reSee.it - Related Post Feed

calleymeans
Posted - January 4, 2024 at 11:57 PM
Saved - January 5, 2024 at 3:50 AM

@calleymeans - Calley Means

(1) Harvard doctor @askdrfatima publishes article in premier medical journal heralding Ozempic jabs for kids. (2) Journal cites no conflicts. (3) Cursory search shows she’s been paid six figures in direct bribes. This would be comical if it wasn’t literal child abuse. https://t.co/oX1BjotxSm

Cancelcloco
Posted - February 26, 2024 at 7:58 PM
Saved - February 26, 2024 at 10:35 PM

@Cancelcloco - Ian Carroll

Big pharma pays for almost half the FDA’s budget. Obviously so they can help be regulated better. Everything’s fine. https://t.co/Jc1MJfwQvY

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FDA receives significant funding from Big Pharma through the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, leading to potential conflicts of interest. Lobbying efforts have hindered drug price negotiation and transparency. The Act's impact on FDA warning letters coincided with the Vioxx scandal. Former FDA officials often transition to pharmaceutical companies, raising concerns about regulatory integrity. Despite past controversies, trust in the industry and regulators is emphasized, despite their substantial profits.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know that the FDA receives almost half of its funding from Big Pharma? You know, the Food and Drug Administration that's supposed to regulate and make sure that the drugs big pharma is producing are safe. But back in 1992, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act was passed. They very cleverly worded it as if it was the Food and Drug Administration collecting fees from drug manufacturers to fund the approval process. But notice how if you flip that around, that is the drug manufacturers paying the FDA to expedite the approval process. And every 5 years the pharmaceutical lobbyists come out in support of renewing the act and increasing the fee. This is the organization lobbying on behalf of this law. They're one of the biggest pharmaceutical industry lobbying organizations. They've lobbied fiercely against allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices for Medicare recipients. They've also lobbied to prevent price limits and greater price transparency for drugs. Go figure. And when the PDUFA law was passed in 1992, it wasn't funding a lot of the FDA, but by now it's providing almost half of their budget. Notice the scale is in 1,000,000 of dollars. So that is almost $3,000,000,000 out of an almost $6,000,000,000 budget. In the year 2002, when the fees really started to kick off, fees are the blue line, money getting paid from pharma to the FDA, Right as fees were taken off, the number of warning letters being submitted about drugs just dropped off a cliff. Suddenly, I suppose all the drugs were super safe. Notice this data only goes through 2013 and even this data only goes through 2019. But it turns out this time frame here is not random. That was when Vioxx was happening. And if you don't know about Vioxx, Vioxx was a pain killer that was developed by Merck Pharmaceuticals, where they actively covered up findings that it was causing our problems in their test subject, got it approved to market, sold it to millions of Americans, and in the time it was on the market, it caused 88,000 heart attacks, killing 38,000 people. In the end, Merck paid what is believed to be the biggest drug settlement ever of $4,850,000,000 Although, I think Purdue Pharma and the opioid crisis topped that. And if you want just one more nugget, Daniel Troy, the FDA chief counsel that was appointed in 2,001 through the Vioxx situation. This guy. So he was the chief lawyer for the Food and Drug Administration that's regulating the pharmaceutical companies and making sure they're safe. What does he do immediately after leaving the FDA? He goes to become a partner at the Washington law firm, Sydney Austin LLP, where he principally represented the pharmaceutical companies and trade associations on matters related to the FDA and government regulations. He later joined GSK, GlaxoSmithKline, a pharmaceutical company, and was responsible for leading the company's legal department in protecting GSK's intellectual property, managing litigation, supporting their business, relevant transactions, etcetera. The FDA is funded by big pharma. Big pharma is staffed by ex FDA regulators protecting them against regulation. And when they put out deadly drugs with fraudulent studies to back them up, they walk away with a fine and a slap on the wrist and they get to keep all the rest of the profit. But of course, that's all ancient history. These days, big pharma is a bastion of integrity and moral values. They only produce high quality products that are heavily regulated, that are tested in out all around. You should trust big pharma. You should trust the regulators. They have your best interest in mind. And they do such a good job at having your best interest in mind that that's why they make 1,000,000 of dollars every year. The CEOs, I mean. The companies make 1,000,000,000 of dollars every year. Trust the science. Don't ask questions.
JoshWalkos
Posted - April 16, 2024 at 1:24 PM
Saved - April 16, 2024 at 4:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2023, fatalities increased by 230% due to the surge in prescriptions. Experts acknowledge the correlation between more drug users and higher fatality rates. The posts highlight the profitability of these drugs, despite the 100 deaths mentioned.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

It’s only 100 deaths, just think of the greater good these repurposed, extremely profitable drugs are doing. Next up, the kids.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

You’ve gotta crack a few eggs to make a money omelette. “Fatalities surged 230 percent in 2023 compared to previous years, although experts said that about this time prescriptions also exploded. If there are millions more people taking a drug, then this raises the likelihood of fatalities in patients using it.” Story: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13276757/deaths-linked-ozempic-weight-loss-drugs-analysis.html

More than 100 US deaths linked to Ozempic and similar drugs The cases have been recorded in an FDA monitoring system used to track the safety of medicines used in the US, called FAERS. dailymail.co.uk
myhiddenvalue
Posted - May 11, 2024 at 12:20 PM
Saved - May 11, 2024 at 7:11 PM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

Big Pharma sell drugs that don't cure people https://t.co/jct0BK7x9l

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 250,000 drugs in the PDR, but none are designed to cure anything except maybe antibiotics for strep throat. Pharmaceutical companies focus on making money from insurance policies rather than creating cures. Laws do not require them to produce drugs that cure, despite their ability to do so.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 250,000 drugs, pharmaceuticals and PDR, the physician's desk reference, they have access to treat people in America. There's new ones coming out all the time. They're always bragging about how many 1,000,000,000 of dollars worth of research they spend every year to buy new drugs. If you take out the 500 antibiotics, that still leaves 249,005 100 drugs. Not a single one of those designed to cure anything. Not a single drug in the PDR except maybe antibiotics cure strep throat. Other than that, there's not a single drug in the PDR that cures anything. All designed to milk your insurance policies. They're all designed to milk Medicare and Medicaid, because there's no laws requiring pharmaceutical companies to manufacture drugs that cure, even though they could.
drsimonegold
Posted - August 1, 2024 at 7:42 PM
Saved - August 2, 2024 at 2:36 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

This is what happens when Big Pharma installs their allies into positions of power. https://t.co/f2VaG36I7K

Thekeksociety
Posted - August 3, 2024 at 5:01 PM
Saved - August 4, 2024 at 1:06 AM

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

DO YOU BELIEVE THE IDEA OF BIG PHARMA IS TO CONVINCE AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE TO THINK THEY NEED TO RELY ON TAKING MEDICINES FOR LIFE? https://t.co/XzeDc1ZWiy

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video explains how cholesterol-lowering drugs can impact hormone production, leading to issues like low testosterone and serotonin levels. It also discusses the importance of salt for kidney function and blood pressure regulation. Contrary to popular belief, consuming adequate salt is crucial for overall health. The discrepancy between recommended salt intake levels highlights the complexity of this topic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This video before it's removed from the Internet. If you tell people that they have to lower their cholesterol, and we have a pill to do it, and it will protect you from having heart disease, which everyone's being told this is hereditary. What you guys don't know is that the moment you start taking the statin, the statin drug itself lowers the amount of cholesterol your body can make no matter how much fat you consume. Right. Did you know at home, everybody, that cholesterol is the backbone required by your hormone glands in your body to make most of your hormones? I mean, you need cholesterol to make testosterone, men. 6 months later, you're gonna go to your medical doctor and tell them, look, doc. I'm glad my cholesterol numbers are better. I just have no interest in sleeping with my wife. The MD says, oh, that's okay. You're in your forties. This is normal for your age. It's little blue pill to help you with that. When in fact, the cholesterol drug you started 6 months ago doesn't allow your body to now make testosterone because you need cholesterol to make testosterone. And said fat is bad for you, causes cholesterol to go up, which will cause you to have heart disease and increase your risk of that. Take this pill. You take that pill. Now you lower your amount of cholesterol to offset the side effects of the statin drug and the low fat diet that you're now on. Okay. That's 1. Did you know serotonin, a hormone in every male and female's body, needs cholesterol to be made? So now you can't make serotonin. Serotonin is your happy, feel good hormone. Now you can't make it because you don't have cholesterol to make enough of it. What are you gonna report to your medical doctor within 6 months to a year after starting your statin drug? You're gonna tell them you're depressed, you're anxious, and guess what your MD is gonna tell you. That's okay. This is normal. A lot of people experience this. A lot of people in my practice have this after 6 months of coming in here and get their cholesterol checked. We put them on this. Antidepressants are still the number one most prescribed drugs on the planet next to cholesterol drugs. Can't you see how that fits in? Alright. So what happens when you tell the world to stop eating so much salt? Well, your kidneys your kidneys take all of your blood and they filter it in the urine and they excrete all whatever it is that you don't need in the body. It removes all the excess water out of your body and cleanses the body. Your kidneys have cells inside of them to convert uric acid into urine and filter out your blood so you can urinate. Your kidneys can't even filter anything in your blood without sodium, potassium pumps. Salt. Okay. So these are called salt, potassium pumps. Okay. Well, your kidneys require salt to even work. Pry the kidneys of salt. Guess what happens to your kidney function? Do the pumps get better or worse? What do you think? And what happens when your body starts retaining water because your kidneys no longer can filter out urine out of your body? Detain it, will the added water in your body put pressure on your blood vessels and on your heart or reduce it? Yeah. Pressure. It increases it. Increased water, increased pressure. If you increase pressure, what's gonna happen to your blood pressure? Now you're not eating salt and your blood pressure is going up. If you tell the whole society to restrict from the time you're born how much salt you consume, all of you, because you're mammals and designed the same way and all have salt potassium pumps in your kidneys, you all, over time, will produce high blood pressure. And your medical doctor's gonna take your blood pressure and go, oh, your blood pressure's high. We gotta actually give you a high blood pressure. Can make sure you don't eat salt, Mary? The FDA in America says the maximum amount of salt every day that American should consume is 23 100 milligrams a day. What does the American Heart Association say that's in the same country? It says, we do not agree with the FDA's salt amount. They believe it should be 1100 milligrams a day. That's less than half of what the FDA says. How come they don't agree? The Tel Aviv University study in 2016, they published the lowest amount of salt a day that keeps your blood pressure normal they found in their study is 6000 milligrams. Oh. It's 6000 to 9000. They even said as you get to 9,000 milligrams, the results of blood pressure were better. What what amount of salt is in every saline flowing bag in the hospital. Can we Medical profession knows salt's bad for you. They tell you it's bad for you. An ambulance came to pick you up. Before you get to the hospital, you will have an IV drip of salt water going into your veins Yeah. Before you even get there. Before a doctor walks in the room, does an EKG or ECG or any other testing on you, they're gonna give you salt. Without question, they know you need salt. Now why do they know you need salt? Why do they know we need it? Yeah. Because they know everybody on Earth is eating less salt than they need.
MidwesternDoc
Posted - September 2, 2024 at 7:00 PM
Saved - September 3, 2024 at 12:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was surprised to see RFK invited to Fox to discuss the dangers of seed oils, food dyes, and pesticides, highlighting the corruption behind these products. It feels like there's a real opportunity to Make America Healthy Again. On another note, Ozempic, touted as a solution for weight loss, has significant drawbacks: many users experience side effects, digestion issues, and the weight often returns after stopping. An interview with Calley Means and Tucker Carlson further exposes the corruption in our regulatory system, particularly regarding Ozempic.

@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor

RFK was just invited to Fox to tell the nation about the dangers of Seed Oils, Food Dyes and Pesticides while exposing the immense corruption behind these products. I never expected to see this in my lifetime and I now believe there's a real window to Make America Healthy Again

Video Transcript AI Summary
Seed oils are unhealthy ingredients linked to serious illnesses like body-wide inflammation, but are used in processed foods because they are heavily subsidized. The government subsidizes unhealthy foods due to corruption, with 75% of the FDA's budget coming from regulated industries that profit from a sick population. Food coloring, like yellow food coloring, is a petroleum product associated with depression, autoimmune injuries, and ADHD. While Europe uses natural coloring, the US uses almost 1,000 chemicals in food that are banned or discouraged in Europe. 70% of the food stamp program subsidizes processed foods. "Natural flavors" are chemical products, and ingredient labels cannot be trusted due to government corruption and agencies being captured by the industries they regulate. Non-organic produce like kale and strawberries are contaminated with pesticides, with the Environmental Working Group identifying the "dirty dozen" worst offenders. Unless certified organic, these foods can be harmful.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why should people be worried about these kind of products? Speaker 1: Seed oils are one of the, the most unhealthy, ingredients that we have in foods. And seed oils, The reason they're in the foods is because they're heavily subsidized. They're very, very cheap, but they, they are associated with all kinds of very, very serious illnesses, including, body wide inflammation Right. Which affects all of our health. It's one of the worst things you can eat, and it's almost impossible to avoid. If you eat any processed food, you're gonna be eating seed oil. Speaker 0: Right. And it's interesting the government subsidizes it. Why would the government wanna subsidize something that's gonna make people sick? And then in the end, we all end up paying for that in in terms of health care costs, which are skyrocketing. Speaker 1: Yeah. Because that that is a direct result of corruption. 75% of FDA's budget comes from regulated industry, and that means food processors and pharmaceutical industry, all of them profit from a sick population. Speaker 0: You know, the a big item that and and by the way, it's getting very expensive, are cereals. Why is the food coloring in particular bad? Speaker 1: Food coloring, you see your yellow food coloring, that is a petroleum product. Mhmm. It's associated with really, you know, with with depression. It's associated with autoimmune injuries and ADHD. Yeah. These and red dye also is, you know, is very bad. In Europe, the same companies are producing the same products, but they're using natural coloring. But here, they can get away with it. We have about almost a 1,000 chemicals that are in our food that are either outright banned in Europe or actively discouraged. So you wouldn't be able to buy this kind of stuff in Europe. You ask about why it's so cheap, why it's so, ubiquitous. It's because we subsidize the worst foods. We subsidize it with about 70% of our food stamp program is to process foods, which are all poison. Speaker 0: Right. One other thing that's interesting is you'll see on on labels, natural flavors, which is this catch off phrase that I guess was lobbied for, but the ingredients in natural flavors are not really natural. Speaker 1: No. In our country, natural flavors are are chemical products. So you can't trust what's on the ingredient label, and the reason for that again is government corruption. It's that the agency, the USDA, the FDA have been captured by the industries they're supposed to regulate, and they all have an interest in in subsidies and then in mass poisoning, the American public. Speaker 0: Yeah. I wanna talk about pesticides, and then let's talk to the about the policy. So let's talk about the pesticides and the and the things that worry you about. I mean, this looks like fresh food. Right? What should I be worried about here? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, the irony is, like, for example, my wife loves kale, and she had the impression that kale is actually good for you. If it's organic, it's very good for you. But most kale and strawberries, for example, grapes are contaminated with pesticides and and particularly the environmental working group has found what they call the dirty dozen, some of the worst pesticides on these products. So, you know, I wanna I look at a strawberry and I think, oh, this is a healthy food. But in most cases, unless it's organic, certified organic, you are getting something that's actually hurting you.

@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor

Unfortunately, Ozempic, the "solution" to this new epidemic: •Gives half of users side effects and over 30% quit in a month •Paralyzes digestion and raises the risk of severe GI issues (ie pancreatitis) by 50-900% •The weight lost returns once you stop https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-ozempic-scam-and-safer

The Great Ozempic Scam and The Safe Ways to Lose Weight The Immense Dangers of the GLP-1 drugs and the Scandalous Corruption That Led the FDA to Push Them Upon America midwesterndoctor.com

@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor

This except for @calleymeans interview with @TuckerCarlson lays how bare how corrupt our regulatory system has become (through showing exactly what's happened with Ozempic) https://t.co/LSmW4NjcsU

Video Transcript AI Summary
The average 65-year-old in the US takes about seven drugs. 95% of people on the USDA nutrition guidelines had conflicts of interest with food companies, influencing school lunches, where the USDA serves 3 billion meals yearly. Kraft Heinz is brokering deals to put Lunchables in schools, a top growth area. Novo Nordisk, the Ozempic manufacturer, is now Europe's most valuable company, with almost all revenue from the US due to a broken system. 30% of Americans with insurance coverage stop using Ozempic within three months, despite it being touted as a lifetime drug. Lawsuits are emerging regarding gastrointestinal issues and stomach paralysis, which may persist after discontinuing the drug. The EU is probing suicidal ideation linked to Ozempic. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends Ozempic as a first-line defense for teens based on a 68-week study. Pharma is the largest TV news ad spender, and Novo Nordisk is a major funder of obesity research, medical groups, and civil rights groups, including paying the NAACP, who claims that not supporting Ozempic is racist. Analyst reports assume increased obesity rates, and loans for obesity treatment centers project growth in obesity. Weight Watchers, now an Ozempic prescriber, shifted from personal accountability due to Ozempic's superior business model.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The average, say, 65 year old person in this country is on how many drugs? Speaker 1: The about about 7. Speaker 2: 95% of people on the USDA nutrition guidelines for America 2020 to 2025 had a conflict of interest with food companies. These studies are used to influence what the u d USDA is basically saying can go in school lunches. The USDA controls the US school lunch program, which serves 3,000,000,000 meals per year to students. The largest fast food chain in America is the USDA school lunch program. And, you know, just this past year, Kraft Heinz is brokering deals with the USDA to put Lunchables in schools. Speaker 1: These It's a top growth area for Kraft. So all you need to know is that Novo Nordics, the company that makes this drug, recently passed LVMH to become the most valuable company in Europe. They don't allow this drug for obesity in Europe. Almost all of Novo Nordics revenue is coming from taking advantage of Americans. They are saying on their stock calls that their all of their growth is coming from the US. They're taking advantage of a broken US system in the United States. And when you dive into it, even people in the United States who are getting government funding, insurance funding for this drug don't have to pay for it. 30% of them go off the drug within 3 months. So even though they're fully being paid for and we're being told this is a lifetime drug, there's lawsuits coming just reported in the past couple days on gastrointestinal issues and stomach paralysis. The drug itself essentially is, stomach paralysis, to to make you not be able to process food correctly. And there's studies now saying that that stomach paralysis, the really, messing with your ability to digest food, actually stays after you go off the drug. So there's lawsuits now with people with severe gastrointestinal issues after coming off the drugs. Additionally, you're consistently seeing patients who go off the drugs, gain the weight back. Additionally, the EU, again, where this company is based, just launched a, a probe into suicidal ideation caused by Ozempic because there's so many reports of increased depression and increased suicide. The problem is where the rubber really hits the road is there is an all out assault to convince us that this is the appropriate drug. Again, this is the target market. This is why the stocks are popping and why Wall Street's going crazy. It's the biggest TAM, the biggest target market for any drug in American history. It's 80% of American adults, but it's being fast tracked. You wouldn't believe this, but the American Academy of Pediatrics recently said that they recommend this as a first line of defense for teens. And the study basing that decision for the American Academy of Pediatrics to say that every obese or overweight teen, which is 50%, should take this drug, was a 68 week study. We had a 68 week study for a lifetime recommendation to 50% of teens in America to to receive these injections. Just step back and think about it. Pharma is the largest spender on TV new ad news ads. It's the largest spender. Novo Nordisk, specifically, is the largest spender on foundational obesity research. It's the largest spender on, medical to medical groups like the AAP. It's one of the largest, funders of actual civil rights groups. So you actually can't even believe this, but Novo Nordics is paying the NAACP to say that not supporting Ozempic is a civil rights issue. Speaker 0: So you're racist if you're against giving kids a diabetes drug? Speaker 1: It's on the n, double, a c p website, and the n, double, a c p is a registered lobbyist for Ozempic, saying that you are a racist because there's disproportionate issues, with obesity in certain communities, that you're a racist for not supporting government funding for Ozempic. We're being asked to trust pharma when 80% of the American people, their bodies are, like, rebelling against them, with obesity, which are clearly a sign of of underlying issues, where Ozempic and daily you know, weekly shots is not the root cause. This just, on its face, doesn't make sense. And then you trace the corruptions. Again, Ozempic is paying off everyone. They are one of the 5 largest funders the company itself, one of the 5 largest funders of news ads, one of the, you know, top research funders of obesity research, largest funders to university on the obesity topic. And and the thing I, you know, kind of kind of ram home here, Tucker, is you just have to look where the money is. So if you actually look at the analyst reports that are propping up these stocks, they're assuming an increase in obesity. So you talk about all the, like, the Novo Nordisk's largest company, in Europe. They literally in in the where the money hits the road, where people are investing 1,000,000,000 of dollars, they're assuming increased rates of obesity over the next 10 years in America. You actually, I was talking to a a a doctor at Harvard. They you know, they're underwriting a loan for a new obesity center where they can where they can treat an issue as Ipic. Those loans have projections for growth of obesity. They're not projecting that increased Ozepic is gonna decrease obesity. The loans that are underpinning these medical centers if you go to any any city in the country, the biggest, most beautiful building is is, you know, some kind of new pediatric, you know, obesity center or cardiology center. The the loans assume increased rates of conditions. So, fundamentally, we have the largest energy in the country, health care, not asking imagine the leader saying, how do we reverse obesity? How do we cure they're not asking that. They're saying, how can we actually say obesity is not your fault? Oprah, who's involved with rate Weight Watchers, just apologized for preaching her personal accountability over the past decade. She said it's not personal accountability. We're supporting Ozempic. Yeah. Weight Watchers has shifted from a personal accountability organization that it's been, preaching for decades and is now a prescriber of Ozempic. They've totally changed because Ozempic is a better business model because you never go off of it. This is insane.
drjasonfung
Posted - October 11, 2024 at 3:08 AM
Saved - October 11, 2024 at 10:00 PM
toobaffled
Posted - October 16, 2024 at 1:02 PM
Saved - October 17, 2024 at 1:03 AM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced plans to force fat people in the UK to be injected with Ozempic in order to get them back to work. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/british-govt-to-force-jab-fat-lazy-people-with-ozempic-weight-loss-drug/

British Gov’t To Force Jab Fat Lazy People With Ozempic Weight-Loss Drug British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced plans to force fat people in the UK to be injected with Ozempic in order to get them back to work. thepeoplesvoice.tv
ifixhearts
Posted - October 17, 2024 at 6:32 PM
Saved - October 18, 2024 at 2:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ozempic not only targets fat but also muscle, raising concerns about heart tissue protection. If you're considering it, consult your doctor about safeguarding your heart. Meanwhile, there's a push for Medicare to fund Ozempic, despite its high cost and the fact that obesity is largely preventable. Instead of supporting this drug, we should focus on promoting healthier diets and exercise. Additionally, while alcohol might have been enjoyable in the past, it's harmful to metabolic health. A new course will help you understand its effects and how to eliminate it from your life.

@ifixhearts - Heart Surgeon Dr. Philip Ovadia

Ozempic doesn't just eat fat. It eats muscle too. Your 🫀 is a muscle. If you are considering this drug, ask your doctor, "what will we do to protect my heart tissue while I am taking this drug?" (And if you get a good answer back, let me know!)

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "Today, over 100 members of Congress support a bill to fund Ozempic with Medicare at $1,500 a month. Most of these members have taken money from the manufacturer of that product, a European company called Novo Nordisk. As everyone knows, once a drug is approved for Medicare, it goes to Medicaid. And there is a push to recommend Ozempic for Americans as young as six over a condition, obesity, that is completely preventable and barely even existed 100 years ago. Since 74% of Americans are obese, the cost of all of them, if they take their Ozempic prescriptions, will be $3 trillion a year. This is a drug that has made Novo Nordisk the biggest company in Europe. It's a Danish company, but the Danish government does not recommend it. It recommends a change in diet to treat obesity and exercise. Virtually Novo Nordisk's entire value is based upon its projections of what Ozempic is going to sell to Americans. For half the price of Ozempic, we could purchase regeneratively raised organic agriculture, organic food for every American three meals a day and gym membership for every obese American. Why are members of Congress doing the bidding of this Danish company instead of standing up for American farmers and children? Because Novo Nordisk is one of the largest funders of medical research, the media and politicians and the medical schools all go along with them."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 100 members of Congress support a bill to fund Ozempic with Medicare at $1500 a month, and most have taken money from Novo Nordisk, the drug's manufacturer. Once approved for Medicare, it goes to Medicaid, and there's a push to recommend Ozempic for Americans as young as 6 for obesity, a condition claimed to be preventable and recently rare. With 74% of Americans obese, the cost of Ozempic prescriptions for all of them would be $3 trillion a year. Novo Nordisk's value is based on projected Ozempic sales to Americans, yet the Danish government recommends diet and exercise instead. For half the price of Ozempic, every American could receive regeneratively raised organic food and gym memberships. Congress is allegedly doing the bidding of Novo Nordisk instead of supporting American farmers and children because Novo Nordisk heavily funds medical research, the media, politicians, and medical schools.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, over a 100 members of congress support a bill to fund Ozempic with Medicare at $1500 a month. Most of these members have taken money from the manufacturer of that product, a European company called Novo Nordisk. As everyone knows, once the drug is approved for Medicare, it goes to Medicaid. And there is a push to recommend Ozempic for Americans as young as 6 over a condition obesity that is completely preventable and barely even existed a 100 years ago. Since 74% of Americans are obese, the cost of all of them, if they take their Ozempic prescriptions, will be $3,000,000,000,000 a year. This is a drug that has made Novo Nordisk the biggest company in Europe. It's a Danish company, but the Danish government does not recommend it. It recommends a change in diet to treat obesity and exercise. Virtually Novo Nordisk entire value is based upon its projections of what Ozempic is going to sell to Americans. For half the price of Ozempic, we could purchase regeneratively raised organic agriculture, organic food for every American, 3 meals a day, and gym membership for every obese American. Why are members of congress doing the bidding of this Danish company instead of standing up for American farmers and children? Because Novo Nordisk is one of the largest funders of medical research, the media and politicians and the medical schools all go along with them.

@ifixhearts - Heart Surgeon Dr. Philip Ovadia

Maybe you had good times with alcohol when you were younger, but alcohol is not your friend. It's doing serious damage to your metabolic health. In this course you'll learn what alcohol does, and how to ditch it for good. https://ifixhearts.spiffy.co/checkout/alcohol

Introduction to Alcohol

Learn how you can improve your metabolic health with a deeper understanding of how alcohol affects your health.

Terms of Purchase

 ifixhearts.spiffy.co
myhiddenvalue
Posted - October 28, 2024 at 3:17 AM
Saved - October 28, 2024 at 10:35 AM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

They're adding cancer causing ingredients to the Food Supply, so they can make money from chemo later. https://t.co/8Flv3y6Eat

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the US, Skittles contain 11 ingredients, including harmful substances like dimethylpolysiloxane and artificial dyes, while the UK version has only 3 ingredients and optional salt. The US version includes 10 artificial dyes and titanium dioxide, banned in Europe for its potential DNA damage and links to cancer. Gatorade in the US uses red 40 and caramel color, whereas Germany opts for natural colors from carrots and sweet potatoes. Doritos in the US contain multiple artificial dyes and MSG, while the UK version does not. General Mills recently launched a dye-free version of Trix in Australia, highlighting the disparity in food safety standards. This motivates the push for equal treatment of American consumers by food companies.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the US, there's 11 ingredients. In the UK, there's 3. And salt is optional. An ingredient called dimethylpolysiloxane is an ingredient preserved with formaldehyde, a neurotoxin. This is Skittles. Notice the long list of ingredient differences. 10 artificial dyes in the US version and titanium dioxide. This ingredient is banned in Europe because it can cause DNA damage. Artificial dyes are made from petroleum, and products containing these dyes require a warning label in Europe. And they have been linked to cancer and disruptions in the immune system. This on the screen back here is Gatorade. In the US, they use red 40 and caramel color. In Germany, they don't. They use carrot and sweet potatoes to color their Gatorade. This is Doritos. The US version has 3 different artificial dyes and MSG. The UK version does not. General Mills is definitely playing some tricks on us. They launched a new version of Trix just recently in Australia. It has no dyes. They even advertised that when the US version still does. This is why I became a food activist. My name is Vonnie Hari, and I only want one thing. I want Americans to be treated the same way as citizens in other countries by our own American companies.
HustleBitch_
Posted - October 28, 2024 at 5:06 PM
Saved - October 28, 2024 at 5:47 PM

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

BIG PHARMA: "Let's give them cancer through the food... ...they'll pay us billions from the chemo they need after." https://t.co/H6uZN86oYU

WallStreetApes
Posted - January 29, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 5:28 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Welp, no longer a “conspiracy theory” Robert F. Kennedy Jr confirms US Congress is taking HUGE amounts of money from pharmaceutical companies to specifically approve SKY HIGH prices for drugs that US Taxpayers will pay for HOW IS THIS NOT RACKETEERING??? https://t.co/FdSBGvvypq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 100 members of Congress support a bill to fund Ozempic through Medicare at $1,500 a month, despite many having received funding from its manufacturer, Novo Nordisk. This drug, aimed at treating obesity—a largely preventable condition—could cost the U.S. $3 trillion annually if prescribed widely, as 74% of Americans are obese. While Novo Nordisk thrives, the Danish government promotes diet and exercise instead. For half the cost of Ozempic, we could provide organic food and gym memberships for every obese American. The influence of Novo Nordisk extends to medical research funding, leading to complicity from media, politicians, and medical schools.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, over a 100 members of congress support a bill to fund Ozempic with Medicare at $1500 a month. Most of these members have taken money from the manufacturer of that product, a European company called Novo Nordisk. As everyone knows, once the drug is approved for Medicare, it goes to Medicaid, And there is a push to recommend Ozempic for Americans as young as 6 over a condition obesity that is completely preventable and barely even existed a 100 years ago. Since 74% of Americans are obese, the cost of all of them, if they take their Ozempic prescriptions, will be $3,000,000,000,000 a year. This is a drug that has made Novo Nordisk the biggest company in Europe. It's a Danish company, but the Danish government does not recommend it. It recommends a change in diet to treat obesity and exercise. Virtually Novo Nordisk entire value is based upon its projections of what Ozempic is going to sell to Americans. For half the price of Ozempic, we could purchase regeneratively raised organic agriculture or organic food for every American, 3 meals a day, and gym membership for every obese American. Why are members of congress doing the bidding of this Danish company instead of standing up for American farmers and children? Because Novo Nordisk is one of the largest funders of medical research, The media and politicians and the medical schools all go along with them.
charliekirk11
Posted - February 13, 2025 at 6:49 PM
Saved - February 14, 2025 at 12:02 AM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Honestly, it's time to get Big Pharma ads off the TV. Listen to this garbage. MAGA 🤝 MAHA https://t.co/0Qd1s2M9GN

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pluvicto treatment involves radioactivity, potentially increasing cancer risk and causing fetal harm. To minimize risks, stay hydrated, urinate frequently, use contraception, and discuss radiation safety with your doctor both during and after treatment. Pluvicto may lead to low blood cell counts, kidney issues, and infertility. Contact your doctor if you experience weakness, pale skin, shortness of breath, easy bleeding or bruising, infection, or changes in urination. Common side effects include tiredness, dry mouth, nausea, appetite loss, and constipation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pluvicto involves contact with radioactivity, which may increase the risk for cancer and cause fetal harm. Drink plenty of fluids, urinate often, use contraception, and talk to your doctor about ways to reduce the risk of exposing others to radiation during and after treatment. Pluvicto can cause low levels of blood cell counts, kidney problems, and infertility. Tell your doctor if you have weakness, pale skin, shortness of breath, bleeding or bruising more easily, an infection, or changes in urination. Side effects include tiredness, dry mouth, nausea, appetite loss, and constipation.
EdbieLigerSmith
Posted - February 14, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 11:08 AM

@EdbieLigerSmith - Liger

Reminder: China developed a cure for diabetes & American pharma companies don’t want to adopt it because they’re making tons of money selling insulin.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Reports from China indicate scientists may have found a diabetes cure, which is unwelcome news for the American pharmaceutical industry. Chinese patients receiving experimental stem cell therapy have stopped needing insulin after about eleven weeks. This poses a threat to companies like Eli Lilly, who profit greatly from the insulin market. The rising insulin prices have sparked controversy, especially considering insulin's inventor, Frederick Banting, sold the patent for $1, believing it should be accessible to everyone. A diabetes cure would reduce the demand for insulin, impacting pharmaceutical companies' profits. This reveals a contradiction within the American for-profit healthcare system, where cures are disincentivized if they eliminate the need for repeat customers, challenging the notion that capitalism always promotes innovation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So there are reports out of China now that scientists have found a cure for diabetes, and the American pharmaceutical industry is not happy about it. There are now examples of Chinese patients receiving this experimental stem cell therapy and after about eleven weeks no longer requiring insulin, which I imagine is something that sounds amazing to people with diabetes, no longer having to poke yourself. But it doesn't sound amazing to giant American pharmaceutical companies like Eli Lilly who currently dominate the insulin market and use it to make billions of dollars. And this has been very controversial as they regularly increase the price of insulin knowing that it's a necessary commodity that people with diabetes need to survive. And this is extra disgusting because the inventor of insulin, Frederick Banting, originally sold a patent for $1 saying that insulin doesn't belong to me. It belongs to the world. And if people can be cured of diabetes so they no longer need insulin, obviously, that would really cut into the demand for this product and cut into their profits. And here we see the contradictory nature of the for profit American health care system. Innovation and advancements in medical technology are actually disincentivized if they have the potential to cure the patient and make it so they're no longer a repeat customer for the pharmaceutical industry. So much for capitalism promoting innovation and socialism destroying it. In reality, it's the opposite.

@EdbieLigerSmith - Liger

Join the ACP to join us in combatting the for profit healthcare system! http://ACp.us

American Communist Party The future belongs to the working class. acp.us
WallStreetApes
Posted - February 25, 2025 at 6:20 AM
Saved - February 25, 2025 at 7:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe we've uncovered a major source of waste in Medicare. RJK Jr pointed out that inflated drug costs are approved because many members of Congress receive money from manufacturers. For instance, over 100 Congress members support funding ozempic through Medicare at $1,500 a month, despite having ties to its manufacturer. This raises the question: why are they prioritizing a Danish company's interests over those of Americans? It seems Congress is influenced by pharmaceutical companies, leaving taxpayers to foot the bill for exorbitant drug prices.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Calling Elon Musk and DOGE: I think we just stumbled upon the biggest cause of waste in Medicare RJK Jr reveals the reason hugely inflated costs for drugs on Medicare get approved is because US Congress “have taken money from the manufacturer” EXAMPLE: “Over 100 members of Congress support a bill to fund ozempic with Medicare at $1,500 a month. Most of these members have taken money from the manufacturer of that product” “Why are members of Congress doing the bidding of this Danish company instead of standing up for Americans” - US Congress gets paid off by pharmaceutical companies - They approve astronomical prices for drugs for Medicare - Taxpayers pick up the bill

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over a hundred members of Congress are backing a bill to fund Ozempic through Medicare at $1,500 monthly, many having received funds from Novo Nordisk, its manufacturer. Once Medicare approves, Medicaid follows. There's a push to prescribe Ozempic for obesity in Americans as young as six, a condition largely preventable. With 74% of Americans obese, covering Ozempic prescriptions would cost $3 trillion annually. Novo Nordisk's value relies heavily on projected Ozempic sales in the US, yet Denmark, their home country, favors diet and exercise over the drug. For half the cost of Ozempic, we could provide regeneratively raised organic food to every American, three times a day, and gym memberships for every obese American. Why is Congress prioritizing this company over American well-being? I've dedicated my life to solving the childhood chronic disease crisis, and I see an opportunity for bipartisan change to improve American health, our economy, and our nation's spirit.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, over a hundred members of congress support a bill to fund Ozempic with Medicare at $1,500 a month. Most of these members have taken money from the manufacturer of that product, a European company called Novo Nordisk. As everyone knows, once the drug is approved for Medicare, it goes to Medicaid. And there is a push to recommend Ozempic for Americans as young as six over a condition obesity that is completely preventable and barely even existed a hundred years ago. Since nine seventy four percent of Americans are obese, the cost of all of them if they take their Ozempic prescriptions will be $3,000,000,000,000 a year. This is a drug that has made Novo Nordisk the biggest company in Europe. It's a Danish company, but the Danish government does not recommend it. It recommends a change in diet to treat obesity and exercise. Virtually Novo Nordisk entire value is based upon its projections of what Ozempic is going to sell to Americans. For half the price of Ozempic, we could purchase regeneratively raised organic agriculture or organic food for every American, three meals a day, and gym membership for every obese American. Why are members of congress doing the bidding of this Danish company instead of standing up for American with them. For nineteen years, solving the childhood chronic disease crisis has been the central goal of my life. And for nineteen years, I have prayed to God every morning to put me in a position to end this calamity. I believe we have the opportunity for transformational bipartisan change to transform American health, to hypercharge our human capital, to improve our budget, and I believe to save our spirits and our country.
WallStreetApes
Posted - March 3, 2025 at 6:22 PM
Saved - March 3, 2025 at 9:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently came across some shocking research that reveals how Big Food is secretly engineering products to counteract the appetite-suppressing effects of Ozempic and similar weight loss drugs. A lab in Northern California, Mattson, is working on reformulating ingredients to make food more addictive, as companies face declining sales due to fewer purchases from those on these medications. The CEO of Walmart noted a drop in calorie purchases, prompting food executives to create what they call GLP-1 optimized products. It’s concerning that this is all happening behind closed doors.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

OHH MY GOD 🚨 Everyone MUST LISTEN to this research @5149jamesli “Big food just found a way to hack Ozempic and they're doing it in secret. The story is actually crazy” Right now Big Food is ENGINEERING FOOD to bypass how Ozempic make people feel less hungry “There's a food laboratory in Northern California called Mattson that is quote unquote creating the future of food. It's run by this guy named Justin Shimek, PHD — for nearly 50 years, Matson has conceptualized, developed, branded, and scaled hundreds of product lines, and in the process created billions of dollars in revenue for clients” “Right now their clients Big Food is asking them to do experiments that will reformulate ingredients so that their food can bypass the effects of Ozempic, wegovy and other GLP one weight loss drugs. Because from a financial perspective, people on these weight loss drugs are buying less food. Walmart, CEO, John Feer recently told Bloomberg news that the company is seeing signs that people taking GLP one agonist appetite suppressant medications are buying less units, slightly less calories, which equals less profit.” “New York Times has reported that sales are down in sweet baked goods and snacks, and the industry is weathering a downturn. That's a big problem for these food executives. In response, the food companies are designing what they call GLP one optimized products. In layman's terms, they're trying to make the food more addictive, even more addictive than they already are.” (In the video James explains a huge amount of ways food is being engineered and what this company is currently doing) “I think the certainty here is that we're gonna be left with a bunch of people who are still obese, taking drugs with pretty bad side effects that no longer work that I would say is not ideal and worse yet, it's all being done in secret. When asked Justin Shimek wouldn't say which companies he was working with to develop these GLP one products, saying quote, we are professional secret keepers.” “These people are sick.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Big Food is secretly trying to hack Ozempic with the help of a food laboratory called Matson, run by Justin Shimick. Matson is reformulating ingredients to bypass the effects of GLP-1 weight loss drugs because these drugs are cutting into food company profits. Walmart's CEO has noticed that people on these medications are buying less food. Food companies are designing "GLP-1 optimized products" to make food even more addictive by using tactics like nostalgic aromas, amplified artificial sweeteners, and altered salt crystals. This is all being done in secret as Justin Shimick wouldn't disclose which companies he's working with, stating that they are "professional secret keepers". The end result could be that obesity persists, drugs with side effects become ineffective, and it's all shrouded in secrecy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Big food just found a way to hack Ozempic and they're doing it in secret. The story is actually crazy. Okay. So there's a food laboratory in Northern California called Matson that is quote unquote creating the future of food. It's run by this guy named Justin Shimick. PhD, so you know he is a smart guy and he has monetized his intelligence quite well. It says for nearly fifty years Matson has conceptualized, developed, branded and scaled hundreds of product lines and in the process created billions of dollars in revenue for clients. And right now their clients, Big Food, is asking them to do experiments that will reformulate ingredients so that their food can bypass the effects of Ozempic, Wegovy, and other GLP-one weight loss drugs. Because from a financial perspective, people on these weight loss drugs are buying less food. Walmart CEO John Furnard recently told Bloomberg News that the company is seeing signs that people taking GLP-one agonist medications are buying less units, slightly less calories, which equals less profit. New York Times has reported that sales are down in sweet baked goods and snacks, and the industry is weathering a downturn. That's a big problem for these food executives. So in response, the food companies are designing what they call GLP-one optimized products. In layman's terms, they're trying to make the food more addictive, even more addictive than they already are because we know that food is already pretty addictive. Quote, there is little the industry hasn't tried to keep health conscious consumers eating. Companies concealed clouds of nostalgic aromas into packaging to trigger Proustian reverie. When they discovered that noisier chips induced people to eat more of them, snack engineers turned up the crunch. Food technologists found a way to amplify the intensity of artificial sweeteners to hundreds of times beyond sugar's natural flavor. The structure of salt crystals can be altered to accelerate the speed at which they absorb into the chemical pathways that signal saltiness, allowing the brain to perceive the flavor more intensely. In the chemo sensory world, referring to the science of how chemicals provoke sensations, almost anything is possible. Yeah, I suppose almost anything is possible, but I think the certainty here is that we're gonna be left with a bunch of people who are still obese taking drugs with pretty bad side effects that no longer work. That I would say is not ideal. And worse yet, it's all being done in secret. When asked, Justin Shimick wouldn't say which companies he was working with to develop these GLP-one products saying We are professional secret keepers. These people are sick.
liz_churchill10
Posted - March 9, 2025 at 4:25 AM
Saved - May 12, 2025 at 6:48 PM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

DOGE must investigate this and this must be outlawed. “Today, over 100 Members of Congress support a Bill to fund Ozempic with Medicare at $1,500 a month. Most of these members have taken money from the manufacturer of that product…” -HHS RFK Jr. https://t.co/DrseGnYTHE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 100 members of Congress support a bill to fund Ozempic with Medicare at $1,500 monthly, with most having received money from Novo Nordisk, its manufacturer. Approval for Medicare would extend to Medicaid, with potential recommendations for Americans as young as six for obesity, a condition claimed to be preventable and recently rare. With 74% of Americans obese, the total cost of Ozempic prescriptions could reach $3 trillion annually. Ozempic has made Novo Nordisk the biggest company in Europe, yet the Danish government recommends diet and exercise instead. The company's value relies on projected Ozempic sales in America. For half the cost of Ozempic, every American could receive regeneratively raised organic food and obese Americans could receive gym memberships. The speaker questions why Congress is supporting Novo Nordisk over American farmers and children, suggesting Novo Nordisk's funding of medical research influences media, politicians, and medical schools.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, over a hundred members of congress support a bill to fund Ozempic with Medicare at $1,500 a month. Most of these members have taken money from the manufacturer of that product, a European company called Novo Nordisk. As everyone knows, once the drug is approved for Medicare, it goes to Medicaid. And there is a push to recommend Ozempic for Americans as young as six over a condition obesity that is completely preventable and barely even existed one hundred years ago. Since seventy four percent of Americans are obese, the cost of all of them if they take their Ozempic prescriptions will be $3,000,000,000,000 a year. This is a drug that has made Novo Nordisk the biggest company in Europe. It's a Danish company, but the Danish government does not recommend it. It recommends a change in diet to treat obesity and exercise. Virtually Novo Nordisk's entire value is based upon its projections of what Ozempic is going to sell to Americans. For half the price of Ozempic, we could purchase regeneratively raised organic agriculture or organic food for every American, three meals a day, and gym membership for every obese American. Why are members of congress doing the bidding of this Danish company instead of standing up for American farmers and children? Because Novo Nordisk is one of the largest funders of medical research, The media and politicians and the medical schools all go wrong with them.
travelingenes
Posted - March 13, 2025 at 1:00 AM
Saved - March 13, 2025 at 9:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Yesterday, I testified in Texas for a bill to eliminate sugary sodas and candy from SNAP eligibility. To my surprise, I found myself opposing the American Heart Association. This situation highlights the troubling incentives present in our most trusted health organizations.

@travelingenes - Grace Price🧬

Yesterday I testified in Texas for a bill to remove sugary sodas and candy from SNAP eligible items. You’ll never guess who I was fighting against… The American Heart Association. This is a prime example of the perverse incentives within our most trusted health institutions. Here’s the full story:

Video Transcript AI Summary
SB 379 aims to eliminate the purchase of cookies, soda, and candy with food stamps. The speaker testified in favor of the bill, arguing that America has an obesity crisis worsened by SNAP-funded soda and candy. They noted that tobacco and alcohol were previously removed from SNAP in 2014. The American Heart Association opposed the bill, citing concerns about its potential impact on participation and population health, as well as issues with defining restricted items. The speaker expressed surprise at the American Heart Association's opposition, suggesting it may be linked to past donations from pharmaceutical and food companies like Kellogg's and Pepsi. The speaker supports the "Make America Healthy Again" movement and will provide updates on the bill's progress.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yesterday, I testified at the Texas State Capitol for SB three seventy nine. SB three seventy nine is a necessary step to align Snap with its mission, which aims to eliminate cookies, soda, and candy from purchasing items under the food stamp program. You will not believe who actually showed up in opposition to this bill. Speaker 1: My name is Alec Puente, and I'm the director of government relations for the American Heart Association. I'm here to testify in today in opposition to senate bill three seventy nine. Speaker 0: The Heart Association. And I was not the only one who was surprised by this. That might be the surprise of the session so far. Here's what the American Heart Association representative had to say. Speaker 1: The Heart Association is concerned about potential impacts of this bill on participation and population health. You know, we get we get into the other issues of how exactly we define a lot of these things. Speaker 0: Here's what I was arguing for in my testimony for the bill. America has an obesity crisis, and products like soda and candy funded by Snap are making it worse. In 2014, we stood up against addictive products in Snap by removing tobacco and alcohol. Now a decade later, it is time we do the same for candy and soda. Although this shouldn't come as a huge surprise when we look at who the American Heart Association has accepted donations from in the past, which is largely big pharmaceutical companies and even big food companies like Kellogg's and Pepsi. Thank you to senator Cole Kors for actually calling him out. I would encourage you to look at what it it restricts. This is why we need the make America healthy again movement now more than ever. I will keep you guys updated on this story. I'm still absolutely appalled that it's happening, but follow this account for more because if you want to understand what's actually happening behind the scenes, here's a real life example.
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 28, 2025 at 11:22 AM
Saved - July 1, 2025 at 5:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a shocking revelation from an American pharmacist about the healthcare system. Certain effective drugs, like Brenzavvy, are being sidelined because they are too cheap. Insurance companies refuse to cover them, leading doctors to avoid prescribing them and wholesalers to not carry them. This is all to protect the profits of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), who earn substantial rebates from more expensive medications. The system prioritizes profit over patient care, effectively banning affordable options and perpetuating high drug costs. It feels like organized crime to me.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 Pay attention to this American pharmacist exposing that some cheap, very effective drugs, HAVE BEEN BANNED form being prescribed because they’re too cheap So instead of the cheap option, drugs that cost $1,000+ are allowed for certain treatments (INSANE) “The most insane examples of why drugs cost so much is a drug called Brenzavvy. You almost certainly haven't heard of it, but you've probably heard of similar drugs like Jardiance or Farxiga. The reason you haven't heard of Brenzavvy, though, is because no insurance companies will cover it. Most doctors won't prescribe it, and most wholesalers won't even carry it. When I tell you why our entire healthcare industry is turning its back on this proven drug in one of the most critical classes in existence, you are going to be furious. They are shunning Brenzavvy because it's too cheap. I'm not being hyperbolic or sensational. I mean it literally. At my pharmacy, Brenzavvy costs $60 bucks. When they took that price to the pharmacy benefits managers, or PBMs, that's the people in charge of deciding what's covered on your insurance, they all said no, because Brenzavvy can't do a rebate at a price that low. Farxiga and Jardiance, the other Drugs in the SLGT 2 class with Brenzavvy, cost insurance payers $1000 bucks each prescription up front. Then they get a big, probably like 40% rebate later. So that's a $400 rebate, and that is a huge selling point for the PBMs to prove how important they are. The PBMs get a piece of that rebate, and they get a percentage of the final price. An HHS report from last year said that the PBMs get 23% on average for for brand meds. After the rebate, Farxiga and Jardiance still cost $600. 23% of that is $138 for the middleman. Those drugs get dispensed 8 million times a year, which means the total they make in a year off of those two drugs is $1.1 billion. They don't make the drug, they don't prescribe it, they don't dispense it, they don't sell it. They only have to do one thing to make that money. Keep Brenzavvy off their list. If they let in a drug that costs 1/10 of the price and doesn't pay rebate, they literally lose a billion dollars a year. To me, that's the clearest example of why we will never get affordable health care in America. As long as we have PBMs involved, they can't afford to save you money.“ So while this might not be an outright ban, meaning illegal to create, for all purposes it is a ban. Because if the insurance companies won’t cover it, their doctors won’t prescribe it and nearly all wholesalers won’t carry it, that means the insurances companies and PBMs are effectively banning medication in America so they can make maximum profits. Billions a year on a single Medicine, when there are much cheaper options available for the customer This is organized crime. This is racketeering

Video Transcript AI Summary
Brenzavvy, a drug similar to Jardiance or Farxiga, is not covered by insurance, prescribed by doctors, or carried by wholesalers because it is too cheap. Brenzavvy costs $60 at the speaker's pharmacy. Pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) deny coverage because Brenzavvy's low price prevents rebates. Farxiga and Jardiance cost insurance payers $1,000 upfront with a 40% rebate. An HHS report stated PBMs get 23% on average for brand meds. After rebates, Farxiga and Jardiance still cost $600, with PBMs earning $138. With 8,000,000 prescriptions a year, PBMs make $1,100,000,000 off those two drugs. The speaker claims PBMs keep Brenzavvy off their lists to avoid losing a billion dollars annually. The speaker believes affordable healthcare is impossible with PBMs involved. The speaker encourages listeners to use forestpark.pharmacy to save money and to inform their bosses about potential savings.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the most insane examples of why drugs cost so much is a drug called Brenzavvy. You almost certainly haven't heard of it, but you've probably heard of similar drugs like Jardiance or Farxiga. The reason you haven't heard of Brenzavvy though is because no insurance companies will cover it. Most doctors won't prescribe it and most wholesalers won't even carry it. When I tell you why our entire healthcare industry is turning its back on this proven drug in one of the most critical classes in existence, you are going to be furious. They are shunning Brenzavvy because it's too cheap. I'm not being hyperbolic or sensational. I mean it literally. At my pharmacy, Brenzavvy costs $60. When they took that price to the pharmacy benefits managers or PBMs, that's the people in charge of deciding what's covered on your insurance, they all said no because Brinzavvy can't do a rebate at a price that low. Farxiga and Jardiance, the other drugs in the SLGT two class with Brinzavvy cost insurance payers a thousand bucks each prescription upfront, then they get a big, probably like 40% rebate later. So that's a $400 rebate and that is a huge selling point for the PBMs to prove how important they are. But the PBMs get a piece of that rebate and they get a percentage of the final price. An HHS report from last year said that the PBMs get 23% on average for brand meds. After the rebate, Farxiga and Jardiance still cost $600. 23% of that is a $138 for the middleman. Those drugs get dispensed 8,000,000 times a year, which means the total they make in a year off of those two drugs is $1,100,000,000. They don't make the drug. They don't prescribe it. They don't dispense it. They don't sell it. They only have to do one thing to make that money. Keep Brenzavvy off their list. If they let in a drug that costs a tenth of the price and doesn't pay rebate, they literally lose a billion dollars a year. To me, that's the clearest example of why we will never get affordable health care in America as long as we have PBMs involved. They can't afford to save you money. That's why we fired the middleman. Go to forestpark.pharmacy to look at a price checker and transfer today to save. Then click the tell my boss button so I can explain how they're getting ripped off and how I can save them and you money. See you.
CultivateElevat
Posted - July 12, 2025 at 5:39 PM
Saved - July 16, 2025 at 1:58 AM

@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate

Ozempic? Breaks people's bones and makes patients for life. Eli Lily funded this product the same company who made the polio shot paralyzing millions. It's easier to get outside in the 🌞, clean up your diet, and remove wireless technology. https://t.co/ZzVX82jUlQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ozempic breaks people's bones. Pharmaceutical companies selling weight loss pills have side effects that include breaking people's bones. Instead of cleaning up their diet, eating organic, working out, getting rid of Wi Fi, and spending time in nature, people are going to pharmaceutical companies expecting results. When your bones break in half, it doesn't matter if you lose weight. Taking care of yourself and being healthy takes work. If you're concerned about weight loss, you should be concerned about what's in your house, what you're eating, the chemicals you're spraying all over your body, and the lotions you're putting all over your head. If you can't lose weight, it's probably your diet, and an all-organic diet can heal everything. Pharmaceutical companies poison people to gain weight, then sell them something to make them lose weight, which causes their bones to break, creating patients for life.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We said totally different topic. How do you feel about Ozempic? Ozempic breaks people's bones. So that's kind of how I feel about Ozempic. The thing is is when pharmaceutical companies are involved in selling you weight loss pills, you have to read all the side effects and the side effects include breaking people's bones. So what happens is instead of people just cleaning up their diet, eating organic, working out, getting rid of Wi Fi, spending times in nature, they are going to a pharmaceutical company expecting results. And when your bones break in half, I don't think it matters if you lose weight. So this is the issue, people want a quick fix but when you want to take care of yourself, want to be healthy, it takes work. Like I go outside every day and workout in 115 degrees and when I was at the beach in California, I'm running on the beach, I'm swimming, doing sprints, jumping up and down through the waves, it takes work. You cannot expect a pharmaceutical pill to do what you need and if you're concerned about weight loss you should be concerned about what's in your house, you should be concerned about what you're eating, the chemicals you're spraying all over your body, the lotions you're putting all over your head and shampoo and whatever it is. That's causing you to gain weight. And if you can't lose weight, it's probably your diet. You know and an all organic diet can heal everything. You know they just like I said they just want to sell people pharmaceutical pills and that's a big industry. They poison the people, got them you know to gain weight. Think about this. And then now they're gonna sell them something to make them lose weight but it's also gonna cause their bones to break in half which then creates patience for life because they got broken bones now.
newstart_2024
Posted - August 6, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Saved - August 6, 2025 at 10:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Medicine plays a crucial role in various health issues, but primary care needs to focus more on lifestyle changes rather than just prescribing medications. It's easier to write a prescription than to encourage patients to lose weight or change their habits, but this approach can lead to serious consequences. While medications like Ozempic are available, they shouldn't replace the need for teaching healthy habits. The healthcare system must shift to support real health through lifestyle choices, not just quick fixes. A revolution in patient care is necessary.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

"Medicine has a role in delivering babies, treating pneumonia, and handling trauma—but primary care must step up. It’s not just about writing scripts for cholesterol pills. Doctors should advocate for health, pushing patients to track calories, exercise, and make real lifestyle changes before reaching for the prescription pad." —Dr. Sabine Hazan, gastroenterologist, sheds light on a critical issue in modern healthcare. The easy way out? Writing a script for omeprazole instead of telling a patient to lose weight, quit caffeine, or cut alcohol. But that prescription has consequences—osteoporosis, C. diff infections, and masking the root problem. The hard truth? A 300-lb patient might need double the acid meds, but the real fix isn’t more pills—it’s weight loss. Yet, doctors are trapped in a system that rewards quick fixes over lasting change. Enter Ozempic. Doctors are desperate for tools that work because teaching patients to cook, exercise, and fast after indulgence isn’t scalable. Insurance will cover weight-loss drugs in full but only 3 nutritionist visits. Where’s the coverage for gym memberships? Workplace incentives? Should we mandate fitness? The system is broken. Real health isn’t just in a pill—it’s in the choices we enable patients to make. Time for a revolution.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Medicine is important for specific treatments, but primary care should emphasize lifestyle changes before prescribing medication. It's easier to prescribe drugs like omeprazole than to advise weight loss and dietary changes, but these medications can cause problems like osteoporosis or C. Diff. Overweight patients often need higher doses of medication, but weight loss should be the first step. Doctors may over-prescribe medication to allow patients to continue unhealthy habits, like eating steak. Instead, people should balance indulgences with healthier choices. Doctors may favor drugs like Ozempic because they offer a quick solution when lifestyle changes seem improbable. Insurance may cover weight loss medication but offer limited support for nutritionists. There should be incentives in the workplace to encourage exercise.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think medicine has a role for, you know, delivery of babies, you know, treating a pneumonia, surgery, appendix, trauma. I think medicine, you know, of the primary care needs to step it up a bit in that they need to not just give the cholesterol pills, ideally have a discussion with their patients and being that advocate of health to say, look, you can use an app and monitor whatever calories you're eating, and you can exercise, and I'm gonna make you do this before I write the prescription for the medication Speaker 1: that I love Speaker 0: because here's the thing I and I'm a gastroenterologist right it's much easier for me to write a prescription for omeprazole or pralosec or anti antacid for patient than to tell them lose weight, drop the coffee Sure. Stop the mint, stop the alcohol, stop the fatty food, elevate your bed. You know, it's much easier for me to write the prescription. Right? And and it's within the guidelines, etcetera. But here's the problem. That prescription is gonna run me a problem with maybe my patients are gonna get osteoporosis early. Maybe my patients are gonna develop C. Diff because now they've, you know, killed the they've they've alkalinized their stomach in a way and allowed microbes to go in that shouldn't have gone in that the stomach acid was needed for. Right? So a simple thing like, you know so I used to have patients that were you know 300 would show up in my clinic and they would need a lot more Prilosec than the normal like eighty milligrams twice a day because they're overweight they're three hundred pounds And I would say no, I want you to lose weight and then you come back to me with 10 pound weight loss and then we'll consider it. But here's the thing, if you don't do that and you keep riding the meds, you never, you know, you never fix the problem. Speaker 1: Right. I love your heart. Speaker 0: And and I have a problem with, you know, giving a pill to allow the person to eat a steak. You know? Change your change your diet. Like, you wanna eat the steak tonight, maybe what you do is you tomorrow, you're doing a cleansing or fasting or lemon juice for the day because you kind of, like, have to balance that overindulgence Yeah. With you know, of wine and alcohol, etcetera. Maybe calm down the gut the next day, right? Speaker 1: I think that's why doctors are so crazy about Ozempic and Ozempic like drugs because their hands have been tied in the past, now they finally have a tool that can get results. Because for them, it's just improbable that they're gonna help their patients learn how to cook, exercise, and all that out That's of Speaker 0: the key. Speaker 1: They're paying now, if you're at dose within three months, they're gonna pay in full for the weight loss medication. But they'll only pay for, usually, three sessions with a nutritionist with a $25 co pay only. Speaker 0: So the and and are they paying for the gym? Are we mandating should we start mandating people to go to the gym? You know? Yes. I mean, I think there should be, you know, incentives in the workplace.
Humanspective
Posted - October 19, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Saved - October 20, 2025 at 8:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that a Local Government warned residents and Australian Councils about alleged DNA contamination in Pfizer/Moderna mRNA vials (peer‑reviewed). The State Government dissolved the local council and cancelled elections after questions about Big Pharma. In WA, Port Hedland faced dissolution; the TGA is funded largely by Big Pharma. Buckhaults claims DNA contamination in Pfizer vaccines, with "Process 1" vs "Process 2." Other posts critique policy makers and Big Pharma.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

Unbelievable. Local Government passed a Worlds First motion warning residents and Australian Councils about DNA contamination of Pfizer/Moderna covid mRNA vials (peer reviewed research). The State Government responded by cancelling their elections and dissolving the local council. Adrian McCrae speaking at MEHA in the European Union: "Last month my entire local government in Australia was sacked and dissolved and we had our elections cancelled. Why? Because as a tier of Australian government we dared to ask uncomfortable questions, that embarrassed the Australian federal government and their cozy relationship with Big Pharma." The local Government of a small town in Western Australia (W.A), Port Hedland, put the TGA and the Federal Government and the Prime Minister of Australia, Anthony Albanese on Notice. W.A Labor Minister for Local Government Hannah Beazley, who PM Anthony Albanese calls a "Friend", has recently appeared on Legacy media channels targeting small government, and according to McCrae was involved in dissolving the Port Hedland council and cancelled their elections. The TGA, which was indirectly instituted in response to tragedies like Thalidomide, receives 95% of its funding from Big Pharma.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Twelve months ago, my local government in Port Hedland, Western Australia moved and passed a motion demanding the prime minister, the state leaders, health ministers across the country validate what is now verified science, and we demanded a suspension of the mRNA injections that Australians' mRNA COVID injections are dangerously contaminated with foreign DNA contaminations and foreign DNA fragments. Now this Australian local government action has now been successfully followed and replicated in towns and cities all across Australia. We've also had over 200,000,000 views on our on social media of our council meeting. This put some serious pressure on the Australian TGA, which is Australia's drug regulation body akin to Europe's EMA or the FDA in The USA. For those of you who don't know, the Australian drug regulator, the receives around about 95 of its funding from big pharma. It's like regulatory capture on steroids. To make matters worse, the unelected bureaucrats who approve or deny applications for new drugs or medical interventions have no legislative requirement to declare any conflicts of interest. So when over 90% of the TGA's budget is supported by industry it regulates and when the conflicts of interest of those marketing drug approval decisions is hidden, is it any wonder in the West that we've lost our faith in our health institutions? Only in Australia could a regulator funded by the industry it regulates still call itself impartial with a straight face. I tell you this story to point out the inherent risks that we all face in speaking truth to power. Last month, my entire local government in Australia was sacked and dissolved and we had our elections canceled. Why? Because as a tier of Australian government, we dared to ask uncomfortable questions that embarrassed the Australian federal government and their cozy relationship with big pharma.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, Maria. Adrian McCray from Australia. Twelve months ago, my local government in Port Hedland, Western Australia moved and passed a motion demanding the prime minister, the state leaders, health ministers across the country validate what is now verified science, and we demanded a suspension of the mRNA injections that Australians' mRNA COVID injections are dangerously contaminated with foreign a foreign DNA con contaminations and foreign DNA fragments. Now this Australian local government action has now been successfully followed and replicated in towns and cities all across Australia. We've also had over 200,000,000 views on our on social media of our council meeting. This put some serious pressure on the Australian TGA, which is Australia's drug regulation body akin to Europe's EMA or the FDA in The USA. For those of you who don't know, the Australian drug regulator, the receives around about 95 of its funding from big pharma. It's like regulatory capture on steroids. To make matters worse, the unelected bureaucrats who approve or deny applications for new drugs or medical interventions have no legislative requirement to declare any conflicts of interest. So when over 90% of the TGA's budget is supported by industry it regulates and when the conflicts of interest of those marketing drug approval decisions is hidden, is it any wonder in the West that we've lost our faith in our health institutions? Only in Australia could a regulator funded by the industry it regulates still call itself impartial with a straight face. I tell you this story to point out the inherent risks that we all face in speaking truth to power. Last month, my entire local government in Australia was sacked and dissolved and we had our elections canceled. Why? Because as a tier of Australian government, we dared to ask uncomfortable questions that embarrassed the Australian federal government and their cozy relationship with big pharma.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

“The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with Plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA...it's got bits of DNA in it [and I know] because I sequenced it in my own lab” Phillip Buckhaults, PhD Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Professor of Molecular Biology & Genetics https://t.co/mSIssVOknM

Video Transcript AI Summary
Philip Buchholz, a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology and cancer genomics researcher at the University of South Carolina, describes himself as an expert on how the human genome can be altered and which alterations cause cancer. He emphasizes his skill in DNA sequencing and detecting foreign DNA pieces at very low levels, noting that his lab used these abilities during the pandemic to invent the spit-based COVID test. He asserts that the Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA, not just mRNA, and that this DNA is the DNA vector used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when producing the mRNA. He claims to have proven this by sequencing in his own lab. Regarding evidence in Columbia, he says a colleague in the College of Pharmacy was in charge of the vaccination program and kept every vial, including empty ones with a small amount left at the bottom. He states he received these vials and examined two batches from Columbia by sequencing, sequencing all the DNA in the vaccine to determine its content, and notes it is surprising that any DNA is present at all. He asserts this DNA can be identified and the mechanism of its presence inferred, and that he is alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it. He explains that this DNA could cause rare but serious side effects, including death from cardiac arrest, noting there are cases of suspicious death after vaccination and that DNA is a plausible mechanism. He argues that this DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that were transfected with the vaccine, describing it as a permanent fixture in the cell and in its progeny indefinitely. He says this makes the DNA different from RNA because it can be permanent, posing a real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells like stem cells, and potentially causing a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. He adds that while autoimmunity is not his field, the cancer risk is within his purview and it is a possibility.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Name is Philip Buchholz. Have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically, do cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina. What that means is that I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get futzed with during your lifetime and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't. Okay. So technically, that means that I'm very, very skilled in in the art of DNA sequencing. Okay. I can figure out the sequence of things that I didn't know what I was looking for. And I'm also pretty good when I say I, I mean the people in my laboratory, you're not gonna hear their names, but there's a group of people that do this excellent work. We're really good at at, detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they're not supposed to be, even if they're real low levels. And we used those skills during the pandemic. We invented the COVID test that many of you did the spit test. Okay? That came out of my lab because we were really good at that kind of stuff. The Pfizer, vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA. It's got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Columbia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy. Pharmacy. And for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to me, and I looked at We had two batches that were given out here in Columbia and I checked these two batches and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine and I can see what is in there. And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out what it is and how it got there. And I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, both in terms of human health and biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there. So this DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. There's a lot of cases now of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's hard to prove what caused associated. And this DNA is a plausible mechanism. Okay? This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in, We pour it onto cells, and and a lot of it gets into the cells, and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells, and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's it's different from RNA because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long lived somatic cells, like stem cells, and it could cause theoretically that it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer. The autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse. I'm not an immunologist, but the cancer risk is. That's my bag. I know this is a thing, and it is a possibility.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

Pfizer's "Bait and Switch". Pfizer's mRNA covid 'vaccine' clinical trial participants got the cleaner "Process 1" Billions of humans Globally were injected with "Process 2", where DNA contamination and SV40 sequences were introduced into the vials https://t.co/pyma32bKh1

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is not conspiracy theory. This has been published in the BMJ by Retzaf Levy, and they go through this process: one where they ran these vaccines in the trial and how they changed that when they decided to go and inject the rest of the world. This is traditionally a mortal sin in vaccine manufacturing or in any sort of biologic manufacturing. The process is the product. You change the process, you have to go through trials again. And the EMA even asked them to do that, although they failed to. They asked for another trial of 250 people once they changed the process and that data was never delivered. So this bait and switch is very important for you to understand why the trial data is of absolute zero consequence to what we're actually seeing in the field. Those numbers are a caricature of what they're actually doing with these injections. They know something. Pfizer very early on they had the data on this from their trial, they knew this was going to happen and they quickly went out and acquired cancer companies. They put $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and they put $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium was focused on blood cancers that have a CD one forty seven marker on them. Okay? That is one of the markers that is known to be involved in COVID. So, they have a very interesting window on those malignancies and, they're buying up the cancer companies that are probably gonna play the biggest role in benefiting from the mess that they've created. So, in summary, the Pfizer vaccines on the market are not the same formulation as what was tested in the clinical trials. This is a big bait and switch and it's a fraud. So you can't believe anything they're saying about the vaccine efficiency, which we have seen even those numbers decay over time. This is probably why. They're not really what they trialed. They gave you something different. There is significant DNA contamination that's found. Like, 10 out of 11 studies have found this, and the ones that haven't found it have some financial conflicts. So, I think the consensus is out. 10 out of 10 out of 10 of the real studies, are finding this. Several are through peer review, which have not been easy to get through peer review. The peer review journals do not like these papers. They get beat around in peer review for months to years, but they're making their way out now. There is also significant DNA contamination now found in five peer reviewed studies that were not looking at this. They were looking at people's blood and tissue and it was accidentally in there. Other people had to go sleuth it out. We've got cancer on the rise and there's several papers that report cancer post vaccination. Like, right at the site of injection, they'll see neoplasms. Alright? There is there's something going on here. This can't be ignored saying it's a coincidence anymore. Now this is these are liability free and they're often mandated. Okay? This may be the largest carcinogenic hit ever to the human population. And we have these on childhood schedules. We're giving these to pregnant women. This has gone absolutely off the rails.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is not conspiracy theory. This has been published in the BMJ by Retzaf Levy, and they go through this process one where they where they ran these vaccines in the trial and how they changed that when they decided to go and inject the rest of the world. This is traditionally a mortal sin in vaccine manufacturing or in any sort of biologic manufacturing. The process is the product. You change the process, you have to go through trials again. And the EMA even asked them to do that, although they failed to. They asked for another trial of 250 people once they changed the process and that data was never delivered. So this bait and switch is very important for you to understand why the trial data is of absolute zero consequence to what we're actually seeing in the field. Those numbers are a caricature of what they're actually doing with these injections. They know something. Pfizer very early on they had the data on this from their trial, they knew this was going to happen and they quickly went out and acquired cancer companies. They put $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and they put $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium was focused on blood cancers that have a c d one forty seven marker on them. Okay? That is one of the markers that is known to be involved in COVID. So, they have a very interesting window on those malignancies and, they're buying up the cancer companies that are probably gonna play the biggest role in benefiting from the mess that they've created. So, in summary, the Pfizer vaccines on the market are not the same formulation as what was tested in the clinical trials. This is a big bait and switch and it's a fraud. So you can't believe anything they're saying about the vaccine efficiency, which we have seen even those numbers decay over time. This is probably why. They're not really what they trialed. They gave you something different. There is significant DNA contamination that's found. Like, 10 out of 11 studies have found this, and the ones that haven't found it have some financial conflicts. So, I think the consensus is out. 10 out of 10 out of 10 of the real studies, are finding this. Several are through peer review, which have not been easy to get through peer review. The peer review journals do not like these papers. They get they get beat beat around in peer review for months to years, but they're they're making their way out now. There is also significant DNA contamination now found in five peer reviewed studies that were not looking at this. They were looking at people's blood and tissue and it was accidentally in there. Other people had to go sleuth it out. We've got cancer on the rise and there's several papers that report cancer post vaccination. Like like, right at right at the site of injection, they'll see neoplasms. Alright? There is there's something going on here. This can't be ignored saying it's a coincidence anymore. Now this is these are liability free and they're often mandated. Okay? This may be the largest carcinogenic hit ever to the human population. And we have these on childhood schedules. We're giving these to pregnant women. This has gone absolutely off the rails.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

@senorameredith I think it's a symptom of complete cognitive dissonance and belief in Big Pharma from policy makers

@Humanspective - Humanspective

@TonyWil93639204 I hear you....just trying to make it easier for people.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

@Zobbie137 Absolutely

karma44921039
Posted - January 27, 2026 at 10:48 AM
Saved - January 28, 2026 at 6:25 AM

@karma44921039 - karma

The pharmaceutical companies are ran like a mafia. https://t.co/RZoY1sixew

alizaeteri
Posted - March 6, 2026 at 9:16 PM
Saved - March 7, 2026 at 12:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explain how the Sackler brothers turned Purdue Pharma into a lethal empire: marketing opioids, financing doctors, pushing “pain” as a crisis, and masking addictiveness. Overdose deaths exploded while they evaded real punishment, hid wealth offshore, and funded Israeli causes and museums to whitewash crimes. They used philanthropy to shield them; the system protected them. Their template now echoes in other drugs.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

THE DEADLIEST FAMILY IN AMERICAN HISTORY No guns. No bombs. Just pills. 1,000,000+ Americans killed. More than 9/11 and every U.S. war combined. Funded pro-Israel empires from American death and addiction. And they were never punished. Meet the Jewish Sackler family A thread 🧵🧵🧵

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

So who are they? The Sacklers were 3 Jewish brothers, Arthur, Mortimer, and Raymond. Sons of immigrants in Brooklyn who became doctors in the 1940s. Trained as psychiatrists. Arthur was the mastermind. A psychiatrist. A businessman. And a marketing genius. He never touched OxyContin, but he invented the playbook.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

In 1952, they bought Purdue Frederick, a small company. Renamed Purdue Pharma… they turned it into a monster. They bought off the medical system. They hijacked U.S. healthcare. They rebranded pain. And they made billions off addiction, overdoses, and death. All while being called "philanthropists."

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

In the 1950s, Arthur Sackler revolutionized pharmaceutical ads. He turned doctors into sales reps. He pioneered direct-to-physician marketing. He sold Valium like candy and it became America's first billion-dollar drug. That was just the beginning.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

Arthur died in 1987. A year later, his brothers launched a new drug: OxyContin. A "miracle painkiller" with a secret: It was HIGHLY addictive. But Purdue Pharma, owned by the Sacklers, claimed it wasn't. That lie built their empire.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

How did they get away with it? They flooded the market with paid doctors, fake studies, and junk science. 🔹Claimed less than 1% addiction risk 🔹Bribed pain organizations 🔹Pushed for "pain as the 5th vital sign" 🔹Trained doctors to overprescribe It worked.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

Since 1999, over 1 million drug overdose deaths in the US, with opioids driving most. CDC says nearly 645,000 opioid deaths alone by 2021 That's more Americans than WWII battle deaths. That's more than 9/11. More than every war since Vietnam combined. It is a silent genocide ! The Sacklers didn't just kill… They normalized mass chemical dependency.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

Purdue lobbied Congress, donated to pols. FDA officials who approved Oxy later got pharma jobs. Ties to Afghan poppy fields? US invasion in 2001 boosted opium production… raw material for opioids. Coincidence? Or part of a Zionist network protecting and expanding their empire?

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

Purdue made over $35 billion from OxyContin. The Sacklers cashed out billions. They hid it in offshores. Moved money to trusts. Renounced U.S. citizenship. And all while overdoses surged in towns across the country.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

Sacklers donated heavily to Israeli causes, pro-Israel groups and tens of millions to Israeli institutions. The biggest example was the Sackler Faculty of Medicine at Tel Aviv University. The faculty carried the Sackler name for decades until 2023, when the university removed it after pressure related to the opioid crisis. While America bled from opioids, they donate the profits on Israel.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

But even in America… They weren't treated like drug lords. The family hid behind "philanthropy." Donated millions to museums like the Met, Louvre… They were treated like royalty. Named buildings: 🔹Harvard 🔹Yale 🔹Guggenheim 🔹Smithsonian 🔹The Louvre They bought cultural prestige with American blood money.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

Then… Lawsuits piled up: Thousands from states, cities, families. Even after the lawsuits, the Sacklers never went to prison. Purdue filed bankruptcy in 2019. The family paid a few billion in fines without admitting guilt. No handcuffs. No trials. No accountability. Justice? Bought and buried.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

This is the real deep state: Families like Sacklers, Rothschilds… profiting off our destruction, protected by the system. America has a "war on drugs" But when they flood the country with lethal narcotics? It's "healthcare innovation." It's "pain management." It's "philanthropy."

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

This wasn't a bug in the system. It IS the system. From Big Pharma to hospitals From the FDA to the media From politicians to universities They all fed off the opioid empire. It was never just Purdue.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

The Sacklers didn't just create addicts. They created a template. Now it's statins. SSRIS. ADHD meds. Anxiety pills. Weight loss shots. They showed Big Pharma the playbook: Create the disease. Sell the "cure“ Profit off both.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

They stole lives. They bought silence. They laundered death into reputation. But now the name is toxic. Museums are removing it. Students are protesting it. Even Netflix made a series about it. But it's too late for millions.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

Remember this: The most dangerous criminals wear suits. They don't run from the law. They write it. And they don't destroy countries with bullets… They do it with pills and vaccines.

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

The Sacklers weren't alone. They were just the most obvious. Big Pharma is full of them. And they still run the show. Wake up!

@alizaeteri - Ali Zaeteri

I send free weekly reports every Sunday. It you want more clear explanations, join my email list. Link in my bio.

View Full Interactive Feed