or lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - June 24, 2024 at 3:12 PM

Saved - June 25, 2024 at 3:18 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The CIA Chief of Disguise confirms the use of "full face masks" for undercover operations. The author suggests that Joe Biden should undergo drug and DNA tests before the CNN Debate with Donald Trump. The Chief of Disguise recalls a memorable moment when he wore a full face mask while briefing President George H.W. Bush at the White House. The masks allow individuals to convincingly assume different identities.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Here’s The Uncut Version Of The CIA Chief Of Disguise Confirming They Use “Full Face Masks” To “Walk around as someone else” This is why Joe Biden needs both a drug test and a DNA test before the CNN Debate with Donald Trump “I was Chief of Disguise. The office I worked in was like the Q in James Bond. We were the Q for the CIA and the intelligence community. So there were different parts of it, whatever you needed. ‌ If you needed a bug, if you needed secret writing or a microdot or a concealment device or whatever you needed, you had to come to us and we'll put something together for you. Okay. What's the most memorable moment from being in disguise for you? Um, there were a number of them, but the one I mean, one that has to stand out, I went to the White House and I briefed George H. W. Bush, the president, at the time while I was wearing a full face mask. ‌ So we're sitting, like, this close together, and I'm telling him that I'm gonna show him the best disguise that we have. And he's looking for a bag, like, where where is it? I said, well, I'm wearing it, and I'm going to take it off. And I reached to start taking it off, and he said, stop. And he got up and he walked and he looked and he looked at it. ‌ He couldn't he didn't know it was a mask. He wasn't sure what I was wearing. He sat back down. He said, okay. So I took it off. ‌ And I was holding it up in the air so he could see it, my whole head. It had hair and a face and a neck. So you could walk around as someone else? Absolutely. And that would be the disguise. ‌ Absolutely.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

I worked in a CIA office like James Bond's Q, creating disguises and gadgets. A memorable moment was briefing President George H.W. Bush while wearing a full face mask. He couldn't tell it was a mask until I took it off, revealing a lifelike disguise for walking around as someone else.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I was chief in disguise. What all did that entail? The, the office I worked in was like the queue in James Bond. We were the queue for the CIA and the intelligence community. So there were different parts of it, whatever you needed. If you needed a bug, if you needed secret writing or a microdot or a concealment device or whatever you needed, you had to come to us and we'll put something together for you. What's the most memorable moment from being in disguise for you? There were a number of them, but the one I mean, one that has to stand out. I went to the White House Mhmm. And I briefed George h w Bush, the president at the time while I was wearing a full face mask. So we're sitting like this close together, and I'm telling him that I'm gonna show him the best disguise that we have. And he's looking for a bag like, where where is it? I said, well, I'm wearing it and I'm going to take it off. And I reached to start taking it off, and he said, stop. And he got up, and he walked, and he looked, and he looked, and he couldn't he didn't know it was a mask. He wasn't sure what I was wearing. He sat back down. He said, okay. So I took it off, and I was holding it up in the air so he could see it. My whole head. It had hair and a face and a neck. So you could walk around as someone else. Absolutely. And that would be the disguise. Absolutely.

@Real_RobN — 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Posted - September 1, 2024 at 7:53 PM

Saved - September 3, 2024 at 7:55 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I shared insights on the significant coverup in U.S. history, highlighting O’Keefe Media Group's undercover footage. This footage corroborates findings from investigative journalists, revealing that the American intelligence community conducted an illegal spy operation against Trump’s 2016 campaign. It also shows how intelligence was improperly obtained to justify the FBI's "Crossfire Hurricane" investigation, which ultimately did not uncover evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And the greatest coverup in United States history, O’Keefe Media Group’s bombshell undercover footage supports earlier reports by investigative journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi, and Alex Gutentag that revealed how the American intelligence community illegally ran a spy operation against then-candidate Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016 and illegally acquired intelligence that was later used to justify the Federal Bureau of Investigation (@FBI) official probe, “Crossfire Hurricane,” which in turn led to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation that ultimately did not find evidence of Russia collusion by the 2016 Trump campaign.

Video Transcript AI Summary

A House committee is investigating Dr. Anthony Fauci's involvement with the CIA regarding COVID-19's origins. According to the committee, Fauci was escorted into CIA headquarters without record and participated in analysis to influence the agency's review. This follows a whistleblower claim that the CIA paid people to bury the lab leak theory. The committee is ordering HHS to provide documents detailing Fauci's movements during the pandemic, specifically in and out of CIA controlled sites.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Fox News alert. New evidence has just surfaced, tying doctor Anthony Fauci to the CIA's cover up of COVID 19. Last week, a whistleblower claimed the CIA was paying people off to bury the lab leak theory, and now this, from the house committee investigating the pandemic origins, quote, doctor Fauci was escorted into Central Intelligence Agency, CIA headquarters, without a record of entry and participated in the analysis to influence the agency's review. The committee is now ordering HHS to hand over documents detailing all of Fauci's movements during the pandemic in and out of CIA controlled sites.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

BREAKING – EXPOSING THE CIA: “So the agencies kind of, like, all got together and said, we’re not gonna tell Trump…Director of the CIA would keep [information from Trump]…” A project manager working in Cyber Operations for the @CIA and an @NSAGov contractor with top-secret clearance working for @Deloitte, Amjad Fseisi, is caught on undercover cameras implicating the highest levels of the intelligence agencies, including “The executive staff. We’re talking about the director and his subordinates,” former CIA Directors “Gina Haspel....And I believe Mike Pompeo did the same thing too,” “kept information from him [Trump] because we knew he’d fucking disclose it.” Amjad reasons “There are certain people that would…give him a high-level overview but never give him any details. You know why? Because he’ll leak those details...He’s a Russian asset. He’s owned by the fucking Russians.” @mikepompeo Amjad reveals to OMG’s Undercover American Swiper that intel agencies not only kept intelligence information from a sitting United States President and Commander-In-Chief, they also used FISA to spy on @realDonaldTrump and his team and are still monitoring President Trump according to Amjad who says, “We monitor everything.” Amjad adds “we also have people that monitor his ex-wife. He likes to use burner phones” – information only an insider with access to highly sensitive information would state. “We steal it [information]” and “We hack other countries just like that,” Amjad, who states he currently works on the CIA’s China Mission Center, explains how intel agencies obtain information. He also describes a broken intelligence system where “We don’t share information across agencies” because the CIA is “very reluctant” to share information with the “careless” NSA. O’Keefe Media Group’s bombshell undercover footage supports earlier reports by investigative journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi, and Alex Gutentag that revealed how the American intelligence community illegally ran a spy operation against then-candidate Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016 and illegally acquired intelligence that was later used to justify the Federal Bureau of Investigation (@FBI) official probe, “Crossfire Hurricane,” which in turn led to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation that ultimately did not find evidence of Russia collusion by the 2016 Trump campaign. @shellenberger @mtaibbi @galexybrane Contractors like Fseisi hold the duty to withhold sharing confidential or national security information. In denying his statements, Fseisi may have realized he could be held liable for violating internal agency provisions and federal laws like the Executive Agency ethics provisions, which restrict what he may share with others outside of his contracted-to agency. Additionally, any government worker or agency head who withheld information from a superior (i.e. President Trump) may violate: (a) obstruction of justice by deception (18 USC 1512); (b) conspiracy to obstruct (18 USC 371); and false statements (18 USC 1001). Agency regulations may also provide offenses related to insubordination, reflecting poorly on the agency in public, or misrepresentation or dishonesty. When James O’Keefe caught up with Amjad Fseisi on the streets of Washington, D.C., Fseisi could not tell O’Keefe whether he had top secret clearance, denied making statements clearly caught on camera, and would not even confirm it was him on the video saying only “It looks like me.” When asked directly if he works at the CIA, Fseisi said, “I can’t tell you that.”

@greg_price11 — Greg Price

Posted - October 10, 2024 at 5:55 PM

Saved - October 10, 2024 at 6:41 PM

@greg_price11 - Greg Price

Reporter: An Afghan national who was working for the CIA was arrested for plotting a terrorist attack on Election Day. How was he brought here? Mayorkas: *Refuses to answer* Reporter: We're getting conflicting answers from DHS Mayorkas: *Gets angry* https://t.co/IuI1QvauUE

Video Transcript AI Summary

An Afghan national, who worked for the CIA in Afghanistan, was arrested for allegedly planning an election day terror plot. He was brought to the US after the collapse of Afghanistan. The reporter states that the agency claims it was through the SIV program, but the State Department denies this, stating he was never issued an SIV or immigrant visa and was paroled into the US by DHS. The reporter asks the secretary how the man was brought to the US, what screening he underwent, and what he applied for. The secretary declines to answer, stating he is there to discuss disaster relief efforts. The reporter presses, noting conflicting information from the agency and State Department. The reporter asks for assurance that appropriate steps have been taken to secure the country against threats, questioning whether the man was radicalized before or after entering the US.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This Afghan national who was working for the CIA in Afghanistan was arrested for planning an election day terror plot. He was brought to the US after Afghanistan collapsed. Your agency says as part of the SIV program. The state department is telling us he was not part of the SIV program, which had strenuous vetting. They say he was never issued an SIV or immigrant visa, and DHS paroled him into the US. They further expect the court document to be updated to reflect this from DOJ side. So, mister secretary, how was this man brought into the US? What screening did he undergo? What did he apply for to get here? Speaker 1: Jackie, I I'm here in North Carolina, communicating with the individuals who are still conducting search and rescue operations. Over 200 people have lost their lives in hurricane Helene. We have, reports, that at least 10 individuals have lost their lives as a result of hurricane Milton. I'd be very pleased to answer your question in a different setting, but we are here to talk about emergencies and the support that we can deliver to people in desperate need. Thank you. Speaker 0: That, mister secretary, but we're getting conflicting answers from your agency and from the state department about a man who was arrested for an election day terror plot. How do you not have those answers prepared? Speaker 1: Oh, Jackie, that's, not what I said. What I said is I'd be pleased to discuss this issue at a different time, but I am here to speak about disasters that have impacted people's lives in real time. And that is the subject that I'm addressing today. Speaker 0: Mister secretary, can you assure people that appropriate steps have been taken to secure the country against these kinds of threats? Because the outstanding question is whether this man was radicalized before the US government brought here him here or afterward. And people should be concerned about that. Speaker 1: Jackie Jackie, your persistence in questioning can be matched by by my persistence in answers. Speaker 0: Alright. We're gonna go.

@JamesOKeefeIII — James O'Keefe

Posted - December 17, 2024 at 6:54 PM

Saved - December 17, 2024 at 8:45 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I confronted Henry Appel, a National Security Council advisor, after he was caught on hidden camera making shocking comments about President Biden, including saying he "can't say a sentence" and referring to him as "dead." Appel expressed fears about the Trump administration targeting his colleagues, describing a sense of being "trauma-bonded" due to past experiences. When I pressed him on national security protocols, he chose to flee the scene rather than engage further.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

CONFRONTED: Henry Appel, National Security Council advisor, is confronted by James O'Keefe after being caught on hidden camera spilling the "Tea" about @POTUS saying "He [Biden] Can't Say a Sentence." "You’re Lucky I’m Not a Chinese spy," O’Keefe tells Appel, highlighting the sensitivity of his loose-lipped comments, including calling President Biden "Dead” and sharing his concern that the Trump administration will come after his colleagues in the National Security Council and how they are "Trauma-Bonded." When pressed about national security protocols and his tears over Trump’s victory, Appel chose to flee the scene in Washington, D.C., with O’Keefe remarking: "The Spy That Works for the Biden Administration… Running Away, Not Saying a Word."

Video Transcript AI Summary

Henry Appel from the National Security Council is confronted by investigative reporter James O'Keefe. O'Keefe questions why an advisor is sharing sensitive information with an undercover reporter, suggesting it could be dangerous if he were a spy. Appel admits to feeling traumatized and reflects on his past aspirations of being a spy. O'Keefe highlights Appel's comments about President Biden, implying he seems out of touch. The conversation touches on Appel's emotional reaction to Trump's election victory and concerns about retaliation. O'Keefe criticizes the advisor for being careless with national security information, suggesting that such behavior could have serious consequences. The segment concludes with O'Keefe emphasizing the risks of leaking secrets in Washington, D.C.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Henry? Henry Appel? National Security Council. Hi. Speaker 1: Alright. Speaker 0: I'm James O'Keefe, investigative reporter and muckraker. This is you on hidden camera. Cool. You're lucky I'm not a Chinese spy. You are a very lucky man that I'm not a Chinese spy. But I gotta ask you a question. What the hell is the guy who's an advisor to the National Security Council doing spilling the quote tea to an undercover fine. Speaker 1: Yeah. Sorry. That was on us. Yeah. We're traumatized. Speaker 0: What type of national security operation you boys running in the United States government? And I and you used to be a spy. Speaker 1: For a while, I thought I was gonna be a spy. I was You thought what? I was gonna be a spy. A little chaos. And I did that for a little while. Speaker 0: What type of spy are you? So, where are you going? So we're here in Washington with with the spy who works for the United States government who's, quote, spilling the tea. Now this is you talking about Biden being, quote, dead. Speaker 1: Joe Biden. Is like That was not dead. He's like he's like just say his sentence. Speaker 0: Is it your words? I'm gonna play them for you here. Joe Speaker 1: Biden. He's Speaker 0: like dead. You also tell an anecdote where you're on the phone with the president. He didn't even know that the guy that he was asking for was right next to him. Speaker 1: My boss was on an international trip with him, like, 0 for some date. The phone rang in the office, and I picked it off. Speaker 0: As an advisor. And you're saying all these things to a rando. What if that random person was a Chinese spy? Is that what they teach you in in intel school? What do you what do you feel like? You're you're about to be famous. And by the way, what was it like to cry those tears when Trump won? You said you're concerned about being retaliated against. Speaker 1: There are a lot of tears the next morning. To the We're also, like, also, like, concerned about, like, them coming after us. Speaker 0: What was it like to cry? There he goes. The spy who shagged me. No. The spy that works for the Biden administration running away, not saying a word. He's very concerned. People who are intelligence, people don't want to be famous. So we just confronted the spy who works as an advisor to the National Security Council for Biden. He ran away into this place here. We asked him about the tears he was feeling and the trauma that he was feeling as a deep state official after Trump's victory. Perhaps he should be concerned because he works for the National Security Council and he's giving away all the secrets to a stranger here on the streets of Washington, D. C. Hello, ma'am. Yes. Then she runs away. People like to stare at us when we do this. We are behind enemy lines in the nation's capital and the trauma that they feel, maybe they should come after these people for spilling secrets and being horrible at their jobs as spies. That's not the worst espionage ever if you're going to be telling people about what's happening inside the White House. Reporting from Washington DC, this is James O'Keefe with OMG.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

https://t.co/yYDPeGkqWD

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

SHOCKING UNDERCOVER VIDEO: ‘Joe Biden is Dead;’ National Security Council Advisor Inside the White House Details Biden "Can't Say a Sentence." Henry Appel, a former spy who currently works at the Intelligence Programs Directorate for the NSC, reveals: 'We’re concerned about Trump coming after us.’ "We're trauma-bonded... there were a lot of tears."

Video Transcript AI Summary

Henry Appel, an adviser at the National Security Council, shared experiences about President Biden's confusion during calls and meetings. He recounted a time when Biden called looking for NSC adviser Jake Sullivan, not realizing Sullivan was on the same trip. Appel noted Biden struggled with basic words in briefings, leading to misunderstandings. He also mentioned the emotional impact of Trump's victory on his team, describing them as "trauma bonded." Appel expressed concerns among White House officials about potential repercussions from the incoming Trump administration. He humorously revealed that his dating profile highlights his tendency to overshare. In a meeting, he was confronted about sharing sensitive information with an undercover journalist, raising questions about his role in the NSC.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Well, here's the tea. Joe Biden is, like, best gay. She's, like, Kim, just say this. She's, like, really, like, progressed. It is old age. Yeah. Everybody Speaker 1: recognized. Baby. Everybody Speaker 0: recognized. I can't believe it wasn't a bigger scandal. He'll be dead in a year. Speaker 2: Meet Henry Appel, an adviser for the National Security Council. Henry Appel shared that president Biden had called the NSC White House phone while on a foreign trip looking for NSC advisor, Jake Sullivan. Henry told the president that in fact, mister Sullivan was not at the White House, but on the same foreign trip as president Biden. Speaker 0: My boss was on an Internet with him, like, 0 or something. The phone rang in the office, and I was like, oh, mister president. I was wondering, they were like, he was like, you stayed there. He's like, no. He's he's traveling with you. He's on the same trip as you are. In Speaker 2: another encounter with president Biden, Henry Appel from the National Security Council revealed a phone call exchange. On the call, Biden was asking for NSC adviser, Speaker 0: I was, like, the last one in the office. I'm gonna be a call for my boss. And so I picked up and said, love is present. Like, this is Henry on Jake's phone. He's up for the day, but I can try to get later, same thing. I picked up again. I was like, how's the hi, Ian. It's Henry. She was like, is she there? I was like, no. You called the same office. Speaker 2: Henry Appel stated that president Biden did not understand basic words in meetings at the White House. Speaker 0: Another time my boss went in to brief him, I heard the time points. I said, like, oh, this is like a novel phenomenon versus a thing. It's like it's new. Like, it hasn't been done before. Speaker 2: Henry even goes on to say, on his dating profile, his greatest strength is quote, oversharing on the first date. You can't make this shit up. Henry Appel states that we, referring to his team at the National Security Council, were crying the night of Trump's victory, claiming they are all, quote, trauma bonded. Speaker 1: So everybody's probably, like, We shared Speaker 0: trauma. Yeah. Speaker 3: It's the thing. Traveler bond. Speaker 0: We're trauma bond. Speaker 1: We're trauma bond. Yes. What was it like? But he might just found out. Speaker 0: There were a lot of tears the next morning. Care. Take I gotta find new job. Speaker 2: Then Henry Appel shares, to our undercover journalist, White House officials and national security officials are concerned about the incoming Trump administration coming after them for things they may have done wrong. In recent months, many of our fellow Americans experienced unprecedented natural disasters and damaged infrastructure, making access to health care essentials impossible at the very moment it was needed. When disaster strikes, being prepared is your best defense. And now I'm excited to share with you the brand new field emergency kit from our friends at the wellness company, the ultimate survival kit for any situation where medical help is not an option. Inside this rugged waterproof case, you'll find essential medications that cover over 60 conditions that you can encounter along with a detailed 85 page doctor written guidebook. This ultimate kit includes amoxicillin, an essential for treating bacterial infections and antivirals and antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, medications that are critical in situations where you're exposed to respiratory viruses or parasites. And for those facing potentially life threatening allergic reactions, the field kit includes epinephrine, the generic EpiPen, along with vital first aid supplies such as tourniquet and wound and burn treatments. Natural disasters are happening at record rates, so I urge everyone to get the ultimate field emergency kit from our friends and supporters at at the Wellness Company by going to twc.healthomg. That's twc.healthomg. And now you can save 50% just by using code OMG at checkout. Meet Henry Appel, an adviser at the intelligence programs directorate for the National Security Council. Within the NSC, Henry Appel works within the intelligence programs directorate. According to multiple government websites, the division is responsible for overseeing and coordinating intelligence activities across various US intelligence agencies, providing the NSC with crucial intelligence analysis to inform national security decision making, essentially acting as the primary point of contact between the intelligence community and the National Security Council on intelligence matters. Henry met our OMG American Swiper on a dating app in Washington DC, and spoke more in-depth about his NSC job and his background, even mentioning he was a spy at one point in his career. Speaker 0: We're it's an awesome career working, like, intelligence. So I work in the intelligence programs director of the street council. Help. So we give, like, all of the senior policy makers, like, all the secrets. Yep. It's like diplomacy and international relations, like, for the core operating. My office is, like, super involved there. Speaker 1: Making the a How was that drawing? Speaker 0: Careful. Speaker 1: I'll see that Speaker 0: for a while. I thought I was gonna be a spot. Speaker 1: I thought I Speaker 0: was gonna be a spot. I don't think so. And I did that for a little while. Speaker 2: Prior to the undercover meeting, Henry Speaker 0: Biden is is, Speaker 1: like, not a letter. But Speaker 0: He, like, can't just say his that he really? He's, like, really, like, Speaker 2: Joe Biden. On the call, Biden was asking for NSC advisor Jake Sullivan. Henry told Biden that Sullivan had left the office for the day. Biden stated he would call Sullivan's personal phone. Instead, Biden called the same office 10 seconds later asking for Sullivan again. Biden asked, is Jake Sullivan there? To which Henry stated, no. You called the same office, mister president. Speaker 0: A couple weeks ago, I was like, the last one in office. They made me call from my boss. Speaker 1: Right. Just Speaker 0: And so I picked up and said, well, I was president, like, Henry on Jake's phone. He's up for the day, but I can try to get it. I have one for you. Speaker 1: You don't Speaker 0: And he, like, asked me some questions. I was like, I don't know, like, when we get the, keep track of your doubts. And I'll call the secret service detail, and I'll Speaker 1: send him Probably not. Speaker 0: I know it's okay. I'll, like, call his, like because he called me on the classified phone. So it's like, I'll I'll try his, like, unclassified phone, like Speaker 1: What's the it's a stat. Speaker 0: And then he called, and then I was like, okay. Well, let me know if you have any trouble. And then, like, 10 seconds later, same hour, these now for you. No. And I did. Speaker 2: In another encounter with president Biden, Henry Appel shared that president Biden had called the NSC White House phone while on a foreign trip looking for NSC advisor Jake Sullivan. Henry told the president that, in fact, mister Sullivan was not at the White House, but on the same foreign trip as president Biden. Speaker 1: Another time. This is the last week, Speaker 0: high box was on an Internet for Skype with him, like, 0 for some date. And, the phone rang in the office, and I picked it up. And I was like, oldest president. Henry, he was like, you skate there. He's like, no. He's traveling with you. He's on the same trip as you are. Speaker 1: I don't Speaker 0: know. That was, like, a year He'll be dead in a year, or he'll be like out of public life. Speaker 2: Henry Appel from the NSC even stated that president Biden did not understand basic words in meetings at the White House. Here's another experience he had with president Biden. Take a look. Speaker 0: Another time my boss went into briefing, I heard the talking points. And, Speaker 1: I What? Speaker 0: I said, like, oh, this is, like, a novel phenomenon person. Like, it's, like, it's new. Like, it hasn't been done before. My boss said it, said, like, piece of notes, and I was like, like, no. I'm like, what do you mean by upload? Leave me not. Speaker 1: What's You didn't know the matter? Speaker 0: I guess. Well, just like the word, like, the true meanings of the word not really, like, he was lost Speaker 2: there. Henry Appel states that we, referring to his team at the National Security Council, were crying the night of Trump's victory, claiming they are all, quote, trauma bonded because of Trump's victory. I gotta find a new job. Okay. Just to Speaker 0: so everybody's caught it, like, people Speaker 1: We shared Speaker 3: trauma. It's the thing. Traveler. Speaker 0: We're trauma Speaker 1: bonded. Yes. What was it like when you guys found out? Speaker 0: There were a lot of tears the next morning. The first one there. Speaker 2: Then Henry Appel, National Security Council shares to our undercover journalist that White House officials and national security officials are concerned about the incoming Trump administration coming after them for things they may have done wrong over the next 4 years. Speaker 0: We're also, like, talking about, like, Tim coming after us. They have Speaker 1: to have lots of money if they would. Of course. She's hurt. Like, how the, like, the alien children. Chris? What would that They make up like a fake scandal. Speaker 0: And just Speaker 1: like, like, even jail. Speaker 0: No. Not in jail. Yeah. They're like in my CEO, so whatever. Speaker 2: Well, maybe the new administration should come after this national security adviser. After all, he is in the National Security Council, and he's sharing secrets and spilling tea to a stranger in a restaurant. Henry even goes on to say that on his dating profile, his greatest strength is, quote, oversharing on the first date. You can't make this shit up. Our OMG American Swiper asked Henry Pell if they thought Donald Trump would win the 2024 election. Henry also went on to mention that Biden's team felt like they got pushed aside by Kamala Harris during the presidential campaign. Speaker 1: I do think, turn the fucking boom. Oh, shit. Speaker 0: So that's Kamala rant. Terrible campaign. Speaker 1: She could call us. She doesn't believe in anything. I'm Speaker 0: my god. I know that, like, Biden and his son, like, fell close to me to not like that they got pushed aside. Speaker 1: Oh, like, wait. So Speaker 2: In the last meeting with Henry Appel, Henry showed up to the restaurant, but he didn't find his date. He found me outside of the restaurant waiting for him. Here's part of that conversation. Hi. Hi. Henry? Henry Appel? National Security Council. Hi. I gotta ask you a question. What the hell is the guy who's an adviser to the National Security Council doing spilling the quote tea to an undercover journalist? Stay tuned for that full interaction with Henry to see how he responded. And if you're on the inside of the White House or any government institution and notice corruption or lies hidden from public view that you want us to disclose to the American people, please email us tips at o'Keefemediagroup.com or text us at this phone number here, 914-491-9395, and our journalism team will get back to you. Thank you, and stay tuned.

@TheTapeDK — Tape

Posted - January 11, 2025 at 5:42 PM

Saved - January 14, 2025 at 4:08 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

After David Goldberg's passing, his friends took over his YouTube channel, which he had entrusted to them. They aim to share his findings, including classified projects like Project Pogo and Project Zyphr, which he claimed threaten free speech and American lives. David's final videos discussed sensitive topics, including potential false flags related to Iran. His friends are working to legally release his notes and documents while facing threats and scrutiny. They seek support to ensure his messages are heard and to protect the channel from closure.

@TheTapeDK - Tape

Friends Of David Goldberg - David's Youtube channel taken over by David's friends after his death - he had stated that his friends had his passwords in case they needed to take it over. https://web.archive.org/web/20191116081159/https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjSL2D4cTt6Rx-QHVydEqSg --------- David Goldberg's FINAL WORDS: Classified docs reveal DEADLY "Project Zyphr" Published on Aug 31, 2019 by Friends Of David Goldberg https://web.archive.org/web/20191225195507/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=449V3VPyaqM “In David Goldberg's final video before his death, he reveals two classified projects underway - Project Pogo & Project Zyphr - to stifle American free speech and the chilling plans scheduled for 2020/2021 that will result in the "extermination" of tens of millions of Americans. Updated video here with David's personal notes: [next link and first video] On June 8th, David Goldberg passed away in his Brooklyn apartment. No cause of death was given and a cover-up began. David's friends came together to save his Youtube channel, and were able to access his floor safe and recover audio files, classified documents and other personal items. Friends of David Goldberg will continue to compile his information and will release it after we receive legal permission to do so. At this time, the release of the classified documents may constitute a crime, so we are looking at all legal avenues to release them. We feel David's audio file should be released in the spirit of truth and free press.” --------- Video 1 WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: "USA & Israel Plot FALSE FLAG To Spark Iran War" Published on May 12, 2019 https://web.archive.org/web/20191112142225/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwCwrj4rtbk “I have been given further information from my White House insider, a person with very close ties with the White House who was formerly employed there until recently -- but I will not reveal it until I have insurance that my channel is given more exposure. They will shut down my channel immediately if I reveal this information. I need everyone's help in posting my videos otherwise they will just close my channel. I have been posting secret information from the White House for months on my channel but I have very few views, which means they can just eliminate me any time they want. I have already been threatened, I believe poisoned with arsenic, and I have also had people outside of my apartment watching me. Without your help my channel will be deleted. I have also been hit with a barrage of antisemitic comments, which concerns me greatly as well. I need help. I'm asking for help now because things are getting very serious. This information is highly sensitive and they do not want it out. I have already exposed that Trump converted to Judiasim and he believes Kushner is the Messiah or Moshiach. They do not want this information out! I have already revealed in two previous videos detailed plans about the coming Iran War and false flag! This information is highly secret in nature. My channel may be removed any time. David Elias Goldberg was an advocate for Israel and the Jewish people during his 25 year career in public service, and fought antisemitism wherever hatred and racism against Jews dwelt. He passed away on June 8th. He was 59. This channel is now managed by "Friends of David Goldberg"” --------- Video 2 IRAN WAR: Top Rabbi GOES NUTS, demands U.S. INCREASE troops Published on May 26, 2019 https://web.archive.org/web/20190905153058/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxYkWu-1AjQ “I have been told that the same top Israeli Rabbi who went ballistic over the incompetent Pompeo and Bolton "Iran War rollout" (as reported in a previous video) is now demanding "significant U.S. troop increases" in the Middle East, and it appears this is already happening and will continue. Please watch all of the videos on my channel before commenting or jumping to conclusions. I have explained over and over many details needed before you understand the full picture about the Iran War false flags throughout my videos. Many people are commenting without having watched my videos, so they have no idea what they are talking about. TruNews segment on my channel begins at 55:30: https://web.archive.org/web/20190904145933/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiDBsuVyyxI ” --------- Video 3 David E. Goldberg - 1959 - 2019 Published on Jun 11, 2019 Jun 13 archival, channel name is "David Elias Goldberg" https://web.archive.org/web/20190613040432/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUHUNS95f44 Jun 24, channel name is "Friends Of David Goldberg" Title changed to "Man who predicted Iran War dies: David E. Goldberg - 1959 - 2019" https://web.archive.org/web/20190624160057/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUHUNS95f44 ---------- Video 4 David Goldberg's notes on Project Pogo & Zyphr (all notes) Published on Sep 18, 2019 Removed "by user" between Nov 2 and Dec 23, 2019 https://web.archive.org/web/20190919151627/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8isur9kvvI “After David Goldberg's death, two of his close friends were able to open his floor safe and retrieve dozens of hand-written notes, tape recordings, USB drives as well as the classified documents relating to Project Pogo and Project Zyphr. We, as "Friends of David Goldberg" -- a collective of his associates -- are attempting to release this information. It is a crime to release classified documents. We have legal professionals handling this but it is not as simple as releasing them. Our identities are all known by law enforcement and they have been in contact with us. Many of David's associates seem to be under investigation. We are working to release what we can legally, which will include David's notes and some photos. We believe if we released these documents now, not only would they not receive much attention due to the low subscriptions to this channel, our lawyers have advised we would be charged with a number of Federal crimes. David's work would simply die in vain. We are asking those watching to help spread the David's message so others may know of his warnings. Not only is this channel under threat, we have personally received threats ourselves. These threats, while anonymous, seem to be increasing weekly. We are being told not to post anymore videos, for example. We do not know how much longer this channel will be in existence. As for David's notes, there are many more we were advised not to upload. The ones we have uploaded are confusing, and we hope viewers can use their own investigative skills to dig deeper into some of what is presented. A few additional notes not included in the video are shown in this image: https://web.archive.org/web/20200615215256/https://israeltodaynews.blogspot.com/2019/09/david-goldberg-notes-project-zyphr-pogo.html [removed and unavailable] We will also be deleting threats and other harassment from the comments section. We tolerated criticisms and allowed many comments to be posted in the past, but the level of hostility and aggression expressed by some viewers is not acceptable. Please visit our blog for recent updates: https://web.archive.org/web/20190919151627/https://israeltodaynews.blogspot.com/ ” --------- Just found 14 of his videos archived here. The list of videos on the archived Youtube channel (top link) show them all, but only a few were archived directly there. Note that the first of the 14 videos is an apparent attempt at satire to get the truth out, as described in video 11 titled "David Goldberg's Iran War False Flag Predictions Update" at 0:32. https://archive.org/details/davidgoldberg/

Video Transcript AI Summary

I have been sharing critical information about the Trump White House based on insights from an insider. Recently, I've faced serious threats, including a poisoning incident. Despite my efforts, it feels like no one is paying attention. I need an insurance policy—exposure—so that my voice is heard and I remain safe. I urge you to spread this information and support channels like Adam Green's and True News, as they are also under scrutiny. This is not a joke; there are real dangers ahead, especially regarding the situation with Iran. I do not support the current narrative or the wars being planned. If you care about this information, take action and help get it out there. This may be my last video unless I see more awareness.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hello, everyone. This is David Goldberg again. As you know, I have been posting many videos about what's going on with the Trump White House. I have an insider who has been speaking to me and giving me information. For months now, I have posted many videos. And I'm showing you a screen of my channel. Just so you know, there is more information on my channel. Please watch the other videos. The reason I'm asking this is because I have been threatened. I talked about this months ago. I was in the hospital. I believe I was poisoned. They determined it was arsenic poisoning, but it did not kill me. I've had people outside of my apartment complex here in New York. This is very, very serious, but I feel like no one is listening. No one is paying any attention. I have been right about everything. I have been right. Every single one of my videos is giving you information that you cannot get anywhere else because I have an insider from the White House who is telling me what's going on inside of the White House. But the problem is that no one even knows. No one cares. No one is doing anything about this. I need an insurance policy. If someone if people do not get my information out there, they will kill me, and they will take away my YouTube channel, and they will be gone, and no one will know. I need people to take action to do something. I do have more information from the White House insider who's giving me more information. I'm not going to post it. I'm not going to put my life on the line anymore when no one cares, when no one is doing anything about the information I'm putting out here. You're all you laugh. You think it is funny that you're going to go die for Israel. You're going to send your boys and girls to go die for Israel and for Moloch. There are Christians, millions of Christians in this country, who are going to walk right into hell. They are so stupid and so brainwashed. I am a Jew. I love Israel. I have talked about this on my channel over and over again. I've worked in the Jewish community and many Jewish Jewish organizations for decades. I know Jews in New York. I know Jews in Washington, DC. I have many friends in Israel. I love the Jewish people, but this is too much for me. I cannot abide any longer with this Iran nonsense. It is it is totally evil. I don't support it. Just because you are a Jew doesn't mean you have to support the state of Israel and all the nonsense and the stupid plans they have to take over the Middle East and have the U. S. Government do their bidding and to have the boys and girls of America go fight their stupid wars. No. I don't have to agree with this just because I am Jewish. And I don't agree with it. Part of me supported it first, but I no longer support it anymore. It is totally wrong and it's totally evil. Everything they're talking about with Iran is totally fake. It is a staged post flag war they are starting. I have given details. I have told you what they're going to do in my other videos. What I ask of you now, I need you to spread this information. I need people who have more influence, more power to talk about me so they don't kill me, so they don't wipe me out. The only insurance I have is exposure. I'm asking you, please post a video on the website, contact people you know. Now if you look at my screen, you can see that there is a video that says Jewish Organization Shut to Sit down, Shut on, Adam Green's channel. Adam Green's channel is excellent. I had posted a video. I did not release it yet because the information is so sensitive. I was worried it may hurt him, but I was given information. They are watching him very, very closely. You need to go subscribe to know more news. Adam Green. Go subscribe now. You need to support him. I have nothing to do with him. I'm not associated with him at all, but I do have information about him. He is going to be targeted in the future. I made a video that has a lot of very good information, but I made it private as you can see. It says private, because I'm very concerned the information is too damaging and it could hurt him. I don't want it to hurt him. Please subscribe to this channel. Please subscribe to other people's channels. Please get the information out there. True News is doing excellent work, and you'll subscribe to them as well. All I'm asking is please take some action to get this information out. I mean, my god. This is not a joke. This is war. And there are people who leave comments on my channel, and they think it is a joke. You are so stupid. They are going to send your boys and girls off to fight, and there is going to be bloodshed in the name of Moak, and you will cheer it on because you are so stupid, and you are so evil in this country. America is so depraved and so lost and so deceived. I am disgusted to observe what they are doing every day. More and more about Iran, it is so obvious what they are doing, and people and Americans don't get it. They will cheer it on. They will cheer on their own destruction. They will cheer on their own destruction of America and their souls. As a Jew, I do not support this war, and I see what they are doing. And I have information from the White House, and I can tell you right now they are plotting and planning. I have said it would be October of 2019. I still stand by that. We will see. I have already made the prediction months ago. I have told you what's going to happen. You don't listen. This is my last video until I see more people waking up.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Thank you all for your support. I appreciate the coverage from TrueNews, which accurately discussed my channel. I've made predictions about troop movements and conflicts, including the Iran war, which I believe is scripted and will involve a false flag operation. There are influential figures pushing for troop increases in the Middle East, and the situation is escalating. Many people remain unaware of the impending dangers, which could lead to significant conflict. My channel exists as part of a belief system that requires warning before actions are taken, but my safety is at risk if I interfere with their plans. It's crucial for you to share this information and stay informed. The responsibility lies with you to act on this truth.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hello, everyone. This is David Goldberg again. I wanna thank everyone who has helped get the word out about my channel. I wanna thank all of you. You've done great work. Someone had pointed out that I was on TrueNews. TrueNews is a wonderful Christian channel that has done amazing work. I recommend that you go look at it and subscribe to them. They discussed my channel and I thought they did a very they were very fair and they were very accurate in everything they said. I really appreciate their coverage. They did a wonderful job in covering the things that I've been talking about. I have received some word that they are okay with me publishing the information. And there are some reasons why I speculated why that is, why I'm still here, why is the channel still up, because everything I've said is true. I have predicted things accurately. I predicted the 120,000 troops before a month before it was reported. I talked about the Iran war a month before we started to see all these things show up in the news. I have talked about Trump's conversion to Judaism. I have talked about Jared Kushner's involvement and his level of involvement in the administration and why they believe and how they believe he is the Messiah, the Moshiach. I have discussed incredible things on my channel, things that should not be allowed to be put out into the public. And I've wondered why is my channel still here? Why am I allowed to say these things? So I made some inquiries. I asked some questions. Some friends of mine in Washington, D. C. Were able to give me some answers. And what I was told is they're going to allow my channel to exist, and there's a reason for it. And we'll get into what that reason is. And there are smart people who are listening now who may be able to figure out what that is. It is the same reason It is the same reason that that you were told about 911 before it happened. You were told about it through different media outlets, through different what are called well, I guess you would call them Easter eggs. Easter eggs, little little things that were put into the media before 9/11 that were give they were giving you clues, and this is something they do. This is part of their Kabbalah belief system. It is known as white balance. It is part of what they do to balance out all the evil that they do. So they're going to let my channel exist as far as I know for the time being because it is part of their, I guess, you could say, his atonement or for what they're they're doing. So they're going to allow it to exist. They always tell the truth about what they're going to do. They just know that the the sheep are so dumb that they won't listen. Just like with 911, there were many, many signs that 911 was coming. They even told you that it was coming in a television show called The Lone Gunmen on Fox. This television show, Although, it was about 6 months before 911, they aired an episode in which they showed the entire thing happened. The Twin Towers were attacked in the episode, and there was a false flag in the television show in the script. Now we know for a fact that the lone gunman received script ideas from the CIA. That is a fact. Go look it up. So they told you about 9:11 before it was going to happen, and they told you that it would be a false flag. And they're allowing me to tell you that the entire Iran war is fake. It is scripted and it is a false it is going to be precipitated by a false flag. They are allowing me to tell you the truth because it is part of their religious beliefs that the golem be told in advance of the evils that they are to be would that the evils that are to be enacted upon them that they are told about them? Do you understand what I just told you? I hope you do. I hope you understand the gravity of that. I hope you understand how and why this is all playing out. The Iran war totally fake. Now they're talking about threats from Iran. There is no threat from Iran. Why didn't we hear about this 2 years ago? Why didn't we hear about this a year ago? Why is it that all of a sudden Iran is a threat? That is because this is totally scripted, and they've been planning this for years. Now the timeline has been moved back multiple times because they either screwed up or things didn't go the way they wanted. The time line has been moved back, but now we are back on track. October I already said October months ago. Were you paying any attention at all? I said October is the date. That is the time line. We will see how it plays out, but I do believe October is still the date. Everything that we are seeing now is predictive programming. It is gearing up for war. Now now I want to address some of the things that I said in my previous videos. There was a little bit of confusion. I'm watching all this play out. I'm getting information from my White House insider and from a few other sources, and I'm asking questions. What is going on here? There was a rabbi that was very, very upset with how some of this the Iran war rollout had come out. Pompeo and Bolton, this rabbi felt that Pompeo and Bolton had made some mistakes, because there was a lot of negative feedback at first from the media and from the public, because the whole rollout looked totally inept. It looked obvious, so the rabbi went crazy and the same rabbi has gone berserk again. You have to understand how much power he has. He has incredible influence. He's considered a real religious leader. Netanyahu looks at him as his religious leader. And the same rabbi has come out, and he is demanding more troops be sent to the Middle East, and we are already seeing it happen. We are already seeing it happen. I believe that the troop increases will continue. Either, as we have been told, over the next month or 2, we're going to see more troop increases, but we are not going to be told about the true extent. It's going to be more than they are telling you. If they say 5,000, it will be more like about 10,000. I have been told they are going to tone down some of those numbers because there is so much public resistance to this. But they are moving troops into the Middle East. They are moving troops toward Iran. It is happening. Before your eyes, the preparation for this war is happening, and you still don't believe it. You are still so completely in denial. I mean, the American people are in total denial about what's going on right now. It will happen. It is going to happen. It could lead to World War 3. It could lead to just total denial. I mean, It could be so bad. I fear for my life, I fear the lives of my family and the people I love that the war could get that bad because Iran has a lot of capabilities. Iran has great capabilities that are not fully known to the U. S. Government, I've been told anyway, or at least the U. S. Government is aware and they just don't care. I mean, it is almost suicidal what they're doing. So I would I would advise you, get the word out. They're allowing my channel to exist for now because it is a part of the white balance. It's a part of their cabalistic Luciferian belief system that they warn the Goham before they commit their acts of evil. And of course, the sheep never actually respond or listen or do anything about it, and they know that. Do you understand me? They know that. That's why they told you about 911 before it happened. They know you're not gonna do anything about it. They know you don't care. They know you don't pay attention. But it's part of their religious belief system that they have to tell the truth before they commit these great acts of evil. And they put these little Easter eggs out there, and they let people know, and then it happens. And then we go back and we look and say, oh, wow. Look at that. There was this and this and this, letting us know what was going to happen. That appears to be what's playing out with my channel. I don't know fully. I have been given some hints with respect to that. For now, I'm allowed to exist, but my life is still under threat. They will kill me if certain things are said. If I start to interfere with their plans in a significant way, they will kill me and they will shut us down. This has been a longer video than I expected. I wanted to address a lot of issues. I hope that you've listened to me, and I hope you will spread the message. This is up to you more than it is up to me. I'm giving you the information and the truth. You can choose to do with what do with it what you will. That is in your hands. And God is watching. I can promise you that.

Friends Of David Goldberg Any attempt to defame, harass or harm "Friends of David Goldberg," their families, associates or friends, or suppress our free speech rights, will be met wit... web.archive.org

David Goldberg's FINAL WORDS: Classified docs reveal DEADLY "Project Zyphr" In David Goldberg's final video before his death, he reveals two classified projects underway - Project Pogo & Project Zyphr - to stifle American free speech... web.archive.org

WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: "USA & Israel Plot FALSE FLAG To Spark Iran War" I have been given further information from my White House insider, a person with very close ties with the White House who was formerly employed there until r... web.archive.org

IRAN WAR: Top Rabbi GOES NUTS, demands U.S. INCREASE troops I have been told that the same top Israeli Rabbi who went ballistic over the incompetent Pompeo and Bolton "Iran War rollout" (as reported in a previous vide... web.archive.org

Did President Trump Secretly Convert to Judaism in 2017? Today on TRUNEWS hosts Rick Wiles and Doc Burkhart discuss the reinforced speculation that President Donald Trump may have converted to Chabad Judaism in lat... web.archive.org

David E. Goldberg - 1959 - 2019 Updates to be posted here: https://israeltodaynews.blogspot.com/ web.archive.org

Man who predicted Iran War dies: David E. Goldberg - 1959 - 2019 Updates to be posted here: https://israeltodaynews.blogspot.com/ David Elias Goldberg was an advocate for Israel and the Jewish people during his 25 year car... web.archive.org

YouTube web.archive.org

Blog not found Blogger is a free blog publishing tool from Google for easily sharing your thoughts with the world. Blogger makes it simple to post text, photos and video onto your personal or team blog. web.archive.org

Israel Today News - Friends of David Goldberg News from Israel, including insider info and whistle-blowers web.archive.org

Friends Of David Goldberg : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Backup of Friends Of David Goldberg Youtube channel. archive.org

@JamesOKeefeIII — James O'Keefe

Posted - January 15, 2025 at 3:30 PM

Saved - January 15, 2025 at 9:30 PM

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

The man is a “spy hunter” in the Pentagon and I’m sitting next to him in disguise filming B-roll of him stating “that is sensitive information, keep it between us.” https://t.co/SW8q6Wjvf5

Video Transcript AI Summary

I'm embedded in the Pentagon, working in the joint staff, and I have experience as a former FBI agent. We discuss trafficking and I describe the perpetrator as a sociopathic narcissist. There are concerns about protecting the American people from potential threats he may pose. I'm currently in discussions with retired generals to explore strategies for addressing these issues.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: But with me, literally with a former FBI agent, you made me say. Thank you. So I'm embedded in the Pentagon. I work in the joint staff, the, top military command, and I became a spy on through. You're not a spy? You're not trying to, like, collect information from me? I'm gonna say send some information. You're gonna need to keep it between us. Speaker 1: What's your, like, overall assessment of trafficking? Speaker 0: He's a sociopathic narcissist. Speaker 1: Is there anything you can do to, like, protect American people from stuff that he might try to do? Speaker 0: I'm, in conversation with a couple of, retired generals to try to explore what went through.

@JamesOKeefeIII — James O'Keefe

Posted - January 21, 2025 at 11:26 PM

Saved - January 22, 2025 at 12:13 PM

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

COMING UP NEXT ON ‘DATING THE DEEP STATE’ An official in the Government describes subversion efforts underway in DC and how they intend to sabotage. While I stand nearby filming while in disguise! https://t.co/oMErVsthFo

@OKeefeMedia — O’Keefe Media Group

Posted - January 23, 2025 at 9:59 PM

Saved - January 30, 2025 at 6:44 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I confronted Byron Cohen, a White House advisor, about his admission that "the deep state is real," which was captured in undercover footage. When pressed on his comments regarding the bureaucracy's role, Cohen became defensive and expressed disinterest in continuing the conversation. I pointed out that he had already discussed these issues on tape. He maintained that the bureaucracy should implement elected leaders' policies while advising them. As he attempted to leave, I reminded him and others in Washington that we will be watching and recording.

@OKeefeMedia - O’Keefe Media Group

DEEP STATE OFFICIAL WADDLES AWAY: Top White House Advisor Confronted By O’Keefe for Admitting on Tape ‘The Deep State Is Real’ @ByronCohenMA looks back in bewilderment at the American Swiper before frustratingly exclaiming, “I'm not really interested in having this conversation.” “No one denies that the bureaucracy exists.” “Are we done here?” —— Support Our Partners @OkeefeMedia has partnered with Fisher Capital to offer you $20,000 in free silver from America’s top-rated precious metals retailer! Support our journalism and see if you qualify at http://FisherOMG.com.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Hi, I'm James O'Keefe, an investigative reporter. I spoke with Byron, a White House adviser, who acknowledged that the deep state exists. He explained that bureaucracies often create commissions to delay action, which can hinder incoming leadership, citing RFK Jr. as a potential target for bureaucratic resistance. Byron mentioned that the bureaucracy should implement elected leaders' policies while also advising them. Our conversation revealed insights into how the bureaucracy operates, and I recorded it all. Byron seemed surprised but engaged. This highlights the importance of transparency in government, and we will continue to investigate and report on these matters.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Byron? Hi. Hi. I'm James O'Keefe, investigative reporter and muckraker. You're an adviser to the White House, aren't you? I see, I've been in disguise as you were talking to my colleague for a hidden camera, And I've been listening to your conversation about how the deep state is real. Speaker 1: People joke about the deep state, but, like, to some degree, it's real. Speaker 0: Tell me more about that. Speaker 1: No, honey. Have a good night. Speaker 0: So you mentioned that one of the ways that the deep state operates, the bureaucracy, is that it creates commissions? Speaker 1: One of the ways you can slow things down, in a bureaucracy is to sort of put together, like, a commission to study something, and then years will pass and nothing has happened. Speaker 0: You said all these things, you recorded, so if you could just elaborate a little bit more about what that means. Byron? Speaker 1: I'm not really interested in having this conversation. Speaker 0: Well, you've already had the conversation. Yeah. I have it all recorded. So Lovely. So if you could just clarify for the American people, because people are really interested to know more about how the deep state operates. You clarified quite a bit. I have you on hidden camera. In fact, I was standing next to you Yeah. The whole time. It's so creepy. Well, I think it's really creepy that the deep state is operating the way that you describe it. Bureaucracies creating commissions to slow things down. You even mentioned the word crushing, incoming leadership. Speaker 1: RFK Jr. Is very bad a very bad pick for HHS. There's a good chance that the bureaucracy just crushes him. Speaker 0: Do you recall you saying that? Speaker 1: You guys hired someone to go on, like, fake dates with me. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's investigative reporting. That's Speaker 1: definitely not a credit to you, but okay. Speaker 0: What do you what what about the deep state? What what look. Speaker 1: No one denies that the bureaucracy exists. Speaker 0: Do you think it's a good thing? That the bureaucracy exists. Do you think it's a good thing for the bureaucracy to do what you were describing? Speaker 1: I think that, in general, the bureaucracy ought to implement the policies of the elected leaders. I also think the bureaucracy has a responsibility to advise our elected leaders as best they can. Mhmm. There's a reason we don't have politicals throughout the civil service. It's only the top. Speaker 0: And what exactly is your role at the White House or the adviser to the White House? Speaker 1: I'm I advise on research and development policy. Speaker 0: Mhmm. I see. Speaker 1: Are we done here? Speaker 0: I don't know. You tell me. Speaker 1: You're gonna follow me into the subway? Speaker 0: I will not be following into the subway. But I'm fascinated. The American people wanna know how this bureaucracy operates, and I think you've provided some clarity. So I thank you very much for that. Speaker 1: Have a nice night. You too. Speaker 0: Byron, adviser of the White House, very much shocked. Have a good evening, Byron. There he goes, shuffling along. Yeah. Some very interesting reactions on the streets of Washington, DC, Byron at the White House. Just sort of slowly, he goes he's sort of waddling along. And, you know, I think he was surprised at first, but he kinda talked to us a little bit. I think he's just in a state of total shock. And you know what? Bureaucrats in Washington, you're on notice. Okay? You are on notice. You either say these things openly and publicly and transparently or we catch you on tape, also known as investigative journalism. It is the nadir of immorality to hide these things from the public, and that's why we record you. We're gonna be recording you en masse. Stay tuned. Reporting from the streets of Washington DC. This is James O'Keefe in disguise. They never recognize me.

Fisher Capital | Endorsed by James O'Keefe Fisher Capital was founded with the objective of helping as many families as possible safeguard their retirement savings from downturns and crises. Let us help you now. fishercapitalgroup.com

@OKeefeMedia - O’Keefe Media Group

"You are on notice. You either say these things openly and publicly, or we catch you on tape," asserts @JamesOKeefeIII while confronting Byron Cohen (@ByronCohenMA), an advisor at the White House Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy, after @OKeefeMedia released undercover footage showing Cohen admitting that ‘the deep state is real.’ O'Keefe pressed Cohen to clarify his earlier comments about the bureaucratic structure, which Cohen claimed operates by "creating commissions" to protect “its own interests.” Cohen responded defensively, saying, “I’m not really interested in having this conversation.” O'Keefe replied, “You’ve already had the conversation. I have it all recorded.” Despite Byron’s attempt to deflect, O'Keefe continued questioning his views on the bureaucracy. O'Keefe asked whether it was a “good thing” for the bureaucracy to operate as Cohen had described, to which Cohen responded, “In general, the bureaucracy ought to implement the policies of the elected leaders.” He added that the bureaucracy also has a responsibility to “advise our elected leaders as best they can,” noting that only the “top levels” of the civil service were political appointees. O’Keefe concluded, “I think you’ve provided some clarity, so I thank you very much for that.” Cohen, visibly shocked, began to waddle away, but O'Keefe made a final remark: “Bureaucrats in Washington, you’re on notice… We’re going to be recording you.” @realDonaldTrump @POTUS @RobertKennedyJr @HHSGov @HorizonIPS @karolineleavitt

@MAGAVoice — MAGA Voice

Posted - January 23, 2025 at 10:08 PM

Saved - February 13, 2025 at 11:39 PM

@MAGAVoice - MAGA Voice

HOLY SH*T 🚨 James O’Keefe confronts a White House Advisor and HE RUNS AWAY after being caught saying the Deep State is real James O’Keefe is a LEGEND 🔥 https://t.co/9tRUlGIzni

Video Transcript AI Summary

I'm James O'Keefe, and I caught a White House advisor, Byron, on hidden camera discussing the deep state. Byron admitted that the deep state exists to some degree, operating through bureaucracy by creating commissions to slow things down. He also mentioned that the bureaucracy could "crush" incoming leadership, specifically mentioning RFK Jr. Byron defended the bureaucracy's role in advising elected leaders but acknowledged its potential to obstruct policies. I confronted Byron about these statements, emphasizing the public's interest in understanding how the bureaucracy operates. Bureaucrats in Washington are now on notice. Either be transparent or we will record you.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Byron? Hi. Hi. I'm James O'Keefe, investigative reporter and muckraker. You're an adviser to the White House, aren't you? I see. I've been in disguise as you were talking to my colleague who wore a hidden camera, And I've been listening to your conversation about how the deep state is real. Speaker 1: People joke about the deep state, but, like, to some degree, it's real. Speaker 0: Tell me more about that. Speaker 1: No, Huggie. Have a good night. Speaker 0: So you mentioned that one of the ways that the deep state operates, the bureaucracy, is that it creates commissions. Speaker 1: One of the ways you can slow things down, in a bureaucracy is to sort of put together, like, a commission to study something, and then years will pass and nothing has happened. Speaker 0: You said all these things you recorded, so if you could just elaborate a little bit more about what that means. Byron? Speaker 1: I'm not really interested in having this conversation. Speaker 0: Well, you've already had the conversation. Yeah. I have it all recorded. So Speaker 1: That's lovely. Speaker 0: So if you could just clarify for the American people, because people are really interested to know more about how the deep state operates. You clarified quite a bit. I have you on hidden camera. In fact, I was standing next to Speaker 1: you Yeah. Speaker 0: The whole time. Speaker 1: It's so creepy. Speaker 0: Well, I think it's really creepy that the deep state is operating the way that you describe it. Bureaucracies creating commission to slow things down. You even mentioned the word crushing, incoming leadership. Speaker 1: RFK Jr. Is very bad a very bad pick for HHS. There's a good chance that the bureaucracy just crushes it. Speaker 0: Do you recall you saying that? Speaker 1: You guys hired someone to go on, like, fake dates with me. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's investigative reporting. That's Speaker 1: definitely not a credit to you, but okay. Speaker 0: What do you what what about the deep state? What what look. Speaker 1: No one denies that the bureaucracy exists. Do you think it's a good thing? That the bureaucracy exists. Speaker 0: Do you think it's a good thing for the bureaucracy to do what you were describing? Speaker 1: I think that, in general, the bureaucracy ought to implement the policies of the elected leaders. I also think the bureaucracy has a responsibility to advise our elected leaders as best they can. Mhmm. There's a reason we don't have politicals throughout the civil service. It's only the top. Speaker 0: And what exactly is your role at the White House or the adviser to the White House? Speaker 1: I'm I advise on research and development policy. Speaker 0: Mhmm. I see. Are we Speaker 1: done here? Speaker 0: I don't know. You tell me. Speaker 1: You're gonna follow me into the subway? Speaker 0: I will not be following you into the subway. But I'm fascinated. The American people wanna know how this bureaucracy operates, and I think you've provided some clarity. So I thank you very much for that. Speaker 1: Have a nice night. You too. Speaker 0: Byron, adviser of the White House, very much shocked. Have a good evening, Byron. There he goes, shuffling along. Yeah. Some very interesting reactions on the streets of Washington, DC. Byron at the White House. Just sort of slowly, he goes he's sort of waddling along. And, you know, I think he was surprised at first, but he kinda talked to us a little bit. I think he's just in a state of total shock. And you know what? Bureaucrats in Washington, you're on notice. Okay? You are on notice. You either say these things openly and publicly and transparently or we catch you on tape, also known as investigative journalism. It is the nadir of immorality to hide these things from the public, and that's why we record you. We're gonna be recording you en masse. Stay tuned. Reporting from the streets of Washington, DC. This is James O'Keefe in disguise. They never recognize me.

@Real_RobN — 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Posted - April 10, 2025 at 5:07 AM

Saved - April 11, 2025 at 12:36 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Chris Krebs, former head of CISA, is now under criminal investigation for his role in the 2020 presidential election. Following this, he participated in a media tour with the FBI and Big Tech to censor related information.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And this is, Chris Krebs the former head of Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) officially under criminal investigation for the overthrow of the United States government during the 2020 presidential election. He then went on a media tour, and alongside the FBI and Big Tech, to censor all of it.

Video Transcript AI Summary

All votes in The United States Of America are counted in The United States Of America. There is no evidence that any machine has been manipulated by a foreign power. Recounts are consistent with the initial count, confirming that the systems used in the twenty twenty election performed as expected. The American people should have 100% confidence in their vote. A lawyer representing the president claimed that Dominion voting machines ran an algorithm to take votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden. Votes in Georgia were cast on paper, counted by a machine, and recounted by hand, with consistent outcomes. If there was an algorithm flipping votes, it didn't work. The more likely explanation is that there was no algorithm and that security controls protected the systems from misbehavior.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Team have been alleging votes tabulated in foreign countries. So all votes in The United States Of America are counted in The United States Of America. I don't understand this claim. All votes in The United States Of America are counted in The United States Of America, period. Voting machines corrupted by mysterious actors in Venezuela. So, again, there's no evidence that any machine that I'm aware of has been manipulated by a foreign power. Period. Communist money from China and Cuba used to influence the election. Look, I think these we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that alleging interference in the twenty twenty election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count. And to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the twenty twenty election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote. In a news conference, a lawyer who was representing the president at the time, Sidney Powell, said specifically that the Dominion Company's voting machines, quote Speaker 1: It can set and run an algorithm that probably ran all over the country to take a certain percentage of votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden. Speaker 0: Votes were cast in Georgia, for instance, again, on paper. They were counted by a machine. They were subsequently recounted by hand. The outcomes of that count were consistent. If there was an algorithm that was flipping votes or changing votes, it didn't work. I think the more likely explanation though is that there was no algorithm, that the systems performed as intended, that the series of security controls before, during, and after an election protected those systems from any sort of misbehavior.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker is alarmed by events in the 2020 US presidential election, drawing parallels to the 2013 Venezuelan election where Smartmatic software allegedly changed votes. Vote counting abruptly stopped in five states using Dominion software while Donald Trump was ahead. During the night, vote reporting went offline, and when it resumed, there was a significant shift favoring Joe Biden. According to the speaker, votes in 27 or 28 states counted by Dominion are sent outside the US to Germany and Spain, where Smartmatic, a company founded in Venezuela in 2005 to fix elections, does the counting. Smartmatic has a history of election interference in Venezuela and Argentina, and allegedly botched an election in Chicago. The speaker claims Smartmatic stopped vote counting and subtly switched votes, around 10 per district, which was discovered in Antrim County.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Blore says this, if we, ever get it up. I am alarmed because of what is occurring in plain sight during this twenty twenty election for president of The United States. The circumstances and events are eerily reminiscent of what happened with Smartmatic software electronically changing votes in the twenty thirteen presidential election in Venezuela. What happened in The United States was that the vote counting was abruptly stopped in five states using Dominion software. At the time that vote counting was stopped, Donald Trump was significantly ahead in the votes. Then during the wee hours of the morning, when there was no voting occurring and the vote count reporting was offline, something significantly changed. When the vote reporting resumed the very next morning, there was a very pronounced change in voting in favor of the opposing candidate, Joe Biden. That from a whistleblower who was present both in Venezuela in 2013 and in this country as we were counting votes overnight on November 3. Your thoughts. Speaker 1: Well, Lou, I don't know if people can appreciate this, but I think when they do, they're gonna be outraged. Our votes in 27, 20 eight states that are counted by dominion and calculated and analyzed, they're they're sent outside The United States. And they're not sent to Canada. They're sent to Germany and Spain. And the company counting it is not Dominion. It's Smartmatic, which is a company that was founded in 02/2005 in Venezuela for the specific purpose of fixing elections. That's their expertise, how to fix elections. They did it a number of times in Venezuela. They did it in Argentina, and they messed up an election to a fairly well in Chicago. And there's a whole congressional record that you can go look at about what a terrible company this is. Mhmm. Well, that's the company Wow. That was counting and calculating on election night, and they did all their old tricks. Speaker 0: But we Speaker 1: They stopped it. No. They also switched votes around subtly, maybe 10 per district so you don't notice it. They got caught in Antrim County, which is how we found out about them.

@JamesOKeefeIII — James O'Keefe

Posted - April 15, 2025 at 7:45 PM

Saved - April 17, 2025 at 7:12 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

As millions rush to file today, I recall when IRS official Alex Mena sprinted down 7th Avenue after I showed him footage of himself calling the IRS's AI surveillance of Americans' bank accounts 'unconstitutional.' He denied it was him but could only say, “I’m really sorry.”

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

As millions rush to file today, remember when IRS official Alex Mena literally SPRINTED down 7th Avenue in NYC, after I showed him hidden camera footage of himself calling the IRS’s AI surveillance of Americans' bank accounts 'unconstitutional.' He denied his own identity, claiming, “That’s not me.” But when confronted with the footage, all he could say was: “I’m really sorry."

Video Transcript AI Summary

An individual confronts a man, identified as Alex Mayna with the IRS, alleging he is part of an undercover investigation targeting small people and destroying lives. The man is informed he is on hidden camera. Mayna denies knowledge of the situation and attempts to flee. The individual pursues him, stating they have "a runner at the IRS" and are on a "jog" in New York City with a criminal investigation poised to impact the IRS.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Are you Alex Mayna with the IRS? Are you Alex Mayna with the IRS, sir? You're part of an undercover investigation. They're talking about you're going after small people, destroying people's lives. You have no problem doing that. You're on hidden camera as part of a hidden camera investigation. Speaker 1: They don't have any empathy at all towards it? Speaker 0: It was at this moment that he knew. He fucked up. Sir? You're on camera, sir. Speaker 1: I don't know what you're talking about. I'm sorry. Speaker 0: Have a runner here. We have a runner. Sir, we have a runner. We have a runner at the IRS. We're we're going for a jog here in New York City with a criminal investigation due to hit the IRS. I got my chocolate chip cookies. My chocolate chip cookies. Fast as fuck boy. Fast as fuck boy. I'm fast as fuck boy. Fast as fuck boy.

@Project_Veritas — Project Veritas

Posted - July 14, 2025 at 4:59 PM

Saved - July 14, 2025 at 9:11 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I shared breaking news about a Secret Service agent, Marc Hendrickson, who invited Project Veritas to the White House while disparaging President Trump. Text messages reveal he disclosed operational details and a photo from the White House grounds, highlighting a serious security breach. This incident raises concerns about the Secret Service's commitment to protecting the President and maintaining trust. I noted that the agency has not yet commented on the situation.

@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas

🚨BREAKING: Project Veritas Invited to @WhiteHouse by @SecretService Agent Exposing Reckless Security Breach One Year After Trump Assassination Attempt [@realDonaldTrump is] “doing a lot of wacky shit right now.” “I’m in protection, I travel with protectees and provide access control...” "I can show you where I am right now for work..."

Video Transcript AI Summary

This Sunday marks one year since the assassination attempt on President Donald Trump at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Secret Service agents were suspended without pay following the incident. The disciplinary action took place in February.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This Sunday marks one year since the assassination attempt on president Donald Trump at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Big secret service agents were suspended without pay following the incident. The disciplinary action took place in February.

@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas

Text messages show U.S. @SecretService Agent Marc Hendrickson inviting a stranger to the White House, sharing a photo from the @WhiteHouse grounds, disclosing operational details, and disparaging his protectee, President Donald J. Trump. Evidence reveals a continued and dangerous lapse in the Secret Service’s sacred commitment to be “Worthy of Trust and Confidence.”

@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas

U.S. Secret Service Agent Marc Hendrickson Invites Project Veritas to the @WhiteHouse, Disparages Commander-in-Chief while on Duty Protecting @POTUS, @FLOTUS, and Cabinet Members. The @SecretService has not yet responded to comment. https://t.co/X8zi3RkcfF

@HustleBitch_ — HustleBitch

Posted - September 18, 2025 at 8:10 PM

Saved - September 19, 2025 at 12:49 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I noticed a man at the crime scene of Charlie Kirk’s assassination wearing a law enforcement badge. When he saw a camera, he quickly removed it and hid it. In Utah, displaying a badge without authority is a crime. His actions raise questions about his true identity and intentions.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 SOMETHING IS OFF: WATCH THIS 🚨 This man was spotted wearing a law enforcement badge at the crime scene of Charlie Kirk’s assassination. The second he noticed a camera, he tore it off and hid it. In Utah, impersonating an officer, even just displaying a badge without authority, is a crime. If he WAS law enforcement, why would he behave like this? And if he WASN'T…what exactly was he doing?

@KateHydeNY — Kate Hyde

Posted - December 12, 2025 at 2:11 AM

Saved - December 16, 2025 at 1:48 AM

@KateHydeNY - Kate Hyde

James O’Keefe taking off his clear glasses to reveal he’s James O’Keefe. https://t.co/Nc6Fol4tAt

Video Transcript AI Summary

The transcript captures a tangled back-and-forth about identity between two speakers. The exchange centers on claims and refusals regarding whether each participant is James O’Keeffe or James O’Keefe, revealing a mix of misdirection and confusion. At the start, one speaker asserts a startling claim: “Well, the thing is is that I actually am James O’Keeffe.” The other participant responds with uncertainty and a challenge: “Are you? Yeah. No.” This initial volley sets up a core tension: one person asserts a definitive, singular identity, while the other vacillates between affirmation and negation, throwing the claim into doubt. The dialogue then escalates into a negation-heavy push-pull. The respondent counters with, “You’re not. No. I’m not. I’m not James O’Keefe. Are you not?” In this moment, the accused or challenged party is forced to confront the possibility that the other person might not actually be who they claim to be, intensifying the ambiguity around the identities in question. A reversal occurs as the other participant seemingly reclaims the certainty of their own identity: “I am.” This line signals a shift from denial to assertion, reestablishing a firm self-identification. The follow-up, “Really? Yes. And you you don’t know that,” adds a layer of assurance coupled with a hint of misperception: the speaker insists on their identity while suggesting the other person is unaware of this truth. Overall, the excerpt depicts a rapid swing between certainty and doubt about who each person truly is. The tension hinges on two overlapping claims of being James O’Keeffe and James O’Keefe, with frequent interruptions between affirmation and denial. The exchange culminates in a blunt assertion of self-identity—“I am”—and a companion reminder of the other party’s possible lack of awareness about that truth, encapsulating the core dynamic of identity verification and misrecognition that runs through the dialogue. The fragment offers a compact glimpse into a scenario where personal identity is contested and negotiated in real time, marked by alternating declarations and refusals that keep the true identification unresolved within this short exchange.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Well, yeah. Well, the thing is is that I actually am James O'Keeffe. Are you? Yeah. No. You're not. No. I'm not. I'm not James O'Keefe. Are you not? I am. Really? Yes. And you you don't know that