TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Share this to explode as many liberal heads as possible https://t.co/vPyFUg0nri
Video Transcript AI Summary
Boys stay boys and girls stay girls from birth. As girls grow up, they become women and only they can become mothers. On the other hand, boys grow up to become fathers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you were born a boy, you stay a boy. Girls are girls right from the start. When you're born a girl baby, you grow up to be a bigger girl and then a woman. Only girls can grow up to be the mummies. Only boys can grow up to be the daddy.
@TheGeneral_0 - General™️👀🇺🇸🦅
After watching this video, tell me that Liberals aren't easily triggered.https://t.co/T1INGaJXAN
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses anger towards those who attempted to overthrow the election, comparing it to someone putting a gun to their head. They criticize the individuals for involving themselves in people's personal lives and express a desire to remember them if they try to steal their vote in the future. The speaker also mentions taking a picture of someone and comments on the political climate. They then interact with someone asking for a Republican sample ballot and advise against being friendly with certain individuals who support lynch mobs, the KKK, or hold bigoted beliefs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You, when you when you fucking people try to overthrow the election, you might have been might as well have been walking up to my head on the way to the polling station, putting your gun in my head, trying to tell me not to vote. Do you expect me not to take take that fucking personally? You fucking try to overthrow elections with violence, And then you're out here among decent people? Thanks for coming out of the way. What and what's on your fucking what's on your fucking, Your what are your policy prescriptions?
Have a nice day. You've already done that. Rights Yeah. Involving yourself in people's fucking families, in their fucking bedrooms. It's pretty wild.
You fucking animal. You try to steal my vote next year, I'm gonna fucking remember you personally. Thank you. In fact, I'm taking a fucking picture of you. Is that alright?
Yeah. You're in. Yeah. It's a 1 party consent state. Shit bird?
Yeah. 1 party state. You want a fucking 1 party country is what you Hey, sir. How are you? Headed in to vote?
Yes. Can I get your republican sample ballot? No. Sure. Thank you.
You know, try not to be buddy buddy with these people because they they put on a the Facebook at the neighbor, but they support lynch mobs or the fucking KKK or they're Fucking bible beating bigots and freaks.
@truckdriverpleb - The Pleb 🇨🇦 Reporter
Pierre Poilievre just made this liberal MP lose his cool and SNAP on the floor of the House of Commons This Liberal got so TRIGGERED by Pierre that he called him a "F*CKING TOOL" The left is MELTING, folks. https://t.co/s8Hk3mxZex
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a law, 718.2 of the criminal code, that already addresses auto theft connected to organized crime. Instead of focusing on that, let's concentrate on what we can actually do, like cracking down on organized crime and anti-money laundering.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Secondly, as an aggravating factor for an auto theft that occurs with organized crime, that's already on the books too. 718.2 of the criminal code, mister leader of the opposition. Why don't we focus on things we can actually do? We're getting tough with organized crime and anti money laundering. The honorable leader of the opposition.
@Maga4liberty - Mark Lewis
Hilarious Liberal Meltdown Over MAGA Hat. 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/TAc0Xrf71M
Video Transcript AI Summary
A liberal store worker had a meltdown over a customer wearing a Make America Great Again hat and Trump shirt. The worker accused the customer of being racist and refused to serve him. The customer remained calm and tried to purchase vape juice, but the worker continued to demand that he leave the store. The situation escalated with the worker repeatedly telling the customer to leave.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Liberal store worker melts down over a make America great again hat and Trump shirt. Check this out.
Speaker 1: I am looking forward to releasing this video because I just wanna purchase something No, dude. Get the off in here, man. Fuck, man. You. Racist.
Racist? Yeah. Straight. I'm not a racist. He's racist.
I'm not a racist. He's racist Trump. Got some racist bulldog and said shit. I already I'm I'm He's freezing asshole. I don't have a problem with you, sir.
I'd like to purchase some of this
Speaker 0: naked vape juice, though, but that'd be alright.
Speaker 1: Alright. See if you guys okay. Here's where we're at. Leave the store. Here's where we're at.
Leave the store. Here's where we're at. Store. Here's where we're at. Store.
Up. I don't give a
@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸
Let's just check in with how the left is dealing with all of this: https://t.co/0Q1DIwtbBR
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
The liberal fcks have lost their minds. https://t.co/qdsM8etek6
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
This unhinged leftist is having a meltdown because the sh**ter missed Trump. These people are deranged. https://t.co/7UGmq2vNw6
Video Transcript AI Summary
I just found out about this recent event. Someone attempted to shoot, but missed by a hair. The shooter was likely a white man. We were so close to solving half of the issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just found out about this shit. It just happened. I haven't even had a second to process. You're telling me somebody finally had the balls to bring a pew pew. And in that, we were a second away.
We were a a centimeter away from half of the problem being gone, and you missed. There was a white man attached to that trigger. I know it. We were a centimeter away.
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
While liberal lady gets a reality check… 😂 https://t.co/smBgdbVdlS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts the dominant narrative in America is that white people are evil and should be ashamed. The other speaker believes people should take responsibility for the system they've created. The first speaker calls it the best system in the world, but the second speaker disagrees, citing many European countries are better off. The first speaker asks if they mean European countries with a higher density of whites, like Northern Europe, which the second speaker seems to confirm. The first speaker points out the better systems aren't in Turkey or communist Eastern Europe, implying the only systems considered better than America are more white than America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ominant narrative in America is white people are evil, white people suck, we should be ashamed of ourselves, and
Speaker 1: be ashamed of ourselves, I think that we should take responsibility for the system that we've created.
Speaker 0: The best system in the world?
Speaker 1: Oh, we do not have the best system in the world.
Speaker 0: Who has a better system?
Speaker 1: There are many European countries that have are much better off
Speaker 0: than us. Oh, you mean, like the European countries with a higher density of whites, like Northern Europe.
Speaker 1: That's one way to phrase it, I guess.
Speaker 0: You don't mean Turkey. No. You don't mean Eastern Europe No. With the communists. So, the only time you can come up with a system that's better than America, it's a country that's more white than America.
Emotional damage. I don't
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
This is a member of Congress. What a clown show https://t.co/4oFU82ddsN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Appropriations is where the money moves in Congress. Democrats are making lives smoother through government funding.
Republicans' Project 2025 is suspect, aiming to eliminate the Department of Education. This would negatively impact the environment, education, and rights.
Democrats are keeping people informed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yo. This is the ranking Rizzler on appropriations, serving Connecticut's 3rd district. It's time to enter your dark academia congress era. Alright, besties. House appropriation is the money moves in congress.
We are not chasing the bag. We are the bag. Democrats are making lives smoother through government funding. It's giving. It's giving it.
So Sigma main character energy. But Republicans project 2025 is mad sus. Eliminating the Department of Education, negative aura points. Basically, the biggest fandom tax on the environment, on your education, and your rights. Big l posting it online, buddy.
Democrats understood the assignment, but the law see how I keep you informed? Very cute, very demure.
@Inga_C8 - 🇺🇸 Inga 🇺🇸
Liberal logic summed up in one short video. Did he miss anything? https://t.co/LihL5bVbaD
Video Transcript AI Summary
You seem to have contradictory views: you dislike white men unless they're gay, and you support black individuals unless they're conservative. You advocate for illegal immigration but not in your own home. You want to ban guns while allowing the government to keep theirs. You oppose capitalism yet expect corporations to promote pride. You criticize the party that abolished slavery while aligning with the one that supported it. You don't recognize two genders unless discussing hormones, and you reject American values but still choose to live here. Despite your party controlling the government, you blame others. You opposed the Trump administration but are concerned for Mike Pence. You claim black people can't be racist, yet label figures like Candace Owens and Thomas Sowell as white supremacists. You want to ban guns to protect children while supporting abortion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna make sure I got this correct. You hate white men unless they're gay. You love black people unless they're conservative. You're for illegal immigration as long as they don't come into your home. You want to ban guns, but you want the government to still have theirs.
You hate capitalism, but you expect these corporations to change their logo for pride month. You hated slavery, so you hate the party that was formed to abolish the slaves. You hated slavery, but you align with the party that was for keeping slaves. You don't recognize 2 genders unless you're talking about their hormones. You hate American values, but yet you want to still live here.
Your party controls the house, the senate, and the presidency, but it's everyone else's fault. You hated the Trump administration, but you're concerned for Mike Pence's life. You say black people can't be racist, but Candace Owens, Thomas Sowell, and Larry Elder are white supremacists. You want to ban guns to save children, but keep abortion to murder them. Comment
@Sandfort_ - Sandfort
@Travis_4_Trump Liberal meltdown.. https://t.co/pSyNgts2PI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald J. Trump is now the president of the United States. It is a great honor to introduce him for the first time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Position Donald J. Trump is now president of the United States. President of the United States. For the moment. Step to loosen for the great honor to be able to introduce for the first time ever anywhere the
@scrowder - Steven Crowder
Leftist meltdown commence in 3... 2... 1... 🇺🇸 https://t.co/l4P1R9xDUf
Video Transcript AI Summary
Look at those long faces! Are you upset that Trump is back in office, winning in a landslide? He dominated the election, while his opponent barely won a single state—was it American Samoa? Trump’s victory is impressive, and we owe thanks to the press for boosting his numbers every time they spoke. It’s a fantastic night! I even saw Kamala heading to the restroom with some razor blades. I couldn’t be happier. Trump is president again, ready to make America great and clean house. You’re all fired—get out!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, well, well, look at all the long faces. Look at all the long faces. What's the matter? Your mad Hitlers back in office? 1 in a landslide.
The kind of landslide they had in North Carolina you didn't do about. That kind of landslide. He smoked her. She won one state. What state was that anyways?
She didn't even win now? I thought she won, like, what is it? Samoa? American Samoa? Is that a state?
What is that? A village? That doesn't, Sandals have a resort on American Samoa? That's right. He won.
He won big. And we wanna thank you, the press, for helping him. Because every time you opened your dirty fish holes, his numbers went up and up and up. This is a fantastic night. Somebody just saw Kamala, by the way, heading to the ladies' room with a pack of razor blades.
I couldn't be happier, probably for our legs. But, anyways, Trump is president again. He's gonna make America great again, and start by cleaning house hair. You're all fired. Get out.
You think I'm kidding? Get out.
@CollinsforTX - Christian Collins
The hosts of The View are currently having an epic meltdown live on television. This is the best thing you'll watch all day. ⬇️ https://t.co/gFQd85kkQ4
Video Transcript AI Summary
The election results are deeply troubling. We now face a Trump administration with significant power, raising concerns for the working class, the elderly, and future generations. Civil rights have regressed, and the 14th Amendment's failure to prevent an insurrection participant from becoming president is alarming. If someone can be president, the stigma against convicted felons in employment should be reconsidered. The healthcare system is at risk, and economic forecasts predict massive debt increases. The election reflects cultural resentment rather than policy issues. Despite the disappointment, there's a commitment to continue fighting for marginalized communities, including LGBTQ individuals, immigrants, and women. Today, we can feel sadness, but the fight for justice will persist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was red. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It was pretty red last night. I I don't know. I'm profoundly disturbed. I think if you look at the New York Times this morning, the headline was America makes a a perilous choice.
I think that in 2016, we didn't know what we would get from, a Trump administration, but we know now. And, we know now that he will have almost unfettered power. And so I worry not about myself, actually. I don't worry about my station in life. I worry about the working class.
I worry about my mother, a retired teacher. I worry about our elderly and their social security and their Medicare. I worry about my children's future, especially my daughter who now has less rights than I have. And I remember my father telling me many, many years ago that I was the first person in in his family to enjoy full civil rights. And now I have less civil rights than I had when he told me that.
So, again, I'm profoundly disturbed that the 14th amendment of the constitution did not prevent someone who participated in an insurrection from becoming president of the United States. I think that going forward, the convicted felon box, unemployment applications better be taken off. Because if you can be the president of
Speaker 0: the United States, then you should then
Speaker 1: you should not be prevented from employment in this country. Because I remember applying for my jobs as a federal prosecutor, and there was a box for convicted felons.
Speaker 0: Well
Speaker 1: And so that box better better be taken off. And I I think our health care system is now at risk. I think, it's
Speaker 0: fluoride for anyone.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Economists have made clear that, he's going to increase the debt by $7,750,000,000,000. I'm worried about mass deportation and internment camps, and I'm also worried about Elon Musk warning Americans to prepare for temporary hardship. I'm surprised at the results, but I'm not surprised. As a woman of color, I was so hopeful that a mixed race woman married to a Jewish guy could be elected president of this country.
Mhmm. And, I think that it had nothing to do with policy. I think this was a referendum of, cultural resentment in this country.
Speaker 0: Well, I think it, you know, I'm I'm I think it has to do with a lot of things that being one of them. I'm, I'm obviously very disappointed. I'm I'm very sad. I was at the Kamala Harris, headquarters yesterday in Washington, and it was it was a very sad scene. The mood turned immediately.
And, I I tell you, there's, there's a quote I get a lot of inspiration from, and it's got a quote that I read when I was reading about John f Kennedy. And it says, whether I am on the winning or the losing side is not the point with me. It is being on the side where my sympathies lie that matters. And that to me brought me a consolation and inspiration this morning because I have no regrets. Yep.
I worked hard as hell to elect the first black Asian woman president. History slipped through our fingers again. I worked hard as hell for Donald Trump not to be president. But today, unlike Donald Trump and his followers, I acknowledge that he won. Mhmm.
I hope for the best for our country, and I make a commitment to our LGBTQ, to our immigrants, to our elderly, to our young girls, to the women, that we will not stop fighting. We can be sad today. Yeah. Today, we can be sad.
@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸
Holy crap! this is the most savage and based smackdown I’ve ever witnessed in political debate anywhere. https://t.co/6tFLB594i9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Cenk criticizes a non-American for chanting "USA," emphasizing that Donald Trump’s actions, including attempting to overturn the election and inciting a riot, demonstrate a lack of class. He expresses disappointment in the Democratic Party's campaign strategy, suggesting they rely too much on donors.
Patrick, the guest, explains he was invited to the U.S. as a politician and respects the country for its role in promoting freedom, particularly for Poland, which he says was liberated from communism thanks to American efforts. He expresses gratitude towards the Republicans for their support and asserts he does not want communism to return, labeling Kamala Harris as a communist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cenk, go for it. Go ahead, Cenk. Yeah. This brother isn't isn't even American. So I don't know what the hell he's chanting USA for.
I'll chant USA, not you. Okay? And so second of all, you're talking about losing with class when that bitch Donald Trump tried to steal an election, tried set to terminate the constitution, or set off a riot, that he didn't mind if his vice president was murdered, bum rushed to capital, tried to destroy our democracy. He he's the very worst in how That does do you. Losing and losing with no class at all.
Here I am telling you that I think the Democratic party would did it wrong. I think they ran a wrong campaign. They're relying on the donors. They've got the wrong strategy. So we are honest about what goes wrong in the Democratic Party and what goes in the Republican Party.
Are you guys honest about the fact that Donald Trump tried to steal an election? He's got no class at all.
Speaker 1: Patrick, if I may So please sentence.
Speaker 0: Cenk, go for it. Dominic.
Speaker 1: Guys, if I if I can ask you for another moment of silence.
Speaker 0: Who the hell is this guy? Are you Victor Orban's cousin?
Speaker 1: Yes. I'd like to have a I'd like to have a conversation. I would like to answer. You asked me why I am in US now, because I was invited, and I came here with my passport. So I was invited.
Patrick invited me as a politician to come to US because as a European, as a Polish, I do recognize US as a leader of the free world, and I pay my respect to this country.
Speaker 0: Good.
Speaker 1: And I came here, my friend, and I came here because I used to live under communism. My country was under communism, and Reagan with John Paul the second freed our country. And I will be always grateful to the republicans of United States for the freedom of Poland and Europe. And my presence here in America is my way to pay respect to those who free the world from the communism. And that was America and John Paul the second.
And I do not want communism back. And Kamala is a communist.
@Sadie_NC - Sadie
OMG she nails the left in their hysteria. 😂😂😂😂😂 https://t.co/5feOsLZ2uM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Get ready to fit in! First, find those oversized glasses; everyone has them, but I can't say where to get them. Next, get a septum piercing—it’s a must for our group. Don’t forget your passport; you’ll need it. Head to the pharmacy for Plan B. And remember, showering is essential.
You’ll need duct tape for some things, so grab that. Also, don’t forget the blue bracelet; it’s key for our identity. I’m out of duct tape right now, but I’ll get some soon.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. I'm gonna guide you through. Now, shave that. Glasses. I don't know where you get these big glasses, but we all have them.
So if you wanna be one of us, you've gotta find these somewhere in the store. I've never I don't know where I got these, but everybody's got them. The septum piercing. Get that right away for some reason that that unites us. The passport.
Get your passport. You're gonna need it. Pharmacy right away. You've gotta go to your pharmacy and get your plan b. And most importantly, you shower bra ever again.
Okay. Then there's this. You've gotta do this. You've gotta tape that baby up. You gotta tape it up.
I'm gonna just tell you. The blue bracelet. Don't forget the blue bracelet. Don't forget the blue bracelet so we know who we are. Okay.
I don't know where to get these glasses. We all have them, but I can't tell you where to get them. I don't know. But I'm gonna get some duct tape. I don't have any duct tape right now.
I only have the packing tape, but I'm getting the duct tape.
@Sadie_NC - Sadie
If you ever questioned if the left are trash. Here is your answer. https://t.co/fIyNTGpADL
Video Transcript AI Summary
When California is on fire, there's a sense of satisfaction. Similarly, when a hurricane or tornado approaches, I hope it only affects certain areas, particularly those with specific flags. At least I'm honest about my feelings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go ahead, Maga. Admit it. When you see California burning, you're like, yeah. You know why I know that? Because every time I hear a hurricane's coming or a big ass tornado, I always say, please, please let it only hit the white trailer courts and especially the ones with the Dixie flag.
So, yeah, at least I'm not afraid to admit it.
@damonimani - Damon Imani
Taking down The Fake News media for 9 minutes straight. Sit back and enjoy! https://t.co/LrOnRWTTWn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Where are the fact checkers on MSNBC? Trump promised to remove illegal immigrants to create jobs for Americans, but now it's clear that this was misleading. RFK Jr. has been misrepresented regarding vaccines and fluoride; such claims are unfounded. Discussions about gender roles show hypocrisy when praising men for chores while criticizing them for traditional roles. California's issues are misattributed to "woke politics," ignoring the complexities of land and resource management. Affirmative action has benefited women, but DEI initiatives can lead to hiring based on identity rather than qualifications. Ultimately, the focus should be on hiring the most qualified candidates, regardless of race or gender.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And where are the fact checkers on MSNBC? Maybe maybe I should host this show. Who knows? You know what? I'm kidding.
I will never work for the children of life. But
Speaker 1: Trump ran on, let's get all the immigrants out of the country so that Americans can get rid of jobs. And now they're saying, oh, sorry. You can't do the job. The lie was that we're gonna get rid of the immigrants so that you will have more jobs.
Speaker 2: The immigrants. And now
Speaker 1: they're saying, you can't let them more immigrants.
Speaker 0: Choice. We've been through this before. He wants to get rid of the illegal immigrants who are taking people's jobs. But since you keep misrepresenting these statements, I'm gonna have to ask you, can you tell me the difference between legal and illegal immigrants? Let's go.
I'm not sure. Say what? Let's let's just finish this.
Speaker 1: We'll be right.
Speaker 0: Why are
Speaker 3: we giving RFK Jr a pass? Okay. He wants to ban pharmaceutical advertising. That's nice. He also wants to kill our kids by withdrawing vaccines from our schools and taking fluoride out of our drinking water.
I mean, Democrats have to fight these nominees. And and Chris.
Speaker 0: Chris. RFK junior has never said he wants to withdraw vaccines from schools. You just made that up. And if removing fluoride from water kills people, then 97% of European population should be extinct by now since 45 out of 50 countries in Europe do not put fluoride in their water. So, obviously, not only do you not know what you're talking about, but to fabricate these lies, life on air.
And where are the fact checkers on MSNBC? Maybe maybe I should host this show. Who knows? You know what? I'm kidding.
I will never work for the children of lies. But to make up these lies, to suggest that RFK Jr wants to kill the Americans' children is outright vile. Obvious.
Speaker 3: No. And senator Chris Murphy, thank you very much.
Speaker 2: But I love the fact that, you know, Manny is younger, and it's very helpful that he's handy. And when we travel, I'm not picking up any bags. He's the one that's hefting them over overhead.
Speaker 1: He throws
Speaker 2: the garbage out. He does the heavy stuff.
Speaker 0: Well, right, Sunny. But plenty of times, every single one of you on this show slammed men and called them misogynists for saying that they prefer women who clean, cook, and take care of the children. Yet now you just praised some of men's duties, like picking up your bags and taking out the trash. So to me, it sounds like you have no issues with gender roles when it benefits you.
Speaker 2: He said that California's woke politics and DEI are the reasons for the fires because Newsom has been tearing down dams because Native Americans wanted some of the river back. I'm sorry. This stolen land, first of all. Okay? California stolen land.
2nd of all, that's part of what always happens. These dams, there's preservation of the dam. So that was just complete, not only misinformation, but it was racist.
Speaker 0: Well, Sunny, you find it racist because you look at it through your race hustling lens without which you would be as ineffective as Newsome's choice to save the infamous Delta smell fish over the people of California. And literally, one sentence after calling the dams demolition misinformation, you confirmed that Newsom did in fact knock them down. And I don't think you were supposed to say that.
Speaker 2: We've had people like Dolly Parton, and I think you asked her only feminist? Are you a feminist? And she said She
Speaker 1: said, I don't think so.
Speaker 2: Think so. But then you pushed her, and she said, yeah. I guess I am.
Speaker 1: Well, I said to her, Do you believe that women should make the same amount of money as men? Well, I guess I am a feminist. Yeah.
Speaker 2: And she said, I guess I am a feminist. So I I
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. But doing the same job, women do earn the same as men. It's illegal for companies not to pay equal wages for equal work. But since Logic always take a back seat on this show, will be, you're looking at the uncontrolled pay gap, which does not take into account things like, I don't know, women often take pregnancy leave. Women opt for part time work more frequently.
Women negotiate less aggressively for salary increases. And women take more time off for personal travel and other family responsibilities. And when you analyze these factors, you find out that for the same work, under same conditions, pay is equal by law. So I wish you were as right as your confidence implies.
Speaker 1: They need to they need to start shelling their money out. These guys, Bezos and, but they said, Musk, do they think that they're gonna live forever, these people? You know, everybody dies. According to the World Food Programme, we could end world hunger by 2030 with $40,000,000,000, and nothing is done with that money to help people. It's just to increase their power.
Speaker 0: Well, Joy, your net worth should not be over $30,000,000 if you were doing anything with your money to help people. So I think you're going to sit this one out.
Speaker 1: Is this the immigration system fix that people had in mind when they voted, do you think?
Speaker 2: I think there's a very clear message as to what this president wants the look of a criminal migrant to look like, and I think that's racist.
Speaker 1: Let me also say
Speaker 0: But but wait a minute, Sunny. Most criminal immigrants look the way they look. They are brown because they come from regions closer to the equator where UV radiation is higher. Therefore, they have more melanin, which makes the skin darker. So I know this is surprising to you, but Trump did not do that.
Nature and genetics did. They are the true racists.
Speaker 1: This is not a normal inauguration. No. This is not a normal person. Why do they go as if this is a normal inauguration? It should.
Let me let me say this. The Germans voted also.
Speaker 0: Okay. Here we go again with the Hitler thing. Joy, the Germans also drank water. Okay? But for someone who preaches a lot about democracy on this show, that's what you do, you sure sound like an election denier.
I don't know. And I think the only reason this is not a normal inauguration to you is because, just like Ben here, whose last hit was so long ago that he literally came out wishing he was black to score political points with Kamala, you are both just out of touch with what Americans voted for.
Speaker 4: If if you opposed and stood up against Trump in 2017, but you were there now, if you spoke up against Trump January 7, 2021, but you were there now applauding him like a trained seal, Donald Trump has not changed. You've changed.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, I agree with you, actually. Trump did not change, people did. And they changed after they stopped watching and getting their news from the corporate activist media, such as yours, a table of very unstable people, by the way, which has been acting as the hand of the Democrat establishment to vilify and demonize Trump, by all means. So I would say that's a change for good.
Won't you?
Speaker 2: Women were really the the most, they gained the most advantages from from from affirmative action. And so this is a war on women. I think it's, a war on people of color. And so what we're seeing is an attack, not on necessarily DEI or wokeness. We're seeing an attack on the very fabric of our company, which is opportunity for all, including women.
Speaker 0: Well, Sunny, women have the opportunity if they have better qualifications than others applying for a given job. But the DEI tells companies not to aim for the best and the most qualified applicant, instead to hire based on the right skin color, the perfect pronoun, and the trendiest gender identity just so they can check all the boxes under diversity form. And by doing that, they are discriminating against those who are more qualified. I mean, you are the perfect example of this Sunny. You are a lawyer, yet most of the time you have no idea what you're talking about.
So I would never hire you. And that would not be because you're black or you're a woman, but because again, you have no idea what you're talking about.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
This is hilarious! https://t.co/MK695N1UlD
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am incensed to have a journalist talk from a position of ignorance. Do you want to tell me the health sector is well funded? You can't.
You are accountable to the population. You're marketing sanitizer. You walked out, so what? Do you want me to remove my jacket? Tell me when is that.
How do you contend with being thrown under the bus? You seem to be causing chaos. How are you coming to terms with embarrassing scenes at the burial? Your term expired, but it's renewable. We continue in office and organize elections. We are in the office legally.
I am not defending anybody; you are conflicted. Can we assume that the hunter is now being hunted? Why are you gay? What's this unwanted witness? What is your relationship with homosexuals and foreigners?
I'm a senior citizen, a child of God. Where is your seniority? You are weak in your backyard. The person we got was bought off. How many candidates have we gained? You lost in your backyard. If I went to hunt a small rat, but I have got the elephant, which is a better tank.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It incenses me to get a journalist like you to talk from position of ignorance.
Speaker 1: Now, honorable. Do you want to tell me that
Speaker 0: the health sector is
Speaker 1: well funded? No.
Speaker 0: You can't. I walk out.
Speaker 1: No. You shouldn't walk out. Where should I
Speaker 0: I will not contact you with a legal No.
Speaker 1: Honorable. You are accountable to the population. No. Thank you very much. Mister Magola, in simple terms, you're marketing the sanitizer.
Right? Yes. But before before That's what we wanted to know. Thank you very much, mister Magola. Thank you very much, Joel.
I'm, very in submissions.
Speaker 2: Don't go in
Speaker 1: honorable. Think so far. You walked out. So what? So what?
So Honorable Mafavi, did you say you don't wear short sleeve shirts? I don't Rather long sleeve? No. I wear short sleeve.
Speaker 3: Do you want
Speaker 1: me to remove my jacket unless you? You you you see that? Where? You want to see that? When?
Who is that? When is that? Who is that? Oh, when is that?
Speaker 3: Who is that? Who is that?
Speaker 1: Who is that? No. No. I want you to tell me when is that? Who is that?
Tell me when is that? We'll take a break. How do you contend with the reality that you are thrown under the bus? It takes quite some bit of, discipline and courage to speak to a general. You're retired, but you seem to be causing a lot of chaos.
Retired but worried. Good morning, counsel. And nice to have you with us. Good morning, Simon. It's a pleasure.
How are you coming to terms with embarrassing scenes at the burial in Masaka over the weekend? You find them embarrassing. Honorable Lydia Wanyoto, a member of the NRN central executive committee. As far as I gather, your term expired and you're in office legally. True or false?
Speaker 3: That's so true.
Speaker 1: But your term expired?
Speaker 3: It expired, but it's renewable. We continue in the office and we organize elections.
Speaker 1: So are you in office legally or illegally?
Speaker 3: We are in the office legally.
Speaker 1: When your term expired?
Speaker 3: Did not expire. We are in the office.
Speaker 1: Well, nice to have you. You come off as awkward in trying to. No, I I defend. My
Speaker 0: my friend.
Speaker 1: Defend the minister. Defend general side mister. I am. Clean.
Speaker 0: I am not. I am not defending. You are conflicted. I am not. You are conflicted.
My friend, I am not defending anybody.
Speaker 1: You you you are not neutral. We have with us, the lord mayor in the studio. Good morning.
Speaker 2: Good morning.
Speaker 1: Thank you for joining us.
Speaker 2: You're welcome, lord, mayor.
Speaker 3: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Can we assume that the hunter is now being hunted? With Fine. We bring in the studio this morning, one of the gay rights activists, mister should I call you mister? Pepe Julian Onzima. Yes.
Why are you gay? You are gay. In in the studio, I'm joined this morning by mister Morrison Raka Kamba, special presidential assistant on research and information. Thank you for joining us, Morrison. Thank you.
And good morning, viewers. And on my right is mister Wokulida Seva Gara, a media activist from the unwanted witness. Good morning.
Speaker 0: Morning, sir.
Speaker 1: What's this unwanted witness? What is your relationship with homosexuals like the president alleges and foreigners? Doctor Miriam Mathembe, a politician in her category, a woman activist Mhmm. And a preacher. Good to have you.
I told you I'm a senior citizen in this country. This activism thing,
Speaker 4: I don't want to hear it again. I'm a senior citizen, a child of God. Good evening. Good evening, viewers.
Speaker 1: Who baptized you that? What? Rank of a senior citizen. God. Where is your seniority?
In this brain, in the age, in the
Speaker 4: in the work I have done in this country, in everything.
Speaker 2: Supportive. But you lost. How many?
Speaker 1: You are weak in your backyard.
Speaker 2: I have not lost. No. No.
Speaker 1: If you could not find a candidate to run against
Speaker 2: not that.
Speaker 1: To run against
Speaker 2: the run against the run against the
Speaker 0: person we
Speaker 2: got was both off. The person we got was both off. Like many of them are still being bought off. That's a
Speaker 1: weakness.
Speaker 2: Okay. That
Speaker 1: means you you you're
Speaker 2: not confident enough. It is the new Uganda we want.
Speaker 1: Congrats next year. That's weak now. That's a weakness on your part.
Speaker 2: It is not. Okay.
Speaker 1: How many candidates Excuse me. Who were easily bought off.
Speaker 2: How many candidates have we now got across Northern Uganda? Because I did not kakunu myself in Nigeria. How many candidates have we gained? You lost From a no. No.
No. No. No. No. No.
How many Where
Speaker 1: is the
Speaker 2: Do you not dodge my question?
Speaker 1: You lost in your bucket.
Speaker 2: No. I didn't. I actually gained a lot.
Speaker 4: I lost What did you
Speaker 1: I lost okay. If I something.
Speaker 2: Excuse me. If I went to hunt, for example, this is an Yeri, a small edible rat, but I have got the elephant, which is a better tank.
Speaker 1: Where is the elephant?
Speaker 2: Which is a better tank.
Speaker 1: Where is
Speaker 2: the Which is a better tank. No.
Speaker 1: No. No.
Speaker 2: This small this small loop, and a big elephant spread at core across Northern Uganda. Oh, my goodness.
Speaker 1: You come off as awkward in trying to no. I I defend My
Speaker 0: my friend.
Speaker 1: Defend the minister, defend general service.
Speaker 0: I am Clean. I am not I am not defend. You
Speaker 1: are conflicted.
Speaker 0: I am not You are conflicted. My friend. I am not defending anybody.
Speaker 1: You you you are not neutral in this.
Speaker 0: I I I Simon. Hey.
Speaker 1: I want I'm married. I'm the host. To you. Uh-uh. I'm the host.
You're the guest.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
LMAO just watch this… https://t.co/uaHQc7K1P9
Video Transcript AI Summary
The USAID funding freeze by Donald Trump is a political attack on international human rights, which will cost lives and close vital health programs. I asked the minister if he has spoken to his US counterpart about reversing this decision.
I have not yet engaged with Secretary Rubio on these matters, as we are in a process of review.
We've already done an initial assessment on the implications. A lot of damage can be done in ninety days. Aid organizations say this will have a disastrous impact. If the government has looked at the impacted projects, will they step up and add more funding to those projects? What will the government do about UNRWA funding?
It's unrealistic to think Australia can make up the difference. We can only do what Australia can do. Australia is not a great and global power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Minister, Donald Trump's USAID funding freeze, stop work order alongside the global gag order and stopping UNRF funding is, of course, a callous political attack on the international human rights, which will cost lives, inflict suffering, result in the closure of vital health and gender equity programs in the global South. And it will be a catastrophic blow for the Pacific And Southeast Asia and Gaza. I read this morning that the minister has tasked the department to review all projects in the Pacific And Southeast Asia funded by US foreign aid that has been frozen by Donald Trump. Minister, have you also spoken to your counterpart in The US about the impacts of freezing aid and urge them to reverse this terrible decision?
Speaker 1: Senator, in relation to the decisions of the Trump administration to pause or freeze and review, and I'd make just emphasize that we're obviously in a process of review. I personally have not yet engaged with Secretary Rubio on those matters. Obviously, there is a pause in place.
Speaker 0: So I was asking not about The US review. I know it's a ninety day freeze. I was asking about the department's review that the minister has tasked you with, looking at projects which will be impacted. When is that review going to be completed?
Speaker 2: So, I think, senator, we we've already, done an initial assessment on those implications. And then, obviously, once the, ninety days is over from The US
Speaker 0: Ninety days, a lot of damage would be done, minister. What I I have been hearing from aid organizations is that it will have a disastrous impact on many things. So is the government if you have looked at the projects that are being are being impacted, is the government going to step up, add more funding to those projects? What is the government going to do about UNRWA funding as well?
Speaker 1: It's unrealistic to think that a country of Australia's size could make up the difference in some of the
Speaker 0: You could step up well.
Speaker 1: Just Senator, let me finish. It's unrealistic to think that. And we can shake your head, but there are a lot of claims on the budget, but Australia can do what Australia can do, and we will do that. But Australia can't do what Australia can't Australia is not a great and global power.
@RealJamesWoods - James Woods
Watching Stephen Miller field dress the carcass of this poor liberal lap dog is entertainment of the highest order. https://t.co/R5omj0qTXt
Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration believes the president has the constitutional right to conduct national security operations, citing the Alien Enemies Act. They argue a district court judge cannot interfere with the president's authority to repel an alien invasion or foreign terrorist, as this is a Title 50, commander-in-chief authority.
The administration claims Tren de Aragua (TDA) is an alien enemy force sent by the Venezuelan government, triggering the Alien Enemies Act, which allows the president to act against invasions or predatory incursions directed by a foreign government. They state the president's decisions as commander in chief are not subject to judicial review.
The administration maintains there is no conflict between the judge's order and the actions of the Departments of Defense, Justice, and Homeland Security. They argue a district court cannot restrain the president's authority under the Alien Enemies Act or his ability to conduct foreign affairs, such as bilateral security agreements. They also claim the judge's order put lives at risk by interfering with flight operations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you called the judge's order just earlier today, quote, patently unlawful, end quote, and said that it was an assault on democracy itself. Does that mean that the administration is ignoring this order, and might you ignore future court orders that meet the criteria you laid out?
Speaker 1: The president of The United States and his administration reserve all rights under the constitution to conduct national security operations and defense The United States. The Alien Enemies Act, which was passed into law by the founding generation of this country, men like John Adams, was written explicitly to give the president the authority to repel an alien invasion of The United States. That is not something that a district court judge has any authority whatsoever to interfere with, to enjoin, restrict, or to restrain any way. You can read the law yourself. There's not one clause in that law that makes it subject to judicial review, let alone district court review.
Speaker 0: So, Steven, when you when you say that this person has no authority at all, this is how our system works. It starts with these judges and then continues up. At what point does it become, in your view, legal for the justice system to be looking at this and making a judgment and I I I fail to see how there's any other way but to start with where we're starting here before you get to eventually the supreme court.
Speaker 1: Well so first of all, there's a there's a term in law, justiciable. This is not justiciable. In other words, this is not the president is exercising his article two powers to defend the country against an invasion or to repel a foreign terrorist that is unlawfully in the country, he's exercising his court article two powers as commander in chief.
Speaker 0: Is Venezuela invading The US?
Speaker 1: This is this is a very important point. This is a title 50 authority. It's a commander in chief authority. So just to ask you a simple question. You you talk about how the system works.
Does a district court judge have the right to direct or enjoin troop movements overseas? Yes or no?
Speaker 0: Well, Steven, my question I
Speaker 1: Oh, no. No.
Speaker 0: It's If you could answer my question
Speaker 1: first. In other words,
Speaker 0: the Is Venezuela is Venezuela invading our country in a way that would T t t t a.
Speaker 1: So under the so I'll answer yours, and you'll answer mine. Under the terms of the statute, Trane de Aragua is an alien enemy force that has come here as detailed at length in the proclamation at the direction of the Venezuelan government. The statute says that a president has the ability to repel an invasion or predatory incursion that is directed by
Speaker 0: a foreign government. Right? Are they a state or
Speaker 1: a government? This would be yes. It is it is documented. The the TDA was sent by the Venezuelan government in the proclamation. And here's an even more important point.
Under the constitution, who makes that determination? A district court judge elected by no one or the commander in chief of the army and navy? The president and the president's alone makes a decision of what triggers that
Speaker 0: determination statute. Actually at war with Venezuela, the nation state of Venezuela?
Speaker 1: You're not hearing understanding me. Read the statute. Alien Enemies Act seventeen ninety eight. It says if a predatory incursion is perpetrated by a foreign government so it lists a three three qualifying actions. It could be an act of war.
In the
Speaker 0: very beginning, there has to be declared war against a nation or
Speaker 1: a state. That's what it says. Wrong. Look up the statute. It's on my account on social media.
You can see it? The yes. It says or a predatory incursion or an invasion. The statute delineates three criteria for triggering the Alley Enemies Act. One is a act of war, which, by way, an invasion is an act of war, but put that aside.
One is an invasion, which this is. One is a predatory incursion, which this is. So it actually meets all three statutory criteria. But with respect to this particular statute, it's the proclamation is utilizing the incursion and invasion language in the statute. So but no.
But this is a very important question because no. No. No. Hold on. It's a very important question.
You said the way our system works is the president of The United States commands the armed forces of the country, commands the foreign policy of the country, and that's subject to district court review. That is
Speaker 0: fundamentally not true. I never said that, Steven. I did not say
Speaker 1: never been true.
Speaker 0: This was not a military upper I mean, the
Speaker 1: A district court judge can no more enjoin the expulsion of foreign terrorists to foreign soil, that he can direct the movement of air force one, that he can direct the movement of an aircraft carrier, that he can direct Marco Rubio to engage the diplomacy in a
Speaker 0: country. Or not? Like, does the Supreme Court of the United States have any say over the things that you were just outlining right here?
Speaker 1: I believe what the Supreme Court will say is what I just said, which is that the president's conduct here is not subject to
Speaker 0: judicial review. You are acknowledging that they do in fact have a say here. Well Even though you think they may agree with you.
Speaker 1: What we are expecting is the Supreme Court to say what has always been the case, which is when the president is using his powers as commander in chief, those determinations are not subject to judicial review. In other words, the president's designation of as a foreign terrorist organization and as an alien enemy are part of his inherent plenary authority. There is no
Speaker 0: way what point in
Speaker 1: this system, how how are you going to expel illegal illegal alien invaders from our country who are raping little girls, who are murdering little girls if each and every deportation has to be adjudicated in a district court judge? And that means you have no country. Sovereignty. It means you have no future. It is fundamentally incompatible to have a country and have individual expulsions adjudicated by a single district court judge.
Speaker 0: I'm just trying to figure out at what point
Speaker 1: in the
Speaker 0: system do you because what does the Trump administration believe? Because we do have separation of powers in this country. I hear what you're saying.
Speaker 1: Yes. Of powers.
Speaker 0: This is
Speaker 1: the judiciary interfering Steven. Let me finish. Executive function.
Speaker 0: Let me That
Speaker 1: is the separation of powers. That is
Speaker 0: order here because you thought you could?
Speaker 1: So the judge's order and the actions taken by the departments of defense, justice, and homeland security are not in conflict. And the department just has been clear that they are not in conflict. But I So you think that
Speaker 0: you did go along with the order that the judge put out? You do not think that the Trump administration I agree. This order?
Speaker 1: As the justice department said, there is no conflict between the judge's order, and the action is taken by the departments I just listed. But I'm making a deeper and more fundamental point. Yeah. The district
Speaker 0: court has to,
Speaker 1: in any way, restrain the president's authorities under the Alien Enemies Act or his ability to conduct the foreign affairs of United States. Let me paint a picture for you. President Trump and secretary of state Marco Rubio had engaged in intensive intensive diplomacy to obtain a bilateral security agreement with the nation of El Salvador. If a district court judge So can join that bilateral security agreement Again. Then we do not have a democracy.
Major argument. Got it. Policy.
Speaker 0: Heard you say this. I've Did did you ignore did the ignore the order from the district judge?
Speaker 1: I've It's
Speaker 0: a simple question.
Speaker 1: I've and I've answered it. I've I've answered it because this the department has made a filing in the court. But let me make another point. The judge in this case put the lives of every single person on those aircraft at risk. Did he know how much fuel was in those planes?
Did he know the flight conditions? Did he know the weather conditions? Did he know how many crew hours? Did he know the need for crew rest? Did he know any of that?
No. This judge violated the law. He violated the constitution. He defied the system of government that we have in this country.
Speaker 0: Courts because that does to
Speaker 1: be what you're arguing. The same the same district court judges didn't do a damn thing to stop Joe Biden from flooding this nation with millions of illegal aliens. Do these district court judges didn't issue any injunctions to save the lives of Jocelyn Mungry, Blake, anyone
Speaker 0: courts. Is that what you're saying?
Speaker 1: What I'm saying is that what you said, there's a separation of powers. The the the judiciary exercises
Speaker 0: judgment and relief. I don't speak for the White House. You you are here to speak
Speaker 1: for the White House.
Speaker 0: Will I just want you to answer that one simple question. I am.
Speaker 1: Ready? Here we go. Under a proper reading of the constitution, district court judges provide relief to individual plaintiffs seeking relief. District court judges do not have the authority as a general matter to enjoin the functioning of the executive branch, but their authority is at its lowest point when the president is exercising his powers as commander in chief. And I asked you a question.
You never answered it. Can a judge enjoin troop movements overseas? Can a district court judge enjoin troop movements overseas? Stephen?
Speaker 0: Yes, sir. I I am not gonna get into the the
Speaker 1: the This And then you'll know that I'm right.
Speaker 0: Is a separate question.
Speaker 1: You'll know that I'm right.
Speaker 0: Okay. We're not talking about other other truths of me. I need to ask you about something else. The president
Speaker 1: issued a proclamation d delineating delineating in detail how the Venezuelan regime sent this gang, this terrorist organization to our shores. And by the way and I and I love being here, but all the outrage that we are seeing from the Democrat party and from the corporate
Speaker 0: media
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
HOLY SHLIT, Liberals said that the country is a disaster, but couldn’t list ANY examples why.. 🤣🤣 https://t.co/FsRgERS9WW
Video Transcript AI Summary
An attendee at a Bernie Sanders rally expressed disgust with the current state of the country. When asked about the biggest risk, the attendee deferred to someone else. Another person expressed dislike for the language being spoken in the country but couldn't provide specific examples immediately. When asked what had changed since the start of the Biden administration, both individuals struggled to identify specific issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you out here today to the Bernie Sanders rally?
Speaker 1: I don't like what's going on in our country right now. I'm just kind of disgusted by it.
Speaker 0: What's the biggest risk?
Speaker 1: Oh, gosh. What would you say to that? Well, I'll let you speak to that.
Speaker 0: I don't know. I don't really care for the, the language that's being spoken right now in the country. Can can you give any examples of specific language? Let me think about that.
Speaker 1: So many things. I don't even know where to start. I would say, oh gosh, Dan, help. This is
Speaker 0: What's changed over the last couple months, post Biden administration for you guys?
Speaker 1: Oh, gosh. Once again, where do we start? You wanna okay. You go for this one.
Speaker 0: It's a a whole list of things I can't think of right now.
@TrumpGirlLove - Trump Girl
It's utterly incomprehensible how blatantly idiotic liberals can be! 🤦♀️ https://t.co/unhrPB7zK5
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 claims Donald Trump banned Sesame Street and PBS. Speaker 1 refutes this, stating Trump only defunded them, meaning the government will no longer pay for their content. Speaker 0 expresses distress that Elmo will no longer be on TV, lamenting the loss of inclusivity and diaper education. Speaker 1 mocks Speaker 0's tears, characterizing them as typical liberal overreactions. Speaker 1 suggests the content being produced is "bullshit" and that "they're feeding our kids." Speaker 1 revels in Speaker 0's distress and considers making a part two video. Speaker 0 says "justice for Elmo."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Donald Trump literally just banned Sesame Street Donald Trump just banned Sesame Street. And, like, the entirety of PBS.
Speaker 1: First of all, he didn't ban fucking goddamn Sesame Street or ban PBS. All he did was defund them. The government's not gonna pay for their fucking bullshit.
Speaker 0: And if you're wondering why I'm sobbing
Speaker 1: I don't think anybody's wondering why you're crying, girl. All liberals cry. Y'all just are all fucking drama queens.
Speaker 0: It's literally Elmo's not gonna be on TV anymore. Like Oh, Elmo's not gonna be on TV no more. Ugh. It teaches you all about inclusivity and diapers.
Speaker 1: Because they're feeding our kids, you know. But, man, for real, this these liberal tears is just a fucking treat. I literally just hit the jackpot. She's doing the whole like, she can't breathe and stuff.
Speaker 0: Any I'm literally crashing out right now. Oh my god.
Speaker 1: Mother load. I might have to do a part two on this.
Speaker 0: Literally, justice for elbow.
Speaker 1: Let me know if y'all want a part two.
@Mappy6984 - NRM84
Be sitting down watching this one. How fucked https://t.co/YMwdvf9nRM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Officers cut through layers of trash bags to uncover a black suitcase. The speaker claims the suitcase contains dirty clothes and blankets used in hotels. She states she uses the blankets to transport items from hotels to cars. After further cutting, officers find a bag inside the suitcase. The speaker identifies the bag as "dirty luggage" for her husband. Officers instruct her to remove the bag from the suitcase and open it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Open up. If I take all my stuff out, where am gonna
Speaker 1: I just need this right here is is is drawing my attention to it, so I'm a have to I need to see it. I know.
Speaker 2: Just feel it.
Speaker 0: That's what I'm
Speaker 1: trying to show you.
Speaker 0: No. I'm just I'm I'm with you. What happened? Now I'm just
Speaker 1: telling give him some
Speaker 0: advice. Okay. I'm telling him you just go find a bunch of dirty blankets.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but I need to know what that smell is.
Speaker 0: I am, I'm about to show you.
Speaker 3: Nicole turns to the officer for help and he carefully begins cutting through the thick layers with a knife.
Speaker 0: You gotta get all the way through to the dirty pussy clothes.
Speaker 2: Why you got all these blankies? Why you got all these blankets?
Speaker 0: Because we stay in hotels, from the hotel to the car. Like, can't even get the hotel.
Speaker 2: No. No. No. You can finish it. I was just curious.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. I can even get to the hotel receipt for you. Okay. It won't You ain't gotta
Speaker 1: go through that.
Speaker 2: I was just curious.
Speaker 0: Keep finding blankets. I ain't found one blanket. Keep finding Oh, you go you can keep finding them. What? You see them right there as soon as you open the suit.
Keep Keep finding. What? Oh, yeah. Because soon as you open it, it's you go find them.
Speaker 1: Stay on the front of this car and make sure she don't go anywhere.
Speaker 3: After cutting through multiple layers of trash bags, officers finally uncover a black suitcase.
Speaker 1: Just open the suitcase and we can be good after that.
Speaker 0: This will be more blankets still. Can you cut it from here?
Speaker 1: Can you cut it one more time?
Speaker 0: And this is what smells, Rita. What
Speaker 1: is that? What is that? Dirty thing. No. Open.
Pull it out. Put on there.
Speaker 0: Dirty thing for my husband.
Speaker 1: I will hold bag up.
Speaker 0: I am. My husband just sent me the dirty dirty luggage for my husband. Husband. Yeah. See?
Speaker 1: Take it out.
Speaker 0: Take your
Speaker 1: bag out. Take that bag out of there. I am. Okay.
Speaker 0: Pretty close. All pretty close.
Speaker 1: Open it up, ma'am.
Speaker 0: I see it.
Speaker 1: I'm going the whole thing. What? Open that up. Open that up. What the
Speaker 0: Get the in. Put your hands up. Don't you
Video Transcript AI Summary
An officer pulls over a woman, Miss Johnson, whose car has been sitting for a month and smells like dirty clothes. The officer informs her she must go to the Kelso Drive Courthouse within five days to request a court date or a warrant may be issued for her arrest. Miss Johnson says she can't go through anymore and tonight is her last night, claiming people will see her make her "big favor" tomorrow.
The officer says he has to do an inventory search of her car. He explains that it is to protect her, in case something valuable goes missing after the tow. Backup arrives, and one officer tells the other something is very wrong. The officer asks Miss Johnson what is hidden under a pile of dirty clothes and blankets. The stench is unmistakable, but the source is buried beneath layers of plastic trash bags.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That don't smell like dirty clothes.
Speaker 1: What do you mean? I'm gonna show you. This shit been sitting there for one month.
Speaker 0: You're have to open that up all the way. What is that? What is that? Dirty clothes? No.
Open pull it out. What the? Get your in. Push out. So you got pulled over for the same stuff already.
But
Speaker 1: that's why I went and I really, really thought I got good tags.
Speaker 0: You got to be careful with that stuff off the internet and all that kind of stuff like that. Stuff I don't even be legit.
Speaker 1: Like you literally see like literally that, well not her, but me and my kids literally living in the car.
Speaker 0: Miss Johnson, I just need you to sign this. This is basically telling you that you had to go to Kelso Drive Courthouse within five days to request a court date. If you don't request a court date within five days, they can issue a warrant for your arrest. This is not meant to guilt.
Speaker 1: Here in five days. I swear to god. Please. I can't go
Speaker 0: I can't go
Speaker 1: through through anymore. It. Like, And just take me home, please.
Speaker 0: Can't take you as soon as in the city. I can't go down there. There you go. This is not meant to guilt or just anything like that. Just be
Speaker 1: saying I'm like telling you, it's cool. I won't be here tomorrow. Tonight is my last night. When am I going through? Like No.
Speaker 0: I said I still gotta do my job until I explain it to
Speaker 1: I know, but I'm just saying.
Speaker 0: So once they explain
Speaker 1: I'm not even talking about in Baltimore. Watch tomorrow, y'all are gonna see me make my big favor. I swear to God.
Speaker 2: The officer has no idea her bizarre comment will soon become a shocking reality. With a tow truck on its way, Nicole sits on the sidewalk and calls a friend for a ride.
Speaker 0: You wanna grab a couple of your things? Yes, please. Go ahead. Do you have a do ahead and do a few ideas? We've been doing a I'm a do an inventory search of your car once you finish taking out what you wanna take out.
What's that inventory search? So an inventory search is is when I go through your car for instance, say like you had $15,000 in the trunk of this car right now, and you're gonna tow it and it's gone.
Speaker 1: Like, where is the light?
Speaker 2: When backup arrives at the scene, the officer taps his colleague on the arm and quietly shares that something is very wrong.
Speaker 0: Did you move or you come?
Speaker 1: This way I live it.
Speaker 0: What's the hidden? Seriously, this is the sign. I didn't I didn't know. Told you what this right here? What is this?
Speaker 1: A bunch of dirty clothes. Bunch of dirty clothes.
Speaker 0: That don't smell like dirty clothes. I smell like dirty clothes.
Speaker 1: What do you mean? I'm about to show you. I'm about to show you. I'm about to show you right now. There's a bunch of dirty blankets.
Well, this been sitting there for months and months and months. You're have
Speaker 0: to ma'am, I'm on you're have to open that up all the way.
Speaker 1: I'm about to open it up all the way.
Speaker 0: You'd open it up all the way for me.
Speaker 1: Stuff all over it and everything. Because it's bugs and stuff over it and everything. I know,
Speaker 0: I don't know what it is though.
Speaker 2: The stench is unmistakable, but finding the source of the smell is easier said than done as whatever is inside is buried beneath endless layers of plastic trash bags.
Speaker 1: Literally ripping through all the mania so we see all of their nerdy stuff.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
OMG. Check out this Trump Deranged psychopath who's literally going batshit crazy over the ending of the Schumer Shutdown. Enjoy this one 👇😂😂😂😂 https://t.co/vh92iQFxF8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that “The capitulation of a few senate democrats is as backstabbing a betrayal as we will ever need to unite as a true democratic party and dismantle the leadership that put us in this position.” They assert that “Mom Donnie has shown us the way” and declare that “it is time to end the era of the feckless democrat too scared to unify the party and stand up to Donald Trump, to stand up to lawlessness, and in this case, to fight for Americans.” The speaker then emphasizes a contrast between Republicans’ actions and the consequences for Americans, stating “what Republicans are doing is robbing millions of Americans of their health insurance.” They add, “It is horrible what Republicans are doing, and it is equally bad that Democrats have lost their spine in standing up to it.”
The speaker frames this moment as a turning point, describing it as “the moment when we recognize that is the old Democratic party,” and proclaims that “it is time to make way for the new Democrats who are born of courage and battle for the American people, not for bowing down out of fear.” Throughout, the message centers on unity within the Democratic Party, a repudiation of perceived capitulation or timidity, and a call to replace the old leadership with a more courageous, combative strain of Democratic leadership that will actively defend Americans and confront lawlessness and opposition encountered from Republicans. The rhetoric casts the shift as essential to effectively oppose Donald Trump and to mobilize a party that stands up for the health and welfare of American citizens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The capitulation of a few senate democrats is as backstabbing a betrayal as we will ever need to unite as a true democratic party and dismantle the leadership that put us in this position. Mom Donnie has shown us the way. It is time to end the era of the feckless democrat too scared to unify the party and stand up to Donald Trump, to stand up to lawlessness, and in this case, to fight for Americans. And let's remember, what Republicans are doing is robbing millions of Americans of their health insurance. It is horrible what Republicans are doing, and it is equally bad that Democrats have lost their spine in standing up to it.
But this is the moment when we recognize that is the old Democratic party, and it is time to make way for the new Democrats who are born of courage and battle for the American people, not for bowing down out of fear.