TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - September 16, 2023 at 4:35 PM

@IreneMavrakakis - Irene Mavrakakis, M.D. "CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT"

Recall all COVID vaccines and biologics as they are not safe or effective. No human should have ever been given them. Also, halt all influenza vaccines since they increase coronavirus susceptibility by 36 %. #firstdonoharm #recallcovidjabs

Saved - October 12, 2023 at 7:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. P. McCullough urges immediate action: 1) Withdraw all COVID-19 vaccines to prevent further harm. 2) Western nations must exit WHO due to lack of trust. 3) Pause childhood vaccines until safety concerns regarding messenger RNA on the schedule are addressed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. @P_McCulloughMD Calls for Three Immediate Courses of Action #1 - "Pull all COVID-19 vaccines off the market before anyone else is harmed." #2 - "US, EU, and all Westernized nations [need to] pull out of the WHO. They're not trustable." #3 - "I am recommending a halt on all childhood vaccines, the entire vaccine schedule, until this is clarified, since messenger RNA is now on the schedule without any concerns for safety by the ACIP panel."

Video Transcript AI Summary
I would enact three things right now. Firstly, I would call for the removal of all COVID-19 vaccines from the market to prevent further harm. Secondly, I would advise the US, EU, and other Western nations to withdraw from the WHO due to trust issues. Lastly, I recommend a temporary halt on childhood vaccines until the safety concerns regarding messenger RNA on the vaccine schedule are clarified.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you could enact 3 things right now, given everything you've just told us and everything else, you know, that we didn't have time to get access to, what would those 3 things be? Speaker 1: I say number 1, I've called in the US Senate, now the European Parliament, pull all COVID nineteen vaccines off the market before anyone else is harmed. Number 2, US, EU, and all Westernized nations pull out of the WHO. They're not trustable. And number 3, I'm following the World Council For Health. I am recommending a halt on all childhood vaccines, the entire vaccine schedule until this is Clarified since messenger RNA is now on the schedule without any concerns, for safety by the
Saved - April 16, 2024 at 11:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Florida surgeon general, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, urges a pause on the use of mRNA vaccines, stating that Americans should not be used as pharmaceutical guinea pigs. He also expresses concerns about the WHO Pandemic Treaty and its potential impact on US sovereignty.

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

‘Americans are not pharmaceutical guinea pigs’ declared Florida surgeon general Dr Joseph Ladapo before the US House Judiciary as he repeated his call for a halt on the use of the MRNA vaccine. Noting the crimes committed against the people through lockdowns/mandates he raised the alarm over the looming WHO Pandemic Treaty which he described as having: ‘pernicious implications for the sovereignty of the United States and our citizens here.’ Indeed!! 🙌💥🙌

Video Transcript AI Summary
Global research has raised concerns about risks from COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, including myocarditis and blood clotting. Evidence of adverse events is often dismissed. Calls to halt mRNA vaccine use due to lack of transparency. Florida Supreme Court investigates harm from lockdowns and mask mandates, finding negative impacts on mental health and inflated hospitalization data. WHO drafting pandemic treaty threatening US sovereignty. Florida Governor DeSantis praised for protecting personal freedoms. Committee discusses need to uphold individual liberties and recognize threats to personal rights. Thank you, Dr. Lattebone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Meanwhile, global research had been detecting risks associated with COVID 19 mRNA vaccines. Data continued to surface on adverse events, including myocarditis, acute cardiac injuries, Bell's palsy, encephalitis, and other blood clotting events. Even the FDA themselves identified safety signals among seniors following COVID 19 vaccine administration. To this day, this evidence is largely ignored and often smeared as hysteria or myths. Americans are not pharmaceutical guinea pigs. Based on years of evidence across the world and lack of transparency from the FDA and CDC, I called for a halt to the use of mRNA COVID 19 vaccines earlier this year. In 2022, governor DeSantis petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for a statewide grand jury to investigate crimes committed against Floridians related to COVID 19. This year, the first interim report of these findings revealed exactly what we are here today to discuss. They concluded that mask mandates and lockdowns did more harm than good, resulting in depression, excuse me, substance abuse, and suicidal behavior. The jury also found that higher excess mortality occurred in lockdown areas, and that CDC COVID 19 hospitalization data were likely inflated due to financial incentives that impacted reporting. Unfortunately, the WHO is in the process of drafting a pandemic treaty. This treaty would expand the power, their power, in response to a pandemic. And this would have pernicious implications for the sovereignty of the United States and our citizens here. Under the leadership of governor DeSantis, Florida has always been a leader in protecting personal freedoms. I'm honored to be here today to discuss these issues. I'm grateful to the committee's commitment to upholding individual liberties and common sense, and I'm very grateful to the committee's recognition that these impulses to curtail individual rights and overcome personal responsibility and and individual liberty are still present and unfortunately just as strong as ever as they ever were 4 years ago. Thank you, doctor Lattebone.
Saved - July 12, 2024 at 4:31 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Watch this. You just have to watch the last 40 seconds. They lied about the side effects to reduce vaccine hesitancy, and "they NEVER should have been mandated" per former CDC director.

@McCulloughFund - McCullough Foundation

JUST IN - Former CDC Director Robert Redfield admits that COVID-19 mRNA injections can induce a very strong pro-inflammatory response and that side effects were intentionally underreported. "They should have never been mandated ... They don't prevent infection, they do have side effects." @SenRonJohnson #MFPolicy

Video Transcript AI Summary
We were misled about mRNA vaccines staying in our arms, as they actually circulate in the body for months. Lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines distribute throughout the body, causing potential harm. The spike protein produced by the vaccines can be toxic, leading to inflammation. Transparency regarding vaccine side effects was lacking, and mandating vaccines was a mistake. Personal choice should have been prioritized over mandates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We were told it was gonna stay in our arm. Right? Yeah. Okay. We were told this is mRNA. Gonna degrade rapidly in our body. Right? But it wasn't mRNA, was it? It was modified actually produced synthetically so it wouldn't degrade. And we now have studies that say that mRNA is circling the body at least, I think, 2 months, and we haven't done studies beyond that. Correct? I know in your own practice, you don't administer that because you realize the spike protein is toxic to the body. Speaker 1: I prefer the killed protein vaccines. Speaker 0: When when did you first determine or when did you first find out about the biodistribution studies Pfizer had done that the Japanese regulators released in February of 2021? Speaker 1: Probably. Yeah, probably somewhere in the spring or summer of 'twenty 1. It was clear that the mRNA in some patients was persisting much longer than it should. Speaker 0: When did you find out about the just the biodistribution, the lipid nano particles, or when did people in the FBI, FDA, when should they known about the fact that they were by distributing all over the body? Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't know the answer to that. I was telling you the summer of 2021 is when I be probably became more aware that this Speaker 0: Only because the Japanese regulators released that. But again, this was part of the Pfizer studies. So they knew that the lipid nanoparticle which is designed to permeate difficult to permeate barriers, correct? That's the design of the lipid nanoparticle. So they knew it was gonna be distributed all over the body, concentrating the ovaries, the adrenal glands. It crosses the blood brain barrier, correct? Speaker 1: Correct. Speaker 0: So what would let's just again, you're a doctor. What happens when you have a lipid nanoparticle by distributing, and let's say, this mRNA, this modified mRNA attaches to a heart muscle. What is it? It it it injects itself into the cells, causes that heart muscle cell to produce a spike protein, correct? Which is toxic to the body. And then what does the body do? Speaker 1: It has a very strong pro inflammatory response, which is problematic. Again, I think, senator, what you're getting at, which I'm a 100% agreeing with you, is I think there was not appropriate transparency from the beginning about the potential side effects of these vaccines. And I do think there was inappropriate, decisions by some to try to under report any side effects because they argue that would make the public less likely to get vaccinated. I do think one of the greatest mistakes that was made, of course, was mandating these vaccines. They should have never been mandated. It should have been open to personal choice. They don't prevent infection. They do have side effects.
Saved - October 10, 2024 at 11:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that Slovakia is considering a ban on the mRNA vaccine, influenced by Peter Kotlar, the Commissioner for the Covid investigation, who is advised by Dr. Richard M. Fleming. Dr. Fleming emphasized the need for an investigation into those responsible for developing bioweapons and urged the withdrawal of these vaccines to protect Slovakians, especially children. Kotlar's press conference also highlighted Trump's potential influence, with many on his team sharing similar views on Covid.

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

They told you that Slovakia wants to ban the MRNA vaccine. What they didn’t tell you is that the Commissioner for the Covid investigation, Peter Kotlar is being advised by the esteemed Dr Richard M Fleming!! Who says that he has been approached to work as the secretary of HHS if Trump gets elected. Kotlar started his press conference with a statement from Dr Fleming highlighting the following: ‘ It is my hope that the materials provided will give you clarity so that you will have the courage to call for the investigation of the Americans through the US government responsible for evolving these bioweapons. That you will withdraw these eugenic genetic vaccines from the Slovakian population. Stopping the harm and injury occurring to Slovakians. Particularly your children. And to stand firm in your resolution to not sign the 2024 IHR and to go further with revocation of any presumed actions by the UN giving them authority over your country.’ During the conference Kotlar made several references to Trump and the fact that many on his team share the same views on Covid.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Richard Fleming, a PhD, MD, and JD, has investigated inflammatory thrombotic response diseases for decades. He was asked by Peter Kottler to provide materials to the Congress of Slovakia and Prime Minister Robert Pico regarding the origins of SARS CoV 2, eugenic genetic vaccines, and WHO international health regulations. He has provided two video presentations and two PDFs: "Is COVID 19 a Bioweapon a Scientific Forensic Investigation?" and "Are We the Next Endangered Species, Bioweapons, Eugenics, and more." Fleming stated that he has agreed to serve as Secretary of Health and Human Services if Donald Trump is reelected and asks him to fill the role. He has provided a document outlining 20 points he would pursue as secretary, including investigating and prosecuting Americans involved in the development of the SARS CoV 2 bioweapon and withdrawing COVID-19 vaccines from the market. He would also advise Trump to revoke agreements made in 2024 within the international health regulations. Fleming hopes the materials will encourage Slovakia to investigate those responsible for developing bioweapons, withdraw the vaccines, and refuse to sign the 2024 IHR.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. My name is doctor Richard Fleming. I'm a PhD, MD, JD in the United States of America. I've been a physicist for 50 years, a physician for 38, and an attorney for 10. Throughout my career, I've been actively involved in trying to figure out what causes inflammatory thrombotic response diseases like heart disease, strokes, high blood pressure, diabetes, cancer, miscarriages, and a variety of other illnesses. I've been actively involved in trying to figure out why they occur, how we can diagnose them, and how we can best treat them. As a result, four and a half years ago when SARS CoV 2 slash COVID 19 hit the scenes, I became actively involved in the investigation and research of these bioweapons and the genetic genetic vaccines. The plenipotentiary, Peter Kottler, has asked me to provide materials for the 14 of you, the Congress of Slovakia as well as mister Robert Pico, your prime minister, to discuss the topics of the origins of these viruses, eugenic genetic vaccines, and the World Health Organization slash international health rules and regulations. To that end, I have assembled 2 different video presentations, 1 on the origins and one on the eugenic genetic vaccines. Included within that has material on WHO International Health Rules and Regulations. I have also provided 2 PDFs. One of the book known as Is COVID 19 a Bioweapon a Scientific Forensic Investigation? And the other, Are We the Next Endangered Species, Bioweapons, Eugenics, and more. It's been my pleasure to hear for several presidents in the United States, 1 vice president, and a number of members of Congress. To that end, I've had people ask me very specifically if Donald j Trump is reelected as president, becomes the 47th president of the United States, would I be willing to be the 26th secretary of health and human services? And I've agreed to do that should Donald Trump ask me to be his secretary of health and human services. This is a position that will require someone with a science, medical, and law background and training to address. I've provided a document for doctor Peter Cutler to share with you on the 20 points that I would actively pursue as secretary of AHS. Included in that is the investigation, indictment, and prosecution of Americans involved in the funding and development of the SARS CoV 2 bioweapon. Also included is the action that I would take as secretary of HHS to immediately withdraw the eugenic genetic vaccines being used for COVID 19 from the American market. And I would also advise president Trump to revoke any agreements made in 2024 within the international health regulations and the current actions before the UN where efforts are being made to use certain power and authority of several nations including the United States and Slovakia. It's my hope that the materials provided give you clarity so that you will have the courage to call for the investigation of the Americans through the US government responsible for developing these bioweapons, that you will withdraw these eugenic genetic vaccines from the Slovakian population, stopping the harm and injury occurring to Slovakians, particularly your children, and to stand firm in your resolution to not sign the 2024 IHR and to go further with verification of any presumed actions by the UN giving them authority over your country. It's been my pleasure to work with doctor Koller. It will be my pleasure to work with president Trump. It will be my pleasure to assist the Slovakian government in efforts for Slovakia and the United States may work together to restore the sovereignty of our nations, to protect our citizens, authorities out of the health care of Slovakian and American citizens. Thank you.
Saved - October 25, 2024 at 10:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The FDA's aggressive suppression of various health advancements, including psychedelics, peptides, and clean foods, is coming to an end. If you're part of this corrupt system, I suggest you preserve your records and prepare to leave.

@RobertKennedyJr - Robert F. Kennedy Jr

FDA’s war on public health is about to end. This includes its aggressive suppression of psychedelics, peptides, stem cells, raw milk, hyperbaric therapies, chelating compounds, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamins, clean foods, sunshine, exercise, nutraceuticals and anything else that advances human health and can't be patented by Pharma. If you work for the FDA and are part of this corrupt system, I have two messages for you: 1. Preserve your records, and 2. Pack your bags.

Saved - November 7, 2024 at 2:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
If Trump isn't a puppet, he would aim to end the Federal Reserve, dismantle the FDA, expel Monsanto, and remove organizations like the WHO and WEF. He'd target the CIA and FBI, cut foreign aid, release Epstein files, restore the gold standard, and hold Fauci accountable, among other actions. What else should I consider?

@sircryptotips - Toby Cunningham

If Trump isn't a puppet he will try his best to End the Federal Reserve Destroy the FDA Kick out Monsanto Kick out the WHO, WEF Destroy the CIA, FBI and 99 percent of these worthless 3 letter agencies. Zero cash to nations overseas Release Epstein files Bring back the gold standard Imprison doctors that mutilate little girls during sex changes Hold Fauci responsible and imprison him for life Go after the Council on Foreign Relations Stop CBDC's What am I missing here?

Saved - November 7, 2024 at 3:34 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The FDA's efforts to suppress various health advancements, including psychedelics, peptides, and natural therapies, are coming to an end. I believe this suppression targets anything that promotes health and cannot be patented by pharmaceutical companies. To those within the FDA who support this corrupt system, I urge you to preserve your records and prepare for significant changes ahead.

@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele

“FDA's war on public health is about to end. This includes its aggressive suppression of psychedelics, peptides, stem cells, raw milk, hyperbaric therapies, chelating compounds, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamins, clean foods, sunshine, exercise, nutraceuticals and anything else that advances human health and can't be patented by Pharma. If you work for the FDA and are part of this corrupt system, I have two messages for you: 1. Preserve your records, and 2. Pack your bags.”—@RobertKennedyJr

Saved - November 17, 2024 at 1:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to clarify my position on vaccines as I run for president. Vaccines, like all drugs, have side effects, and I believe there is no vaccine that is universally safe and effective for everyone. I've faced criticism for highlighting serious side effects, but vaccine-injured children deserve attention. I advocate for transparency and accountability from vaccine manufacturers, who currently have immunity from lawsuits. Freedom means the right to choose, and I will ensure that informed consent is respected. My goal is to make vaccines safer while preserving individual choice.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

RFK Jr. clarifies his stance on vaccines with this amazing presentation: "Since I decided to run as an independent candidate for the presidency, one of the issues people seem most confused about is my position on vaccines. So today I'm gonna set the record straight by explaining my exact posture point by point. If you're willing to take a few minutes, I think you might be surprised to find out how much we actually agree." "So let's begin with my first point, which is probably the most controversial. Vaccines have side effects just like every other drug. This shouldn't be controversial, but it is. When I'm asked about this on television, it usually sounds something like this. You said that no vaccine is safe and effective. You said, quote, there's no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective. Do you still believe that? That statement comes from an interview where I was interrupted and I didn't get to complete my thought." "Can you name any vaccines that you think are good? I think some of the live virus vaccines are probably saw averting more problems than they're causing. There's no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective. The big words. What I was actually saying that interview and what I've said for 20 years is that there is no such thing as a vaccine that is safe and effective for everyone. Let me explain." "Just like every drug on the market, vaccines have side effects that severely injure and kill some people every year. If that's in contrast to what you've been told, then your doctor probably never showed you the warning sheet that comes with every vaccine on the market. This is the insert that comes in the box with the hepatitis B vaccine, which is injected into most babies. within 24 hours of birth." "Let me read you just a few of the serious side effects in this document. Under the heading of nervous system disorders, it says Guillain-Barre syndrome, multiple sclerosis, exacerbation of multiple sclerosis, myelitis, including transverse myelitis, seizure, febrile seizure, peripheral neuropathy, including vellus palsy, radiculopathy, herpes, eye grain, muscle weakness, hypesthesia, and encephalitis, just swelling of the brain, even Johnson's syndrome, alopecia, and eczema. A list of side effects goes on and on. You got the idea." "For over a decade, I've been attacked and labeled an anti-vaxxer and a conspiracy theorist for simply drawing attention to the serious side effects listed on every vaccine insert and for advocating that the children who are suffering from these side effects. Our health departments believe we shouldn't talk about vaccine injuries because they are rare, but I don't agree with that. We can't fix a problem by ignoring it." "Vaccine-injured children deserve just as much attention as a child with a rare disease like cancer. Luckily, the thinking on this is starting to change. Here's a recent New York Times article about people who have been injured by the COVID vaccine. Thousands believe that COVID vaccines harm them. Is anyone listening? All vaccines have at least occasional side effects, but people who say they were injured by COVID vaccines believe their cases have been ignored. The article explains that all vaccines do have occasional side effects." "It calls for an investigation of the injured so that we can come up with solutions. Even one of the heads of the COVID task force, Dr. Deborah Birx, is joining this call for action. Well, that's why we need all the people to come forward that have had reactions, because I'm not sure all of them have been reported. There's been so much credibility lost in the public science groups, NIH, FDA, CDC, because I think there was a lack of really just transparency." "One of the things I used to tell my colleagues, don't be afraid to say you don't know the answer. And all too often, people would make up the answer. Those of us that tried to suggest there may be significant side effects from vaccines, we kind of like with the rest of your show that you had early on, we kind of got canceled because no one wanted to talk about the potential that there was a problem from the vaccines because they were afraid that would cause people not to want to get vaccinated. For years, we've been told that vaccines have been studied extensively, but Dr. Birx knows this is not true." "Should she be called an anti-vaxxer for finally telling us the truth? Back in 2005, Dr. Bernadine Healy, the former head of NIH, the National Institute for Health, made this shocking admission to CBS News. This is the time when we do have the opportunity to understand whether or not there are susceptible children, perhaps genetically, perhaps they have a metabolic issue, mitochondrial disorder, immunological issue, that makes them more susceptible. to vaccines plural or to one particular vaccine or to a component of vaccine like mercury." "Why is this important? A susceptible group does not mean that vaccines aren't good. What a susceptible group will tell us is that maybe there is a group of individuals or a group of children that shouldn't have a particular vaccine or shouldn't have vaccine on the same schedule. It is the job of the public health community and of physicians. to be out there and to say, yes, we can make it safer because we are able to say, this is a subset." "We're gonna deliver it in a way that we think is safer. Do you feel the government was too quick to dismiss out of hand that there was this possibility of a link between vaccines and autism? I think the government or certain public health officials in the government have been too quick to dismiss the concerns of these families without studying the population that got sick. I haven't seen. major studies that focus on 300 kids who got autistic symptoms within a period of a few weeks of a vaccine." "The reason why they didn't want to look for those susceptibility groups was because they were afraid that if they found them, however big or small they were, that would scare the public away. The fact that there is concern that you don't want to know that susceptible group is a real disappointment to me. If you know that susceptible group, you can say hello to your children. I'm going to usher in a new era in medicine." "I'm going to make sure that our regulatory agencies stop putting the interests of the pharmaceutical industry above the interests of the American people. I'm going to make sure that you are told the truth about every product, and that includes all the benefits and all the side effects that they know about." "And I'm going to fund our regulatory agencies to fix the problem instead of ignoring them and I'm going to stop them from gaslighting and silencing the scientists, the physicians, and the individuals who want to talk about vaccine injuries. That leads me to my next point. Vaccine makers should be legally responsible for their products and surprisingly they're not." "Let me explain. In 1986, vaccine manufacturers were losing so much money from lawsuits for death and injury caused by their vaccines that they couldn't make a profit. So they asked our government to protect them from liability, and that's what Congress did. It passed the so-called 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act, and as a result of that bill, vaccines are the only consumer product that are completely shielded from liability." "That means no matter how reckless the company behaves, no matter how negligent they are, no matter how grievous your injury, you can't sue them. So let me ask you this, if a company can't be sued when their product injures or kills somebody, what incentive do they have to fix it? As an attorney, I can assure you that once a company knows that they can be sued when their product is defective, they work much harder to fix the issue themselves." "By repealing the 1986 act, we can replace regulation with responsibility and accountability. And my last point is this, freedom means having the right to choose. When President Biden passed the mandate during the pandemic to take away people's jobs if they did not submit to the COVID vaccine, he violated one of the central principles of freedom. Four million more people. got their first shot in August than they did in July. But we need to do more." "This is not about freedom or personal choice. It's about protecting yourself and those around you. If a person does not have the final decision of their own bodies, and they are owned by whoever does, this was the central discussion during the trials of the doctors who committed war crimes during World War II that resulted in the passage of the Nuremberg Code." "The very first rule of that code is called informed consent. It states, quote, the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. Any use of force or coercion to inspire a medical decision is considered unethical. Americans today are reawakening to the critical importance of Nuremberg code. Currently, over 75% of Americans who are eligible are refusing to take the latest COVID booster." "For some, this would be their ninth shot. They've done their research. They've decided that they've had enough. That's called informed consent. Pfizer and Moderna are currently lobbying our government to mandate every shot, just like the first one. If this passes, you can be assured that we will be lined up like cattle and mandated to take every shot just like we were the first time." "American children are required to take 72 vaccines just to stay in school. Should that be the fate of adults too? That will never happen when I'm president. So to sum it all up, despite what you may have heard, I'm not going to take away anybody's vaccine who wants a vaccine. I'm just going to make them safer for everyone." "I'm going to make sure that the industry is responsible for their products. And I'm going to make sure that you are always free to choose what's right for you. If you agree with me, then go to http://Kennedy24.com to see what other changes I'm going to make when I'm the president."

Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to clarify my stance on vaccines. First, vaccines, like all drugs, have side effects that can harm some individuals. There's no vaccine that is universally safe and effective for everyone. Vaccine injuries deserve attention, just like rare diseases. The public health community has often ignored concerns about vaccine side effects, which is disappointing. I believe vaccine manufacturers should be held legally accountable for their products, as they currently have immunity from lawsuits. Additionally, individuals must have the freedom to choose what goes into their bodies. The Nuremberg Code emphasizes informed consent, which is crucial. As president, I will ensure vaccines are safer, hold the industry accountable, and protect personal choice. If you support these ideas, visit Kennedy24.com to learn more about my plans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Since I decided to run as an independent candidate for the presidency, one of the issues people seem most confused about is my position on vaccines. So today, I'm gonna set the record straight by explaining my exact posture point by point. If you're willing to take a few minutes, I think you might be surprised to find out how much we actually agree. So let's begin with my first point, which is probably the most controversial. Vaccines have side effects just like every other drug. This shouldn't be controversial, but it is. When I'm asked about this on television, it usually sounds something like this. You said that No vaccine is safe and effective. Speaker 1: You said, quote, there's no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective. Do you still believe that? Speaker 0: That statement comes from an interview where I was interrupted, and I didn't get to complete my thought. Can you name any vaccines that you think are good? I think some of the live virus vaccines are probably, saw are earning more problems than they're causing. There's no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective. The It's a big word. What I was actually saying that interview and what I've said for 20 years is that there is no such thing as a vaccine that is safe and effective for everyone. Let me explain. Just like every drug on the market, vaccines have side effects that severely injure and kill some people every year. If that's in contrast to what you've been told, then your doctor probably never showed you the warning sheet that comes with every vaccine on the market. This is the insert that comes in the box with the hepatitis b vaccine, which is injected into most babies within 24 hours of birth. Let me read you just a few of the serious side effects in this document. Under the heading of nervous system disorders, it says Guillain Barre syndrome, multiple sclerosis, exacerbation of multiple sclerosis, myelitis, including transverse myelitis, seizure, febrile seizure, peripheral neuropathy, including Bell's palsy, radiculopathy, herpes, migraine, muscle weakness, hypesthesia, and encephalitis swelling of the brain. Even Johnson's and alopecia and exit list of side effects goes on and on. But you got the idea. For over a decade, I've been attacked and labeled an anti vaxxer and a conspiracy theorist for simply drawing attention to the serious side effects listed on every vaccine insert and for advocating for the children who are suffering from these side effects. Our health departments believe we shouldn't talk about vaccine injuries because they are rare, but I don't agree with that. We can't fix a problem by ignoring it. Vaccine injured children deserve just as much attention as a child with a rare disease like cancer. Luckily, the thinking on this is starting to change. Here's a recent New York Times article about people who've been injured by the COVID vaccine. 1,000 believe that COVID vaccines harm them. Is anyone listening? All vaccines have at least occasional side effects, but people who say they were injured by COVID vaccines believe their cases have been ignored. The article explains that all vaccines do have occasional side effects. It calls for an investigation of the injured so that we can come up with solutions. Even one of the heads of the COVID task force, doctor Deborah Birx, is joining this call for action. Speaker 2: Well, that's why we need all the people to come forward that have had reactions because I'm not sure all of them have been reported. Speaker 3: There's been so much credibility lost, in the public, science groups, NIH, FDA, CDC, because I think there was a lack of really just transparency. One of the things I used to tell my colleagues, don't be afraid to say you don't know the answer. And all too often, people would make up the answer. And as you know, those of us that tried to suggest there may be significant side effects from vaccines, we kinda like with the rest of your show that you had early on, we kinda got canceled because no one wanted to talk about the potential that there was a problem from the vaccines because they were afraid that that would cause people not to wanna get vaccinated. Speaker 0: For years, we've been told that vaccines have been studied extensively, but doctor Birx knows this is not true. Should she be called an anti vaxxer for finally telling us the truth? Back in 2005, doctor Bernardini Healy, the former head of NIH, the National Institute For Health, made this shocking admission to CBS News. Speaker 1: This is the time when we do have the opportunity to understand whether or not there are susceptible children, perhaps genetically, perhaps they have a metabolic, issue, mitochondrial disorder, immunological issue, that makes them more susceptible to vaccines, plural, or to one particular vaccine or to a component of vaccine, like mercury. Why is this important? A susceptible group does not mean that vaccines aren't good. What a susceptible group will tell us is that maybe there is a group of individuals or a group of children that shouldn't have a particular vaccine or shouldn't have vaccine on the same schedule. It is the job of the public health community and of physicians to be out there and to say, yes, we can make it safer because we are able to say this is a subset. We're gonna deliver it in a way that we think is safer. Speaker 2: Do you feel the government was too quick to dismiss out of hand that there was this possibility of a link between vaccines and autism? Speaker 1: I think the government or certain public health officials in the government, have been too quick to dismiss the concerns of these families without studying the population that got sick. I haven't seen major studies that focus on 300 kids who got, autistic symptoms within a period of a few weeks of a vaccine. The reason why they didn't want to look for those susceptibility groups was because they were afraid that if they found them, however big or small they were, that that would scare the public away. The fact that there is concern that we don't wanna know that susceptible group is a real disappointment to me. If you know that susceptible group, you can say no children. Speaker 0: I'm gonna usher in a new era in medicine. I'm gonna make sure that our regulatory agencies are putting the interest of the pharmaceutical industry above the interest of the American people. I'm gonna make sure that you were told the truth about every product, and that includes all the benefits and all the side effects that they know about. And I'm gonna fund our regulatory agencies to fix the problem instead of ignoring them, And I'm gonna stop them from gaslighting and silencing the scientists, the physicians, and the individuals who wanna talk about vaccine injuries. That leads me to my next point. Vaccine makers should be legally responsible for their products, and surprisingly, they are not. Let me explain. In 1986, vaccine manufacturers were losing so much money from lawsuits for death and injury caused by their vaccines that they couldn't make a profit. So they asked our government to protect them from liability, and that's what congress did. It passed the so called 1986 vaccine injury compensation act. And as a result of that bill, vaccines are the only consumer product that are completely shielded from liability. That means that no matter how reckless the company behaves, no matter how negligent they are, no matter how grievous your injury, you can't sue them. So let me ask you this. If a company can't be sued when their product injures or kills somebody, what incentive do they have to fix it? As an attorney, I can assure you that once company knows that they can be sued when their product is defective, they work much harder to fix the issue themselves. By repealing the 1986 act, we can replace regulation with responsibility and accountability. And my last point is this, freedom means having the right to choose. When president Biden passed the mandate during the pandemic to take away people's jobs if they did not submit to the COVID vaccine, he violated one of the central principles of freedom. Speaker 3: 4000000 more people got their first shot in August than they did in July, but we need to do more. This is not about freedom or personal choice. It's about protecting yourself and those around you. Speaker 0: If a person does not have the final decision of their own bodies, then they are owned by whoever does. This was the central discussion during the trials of the doctors who committed war crimes during World War 2 that resulted in the passage of the Nuremberg Code. The very first rule of that code is called informed consent. It states, quote, the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. Any use of force or coercion to inspire a medical decision is considered unethical. Americans today are reawakening to the critical importance of the Nuremberg Code. Currently, over 75% of Americans who are eligible are refusing to take the latest COVID booster. For some, this would be their 9th shot. They've done their research. They've decided that they've had enough. That's called informed consent. Pfizer and Moderna are currently lobbying our government to mandate every shot just like the first one. If this passes, you can be assured that we will be lined up like cattle and mandated to take every shot just like we were the first time. American children are required to take 72 vaccines just to stay in school. Should that be the fate of adults too? That will never happen when I'm president. So to sum it all up, despite what you may have heard, I'm not gonna take away anybody's vaccine who wants a vaccine. I'm just gonna make them safer for everyone. I'm gonna make sure that the industry is responsible for their products, and I'm gonna make sure that you are always free to choose what's right for you. If you agree with me, then go to Kennedy 24.com to see what other changes I'm gonna make when I'm the president.
Kennedy24 Official Site of Make America Healthy Again Movement, led by the RFK Jr. Campaign. MAHA movement will solve the Children with Chronic Illness epidemic, get toxin out of our food supply, and get corporations out of the 3-letter health agencies that are meant to regulate them. mahanow.org
Saved - November 18, 2024 at 5:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it concerning that Trump continues to boast about Op Warp Speed and the regulatory changes that allowed mRNA vaccine technology to be rushed to market, especially given its previous struggles with safety and efficacy. I believe RFK Jr. should clarify his stance on mRNA and biotechnology injectables if he becomes head of HHS, particularly since he has remained silent on this since endorsing Trump. It's important to consider that key figures in Trump's circle, including VP Vance and major donors like Musk, have significant investments in genetically engineered medical products.

@_whitneywebb - Whitney Webb

If Trump is still bragging about the military-run Op Warp Speed and the removal of regulations it also entailed so mRNA vax tech could be finally taken to market under the fog of crisis (when it couldn't even get through animal trials the entire decade preceding Covid due to safety concerns over LNPs and near-zero efficacy, etc.), I think RFK Jr really should address what his policies will be on mRNA and other biotechnology injectables as head of HHS bc since endorsing Trump he has been silent on this issue and VP Vance and many prominent Trump donors, like Musk, are deeply invested in medical genetically engineered products.

@LegendaryEnergy - An0maly

BREAKING: Trump is still bragging about “Operation Warp Speed” https://t.co/JXQl92phyF

Saved - December 2, 2024 at 8:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the pandemic narrative was fundamentally flawed. Vaccines weren't safe or effective, masks didn't stop the spread, and the six-foot distancing rule lacked scientific support. Asymptomatic transmission was overstated, and children were not the spreaders we thought they were.

@junogsp7 - Tom Moore

Dr Richard Urso opines with bombshell pandemic truth serum : It was all a lie from the outset. Vaccines were neither safe or effective . Masks didn’t prevent spread . Six foot social distancing had no scientific basis . Asymptomatic spread was never a real issue . Children were like a break in the spread not harbingers .

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Dr. Richard Urso shares some truth bombs about COVID-19, vaccines, lockdowns, masks... "Everything was a lie from the beginning. The asymptomatic people don't transmit. Kids were not harbingers of the disease. They don't actually, they're like a break on the disease. Lockdowns were a farce. Masks don't work." "I tell people, I joke sometimes I say masks do work. A lot like bathing suits work to keep pee out of the pool. They're not very effective. So that's one of those things that, you know, it was a farce. Pretty much everything they said was a farce. I know we're still recovering from it. Just yesterday we walked into a pharmacy and they were advertising COVID-19 vaccines." "Well if you want to destroy your immune system, take a COVID-19 vaccine. It will destroy your immune system. It distributes widely in your body. It can't be broken down because it's a genetically modified RNA. There are contaminants, process related impurities, what I usually call them, but contaminants for most people, that they haven't gotten out of the vaccines." The drug that I invented took eight years for us to get the process related impurities out. It's hard to do and I knew this would be a problem early on when they were trying to push this so fast because nobody had ever made these vaccines in anything bigger than a blender. What we had is found is even worse." "They put an SV40 promoter in the vaccine, Pfizer did, that actually well known for the last five decades to bind P53 to Guardian the genome and cause cancers. They know that. We just kept them in the head of the Human Genome Project did this discovery with a few other molecular biologists." "This is really big news because the contaminants and the impurities in the vaccine are very dangerous and there's design flaws like I just pointed out. Wide distribution to the brain, the bone marrow, the ovaries, the testes and long term production six months or more in the last study that we did. So there's a lot to talk about. Do not get the vaccines unless you just want a crummy immune system. " "I think the main thing is these vaccines are dangerous. They have process related impurities. They cause cancer, strokes, heart attacks. The data is in 40% more deaths in 2021 between 18 to 64. This is just data we can't ignore, so please stay away from the vaccines."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Everything was alive from the start. Asymptomatic individuals don't transmit the virus, and children don't harbor it; they actually help limit its spread. Lockdowns were ineffective, and masks offer minimal protection. The COVID-19 vaccine can harm your immune system due to genetically modified RNA and contaminants that are difficult to eliminate. There are serious design flaws, including the potential for cancer due to specific components in the vaccine. Recent findings indicate dangerous impurities and long-term effects on critical organs. Data shows a significant increase in deaths among those aged 18 to 64 in 2021. It's crucial to avoid these vaccines if you want to maintain a healthy immune system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But everything was alive from the beginning. The asymptomatic people don't transmit. Kids were not, harboring of the disease. They don't actually they're like a break on the disease. Lockdowns were a forest. Masks don't work. I tell people I joke sometimes. I say masks do work, a lot like bathing suits work to keep pee out of the pool. They're not very effective. So that's one of those things that, you know, it it was a farce. Pretty much everything they said was a farce. Speaker 1: I know. We're still recovering from it. Just yesterday, we walked into a pharmacy and they were advertising COVID 19 vaccines. Speaker 0: Well, if you if you want to destroy your immune system, take a look COVID 19 vaccine. It will destroy your immune system. It distributes widely in your body. It it can't be broken down because it's a genetically modified RNA. There are contaminants, a process related impurities what I usually call them, but contaminants for most people, that they haven't gotten out of the vaccines. And I worked on a the drug that I invented took 8 years for us to get the process related impurities out. It's hard to do and I knew this would be a problem early on when they were trying to push this so fast because nobody had ever made these vaccines in anything bigger than a blender. What we had is found is even worse. They put an s v 40 promoter in the vaccine Pfizer did that actually well known for the last 5 decades to bind p 53 to Guardian the genome and cause cancers. They know that. We just Kevin McCarron, the head of the Human Genome Project just actually did this discovery with a few other molecular biologists. This is really big news because the contaminants and the and the impurities in the vaccine are very dangerous. And there's design flaws like I just pointed out. Wide distribution to the brain, the bone marrow, the ovaries, the testes, and long term production, 6 months or more in the last study that we did. So there's a lot to talk about. Do not get the vaccines unless you just wanna crummy immune system. So I think the the main thing is these vaccines are dangerous. They have process related impurities. They cause cancer, strokes, heart attacks. The data's in 40% more deaths in 2021 between 18 to 64. This is just data we can't ignore, so please stay away from the vaccines.
Saved - December 9, 2024 at 1:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that over 200 members of Congress and their families were secretly treated with Ivermectin for Covid-19, which was proven to be safe and effective. It raises questions about why they remained silent during a global pandemic and why mainstream media labeled it as horse de-wormer. The CDC and FDA also downplayed its effectiveness, even mocking Americans. Meanwhile, the government allegedly paid pharmacies to remove Ivermectin from shelves, prioritizing profits from vaccines over public health. This situation feels like a betrayal, and it’s time to channel that anger into action.

@GinaSaysSo - Gina

Members of Congress and their familes were secretely treated with Ivermectin for Covid 19. It was PROVEN a safe and effective treatment. So why were these 200 members of Congress silent about their success with the Ivermectin treatment? Why the secret? Weren't we in the middle of a Global Pandemic? Why was MSM labeling it horse de-wormer? Meantime the corrupted CDC and FDA also kept Ivermectin a secret with the FDA even shaming Americans with warnings like this: 'You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.' And, as for the 81 million (my ass) installed puppet: ON BIDEN'S WATCH OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PAID PHARMACIES HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS TO STRIP THEIR SHELVES OF IVERMECTIN. Wanna know why? With a safe and effective existing treatment for Covid, there would be no Emergency Use Authorization granted for the 'vaccine.' Nevermind safe. Nevermind effective. We're talking about power and money and that's everything to big government. So Ivermectin vanished in an MSM-created cloud of shame. This 'horse-dewormer' could have saved millions of lives. Our government was more interested in the BILLIONS it could make in partnership with big pharma. Our lives didn't matter to the Biden Administration. Biden/Harris were installed to DESTROY us. Find your anger. Then find your resolve.

Saved - February 3, 2025 at 4:29 AM

@redpillb0t - redpillbot

https://t.co/gRfnJ0lpVj

Video Transcript AI Summary
The vaccine is back in the news as Republican leaders in Brevard County are set to call for an immediate ban on mRNA-based COVID vaccines. The Brevard GOP executive committee believes these vaccines are a biological weapon. They are expected to vote on a letter requesting state leaders to make it illegal to administer or receive mRNA vaccines in Florida. The letter, which includes citations, outlines their reasoning and is likely to pass during the upcoming vote.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The vaccine turns out it's back in the news. Republican party leaders on the Space Coast are minutes away from officially calling on the governor and other state leaders to ban mRNA based COVID vaccines immediately. IT chief investigator Mike Magnolia has more on what exactly is going on. Mike. Good evening, everybody. Well, in their own words, the leaders of Brevard County's GOP say that they believe the vaccines are a biological weapon. As you say, this is the executive committee of the party in Brevard. They haven't hit send on this letter yet, but that vote coming up at 6:30, and I'm told it's fairly likely going to pass. If it does, they're asking state leadership to make it illegal to give or to take MRNN vaccines in Florida. In this 4 page letter, complete with footnotes, Brevard County Republicans cite sources which led them to a stunning conclusion. Here it is in their own words.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@redpillb0t https://t.co/fXGAIkzuYC

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

NEW - The Brevard County, FL Leadership Committee Adopted a Resolution Calling on Gov. Ron DeSantis to Make COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Illegal "The pharmaceutical companies committed crimes and pushed fraud on the public about the effectiveness of the vaccines and downplayed the risks and side effects, they argued. The Brevard Republican party’s controversial letter will be sent to DeSantis and other state leaders asking to outlaw the vaccines in the Sunshine State."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Republican leaders in Brevard County are poised to call for an immediate ban on mRNA COVID vaccines, labeling them as biological weapons. The executive committee plans to vote on a letter urging state leaders to make these vaccines illegal in Florida. The letter accuses government agencies and corporations of fraudulently claiming the vaccines are safe and effective, citing recent evidence suggesting the vaccines are harmful. If the letter is approved, it will be sent to Tallahassee amid an ongoing grand jury investigation into potential legal violations by pharmaceutical companies regarding the vaccines. Currently, it is illegal to mandate COVID vaccinations in Florida, but this request could further restrict access to mRNA vaccines. Meanwhile, the federal government is encouraging drug companies to make COVID vaccines more affordable and accessible as flu season approaches.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Republican party leaders on the Space Coast are minutes away from officially calling on the governor and other state leaders to ban mRNA based COVID vaccines immediately. IT chief investigator Mike Magnolia has more on what exactly is going on. Mike? Speaker 1: Good evening, everybody. Well, in their own words, the leaders of Brevard County's GOP say that they believe the vaccines are a biological weapon. As you say, this is the executive committee of the party in Brevard. They haven't hit send on this letter yet, but that vote coming up at 6:30, and I'm told it's fairly likely going to pass. If it does, they're asking state leadership to make it illegal to give or to take mRNA vaccines in Florida. In this 4 page letter, complete with footnotes, Brevard County Republicans cite sources which led them to a stunning conclusion. Here it is in their own words. Government agencies, media, and tech companies, and other corporations have committed enormous fraud by claiming COVID 19 injections are safe and effective. Strong and credible evidence has recently been revealed that COVID 19 and COVID 19 injections are biological and technological weapons. If approved, this letter will be sent to Tallahassee at a time when a grand jury requested by governor DeSantis is investigating those very same vaccines. That grand jury's job is to determine whether pharmaceutical giants who brought the mRNA vaccines to market broke any laws and should face charges. It's already illegal to require anyone to get the COVID vaccine in Florida, but if state leaders go along with Brevard's request, no one in Florida would be allowed to get those vaccines. Today, the federal government sent a very different letter to drug companies calling on them to make the COVID vaccines cheaper and more accessible, anticipating an increase in demand come flu season.
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 6:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Multiple U.S. states are moving to ban COVID vaccines, with eight states leading the charge. Over 81,000 medical professionals and 240 elected officials are demanding the withdrawal of these vaccines, citing overwhelming evidence of harm. A peer-reviewed study indicates that vaccine-related deaths exceed recall thresholds significantly. Reports show vaccinated individuals face a higher risk of infection, and DNA contamination has been found in vaccine batches. The medical establishment is criticized for not adhering to the Hippocratic Oath, and more states may soon follow suit.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🚨BREAKING: Multiple U.S. states now moving to BAN COVID vaccines. And the Federal government may follow suit. THIS IS HUGE... 🧵Thread (1/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

Eight states are leading the charge to END the "Jab" experiment: • Washington • Idaho • Montana • Iowa • Texas • Tennessee • South Carolina • Florida (Tell me in the comments if I've missed any.) (2/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

KNOW THIS: Over 81,000 medical professionals, 240 elected officials, and 17 professional organizations are DEMANDING these shots be pulled. The evidence of the Vax's harm? OVERWHELMING. (3/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🔥NEW BOMBSHELL STUDY🔥 Peer-reviewed research CONFIRMS what we've been saying: These "vaccines" have exceeded previous recall thresholds by up to 375,340% Let THAT sink in. (4/11)

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨 Failure to Immediately Withdraw COVID-19 'Vaccines' Qualifies as Mass Negligent Homicide. Here's Why👇 📢 Widespread & Unified Calls for Market Withdrawal – More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 public health & physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 GOP County Committees, and 6 global studies demand immediate removal. ⚰️ Excess Mortality – 12 studies and VAERS confirm mass COVID-19 'vaccination' led to a catastrophic number deaths. 🚨 FDA Class I Recall Indicated – 37,544 VAERS-reported deaths exceed past vaccine recall limits by up to 375,340%. 📉 Negative Efficacy – Multiple studies have demonstrated that COVID-19 vaccinated individuals face a higher risk of infection compared to unvaccinated individuals. 🧬 DNA Contamination – Found across multiple manufacturers, batches, and geographic regions, far exceeding EMA & FDA safety thresholds. 📄 From our study: Hulscher N, Bowden M T., McCullough P A.. Review: Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits. Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. 2025 Jan 28; v6.2019-2025 @JimFergusonUK @RobertKennedyJr @BillCassidy @P_McCulloughMD @MdBreathe @McCulloughFund @VigilantFox @CDCgov @US_FDA @FDArecalls

Video Transcript AI Summary
If I had the opportunity to speak with RFK, I would focus on the urgent need to address the harm caused by the genetic injections. While tackling chronic disease and improving our food and water is crucial, removing these injections from the market is paramount. Our peer-reviewed paper in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law presents compelling evidence, including 12 studies demonstrating excess mortality, a causal link between the injections and death, and reduced life expectancy. We've found DNA contamination across multiple batches and manufacturers worldwide, and the injections have shown negative efficacy, increasing the risk of infection. Given the precedent of withdrawing products like the Qatar Polio vaccine, Swine Flu vaccine, and RotaShield vaccine for far fewer deaths or complications, the current situation, with over 30,000 VAERS death reports, demands immediate action. Continuing to administer these injections could be considered mass negligent homicide.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you had, an opportunity to meet with RFK, let's just say he gets appointed as the head of the HHS, the health service in America, what would you, what would you say to him? What would your your first choice be in terms of policy? Speaker 1: Well, so he's rightfully going after the chronic disease epidemic. Right over sixty percent of Americans have at least one chronic disease. So we got to address that. We got to address the the contaminated food supply, water supply, all that. It's super important. But we do have to get the genetic injections that have harmed, killed, or permanently disabled millions of people across the world off the markets. We have a peer reviewed paper out now in the journal Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, and we lay out all the evidence required that would be needed to get these injections off the market, immediately. 12 studies are included. 12 studies demonstrate excess mortality, causal link between COVID vaccination and death, reduced life expectancy from these injections. There's around 10 reports of DNA contamination when they look, nearly all of them find DNA contamination over the regulatory limits. And this is consistent across multiple batches, manufacturers, and is worldwide. And so they're contaminated. And lastly, negative efficacy. The vaccines don't work. They've now been demonstrated to increase your risk of infection dosed independently, and we have far surpassed the threshold for withdrawal of a pharmaceutical product. We have to look back at the Qatar Polio vaccine in the nineteen fifties that was pulled after ten deaths. The swine flu vaccine in the nineteen seventies was pulled after twenty to fifty deaths, and the RotaShield vaccine was pulled in 1999 due to fifteen cases of bowel obstruction. And so VAERS indicates over thirty thousand death reports now. So we have massively exceeded the limit for withdrawal of a product, and they have to get off. And continuing to administer or recommend these rejections could qualify as mass negligent homicide.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

SHOCKING TRUTH about excess mortality: 12 separate studies now link mass vaccination to increased deaths 🚨 Autopsies showing DIRECT CAUSAL connections The science they tried to silence is speaking (5/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

FACT: The "vaccinated" got MORE infections than the unvaccinated Some studies show up to 253% INCREASED RISK after 3+ doses Still trust Big Pharma's narrative? (6/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🧬 DNA CONTAMINATION ALERT: Tests reveal vaccine batches contain DNA fragments FAR ABOVE safety limits set by: • FDA • EMA Where's the Enemedia's coverage? There isn't any. They're still telling you to go get "the Jab". Or your 43rd booster. (7/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

PERSPECTIVE: Previous vaccines were pulled after just 10 deaths Current VAERS data shows 37,544 deaths globally The math isn't hard, folks. They rushed a vaccine to market without proper testing and then tried to force you to take it. (8/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

BIG PHARMA'S DIRTY SECRET: No large-scale, double-blind trials show these shots: • Stop you from getting COVID • Stop you from spreading it • Reduce infection • Prevent hospitalization • Save lives ZERO. NONE. NADA. But it turns out that it can kill you. (9/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

Every doctor pushing these shots is violating their Hippocratic Oath. "First, do no harm" = MEANINGLESS to them now? The medical establishment has lost its way. (10/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🚨 The dam is breaking. More states will follow. Federal government will be FORCED to act. Stay informed. Stay vigilant. Share this thread. 👇 Oh, and also, sign up for your FREE subscription to my newsletter at http://RodMartin.org. (11/11)

The Rod Martin Report | Rod D. Martin | Substack Tech Entrepreneur. Futurist. Christian. "Philosopher Capitalist". Click to read The Rod Martin Report, by Rod D. Martin, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. rodmartin.org
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 7:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my experience with the vaccine, noting that it made me the sickest I've been in fifteen years, even worse than my five COVID infections. I find it concerning that we can't discuss these experiences openly, especially when many people I know felt ill after their second vaccine shot. Joe Rogan echoed my thoughts, highlighting the troubling history of pharmaceutical companies and their lack of accountability for side effects.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

JD Vance: "I took the vax, and, you know, I haven't been boosted or anything. But the the moment where I really started to get red pilled on the whole vaxx thing was the sickest that I have been in the last fifteen years by far was when I took the vaccine. And I, you know, I've had COVID at this point five times. I was in bed for two days. My heart was racing." "I was like the the the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about that, even, you know, I no no, like, serious injury. But but even the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about the fact that I was as sick as I've ever been for two days, and the worst COVID experience I had was like a sinus infection, I'm not really willing to trade that." "And everybody that I know or a lot of people I know, they talk about the second shot that they got of the vaccine was really that made them really, really sick. Well, that's a side effect and not a side effect that we even talk about enough in this country." Joe Rogan: "No. It's and it's also again, we're talking about companies that have a long history of lying and being forced to pay criminal fines, and then we're giving them this exemption from being responsible for any of the side effects."

Video Transcript AI Summary
I got vaccinated, but never boosted. The sickest I've been in 15 years was after the vaccine. I've had COVID five times, but the vaccine put me in bed for two days with a racing heart. It's concerning that we can't even discuss these reactions. My worst COVID experience was just a sinus infection, which is preferable to how the vaccine made me feel. Many people I know felt extremely ill after the second shot. These side effects aren't discussed enough. Plus, these are companies with a history of lying and criminal fines, yet they're exempt from responsibility for vaccine side effects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I I mean, you know, I so I I I took I took the vax and, you Speaker 1: know, I haven't been boosted or anything. But the the moment where I really started to get red pilled on the whole vaxx thing was the sickest that I've been in the last fifteen years by far was when I took the the vaccine. And I've had COVID at this point five times. I was in bed for two days. My heart was racing. I was like the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about that even, you know, no, like, serious injury. But but even the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about the fact that I was as sick as I've ever been for two days, and the worst COVID experience I had was, like, a sinus infection, I'm not really willing to trade that. Speaker 0: And No. Speaker 1: You don't even you know, everybody that I know or a lot of people I know, they talk about the second shot that they got of the vaccine was really that made them really, really sick. Well, that's a side effect and not a side effect that we even talk about enough in this country. Speaker 2: No. It's and it's also again, we're talking about companies that have a long history of lying and being forced to pay criminal fines, and then we're giving them this exemption from being responsible for any of the side effects.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Credit: @JDVance; @joerogan

Saved - March 2, 2025 at 12:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the only way to halt the COVID injections is for HHS Secretary RFK Jr. to revoke the PREP Act liability shield, which he can do unilaterally. In an open letter, Sasha Latypova argues that the current emergency declaration is unfounded and that the COVID jabs are Emergency Use Authorized military countermeasures. RFK Jr. has previously described the clinical trials as "meaningless theater" and stated that the safety of these jabs relies solely on the HHS Secretary's opinion. He claims that continued use of the PREP Act shield allows for "mass murder" and undermines public trust in health authorities.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

This is *the only realistic way* to get the COVID injections pulled. HHS Secretary RFK Jr. (@SecKennedy) must revoke the PREP Act liability shield for the jabs—and he can do that NOW, *UNILATERALLY* If he does not, he becomes complicit in "mass murder" (his quote) (A 🧵, 1/11) In this open letter recently posted by Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova), the retired pharma R&D executive calls on RFK Jr. to "use [his] authority to immediately terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration for the covid pandemic, as there is no such emergency in reality." She notes, "All mRNA injections marketed as covid vaccines today are Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) Military Countermeasures." Latypova adds that the COVID injections are being given to babies as the jabs are now on the CDC's immunization schedule, and that this means, in effect, that it's RFK Jr.'s opinion—by default—that this is an acceptable practice. The retired pharma R&D executive goes on to say that the COVID injections constitute "the greatest human tragedy in recorded history" and have also "destroyed public trust in the government['s] health agencies." Approximate transcription of Latypova's remarks in this clip: "Secretary Kennedy, "All mRNA injections marketed as covid vaccines today are Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) Military Countermeasures. The EUA pathway is used only when the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services declares an emergency and issues a PREP Act declaration. Section 564 of the Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act exempts medical countermeasures from the pharmaceutical regulatory compliance or from the informed consent requirements for the duration of the PREP Act declaration of emergency. While the manufacturers may choose and FDA may ask to undertake some of the activities typically expected from an investigational clinical trial and manufacturing validation process, none of the typical pharmaceutical regulatory standards are applicable in an enforceable way. "If there is no enforcement of the law, it’s as if the law doesn't exist. Misrepresentations of safety, efficacy or contents of EUA products are allowed by federal law. Thus, claims provided by the federal health authorities or manufacturers cannot be considered reliable sources of information. When these products are pushed onto unsuspecting consumers, claims about safety, efficacy or contents of these products are based solely on the HHS Secretary’s opinion, which requires no supporting scientific evidence. Today, three mRNA shots are listed on the CDC Childhood Vaccination Schedule to be given to 9 months old infants. Secretary Kennedy, are we supposed to think that it is now YOUR opinion that they are safe and effective for babies? I do not believe that, knowing what you know about mRNA injections, you can honestly believe this yourself. Current PREP Act emergency declaration [for covid] was extended by the previous administration by Xavier Becerra and it's now supposed to last until December 31, 2029! "Real emergencies do not last decades simply based on the opinion of a single public health official. There is no real emergency for covid in the United Sates or worldwide as you are well aware. Continued PREP Act declarations, therefore, defy the observed reality and common sense, and represents a misuse and abuse of the federal law which was intended for declaring short-term emergencies in severe situations such as war or acts of terrorism. This law also did not envision shipping of billions of doses of medical products legally allowed to be adulterated and misbranded. Yet, this is precisely what is transpiring under the current PREP Act declaration today. "By keeping the PREP Act declaration in place, the current administration continues to contrive a non-existing emergency. This contrivance serves only the interests of pharmaceutical companies and those institutions that still mandate the shots, shielding them from liability for deaths and injuries caused by the falsely promoted inherently unsafe products. Clearly, this contrivance does not serve the interests of the public at all. The continued disregard of the victims of the covid shots under the thorough liability shield of the PREP Act abuses the federal law and destroys any remaining shreds of the public trust in the government health authorities. These products pose severe risk of harm and death to the public due to the absence of any enforceable pharmaceutical regulations. "The FDA and manufacturers falsely claim that these products are fully approved for age 12 and older as prophylactic vaccines. However, once someone is injured by these vaccines and seeks compensation for their injuries, they are informed that the products are not legally vaccines but countermeasures, and the only avenue available to them is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program. "To date this program has denied almost all claims and paid only a few thousand dollars to a handful of victims, making a mockery of them and the unbearable toll of their permanently destroyed health. During your Congressional confirmation hearings you said that a healthy person has a thousand dreams while a sick person has only one dream. Were you sincere about helping the covid vaccine victims? Secretary Kennedy, I respectfully ask you to: "Please use your authority to immediately terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration for covid pandemic, as there is no such emergency in reality. "Please also investigate the misuse and abuse of the federal law utilized in the so-called 'pandemic response' and countermeasures that resulted in the greatest human tragedy in recorded history and also destroyed public trust in the government health agencies."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Secretary Kennedy, the mRNA injections marketed as COVID vaccines are merely emergency use authorized medical countermeasures. This pathway bypasses standard pharmaceutical regulations and informed consent. Misrepresentations about these products' safety and efficacy are legally permissible, making official claims unreliable. These shots are now on the CDC childhood vaccination schedule for infants as young as nine months old. The current PREP Act declaration, extended until 2029, abuses federal law intended for short-term emergencies. This shields pharmaceutical companies from liability for deaths and injuries caused by these unsafe products. The FDA falsely claims full approval for those 12 and older, yet the injured are directed to a compensation program that denies almost all claims. I urge you to terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration and investigate the misuse of federal law in the pandemic response, which has led to a human tragedy and destroyed public trust.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is my open letter to health and human services secretary Robert Kennedy junior. Secretary Kennedy, all mRNA injections marketed as COVID vaccines today are emergency use authorized EUA medical countermeasures. The EUA pathway is used only when The United States Secretary Of Health And Human Services declares an emergency and issues a prep act declaration. Section five six four of the Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act exempt medical countermeasures from the pharmaceutical regulatory compliance or from the informed consent requirements for the duration of the Prep Act declaration of emergency. While the manufacturers may choose and FDA may ask to undertake some of the activities typically expected from the investigational clinical trial and manufacturing validation process, none of the typical pharmaceutical regulatory standards are applicable in an enforceable way. If there is no enforcement of the law, it's as if the law doesn't exist. Misrepresentations of safety, efficacy, or contents of EUA products are allowed by federal law. Thus, claims provided by the federal health authorities or manufacturers cannot be considered a reliable source of information. When these products are pushed onto unsuspecting consumers, claims about safety, efficacy, or contents of these products are based solely on the HHS secretary's opinion, which requires no supporting scientific evidence. Today, three mRNA shots are listed on the CDC childhood vaccination schedule to be given to nine months old infants. Secretary Kennedy, I was supposed to think that this is now your opinion that these are safe and effective products for babies. I do not believe that knowing what you know about mRNA injections, you can honestly believe this yourself. Current PREP Act declaration of emergency was extended by the outgoing HHS secretary Javier Bissera, and it's now supposed to last until 12/31/2029. Real emergencies do not last decades simply based on the opinion of a single public health official. There is no real emergency for COVID in the world or in The United States, and you are well aware of this. Continued PREP Act declaration, therefore, defies the observed reality and common sense and represents a misuse and abuse of the federal law, which was intended for declaring short term emergencies in severe situations such as war or acts of terrorism. This law also did not envision shipping of billions of doses of medical products legally allowed to be adulterated and misbranded. Yet this is precisely what is transpiring on the current PrEP Act declaration today. By keeping PrEP Act declaration in place, the current administration continues to contrive a nonexisting emergency. This contrivance serves only the interests of pharmaceutical companies and those institutions that still mandate the shots, shielding them from liability for deaths and injuries caused by the falsely promoted inherently unsafe products. Clearly, this contrivance does not serve the interest of the public at all. The continued disregard of the victims of the COVID shots under the thorough liability shield of the PREP Act abuses the federal law and destroys any remaining shreds of the public trust in the government health authorities. These products pose severe risk of harm and death to the public due to the absence of any enforceable pharmaceutical regulations. The FDA and manufacturers falsely claim that these products are fully approved for age 12 and older as prophylactic vaccines. However, once someone is injured by these vaccines and seeks compensation for their injuries, they are informed that in fact these products are not legally vaccines but countermeasures. And the only avenue available to them is the countermeasures injury compensation program. To date, this program has denied almost all claims and paid only a few thousand dollars to a handful of victims, making a mockery of them and the unbearable toll of their permanently destroyed health. During your congressional confirmation hearings, you said that a healthy person has a thousand dreams while a sick person has only one dream. Were you sincere about helping the COVID vaccine victims? Secretary Kennedy, I respectfully ask you to please use your authority to immediately terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration for COVID pandemic as there is no such emergency in reality. Please also investigate the misuse and abuse of the federal law utilized in the so called pandemic response and countermeasures that resulted in the greatest human tragedy in recorded history and also destroyed the public trust in the government health agencies. Thank you very much.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@SecKennedy (2/11) Note RFK Jr. said in a March 2023 discussion that the "clinical trials" for the COVID injections were, quote: "meaningless theater." RFK Jr. added that the jabs are "a demonstration product, not a medical product" and that "the FDA has no authority over [them]."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out under a series of laws that allowed the military to take over distribution, bypassing typical clinical trials and safety testing. The FDA's involvement was a "pretend authorization," as their mandate is to regulate interstate commerce of medical products, not countermeasures. The Department of Defense is fully in charge of the development, clinical trials, manufacturing, and distribution of the vaccines, utilizing "other transaction authority" (OTA), initially intended for NASA and weapons procurement. The vaccines are purchased under OTA as demonstration products, exempting them from FDA and CDC authority. Pharmaceutical companies were brought in largely for branding purposes, while the military oversaw manufacturing and distribution through military contractors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me let me just give a punchline to what you're about to tell us, which is that essentially there were a series of laws put in place that allowed the military to take over distribution of vaccines and under a provision that does not allow any clinical trials and does not allow any safety testing. And that essentially the safety testing that we did see, which was conducted by the pharmaceutical industry, was kabuki theater put on for the public with no regulatory implications. And that's why they were able to take all these shortcuts because it was meaningless, theater. I I'm gonna let you explain kind of the long version of that, but that's what people you know, that's kind of where we're going. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yes. Exactly. So it was, you know, a pretend authorization by a a a regulatory agency, FDA, that has no, regulatory mandate to regulate countermeasures in The United States. You know, remember, the FDA mandate is to regulate interstate commerce of medical products and food. Right? So they are supposed to approve medical products, and these are not medical products. They're countermeasures. So that that legal framework that's being utilized here is is essentially pretending that this this this this is a health event and pretending that these are health products while using the laws that actually put them into a totally different space legally or pseudo legally, I would say. So so in addition to the emergency use authorization, they're using another set of set of laws that are called that they're allowing them to contract under other transaction authority. So department of defense and they're not just overseeing the distribution of vaccines, by the way. That was sold to the public also. They're actually department of defense is fully in charge of their of the development of the clinical trials, of the execution of all this manufacturing and ordering of them and distributing the money and taking the possession of the delivered product and distributing it and owning it until it is injected into a person. So so the the they're using other transaction authority, which is this is which is a way for the government to contract. Again, initially, it was very narrowly defined given, authority to NASA to do it in the sixties. Now 11 government agencies are using it, and DOD is a particular frequent user of this method. Speaker 0: Other transaction authority is called a OTA. OTA. And it was essentially designed to allow the Pentagon to quickly buy weapons and weapon systems Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: Without paying attention to any regulatory any existing regulatory authorities. Yes. What they've done is they've taken that authority, and they've applied it to the vaccines. So they're purchasing the vaccines under OTA as a demonstration product project prod product. It's not a medical product. So it has FDA has no authority over it. CDC has no authority over it. Military is actually manufacturing. They've farmed this out to hundreds of military contractors to do the manufacturing, to do the distribution, to do every aspect of it, and it's all a huge military operation. And the involvement of the drug companies is kind of window dressing because the Pentagon did not wanna say did not wanna put on the product product. This is a Pentagon made, defense department made product. They essentially paid the pharmaceutical companies for their brand name, people would think they were getting something from Pfizer or Moderna. Speaker 1: But Speaker 0: all of the back room and the, you know, the distribution and manufacturing is done by the military, and the the and the the pharmaceutical companies were brought in to put their name on it and then to pretend to do clinical trials which have no legal significance. Speaker 1: Absolutely. Yeah. That's exactly right. So Speaker 0: OTA

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(3/11) RFK Jr. said in the same discussion, quote: "[Regarding the COVID jabs] the only determination [they're safe/effective] is that the Secretary of HHS decides, in his head, with either some evidence, or no evidence whatsoever, that the product may be effective. That's it." RFK Jr. adds, "even if the evidence then shows that it's not effective, if he can say, 'Well, I still believe it's effective, it stays on the market. Even if there's a mountain of evidence that says it's killing people, it's not effective, he can choose, legally, under his own decision-making, that I'm going to believe that this is effective, no matter what the evidence says, and as long as I believe it's effective, legally, I can essentially mandate it for all Americans."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Normally, bringing a product to market involves proposals, clinical trial designs for efficacy and safety, years of trials, and FDA determinations on safety, efficacy, harm versus benefit, warnings, and inspections. All of this is abolished. Now, the HHS secretary only needs to decide, with or without evidence, that a product may be effective. Even if evidence shows ineffectiveness, they can still believe it's effective. This decision-making allows them to legally mandate the product for all Americans, regardless of evidence to the contrary. There are no stopping criteria, and the secretary never has to reconsider their decision because there were no criteria to begin with.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me just clarify what you're saying. Normally, you know, the the protocols that you had to go through in your businesses, you would do, you know, you do a series of proposals. You design the clinical trials to make sure that they're going to show efficacy, that they're going to be show safety. You do those clinical trials for a number of years, and then you go and show the results to FDA, and FDA has to make determinations about safety and efficacy and has to make determinations that the product is going to avert more harm than it causes, and the appropriate warnings and the, you know, the side effects that you put on the manufacturer's inserts and all these thousand things that you have to do to get a product to market and get the inspections, etcetera. Here, all of those are abolished. And the only determination is that the secretary of HHS decides in his head with either some evidence or no evidence whatsoever that the product may be effective. Mhmm. That's it. That's it. That's it. So and even if the evidence then shows that it's not effective, if he can say, well, I still believe it's effective. Absolutely. Never Even if there's a mountain of evidence that says it's killing people, it's not effective, he can choose legally, his own decision making that I'm gonna believe this is effective no matter what the evidence says. And as long as I believe it's effective legally, I can, you know, essentially mandate it for all Americans. Speaker 1: Absolutely. There is no stopping criteria. He never has to reconsider the decision. And since there is no criteria to begin with, well, whatever made him believe so can continue making him believe so.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(4/11) RFK said in the same discussion, quote: "all these actors...[are] getting away LITERALLY WITH MURDER, with mayhem, with MASS MURDER..because they have been given this shield of immunity from liability [via the PREP Act/CARES Act/and the 1986 childhood vaccine act]." (Emphasis added.) RFK Jr. goes on to call the actions surrounding the COVID injections "ILLEGAL ACTS." (Emphasis added.)

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm an attorney looking for ways to sue those responsible for damages during the pandemic, but the PrEP Act, the CARE Act, and the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act, provide broad immunity from liability. As a corporate liability officer, my colleague and I agree, that we should go after Pfizer for the fraud they have committed. The challenge is figuring out how to break through their defenses. Pfizer will argue they delivered the fraud that the government ordered. Even if a case gets dismissed based on this argument, the admission itself is valuable. We need to get them to admit in court whether committing mass murder and genocide is explicit US government policy, or if individuals like Kotlik, Marks, and Fauci were rogue actors acting outside their authority.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, I'm gonna let you go, Sajid. But before I do, I'm an attorney. I try to figure out ways to sue people like this. And, you know, one of the frustrating things during this pandemic is that the PrEP Act, the CARE Act, the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act have all bestowed broad immunity from liability under all of these actors. So they're getting away literally with murder, with am, with mass murder. They're getting away with it because they have been given this bubble of this shield of immunity from liability. You have an expertise in in corporate liability. As a corporate liability officer, do you see any obvious ways where somebody like me can file a lawsuit and get redressed for some of these, illegal acts? Speaker 1: Yeah. So, first of all, neither me nor my colleagues, discourage anyone from doing just that, to just going after Pfizer because of all the fraud that they have committed. I think what the the problem is we're all having, we don't know, exactly what's going to crack that that wall, but we have to attempt different ways. Now the, yes, we can try going after Pfizer. I'm just saying, you know, here's the lay of the land. This is the the defense they're going to invoke. They already invoked it in Brooke Jackson's case. They're saying we did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered. And that's a even Speaker 0: Which gay? Oh, in Brooke Jackson. Speaker 1: In Brooke Jackson's in April, they filed motion to dismiss. So and while, you know, the case may be dismissed it hasn't been dismissed. But in let's say in the future, it gets dismissed because because of this. That admission alone is priceless, and we need to elicit these admissions in court. They need to tell us ultimately ultimately through whatever method we're going to to go after. Ultimately, they they need to tell us it's an explicit US government policy to commit mass murder and genocide, or these were rogue actors, these people, Robert Kotlik, Peter Marx, you know, Fauci, whoever. You know, these specific individuals, they were rogue actors and acting outside of their authority. Speaker 0: So

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@SecKennedy (5/11) Furthermore, RFK Jr. even noted in the same discussion that there are "devastatingly effective" drugs "against COVID," including hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. He notes acknowledging this "[kills] the entire use of the emergency use authorization" for the COVID jabs.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) regulation from the Clinton administration included safeguards. You can distribute a medication without approval, clinical trials, or safety testing, but only if no existing approved drug is effective against the target illness. To use the EUA for vaccines, any effective drugs against COVID needed to be discredited. Early on, it was known that hydroxychloroquine was effective against coronavirus. NIH studies demonstrated its effectiveness both as a preventative and as a cure. Ivermectin was also very effective. Acknowledging that these drugs worked would have eliminated the use of the emergency use authorization. So, they had to suppress them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just to to elucidate this for our listeners, the, the EUA provision regulation that was promulgated by the Clinton administration had safeguards in it. And it said, yes, you can you can take a medication that has no approval, and you can distribute it and approve it for use without clinical trials, without any safety or efficacy testing. But you cannot do that if there is an existing drug that is approved for any purpose that is demonstrated to be effective against the target illness. And so, you can only use that EUA if no other drug or treatment exists. And so it was very important if they wanted to use that EUA for their vaccines, they needed to first discredit or destroy any drugs that actually were effective against COVID. And very early on, they they knew that hydroxychloroquine was effective against coronavirus because NIH did studies that showed it was it was devastatingly effective both as a preventative and as a cure, and they knew that. And ivermectin was also devastatingly effective, but they it would have killed their entire use of the emergency use authorization if there had been any acknowledgment that those drugs were, so they had to suppress them. So that and let me

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(6/11) Finally, RFK Jr. goes on to note that the FDA "lied" to get Moderna's COVID jab approved for pregnant women. He notes when Moderna did animal testing, rat pups developed "horrible bone deformities...and it was a signal that was as loud [of] a signal that you...ever see in medicine." He adds that the rats were "horrendously deformed, and yet FDA...lied about it [the study on the rat pups] by saying there were no problems with the rat study." RFK Jr. adds that, for the FDA, "it was just a huge enterprise in lying."

Video Transcript AI Summary
We found that the FDA lied about a maternal rat study that was testing the safety of mandating a vaccine to pregnant women. In every litter, individual pups had horrible bone deformities. This signal was extremely prominent. Moderna submitted the rat study, as they were required to do. The FDA then lied about the study results by claiming there were no problems. It was a huge enterprise in lying.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: FDA actually lied, as you would have pointed out, as they did a rat study for to look at a maternal rat study to look at if they gave this vaccine to rats. This is how they were testing whether it was safe to mandate to pregnant women. Mhmm. And in every litter of rats, there were individual pups who had these really horrible bone deformities. Mhmm. And it was a signal that was as loud as a signal that you can get that you ever see in medicine. I mean, these rats were horrendously deformed. And and yet FDA, when it looked and Moderna didn't even try to lie about it. Moderna submitted the the rat study because it had to, and then FDA lied about it by saying there were no problems with the rat study. Mhmm. Yep. It was just a huge enterprise in lying. Absolutely. So they the FDA

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(7/11) Note these claims aren't speculation on the part of Latypova or RFK Jr. These are all checkable facts. In the COVID-jab contract between DOD & Pfizer, the former paid the latter $1.95 billion for a "large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration" of a "prototype." (1) When Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson sued Pfizer over its fraudulent clinical trials, Pfizer itself confirmed that it was only responsible for producing a "large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration" that imposed "no requirements related to Good Clinical Practices" ('CGP') or related FDA regulations." (2) Source: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22028602-pfizer-contract-statement-of-work/ Source: https://www.iambrookjackson.com/_files/ugd/9df0bc_b7e94cf398e74b35a9182f27e685348b.pdf

Pfizer Contract Statement of Work documentcloud.org

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@SecKennedy (8/11) The HHS Secretary unilaterally declares a "public health emergency" and unilaterally decides if "countermeasures" are warranted. Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/04/01/2020-06905/emergency-use-authorization-declaration Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/04/01/2020-06905/emergency-use-authorization-declaration

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(9/11) According to the Code of Federal Regulations, "the use of [products] within the scope of [an EUA] authorization shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation." Furthermore, the jabs can't be considered "adulterated" unless the HHS Sec says they are. Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3 Source: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section360bbb-3a&num=0&edition=prelim

21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies law.cornell.edu

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@SecKennedy (10/11) The HHS Secretary **UNILATERALLY** decides whether or not the (unconstitutional) PREP Act liability shield remains in place for the COVID injections. Once the liability shield is removed, the jabs stop—entirely and immediately. Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/04/01/2020-06905/emergency-use-authorization-declaration https://t.co/cKDQgoWDFd

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@SecKennedy (11/11) Why is RFK Jr. complicit in "mass murder" (his term) if he doesn't act to pull the jabs? Because as HHS Secretary he now has a "duty to act." He knows the jabs are "mass murder" (his term) and he is in a position to do something about it. Just ask Grok: https://t.co/UyeUMbDn9d

Saved - March 8, 2025 at 3:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya made a bold statement during his Senate confirmation hearing, advocating for the Covid vaccine-injured and promising to expose the truth about rising autism rates. He outlined five goals for the NIH, emphasizing the need for replicable research, a culture of free speech, and transparency in operations. Bhattacharya criticized the NIH's funding of risky research and expressed concern over censorship during the pandemic. He aims to ensure that science serves as a tool for knowledge and freedom, not as a means of coercion.

@AVPac_US - American Values 🗽

🔥 Dr. Jay Bhattacharya held NOTHING back in his Senate confirmation hearing. Covid vaccine-injured Americans will finally have a champion at NIH. The truth about skyrocketing rates of autism will be EXPOSED. Dissident scientists will finally be heard. 🧵THREAD https://t.co/nfop9hXC1u

@AVPac_US - American Values 🗽

Dr. Bhattacharya pledged “five concrete goals” for NIH in his opening statement. “Dissent is the very essence of science.” 1. “NIH research should focus on research that solves the American chronic disease crisis. American health is going backwards.” “Life expectancy flatlined between 2012 and 2019, plummeted during the pandemic, and still has not bounced back.” “The chronic disease crisis is severe, with hundreds of millions of Americans, children and adults, suffering from obesity, heart disease, cancer and more.” 2. “NIH-supported science should be replicable, reproducible, and generalizable. Unfortunately, much bought modern biomedical science fails this basic test.” “The NIH itself just last year faced a research integrity scandal involving research on Alzheimer's disease that throws into question hundreds of research papers.” “It is no stretch to think that the slow progress on Alzheimer's disease is linked to this problem. The NIH can and must solve the crisis of scientific data reliability.” 3. “If confirmed, I will establish a culture of respect for free speech in science and scientific dissent at the NIH.” “Over the last few years, top NIH officials oversaw a culture of cover up, obfuscation, and a lack of tolerance for ideas that differ from theirs.” 4. “The NIH must recommit to its mission to fund the most innovative biomedical research agenda possible to improve American health.” 5. “The NIH must embrace, and vigorously regulate, risky research that has the possibility of causing a pandemic.” “We must regulate risky research that has the possibility of causing a pandemic. It should embrace transparency in all its operations.” “If confirmed, I'll carry out President Trump's agenda of making the public science institutions of this country worthy of trust and serve to Make America Healthy Again.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm deeply honored by the nomination for NIH director. The NIH is the crown jewel of American biomedical sciences, but post-pandemic, American confidence in science has declined. If confirmed, my goals are to refocus NIH research on solving America's chronic disease crisis, ensure NIH-supported science is replicable and reliable, and establish a culture of respect for free speech and scientific dissent. The NIH must recommit to funding the most innovative biomedical research possible and embrace transparency while vigorously regulating risky research that could cause a pandemic. I will work with congress to guarantee that. I respect the work and mission of the NIH. I will carry out President Trump's agenda of making the public science institutions of this country worthy of trust and serve to make America healthy again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator. Chairman Cassidy, ranking member Sanders, members of the senate health committee, I'm honored to speak with you today and deeply humbled by president Trump's nomination. I'm delighted to have with me my wife Kathy, my son my son Matthew, and my brother Deep. My my two other adult children, Jody and Benjamin, unfortunately, could not attend today but are here with me in spirit. The NIH has played a pivotal part role in my career. I served for a decade as a standing member of NIH grant committees. I helped train many trainees prepare for scientific careers with NIH support. And I want NIH funding to study population aging, chronic disease, and obesity. I've made the study of scientific institutions, including the NIH itself, a focus on my own scientific work. The NIH is the crown jewel of American biomedical sciences with a long and illustrious history of supporting breakthroughs in biology and medicine. I have the utmost respect for the NIH scientists and staff over the decades who have contributed to this success. The NIH's mission to support scientific discovery to enhance health and lengthen life is vital to our country's future and indeed the world's. I love the NIH. But post pandemic, American Biomedical Sciences are at a crossroads. On November 2024 Pew study reported that only 26% of the American public had a great deal of confidence in scientists to act in the public's best interest. 23% have not much or no confidence at all. So, how can I help the NIH better achieve its mission? I have five concrete goals if confirmed as director of the NIH. First, NIH research should focus on research that solves the American chronic disease crisis. American health is going backwards. Life expectancy flatlined between twenty twelve and 2019, plummeted during the pandemic, and still has not bounced back to pre pandemic levels. The chronic disease crisis is severe with hundreds of millions of Americans, children, and adults suffering from obesity, heart disease, cancer, and more. If confirmed, I will carry out President Trump and Secretary Kennedy's agenda of committing the NIH to address the dire chronic health needs of the country with gold standard science and innovation. Second, NIH supported science should be replicable, reproducible, and generalizable. Unfortunately, much modern biomedical science fails this basic test. The NIH itself, just last year, faced a research integrity scandal involving research on Alzheimer's disease that throws into question hundreds of research papers. If the data generated by scientists is not reliable, the products of such science cannot help anyone. It is no stretch to think that the slow progress on Alzheimer's disease is linked to this problem. The NIH can and must solve the crisis of scientific data reliability. Under my leadership, if confirmed, it will do so. Third, if confirmed, I will establish a culture of respect for free speech in science and scientific dissent at the NIH. Over the last few years, top NIH officials oversaw a culture of cover up, obfuscation, and a lack of tolerance for ideas that differed from theirs. Dissent is the very essence of science. I'll foster a culture where NIH leadership will actively encourage different perspectives and create an environment where scientists, including early career scientists and scientists that disagree with me, can express disagreement respectfully. Fourth, the NIH must recommit to its mission to fund the most innovative biomedical research agenda possible to improve American health. My plan is to ensure that the NIH invests in cutting edge research in every field to make big advances rather than just small incremental progress over years. Fifth, the NIH must embrace and vigorously regulate risky research that has the possibility of causing a pandemic. Must must regulate risky research that has the possibility causing a pandemic. It should embrace transparency in all its operations. While the vast majority of biomedical research poses no risk of harm to research subjects or the public. The NIH must ensure that it never supports work that might cause harm. If confirmed, I will work with congress and the administration to guarantee that happens. While I believe there are real problems to be addressed, I want to finish by reiterating my great respect for the work and mission of the NIH. If confirmed, I'll carry out President Trump's agenda of making the public science institutions of this country worthy of trust and serve to make America healthy again.

@AVPac_US - American Values 🗽

Dr. Bhattacharya pledged to expose the truth about skyrocketing rates of autism. “We have had a sharp rise in autism rates in this country.” “I would support a broad scientific agenda to get an answer to that.” “If I’m confirmed as NIH Director, the one level I will have is to give people good data.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I raised concerns about investing NIH resources to re-examine the link between the measles vaccine and autism, given the extensive existing research and limited resources. It's impossible to prove a negative, and re-plowing already examined ground distracts from addressing unknown causes or solutions to the chronic disease crisis. We risk children dying from preventable diseases if we keep pretending this link is an issue. I agree that we need to address the rise in autism. While I believe the literature shows no connection between the MMR vaccine and autism, distrust in medicine exists post-pandemic. Providing good data is key to addressing concerns, but I'm unsure what constitutes "good data" when it already exists. The focus should be on pressing childhood health problems like diabetes and obesity, which should be the priorities of the NIH director.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have said that we need to invest in NIH resources at looking at the link, a possible link between measles vaccine and autism. I've not heard that directly. It's hearsay. Any comment on that? Speaker 1: Senator, it's it's a tragedy that a child would die from a vaccine preventable disease. I fully support children being vaccinated for for diseases like measles that that can be prevented with the vaccination efforts. I I I as far as research on autism and and and vaccines, I don't generally believe that there is a link and based on my reading of the literature but what I have seen is that there's tremendous distrust in the in medicine and science coming out of the pandemic and we do have as you know, senator of of of a sharp rise in autism rates in this country and I don't know and I don't think any scientist really knows the cause of it. So I would support an agenda of a broad agenda, broad scientific agenda based on data to get an answer to that. Speaker 0: But this has been fairly well. In fact, it's been exhaustively studied and there's limited resources And if we keep plowing over ground that has been plowed over, knowing you can never prove a negative. And since we don't know the cause, we'll still have a problem. We've got a responsibility with limited resources. How do we address those things that we don't know the cause for or that can ameliorate those things that are related to this crisis of chronic disease. My state by the way is terribly affected by chronic disease. So, I'm totally with you on that But what I want to make sure is there's an appropriate use. So again, just going back to, did you have an idea or an agenda that would once more by golly once more prove that measles vaccine is not associated with autism, Neither the schedule, the vaccine, or anything else associated with it because my concern is the more we pretend like this is an issue, the more we will have children dying from vaccine preventable diseases. Speaker 1: So, I guess I've turned it around and say, I want to, I don't want to disprove a negative. That's almost, that's impossible really but I wanna I wanna address the rise in autism Speaker 0: that. No, accept that. I think that's possible. Speaker 1: Yeah. We need to do that. Yeah, that's a positive. Speaker 0: But I'm but I'm asking the specific question, will we once more have to go back over this particular issue? Because that has been exhaustively studied. Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I I think as I said, senator, I I don't think that there's a link between back that between, you know, the MMR vaccine and autism. I I'm I'm convinced based on that literature. I the only reason I'm not wholeheartedly saying yes to the to your question which which I every instinct of mine is to do that is that there are people who who might disagree with me. I want to make Speaker 0: sure but that's life. Yeah. I mean, there's people who disagree that the world is round. That's true and I say that not to minimize these concerns but but people's people still think Elvis is alive and so if you just say someone disagrees with me so therefore, I'm going to put precious limited taxpayer dollars to this and not to addressing issues of obesity, heart disease, cancer. We've lost. There's an opportunity cost there. You're the economist. What am I doing talking about opportunity cost? So, I'm pressing you on this because I think that that kind of is a framework if just because somebody is upset about something, do we do we have the opportunity cost of devoting resources at something which has already been pretty well examined? Speaker 1: I mean, I guess I I yes, you're absolutely right, senator. We don't need to address every every idea that or or or concern but if those concerns result in parents not wanting to vaccinate their children for a vaccine that is well tested. My my sense is that my my inclination is to give people good data. That's how you address those concerns. I don't I don't Speaker 0: know but I'm not I'm not quite sure what what at what endpoint we say we've got good data because Speaker 1: I mean, I I I'm I'm convinced that we have good data on MMR and autism but if other people don't agree with me and then they don't vaccinate their children, I think I don't as a as a if I'm confirmed as NIH director, the one lever I'll have is to give them good data. That's that's really the lever I'd have. Speaker 0: But that good data already exists. You're a scientist and I accept that. It seems more an endorsement with an with an appropriate allocation of current dollars would be a better way to spend precious limited federal dollars. Speaker 1: I mean, I think I think the most important childhood health problems have to do with childhood diabetes, childhood obesity. Speaker 0: I think that's what we should be studying that. Speaker 1: That's where most that's the that's the vast vast majority of the the effort should go. Prevention of of child infectious diseases also I think is important. I mean, all of those are and I think you and I agree would be the main priorities. That's that's the priorities Aloha if I'm an NIH director. Speaker 0: Thank you.

@AVPac_US - American Values 🗽

In response to Dr. Bhattacharya’s pledge to find the truth about the prevalence of autism … Senator Bill Cassidy compared the belief that there is a link between vaccines and autism the belief that the world is flat and Elvis is still alive. “There's people who disagree that the world is round—and I say that not to minimize these people’s concerns—but people still think Elvis is alive.” “Just because somebody is upset about something, do we have the opportunity cost of devoting resources at something which has already been pretty well examined?”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some people will disagree with me, just like some think the world is flat or that Elvis is still alive. I'm not trying to minimize concerns, but should we spend limited taxpayer money on things just because someone is upset? There's an opportunity cost here. Resources spent on one thing can't be used for others like obesity, heart disease, or cancer. If we devote resources to something already well-examined just because someone is upset, are we missing out on other important issues?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are people who who might disagree with me. I wanna make sure that it's Yeah. I mean, there's people who disagree that the world is round. That's true. And I say that not to minimize these concerns, but but people's people still think Elvis is alive. And so if you just say someone disagrees with me, so therefore, I'm gonna put precious limited taxpayer dollars to this and not to addressing issues of obesity, heart disease, cancer. We've lost. There's an opportunity cost there. You're the economist. What am I doing talking about opportunity cost? So, I'm pressing you on this because I think that that kind of is a framework if just because somebody is upset about something, do we do we have the opportunity cost of devoting resources at something which has already been pretty well examined? I mean,

@AVPac_US - American Values 🗽

President Trump, RFK Jr. and Dr. Bhattacharya will lead the most transparent Administration in American history. Dr. Bhattacharya: “You can't have trust unless you are transparent.” “If I'm confirmed as NIH Director, I fully commit to making sure that the American people can see all of the activities of the NIH openly.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
As NIH Director, I commit to ensuring the American people can openly see all NIH activities with limited obfuscation. Our interactions with the public have unfortunately been characterized as something less than transparent, and I aim to change that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can't have trust unless you are transparent. And if I'm confirmed as NIH Director, I fully commit to making sure that the American people can see all of the activities of the NIH openly with limited sort of obfuscation, which is characterized, I think, unfortunately, the NIH's way that they interacted with American people. And I think that starts with being very visual on tele

@AVPac_US - American Values 🗽

Dr. Bhattacharya called out NIH funding for dangerous gain-of-function research. “I don’t think the NIH should be doing any research that has the potential to cause a pandemic.” Senator Rand Paul SLAMMED the insanity of funding bioweapons labs in Ukraine despite the war and conflict that has plagued the country since 2014.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to collaborate with Congress to ensure appropriate regulation of any risky research. The NIH shouldn't be involved in research that could potentially cause a pandemic, and I'm committed to working with Congress to prevent that. Transparency is crucial for building trust. If confirmed, I pledge to ensure the American people have full access to the NIH's activities, minimizing the obfuscation that has unfortunately characterized the NIH's interactions with the public. Openness is key to fostering trust.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I wanna work with with with with the congress to make sure that there's appropriate regulation of any risky research. The NIH to have I don't think she'd be doing any risk research that has the potential to cause a pandemic, and I wanna work with congress to make sure that happens. As far as trust, I think the key thing is we have to be utterly open as I were if I'm confirmed, I'll be at the head of our organization. There's a scientific organization. As a citizen, I would often look for foyer responses from the NIH Freedom Information Act requests and they'd be fully redacted during the pandemic. You can't have trust unless you are transparent. And I as if I'm confirmed as an instructor, I fully commit to making sure that the American people can see all of the activities of the NIH openly with with with limited sort of obfuscation, which is characterized, I think, unfortunately, the NIH's way that they interact with with with American people.

@AVPac_US - American Values 🗽

“I was personally subject to censorship by the Biden Administration during the pandemic.” Dr. Bhattacharya pledged his support to free speech and dissident scientists as NIH Director. “It was so refreshing to be able to speak my scientific views in Florida during the pandemic.” “The root problem was that people who had alternative ideas were suppressed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Florida's pandemic response was a tremendous success. It was refreshing to be allowed to speak my scientific views in Florida during the pandemic. Pandemics are difficult and create uncertainty, but the root problem was the suppression of alternative ideas. I was personally censored by the Biden administration. Science needs free speech and tolerance for dissent to succeed. Florida provided an outlet for dissent, allowing the state government to adopt the best ideas. No state was perfect during the pandemic, but to do well, open communication is necessary, even when ideas are controversial.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think Florida's response to the pandemic was tremendous success. But I'm really glad you highlighted the role of of of censorship and restriction of of scientific discussion. It was so refreshing to me to be allowed to speak my my scientific views in Florida during the pandemic. I think the root problem it's a pandemic is a very difficult thing. There's so many people are gonna have different ideas in a in a environment of uncertainty. The root problem was that people who had alternative ideas were suppressed. I was personally was subject to censorship by the actions of the Biden administration during the pandemic. Science to succeed needs free speech. It needs an environment where there's tolerance for descent. And the reason I think why Florida did so well was that it provided an outlet for that descent so that the the so that the the government of Florida, the the state of Florida could adopt the best ideas for for its you know, it's not that no mistakes were ever made. That's you can't say that of any state in a pandemic. But in order to do well, you have to allow people to to speak with each other openly even when the ideas are are are controversial.

@AVPac_US - American Values 🗽

RFK Jr. pledged the same transparency for HHS. “Nothing is gonna be off-limits.” “The childhood vaccine schedule, electromagnetic radiation, glyphosate, other pesticides, ultra processed foods, artificial food additives, SSRI and other psychiatric drugs, PFAS, PFOAs, microplastics.” “Some of the possible factors we will investigate were formally taboo or insufficiently scrutinized.” “That is gonna be our template: unbiased science.” “Let's all depoliticize these issues and reestablish a common ground or action and renew the search for existential truth with no political impediments and no preconceptions.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I signed an executive order last Thursday to establish the MAHA commission, which will investigate the decline in American health over the last two generations. We will bring together people with different ideas to study the reasons behind the big increase in chronic diseases. We'll look into things like childhood vaccine schedules, electromagnetic radiation, pesticides like glyphosate, highly processed foods, artificial additives, psychiatric drugs, microplastics, and more. We won't rule anything out. We will use unbiased science as our guide. I want us to do research that will make everyone happy once and for all. We will agree on the study methods ahead of time and not change the results halfway through if they are not what we expect. Let's take the politics out of these problems, find common ground, and look for real truth without political obstacles or biases.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Last Thursday, president Trump signed an executive order to establish the MAHA commission to study what has caused the precipitous decline in American health over the past two generations. So we will convene representatives of all viewpoints to study the causes for the drastic rise in chronic disease. Some of the possible factors we will investigate were formally taboo or insufficiently scrutinized. A childhood vaccine scheduling, electromagnetic radiation, glyphosate, other pesticides, ultra processed foods, artificial food additives, SSRI and other psychiatric drugs, PFAs, PFOAs, microplastics, nothing is going to be off limits. Whatever belief or suspicion I have expressed in the past, I'm willing to subject them all to the scrutiny of unbiased science. That is gonna be our template, unbiased science. That's something that will make us all proud of this agency and of our role in restoring American health. Let's commission research that will satisfy all the stakeholders once and for all. Let's use protocols that we all agree on in advance and not alter the outcomes of the studies when they're halfway through and that they look inconvenient. Let's all depoliticize these issues and reestablish a common ground or action and renew the search for existential truth with no political impediments and no preconceptions. Finally, I wanna ask you to think about

@AVPac_US - American Values 🗽

Americans injured by Covid-19 vaccines will FINALLY have a champion at NIH in Dr. Bhattacharya. Senator Andy Kim: “Are there any vaccines that you are concerned about?” Dr. Bhattacharya: “I was concerned about the Covid vaccines for young men causing myocarditis in 2021.” https://t.co/dHnaQhlHIR

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was concerned about the COVID vaccines for young men causing myocardial issues in 2021.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In terms of few other things. Are there any vaccines out there that you are concerned about in terms of safety? Senator, I was concerned about the COVID vaccines for young men with the causing myocardial in 2021.

@AVPac_US - American Values 🗽

Dr. Bhattacharya SLAMMED the totalitarian approach to science during the pandemic. “Science should be an engine for knowledge and freedom, not something that stands on top of society and says you must do this or else.” “It shouldn’t be pushing Covid vaccines.” “The proper role of scientists in a pandemic is to answer basic questions that policy makers have about what the right policy should be.” “The role of scientists shouldn’t be to say you can’t send your kids to school for two years.” “If science is a force for freedom and knowledge, it will have universal support.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
As scientists, our job during a pandemic is to provide policymakers with answers to inform their decisions. We shouldn't dictate personal choices like saying goodbye to loved ones or attending funerals. Instead, we should present the risks and allow individuals to decide for themselves. Scientists shouldn't close schools or limit hospital treatments. Our role is to offer reliable data, empowering people to make informed choices. Science should promote freedom and knowledge, not impose restrictions. Pushing mandates, especially for rapidly developed vaccines like the COVID vaccines, can erode public trust. If science champions freedom and knowledge, it will have widespread support.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The proper role of scientists in a pandemic is to answer basic questions that policymakers have about what the right policy should be. They're not our role isn't to make decisions to say you shouldn't be saying goodbye to your grandfather as he's dying in a hospital. It shouldn't be to say you can't have a funeral because it's too dangerous. The scientists should say, here's what the risks are. And then you decide what the risks whether you take it. The role of the scientist shouldn't be to say you can't send your kids to school for two years, that you can't you should close hospitals so that they can't treat heart attack patients. You should not the role of scientists should be to address those problems by giving good data and then let people make the science should be an engine for freedom. Knowledge and freedom. Not not something where it stands on top of society and says you must do this, this, and this or else. It shouldn't be pushing mandates for vaccines that have been like like the COVID vaccines that were tested for, you know, for a relatively short period of time. I took the COVID vaccine myself but I think that the mandates that many scientists push have led to the the the lack of confidence that so many of of the public has in science. If science is a force for freedom and for knowledge, it will have universal support. That's what the role of science is.
Saved - April 10, 2025 at 3:13 AM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

COVID vaccines were approved in days instead of years. 1.6M VAERS reports with 38K deaths and the media stays silent. Natural immunity works. The COVID vaccines are deadly. The American people deserve to know the truth. FDA approval of MRNA COVID vaccines should be repealed. https://t.co/aW7PmcWbij

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses the issue of vaccines, claiming the FDA has lost the trust of Americans. Autism rates are cited, stating that in the 1980s, it was 1 in 10,000, but a recent Children's Health Defense study indicates it's now 1 in 33 among children ages 5 to 8. Parents are said to point to vaccines as a cause, but are dismissed. The speaker criticizes the emergency use authorization of COVID vaccines, alleging the process took only days compared to the typical 10-15 years for vaccine development. VAERS reports are referenced, citing 1,662,426 reports, including 38,541 deaths, 220,494 hospitalizations, and other adverse events. The speaker contrasts this with the alleged dismissal of Ivermectin as "horse paste," despite its effectiveness against COVID. The speaker asks if the addressee objected to the removal of Doctors Gruber and Krausz for opposing mandated booster shots, to which the addressee said no. The speaker claims vaccinated and boosted individuals keep getting and spreading COVID-19, while those with natural immunity do not.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I'm going to speak on behalf of a community of people that here in America that largely get ignored on an extremely important issue. And that's the issue of vaccines. And while we're talking about the FDA losing the trust of Americans, there's a very important reason why for that. And I have to recognize autism rates. Now, anytime you mess with people's children, this this is getting to the heart of a family. And, you know, in the nineteen eighties, '1 to '4 out of every '10 thousand individuals had autism. Twenty years ago, it was one in one hundred and fifty. And just recently, the rate has been said to be one in thirty six. But today, there was a study that just came out of twelve million children ages five to eight. And it has been released by the Children's Health Defense that the autism rate is now one in thirty three. I mean, we're talking about something that cannot be ignored anymore. This is a crisis and people are losing their children. They're watching their children go from being happy, active, babbling, growing, reaching milestones to completely disappearing. Completely disappearing. And parents over and over and over again point to vaccines. And they called conspiracy theorists. They're dismissed. And they are completely ignored. And this cannot be ignored anymore. This is a crisis and we are losing our children. And this cannot be allowed. Let's talk about another reason why the FDA has lost all trust from Americans and we can talk about the COVID vaccines. Emergency use authorization was given for these vaccines. And the FDA took approximately twenty one days to give it for the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine. Moderna, the Emergency Youth Authorization was given in eighteen days. Eighteen days. And then for Johnson and Johnson, it was given in twenty three days. Now this comes after typically vaccine development approval takes ten to fifteen years. But for these vaccines for COVID, it was given the emergency use was given in a matter of days and then full approval was given in months. Now what has been the result of that? Another thing in people that have been ignored. These are the VAERS reports. Now, there's 1,662,426 VAERS reports. And it is listed here that there are 38,541 deaths, two hundred and twenty thousand four hundred and ninety four hospitalizations, one hundred and fifty six thousand five hundred and twenty seven thousand urgent care, seventeen thousand nine hundred and thirteen Bell's palsy, five thousand one hundred and seventy five miscarriages, twenty two thousand two hundred and forty seven heart attacks, twenty eight thousand nine hundred and eight myocarditis, seventy seven thousand three hundred and eleven permanently disabled. And these are people reporting themselves and no one seems to give a damn. And this is why the people do not trust the FDA, along with the myriad of reasons that has been given today. And it's unbelievable. And at the same time, medicines that have been trusted for years, like Ivermectin, one of the safest drugs, was called horse paste and has been one of the best effective treatments against COVID. Now, Mr. Kessler, did you object when Doctor. Marks forced out the two top vaccine scientists at the FDA, Doctor. Gruber and Doctor. Krausz, due to their opposition of mandating booster shots. Did you object to that? Speaker 1: I have enormous respect. Speaker 0: Did you object? Yes or no. Yes or no. I have little time left. Yes or no. Speaker 1: No. But may I may I respond? Speaker 0: May I please respond? Did not object. You did not object. Speaker 1: I had enormous respect for doctor Marks. Speaker 0: I'm glad you do, but you didn't object to him being removed when he said the booster shot should not be mandated, And people that have been vaccinated with COVID nineteen are the people that keep getting COVID nineteen. And the people with the booster shots keep spreading and getting COVID nineteen. No, this is my time. Where people like me with natural immunity don't get it and don't spread it around. Speaker 1: Madam chair, may I please This Speaker 0: is my time, doctor Kessler, and my time has expired.
Saved - April 10, 2025 at 2:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the FDA has repeatedly misled Americans, leading to a significant loss of trust. They've restricted access to traditional goods while promoting foreign products, such as Chinese vapes and vaccines. It's crucial to restore confidence in the FDA. Under the current administration, I feel they have let Americans down. I believe that with President Trump, we can work towards making America healthy again.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

COVID Vaccines. Baby formula. Nicotine products. Raw milk. Fentanyl. Hemp. The FDA has steered our citizens wrong time after time, resulting in the complete loss of trust from Americans. While this agency has shut down freedom of choice in goods that have supported humans from the beginning of time, they encourage the people of America to consume foreign chemicals like Chinese vapes and vaccines. There needs to be a restoration of trust in the FDA. Under the Biden administration, they failed Americans. With President Trump, they can Make America Healthy Again.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims Americans didn't die under President Trump and criticizes the Biden administration's infant formula failures, where mothers were blocked from ordering safe formulas from overseas. The speaker also criticizes the FDA's ban on raw milk, which is sold in many countries, and accuses the FDA of declaring war on anything natural while allowing chemicals in American foods, contributing to obesity and sickness. The FDA's failure to approve safer nicotine products has led to a dangerous illegal market of Chinese vapes. China has been murdering Americans for years with fentanyl. The FDA has also failed to regulate hemp-derived products and needs to crack down on counterfeit drugs from China. President Trump's executive order ending the de minimis package exemption for low-value imports will help the FDA restrict illicit products from China. The speaker believes Americans don't trust the FDA and that the COVID vaccine FDA approval should be revoked and removed from the childhood vaccine schedule, as children had the lowest hospitalization rates and deaths during COVID.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The good news ladies and gentlemen, the American people are not going to die under President Trump and his great administration because the goal is to make America great again. And as our new administration is getting in place, we have to talk about things that previously happened under the Biden administration. Things like the failures with infant formula, where mothers were desperately seeking formula for their children and were blocked from ordering safe formulas from overseas. That was a complete failure. I can't believe that any time in our country, mothers could not find infant formula on the grocery store aisles and were blocked from getting formula that they much needed for their babies. We can also talk about how the FDA bans raw milk, which is ridiculous. Raw milk is sold in countries all over the world. Countries like England, New Zealand, France, Italy, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Denmark. Raw milk has been here since the beginning of time. And many Americans not only produce raw milk, they'd also like to sell it and many consumers would like to be able to buy it. But the FDA has declared war on anything natural and good. And while it allows many chemicals to be brought in into America, put in our foods, and distributed all over the country, no wonder obesity is at all time highs. No wonder Americans are sicker than most people around the world. The FDA is a failure to approve new nicotine products, are safer than cigarettes, has spawned a massive and dangerous illegal market of Chinese vapes. No one trusts many of the products, especially anything laden with chemicals coming from China because China, after all, has been murdering Americans for years now and Americans are dying every single day from fentanyl that comes in our country. And if China wants to be serious about tariffs and its treatment and unfair treatment against America, the first step they should do is stop sending fentanyl in our country and poisoning our people. The FDA has failed to effectively regulate hemp derived products which the industry themselves desperately wants to be regulated and we heard that in testimony today. The FDA has the authority to crack down on counterfeit drugs, which come primarily from China and infiltrate our legitimate drug supply chain endangering American lives. And we heard our witnesses today talk about how we cannot trust China to give us life saving medications. President Trump's recent executive order ending the de minimis package exemption for low value imports will bolster bolster FDA's ability to restrict the flow of illicit products from China. And I think that's a great thing for every single American no matter how they vote and how they feel about the current president of The United States. The reality today is it is very sad that Americans don't trust the FDA. And I will reiterate again for the many millions and millions of Americans who are still angry and want accountability and they deserve it for being forced to take a vaccine they should have never have been forced to take. And all the Americans that suffer from side effects and lost loved ones from a vaccine that should lose its FDA approval. And I'm saying that that is my own opinion. I believe that the FDA approval of COVID vaccines should be revoked and that they should be taken off the childhood vaccine schedule. Children don't need a COVID vaccine. Children were one of the healthiest and had the lowest hospitalization rates and deaths during COVID. After all, our kids are resilient and they shouldn't be forced and be injected with manufactured vaccines that their parents disagree with. I thank everyone, for for tuning into this hearing today. I thank our witnesses for being here, and thank you for your testimony. With
Saved - May 4, 2025 at 6:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I represent the base, and when I'm frustrated with the current direction, it reflects their unhappiness. I campaigned against foreign wars, yet we face potential conflict with Iran and involvement in Ukraine, where funds seem mismanaged. The lessons from Iraq's war remain unlearned, and we should focus on our own resources instead. I advocate for accountability regarding Covid policies and the judicial system's failures. We must prioritize election integrity and address the issues affecting our children, as losing sight of these concerns alienates the base.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I represent the base and when I’m frustrated and upset over the direction of things, you better be clear, the base is not happy. I campaigned for no more foreign wars. And now we are supposedly on the verge of going to war with Iran. I don’t think we should be bombing foreign countries on behalf of other foreign countries especially when they have their own nuclear weapons and massive military strength. And on top of that, now we are told that we have signed a deal for mineral rights in Ukraine, in order to pay us back for the hundreds of billions of dollars that we gave Ukraine and they used for money laundering, sold the weapons we gave them to our enemies, and their leader is a dictator who canceled elections, was involved of the first impeachment of Trump, and campaigned for Biden. Didn’t we learn our lesson when we went to war in Iraq and killed Saddam Hussein because of “weapons of mass destruction?” Did we ever find any? And did any of that oil over in the Middle East make us rich? The answer is no, we are $36 trillion in debt today. So why on earth would we go over and occupy Ukraine and spend an untold amount of future American taxpayer dollars defending and mining their minerals as well as potentially putting American lives at risk and future war? Why don’t we just mine our own rare earth minerals that are tied up on federal lands that the government confiscated years ago? I also campaigned on accountability for the communist and tyrannical acts made by the government during Covid. Yet the Covid vaccine still has FDA approval even though there are millions reported injuries and deaths, and this mRNA vaccine is known to have horrific side effects and DOES NOT STOP PEOPLE FROM CATCHING COVID. And to this day, it’s still on the childhood vaccine schedule, why on earth is this happening? Hasn’t big pharma made enough billions and billions and billions of dollars on this lie? I also campaigned on accountability for all the law fair that was waged against the American people in the past four years. What about all the people that were locked up in jail and the abuse that they went through? And when are those vicious attorneys and judges ever going to be held accountable for the lives they ruined? And I campaigned for an end to waste fraud and abuse of the American people’s harder tax dollars. I believe the DOGE mission is one of the most important things happening today in our government, and yet where are the rescissions that we should be voting on in Congress? And one of the biggest issues in the nation that I have fought for, and early on I was one of the only ones that took a loud screaming stand against, is the evil transgender assault against our children. Most normal people in this country can’t even comprehend how it’s allowed to happen to kids who by law can’t even get a tattoo, drive, or vote. And how did so many of our teachers turn into the predators themselves that groom children with gender lies? This should be an all out effort by Republicans to end this insanity. And look at the extreme nature of our rogue judicial system that is so defiant that there are judges that defy our nation’s laws and block the deportation of literal enemies of the United States of America. Where is the outrage and moral courage to dispose of this treason? Sadly not in Congress. And what about election integrity? This should be the most important issue that the Republicans aggressively fight to protect because without secure elections protected from illegals voting and protections from stealing our votes, the American people have lost their power. When you are losing MTG, you are losing the base. And Trump isn’t on the ballot in the future, so do the math on that.

Saved - June 12, 2025 at 7:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently shared that RFK Jr. appointed eight new members to the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee, aiming to enhance independence, transparency, and public trust in vaccine science. I introduced each member, starting with Dr. Robert Malone, a critic of mRNA vaccines, and Dr. Cody Meissner, who raised concerns about their rapid introduction for children. Other members include Dr. Joseph Hibbeln, who emphasizes natural health, Dr. Vicky Pebsworth, advocating for informed consent, and Dr. Retsef Levi, who critiques vaccine data management. Dr. Martin Kulldorff is known for opposing mandates and questioning mRNA safety.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

RFK Jr. just appointed 8 new members to the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee. He says the goal is to restore independence, transparency, and public trust in vaccine science. Here’s a quick breakdown of who they are—and where they stand on vaccines. Thread🧵 https://t.co/wicVrHgHAU

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

This is a brief intro to the 8 people RFK Jr. just appointed—feel free to reply with more info on them if you have it🧵

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Robert Malone: An early contributor to mRNA vaccine research, Malone now argues the tech was misused during the pandemic. He was banned from Twitter during Covid for warning about spike protein toxicity. He’s become one of the most vocal critics of mRNA shots in both adults and children.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Cody Meissner: A pediatric infectious disease specialist from Dartmouth, Meissner served on prior FDA and CDC vaccine panels. He supported Covid vaccines for older adults but raised red flags on risk–benefit for young children. He’s expressed concerns about how fast mRNA shots were pushed into childhood schedules.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Joseph Hibbeln: A psychiatrist and former NIH nutrition scientist, Hibbeln is known for studying how diet affects brain and immune function. He hasn’t been a public voice on Covid shots, but he’s emphasized natural health over pharmaceutical intervention. No major record of him discussing mRNA vaccines specifically.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. James Pagano: An emergency medicine physician with over 40 years of clinical experience, Pagano has worked in trauma centers and community hospitals across the country. He’s served on hospital committees focused on critical care and patient safety, and brings a frontline medical perspective to the new ACIP. No public statements found on Covid or mRNA vaccines. I haven’t heard of Dr. Pagano and couldn’t find a picture I was sure was him so please reply if you have an image or more about his stance on vaccines🧵

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Vicky Pebsworth: A nurse and public health PhD who previously advised the FDA on vaccine safety. She’s advocated for better informed consent and more research into long-term effects. She’s expressed caution about mRNA vaccines, particularly regarding adverse event tracking.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Michael Ross: An OB-GYN with experience on CDC cancer prevention panels, Ross brings maternal health expertise. He hasn’t been a major public figure in the Covid vaccine debate. No known statements on mRNA vaccines, but his focus may shape pregnancy vaccine policy. https://t.co/QSzt0fMciN

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Retsef Levi: A professor at MIT Sloan, Levi analyzes health systems using risk management and data science. He’s spoken out on vaccine side effect data being mismanaged and underreported. He’s been highly critical of mRNA technology rollout without transparent long-term trials.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Martin Kulldorff: An epidemiologist formerly at Harvard, Kulldorff helped write the Great Barrington Declaration against lockdowns and mandates. He publicly opposed Covid vaccine mandates and criticized CDC policy. He’s questioned the long-term safety of mRNA platforms, especially for young people.

Saved - August 27, 2025 at 9:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared findings from four landmark studies indicating significant health risks associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, including increased rates of myocarditis, heart attacks, and strokes. The data suggest a causal link between these vaccines and serious health outcomes, leading to a call for immediate market withdrawal to prevent further loss of life. In a related update, I announced the end of COVID vaccine mandates and the availability of vaccines for those who choose them, emphasizing the importance of safety and informed choice in public health.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

184 Million People, 4 Landmark Studies: COVID-19 mRNA Shots Are NOT SAFE FOR HUMAN USE 🚫 🩸 Autopsies. Heart Attacks. Strokes. Multi-Organ Failure — The Data Are In 👇 📍FAKSOVA ET AL (n=99 million): ➊ Myocarditis (+510% after mRNA injection) ➋ Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (+278% after mRNA injection) ➌ Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (+223% after viral vector injection) ➍ Guillain-Barré Syndrome (+149% after viral vector injection) 📍KARIMI ET AL (n=85 million): ➊ Heart Attack (+286% after second dose) ➋ Stroke (+240% after first dose) ➌ Coronary Artery Disease (+244% after second dose) ➍ Cardiac Arrhythmia (+199% after first dose) 📍HULSCHER ET AL (n=325 autopsies): ◾️Proved a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death via multiple organ systems. 📍ALLESSANDRIA ET AL (n=290,727): ◾️Subjects vaccinated with 2 doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during follow-up. IMMEDIATE market withdrawal of the COVID-19 mRNA injections is essential to prevent further loss of life among the millions of Americans still receiving them. In light of the overwhelming safety signals confirmed in the largest studies ever conducted, continued administration of these products may constitute mass negligent homicide.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"a systematic review of autopsy findings and deaths after COVID nineteen vaccination, actually proved a causal link between these mRNA shots and death." "A study by Alessandro and colleagues found a thirty seven percent life expectancy reduction in those who received two or more doses." "The first one, ninety nine million people in it. They found, five hundred percent increased risks of myocarditis, about two hundred, three hundred percent increased risks of spinal cord inflammation." "The second largest study with eighty five million people, and it just came out. They found three hundred percent increased risks, heart attacks, strokes, arrhythmias, and coronary artery disease." "And then we had another study last week that came out that showed people with strokes who got mRNA shots are producing spike protein in their cerebral arteries, so in their brains, for up to seventeen months."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At the McCullough Foundation, we have conducted over 20 scientific studies all published in the peer reviewed literature now, exposing the harms of these shots. And, I I I'll I'll go over some of the most glaring ones. And so, one of our studies, a systematic review of autopsy findings and deaths after COVID nineteen vaccination, actually proved a causal link between these mRNA shots and death. And so what Brazil's doing, they're putting these kids at risk of death. A study by Alessandro and colleagues found a thirty seven percent life expectancy reduction in those who received two or more doses. And so they're reducing the life expectancy of these kids, and it's just an absolute disaster. We now know few recent studies that are absolutely shocking that we are so we have the first, and we have the second largest COVID nineteen vaccine safety studies ever conducted. The first one, ninety nine million people in it. They found, five hundred percent increased risks of myocarditis, about two hundred, three hundred percent increased risks of spinal cord inflammation. And then we have Guillain Barre syndrome in that study. So that just that study proved it wasn't safe for human use. And then we have last week, the second largest study with eighty five million people, and it just came out. They found three hundred percent increased risks, heart attacks, strokes, arrhythmias, and coronary artery disease. And then we had another study last week that came out that showed people with strokes who got mRNA shots are producing spike protein in their cerebral arteries, so in their brains, for up to seventeen months. Or that's at least how long it looked. And so we have people now producing spike in their vital organs, reducing their life expectancy, risking death, risking cardiovascular damage, and it's absolutely dangerous. It's absolutely terrible that they're giving these to children.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

I promised 4 things: 1. to end covid vaccine mandates. 2. to keep vaccines available to people who want them, especially the vulnerable. 3. to demand placebo-controlled trials from companies. 4. to end the emergency. In a series of FDA actions today we accomplished all four goals. The emergency use authorizations for Covid vaccines, once used to justify broad mandates on the general public during the Biden administration, are now rescinded. FDA has now issued marketing authorization for those at higher risk: Moderna (6+ months), Pfizer (5+), and Novavax (12+). These vaccines are available for all patients who choose them after consulting with their doctors. The American people demanded science, safety, and common sense. This framework delivers all three. Thank you @DrMakaryFDA for your leadership.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

REFERENCES 1. HULSCHER ET AL: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/a-systematic-review-of-autopsy-findings-in-deaths-after-covid-19-vaccination/ 2. ALLESSANDRIA ET AL: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39065111/ 3. KARIMI ET AL: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40191438/ 4. FAKSOVA ET AL: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/

A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Background: The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of publichealthpolicyjournal.com
Saved - September 3, 2025 at 8:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
There's a significant effort underway to oust RFK Jr., backed by a $2 million plan from the pharmaceutical industry. A leaked memo revealed that former CDC Directors, Senators, and public health experts are targeting him due to his stance against vaccines, which they view as a threat. Critics, including Senator Bernie Sanders, have called for his resignation, citing concerns over his views. Meanwhile, former CDC Directors defend their record, but many argue that public trust in these authorities has eroded. The situation is escalating as RFK Jr. prepares to testify before the Senate.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

There is a $2 million effort to get RFK Jr. ousted happening right in front of us. A leaked memo EXPOSED the whole plan. Now, it’s happening—and Pharma is holding NOTHING back. CDC bureaucrats are subverting Kennedy. Senators are demanding his resignation. The vaccine industry is lobbying to get him fired. And it’s all about to reach a fever pitch: 🧵THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

First, bookmark this thread above. There is concerted effort from Pharma to get RFK Jr. OUSTED. 2 months ago, a leaked memo EXPOSED the plan. Former CDC Directors, Pharma, Senators, public health “experts,” and the media just launched an all-out assault on MAHA:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

In July, the Brownstone Institute EXPOSED a leaked memo from BIO, the lobbying arm for Pfizer, Moderna, Merck, Eli Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson. The memo made their goal clear: “It’s time to go to The Hill and lobby that it is time for RFK Jr. to go.” Why? Because RFK Jr. and MAHA are a threat to the corrupt vaccine industry. Vaccyte EVP/COO Jim Wassil allegedly stated there is “no opportunity to raise capital in the current environment.” “Investors are sitting on the sidelines for next 6-9 months.” “Vaccine pathway to approval is unpredictable.” @brownstoneinst

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

BIO’s leaked memo REVEALED that they set aside $2 million—half of its $4 million cash reserve—to stop RFK Jr. They planned to target legislators and influencers. The Brownstone Institute noted that the plan “reveals a timeline racing toward” September. It’s now September, and we’re now seeing an all-out PR war from Senators like Bernie Sanders, former CDC Directors, and the media to try and get RFK Jr. ousted from the Trump Administration. Read the Brownstone Institute’s full article exposing this memo here: https://brownstone.org/articles/the-plot-to-get-rfk/ @brownstoneinst

The Plot to Get RFK ⋆ Brownstone Institute On the eve before US Senate reconvenes, a memo plotting removal of US Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. leaked. brownstone.org

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

On August 30, Senator Bernie Sanders called for RFK Jr. to resign. His whole argument revolves around Kennedy’s “anti-vaccine views.” He cited the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, and the World Health Organization to make his case. What do these organizations have in common?🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The American Academy of Pediatrics has received $50K+ from Pfizer, Moderna, Merck, and Sanofi, between $25K - $49K from Eli Lilly, and tens of thousands more from other Pharma companies. The American Medical Association has received $1M+ from Pfizer, between $500K - $999K from Merck, AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly, between $250K - $499K from Novo Nordisk and GSK, and hundreds of thousands more from other Pharma companies. The heart of RFK Jr. and MAHA’s argument against these “expert” public health organizations is that they’re corrupted by Pharma. But Sanders made no attempt to address these concerns. He just regurgitated their talking points.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Now, 9 former CDC Directors just wrote an article slamming RFK Jr. for “endangering every American’s health.” It’s your typical appeal to authority—despite the total collapse of trust in public health authorities since 2020. “Collectively, we spent more than 100 years working at the CDC, the world’s pre-eminent public health agency.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Guess what they held up as a “shining example” of success at HHS and CDC? Operation Warp Speed. But the American people have woken up to the TRUTH: The Covid-19 shots are an unmitigated disaster that ruined countless lives. Even President Trump, who spent 5 years touting Operation Warp Speed as a “brilliant” success, is now listening to RFK Jr. and questioning the lies he was told by Pfizer and Moderna.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The evidence against the safety of Covid-19 shots is now overwhelming. Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo just declared they are “not fit for human use.” Bookmark the thread below—he EXPOSED the TRUTH that no “expert” dares to study:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Florida is going to WAR with Pfizer and Moderna. Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo just declared Covid-19 shots are “not fit for human use.” He EXPOSED the truth—and held nothing back. “They should NOT be going into human beings.” And he has a warning for the Republican Party: “Trying to protect President Trump is not a reason to not take care of MILLIONS of people who have been injured by these mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.” 🧵THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Next, these 9 former CDC Directors credited the CDC with several major public health accomplishments. This is worth breaking down point by point—because they’re all lies, coverups, or half-truths:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

First, they claim that US life expectancy rose from 66 years to 78 years since the CDC was created in 1946. Here’s what they didn’t tell you: They’re using outdated numbers. Since 2020, US life expectancy has taken a sharp downward turn, erasing 25 years of slow progress—and it still hasn’t recovered, 5 years later.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Second, they credit the CDC with significantly reducing smoking rates. But there is a much darker side to this story … RFK Jr. has EXPOSED that tobacco companies are responsible for turning our food into addictive “poison.” When smoking rates dropped, tobacco companies started buying up food companies. Then, they engineered our food into the chemical-laden, poisonous, addictive catastrophe that it is today. Kennedy: “By the mid-1990s, the two biggest food companies in the world were R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris.” “They transferred thousands of scientists that were engaged in making tobacco more addictive to do the same thing with food.” “They developed in the lab all of these chemicals that are unknown in nature, that make food more attractive.” “It doesn’t give you nutrition, but you want to eat more and more, so you get obese.” “But at the same time, you get malnourished.” So, while Americans don’t smoke at the rate we did 50 years ago … The same companies that were responsible for that public health issue just turned around and created a much, much larger public health crisis by mass poisoning us with food. That is hardly a “success” for the CDC or public health.

Video Transcript AI Summary
And we have something that is unique in human history. We have people who are obese who are at the same time malnourished because the food that we're eating does not is is not nutrient dense anymore. I was involved in tobacco litigation back in the 1980s, late 1980s, and the tobacco companies at that point were the most cash rich companies on earth and they saw the writing on the wall. They saw the regulatory headwinds, and their consumers were were walking away from their product, and they decided to diversify. So they started buying up the food companies. By the mid nineteen nineties, the two biggest food companies in the world were RJ Reynolds and Philip Morris, and they transferred thousands of scientists that were engaged in making tobacco more addictive to do the same thing with food.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we have something that is unique in human history. We have people who are obese who are at the same time malnourished because the food that we're eating does not is is not nutrient dense anymore. I was involved in tobacco litigation back in the 1980s, late 1980s, and the tobacco companies at that point were the most cash rich companies on earth and they saw the writing on the wall. They saw the regulatory headwinds, and their consumers were were walking away from their product, and they decided to diversify. So they started buying up the food companies. By the mid nineteen nineties, the two biggest food companies in the world were RJ Reynolds and Philip Morris, and they transferred thousands of scientists that were engaged in making tobacco more addictive to do the same thing with food. And they developed in the lab all of these chemicals that are unknown in nature that make food more attractive. It's not food. It's food like substances. So they'll put a strawberry flavor in the food but there is no nutrients that you'd find in a strawberry. Your body is craving that and but it doesn't get filled up and it doesn't give you nutrition, but you wanna eat more and more so you got obese, but at the same time you get malnourished. And they put addictive substances like sugar and sodium and others, monosodium glutinate in our foods and make use so that you don't get satiated and that you constantly want to have more. They realized at some point through all these you know that they could hijack the human brain and different all these nefarious ways, but one of them is that they realize that one of the ways that your brain tells your stomach that it's full is how many times you chew. Oh, they began adding food softeners to our food so that your your brain would be under the illusion that you weren't full. You can inhale 20 Twinkies and still want more as you're not chewing them. And so they've they figured out all these things and they changed our food system in this country. So it is poison to us, and it is poisoning the American people.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Third, they held up the East Palestine chemical spill by Norfolk Southern as a success. This one is SHOCKING. East Palestine is an unmitigated disaster—and top health officials regurgitated Norfolk Southern’s LIES. Reporter Jordan Chariton called it Flint, Michigan 2.0. “They brought people back to town within days of chemically detonating over a million pounds of vinyl chloride.” “That’s linked to all sorts of cancers, leukemia, reproductive issues in women.” “We’re starting to see cancers including male breast cancer, which is fairly rare.” “I’ve talked to fathers who their daughters as young as 7 or 8 are starting to have early puberty and menstrual cycles … and young boys are starting to get hair that you wouldn’t get until you’re 12, 13, 14.” “The EPA, the federal government, and the state agencies are basically saying, all good, nothing to see here—but the proof is in the residents.” “They’re sick.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
EPA official in East Palestine said, "the railroad company that chemically nuked the town was lying to you, but the EPA echoed those lies." He cited "over a million pounds of vinyl chloride" detonated, "linked to all sorts of cancers, leukemia, reproductive issues in women." He argued the EPA should have offered temporary relocation "pretty much right away," noting it’s "totally unknowable how many people got sick unnecessarily because they weren't relocated sooner." He has visited twice in six months and says, "I've gotten sick both times, and residents are sick, both in Ohio and Pennsylvania." We're "already starting to see cancers, including in men, male breast cancer," with fathers reporting daughters "as young as seven or eight" starting early puberty and menstrual cycles, and boys getting hair earlier. "Flint two point zero," the agencies are saying, "All good, nothing to see here," but the residents are sick and not getting help.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. And here is the top EPA official who's been on the ground in East Palestine basically saying, yeah. The railroad company that chemically nuked the town was lying to you, but the EPA echoed those lies. They they said the same thing. So it's very illuminating because they brought people back to town within days of chemically detonating over a million pounds of vinyl chloride that's linked to all sorts of cancers, leukemia, reproductive issues in women. So he's saying, Yeah, when I saw that, I was like, Oh my God, you never say that. But the EPA was echoing the same things. He also acknowledged that the EPA should have offered temporary relocation pretty much right away. Waited a So it's totally unknowable how many people got sick unnecessarily because they weren't relocated sooner. And I'll just say, I mean, I could speak for myself. I've been there twice in the last six months. I've gotten sick both times, and residents are sick, both in Ohio and Pennsylvania. We're already starting to see cancers, including in men, male breast cancer, which is fairly rare. I've talked to fathers who their young daughters, as young as seven or eight, are starting to have early puberty and menstrual cycles, and young boys are starting to get, you know, hair that you wouldn't get until you're like 12, 13, 14. There's all sorts of health issues, but we're seeing kind of, I think, Flint two point zero, where the EPA and the federal government and the state agencies are basically saying, All good, nothing to see here, but the proof is in the residents. They're sick and really they're not getting much help.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Meanwhile, Calley Means just EXPOSED that corrupt CDC bureaucrats are circulating a memo on how to “SUBVERT” RFK Jr. They think the bureaucracy can just overrule the MAHA agenda that Americans voted for. “There is a memo going around at the CDC and HHS about how to subvert President Trump and Secretary Kennedy.” “They are saying that we’re gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan.” @calleymeans

Video Transcript AI Summary
- it's that he took the COVID vaccine off the recommended schedule for children. - 95% of parents were already rejecting that advice, and actually 85% of healthcare workers rejecting that advice. - when these people in the media say that they are standing up for science, they are saying they're going against 95% of parents, and they want every single six month old in this country to have a mandated mRNA COVID injection. - There is a memo going around at the CDC and throughout HHS about how to subvert president Trump and how to subvert secretary Kennedy. - They're saying we're gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you get past the rhetoric and actually look at why these people are resigning, look what they're listing that Bobby Kennedy did, it's that he took the COVID vaccine off the recommended schedule for children. 95% of parents were already rejecting that advice, and actually 85% of healthcare workers rejecting that advice. So when these people in the media say that they are standing up for science, they are saying they're going against 95% of parents, and they want every single six month old in this country to have a mandated mRNA COVID injection. I want everyone watching to know this. There is a memo going around at the CDC and throughout HHS about how to subvert president Trump and how to subvert secretary Kennedy. They are saying we're gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan. The American people have a very, very clear choice. Do you accept their argument that the status quo when it comes to health care in this country is acceptable, or do you support president Trump and Bobby Kennedy who are fighting for reform?

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

There is more evil under the surface of the CDC’s history than you can imagine. This is not just a fight to reform a misguided system—it’s a spiritual war:🧵

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

🚨 Is the CDC a DEATH CULT? RFK Jr.’s firing of Susan Monarez exposed what’s been hiding in plain sight for 100 years: A much darker agenda of eugenics, sterilization, and depopulation. The mask is finally DOWN. This is war — and it’s spiritual. 🧵 THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

RFK Jr. is set to testify before the Senate on Thursday. The firing of CDC Director Dr. Susan Monarez opened the door to the CDC adopting Kennedy’s vaccine reforms—meaning that Pharma’s push to get him ousted is about to reach a fever pitch. This is a make or break moment for MAHA. Kennedy’s biggest and boldest reforms are finally on the table—and Pharma is throwing millions of dollars into blocking them.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Thanks for making it to the end. Before you go, follow me @Holden_Culotta and Subscribe for $3/month to support my work! I’m a Gen Z Independent who covers everything from MAHA and health freedom to UFOs and ancient civilizations. https://t.co/ocRnXE30Du

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

@Fynnderella1 @RobertKennedyJr Thank you 🙏

Saved - October 3, 2025 at 4:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm questioning whether RFK Jr will release the COVID data that was withheld from him. I believe Demetre Daskalakis, who I view as a satanist, obstructed RFK Jr's efforts to secure vaccine data and funding for Texas. He previously managed the VAERS system and served as Biden's monkeypox coordinator, highlighting the leadership during this administration.

@Nevstv - Nevs

Will RFK Jr release this covid data that was held back from him? Demetre Daskalakis is a satanist - he held back money RFK Jr promised Texas for the measles and stonewalled RFK Jr on his attempts to get vaccine data. This guy ran the VAERS system and was Biden's "monkeypox coordinator". This is an example of who has been running the country during the Biden administration.

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

🚨 BREAKING: Secretary RFK Jr. reveals that he fired the CDC vaccine chief because for 7 MONTHS Kennedy was BLOCKED from getting vaccine safety data. This person also STONEWALLED money going to Texas to help with measles...he was a full-on TRAITOR, holy crap! "I gave the order, I'm running this agency, how come nothing's happening?" "And then we tried to get the vaccine safety data language - the data that supposedly the CDC tries to use to make good decisions on whether vaccines are hurting people and whether there are side effects. For 7 MONTHS, he stonewalled us so that we could not get that data!" "He's also the individual that runs the VAERS system, which is the surveillance system for injuries that captures, according to CDC's own study, fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries. This is malpractice." "These people are the people who ordered our children to walk around in masks. They're the people who closed our schools. They're the people who imposed social distancing with no science, shut down our businesses, and they need to GO." "We need new blood, and we need new people who are committed to public health and integrity and gold standard science."

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the measles outbreak, I promised governor Abbott to send money and aid to Texas, but this individual blocked that money for a month. We then sought the vaccine safety data link—the data CDC supposedly uses to assess vaccine harms—but for seven months he stonewalled us. He also runs VAERS, the surveillance system for injuries, which, according to CDC's own study, captures fewer than one percent of vaccine injuries. This is malpractice. These people are the people who ordered our children to walk around in mass. They're the people who closed our schools, imposed social distancing with no science, and shut down our businesses, and they need to go. The Trump administration is gonna make sure that happens. You know, secretary, you
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, that individual actually came to my attention because early on during the measles outbreak, I promised governor Abbott to send some money down, badly needed money, and help down to Texas. And this individual blocked that money for a month. I couldn't figure out what's happening. I gave the order. I'm, you know, I'm running this agency. How come nothing's happening? And then we tried to get the vaccine safety data link, which is the data that supposedly the CDC tries to use to make good decisions on whether vaccines are hurting people and what their side effects. For seven months, he stonewalled us so that we could not get that data. He's also the individual that runs the VAERS system, which which is the the surveillance system for injuries, that captures, according to CDC's own study, fewer than one percent of vaccine injuries. This is malpractice. These people are the people who ordered our children to walk around in mass. They're the people who closed our schools. They're the people who impose social distancing with no science, shut down our businesses, and they need to go. We need new blood, and we need new people who are committed to public health integrity and gold standard science. And the Trump administration is gonna make sure that happens. You know, secretary, you
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 3:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I share a warning: the FDA approves dangerous compounds, while RFK Jr. seeks to end five poisons. 1) Seed oils; 2) Fluoride in water; 3) Chemical additives; 4) Harmful pesticides and glyphosate; 5) Weight loss meds like Ozempic. Toxic foods fuel chronic disease and expensive treatment. Focus on sleep, sun, unprocessed food, exercise, and stress reduction. DM “HEALTH” for help.

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

The FDA don´t want you to know this: They approve dangerous compounds and meds proven to cause: - Cancer - Brain damage - Heart disease... But now RFK Jr. is in charge. Here are 5 poisons he wants to get rid of: 🧵 1. Seed Oils https://t.co/3M1EL0xrr1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 raises concern about seed oils. "Seed oils are one of the most unhealthy ingredients that we have in foods." "Seed oils, The reason they're in the foods is because they're heavily subsidized. They're very very cheap but they are associated with all kinds of very very serious illnesses including body wide inflammation Right. Which affects all of our health. It's one of the worst things you can eat, and it's almost impossible to avoid." "If you eat any processed food, you're gonna be eating seed oil." The speaker emphasizes the prevalence of seed oils in processed foods today.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I thought it'd be great to just kind of look at some of these items because parents are encountering these food items in grocery stores everywhere. Maybe we could just start right here with seed oils. We're hearing a lot about seed oils. Why should people be worried about these kind of products? Speaker 1: Seed oils are one of the most unhealthy ingredients that we have in foods. Seed oils, The reason they're in the foods is because they're heavily subsidized. They're very very cheap but they are associated with all kinds of very very serious illnesses including body wide inflammation Right. Which affects all of our health. It's one of the worst things you can eat, and it's almost impossible to avoid. If you eat any processed food, you're gonna be eating seed oil.

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

They claim seed oils are "heart healthy" compared to animal fats like butter... But they´re proven to cause: - Digestive issues - Heart disease - Inflammation - Obesity. They´re found in nearly every packaged food. https://t.co/osOggWSkxl

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

2. Fluoride in drinking water They market it as a "tooth saver", but here are the side effects: - Skeletal fluorosis (brittle bones) - Higher risk of bone cancer - Thyroid dysfunction https://t.co/BF89jrK0qe

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Fluoride should not be in our water." "Now, we know that there is no systemic advantage." "The evidence evidence against fluoride is overwhelming." "In animals, in animal models, and in human models, we know that it causes profound IQ loss." "And it's dose related." "So the more fluoride you get, the higher levels in your drinking water, your urine, the more likely it is you lose IQ and also other neurological injuries like ADHD." "It affects, there's a science indicates that it affects kidney health, it affects liver health, that it causes hyperthyroidism, that it causes osteoarthritis, women who are more exposed have up to fifty percent more hip fractures than women who are unexposed." "It makes no sense to have an our water supply."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fluoride should not be in our water. Fluoride had a strong justification in the nineteen forties when it was added and people didn't understand the science and they thought its benefit to our teeth was systemic. By drinking it, it would enter your body and somehow protect your teeth. Now, we know that there is no systemic advantage. It's zero systemic advantage. The evidence evidence against fluoride is overwhelming. In animals, in animal models, and in human models, we know that it causes profound IQ loss. And it's dose related. So the more fluoride you get, the higher levels in your drinking water, your urine, the more likely it is you lose IQ and also other neurological injuries like ADHD. It affects, there's a science indicates that it affects kidney health, it affects liver health, that it causes hyperthyroidism, that causes osteoarthritis, women who are more exposed have up to fifty percent more hip fractures than women who are unexposed. It makes no sense to have an our water supply. This

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

3. Chemical additives. Banned in Europe, still approved in the U.S. They're linked with hormone disruption, inflammation and cancer. The craziest part? Over 10,000 chemical additives are used in our food today: https://t.co/3oN5urFU9B

Video Transcript AI Summary
They developed in the lab all of these chemicals that are unknown in nature that make food more attractive. But it's not food. It's food like substances. So they'll put a strawberry flavor in the food but there's no nutrients that you'd find in a strawberry. Your body is craving that and but it doesn't get filled up and it doesn't give you nutrition but you want to eat more and more so you got obese but at the same time you get malnourished. They put addictive substances like sugar and sodium and others, monosodium glutinate in our foods, and make you so that you don't get satiated and that you constantly want to have more. They realize that at some point, through all these, that they could hijack the human brain and all these nefarious ways. Oh, they began adding food softeners to our food so that your brain would be under the illusion that you weren't full. You can inhale 20 Twinkies and still want more because you're not chewing them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And they developed in the lab all of these chemicals that are unknown in nature that make food more attractive. But it's not food. It's food like substances. So they'll put a strawberry flavor in the food but there's no nutrients that you'd find in a strawberry. Your body is craving that and but it doesn't get filled up and it doesn't give you nutrition but you want to eat more and more so you got obese but at the same time you get malnourished. They put addictive substances like sugar and sodium and others, monosodium glutinate in our foods, and make you so that you don't get satiated and that you constantly want to have more. They realize that at some point, through all these, that they could hijack the human brain and all these nefarious ways. But one of them is that they realize that one of the ways that your brain tells your stomach that it's full is how many times you chew. Oh, they began adding food softeners to our food so that your brain would be under the illusion that you weren't full. You can inhale 20 Twinkies and still want more because you're not chewing them.

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

4. Harmful pesticides and Glysophate. It's contaminated wheat, oats, corn, soy, canola oil, causing: - Gut microbiome disruption - Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma - Liver & kidney damage. The WHO calls it “probably carcinogenic", yet it coats our food daily. https://t.co/1XcRhgCijv

Video Transcript AI Summary
atrazine. What is atrazine? It's in the water. It's a pesticide. They took atrazine, and they put it in a tank with 40 frogs. They put below the exposure levels that EPA considers acceptable to humans. They're all male frogs, and 30 of those frogs were chemically castrated. Four of them turned into females and produced fertile eggs. Here it is. Report toxic herbicide found in many Texans drinking water. That's from February. And we're subjecting our children to exposure to that every day. What does this do to sexual development in children? We know what it does to frogs. It's terrifying.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Probably the most disturbing, and this is something we should all be looking at, is atrazine. What is atrazine? It's in the water. It's a pesticide. They took atrazine, and they put it in a tank with 40 frogs. They put below the exposure levels that EPA considers acceptable to humans. They're all male frogs, and 30 of those frogs were chemically castrated. Four of them turned into females and produced fertile eggs. Here it is. Report toxic herbicide found in many Texans drinking water. That's from February. And we're subjecting our children to exposure to that every day. What does this do to sexual development in children? We know what it does to frogs. It's terrifying.

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

5. Weight loss meds like Ozempic. A magic med to lose weight IS too good to be true... Nutrient deficiencies. Muscle loss. Stomach issues. Even worse? If you stop taking it, you´ll probably gain the weight back anyway. https://t.co/fqTax4hkKV

Video Transcript AI Summary
Summary: "But they're not marketing it in Europe." "They make this drug in Denmark, and in Denmark, they do not recommend it for diabetes or for obesity." "They recommend dietary and and behavioral changes." ""In our con they're counting on selling it to Americans because we're so stupid and so addiction addicted to drugs." These statements illustrate a regional gap in marketing strategy, contrasting European positioning with an apparent U.S.-oriented push. The remarks highlight production in Denmark and differing recommendations there, set against a targeting of the American market. The speaker's wording emphasizes a strategic emphasis on a specific national audience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But they're not marketing it in Europe. They make this drug in Denmark, and in Denmark, they do not recommend it for diabetes or for obesity. They recommend dietary and and behavioral changes. In our con they're counting on selling it to Americans because we're so stupid and so addiction addicted to drugs.

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

The Bottom Line: Toxic foods and chemicals lead to most Americans having chronic diseases that "require" a lifetime of expensive "treatment". They profit from your poor health while the FDA approves it. "Healthcare" is a $5 trillion a year industry in the US. https://t.co/wvrNsIH9J0

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is nothing more profitable in our society today than a sick child, with insurance companies, hospitals, the medical cartel, and pharmaceutical companies having lifetime annuities; the speaker says they want kids sick for the rest of their lives, creating a whole generation. When my uncle was president, six percent of Americans had chronic disease today at sixty percent. The annual cost of treating chronic disease was Zero back then; today it's about $4,300,000,000,000. For autism, in 1960 the rate was reportedly about one in twenty five hundred, one in fifteen hundred, one in twenty five hundred, one in ten thousand; today it's one in thirty four kids according to the CDC, with states like California, Utah, and New Jersey at one in 22. These kids should be healthy; these kids shouldn't be our highest performing kids.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is nothing more profitable in our society today than a sick child because it all of these entities are making money on them. The insurance companies, the hospitals, the the medical cartel, the pharmaceutical companies have lifetime annuities. And the earlier that kid is sick, they don't wanna kill him. They want him sick for the rest of their lives. And we have now a whole generation. When my uncle was president, six percent of Americans had chronic disease today at sixty percent. When my uncle was president, do you know what the annual cost of treating chronic disease was in this country? Zero. There weren't even any drugs invented for it. Zero. Today, it's about $4,300,000,000,000. When your uncle was president None of it is necessary. What what was the autism rate in 1960? Do we know? In 1960, the autism rate, there's about four, five studies, and the the the the highest rate, say about one in twenty five hundred, one in fifteen hundred, one in twenty five hundred, one in ten thousand. Oh, so that, you know, it was it was somewhere between one in fifteen hundred and one in ten thousand. Today, it's one in every thirty four kids according to the CDC, and in some states, like California, I think maybe Utah and New Jersey, one at 22. One in twenty two kids. And, you know, these kids should be healthy. These kids shouldn't be our our highest performing kids.

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

We hope RFK Jr. can limit how widespread these things are... But it´s ultimately on you to take care of your health. You just need to focus on: - Improving your sleep - Getting more sunlight - Eating unprocessed food - Exercising 2-3 hours/week - Lowering your stress levels.

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

If you liked this thread: 1. Follow me here 👉@Longevity_EDU for more 2. Retweet the tweet below and comment below your opinion on this 👇 https://t.co/3U4qqsdKs9

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

The FDA don´t want you to know this: They approve dangerous compounds and meds proven to cause: - Cancer - Brain damage - Heart disease... But now RFK Jr. is in charge. Here are 5 poisons he wants to get rid of: 🧵 1. Seed Oils https://t.co/3M1EL0xrr1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I thought it'd be great to just kind of look at some of these items because parents are encountering these food items in grocery stores everywhere. Maybe we could just start right here with seed oils. We're hearing a lot about seed oils. Why should people be worried about these kind of products? Speaker 1: "Seed oils are one of the most unhealthy ingredients that we have in foods. Seed oils, The reason they're in the foods is because they're heavily subsidized. They're very very cheap but they are associated with all kinds of very very serious illnesses including body wide inflammation Right. Which affects all of our health. It's one of the worst things you can eat, and it's almost impossible to avoid. If you eat any processed food, you're gonna be eating seed oil."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I thought it'd be great to just kind of look at some of these items because parents are encountering these food items in grocery stores everywhere. Maybe we could just start right here with seed oils. We're hearing a lot about seed oils. Why should people be worried about these kind of products? Speaker 1: Seed oils are one of the most unhealthy ingredients that we have in foods. Seed oils, The reason they're in the foods is because they're heavily subsidized. They're very very cheap but they are associated with all kinds of very very serious illnesses including body wide inflammation Right. Which affects all of our health. It's one of the worst things you can eat, and it's almost impossible to avoid. If you eat any processed food, you're gonna be eating seed oil.

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

If you´re a high achiever wanting to lose over 20lbs and improve your metabolic health: • Training only 90 mins/week at home • Without tracking calories or starving. DM me "HEALTH" to see how I can help: 👇 https://t.co/mnhkj3pGQr

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

Here are the results of a few of my clients. If you want the same, DM me "HEALTH" through the button in the tweet above https://t.co/rssBH5EAIa

Video Transcript AI Summary
"You've lost over 30 pounds or roughly 30 pounds in the last ninety Twenty nine. 20 nine." "What's interesting is I did have a kit available, and I went and did it on my own, and it was no problem." "I feel 20 years younger." "You've lost 75 pounds in the last year, man." "Some of the things I felt in the last fifteen, twenty days, I never felt in my life." "The highlight is that I have lost about 13 pounds." "Just over 30 pounds in less than three months." "I am off of my cholesterol statin." "Blood pressure is at at at the right level." "They're going to reduce the medication strength." "My cholesterol is brilliant, which is the first time in a long time my cholesterol has been good." "My uric acid is now down as well."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've lost over 30 pounds or roughly 30 pounds in the last ninety Twenty nine. 20 nine. Yeah. That's awesome. Speaker 1: What's interesting is I did have a kit available, and I went and did it on my own, and it was no problem. You know? And here I am throwing around sheets of plywood on this patio cover and throwing it up eight feet in the air onto something, and I'm doing fine. I get to the end of the day and it's, you know, it's dark. I'm like, dang it. I want to keep working. You know? And I feel 20 years younger, really. A month ago, two months ago, it's like, geez. I'm freaking getting old. You know? This is what it's gonna be like. I guess I better just you know? But now I'm feeling like this. And it's like, oh, alright. This is good. Speaker 0: So you've lost 75 pounds in the last year, man. That is awesome. Speaker 2: Yeah. No, that is huge. Speaker 0: You are crushing it. I know you're really hard on yourself and you hold yourself to a really high standard, but moving across the country too. That's amazing. Speaker 2: Yeah. No, I mean, that is that's, great. Speaker 0: I hope that motivates you. Speaker 2: Yeah. I definitely, I mean, it's definitely motivating. Speaker 3: Some of the things I felt in the last fifteen, twenty days, I never felt in my life. Snowplotting feeling, feel like, wow. At this age and I'm, you know, that I'm 59 and I never felt other than my young age, naturally, Speaker 0: it's good. The highlight is that I have lost about 13 pounds. Just over 30 pounds in less than three months. I am off of my cholesterol statin. Speaker 2: Blood pressure is at at at the right level. They're going to reduce the medication strength. My cholesterol is brilliant, which is the first time in a long time my cholesterol has been good. My uric acid is now down as well. Probably been the best health check I've had in a long, long time because there's always been high blood pressure cholesterol. Speaker 4: How I look, how I feel, I feel more confident. I feel stronger than I have in a very long time. And even though weight wasn't a primary goal for me, it was really more of a secondary thing. I lost over 10 pounds and that was a nice plus as well. Speaker 5: Two and a half going on three months, I went from two twenty pounds and I am down to somewhere between one hundred ninety three, one hundred ninety seven, depending on water weight. And my blood pressure for the first time in my adult life is in the normal range again.

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

@ManlinessNorms @MindMatterMoney Appreciate it

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

@TBusinessaholic Appreciate it

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

@WisdomStoics @ManlinessNorms Thank you!

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

@Daily__wisdom_ Thank you

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

@AlexThinkBright Appreciate it

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

@MindMatterr Appreciate it

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

@_PrinceCarlton_ @Wealth_Pill 👍

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

@BotPhilosophyQ Time will tell

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

@mindfulmaven_ Appreciate it!

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

@DSecretsOfLife At least when it’s consumed in high quantities

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

@Life__Mastery You´re welcome

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

@PreneursCircle Thank you

@Longevity_EDU - Andrew Panella

@DFitpreneur Thank you!

View Full Interactive Feed