reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Posted - September 28, 2023 at 3:02 AM

Saved - September 28, 2023 at 12:49 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Agencies' purpose has shifted: safeguarding institutions, not serving people. SECGov shields financial incumbents, FBI maintains control, TheJusticeDept defends other agencies. Calls for reform grow louder. Influencers like WarrenDavidson, JohnEDeaton1, and ElonMusk join the conversation. #OverhaulNeeded

@StevenNerayoff - Steven Nerayoff

Seems like there is confusion that agencies are still here to serve the people. They’ve evolved to protect government & institutions from the people. @SECGov protects financial incumbents. @FBI keeps citizens in line. @TheJusticeDept protects all other agencies. #OverhaulNeeded @WarrenDavidson @JohnEDeaton1 @digitalassetbuy @NerdNationUnbox @Leerzeit @MoonLamboio @ErikVoorhees @BlackberryXRP @BoringSleuth @Rach_IC @elonmusk

@BitcoinMagazine - Bitcoin Magazine

JUST IN - 🇺🇸 US Congressman tells SEC Chair Gary Gensler his bill would fire him and restructure the SEC. "I wish the Biden administration would say you're fired. Congress hopefully will"

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker criticizes the proposed ESG disclosure rules and argues that the SEC lacks the legal authority to implement them. They accuse the Chairman of the SEC, Gary Gensler, of disregarding the impact of the rules and pushing a political and social agenda. The speaker proposes the SEC Stabilization Act, which would remove the role of Chairman and add a 6th commissioner to ensure bipartisan representation. They express concern about the Chairman's actions and hope that Congress will hold him accountable. The speaker concludes by yielding the floor.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And it it introduces a major questions doctrine. And you told mister Barr that you received tons of feedback on your proposed ESG disclosure rules, feedback that should make clear that the proposal for ESG disclosure is a major question, and it should make clear that you don't have the legal authority to do that. So I'd ask you to knock it off, cease and desist and work with this body to pass a law if you want to regulate something. Frankly, your time as Chairman has highlighted 2 problems, a Gary Gensler problem and a structural flaw in the SEC. And as I told you in April, I proposed a solution called the SEC Stabilization Act. You're making the case for this bill easier every day you're acting as the Chairman. By doing rulemaking after rulemaking without any regard to the impact of these rules, or maybe that's the feature for you, I don't know. But it's having a massive impact on our markets. I mean, we have markets that truly are the envy of the world. And why would you disrupt them with processes that are driving capital out of our markets, not to avoid our laws, but to find some place where they can get clarity, where they can work with a regulator and get a decision in a path forward. So instead of selectively applied, you are shortened you're not providing clarity with a rule that's evenly applied. Your intentionally shortened comment periods to limit feedback, and the courts have even called this arbitrary and capricious. You're pushing a woke political and social agenda, and I think abusing your role and the authority of the SEC as cover. So, I think fundamentally, the SE Stabilization Act would remove the role of Chairman. It would preserve the current commissioners, we would add a 6th commissioner. So there would be no more than 3 from any 1 political party. And so that would provide a path that would make the SEC do what you're avoiding. Frankly, you're front running Congress, you're front running the courts, you're front running even the own administration, and no one has held you to account for that. I mean, I wish the Biden administration would say you're fired, but the list of folks they need to do that for is long. Congress hopefully will with the SEC Stabilization Act. I yield.

@CollinRugg — Collin Rugg

Posted - October 5, 2023 at 9:16 PM

Saved - October 6, 2023 at 5:18 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Elon Musk demands an overhaul of agencies like the SEC, urging punishment for those who abuse power for political reasons. The SEC's lawsuit against Musk, related to his Twitter stock purchase, seems to fuel his call for change. Musk believes a comprehensive overhaul is necessary, along with a commission to penalize those who misuse regulatory authority. He confidently predicts a 100% probability of this transformation.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

JUST IN: Elon Musk calls for the overhaul of agencies like the SEC & calls for the punishment of people at these agencies who abuse their power for political reasons. Good, let's do this for all 3-letter agencies. The comment from Musk came on X in response to the news that the SEC is suing Musk in relation to his Twitter stock purchase. The SEC clearly has it out for Musk as they're forcing him to testify. While responding to @MarioNawfal on X, Musk gave it a 100% probability that agencies like the SEC will be overhauled. "A comprehensive overhaul of these agencies is sorely needed, along with a commission to take punitive action against those individuals who have abused their regulatory power for personal and political gain." "Can’t wait for this to happen... I estimate the probability at 100%." I can't wait either

Video Transcript AI Summary

The SEC is suing Elon Musk because he failed to appear in court in San Francisco after being subpoenaed. They wanted him to testify about his Twitter deal and his purchase of Twitter stock. The SEC had expected him to comply with the subpoena in September, but he didn't show up. As a result, they have filed a lawsuit in federal court to enforce the subpoena. This is not the first time Musk has had issues with the SEC, as he previously faced consequences for his tweets and interactions with regulators.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Morgan, the SEC is suing Musk because they subpoenaed him in September to show up in court in San Francisco to talk about his Twitter deal and he didn't show up. And so he was supposed to provide agreed upon testimony, they say, and he didn't show up. And so they have sued him in San Francisco federal court to enforce that subpoena. That's the news. OK. I mean, we know Musk doesn't have a particularly good history with the SEC. I think back to the to the tweets and what happened with regulators there. I mean, any sort of sense or detail around what specifically this could could involve with Musk and Twitter? Well, they they just say that the investigation had focused on Musk's purchase of Twitter stock and his disclosures of his Twitter investment. And so they had sought his testimony. They expected him to show up, respond to that subpoena in September. It seems like there was an expectation that he would and then he didn't. And so now they have sued him in San Francisco federal court to enforce that subpoena. OK.

@alx — ALX 🇺🇸

Posted - October 31, 2023 at 7:39 PM

Saved - November 2, 2023 at 8:36 AM

@alx - ALX 🇺🇸

ELON MUSK: “The degree to which Twitter was simply an arm of the government was not well understood by the public… Republicans were suppressed at ten times the rate of Democrats.” https://t.co/r1O4YF0Mpv

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speakers discuss the influence of Twitter and its bias towards the far left. They mention how Twitter was seen as an arm of the government and compared it to a state publication like Pravda. The suppression of views that were even mildly right-leaning, including Republicans, was highlighted. The speakers also mention the Twitter files, where individuals like Shellenberger and Matt Taibbi faced consequences for their views, such as audits. Overall, the discussion revolves around the blatant bias and control exerted by Twitter, particularly by the far left.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: What was that like? Because that to me, that was the most bizarre, was the Twitter files. When you let Shellenberger and Matt Taibbi and all those guys get in the Twitter and then the response where Matt Taibbi gets audited. I mean, which is just wild. I mean, just just so blatant and so in your face. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's weird. No. I mean, There yeah. The the real which and and, by by the way, Jack didn't really know know this, but the degree to which Twitter was simply, An arm of the government was not well understood by the public. And, it it was there was no it was whatever the official go I mean, it was like Pravda, basically. You know, it's a state publication is the way to think of old Twitter. It's a state publication. Speaker 0: And was the justification from their perspective that they are progressive liberals. They have the right intentions. It's important that they stay in power. The progressive liberals stay in government and power because this is the this is their Speaker 1: There there was there was, basically, oppression of, Any any views that would even I would say could be considered middle of the road, but certainly anything on the the right. I'm not talking about, like, Like far right, I'm just talking mildly right. The people like Republicans were suppressed at 10 times the rate of Democrats. Now that's because, old Twitter was fundamentally controlled by the far left. It was like completely controlled by the the far left.

@GenFlynn — General Mike Flynn

Posted - July 15, 2024 at 2:46 PM

Saved - July 15, 2024 at 5:24 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Prosecutor Jack Smith and others in the DOJ are under investigation by the DOJ OIG due to a whistleblower complaint. Witnesses involved in the complaint have allegedly been offered bribes exceeding $25M. Judge Cannon may have received a copy of the complaint. The investigation, supported by @PatrickByrne, has been ongoing for over a year. This case could have significant implications for national security if the truth is revealed. The media has not covered this issue. Corruption must be exposed and eliminated for America to progress. More updates to come.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

BREAKING: Given the recent decision by Judge Cannon regarding prosecutor Jack Smith’s “classified documents” case, the following can now be stated. 1. A filed whistleblower complaint has Smith and other members close to him inside the DOJ under serious investigation by the DOJ OIG (yes, there are some good guys—but we’ll see). 2. Deposed witnesses (part of this WB complaint) have been offered massive bribes to back off their statements (by apparently Americans—to be named later). The bribes are north of $25M (you read that right). 3. I am told Judge Cannon had either requested or received a copy of this whistleblower complaint (I have zero idea if she actually received it or read it), but this is some of the information I’ve been made aware of. 4. This has been an ongoing investigation for well over a year now led by very credible investigators and the public whistleblower complaint was posted back in DEC (go find it). 5. This has been pressed very hard thanks to @PatrickByrne (w/out his patience and support), the investigation and the legal and very public filing would not have occurred. 6. Be prepared for more on this very serious case which stands in history to be one of the most egregious abuses of authority within the department of justice (if the truth plays out here, the 2nd and 3rd order effects could very well prove to be stunning to America’s national security). 7. The media hasn’t covered one iota of this (no surprise here). For America to move forward, the rot must be removed and the corruption must be publicly called out and eliminated. More to follow. @elonmusk

@alx — ALX 🇺🇸

Posted - September 5, 2024 at 4:45 PM

Saved - September 6, 2024 at 12:32 AM

@alx - ALX 🇺🇸

TRUMP: “At the suggestion of Elon Musk — I will create a Government efficiency Commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms. Elon.. has agreed to head that task force” https://t.co/a48F9RUC1f

Video Transcript AI Summary

At Elon Musk's suggestion, who has given his complete and total endorsement, a government efficiency commission will be created. The commission will conduct a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and make recommendations for drastic reforms. Elon Musk has agreed to be on the task force.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: 4th, at the suggestion of Elon Musk, who has given me his complete and total endorsement. That's nice. He's a smart guy. He knows what he's doing. He knows what he's doing. It's very, very much appreciated. I will create a government efficiency commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms. We need to do it. Can't go on the way we are now. And Elon, because he's not very busy, has agreed to hit that task force. Be interesting. If he has the time, he'll be a good one to do it.

@CollinRugg — Collin Rugg

Posted - October 27, 2024 at 11:12 PM

Saved - October 28, 2024 at 1:45 AM

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

JUST IN: Elon Musk rips the federal government, says the Department Of Government Efficiency will get them "off your back and out of your pocketbook." "America is going to reach heights that it has never seen before." 🔥🔥 https://t.co/Nj9PeD61s8

Video Transcript AI Summary

All government spending is taxation, either directly or through inflation. The Department of Government Efficiency will address wasted money. The goal is to get the government out of people's pocketbooks, leading America to unprecedented heights and an amazing future. The speaker expresses enthusiasm for the positive energy present.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I mean, at the end of the day, you're being taxed. You're being taxed. All government spending is taxation. So whether it's it's direct taxation or all government spending, it's either becomes inflation or it's it's direct taxation. Your money is being wasted, and the Department of Government Efficiency is gonna fix that. We're gonna get the government off your back and out of your pocketbook. And America is just not not just gonna be great. America is gonna reach heights that it has never seen before. The future is gonna be amazing. Now you guys are awesome. Honestly, this is like What? Honestly, this is like yeah. I mean, this is this is, like, this is the kind of positive energy that America is all about.

@PaintressApril — Paintress April 🎨

Posted - November 9, 2024 at 1:21 AM

Saved - November 9, 2024 at 6:33 PM

@PaintressApril - Paintress April 🎨

@gaxrav The most important warning from John Mcafee to @elonmusk whose job will be getting rid of these government agencies who are the Trojan Horses for corruption and who think they are above the American people and who disobey the US Constitution so are traitors! https://t.co/k74P81adyy

Video Transcript AI Summary

The deep state refers to career employees within the U.S. government and military who influence policy without being directly accountable to elected officials. Agencies like the FCC, CIA, SEC, and IRS have the power to enact regulations that can significantly impact our lives, often more than laws passed by Congress. These regulations, totaling 200,000 since 1975 and spanning 800,000 pages, demonstrate that the deep state is not a secret but a well-established reality. Unfortunately, these career employees cannot be easily fired, ensuring that political interests have limited influence over them. This situation highlights a concerning aspect of our governance that needs to be acknowledged.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The deep state is a conspiracy theory of of, it's defined as the people within the US government military who are in secret control of government policy. Secret? Please, people. The deep state is those people within the US government that are career employees that cannot be fired by people that we elect by the congress or the president. There are the FCC, the, the CIA, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the IRS. Are these people in control? Can they enact laws? Fuck yes. They're called regulations for every law that congress passes, and we elect congress to pass our laws. There are 20 regulations enacted by federal agencies that have far more impact on our lives than anything congress can possibly pass. Is there a deep state? Yes. Can we fire these people? No. Can presidents fire them? No. It it's designed that way so that political parties and political interest cannot affect the deep state. Do you understand the nightmare of our situation, people? I'm sorry. It's not secret. It's as open as anything could be. In the past since 1975, 200,000 regulations have been passed by federal agencies, encompassing 800,000 pages of fine print, people. It is no secret. It is as open as it can be. The deep state does control America. Wake up people, please. God. Here's some common fucking sense. Thank you.

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - December 5, 2024 at 3:31 AM

Saved - December 5, 2024 at 9:36 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 YES 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

@SpeakerJohnson - Speaker Mike Johnson

Under President Trump, we will take a blowtorch to the administrative state and reduce the size and scope of government. House and Senate Republicans look forward to hosting Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy tomorrow to discuss how the Department of Government Efficiency can help us get it done.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Supreme Court's decision to overturn the Chevron doctrine is a pivotal moment, allowing for a shift in control from the administrative state, which has long dictated rules affecting industries and small businesses. There is potential for significant change, with support from Republicans in Congress. However, there will be resistance from donors and lobbyists concerned about re-election. A bold presidential approach is necessary to reduce the size and scope of government, which will benefit the free market. Specific targets for cuts include Planned Parenthood and PBS, which are under congressional control, and there is a desire to eliminate both.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Remember the Supreme Court overturned the Chevron document. Right. Right? That's a game changing kind of situation. Not in my lifetime Yeah. That we had the opportunity to go in and really take back control from the administrative state. For a long time, they've been acting as judge, jury, and executioner on the rules that they make on industries and small business owners and the rest. So we we have the ingredients. We have the conditions right now to actually be able to make really dramatic change. And we're going to go through and and have those discussions, those brainstorms to see. But you're going to have willing, partners in the House and Senate among the Republicans. But you're Speaker 1: also going to have so many people who are pushing back. Speaker 0: Oh, cool. Speaker 1: Oh, my donors, my, you know, the the lobbyists that I promised things to. They're not going to go for that, and I won't get reelected if I let you cross that off on our list. So what are you gonna do, Bob? Speaker 0: Well, you're gonna have a president that's bold enough to do it. You know, we have our own version of the Argentinian leader, right, with Donald Trump. And, I've used the blowtorch analogy rather than a chainsaw, but it's all the same. We do have to scale back the size and scope of government. It serves the people. It unleashes the free market again. Our policy changes will be a part of that, but, I think that if we can make some dramatic changes in downsizing the scale and scope of these things, we'll go a long way. And, so Speaker 1: So two specific examples, Planned Parenthood and PBS are in congressional control. Are you planning to ax both of those? Speaker 0: I I would like to. That's for sure.

@BasedMikeLee — Mike Lee

Posted - December 6, 2024 at 1:48 AM

Saved - December 6, 2024 at 3:22 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

In a recent meeting with Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, we discussed how unelected bureaucrats have undermined our constitutional republic, stripping us of our rights. Reflecting on pivotal years in American history—1776, 1861, and 1937—I believe 2025 could mark another significant turning point. It's crucial to restore constitutional protections and hold our government accountable. We must dismantle the administrative state, reduce regulations, and empower the American people to reclaim their freedom and prosperity. Let's make 2025 a year of transformation.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

🧵1. In a meeting today with @elonmusk, @vivekgramaswamy, & @speakerjohnson, Elon & Vivek referred to the fact that, because unelected bureaucrats now make most federal law & control much of our economy, we’ve been stripped of the benefits of a constitutional republic. https://t.co/8Zo3DoilrB

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

2. As @vivekgramaswamy noted, the need for Americans to demand accountability from their own government is precisely why we fought—and mercifully won—the American Revolution. That got me thinking …. https://t.co/SPw5vfO7J7

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

3. Throughout Anglo-American history, we’ve seen a major upheaval every 75-90 years. It’s almost like clockwork! https://t.co/miZWDp40Ck

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

4.Each pivot in American history has been kickstarted by events in just three critical years. By my reckinging, those years were 1776, 1861, and 1937. These aren’t just random years; they’re game-changers. https://t.co/A23Ba6OHxu

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

5.In 1776, we declared our independence from a large, distant government that recognized no limits on its authority and refused to hold itself accountable to the American people. Sound familiar? https://t.co/fkhQexOV47

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

6. In 1861, the American Civil War began, hastening the end of a tragic chapter of our history when many Americans “owned” other Americans as property—as slaves—with the approval and protection of government. https://t.co/aAVSrP7vUj

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

7.In 1937, progressives in all three branches of the U.S. government—with one final push from the Supreme Court—dangerously eroded the Constitution’s twin structural protections: the “vertical” protection we call federalism and the “horizontal” protection known as separation-of-powers, all to facilitate FDR’s quest to centralize power in the federal government in response to the Great Depression.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

8. In the nearly 88 years since the Supreme Court opened this era on April 12, 1937—the day the Court re-defined Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce so broadly that nothing remained of federalism, and indirectly set in motion Congress’s now-common habit of delegating lawmaking power to unelected bureaucrats—Americans have lost much of their power to control their own destiny to people in Washington, D.C.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

9. We’re about to have another one of those years, one that could initiate the reversal of the immense harm that has been unleashed on the American people—by their own government, no less—ever since April 12, 1937.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

10.Brace yourselves because 2025 is shaping up to be the next big, pivotal year—only the fourth in our 248-year history as a country. We're on the cusp of setting in motion a new, brighter era for America.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

11. This next era MUST be about reinstating the Constitution’s core, structural protections—both the vertical protection of federalism and the horizontal separation-of-powers.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

12.Congress needs to step up aggressively. It’s time to open this next chapter where WE, the American people, take back control from unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats who've been running our government like it’s their personal sandbox, treating us like their toys—or, better said—their subjects.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

13.These bureaucrats churn out nearly 100,000 pages of regulations every year. Regulations that NOT ONE ELECTED LAWMAKER votes to enact into law!

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

14.It’s nearly impossible to fire these federal bureaucrats. They enjoy so much insulation from the citizens they govern that King George III—the tyrant whose excesses triggered the American Revolution—would be green with envy were he alive and able to observe conditions in America today. That has to end—and 2025 is the year it must happen.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

15.It's time to put the PEOPLE back in charge.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

16.In approaching this daunting, but all-important task, we must be looking not just at cutting costs, but also at setting the stage for an unprecedented era of economic growth. Without the federal “administrative state” leeching off our economy—like an alien parasite that’s torturing its host and robbing it of nutrients—we can and will thrive.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

17.Think about this: some estimate that laws imposed by the federal administrative state (generally referred to euphemistically as “regulations”) cost the American economy roughly $4 trillion annually. That’s money that could and should be in the pockets of hardworking American families, not wasted on red tape.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

18.The @DOGE effort led by @elonmusk and @vivekgramaswamy is not about austerity; it's a call for prosperity—the kind of prosperity that’s long been stifled by a bloated government, which thinks it knows better than the people it’s supposed to serve, not terrorize.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

@DOGE @elonmusk @VivekGRamaswamy 19.Some have suggested that if we had never formed the federal administrative state, our economy could be an astounding FOUR TIMES its current size. Imagine the opportunities, the innovation, and the growth!

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

@DOGE @elonmusk @VivekGRamaswamy 20. This bureaucratic monster doesn't just cost money; it undermines us our freedom, our peace of mind, and our popular sovereignty. In a constitutional republic, the people are supposed to have power, not some faceless agency run by people who can’t be fired—even by voters!

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

21.We need a government of the people, by the people, and for the people—not one in which major questions of law and public policy are dictated by those who aren't answerable to the ballot box.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

22. The coming year, 2025, can and must mark the beginning of the end for our current era of bureaucratic overreach, which commenced in 1937.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

23. We’re talking about restoring the balance of powers that our founders—wise men, raised up by God to that very purpose—righteously intended.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

24. It’s not just about shrinking government; it’s about making government work FOR the people, not against them or without them.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

25. So, let’s make 2025 the year we pivot back to the American dream, where government serves the people, not the other way around.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

26. We’ll see an America where businesses aren’t bogged down by regulations, where innovation isn't stifled, and where every American can truly pursue their happiness without government overreach.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

27. The time is now to dismantle the administrative state, reduce the regulatory burden, and unleash the potential of the American economy.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

28. Remember, this isn’t only about less government; it's about better government. It’s about government that respects the Constitution and the will of the people.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

29. This new era will be one in which we will see the fruits of our labors, where we can innovate without permission, and where prosperity isn't just a promise, but a reality.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

30. Let’s make 2025 the year we remember as the turning point back to constitutional governance, where the American spirit isn’t just nominally free, but truly free and empowered.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

31.No cap: this is our chance to redefine America for the better—for freedom, and for prosperity.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

32. So, let’s get to work. Let’s ensure that the next chapter in our history is written by us, the American people, not by unelected officials in D.C.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

33. We've got the power, we’ve got the will, and now, with 2025 on the horizon, we’ve got the moment. Let’s seize it.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

34. The haters can’t handle this frickin' smoke, but we know the truth: America's best days are ahead—and they always will be—when we put the Constitution first and the bureaucracy last.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

35. Please join me in this fight. Together, we'll make America not just great again, but truly free again.

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

36. Please follow me if you’d like to see more posts like this. @DOGE #RestoreTheConstitution #MakeAmericaAboutFederalismAndSeparationOfPowersAgain #Pivot2025

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - December 6, 2024 at 1:50 AM

Saved - December 6, 2024 at 3:40 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

This needs to be fixed. Should be rule by democracy, not rule by bureaucracy!

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

🧵1. In a meeting today with @elonmusk, @vivekgramaswamy, & @speakerjohnson, Elon & Vivek referred to the fact that, because unelected bureaucrats now make most federal law & control much of our economy, we’ve been stripped of the benefits of a constitutional republic. https://t.co/8Zo3DoilrB

@DogRightGirl — Spitfire

Posted - December 19, 2024 at 4:13 PM

Saved - December 19, 2024 at 8:27 PM

@DogRightGirl - Spitfire

I CANT BELIEVE @elonmusk HAS ANY INFLUENCE ON POLITICIANS!!!!!! How DARE he!! https://t.co/iaL6NpbdmE

@BehizyTweets — George

Posted - January 3, 2025 at 8:23 PM

Saved - January 3, 2025 at 10:39 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Mike Johnson just declared that Congress will swiftly work on legislation to shut down federal bureaucracies, aiming to significantly reduce government size and return power to the people. The reaction from Democrats was notably unhappy. I can only imagine @ElonMusk and @VivekGRamaswamy are thrilled by this commitment.

@BehizyTweets - George

BREAKING: Mike Johnson just announced that Congress will immediately move to pass legislation to shut down the federal bureaucracies. Zero Democrats looked happy to hear that. "We're going to drastically cut back the size and scope of government. We're going to return the power back to the people." @ElonMusk and @VivekGRamaswamy are sitting somewhere beyond excited to hear this public commitment.

Video Transcript AI Summary

We are committed to rolling back the administrative state and reducing the size of government. Our goal is to return power to the people and create a more efficient federal workforce in collaboration with President Trump. Citizens should not be governed by unelected bureaucrats but by those they have chosen to lead. This aligns with the principles of Article 1 and the original intent of Congress. The American people demand a departure from the status quo, and we will respond to their call for change.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And as heirs to the American Revolution and the descendants of patriots who defied tyranny, in the coming months, we are going to pass legislation to roll back the totalitarian 4th branch of government known as the administrative state. We're going to drastically cut back the size and scope of government. We're gonna return the power back to the people. And in coordination with president Trump and his administration, we are going to create a leaner, faster, and more efficient federal workforce. We need to do that. Our people do not deserve to be ruled by millions of bureaucrats they've never voted for, never met, and can never hold accountable. They deserve a government that is led by those they've elected to lead. That is how article 1 is supposed to work. That was the idea of the congress, and we will return to that principle. The American people have called on us to reject business as usual and throw out the status quo. We must and we will heed their call.

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - February 4, 2025 at 6:12 PM

Saved - February 5, 2025 at 1:53 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Elon Musk expressed frustration that DOGE is exposing a radical-left shadow government, emphasizing the need to return power to the people from an unelected bureaucracy. In response, another user criticized a figure named Chuck for wanting to replace American workers with illegal immigrants, suggesting he is compromised.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

He’s mad that @DOGE is dismantling the radical-left shadow government in full view of the public. This is our ONE CHANCE to return POWER to the PEOPLE from an unelected BUREAUcracy back to DEMOcracy!! Only with the support of YOU can this succeed. Thank you, unknown soldiers.

@unlimited_ls - Unlimited L's

🚨Chuck Schumer on DOGE: "The American people will not stand for an un-elected secret group to run rampant through the executive branch. Being innovative is good, but Mr. Musk, this isn't a tech startup. These are public institutions." https://t.co/yPcFatrJuE

Video Transcript AI Summary

The American people will not accept an unelected group controlling the executive branch. Innovation is important, but public institutions like Social Security, Medicare, and national defense serve the well-being of the citizens. The public deserves a voice in these matters. Elections reflect the will of the people, and just because one viewpoint wins does not mean we abandon democracy. We cannot replace centuries of democratic practice with a small group that believes it knows better than the collective wisdom of the American populace.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And the American people, mark my words, the American people will not stand for an unelected secret group to run rampant through the executive branch. Being innovative is good. But mister Musk, this isn't a tech startup. These are public institutions that deal with things like social security and Medicare and national defense and provide for the well-being of the American people. And the American people have a right to be part of that debate. Part of that debate. The elections occurred and once one viewpoint got a few more votes than the other, but that doesn't mean we throw out democracy. That doesn't mean what's been done for centuries in this country should just go out the window and be substituted by a small group of people who think they know a lot more than the wisdom of the American people.

@floridanow1 - floridanow1

@elonmusk @DOGE Chuck also wanted to have American workers replaced by illegals....so this man is owned. https://t.co/SEktC6bd5e

Video Transcript AI Summary

We are currently facing a significant labor shortage due to a declining birth rate. To secure a prosperous future for America, it is essential to welcome and embrace immigrants, including dreamers. Our ultimate aim is to support dreamers and provide a path to citizenship for all undocumented individuals living here, estimated at around 11 million.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Now more than ever, we're short of workers. We have a population that is not reproducing it on its own with the same level that it used to. The only way we're gonna have a great future in America is if we welcome and embrace immigrants, the dreamers, and all of them because our ultimate goal is to help the dreamers but get a path to citizenship for all 11,000,000 or however many undocumented there are here.

@EndWokeness — End Wokeness

Posted - February 5, 2025 at 3:15 AM

Saved - February 5, 2025 at 5:26 PM

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

Before the election, Trump told us he would put Musk in charge of cutting spending and federal agencies. We voted for this. https://t.co/PvQznutRE1

Video Transcript AI Summary

There's a lot of inefficiency in government that needs addressing. When it comes to which agencies to shut down, I'll let Elon Musk share his thoughts, as he's eager to discuss this. Musk is not just known for his work in science and rockets; he's also an excellent businessman and cost cutter. He often shares innovations, like a new titanium screw he's developed, which showcases his focus on efficiency and improvement.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So that there's a lot of fat in government that you would want to split down. Fat. So So what agencies would you wanna shut down? Well, let me let me, have you ask another person that because I'm gonna have Elon Musk. He's he is dying to do this. You know, he's a great business guy, actually. You think of him for science and rockets, and every time I think he's telling me about a new screw that was developed, he's developed a new screw. Screws are difficult, and it's made out of titanium and it's so exciting. But you know what? He's a great business guy and he's a great cost cutter. You've seen that.

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - February 5, 2025 at 6:28 PM

Saved - February 6, 2025 at 12:08 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

💯🇺🇸

@JDVance - JD Vance

“No one voted for Elon Musk.” (They did however vote for Donald Trump who promised repeatedly to have Elon Musk root out wasteful spending in our government.)

@JohnStrandUSA — John Strand

Posted - February 7, 2025 at 9:51 PM

Saved - February 7, 2025 at 10:26 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: Stephen Miller goes SCORCHED EARTH on Democrat complaints that @elonmusk is ‘unelected’ “The unelected power in this country is the rogue bureaucracy. USAID is unelected! The FBI that persecuted President Trump for 8 years is unelected!” He’s exactly right. https://t.co/7OinXcGxLU

Video Transcript AI Summary

The term "unelected" used by Democrats is misleading. Donald Trump was elected in a landslide, and his staff, including the national security adviser and chief of staff, serve at his pleasure. They are implementing the agenda chosen by the American people. The real unelected power lies within the bureaucracy, such as USAID, the FBI, and the CIA, which have acted against Trump. President Trump is working to restore democracy by asserting control over the federal bureaucracy. He is the only individual elected by the entire nation to carry out the agenda that reflects the voters' wishes, while other officials are elected at local or state levels. Ultimately, the president is in charge of the federal executive branch.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The the Democrat use of the term unelected is really quite remarkable here. Donald Trump was elected in an overwhelming landslide. These are Donald Trump staffers. In the sense, like, saying that Mike Walls, the national security adviser, is unelected or Susie Wiles, the chief of staff, is unelected or Donald Trump's communications team is unelected. This is presidential staff that serves at the pleasure and for the president just as I do. I am a staffer for the president of The United States. He is elected. He is the one that American people have chosen to implement his agenda. This is the agenda the American people voted for that he is asking his staff, his subordinates, his employees to implement. The unelected power in this country is the rogue bureaucracy. USAID is unelected. The FBI that persecuted president Trump for eight years is unelected. The CIA and those who have laundered intelligence to try to change the foreign policy of The United States are unelected. President Trump is restoring democracy by controlling the federal bureaucracy. There is one man in the country who is elected by the whole American people to implement an agenda they support. That is the president. Every other officer in this country Yep. Members of congress and senators are elected at the state or local level. Let me ask you something. I have to continue. One man in charge of the federal executive branch, and that's the president. I understood.

@cb_doge — DogeDesigner

Posted - February 8, 2025 at 6:15 PM

Saved - February 9, 2025 at 3:02 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I discussed the increasing bureaucracy and the growing size of government, noting that laws and regulations expand each year. I mentioned that the usual method for eliminating unnecessary regulations has been war, which we obviously want to avoid. Instead, I proposed the idea of a Department of Government Efficiency, acknowledging the challenges ahead. I emphasized that this is a tough battle and that previous attempts to reduce bureaucracy have often failed, so success is uncertain.

@cb_doge - DogeDesigner

🚨 ELON MUSK: "One of the things that's happened is that you have a steady increase in the amount of bureaucracy. The size of government grows, the laws and regulations that are put in place get larger every year. The cleansing process normally for getting rid of nonsensical laws and regulations, is war. Now, obviously we prefer to not have war, so you have to have something like what we have formed here in the US, a Department of Government Efficiency. These things are all very hard, and I want to be clear like we may indeed fail in this objective. That's why I described it as an extremely difficult battle. This has never succeeded before. So prior attempts to reduce the size of bureaucracy, to make out more efficient, have generally failed."

Video Transcript AI Summary

Prolonged peacetime leads to increased bureaucracy and government growth. Regulations multiply yearly, and war historically serves as a necessary, albeit undesirable, reset. To avoid this, we've created a Department of Government Efficiency. We'll streamline regulations at the executive level, requiring Congressional consent for law changes. Our goal is to eliminate harmful regulations, downsize government, and balance the budget. This is incredibly difficult; past attempts have failed, and we may not succeed this time.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Now one of the things that's happened, which which always happens with an extended period of peace time, is that you have a steady increase in the amount of bureaucracy. The size of the government grows. The the laws and regulations that, are put in place, get, larger every year. So it it stands to reason that, you know, if you have regulators, regulators are going to add more regulations every year. Lawmakers will add more laws every year. The the the cleansing process normally for getting rid of nonsensical laws and regulations is war. Now, obviously, we'd prefer to not have war drive the, reformation of government. So in the absence of war, you have to you have to have something like what we have have formed here in The US, a Department of Government Efficiency, in order to get rid of, laws and regulations. Well, with laws, we have to talk require, obviously, the the consent of congress. But for regulations, this can be done at the with the at the executive branch level, is to reexamine the vast body of regulations and get rid of those where the they do where there's more harm than good, of which there are many. And and then reducing the size of the government, and and and then also balancing the budget so that we are not driving the country into bankruptcy. These things are all very hard, and I wanna be clear, like, we we may indeed fail in this objective. That's why I described it as an extremely difficult battle. The this has never succeeded before. So prior attempts to reduce the size of bureaucracy to, make out more efficient have, generally failed. Even when parties are elected for

@ImMeme0 — I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

Posted - February 9, 2025 at 4:52 PM

Saved - February 11, 2025 at 1:07 AM

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

NEW: MSNBC’s Alicia Menendez is urging Americans to contact their representatives and push back against Musk and Trump, claiming they are dismantling critical parts of Washington’s “bureaucracy.” Do these people even hear themselves? Since when has bureaucracy ever been a good thing?

Video Transcript AI Summary

The biggest question I'm getting is "What can I do?" A recent New York Times headline highlights the answer: constituents are flooding congressional lines, outraged by Trump's actions and Musk's influence on the federal bureaucracy. This isn't Trump's, or anyone else's government; it's *ours*. They need to hear from us. Keep calling, keep faxing—that's what we can do. I agree completely. It's not *their* government to dismantle. Musk is unelected, and Trump's appointees are accountable to us. The election might have been a shock, but what's happening now is real. Don't get discouraged—raise your voices and make them listen.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Number one question I get from folks post election is that what can I do? What am I supposed to be doing? And this headline from the New York Times sort of drove the answer home to me as Trump and Musk upend Washington, congressional phones can't keep up, calls are pouring in from constituents outraged about mister Trump's unilateral moves and how he has allowed mister Musk to gain access to and begin dismantling critical parts of the federal bureaucracy. It goes on and on. And that's the answer. You keep calling because it's not Donald Trump's government and it's not Russell votes government and it's not Stephen Miller's government and it certainly is not Elon Musk's government. It's your government, it's my government and they need to hear from you. So you keep calling them, you keep faxing them at this moment. That's what we all can do. Speaker 1: No. I I agree with that and and I love the way you frame it because it's not their government, it's our government and they don't get to tear it down. They don't get to take it apart. You know, Elon Musk is unelected. Donald Trump appointed Vought. They are accountable, each of them. They're they're all accountable to us, and he, Trump, is ultimately accountable to us to the extent citizens feel, and know it's important for them to raise their voices, please do. Because, you know, I get it. You know? Oh, the election was a shocker, and I didn't think this was gonna happen. Okay. Fine. Get over it because what you're seeing happening now is real.

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - February 10, 2025 at 8:26 AM

Saved - February 10, 2025 at 12:50 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

We must defeat bureaucracy

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

ELON: DEFEATING BUREAUCRACY IS ALMOST AS DIFFICULT AS BREAKING PHYSICS “The challenge is overcoming bureaucracy. Bureaucracy is perhaps the penultimate boss battle. The ultimate boss battle is defeating entropy, which physics tells us we can't. The second-hardest battle is defeating bureaucracy. That's how difficult it is to improve government.” Source: WELT Economic Summit, January 28, 2025

Video Transcript AI Summary

Improving government is incredibly difficult. The most difficult challenge is overcoming entropy, a battle physics tells us is impossible to win. The second most difficult is overcoming bureaucracy. It's a monumental struggle; bureaucracy is the penultimate battle in the fight for better government.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The challenge is overcoming, bureaucracy. And I think bureaucracy is perhaps the I'd say the penultimate bust battle. The the ultimate bust battle is defeating entropy, which we I mean, physics tells us we cannot defeat entropy. The second hardest battle is defeating bureaucracy. Or but, you know, it's it's that that's that's how difficult it is to improve government.

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - February 10, 2025 at 3:47 PM

Saved - February 10, 2025 at 7:26 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

There is a massive effort by the UNELECTED bureaucracy to oppose the ELECTED President, House & Senate!! This is why I say the true & noble battle is to restore DEMOcracy, rule of the people, from the BUREAUcracy, rule of the bureaucrats.

@alx - ALX 🇺🇸

Will be interesting to find out the people who greenlit this and hear their explanation on why they think they have the authority to subvert the President’s agenda and the will of the voters. Are Democrats outraged by this decision made by some unelected bureaucrat?

@RupertLowe10 — Rupert Lowe MP

Posted - February 10, 2025 at 3:54 PM

Saved - February 11, 2025 at 12:20 PM

@RupertLowe10 - Rupert Lowe MP

We must watch what Musk and Trump are doing, and follow their lead - that means brutally slashing back waste, fraud, and bureaucracy. How to release the private sector? Take a chainsaw to big Government, again and again and again. https://t.co/v8dmTq1K5x

Video Transcript AI Summary

The West's only hope lies in observing the actions of Elon Musk, Donald Trump, and their associates. Keir Starmer's preference for a struggling Europe over a dynamic, deregulated America is concerning. Musk's actions are revealing widespread fraud within Western governments, a consequence of excessive central planning and quantitative easing. This central planning breeds fraud. By exposing and eliminating this fraud, Musk aims to unleash private enterprise, sparking innovation and growth, allowing the West to return to its strengths. We will innovate and grow again once we get rid of the fraud.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Thanks. Well, the only hope we've got, I think, Alan, is watch what Elon Musk, Donald Trump, and the team are doing out there. It's quite extraordinary that Keir Starmer seems to want to cuddle up to a failing Europe rather than a vibrant, deregulating in America. And if you look at what Elon Musk's doing, he is exposing the fact that at the center of the Western government now, there's huge amounts of fraud because we've become too centrally planned. That's what happens when you get central planning, you get fraud. It's what happens when you get quantitative easing, you get fraud. And what he's doing is he's going to ultimately expose it, get rid of it, and that will release private sector enterprise, and then we will start to do what we the West is good at. We will start to innovate and grow.

@nicksortor — Nick Sortor

Posted - February 11, 2025 at 9:34 PM

Saved - February 11, 2025 at 10:08 PM

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 ELON MUSK: “The people voted for major government reform… and THAT’S what they’re going to get” LET’S GO!!!! 🔥🇺🇸 https://t.co/QBlVgW7pwp

Video Transcript AI Summary

The people clearly voted for major government reform. This was a central campaign promise, discussed at every rally. I made it clear this is what they would receive. My presidency will deliver on that promise. Too often, people don't see their votes reflected in government action. But in this case, the people will get what they voted for – that's the essence of democracy.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was on the campaign. The president spoke about that at every rally. The people voted for for major government reform, and that's what what people are gonna get. They're gonna get what they voted for. And and a lot of times that, you know, people that don't get what they voted for. But in this presidency, they are gonna get what they voted for, and that's what democracy is all about.

@RealAmVoice — Real America's Voice (RAV)

Posted - February 11, 2025 at 9:38 PM

Saved - February 12, 2025 at 12:15 AM

@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)

“THE PUBLIC VOTER FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP, THE PEOPLE VOTED FOR MAJOR GOVERNMENT REFORM, AND THAT’S WHAT THE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET.” - @elonmusk responds to criticism of how he is running DOGE. President @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/UG9iWlFBWs

Video Transcript AI Summary

My critics, including many Democrats, accuse me of orchestrating a hostile, non-transparent government takeover. However, the public clearly voted for major government reform, which is exactly what they'll get. We're committed to transparency; our actions are posted on X and our website. We're implementing simple, basic checks and balances to ensure taxpayer money is used responsibly and correctly categorized. This isn't about individual judgment calls; it's about systemic improvements. Concerns about conflicts of interest, particularly regarding my past federal contracts, are addressed through our commitment to transparency and the implemented checks and balances. All our actions are public.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Your detractors, mister Muskelet I've what? Including a lot of Democrats. Speaker 1: I have detractors? You do, sir. I don't believe it. Speaker 0: Say that you're orchestrating a hostile takeover of government and doing it in a non transparent way. What's your response to that criticism? Speaker 1: Well, first of all, you couldn't ask for a stronger mandate from from the public. The public voted, you know, that we we do have a majority of the public vote voting for president Trump, won the house, won the senate. The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was on the campaign. The president spoke about that at every rally. The people voted for for major government reform, and that's what people are gonna get. They're gonna get what they voted for. And and a lot of times that, you know, people that don't get what they voted for, but in this presidency, they are gonna get what they voted for. And that's what democracy is all about. Speaker 0: Mister Vasquez, the White House says that you will identify and excuse yourself from any conflicts of interest that you may have. Does that mean that you are are in effect policing yourself? What are the checks and balances that are in place to ensure that there is accountability and transparency? Well, Speaker 1: we we actually are trying to be as transparent as possible. In fact, our actions we post our actions to the the Doge handle, on x, and to the the Doge website. So all of our actions, which are are maximally transparent. In fact, I don't think there's been I I don't know the case that where where, an organization has been more transparent than the Doge organization. K. And and so, you know and and the kind of things we're doing are, I think, very, very simple and basic. They're they're not we're we're you know, what I mentioned, for for example, about treasury, just making sure that that payments that go out, taxpayer money that goes out, is categorized correctly, that the that the the payment is explained, that organizations on the do not pay list, which are takes a lot to get there, that actually are not paid, which currently they are paid. These these are these are not individual judgment decisions. These are about simply having sensible checks and balances in the system itself to ensure that taxpayer money is spread well. So it's got nothing to do with, like, say, a contract with some company of mine at all. Speaker 0: But if there is a conflict in of interest when it comes to you, yourself, for instance, you've received billions of dollars in federal contracts when it comes to the Pentagon, for instance, which the president, I know, has directed you to look into Yeah. Are you policing yourself in that? Is there any sort of accountability check and balance in place that would provide any transparency for the American people? Well, all of our actions are are, sec.

@SpeakerJohnson — Speaker Mike Johnson

Posted - February 16, 2025 at 5:04 AM

Saved - February 16, 2025 at 1:50 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

What I'm seeing from Elon Musk is revolutionary. The DOGE algorithms are uncovering long-hidden fraud and waste in executive agencies, paving the way to restore our Constitution's intent for a leaner, more efficient, and accountable federal government, checked by Congress.

@SpeakerJohnson - Speaker Mike Johnson

What @ElonMusk is doing is truly revolutionary. As the DOGE algorithms find widespread fraud, waste, and abuse in the executive branch agencies that have been hidden from Congress for decades—it will allow us to restore the original intent of our Constitution: a leaner, more efficient, and more accountable federal government that is kept in check by the legislative branch.

Video Transcript AI Summary

**Speaker 0:** Why is Elon Musk criticized while George Soros, who influences government decisions and backs progressive prosecutors, is not? Is this hypocrisy? **Speaker 1:** Absolutely. Elon's actions are heroic. He's bringing transparency to the federal government and the "deep state." I told him that his work can restore the original intent of the Constitution. Congress has struggled to oversee the bureaucracy because it has not been provided key information. Now, Elon is revealing things we suspected but couldn't prove. This is revolutionary and will restore the government to its intended form. That's why big government advocates are afraid; it's exciting for the people. **Speaker 0:** If you love the country and the Constitution, you are supporting this effort. Thank you. **Speaker 1:** Thanks. Great to be here.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I wanna ask you another question related to Elon Musk. They turn him into this boogeyman. Why do you think they love multibillionaire George Soros, who has used the various instrumentality of the government to acquire radio stations, who spends tens of billions of dollars throughout the years, he and his son to influence our government, to insinuate themselves in governmental decisions, to elect prosecutors who refuse to prosecute and so forth. That's their sugar daddy. That's their guy. But when it comes to Elon Musk, they want him criminally investigated. They believe he doesn't have any role in anything and so forth and so on. Do you see this as complete hypocrisy? Speaker 1: Complete hypocrisy. And what Elon is doing is heroic. You used the word, in the opening monologue. Exactly right. This is an heroic effort. He is bringing common sense and transparency and sunlight to the federal government, to to the bureaucracy, to what many of us refer to as the deep state. And this is what he and I were talking about, just on Monday night at his office. I said, Elon, I am so excited about what you are doing, what you are uncovering. I I said, you think of this as a scientist and a data analyst. I think of it as a constitutional law attorney and historian. Elon, what we are going to be able to do through this effort is restore the original intent of the framers of the constitution. What they had in mind is a small federal government that was closely monitored and had heavy oversight by the duly elected representatives of the people. The challenge we've had here in recent decades is that members of congress, these representatives, have not been able to do that job well. The oversight job has been hindered because the deep state and the bureaucracy has not turned over the data. They wouldn't give us the information we were seeking. We didn't know all this because it was hidden. Now Elon has cracked the code. He is on the inside of the belly of the beast, Mark, and he is he is unveiling and revealing all these things that we knew intuitively were happening, but we didn't have the evidence. This is a game changer. It is truly revolutionary, and we're gonna restore, ultimately, through this process, the federal government to the original intent of the founders, and that's what has the the big government, socialist, liberals, and Democrat party apoplectic because they're afraid of what the final result of this is gonna be, and it's very exciting for the people. Speaker 0: You're so right. If you love the country, you love the constitution, you love small r republicanism, you're cheering these guys on. Mister speaker, thank you for all you're doing, and God bless you, my friend. Speaker 1: Thanks, Mark. Great to be with you. Speaker 0: We'll be Speaker 1: right back.

@VigilantFox — The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Posted - February 19, 2025 at 3:33 AM

Saved - February 19, 2025 at 5:50 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Elon Musk responds to critics who say, “Nobody voted for Elon,” highlighting the challenges posed by a federal bureaucracy that opposes the president and cabinet. He points out that D.C. voting is overwhelmingly in favor of Kamala Harris, suggesting that if the president's will isn't carried out, it reflects a disconnect between the government and the people's wishes, questioning the true nature of democracy.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

NEW: Elon Musk delivers the PERFECT comeback to people complaining, “Nobody voted for Elon.” “Speaking of unelected, there’s a vast federal bureaucracy that is implacably opposed to the president and the cabinet. “And you look at D.C. voting, it’s 92% Kamala. Okay, so we’re 92% Kamala. That’s a lot... That’s basically almost everyone. And so, if the will of the president is not implemented and the president is representative of the people, that means the will of the people is not being implemented. And that means we don’t live in a democracy.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Democrats complain that nobody voted for Elon or my cabinet nominees and claim people are dying because of budget cuts while also calling my actions illegal. Their reaction shows we must be over the target and doing something right. We're trying to restore the will of the people through the president. There's a vast, unelected federal bureaucracy implacably opposed to the president and the cabinet. Consider that DC voting is 92% for Kamala. If the president's will, representing the people, isn't implemented, then the will of the people isn't being implemented. We're not living in a democracy, but a bureaucracy. What you're seeing is the bureaucracy resisting as we try to restore democracy and the will of the people.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And this is what you get for it from the Democrats you get nobody voted for Elon or nobody voted for any of your cabinet nominees. Okay. People are dying because of doge cuts. I'll give you a chance to respond all that. What doge is doing is illegal. Elon Musk is small street vernacular for a male body part. It's a constitutional crisis. Speaker 1: Okay. Why why are they reacting like this? Speaker 0: Well, I'm first of all, do you give a fly and rip over number one? And Well, I guess we must Speaker 1: be over the target or doing something right, you know. If like, they wouldn't be complaining so much if they we weren't doing something useful, I think. But what what what all we're really trying to do here is restore, the will of the people through the president. And and what we're finding is that there's an unelected bureaucracy. Speaking of unelected, there's a there's a vast federal bureaucracy that is implacably opposed to the president and the cabinet. And you look at, say, DC voting, it's 92% Kamala. Okay. So we're in 92% Kamala. That's a lot. Speaker 0: They don't like me here either. Speaker 1: I think about that number a lot. And, like, 92%, that's basically almost everyone. Yeah. And so but but if but but how can you if if if the will of the president is not implemented and the president is representative of the people, that means the will of the people is not being implemented. And that means we we don't live in a democracy. We live in a bureaucracy. And so I think what we're seeing here is the sort of the thrashing of the the bureaucracy as we try to restore democracy and the will of the people.