reSee.it - Related Post Feed

WSBChairman
Posted - September 6, 2023 at 9:30 PM
Saved - September 7, 2023 at 6:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The 50 richest members of Congress possess a combined net worth of $4.8B. Their annual salary of $174k would require 27,500 years of work to reach that wealth. It's alarming how those in high government positions exploit power for personal financial gain. We must question how we allow this to persist.

@WSBChairman - Chairman

The combined net worth of the 50 richest members of Congress is $4.8 Billion. With an annual salary of $174k, they would have to work 27,500 years to earn that much money. The highest positions of our government, on both sides of the aisle, are abusing their power for personal financial gain. How are we allowing this to happen?

WSBChairman
Posted - September 7, 2023 at 8:20 PM
Saved - September 8, 2023 at 6:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell's combined net worth skyrocketed from 44 million to 360 million since their election. Despite earning 193k annually, they outperformed the stock market and hedge funds. Exploiting their authority, they engaged in insider trading and secretive deals. Remarkably, both over 80, they hold influential positions while most retirees their age step back. To combat such corruption, enforcing term limits for Congress members is crucial. It's time to say "enough" to these career politicians.

@WSBChairman - Chairman

Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell were only worth $4.4 million when elected to Congress. Today, they are worth a combined $360 million. So, with an annual salary of only $193k, how did they increase their net worth by a staggering 8081.82%? They abused their authority as the most influential members of Congress to solicit insider information and negotiate backroom deals, outperforming the stock market and top hedge funds. Nearly 100% of Americans age 80 or higher are retired, yet Pelosi and McConnell, who are both over 80, continue to hold some of the most powerful positions in the world. Corrupt career politicians like this can be eliminated by enforcing term limits for members of Congress. When is enough enough?

ElonMuskAOC
Posted - September 15, 2023 at 6:04 PM
Saved - September 16, 2023 at 4:17 AM

@ElonMuskAOC - Elon Musk (Parody)

Congress members annual salary and net worth… Nancy Pelosi Annual salary: $223,000 Net worth: $202 million Mitch McConnell Annual salary: $200,000 Net worth: $95 million How does this make any sense at all? Trading stocks should not be allowed for them or their spouses. It’s horrible.

@WatcherGuru - Watcher.Guru

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US Congressman introduces plan to ban Congress & their spouses from trading stocks.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I propose a 5 point plan to reform our government. Firstly, we should prohibit PAC and lobbyist money in congressional campaigns, as I personally do not accept any of it. Secondly, we must ban stock trading by members of Congress and prevent them from becoming lobbyists. Notable activists and organizations like Unusual Whales, Quiver Quantitative, and CREW support this cause. Thirdly, we need term limits for both members of Congress and Supreme Court Justices. Lastly, an ethics code should be established for Supreme Court Justices. These changes are necessary and demanded by the people. It's time for bipartisan support to restore our government. Thank you, Madam Speaker.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That is why I'm introducing a 5 point plan. 1st, ban all PAC and lobbyist money to congressional campaigns. I don't take a dime of it. Second, ban completely stock trading and members of Congress from ever becoming lobbyists, Activists like Unusual Whales, Quiver Quantitative, and the leaders at CREW have been mobilizing for this. 3rd, term limits for members of Congress, 4th, term limits for Supreme Court Justices, and 5th, an ethics code for Supreme Court Justices. This is common sense. The people demand it. It's time we give them back their government and we reform in Washington. We should have bipartisan support for this 5 point plan. Thank you, Madam Speaker. I yield back.
Gapeach_3102
Posted - October 9, 2023 at 11:14 AM
Saved - October 9, 2023 at 12:49 PM

@Gapeach_3102 - Peach

Letitia James Net Worth is $15 Million with an Annual income of $4 million... Other income: $3.9 Million Stock portfolio: $2.6 million Salary: $103,375 per year She's not the only DemOcRaT whose net worth is more than they earn Shouldn't this be investigated?

Liberacrat_
Posted - November 1, 2023 at 7:36 PM
Saved - November 8, 2023 at 2:28 PM

@Liberacrat_ - Liberacrat™️

@NewYorkStateAG Someone should investigate you and your family’s “fraudulent business operations” as there’s no way a “public servant” making a $200K/yr salary boasts a net worth of over $15M+, considering the fact that you were barely worth $100K in 2010. What did you do in 13 years? 🧐 https://t.co/pMzi32omWq

WallStreetSilv
Posted - August 30, 2024 at 5:20 AM
Saved - August 30, 2024 at 5:36 AM

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

It’s funny how Congress doesn’t know how to balance the federal budget, but somehow many of them are multi-millionaire stock traders. 🔊 https://t.co/dfKbRbxZEK

RickyDoggin
Posted - November 30, 2024 at 8:53 PM
Saved - December 2, 2024 at 2:34 PM

@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes

In 2021, Nancy Pelosi was asked if Congress should be banned from trading stocks. Her Response: "No… This is a free market." While serving 37 years in Congress with an annual salary of $223,500, she increased her net worth to an estimated $263,000,000. https://t.co/NZneNs1CGi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Should Congress members and their spouses be prohibited from trading individual stocks while in office? I'm not sure about that. We have a duty to report stock trades, but I'm not familiar with the five-month review process. If individuals aren't reporting, they should be held accountable. However, we live in a free market economy, and people should have the right to participate in it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Should members of Congress and their spouses be banned from trading individual stocks while they're in Congress? No, I don't know to the second one. Any we have a responsibility to report in the stock on the stock, but I don't I'm not familiar with that 5 month review. But if people aren't reporting, they should be. Why don't they take it? Because this is a free market and people we have a free market economy. They should be able to participate in that.
01Funkytown
Posted - November 30, 2024 at 11:35 PM
Saved - December 2, 2024 at 2:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just learned that Nancy Pelosi made 3 million dollars in just 3 hours from insider trading and has profited 4 million on a single trade. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and mansions worth over 5 million each. It's time for senators to pass a bill banning congressional stock trading.

@01Funkytown - .*Funkytown™*.

Nancy Pelosi made 3 MILLION DOLLARS in 3 hours of insider trading. She’s also made 4 MILLION DOLLRS on a single trade. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and mansions worth over $5 MILLION a piece. Senators must pass a bill to ban congressional stock trading and prevent members from profiting from insider knowledge.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nancy Pelosi reportedly made $3 million in just three hours, which is 17 times her annual salary. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and multiple properties valued over $5 million each. It would take an average person 27 years to earn that amount. This suggests that her primary motivation for being in Congress is financial gain, and she appears to excel at it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nancy Pelosi just made $3,000,000 in 3 hours. That's 17 times her annual salary. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and multiple states worth over $5,000,000 apiece. It would take you 27 years to make that much money. She is only in congress to get rich, and she is very good at it.
liz_churchill10
Posted - December 21, 2024 at 11:16 AM
Saved - December 22, 2024 at 7:51 PM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Nancy Pelosi has a net worth $272M…and still took out a $1.7M ‘Covid Loan’…which was forgiven. While she received this loan…she showcased her $24K fridge. https://t.co/St82f096cv

Chicago1Ray
Posted - February 5, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 11:41 PM

@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

Maxine Waters lives in a $4.6M dollar mansion, has a net worth of over $5.3M on a Govt salary of $174K a year, and paid her daughter $100K a year for (10) yrs Do you think Pam Bondi should look into how she managed this while representing one of the poorest dist in California https://t.co/MUZccFSiJb

Video Transcript AI Summary
A lot of people are willing to accept a dishonorable person, someone convicted of felonies, openly racist, and who has expressed admiration for controversial leaders. Why has America voted for him? It boils down to racism. People don't like discussing it, but the majority of votes come from whites who believe in "taking the country back" from minorities who are succeeding and closing the wealth gap. It's about white versus other, not the economy. I believe that the majority of Americans will buy into anything that gives them an advantage and ensures they don't have to worry about others being equal. Regarding claims of an expanded base including more black and Latino voters, I'm skeptical, especially about the increase in black votes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The majority are basically whites in this country willing to accept a dishonorable human being, someone who has been convicted, of 34 felonies, someone who has been openly and brazenly racist, someone who has, you know, talked about, his love for Putin and, Kim Jong un and made some statements favorable to Hitler. It doesn't matter. Speaker 1: This is all why you don't like him, but why has America voted for him? Speaker 0: Racism is the the basic point. People don't like to talk about racism. But the fact of the matter is the majority of his votes are going to come from whites. And that's who has been talking to all campaign about taking the country back, taking it back from whom, taking it back from too many minorities who are doing too well, who are succeeding, who are closing the wealth gap, and something has to be done in his, estimation. And so that's what it's really all about. It's not about the economy and all that, you know, people would like to basically hide behind. It's about white versus other. Speaker 2: Just a quick reminder in between this rage, guys. Don't forget to like the video if you haven't already. It does help me enormously. And if you haven't subscribed to the channel already, you're welcome to do so. Let's get back to it. Speaker 1: But, yeah, you know, it's looking possible tonight that Donald Trump has won the popular vote. Are you are you saying that the majority of Americans are racist? Speaker 0: I'm saying the majority of, the Americans will buy into anything as long as they believe that somehow they will have more advantage, they will have more ownership, that they don't have to worry about others who will be equal to them. You can call it what you want, but that's the way it is. Speaker 3: It looks, congressman Walters, as if he's expanded his base to include more black voters, more Latino voters, more people of color this time around. I mean, not more than Harris, but more than last time around. Doesn't that fight your theory? Speaker 0: Well, I don't know. We've gotta wait and see. I don't know what the expansion is. There may be some expansion in the Latino community, but, all this talk about getting black votes, I don't think it's true. Speaker 4: I I I just say really quickly too. Democrats need to be mature, and they need to be honest. And they need to say, yes. There is there's misogyny. But it's not just misogyny from white men. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 4: It's misogyny from Hispanic men. Right. It's misogyny from black men. Things we've all been talking about who do not want a woman leading them. Might be race issues with
elonmusk
Posted - February 9, 2025 at 2:27 PM
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 12:44 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Sounds very fishy

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨EX-USAID CHIEF SAMANTHA POWER’S NET WORTH SKYROCKETS—FROM $6.7M TO $30M ON A $180K SALARY Samantha Power, Biden’s ex-USAID chief, saw her wealth explode while earning just $180K per year. Where did the extra $23.3M come from? And all of this in just 3 years! USAID oversees billions in global funding—was she cashing in? The public deserves answers. Follow the money. Source: vBulletin, Inside Biden's Basement

BehizyTweets
Posted - February 11, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 10:17 PM

@BehizyTweets - George

BREAKING: President Trump & Elon Musk will now look into federal officials who end up being worth MILLIONS despite lower salaries. Maybe we can start with all the members of Congress who somehow instantly become multi-millionaires on 200k a year. https://t.co/5yNA4Su220

Video Transcript AI Summary
We've uncovered some unusual financial discrepancies. Several individuals in bureaucratic positions with modest salaries have amassed tens of millions of dollars in net worth. One example involves a woman who walked away with approximately $30,000,000. We're curious about the source of this wealth. Perhaps they are skilled investors, but it seems more likely that they are enriching themselves at the expense of taxpayers. We are investigating to determine how this occurred.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And also, could you mention some of the things that your team has found, some of the crazy numbers including the woman that walked away with about 30,000,000, etcetera? Speaker 1: Well, we we we we do find it sort of rather odd that, you know, there there are quite a few people in in in the bureaucracy who who have a, ostensibly, a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars but somehow managed to accrue tens of millions dollars in net worth, while they are in that position, which is, you know, what what happened to USAID. We're just curious as to where it came from. Maybe they're very good at investing. They in which case, we should take their investment advice, perhaps. But, just there seems to be mysteriously they they get wealthy. We don't know why. Where does it come from? And, I think the reality is that they're getting wealthy at detached fair expense. That's that's the that's the honest truth of it. So, you know, we we're looking at, say, well, we we we just
nicksortor
Posted - February 12, 2025 at 5:02 AM
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 3:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I asked Elizabeth Warren about her $12M net worth on a $200K salary, which caught Elon Musk's attention. Today, he announced in the Oval Office that DOGE will investigate public officials with high net worths and low pay. Finally, our government is listening to us! We are the media now.

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 YESTERDAY: I asked Elizabeth Warren HOW she achieved a $12M net worth on a $200K salary, prompting a reply from Elon inquiring as well TODAY: @ElonMusk announces in the Oval Office DOGE will be investigating public officials with high net worths and low pay Our government FINALLY listens to US! 🇺🇸 WE ARE THE MEDIA NOW.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Warren, I'm curious about your financial background. How did you manage to accumulate a $12 million net worth while earning a $200,000 salary in Congress? Could you explain how you achieved that? Excuse me, I'm simply asking a question and would appreciate it if you didn't obstruct my camera. We are on a public sidewalk.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator Warren, this is my answer question. How did you get a $12,000,000 net worth on a $200,000 salary in congress? Thank you. How did you do that? Excuse me. How did you do that? You didn't keep trying to block my camera. We're on public sidewalk. So
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's strange to see bureaucrats with modest salaries somehow accumulate tens of millions in net worth during their service. Take USAID, for example. We wonder how they became so wealthy while in their positions. Maybe they're just brilliant investors, and we should seek their advice! But, in reality, it seems they are getting rich at the expense of taxpayers. We're looking into this.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, also, could you mention some of the things that your team has found, some of the crazy numbers including the woman that walked away with about 30,000,000, Speaker 1: etcetera? Well, we we we are we do find it sort of rather odd that, you know, there there are quite a few people in in in the bureaucracy who who have a ostensibly a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars, but somehow managed to accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth, while they are in that position, which is, you know, what what happened to USAID. We're just curious as to where it came from. Maybe they're very good at investing. They, in which case, we should take their investment advice perhaps. But, just there seems to be mysteriously they they get wealthy. We don't know why. Where did it come from? And, I think the reality is that they're getting wealthy at the taxpayer expense. That's that's the that's the honest truth of it. So, you know, we're looking at, say, well, we we we would just

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@nicksortor Has anyone tracked how she got $12M from a $200k salary? This is a real question.

CollinRugg
Posted - February 20, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Saved - February 21, 2025 at 2:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Rep. Jasmine Crockett expressed her lack of support for the DOGE dividend, questioning the impact of an extra $5000. It seems she believes it means little to her personally. In response, I've been blocked.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

NEW: Rep. Jasmine Crockett says she does *not* support the DOGE dividend, says she doesn't know what an extra $5000 is going "to do for you." They're falling right into the trap. Remarkable. https://t.co/eTiuUGUuzj

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump is lying about wanting to give savings back to Americans as a dividend. He had nothing to do with the $1,200 refunds during COVID; that was done by a Democratic house and senate. Now, they'll claim they want to give refunds, but Congress won't allow it because there's no money. Those refunds happened during a unique time, a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic. However, with Ebola detected in New York and the disregard for scientists, experts, vaccines, and medicine, we risk facing multiple future pandemics due to incompetence. We aren't in the business of giving out money, and I doubt $5,000 would make a significant difference anyway.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Trump says he likes the idea of giving some of the savings from Doge back to Americans as kind of a dividend. Would you support that? Listen. He's just telling a lie. He's not the one that had anything to do with the $1,200 refunds that people had during the midst of COVID that was done by a Democratic house and Democratic senate. Right now, what they're going to do is say, hey. We want to give you a refund, but congress won't let us because they already know that there's just no money for that. The only reason that those refunds came before was because we were living in different times. This was a time in which hopefully we won't ever go through again. We had a once in a lifetime pandemic. The bad part is that I don't know if it's once in a lifetime because we know that Ebola, unfortunately, was detected right here in New York, here recently. And if we continue down this road of getting rid of scientists or deciding that we don't want to rely on experts as it relates to what they're telling us to do, or we don't want to deal with vaccines and medicine in this country, then we may be facing not only our next pandemic, but our next two, three, or four pandemics because of their incompetence. So no, we are not in the business of giving out money. And honestly, I don't know what $5,000 will do for you.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

What she meant to say is that $5000 does nothing for *her.* https://t.co/GzYTIotGLC

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

I have been blocked. https://t.co/EZKD9ghjhm

elonmusk
Posted - February 23, 2025 at 2:53 AM
Saved - February 23, 2025 at 3:02 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Doesn’t add up

@Sadie_NC - Sadie

I am beginning to understand why they are fighting so hard to stop Elon. Something is very wrong here. https://t.co/mfg1HRRis0

TaraBull808
Posted - March 5, 2025 at 10:44 PM
Saved - March 7, 2025 at 1:37 AM

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

Elizabeth Warren salary: $285,000/yr Net worth: $67,000,000 Wants to stop YOU from finding out where your money goes. https://t.co/CNBiTZD9sY

Video Transcript AI Summary
Here's what Elon is up to. First, he signaled his intentions with the "CFPB RIP" tweet, followed by his team locking out CFPB staff. Now, he's pushing Congress to block a CFPB rule, which would give his payment app free rein without regulatory oversight, allowing him to potentially exploit users without consequences. But it's a three-part plan. Part one aimed to temporarily shut down financial watchdogs. Part two involves dismantling rules that would hold Elon accountable. Next week, Republicans will try to pass legislation enabling Elon to launch "X money" as a stablecoin, free from consumer protections, national security measures, and safeguards for financial stability. Essentially, they're paving the way for billionaires to control our money and payment systems, impacting the entire economy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it's pretty clear what Elon's play is here. He wasn't very subtle when he tweeted CFPB RIP. The next thing you know, his Doge team then locks the CFPB staff out of their own building. That was act one. Now he wants act two. He wants congress to block this CFPB rule. So what will Elon get out of it if the rule is blocked? Well, he will get a clear runway for his payment app without having to worry about whether there's a cop on the financial beat who would catch him if he rips off customers who use his new app. But this is really a three part play, not just a two part play. Act one was closing down the CFPB so that the financial cops were shut out at least for a while. Act two is the part we see now with Elon rolling back a rule that when the cops are back on the beat, a financial cop could use to use that rule to go after Elon if he breaks the law. Act three comes next week when Republicans try to move forward with legislation that will clear the decks for Elon to issue x money as his own stablecoin without any guardrails to protect consumers, to protect national security, or to protect the financial stability of our economy. Put simply, Republicans are setting the stage for the richest man in the world to issue his own currency that competes with the US dollar. Act one protected all the scammers. Act two protects the cash app scammers in particular. And act three, as currently drafted, will roll out the red carpet for Elon and Jeff and Mark and maybe a few other big tech billionaires to seize control of our money and payments, which underpins the entire economy.
elonmusk
Posted - March 6, 2025 at 10:23 PM
Saved - March 9, 2025 at 4:12 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Where did Senator Karen get $67 million?

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

Elizabeth Warren salary: $285,000/yr Net worth: $67,000,000 Wants to stop YOU from finding out where your money goes. https://t.co/CNBiTZD9sY

Video Transcript AI Summary
Here's what Elon is up to: First, he signaled his intentions by tweeting "CFPB RIP" and then locking CFPB staff out. Now, he's pushing Congress to block a CFPB rule, which would give his payment app a free pass without regulatory oversight. But it's a three-part plan. After weakening the CFPB, he's working to repeal a rule that could hold him accountable. Next, Republicans will try to pass legislation allowing him to issue "X money" as a stablecoin, free from consumer protection. This plan benefits scammers, especially those using cash apps. Ultimately, the goal is to enable tech billionaires like Elon, Jeff, and Mark to control our money and payments, potentially undermining the entire economy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it's pretty clear what Elon's play is here. He wasn't very subtle when he tweeted CFPB RIP. The next thing you know, his Doge team then locks the CFPB staff out of their own building. That was act one. Now he wants act two. He wants congress to block this CFPB rule. So what will Elon get out of it if the rule is blocked? Well, he will get a clear runway for his payment app without having to worry about whether there's a cop on the financial beat who would catch him if he rips off customers who use his new app. But this is really a three part play, not just a two part play. Act one was closing down the CFPB so that the financial cops were shut out at least for a while. Act two is the part we see now with Elon rolling back a rule that when the cops are back on the beat, a financial cop could use to use that rule to go after Elon if he breaks the law. Act three comes next week when Republicans try to move forward with legislation that will clear the decks for Elon to issue x money as his own stablecoin without any guardrails to protect consumers, to protect national security, or to protect the financial stability of our economy. Put simply, Republicans are setting the stage for the richest man in the world to issue his own currency that competes with the US dollar. Act one protected all the scammers. Act two protects the cash app scammers in particular. And act three, as currently drafted, will roll out the red carpet for Elon and Jeff and Mark and maybe a few other big tech billionaires to seize control of our money and payments, which underpins the entire economy.
CRRJA5
Posted - April 10, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Saved - April 11, 2025 at 12:49 PM

@CRRJA5 - 🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅

KABOOM 💥 .@megynkelly is calling out Barack Obama’s unexplained wealth, pointing out how a man who only spent 14 years in public office—most of it in modest government roles—somehow walked away with a fortune that appears to exceed $100 million! 😳 https://t.co/PJbIkEaz6i

Video Transcript AI Summary
Public reports estimate the Obamas' net worth at $70 million, acquired after Barack Obama's 14 years in political office, including time in the Illinois State Senate, the U.S. Senate, and two presidential terms. It is claimed he made almost or over $100 million. The Obamas reportedly own four luxury properties: a $20 million home in Martha's Vineyard, a Washington D.C. property bought for $8.1 million, a beachfront home in Hawaii bought for $8.7 million, and a Chicago home bought for $1.65 million. The speaker questions if this is more than the Obamas need.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How much is enough money according to the Obamas? Seventy million? Because public reports estimate that that is their net worth parlayed on the back of Barack Obama's fourteen years of holding political office. He did not spend fifty years in government service. He did a stint in the Illinois state senate. He did a couple years in the US senate before he ran for office in one. Alright? Then he did two terms as president. And off of that, he's made himself over a hundred million dollars, Almost a hundred million dollars, probably over, to be honest. We don't know all of the earnings. The Obamas reportedly own four, count them four, luxury properties. A home in Martha's Vineyard estimated to be worth some $20,000,000, in addition to properties in Washington DC reportedly bought for 8,100,000.0, a beachfront home in Hawaii reportedly bought for 8,700,000.0, and a home bought in Chicago for 1,650,000.00. Is that more than you need, mister Obama, missus Obama?
GenXGirl1994
Posted - April 17, 2025 at 12:43 PM
Saved - April 17, 2025 at 10:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been exploring the controversial figure known as Insurrection Barbie, or Irina Pavchinskaya-Cedano. Her past includes felony theft, disbarment, and fraud charges, leading to her rise as a social media influencer. Since her account's launch in August 2022, she has amassed a significant following, raising questions about the authenticity of her engagement. Many of her posts appear to be part of coordinated campaigns promoting Israel, often using deceptive tactics. The volume of her posts suggests possible automation, leading to further scrutiny of her influence and methods.

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

WHO IS INSURRECTION BARBIE🧵 Meet Irina Pavchinskaya-Cedano - 2017 Plead Guilty Felony Theft $2K - 2017 Disbarred - 2018 Fraud & Forgery Charges - 2020 Felony Theft $80K - 2022 Insurrection Barbie on X - 2024 Peddles Israel Propaganda - 2025 1M Followers & Reposted by @elonmusk

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

Sources: Charges: https://www.therecordnorthshore.org/2020/10/05/northfield-police-nab-two-for-embezzling-from-accounting-firm/ Turns herself into Police https://patch.com/illinois/winnetka/glenview-woman-turns-herself-2-felony-warrants-blotters Disbarred https://www.isba.org/barnews/2017/05/19/illinois-supreme-court-disbars-seven-suspends-nine-reprimands-three-censures-three Twitter Archive of oldest Post

Northfield Police nab two for embezzling from accounting firm - The Record A three-year theft investigation in Northfield concluded Thursday, Oct. 1, with the arrests of two women: Josefina Camacho, 38, of Chicago, and Irina Pavchinskaya-Cedano, 35, of Glenview. Camacho and Cedano reportedly in 2017 stole more than $83,000 from their employer, an accounting firm in the 400 block of Central Avenue in Northfield, according to Village […] therecordnorthshore.org
Disbarred Lawyer Turns Herself In On 2 Felony Warrants: Blotters Disbarred Lawyer Turns Herself In On 2 Felony Warrants: Blotters - Winnetka-Glencoe, IL - Winnetka, Glencoe, Northfield Police Blotters for the week of April 26 to May 2. patch.com
Illinois Supreme Court Disbars Seven, Suspends Nine, Reprimands Three, Censures Three | Illinois State Bar Association isba.org

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

How does one go from a lawyer to disbarred criminal to social media influencer & how much of her fraud is in play on X? Prior to Insurrection Barbie, Irina had 2 other accts:@yesisworldMary Alvirez Ppl who knew her under those accts recall lies & fake cancer claims 👇🏼Read & scroll up

@hippyresident - 𝕻𝖆𝖓𝖓𝖘𝖙𝖎𝖌𝖆𝖙𝖔𝖗

@mostlypeacefuI @Leerose1985 @KTRS2024 She was in some of my groups back in 2021-2022 too.

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

Insurrection Barbie’s oldest post is on August 18, 2022. Her first 3 posts garnered significant likes and reposts. Idk about you guys, but my first posts on X barely got any views let alone likes and reposts. So it’s very strange that on her first day, X users flocked to her https://t.co/YosdRVE7X9

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

In 1 month and only 12,700 followers, her posts were going viral with 11,500 likes & 4977 reposts. Are these bots or bought followers? Ppl who know her have said she used an app to buy followers. If anyone has screenshots of this information, please share in the comments. https://t.co/2QwMSpqrWo

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

Even more interesting is the volume of posts which average 1 post every 3 minutes since 8/18/2022. The “no DMs” note on her bio may just be because the account is operated by multiple ppl. It’s impossible for 1 person to post every 3 mins for 2.5 years. You would die w/o sleep.

@RedTeamActual - R E D

Okay, so questionable past Barbie over here and one of @elonmusk pets, has 429,000 posts since her account creation. Now, that’s pretty impressive to post every 3 minutes and to an impressive level of 436 posts per day since her account creation on August 2022. I don’t know about you but that’s some dedication right there 😆. I’ve talked about this before how this works and the use of automation bots and specific spam tools to churn posts every second if you wanted. Barbie’s account is nothing more than a narrative farmer.

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

Many of her posts are coordinated campaigns with other Israel propagandists. This is an example of her downplaying Israel lobby’s donations to elected officials by selectively posting the list of donations from FARA registered Israel lobby which is only 12 orgs. This is highly deceptive b/c it excludes most of the Israel lobby which does not registered under FARA. Nonetheless, this claim has been trending. Much bigger thread coming soon to expose the Israel lobby’s campaign to downplay their role by fabricating tales about Qatar’s role in our Gov & the army of paid influencers that spread this propaganda

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

🧵🧵 Very important thread about how Qatar is quietly transforming the American education system stating from Kindergarten and ending with Ivy League colleges: Qatar has made significant investments in American education, aiming to enhance its global influence and foster cross-cultural academic collaborations. These investments span various programs and initiatives, primarily focusing on establishing branch campuses of U.S. universities in Qatar and providing substantial financial contributions to American educational institutions

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

Thanks @hippyresident and @ZMTabloid for your help with this post.

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

@hippyresident @ZMTabloid Thank you for confirming. Case closed https://t.co/m8dHwEgLmV

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

@hippyresident @ZMTabloid FYI.

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

@OGChuckD @elonmusk Dude!! Thank you! If it wasn’t for this comment, I wouldn’t have gotten a screenshot of her post before she deleted it. https://t.co/TNs7YIVu6M

RepMTG
Posted - August 10, 2025 at 1:40 PM
Saved - August 10, 2025 at 3:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated with the slander against me for being unapologetically America First. I demand AIPAC register as a foreign lobbyist and refuse to support foreign aid funded by U.S. taxpayers. I’ve built my family’s construction business for over two decades and my wealth comes from that, not politics. My financial disclosures reflect my diverse investments managed by a fiduciary. Life was easier before Congress, and I’m proud of my success. I’m committed to ensuring my children can achieve the American dream just as I have.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I’m fed up with the outright slander and lies about me because I’m UNAPOLOGETICALLY AMERICA FIRST and I am demanding AIPAC register as a foreign lobbyist and I refuse to vote for U.S. taxpayers hard earned money fund foreign aid and foreign wars. I’ve owned my family’s construction business for well over two decades and made all of my net worth BEFORE I became a Member of Congress in 2021 and all of my Public financial disclosures show this. My publicly disclosed portfolio is diversely invested through a financial manager whom I’ve signed a fiduciary contract with. My hard earned wealth, that I am thankful and proud of HAS NOT in any way come from politics!!! As a matter of fact I made a hell of a lot more money and my life was WAY EASIER before I entered public life. I am so proud of my company’s success and hard work and there is not anyone who can shame me for being a successful business owner because thankfully I’ve lived the American dream!!! You can go to hell. I am FIGHTING to ensure that my children’s generation is able to do exactly what I have done!!! I’m fighting to preserve the AMERICAN DREAM!!!

@EYakoby - Eyal Yakoby

How does Marjorie Taylor Greene’s net worth go from $700,000 before she joined Congress to $21 million today? A congressional salary is only $174,000 per year. https://t.co/I31Ltz3B0T

BelannF
Posted - August 18, 2025 at 3:22 PM
Saved - August 19, 2025 at 1:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m concerned about politicians profiting from insider trading. For instance, Nancy Pelosi earns $174k annually but has a net worth of $413M. In 2024, her stock portfolio grew by 70%, surpassing all hedge funds. This raises questions about how she and others might be using their knowledge of upcoming legislation and government contracts to benefit financially before the information is public. It's crucial to address this issue to ensure fairness and integrity in our political system.

@BelannF - BelannF

WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE ABOUT POLITICIANS PROFITING OFF OF INSIDER TRADING? EXAMPLE: Pelosi makes $174k per year - yet she has a net worth of $413M” "In 2024 Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio grew by 70%, outperforming every single Hedge Fund." This is all done by Insider Trading, knowing what laws Congress is going to pass and which Corporations that will benefit (or sometimes harm), or major contracts the government is going to sign (or cancel), before the news reaches the markets or the general public.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The reason that this idea to put a ban on stock trading for members of congress is even a thing is because of Nancy Pelosi. She is is is rightfully criticized because she makes, think, a $174,000 a year, yet she has a net worth of approximately 413,000,000. In 2024, Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio, this was a fascinating statistic to me, grew 70% in one year in 2024. And her portfolio outperformed every single large hedge fund in that same year and even more than doubled the returns of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. As for the mechanics of the legislation and how it will move forward, the White House continues to be in discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The reason that this idea to put a ban on stock trading for members of congress is even a thing is because of Nancy Pelosi. I mean, she is is is rightfully criticized because she makes, think, a $174,000 a year, yet she has a net worth of approximately 413,000,000. In 2024, Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio, this was a fascinating statistic to me, grew 70% in one year in 2024. And her portfolio outperformed every single large hedge fund in that same year and even more than doubled the returns of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. So think the president stands with the American people on this. He doesn't wanna see people like Nancy Pelosi enriching themselves off of public service and ripping off their constituents in the process. As for the mechanics of the legislation and how it will move forward, the White House continues to be in discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill.
someonesom47381
Posted - December 19, 2025 at 4:31 AM
Saved - December 19, 2025 at 4:55 AM

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

Huh ,what repeat that again!? Pelosi OUTPERFORMS SOME TOP BILLIONAIRES!!! WHAT!? https://t.co/AAlVjzc4Sh

EricLDaugh
Posted - January 27, 2026 at 2:14 AM
Saved - January 27, 2026 at 9:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting that Ilhan Omar’s supposed winery allegedly jumped to $5 million in a year with no physical winery, no wine, a barely functioning site—scared, prosecute! And @bennyjohnson has them terrified.

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

🚨 HOLY CRAP. Ilhan Omar’s “winery” suspiciously surged in value from practically zero to $5 MILLION DOLLARS in a year — despite NO physical winery, phone line, social media, barely functioning website and *NO WINE* This is why she’s scared. PROSECUTE! https://t.co/JEatM5UK6x

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

@bennyjohnson has them TERRIFIED!

C_3C_3
Posted - January 27, 2026 at 4:28 PM
Saved - January 28, 2026 at 2:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Ilhan Omar’s net worth rising from -$65K in 2020 to $30 million in 2024, tied to The MEALS Act she introduced in 2020. From 2022 to today, Somalians charged with millions in fraud connected to The MEALS Act. Scam.

@C_3C_3 - C3

This might explain some things… Ilhan Omar’s net worth and The MEALS ACT: 2020: -$65K 2020: Ilhan Omar introduced The MEALS Act. 2021: $65K 2022: $115K 2023: $205K 2024: $30 million 2022 to today: Somalians charged with MILLIONS in fraud connected to The MEALS Act. Scam. https://t.co/fk29fjcH6a

WallStreetApes
Posted - April 13, 2026 at 11:00 AM
Saved - April 13, 2026 at 5:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
WOAH. Just days before Rep Ayanna Pressley’s swearing-in, her husband quit a $92k job to start a consulting firm. Net worth with assets reportedly jumped to $8M. Every time you see a politician with a 'consulting firm' it’s taxpayer money laundering.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 JUST DAYS before Democrat Rep Ayanna Pressley was sworn into Congress, her husband quit a $92,000 a year job TO START A CONSULTING FIRM Net worth with assets skyrocketed to $8 million Every time you see a politician with a ‘consulting firm’ its taxpayer money laundering https://t.co/GeAQ4DeniI

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fox News reports allege wealth increases among prominent progressive lawmakers. The segment claims Ilhan Omar is worth up to $30,000,000, noting she rose from negative net worth when first elected to Congress to substantial wealth, with a husband who is a consultant. The piece centers on Ayanna Pressley, stating that when she was elected in 2018 she had a negative net worth, but today she is worth $1,300,000 with assets up to $8,000,000. It highlights property holdings in 2024: a Martha’s Vineyard rental worth up to $5,000,000 and multiple Boston rentals worth up to $1,000,000 each, contrasting with 2019 when she reportedly owned only one property in Boston. The report also notes that days before Pressley was sworn in, her husband left a $92,000-a-year Boston City Hall job to launch Conan Harris and Associates, a consulting firm. It states his income reportedly jumped while in Washington, with a client list including government organizations and one with deep ties to the Obama Foundation. The segment describes ethics concerns about using his city-issued email to pitch Walsh’s Chief of Staff on staying on as a consultant, while city officials say they did not solicit nor accept the offer and that ethics laws bar municipal employees from using official resources for personal gain. Pressed for comment, Pressley did not respond to Fox Business requests. Fox Business anchor David Asman appears to align with the report’s framing, acknowledging that wealth accumulation through government contacts is common but asserting questions arise about those who position themselves as anti-capitalist. David Asman contrasts the situation with what he describes as anti-capitalist squad members who denounce capitalism yet accumulate wealth, asserting that Pressley and her fellow squad members “condemn capitalism” while “she’s the one who’s been pillaging the government,” and noting her husband’s consulting income. The discussion broadens to Ilhan Omar, claimed to be worth up to $30,000,000, with a husband who is also a consultant and previously connected to progressive circles with alleged anti-capitalist leanings. The segment references Nancy Pelosi as part of a broader pattern, describing her as “the grand dam of all this,” and asserts she is worth about $275,000,000, with husband Paul Pelosi, suggesting insider information influenced certain trades tied to credit card companies. The speakers argue that such patterns illustrate long-standing issues, vowing continued investigation and pressure to stop perceived abuses. Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 close with remarks that this situation requires ongoing scrutiny, and they thank David Asman for the discussion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a Fox News alert. It looks like Ilhan Omar isn't the only millionaire squad member. Our team dug into open secrets and financial disclosure reports. What we found is that when Ayanna Pressley was elected to Congress back in 2018, she had a negative net worth. You fast forward to today, she's worth $1,300,000 with assets worth up to 8,000,000. Now that's a massive increase in just six years, especially for someone on a $174,000 congressional salary. It's impressive, really. But how did she do it? Well, part of its property in 2024, Presley reported owning a Martha's Vineyard rental worth up to $5,000,000 as well as multiple Boston rentals worth up to $1,000,000 each. Now for context, back in 2019, she only reported owning one property in Boston. We're also learning days before Presley was sworn into Congress, her husband quit his $92,000 annual Boston City Hall job to start his own consulting firm called Conan Harris and Associates. And as we read more of the congresswoman's financial disclosure reports, we learned that her husband also saw his income jump while he was in Washington. His client list consists of some government organizations, including one with deep ties to the Obama Foundation. But as he started his firm and seek new clients, he faced ethics concerns because of Presley's job in Congress. As Harris's days dwindled in the city's Office of Public Safety, he used his city issued email account to pitch Walsh's Chief of Staff on staying on as a consultant. City officials say they did not solicit nor accept the offer, and state ethics laws bar municipal employees from knowingly using official resources for personal gain. Now we asked Presley for comment, and we even invited her on. She did not answer, but Fox Business anchor David Asman joins me now. He's been looking over this information, and David, there's nothing wrong with, you know, gaining financial resources. We see this a lot in congress, but there are questions. Speaker 1: Well, you go back to the 1930s, the last when movies began, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. I mean, it's happened for a long time. It happens in both the right and left, but what's so rich is that this is coming from anti capitalist squad members. Know? Yes. People who spent their life denigrating our capitalist system and saying how bad it was. In fact, congresswoman Presley came out with an ex post just a year ago. She and her fellow squad members, of course, constantly condemn capitalism, but she says Donald Trump and Musk want big banks and bad actors to run rampant and take people for a ride. They want to pillage the government and make themselves rich. Well, she's the one who's been pillaging the government. Now again, we're not suggesting she's going in and stealing funds or anything like that, but the fact is she got rich off of her contacts in government. Her husband got rich consulting with members of the business community and others, perhaps some people who were taking grants. That's, by the way, we saw that with Lee Zeldin, the EPA Commissioner. When he came in, he found out that right before Biden left office in December 2024, he was spending billions of dollars. A lot of that money was going directly to friends, you know, to acquaintances within the Democratic community that learned how to go in and write grants that would get accepted, making millions and millions of dollars each one of them. So, this has been going on for a while. I should mention that Presley's kind of a poor gal next to her friend Ilhan Omar. Yes. Because Ilhan Omar is worth up to $30,000,000 right now because, and she went from basically a flat to negative, if not negative point when she came into Congress. She also has a husband who's a consultant. He was working with progressive leftists who, again, have this anti capitalist creed which they live and die by, but apparently, they, it's very easy to condemn capitalism when you're making millions of dollars, And of course, we have to mention the grand dam of all this, which is Ms. Pelosi. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: Who's worth about $275,000,000 at least $275,000,000 with her husband Paul, who, and, you know, he's a good investor, but she's come to him, I'm sure, with excellent inside information that we're not allowed to trade on, but members of Congress still do, and there are certain trades that she and her husband made that clearly were based on information she was getting about credit card companies that were going to have a particular advantage that other companies didn't have. A lot of So this has got to stop. We've tried to stop it time and time again. Again, going back decades and decades, it never seems to work properly. Schweizer has done his best to try to try to come out with revealing stuff, but we're going to continue investigating and put pressure on the politicians to stop this once and for all. Speaker 0: David Asman, thank you. Lots of questions here.
View Full Interactive Feed