reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@Dylan_Housman - Dylan Housman
WATCH: Matt Lee tries to explain in elementary terms to State Department Spokesman Matt Miller that money Biden unfroze for Iran is fungible. Miller tries to shift blame to Trump. Fireworks ensue: https://t.co/D7MjGZSEZS
Video Transcript AI Summary
Iran's access to frozen funds may indirectly support malign activities, despite claims of strict oversight. The money, accumulated under the Trump administration, can only be used for humanitarian purposes. Critics argue that freeing up these funds allows Iran to redirect resources towards terrorism. However, there is no concrete evidence of this happening. If misuse is detected, the funds can be frozen immediately.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You guys are saying, yes. Maybe that specific dollar with that serial note the serial number, or that euro with that serial number on it can't be used to fund terrorism. But the fact of the matter is, and you guys know this, is that it allows or it frees up money that Iran has already inside its own country to use for other things. So they don't have to spend that money
Speaker 1: on So let me
Speaker 0: non sanctioned items.
Speaker 1: Let me say 2 things about that. 1, the reason I read this exact quote is I have heard a number a a a fair bit of criticism about this money, including from the person who said this in November of 2018. And I thought it was fair to point out that this money was first allowed to accrue into these accounts under the Trump administration. And that's and that's a point say I'm saying you you
Speaker 0: did then as well.
Speaker 1: You did. And there are a number of people who have had a lot to say about this, the last few days who have conveniently forgot that fact, which is why I thought it was important to remind the world. The second thing I will say is that Iran has, of course, always funded terrorism. They have always funded malign activities in the region, and that's why we have always taken action to hold them account. But this, money can only be used for humanitarian purposes.
Not a cent of it has been fro has been spent at this point, and we have the ability to freeze it at any time.
Speaker 0: That is that is not the criticism that you're getting. The criticism you're getting is that that is that this allows this frees up money inside Iran so that they can use for malign purposes as as you said.
Speaker 1: And there is just no evidence that that is accurate when you we have seen when we have seen when we have seen when we have seen accurate? When we have the the evidence so these
Speaker 0: say that there is no evidence that Iran has used money over the course of the last month or month and a half since since the money arrived months since the money arrived in Qatar, to to, to send to Hamas? Can you say Iran
Speaker 1: has funded terrorism before these accounts were established during the Trump administration. They have funded terrorism after these accounts were established in the the Trump administration. They will no doubt continue to fund terrorism in the future, which is why we have sought to held them accountable. With respect to this money, it cannot be used for anything but humanitarian purposes. We have strict oversight.
We have strict visibility. And if we see it being used for anything else, we can shut it down immediately.
reSee.it AI Summary
Kamala Harris faced significant challenges during her interview with Bret Baier, struggling to answer questions on illegal immigration and her administration's policies. She dodged direct inquiries, slurred her words, and failed to articulate a clear economic plan or distinguish her approach from Joe Biden's. The interview highlighted her reliance on criticizing Donald Trump rather than providing substantive responses. Ultimately, she left viewers with little insight into her own agenda, directing them to her website for more information.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Kamala Harris Falls Apart in Train-Wreck Fox News Interview Kamala thought she was ready for Bret Baier—she was wrong. Two moments in particular were especially humiliating. Here’s how it all went down. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/NssTE9FF5p
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The conversation quickly went off the rails when Kamala Harris dodged Bret Baier's question on illegal immigration while simultaneously saying, “Let’s get to the point.” You never see anything like this happen with any other candidate, and it’s so unusual that you literally can’t make it up. BRET BAIER: “How many illegal immigrants would you estimate your administration has released into the country over the last three and a half years?” KAMALA HARRIS: “Bret, let's just get to the point. Okay? The point is that we have a broken immigration system that needs to be repaired.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that voters in Pennsylvania and across the country consider immigration a key election issue, specifically the influx of illegal immigrants from over 150 countries. Speaker 0 asks how many illegal immigrants Speaker 1's administration has released into the country over the last three and a half years, suggesting a number like 1,000,000 or 3,000,000. Speaker 1 agrees immigration is a topic of discussion. Speaker 1 states that the U.S. has a broken immigration system that needs repair. Speaker 0 claims that 6,000,000 people have been released into the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, voters tell pollsters all over the country and here in Pennsylvania that immigration is one of the key issues that they're looking at this election. And specifically, the influx of illegal immigrants from more than 150 countries. How many illegal immigrants would you estimate your administration has released into the country over the last three and a half years?
Speaker 1: Well, I'm glad you raised the issue of immigration because I agree with you. It is a it is a topic of discussion that people want to rightly have. And you know what I'm gonna talk about. Yeah.
Speaker 0: But do you have just a number. Do you think it's 1,000,000, 3,000,000?
Speaker 1: Brett, let's just get to the point. Okay? The point is that we have a broken immigration system that needs to be repaired.
Speaker 0: So your homeland security secretary said that 85 percent of apprehensions
Speaker 1: I'm not finished. We have a we have to
Speaker 0: do immigration system. 6,000,000 people have been released into the country. And let me just finish. I'll get you the question. I promise you.
Speaker 1: I was beginning to answer.
Speaker 0: And when when you came
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The next question involved Kamala slurring her words, saying, "No future HURM would occur,” while blaming Trump for nursing student Laken Riley's death. This was right after Bret Baier informed Kamala to her face that the illegal immigrant who murdered Riley came on her watch and before any bill negotiations were on the table.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims Jocelyn Mungari, Rachel Moran, and Laken Riley were killed by men released early in the administration due to a specific policy decision, predating any bipartisan bill or Donald Trump's involvement. They ask if the Vice President owes the families an apology.
The Vice President acknowledges the tragic cases and the families' pain. They state that a border security bill from nine months prior would have provided more border agents and support. They claim the upcoming election will determine if the next president cares more about fixing the problem, even if it's not politically advantageous.
A mother states that due to the Biden-Harris administration's open border policies, those who killed her daughter were released into the United States and enrolled in alternatives to detention. She believes the administration's policies are responsible for her daughter's death. The speaker asks again if the Vice President owes them an apology. The Vice President responds that they are sorry for her loss.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jocelyn Mungari, Rachel Moran, Laken Riley, they are young women who were brutally assaulted and killed by some of the men who were released at the beginning of the administration well before a negotiated, bipartisan bill. Former president Clinton actually referred to Lake and Riley Sunday campaigning for you in Georgia saying, if those men had been properly vetted, Lake and Riley probably would not have been killed. So if it wouldn't have happened, this is well before any negotiation. This is well before Donald Trump got involved in the politics. This is a specific policy decision by your administration to release these men into the country.
So what I'm saying to you, do you owe those families really, an apology?
Speaker 1: Let me just say, first of all, those are tragic cases. There's no question about that. There's no question about that. And I can't imagine the pain that the families of those victims have experienced for a loss that should not have occurred. So that is true.
It is also true that if a border security had actually been passed 9 months ago, it would be 9 months that we would have had more border agents at the border, more support for the folks who are working around the clock, trying to hold it all together
Speaker 0: Madam vice president.
Speaker 1: To ensure that no future harm would occur. And this election in 20 days will determine whether we have a president of the United States who actually cares more about fixing a problem even if it is not to their political advantage in an election. Because there was a solution, Brett.
Speaker 0: Madam vice president, it was a policy decision in the early part of your administration. I will let one of the mothers talk about it. Take a listen.
Speaker 2: Because of the Biden Harris administration open border policies catch and release, they were enrolled in the alternatives to detention program. This meant that they were released into the United States. It was not even a full 3 weeks later that they would take my daughter, Jocelyn Nungarey's life. I believe the Biden Harris administration open border policies are responsible for the death of my daughter.
Speaker 0: That's the early days. So do you owe them an apology is what I'm saying?
Speaker 1: Tell you that I am so sorry for her loss. I'm so sorry for her loss. Sincerely.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Kamala then oddly flipped the script from “the border is secure” to the border has been insecure for a long time, and it started with Trump. Bret Baier then reminded her that there were “90-plus executive orders that were rescinded in the first days. Many of those were Trump border policies.” Kamala didn't know how to respond and was left speechless.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker was asked when the border situation became a crisis, and responded that the immigration system has been broken for a long time, even before the Trump administration. The speaker stated the system needs to be fixed and more resources are needed, such as more judges to process cases faster. Congress is the only place that can fix it. The questioner noted that many Trump border policies were rescinded and that the border patrol union supported a bipartisan bill, but also endorsed Donald Trump and called the current administration a failure on border security.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: During that time, you said repeatedly that the border was secure. When in your mind did it start becoming a crisis?
Speaker 1: I think it we've had a broken immigration system transcending, by the way, Donald Trump's administration even before. Let's let's all be honest about that. I have no pride in saying that this is a perfect immigration system. I've been clear. I think we all are.
That it needs to be fixed. We need more I was just down at the border, talking with border agents. And they will tell you, and I'm sure you probably I know you investigate and you are a serious journalist. They will tell you, we need more judges. We need to process we need to process those cases faster.
We need the support for those cases that should be prosecuted. They need more resources, and Congress, ultimately, is the only place that that's gonna get fixed, Brett. Well That's how the system works.
Speaker 0: That's that's the premise of this question. There were 90 plus executive orders that were rescinded in the 1st days. Many of those were Trump border policies. I'm not gonna stay here because there's other things to talk about. But you frequently talked to the border patrol union for support of that bipartisan bill, and they did.
They supported it. But they also just endorsed Donald Trump and said, you've been, quote, a failure with border security.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Kamala’s full-blown TDS overcame her further when Bret Baier played an ad that exposed her support for taxpayer-funded sex changes for prisoners. The vice president responded by complaining about how much money Trump spent on that ad. https://t.co/yEvoFhdPTO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on claims that Kamala Harris supports taxpayer-funded sex change surgeries for prisoners. One speaker states that every transgender inmate would have access.
Another speaker claims that under the Trump administration, such surgeries were available on a medical necessity basis to people in the federal prison system, calling the Trump campaign ad hypocritical. Trump aides deny advocating for the prison policy and say no gender transition surgeries occurred during his presidency.
When asked if they would advocate for using taxpayer dollars for gender reassignment surgeries, the speaker responded that they would follow the law, as Donald Trump would say he did. They also claim Trump spent $20,000,000 on ads to create fear in voters instead of focusing on the needs of the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This particular one from the Trump campaign has gotten a lot of attention. Kamala supports taxpayer funded sex changes for prisoners. Surgery.
Speaker 1: For prisoners. For prisoners. Every transgender inmate in the prison system would have access.
Speaker 0: So are you still in support of using taxpayer dollars to help prison inmates or detained illegal aliens to transition to another gender?
Speaker 1: I will follow the law. And it's a law that Donald Trump actually followed. You're probably familiar with, now it's a public report. That under Donald Trump's administration, these, surgeries were available to, on a medical necessity basis, to people in the federal prison system. And I think frankly, that ad from the Trump campaign is a little bit of like throwing, you know, stones when you're living in a glass house.
Speaker 0: The Trump aids say that he never advocated for that prison policy and no gender transition
Speaker 1: surgery has happened very easily. For what happened in your administration.
Speaker 0: Yeah. No surgeries happened in this pregnancy.
Speaker 1: It's in black and white.
Speaker 0: Would you still advocate for using taxpayer dollars for gender reassignment
Speaker 1: searches? The law. Just as I I think Donald Trump would say he did.
Speaker 0: You would have a say as president.
Speaker 1: I like I said, I think it's real he spent $20,000,000 on those ads trying to create a sense of fear in the voters because he actually has no plan in this election that is about focusing on the needs of the American people. Whereas, at $20,000,000 on that ad, on an issue that as it relates to the biggest issues that affect the American people, it's really quite remote.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
In typical Kamala Harris fashion, the vice president said her plan for the economy would “strengthen” it, and Trump's plan would “blow up our deficits.” Kamala provided zero details on what her plan entails. https://t.co/aU89wj8jvV
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims their economic plans would strengthen the economy, while the other candidate's would weaken it. They state that more people trust the other candidate on the economy.
The speaker believes that analyses of their plans show they are sound and will strengthen the country. They claim the American people are ready to move past divisiveness and want a president with a plan for the future. The speaker alleges the other candidate's plan would give tax cuts to billionaires and corporations and increase the deficit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My plans for our economy would strengthen our economy. His would make them weaker. Why do you think more people say inflation and invite a recession by the middle of next year. Those are the facts. Why do you think more people say they trust him on the economy than they trust you?
I think that when you look at an analysis of our plans for what we would do as president of the United States, it has been clear to those who study and understand how economic policy works that moving forward, because I do believe the American people are ready to turn the page on the divisiveness and the the type of rhetoric that has come out of Donald Trump. People are ready to chart a new way forward, and they want a president who has a plan for the future and a plan that is sound and will strengthen our country. My plan for the economy does exactly that. His plan would be, again, to give tax cuts to billionaires and the biggest corporations in our country and blow up our deficit.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Things went from bad to worse when Kamala still could not come up with a single thing that she would do differently than Joe Biden. Bret Baier asked, “So you're not Joe Biden, you're not Donald Trump, but nothing comes to mind that you would do differently?” Instead of answering the question, Kamala rambled for a full minute while saying nothing of substance.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris was asked what she would do differently from President Biden. She stated she has been part of most decisions that have had impact. When asked what the major changes would be under a Harris administration, she stated she is not Joe Biden or Donald Trump.
Harris said her presidency will not be a continuation of Biden's. She stated that she will bring her life and professional experiences, along with fresh ideas. She represents a new generation of leadership and has not spent the majority of her career in Washington D.C.
Harris invites ideas from Republicans and the business sector. She mentioned her plan for increasing the supply of housing in America and bringing down the cost of housing, as well as addressing the issue of small businesses by working with the private sector to bring more capital and access to capital. She also mentioned her plan for a $25,000 down payment assistance for first-time homebuyers and for small businesses, extending the tax deduction from $5,000 to $50,000.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's interesting you said turn the page, madam vice president. You were asked on 2 different shows last week what, if anything, you would do differently than president Biden. Here's what you said.
Speaker 1: Would you have done something differently than president Biden during the past 4 years? There is, Donna, a thing that comes to mind in terms of and I've been a part of of of most of the decisions that have had impact.
Speaker 0: Under a Harris administration, what would the major changes be, and what would stay the same?
Speaker 1: Sure. Well, I mean, I'm obviously not Joe Biden.
Speaker 0: I know.
Speaker 1: And so that would be one change in terms of but, also, I think it's important to say with, you know, 28 days to go, I'm not Donald Trump.
Speaker 0: So, you're not Joe Biden, you're not Donald Trump, but but nothing comes to mind that you would do differently?
Speaker 1: Let me be very clear. My presidency will not be a continuation of Joe Biden's presidency. And like every new president that comes in to office, I will bring my life experiences, my professional experiences and fresh and new ideas. I represent a new generation of leadership. I, for example, am someone who has not spent the majority of my career in Washington DC.
I invite ideas whether it be from the republicans who are supporting me, who are were just on stage with me minutes ago, and the business sector, and others who can contribute to the decisions that I make about, for example, my plan for increasing the supply of housing in America and bringing down the cost of housing. Addressing the issue of small businesses, which is about working with the private sector to bring more capital and access to capital to our small business leaders including my plan for a 25 $1,000 down payment assistance for first time home buyers and for small businesses extending the tax deduction from $5,000 to 50,000.
Speaker 0: We've heard a lot about those plans in in recent days.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
While you’re here, don’t forget to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more threads like this one. https://t.co/3v30h0ciBE
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The most painful moment of the night occurred when Kamala Harris crumbled for two minutes straight on a question about why Americans are unhappy with the direction the country is moving in. Kamala revealed that doesn't have one useful thing to say other than to belittle Donald Trump. This moment was an absolute train wreck because it made Kamala look like an NPC that could only provide pre-programmed answers.
Video Transcript AI Summary
79% of people say the country is on the wrong track after 3.5 years of the current administration. Over the last decade, people have become exhausted. Republicans, including former chiefs of staff, defense secretaries, national security advisors, and the former Vice President, believe Donald Trump is unfit, unstable, dangerous, and spends too much time on personal grievances instead of focusing on the American people. Despite these claims, half the country supports him, and he is beating his opponent in swing states. The election for President of the United States is not supposed to be easy. Donald Trump demeans the American people, talks about an enemy within, and suggested turning the American military on the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Frederick that people are frankly exhausted of Brett. More than 7 people
Speaker 1: tell the country is on the wrong track. They say the country is on the wrong track. If it's on the wrong track, that track follows three and a half years of you being vice president and president Biden being president. That is what they're saying, 79% of them. Why are they saying that?
If you're turning the page, you've been in office for 3 and a half years.
Speaker 0: And Donald Trump has been running for office
Speaker 1: since the president's office.
Speaker 0: From what? Madam Westridge. Know what I'm talking about. You and I both know what I'm talking about. I actually don't.
Speaker 1: What are you talking about?
Speaker 0: But what I'm talking about is that over the last decade, people have become power. But, listen. Over the last decade, it is clear to me, and certainly the Republicans who are on stage with me, the the the former chief of staff to the president, Donald Trump, former defense secretaries, national security adviser, and his vice president. One that he is unfit to serve, that he is unstable, that he is dangerous, and that people are exhausted with someone who professes to be a leader, who spends full time demeaning and and and engaging in personal grievances, and it being about him instead of being American people. People aren't tired of that.
Speaker 1: If that's the case, why is half the country supporting him? Why is he beating you in a lot of swing states? Why, if he's as bad as you say, that half of this country is now supporting this person who could be the 47th president of the United States? Why is that happening?
Speaker 0: This is an election for president of the United States. It's not supposed to be easy.
Speaker 1: I know. But
Speaker 0: if it's supposed to be the it it it is not supposed to be a cakewalk for president of
Speaker 1: the United States. Stupid? What what is
Speaker 0: I would never say that about the American people. And in fact, if you listen to Donald Trump, if you watch any of his rallies, he's the one who tends to demean and belittle and diminish the American people. He's the one who talks about an enemy within within. An enemy within. Talking about the American people, suggesting he would turn the American military on the American people.
Speaker 1: We ask that question.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The conversation took an uncomfortable turn when Harris got angry talking about Donald Trump and the "enemy from within." What she conveniently left out at the end is the perfect example of hypocrisy. “This is a democracy. And in a democracy, the President of the United States, in the United States of America, should be willing to be able to handle criticism without saying he'd lock people up for doing it,” Harris said. But the Democrats literally use lawfare try and to lock Donald Trump before an election. That's about as anti-democratic as it gets.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asserts that a clip shown does not accurately represent what "he" has been saying about the American people, claiming "he" has repeatedly spoken about turning Americans against each other and targeting peaceful protesters. Speaker 0 states "he" has talked about imprisoning those who disagree with him, which is unacceptable in a democracy where the president should handle criticism. Speaker 0 references Mark Milley's assessment of Donald Trump as a threat to the United States. Speaker 1 references Bob Woodward's book. Speaker 1 asks about calling Donald Trump misguided. Speaker 0 clarifies that she calls him unstable and mentally not stable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I I'm sorry. And with all due respect, that clip was not what he has been saying about the enemy within that he has repeated when he's speaking about the American people. That's not what you just showed.
Speaker 1: He was asked
Speaker 0: about this. No. No. That's not what you just showed. In all fairness and respect to you.
Speaker 1: The question that we asked him.
Speaker 0: You didn't show that. And here's the bottom line. He has repeated it many times. And you and I both know that. And you and I both know that he has talked about turning the American on the American people.
He has talked about going after people who are engaged in peaceful protest. He has talked about locking people up because they disagree with him. This is a democracy. And in in a democracy, the president of the United States in the United States of America should be willing to be able to handle criticism without saying he'd lock people up for doing it. And this is what is at stake, which is why you have someone like the former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff saying what Mark Milley has said about Donald Trump being a threat to the United States of America.
Speaker 1: He's quoted in the Bob Woodward book that way. Yes. Let let me ask you this. Madam vice president, you call Donald Trump. You you call Donald Trump.
He's misguided. You say now
Speaker 0: He's unstable. Unstable. He is unstable.
Speaker 1: But he's not well. You say he's mentally not stable.
Speaker 0: He's not stable.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you this.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Arguably, the most embarrassing moment of the night happened when Kamala fell for the most obvious trap ever. Bret Baier seemingly empathized with Kamala's remarks about "unstable" Donald Trump and then used those same comments to ask her when she noticed Joe Biden's mental acuity was crumbling. She didn't see this coming. Kamala's answer to the question was resorting to the only thing she’s comfortable with, which is sh*tting on Donald Trump some more.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The interviewer questions the speaker about President Biden's mental state, referencing claims that Biden's mental faculties have diminished. The speaker avoids directly addressing Biden's condition, stating Biden has the judgment and experience to make important decisions. The interviewer brings up George Clooney's observation that Biden is not the same as he was on the debate stage. The speaker reiterates that Joe Biden is not on the ballot, but Donald Trump is. The speaker claims the American people have concerns about Donald Trump and that leaders of the national security community have spoken out, saying he is unfit and dangerous and should never be president again. The speaker notes that even Trump's former vice president feels this way.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's unstable. Unstable? He is unstable, but
Speaker 1: he's not well. You say he's mentally not stable?
Speaker 0: He's not stable.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you this. And You told many interviewers that Joe Biden was on his game, that ran around circles on his staff. When did you first notice that President Biden's mental faculties appeared diminished?
Speaker 0: Joe Biden, I have watched in from the Oval Office to the situation room. And he has the judgment and the experiment and experience to do exactly what he has done in making very important decisions on behalf of the American people.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden concerns right now.
Speaker 0: Right? Joe Biden is not on the ballot.
Speaker 1: Understand.
Speaker 0: And Donald Trump But
Speaker 1: you've talked about it.
Speaker 0: And Donald Trump is.
Speaker 1: George Clooney said within a few minutes of talking to president Biden at a fundraiser that he thought this was not the same Joe Biden that we saw on the debate stage.
Speaker 0: Trump is on the ballot.
Speaker 1: I understand. You met with him at least once a week for three and a half years. You didn't have any concerns?
Speaker 0: I think the American people have a concern about Donald Trump, which is why the people who know him best, including leaders of our national security community, have all spoken out. Even people who worked for him in the Oval Office, worked with him in the situation room, and have said he is unfit and dangerous and should never be president of the United States again, including his former vice president, which is why the job was open for him to choose another running mate. So that is a fact. That is a fact.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The conversation concluded with a fitting end when Bret Baier softly reminded Kamala that she didn't say a single thing about herself and chose to spend her time sh*tting on Donald instead. That's literally the theme of the entire interview. Kamala told viewers that if you want to learn anything about her, you have to go to her website instead.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris directs people to kamalaharris.com to view her 80 pages of policies. These policies include what she intends to do about affordable housing and small businesses. She also intends to ensure America's military remains the most lethal and best fighting force in the world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I hope you got to say what you wanted to say about Donald Trump. There are a lot of things
Speaker 1: There's more to say. I have
Speaker 0: to say. There are a lot of things that people wanna learn about you and your policies. Yes. And that's why
Speaker 1: we invited you. To go to kamalaharris.com. And you will see that I have 80, pages of policies that are quite comprehensive and should be, accessible to anyone who would like to read them. And it includes what I intend to do about affordable housing, what I intend to do about small businesses, what I do
Speaker 0: And that's why we invited
Speaker 1: you here. To see
Speaker 0: where you were in 2019 and where you are now.
Speaker 1: America's military and ensure we have the most lethal and best fighting force in the world.
Speaker 0: Madam vice president
Speaker 1: And they're giving me
Speaker 0: a hard racket.
Speaker 1: Well, I thank you for the time.
Speaker 0: I thank you for the time. It's good
Speaker 1: to meet you.
Speaker 0: Thank you very much.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Thanks for reading! If you found this post helpful, please do me a favor and follow this page before you go. While you're here, don't miss these 10 shocking stories from today that the mainstream media completely ignored. https://t.co/CABNbMcNay
@_ROB_29 - Rob
REPORTER: "The administration has money to send to Lebanon without Congress coming back, but Congress does have to come back to approve money to be sent to people in North Carolina?" KJP: "Thanks everyone" *Quickly walks out of the room without answering* Nobody wants 4 more years of this
Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration can send funds to Lebanon without needing congressional approval, but it does require Congress to return to approve financial assistance for people in North Carolina. Thank you, everyone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The administration has money to send to Lebanon without congress coming back. But congress does have to come back to approve money to send to people in North Carolina. Do I have that right? Thanks, everybody.
@matt_vanswol - Matt Van Swol
"Do you see the absurdity in American citizens struggling to just get their $750, while FEMA is EASILY handing out money, food, and shelter to those who are here illegally?" FEMA Director: "No." https://t.co/ISPjdDkrEl
Video Transcript AI Summary
American citizens are struggling to access aid for housing and food, while those here illegally receive immediate support from FEMA. The priority should be to assist American citizens first during emergencies. There should be fairness in how services are distributed. The inequity is evident when individuals who entered the country illegally receive benefits more easily than citizens seeking disaster relief. This situation fuels misinformation and perceptions of incompetence within FEMA. Despite claims that the agency prioritizes American citizens, the processes in place suggest otherwise, leading to frustration and a sense of failure in the agency's focus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you see the absurdity that American citizens are getting their 750, and then, yes, struggling through a very complicated process to meet the thresholds necessary to get the aid they need to have housing, food, and shelter while your agency is contracting with not for profits to easily hand out access to those who are here placed here illegally. Do you see the absurdity?
Speaker 1: Congressman, our mission is to support people, help people before, during, and after disasters.
Speaker 0: And I'm trying to get decisions Ma'am, do you think that do you think in responding to an emergency, the priority of government ought to be to ensure that American citizens are triaged and that the services of FEMA are focused on responding to them and their service programs first?
Speaker 1: I absolutely believe that the services that FEMA provides should be supporting the people that have been impacted by disasters.
Speaker 0: Should it be should there be equity in that distribution and response? Should there be fairness in that response?
Speaker 1: We should make sure that all people have access to our programs and that we Fair enough.
Speaker 0: So it's it's my time and I get 4 minutes to 2 minutes to do it. So in fairness, do you not see the inequity in those placed here illegally having taxpayer support a plane ticket, a house, a hotel, food, cell phones, access to health care, do you not see the inequity that they have access immediately? I want us to be a welcoming nation, But if we cannot respond to those who are living in emergencies, then we do not have the right to claim that we are the Federal Emergency Management Administration. Do you not see the inequity?
Speaker 1: Congress directed No.
Speaker 0: Congress established law. You have to prioritize, triage, and decide. During COVID, there were federal agencies and local governments who were responsible for providing lots of services. We said in this emergency, you're not gonna do that. We told federal employees get back out on the ground because you gotta respond to a public health pandemic, and mess most of them were never involved in public health, pan health response.
You established the priority. Why can you not say today that the priority ought to have been to make sure that American citizens were getting first response, adequate response, and not distracted response? Why can you not say that?
Speaker 1: Our priority is the American people, and we administered our disaster programs.
Speaker 0: And you will not and you will not admit to or acknowledge the inequities. I'm not trying to be combative. This is absurd. Today when when you spent some time and my colleagues talk about misinformation first, misinformation's freedom of speech, whether it's true or not. That that's but but you know what fuels misinformation?
The inequity that FEMA has engaged in, because it it allows for people to assume, whether true or not, a level of either incompetence, inefficiency, or lack of concern for those who are struggling the most when they see individuals enter this country illegally and then are transported here and receiving services. And you know that it is easier to access the shelter and services funding than it is to access disaster relief aid, housing assistance, small business aid. You know that it's more complicated. Doesn't that in of itself fuel the misinformation?
Speaker 1: Congressman, we are administering that program as directed by congress.
Speaker 0: You are not administering the program as directed by congress. You were you we we establish the law, we we establish the provisions, and we expect the person, whether it's the president or the administrator, of FEMA, to decide what is and is not priority in response to emergency. And by that very measure, with all due respect, the agency has failed. And it has lost focus. My time is up.
I, yield back to the chairman. Chair, thanks
reSee.it AI Summary
I just watched Stephen Miller effectively counter Jake Tapper's "gotcha" question on illegal immigration. Miller confidently stated he could explain the topic for 30 minutes to help Tapper understand. When asked about avoiding deportations in agriculture, Miller pointed out that only 1% of illegal workers are in that sector, highlighting that most illegal immigrants are in major cities like New York and Los Angeles. Tapper suggested Miller was changing the subject, but Miller insisted he could dive deeper into the discussion.
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
JUST IN: Stephen Miller shuts down CNN's Jake Tapper after he tried asking a "gotcha" question on illegal immigration, Miller says he can stay for 30 minutes explaining the topic so Tapper can understand. I missed these interviews. Tapper: How are you going to avoid deporting illegal immigrants working in agriculture? Miller: "Only 1% of alien workers in the entire country work in agriculture. The top destinations for illegal aliens are large cities like New York, like Los Angeles..." Tapper: "You're kinda changing this subject." Miller: "Give me 30 minutes, I'll go as deep as you want."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many Americans are concerned about the impact of deporting illegal immigrants on food prices and safety. However, only 1% of undocumented workers are in agriculture, with most residing in major cities. The influx of illegal immigrants from countries like Venezuela and Haiti is not contributing to farm work but rather relying on welfare in urban areas. President Trump supports a guest worker program for farmers and emphasizes the need for automation in agriculture. The administration will enforce immigration laws strictly, ensuring that illegal immigrants who pose a threat to public safety are removed. The focus will be on addressing transnational threats effectively.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jobs many Americans do not want to do. So how do you how does president Trump make sure that the effort to deport people who are not in this country legally doesn't end up hurting Americans who want safe borders, absolutely, but also don't want to see even more higher prices in groceries.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I'm sure it's not your position, Jake. You're just asking the question that we should supply America's food with exploitative illegal alien labor. I obviously don't think that's what you're implying. Only 1% of alien workers in the entire country work in agriculture. The top destination for illegal aliens are large cities like New York, like Los Angeles, and small, industrial towns, of course, all across the heartland as we've as we've seen with the Biden floods.
Mhmm. None of those illegal aliens are doing farm work. Those 30,000 illegal aliens that Joe Biden dumped into Spring Hill.
Speaker 0: I'm talking about the ones that
Speaker 1: are No. No. No. No. But I'm but I'm no.
No. But I'm explaining this. It's important to understand. Ones in the cities. I swear.
I'll do the I'll do the whole answer. The illegal aliens that Joe Biden brought into our country are not full stop doing farm work. They are not. The illegal aliens you brought in from Venezuela, from Haiti, from Nicaragua, they are not doing farm work there in our cities collecting welfare. As for the farmers, there is a guest worker program that president Trump supports.
Over time as well, we will transition into automation, so we'll never have to have this conversation ever again. But there's no universe in which this nation is going to allow the 1,000,000 of illegal aliens who just get to stay here, and we are especially not going to allow a subset of those illegal aliens to rape and murder our citizens. So we are going to unapologetically enforce our immigration laws. And as I'm sure you will celebrate, we are going to unleash the power and might of the US government to eradicate the presence of transnational threats on our soil.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just witnessed an intense exchange between Stephen Miller and Jake Tapper. Miller challenged Tapper's question about relying on illegal alien labor for agriculture, asserting that only 1% of undocumented workers are in farming. He emphasized that most illegal aliens are in cities, not on farms, and criticized the notion that they contribute to agricultural work. Miller also mentioned that there is a guest worker program supported by President Trump for farmers. It was a compelling defense from Miller.
@WesternLensman - Western Lensman
🔥HOLY SMOKES: @StephenM just scorched a combative Jake Tapper and his “who’s going to pick the crops!" propaganda: "Well, I mean, I'm sure it's not your position, Jake. You're just asking the question that we should supply America's food with exploitative, illegal alien labor. "I obviously don't think that's what you're implying." LOL. Miller continued: "Only 1% of alien workers in the entire country work in agriculture. The top destination for illegal aliens are large cities like New York, like Los Angeles and small, industrial towns, of course, all across the heartland." "None of those illegal aliens are doing farm work." "The illegal aliens that Joe Biden brought into our country are not full stop doing farm work. They are not the illegal aliens he brought in from Venezuela, from Haiti, from Nicaragua. They are not doing farm work. They are in our cities collecting welfare." "As for the farmers, there is a guest worker program that President Trump supports." Masterclass performance here from Miller. 🔥
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump has stated that high grocery prices contributed to his election. The Department of Agriculture reports that 42% of crop workers were undocumented immigrants from 2020 to 2022, often filling jobs that many Americans avoid. However, only 1% of undocumented workers are in agriculture, with most residing in cities. The migrants brought in recently are not working on farms but are in urban areas. Trump supports a guest worker program and emphasizes transitioning to automation in agriculture. He insists on enforcing immigration laws to prevent illegal immigration and protect citizens, asserting that the government will combat transnational threats effectively.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A question about because one of the reasons that president Trump got elected, according to president Trump in an interview, I think it was with Kristen Welker of NBC, was because of grocery prices. Not the only reason, but a reason, high prices inflation, especially at the grocery. The Department of Agriculture says that between 2020 and 2022, 42% of crop workers were undocumented immigrants. And in many cases, as you know, these migrants do jobs many Americans do not want to do. So how do you how does president Trump make sure that the effort to deport people who are not in this country legally doesn't end up hurting Americans who want safe borders absolutely, but also don't want to see even more higher prices in groceries.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I'm sure it's not your position, Jake. You're just asking the question that we should supply America's food with exploitative illegal alien labor. I, obviously, don't think that's what you're implying. Only 1% of alien workers in the entire country work in agriculture. The top destination for illegal aliens are large cities like New York, like Los Angeles, and small, industrial towns, of course, all across the heartland as we've as we've seen with the Biden floods.
Mhmm. And heartland as we've as we've seen with the Biden floods. Mhmm. None of those illegal aliens are doing farm work. Those 30,000 illegal aliens that Joe Biden dumped into Spring Hill.
Speaker 0: I'm talking about the ones that are No.
Speaker 1: No. No. No. But I'm but I'm no. No.
But I'm explaining this. It's important to understand. No.
Speaker 0: You're kinda changing this subject. I mean, I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm
Speaker 1: I'm I'm I'm I'm talking about the
Speaker 0: ones in the cities. I swear.
Speaker 1: I'll do the I'll do the whole answer. The illegal aliens that Joe Biden brought into our country are not full stop doing farm work. They are not. The illegal aliens he brought in from Venezuela, from Haiti, from Nicaragua, they are not doing farm work, they are in our cities collecting welfare. As for the farmers, there is a guest worker program that president Trump supports.
Over time as well, we will transition into automation, so we'll never have to have this conversation ever again. But there's no universe in which this nation is going to allow the previous president to flood our nation with millions and millions of illegal aliens who just get to stay here, and we are especially not going to allow a subset of those illegal aliens to rape and murder our citizens. So we are going to unapologetically enforce our immigration laws, and as I'm sure you will celebrate, we are going to unleash the power and might of the US government to eradicate the presence of transnational threats on our soil. So
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched a segment where a Fox host struggled to challenge Stephen Miller on President Trump's spending freeze. She kept repeating what a judge said, sounding quite childish. Miller patiently explained that the President paused funding for various discretionary projects, including DEI, radical gender ideology, and foreign aid, which are not mandated by law or Congress. It’s clear that the administration is well-informed, and I think the anchors could benefit from listening more than they speak.
@BehizyTweets - George
WATCH: A very dumb Fox host tried to corner Stephen Miller on the spending freeze President Trump implemented, and he had to explain it to her like she was 6 years old. Host: "The judge said... but the judge said" *more childish ramble* Miller: "I'm going to answer your question exactly. The President paused funding for DEI, radical gender ideology, CRT, s*x changes for minors, foreign aid, certain Green New Deal projects, also the resettlement of illegal aliens and funding to NGOs that resettle illegal aliens. Those are all discretionary agency-directed spending projects that are NOT required by law, that are not required by Congress." Everyone in this administration just knows what they're talking about. These "anchors" should listen more than they speak.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The President issued executive orders to pause funding for various initiatives, including diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, critical race theory, radical gender ideology, sex changes for minors, foreign aid, certain Green New Deal projects, and the resettlement of illegal aliens. This funding is categorized as discretionary agency-directed spending, which is not mandated by law or Congress.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President issued executive orders pausing funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion, critical race theory, radical transgender ideology, sex changes. I'm just because it's because the judge said that there was already stopped. Either. Go ahead. Either I can answer the question or I can't.
I'm trying to get clarity going because because the judge said Friday. I'm going to I'm going to answer your question exactly. Okay. The president paused funding for diversity, equity, inclusion, radical gender ideology, critical race theory, sex changes for minors, foreign aid, as well as certain Green New Deal projects. Also, the resettlement of illegal aliens and the funding to NGOs that were settled illegal aliens.
Those are all discretionary, agency directed spending projects that are not required by law, that are not required by congress.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw Elon Musk's post about the Biden Admin reallocating billions from aiding Americans to supporting illegal immigration. He mentioned an NGO receiving $600 million every two months for this purpose, citing a DHS contact who handles the fund transfers. It's a staggering amount of taxpayer money.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Elon Musk just shared the Biden Admin shifted billions of dollars from helping Americans in need to facilitating illegal immigration This is how bad it got, a NGO got paid $600 million EVERY 2 MONTHS to facilitate illegal immigration “I spoke to a gentleman that works in DHS. He actually sends the electronic fund transfers” LET ME REPEAT: $600,000,000 of US taxpayer money sent to an NGO, EVERY 2-3 MONTHS for illegal migrants - House Homeland Security Committee Hearing
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 911, I need to report the m*rder of CNN. HOST: No one is disagreeing there is government bloat/waste, CNN has been covering it. TIM BURCHETT: No you haven't. All y'all do is run down Musk and Trump, and that's why your ratings are in the tank. https://t.co/RCGrhKzzVM
@martinwalsh__ - Martin Walsh
GOP Rep. Burchett turns CNN host into a stuttering mess Brown: “No one is disagreeing there is bloat, waste! CNN has been covering at length where the money is going to” Burchett: “No you haven't. All y'all do is run down Musk & Trump … that's why your ratings are in the tank” https://t.co/AeVC6zs5Qk
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're not debating whether there's waste in government; everyone agrees on that. The issue is how we're addressing it. Firing staff overseeing nuclear weapons, only to realize the mistake and try to bring them back, seems clumsy. It's like using a sledgehammer to remove fat from a steak, making a mess.
You're focusing on the messenger, not the results. Under the Biden administration, someone in charge of nuclear secrets, who stole women's luggage, wasn't questioned. Humans make mistakes, but these programs are bloated. People are upset about returning to work, but no one disagrees there's bloat. Why aren't you exposing wasteful spending like the $10 million for circumcisions in Mozambique? You only focus on Elon Musk and Donald Trump, which is why your ratings are down.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congressman, hold on. I wanna go to this question because, again, it's it's not a question of whether waste should be rooted out of the government. So many people agree with that. But now we're seeing it's the way it's being done. The government is trying to claw back several employees who oversaw nuclear weapons after they were fired.
They realized, oh, we made a mistake. We need the staffers who oversee nuclear weapons. A professor at the University of Maryland, Don Kettle, who specializes in silver service told the Washington Post that, yes, the government is likely full of wasteful bloat, but said a clumsy fix is worse than no fix at all, saying it's like going to a meat market, getting a piece of steak, and trying to cut out the fat with a sledgehammer. That would only make a mess of the meat. Do you think congressman that is a fair point that the way this is being done is clumsy rather than methodical?
Speaker 1: Again, you're upset about that. You're you're attacking the message carrier, not the results. You you talk about nuclear, secrets. You had a nuclear a person who is in charge of nuclear secrets, a person who is in charge of nuclear secrets, a man who dressed up as a woman would go into the airport and steal women's luggage, was overseeing those nuclear secrets under the Biden administration, and I never heard y'all say a peep about that. Again, ma'am
Speaker 0: I I don't know anything about that. I'll be transparent.
Speaker 1: Ma'am, it's over the Internet. It's all over. He was on charge
Speaker 0: the Internet. And this is unrelated to the people overseeing nuclear weapons being fired. And Elon Musk himself said, we're moving so fast. Of course, there will be mistakes. The question is, you know, some of these mistakes are really high stakes.
Firing accidentally firing people overseeing nuclear weapons. Do you see that point?
Speaker 1: Humans will make mistakes, ma'am, but currently, these are bloated programs. You have no show employees that are that are angry that they're having to go back to work, that they've moved, and they're not
Speaker 0: No one's disagreeing. There's bloat and waste. Jobs were. No one's disagreeing.
Speaker 1: Well, then why are y'all not exposing it? Have y'all have y'all even talked about, hey. Mozambique. We sent them $10,000,000 for circumcision. I mean, goodness gracious, ma'am.
Americans are paying
Speaker 0: We have we've been covering at
Speaker 1: length salaries.
Speaker 0: Where the money is going to.
Speaker 1: You all all y'all do is run down Elon Musk and Donald Trump, and you continuously do this, and that's why your ratings are in the tank, ma'am, you need
Speaker 0: to get ball Tim Birchit. We're gonna leave it there.
Speaker 1: He's tired.
Speaker 0: I do appreciate your time coming on and having this conversation. Thank you very much. Coming
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Stephen Miller SHREDS CNN’s Brianna Keilar: "The federal government will find EVERY illegal alien who is stealing American taxpayer dollars — and that's what Americans expect to happen. I don't even fathom the premise of your question." https://t.co/6h8eC8Wqj7
Video Transcript AI Summary
If a crime is committed by illegal immigrants, there should be an investigation. The federal government will find every illegal alien who is stealing American taxpayer dollars. If IRS investigators find illegal aliens stealing taxpayer money, they'll be referred to ICE and Homeland Security investigations. We shouldn't let illegal aliens steal taxpayer dollars.
Millions of illegal aliens have stolen Social Security, using fake Social Security numbers and identities, which are felonies. They will be investigated, prosecuted, and deported. When those deportations occur, Americans will get jobs, tenants, and houses.
If a crime has been committed, they'll be referred. If prosecution and deportation are justified, they will occur based on existing IRS protocols. No one is given immunity anymore. Illegal aliens freely stealing billions of taxpayer dollars should not be above the law.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You mentioned yesterday and you mentioned again here, illegal immigrants who are getting child tax credits. If are are you looking for that information in the IRS data?
Speaker 1: Anytime a crime is committed, of course, there should be an investigation. Is it your position that if somebody who is Steven, are you looking
Speaker 0: for that information in the IRS data?
Speaker 1: The federal government will find every illegal alien who is stealing American taxpayer dollars. And that's what American taxpayers are. That in
Speaker 0: the IRS data and share that with Lon. Question. It's a simple question. When you find that information in the IRS data and share that with law enforcement.
Speaker 1: If IRS investigators find illegal aliens stealing taxpayer money, of course, they'll be referred to ICE. Of course, they'll be referred to Homeland Security investigations. Of course, they will be. Surely, your position is not that we should let illegal aliens steal taxpayer dollars. Again, you wanna talk about something to be upset about, that's it.
What do you think? The millions of illegal aliens who've also stolen Social Security, illegal aliens in mass have fake Social Security numbers, they have fake identities, those are felonies. Why should there be an entire class in this country that is immunized from criminal prosecution and arrest for committing felonies? Felony theft of taxpayer information, felony theft of social security, felony theft of identity. These are all crimes, and yes, they will be investigated.
Yes, they will be prosecuted, and yes, they will be deported. And you know what happens when those deportations occur?
Speaker 0: Just very quickly.
Speaker 1: Americans will get jobs, Americans will get tenants, Americans will get houses.
Speaker 0: Steven, if they got a child if they got a credit, a child tax credit, and they they will be referred, you're saying, to ICE for that, and you would expect deported for that? Is that is that the position of the administration?
Speaker 1: If it is found that a crime has been committed, they'll be referred. If the if it is justifies the prosecution, they'll be prosecuted. If it justifies the deportation, they will be deported. This will be based on existing IRS protocols and procedures for criminal investigation and fraud. Alright.
The difference is that no one is given immunity anymore. No one is given permission to break the law anymore because this is not a country. This is not a sovereign territory. If illegal aliens can freely steal billions with a b, billions of taxpayer dollars. And I would have to imagine that that CNN, which is endlessly talks about the importance of democracy and the rule of law, would say that no class in this country should be above the law, least of all illegal aliens who trespassed on our territory.
Speaker 0: Steven, I'm just, asking. I wanted to get your position on some things. This we're not taking a position here. We wanted to get some answers to some questions. There are so many questions that need to be answered.
Speaker 1: It doesn't sound to me like you are in fact indifferent or unbiased on these questions, but thank you.
Speaker 0: Stephen Miller, thank you so much for your time. Really appreciate it, and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
@Breaking911 - Breaking911
MILLER: "The federal government will find every illegal alien who is stealing American taxpayer dollars & that's what Americans expect to happen. I don't even fathom the premise of your question!" "No one is given permission to break the law anymore!" https://t.co/P0MfzdWgKP
Video Transcript AI Summary
When crimes are committed, investigations should occur. The federal government will find illegal aliens stealing American taxpayer dollars. If IRS investigators find illegal aliens stealing taxpayer money, they'll be referred to ICE and Homeland Security investigations.
Illegal aliens use fake social security numbers and identities, which are felonies. They should not be immune from criminal prosecution and arrest for committing felonies like theft of taxpayer information, social security, and identity.
If a crime has been committed, they'll be referred; if it justifies prosecution, they'll be prosecuted; if it justifies deportation, they will be deported, based on existing IRS protocols. No one is given immunity to break the law, and no class should be above the law, least of all illegal aliens who've trespassed on our territory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You mentioned yesterday and you mentioned again here, illegal immigrants who are getting child tax credits. If are are you looking for that information in the IRS data?
Speaker 1: Anytime a crime is committed, of course, there should be an investigation. Is it your position that if somebody who is Steven, are
Speaker 0: you looking for that information in the IRS data?
Speaker 1: The federal government will find every illegal alien who is stealing American taxpayer dollars. And that's what Americans expect that out.
Speaker 0: IRS data and share that with law enforcement. It's a simple question. When you find that information in the IRS data and share that with law enforcement?
Speaker 1: IRS investigators find illegal aliens stealing taxpayer money, of course, they'll be referred to ICE. Of course, they'll be referred to Homeland Security investigations. Of course, they will be. Surely your position is not that we should let illegal aliens steal taxpayer dollars. You wanna talk about somebody to be upset about, that's it.
What do you think? The millions of illegal aliens who've also stolen Social Security. Illegal aliens in mass have fake Social Security numbers, they have fake identities, those are felonies. Why should there be an entire class in this country that is immunized from criminal prosecution and arrest for committing felonies. Felony theft of taxpayer information, felony theft of social security, felony theft of identity.
These are all crimes. And, yes, they will be investigated. Yes, they will be prosecuted. And, yes, they will be deported. And you know what he matters in those Is that Americans will get jobs, Americans will be Americans will get houses.
Speaker 0: Steven, if they got a child if they got a credit, a child tax credit, and they they will be referred, you're saying, to ICE for that, and you would expect deported for that? Is that is that the position of the administration?
Speaker 1: If it is found that a crime has been committed, they'll be referred. If the if it is justifies the prosecution, they'll be prosecuted. Prosecuted. If it justifies the deportation, they will be deported. This will be based on existing IRS protocols and procedures for criminal investigation and fraud.
Alright. The difference is that no one is given immunity anymore. No one is given permission to break the law anymore because this is not a country. This is not a sovereign territory. If illegal aliens can freely steal billions with a b, billions of taxpayer dollars.
And I would have to imagine that that CNN, which is endlessly talks about the importance of democracy and the rule of law, would say that no class in this country should be above the law, least of all illegal aliens who've trespassed on our territory.
Speaker 0: Steven, I'm just asking. I wanted to get your position on some things. This we're not taking a position here. We wanted to get some answers to some questions. There are so many questions that need to be answered with Stephen Miller.
Speaker 1: Like you are
Speaker 0: in
Speaker 1: fact indifferent or unbiased on these questions, but thank you.
Speaker 0: Steven Miller, thank you so much for your time. Really appreciate it, and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Hi. Want to see a murder on live TV? I give you White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller vs. generic CNN Karen. CNN Karen complains that the White House is prosecuting Illegal Aliens who commit tax fraud. Then, Fatality… https://t.co/l0jC8WoRNq
Video Transcript AI Summary
When a crime is committed, there should be an investigation. The federal government will find every illegal alien who is stealing American taxpayer dollars. If IRS investigators find illegal aliens stealing taxpayer money, they'll be referred to ICE and homeland security investigations.
Illegal aliens in mass have fake Social Security numbers and fake identities, those are felonies. Why should there be an entire class in this country that is immunized from criminal prosecution and arrest for committing felonies? Yes, they will be investigated and prosecuted. Americans will get jobs, benefits, and houses.
If it is found that a crime has been committed, they'll be referred. If it justifies the prosecution, they'll be prosecuted. If it justifies the deportation, they will be deported. No one is given immunity anymore. No one is given permission to break the law anymore because this is not a country if illegal aliens can freely steal billions of taxpayer dollars.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You mentioned yesterday, and you mentioned again here, illegal immigrants who are getting child tax credits. If are are you looking for that information in the IRS data? Anytime
Speaker 1: a crime is committed, of course, there should be an investigation. Is it your position that if somebody who is Steven, you
Speaker 0: looking for that information in the IRS data?
Speaker 1: The federal government will find every illegal alien who is stealing American taxpayer dollars, and that is what Americans expect. I fast track federal question.
Speaker 0: It's a simple question. When you find that information in the IRS data and share that with law enforcement?
Speaker 1: IRS investigators find illegal aliens stealing taxpayer money, of course, they'll be referred to ICE. Of course, they'll be referred to homeland security investigations. Of course, they will be. Surely, your position is not that we should let illegal aliens steal taxpayer dollars. Again, you wanna talk about something to be upset about, that's it.
What do you think? The millions of illegal aliens who've also stolen Social Security. Illegal aliens in mass have fake Social Security numbers. They have fake identities. Those are felonies.
Why should there be an entire class in this country that is immunized from criminal prosecution and arrest for committing felonies. Felony theft of taxpayer information, felony theft of Social Security, felony theft of identity. These are all crimes. And, yes, they will be investigated. Yes, they will be prosecuted.
And, yes, illegals be And you know what happens when those deportations occur?
Speaker 0: Just very quickly.
Speaker 1: Americans will get jobs. Americans will get benefits. Americans will get houses.
Speaker 0: Steven, if they got a child if they got a credit, a child tax credit, and they they will be referred, you're saying, to ICE for that, and you would expect deported for that. Is that is that the position of the administration?
Speaker 1: If it is found that a crime has been committed, they'll be referred. If the if it is justifies the prosecution, they'll be prosecuted. If it justifies the deportation, they will be deported. This will be based on existing IRS protocols and procedures for criminal investigation and fraud. Alright.
The difference is that no one is given immunity anymore. No one is given permission to break the law anymore because this is not a country. This is not a sovereign territory. If illegal aliens can freely steal billions, with a b, billions of taxpayer dollars. And I would have to imagine that that CNN, which is endlessly talking about the importance of democracy and the rule of law, would say that no class in this country should be above the law, least of all illegal aliens who've trespassed on our territory.
Speaker 0: Steven, I'm just asking I wanted to get your position on some things. This we're not taking a position here. We wanted to get some answers to some questions. There are so many questions that need to
Speaker 1: be answered. Doesn't to me like you are,
Speaker 0: in
Speaker 1: fact indifferent or unbiased on these questions, but thank you.
Speaker 0: Steven Miller, thank you so much for your time. Really appreciate it, and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk
Boom!! White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller absolutely DEMOLISHED this CNN anchor who seems to believe that illegals who commit tax fraud should be immune from deportation. She poked the bear and paid the price. https://t.co/uBVXZyBeRL
reSee.it AI Summary
I just witnessed Stephen Miller confront the media, accusing them of lying about Joe Biden's mental state for years. He emphasized that many in the room ignored Biden's incompetence. He also praised President Trump for removing federal bureaucrats who resist his lawful orders, asserting it's what the American people want.
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
JUST IN: Stephen Miller slams the media to their faces for lying about Joe Biden's mental decline for years before calling out federal bureaucrats. "Many of the people in this room for four years failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent and was not running the country." "What President Trump is doing is he is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many of you failed to acknowledge Joe Biden's mental state and questioned Elon Musk's authority, revealing a misunderstanding of government. The President, elected by the entire nation, embodies the will of the American people.
He appoints staff to implement this democratic will throughout the government. The real threat to democracy comes from unelected, tenured bureaucrats who disregard the people's vote. They resist change, whether it's FBI reform, energy policies, or ending DEI, undermining the democratic process. President Trump is removing these officials who defy democracy by not implementing his lawful orders, which represent the will of the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is true that many of the people in this room for four years failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent and was not running the country. It is also true that many people in this room who have used this talking point that Elon is not elected fail to understand how government works. So I'm glad for the opportunity for a brief civics lesson. A president is elected by the whole American people. He's the only official in the entire government that is elected by the entire nation.
Right? Judges are appointed. Members of congress are elected at the district or state level, which is one man. And the constitution article two has a clause known as the vesting clause, and it says the executive power shall be vested in a president, singular. The whole will of democracy is imbued into the elected president.
That president then appoints staff to then impose that democratic will onto the government. The threat to democracy, indeed the existential threat to democracy, is the unelected bureaucracy of lifetime tenured civil servants who believe they answer to no one, who believe they can do whatever they want without consequence, who believe they can set their own agenda no matter what Americans vote for. So Americans vote for radical FBI reform and FBI agents say they don't wanna change, or Americans vote for radical reform under energy policies, but EPA bureaucrats say they don't wanna change, or Americans vote to end DEI, racist DEI policies, and lawyers at the Department of Justice say they don't want to change. What president Trump is doing is he is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Stephen Miller: “President Trump has packed eight years of transformative action restoring this nation — restoring our laws, restoring fairness, restoring economic opportunity, restoring national security — in just one month." TRUTH 🔥 https://t.co/nc6lKQIsxA
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: Stephen Miller goes OFF on Joe Biden, The Press, and Unelected Bureaucracy at The White House Press Briefing. (MUST WATCH) 🔥🔥🔥 "The existential threat to democracy is the unelected bureaucracy of lifetime tenured civil servants who believe they answer to no one." https://t.co/r4ALTz9GT7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many in the media failed to cover Joe Biden's mental state and misunderstand Elon Musk's role. A president, elected by all Americans, is unique. The Constitution vests executive power in this single president. They appoint staff to implement the democratic will. The real threat to democracy is the unelected bureaucracy of tenured civil servants who defy the will of the American people. For example, when Americans vote for FBI reform, or to end racist DEI policies, these bureaucrats resist change. President Trump is removing those defying democracy by not implementing lawful orders, which represent the will of the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some very, harsh things about some of our media friends. The yes. It is true that many of the people in this room for four years failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent and was not running the country. It is also true that many people in this room who have used this talking point that Elon is not elected fail to understand how government works. So I'm glad for the opportunity for a brief civics lesson.
A president is elected by the whole American people. He's the only official in the entire government that is elected by the entire nation. Right? Judges are appointed. Members of congress are elected at the district or state level, which is one man.
And the constitution article two has a clause known as the vesting clause, and it says the executive power shall be vested in a president, singular. The whole will of democracy is imbued into the elected president. That president then appoints staff to then impose that democratic will onto the government. The threat to democracy, indeed the existential threat to democracy, is the unelected bureaucracy of lifetime tenured civil servants who believe they answer to no one, who believe they can do whatever they want without consequence, who believe they can set their own agenda no matter what Americans vote for. So Americans vote for radical FBI reform, and FBI agents say they don't wanna change.
Or Americans vote for radical reform under energy policies, but EPA bureaucrats say they don't wanna change, or Americans vote to end DEI, racist DEI policies, and lawyers of the Department of Justice say they don't want to change. What president Trump is doing is he is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people. Thank you.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Hi. Want to see a murder on Live TV? I give you White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller vs CNN’s Kasie Hunt. Hunt asks if the Trump Administration ignored orders from the district judge to stop deportations. Then, Fatality… https://t.co/uvzgRwGhCS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration believes the president has the constitutional right to conduct national security operations, citing the Alien Enemies Act. They argue a district court judge cannot interfere with the president's authority to repel an alien invasion or foreign terrorist, as this is a Title 50, commander-in-chief authority.
The administration claims Tren de Aragua (TDA) is an alien enemy force sent by the Venezuelan government, triggering the Alien Enemies Act, which allows the president to act against invasions or predatory incursions directed by a foreign government. They state the president's decisions as commander in chief are not subject to judicial review.
The administration asserts that district court judges cannot enjoin the expulsion of foreign terrorists or direct military actions. They believe the Supreme Court will agree that the president's actions as commander in chief are not subject to judicial review. They also claim that individual deportations cannot be adjudicated by district court judges without undermining national sovereignty. The administration maintains there is no conflict between the judge's order and their actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you called the judge's order just earlier today, quote, patently unlawful, end quote, and said that it was an assault on democracy itself. Does that mean that the administration is ignoring this order, and might you ignore future court orders that meet the criteria you laid out?
Speaker 1: The president of The United States and his administration reserve all rights under the constitution to conduct national security operations and defense The United States. The Alien Enemies Act, which was passed into law by the founding generation of this country, men like John Adams, was written explicitly to give the president the authority to repel an alien invasion of The United States. That is not something that a district court judge has any authority whatsoever to interfere with, to enjoin, restrict, or to restrain any way. You can read the law yourself. There's not one clause in that law that makes it subject to judicial review, let alone district court review.
Speaker 0: So, Steven, when you when you say that this person has no authority at all, this is how our system works. It starts with these judges and then continues up. At what point does it become, in your view, legal for the justice system to be looking at this and making a judgment and I I I fail to see how there's any other way but to start with where we're starting here before you get to eventually the supreme court.
Speaker 1: Well so first of all, there's a there's a term in law, justiciable. This is not justiciable. In other words, this is not the president is exercising his article two powers to defend the country against an invasion or to repel a foreign terrorist that is unlawfully in the country, he's exercising his court article two powers as commander in chief.
Speaker 0: Is Venezuela invading The US?
Speaker 1: This is this is a very important point. This is a title 50 authority. It's a commander in chief authority. So just to ask you a simple question. You you talk about how the system works.
Does a district court judge have the right to direct or enjoin troop movements overseas? Yes or no?
Speaker 0: Well, Steven, my question I
Speaker 1: Oh, no. No.
Speaker 0: It's If you could answer my question
Speaker 1: first. In other words,
Speaker 0: the Is Venezuela is Venezuela invading our country in a way that would T t t t a.
Speaker 1: So under the so I'll answer yours, and you'll answer mine. Under the terms of the statute, Trane de Aragua is an alien enemy force that has come here as detailed at length in the proclamation at the direction of the Venezuelan government. The statute says that a president has the ability to repel an invasion or predatory incursion that is directed by
Speaker 0: a foreign government. Right? Are they a state or
Speaker 1: a government? This would be yes. It is it is documented. The the TDA was sent by the Venezuelan government in the proclamation. And here's an even more important point.
Under the constitution, who makes that determination? A district court judge elected by no one or the commander in chief of the army and navy? The president and the president's alone makes a decision of what triggers that
Speaker 0: determination statute. Actually at war with Venezuela, the nation state of Venezuela?
Speaker 1: You're not hearing understanding me. Read the statute. Alien Enemies Act seventeen ninety eight. It says if a predatory incursion is perpetrated by a foreign government so it lists a three three qualifying actions. It could be an act of war.
In the
Speaker 0: very beginning, there has to be declared war against a nation or
Speaker 1: a state. That's what it says. Wrong. Look up the statute. It's on my account on social media.
You can see it? The yes. It says or a predatory incursion or an invasion. The statute delineates three criteria for triggering the Alley Enemies Act. One is a act of war, which, by way, an invasion is an act of war, but put that aside.
One is an invasion, which this is. One is a predatory incursion, which this is. So it actually meets all three statutory criteria. But with respect to this particular statute, it's the proclamation is utilizing the incursion and invasion language in the statute. So but no.
But this is a very important question because no. No. No. Hold on. It's a very important question.
You said the way our system works is the president of The United States commands the armed forces of the country, commands the foreign policy of the country, and that's subject to district court review. That is
Speaker 0: fundamentally not true. I never said that, Steven. I did not say
Speaker 1: never been true.
Speaker 0: This was not a military upper I mean, the
Speaker 1: A district court judge can no more enjoin the expulsion of foreign terrorists to foreign soil, that he can direct the movement of air force one, that he can direct the movement of an aircraft carrier, that he can direct Marco Rubio to engage the diplomacy in a
Speaker 0: country. Or not? Like, does the Supreme Court of the United States have any say over the things that you were just outlining right here?
Speaker 1: I believe what the Supreme Court will say is what I just said, which is that the president's conduct here is not subject to
Speaker 0: judicial review. You are acknowledging that they do in fact have a say here. Well Even though you think they may agree with you.
Speaker 1: What we are expecting is the Supreme Court to say what has always been the case, which is when the president is using his powers as commander in chief, those determinations are not subject to judicial review. In other words, the president's designation of as a foreign terrorist organization and as an alien enemy are part of his inherent plenary authority. There is no
Speaker 0: way what point in
Speaker 1: this system, how how are you going to expel illegal illegal alien invaders from our country who are raping little girls, who are murdering little girls if each and every deportation has to be adjudicated in a district court judge? And that means you have no country. Sovereignty. It means you have no future. It is fundamentally incompatible to have a country and have individual expulsions adjudicated by a single district court judge.
Speaker 0: I'm just trying to figure out at what point
Speaker 1: in the
Speaker 0: system do you because what does the Trump administration believe? Because we do have separation of powers in this country. I hear what you're saying.
Speaker 1: Yes. Of powers.
Speaker 0: This is
Speaker 1: the judiciary interfering Steven. Let me finish. Executive function.
Speaker 0: Let me That
Speaker 1: is the separation of powers. That is
Speaker 0: order here because you thought you could?
Speaker 1: So the judge's order and the actions taken by the departments of defense, justice, and homeland security are not in conflict. And the department just has been clear that they are not in conflict. But I So you think that
Speaker 0: you did go along with the order that the judge put out? You do not think that the Trump administration I agree. This order?
Speaker 1: As the justice department said, there is no conflict between the judge's order, and the action is taken by the departments I just listed. But I'm making a deeper and more fundamental point. Yeah. The district
Speaker 0: court has to,
Speaker 1: in any way, restrain the president's authorities under the Alien Enemies Act or his ability to conduct the foreign affairs of United States. Let me paint a picture for you. President Trump and secretary of state Marco Rubio had engaged in intensive intensive diplomacy to obtain a bilateral security agreement with the nation of El Salvador. If a district court judge So can join that bilateral security agreement Again. Then we do not have a democracy.
Major argument. Got it. Policy.
Speaker 0: Heard you say this. I've Did did you ignore did the ignore the order from the district judge?
Speaker 1: I've It's
Speaker 0: a simple question.
Speaker 1: I've and I've answered it. I've I've answered it because this the department has made a filing in the court. But let me make another point. The judge in this case put the lives of every single person on those aircraft at risk. Did he know how much fuel was in those planes?
Did he know the flight conditions? Did he know the weather conditions? Did he know how many crew hours? Did he know the need for crew rest? Did he know any of that?
No. This judge violated the law. He violated the constitution. He defied the system of government that we have in this country.
Speaker 0: Courts because that does to
Speaker 1: be what you're arguing. The same the same district court judges didn't do a damn thing to stop Joe Biden from flooding this nation with millions of illegal aliens. Do these district court judges didn't issue any injunctions to save the lives of Jocelyn Mungry, Blake, anyone
Speaker 0: courts. Is that what you're saying?
Speaker 1: What I'm saying is that what you said, there's a separation of powers. The the the judiciary exercises
Speaker 0: judgment and relief. I don't speak for the White House. You you are here to speak
Speaker 1: for the White House.
Speaker 0: Will I just want you to answer that one simple question. I am.
Speaker 1: Ready? Here we go. Under a proper reading of the constitution, district court judges provide relief to individual plaintiffs seeking relief. District court judges do not have the authority as a general matter to enjoin the functioning of the executive branch, but their authority is at its lowest point when the president is exercising his powers as commander in chief. And I asked you a question.
You never answered it. Can a judge enjoin troop movements overseas? Can a district court judge enjoin troop movements overseas? Stephen?
Speaker 0: Yes, sir. I I am not gonna get into the the
Speaker 1: the This And then you'll know that I'm right.
Speaker 0: Is a separate question.
Speaker 1: You'll know that I'm right.
Speaker 0: Okay. We're not talking about other other truths of me. I need to ask you about something else. The president
Speaker 1: issued a proclamation d delineating delineating in detail how the Venezuelan regime sent this gang, this terrorist organization to our shores. And by the way and I and I love being here, but all the outrage that we are seeing from the Democrat party and from the corporate
Speaker 0: media
@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸
God Bless Stephen Miller He has taken it up on himself to restore civics in America, one legacy media journalist at a time https://t.co/J43LZSrL01
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker defends government cuts and reforms, questioning why they aren't celebrated if waste, abuse, and corruption are acknowledged. They claim many failed to cover Joe Biden's mental incompetence and misunderstand Elon Musk's role in government.
President Trump is removing federal bureaucrats defying democracy by not implementing his lawful orders, which represent the will of the American people. Taxpayer-funded, empty government buildings are criticized. The speaker asserts that illegal aliens brought in by Joe Biden are not doing farm work but are collecting welfare.
The speaker supports a guest worker program and automation for farms. They oppose allowing the previous president to flood the nation with millions of illegal aliens, especially those who rape and murder citizens. USAID is described as an entrenched power center of unelected bureaucrats funneling money to cronies. Democrats are accused of opposing democracy by opposing President Trump's reforms. The speaker states that President Trump is on the side of democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You may assert there's no waste in the Pentagon. You may assert there's no waste in treasury. I'm not Steven. Steven, I don't think anyone are you not celebrating these cuts? If you agree there is waste, if you agree there is abuse, if you agree there is corruption, why are you not celebrating the cuts, the reforms that are being instituted?
It is true that many of the people in this room for four years failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent. It is also true that many people in this room who have used this talking point that Elon is not elected failed to understand how government works. So I'm glad for the opportunity for a brief civics lesson. What president Trump is doing is he is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people. You have these giant cavernous office buildings in Washington DC carved out of marble stone and granite in the Greek classical style, some of those gorgeous buildings on earth.
The taxpayers fund that they pay for, they upkeep, they provide electricity to, and no one's showing up. And what what are they doing at home? Watching their favorite streaming shows? It's crazy. Of course, they have to get back into the office because they work for everyone watching me today Pat and Pat Pat and Pat.
Today. The illegal aliens that Joe Biden brought into our country are not full stop doing farm work. They are not. The illegal aliens he brought in from Venezuela, from Haiti, from Nicaragua, they are not doing farm work. Are in our cities collecting welfare.
As for the farmers, there is a guest worker program that president Trump supports. Over time as well, you will transition into automation, so we'll never have to have this conversation ever again. But there's no universe in which this nation is going to allow the previous president to flood our nation with millions and millions of illegal aliens who just get to stay here, and we are especially not going to allow a subset of those illegal aliens to rape and murder our citizens. There is probably no entity in the government that is more of an entrenched power center of unelected bureaucrats with less accountability, less oversight than USAID. They funnel money to their cronies all over the world through a swampy network of NGOs, nongovernmental nongovernmental organizations.
What Democrats are saying is they oppose democracy itself. They oppose the idea that the American people can elect a man, in this case, our president Donald Trump, to reform the government according to the will of the people. This a battle between the will of the people through their president Donald Trump. No. And the will of an unelected federal bureaucracy.
So we and president Trump are on the side of democracy.
reSee.it AI Summary
Stephen Miller delivered a powerful defense of Trump’s agenda, attacking critics of the former president and highlighting the challenges faced during the previous administration. He emphasized the negative impacts of lockdowns, border policies, and foreign relations, asserting that Trump is actively repairing the damage. Miller praised the significant reduction in illegal crossings at the southern border and stressed the importance of manufacturing security for national security. He concluded by stating that Trump is restoring democracy and freedom in America.
@overton_news - Overton
WATCH: Stephen Miller Just Annihilated What’s Left of the Anti-Trump Crowd—Unleashing a Historic Defense of Trump’s ‘Golden Age’ Agenda Stephen Miller didn’t just defend Trump—he took a proverbial flamethrower every remaining critic still clinging to the old regime. @StephenM released pure fire: “The same people who are criticizing President Trump's agenda to restore America, to usher in this new golden age, are the ones who ordered us to lock down during Covid and close all the schools.” “They are the ones who opened the borders and flooded our cities with illegal aliens.” “They are the ones who brought us nothing but death and destruction in the Middle East, one disaster after another.” “They are the ones who empowered a federal bureaucracy to steal our rights and voices as citizens, crush dissent, crush fresh free speech, crush industry.” “They are the ones who allowed China and foreign countries to take our most essential industries out of the United States, gravely imperiling our national security, and destroying that working and middle classes of this country.” That’s the America Trump inherited, Miller said—and it’s the one he’s been fixing since day one. “That is what President Trump inherited. That is what he is boldly and bravely repairing every single day.” He pointed to the border as proof of results: “The southern border now under his leadership, has the lowest number of illegal crossings in the history of the lancets of America.” “Not in the last 10 years or 20 years or 30 years, in the HISTORY of these United States.” And it’s not just about immigration—it’s about survival: “Under President Trump, for the first time since the rise of China we are protecting and defending our jobs and our manufacturing base, and we are preventing foreign countries from making it impossible to defend ourselves in the event of a national emergency.” “Manufacturing security is national security,” he added. “And he is taking on the rogue bureaucracy and rogue judiciary that have sapped and stolen and frittered away the rights of our people and pushed them into the hands of unelected power centers.” Miller closed with a line that could define Trump's second term: “He is, in every sense of the word, restoring national democracy and popular sovereignty. He is making America free again.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that critics of President Trump's agenda are responsible for COVID lockdowns, open borders, Middle East failures, federal overreach, and the offshoring of essential industries to China.
The speaker claims Trump inherited these problems and is actively fixing them. According to the speaker, under Trump, the Southern Border has the lowest number of illegal crossings in US history. The speaker says Trump is protecting American jobs and manufacturing, preventing foreign countries from undermining national defense.
The speaker states that manufacturing security is national security, and Trump is confronting the bureaucracy and judiciary that have taken away citizens' rights. The speaker concludes that Trump is restoring national democracy and popular sovereignty, making America free again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The same people that are criticizing president Trump's agenda to restore America, to usher in this new golden age, are the ones who ordered us to lock down during COVID and close all of the schools. They're the ones who opened the borders and flooded our cities with illegal aliens. They're the ones who brought us nothing but death and destruction in The Middle East, 1 disaster after another. They are the ones who empowered a federal bureaucracy to steal our rights and our voices as citizens, crush dissent, crush free speech, crush industry. They're the ones who allowed China and foreign countries to take our most essential industries out of The United States, gravely imperiling our national security, and destroying the working and middle classes of this country.
That is what president Trump inherited. That is what he is boldly and bravely repairing every single day. The Southern Border now, under his leadership, has the lowest number of legal crossings in the history of The United States Of America. Not in the last ten years or twenty years or thirty years, in the history of These United States. Under president Trump, for the first time since the rise of China, we are protecting and defending our jobs and our manufacturing base, and we are preventing foreign countries from making it impossible to defend ourselves in the event of a national emergency.
Manufacturing security is national security, and he is taking on the rogue bureaucracy and the rogue judiciary that have sapped and stolen and frittered away the rights of our people and pushed them into the hands of unelected power centers. He is, in every sense of the word, restoring national democracy and popular sovereignty. He is making America free again, Mark.
@overton_news - Overton
If you enjoyed this Overton original production, make sure to follow @overton_news and turn on notifications for real-time breaking news updates. If you appreciate our work and want to support decentralized, unfiltered news, consider subscribing here on X for just the price of a coffee each month. As an entirely independent network, your support helps us continue offering an alternative to mainstream media. Thank you for being part of this movement!
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw President Trump’s administration members take turns criticizing CNN's Kaitlan Collins for her question about the deportation of an alleged MS-13 member to El Salvador. Pam Bondi, Stephen Miller, Marco Rubio, and Nayib Bukele all joined in on the media backlash. Lmao.
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
JUST IN: President Trump has multiple members of his admin take turns ripping CNN's Kaitlan Collins after she asked why an alleged MS-13 member was deported to El Salvador. Lmao. Pam Bondi, Stephen Miller, Marco Rubio, as well as Nayib Bukele all ripped the media after Collins asked about releasing an alleged MS-13 member.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration was asked about a man who was allegedly mistakenly deported to El Salvador.
It was stated that the individual was illegally in the U.S. and that two immigration courts ruled in 2019 that he was a member of MS-13. Additional paperwork was needed, and it is up to El Salvador whether they want to return him. The Supreme Court ruled that if El Salvador wants to return him, the U.S. would facilitate it by providing a plane.
MS-13 was declared a foreign terrorist organization, making him ineligible for immigration relief. A district court judge tried to compel the administration to "kidnap" him and fly him back, but the Supreme Court unanimously reversed this, stating that no court can compel the foreign policy function of the U.S. If El Salvador sends him back, the U.S. could deport him again.
The individual is a citizen of El Salvador, and the president of El Salvador would need to weigh in. The U.S. does not plan to release terrorists into the country. The foreign policy of the United States is conducted by the president, not by a court.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Return the man who your administration says was mistakenly deported the man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador?
Speaker 1: Well, let me ask Pam. Would you ask answer that question?
Speaker 2: Sure, president. First and foremost, he was illegally in our country. He had been illegally in our country. And in 2019, '2 courts, an immigration court and an appellate immigration court ruled that he was a member of MS thirteen and he was illegally in our country. Right now, it was a paperwork.
It was additional paperwork had needed to be done. That's up to El Salvador if they want to return him. That's not up to us. The supreme court ruled president that if as El Salvador wants to return him, this this is international matters, foreign affairs. If they wanted to return him, we would facilitate it, meaning provide a plane.
Speaker 0: So will you return
Speaker 1: him, president? You are doing a great job.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Well, just like I used to put Steve here another wait a minute. Can you just also respond to that question? Because, you know, it's asked by CNN, they always ask it with a slant, because they're totally slanted because they don't know what's happening. That's why nobody's watching them. But would you answer that question also, please?
Speaker 3: Yes. Gladly. So as Pam mentioned, there's an illegal alien from El Salvador. So with respect to you, he's a citizen of El Salvador. So it's very arrogant even for American media to suggest that we would even tell El Salvador how to handle their own citizens as a starting point.
As two immigration courts found that he was a member of MS thirteen. When president Trump declared MS thirteen to be a foreign terrorist organization, that meant that he was no longer eligible under federal law, which I'm sure you know, you're very familiar with the INA, that he was no longer eligible for any form of immigration relief in The United States. So he had a deportation we order that was valid, which meant that under our law, he's not even allowed to be present in The United States and had to be returned because of the foreign terrorist designation. This issue was then by district court judge completely inverted and a district court judge tried to tell the administration that they had to kidnap a citizen of El Salvador and fly him back here. That issue was raised to the supreme court.
And the supreme court said the district court order was unlawful and its main components were reversed nine zero unanimously stating clearly that neither secretary of state nor the president could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador from El Salvador who, again, is a member of MS thirteen, which is I'm sure you understand, rapes little girls, murders women, murders children, is engaged in the most barbaric activities in the world. And I can promise you if he was your neighbor, you would move right away.
Speaker 0: So you don't plan to
Speaker 1: ask him to and what was the ruling that and the supreme court, Steve, was it nine to nothing?
Speaker 3: Yes. Was a nine zero. In our favor? In our favor against the district court ruling saying that no district court has the power to compel the foreign policy function of The United States. As Pam said, the ruling solely stated that if this individual at El Salvador's sole discretion was sent back to our country, that we could deport him a second time.
Speaker 1: Well, I
Speaker 3: No version of this legally ends up with him ever living here because he is a citizen of El Salvador. That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about it per the court can only be directed to him.
Speaker 0: I I asked Can president Bukele weigh in on this? Do you plan to
Speaker 1: The United States. I I don't have the power to return him to The United States. But you can release him inside of Yeah, but I'm not releasing I mean, we're not very fond of releasing terrorists into our country. We just turned the murder capital of the world into the safest country in the Western Hemisphere, and you want us to go back into the releasing criminals so they can go back to being the murdered capital of the world. And that's that's not gonna be bad.
That's Well, they'd love to have a criminal, you know, released into I mean, I mean, there's there's a fascination. They would love it. Yeah. They're sick these are sick people. Mark, could you have something to say
Speaker 4: about Yeah. I mean, Steven, I don't understand what the confusion is. This individual is a citizen of El Salvador. He was illegally in The United States and was returned to his country. That's where you deport people back to their country of origin, except for Venezuela that wasn't refusing to take people back to places like that.
I can tell you this, mister president. No. The foreign policy of The United States is conducted by the president of The United States, not by a court. And no court in The United States has a right to conduct the foreign policy of The United States. It's that simple.
End of story.
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 WATCH: MULTIPLE members of the Trump admin take turns dunking on CNN’s Kaitlan Collins for pushing fake news about an MS-13 member deported to El Salvador This is so beautiful 🤣 Way to go Rubio, Miller, Bondi, and Bukele 🔥 https://t.co/nHqyLBZ4ck
Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration was asked about a man who was allegedly mistakenly deported to El Salvador.
It was stated that the individual was illegally in the U.S. and that two immigration courts ruled in 2019 that he was a member of MS-13. Additional paperwork was needed, and it is up to El Salvador if they want to return him. The Supreme Court ruled that if El Salvador wants to return him, the U.S. would facilitate it by providing a plane.
Because the individual is a citizen of El Salvador, it is arrogant for American media to suggest the U.S. would tell El Salvador how to handle their own citizens. Because Trump declared MS-13 a foreign terrorist organization, the individual was no longer eligible for immigration relief and had a valid deportation order. A district court judge tried to compel the administration to kidnap the citizen of El Salvador and fly him back, but the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the district court order.
The ruling stated that if El Salvador sent the individual back to the U.S. at their discretion, the U.S. could deport him a second time. The U.S. does not have the power to return him, and they are not fond of releasing terrorists into the country. No court in the U.S. has a right to conduct the foreign policy of the U.S.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Return the man who your administration says was mistakenly deported the man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador?
Speaker 1: Well, let me ask Pam. Would you ask answer that question?
Speaker 2: Sure, president. First and foremost, he was illegally in our country. He had been illegally in our country. And in 2019, '2 courts, an immigration court and an appellate immigration court ruled that he was a member of MS thirteen and he was illegally in our country. Right now, it was a paperwork.
It was additional paperwork had needed to be done. That's up to El Salvador if they want to return him. That's not up to us. The supreme court ruled president that if as El Salvador wants to return him, this this is international matters, foreign affairs. If they wanted to return him, we would facilitate it, meaning provide a plane.
Speaker 0: So will you return
Speaker 1: him, president? You are doing a great job.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Well, just like I used to put Steve here another wait a minute. Can you just also respond to that question? Because, you know, it's asked by CNN, they always ask it with a slant, because they're totally slanted because they don't know what's happening. That's why nobody's watching them. But would you answer that question also, please?
Speaker 3: Yes. Gladly. So as Pam mentioned, there's an illegal alien from El Salvador. So with respect to you, he's a citizen of El Salvador. So it's very arrogant even for American media to suggest that we would even tell El Salvador how to handle their own citizens as a starting point.
As two immigration courts found that he was a member of MS thirteen. When president Trump declared MS thirteen to be a foreign terrorist organization, that meant that he was no longer eligible under federal law, which I'm sure you know, you're very familiar with the INA, that he was no longer eligible for any form of immigration relief in The United States. So he had a deportation we order that was valid, which meant that under our law, he's not even allowed to be present in The United States and had to be returned because of the foreign terrorist designation. This issue was then by district court judge completely inverted and a district court judge tried to tell the administration that they had to kidnap a citizen of El Salvador and fly him back here. That issue was raised to the supreme court.
And the supreme court said the district court order was unlawful and its main components were reversed nine zero unanimously stating clearly that neither secretary of state nor the president could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador from El Salvador who, again, is a member of MS thirteen, which is I'm sure you understand, rapes little girls, murders women, murders children, is engaged in the most barbaric activities in the world. And I can promise you if he was your neighbor, you would move right away.
Speaker 0: So you don't plan to
Speaker 1: ask him to and what was the ruling that and the supreme court, Steve, was it nine to nothing?
Speaker 3: Yes. Was a nine zero. In our favor? In our favor against the district court ruling saying that no district court has the power to compel the foreign policy function of The United States. As Pam said, the ruling solely stated that if this individual at El Salvador's sole discretion was sent back to our country, that we could deport him a second time.
Speaker 1: Well, I
Speaker 3: No version of this legally ends up with him ever living here because he is a citizen of El Salvador. That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about it per the court can only be directed to him.
Speaker 0: I I asked Can president Bukele weigh in on this? Do you plan to
Speaker 1: The United States. I I don't have the power to return him to The United States. But you can release him inside of Yeah, but I'm not releasing I mean, we're not very fond of releasing terrorists into our country. We just turned the murder capital of the world into the safest country in the Western Hemisphere, and you want us to go back into the releasing criminals so they can go back to being the murdered capital of the world. And that's that's not gonna be bad.
That's Well, they'd love to have a criminal, you know, released into I mean, I mean, there's there's a fascination. They would love it. Yeah. They're sick these are sick people. Mark, could you have something to say
Speaker 4: about Yeah. I mean, Steven, I don't understand what the confusion is. This individual is a citizen of El Salvador. He was illegally in The United States and was returned to his country. That's where you deport people back to their country of origin, except for Venezuela that wasn't refusing to take people back to places like that.
I can tell you this, mister president. No. The foreign policy of The United States is conducted by the president of The United States, not by a court. And no court in The United States has a right to conduct the foreign policy of The United States. It's that simple.
End of story.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent exchange, Stephen Miller confronted a reporter questioning the administration's focus on immigrant families. He challenged the reporter to consider the implications of allowing millions of undocumented immigrants to stay, asserting that all individuals released by Biden should return home. Miller emphasized that ICE will prioritize targeting high-threat criminal aliens and will not allow taxpayers to support any illegal immigrants. He maintained a firm stance on immigration policy, dismissing the reporter's attempts to shift the conversation.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 MAJOR SMACKDOWN ALERT: Stephen Miller does it again. Fake news reporter in utter shambles. REPORTER: "Is it the best use of the administration's resources to be going after moms of young kids, basically?" MILLER: "Do you yourself have an opinion on this subject? What percentage of the, let's just pick an even number of say, 10 million illegal aliens. Let's say that Biden released, I think it's close to the 20 million. Let's say he released 10 million illegal aliens into the country over the last four years. What percentage do you think we should let stay here of those 10 million?" REPORTER: "I'm not trying to do a game!" MILLER: "is it your view that if a Democrat president releases 10, 15, 20 million illegals into the country, they all then should get to stay forever and for all of life?" REPORTER: "Stephen, I don't have a view about what Democratic presidents do. I'm asking what the Republican president..." MILLER: "Okay, so you don't want to answer the question because you know the answer is obvious. Everyone that Biden let in has to go home. Of course. It's a crazy thing to even ask. You think we should give administrative amnesty to some subset of the illegals that Biden [let in]?" "ICE is going to continue to focus on raids against high threat criminal aliens. We're going to use the entire force and power of federal government to get them all home. Many will choose also to leave voluntarily and take advantage of the CBP Home app. But we are not going to ask taxpayers to subsidize the presence of a single illegal alien in this country." 🔥🔥 @StephenM
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the Biden administration's immigration policies and resource allocation. When asked about the best use of administrative resources regarding undocumented immigrants, the speaker refrains from stating a specific opinion on what percentage of released immigrants should be allowed to stay.
The speaker asserts that all undocumented immigrants released into the country under the Biden administration should be deported. According to the speaker, ICE will prioritize raids against high-threat criminal aliens, and the federal government will use its full power to send all undocumented immigrants home. The speaker also claims that many will choose to leave voluntarily using the CBP home app. The speaker states that taxpayers will not subsidize any undocumented immigrants' presence in the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is it the best use of the administration's resources to be going after moms of young kids, basically? Do you yourself have an opinion on the subject? I'm more interested in yours. Well, what percentage of the let's just pick an even number of say, 10,000,000 illegal aliens. Let's say that Biden released I think it's closer to 20.
Let's say he released 10,000,000 illegal aliens into the country over the last four years. What percentage do you think we should let stay here of those 10,000,000? I'm not trying to do a game show. No. But I'm saying No.
No. But You think that's the best use of Well, hold on. But the it is it your view that if a democrat president releases ten, fifteen, 20 million illegals into the country, they all then should get to stay forever and for all of life? Steven, I don't have a view about what democratic presidents do. I'm what the Republican president Yes.
So for and how Okay. So you don't wanna answer the question because you know the answer is obvious. Everyone that Biden let in has to go home. Of course. I mean, it's a crazy thing to even ask.
You think we should give administrative amnesty to some subset of the illegals that Biden asking how you're the work this year. Here's how we're prioritizing. ICE is gonna continue to focus on raids against high threat criminal aliens. We're gonna use the entire force and power of the federal government to get them all home. Many will choose also to leave voluntarily and take advantage of the CBP home app, but we are not gonna ask taxpayers to subsidize the presence of a single illegal alien in this country.
@DongJonsen - LongDongJonsen
@IanMalcolm84 From my latest Decent™️ Jonathan Substack. This is critical to understand. Thank you for discussing it, Mike Honcho. 💥WHO IS STEPHEN MILLER: https://open.substack.com/pub/decentfijc/p/what-is-president-trumps-doj-doing?r=32gbmm&utm_medium=ios
What is President Trump’s DOJ doing?
Six months into the “greatest first 6 months of a Presidency in American history”, hundreds of millions of regular Americans who are still recovering from the previous five years of draconian COVID measures and the cartoonishly Bolshevik Biden administration, now find themselves looking around, asking “according to whom?”
decentfijc.substack.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I just learned from Stephen Miller about a "massive scandal" in Washington DC. He claims the Democrat-run police department has been hiding crime statistics, even reporting homicides as accidents. He promises that the truth will be revealed soon. This is significant.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: Stephen Miller just revealed that a "massive scandal" has been uncovered in Washington DC. The Democrat-run police department has been extensively hiding crime statistics, going so far as reporting homicides as "accidents instead of m*rders." "It will all be brought to light." Whoa. This is big. @StephenM
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes "a massive scandal in Washington DC with the doctoring of crime stats," noting that "the Department of Justice under the attorney general is leading the effort to uncover this." "But when we ultimately share the results, results, it will it will stun you." They state that "the extent to which even though DC had the worst crime in America, honestly measured, it dramatically understated how bad it was," and claim "There's even accusations that murders and homicides were reported as accidents instead of murders." "I mean, this is how severe the manipulation of the crime data has been in this city." "And it will all be uncovered, it will all be brought to light." The speaker adds: "I've had a chance to spend some time, as to everyone here, with the police officers in the city." "Members of the public are going up to them and thanking them, just overflowing with gratitude."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the president spoke about this before. We've uncovered and the process of uncovering a massive scandal in Washington DC with the doctoring of crime stats, and the Department of Justice under the attorney general is leading the effort to uncover this. But when we ultimately share the results, results, it will it will stun you. The extent to which even though DC had the worst crime in America, honestly measured, it dramatically understated how bad it was. There's even accusations that murders and homicides were reported as accidents instead of murders.
I mean, this is how severe the manipulation of the crime data has been in this city. And it will all be uncovered, it will all be brought to light. You know, I've had a chance to spend some time, as to everyone here, with the police officers in the city. Members of the public are going up to them and thanking them, just overflowing with gratitude.