reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@TheOppressedest - Dr. Dawshawnderez Goldenstein
END ALL FOREIGN AID. AMERICAN MONEY STAYS WITHIN AMERICA. https://t.co/sdRXQlZUM8
@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson
You can say you care about America, but if you’re sending $100 billion to foreign countries right now, you’re lying. https://t.co/jFmBlAW3qG
Video Transcript AI Summary
In early 2016, I recognized the need to address the concerns of everyday Americans, believing that if ignored, it could lead to unrest. Despite my expectations for political change, the situation worsened, with many dismissing legitimate grievances about economic struggles and rising costs. People feel disconnected from their government, which seems more focused on foreign issues than domestic needs. The media often fails to address the consequences of proposed actions, such as potential conflicts, leaving citizens anxious about the future. There's a growing resentment toward leaders who prioritize external matters over the well-being of Americans. This disconnect is palpable, and it’s crucial for leaders to acknowledge and address the real concerns of the populace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I thought early, and I actually wrote a piece not for the early caller I'm embarrassed, but for political because I wanted to sort of drop a bomb into my neighbor's laps. And said, look, you may think that Trump is a ludicrous figure, and, you know, he may be on to something. But fundamentally, what he's saying is not crazy at all. And in fact, it's necessary. And if you don't want to have another revolution in the country, you should probably start paying a little bit of attention to what the people beyond Washington think.
And and I thought then that was January of 2016. I thought that that message was so rooted in common sense and also in observed reality that he would probably win and and he did. So I got a lot out of making that one call correctly in my life. And I really did think that we would see, say, 5 or 6, 7 years hence, a political system that more closely matched that idea. You know, that the work product coming out of Washington would bear a little closer resemblance to what people wanted.
And of course, the opposite happened. It's crazy how that idea just went away, and no one actually believed in it, which that blew my mind most of all, including a lot of people I thought were on my side. A lot putting a lot of people who paid a lot of lip service to, you know, put the country first. I personally don't like the term America first because I think it is loaded, but just like just common sense stuff. Like, if something really dramatic in your country happens, like, young people can't, I don't know, get married, you know, or buy houses or have any hope for a future that approaches, you know, the middle class upbringing they had, then you've got a huge problem.
Someone should be responding to that. And if your economy is like on the brink of collapse, you know, if your country is literally bankrupt, someone would say that. And if food inflation gets so crazy that, you know, people are actually complaining about it, at least where I live. Spend a lot of the urine remain. It doesn't make me an expert on the people or anything.
I'm fundamentally rich kid, obviously. But I do live among people who aren't rich, and they're like legit upset about what groceries cost, like for real and what gas costs. And now that we've drained the strategic petroleum reserve, they're about to find out that it could get way higher than it is. So these are just real concerns. It doesn't mean they're the only concerns, but they can't be completely ignored, or or you're going to have a volatile situation on your hands, and why wouldn't you?
You know, angry people who feel like they have no recourse, who don't think elections are real, and they're totally right, obviously. Let's stop lying. There's a lot of truth in that. And those people are you know, they have real grievances, legit grievances. And the only way to temp those grievances down is not by creating some East German surveillance state, comma, which we have done, comma, or throwing people in prison for loitering outside the capital, which is their house after all.
That doesn't work long term. It didn't work in Eastern Europe. It won't work here. The only thing that does work is kind of giving them not all they want, but some or how about this? Let's just start with pretending you care.
But you know what doesn't work? Saying, we're going to spend a $100,000,000,000 in other countries. And I don't care how virtuous the case those countries make is, and I don't care how much I personally may agree or disagree with what those countries are doing. That is immaterial. The job, the moral duty of the people running a country is to look out for the people in that country.
Period. That's always true. And it doesn't mean they can't help other people or whatever, but if they pay no attention whatsoever, and in a moment when every person, 350,000,000 Americans, everyone regardless of political affiliation can feel that something bad is coming. Everybody knows that. Everybody knows that.
I mean, if you've been to church once in the last year, have you thought about the end times recently? Yes, you have. Whether I'm serious because you can feel that abrupt change is coming, and that's very disconcerting. And so rather than reassure people that, you know, we kind of got your back a little bit. By the way, we're going to spend a $100,000,000,000 on other people.
Only the border security part is purely designed to make it easier for more people to come here illegitimately. That's freaking scary. Okay? So I don't have TV at home, and I don't watch TV. We haven't in years because my wife is fiercely opposed to television.
But obviously, I have some familiar with the genre. So I'm thinking to myself the other day, I was like, I wonder what they're saying about this on TV, but I'm speaking with, I have no way really of knowing. So today, I'm today, this afternoon, 2 o'clock this afternoon in the hospital visiting a very sick relative. And in the room, and I'm very focused on this and it's, you know, a drama familiar to everyone who has a family. And these are the saddest moments in your life, but I'm sitting there.
And the TV is cranked way up because it's a facility for older people and no one can hear well. So when they watch TV, it's like, bam, it's loud. And it's a channel that I'm familiar with. I guess I'm familiar with all of them. Having worked at all of them, and I've been fired from all of them.
But, but this is what I know well. And and I'm thinking, well, I wonder what they're saying about all this. You know, because their job is to be, you know, opposed to this. And they take the White House briefing. And the White House briefing is just humiliation exercise because it's administered by the dumbest person in public life.
Like, so dumb, it's unbelievable. I'm not being mean. I feel sorry for her. By the way, intelligence is not a moral category. My dogs are dumb and I love them.
So I'm not sort of judging her, but I'm just saying is, you know, this is like a mouth breather. Okay? And her, the whole point of her being the White House Spokes moron is to tell you that the people in charge have no respect for you, so we're gonna put the dumbest possible person we can up there. And she's prattling on about Iran, and I'm just waiting for her. Like, she doesn't know Iran from Innsbruck.
Okay? She has no idea what she's talking about. Right? And I'm literally waiting for her to say you know, to attack Saddam Hussein, the president of Iran. Okay?
Because literally her shallowness has no bottom. It's like a Zen cone that's almost like a Kamala Harris line actually. Anyway and then they come back, and they're totally taking her seriously. And then the oiliest fakes admiral spokesman who've ever commanded a ship can't run literally can't run a Boston Whaler. He's been a flack his whole life.
Admiral. He's a liar, and I know him personally. He's a liar, and everybody who dealt with him knows he's a liar. And they're like, well, he says this. And the upshot is, we gotta attack Iran.
Now I'm thinking to myself, I think, you know, I have no love for Iran, and I can certainly see why people wanna attack Iran. All I'm asking is just to put one person on TV to point out that there are consequences to the United States that may not be entirely positive to doing this. That maybe another moral victory, and we've won a lot of those recently. I don't know. Are you guys sick of winning moral victories?
We've won a lot of important moral victories. I interviewed someone the other day, a major political figure from the UK, and he's like, well, we've let all these refugees in, and and it's really been a great moral victory. And I was like, I was just in your country. That's garbage. I mean, it smells and it's pathetic.
And, like, do you think that I know you're psyched about your moral you're good people. You trust me. You're good Anglicans. I'm really so impressed by you morally, but, like, has there been a downside in real terms? And he's like, oh, I can't answer that question.
Not allowed. So anyway, I just wanted someone to stand up and ask the obvious question. I'm not even arguing against a war with Iran. I'm merely saying there are consequences to doing that. One is we can't win it probably with the with the defense that we have currently.
I think that's fair. But even if we could, I mean, what would happen if they mind the straight of our moves? I mean, I'm no energy expert, but I think that we would have an immediate energy shock that would send our country into an economic spiral within like hours. Okay? And we don't have any cushion because we burned it all.
Because the senile guy is running for president again. Okay? And we sort of let that happen. So some of it's China. We sort of let it happen.
So that's not a small thing. One thing Americans are not used to is being poor. In the rest of the world, people really worry about the economic effects of everything. Why wouldn't they? Because they're not generationally rich like us.
But what if we ran out of money? At the very same moment that American society is more fractured or social fabric is in tatters, and we've let in millions upon millions of people who have no affinity for the United States, who are merely here for the economic benefits, which by the way is not all bad. And I think a lot of them are good people. I'm not attacking them. I'm merely saying their addition does not make this a more cohesive country.
It makes it a far less cohesive country. Okay? No matter how admirable they may be, and I know some of them, and I really like them. Okay? I've I've even met a legal alien.
I really like them. Just being honest. But if you have millions upon millions of people with no loyalty to the United States, we're all in public benefits and the country goes bankrupt. What happens? You know, last time we had a depression, the country held together because Americans had a lot in common with each other.
But what happens next time? Honestly. Moreover, when your country's at war, civil liberties disappear. And we saw this in the last 20 year war on terror. And I supported all that stuff, and I I have egg on my face.
I'm worse than that. I'm ashamed of the measures that I supported, which were, of course, turned against me. And the NSA got busted reading my text messages on signal, which is supposedly secure. Spoiler, it is not. Keep the naughty pictures off signal.
Okay? Because they're looking at them. But they did that. They got caught doing it. No one resigned or even apologized, and that was all legal because of the measures we put in place the last time we were fighting the bad guys over a 20 year period that measurably weakened the country, and from which we derive nothing in the end.
So I'm merely saying, maybe we should just pause for one second to ask, could we be doing that again, but at scale? Not one person. You're not allowed. Because everything is some moral argument. Well, are you on the side of the bad guys?
No. And so I look at how this is rated, and again, I can't tell you how disgusted I am, but the behavior of people who said they were conservative and cared about the country. I clearly don't. Because no one asked that question. They're all too afraid.
And then the other side, the wackos running around calling for, you know, the pro Hamas people decolonize. You know, they're mad at Israel for being white. They wanna kill everybody. Obviously, if if forced to choose, I go with Ben Shapiro. Okay?
But I shouldn't have to choose. Like, there should be the America guy in the middle who's like, I have strong sympathies here and, you know, morally, I'm on one side, but I'm an American and I've got a ton of kids. I'll speak for myself. I am an American. I was born here.
I will die here. I have a ton of kids, and I kinda want them to be able to live here in a country that resembles the one in which I grew up. And what about them? Shut up. Oh, shut up is not good enough, actually.
And I just the spirit of fear, and I hate to use the term of group think that is descended upon lawmakers, and I would say movement leaders in Washington where no one can say something that's completely obvious. Because when you're anti Israel, no one's gonna call me anti Israel. I like Israel. And one of the things I love about Israel, in addition to the fact it's beautiful and great food, took my kids there on vacation, is I like the Israelis. What I like about the Israelis, they they're proud of themselves in their country.
I like that. I like secure people. But I don't know I don't know a single Israeli, and I say this as a compliment from my heart. I don't know a single Israeli who would jeopardize his own country's economy or safety for another nation. Because they care about their nation.
Like, what the hell? I'm saying this as a compliment, but why would we do that? And when I see leaders on the left and right call for refugees from Gaza to be imported here, they're too dangerous for other countries, but we should take them. What are you saying? What are you saying about how you feel about my country?
You're saying you consider it a trash bin. Throw the refuse there. No one else wants to deal with it. America will deal with it. Well, how about no?
How about anyone who even suggest something like that? Speaking I mean, speaking of a betrayal of your country, that's just telling me everything I need to know about how you feel about the United States of America, and I'm disgusted by it. Did you even think something like that? Really? And yet that is considered, like, kind of within bounds.
I know there's a few Republicans who are like, well, that could happen. And we're gonna pass legislation preemptively to make sure it doesn't. It's like, why would we even have that conversation? That is truly nuts. It's nuts.
And more than anything, it's revealing of an attitude that is poisonous and that everyone else in the country can feel. They know it. And again, don't look to me because I live in my family summer house. I'm not pretending to be, you know, what JD Vance actually is, which is a son of middle America, of working America. I'm not.
But I try to observe, and I try to talk to people. I like people. And I can tell you, I can promise you that the level of resentment toward those attitudes is extremely high. It's extremely high, and it absolutely should be.
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
Tucker Carlson gets it: "You can say you care about America, but if you’re sending $100 billion to foreign countries right now, you’re lying." https://t.co/hGXvGD5euz
@RonFilipkowski - Ron Filipkowski
Trump is asked about the report that his businesses profited over $8 million from foreign governments including China while he was president. He said that is such a small amount of money and “I was doing services for them … I don’t get $8 million for doing nothing!” https://t.co/BLhAU3OKCS
Video Transcript AI Summary
I own luxurious hotels and clubs where people from China stay and pay for their services. Although it may seem like a large sum of money, it is actually a small amount considering the quality of my establishments. I take pride in offering the best accommodations and amenities. I earn a significant amount of money from these guests, around $8,000,000, because they choose to stay at my exceptional hotels and clubs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And if I have a hotel and somebody comes in from China, that's a small amount of money. You know, it sounds like a lot of money. That's a small but I was doing services for that. People were staying in these massive hotels, these beautiful hotels because I have the best hotels. I have the best clubs.
I have the best clubs. I have the I have great stuff. And they stay there, and they pay. I don't get $8,000,000 for doing nothing.
@DOGE - Department of Government Efficiency
The United States gives more in aid to foreign countries than the next 9 countries combined. Where exactly is that money going and how is it being spent? https://t.co/bNG0tGd8jc
@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand
BREAKING: President Trump addresses Congress and says American decline is over—the “Golden Age has officially begun” He’s putting a freeze on Foreign Aid—because “we’re tired of giving money to nations that hate us” Wow, can we get an AMEN? https://t.co/05zua56oSx
Video Transcript AI Summary
In just one week, over 350 executive actions were taken, including signing 300. The era of American decline is over, and a new golden age has begun. On day one, every cabinet member was directed to use their powers to combat inflation and reduce living costs. A federal hiring freeze, regulation freeze, and foreign aid freeze were imposed, reflecting a shift in priorities. The creation of a new department focused on Government Efficiency aims to enhance effectiveness. Additionally, the termination of the costly Green New Deal was announced, highlighting a commitment to eliminate wasteful spending.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a single week, I've taken over 350 executive actions. We've signed 300 and whoever heard of that 1. And as I said in my inaugural address, the American decline is over. It's over. The golden age of America has officially begun.
And I think that's a good thing for us to talk about. The golden age and the American dream. I think it's a good thing because people haven't been talking that way for a long period of time. On day 1, I directed every member of my cabinet to marshal all powers at their disposal to defeat inflation and bring down the cost of daily life. And we're gonna do that.
You're gonna see it starting to happen brought everything up. It's gonna bring everything down. I imposed a federal hiring freeze, a federal regulation freeze, a foreign aid freeze, a foreign aid freeze. A foreign aid freeze. Isn't that nice?
We get tired of giving massive amounts of money to countries that hate us, don't we? And I created the new department of Government Efficiency, and I think it's gonna be very meaningful. I terminated the ridiculous and incredibly wasteful green new scam. Great 1 of the great scams in history.
@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports
'America is the piggy-bank they are all stealing from.' https://t.co/tnozSd3qbr
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
PRESIDENT TRUMP ON USAID: "I WANT TO SEE WHERE THE KICKBACKS ARE" "The people that got all that money are they kicking it back to the people that gave it from government?" @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/cnv64scb3b
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's significant fraud in USAID, with radical groups receiving funds they don't deserve. A staggering amount, like a hundred million, is being misallocated. It's crucial to investigate the kickbacks associated with this spending. Who would invest such sums in questionable projects? It's likely that those who received the funds are not returning any to the government, indicating a high level of corruption. The key issue is understanding the extent of these kickbacks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look at all the fraud that he's found in this, USAID. It's a disaster what the people, radical left lunatics. They have things that nobody would have even believed. The whole thing with a hundred million spent on you know what? With money going to all sorts of groups that shouldn't deserve to get any money with the money.
I'd like to see what the kickbacks are. How much money has been kicked back? Who would spend that kind of money to some of the things that you read about and I read about, and I see every night on the news and every morning when I read the papers? Who would spend money for that? I would say this, the people that got all that money, are they kicking it back to the people that gave it from government?
No. That's to me, very, very corrupt. The real question is how much of a kickback has
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨President Trump on corruption and fraud in USAID: "Elon Musk has done a great job. Look at all the fraud he has found in this USAID. It is a disaster, radical left lunatics. The whole thing with 100 million spent on you know what.. I’d like to see what the kickbacks are." https://t.co/ob2S4NrMbg
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm Elon Musk. There have been many ideas discussed, but some are too extreme. The fraud found in USAID is shocking, with over a hundred million spent on questionable groups. It's concerning how much money is being kicked back to those in government.
The train project between Los Angeles and San Francisco is poorly managed, with massive budget overruns. It would have been cheaper to provide limousine services for all passengers. Now, the project is not even reaching the main cities but instead stops far away.
We're launching an investigation into this because the scale of mismanagement is unprecedented. This is the worst cost overrun in U.S. history, and it was unnecessary. There are better alternatives like flying or driving. We need to scrutinize this further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It doesn't seem to work. I'm Elon Musk. Thank you, sir. I'm Elon Musk. How often are you talking to him?
And have there been ideas that he's brought to you that you said, oh, no. Wait a minute. This is going a little too far. Well, many ideas, but look, he's done a great job. Look at all the fraud that he's found in this, USAID.
It's a disaster what the people, radical left lunatics. They have things that nobody would have even believed. The whole thing with a hundred million spent on, you know what? With money going to all sorts of groups that shouldn't deserve to get any money with the money. I'd like to see what the kickbacks are.
How much money has been kicked back? Who would spend that kind of money to some of the things that you read about and I read about and I see every night on the news and every morning when I read the papers? Who would spend money for that? I would say this, the the people that got all that money, are they kicking it back to the people that gave it from government? No.
That's to me, very, very corrupt. The real question is how much of a kickback has there been? And one of the things I want to investigate, rapidly because I've never seen anything to this extent. The train that's being built between Los Angeles and San Francisco is the worst managed project I think I've ever seen, and I've seen some of the worst. Billions and billions, hundreds of billions of dollars over budget.
In fact, I read where you could take every single person that was gonna go on the train and get the finest limousine service in the world and take them back and forth with limousines, and you'd have hundreds of millions of dollars left over. It is the worst thing, and we're gonna start an investigation in that because it's not possible. I built for a living, and I built on time, on budget. It's impossible that something could cost that much. And now it's not even going to San Francisco, and it's not going to Los Angeles.
It's they made it much shorter. So now it's at little places way away from San Francisco and way away from Los Angeles. No. We're gonna start a big investigation on that because it's I've never seen anything like it. Nobody has ever seen anything like it.
The worst overruns that there have ever been in the history of our country, And it wasn't even necessary. I would have said, you don't buy it. You take an airplane. Of course, you $2. Of course, you're nothing.
You take an airplane. But this got started. And if you have to, you drive. You can drive. And there are other agents?
They have hundreds of billions of dollars of cost overruns, and it's not even the same project. It's much shorter. It's way outside of San Francisco and way outside of Los Angeles. So we're gonna be looking
reSee.it AI Summary
I just shared that Trump is demanding investigations into corruption within USAID, questioning who has profited from the billions allocated. He suggests that USAID has been misused as a slush fund, raising concerns about where the money has actually gone and who benefited while taxpayers were left in the dark. There's a sense of urgency as Democrats seem anxious about the potential fallout. This effort is positioned as a broader initiative to unveil globalist corruption, signaling that a reckoning is on the horizon.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 BREAKING: TRUMP DEMANDS INVESTIGATIONS INTO USAID CORRUPTION – WHO'S GETTING KICKBACKS? 🚨 🇺🇸 Trump just called for full investigations into who has been profiting from the billions funneled through USAID. 🔴 For years, USAID has been a Deep State slush fund—where did all that money REALLY go? 🔴 Who got rich while American taxpayers were robbed blind? 🔴 Democrats are sweating because they KNOW the Hammer of Justice is coming. 🔥 This isn’t just about USAID—this is about exposing the globalist corruption machine. The cover-up is crumbling. The reckoning is here. 🔥
Video Transcript AI Summary
在这里，每个人都在这里。每个人都是这里的一部分。我们都是在这个地方的个体，彼此相连。
Everyone is here. Each person is part of this place. We are all individuals connected in this space.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 的 一 个 人 在 这 里
Speaker 1: 的 一 个 人 在 这 里 的 一 个 人 都 是 在 这 里 的 一 个 人 都 是 在 这 里 的 一
Speaker 0: 个 人 的 一 个
Speaker 1: 人 都 是 在 这 里 的 一
Speaker 2: 个 人 的 一 个 人
Speaker 0: 的 人 都
Speaker 2: 是 在 这 里 的 一
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
🔥🔥🔥 President Trump will be NAMING the Criminals that were stealing from the American Tax Payers tomorrow at a Press Conference. “I'm going to read to you some of the names that hundreds of MILLIONS and even BILLIONS of dollars have been given to…” https://t.co/IDPzl19jO9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tomorrow, I will hold a news conference to reveal the names of entities receiving hundreds of millions, even billions, of dollars. If you believe these entities deserve the funding, you shouldn't be a reporter. Billions are being wasted illegally, and I believe kickbacks are involved. When someone gets millions for a mere fifteen-minute assessment, that money is coming back somehow. This corruption significantly harms our country through massive expenditures.
I reviewed 200 expenditures and found only three reasonable. We'll discuss this further tomorrow. I commend Elon Musk; despite daily abuse, he has uncovered more than anyone else. His team of geniuses, starting with 12 and now almost a hundred, is helping expose massive fraud.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That you can have that kind of fraud. You're talking about, like are you talking about what? The way Wait. Wait. Wait.
General Which are you talking? You're talking about with regard to all of the investigations that are going on about this stupidity. What we're gonna do is tomorrow, I'm having a news conference. I'm gonna read to you some of the names that hundreds of millions and even billions of dollars have been given to. And if you tell me that we should be giving money to those things, those entities, I think you'll probably have to leave as a reporter because you're not very talented.
When you look at the kind of money, billions and billions of dollars being thrown away illegally, and there's no there's no chance I mean, I say it in front of our our attorney general, there's no chance that there's not kickbacks or something going on. When you give millions and millions of dollars to somebody that stands to look at something for fifteen minutes and walks away with millions of dollars, That money's coming back in some form, and that's only one form of corruption. The biggest thing is what they do to our country, they're taking massive amounts of money and spending it on items. I went through a list of 200 expenditures that were made, and I found three that looked like they were reasonable. Okay?
Three. And, we'll be talking about that tomorrow. We have a lot of stuff. And I wanna commend Elon because he's done a fan he doesn't need this. You know, he's abused by you people every day.
He's found more things than anybody could find. I think he's got the credibility to do it. I know he does. And, it's his group of people. You know, they started off with 12.
I call them 12 geniuses. They started off with 12 and then went to twenty and twenty five, and now they're up to almost a hundred. People are joining to help them because there's a massive fraud that's taken place.
@RapidResponse47 - Rapid Response 47
President Trump reads aloud a list of some of the ridiculous projects taxpayers have been funding — like $10 million for circumcisions in Mozambique and $25 million for biodiversity in Colombia. https://t.co/QSDy8x2RAZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Where is all of our money going? $520 million to consultants for environmental, social, and governance investments in Africa. $25 million is going to Colombia to promote biodiversity conservation and socially responsible behavior. $40 million to improve social and economic inclusion of migrants, and $42 million for Johns Hopkins to research social and behavior change in Uganda.
Purdue is getting $70 million to research solutions to developmental challenges, while $10 million goes to Mozambique for voluntary medical male circumcisions. UC Berkeley receives $9.7 million to develop enterprise skills in Cambodian youth. The Prague Civil Society Center, a very liberal group, gets $32 million. $14 million is for improving public procurement in Serbia. We're giving $486 million to strengthen elections and political processes, including $21 million for voter turnout in India. This is fraud, and it just keeps going on and on.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where's the money being spent? Right? Let's go into that for just a second. Five hundred and twenty million dollars for a consultant on the environment. It's called environmental, social and governance investments in Africa and mobilize private sector resources, $520,000,000 Somebody got $520,000,000 for an environmental sounds like an environmental study.
Most I've always been one that paid a lot of money for my environmental studies, but they, you know, I paid like $50,000 not $520,000,000 5 20 million dollars for ESG. Twenty five million dollars to promote biodiversity, conservation, and promote licit livelihoods by developing socially responsible behavior in the country of Colombia. Well, it's nice. 25,000,000 to go into Colombia for something that nobody ever heard of. $40,000,000 to improve the social and economic inclusion of sedentary migrants.
40,000,000. 40 2 million dollars for Johns Hopkins, great place to research and drive social and behavior change in Uganda, Forty Two Million. What about us? What about social change in our country? $70,000,000 for a center at Purdue to research university sourced evidence based solutions to developmental challenges.
I mean, these are massive numbers on things that nobody ever heard about. $10,000,000 for Mozambique voluntary medical male circumcisions. Ten million dollars for circumcisions in another country. $9,700,000 for UC Berkeley to develop a co a cohort of Cambodian youth with enterprise driven skills. In other words, let's teach them something about enterprise.
What about our people? Can we teach them about enterprise? $2,300,000 for strengthening independent voices in Cambodia. Thirty Two Million Dollars to the Prague Civil Society Center, which is a very liberal group of people. Wonder how much of that money came back to the people that approved it.
$14,000,000 for improving public procurement in Serbia. Four Hundred And Eighty Six Million Dollars to the consortium for elections and political process strengthening, including $22,000,000 for inclusive and participatory political process in Moldova, and $21,000,000 for voter turnout in India. But why are we giving $21,000,000 to India? They got a lot of money. They're the one of the highest taxing countries in the world in terms of us.
We can hardly get in there because their tariffs are so high. I have a lot of respect for India. I have a lot of respect for the prime minister. He just left, as you know, two days ago. But we're giving $21,000,000 for voter turnout.
It's voter turnout in India. What about, like, voter turnout here? Oh, we've done that, I guess. We did 500,000,000, didn't we? It's called the lock boxes.
$20,000,000 for fiscal federalism in Nepal. Listen to these numbers. These are this is all fraud. $19,000,000 for biodiversity conservation in Nepal. One Point Five Million Dollars for voter confidence.
We wanna give them confidence in Liberia. Fourteen Million Dollars for social cohesion in Mali, Two Point Five Million Dollars for inclusive democracies in South Africa, Forty Seven Million Dollars for improving learning outcomes in Asia. Asia's doing very well. They're doing a lot better than we do in the schools, aren't they? $2,000,000 to develop sustainable recycling models to increase socioeconomic cohesion among marginalized communities in Kosovo and, Eskalie and in Egypt.
We're talking about hundreds of billions of dollars. I could I could by the way, I could read this all day long. I could go on all day long, and you'll see hundreds of billions of dollars.
@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk
President Trump spends four minutes listing different ways American taxpayers' money was being wasted on ridiculous pet projects in foreign countries: "I could go on all day long. Hundreds of billions of dollars." Why are Democrats fighting this? https://t.co/m4vR5odivV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Where's the money going? $520 million for environmental, social, and governance investments in Africa. $25 million to promote biodiversity in Colombia. $40 million to include sedentary migrants. $42 million for Johns Hopkins to research social change in Uganda. What about us? $70 million for Purdue to research solutions to developmental challenges.
Then, $10 million for circumcisions in Mozambique, $9.7 million for UC Berkeley to develop Cambodian youth enterprise skills. $2.3 million to strengthen independent voices in Cambodia, $32 million to the Prague Civil Society Center, $14 million to improve public procurement in Serbia, $486 million to strengthen elections, including $21 million for voter turnout in India.
It continues: $20 million for fiscal federalism in Nepal, $19 million for biodiversity in Nepal, $1.5 million for voter confidence in Liberia, and $47 million for improving learning outcomes in Asia. This involves hundreds of billions of dollars, and I could continue reading examples all day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where's the money being spent? Right? Let's go into that for just a second. Five hundred and twenty million dollars for a consultant on the environment. It's called environmental, social and governance investments in Africa and mobilize private sector resources, $520,000,000 Somebody got $520,000,000 for an environmental sounds like an environmental study.
Most I've always been one that paid a lot of money for my environmental studies, but they, you know, I paid like $50,000 not $520,000,000 5 20 million dollars for ESG. Twenty five million dollars to promote biodiversity, conservation, and promote licit livelihoods by developing socially responsible behavior in the country of Colombia. Well, it's nice. 25,000,000 to go into Colombia for something that nobody ever heard of. $40,000,000 to improve the social and economic inclusion of sedentary migrants.
40,000,000. 40 2 million dollars for Johns Hopkins, great place to research and drive social and behavior change in Uganda, Forty Two Million. What about us? What about social change in our country? $70,000,000 for a center at Purdue to research university sourced evidence based solutions to developmental challenges.
I mean, these are massive numbers on things that nobody ever heard about. $10,000,000 for Mozambique voluntary medical male circumcisions. Ten million dollars for circumcisions in another country. $9,700,000 for UC Berkeley to develop a co a cohort of Cambodian youth with enterprise driven skills. In other words, let's teach them something about enterprise.
What about our people? Can we teach them about enterprise? $2,300,000 for strengthening independent voices in Cambodia. Thirty Two Million Dollars to the Prague Civil Society Center, which is a very liberal group of people. Wonder how much of that money came back to the people that approved it.
$14,000,000 for improving public procurement in Serbia. Four Hundred And Eighty Six Million Dollars to the consortium for elections and political process strengthening, including $22,000,000 for inclusive and participatory political process in Moldova, and $21,000,000 for voter turnout in India. But why are we giving $21,000,000 to India? They got a lot of money. They're the one of the highest taxing countries in the world in terms of us.
We can hardly get in there because their tariffs are so high. I have a lot of respect for India. I have a lot of respect for the prime minister. He just left, as you know, two days ago. But we're giving $21,000,000 for voter turnout.
It's voter turnout in India. What about, like, voter turnout here? Oh, we've done that, I guess. We did 500,000,000, didn't we? It's called the lock boxes.
$20,000,000 for fiscal federalism in Nepal. Listen to these numbers. These are this is all fraud. $19,000,000 for biodiversity conservation in Nepal. One Point Five Million Dollars for voter confidence.
We wanna give them confidence in Liberia. Fourteen Million Dollars for social cohesion in Mali, Two Point Five Million Dollars for inclusive democracies in South Africa, Forty Seven Million Dollars for improving learning outcomes in Asia. Asia's doing very well. They're doing a lot better than we do in the schools, aren't they? $2,000,000 to develop sustainable recycling models to increase socioeconomic cohesion among marginalized communities in Kosovo and, Eskalie and in Egypt.
We're talking about hundreds of billions of dollars. I could I could by the way, I could read this all day long. I could go on all day long, and you'll see hundreds of billions of dollars.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🌍 Holy Shit - Trump just exposed the entire Money Laundering Fraud Scam for 4 minutes straight. https://t.co/4EZD3Krv50
Video Transcript AI Summary
Let's talk about where money is being spent. We've got $520 million for environmental, social, and governance investments in Africa and to mobilize private sector resources. There's $25 million to promote biodiversity in Colombia, $40 million to improve social and economic inclusion of migrants, and $42 million for Johns Hopkins to research social and behavior change in Uganda.
Then we see $70 million for Purdue to research solutions to developmental challenges, $10 million for circumcisions in Mozambique, and almost $10 million for UC Berkeley to train Cambodian youth. Plus, millions more are going to various projects, including election and political processes strengthening, voter turnout in India, fiscal federalism in Nepal, biodiversity in Nepal, and learning outcomes in Asia. It's a lot of money going to a lot of different places.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's just that. And then where's the money being spent? Right? Let's go into that for just a second. Five hundred and twenty million dollars for a consultant on the environment.
It's called environmental, social, and governance investments in Africa and mobilized private sector resources, $520,000,000 Somebody got $520,000,000 for an environmental sounds like an environmental study. Most I've always been one that paid a lot of money for my environmental studies, but they you know, I paid, like, $50,000, not $520,000,000 5 hundred and 20 million dollars for ESG. Twenty five million dollars to promote biodiversity, conservation, and promote licit livelihoods by developing socially responsible behavior in the country of Colombia. Well, that's nice. 25,000,000 to go into Colombia for something that nobody ever heard of.
$40,000,000 to improve the social and economic inclusion of sedentary migrants. 40,000,000. 40 2 million dollars for Johns Hopkins, great place to research and drive social and behavior change in Uganda. Forty Two Million. What about us?
What about social change in our country? $70,000,000 for a center at Purdue to research university sourced evidence based solutions to developmental challenges. I mean, these are massive numbers on things that nobody ever heard about. $10,000,000 for Mozambique voluntary medical male circumcisions. Ten million dollars for circumcisions in another country.
$9,700,000 for UC Berkeley to develop a co a cohort of Cambodian youth with enterprise driven skills. In other words, let's teach them something about enterprise. What about our people? Can we teach them about enterprise? $2,300,000 for strengthening independent voices in Cambodia.
Thirty Two Million Dollars to the Prague Civil Society Center, which is a very liberal group of people. Wonder how much of that money came back to the people that approved it. $14,000,000 for improving public procurement in Serbia. Four Hundred And Eighty Six Million Dollars to the consortium for elections and political process strengthening, including 22,000,000 for inclusive and participatory political process in Moldova, and $21,000,000 for voter turnout in India. Well, why are we giving $21,000,000 to India?
They got a lot of money. They're the one of the highest taxing countries in the world in terms of us. We can hardly get in there because their tariffs are so high. I have a lot of respect for India. I have a lot of respect for the prime minister.
He just left, as you know, two days ago. But we're giving $21,000,000 for voter turnout. It's voter turnout in India. What about, like, voter turnout here? Oh, we've done that, I guess.
We did 500,000,000, didn't we? It's called the lock boxes. $20,000,000 for fiscal federalism in Nepal. Listen to these numbers. These are this is all fraud.
$19,000,000 for biodiversity conservation in Nepal, One Point Five Million Dollars for voter confidence. We wanna give them confidence in Liberia, Fourteen Million Dollars for social cohesion in Mali, Two Point Five Million Dollars for inclusive democracies in South Africa, Forty Seven Million Dollars for improving learning outcomes in Asia. Asia's doing very well. They're doing a lot better than we do in the schools, aren't they? $2,000,000 to develop sustainable recycling models to increase socioeconomic cohesion among marginalized communities in Kosovo and, Eskali and in Egypt.
We're talking about hundreds of billions of dollars. I could I could by the way, I could read this all day long. I could go on all day long, and you'll see
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Trump slams Zelensky and Biden era funding for the endless war. Why does the U.S. get the worst end of the deal? Europe’s money was guaranteed, ours wasn’t. Half of ours went missing. Trump’s Art of the Deal will not let this abuse of America continue. https://t.co/HQzPhqgzOF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky got the U.S. to spend $350 billion on a war that was unwinnable and unnecessary, a war that wouldn't have started under my presidency. Without U.S. involvement, this war will never end. The U.S. has spent far more than Europe, who will get their money back as a loan, unlike us.
Why didn't Biden demand equalization, especially since this war affects Europe more? Zelensky admits half the money we sent is missing and refuses to hold elections. He played Biden, a dictator without elections needs to act fast.
We will negotiate an end to the war with Russia because Biden and Europe have failed. Zelensky is upset he wasn't invited to Saudi Arabia. The losses are staggering, and Zelensky has done a terrible job. To end the war, you must talk to both sides, which hasn't happened for three years. We aim for a ceasefire and stability in Europe and the Middle East.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But think of it, a modestly successful comedian. President Zelensky talked The United States Of America into spending $350,000,000,000 to go into a war that basically couldn't be won, that never had to start and never would have started if I was president. Not even a chance. And it didn't start for four years. Never would have started.
But a war that he, without The US and Trump, will never be able to settle. They'll never settle that war without our involvement. That's why they did such a great job this weekend. That's why Saudi Arabia did such a great job this weekend in hosting. The United States has spent $200,000,000,000 more than Europe, and Europe's money is guaranteed.
They get their money back. It's a form of a loan. Nobody knows that. I know that. I said, why isn't somebody saying, you know, we do it the same way, and we spent much more money.
We have to equalize. But while The United States gets nothing back, so they get their money back. It's a it's a loan. We just give our money. And we had a deal based on rare earth and things, but, they broke that deal.
But we, they broke it two days ago. We had a deal because, I said, we're spending $350,000,000,000, and Europe gets their money back in the form of a loan, and we don't. We're just giving the money hand over fist. That's the Biden administration for you. But they're no longer dealing with the same United States as they were dealing with a few months ago.
Why didn't Crooked Joe Biden demand equalization? And that this war is far more important, to Europe than it is to us, and that there's a very big, beautiful ocean, a separation. This is you know, we're helping Europe. We're trying to help Europe. On top of this, Zelensky admits that half of the money that we sent them is missing.
They don't know where the money is. He said, well, we don't know where half of it is. That's great. Wonderful. He refuses to have elections.
It's low in the real Ukrainian polls. I mean, how can you be high with every city is being demolished? It's hard to be high. Somebody said, oh, no. His polls are good.
Give me a break. Every city is being demolished. They look like a demolition site, every single one of them. And the only thing he was really good at was playing Joe Biden like a fiddle. He played him like a fiddle.
That's an expression we use, yes, sir, to say that, he's pretty easy. Pretty easy. A dictator without elections. Zelensky better move fast or he's not going to have a country left. Gotta move.
Gotta move fast because that war is going in the wrong direction. In the meantime, we're successfully negotiating an end to the war with Russia. Something I'll admit that only Trump is gonna be able to do in the Trump administration. We're gonna be able to do it. I think Putin even admitted that.
Biden never tried. Europe has failed to bring peace, And Zelensky probably wants to maybe he wants to keep the gravy train going. I don't know what's the problem, but he hasn't been able. He's very upset that he wasn't invited. He could have come if he wanted to, but that he wasn't invited to Saudi Arabia.
But, he's been working for three years. There's never been even meetings or phone calls to stop this war. It's a horrible thing. I figure Russia's lost 900,000 soldiers. I think that Ukraine's lost probably 700,000.
And it's a terrible thing. You'll see body parts bodies and body parts all over the field, all over. We see them through very accurately through satellites. I love Ukraine, but Zelensky has done a terrible job. His country is shattered, and millions and millions of people have unnecessarily died.
And you can't bring a war to an end if you don't talk to both sides. You gotta talk. They haven't been talking for three years. So we hope to see a ceasefire soon and to reestablish stability in Europe and The Middle East.
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 President Trump just WENT OFF aboard Air Force about the stolen taxpayer dollars for Ukraine “All the money that we've been sending to Ukraine — where is it?” WE TAXPAYERS WANT A REFUND! https://t.co/lrmuX6zcpp
Video Transcript AI Summary
I think I'm going to resurrect that deal, or some people won't be too happy. It's time for elections. It's also time to find out what happened with all the money we've been sending to Ukraine. Where is it?
I can tell you we're going to do something with Russia that others were unable to do. We can make a deal with Russia to stop the killing of potentially millions of people. The soldiers are being wiped out on both sides. It's horrible. The weaponry today is so powerful that it's killing a lot of soldiers, Russian and Ukrainian. I don't want to see them killed. They have families.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can you resurrect that deal? Is there anything that you can I think I'm gonna resurrect it? Of course. You know, we'll see what happens, but I'm gonna resurrect it or things are not gonna make him too happy. And look, it's time for elections.
I haven't had an election in a long time. It's wonderful to say, you know, we can't have an election, but it's time for elections. And it's also time to find out what happened with all the money because he made the statement that half of it, he doesn't know where it is or something like that. And I'd like to find out all the money that we've been sending to Ukraine, where is it? And I can tell you we're doing very well with Russia.
We're we're gonna do something with Russia that he was unable to do. We can make a deal with Russia to stop the killing of, you know, potentially additional millions of people. The soldiers are being just wiped out on both sides. Wiped out. It's horrible.
You know, the weaponry today is so powerful, so, you know, strong that it's killing a lot of soldiers. And I don't wanna see so they're Russian and they're Ukrainian. I don't wanna see those soldiers killed. They have mothers and fathers. They have sisters and brothers.
I don't wanna see them killed.
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
This is a must watch. Trump lists off a bunch of insane scams that US taxpayers were funding before DOGE: https://t.co/8CfrKboiQl
Video Transcript AI Summary
Here's a glimpse at some wasteful spending I've uncovered. We're talking $22 billion from HHS for housing and cars for illegal immigrants, and $45 million for diversity scholarships in Burma. Millions more are going towards initiatives like sedentary migrant inclusion, LGBTQI+ promotion in Lesotho, and indigenous empowerment in Central America.
I've also found $8 million allocated to making mice transgender, $32 million for a left-wing propaganda effort in Moldova, and $10 million for male circumcision in Mozambique. There's nearly $2 billion tied to a decarbonization committee, plus millions more for fish monitoring, voter confidence in Liberia, and illegal alien hotel rooms in NYC.
Other questionable expenditures include vegan climate action in Zambia, social change in Uganda, public procurement in Serbia, learning outcomes in Asia, and a record-breaking $101 million in DEI contracts at the Department of Education.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just listen to some of the appalling waste we have already identified. $22,000,000,000 from HHS to provide free housing and cars for illegal aliens. $45,000,000 for diversity, equity, and inclusion scholarships in Burma. Forty Million Dollars to improve the social and economic inclusion of sedentary migrants. Nobody knows what that is.
$8,000,000 to promote LGBTQI plus in the African nation of Lesotho, which nobody has ever heard of. $60,000,000 for indigenous peoples and Afro Colombian empowerment in Central America. 60 Million Dollars. 8 Million Dollars for making mice transgender. This is real.
$32,000,000 for a left wing propaganda operation in Moldova. Ten Million Dollars for male circumcision in Mozambique, Twenty Million Dollars for the Arab Sesame Street in The Middle East. It's a program. $20,000,000 for a program. $1,900,000,000 to recently created decarbonization of homes committee headed up, and we know she's involved.
Just at the last moment, the money was passed over by a woman named Stacey Abrams. Have you ever heard of her? A $3,500,000 consulting contract for lavish fish monitoring. $1,500,000 for voter confidence in Liberia. Fourteen Million Dollars for social cohesion in Mali.
Fifty Nine Million Dollars for illegal alien hotel rooms in New York City. He's a real estate developer. He's done very well. $250,000 to increase vegan local climate action innovation in Zambia. Two Million for social and behavior change in Uganda.
Fourteen Million Dollars for improving public procurement in Serbia. Forty Seven Million Dollars for improving learning outcomes in Asia. Asia is doing very well with learning. You know what we're doing. We should use it ourselves.
And $101,000,000 for DEI contracts at the Department of Education. The most ever paid, nothing even like it. Under the Trump administration, all of these scams, and they are far worse, but I didn't think it was appropriate to talk about
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
JUST WOW One TRILLION American taxpayer dollars were stolen during the pandemic & 70% PERCENT of that money went overseas. This is unreal!! Hidden Truth
Video Transcript AI Summary
Transnational fraud rings, terrorist organizations, and even nation-states are being funded by taxpayer dollars.
During the pandemic, one trillion dollars was stolen, with 70% going overseas. For example, in one Western state, unemployment insurance applications exceeded the number of adults. Romanian criminals used stolen funds to facilitate fraud schemes involving fentanyl and attempts to undermine our democracy.
While 99% of public sector employees are honest, some exploit the system. Data and technology are crucial to identifying these individuals. Recent examples include a breach of a Medicaid system in a Western state, resulting in $50 million stolen in under four months. These aren't individual thieves, but organized criminal groups, both domestic and transnational.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Transnational fraud rings, terrorist organizationals, nations, nation states, North Korea, nuclear weapons programs funded by our tax dollars, China, Nigeria, Iran, Romania, Russia, not our friends necessarily that are being funded by taxpayer dollars. Could you give us some examples of how this is happening?
Speaker 1: Got it. Yeah. So when you think about what happened during the pandemic, one trillion was stolen. 70% of that money went overseas. And I can give you some examples.
In a western state, they had more people applying for unemployment insurance benefits than they had individuals over 18. The people that were stealing the money from Romania were using it to facilitate other fraud schemes that include fentanyl, that include doing things to impact our democracy. On the insider threat, right, the the first thing you have to say, and my dad was a public servant, is 99% of people that work in the public sector are honest, hardworking individuals. But there are some. And what you need is data and technology to root that out.
There were examples during the pandemic. There were some examples even of last week where people got into the Medicaid system in a southern in a Western state and stole $50,000,000 in less than four months. So you have to have these controls in place. Right? These aren't individuals stealing, mister Cloud.
These are organized criminal groups, both domestic and transnational.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
WHAT IS THIS?! 🚨 “When you think about what happened during the pandemic, $1 TRILLION WAS STOLEN. 70% OF THAT MONEY WENT OVERSEAS.” 70% of COVID MONEY LAUNDERED OVERSEAS “These are organized criminal groups, both domestic and transnational” https://t.co/nLEVCmYzod
Video Transcript AI Summary
Transnational fraud rings, terrorist organizations, and even nation-states like North Korea are being funded with our tax dollars. During the pandemic, a trillion dollars was stolen, with 70% going overseas.
For example, one state had more unemployment claims than adults, and Romanian thieves used stolen funds for fentanyl and to undermine our democracy. While most public servants are honest, insider threats exist. Data and technology are crucial to identify them.
Recently, in a Western state, criminals stole $50 million from Medicaid in under four months. These aren't individual acts; they're organized criminal groups, both domestic and transnational. Controls must be in place.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Transnational fraud rings, terrorist organizationals, nations, nation states, North Korea, nuclear weapons programs funded by our tax dollars, China, Nigeria, Iran, Romania, Russia, not our friends necessarily that are being funded by taxpayer dollars. Could you give us some examples of how this is happening?
Speaker 1: Got it. Yeah. So when you think about what happened during the pandemic, one trillion was stolen. 70% of that money went overseas. And I can give you some examples.
In a western state, they had more people applying for unemployment insurance benefits than they had individuals over 18. The people that were stealing the money from Romania were using it to facilitate other fraud schemes that include fentanyl, that include doing things to impact our democracy. On the insider threat, right, the the first thing you have to say, and my dad was a public servant, is 99% of people that work in the public sector are honest, hardworking individuals. But there are some. And what you need is data and technology to root that out.
There were examples during the pandemic. There were some examples even of last week where people got into the Medicaid system in a southern in a Western state and stole $50,000,000 in less than four months. So you have to have these controls in place. Right? These aren't individuals stealing, mister Cloud.
These are organized criminal groups, both domestic and transnational.
@BehizyTweets - George
Trump has always known how screwed America's trade policies were. https://t.co/7CnQmIPIzD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump discusses US foreign policy, stating allies should pay their fair share and that the US is being ripped off. He claims Japan makes it impossible for the US to sell goods there while selling their products in America. He also questions why Kuwait isn't paying the US 25% of their oil earnings.
When asked about running for president, Trump says he probably wouldn't because he enjoys his current work, but he doesn't rule it out completely if the country's situation worsens.
Regarding the current presidential race, he believes George Bush has an advantage due to incumbency, but acknowledges Jesse Jackson and Michael Dukakis have also performed well. Trump believes he would win if he ran for president because people are tired of the United States being taken advantage of. He asserts he would make the country a lot of money from those who have been exploiting it for 25 years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Last year criticizing US foreign policy. What would you do differently, Donald?
Speaker 1: I'd make our allies forgetting about the enemies, the enemies you can't talk to so easily, I'd make our allies pay their fair share. We're a debtor nation. Something's gonna happen over the next number of years with country, because you can't keep going on losing 200,000,000,000, and yet we we let Japan come in and dump everything right into our markets and everything. It's not free trade. If you ever go to Japan right now and try to sell something, forget about it, Oprah.
Just forget about it. It's almost impossible. They don't have laws against it. They just make it impossible. They come over here.
They sell their cars, their VCRs. They knock the hell out of our companies. And, hey, I have tremendous respect for the Japanese people. I mean, you can respect somebody that's beaten the hell out of you, but they are beating the hell out of this country. Kuwait, they live like kings.
The poorest person in Kuwait, they live like kings, and yet they're not paying. We make it possible for them to sell their oil. Why aren't they paying us 25% of what they're making? It's a joke.
Speaker 0: This this sounds like political presidential talk to me, and I know people have talked to you about whether or not you want to run. Would you ever?
Speaker 1: Probably not. But I do get tired of seeing the country rip off.
Speaker 0: Why would you not?
Speaker 1: I just don't think I really have the inclination to do it. I love what I'm doing. I really like it.
Speaker 0: Also, it doesn't pay as well.
Speaker 1: But, you know, I just probably wouldn't do it, Oprah. I probably wouldn't, but I do get tired of seeing what's happening with this country. And if it got so bad, I would never want to rule it out totally, because I really am tired of seeing what's happening with this country, how we're how we're really making other people live like kings, and we're not.
Speaker 0: What do you think of this year's presidential race, the way it's shaping up?
Speaker 1: Well, it's gonna be very interesting. I I think, I think that probably George Bush has an advantage in terms of the election. I think that probably people would say that he's got, like, that little edge in terms of the incumbency, etcetera, etcetera. But I think Jesse Jackson's done himself very proud. I think Michael Dukakis has done one hell of a job.
And George Bush has done a hell of a job. You know, they all went in there sort of as semi underdogs, including George Bush, and they've all come out. I think people that are around all 3 of those candidates can be very proud of the jobs they've done.
Speaker 0: You've said, though, that if you did run for president, you believe you'd win.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't know. I think I'd win. I tell you what, I wouldn't go in to lose. I've never gone in to lose in my life. And and if I did decide to do it, I think I'd be inclined I I would say that I would have a hell of a chance of winning because I think people I don't know how your audience feels, but I think people are tired of seeing the United States ripped off.
And I can't promise you everything, but I can tell you one thing. This country would make one hell of a lot of money from those people that for 25 years have taken advantage. It wouldn't be the way it's been. Believe me.
@MAGAVoice - MAGA Voice
HOLY SH*T 🚨 Here is President Trump in 1995 on how he would handle trade with Foreign countries This man has been preaching America First since the very beginning 🇺🇸 https://t.co/MRcTJkekpX
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a past auto deal with Japan as a failure in negotiation. Despite holding all the cards, the U.S. was "duped" because they were afraid to take a tough stand. The speaker believes that removing Japanese cars for a short time would have secured a better deal.
When asked if the U.S. government should take a firmer stand with foreign countries, the speaker asserts that the U.S. would be better off and more respected, particularly by Japan. The speaker claims Japan currently has no respect for the U.S. because of the U.S.'s handling of trade deficits. The speaker believes a tougher stance would ultimately gain more friends and respect for the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I couldn't believe this last auto deal as an example. Here we are, we're sitting there, it's restricted in Japan, everything's restricted, restricted, restricted. We're sitting, they can't come in, and all of a sudden, this country falls. We do the old fold out. I've never seen
Speaker 1: it That isn't the way the press reported the press reported it that we had a deal. Yeah. And then all of a sudden, it
Speaker 0: turned out that the deal turned out that it was not a good deal for us. And we had all the cards. I mean, it's not like we didn't have the cards. It's like, keep your cards out of here until you open up. That's all.
Keep your cars out and then you the first hour was like, we made this wonderful deal. After about fifteen seconds after that, people realized we got duped. I just don't understand it
Speaker 1: wrong with us? I mean, I guess what they said, well, this would hurt American car dealers.
Speaker 0: You know, what's wrong with us? I don't know. They're afraid politically to make a little bit of a tough stand. That wasn't even a tough one. That was a no brainer.
You would have had the Japanese cars out for nineteen and a half seconds and you would have won every single point. It's the most incredible failure in negotiation that I've seen. But it happens all the time. I just don't understand it. So I would take a much harder stand, I'd take a much more difficult stand, would say.
Make a couple of enemies. I think I'd make a lot of friends ultimately.
Speaker 1: If the United States government took a firmer stand with foreign countries, would we be better off or are we so much now a part of the nation of the community of nations that we can't really afford to offend anybody?
Speaker 0: I think we'd be better off and I think we'd be far more respected. I think the Japanese would respect us far more than they do. I don't think they have any respect for us, and they shouldn't have any respect for us because we are idiots when it comes to what's happened. I mean, look look at dealing with Japan. I mean, just take a look at what's going on.
I mean, they make hundreds of billions of dollars a year, and we lose money in deficits, and nothing happens. And they say, no, the Japanese are learning and they're starting to open up. In the meantime, every second goes by, we're losing. I I just think that people would have far greater respect for this country if we took a much tougher stand. It's it's really quite pathetic.
@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution
🇺🇸 President Trump’s sacrifice for America runs DEEP. In this clip, he lays out the BILLIONS he’s given up to fight for US. That’s real leadership! https://t.co/XxaFcQ8Gr4
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Holy crap!! One TRILLION American taxpayer dollars were stolen during the pandemic & 70% PERCENT of that money went overseas. This is unreal!! https://t.co/Be4R6kwCCL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks for examples of how taxpayer dollars are funding transnational fraud rings, terrorist organizations, and adversarial nations like North Korea, China, Nigeria, Iran, Romania, and Russia.
Speaker 1 states that during the pandemic, one trillion dollars was stolen, with 70% going overseas. In one Western state, unemployment insurance applications exceeded the number of adults. Romanian criminals used stolen funds to facilitate fraud schemes involving fentanyl and attempts to impact democracy. While most public servants are honest, data and technology are needed to identify insider threats. Recent examples include a $50 million Medicaid theft in a Western state within four months. These thefts are attributed to organized criminal groups, both domestic and transnational.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Transnational fraud rings, terrorist organizationals, nations, nation states, North Korea, nuclear weapons programs funded by our tax dollars, China, Nigeria, Iran, Romania, Russia, not our friends necessarily that are being funded by taxpayer dollars. Could you give us some examples of how this is happening?
Speaker 1: Got it. Yeah. So when you think about what happened during the pandemic, one trillion dollars was stolen. 70% of that money went overseas. And I can give you some examples.
In a western state, they had more people applying for unemployment insurance benefits than they had individuals over 18. The people that were stealing the money from Romania were using it to facilitate other fraud schemes that include fentanyl, that include doing things to impact our democracy. On the insider threat, right, the the first thing you have to say, and my dad was a public servant, is 99% of people that work in the public sector are honest, hardworking individuals. But there are some, and what you need is data and technology to root that out. There were examples during the pandemic.
There were some examples even of last week where people got into the Medicaid system in a southern in a Western state and stole $50,000,000 in less than four months. So you have to have these controls in place. Right? These aren't individuals stealing, mister Cloud. These are organized criminal groups, both domestic and transnational.
@BehizyTweets - George
President Trump is fully exposing Europe's free healthcare scam. It's never been free cause AMERICANS were paying for it one way or another. "This means American patients were effectively subsidizing socialist healthcare systems in Germany, in all parts of the EU." https://t.co/kTR2YZBQat
Video Transcript AI Summary
American patients were subsidizing socialist healthcare systems in the European Union. The European Union is nastier than China, but they will come down a lot. The U.S. has all the cards because the EU treated the U.S. unfairly. The EU sells the U.S. 13 million cars, but the U.S. sells them none. The EU sells the U.S. their agricultural products, but they don't take U.S. products. Because of this unfairness, the EU will have to pay more for healthcare, and the U.S. will have to pay less.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This means American patients were effectively subsidizing socialist health care systems in Germany, in all parts of the European Union. They they were the toughest of all. They were nasty. And I see that. I see that with trade too.
European Union is, in many ways, nastier than China. Okay? And, we've just started with them. Oh, they'll come down a lot. You watch.
We have all the cards. They treated us very unfairly. They sell us 13,000,000 cards. We sell them none. They sell us their agricultural products.
We sell them virtually none. They don't take our products. That gives us all the cards and very unfair. So they're gonna have to pay more for health care and we're gonna have to pay less. That's all it is.
Believe
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw President Trump's post claiming Michigan Democrats are involved in laundering $5 billion in taxpayer money. He mentioned over 4,000 fake jobs used to divert funds into non-existent programs, questionable surgeries, and dubious grants. The fraud needs to stop.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 WOW! President Trump just posted that Michigan Democrats have been caught red-handed laundering $5 BILLION in taxpayer dollars. "More than 4,000 fake PHANTOM jobs allegedly used to siphon taxpayer dollars into non-existent programs, questionable gender surgeries, and dubious arts and culture grants." The fraud has to end.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Again are caught up in a $5,000,000,000 fraud scheme that was siphoning taxpayer dollars. The scheme was uncovered by house Republicans. The accusations which have sparked outrage center on the discovery of more than 4,000 fake phantom jobs allegedly used to siphon taxpayer dollars into nonexistent programs, questionable gender surgeries for prisoners, and dubious arts and culture grants. House GOP investigators claim to have identified the thousands of fake job positions created to justify budget allocations that never materialized into actual employment. Critics argue this was a deliberate tactic to funnel public money back to Democrats, bypassing accountability and oversight. This as multiple claims come in over fiscal mismanagement under Democrat control led by governor Gretchen Whitmer with the Michigan state budget ballooning to more than $82,000,000,000.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Again are caught up in a $5,000,000,000 fraud scheme that was siphoning taxpayer dollars. The scheme was uncovered by house Republicans. The accusations which have sparked outrage center on the discovery of more than 4,000 fake phantom jobs allegedly used to siphon taxpayer dollars into nonexistent programs, questionable gender surgeries for prisoners, and dubious arts and culture grants. House GOP investigators claim to have identified the thousands of fake job positions created to justify budget allocations that never materialized into actual employment. Critics argue this was a deliberate tactic to funnel public money back to Democrats, bypassing accountability and oversight.
This as multiple claims come in over fiscal mismanagement under Democrat control led by governor Gretchen Whitmer with the Michigan state budget ballooning to more than $82,000,000,000. That's