reSee.it - Related Post Feed

America1stLegal
Posted - November 15, 2023 at 4:34 PM
Saved - November 15, 2023 at 7:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
We filed a brief defending Trump's First Amendment rights in a D.C. Circuit case against an unconstitutional gag order. This order restricts him from targeting the Special Counsel, witnesses, or their testimony. It hampers his political speech and accountability during his campaign. We oppose the Biden administration's misuse of power to silence political opponents. America First Legal stands with Trump's right to free speech.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — We just filed a brief defending the First Amendment rights of @realdonaldtrump in a D.C. Circuit case involving an unconstitutional gag order. https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-files-brief-defending-donald-j-trumps-first-amendment-rights-in-d-c-circuit-case-involving-unconstitutional-gag-order/

America First Legal Files Brief Defending Donald J. Trump’s First Amendment Rights in D.C. Circuit Case Involving Unconstitutional Gag Order WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, America First Legal (AFL) filed a brief defending Donald J. Trump’s First Amendment rights at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. This case arises from an unprecedented gag order issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s politically-motivated prosecution of […] aflegal.org

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/2 This case arises from an unprecedented gag order issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s politically-motivated prosecution of Former President Trump in Washington, D.C.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/3 The gag order prevents the President from making public statements that target the Special Counsel or his staff, public statements that target any reasonably foreseeable witnesses or the substance of their testimony, and directing others to make any public statements about either of those two categories.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/4 This absurd gag order is just another example of the Biden administration unjustly using its power to silence its political opponents and to attempt to prevent President Trump from speaking. AFL’s brief highlights two critical issues for the court: https://t.co/smgkUVgGzt

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/5 As AFL’s brief highlights, the Biden Administration has authorized the appointment of, and an indictment by, a Special Counsel. That indictment charges President Biden’s principal political rival and likely general-election opponent, Donald J. Trump, with multiple federal crimes.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/6 The gag order sharply curtails President Trump’s ability to engage in core political speech and political association, thereby limiting his ability to keep both the Special Counsel and the President “accountable . . . to his country in his political character.”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/7 That political accountability—like the First Amendment’s protections—“has its fullest and most urgent application . . . during a campaign for political office.” Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310, 339 (2010).

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/8 And the gag order prevents President Trump from engaging in that core political speech despite his campaign for political office.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/9 America First Legal is proud to support President Trump’s right to free speech and will continue to be vocal against the Biden Administration’s weaponization of the Department of Justice and the federal government at large.

JesseBWatters
Posted - June 25, 2024 at 12:21 AM
Saved - June 25, 2024 at 12:48 AM

@JesseBWatters - Jesse Watters

CNN just slapped a gag order on The Trump campaign— days before the CNN debate. We knew Trump’s mic would be muted during the debate, but we didn’t know his campaign’s mic would be muted before it. https://t.co/8S6XlZ0VLB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Muhammad Ali prepares for a fight, while Trump and Biden gear up for a debate. CNN silences Trump's campaign, Biden practices smiling, and Trump rallies in Philly. Trump jokes about Biden's debate prep and connects with supporters in blue states. The stage is set for a showdown between Trump and Biden, with both sides strategizing for victory.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was billed as the fight of the century before he faced off against Smoke and Joe Frazier. The great Muhammad Ali said, I want 15 referees to be at this fight because there ain't no one man who can keep up with the pace I'm gonna set except me. It's fight night in Washington. Trump stepping back on the debate stage, and Democrats already smell trouble. Speaker 1: President Biden versus Donald Trump is gonna be must see. See. See. So this is like a real live freestyle battle. Good luck, president Joe Biden. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, the Good luck. Biden's not gonna be able to keep up. Speaker 0: Yeah. That's interesting. Speaker 1: It's it's it's gonna be listen. I don't know. Maybe it won't be bad. Maybe they got some new they've been working on, some super serum. Speaker 0: Yeah. You Speaker 1: know what I mean? They're gonna shoot It's it's gonna be bad. It's gonna be bad. Donald Trump is dangerous because he's funny. Yeah. Yeah. He's dangerous because he's funny. Yeah. He's gonna give us one of the greatest stand up specials we've ever seen. Speaker 0: The refs sense danger too. We're 3 days from the CNN presidential debate, and the network's already proving it won't be a fair fight. Speaker 2: What do you expect, from Joe Biden? Well, first of all, it it's so it takes someone 5 minutes to Google Jake Tapper, Donald Trump, to see that Jake Tapper has Ma'am, continue to stop this interview if they're gonna keep the election in my call. Filter. Ma'am, I'm gonna stop this interview if you continue to attack my colleagues. I would like to talk about Speaker 3: Joe Biden Speaker 2: and Donald Trump who you work for. Yes. Speaker 1: If you Speaker 2: are here to speak on his behalf, I will be Speaker 1: able to Speaker 2: have this conversation. I am stating facts that your colleagues have stated in the past. Now as soon as Speaker 1: this is case. Speaker 2: We're gonna come back out to the panel. Caroline, thank you very much for your time. You are welcome to come back at any point. Speaker 0: CNN cuts your mic for saying Google Jake Tapper. CNN just slapped a gag order on the Trump campaign days before the debate. We knew Trump's mic would be muted during the debate, but we didn't know his campaign's mic would be muted before it. You can go on CNN and lie about Trump Russia, call Republicans racist Nazis, but you can't say Tapper's biased. If Jake's not biased, why is he celebrating Trump losing? Speaker 4: There's also been a time, of extreme divisions. Many of the divisions caused and exacerbated by president Trump himself. The unwillingness to respect facts and science and do everything that could be done to save lives during a pandemic. But now the Trump presidency is coming to an end to an end. For tens of millions of our fellow Americans, their long national nightmare is Speaker 0: We know what's in corner CNN's in. They're gagging the Trump campaign and giving Biden pointers. Speaker 1: For president Biden, one more piece of advice because this is still a physical, visual medium. Right? He's kinda got resting old face. Right? So you need him to point that out. I've learned it so much. It bars him down. Resting old face. And so he needs to smile. And when he smiles, it goes away a little bit. Because when he smiles, his face come to life. I would just say if they're practicing this, practice smiling. You Speaker 2: basically just said smile more. Speaker 1: I did. You would. 80 year old Speaker 0: at Camp David practicing standing for 90 minutes and working on his resting old face. NBC News says his team's been meticulously studying Trump in an effort to best identify what might get under his skin. Biden's goal Thursday is to make Trump snap. He'll be fighting dirty. Every shot will be below the belt. You're a twice impeached, bigoted, bankrupted, convicted felon. Trump's muted when Biden's trashing him, so he needs to compose himself, say, namaste. And when Biden's time is up, react calmly. Don't take debate because Biden's gonna make the debate all about Trump because Joe doesn't have a record to run on. Trump needs to make the debate all about the American people. Joe's trying to lock me up instead of the illegals raping and murdering our women and children. I never went bankrupt. Bidenomics is bankrupting our country like that. The Biden camp's feeling the pressure. Politico says there's feelings of disappointment and depression with Biden's biggest fundraisers who watch their cash advantage just vanish. Thursday's make or break for the Joe Biden legacy. If he falls flat on his face, both figuratively and literally, it's a green light for the Democrat switcheroo in Chicago. So Democrats are promising a juiced up Joe. Speaker 3: Biden is taking this very seriously, and, I'll tell you, you're gonna see a very energized president Biden who is looking forward to having these direct conversations with Donald Trump on on Thursday night in Atlanta. Speaker 0: Trump knows Joe's not gonna come really that sleepy. Speaker 5: So tonight, we'll refer to him as sleepy Joe. Because right now, as you know, it's been reported that right now Crooked Joe has gone to a locked cabin to study, prepare. No. He didn't he's sleeping now because they wanna get him good and strong. So a little before debate time, he gets a shot in the ass. Speaker 0: Well, Biden mocked debate Trump impersonators for a week with 16 advisers in the woods, Trump's campaigning on Democrats' home turf, Philly, and asking the crowd what they wanna see. Speaker 5: How should I handle him? Should I be tough and nasty? Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 5: Or should I be should I be she say no. Should I be tough and nasty and just say you're the worst president in history? Or should I be nice and calm and let him speak? Speaker 0: Prime time votes for calm. The base is already fired up. We don't need any more nicknames and insults. We need this is my 4 years. This was Biden's 4 years in a relaxed, specific, and charming manner. We're not saying Trump shouldn't be colorful. Speaker 5: Even I won't buy bacon anymore. It's too expensive. I said I'd love to have some lovely bacon, darling. And she said, no. I'm sorry. It's too expensive. Speaker 0: Bacon's a great way to tell a story about inflation. Lake and Riley is a way to tell a story about illegal immigration. 1,000,000,000 of dollars for 7 car chargers, there's your story about energy. Trump's been at the bodegas, the Chick Fil A's construction sites, the freezing cold courtrooms, the border. He's personally experienced the Biden presidency. Joe hides from it. You know how much Biden loves going to Philly? It's like the only place he campaigns besides Delaware. Biden hasn't gone to Philly for a cheese steak in 14 years. That cheesesteak he's chowing down on probably cost a dollar 50 back then. Trump was at Tonya next Saturday. Speaker 5: These are my people. Let me tell you, these people built America. You know that? These people built America. Speaker 0: 45 even left a $500 tip. Speaker 5: No tax. Okay. You ready? Speaker 1: We are ready. I'm ready Speaker 5: to give you $500. You guys all split it Speaker 1: up. Thank you. Alright. Great things Speaker 5: happen in Philadelphia. Let's go. Speaker 0: And just like the Bronx and Atlanta, Trump went behind the blue wall and was showered with love. Speaker 5: I'm saying the people need hope. I go out. I see the greatest people. So we're in the middle of a pretty rough area, and it's a love fest. You see that. It's incredible. They want hope. They want to have they want to have a future. Listen to the people. And these are not people that would normally be going wild. It's been amazing.
RedWave_Press
Posted - January 28, 2025 at 2:39 AM
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 6:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jim Acosta is reportedly out at CNN after being moved to the midnight slot. I remember when President Trump had a heated exchange with him, criticizing CNN for having him on air and calling him a rude person. It was quite a moment in their contentious relationship.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

BREAKING: Jim Acosta is reportedly out at CNN after being banished to the midnight time (EST) slot on the network. Flashback to when President Trump slapped Jim Acosta all over the White House in a heated exchange: “I’ll tell you what, CNN should be ashamed of itself having you work for them.” “You are a rude, terrible person, you shouldn’t be working for CNN. You are a very rude person.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the midterms, a discussion arose about a caravan of migrants from Central America. One party characterized it as an invasion, while the other disagreed, emphasizing the need for legal immigration processes. The president insisted on the necessity of immigrants for economic growth, despite the caravan being far from the border. Tensions escalated when questions about the Russia investigation were raised, with the president dismissing them as a hoax. The president criticized a CNN reporter for being rude and unprofessional, claiming CNN spreads fake news and labeling them as the enemy of the people. Another reporter defended the first, but the president continued to express his disdain for the media's portrayal of his administration and the fearmongering surrounding Democrats and crime.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the midterms. That is Here we go. That well, if you don't mind, mister president come on. That this caravan was an invasion. As you know, mister president as you know, mister president, caravan was not an invasion. It's a it's a a group of migrants moving up from Central America towards the border with The US. Speaker 1: Thank you for telling me that. Speaker 0: Why why did you why did you characterize it as such? Speaker 1: And Because I consider it an invasion. You and I have a difference of opinion. Speaker 0: Do you think that you demonized immigrants in this election to try to keep Speaker 1: I want them I want them to come into the country, but they have to come in legally. You know, they have to come in, Jim, through a process. I want it to be a process, and I want people to come in. And we need the people to go in. Speaker 0: Your campaign your campaign Wait. Speaker 1: You know why we need the people, don't you? Because we have hundreds of companies moving in. We need the people. Speaker 0: They're hundreds of miles away, though. They're hundreds and hundreds of miles away. That that's not an invasion. Speaker 1: Honestly? You know why? Speaker 0: That that's not an invasion. Speaker 1: Honestly? I think you should let me run the country. You run CNN. Alright. And if you did it well, your ratings Speaker 0: Let me ask if I may ask 1 other question. Mister president, I That's enough. Speaker 1: I was gonna ask 1 Speaker 0: of the the other folks Speaker 1: that That's enough. Speaker 0: Pardon me, ma'am. I'm I'm mister president. Speaker 1: That's enough. Speaker 0: Mister president, I had 1 other question. If I may ask on on the Russia investigation, are you concerned that that you may have Speaker 1: I'm not concerned about anything with the Russian investigation because it's a hoax. Are you That's enough. Put down the mic. Speaker 0: Mister president, are you worried about indictments coming down in this Speaker 2: Mister president. Mister president. Speaker 1: I'll tell you what. CNN should be ashamed of itself, having you working for them. You are a rude, terrible person. You shouldn't be working for CNN. Go ahead. Speaker 2: I I think that's unfair. Speaker 1: A very rude person. The way you treat Sarah Huckabee is horrible, and the way you treat other people are horrible. You shouldn't treat people that way. Go ahead. Speaker 2: In in Go Speaker 1: ahead. Peter. Go ahead. Speaker 2: In in Jim's defense, I've traveled with him and watched him. He's reporter who busts Speaker 0: his butt. Speaker 1: I'm not a big fan of yours either, so Speaker 2: I understand. To be honest. So let me so let me ask you a question if I can. You repeatedly said You Speaker 1: are you are the best. Speaker 2: Mister president, you repeatedly o over the course of Speaker 1: I mean, just sit down, please. Well, when you when you report fake news no. When you report fake news, which CNN does a lot, you are the enemy of the people. Go ahead. Speaker 2: Mister president, over the course over the course of the last several days of the campaign, sir, sir, at the end of the campaign, you repeatedly said that Americans need to fear Democrats. You said it would unleash a wave of violent crime that endangers families everywhere. Why are you Speaker 1: committing to very weak crime. Speaker 2: Why are you
njhochman
Posted - January 28, 2025 at 8:35 PM
Saved - January 28, 2025 at 11:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the recent actions by President Trump regarding immigration funding are pivotal. He signed an executive order halting refugee admissions and directed the State Department to stop funding NGOs involved in refugee resettlement. These organizations, heavily reliant on taxpayer money, have been accused of undermining U.S. immigration laws. Many operate almost entirely on federal grants, facilitating the immigration process and providing financial support to migrants. This shift in funding represents a significant change in the immigration landscape, which I see as a major victory against these NGOs.

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

This is arguably the single most important aspect of Trump's funding freeze. The immigration crisis isn't an accident. It's a well-oiled system, facilitated by powerful NGOs—and funded by your tax dollars. By defunding the NGOs, Trump is crippling the entire system. 🧵 https://t.co/OJs1GN0O3y

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

Here's what just happened: Last week, President Trump signed an executive order suspending refugee admissions into the U.S. Then, the State Department went a step further—they issued a "stop-work" order to their NGO "partners," suspending all funding for refugee resettlement. https://t.co/TU6TgRTEzO

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

The NGOs were beside themselves. And for good reason—very few of these groups are self-sufficient. Most of them are sustained by the federal tax-dollar gravy train. The immigration crisis is being financed by your government—with your money. Hence, their outraged statements: https://t.co/KfxDJMtwg1

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

To be clear, these NGOs exist to subvert U.S. immigration law at every step of the process—actively transporting migrants into the country, fighting enforcement efforts at the border, resettling migrants in American towns and cities, and lobbying for open border policies in D.C. https://t.co/ZYMjlIcDMq

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

And again, they've been doing it on your dime. For the past four years, The Biden State Department has been mainlining taxpayer funds to groups that run an end-to-end mass migration network, beginning deep in South America and finishing with resettlement in American communities. https://t.co/UuZqmEZhoP

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

They provide "humanitarian transportation" to ferry immigrants up to our border, waypoints with shelter and medical services along the way, Spanish-language maps showing the best route to the U.S., and legal services for immigrants to beat our immigration laws once they get here. https://t.co/ZfuKr7gAIn

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

Oh, and money. They just give them cash cards, vouchers, and often even just stacks of cash in envelopes. Tough to think of a more direct 1:1 redistribution: You pay your taxes. Your government sends that money to the NGOs. The NGOs hand it to immigrants. You work, they benefit. https://t.co/NsnIyYziPP

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

Ten of these major immigration NGOs—known as VOLAGS ("Voluntary Agencies")—have contracts with the State Department's Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration (PRM), which provides them with the funding to resettle migrants in the U.S. These are the ten VOLAGS in question: https://t.co/43lGcF7hEs

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

Most of these groups are only able to operate because of the federal government. Take the USCCB: In 2023, they received $129.6M in federal grants for migration services. They spent $130.5M on migration services. Their immigration activities are almost 100% taxpayer-funded. https://t.co/dAgiXcgFxs

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

Or take the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service. (Which, unlike the USCCB as an overall organization, is exclusively focused on immigration). In FY 2023, 96.65% of their revenue came from federal grants and contracts, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars. https://t.co/q30J9qkzah

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

Or take the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society—a group that we made an entire video about last year. (See below). Biden DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas served on their board until taking a job in the Biden admin. Surprise, surprise—after he took office, their funding skyrocketed. https://t.co/7hwpgZps7S

@America_2100 - America 2100

Alejandro Mayorkas is fully in bed with the open borders lobby. Until 2020, he served on the board of HIAS — a radical left-wing group that is actively ferrying illegals into America. He was never serious about border security. The Senate must impeach. https://t.co/yTlpQYHeAQ https://t.co/w36fGap0NX

Video Transcript AI Summary
Alejandro Mayorkas, the Secretary of Homeland Security, is facing impeachment due to his role in the ongoing border crisis. His connection to open borders began before his current position; he served on the board of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), which advocates for open immigration policies. The Biden administration has deep ties to various NGOs that facilitate immigration, including HIAS, which provides resources for immigrants and lobbies for amnesty. HIAS, founded in 1881, has shifted its focus to assist all refugees, receiving significant funding from government grants, including from DHS. Critics argue that these policies contribute to a crisis marked by increased crime and suffering at the border, contradicting the idealistic vision of immigration policy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alejandro Mayorkas is the chief architect of the American border crisis. Right now, the house is trying for the second time to impeach Biden DHS secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. The yeas are 214 and the nays are 213. The resolution is adopted. You've seen the videos of the crisis at our southern border. You've read the tragic stories of the Americans who have been killed by the drugs and crime pouring into our country. You may have even read about the ways in which Mayorkas' policies at the Department of Homeland Security have facilitated this disaster. But what you might not know is that Mayorkas' role in our open borders crisis started years before he joined the Biden administration. Prior to his current position as the head of the Department of Homeland Security, Mayorkas served on the board of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society or HIAS. The organization is part of a sprawling coalition of NGOs, activist groups, and nonprofits hailing from a wide range of both religious and secular backgrounds that partner with both United Nations and the US government to push for open borders. The Biden administration's connections to this network run deep, well beyond Mayorkas and HIAS. Robin Marcos, the Director of Biden's Office of Refugee Resettlement, previously served as the Senior Director of Resettlement, Asylum, and Integration Programming for the International Rescue Committee, a powerful NGO that helps to aid and coordinate the flow of immigration up to the US border. Katie Tobin, who served as a senior border advisor on Biden's National Security Council, previously worked for Annunciation House, a major Catholic immigration nonprofit which is currently being sued by the state of Texas for helping to facilitate illegal immigration. Mayorkas joined the board of HIAS in 2020. HIAS bills itself as the world's oldest refugee agency. The group was founded in 18/81 and was originally dedicated to aiding and advocating for Jewish refugees fleeing persecution in Russia and Eastern Europe. Over the past few decades, however, the group's focus has expanded to include all refugees of every religious and national background. The group's leaders see themselves as humanitarians who help to provide vital services to refugees and asylum seekers around the world. HIAS, welcome the stranger. Protect the refugee. But in practice, HIAS and groups like it play a critical role in our open borders crisis. At the government level, HIAS regularly lobbies for open borders, amnesty, and uncontrolled immigration. On the ground, the group actively facilitates the ongoing invasion with everything from cash cards and vouchers for immigrants arriving at our border to Spanish language maps showing immigrants how to get here to providing tents, shelter, and legal and medical services for immigrants to use during their journey up to the US border. Once they've made it into America, HIAS helps to resettle them in communities across the country. All of this is funded by your tax dollars. HIAS had an operating budget of more than $162,000,000 in 2022. Nearly half of its funding came from government grants, including from Mayorkas' DHS. Millions of tax dollars in those government grants were explicitly earmarked for the group's efforts to fund and support immigration from South America. Since Biden took office, the number of tax dollars hold a utopian vision of immigration policy. A world without borders. But in the real world, their policies do not lead to utopia. They lead to death, destruction, and misery. The crisis at our border is living proof. For more stories like this, follow America 21100.

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

If you're looking for the villain at the center of the immigration crisis, it's these guys. The refugee NGOs are a fifth column in American politics. And they've essentially been acting as an extension of the federal government. But not anymore. This is a big, big win.

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

You can check out my deep-dive thread on mass deportations from earlier this month here:

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

In 1954, 750 Border Patrol agents deported 1.1 million illegals in the space of a few months. Today, we have 21,000 Border Patrol agents—and far more advanced technology. Mass deportations are reasonable, necessary and possible. We've done it before—and we can do it again. 🧵 https://t.co/K2QrzqTajp

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

And yesterday’s thread on how the “online right” won:

@njhochman - Nate Hochman

For years, we were told that "the internet isn't real life." But in this election, it was. Online influencers, issues and ideas played a major role in the 2024 election—especially on the right. Today's right is more "online" than the left—and that's part of why it's winning. 🧵 https://t.co/jxzosG8XOb

EricLDaugh
Posted - February 2, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Saved - February 2, 2025 at 3:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe how biased the media is. NPR "fact-checked" Trump's claim about saving stranded astronauts, saying they're not stranded, despite major outlets calling them "stranded" months ago. It feels like anything Trump says is instantly labeled as wrong. Despicable.

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

🚨 HOLY SHLIT. You can't hate the media ENOUGH. NPR has "fact checked" Trump's mission to save the stranded astronauts by claiming "they're not stranded." Yet, MONTHS ago, virtually every major media outlet (CNN, PBS, et al) *literally* called them "STRANDED." As soon as Trump says something, it has to be wrong, though. Despicable.

unlimited_ls
Posted - February 12, 2025 at 6:55 PM
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 8:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I questioned which White House official prevented the AP from entering the Oval Office over the "Gulf of America" terminology. In response, Karoline Leavitt stated that they will hold accountable those who spread lies, asserting that the body of water near Louisiana is indeed called the "Gulf of America."

@unlimited_ls - Unlimited L's

🚨Kaitlan Collins: Which White House official barred the AP and from the Oval Office last night [over not using the "Gulf of America" language] Karoline Leavitt: "We are going to hold those lies accountable, and it is a fact that the body of water off the coast of Louisiana is called the 'Gulf of America.'"

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's a privilege to cover the White House, and no one has the right to just walk into the Oval Office and ask the President questions. We decide who gets invited, and many outlets don't even have that daily privilege. We reserve the right to decide who enters the Oval Office. Regarding the AP being barred, if we believe outlets are pushing lies, we'll hold them accountable. The body of water off Louisiana is the Gulf of America. The Secretary of Interior has made that the official designation and Apple and Google recognize it. It's important we get that right for everyone.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Which White House official made the decision to bar the AP reporter from the Oval Office and the Diplomatic Reception Room last night? Speaker 1: Well, first of all, let me just set the record straight. It is a privilege to cover this White House. It's a privilege to be the White House press secretary. And nobody has the right to go into the Oval Office and ask the president of The United States questions. That's an invitation that is given, and there are hundreds of outlets on this campus. Many of you in this room who don't have the privilege of being part of that pool every single day and getting to ask the president questions. We reserve the right, to decide who gets to go into the Oval Office, and you all have credentials to be here including the Associated Press who is in this briefing room today. Speaker 0: Retaliatory in nature, is is the argument because the reason that the AP was barred, which they said was because they're not using the phrase Gulf Of America. They're using Gulf Of Mexico in line with their standards. And so the question here is, is this setting a precedent that this White House will retaliate against reporters who don't use the language that you guys believe reporter should use. Speaker 1: And how does that align with Speaker 0: the First Amendment commitment that you were just talking about? Speaker 1: I was very upfront in my briefing on day one, that if we feel that there are lies being pushed by outlets in this room, we are going to hold those lies accountable. And it is a fact that the body of water off the coast of Louisiana is called the Gulf Of America. And I'm not sure why news outlets don't want to call it that, but that is what it is. The secretary of interior has made that the official designation in the, geographical identification name server. And Apple has recognized that. Google has recognized that. Pretty much every other outlet in this room has recognized that body of water as the Gulf Of America, and it's very important to this administration that we get that right. Not just for people here at home, but also for the rest Speaker 0: of Speaker 1: the world.
catturd2
Posted - February 12, 2025 at 7:20 PM
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 7:40 PM

@catturd2 - Catturd ™

This is 🔥

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

🚨🔥Karoline Leavitt shuts CNN hack Kaitlan Collins down after whining about an AP reporter losing access over ‘Gulf of America': “Let me just set the record straight. It is a privilege to cover this white House. It's a privilege to be the white House press secretary. And nobody has the right to go into the Oval Office and ask the president of the United States questions." "I was very upfront in my briefing on day one, that if we feel that there are lies being pushed by outlets in this room, we are going to hold those lies accountable. And it is a fact that the body of water off the coast of Louisiana is called the Gulf of America, and I'm not sure why news outlets don't want to call it that, but that is what it is."

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's a privilege to cover the White House, and no one has the right to ask the President questions in the Oval Office. We decide who gets invited, and many outlets don't have that privilege. Regarding the AP being barred, we reserve the right to hold outlets accountable for pushing lies. The body of water off the coast of Louisiana is called the Gulf Of America. The Secretary of Interior has made it the official designation, and Apple, Google, and most other outlets recognize it as such. It's important for this administration to get it right for people here and the rest of the world.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't think for you, which White House official made the decision to bar the AP reporter from the Oval Office and the Diplomatic Reception Room last night? Speaker 1: Well, first of all, let me just set the record straight. It is a privilege to cover this White House. It's a privilege to be the White House press secretary. And nobody has the right to go into the Oval Office and ask the president of The United States questions. That's an invitation that is given, and there are hundreds of outlets on this campus. Many of you in this room who don't have the privilege of being part of that pool every single day and getting to ask the president questions. We reserve the right, to decide who gets to go into the Oval Office, and you all have credentials to be here including the Associated Press who is in this briefing room today. Speaker 0: But isn't it retaliatory in nature? Is is the argument because the reason that the AP was barred, which they said was because they're not using the phrase Gulf Of America. They're using Gulf Of Mexico in line with their standards. And so the question here is, is this setting a precedent that this White House will retaliate against reporters who don't use the language that you guys believe reporters should use? And how Speaker 1: does that align with the Speaker 0: first amendment commitment that you were just talking about? Speaker 1: I was very upfront in my briefing on day one, that if we feel that there are lies being pushed by outlets in this room, we are going to hold those lies accountable. And it is a fact that the body of water off the coast of Louisiana is called the Gulf Of America. And I'm not sure why news outlets don't want to call it that, but that is what it is. The secretary of interior has made that the official designation in the, geographical identification name server. And Apple has recognized that. Google has recognized that. Pretty much every other outlet in this room has recognized that body of water as the Gulf Of America and it's very important to this administration that we get that right. Not just for people here at home but also for the rest of the world. Sure.
liz_churchill10
Posted - February 12, 2025 at 7:38 PM
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 7:43 PM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Communist Meltdown… “Donald Trump banned the AP, a 179 year/old newspaper…from the White House…because it declines to call the Gulf of Mexico the ‘Gulf of America’. This is straight up press censorship…” -Jamie Raskin featuring Mask Retard beside him. https://t.co/wYFjWhb35p

Video Transcript AI Summary
Yesterday, Donald Trump banned the Associated Press from the White House because it declines to call the Gulf Of Mexico the Gulf Of America. This is press censorship based on viewpoint discrimination. During Trump's presidency, the DOD kicked out news groups from the Pentagon that asked skeptical questions, including the New York Times, NBC News, and the Washington Post. These organizations were replaced by outlets willing to advance the party line of the states, like Breitbart and One American News Network.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yesterday, Donald Trump banned the Associated Press, a 100 and 70 nine year old newspaper organization, from the White House because it declines to call the Gulf Of Mexico the Gulf Of America. This is straight up press censorship based on retaliatory viewpoint discrimination. Trump's DOD kicked out eight news groups that had space in the Pentagon, but which asked skeptical questions of the new secretary, including the New York Times, NBC News, and the Washington Post, all ousted in favor of outlets willing to faithfully advance the party line of the states, like Breitbart and one American News Network.
nicksortor
Posted - February 14, 2025 at 5:39 PM
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 3:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Trump administration has banned the AP from the Oval Office and Air Force One due to their reporting on the Gulf of America. I support this move and suggest banning Kaitlyn Collins and CNN as well. Karoline Leavitt emphasized that they will hold media accountable for spreading lies.

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING: The Trump administration has officially BANNED the AP from the Oval Office and Air Force One after they refuse to stop peddling fake news about the Gulf of America GOOD! Now ban Kaitlyn Collins and CNN Karoline Leavitt was crystal clear this week reiterating her warning to outlets: “I was very upfront in my briefing on day one, that if we feel that there are lies being pushed by outlets in this room, we are going to hold those lies accountable.” 🔥

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's a privilege to cover this White House and to be the White House press secretary. No one has the right to enter the Oval Office and question the President; it's by invitation only. We decide who enters the Oval Office. If outlets push lies, we will hold them accountable. The body of water off Louisiana is the Gulf Of America. The Secretary of Interior has made that the official designation in the geographical identification name server. Apple, Google, and most other outlets recognize it as the Gulf Of America. Getting the name right is very important to this administration, both domestically and internationally.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't think Speaker 1: for you. Which White House official made the decision to bar the AP reporter from the Oval Office and the Diplomatic Reception Room last night? Speaker 0: Well, first of all, let me just set the record straight. It is a privilege to cover this White House. It's a privilege to be the White House press secretary. Secretary. And nobody has the right to go into the Oval Office and ask the president of The United States questions. That's an invitation that is given, and there are hundreds of outlets on this campus. Many of you in this room who don't have the privilege of being part of that pool every single day and getting to ask the president questions. We reserve the right, to decide who gets to go into the Oval Office, and you all have credentials to be here including the Associated Press who is in this briefing room today. But Speaker 1: isn't it retaliatory in nature is is the argument because the reason that the AP was barred, which they said was because they're not using the phrase Gulf Of America. They're using Gulf Of Mexico in line with their standards. And so the question here is, is this setting a precedent that this White House will retaliate against reporters who don't use the language that you guys believe reporters should use? And how does that align with the First Amendment commitment that you were just talking about? Speaker 0: I was very upfront in my briefing on day one, that if we feel that there are lies being pushed by outlets in this room, we are going to hold those lies accountable. And it is a fact that the body of water off the coast of Louisiana is called the Gulf Of America. And I'm not sure why news outlets don't want to call it that, but that is what it is. The secretary of interior has made that the official designation in the, geographical identification name server. And Apple has recognized that. Google has recognized that. Pretty much every other outlet in this room has recognized that body of water as the Gulf Of America, And it's very important to this administration that we get that right. Not just for people here at home, but also for the rest of the world. Sure.
bennyjohnson
Posted - February 14, 2025 at 5:58 PM
Saved - February 14, 2025 at 7:50 PM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

🚨BREAKING: The Associated Press has been completely BANNED by the Trump Administration from the Oval Office and Air Force One for refusing to accept and use the updated name, the Gulf of America. https://t.co/Cp8KHearmY

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's a privilege to cover this White House, and nobody has the right to enter the Oval Office to ask the President questions; it's by invitation only. We decide who enters the Oval Office. You all, including the Associated Press, have credentials to be here. If outlets push lies, we'll hold them accountable. The body of water off Louisiana is the Gulf Of America. The Secretary of Interior made it official in the geographical identification name server. Apple, Google, and most other outlets recognize it as the Gulf Of America. Getting this right is very important to this administration, both domestically and internationally.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't think Speaker 1: for you. Which White House official made the decision to bar the AP reporter from the Oval Office and the Diplomatic Reception Room last night? Speaker 0: Well, first of all, let me just set the record straight. It is a privilege to cover this White House. It's a privilege to be the White House press secretary. Secretary. And nobody has the right to go into the Oval Office and ask the president of The United States questions. That's an invitation that is given, and there are hundreds of outlets on this campus. Many of you in this room who don't have the privilege of being part of that pool every single day and getting to ask the president questions. We reserve the right, to decide who gets to go into the Oval Office, and you all have credentials to be here including the Associated Press who is in this briefing room today. But Speaker 1: isn't it retaliatory in nature is is the argument because the reason that the AP was barred, which they said was because they're not using the phrase Gulf Of America. They're using Gulf Of Mexico in line with their standards. And so the question here is, is this setting a precedent that this White House will retaliate against reporters who don't use the language that you guys believe reporters should use? And how does that align with the First Amendment commitment that you were just talking about? Speaker 0: I was very upfront in my briefing on day one, that if we feel that there are lies being pushed by outlets in this room, we are going to hold those lies accountable. And it is a fact that the body of water off the coast of Louisiana is called the Gulf Of America. And I'm not sure why news outlets don't want to call it that, but that is what it is. The secretary of interior has made that the official designation in the, geographical identification name server. And Apple has recognized that. Google has recognized that. Pretty much every other outlet in this room has recognized that body of water as the Gulf Of America, And it's very important to this administration that we get that right. Not just for people here at home, but also for the rest of the world. Sure.
WallStreetMav
Posted - February 15, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Saved - February 16, 2025 at 8:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation critiques the media's portrayal of USAID following its funding cuts by Trump and Elon Musk. One participant argues that coverage focuses on the agency's perceived importance while ignoring questionable expenditures, such as funding gender studies in conservative countries and unproductive infrastructure projects. They suggest that the media's emotional response indicates a lack of awareness about USAID's operations, implying that if an organization collapses without government funding, it was not a genuine charity but rather a flawed system.

@WallStreetMav - Wall Street Mav

I just reviewed news on the word "USAID". It is all stories about how horrible it is that Trump and Elon shut it down. There are ZERO stories about the crazy items that USAID was spending money on. They are trying to create a fake narrative to that USAID was an awesome agency and Trump is horrible for stopping the flow of money.

@The_Jtoms101 - Devil Dog

🚨 BREAKING: MEDIA NOW HOSTING A FUNERAL FOR USAID 🚨 Y’all, I just Googled “USAID,” and apparently, Trump and Elon personally turned off the world’s oxygen supply. At least, that’s what the headlines are saying. 📰 “USAID was the heart and soul of humanity!” 📰 “Without USAID, the world may not survive!” 📰 “Trump and Elon hate poor people, confirmed!” But guess what’s mysteriously missing from all these sob stories? ❌ ANY actual reporting on what USAID was spending money on. ❌ ANY mention of the sketchy projects they were funneling billions into. ❌ ANY explanation of why shutting it down might be… a good thing? It’s almost like we weren’t supposed to notice that USAID was: 💰 Dropping millions on gender studies in countries that still stone women. 💰 Funding “infrastructure projects” where nothing ever got built. 💰 Paying for D.C. cocktail parties instead of actual aid. The media is clutching its pearls like USAID was a holy temple, when in reality it was just a government ATM with no withdrawal limits. The funniest part? Nobody outside of Washington even knew what USAID did until Trump shut it down. Now suddenly, half of X is acting like they’ve been volunteering there every weekend since birth. Here’s a thought: If your “charity” dies the second the free government money stops flowing, it wasn’t a charity—it was a money-laundering Ponzi scheme. And the fact that CNN is crying harder than Nancy Pelosi at an empty wine glass? Yeah, that tells you everything you need to know. 💀🔥

Video Transcript AI Summary
I Googled USAID and apparently Trump and Elon shut off the world's oxygen supply. But what's missing from these stories is any reporting on what USAID was spending money on, like sketchy projects they funneled billions into, or why shutting it down might be a good thing. USAID was dropping millions on gender studies in countries that still stone women, funding infrastructure projects where nothing ever got built, and paying for DC cocktail parties instead of actual aid. The media is acting like USAID was a holy temple when in reality, it was just a government ATM with no withdrawal limits. Nobody even knew what USAID did until Trump shut it down. If your charity dies when the free government money stops flowing, it wasn't a charity. It was a money laundering Ponzi scheme. And the fact that CNN is crying tells you everything.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Y'all, I just Googled USAID, and, apparently, Trump and Elon personally turned off the world's oxygen supply. At least that's what the headlines are saying. USAID was the heart and soul of humanity. Without USAID, the world may not survive. Trump and Elon hate poor people. Confirmed. But guess what's mysteriously missing from all these sob stories? Any actual reporting on what USAID was spending money on, any mention of the sketchy projects they were funneling billions into, any explanation of why shutting it down might be a good thing? It's almost like we weren't supposed to notice that USAID was dropping millions on gender studies in countries that still stone women, funding infrastructure projects where nothing ever got built, paying for DC cocktail parties instead of actual aid. The media is clutching its pearls like USAID was a holy temple when in reality, it was just a government ATM with no withdrawal limits. The funniest part, nobody outside of Washington even knew what USAID did until Trump shut it down. Now suddenly, half of x is acting like they've been volunteering there every weekend since birth. Here's a thought. If your charity dies, the second the free government money stops flowing, it wasn't a charity. It was a money laundering Ponzi scheme. And the fact that CNN is crying harder than Nancy Pelosi at an empty wine glass, yeah, that tells you everything you need to know.
HaMeturgeman
Posted - February 17, 2025 at 3:12 AM
Saved - February 17, 2025 at 4:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed that 60 Minutes featured two communications consultants as if they were long-time USAID employees who were dismissed for disloyalty. This misrepresentation contrasts sharply with Kristina Drye's account of the sudden loss of job security due to the USAID shutdown. Additionally, there seems to be a troubling narrative around free speech, with some claiming that the Holocaust was a result of it, while denying reporters access to the Oval Office is seen as an attack on the First Amendment. It's a confusing time in political media.

@HaMeturgeman - Eli Steinberg

🚨🚨60 Minutes pulled in 2 comms consultants who were never actual employees of USAID and presented them as though they were longtime employees who were fired for lack of "loyalty." 🚨🚨

@60Minutes - 60 Minutes

“Twelve days ago, people knew where their next paycheck was coming from. They knew how they were going to pay for their kids' daycare, their medical bills. And then, all gone overnight,” says Kristina Drye, who was fired in the USAID shutdown. https://cbsn.ws/3CU2X1y

CBS News | Breaking news, top stories & today's latest headlines CBS News offers breaking news coverage of today's top headlines. Stay informed on the biggest new stories with our balanced, trustworthy reporting. cbsnews.com

@HaMeturgeman - Eli Steinberg

Between this and Brennan asserting the Holocaust happened because of free speech, CBS had a heckuva day.

@HaMeturgeman - Eli Steinberg

https://t.co/Ccqx1zjUhc

@HaMeturgeman - Eli Steinberg

The state of the political media is such that denying a reporter special Oval Office access is an attack on the First Amendment, but outright censorship is just responsible governance—because, after all, "free speech was weaponized by the Nazis.”

mehdirhasan
Posted - February 17, 2025 at 4:12 PM
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 2:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Mehdi Hasan questioned JD Vance about his stance on free speech, referencing his critiques of Europe. Vance responded, clarifying that denying a reporter a seat in the White House press briefing is not equivalent to imprisoning dissenters, which he views as a genuine threat to free speech.

@mehdirhasan - Mehdi Hasan

Hey @JDVance, I know you’re busy lecturing the Europeans on free speech, but have you seen this?

@MarcACaputo - Marc Caputo

President Trump’s decision to limit AP reporters' access is as much fight over the Gulf of America as it is a protest of what White House advisers say is years of liberal word choices that AP’s influential stylebook has spread across mainstream media https://www.axios.com/2025/02/17/trump-ap-gulf-america-mexico

Scoop: Why Trump is targeting AP Longstanding Republican grievances made AP a target even before the newswire's Gulf of America decision. axios.com

@JDVance - JD Vance

@mehdirhasan Yes dummy. I think there’s a difference between not giving a reporter a seat in the WH press briefing room and jailing people for dissenting views. The latter is a threat to free speech, the former is not. Hope that helps!

CollinRugg
Posted - February 17, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 2:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m calling on the media to unite and boycott the Trump administration after the White House banned the Associated Press. It’s crucial for news outlets to support the AP by writing op-eds and standing with them in court. If necessary, we should refuse to cover presidential events in solidarity until Trump reverses this decision. The power of the press should not be undermined.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

NEW: Former CNN host Jim Acosta is calling on the media to come together and boycott the Trump administration. The call comes in response to the White House's decision to ban the Associated Press. "News outlets then must rally to the cause, by offering supportive statements to the court hearing the case, writing op-Ed’s backing the AP, and, if necessary, refusing to cover presidential movements in solidarity, until Trump backs down," Acosta said on Substack. "The presidential Sharpie is not mightier than the pen."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Okay, here's a concise transcript: Um, you, that, self, is, um, you, that, um, um, um, um, self, is, um, you, that, um, um, um, um, self, is, um, you, that, um, self, is, um, you, that, um, um, um, um, self, is, um, you, that, um, um, um, um, self, is, um, you, that, um, um, um, um, um, um, um, um, um, Su Jin's, um, um, um, um, look, is, have, is, at, want, um, um, um, um, look, is, have, is, at, want, um, um, um, um, look, is, have, is, at, want, um, um, um, um, um, look, is, have, is, cross, cross.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 的 一 你 那 自 是 一 你 那 的 那 的 那 自 是 一 你 那 的 那 的 那 自 是 一 你 那 的 那 自 是 一 你 那 的 那 的 那 自 是 一 你 那 的 那 的 那 自 是 一 你 那 的 那 的 那 的 那 的 那 素 禁 的 那 的 那 看 是 有 是 在 要 的 那 的 那 看 是 有 是 在 要 的 那 的 那 看 是 有 是 在 要 的 那 的 那 的 那 看 是 有 岔 岔
libsoftiktok
Posted - February 17, 2025 at 10:12 PM
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 2:19 AM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

The President of Mexico is now threatening to SUE Google over them complying with Trump’s EO and changing the name to “Gulf of America” https://t.co/7YqsQNmGHr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mexico does not accept the renaming of any geographic zone that includes part of its national territory and is under its jurisdiction. We are awaiting Google's response, and if it's unsatisfactory, we will proceed in court.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lo requieren, pero bajo ninguna circunstancia, México acepta que se renombre cualquier zona geográfica que incluya parte de su territorio nacional y que se encuentre bajo su jurisdicción. Entonces, vamos a esperar la respuesta de Google y si no, pues, procederemos ya en tribunales.
bennyjohnson
Posted - February 24, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Saved - February 25, 2025 at 1:44 PM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

Judge McFadden DENIED the Associated Press motion to return its access to White House press events. Here is the White House’s statement in response to this win: “This is the most transparent Administration in history.”🔥 https://t.co/vvJnqaSzUd

shinboson
Posted - March 15, 2025 at 1:50 AM
Saved - March 16, 2025 at 6:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation begins with a user criticizing a political figure for allegedly using executive power to punish a law firm representing his opponents, labeling him as unstable and a fascist. Another user responds by noting that similar actions occurred during the Obama administration, albeit more covertly. They argue that it is acceptable for the government to avoid working with firms whose advocacy conflicts with its interests, emphasizing that lawyers and clients choose each other based on their positions, and the government should not engage with firms that breach professional ethics.

@shinboson - 𝞍 Shin Megami Boson 𝞍

not only are the wokies going to turn out to be 100% correct that he’s an unstable rеtаrd, they’re also going to be right about him being a fascist tyrant he’s trying to use an executive order to punish a law firm for the “crime” of representing his political opponents

@lokkju - Loki Coyote

No one called Obama a fascist, yet his administration persued similar goals, but in more insidious ways. This is only news because (1) Trump, and (2) he's actually being upfront and public about it, instead of secretive and manipulative. It's perfectly fine, actually, for the USG to decide they don't want to do business with a firm because of that firm's advocacy positions that are in conflict with the USG's. We don't have the cab-rank rule in the US; lawyers choose their clients, and clients their lawyers, specifically for their advocacy positions. The USG doesn't buy components from manufacturers with supply chain risks, and doesn't want to trust a firm that has demonstrated a willingness to breach professional ethics in pursuit of ideological goals. https://reason.com/volokh/2025/03/13/remember-when-the-obama-administration-pressured-baker-hostetler-to-drop-its-representation-in-house-of-representatives-v-burwell/

Remember When The Obama Administration Pressured Baker Hostetler To Drop Its Representation In House of Representatives v. Burwell? For the past two decades or so, conservatives have been systematically excluded from big law. Paul Clement was pushed out of two big law firms for his reason.com
amuse
Posted - April 3, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Saved - April 3, 2025 at 7:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that Mike Balsamo, president of the National Press Club, denied Natalie Winter's membership, stating she isn't a reporter. This seems to be a growing trend among Democrats to exclude conservative journalists by questioning their journalistic status.

@amuse - @amuse

PRESS FREEDOM: The AP's Mike Balsamo is the president of the National Press Club has denied Natalie Winter's membership after determining she is not a reporter. This is becoming a more common way for Democrats to exclude conservative journalists - claiming they aren't journalists. h/t @JoeKinseyexp

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

The National Press Club denied my membership application after review by their Board of Governors. I “do not meet the qualifications for membership.” I co-host one of the largest shows on the right, Presidents and Congressmen share my work, and I have a White House Press pass. https://t.co/bCmEAZ7Ujc

LauraLoomer
Posted - April 4, 2025 at 11:20 AM
Saved - April 5, 2025 at 12:06 AM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Probably just mad I exposed their radical left, Trump hating White House reporter who hit President Trump in the face with a microphone. She was so upset I exposed her, she deleted her X account. DEFUND NPR AND GIVE @LoomerUnleashed THEIR PRESS PASS INSTEAD. She got Loomered. https://t.co/dChFXi1FOj

@RobsRankings - RobsRankings

@LauraLoomer @billmaher Npr is going off on you at this moment. Complete propaganda. Should be defunded

LauraLoomer
Posted - April 12, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Saved - April 13, 2025 at 10:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe President Trump should be commended for taking action against law firms that misuse government power. It's interesting that Bill Maher and HBO chose Davis Wright Tremaine, an anti-Trump firm, to represent them in my defamation lawsuit. Just days before my deposition, Maher visited the White House to seek favor with Trump, despite his public attacks on him. HBO seems to want to profit from Maher's dinner with Trump while funding a firm that opposes him. I think Davis Wright Tremaine should be held accountable for their unethical practices.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

President Trump deserves to be applauded for his actions against law firms that participate in weaponization of government. There is a reason why Bill Maher @billmaher and @HBO chose DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE to represent them in the defamation lawsuit I filed against them. They went out of their way to choose an anti-Trump law firm. Then, days before my deposition of Bill Maher, Maher went to the White House to grovel to President Trump, as he reiterated last night during his show. So he bashes Trump, falsely accused him of committing adultery, and attacked the Trump family, and then HBO wants to monetize the episode about Maher’s dinner with Trump while they are paying an openly anti-Trump law firm? Seriously?!? Cc: @realDonaldTrump Davis Wright Tremaine needs to be held accountable ASAP. Their lawyers are some of the most unethical people practicing law, in my opinion.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

So many conservatives are bending over backwards to compliment rabid Trump hater Bill Maher @billmaher. Meanwhile, Maher is complicit in the lawfare machine against President Trump and his admin. He has been cheering on Trump hatred for years, and now, Maher wants to rewrite history. Anyone who is praising Bill Maher needs to be called out given the fact that Maher has anti-Trump legal representation. I met Bill Maher last week, when my lawyer and I deposed him on video in Beverly Hills. As many of you know, I have filed a $150 Million Defamation lawsuit against Bill Maher and HBO after Maher falsely accused me of having sex with President Trump last September when President Trump invited me as his guest to the Presidential debate. Who is representing Maher and @HBO in this legal matter? An anti-Trump law firm called Davis Wright Tremaine. @DWTLaw The law firm Davis Wright Tremaine has been hard at work "defending" those who have tried to destroy President Trump, his family, me and anyone who stands up to the left and their vile, fake news propaganda. The firm advertises, as you can see in this article, that it is anti-Trump and anti-conservative. They proudly promoted on their website that they are “Trump’s Least Favorite Firm” in a @THR Hollywood Reporter spread in 2019. Among the many Leftists and Trump haters DWT has represented is George Stephanopulos and ABC @ABC @ThisWeekABC in a defamation case filed by President Trump over a false accusation of RAPE. Ultimately, they settled with President Trump for $15 MILLION in December 2024. This further demonstrates how depraved Davis Wright Tremaine is as a firm. They defend people who make defamatory remarks for the sake of destroying our country and emboldening communists in the media. They tried to destroy President Trump’s reputation and his marriage by defending a Fake News puppet who accused Trump of being a RAPIST. Now, Davis Wright Tremaine is up against me and my lawyer Larry Klayman @LarryEKlayman in a defamation case I filed against Bill Maher and HBO. They want to defend Maher from facing consequences for falsely accusing me of having sex with Donald Trump, which was an attempt to destroy my reputation, as well as President Trump’s marriage with @MELANIATRUMP The lawyers from Davis Wright Tremaine need to be held accountable in the same way others like their friends over at Perkins Coie have been. This month, DWT signed a brief DENOUNCING President Trump and his efforts to crack down on law firms that participate in the Weaponization of Government. They went out of their way to defend the anti-Trump, radical Leftist firm PERKINS COIE. Hopefully, President @realDonaldTrump takes action against Davis Wright Tremaine. They need to be held accountable for their egregious behavior. They should be sanctioned and should be the subject of an Executive Memorandum. If Davis Wright Tremaine wants to proudly be anti-Trump, let them embrace the consequences that come with that title and their behavior. Receipts 👇🏻 @POTUS @JDVance @BorisEP

Eric_Schmitt
Posted - April 16, 2025 at 8:29 PM
Saved - April 16, 2025 at 10:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
It's hard to overstate the significance of recent changes regarding free speech. For years, the State Department engaged in a global censorship operation, targeting not just foreign propaganda but also American voices. This censorship, often disguised as combating "disinformation," has threatened Western freedom. My legal battle against the Biden administration revealed extensive ties between government agencies and third-party censors. Now, with a supportive administration, we are dismantling this censorship enterprise, marking a crucial victory for free speech, especially online.

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

It's hard to overstate how big this is. For years, the State Department ran a global censorship operation—not just in America, but across the West. Now, it's pushing free speech instead. Here's why this matters. 🧵

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

The "disinformation" and "hate speech" industry is one of the top threats to Western freedom today. "From its very beginnings," @SecRubio writes, this industry "has existed to protect the American establishment from the voices of forgotten Americans."

@SecRubio - Secretary Marco Rubio

Over the past half decade, our own governing ruling class nearly destroyed America's long free speech history. Today, we are putting that to an end. https://thefederalist.com/2025/04/16/rubio-to-protect-free-speech-the-censorship-industrial-complex-must-be-dismantled/

Rubio: To Protect Free Speech, The Censorship Complex Must Die No matter what name it goes by, the Global Engagement Center is dead. It will not return. thefederalist.com

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

As Attorney General of Missouri, I sued the Biden admin for working with Big Tech to censor conservatives. We took them all the way to the Supreme Court. That case—Missouri v. Biden—led to the release of thousands of pages of documents detailing a vast censorship enterprise. https://t.co/YffN43srog

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

Piece by piece, we uncovered exactly how this system worked. Under Biden, government agencies funded an army of third-party censors and "disinformation" groups to do what they couldn't legally do themselves—censor American speech. More details here: https://t.co/vNDBYyAo8r

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

The Left spent the past decade building a vast censorship enterprise. A shadowy network of NGOs, tech groups and governments working to censor the Left's enemies—not just in America, but across the West. Over the next four years, the GOP must expose + dismantle this system. 🧵 https://t.co/XH2EkdGaoM

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

One of the nerve centers of this censorship machine was the State Department's Global Engagement Center (GEC). Founded under Obama, the GEC was originally billed as a way to combat FOREIGN propaganda. But it began to target Americans—under the guise of fighting "disinformation." https://t.co/i8LTeUKzcB

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

And it wasn't just Americans. The GEC funded and worked with powerful NGOs pushing speech restrictions and creating advertiser blacklists—designed to crush conservative media—across the West. Your tax dollars were funding a global war against conservatives. As Rubio writes: https://t.co/1I03Q8VCks

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

These people were very good at burying their radicalism in neutral, harmless euphemisms—"disinformation," "information integrity," etc. But in practice, they were almost exclusively going after right-wing speech. This was an international effort to silence criticism of the Left.

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

For example: One GEC-funded group, the London-based Global Disinformation Index, compiled blacklists of media outlets to feed to advertisers—essentially a form of financial warfare against disfavored outlets. The top 10 outlets on its "disinformation" list were all on the right. https://t.co/sdjGwfu3dF

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

Last year, I led a fight in Congress to shutter the GEC for good. The agency was supposed to sunset at the end of 2024. But the Biden State Department simply renamed it, kept all the same employees, and tried to smuggle it into the next administration. https://t.co/Zfmi7fDTys

@SenEricSchmitt - Senator Eric Schmitt

The Global Engagement Center must be excluded from any subsequent piece of legislation for the remainder of the 118th Congress. The American people deserve to know their First Amendment rights are being protected. https://t.co/dxU8V5clAz

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

That's how the administrative state works. It morphs and adapts to protect itself. But now, those of us in Congress who pushed for these reforms have an administration that shares our goals. As Rubio writes today: "Whatever name it goes by, GEC is dead. It will not return." https://t.co/M0VsQrrfAN

@Eric_Schmitt - Eric Schmitt

This is a huge step in dismantling the Left's censorship enterprise. Free speech—and in particular, free speech online—is one of the major battlefields of our time. It's one of the fights that will define whether we win or lose on everything else. It's a big, big win.

WarHorizon
Posted - May 2, 2025 at 4:15 AM
Saved - May 2, 2025 at 5:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I signed an executive order to cut federal funding for PBS and NPR. The order directs the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and other agencies to stop funding and eliminate indirect public financing for these organizations, which I believe promote radical, woke propaganda.

@WarHorizon - #𝕎𝕒𝕣 ℍ𝕠𝕣𝕚𝕫𝕠𝕟

🔥Trump signs executive order cutting funding to PBS, NPR The order instructs the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and other federal agencies "to cease Federal funding for NPR and PBS" and further requires that they work to root out indirect sources of public financing for the news organizations. The White House, said the outlets "receive millions from taxpayers to spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as 'news.'"

LauraLoomer
Posted - June 4, 2025 at 11:23 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 11:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just finished my deposition, which started at 10 am EST. Kate Bolger, the lawyer from the anti-Trump firm Davis Wright Tremaine, tried to intimidate me, but I remained committed to the truth. My lawyer, Larry Klayman, effectively defended me against her aggressive tactics. I appreciate all the support I've received, both in kind words and financial contributions to my legal fund, as this litigation will be costly. My goal is to hold Bill Maher and HBO accountable and protect others from similar politically motivated defamation.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

I just got out of my deposition. I was there since 10 am EST. Kate Bolger, the lawyer from the anti-Trump law firm Davis Wright Tremaine @DWTLaw which has been hired by @billmaher and @HBO, attempted to BROW BEAT ME, but that did not deter me from telling the truth. My deposition went extremely well, and my lawyer @LarryEKlayman kept Bolger off my back despite how nasty she was to me. Thank you for your support. I appreciate everyone’s kind words and their financial support of my legal fund to cover the costs of what will continue to be very expensive litigation. https://www.givesendgo.com/LoomerLawfare This will not only teach @billmaher and @HBO a lesson, but it will also protect others who may be subjected to this same type of politically motivated defamation from the Left.

Laura Loomer Lawfare Fund Stand with Laura Loomer: Fund the Fight Against Lawfare and Expose the TruthPatriots, truth-seekers, and freedom lovers—Laura Loomer needs your help now more... givesendgo.com

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

I am about to walk into my deposition for my DEFAMATION lawsuit against @billmaher and @HBO. I will be offline till my deposition is over. It’s absolutely OUTRAGEOUS that I have to use my very valuable time and resources to defend myself from sexist, misogynist and anti-Trump slurs made against me by one of the Left’s biggest Trump haters: Bill Maher. Everyone can see Maher’s long history and record of anti-Trump and low class tweets attacking @potus, his wife @MELANIATRUMP and his family. Bill Maher has in effect sexually harassed me in a vile, and very public manner which has severely harmed and damaged me and my reputation. He accused me of adultery and used me as a vehicle to attack President Trump during the 2024 Presidential election. Everybody knows I should be working in the White House, but Maher tried to Monica Lewinsky me and make me radioactive as I was traveling with President Trump and his campaign team simply because I am an effective investigative journalist, and a Jewish woman. Everyone knows Maher is an ATHEIST who hates women. He especially hates women who support and like President Trump. Who is representing Maher and @HBO in this legal matter? An anti-Trump law firm named Davis Wright Tremaine. @DWTLaw The law firm Davis Wright Tremaine has been hard at work "defending" those who have tried to destroy President Trump @realDonaldTrump, his family, me and anyone who stands up to the left and their vile, fake news propaganda. The firm advertises, as you can see in this article, that it is anti-Trump and anti-conservative. They proudly promoted on their website that they are “Trump’s Least Favorite Firm” in a @THR Hollywood Reporter spread in 2019, which they have since deleted from their website after I exposed this. My lawyer @LarryEKlayman has opposed DWT many times. Among the many Leftists and Trump haters DWT has represented is George Stephanopulos and ABC @ABC @ThisWeekABC in a defamation case filed by President Trump over a false accusation of RAPE. Ultimately, they settled with President Trump for $15 MILLION in December 2024. This further demonstrates how depraved Davis Wright Tremaine is as a firm. They defend people who make defamatory remarks for the sake of destroying our country and emboldening communists in the media. They tried to destroy President Trump’s reputation and his marriage by defending a Fake News puppet who accused Trump of being a RAPIST. Now, Davis Wright Tremaine is up against me and my lawyer Larry Klayman @LarryEKlayman in a defamation case I filed against Bill Maher and HBO. They want to defend Maher from facing consequences for falsely accusing me of having sex with Donald Trump, which was an attempt to destroy my reputation, as well as President Trump’s marriage with @MELANIATRUMP In April, DWT signed a brief DENOUNCING President Trump and his efforts to crack down on radical Left law firms that participate in the Weaponization of Government. They went out of their way to defend the anti-Trump, radical Leftist firm PERKINS COIE. You can support my legal fund to pay for the costs of this litigation to hold Bill Maher and his enabler HBO legally accountable here. Thank you. 🙏 👇🏻 https://www.givesendgo.com/LoomerLawfare 👇🏻

Laura Loomer Lawfare Fund Stand with Laura Loomer: Fund the Fight Against Lawfare and Expose the TruthPatriots, truth-seekers, and freedom lovers—Laura Loomer needs your help now more... givesendgo.com

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

🚨 LAURA LOOMER VS BILL MAHER LAWSUIT UPDATE 🚨 I have arrived in DC for my deposition. Tomorrow, June 4, 2025, I am being deposed in DC by @billmaher and @HBO at the law offices of Davis Wright Tremaine @DWTLaw. This is an anti-Trump law firm, and they openly advertise

Villgecrazylady
Posted - August 4, 2025 at 3:43 PM
Saved - August 4, 2025 at 6:28 PM

@Villgecrazylady - Mel

Cities and states can boycott American companies all day long… but if they boycott Israeli companies, the Trump administration will cut off their federal funding. https://t.co/a6CEmEQlEK

DebiLuvzGold
Posted - September 20, 2025 at 5:00 PM
Saved - September 20, 2025 at 11:06 PM

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

Dear Jews, Stop doing overt Bolshevik shit and we won’t have to remove you by force. Regards, America

@unusual_whales - unusual_whales

JUST IN: Reporters at the Pentagon have been told they can no longer report information which has not been approved. Those who refuse will lose their press credential, per WaPo

View Full Interactive Feed