reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Posted - January 18, 2020 at 11:21 PM

Saved - February 16, 2023 at 6:37 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The House Judiciary, Intelligence, and Managers have filed their impeachment brief against President Trump, alleging that he abused his power by using his office for personal gain and obstructed Congress by preventing investigations into his misconduct. Trump's legal defense is weak and he is not denying pressuring Ukraine. This is a threat to our democracy and future presidents. The Senate must be impartial and hold him accountable. President Trump's impeachment defense team has cherry-picked Sir William Blackstone's treaties and lied about the obstruction of Congress claim. They also failed to mention that absolute immunity does not extend to former senior officials. Trump's brief is weak and unconstitutional, and his assertion that the Senate cannot remove him even if the House proves every claim in the Articles of impeachment is chilling and dead wrong. In response, House Democrats have released a replication to Trump's answers, which is worth reading. It is important that the Senate remains impartial and holds the President accountable for his actions. Failure to do so would set a dangerous precedent for future presidents and threaten the integrity of our democracy.

@File411 - File411

Guys the @HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel and House Managers @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler@RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren@RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow@RepSylviaGarcia Have FILED their Impeachment Brief... https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia Opening paragraph is exquisitely simple This is NOT Democrat v Republican These are important matters of: Our Republic Oath of Office Rule of Law The very foundation of our Democracy - our Constitution & our founding fathers set in place a check & balance https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia Abuse of Power argument is again exquisite in it’s simplicity. These are the facts. Trump used the awesome & immense power of the office of the President of the United States of America for his own personal gain. Full Stop ps exhibit downloading now🤓 https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia Abuse of Power - Foreign interferences “pernicious act” Trump’s “anti corruption” stance belies credulity. He didn’t ask for an investigation - he ONLY wanted a pubic announcement from President Zelensky. Funds Frozen + Oval Mtg withheld = leverage https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia Ackkk BRB apparently my family is annoyed that I haven’t cooked dinner...ungrateful heathens Not thrilled I was like ORDER something from Uber Eats and close my (home) Office Door. As I threw cash at them

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia 🚨INSANE in the MEMBRANE🚨 Trump’s 7 page “answers” to the impeachment - he seems to be taking the impeachment rather well. Note my sarcasm. Good GOD this is the BEST his “1990’s legal team” can do? FFS this is embarrassing for Trump https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T8xwi1n7LQ9DBAxFt23ZBL75TZC8cP6p/view?usp=drivesdk

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia PS so you can affirm the authenticity of that horribly histrionically written 7 page of legal garbage This is the “official” White House link https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Answer-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia FTR Trump’s actual brief is due on Monday so that 7 page petulant garbage screed is the “amuse-bouche” of the expected gold-leaf turd-sammich. (I’m going straight to hell) Back to a REAL and substantive legal brief https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia The closing argument as to the Abuse of Power is incredibly powerful: “President Trump’s continuing presence in office undermines the integrity of our democratic processes and endangers our national security” https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia Moving on to Obstruction of Congress - again the opening paragraph is exquisite in it’s simplicity: “President Trump obstructed Congress by undertaking an unprecedented campaign to prevent House Committees from investigating his misconduct” https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia “If the President could both avoid accountability under the criminal laws and preclude an effective impeachment investigation, he would truly be above the law...President Trump’s conduct is the Framers’ worst nightmare” https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia SMART CLOSING - this is BIGGER than Trump: “...future Presidents will feel empowered to resist any investigation into their own wrongdoing, effectively nullifying Congress’s power to exercise the Constitution’s most important safeguard against Presidential misconduct”

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia “His misconduct challenges the fundamental principle...Americans should decide American elections...a divided system of government, in which no single branch operates without the check and balance of the others, preserves the liberty we all hold dear” https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia Sorry to be redundant - but IMO the closing argument is phenomenally written - in terms of substance, the totality, somberness and gravity of what our Democracy faces. “A man you can bait with a tweet” - @HillaryClinton https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton The rest of the 101 pages present a damning and incontrovertible case of WHY @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems need to be true & faithful to their oath - to be impartial. If the Senate acquits - vote them out in 2020. Full Stop https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems “a man you can bait with a tweet" can't be trusted "with nuclear weapons" - @HillaryClinton Yup that’s my closing argument - she warned all of us. Some of us listened. Some of you didn’t and now we are all paying the price

Video Transcript AI Summary

Imagine him in the Oval Office facing a crisis. A man easily provoked by a tweet cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons. Jackie Kennedy once said that during the Cuban Missile Crisis, President Kennedy worried that a war could be started by small-minded individuals driven by fear and pride. America's strength lies in intelligence, sound judgment, calm determination, and the strategic use of power. This is the type of leader I promise to be as commander in chief.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: If you dare, imagine imagine him in the oval office facing a real crisis. A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man we can trust with nuclear weapons. I I can't put it I can't put it any better than Jackie Kennedy did after to the Cuban Missile Crisis. She said that what worried president Kennedy during that very dangerous time was that a war might be started. Not by big men with self control and restraint, but by little men, the ones moved by fear and pride. America's strength doesn't come from lashing out. It relies on smarts, judgment, cool resolve, and the precise and strategic application of power, and that's the kind of commander in chief I pledge to be.

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems Laid upon the table - again @HillaryClinton warned us. Some of us listened & took her warnings to heart Some of you didn’t and now we are ALL suffering the consequences of your “decisions”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 accuses the other person of playing chicken with 1800 nuclear warheads and lacking respect. The speaker claims that the other person would prefer a puppet as the president of the United States, but it is clear that the accuser is the puppet. The accusation also implies that the Russians have been involved in some way.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: 1800 nuclear warheads, and she's playing chicken. Look. What what from everything I see, has no respect for this person. Well, that's because he'd rather have a puppet as president of the United States. No puppet. It's pretty clear You're the puppet. It's pretty clear you won't admit No. You're the the Russians have engaged

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems And lastly I make zero apologies for the music choice. None. Nada Zilch https://youtu.be/EQXbFHpZbXc

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems I can not emphasize how important these paragraphs are (Obstruction of Congress Article) The fact that Trump, @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept refused to produce a SINGLE document

Video Transcript AI Summary

Some suggest waiting for all witnesses and documents before proceeding with impeachment, but President Trump obstructed the investigation. He instructed his senior aides not to testify and defy subpoenas. He also told agencies not to provide relevant records, hindering our investigation.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Now some have suggested that we should wait to proceed with these impeachment proceedings because we've not heard from all of the witnesses or obtained all the documents. But the reason we have not heard from all the witnesses or documents is because President Trump himself has obstructed the investigation. He's directed his most senior aides who are involved in some of these events not to come testify, to defy subpoenas. He has told every one of his agencies with records that could be relevant not to Reduce those records to us to try to obstruct our investigation.

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept Because I can tell you with a pretty high degree of certainty this is going to be used by the House Managers Trump: 'We're fighting all the subpoenas' https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/24/trump-subpoenas-mueller-report-1289431

Trump vows to fight 'all the subpoenas' as partisan tensions spike The Trump administration is aggressively responding to lawmakers' efforts to probe all aspects of the presidency. politico.com

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept And perhaps you should re-watch the December 9, 2019 hearing where Barry Berke made one helluva strong closing argument as to Trump’s Obstruction of Congress. Thusly explaining “mens rea” and “actus rea” by way of Trump’s own words & actions -the end

Video Transcript AI Summary

President Trump obstructed the impeachment investigation by instructing witnesses not to testify and withholding relevant records. This mirrors his actions during the prior Department of Justice investigation. He created a false record and attacked investigators and witnesses. On July 24th, the special counsel testified, and the very next day, Trump spoke to President Zelensky to further his Ukrainian scheme. He believed he could act above the law and obstruct the investigation if caught. However, courageous individuals testified and provided undeniable evidence that Trump prioritized his political interests over national security and election integrity. He intentionally and corruptly abused his powers, which goes against the principles of our constitution. No one, not even the president, is above the law.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Now some have suggested that we should wait to proceed with these impeachment proceedings because we've not heard from all of the witnesses or obtained all the documents. But the reason we have not heard from all the witnesses or documents is because president Trump himself has obstructed the investigation. He's directed his most senior aids who are involved in some of these events not to come testify, to defy subpoenas. He has told every one of his agencies with records that could be relevant not to produce those records to us, to try to obstruct our investigation. Now, this is evidence that president Trump is replaying the playbook used in the prior Department of Justice this investigation. In that investigation, he directed his White House counsel to create a false, phony record and document and lie Denying that president Trump had told him to fire the special counsel. He did many other things to try to interfere with that investigation. He attacked the investigators and and witnesses and called them horrible names just as he has done here. And president Trump thought he got away with it. On July 24th was the day that special counsel the special counsel testified before this committee and the House Intelligence Committee, The 24th. It was exactly the following day, 25th, that president Trump spoke to president Zelensky and furtherance of his Ukrainian scheme. He thought he got away with it. Not only that, he thought he could use his powers to interfere with that investigation so he could do what he wanted. He could act like he was above the law. And if he got caught, he would again use his powers to try to obstruct the investigation and prevent the facts from coming out. And that's exactly what he did. But fortunately, fortunately, because of the true American patriots who came forward to testify despite the threats by president against the people who worked in his own administration. They told the story. They, on their own, produced documents that provide uncontroverted, clear and overwhelming evidence that president Trump did this scheme. He put his political reelection interest over the nation's national security and the integrity of its elections. He did it intentionally. He did it corruptly. He abused his powers in ways that the founders feared the most. No person in the in this country has the ability to prevent investigations, and neither does the president. Our constitution does not allow it. No one is above the law, not even the president.

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept Indeed... Here’s a truth when you do NOT have facts or the law on your side then your only plausible “defense” is to argue “the process” But even then the Trump’s 7 pg missive masquerading as defense is the most mendacious pathetic legal filing I’ve read

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept Bless his little heart Pulling it down now

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept OMFG - he’s NOT denying he pressured Ukraine https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept The opening salvo by Trump’s “stellar legal team” is about exactly what we should have expected. The level of intellectual contortion is just mind bending https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept FFS you CHERRY picked SIR William Blackstone’s treaties (hundreds of pages) Come on - I thought Trump’s legal was an amalgam of “preeminent litigators” this is ridiculously awful - JFC they literally pulled ONE sentence out of Sir Blackstone’s writings https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept First off you daft nitwit at the TIME our Constitution was ratified there were VERY FEW CRIMINAL LAWS on the books Your mendacity is a mix of sad, poor legal advice & equally deficient counter argument. Trump’s Abuse of power counter argument = <500 words https://whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept Under AG Barr MAIN @TheJusticeDept is a fully own incorporated Trump Inc “obstruction of Congress” claim is frivolous and dangerous... he asserted legal rights and privileges of the Executive Branch against defective subpoenas” “only AFTER..” that’s a LIE https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept Trump’s “only after” belies credulity - in APRIL of 2019 @RealDonaldTrump while on the south lawn of the White House he said the following “we are fighting all subpoenas,” “I don’t want people testifying,” and “no do-overs."

Video Transcript AI Summary

Attorney General Barr's refusal to release the full Mueller report and evidence led to the House Judiciary Committee holding him in contempt of Congress. Although an agreement was reached on some underlying evidence, it remains uncertain if the Department of Justice will honor the deal. Former White House counsel, Don McGahn, has also withheld documents and refused to testify. This pattern of stonewalling extends beyond the Mueller report, affecting various aspects of Americans' lives. These include the president's assault on affordable healthcare, particularly for those with preexisting conditions, family separation policy, misuse of military funds for the border wall, and attacks on civil rights protections.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Attorney general Barr refused to release the full, unredacted Mueller report and underlying evidence. That's why the House Judiciary Committee recently voted to hold him in contempt contempt of Congress. There was news today that an agreement was reached on some of the underlying evidence, but it is yet to be seen whether the Department of Justice will live up to its side of the deal. Meanwhile, former White House counsel, Don McGahn, has also failed to provide documents to Congress while refusing to testify before Congress. This unrelenting campaign of stonewalling doesn't stop with the Mueller report. It includes many issues that impact Americans' everyday lives. Issues like the president's attack on the affordable health care coverage, including those with preexisting conditions, his family separation policy, his misappropriation of military funds for his offensive border wall, his attack on civil rights protections

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump This is so fucking intellectually dishonest - Trump uses an AG Reno OLC - but FAILS to state how/what the Court ruled (Miers & Espy) that “absolute immunity” does NOT extend to former Sr officials (see next tweet for subthread) https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump Re the 2007 OLC Memo and the broadness & brazenness of Trump trying to “extend” absolute immunity to Kris Kobach & others. ⚖️See subthread ⚖️

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump See 2nd subthread the fact that Trump’s (not) awesome legal team is in fact lying in their Impeachment Brief shows he thinks he’s above our Laws, our Constitution and the truth and facts. It is shameful and the only one “debasing” here is Trump

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump You don’t have to agree with me but this is one of the main reasons I was petty vocal that Nadler should NOT be a House Manager bc I expected Trump would do this...attack the person and/or process bc facts are not on Trump’s side https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump I can’t believe Trump and his circa 1996 “legal team” are this intractable. Um...the House DID and IS litigating in Court (now at SCOTUS) enforcement of subpoenas Therefore THIS. IS. A. BLATANT. LIE. (see next tweet) https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump Weird so apparently Trump et al appear to be suffering from acute “selective amnesia” You know wha cures that precious ailment? The FACTs, lots and lots of FACTs FTR the separation of powers argument is kind of interesting, purely academically interesting

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump Back in December of 2019 the Court literally eviscerated the Trump-DOJ argument re Absolute Immunity This case is now on the SCOTUS docket At any rate I promised the kiddos I’d take them metal detecting or build a pressure rocket with a STEM kit

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump Again this is Trump’s brief - a cursory read of it left me underwhelmed It’s more of a rantings of an power thirsty wanna be authoritarian madman So you enjoy reading this gold leaf-turd-brief https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump setting my own bias of @gtconway3d his OpEd is worth reading: “His arguments are wrong on the facts and wrong on the law, but that’s not the worst part. At its core..represents an attack on the impeachment process — and on the Constitution itself” https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/01/20/george-conway-oped-trump-impeachment-answer/

Opinion | George Conway: The worst thing about Trump’s response to the impeachment articles Their arguments are wrong on the facts and wrong on the law, but that’s not the worst part. washingtonpost.com

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump @gtconway3d JUST IN - @HouseDemocrats replication...to the answers submitted by Trump This was JUST released https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_replication_1.20.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump @gtconway3d @HouseDemocrats Holy hell... “President Trump maintains that the Senate cannot remove him even if the House proves every claim in the Articles of impeachment. That is a chilling assertion. It is also dead wrong.” https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_replication_1.20.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump @gtconway3d @HouseDemocrats Forgive me I went back in to Trump’s 101 Duplicitous (legalese is correct) but “deceptive in words or action” Trump’s brief unconstitutional (or iterate thereof) used 19xs I’m not a lawyer but even I can tell this is weak AF -like a petulant child. SAD! https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@mrddmia — 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

Posted - June 13, 2023 at 5:54 AM

Saved - June 13, 2023 at 8:23 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The indictment of a former president by Garland raises questions. Did he seek legal opinion from OLC? How can he charge for espionage when the Presidential Records Act allows retention of records? There is no evidence of intent to harm the US. Ignoring a 2019 OLC opinion, Garland charges for obstructing an investigation into a non-crime.

@mrddmia - 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

1. Did Garland seek a legal opinion from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) before his unprecedented indictment of a former president? 2. How can Garland charge a former president for espionage for retaining his presidential records he is allowed to have under the Presidential Records Act? 3. Even if the Presidential Records Act (somehow) doesn't apply, how can Garland charge a former president for espionage for retaining national-defense information, when there is no allegation--let alone evidence--of any intent to injure the United States? 4. How can Garland ignore a binding 2019 OLC legal opinion and charge a former president for obstructing an investigation into the non-crime of retaining his president records he is allowed to have under the Presidential Records Act? https://t.co/CN31xFRnNB

@mrddmia - 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

Just re-read Biden AG Merrick Garland's (political) indictment of Trump. The Presidential Records Act, not Espionage Act, applies to a former president's handling of his classified records. But even if the Espionage Act (somehow) applies, what is the allegation--let alone…

@mrddmia - 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

https://t.co/HPDOZcMn3J

@RepNancyMace — Rep. Nancy Mace

Posted - June 13, 2023 at 10:52 AM

Saved - June 15, 2023 at 3:34 AM

@RepNancyMace - Rep. Nancy Mace

Just in case anyone is confused what this is really about, this is the President last November: “I’m making sure [Trump], under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next President again.” - Joe Biden, 11/9/22 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/11/09/remarks-by-president-biden-in-press-conference-8/

Remarks by President Biden in Press Conference | The White House State Dining Room (November 9, 2022) 4:15 P.M. EST THE PRESIDENT: Good afternoon. Well, we had an election yesterday. (Laughter.) And it was a good day, I think, for democracy. And I think it was a good day for America. (Clears throat.) Excuse me, I’m a little hoarse. Our democracy has been tested in recent… whitehouse.gov

@charliekirk11 — Charlie Kirk

Posted - June 14, 2023 at 9:44 PM

Saved - June 15, 2023 at 4:04 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Senator JD Vance argues that Trump's indictment undermines the DOJ's case. He questions who controls government documents: the elected President or the unelected bureaucracy? If the latter, Article 2 of the Constitution is meaningless, and we have an oligarchy controlled by the deep state.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Senator JD Vance on Trump's indictment DESTROYS the DOJ's case: "The fundamental issue here is who controls the documents produced by our Government? Is it the permanent unelected bureaucracy or is it the people's elected President? If it's not the people's elected President, Article 2 of the Constitution is meaningless and we don't have a real republican form of government, we have an oligarchy controlled by the deep state."

Video Transcript AI Summary

Senator expresses concerns about Merrick Garland's use of political appointments in the Department of Justice, turning it into a political tool rather than a law enforcement agency. The Senator plans to hold up nominations until Garland commits to focusing on law enforcement and criminal prosecution, not politics. The Senator believes that action is necessary, as people are tired of just complaining about the issue. The Senator also discusses the importance of who controls government documents and information, emphasizing the need for the elected president to have control rather than the unelected bureaucracy. The Senator argues that this case highlights the power struggle between the administrative state and the people. The Senator and another speaker agree that this is a constitutional and moral question about the sovereignty of the country and the role of the president.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Senator, you made some news yesterday about holding up nominees. Tell us about it. Speaker 1: Yeah, the basic idea, Charlie, is that Merrick Garland is the political appointments of the Department of Justice as foot soldiers in a war of politics instead of a law enforcement agency. That's exactly what he's turned the Department of Justice into. And so what we've decided to do is use the authority that the people of Ohio gave me as a United States Senator and use that to gum up the works a little bit and to say to Merrick Garland, that we're gonna hold the nominations that you have to the Department of Justice until you commit your agency to the job of law enforcement and criminal prosecution, not of politics. That's something we're able to do. That's an action that I I felt was important to take. And I've heard it from a lot of people, Charlie, they're sick of us just complaining about this problem. They want us to take action. They recognize we can't stop everything. We can't stop every nominee but we can at least make it a little bit harder for Merrick Garland to use the government agencies to go after his political opponents. That's exactly what we're trying to do. Charlie, I heard some of your commentary sort of in the lead into this. And I I just wanna echo something that sort of I I think it's getting missed in a lot of the conservative commentary on this particular indictment. There's a whole lot of argument that, Yes, Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton, committed the same alleged wrongdoing as Donald Trump. I think that grants way too much to the other side's argument here. They did not do the same thing that Donald Trump did because they didn't have the classification authority. The fundamental issue here, Charlie, is who controls the documents, that's produced by our government? Who controls the information that flows through the executive department of our government. Is it the permanent unelected bureaucracy or is it the people's elected president? Because if it's not the people's elected president, article 2 of the constitution is meaningless and we do not have a real Republican form of government. We have an oligarchy controlled by the Deep State. That is the real issue with this case. The Deep State is jealously guarding its its own documents. When those documents don't belong to them, they don't belong to anybody except for the American people through their elected president. Speaker 0: This is the best point. And this is how much I've missed Tucker. I mean, it's just when you see an expert, you see an expert. So Tucker last night has, You know, I I do this for a living and I'm still learning how to do it. And when I listen to Tucker, I say, oh my goodness. How did I not think about that? Right? Because he just makes the points that are so obvious where Tucker broadens it. He says everything's classified in DC, like, of course. Right? I mean, memos about Flag Day or Arbor Day, they over classify everything because they do believe in a secret gnosis or a secret knowledge or a secret cabal, and then they're able to broaden those statutes to, of course, not enforce the classified document mishandling against their friends. But if anybody they don't like comes in contact with the document, and then, of course, Tucker goes on with this brilliant point. You're trying to tell me Dick Cheney, you know, at Thanksgiving dinner wasn't talking about the of course, he was. I mean, you're trying to tell me that On his way to or from work, Bill Barr wasn't reading documents in the car. These are all violations of the Espionage Act. JD Vance, I think Tucker made the most important point, Which is the essence of the thing, is that how dare you challenge the permanent administrative state? Speaker 1: That's exactly what's going on here, Charlie. Let's take this from the level of reaction to sort of just throw out a hypothetical. Let's say that there are documents that show conclusively the role of the deep state in the Russia collusion hoax, which, of course, tried to take down the presidency of Donald Trump, had our entire government and media complex CEST with a totally fake issue for a couple of years instead of solving the American people's problems. What those documents might show is, 1, the exoneration of Donald Trump but, 2, the deep corruption of our own administrative state. Who do you want to control those documents? The very people whose conduct they impugn, whose conduct they show was illegal? Or do you want the elected president to be able to stay to hold on to this stuff, to take it back to his house after he's after he leaves office and to make a political issue out of it. The craziest thing here, Charlie, is is look. You know, I'm a Trump guy. I I I know you support the president. If you don't think Trump should have taken those documents, fine. Make that argument, substantively criticize them, encourage people to vote against them. You don't to throw the Article 2 president in prison for doing something that he's constitutionally empowered to do. It's nuts. Speaker 0: Yes. And it is about the question of who is the sovereign. This is a constitutional question. This is a moral question. It's not about Donald Trump. It's not about his tweets. This is a big picture. Is the, is the framework that was fought over and articulated in 17/87 at the Constitutional Convention still valid? And by the way, we're long overdue for that answer to that question, because we've largely been living in a post constitutional republic. And now, this is the fork in the road. This is the question, does the administrative state run the country or do do the people run the country? Does the president run the government or does the government run the president? And we shall see.

@julie_kelly2 — Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Posted - July 21, 2023 at 4:30 PM

Saved - July 22, 2023 at 3:21 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Judge Aileen Cannon sets May 2024 trial date for Trump in classified documents case. Excerpts reveal her thinking and Trump's lawyers' strategy. DOJ has 1545 pages of classified material, but only 80 are accessible to Trump's lawyers now. Trump's lawyers claim classified papers were at Mar-a-Lago while he was president. Movement of boxes is crucial to obstruction counts. Trump's lawyer may argue for a different venue. Attorney hints at abuse of grand jury process. Jack Smith aims to prevent Trump from accessing certain classified documents.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Judge Aileen Cannon set a May 2024 trial date for Trump in the classified documents case. Excerpts here from court hearing on Tuesday indicate Cannon's thinking on the matter as well as offers clue as to how Trump's lawyers will proceed. Jack Smith's office has produced over 1M…

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

DOJ has 1,545 pages of classified material incl files from NARA, the May subpoena production, and Mar-a-Lago raid. Trump's lawyers can see about 80%, DOJ said, under interim security clearances. (Full clearance will take 2 months) Here's how DOJ wants judge to treat Trump:

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

This is interesting from Trump's lawyers. Classified papers in boxes at Mar-a-Lago while he was still president? Smith is going to have to prove that any record in the indictment was indeed taken to MAL after he left office and contained in boxes shipped to MAL after Jan 2021

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

LOL Jack Smith has the equivalent of 3 years of security camera footage. Trump's team wants to try and watch all of it. DOJ says, nah, just look at these days. Judge Cannon says, um I don't think so. Movement of boxes is central to obstruction counts

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Sounds like Trump's lawyer will raise very legit venue arguments. Recall that 99% of this investigation took place in DC before DC-based grand jury. DC chief judge Beryl Howell (Obama appointee who also oversaw Mueller investigation) gave DOJ then Smith everything they wanted…

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Stanley Woodward, attorney for Walt Nauta, hints that DOJ likely abused the grand jury process by conducting nearly entire investigation in Trump-hating courthouse in Washington DC rather than FLA

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Jack Smith is going to try very hard to prevent Trump from seeing certain "classified documents." The argument that a former president who had access to all classified material during his administration--in fact, created classified documents--now can't see them smacks of…

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

@RonColeman @RobManess She’s a boss

@kylenabecker — Kyle Becker

Posted - August 2, 2023 at 1:37 PM

Saved - August 2, 2023 at 2:30 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Special Counsel charges former President Donald J Trump with conspiring against the nation, invoking Civil War-era laws. However, these charges seem politically motivated and lack evidence. The alleged incitement of the January 6 riot falls flat, as Trump called for peaceful protests. Moreover, the Supreme Court is asked to review a potential charge of obstruction, which raises questions about the logic behind accusing a former president of participating in an insurrection. Charging Trump for contesting an election sets a dangerous precedent for curtailing freedom of speech.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

Special Counsel Jack Smith just commited one of the greatest acts of election interference in U.S. history. The special prosecutor just charged the 45th President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, with conspiring against the nation that he once led to peace and prosperity. The J6 indictment against Biden's chief 2024 adversary provides interference for a sitting president whom is undoubtedly one of the most corrupt presidents the nation has ever witnessed. The grand inquisitor is bringing forth Civil War era charges against Trump last seen during Reconstruction; namely, Section 241 of Title 18 of the United States Code, which makes it a crime for people to “conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person” in the “free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” This antedated statute invokes racial overtones to smear the former president through insinuation. Congress passed the law after the Civil War with the aim of giving federal agents the means to pursue Southern whites, including Ku Klux Klan members who perpetrated acts of terrorism to hinder the voting rights of freed slaves. It has recently been resurrected for the singular purpose of charging J6 defendants; by extension, of course, former President Donald J. Trump. Another charge, conspiracy to defraud the government, is risible given the U.S. government has done nothing but defraud the American people since Donald Trump appeared as a presidential candidate. Trump was accused of colluding with Russia to win the 2016 election, an implicit charge of treason for which he was later exonerated. Trump was impeached as president for seeking information on former Vice President Biden's actions in Ukraine, a request that has borne out to have significant merit. Indeed, then Speaker Pelosi undoubtedly impeached Donald Trump in search of a crime in order to stop any further investigation into the matter. Most pertinently, Trump was impeached for his alleged incitement of the January 6 riot. Never mind that he told the crowd before the Capitol Riots begin to 'peacefully and patriotically make their voices heard.' And that he told the rioters to stand down on social media platforms before he was banned in a transparent act of political collusion. And that the rioters themselves were penetrated by FBI agents months in advance, who subsequently did nothing to stop them. One agent even admitted by text message that there appeared to be no substantive plot to overthrow the government, as the dejected New York Times reported. Trump was also ultimately exonerated in a Senate trial. Thus, the constitutional process for adjudicating high crimes and misdemeanors that applies to U.S. presidents because they have sovereign immunity as head of state, namely, impeachment, is being completely undermined in a reckless DOJ effort to fling spaghetti against a judicial wall to see if anything sticks. But most interestingly, the U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to adjudicate a third potential charge that applies directly to Donald Trump: Obstruction of an official proceeding. A J6 defendant named Edward Lang recently filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, a type of appeal to the Supreme Court to review a lower court case. As the petition states, the SCOTUS’ decision “will influence scores, if not hundreds, of prosecutions arising from the riot at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.” The writ of certiorari suggested that Lang's appeal could impact the Justice Department’s potential January 6 case against Trump. Lang emphasized the timing of the filing, noting that Trump is currently a leading figure within the Republican Party. At the heart of the case is the alleged misapplication of 18 U.S. Code 1512 (c)(2), which regards to the obstruction of official proceedings, particularly with a “corrupt purpose.”

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

Prosecutors have argued that the “corrupt purpose” is rioting, purportedly at the behest of former President Donald Trump, with the aim of the president unlawfully retaining power by halting the Electoral College proceedings. As the legal writ points out, there has been no plausible explanation given by prosecutors about how rioters temporarily obstructing the Electoral College vote count would lead to Donald Trump retaining his office. This is, of course, exposes the illogical nature of charging a former Commander-in-Chief with participation in an "insurrection." As we are being asked to believe, then President Donald Trump apparently declined to issue any commands to the U.S. military to carry out a 'coup,' and instead directed an unarmed rabble to the capitol building to foment aimless chaos without any means to capture and hold the federal government. In the film "Knives Out," private detective Benoit Blanc sums up the problem with the deceptively straightforward narrative that millionaire benefactor Harlan Thrombey had been accidentally poisoned and had slit his own throat. “I spoke in the car about the hole at the center of this donut," Benoit says with a wry southern drawl. "And yes, what you and Harlan did that fateful night seems at first glance to fill that hole perfectly. A donut hole in the donut's hole. But we must look a little closer. And when we do, we see that the donut hole has a hole in its center -- it is not a donut hole at all but a smaller donut with its own hole, and our donut is not a hole at all!" If you examine the J6 matter closely, it is not what the federal government did on January 6 that raises the most serious questions, it is what it didn't do that defies belief. If Donald Trump was an existential threat to the country, the capitol would have been flooded with National Guard members, instead of crawling with armed undercover agents, as it was later revealed. The dire matter of charging a former president for the crime of “knowing deceit” based foundationally upon political speech was trenchantly summarized by the great French scholar Baron de Montesquieu in "Spirit of the Laws." “Nothing renders the crime of high treason more arbitrary than declaring people guilty of it for indiscreet speeches," Montesquieu wrote. "Speech is so subject to interpretation; there is so great a difference between indiscretion and malice; and frequently so little is there of the latter in the freedom of expression, that the law can hardly subject people to a capital punishment for words unless it expressly declares what words they are." “Words do not constitute an overt act; they remain only in idea," he continued. "When considered by themselves, they have generally no determinate signification; for this depends on the tone in which they are uttered. It often happens that in repeating the same words they have not the same meaning; this depends on their connection with other things, and sometimes more is signified by silence than by any expression whatever. Since there can be nothing so equivocal and ambiguous as all this, how is it possible to convert it into a crime of high treason?" “Wherever this law is established, there is an end not only of liberty, but even of its very shadow," he added. That is what America is now countenancing with the indictment of Donald Trump for January 6. If the former president can be indicted for contesting an election, then Americans can be indicted for anything.

@willscharf — Will Scharf

Posted - August 2, 2023 at 7:34 PM

Saved - August 2, 2023 at 9:23 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Special Counsel Jack Smith's indictment against President Trump is highly political and lacks legal and factual basis. The charges, including conspiracy and obstruction, are unlikely to hold up in court. Moreover, the indictment raises concerns about the criminalization of political speech and the chilling effect it may have on protected speech. Smith's misapplication of statutes and questionable timing further undermine the credibility of the case. Prosecuting a political opponent during a presidential election is concerning and reminiscent of banana republic politics.

@willscharf - Will Scharf

My Take on the New Trump Indictment Special Counsel Jack Smith’s new indictment against President Trump seeks to criminalize political speech and to criminalize taking incorrect legal advice. Americans of all political stripes should be furious and deeply concerned by the course Smith has set this country on. I have reviewed the new Trump indictment closely, and sadly, it is exactly what we have come to expect from Smith’s team—a highly political document, riddled with legal and factual infirmities. This indictment should have never been brought to a grand jury in the first place. Moreover, its timing, particularly in light of Smith’s statements and actions in the Trump documents case, is so highly suspect that it casts a political pall over the whole case. I’m going to run through the various issues I see with this indictment. Apologies in advance for the length of this post, and for some of the more technical aspects of it. Happy to answer any questions. The Indictment Smith’s indictment contains four counts against Trump. The first, brought under 18 U.S.C. § 371, alleges that Trump conspired to defraud the United States “by using knowingly false claims of election fraud to obstruct federal government function by which those results are collected, counted and certified.” The second and third allege conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding and the actual or attempted obstruction of an official proceeding, both in violation of subsections of 18 U.S.C. § 1512. The fourth alleges that Trump committed a “conspiracy against rights,” by knowingly conspiring to deprive Americans of their right to vote and have their votes counted, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241. Having read the indictment, having followed January 6-related cases closely, having read extensive news coverage, and having spoken to others with experience in this area of the law, I do not believe that any of these charges can fairly be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in front of a fair judge and jury. Additionally, I expect that, were this case to reach the Supreme Court, the Court would reject Smith’s theories of liability on all or at least some of these counts, as it did unanimously with his prosecution of former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell. Smith and his team did a real disservice to the cause of justice by bringing this indictment. (1) Trump’s State of Mind In the Trump documents case, we’ve already seen how thorny issues of intent can be. There, many of us have argued that, in light of the President’s rights and responsibilities under the Presidential Records Act, it is essentially impossible for Jack Smith to prove that Trump knowingly violated the Espionage Act subsection charged. Here, we have a similar issue. For all four of these charges, Smith needs to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claims about election integrity were false, and that he knew that the legal theories his team advanced were not viable. Not just that these claims were false, not just that Trump might have known that they were false, or that Trump should have known that they were false. If Trump did not actually know that his claims were false and the theories he was advancing were wrong, then I do not see how he can be found guilty of any of the four charges in the indictment. While Smith points to a few statements Trump allegedly made to others at various stages of his election challenges where he impliedly (if you squint hard enough) appears to concede defeat, the overwhelming gravamen of Trump’s statements and actions indicate that he believed that his claims—both factual about the conduct of the election and legal about potential remedies—were true. Considering the record as a whole, how does one go about proving that Trump didn’t believe his own arguments? Moreover, three of these counts charge conspiracy. For those counts, Smith likely has to prove that Trump’s alleged co-conspirators also knew that the claims they were advancing were false. And that Trump and his alleged co-conspirators all agreed, knowing that the claims were false, to press ahead anyway. Given the list of co-conspirators, their activities during the time period in question, and the interactions between them and Trump that have already been made public, I think the opposite is likely the case. In short, proving the requisite intent on the part of Trump and his alleged co-conspirators on all of these charges is likely impossible, at least in front of a fair jury in a fair courtroom. This indictment should never have been brought. (2) First Amendment Others have made this point publicly already, so I won’t belabor it. To put it simply, Jack Smith’s theory of the case necessarily requires criminalizing political speech. This is core, protected activity under the First Amendment, and the legal implications are truly scary for our democracy. Is any public challenge to a certified federal election a criminal act? In Jack Smith’s telling, the answer is probably yes. At what point do election challenges become criminal? Based of Jack Smith’s theory of the case, the answer to that is entirely unclear, meaning that the very fact that this indictment was brought may have a deeply chilling effect on protected speech in years to come. Hillary Clinton, Stacy Abrams, and many, many others have claimed for years that their elections were stolen from them. Stacy Abrams continued her efforts to challenge her defeat to Brian Kemp long after the results were clear. Andrew Jackson claimed that John Quincy Adams cheated him out of the Election of 1824. After the 2000, 2004, and 2016 elections, Democrats attempted to interfere with the electoral count process. Did those actions constitute a Conspiracy Against Rights under § 241? Under Jack Smith’s theory of the case, I think the answer is unclear, but possibly. Taking political speech and political acts of this sort and shoehorning them into criminal statutes that have never before been used in this way is terrifying. Political candidates should not live in fear of prosecution by their political opponents for stating their views about their elections. Jack Smith, in his rush to “get Trump,” has done serious violence to our Constitutional order and Bill of Rights. (3) Requisite Intent under § 241 Section 241 is a statute that was originally designed to deal with violence against black voters by the Ku Klux Klan, and other similar efforts to deprive people of their constitutional rights. Jack Smith’s use of it here is outrageous on its face, designed to inflame perhaps more than anything else. But there are also serious legal issues that Smith and his team seem to have been willing to ignore in terms of the statute’s applicability to the facts alleged. In United States v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745 (1966), the Supreme Court grappled with the constitutionality of this statute, facing an argument that it was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. The Supreme Court ultimately held that the statute was constitutional, but only because of the heightened intent requirements that follow from it being a conspiracy statute. In the Supreme Court’s words, “[a] specific intent to interfere with the federal right [at issue] must be proved” on the part of the alleged conspirators. Only because of that specific intent requirement was the prosecution in that case allowable, and was the statute itself deemed to pass constitutional muster. In Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211 (1974), the Supreme Court addressed the applicability of § 241 to a scheme to cast fake votes for federal, state, and local candidates in West Virginia. The Court cautioned that “[i]t is established that since the gravamen of the offense under § 241 is conspiracy, the prosecution must show that the offender acted with a specific intent to interfere with the federal rights in question.” Furthermore, the Court stated that “special care” was warranted in assessing this intent, because “charges of conspiracy are not to be made out by piling inference upon inference, thus fashioning . . . a dragnet to draw in all substantive crimes.” To prove his case, it’s not enough for Jack Smith to prove that Trump and his allege co-conspirators sought to overturn certified election results—he needs to prove that they acted with specific intent to deprive people of the rights to have their votes counted. This cannot be established by inference, under binding Supreme Court precedent. Smith needs evidence that Trump’s intent was specifically to deprive people of their right to have their votes counted. On the face of the indictment and public record, it doesn’t appear that he has anything close to meeting this high bar. (4) Issues with § 371 Section 371 is a statute that criminalizes defrauding the federal government or interfering in lawful functions of government. Its origins are in the tax fraud context, and it was originally cabined closely to property frauds against the federal government. Even after the statute was expanded, though, the Supreme Court has urged caution throughout the statute’s history that a conspiracy charge relating to the obstruction of governmental functions must be premised on the use of “deceit, craft or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest.” Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182 (1924). “Open defiance” of the law, for example, cannot give rise to a § 371 charge. Courts have consistently held that obtaining a conviction under this statute requires both the existence of an agreement to achieve an unlawful objective, as well as deliberate, knowing, and specific intent to participate in that agreement. Jack Smith’s theory is that Trump and his alleged co-conspirators conspired to “defeat the lawful federal government function by which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted, and certified by the federal government.” But in light of the requirements for proving fraud conspiracy under § 371, Smith needs to show that Trump and his team knew that their theories were groundless when they promoted them to state legislators and other decision makers in the electoral count process, and encouraged those officials to take various official actions. And that Trump and his team agreed that this was the plan—promoting theories they knew were groundless, based on facts that they knew were false, to these legislators and officials. The fact that Trump received advice to the contrary just doesn’t cut it, from a legal perspective, when it comes to proving a fraud conspiracy under § 371. This charge appears to be dead on arrival from a legal perspective. (5) Misapplication of § 1512 Section 1512 was originally enacted as part of the Sarbanes Oxley Act in 2002, intended to deal with the fallout from the Enron collapse and investigations. Subsection (c), under which Trump has been charged, deals primarily with destroying evidence in advance of judicial proceedings or legislative inquiries, but it also contains a catchall provision that criminalizes corruptly “obstructing” an official proceeding. The Biden DOJ has used this catchall provision, controversially, to prosecute January 6 defendants, and two of the counts in this new indictment track this theory—that Trump’s activities and statements constituted an obstruction of an official proceeding, namely the electoral count process. This is an issue that is expected to come before the Supreme Court sooner rather than later. In a sharply divided panel opinion this April, the D.C. Circuit allowed § 1512 charges to proceed against three January 6 defendants. But it did so only on the basis that, in the words of Judge Justin Walker’s decisive concurrence, the act’s requirement of a “corrupt” mental state on the part of the defendants sharply delimited its scope. In Walker’s view, to convict under this statute, a Defendant must have acted with the specific intent “to procure an unlawful benefit either for himself or for some other person.” (Judge Katsas dissented and would have dismissed the charges entirely). Under this reading of the statute, it is not enough that Trump (and in the case of the conspiracy charge his alleged co-conspirators) called for protests. It is not enough that Trump tried to prevent the certification of the election or the counting of electoral votes. Trump could have burned down the Capitol personally and that wouldn’t necessarily meet this high bar. He must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have done what he did to procure a benefit for himself that he knew to be unlawful. As with the other statutes discussed above, this is a very high bar to meet, and the facts as presented simply do not support this charge. (6) Timing As he did with his original indictment in the documents, Jack Smith accompanied his announcement of charges yesterday with a cynical call for a “speedy trial.” More than anything else, Smith’s insistence that these cases that he is bringing should be tried at the height of a presidential election adds fuel to the fire of President Trump’s expressed view that the Special Counsel is waging a political campaign against him, not a valid legal investigation. To put it simply, there is no reason why this case needs to be litigated now, as opposed to two years ago, or as opposed to after the presidential election in 2024. In the documents case, Smith followed his speedy trial call with a voluminous discovery production consisting of close to a million pages of documentary evidence, nine months of video recordings, and terrabytes of data to be analyzed by Trump’s defense team. He then proceeded to file a superseding indictment adding new charges and a new defendant. That case was either ready for trial at the time it was brought, or it wasn’t, but Smith can’t have it both ways—his public statements and court filings amount to a gaslighting of the federal court and indeed of the American people. In this case, the timing concerns are even more severe. The facts at issue date back to 2020 and the first few days of 2021. President Trump has already been impeached and acquitted for the same offense conduct he now faces these criminal charges for. Trump is now running to be president again (and winning in many polls). Inserting this case into the presidential election season has all the appearances of an attempt by Smith to substitute the judgment of his office, a single judge, and 12 D.C. jurors for the millions of Americans who would otherwise have had the opportunity to weigh these facts, alongside all the other political considerations that go into a presidential election. These millions of Americans will likely be faced with a choice to vote for Smith’s boss, Joe Biden, or his likely opponent, Donald Trump. Prosecuting a political opponent during a presidential election in this manner smacks of banana republic politics.

@realLizUSA — Liz Harrington

Posted - August 3, 2023 at 5:20 PM

Saved - August 3, 2023 at 10:35 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Experience the comfort and pleasure of shoes. Biden henchman Jack Smith, an Obama loyalist, targeted VA Gov Bob McDonnell and was involved in the IRS scandal. Smith's wife is a Biden donor and produced a Michelle Obama documentary. Deputy AG Lisa Monaco is a Russiagate architect. Smith worked at the corrupt International Criminal Court. Liz propagates lies. Smith's legal counsel told him he lost, yet he continued with the big lie. Desperate on arraignment day. Smith is like Blasey Ford of special counsels.

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

The Truth About Biden Henchman Jack Smith and the Democrats’ Witch-Hunt

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

Smith served under Obama’s “wingman” Eric Holder Overturned unanimously by the Supreme Court in his political targeting of VA Gov Bob McDonnell Instrumental in IRS targeting conservatives scandal

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

Jack Smith’s wife is a Biden donor and produced fawning Michelle Obama documentary Deputy AG Lisa Monaco is also Obama loyalist and Russiagate Architect which tried to frame President Trump for Russia “collusion” Smith worked at the corrupt International Criminal Court

@Free_Speech_1A - Free Speech USA

@realLizUSA @mrddmia Smith👉🏼 Blasey Ford of special counsels

@spacespeaker_co - Space Speaker

😎Experience the comfort and pleasure that a pair of shoes can bring to you. 🛒Buy Now 👉https://space-speaker.co/E77861

👟Men's Suede Velcro High Boots - Spacespeaker Note: These shoes have a wider fit than the standard sizing, so it is advised to check the foot and shoe length beforehand to choose the correct size. Simple And Tough Design Helps You Get More Attention In The Crowd!!! FEATURE High-end Fabric The inside is breathable and not stuffy, and the feet are still dry and space-speaker.co

@Drfunkygibbon - GiantFunkyMonkey PhD

@realLizUSA I love the smell of desperacy on arraignment day....

@Gracesodapop - Sodapop

@realLizUSA https://t.co/uhNgKgJc9R

@olhowling_husky - CANIS MAJOR ☆🥑

@realLizUSA When Liz says Truth, she means 'her angle'

@Haulingtmber - Tim Sutton

@realLizUSA @realLizUSA i9s a propagandist for a Traitor to our Republic, that makes her a Traitor. Just move on people and enjoy your day.

@DDSeedling - DDSeedling

@realLizUSA 🤡

@physics_up - Wanderingmind

@realLizUSA His legal counsel told him he lost, yet he continued with big lie. That's fraud.

@FulginitiGreg - Greg F. 🇺🇸

@realLizUSA BS

@marklevinshow — Mark R. Levin

Posted - August 3, 2023 at 10:21 PM

Saved - August 3, 2023 at 11:47 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The Biden administration's actions during the presidential election have created an unprecedented legal situation. The attorney general, appointed by the Democrat president, is authorizing indictments against his potential political opponent. These charges, approved by a special counsel, are intended to hinder Trump's campaign. The timing of the charges and the depletion of Trump's campaign funds raise concerns about political motives. This legal warfare undermines our electoral system and must be addressed. Seeking an emergency hearing before the Supreme Court is necessary to halt this assault on our democracy.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

MY PUBLIC ADVICE TO PRESIDENT TRUMP'S LEGAL TEAM ... The Biden administration has created a legal morass never seen or experienced in American history, as applies to a presidential election. The attorney general, appointed by the Democrat president, is authorizing indictment after indictment of his president's possible if not likely political opponent in the middle of a presidential election cycle. He is doing so through his appointment of a special counsel, whose appointment was a misapplication of the special counsel regulation, and whose charges must be approved by the attorney general. (By the way, as an important side issue, Jack Smith is not a presidential appointee; he never even stood for confirmation by the Senate to hold the position he holds and to exercise the authority he is exercising against a party opponent.) It should be noted at the same time, the attorney general refuses to appoint an outside special counsel to investigate his client, Joe Biden, despite the fact that the DOJ regulation was originally instituted for these exact circumstances. Of course, this underscores the purpose and motive of what is taking place before us today. The attorney general is approving the timing of dozens of charges against the former Republican president, who is actively seeking his party's nomination to challenge the Democrat president for whom he directly reports, which are intended to cripple the ability of Donald Trump to effectively run for president, regardless of what polls show today. And regardless of what the commentariat say, and despite President Trump's strength within the Republican Party, the outcome of the election is unknown. Therefore, the polls are irrelevant in this regard. Moreover, as further evidence that these indictments are being used as political weapons are the timing of the charges -- specifically, all of these charges by the separate grand juries, all controlled by the special counsel, should have been filed AFTER the election, as there was no possibility the statute of limitations would run on any of them. Further, the special counsel repeatedly insists that the charges must be quickly adjudicated, meaning before the people vote, for the purpose of having maximum influence on the election. In addition, the charges have resulted in the significant depletion of Trump's campaign funds to pay for millions in legal fees. Trump has to take significant time from campaigning to address the dozens of charges dropped on him by the Biden administration -- that is, he has to expend an enormous amount of time working with his lawyers in order to defend himself from charges that, collectively, would result in his imprisonment until his death. The fact is that this kind of legal warfare against a presidential and possible if not likely opponent to the present president, is not only unprecedented in the history of our republic it will destroy our electoral system for all time. It is not something that should left to various district courts or local courts to sort out in the course of regular judicial proceedings. In fact, that is part of the intended strategy by the prosecutors who are engaged in this assault on our electoral system. They must not be rewarded for their behavior. They must not be rewarded for their treachery and exploitation of the legal system and the courts to achieve their political ends. Even without getting to the merits of these multitude of charges, which are easily unraveled from my perspective, the process is what is being used to interfere with the election. And the near silence by those who are orchestrating this shocking legal warfare, when the American people are left in the dark, is untenable. Therefore, I want to publicly encourage the Trump legal team to seek an emergency hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court, not to resolve legal disputes, but to at least temporarily halt the abomination of this legal warfare that is unfolding in front of us -- where Democrats and anti-Trump Republicans are unashamedly celebrating the use of the courts by the Biden administration and Democrat DA's to further their political wishes, as the rest of the nation watches in shock. This unprecedented legal warfare requires an unprecedented response by the only constitutional body left that can do something about it -- the Supreme Court.

@WayneTechSPFX — WayneTech SPFX®️

Posted - October 2, 2023 at 3:50 PM

Saved - August 14, 2024 at 8:55 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I attended the ongoing civil fraud trial against Donald Trump in New York, where he faces serious allegations from Attorney General Letitia James regarding financial misrepresentation. The trial has seen various developments, including a limited gag order against Trump for disparaging remarks about court staff. Meanwhile, Trump is also appealing rulings that could affect his eligibility for the 2024 ballot in multiple states. As the legal battles intensify, I remain focused on the implications of these cases for Trump's political future and the broader electoral landscape.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud trial. Election interference. NYC. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump arrives at New York court for $250 million fraud trial KEY POINTS: The $250 million civil fraud trial that could see Donald Trump permanently banned from doing business in New York has begun. Trump is present in the courtroom in the Manhattan Supreme Court. New York Attorney General Letitia James accuses Trump, two of his adult children, the Trump Organization and its top officials of engaging in a yearslong pattern of financial fraud. James alleges the defendants misstated the values of real estate properties by billions of dollars in business records to obtain better loan and insurance terms and tax benefits. Source: https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/10/02/trump-fraud-trial-to-kick-off-in-new-york-court.html?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16962612835975&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2023%2F10%2F02%2Ftrump-fraud-trial-to-kick-off-in-new-york-court.html…

Trump New York fraud trial ends first day with tax accountant testimony New York Attorney General Letitia James accuses Donald Trump, the Trump Organization and others of engaging in business fraud for years. www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Election interference. Trump. Fraud trial. MI intel: #BREAKING Trump makes a powerful statement upon leaving the courtroom today. Goes in on corrupt deepstate operative Letitia James

Video Transcript AI Summary

The judge's recent comments indicate that about 80% of the case is likely resolved due to the statute of limitations, particularly regarding transactions before 2014. While it's unusual not to have a jury, the judge's acknowledgment of the statute is appreciated. There are no victims in this case; banks profited and were satisfied with their dealings. This situation is seen as political interference in the 2024 presidential election, taking time away from campaigning. The speaker emphasizes the success of their business, which has grown significantly since 2011, and criticizes the New York Attorney General for focusing on this case instead of addressing violent crime in the state.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Well, I think that was very good. That last 5 minutes was outstanding because the judge essentially conceded that the statute of intentions that, we wanted the Court of Appeals is in effect. Therefore, about 80% of the case is over. I was going to come out and say that, as you know, we're not entitled to a jury, which is pretty unusual in the United States of America. So I think it's very unfair that I don't have a jury, but the judge's last statement was very fair. And if I read it right, I'll let perhaps one of the lawyers speak to it. But, good night, you'll speak to it if you would. But, the way I interpret that and the way everyone else in the room seems to interpret that is that the statute of limitations is a very real thing in this country. And that would be about 80% that this case would be over. Could somebody speak to that, please? What what we're talking about? Sure. So based on the judge's comments based on the judge's comments at the end of the year, at end of the trial today, it would appear that he is agreeing that all of the transactions that closed prior to 2014 are now out of the case, which is about 80% of the case. And it's also, something that we want on appeal, but was not accepted by this court but now seems to be accepted by this court. As far as the jury is concerned, it's much different now, I must tell you, than it was 20 minutes ago. We're gonna come out and complain that, you know, in this country, you're entitled to a jury. But we very much appreciate the judge's decision today or his statement today on the statute of limitations, which is a very big thing. It's a limited time period, and we did nothing wrong. And if you look at the statements, they show that even in 2011, I I guess the number was 258,000,000 in cash, very strong company. I don't believe we really I wouldn't do a couple of deals or something, but I wouldn't have even needed to go to banks. Banks loved our business. They loved our deals. They weren't defrauded. They lost no money. They made money. They had the finest attorneys that there are. Frankly, their attorneys were better than my attorneys. And, they made a lot of money, and they considered to be a very good client. I paid them back on time, on schedule. There was no default. It never even sent me a default letter. Not once, for years. Never got a default letter. And there's no case here. There's no victim. The banks aren't a victim. The insurance companies are a victim. Everybody gets paid. It's a terrible, terrible thing. This was for politics. Now it has been very successful for them because they took me off the campaign trail. Because I've been sitting in a courthouse all day long instead of being in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, or a lot of other places I could be at. This is a horrible situation for our country. It's never happened before. It's election interference. They're interfering with the presidential election of 2024, and the people of our country see it. But this was a big, big, I I say surprise, but it was a great credit to the court that the judge was willing to do this. Sort of overruled himself, and I greatly respect that. Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you. Are you back to us? We may. I mean, I'd love that one. I'd love to be campaigning instead of doing this. Because we built I built a great company. That's one thing people are seeing all the way back to 2011. And today, it's much bigger and much better and even much more liquid. That was $258,000,000 for a real estate development. That's a lot of money. It was in 2011. Today, it's much more than that. Much much more. I built a great company and did great things for New York, and they should respect that. I've employed thousands and thousands of people in New York, and they should respect that. The attorney general of this state is a disgrace. Leticia James is a disgrace. She's a disgrace to our country and to the state of New York. She should focus on all of the violent crime and the murders going on in New York, not on somebody that paid back the banks in full without a default, and in many cases, paid it back early. Thank you very much, everybody.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Gag. Judge. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump judge issues limited gag order after former president makes disparaging post about court clerk A New York judge placed a limited gag order on Donald J. Trump on Tuesday after the former president posted a message to social media targeting the judge’s law clerk. Mr. Trump attacked the clerk, Allison Greenfield, shortly before noon on his Truth Social site. His post was a picture of Ms. Greenfield with Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic majority leader. Mr. Trump mocked Ms. Greenfield as “Schumer’s girlfriend” and said that the case against him should be dismissed. The post was taken down during a lunch break, shortly after a closed-door meeting in the room where Mr. Trump is being tried. Justice Arthur F. Engoron explained what had happened after the break, though he did not name Ms. Greenfield or Mr. Trump, referring to him only as a defendant. “Personal attacks on my members of my court staff are unacceptable, inappropriate, and I will not tolerate them under any circumstances,” he said. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/03/nyregion/trump-gag-order-fraud-trial.html

Trump Ordered Not to Comment on Judge’s Staff in Fraud Case The former president attacked Justice Arthur F. Engoron’s clerk in a social media post that soon disappeared. He was called to account behind closed doors, then chastised in court as the judge issued a limited “gag order.” nytimes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Trump returns to New York courtroom as civil fraud trial continues Former President Donald Trump is attending his civil fraud trial in New York on Tuesday, returning to a Manhattan courtroom for the fourth time since the trial began two weeks ago. Trump, two of his sons, and their company were already found liable for fraud in September in the civil suit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. The trial is proceeding on several other charges, including falsification of business records and conspiracy. Corrupt NY AG Letiticia James made a video yesterday of new developments in the case Trial Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-trial-new-york-court-civil-fraud-charges/

Video Transcript AI Summary

Today marked the start of the third week in the trial against Donald Trump and the Trump Organization. Testimony came from two current employees: an assistant vice president and a hotel division executive. The assistant vice president, responsible for Trump's financial statements, confirmed that Allen Weisselberg indicated Trump wanted his net worth inflated. The hotel executive, a certified public accountant, used these financial statements for reporting to Scottish authorities. He stated that Trump had over $290 million in cash equivalents, but later admitted this figure was likely overstated and he wouldn't have reported it had he known it was inaccurate. The defendants have built their business on falsehoods, and as the judge noted, false statements cannot be used in business.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Today, we started the 3rd week of our trial against Donald Trump, the Trump Organization, and other defendants. We mainly heard testimony from 2 current employees at the Trump Organization, an assistant vice president and an executive in the hotels division. The assistant vice president was responsible for preparing Donald Trump's statements of financial condition. These are the fraudulent documents that at the very center of our case. On the stand today, the assistant vice president was asked if defendant Allen Weisselberg ever told him that mister Trump wanted his net worth to go up on his statements. His answer, yes. Our second witness is an executive in the Trump's Hotels division who has a graduate degree in accounting. He's a certified public accountant. And while he did not work on the statements of financial condition, he relied on them to demonstrate Trump's financials to authorities in Scotland for Trump's properties there. One of the main questions was how much liquidity did Trump have. Based on the statements, this witness told authorities that Trump had cash equivalents in excess of $290,000,000. Asked on the stand about it today, the witness admitted that the number he presented to Scottish tax authorities appears to have been overstated and that he probably would not have presented that number to authorities had he known that it wasn't accurate. For years, the defendants built a business on lies and misrepresentations. To quote the judge and the law, you cannot make false statements and use them in business.

Instead of coming face-to-face with Michael Cohen, Trump confronts emails and spreadsheets at New York trial Former President Donald Trump attended his civil fraud trial in New York on Tuesday for the fourth time since the trial began two weeks ago. cbsnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud trial. Testify. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump to take the stand momentarily I don't watch the fake news media. So this channel I've been subscribed to since day 1 is streaming the event live. He's a patriot. https://www.youtube.com/live/Yv-x1Y6rphU?si=Pz2aWm9ZwqoqGQ5C

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Trump co-defendant in GA election case Harrison Floyd refusing plea deal. He wants to focus his case on proving Trump won the 2020 election in Georgia.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. TrIal. Alina. Fraud. NYC. MI intel: #BREAKING Trump attorney and spokesperson Alina Habba officially declares plan to file for MISTRIAL in the corrupt AG Octogon member Letitia James' SHAM trial against President Trump

Video Transcript AI Summary

Former President Trump spoke at a rally, expressing that his indictments are a badge of honor and a tactic to discourage voters. He is currently involved in a civil trial in New York, facing a $250 million lawsuit from Attorney General Leticia James for allegedly misleading banks about asset values. Trump's attorney, Alina Haba, discussed a gag order limiting their ability to speak publicly about the case and mentioned plans to file for a mistrial soon. She asserted that Trump's children, who have testified, were not involved in any wrongdoing. Haba criticized James for pursuing the case, suggesting it was politically motivated and detracting from more pressing issues in the city.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Indictment. Even that stupid trial going on in New York, which has been totally discredited. Everybody's been discredited. That's all comes out of the White House. That's to discourage people from voting. That's to hurt us. The only difference is we have a big voice. But every time I'm indicted, I consider it a great badge of honor because I'm being indicted for youth. Speaker 1: And that is former president Trump speaking at a rally in South Florida on Wednesday night on his ongoing legal issues with president Biden's Department of Justice and Democrat prosecutors. The 45th president currently in the middle of a civil trial in New York in which he and his children and the Trump Organization are being sued by the state's attorney general, Leticia James, for $250,000,000 over accusations that they misled banks and others about the value of their assets. James has been front and center at the trial, appearing in the courtroom and holding news conferences at the end of the day, even as violent crime continues to plague everyday New Yorkers. During James' tenure as AG, crime is up 29% in the Big Apple over a 2 year period. While the city saw a 214% spike in anti Semitic crimes last month amid Israel's war against the Hamas terrorists. Joining me right now in this Sunday morning futures exclusive is president Trump's attorney, Alina Haba. Alina, thanks so much for being here today. Speaker 2: Thanks for having me. Speaker 1: So we just heard from, the AG, Leticia James, talking about this trial. Mhmm. She comes out and talks a lot, but president Trump is not allowed to say anything. Speaker 2: Yeah. We have a gag order currently, against certain issues that we can't speak to, and we've seen this on many cases of his. You know, Jack Smith has moved for the same thing. And it's really, you know, it's a first amendment right. He's also a leading candidate. He has a right to speak. He should speak about anybody and anything that he sees that's corrupt. But we do even I have a limited gag order. Speaker 1: You have been complaining about the judge's clerk, and you say that the judge is is compromised, and the clerk appears compromised. Tell me why. Speaker 2: Well, I actually can't tell you why because I'm gagged. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 2: I can tell you that, you know, we'll be filing papers to address all of those issues. And, the fact that, frankly, Maria, I can't even discuss it with you, and I'm his spokeswoman, I'm his attorney, says a lot about what the judicial system the state of our judicial system right now. Speaker 1: I I think I I did see that there were donations that the clerk had given very supportive to the Democrats. That was one issue. Are you going to file to get a mistrial? Yes. When will you do that? Today? Speaker 2: Soon. Yeah. Very soon. Speaker 1: Okay. And and and how would that change things? Then you go from day 1, you start over again. Speaker 2: You know, the problem is with all of these things, such as filing a motion for recusal, which we've done twice, is that this judge has to be the one that decides, is he going to recuse himself? Does he feel that there was a mistrial? It's a bench trial. We have one judge, and it's the same judge that issued the gag order that has to make those determinations. So at this point, you know, I don't have, any reason to believe he shouldn't after what we've we've learned, if it's true. But I will tell you that it's concerning when he is the arbiter and the decision maker of of some of these issues. Speaker 1: These accusations that he overvalued his assets, what kind of third party people did you have or did Donald Trump have in terms of doing their own evaluation? Because, I mean, when you go to get deals, you have to get auditors to to to okay the valuations that you put in. Right? Right. Did he have auditors to Speaker 2: do that? He had an accounting firm put together what's a compilation. The compilation they were involved with, they were there all the time communicating with the Trump Organization. They put their stamp of approval on it. And then there was this disclaimer that everybody always puts on and says, hey. Do your own work. The disclaimer is very important. Remember, there was nobody harmed. These are sophisticated lenders. Deutsche Bank, you know, major major establishments with all kinds of regulations, KYC, FEC regulations. These people take somebody's numbers. They don't use them. They do their own due diligence, and they weren't harmed. They were paid on time. They were paid with interest. They made money. But Laticia James is putting her nose into private companies and private, individuals' work, which is not what's meant to happen. And the law that she's using is a consumer fraud law so that she can establish some way to have control, to not have a jury, to do certain things in this case that are nonsensical and shouldn't be happening. And we've been fighting it all along the way. The problem we have is the judge is the one that's gonna make those decisions, and he's proven himself to be quite motivated by the other side. Speaker 1: And you think he's compromised as well? Speaker 2: I'm not gonna speak to that, but we'll see. Speaker 1: Yeah. The president's children have testified. Speaker 2: That's right. Speaker 1: Ivanka, Don Junior, and Eric Trump as well. Don Junior speaking again tomorrow. Correct? What have they been asking the kids? And tell me how they fit into all of this. Speaker 2: They don't fit into all of this. What have they been asking the kids is very simple. They'll they'll ask the kids, did you give a value to somebody? Did you do something? And everybody said resoundingly, no. The kids were not involved. I believe that when they crafted this complaint, they looked at their titles and they looked at, frankly, PR. And if you patch in the kids, it's more days that Letitia James can go out there and speak. It's more more press for her, and it's more of an impact. Radical left liberals don't really care about facts. They don't care about law. They care about making statements, and these kids did nothing wrong. They should not be in this case. Ivanka's already out of the case. The boys should not be in the case. Their testimony was direct, and they just wanna make it as if there was some sort of corruption and some sort of conspiracy. There was none. There was an accounting firm. There were lawyers, and there were sophisticated lenders that all did their job, and nobody got harmed. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 2: But miss James wanted a headline. She campaigned on this, remember, before she was even the attorney general. That's how she got the attorney general role. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 2: She campaigned on Trump, so she had to follow through. And she should really dismiss this case. It's a little bad, frankly, and the city needs her attention elsewhere. Speaker 1: Alina, we're gonna be waiting and watching for your filings for a mistrial likely later today. Thank you for being here. Speaker 2: Thank you for having me.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Georgia. Election interference. Plea deals. Cabal intel: #BREAKING 4 days ago, Reverend Stephen Cliffgard Lee, one of 18 Trump's co-defendants, declared that he is not ACCEPTING a plea deal in the case initiated by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. "I am not going to plead out to a lie." "I'm not going to cooperate with evil. This is bigger than me." Now, this is how you stand up to cabal! Not like the other deepstate cabal traitors! He faces 5yrs in prison if convicted. I hope he has a legal donation fund setup! Instead of donating to these deepstate cabal Republicans who don't do a damn thing but talk.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Reverend Steven Glyphgard Lee from Orland Park, charged with conspiring to overturn the 2020 presidential election results, announced he will not accept a plea deal. At a fundraiser for his legal fees, he stated he refuses to cooperate with what he calls "evil," unlike others who have taken plea deals for lighter sentences. If convicted, he faces a minimum of five years in a Georgia state prison.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And died along with former president Donald Trump in Georgia's election tampering case. He says he will not take a plea deal. Reverend Steven Glyphgard Lee of Orland Park charged with conspiring to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Chicago Tribune reports at a fundraiser for his legal fees last night, Lee says he'd not take a plea as others have done resulting in less severe penalties. He says, quote, I'm not going to cooperate with evil. He says if convicted, he faces a minimum of 5 years in a Georgia state prison.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election fraud. Ballots. Georgia. MI intel: #BREAKING 3600 duplicate Ballots of the 2020 election found in Fulton County #FultonCounty | #Georgia Trump delivered the news via Truth Social. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Law-fare. Octogon. Alina. MI intel: #VIDEO Alina Habba goes on a truth diatribe stating that Trump has already sued and won members of the cabal, including Hillary, members of the FBI, etc.

Video Transcript AI Summary

I won a court case against President Trump six months ago, which many may not know. The media, which I refer to as fake news, often misrepresents the truth. Trump has sued various parties, including Hillary Clinton and members of the FBI, over the Russia investigation. Despite being impeached twice, he remains resilient. Now, with multiple indictments, I’m focused on how to respond to the next one. The media aims to instill fear and distract supporters, but we are doing well. The current battle is not just political but legal, and it’s crucial to recognize that we are still in a strong position.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Okay. Who here knows that president Trump and I beat him in court 6 months ago when he sued him? You didn't know that either, did you? So I'm here to send you one very loud message. What the fake news covers and by the way, the fake news is everyone. Okay? Just because I go on Fox, just because I go on those stations, doesn't mean they're pro Trump. They're pro ratings. So let's be clear. Those are 2 big cases. You had no idea that President Trump sued Hillary Clinton. You had no idea that he sued members of the FBI. He sued everyone that came after him for Russia hoax. He was impeached once. They made it stronger. Impeached twice, he stayed. He was fine. And now we got how many indictments? I'm losing count. But you know what I care about more? What am I gonna say when we go to indictment number 4? It's fine. Bring it. Bring it. End of the day, here's the truth. The wins, they won't tell you because they want you to be scared. They want you to be worried that you're backing people that have no shot, and they wanna distract you. They give you clips. They give you sound bites, but I'm there. And unfortunately for president Trump, it's a sad day when he has to make his lawyer his spokesperson. But that is what the war is now. It's no longer warfare. It's lawfare. That's what we're dealing with. So let me just make sure you all understand something very clearly. We're doing well.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. J6. Fraud. Courts. Appeal. SC. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Judge pauses Jan. 6 case against Trump amid his appeal to dismiss Judge Chutkan put a pause on Trump's case until the Supreme Court decides whether to weigh in The judge presiding over the case against former President Donald Trump and his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election acknowledged she does not have jurisdiction over the matter while it is pending before the Supreme Court, and put a pause on the case against the Republican 2024 frontrunner until the high court determines its involvement. Special Counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the Supreme Court to rule on whether Trump can be prosecuted on charges relating to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. A federal judge ruled the case could go forward, but Trump said he would ask the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., to reverse that outcome. Smith is attempting to bypass the appeals court — the usual next step in the process — and have the Supreme Court take up the matter directly. Late Monday, the Supreme Court asked Trump’s lawyers to respond to the special counsel's motion by Wednesday, Dec. 20 — two days later than Smith had requested. Lawyers for Trump filed a motion Tuesday urging Judge Tanya Chutkan to pause proceedings against Trump in the Jan. 6 case while his appeal is pending. The trial was set to begin March 4, but now that start date could be delayed. Chutkan said that she would reconsider the trial date at the completion of the appeals process. Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-pauses-jan-6-case-against-trump-amid-former-presidents-appeal-dismiss

Judge pauses Jan. 6 case against Trump amid former president's appeal to dismiss The judge presiding over the case against former President Donald Trump and his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election acknowledged she does not have jurisdiction over the matter while it is pending before the Supreme Court. foxnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election. Fraud. Rudy Giuliani. Lawsuit. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Rudy Giuliani to pay $148 million in Georgia election worker defamation case Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, asked for at least $24 million each for Giuliani’s defamatory statements about them following the 2020 election. What to know about Rudy Giuliani’s defamation trial: •The jury delivered its verdict Friday afternoon in Rudy Giuliani's civil defamation trial related to false claims he made about two former election workers in Georgia. •Jurors awarded the plaintiffs Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea “Shaye” Moss $148.17 million total in damages. •Freeman and Moss asked for at least $24 million each for Giuliani's defamatory statements about them following the 2020 presidential contest when he baselessly accused them of election fraud. U.S. District Judge •Beryl Howell, who is overseeing the trial, ruled this year that Giuliani defamed the two women with his remarks. •Trial testimony this week lasted four days. Giuliani reversed course yesterday and said he would not take the stand in his defense, despite saying earlier that his testimony would make "definitively clear" that what he said about Freeman and Moss "was true." •The jury began deliberating yesterday afternoon following closing arguments in the case. Developing... Source: https://www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/live-blog/rcna129882?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17026806140030&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nbcnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fpolitics-news%2Flive-blog%2Frudy-giuliani-trial-verdict-defamation-live-updates-rcna129882

Rudy Giuliani to pay $148 million in Georgia election worker defamation case: Recap Latest news and updates as a jury deliberates on the damages Giuliani will face for defaming two Georgia election workers following the 2020 election. www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#AMERICAUNDERATTACK Trump. Election interference. Colorado. President. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Colorado Supreme Court disqualifies Trump from 2024 ballot, pauses ruling to allow appeal The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that former President Donald Trump can not appear on the state's ballots for the 2024 election due to his incitement of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, reversing a lower court ruling. But the state Supreme Court stayed its ruling from taking effect until Jan. 4, "subject to further appellate proceedings." The cabal is setting the stage for the steal. Source: https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/12/19/trump-ballot-challenge-decided-by-colorado-supreme-court.html?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17030279636160&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2023%2F12%2F19%2Ftrump-ballot-challenge-decided-by-colorado-supreme-court.html

Colorado Supreme Court disqualifies Trump from 2024 ballot, pauses ruling to allow appeal The Colorado court ruling barring Donald Trump from ballots in the state is the first time a court has rule he is disqualified for engaging in insurrection. www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Trump team issued a statement on the Colorado decision

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election. Fraud. Rudy. Bankruptcy. Lawsuits. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Judge orders Rudy Giuliani to start paying Georgia election workers $146 million. Rudy files chapter 11 bankruptcy U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell lifted a 30-day pause on collecting the judgment because of the plaintiffs' concerns he'd try to hide his assets. Former Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss can immediately seek enforcement of their $146 million financial judgment against Rudy Giuliani because there is good reason to assume he will not comply, a federal judge ruled Wednesday. “Giuliani’s failure to ‘satisfy even more modest monetary awards entered earlier in this case,’ provides good cause to believe that he will seek to dissipate or conceal his assets during the 30-day period,” U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell wrote in her order. Developing... Source: https://www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna130719?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_ct=1703179669900&_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17031796416523&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nbcnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fdonald-trump%2Fjudge-orders-rudy-giuliani-start-paying-georgia-election-workers-146-m-rcna130719

Judge orders Rudy Giuliani to start paying Georgia election workers $146 million U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell lifted a 30-day pause on collecting the judgment because of the plaintiffs' concerns he'd try to hide his assets. www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Rudy Giuliani files for bankruptcy in NY, lists $500M in debts after devastating $148M loss in election fraud case Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani has filed for bankruptcy in the wake of a $148 million civil court ruling and a mountain of unpaid legal bills. Giuliani, who was once hailed as “America’s Mayor,” listed debts of up to $500 million with assets of only $10 million in the filing, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday. I've repeatedly stated that they're setting up the steal again. Look around. The Dominion systems will still be in use. They've convicted a good portion of the J6ers. They've indicted Trump with election fraud. They've indicted those supposedly who were close to him, and many of those pled guilty and will testify against him. They've taken Trump off the ballot in Colorado pending appeal, with more states to follow. Do you get it yet? Source: https://nypost.com/2023/12/21/news/rudy-giuliani-files-for-bankruptcy-in-ny/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

Rudy Giuliani files for bankruptcy in NY, owes up to $500M after devastating $148M loss in election fraud case Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani has filed for bankruptcy in the wake of a $148 million civil court ruling and a mountain of unpaid legal bills. nypost.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Election interference. Michigan. SC. Patriot intel: #BREAKING Michigan Supreme Court keeps Trump on ballot; rejects insurrectionist argument The Michigan Supreme Court has declined to hear a case arguing that former President Donald Trump should be excluded from the state's primary ballot, meaning the frontrunner for the GOP nomination will remain a listed candidate. The order issued Wednesday is in line with lower court rulings in Michigan, though at odds with a recent ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court. Source: https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2023/12/27/michigan-supreme-court-trump-stays-primary-ballot/72037140007/

Michigan Supreme Court keeps Trump on ballot; rejects insurrectionist argument The argument over whether Trump is an eligible candidate center around whether his conduct around the 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol was insurrection. freep.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Escalation. Trump. Election interference. Ballots. Maine. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Donald Trump removed from Maine primary ballot by secretary of state Maine barred Donald Trump from the primary ballot Thursday, becoming the second state to block the former president from running again because of his actions before and during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Resubscribe POLITICS Biden administration The Fix The 202s Polling Democracy in America Election 2024 DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA Donald Trump removed from Maine primary ballot by secretary of state By Patrick Marley Updated December 29, 2023 at 1:29 a.m. EST|Published December 28, 2023 at 6:58 p.m. EST Maine on Dec. 28 became the second state to ban former president Donald Trump from its primary ballot due to his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Maine barred Donald Trump from the primary ballot Thursday, becoming the second state to block the former president from running again because of his actions before and during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. The decision by Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows (D) is sure to be appealed. The Colorado Supreme Court last week found Trump could not appear on the ballot in that state under a part of the U.S. Constitution that prevents insurrectionists from holding office. The Colorado Republican Party has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case, which could resolve for all states whether Trump can run again. Both states have temporarily paused their decisions so Trump can pursue appeals. Developing... Keep a close eye on the Supreme Court. Hopefully, the global cabal blackmail group doesn't get to them. Based on their decision. We'll either know they're working with military intelligence[MI] or not. I was always taught. Hope for the best. Expect the worst. I don't trust anyone working in these cabal controlled institutions. There's a reason why the dems chose state Sen. Shenna Bellows as their new Secretary of State in Maine. She was the first-ever ranked-choice vote as the first woman to hold the position. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/12/28/maine-trump-primary-ballot/

Donald Trump removed from Maine primary ballot by secretary of state Maine is the second state to block the former president from running again under a part of the Constitution that prevents insurrectionists from holding office. washingtonpost.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election interference. Republican. Deepstate. Trump. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Vivek Ramaswamy believes the Republican establishment is rooting for Trump to be forcibly removed from the ballot so they can prop up their chosen candidate. He stated that any state Trump is being removed from that the republican contenders for president should also remove their names from the ballot. If they don't, they are in on it, too. Lately, Vivek has been on a roll releasing comms. As I've been saying for this past year. The proof is in the pudding. Dominion, through actionable court proceedings, won their lawsuit against FOX, and many others stated that their voting machines were good. Courts agreed. Thus, they will continue to use the same systems. In the election fraud case in Georgia, many of the Trump team loyalists have pleaded guilty and decided to testify against Trump. That case and several others against Trump are coming up in a few short months. The precedent for those cases rests in the current Georgia case. I have a feeling that Trump will provide irrefutable evidence at these trials proving his innocence. Now, if the jury/judge decides to convict anyway, this will be another stolen election. I'm praying that it won't. But I am prepared if it does. So should you. Vivek is telling you right here:

Video Transcript AI Summary

If Donald Trump is forcibly removed from the ballot, I will also withdraw my candidacy and challenge Chris Christie, Nikki Haley, and Ron DeSantis to do the same. If all Republicans in Maine step back, it will halt the interference in our GOP primary. Their refusal to act suggests a deeper issue, revealing a faction within the Republican establishment that supports this outcome as much as the Democrats do. We need to recognize this troubling game. I'm concerned that this is just the beginning of their plans for 2024. The system is determined to eliminate Trump from the election, as seen in recent events in Colorado and Maine. We should be worried about what lies ahead for our country.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Any state where Donald Trump is forcibly removed from the ballot in this way, I'll also remove myself. And I challenge Chris Christie and Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis to do the same thing, or else they're also complicit. If every Republican removes themselves from the ballot in Maine, that automatically stops the selection interference in our GOP primary. Now the fact that they're not doing it reveals that there's something deeper going on. This isn't just the Democrats. There's a force within the Republican establishment that's propped up a chosen puppet, and they're actually rooting for this same outcome every bit as much as the Democrats are. And I think it's time we open our eyes to this insidious game that's being played. I'm deeply worried, but I'm worried that I'm right about this. That what we're seeing right now, this isn't the end of the road. This is just the beginning of what they're planning to pull in 2024. And you mark my words on that. This is the a system that has decided by hell or high water at one cost or another, they will eliminate this man from contention in this election. You see that happening Colorado 2 days ago, Maine today. You wait for what's happening in 2024, and I'm worried for this country found it on.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Appeal. J6. Maine. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump appeals Maine ruling that he's ineligible for 2024 primary ballot Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, found that Trump is ineligible for the state’s Republican primary ballot due to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. President Donald Trump on Tuesday filed an appeal of the decision by Maine’s top election official that he is ineligible to appear on the state’s primary ballot. “[T]he Secretary’s Ruling was the product of a process infected by bias and pervasive lack of due process; is arbitrary, capricious, and characterized by abuse of discretion,” Trump's attorneys wrote in the appeal. Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, ruled last week that the former president is constitutionally barred from appearing on the state’s primary ballot, citing his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. But Bellows’ office said her decision would not be enforced until the courts weigh in. Maine’s Republican primary is March 5. In her 34-page decision, Bellows wrote that Trump’s conduct around the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol compelled her to rule him ineligible. “The weight of the evidence makes clear that Mr. Trump was aware of the tinder laid by his multi-month effort to delegitimize a democratic election, and then chose to light a match,” she wrote, adding that he “used a false narrative of election fraud to inflame his supporters and direct them to the Capitol to prevent certification of the 2020 election and the peaceful transfer of power.” In an interview with NBC News last month, Bellows said her preference would have been to wait for the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on the matter, which centers on the 14th Amendment, but she believed Maine law required her to act now. “The country would be well served if the United States Supreme Court issues clear guidance on this unprecedented constitutional question for all to follow,” Bellows said. Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-challenge-maine-ruling-2024-primary-ballot-appeal-rcna131761

Trump appeals Maine ruling that he's ineligible for 2024 primary ballot Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows found that Trump is ineligible for the state’s Republican primary ballot due to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. nbcnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election interference. Fraud trial. NYC. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump makes closing arguments at the conclusion of the fraud case in New York City. No jury. Only a judge will render the verdict in the case. Hopefully, by the end of business day today, or tmr morning. 1 down. 3 cases to go. Video credit: wehaveitall

Video Transcript AI Summary

We've faced years of politically motivated attacks from the New York Attorney General, who campaigned on targeting me. Despite millions of pages of documents and extensive litigation, they lack evidence against us. The only witness they have is a convicted felon who has recanted his statements. We've already won in the Court of Appeals, but the judge has been slow to acknowledge that. This case is unprecedented, using a consumer fraud statute inappropriately, and feels like a witch hunt and election interference. Despite these challenges, our poll numbers are strong, and the American people understand the situation. Thank you for your support.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Yeah. We've gone through years with, this person. She's a political hack, the attorney general. The judge is obviously extremely friendly with the group, and we'll see, what happens. I think maybe, they surprise people on a positive side. We'll have to see what happens exactly. But, we've proven this case so conclusively. We've asked for directed verdict many times. They don't have any facts. They don't have any evidence against us. Millions and millions of pages, years of litigation, and all politically motivated. She campaigned on a I will get Trump. If you've ever seen any of the, seen any of her clips, they're horrible clips, actually, the anger. She's got serious drug derangement syndrome. There's no question about Leticia James, the corrupt attorney general of New York. So we've proven our case. Is not one witness against us other than one person who is a, deranged. He's got a lot of problems. He's a man who's been convicted of lying. He's a felon convicted felon and, not a good person, but that's their only witness, and he's now crashed and burned. They have no witnesses. And, by the way, that witness took back everything that he said. He took back everything he said in court. Took it all back. So they have no case. It's a shame that a thing like this is able to happen. Businesses leave New York. She went after Exxon, and they decided to move to Texas. And, 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars they pay in taxes. I paid over $300,000,000 of taxes over the last number of years. 300,000,000 and, they don't recognize that. They don't recognize anything. So not think of it. Not one witness, millions of pages of document, years of this nonsense, and now it goes on. And one other factor, we won this case already in the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals voted in favor of us, but this judge has been very, very slow to accept that opinion because that's not the opinion that he wants. But we won in the Court of Appeals. That's the boss of this judge who has to know that. And there was a conclusive victory, statute of limitations and other things, and that case has already been won. So that's the story, and I thought we'd come down to 40 Wall Street, which is a great building, and you'd get a chance to see one of the nicest buildings in New York at a convenient place. And I don't have to pay any rent because we have it and it's been a very successful building. But it's a shame to have to have gone through this for years years years. And now we'll see if we're gonna get an honest verdict. We didn't have a jury. We had no rights to a jury. It's a statute that's never been used before for a purpose like this. I just watched a certain broadcast and they said, you know, they've been looking. Has it ever been used before? This is a statute that's a consumer fraud statute. Never been used for anything like this before, and it's a shame. It's, it's really a, it's a witch hunt in the truest sense of the word. It's election interference. And, it just came out. I just it was just right now, Leticia James visited Joe Biden in the White House numerous times during the Trump witch hunt, and this just came out about 10 minutes ago. I got it. And so it's all it's all a conspiracy to try and get Biden who can't put 2 sentences together trying to get him into office. So I just wanna let you know that, we have our best poll numbers. We have the best everything despite this, and maybe because of this. Because the people of the United States, all of those people back there, but the people of the United States really get it. They get it better than anybody else. Yeah. Please. Right. President Trump, everybody.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Immunity. Charges. Ballots. Supreme Court. Election intel: #BREAKING TRUMP TO SC: "All presidents must have complete & total presidential immunity, or the authority & decisiveness of a President of the United States will be stripped & gone forever. Hopefully, this will be an easy decision. God bless the Supreme Court!"

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

RNC. Resolution. Haley. Trump. Election intel: #BREAKING RNC Moving to Declare Trump Its Presumptive Nominee An RNC committeeman has submitted the proposal despite Nikki Haley’s vow to stay in the race. The Republican National Committee (RNC) is reviewing a draft resolution that, if approved, would declare Donald Trump the party’s presumptive 2024 presidential nominee even as Nikki Haley continues to wage a vigorous campaign against the former president and frontrunner. The draft resolution, obtained by The Dispatch Thursday morning, was proposed by David Bossie, an RNC committeeman from Maryland and close Trump ally. His effort to put the national party on a general election footing behind Trump follows RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel saying after the former president defeated Haley in Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary that it was time for Republicans to unite behind the frontrunner and focus on defeating Joe Bidan. “RESOLVED that the Republican National Committee hereby declares President Trump as our presumptive 2024 nominee for the office of President of the United States and from this moment forward moves into full general election mode welcoming supporters of all candidates as valued members of Team Trump 2024,” reads a key portion of the draft resolution. Under current RNC rules, Trump still has to win the requisite number of nominating convention delegates—1,215—to become the party’s unchallenged presumptive nominee. After the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, Trump leads Haley in the race for delegates 32 to 17. But passage of this resolution, possibly next week at the RNC winter meeting in Las Vegas, could begin a preemptive process of the national party working with the former president as if he had already done so. And under RNC rules, that is permissible. This resolution, even in draft form, also functions as another sign that the GOP establishment is anxious to coalesce behind Trump and put an end to a presidential primary that, after his victories in Iowa and New Hampshire, the former president looks poised to win. Developing... Source: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/dispatch-politics/rnc-moving-to-declare-trump-its-presumptive-nominee/

RNC Moving to Declare Trump Its Presumptive Nominee An RNC committeeman has submitted the proposal despite Nikki Haley’s vow to stay in the race. - Start a free trial today for full access. thedispatch.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Lawsuit. Trials. Jury. COMMS. Defamation. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Jury just ruled that Donald Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll over $83 million in defamation damages The nine-person jury began deliberations in federal court in New York at 1:40 p.m. ET and reached a verdict in just under three hours. The award included $11 million for damage to Carroll's reputation, $7.3 million for emotional harm and other damages, and $65 million in punitive damages. The decision came after contentious closing arguments that saw Trump storm out of the courtroom. He returned for his own attorney's closing arguments but left the courthouse at 4 p.m. before the jury returned its verdict. He posted about it on his social media platform on Truth Social a short time later. "Absolutely ridiculous!" he wrote, adding he would be appealing. "They have taken away all First Amendment Rights. THIS IS NOT AMERICA!" Carroll did not comment as she left the courthouse. The cabal has done this to use as Cannon fodder to try and use against him this election. They all need talking points, including Haley. This is also comms to let other juries know how to proceed in Trump’s other upcoming trials this year. As I've stated countless times concerning Trump’s trials. He's going to present all of the evidence in the world that can't be refuted. One of 2 things will happen. Out of all of the scenarios, the world will learn the truth about the election and J6, etc. First scenario. He'll get convicted anyway despite showing all of the evidence. That'll be the 1st marker for MI. Sparking what is to come. 2nd scenario, he's found innocent and vindicated of everything. Then Cabal goes into survival mode. All ops will get escalated globally, sparking the 2nd marker. Both scenarios will spark ops. Get ready. Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/verdict-reached-e-jean-carrolls-defamation-damages-trial-trump-rcna135919

Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll over $83 million in defamation damages, jury finds Former President Donald Trump must pay writer E. Jean Carroll over $83 million in damages for repeatedly defaming her, a jury found Friday. nbcnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. E. Jean Carroll. Epstein. Theater. Actors. COMMS. Cabal intel: #REPORT E. Jean Carroll named the mice that runs around her blue & white striped house that she named the 'Mouse House. She also has a dog named “Tits,” and paints rocks and trees blue in her backyard that runs by a river. What does her house remind you of? These are comms. These are criminals. They are cabal.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Some distinguished mice live here. Kahneman is in the kitchen, and Taborski is in the bedroom. This is my shed, and on the door is a list of my dogs: Marky, Fortuna De Las Funky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. I was horrified to see the dry streams and rivers, which inspired me to paint the rocks blue to show where the water once flowed. After painting the rocks, I moved on to paint the trees, and soon I had painted the entire forest.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Some very distinguished, mice live here. Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taborski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up. On the door of the list of my dogs, Marky, Fortuna De Las Funky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon I've done this whole forest. That's because some very distinguished, mice live here.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. IRS. Taxes. Elon. Leaks. MI intel: #BREAKING Ex-IRS Contractor Who Leaked Trump, Griffin Tax Data Gets Five Years in Prison A former Internal Revenue Service contractor who stole and leaked the tax returns of former President Donald Trump, Ken Griffin, Elon Musk, and other billionaires was sentenced to five years in prison. Charles Littlejohn, 38, had pleaded guilty Oct. 12 to stealing Trump’s tax data from the IRS and leaking it to the New York Times. He also admitted taking tax information about thousands of other wealthy Americans, including Jeff Bezos, that he passed to ProPublica. The judge called it the biggest heist in IRS history and “an intolerable attack on our democracy. Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-29/irs-leaker-of-trump-griffin-tax-data-gets-five-years-in-prison?embedded-checkout=true

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Bidan. Carroll. Election intel: #REPORT Carroll: "I'll do everything I can" to help Bidan beat Trump in 2024.” This means she'll lie, cheat, and steal.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The idea is that when you confront Donald Trump, he appears as just a man without power. His influence comes from the people around him who support him. This concept is similar to Hans Christian Andersen's tale, "The Emperor's New Clothes," where the emperor's power is an illusion created by his followers. Currently, Trump is campaigning for president again and polling suggests a tight race. There hasn't been communication from Joe Biden's campaign about facing Trump, but there is a willingness to engage if necessary.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: That when you've actually faced the man, he's just a man with no clothes on. Yeah. It's the people around him that are giving him the power. What do you mean by that? Speaker 1: Well, Hans Christian Andersen's great fairy tale, the emperor has no clothes, that is written about Donald Trump. It's just we're the ones who clothe him in all this power. He has none himself. It's his followers. It's his hangers on. In the court, they were strutting back and forth and handing him messages. It was right, Robbie? Miss Scott, Speaker 2: you say it's nothing. You say the emperor has no clothes. The emperor is trying to run for president Yeah. Again. Speaker 1: And And right now is leading. Speaker 2: And right now, the polls suggest it's a coin flip. It's very close. Have you heard from Joe Biden's campaign arm about potentially campaigning against the former president Donald Trump? No. Are you interested in doing so? Speaker 1: Do anything I can. Speaker 2: That's a yes. Speaker 0: What was it? Said that

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Appeals. Judges. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump D.C. trial drops off court’s March calendar, clearing way for N.Y. case Administrative move comes as anticipation mounts over how — and when — an appeals court will decide former president’s claim of immunity from criminal prosecution. President Donald Trump’s March 4 trial date on charges of plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election has been dropped from the public calendar of the federal court in Washington, a sign of what has long been anticipated — that his claim of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution would delay his trial while it remains on appeal. The change did not appear on the official criminal case docket before the U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, who has made clear since Trump filed his appeal on Dec. 7 that all trial deadlines would be suspended while he challenges the case. On appeal, Trump is arguing that the government does not have authority under the Constitution to bring charges against him for actions he took while president after the 2020 election through the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack, when he attempted to prevent Congress from confirming Joe Biden’s election victory. A delay in the D.C. case makes it increasingly likely that the first of Trump’s four criminal trials could be held this spring in Manhattan on New York state charges of business fraud in connection with hush money payments during the 2016 election. That trial has nominally been set for March 25, but the court, in that case, has signaled deference to Trump’s federal election subversion case. New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan has scheduled a pretrial hearing in two weeks — Feb. 15 — and is expected to decide after that if the trial will go forward as planned. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/02/01/trump-trial-calendar-jan-6-delay/

Trump’s D.C. trial removed from March calendar, clearing way for N.Y. case A delay in Trump’s case in D.C. makes it likely that the first of his four criminal trials could be his New York state prosecution accusing him of business fraud. washingtonpost.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. FOIA. DOJ. FBI. Fraud. Ballots. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Brand new FOIA documents just uncovered reveals that the DOJ and FBI uncovered alarming 2020 election ballot fraud in Detroit, Michigan, and covered it up In the emails, a DOJ official says, "This allegation, and accompanying photos, is alarming. I would like FBI to look into this, please." Someone at the Michigan Attorney General's office also responded to the complaint, "Talked to the FBI on this and it's not going to be in their lane or ours in terms of apparent criminal actions, but MDOS[Michigan Department of State] may want to call and try and head this off." Source: yehuda_miller

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Immunity. Federal. Appeals. Courts. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Claim of Absolute Immunity The ruling answered a question that an appeals court had never addressed: Can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected former President Donald J. Trump’s claim that he was immune to charges of plotting to subvert the results of the 2020 election, ruling that he must go to trial on a criminal indictment accusing him of seeking to overturn his loss to President Biden. The unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit handed Mr. Trump was a significant defeat, but it was unlikely to be the final word on his claims of executive immunity. Mr. Trump, who is on a path to locking up the Republican presidential nomination, is expected to continue his appeal to the Supreme Court. Still, the panel’s 57-page ruling signaled an important moment in American jurisprudence, answering a question that had never been addressed by an appeals court: Can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? Trump will file an appeal to the Supreme Court. Trump is now in the cabal playing field. Brace yourselves this year, guys. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/06/us/politics/trump-immunity-appeals-court.html

Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Claim of Absolute Immunity The ruling answered a question that an appeals court had never addressed: Can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? nytimes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud. Judge. Rulings. Octigon intel: #BREAKING Judge set to rule in Trump's $370 million civil fraud case A New York state judge is expected to rule on Friday in a $370 million civil fraud case against former U.S. President Donald Trump, who is accused of inflating his net worth to dupe bankers into giving him better loan terms. Justice Arthur Engoron's ruling could deal a major blow to Trump's real estate empire as the businessman turned politician seeks the Republican nomination to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden in the Nov. 5 U.S. election. The lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James accused Trump and his family businesses of overstating his net worth by as much $3.6 billion a year over a decade. Trump has denied wrongdoing and called the case a political vendetta by James, an elected Democrat. In addition to monetary penalties, James is seeking to permanently ban Trump from New York's real estate industry and sharply limit his ability to do business in the state. She is also seeking five-year industry bans for Trump's two adult sons, Don Jr. And Eric, who are also defendants in the case. Developing... Source: https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-set-rule-trumps-370-million-civil-fraud-case-2024-02-16/#:~:text=Justice%20Arthur%20Engoron's%20ruling%20could,the%20Nov.%205%20U.S.%20election.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Judge orders Trump and his companies to pay more than $350 million in the New York civil case. Bars Trump from running businesses in the city for three years.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Motion. Judge. Carroll. COMMS. Octogon intel: #UPDATE Judge Denies Trump’s Delayed Payment Request In E. Jean Carroll Case The New York judge who oversaw E. Jean Carroll’s defamation lawsuit against former President Donald Trump rejected the former president’s request to delay paying Carroll more than $80 million in damages, according to a Sunday court filing. Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, requested an “administrative stay” on Friday to pause Trump’s required payments to Carroll after he made defaming statements against the former writer in 2019. Kaplan said Sunday he would not grant a pause without allowing Carroll and her team to respond and gave them until Thursday at 5 p.m. to respond to Trump’s motion. In Habba’s Friday motion, she asked Kaplan to stay the motion for at least 30 days until Trump’s post-trial motions were resolved, claiming there was a “strong probability” the verdict could be reduced or eliminated on appeal. If they're giving Trump and attorneys a hard time now in just civil suits. Just imagine what they're going to do in the criminal trials. This corrupt 2-tiered justice system is designed to railroad those the cabal wants locked up. It doesn't make a difference how much money a person may have. Sometimes, it does in rare cases. Be prepared for what is to come. https://www.msn.com/en-US/finance/-companies/judge-denies-trumps-delayed-payment-request-in-e-jean-carroll-case/ar-BB1iRzRB?ocid=sapphireappshare

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Interest. Bankrupt. Orders. Civil. COMMS. Octogon intel: #BREAKING $100 MILLION in interest added to Trump's judgment accruing interest at $100k daily In New York, former President Donald Trump's bills are racking up. The judgment in his civil fraud trial was officially entered with the court today — $454,156,783.05 for him alone, plus Trump is now accruing over $100,000 of post-judgment interest each day. This is on top of the recent $83.3 million verdict against him in the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial. Trump and the other defendants in the civil fraud case — his sons Donald Jr. and Eric Trump and two other Trump Organization executives — have 30 days to appeal the decision by Judge Arthur Engoron, which found them liable for fraud for misrepresenting the value of Trump properties. The message is loud and clear. The Octogon intends to bankrupt Trump. Usually, in civil cases. The lawyers tie up litigation on appeals for years. Not in Trump's cases. They want the full amount in 30 days or face hefty interest, fines, penalties, and possible jail time. Next up is Trump's criminal cases. Where he faces decades in prison. Be prepared for what is to come. Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-civil-fraud-judgment-over-450-million-100000-interest-per-day/

Trump's civil fraud judgment is officially over $450 million, and climbing over $100,000 per day The amount former President Donald Trump owes in his New York civil fraud case is $454,156,783 — plus $111,983 of post-judgment interest accruing each day. cbsnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Properties. Assets. Seizure. COMMS. Financial. NY. Octogon intel: #REPORT Attorney General Letitia James says she's prepared to seize Trump's assets if he can't pay his $354 million civil fraud fine.

Video Transcript AI Summary

New York Attorney General Letitia James stated that if Trump cannot pay the over $300 million in penalties from his civil fraud trial, they will seek court enforcement to seize his assets. This includes significant properties like 40 Wall Street. Trump will need to post a bond within the next 25 days, which involves cash and rights to some properties. He has the option to appeal the verdict, but ultimately, he must pay whatever amount is determined. If he cannot provide the cash, prosecutors will proceed to seize and liquidate his assets to satisfy the judgment owed to the state of New York.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: What the New York attorney general Letitia James told ABC News she is going to do if Trump cannot afford to pay the 300,000,000 plus in penalties from his civil fraud trial? Here's what she said. Speaker 1: If he does not have funds, to pay off the judgment, then we will seek, you know, judgment enforcement mechanisms in court. And we will ask the judge to seize his assets. Speaker 0: Those assets include big buildings here in New York City, including, she talked a bit about, 40 Wall Street. Is that what would play out here normally for someone, and do you see this happening? Speaker 2: Yeah. So this is the way it will go, Poppy. First of all, Donald Trump, within the next 25 days or so, is gonna post a bond, meaning some cash element plus the deeds, the rights to some of his properties, including potentially some of those buildings. Then Donald Trump will have the right to appeal, of course. And whatever comes out of that appeal, whatever's left of this verdict, maybe all $350 +1000000, maybe some smaller number, maybe none of it. But whatever comes out of it, Donald Trump then has to pay. This is not negotiable. This will be a judgment owed not to individuals but to the state of New York. And Right. If he cannot put up cash to satisfy that judgment, then the next move that a prosecutor makes is you seize and liquidate assets until you get up to that number.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Appeals. NY. Courts. Patriot intel: #UPDATE Donald Trump appeals $454 million loss in New York real estate fraud case President Donald Trump filed an appeal Monday against the dramatic $454 million court loss he suffered in a New York real estate fraud case. Trump's liability includes penalties of about $355 million plus interest that started running at different times for different Trump properties. Interest will continue accumulating at 9% a year until the judgment is paid under state law. Trump filed the appeal document Monday along with his two oldest sons, former Trump Organization executives, and several business entities. Although Trump didn't lay out his appellate arguments on Monday, legal experts expect he will argue that the fraud he was found liable for didn't involve traditional victims. James made the case that Trump inflated his net worth to get better loan terms, but the lenders themselves haven't sued Trump alleging they were harmed by the inflation. "We trust that the Appellate Division will overturn this egregious fine and take the necessary steps to restore the public faith in New York’s legal system," Trump lawyer Alina Habba said in a statement Monday. I have his appeal pdf file. it's 102pgs long. If his appeal is accepted or rejected. Will set a precedent on how Trump’s other cases play out this year. Source: usatoday

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud. Pause. Judgment. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump cannot line up full bond in New York fraud case, offers to post $100 million Donald Trump on Wednesday lost a bid to pause a $454.2 million civil fraud judgment against him for overstating his net worth and real estate values to dupe lenders, meaning he must soon find the cash or post a bond to prevent New York authorities from seizing his property while he appeals. The decision by Associate Justice Anil Singh of the New York Appellate Division must be affirmed by a full panel of the mid-level state appeals court. Singh granted Trump's request for a stay of a portion of Justice Arthur Engoron's Feb. 16 decision barring the former president from running any New York corporation or seeking loans from the state's banks for three years. In asking for the stay earlier on Wednesday, Trump's lawyers said he is unable to post a bond for the full amount of the judgment while he appeals and wants instead to secure a $100 million bond. A bonding company would be on the hook for any payout if Trump loses his appeal and proves unable to pay. In their filing with the Appellate Division, Trump's lawyers said a stay of Engoron's decision was needed because Trump would suffer "irreparable harm" if James were free to sell his real estate assets to raise capital to pay the judgment. The lawyers also said the "exorbitant and punitive amount of the judgment coupled with an unlawful and unconstitutional blanket prohibition on lending transactions would make it impossible to secure and post a complete bond." They said a $100 million bond, together with Trump's "vast" real estate holdings and ongoing oversight by a court-designated monitor for the Trump Organization, would be more than sufficient to secure the judgment. Developing... Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-cannot-line-up-full-bond-new-york-fraud-case-offers-post-100-mln-2024-02-28/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Supreme Court. Illinois. Eligibility. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Illinois judge says 14th Amendment bars Trump from 2024 primary ballot A judge in Cook County, Illinois, on Wednesday ruled that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, also known as the "insurrection clause," bars former President Donald Trump from the 2024 Republican primary ballot. The order overrules a January determination from the Illinois State Board of Elections that Trump could remain eligible. Cook County Circuit Judge Tracie Porter placed an immediate stay on her decision until March 1 "in anticipation of an appeal to the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, or the Illinois Supreme Court." Trump plans to appeal the ruling, a source familiar confirms. The Supreme Court is currently debating Trumps appeal. The ultimate ruling from the SC will also set the precedent on how things will play out for the rest of this year. I personally don't think it'll be great news. I really hope I'm wrong. The precedent will be set either way. Developing...

Video Transcript AI Summary

The US Supreme Court is hearing arguments on whether former President Trump can be barred from reelection under the 14th Amendment. Trump's attorney contends that he is not an elected official or an officer of the United States, arguing that Section 3 applies only to those in office, not candidates. He warned that affirming the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to remove Trump from the ballot could disenfranchise millions of voters. Conversely, the plaintiff's attorney claims Trump disqualified himself by attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power through insurrection. The court's decision will ultimately address Trump's eligibility in light of these allegations.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: To the US Supreme Court hearing arguments on whether former president Trump could be barred from reelection under the 14th amendment. Trump's attorney argued the former president is not covered under section 3 as an elected official, claiming also that he's not an officer of the United States. He also said that section 3 can't apply to a candidate only to those who hold office. He said that if the US Supreme Court affirms the Colorado Supreme Court's decision, which removed Trump from the ballot in that state, that it would, quote, take away votes of potentially tens of millions of Americans. The plaintiff's attorney argued that president Trump disqualified himself by trying to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power by engaging in insurrection against the constitution. He says that ultimately is this court's, is what this court is going to decide, and it's the question of whether Trump's eligibility holds amid that issue for the country. So let's bring in senior national correspondent Terry Moran outside the Supreme Court, ABC News Supreme Court contributor Kate Shaw, and ABC News executive editorial producer

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE This could be game over: Supreme Court hands Trump big win by taking immunity case The justices agreed on Wednesday to decide whether Trump enjoys "total immunity" from prosecution. The timing of that decision likely means a trial over Trump's role in Jan. 6 won't begin — much less end — before the election. There's nothing Trump wants more in this case than a delay. If he wins in November and hasn't been tried before Inauguration Day, there's a good chance he never will be. "This could well be game over," election law expert Rick Hasen. Trump's first briefs are due to the high court in about three weeks. Oral arguments will be in late April. That sets the stage for a ruling in late June, at the end of the court's term. That's about as fast as the Supreme Court is capable of moving. The justices have kept the actual trial on ice in the meantime. The fundamental issue in this case — whether presidents are fully immune from prosecution over anything they did in office, even after they've left it — is one of the most profound questions of presidential power the court has ever had to answer. A lower court, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's claims of immunity, ruling that he could be prosecuted for Jan. 6. Between the lines: The justices had options here. They could have declined to hear Trump's appeal. They wouldn't have had to tackle the question of presidential immunity, and Trump's trial would have proceeded before the election. That's what some legal experts were anticipating, based on how long it took the justices to announce whether they'd hear the case. Once they agreed to hear the appeal and decide whether presidents are beyond the reach of the criminal-justice system, keeping the trial paused makes sense. If you're not sure whether someone can be prosecuted, it's logical not to prosecute them until you've figured that out. Source: https://www.axios.com/2024/02/29/trump-wins-delay-immunity-case-supreme-court

"This could be game over:" Supreme Court hands Trump big win by taking immunity case A delay is what Trump wanted most — even if he loses at the end of it. axios.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Supreme Court. Ballots. Rulings. Election intel: #BREAKING Trump was wrongly removed from Colorado ballot, US supreme court rules Donald Trump was wrongly removed from Colorado’s primary ballot last year, the US supreme court has ruled, clearing the way for Trump to appear on the ballot in all 50 states. The court’s unanimous decision overturns a 4-3 ruling from the Colorado supreme court that said the former president could not run because he had engaged in insurrection during the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. The Colorado decision was a novel interpretation of section 3 of the 14th amendment, which bars insurrectionists from holding office. “We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the court wrote in an unsigned opinion. Congress, the court said, had to enact the procedures for disqualification under Section 3. “State-by-state resolution of the question whether Section 3 bars a particular candidate for President from serving would be quite unlikely to yield a uniform answer consistent with the basic principle that the President … represent[s] all the voters in the Nation,” the court added. Maine and a judge in Illinois had also excluded Trump from the ballot – decisions that are now likely to be quickly reversed. All nine justices agreed with the central holding in the case: that the Colorado supreme court had wrongly barred Trump from appearing on the ballot. But agreement did not extend beyond that. "For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case," Justice Barrett wrote in her concurring opinion. "That is the message Americans should take home." Trump, praised Monday's ruling. "It was a very important decision," he said in Mar-a-Lago hours after it was announced, calling it "very well-crafted. And I think it will go a long way toward bringing our country together." He added, "I have great respect for the Supreme Court, and I want to just thank them for working so quickly and so diligently and so brilliantly." Moves and countermoves. The cabal thought it would be easier to simply just remove Trump from the ballot as a contingency if Trump so happens to win his court cases. The states that elected to remove Trump from the ballot are compromised. The patriots there need to expose all corruption from the local governments there. Colorado. Illinois. Maine. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/04/trump-scotus-colorado-ruling

Trump was wrongly removed from Colorado ballot, US supreme court rules Court’s decision clears way for ex-president to appear on primary ballot in all states theguardian.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Dossier. Judgements. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Trump is ordered to pay legal fees after failed lawsuit over the Steele dossier President Donald Trump has been ordered to pay a six-figure legal bill to a company founded by a former British spy that he unsuccessfully sued for making what his lawyer called “shocking and scandalous" false claims that harmed his reputation. A London judge, who threw out the case against Orbis Business Intelligence last month saying it was “bound to fail," ordered Trump to pay legal fees of 300,000 pounds[$382,000], according to court documents released Thursday. The Octogon has the judges. They are sleepers. This is just setting the stage for Trump’s upcoming criminal trials. Be prepared. Source: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/trump-ordered-pay-legal-fees-after-failed-lawsuit-107891658

ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos Page Unavailable abcnews.go.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Supreme Court. Judges. Charges. COMMS. Election interference intel: This is a win. But the battle is far from over. #BREAKING Georgia judge tosses some charges against Trump and others in 2020 election case A Fulton County judge on Wednesday tossed out several counts brought against former President Donald Trump and five others in the case involving an alleged attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia. The brief order from Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee states that six of the counts in the 41-count indictment returned by a Fulton County grand jury in August must be quashed. Of those six counts, Trump was charged with three of them. Joining Trump in the challenge to the six counts were former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and lawyers Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Ray Stallings Smith, and Robert Cheeley All had pleaded not guilty to the charges brought against them. Steve Sadow, Trump's lawyer, said the court's decision to quash the counts is the correct one. "The ruling is a correct application of the law, as the prosecution failed to make specific allegations of any alleged wrongdoing on those counts," he said in a statement. "The entire prosecution of President Trump is political, constitutes election interference, and should be dismissed." Eastman's attorney, Buddy Parker, said in a statement that "the court stated clearly the state failed to provide what exactly in the U.S. and Georgia constitutions the defendants solicited the public figures to violate, a clear error. We await the state's position on its intention in moving forward on the remaining charges." Allyn Stockton, Giuliani's local lawyer, said the quashing of the six counts was expected, as "there simply was not enough detail to put the defendants on notice of what to defend against." McAfee's ruling The six counts relate to various alleged attempts to solicit state officials to violate their oaths of office, both to the Georgia Constitution and the U.S. Constitution. The judge wrote that the state failed to specify what those violations were, saying the allegations were "so generic as to compel this Court" to quash the six charges. "The court's concern is less that the state has failed to allege sufficient conduct of the defendants — in fact, it has alleged an abundance. However, the lack of detail concerning an essential legal element is, in the undersigned's opinion, fatal," McAfee wrote. He said that though the six counts as written contain "all the essential elements of the crimes," they "fail to allege sufficient detail regarding the nature of their commission, i.e. the underlying felony solicited." Additionally, they don't give the defendants enough information to prepare their defenses "intelligently," McAfee wrote, as they could have violated Georgia and U.S. Constitutions "and thus the statute in dozens, if not hundreds, of distinct ways." Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-georgia-case-some-charges-dismissed-2020-election/#

Video Transcript AI Summary

Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee dismissed some charges against former President Trump and his co-defendants related to pressuring public officials to overturn the 2020 election, citing a lack of specificity from prosecutors. Three of Trump's charges were dropped, including one tied to his call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Trump's legal team viewed this as a positive development, although a former federal prosecutor noted it was only a partial victory, as the case remains largely intact. A significant decision is expected soon regarding the potential disqualification of District Attorney Fani Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade, who recently disclosed a romantic relationship. If disqualified, a new attorney could take over the case, possibly affecting its progress.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Decades in jail. Here's CBS's Nicole Killian. Speaker 1: Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee threw out charges that accused former president Trump and several of his codefendants of pressuring public officers to violate their oaths as part of an alleged effort to overturn the 2020 election. McAfee said district attorney Fani Willis and her prosecutors were not specific enough about the violations, writing, the lack of detail concerning an essential legal element is fatal. Just 3 of Trump's 13 gowns were tossed, including one for his January 2021 phone call to Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger. Speaker 2: I just wanna find, 11,000 780 votes. Speaker 1: Trump's legal team applauded the ruling. Speaker 0: It was a step in the right direction. It goes to the sloppiness of, frankly, the the prosecutors down there. Speaker 1: Former federal prosecutor Tom Dupree said it was only a partial victory for Trump. Speaker 2: Judge's decision effectively has the result of narrowing the case against Trump and the other defendants. It doesn't eliminate it entirely, though. Speaker 0: It is a lie. Speaker 1: McAfee's ruling comes ahead of a highly anticipated decision this week about whether Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade should be disqualified from the election interference case. Last month, the pair admitted to having a romantic relationship for about a year after Wade was hired, but denied any wrongdoing. Speaker 2: The romantic relationship ended before the indictment was returned. Yes or no? Speaker 0: To a man, yes. Speaker 1: The sprawling racketeering case against the former president and his associates remains largely intact. But if Willis is disqualified, another attorney could be assigned to the case, which could significantly impact the proceedings. Nora? Speaker 0: And potentially delay them. Nicole Killian, thank you so much.

Georgia judge tosses some charges against Trump and others in 2020 election case A Fulton County judge on Wednesday tossed out several counts brought against former President Donald Trump and five others. cbsnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Georgia. Judge. Fani Willis. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Judge rules Fani Willis can stay on Georgia case, but only if prosecutor steps down in [17] page ruling If Fani pack steps down. They would have to pick an entire team. That would delay the case indefinitely. So will she fire her prosecutor bae?

Video Transcript AI Summary

A major ruling has been made in Georgia's election interference case against Donald Trump and 14 co-defendants. Judge Scott McAfee has allowed Fulton County District Attorney Fonnie Willis to remain on the case, although he noted an appearance of impropriety regarding her relationship with a prosecution team member, Nathan Wade. Trump’s attorneys argued for her disqualification based on this appearance, but the judge found no actual conflict of interest. Willis can either let Wade go or step aside with her entire office, but the case can proceed without significant delays. This outcome is seen as a positive for Willis, allowing her to continue without the complications of bringing in a new team.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: News special report. Good morning. I'm Whit Johnson in New York, and we're coming on the air right now because there has been a major ruling in Georgia's election interference case against Donald Trump and 14 other codefendants. Judge Scott McAfee has just ruled Fulton County District Attorney Fonnie Willis can remain on the case. So let's get right to our senior investigative correspondent, Aaron Koutierski. Because, Aaron, the way the judge laid this out here, there are multiple options to work with. Speaker 1: There are with because he did not totally clear the district attorney here in Fulton County from the whiff of but he said Donald Trump and some of his codefendants failed to show that there was an actual conflict of interest posed by her relationship with another member of the prosecution team, Nathan Wade, whom she hired to help run the case. But he did say there was an appearance of impropriety. And so while disqualification was not necessary, the judge did give options. The decision says the district attorney may choose to step aside along with the entirety of her office or she can let Nathan Wade go and the case can continue. So with the ball is now in Fani Willis' court to decide how to proceed. Speaker 0: Alright, Aaron. Stand by. Let's bring in Olivia Rubin, our investigative reporter. And, Olivia, I know you've been following this closely. Of course, the appearance of impropriety, this is exactly what Trump's attorneys and the attorneys of the other codefendants were trying to lay out. Speaker 2: It's exactly what Donald Trump's attorney, Steve Sadow, and many of the other defense attorneys told the judge should be enough to remove her from the case. They said that there is enough in Georgia law that should mean that an appearance of a conflict should get her kicked off, but that is exactly what the DA argued against, telling the judge immediately after we saw all of those, you know, high stakes evidentiary hearings saying that there is no case law that just an appearance of conflict should lead to a disqualification and urged the judge really, really in this I I think it was a 17 page filing saying there must be an actual conflict of interest. And as we just heard from Erin, the judge ultimately found that there was no actual conflict of interest, that the trips that they took together, that the money that was paid by Nathan Wheat's card, remember Fani Willis said she paid that back in cash, that she had no financial benefit, and that should dispel any idea that she had a financial stake in keeping the case going. So when the judge heard that, it seems that that seemed to dispel any notion that she had any sort of personal stake here. And I think it's likely that we're gonna hear from the DA that this is a win for her case. I think it's not, you know, the worst outcome that Nathan Wade, which is likely the option that they're going to choose, is going to have to step aside because the case will continue forward. Fonnie Willis can continue forward, and it does not have to get tied up now by this outside body having to pick an entirely new team to come in and pick up the case, probably delaying it indefinitely. So that has been avoided today if they take the option of Nathan Wade Wit.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Attorney. Michigan. Arrests. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Pro-Trump Michigan attorney arrested after hearing in DC over leaking Dominion documents A Michigan attorney who unsuccessfully sued to overturn former President Donald Trump's 2020 loss has been arrested after a hearing on a separate case in DC. Stefanie Lambert was arrested by the U.S. Marshals after a hearing over possible sanctions against her for disseminating confidential emails from Dominion Voting Systems, the target of conspiracy theories over former President Donald Trump's 2020 election loss. Lambert obtained the Dominion emails by representing Patrick Byrne, a prominent funder of election conspiracy theorists who are being sued by Dominion for defamation. Earlier Monday, Lambert had acknowledged passing on the records from Dominion Voting Systems to “law enforcement.” She then attached an affidavit that included some of the leaked emails and was signed by Dar Leaf, a county sheriff in northern Michigan who has investigated false claims of widespread election fraud from the 2020 election, to a filing in her own case in Michigan. The rest of the documents were posted to an account under Leaf’s name on X. Lambert contended that the Dominion documents obtained under discovery were evidence of “crimes” and needed to be disclosed. Dominion is trying their best to hide exculpatory evidence. If Dominion is not stopped. They will steal the election again. This means they will start another pandemic. To get massive mail-in ballots again. Patterns. Source: https://apnews.com/article/voting-machines-dominion-defamation-68d3f3a4e840ccb7a81d72837c4f6b3e?taid=65f8e50fa8059200016d3705&utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter

Pro-Trump Michigan attorney arrested after hearing in DC over leaking Dominion documents A Michigan attorney who unsuccessfully sued to overturn former President Donald Trump's 2020 loss has been arrested after a hearing on a separate case in Washington, D.C. apnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. New York. Election interference intel: #BREAKING New York judge in hush-money trial rejects Trump's request for delay until after SCOTUS rules on immunity Trump's lawyers had asked to adjourn the New York trial indefinitely until Trump's immunity claim in his Washington, DC, election interference case was resolved Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan deemed Trump’s request untimely, ruling that his lawyers had plenty of opportunities to raise the immunity issue before they did earlier this month. "This Court finds that Defendant had myriad opportunities to raise the claim of presidential immunity well before March 7, 2024," Merchan wrote, adding that Trump and his lawyers could have made the argument on September 29, 2023, which he says was just six days before he made the same presidential immunity argument in Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation into Jan. 6 and election interference. Trump's trial begins on April 15th, 2024. The cabal will try and damage, sentence, and pass judgments by any means necessary up until the election Developing... Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-judge-hush-money-trial-rejects-trumps-request-delay-scotus-rules-immunity

New York judge in hush-money trial rejects Trump's request for delay until after SCOTUS rules on immunity Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan has rejected the former president’s bid for a delay in the hush money trial until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on his immunity claims in another case. foxnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Markers. COMMS. Trump. Trial. Judge. Courts. Denial. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Judge again declines Trump's latest appeal to delay NY hush money case A New York appeals court on Wednesday declined another bid by former President Trump to delay his hush money trial for the third time this week. The former president’s lawyers took aim at three rulings by Judge Juan Merchan: Refusing to recuse, not delaying the trial until the Supreme Court rules on Trump’s presidential immunity claim and requiring Trump to seek permission before filing new motions before trial. Trump is using a maneuver under New York state law, known as an Article 78 proceeding, that involves suing the judge over their decisions. The filings were placed under seal and are not publicly available. The Hill has requested comment from Trump’s lawyers. It marked the latest of a series of eleventh-hour efforts by Trump’s lawyers to stop jury selection from beginning Monday, which would mark the first criminal trial of a former president. The three appeals will now go to a full five-judge panel for consideration. The Octogon controls the judges, jury, and prosecutors. We'll see if the Supreme Court rules by Friday or Monday. Which is highly unlikely. If not, the trial will proceed. And then the only way the Supreme Court can rule is on appeal if found guilty. This would mean all appellate courts would have to deny the appeal first before ultimately bringing it before the Supreme Court. Most of the time, that process could take years. This is a sinister plot by the cabal. Developing... Source: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4586672-trumps-latest-hush-money-trial-delay-effort-denied-by-appeals-court/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Judge. Prosecution. Jury. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump’s Manhattan Criminal Trial Begins With Jury Selection Here’s what else to know about Mr. Trump’s trial: This is the Manhattan criminal case against Mr. Trump, and it was brought by the district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, a year ago. Mr. Trump is facing 34 felony counts of falsifying business records and, if convicted, could face up to four years in prison. The case, one of four indictments facing the former president and presumptive Republican nominee, may be the only one to make it to trial before Election Day. Jury selection will be crucial for both sides. Prosecutors have some advantage, as the jury pool is drawn from Manhattan, one of the most Democratic counties in America. Mr. Trump’s team will be looking for red needles in a blue haystack. Mr. Trump has twice sought Justice Merchan’s recusal, citing his daughter’s work as a Democratic political consultant. Justice Merchan has declined to step aside, noting a ruling by a judicial ethics commission that found his daughter’s work posed no conflict for him. “There is no agenda here,” Justice Merchan said in court on Monday, adding, “we want to follow the law, we want justice to be done.” Mr. Trump has also attacked the judge’s daughter on social media. Hundreds of potential jurors have been summoned. Those who say they cannot be fair or otherwise serve are being excused, and the remaining prospective jurors will answer 42 questions compiled before the trial. Lawyers on both sides will be able to remove a limited number of them without explanation. The lawyers can also ask to remove a potential juror “for cause” by providing specific reasons they believe that person cannot be fair. In addition to the payment to Ms. Daniels, Mr. Bragg’s office is expected to highlight two other deals involving The National Enquirer, a tabloid that has longstanding ties to Mr. Trump. In one deal, the tabloid bought the silence of a man who had heard that Mr. Trump had fathered a child out of wedlock, a rumor that turned out to be false, and in the other, it paid Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model, who wanted to sell her story of an affair with Mr. Trump. The prosecution’s witness list is expected to include David Pecker, the former publisher of The National Enquirer, as well as Hope Hicks, a former aide to Mr. Trump. Ms. Daniels and Ms. McDougal could also testify.■ The judge contends that if Trump misses any day of the trial, he will be arrested and sent to jail. Developing... Source: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/04/15/nyregion/trump-hush-money-trial

No Jurors Picked on First Day of Trump’s Manhattan Criminal Trial Donald J. Trump faces charges he falsified business records to cover up a sex scandal while serving as president. More than half of the first group of prospective jurors was dismissed almost immediately. nytimes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Comms. Trump. Judge. New York. Prison. Trial intel: #BREAKING New York judge says Trump can't attend Supreme Court arguments on presidential immunity The New York judge overseeing former President Trump’s hush money trial said Monday that Trump can not attend arguments on presidential immunity at the Supreme Court next week. It came after the judge earlier delayed a decision on allowing Trump to attend his son Barron’s high school graduation in May. The decision to not allow Trump to be in Washington, D.C., on April 25, when the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on a presidential immunity claim Trump is making in his federal criminal case, came just before the New York trial adjourned Monday. “Arguing before the Supreme Court is a big deal, and I can certainly appreciate why your client would want to be there, but a trial in New York Supreme Court … is also a big deal,” Judge Juan Merchan said to Trump lawyer Todd Blanche, rejecting his request to let the former president play hooky.■ These are further comms suggesting that the judge, jurors, and prosecution are in cohoots with the Octogon. I definitely don't trust this magi judge. Protected. Well insulated. Are prison comms. Source: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4595849-ny-judge-trump-supreme-court-presidential-immunity/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump & Barron: #BREAKING A Heartbroken Trump just wrote: "Who will explain for me, to my wonderful son, Barron, who is a GREAT Student at a fantastic School, that his Dad will likely not be allowed to attend his Graduation Ceremony, something that we have been talking about for years, because a seriously Conflicted and Corrupt New York State Judge wants me in Criminal Court on a bogus “Biden Case” which, according to virtually all Legal Scholars and Pundits, has no merit, and should NEVER have been brought. "This Fake Case is solely meant to attack Crooked Joe Biden’s Political Opponent, ME, who is seriously leading him in the Polls, for purposes of Election Interference. The Judge, Juan Merchan, is preventing me from proudly attending my son’s Graduation. Seems very unfair, doesn’t it? But this whole event is unfair. Every one of the many Fake Cases that are perpetuated by the White House in order to help the Worst President in History, by far, get Re-Elected, are UNJUST SCAMS. We won’t let that happen, but we will MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" The cabal is doing Trump dirty. Karma. The cabal will get theirs in the end. Justice can't come quick enough.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Jurors. New York. Election Interference intel: #BREAKING Lawyers has completed their selection of12 jurors to serve in Trump hush-money case Lawyers in Donald Trump's historic criminal trial on Thursday selected 12 jurors who will assess his guilt or innocence over the coming weeks in a case stemming from a hush-money payment to a porn star. Lawyers for the defense and the prosecution still in their selection phase. Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-hush-money-jury-selection-resumes-lawyers-probe-bias-2024-04-18/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. NY AG. Letitia James. Octogon intel: #BREAKING New York AG Letitia James asks the judge to void Trump's bond over his civil fraud verdict New York Attorney General Letitia James on Friday asked that a judge void former President Donald Trump's bond in his civil fraud case, questioning whether the company that issued it has the funds to back it up. In a 26-page filing ahead of a pre-scheduled hearing on Monday, James expressed concern about whether Knight Specialty Insurance Company could secure the $175 million bond. She also argued that the collateral put up by the former president should be under the full control of the company. One of James' concerns about KSIC is that the insurer "is not authorized to write business in New York and thus not regulated by the state’s insurance department." She added that the company "had never before written a surety bond in New York or in the prior two years in any other jurisdiction and has a total policyholder surplus of just $138 million." Developing... Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/york-ag-letitia-james-asks-233142759.html

New York AG Letitia James asks judge to void Trump's bond in his civil fraud verdict New York Attorney General Letitia James on Friday asked that a judge void former President Donald Trump's bond in his civil fraud case, questioning whether the company that issued it has the funds to back it up. yahoo.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The court has upheld the $175 million bond tied to Trump. Friday, I reported that James was challenging the court to not accept Trumps $175 million payment. The court rejected James' motion. Who doesn't want $175 million?

Video Transcript AI Summary

Breaking news: A court has ruled that Trump's $175 million bond will remain in place, despite challenges from New York Attorney General Letitia James. Former federal prosecutor Tchaikovsky indicated that this ruling is likely to hold up. James argued that the insurance company backing the bond might lack sufficient resources for an appeal, but the court disagreed. The bond must be held in cash, not in fluctuating assets like mutual funds or securities. Knight Insurance will manage the account and provide monthly financial statements to the attorney general, confirming the $175 million is secured.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Alright. So here's the breaking news. And the former federal prosecutor, Tchaikovsky, and I were just talking about this, and he said this was not gonna hold up. He said Trump's gonna be fine. So the court has just ruled that the bond, that $175,000,000 bond that Trump put up will stand despite the fight that the woman on the right, Letitia James, the attorney general of New York, was trying to slide in. And and what did Cherkowsky call it? He called it she was trying to play a legal technicality, saying that the insurance company that Trump was using wasn't going to have the resources to back up that bond should he fail an appeal. Well, the court says the bond can stay. 175,000,000 needs to be in cash, not mutual funds or securities where value can fluctuate. Knight Insurance cannot trade or move the money, but they will have control of the account and will provide a monthly financial statement to the attorney general showing $175,000,000 in

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Memo. Judge. Orders. Patriot intel: #REPORT Trump just released this memo hours ago. It's a comm. This will set the precedent on how this trial will go and his remaining 4 trials.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Immunity. Precedents. Trump. Supreme Court. Future comms intel: #BREAKING Supreme Court case set to argue about immunity for President Trump The Supreme Court has scheduled a special session to hear arguments over whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted over his efforts to undo his 2020 election loss to President Joe Biden. The case, to be argued Thursday, stems from Trump’s attempts to have charges against him dismissed. Lower courts have found he cannot claim immunity for actions that, prosecutors say, illegally sought to interfere with the election results. The Republican ex-president has been charged in federal court in Washington with conspiring to overturn the 2020 election, one of four criminal cases he is facing. A trial has begun in New York over hush money payments to a porn star to cover up an alleged sexual encounter. The Supreme Court is moving faster than usual in taking up the case, though not as quickly as special counsel Jack Smith wanted, raising questions about whether there will be time to hold a trial before the November election, if the justices agree with lower courts that Trump can be prosecuted. The patterns suggest that Trump will not get immunity from prosecution. What does this mean and why does it matters? This will set future direction to go after all of the other living presidents. But unfortunately, it'll have to start with Trump. The letter of the law has to be followed, especially because of this corrupt 2 tired justice system. Every T crossed. Every I dotted. Every R and N cannot be run together. Think rn = m. Think corney/comey. If everything is not done right. This nation is over. You will have new foreign occupants in the Whitehouse. You think no one is fighting back now? No one will definitely fight back then. Our nation stands on the precipice. Source: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-trump-immunity-prosecution-capitol-riot-9fd5dc5947dab82bbd18d3efcb4267d8

What to know in the Supreme Court case about immunity for former President Trump The core issue being debated before the Supreme Court on Thursday boils down to whether a former president is immune from prosecution for actions taken while in office. apnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Secrets service. Trump. Trial. Arrest comms: #BREAKING Secret Service prepares if Trump is jailed for contempt in hush money case The U.S. Secret Service held meetings and started planning for what to do if former President Donald Trump were to be held in contempt in his criminal hush money trial and Judge Juan Merchan opted to send him to short-term confinement, officials familiar with the situation told ABC News. Merchan on Tuesday reserved a decision on the matter after a contentious hearing. Prosecutors said at this point they are seeking a fine. “We are not yet seeking an incarceratory penalty," assistant district attorney Chris Conroy said, "But the defendant seems to be angling for that." Officials do not necessarily believe Merchan would put Trump in a holding cell in the courthouse, but they are planning for contingencies, the officials said. There have not been discussions yet about what to do if Trump is convicted and sentenced to prison. Developing... Source: https://abcnews.go.com/US/secret-services-prepares-potential-trump-contempt-order-hush/story?id=109542824

Secret Service prepares for if Trump is jailed for contempt in hush money case Judge Merchan on Tuesday reserved decision after a contentious hearing. abcnews.go.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Supreme Court. Immunity. Clarence Thomas. Trial intel: #BREAKING Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas raised the question to Trump’s lawyers if they have challenged special counsel Jack Smith's authority to bring charges against the former president, which could provide a loophole that may disqualify Smith. Mr. Sauer said that Trump attorneys have not raised such concerns "directly" in the current case at the Supreme Court however, Trump’s attorney John Sauer agrees with the "analysis provided by AG Edwin Meese and AG Michael B. Mukasey," referring to the amicus brief the two former attorneys general submitted to the Supreme Court on March 19. In the brief, the two attorneys general argue that Mr. Smith "does not have authority to conduct the underlying prosecution." Developing... Source: leadingreport

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Jury. Deliberations. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Jury Now Deliberating In Trump’s Hush Money Trial—And Trump Can’t Leave Until There’s A Verdict Jurors began deliberating Wednesday over whether former President Donald Trump should be criminally convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, bringing nearly six weeks of testimony and arguments in the historic trial to an end—though it’s unclear how long it will take them to reach a verdict. Jurors started deliberating at approximately 11:30 a.m. Eastern time Wednesday after Judge Juan Merchan delivered the jury instructions, following closing arguments on Tuesday that stretched into the evening hours. Parties in the case—including Trump—can’t leave the courthouse during the jury’s deliberations until there’s a verdict, Merchan told the parties. All parties, including the Jurors, can not leave until a verdict is made. Developing... Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/05/29/jury-now-deliberating-in-trumps-hush-money-trial/?sh=2ab9e5bf23c0

Jury Won’t Reach Verdict In Trump Trial Today As Court Ends For The Day It’s unclear how long it could take the jury to reach a verdict. forbes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Judge. Jury. Octogon intel: The cabal are desperately trying by any means necessary to find Trump guilty of any offense so they can sentence him to prison. #BREAKING The judge in Trump's case tells jurors they could be split ‘4-4-4,’ and he will still treat them as unanimous verdicts This is insane!

Video Transcript AI Summary

The judge has indicated that jurors do not need to agree on the specific crime involved in the case, which is unprecedented. In typical criminal cases, jurors must unanimously agree on the elements of the offense, such as intent and the nature of the crime. Here, the key element that elevates the charge from a misdemeanor to a felony is the concealment of another crime. The judge's ruling allows for disagreement among jurors about what that other crime is, which undermines the basis for the felony charge. This is significant because the case could not have been pursued as a misdemeanor due to the statute of limitations expiring in 2019, making the felony charge crucial for the prosecution's ability to proceed.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: First could do. He just delivered, what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. He said that there is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices. Thus, this means that they could split 444 and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean? Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, it's really outrageous because in a normal criminal case, every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case, it's, you know, you have to rob. It's gotta be a financial institution. You have to show intent. Those are the things the jury has to agree on unanimously that were that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here, what we're doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony because, remember, falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you're concealing or committing another crime. And here, the judge is telling them they don't have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, what makes it a 4 year potential prison penalty rather than, a year or less, but it's also what gets us into the courtroom. Because if if this had been a misdemeanor, the the time to bring this case would have lapsed in 2019. So the only reason they're still able to bring this case is because it's a felony, allegedly, and yet now the judge is saying Speaker 0: That these jurors could do.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The jurors just rang the courtroom! Either they have a question or verdict. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Jury asks the judge a question via note: They asked for a witness testimony transcript from former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The jury just asked to rehear the judge’s instructions. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The kury in the Trump trial was dismissed for the day. The court resumes tomorrow at 9:30 a.m. ET. Apparently, the jury can only leave if the judge dismisses them. I will post all updates as they come in on this thread. Be sure to bookmark all pills and all threads.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE These are the jury instructions from the judge: 👇

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#BREAKING Media. Trump and team head back into the courtroom. Could be another jury question. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Chaos continues to ensue outside of the courthouse. Apparently, according to the reporters emails. The people returning back to the courtroom were from a lunch break. Credit: NYP

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Soc media. Judge. Corruption. Patriot intel: #BREAKING Trump just posted minutes ago on his app Truth Social and went in on judge Merchan Will the jury reach a verdict at 6pm? 6 o'clock can be dangerous.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The jury doesn't want to stay until 6pm today. The judge left it up to them. Jury is said to leave 430pm est. No verdict is expected today. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

I strongly believe the jurors have already made their decision. And going home early to marinate on it. They'll return tmr with a Not Guilty verdict.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#BREAKING VERDICT REACHED IN TRUMP TRIAL!

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#BREAKING TRUMP FOUND GUILTY ON ALL 34 COUNTS!

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Verdict. Sentencing. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trimp sentencing is set for July 11th, 2024. The probation interview is being set, too. Judge just told the jury there free to discuss the trial with anyone. The verdict shouldn't surprise anyone. These are Octogon courts. Their minds were already set. The Octogon controls the judges, courts, jurors, prosecutors, district attorneys. The cabal needs Trump out of the way by any means necessary. Cabal is not going down without a fight. Trumps other trials will be similar. This entire fiasco has to play itself out between now and election day. That's if there is an election. I've been telling you they're poised to take it again. Bidan won't make it. Harris becomes president and names Gavin Newsom her VP. Pandemic part 2 is already slated. The summer war has already been set. This is all corruption to high firmament. Where do we go from here? Prep. That's all I'm going to say publicly.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump COMMS: #BREAKING Trump donation page crashed shortly after the verdict was read The sentencing date is 4 days before the GOP Convention on July 18th, where they officially nominate Trump for president.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Supreme Court. Rulings. MI Intel: #BREAKING Trump wins Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity. Will delay Trumps cases until November and beyond. Major blow to the prosecution[s] Supreme Court Ruling: Trump v. United States (23-939) The nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority; he is also entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts; there is no immunity for unofficial acts.■ I've told everyone since the beginning. The SC ruling is very important and that it would go in Trump's favor. Why? Because military tribunals are needed. If Trumps presidential immunity wasn't granted. This would mean the cabal presidency of Bidan. Obama. Bush. Clinton. Would also be brought up on indictments and charges. That can't happen. Why? We have a double jeopardy law. This means someone can't be charged with the same crime twice. The Octogon Group controls the courts, judges, jurors, lawyers, prosecutors, and politicians. So yes, it would've been nice to have them all publicly charged, indicted, and arrested. But all of them would've been cleared of everything. These deepstate cabal[Octogon] members have to be tried in military tribunals. That's the only way to legally and lawfully end this deepstate cabal in America. This ruling should come as no surprise to those who have been following the patterns. Source: https://www.supremecourt.gov/

Home - Supreme Court of the United States supremecourt.gov

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. COMMS. Sentencing. Judges. Patriot intel: #REPORT Judge in Trump's hush money trial delays sentencing following Supreme Court immunity ruling The judge overseeing Donald Trump's New York criminal case approved a delay of the former president's sentencing Tuesday after his lawyers asked for more time to argue that the Supreme Court's immunity decision calls for a new trial. The sentencing hearing, previously scheduled for July 11, will now take place Sept. 18 at the earliest, according to a letter posted on the court's docket. The delay guarantees that Trump won't be sentenced until after he is formally nominated for president at the Republican National Convention, which begins July 15, and that sentencing will happen less than two months before the presidential election. This is perfect timing, actually. It gives us a chance to prep and finish up your preps before all hell breaks loose. At the same time, it's giving the cabal the opportunity to get their black operations together. As they prepare for Trump to retake the throne. Be ready. Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/judge-trumps-hush-money-trial-delays-sentencing-supreme-court-immunity-rcna160028

Judge in Trump's hush money trial delays sentencing following Supreme Court immunity ruling The judge overseeing Donald Trump's New York criminal case approved a delay of the former president's sentencing Tuesday after his lawyers asked for more time to argue that the Supreme Court's immunity decision calls for a new trial. nbcnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

🚨GOOD NEWS ALERT!🚨 Courts. Judges. Trump. Classified. Patriot intel: #BREAKING Judge dismisses Trump "classified documents" case A Trump-appointed judge in Florida has dismissed the criminal case against Donald Trump that charged him with illegally holding on to classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort. The US district judge Aileen Cannon made the ruling after a hearing in which the former president’s legal team urged her to drop the charges brought by special counsel Jack Smith, and notably, after the supreme court said the president has immunity for official acts. Trump’s team had argued that he is the victim of selective prosecution and is being targeted by Democrats as he seeks to regain the presidency. A huge win against the cabal! Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/jul/15/donald-trump-republican-national-convention-speech-milwaukee-shooting-joe-biden-us-politics-latest-news-updates

Trump joins crowd at Republican convention hall with bandaged ear, in first public appearance since assassination attempt – as it happened Ex-president emerges to cheers and chants of ‘USA! USA! USA!’ as he appears amid supporters theguardian.com

@willscharf — Will Scharf

Posted - October 5, 2023 at 6:11 PM

Saved - October 5, 2023 at 6:40 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

President Trump has filed a motion to dismiss the DC case against him, citing presidential immunity. He argues that presidents are immune from criminal prosecutions for acts within their official responsibilities, unless impeached and convicted. This argument is supported by legal principles, caselaw, and the Constitution. The motion asserts that the alleged acts fall within the outer perimeter of Trump's official responsibilities. If the motion is denied, it can be appealed. The entire indictment should be dismissed based on presidential immunity.

@willscharf - Will Scharf

BREAKING: President Trump files motion to dismiss D.C. case A short while ago in federal court in Washington, D.C., President Trump filed a motion to dismiss the case pending against him there for his alleged actions in the aftermath of the 2020 elections. The motion cites presidential immunity as a ground to dismiss the case in its entirety. This is a very big deal. The motion persuasively argues that the D.C. case should be dismissed, and if past practice is any guide all proceedings could and should be stayed while this issue is litigated fully. Notably, this same reasoning should apply to the ongoing Georgia prosecution as well. A number of legal commentators have anticipated this move, and in this thread I’m going to get into the weeds and review the core argument made—that presidential immunity is an absolute bar to the prosecution of President Trump for his alleged acts in office that underlie the federal prosecution in D.C. 1/6

@willscharf - Will Scharf

(A) Presidential Immunity At its heart, President Trump is arguing that presidents, even after their terms in office are over, are absolutely immune from criminal prosecutions arising out of their acts in office that fall within the “outer perimeter” of their official responsibilities as president, unless they have first been both impeached and convicted by the House of Representatives and Senate. And he’s arguing that all of the acts he is alleged to have committed fall within this absolute immunity. This view, as the motion filed today makes clear, is deeply rooted in bedrock legal principles, in caselaw, in the Constitution, and in actual practice dating back centuries. In Nixon v. Fitzgerald, the Supreme Court ruled that a president has absolute immunity from civil liability for acts within the outer perimeter of their official responsibilities. In short, you cannot sue a former president personally because his official acts harmed you. This is unquestioned Supreme Court precedent, based on very serious, core separation of powers concerns. If a president were susceptible to civil suit for his official acts, the Court held that this would “raise unique risks to the functioning of government” in light of the “singular importance of the President’s duties.” The purpose of presidential immunity, the Fitzgerald Court’s view, is to prevent concerns about being sued clouding the president’s judgment and crippling his ability to act—presidents need to be able to discharge their duties to the best of their abilities without having to worry about being haled into court when their terms expire. This well-established immunity doctrine has never been tested in the criminal context, for the simple reason that no president has been subjected to the sort of relentless prosecutions that President Trump has now been faced with, but the motion persuasively argues that the reasoning in Fitzgerald should still apply. 2/6

@willscharf - Will Scharf

(B) Impeachment Clause This view is also rooted in the actual text of the Constitution. The Impeachment Clause of Article I provides that, although impeachment proceedings do not themselves carry a punishment beyond removal from office, a party convicted after impeachment "shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.” By specifying that a president impeached and convicted could be subject to indictment, etc., the Constitution plainly and clearly implies that absent impeachment and conviction a president cannot be criminally prosecuted for his official acts. Democrats impeached President Trump twice, and on both occasions the Senate acquitted him. Absent a conviction at an impeachment trial, presidential immunity applies to all of President Trump’s acts that fall within the outer perimeter of his official responsibilities, and for these acts at least he cannot be prosecuted. 3/6

@willscharf - Will Scharf

(C) Scope of Immunity Are the acts that underlie President Trump’s indictment in D.C. within this “outer perimeter” of his official responsibilities as president? I think the answer is clearly yes. First, it is very important to note that in the context of assessing immunity, the motive of a president is irrelevant. Why the president did something is immaterial; the question is what the president did and whether that was within this very broad outer perimeter of his official responsibilities. And because the scope of presidential authority and of presidential responsibilities is so vast, the catchment of presidential immunity is similarly expansive. When you actually review the alleged acts that underlie the D.C. indictment, my view is that each and every one clearly falls within the other perimeter of President Trump’s official responsibilities. We are talking about things like •Making public statements about the administration of the 2020 federal election; •Communications with public officials, both in the states and in the federal government, about the administration of the 2020 federal election; and •Taking steps, like assembling alternate slates of electors, to allow Congress and/or the Vice President to take action on the federal election fraud that he believed had occurred. Remember, for the purposes of assessing the scope of immunity, intent and veracity/falsity are irrelevant. Your views on whether President Trump’s views on the election were accurate are irrelevant. Your views on why President Trump did what he did are irrelevant. If the acts themselves were presidential acts, falling within the outer perimeter of presidential responsibilities, they cannot form the basis for a criminal prosecution of President Trump, because presidential immunity applies. As a result, since the entire indictment in the D.C. case against President Trump is predicated on acts that he is immune from prosecution for, the case should be dismissed. 4/6

@willscharf - Will Scharf

(D) Appealability One final note on timing: any denial of this motion to dismiss, or any similar motion in Georgia, is likely immediately appealable, as is the case in where Congressional legislative immunity is implicated. Which means, depending on how long it takes Judge Chutkan to rule, this issue could be before the D.C. Circuit and potentially the Supreme Court before long. 5/6

@willscharf - Will Scharf

Lastly, if you like this kind of analysis and want to see more of it, RT this thread and follow me here. And if you’d like to find out more about me, check me out on social media or at http://www.votescharf.com. 6/6

Vote Will Scharf votescharf.com

@TomFitton — Tom Fitton

Posted - October 5, 2023 at 8:47 PM

Saved - October 6, 2023 at 5:37 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Trump's legal team argues that the US Constitution prohibits the Biden administration's prosecution of Trump for questioning the election. They claim absolute immunity for the President's actions within his official responsibilities. The prosecution alleges impure motives, but the President's motivations are not for the court to decide. The indictment should be dismissed.

@TomFitton - Tom Fitton

Breaking: I've carefully reviewed the latest brief filed by Trump's legal team which alleges that the US Constitution prohibits the Biden regime's unprecedented attack on our constitutional system through a crazed prosecution of Trump for daring to question Biden's election victory. Trump's legal team makes a powerful and persuasive constitutional case to DISMISS Biden regime's effort to jail him for simply doing his job as president to try to ensure the laws concerning elections were faithfully enforced and followed. The brief's introduction: The President of the United States sits at the heart of our system of government. He is our Nation’s leader, our head of state, and our head of government. As such, the founders tasked the President—and the President alone—with the sacred obligation of “tak[ing] Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” U.S. CONST. art. II, § 3. To ensure the President may serve unhesitatingly, without fear that his political opponents may one day prosecute him for decisions they dislike, the law provides absolute immunity “for acts within the ‘outer perimeter’ of [the President’s] official responsibility.” Nixon v. Fitzgerald 457 U.S. 731, 756 (1982) (quoting Barr v. Matteo, 360 U.S. 564, 575 (1959) (plurality opinion)). Breaking 234 years of precedent, the incumbent administration has charged President Trump for acts that lie not just within the “outer perimeter,” but at the heart of his official responsibilities as President. In doing so, the prosecution does not, and cannot, argue that President Trump’s efforts to ensure election integrity, and to advocate for the same, were outside the scope of his duties. Instead, the prosecution falsely claimsthat President Trump’s motives were impure— that he purportedly “knew” that the widespread reports of fraud and election irregularities were untrue but sought to address them anyway. But as the Constitution, the Supreme Court, and hundreds of years of history and tradition all make clear, the President’s motivations are not for the prosecution or this Court to decide. Rather, where, as here, the President’s actions are within the ambit of his office, he is absolutely immune from prosecution. Spalding v. Vilas, 161 U.S. 483, 494, 949 (1896) (“The ‘allegation of malicious or corrupt motives’ does not affect a public official’s immunity and “[t]he motive that impelled [the official] to do that of which the plaintiff Case 1:23-cr-00257-TSC Document 74 Filed 10/05/23 Page 7 of 52 2 complains is … wholly immaterial.”). Therefore, the Court should dismiss the indictment, with prejudice. Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794, 801 (1989) (“Dismissal of the indictment is the proper sanction when a defendant has been granted immunity from prosecution…”) (citation omitted).

@America1stLegal — America First Legal

Posted - October 10, 2023 at 8:14 PM

Saved - November 2, 2023 at 5:25 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

A new AFL whitepaper reveals that the President of the United States has absolute authority over his presidential papers, undermining the Biden DOJ's Mar-a-Lago prosecution. The President's authority over these papers is supported by constitutional law, the Presidential Records Act, and historical practice. This has significant implications for the prosecution against Donald J. Trump. The DOJ's reliance on a search warrant to raid Mar-a-Lago is challenged, as the President retains control over his records. The whitepaper emphasizes that a President's records are his, regardless of content or classification. When a President leaves office, new records acquired do not enjoy the same constitutional status as those created while in office. Presidents have the freedom to keep, sell, destroy, or donate their records. It is important to acknowledge the broader constitutional issues at play, as Congress does not have the authority to determine which records belong to the President. The prosecution of President Trump in Florida is deemed legally impossible.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — New AFL whitepaper reveals that the President of the United States has absolute authority over his presidential papers, undermining an essential element of the Biden DOJ’s Mar-a-Lago prosecution. We explain in the thread below…

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/2 This whitepaper details why–as a matter of constitutional law, the Presidential Records Act (PRA), and historical practice–the President of the United States has absolute authority over presidential papers. Neither Congress nor the federal courts may lawfully abrogate or limit this authority.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/3 This constitutional fact has significant implications for Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution against Donald J. Trump in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The Department of Justice has charged Donald Trump with violating 18 U.S.C. § 793(e), which provides:

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/4 In obtaining the search warrant to raid Mar-a-Lago in 2022, the Biden DOJ relied upon the definition of a “Presidential Record” in 42 U.S.C. § 2201 to support its position that Donald Trump retained documents he did not have the authority to retain at the conclusion of his presidency, and that somehow, the National Archives and Records Administration possessed the authority to require them to be returned.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/5 As explained in the whitepaper — text, precedent, and executive practice reinforce the historical tradition. The records a President creates or receives while performing the duties of his office are his presidential records. That test does not depend on the content of the records, or whether the records are classified.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/6 The test does not change when a President leaves office. If, for example, a former President acquires new records after leaving office, those new records would not enjoy the same constitutional status as his presidential records acquired while in office.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/7 But the Presidential records a President takes with him upon vacating the presidency are his, to do with as he pleases. The President can keep them, sell them, destroy them, or donate them, as all Presidents have done.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/8 Other commentators and analysts have asserted that the president has the absolute right under the PRA to determine which records are his, but they have not acknowledged the broader constitutional issues at the heart of the matter...keep reading.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/9 …Congress does not have the authority under the Constitution to tell the president which records are his and which are not.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/10 Since the founding of our republic, presidents leaving office have taken custody of their presidential records—the president’s records are his personal property because they were prepared by him, or for him, in furtherance of his official duties. The records also belong to him because the Constitution requires it.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/11 The documents that a president prepares or receives during his term in office belong to him. A reading of the Presidential Records Act that fails to account for a former president’s right to possess and control his records is inconsistent with the text, history, and precedent of presidential records.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/12 Thus, the politically-motivated Florida prosecution of President Trump is impossible under the law. https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-whitepaper-the-president-of-the-united-states-has-absolute-authority-over-his-presidential-papers-undermining-an-essential-element-of-the-biden-dojs-mar-a-lago-prosecuti/

America First Legal Whitepaper: The President of the United States Has Absolute Authority Over His Presidential Papers, Undermining An Essential Element of the Biden DOJ’s Mar-a-Lago Prosecution Even without the Presidential Records Act, the President has sole authority over his presidential papers. WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, America First Legal (AFL) released a whitepaper detailing why–as a matter of constitutional law, the Presidential Records Act (PRA), and historical practice–the President of the United States has absolute authority over presidential papers. Neither Congress nor […] aflegal.org

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/13 FULL REPORT: https://media.aflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/10195042/AFL-PRA-Whitepaper-10.10.23.pdf?_ga=2.221149784.1994182294.1696968775-1784050686.1696558575

@TomFitton — Tom Fitton

Posted - November 4, 2023 at 1:02 AM

Saved - November 4, 2023 at 3:42 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

A DC federal appellate panel has granted Trump's stay pending appeal of Judge Chutkan's unprecedented gag order. Trump's legal team argued that no court in American history has imposed such an order on a criminal defendant actively campaigning for public office, especially a leading candidate for President. The prosecution failed to provide evidence of any actual threat to justice. The Gag Order violates Trump's First Amendment rights and shows hostility towards his viewpoint. Trump requests an expedited ruling on the motion.

@TomFitton - Tom Fitton

Tonight, a DC federal appellate panel granted Trump's stay pending appeal of Judge Chutkan's unprecedented and anti-constitutional gag order. Indeed, Trump's legal team made a powerful agrument against the Biden regime and Judge Chutkan: No court in American history has imposed a gag order on a criminal defendant who is actively campaigning for public office—let alone the leading candidate for President of the United States. That centuries-long practice was broken on October 17, 2023, when the district court entered its Opinion and Order, A1 (the “Gag Order”), muzzling President Trump’s core political speech during an historic Presidential campaign. Given the Gag Order’s extraordinary nature, one would expect an extraordinary justification for it. Yet none exists. President Trump has made months of public statements about this case, but the Department of Justice (“the prosecution”) submitted no evidence of any actual or imminent threat to the administration of justice. Instead, when asked about the supposed threat to the case, the prosecution admitted, “of course this prejudice is speculative.” Based this speculation, the district court entered a sweeping, viewpoint-based prior restraint on the core political speech of a major Presidential candidate, based solely on an unconstitutional “heckler’s veto.” The Gag Order violates the First Amendment rights of President Trump and over 100 million Americans who listen to him. President Trump’s uniquely powerful voice has been a fixture of American political discourse for eight years, and central to the American fabric for decades. The prosecution’s claim that his core political speech suddenly poses a threat to the administration of justice is baseless. The prosecutors and potential witnesses addressed by President Trump’s speech are high-level government officials and public figures, many of whom routinely attack President Trump in their own public statements, media interviews, and books. President Trump’s viewpoint and modes of expression resonate powerfully with tens of millions of Americans. The prosecution’s request for a Gag Order bristles with hostility to President Trump’s viewpoint and his relentless criticism of the government—including of the prosecution itself. The Gag Order embodies this unconstitutional hostility to President Trump’s viewpoint. It should be immediately stayed. President Trump requests a ruling on this motion by November 10, 2023, and requests an administrative stay pending the Court’s ruling. President Trump has notified the prosecution, who note that they oppose this motion. President Trump respectfully asks that this appeal be expedited to the greatest extent possible.

@kylenabecker — Kyle Becker

Posted - November 30, 2023 at 2:08 PM

Saved - December 1, 2023 at 5:26 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The January 6th incident involved over 200 undercover operatives and Feds, according to Rep. Clay Higgins. Evidence suggests FBI agents infiltrated the crowd dressed as Trump supporters. The FBI's involvement extended beyond that day, with messages leading back to their agents. The event appears to have been a setup, planned months in advance. Despite warnings, law enforcement was unprepared. Claims of a coordinated plot to overturn the election are baseless. This narrative has led to a partisan trial, interfering with the election process. January 6th was a manufactured riot to frame the president and interfere in future elections. Case closed.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

So, it turns out there were "at least 200" Feds and undercover operatives working the Trump entrapment plot on January 6. That's according to U.S. Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), who sat down for a recent interview on the matter. “The FBI was not just participating in the January 6th acts from within. I suspect they had over 200 agents embedded in the crowd, including agents or, as they would call it, human assets inside the Capitol dressed as Trump supporters before the doors were opened.” This figure is in the realm of possibility, given the newly released J6 videos, court documents, and witness statements. “And when you track the text threads and the communications within those groups and find the origins of suggestions of potential violence or an active occupation of the Capitol on January 6th, you’ll find that those messages were led by members of the groups that ended up to be the FBI agents that had infiltrated the group,” Higgins said. “So the FBI’s involvement was deep, not just on J6, but on the days and weeks and months prior.” There is now zero doubt that J6 was a set-up. The Trump "incitement" narrative had been hatched months prior, as the infamous Time "shadow cabal" article made clear. The J6 riot was war-gamed multiple times before the Electoral College. The FBI unconstitutionally used NSA surveillance to track the extremist groups seeking to disrupt the event. It had Federal informants embedded in multiple extremist groups, including the Proud Boys. Yet, somehow, the FBI and Capitol Police were woefully "unprepared" despite multiple advance warnings, including from then Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund. D.C. Mayor Bowser, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and others, refused to press for more National Guard, despite it being documented and on the record that former President Donald Trump wanted 10,000 National Guard troops outside Congress to protect the Electoral College. Also, there was no 'centrally coordinated' plot to overturn the results of the 2020 election, as FBI sources told Reuters in an August 2021 report. Indeed, that was the entire point of the election challenges during the convening of the Electoral College. If Donald Trump wanted to overturn the 2020 election results, he would not have disrupted the Electoral College. He would have continued to pursue his legal challenges and his Constitutional right to challenge electoral slates in Congress. Trump would not have sent in unarmed extremists to disrupt the Electoral College in order to 'retain power.' This is not only illogical, it is absurd on its face. Nonetheless, this ridiculous partisan narrative has constituted the basis for prosecuting a former president in what has devolved into a partisan show trial and tantamount to election interference. It is not only ironic, but a disgrace to our entire justice system. January 6 was a Fed-manufactured riot to frame a sitting president and carry out election interference in 2024. Case closed.

@simonateba — Simon Ateba

Posted - December 2, 2023 at 12:58 PM

Saved - December 2, 2023 at 7:27 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

In a recent ruling against Trump, a DC judge claimed his speech on January 6th was not protected by the First Amendment. The judge also stated that Trump did not have "presidential immunity" on that day. However, some argue these conclusions are false. The case raises questions about whether a crime was committed and if Trump's speech was protected. It's important not to undermine the law and Constitution for political reasons. Let's focus on the facts rather than personal backgrounds. The ruling is likely to be appealed.

@simonateba - Simon Ateba

I'm not a lawyer, and I don't work for anyone's social media account, but I completely disagree with the ruling against Trump last night. It's a total disgrace and unconstitutional. It's actually a shame and will not stand on appeal. The DC judge claimed that when Trump was speaking on January 6 before the protests at the US Capitol, that speech was not protected by his First Amendment rights. Second and more shockingly, the DC judge, Tanya S. Chutkan, also claimed that Trump was not protected by "presidential immunity" on January 6, 2021, while he was still president. These are very false conclusions by the judge. If Trump had sent American troops to capture a terrorist that day or announced it at that gathering, was that a presidential duty or not? The prosecutors claim that the January 6 event was organized by the campaign. That's completely nonsense. When you're President, you're president until you're no longer in office. But I am no lawyer, and I may be wrong. I just believe that this will not stand on appeal.

@simonateba - Simon Ateba

For those who have not been following, the case is so crazy, was Trump a barber that day? Was he a painter? Could he grant pardon that day or announce it at that event? Was he a driver or the President? And just to clarify again, the judge ruled that Trump and other former presidents "do not have absolute (presidential) immunity for federal crimes committed while in office." Has a crime been established? Was Trump protected by the First Amendment that day? Could he talk about the election? Could he say these elections were rigged against me? Doesn't the First Amendment protect him? You cannot destroy the law and the Constitution to convict one mam ahead of 2024. I'm also against those who claim the judge is ruling this way because she was not born in the United States. That's the wrong way of looking at it. Whether born here or elsewhere, Washington works the same way.....

@GregRubini — Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

Posted - December 14, 2023 at 6:39 PM

Saved - December 15, 2023 at 2:57 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The posts discuss the Trump indictments and the motions to dismiss filed by Trump's lawyers. The motions were prepared for the Appellate Court and the Supreme Court. If the motions are recognized as valid, the indictments will be dismissed. The posts also mention the delay in the proceedings and the potential impact on the 2024 elections. The author expresses confidence in the motions and predicts a victory for Trump. They also criticize the Biden family.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

ALL the 4 Trump Indictments will be DISMISSED - soon. Jan. 6 will be dismissed soon, The Georgia case too. Same for the FL and NY cases.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

2) The Trump lawyers - Todd Blanche, Lauro and Singer - have done a great legal job in their 4 Motions to Dismiss. I've read them all - back in October. Those Motions to Dismiss were prepared very carefully. Genius legal work by Trump attorneys Todd Blanche & Co.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

3) Those Motions to Dismiss were prepared NOT for the corrupt judge Chutken, but for the Appellate Court, and for the Supreme Court. That was clear, if you 've read them.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

4) and indeed, now both the Motion to Dismiss for Presidential Immunity, and the Motion to Dismiss for Double Jeopardy are at the Appellate Court. and... the corrupt judge Chutken has been forced to STAY the proceedings.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

5) "STAY the proceedings" means that the corrupt judge Chutken CANNOT do anything. And the entire Trump stuff is OUT of her filthy hands. Everything is suspended, until the Appellate Court decides on the two Trump Motions to Dismiss.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

6) If the Motion to Dismiss for Presidential Immunity is recognized as VALID by the Appellate Court, the entire Jan. 6 Trump Indictments gets DISMISSED, and the deranged SC Jack Smith will be left with NOTHING. The Jan. 6 case will NOT EXIST anymore. No Trial, no Nothing.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

7) Same for the Motion to Dismiss for Double Jeopardy: If recognized as VALID by the Appellate Court, the Jan. 6 Trump Indictment gets DISMISSED.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

8) And not just the Jan. 6 case: If either of the 2 Motions to Dismiss are recognized as VALID, also the Georgia Indictment falls automatically.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

9) and ALL those deranged Bolshevik THUGS - Jack Smith, Fani Willis, Merrick Garland - will be left with NOTHING.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

10) The deranged Jack Smith is in DESPERATE Mode: He has already sent the Presidential Immunity question to the Supreme Court, PRAYING that they take it, and PRAYING them to decide in the shortest possible time.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

11) The Jack Smith move is SUICIDAL: if the Supreme Court rules that on Jan. 6 President Trump HAD the Presidential Immunity, (and he HAD!), the entire Jan. 6 case collapses, and gets thrown out. The Georgia case falls automatically as well.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

12) This is why those 4 Motions to Dismiss have been so well prepared by the Trump lawyers - Todd Blanche, Lauro and Singer: Because they were addressed for the Appellate Court and especially for the Supreme Court. And believe me: those 4 Motions to Dismiss are ROCK SOLID.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

13) And not only they are ROCK SOLID: those 4 Motions to Dismiss are Legal Masterpieces. Thank you Todd Blanche, John Lauro and Gregory Singer!

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

14) Let me Recap the 4 Motions to Dismiss: A- Motion to Dismiss for Presidential Immunity B- Motion to Dismiss for Double Jeopardy C- Motion to Dismiss for Selective and Vindictive Prosecution D- Motion to Dismiss on Constitutional Grounds

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

15) If you want to read those Motions to Dismiss - and I encourage you to do so - you can find them on Google. Type the case number, the Motion to Dismiss of your choice, PDF The case number is: Case No. 1:23-cr-00257-TSC cc: @ChatByCC , @Lara_maga47 , @suzost

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost 16) Why Jack Smith has made that SUICIDAL move to address the Supreme Court? The answer is: * * * * * TIME.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost 17) The original Jack Smith-Chutken-Garland-Biden EVIL plan was to have the Jan. 6 Trump Trial to begin on March 4, 2024 - The day BEFORE Super-Tuesday, during the hot period of the Republican Primaries - to disrupt the Trump candidacy.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost 18) The Trump lawyers have FORCED the STAY in the proceedings, by filing those Motions in the Appellate Court. This means Delay, Delay, Delay.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost 19) This means that the March 4, 2024 for the Trump Trial will inevitably SKIP to a later date - even if both the Motions to Dismiss are not GRANTED. The Trump lawyers have filed other motions, plus the Brady stuff has 13 Million pages, and THOUSANDS of hours of videos.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost 20) Which means that the Date for the Trial may skip for YEARS - well after the 2024 Elections. You see where this is going...

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost 21) Moves and Counter-moves... Like in a chess game.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost 22) And this is why Jack Smith (and the Biden Cabal) are in PANIC mode: Having the Trump Trial AFTER the 2024 Elections DEFEATS the Main Purpose of their Political Prosecution of Trump.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost 23) After the victory in the 2024 Elections, Trump will be President again, and there will be NO Trial. Again: this IF both the Supreme Court and the Appellate Court DO NOT Grant the Presidential Immunity and the Double Jeopardy motions.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost 24) If the Supreme Court or the Appellate Court GRANT either the Presidential Immunity - OR the Double Jeopardy motions - It is ALL OVER. No Trial. Case Dismissed.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost 25) In either case, Trump WINS.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost 26) Now the question is: Will the Supreme Court GRANT the Presidential Immunity Motion to Dismiss? I think it is highly likely. The Supreme Court WILL NOT WANT to set such a dangerous precedent. @KariLake @SarahPalinUSA

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost @KariLake @SarahPalinUSA 27) Plus, both the Constitution - and the legal history - will force the Supreme Court to grant the Presidential Immunity clause.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost @KariLake @SarahPalinUSA 28) As I wrote above, if the Motion to Dismiss for Presidential Immunity is GRANTED: - The Jan. 6 case falls apart. DISMISSED. - The Georgia case falls apart as well. DISMISSED.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost @KariLake @SarahPalinUSA 29) The NY case has already fallen apart. And there will be an Appeal for MISTRIAL. Only the FLA case remains - The Classified Docs case. But Trump has a good judge there - Aileen Cannon - so there won't be any problem in FLA: case DISMISSED.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost @KariLake @SarahPalinUSA 30) Trump wins 4-0

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost @KariLake @SarahPalinUSA 31) And on the opposite side? - Demented Joe Biden is now under Official Impeachment Inquiry, - Hunter Biden in big legal trouble (and he spent $872,000 in PROSTITUTES!!!) Where can you find a more depraved family than the Bidens?

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com

@ChatByCC @Lara_maga47 @suzost @KariLake @SarahPalinUSA 32) and let's not forget those disgusting showers that Joe Biden forced her daughter Asley to have with him, when she was a child... Where can you find a more depraved family than the Bidens?

@VivekGRamaswamy — Vivek Ramaswamy

Posted - December 19, 2023 at 11:56 PM

Saved - December 20, 2023 at 1:53 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

In an unprecedented decision, Democrat judges in Colorado are barring Trump from the ballot, using the 14th Amendment. This tactic is seen as an attack on democracy and an attempt to silence political opponents. However, there are legal problems with this decision, as the 14th Amendment does not apply to elected officials like the President. The use of this narrow provision is concerning and goes against the intentions of the Framers.

@VivekGRamaswamy - Vivek Ramaswamy

This is what an *actual* attack on democracy looks like: in an un-American, unconstitutional, and *unprecedented* decision, a cabal of Democrat judges are barring Trump from the ballot in Colorado. Having tried every trick in the book to eliminate President Trump from running in this election, the bipartisan Establishment is now deploying a new tactic to bar him from ever holding office again: the 14th Amendment. I pledge to *withdraw* from the Colorado GOP primary unless Trump is also allowed to be on the state’s ballot, and I demand that Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, and Nikki Haley to do the same immediately - or else they are tacitly endorsing this illegal maneuver which will have disastrous consequences for our country. Today’s decision is the latest election interference tactic to silence political opponents and swing the election for whatever puppet the Democrats put up this time by depriving Americans of the right to vote for their candidate of choice. The 14th Amendment was part of the “Reconstruction Amendments” that were ratified following the Civil War. It was passed to prohibit former Confederate military and political leaders from holding high federal or state office. These men had clearly taken part in a rebellion against the United States: the Civil War. That makes it all the more absurd that a left-wing group in Colorado is asking a federal court to disqualify the 45th President on the same grounds, equating his speech to rebellion against the United States. And there’s another legal problem: Trump is not a former “officer of the United States,” as that term is used in the Constitution, meaning Section 3 does not apply. As the Supreme Court explained in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2010), an “officer of the United States” is someone appointed by the President to aid him in his duties under Article II, Section 2. The term does not apply to elected officials, and certainly not to the President himself. The Framers of the 14th Amendment would be appalled to see this narrow provision—intended to bar former U.S. officials who switched to the Confederacy from seeking public office—being weaponized by a sitting President and his political allies to prevent a former President from seeking reelection. Our country is becoming unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers.

@LauraLoomer — Laura Loomer

Posted - December 24, 2023 at 2:49 PM

Saved - December 25, 2023 at 12:41 AM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

President Trump says he is entitled to Presidential immunity because he was doing his duty as President by investigating a rigged and stolen election. “It was my obligation to do so, and the proof found is voluminous and irrefutable.” https://t.co/C73vcOeF2z

@Rasmussen_Poll — Rasmussen Reports

Posted - December 25, 2023 at 6:21 PM

Saved - December 25, 2023 at 6:45 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

According to our system of separated powers, the Judicial Branch cannot judge a President's official acts. This doctrine has been considered self-evident since the beginning of our nation. Chief Justice Marshall endorsed this in 1803, stating that a President's acts cannot be examined by the courts. President Trump's statements about election fraud fall within his duty to communicate with the public on federal concerns.

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

"Under our system of separated powers, the Judicial Branch cannot sit in judgment over a President’s official acts. That doctrine is not controversial. It was treated as self-evident and foundational from the dawn of the Republic ... 1/3

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

... and it flows directly from the exclusive vesting clause of Article II. In 1803, Chief Justice Marshall endorsed it, writing in Marbury v. Madison that a President’s official acts 'can never be examinable by the courts.' 2/3

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

President Trump’s public statements and tweets about alleged fraud and irregularity in the federal election fall within the outer perimeter of Presidential duty, to which communicating with the public on matters of federal concern is absolutely central." 3/3 https://x.com/TomFitton/status/1738966112174272799?s=20

@TomFitton - Tom Fitton

In Trump's opening appellate brief challenging the Biden regime's unprecedented attempt to prosecute a former president, Trump's lawyers lay out the dangers of Jack Smith's political attack on our constitutional republic: "During the 234 years from 1789 to 2023, no current or…

@seanmdav — Sean Davis

Posted - February 9, 2024 at 3:47 AM

Saved - February 9, 2024 at 6:32 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

If presidents can be charged for official acts, Biden and his entourage, along with Bush and Obama, could face consequences. Biden's DOJ indicting his political opponent, obstructing justice, and destroying evidence may lead to prison time. SCOTUS should dismiss Biden's cases against Trump to prevent a future consumed by politicians and judges facing criminal charges. If Biden is allowed to indict opponents for his own crimes, it sets a dangerous precedent. We need saner heads in Washington to prevent this from happening.

@seanmdav - Sean Davis

If presidents aren’t immune from being criminally charged for official acts, as SCOTUS seems to be threatening to rule, then Biden and his entire entourage — including much of top DOJ brass — are 100% going down for what they’ve done during this presidency, but especially for the crimes they committed and then excused with this special counsel. And not just Biden: George W. Bush and Barack Obama better lawyer up, too. Those WMDs didn’t invent themselves, and those kids didn’t drone themselves. Nope, it took presidents to do that. Biden directing his DOJ to indict his chief political opponent for crimes which Biden’s own DOJ says Biden committed, then obstructing justice by intimidating government attorneys and telling them to destroy evidence, and then tying it all up by making sure DOJ let Biden off the hook? Oh you better believe every single person involved in that will be facing prison time. Every last political appointee, lawyer, paralegal, and department functionary involved was clearly part of an illegal conspiracy to defraud the United States and her people. See how easy that is? And all takes to make it happen is one prosecutor and the right jury pool. SCOTUS can do the right thing and toss every last one of these idiotic lawless Biden-directed cases against Trump, or SCOTUS can guarantee that the rest of this country’s short history—this republic is careening toward a cliff with a cinder block tied down to the gas pedal—will be consumed with politicians and judges and their government allies and their families spending every last minute and dollar they have fending off criminal charges from their political opponents. Ruling the “wrong” way on a case? Well that looks like criminal corruption and abuse of office. Appointing the “wrong” person? Clearly that was part of a criminal kickback scheme. Voting for the “wrong” law? Textbook case of being bought off by donor lobbyists. Authoring the “wrong” court decision? Better hope the prosecutor who targets you doesn’t have a hopelessly partisan jury pool in his back pocket that will indict a ham sandwich if it was ordered by someone from the “wrong” political party. That’s the future if Biden is allowed to indict his opponents for crimes his own attorneys say he committed while refusing to charge him for it. This isn’t theory. It isn’t an intellectual exercise or a fun 3am dorm room. This is reality, and it will happen. That is, unless saner heads prevail, and head this nonsense off at the pass. Do any of those saner heads exist anymore in Washington? We’ll find out soon enough.

@kylenabecker — Kyle Becker

Posted - June 6, 2024 at 11:29 PM

Saved - June 7, 2024 at 11:22 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Yale Law Professor Jeb Rubenfield advises Trump's legal team on potentially overturning his 'guilty' verdict before the 2024 election. Rubenfield suggests filing a federal lawsuit and seeking an emergency temporary restraining order to halt the judgment of guilt until the federal courts review the constitutional arguments. This could prevent the irreparable harm of a convicted felon affecting the election outcome. Rubenfield emphasizes the importance of a fair and transparent process when pursuing criminal charges against a former president.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

Yale Law Professor Has Brilliant Plan for Trump Legal Team to Overturn 'Guilty' Verdict Before the Election "Could Trump actually be put in jail? You bet he could." "Each count of this 34 count indictment has a maximum penalty attached to it of four years. Well, that's four times 34. That's a maximum sentence, prison sentence of 136 years." "Will he do that? Of course not. He won't. But could he sentence him to some incarceration? Yes, he could. Will he? Nobody knows." Yale Law Professor Jeb Rubenfield, who teaches Advanced Constitutional Law, counseled the Trump legal team on a course of action that could potentially see his 'guilty' verdict overturned before the 2024 election. "Now, when is sentencing scheduled for? Well, Judge Merchan has set it for July 11th." "Will something happen between then and now? Yes. Trump's team will ask for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict." "They'll ask for Judge Merchan to throw out the jury's verdict and find Trump innocent despite the verdict, and Judge Merchan will turn that down." "Then there will be arguments about what the sentence should be briefing on both sides, possibly even a hearing. Then on July 11th, sentencing will be announced. And at that point, that triggers the Trump team's right to appeal." "To what court would they appeal? Well, they would appeal to New York's appellate level court... And after the appellate court rules, then the case could go up to New York's highest court, which is actually called the Court of Appeals... And after that, the case could go up to the Supreme Court." "And ultimately it might well go to the Supreme Court where finally we will have a definitive, conclusive ruling on whether the conviction was constitutional or not." Professor Rubenfield identified a massive, glaring problem with this legal appeals process. "Of course that would take years, and that's a problem here. Why is it a problem? It's a problem because the election will have taken place and if this conviction is unlawful and unconstitutional, it could have an effect on that election." "There are surveys, many polls in which a substantial number of American voters say they will not vote for Trump if he is convicted of a felony. Many independents say that, many Republicans even say that. If that's true, an unlawful conviction in this case could interfere with and in fact decide the outcome of the next election of the next President of the United States" "Even if the conviction were reversed on appeal years later, that effect could not be undone in legal terms. That's called IRREPARABLE HARM. The irreparable harm, once again, is that a 'convicted felon' could affect the election, could decide the election." "And if so, then District Attorney Bragg and Judge Merchan will have UNLAWFULLY INTERFERED with the election and decided the outcome of the next election through unconstitutional means. And no years long appeal could have any effect on that." This is the critical point that Professor Rubenfield makes: There is another way. "Well, is that where we are? So are we stuck with that possibility? Well, believe it or not, there is one other avenue that the Trump lawyers could pursue. They could sue in federal court and ask for an emergency temporary restraining order." "Restraining order of what? Well, let me tell you something that you might not know. You've probably been reading in the press if you've been reading about this case. The Trump is already a "convicted felon." The jury has convicted him. He's a "convicted felon." "Well, guess what? THAT'S NOT TRUE." "You're not a convicted felon because of a jury verdict. You're not convicted unless the judge enters a judgment of guilt against you. The judge still has the power, as I told you before, to throw out that verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal. You are not convicted until the judge enters that judgment of guilt." "Now in New York, it's very likely that Judge Merchan will enter that judgment of guilt against Trump on the same day that he issued sentencing. That'd be July 11th." "So what would this federal case be about in this federal action? Trump would sue District Attorney Bragg and other state actors and ask the judge, the federal judge, for an emergency temporary restraining order halting Judge Merchan from entering that judgment of guilt until the federal courts have had an opportunity to review and rule on the serious constitutional arguments that exist here." "Let me tell you why I think that might be a very important thing to happen. Because going after, criminally, a former president of the United States and somebody who is running for president now, that's a VERY BAD LOOK for this country." "It's an especially bad look when the folks bring in the case and the judge deciding it are members of the opposing political party. And it's an even worse look when the crime is so unclear that the state is hiding the ball about what the actual charges are right up through the trial and indeed into the trial." "And even now, we don't know exactly what the jury found Trump guilty of. If you're going to go after a former president and somebody who's running for president now the poll leading candidate, if you're a member of the other party and you're going to do that, YOU BETTER HAVE THE GOODS. You better not be pursuing some novel legal theory where you have to hide the ball. It's not even clear what the charges are." "That could be a very dangerous precedent for this country. A very bad and dangerous precedent." "That's why it's so important for a federal court to review the constitutionality of this prosecution and decide, was it constitutional, was it not?" "The only way to achieve that before the election takes place is for the Trump team to file an action in federal court and ask the federal court to temporarily hold off the entry of the judgment of guilt until the federal courts and maybe the Supreme Court itself can on an emergency basis adjudicate the likelihood of success of these constitutional arguments." "If that doesn't happen, then that IRREPARABLE HARM danger that I mentioned before, well that's where we are." "But if it does happen, the nation could get a ruling from the federal courts, even the Supreme Court of the United States, before the election takes place." "Maybe that's what the nation needs and maybe that's what the law requires here. So if I were Trump's lawyer, that's probably what I would do."

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

You can follow Professor @Jed_Rubenfeld on X https://t.co/Dne56D0woX

@harryjsisson — Harry Sisson

Posted - July 1, 2024 at 3:08 PM

Saved - July 2, 2024 at 4:57 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

According to the Supreme Court, Biden has the authority to use military force for official acts. Some people are concerned about potential violence, but this is based on Justice Sotomayor's dissent.

@harryjsisson - Harry Sisson

According to the Supreme Court, Biden could now send in Seal Team 6 to take all of them out. He could send in the military to take out Trump. He has “immunity” for official acts now!

@harryjsisson - Harry Sisson

All of these MAGA lunatics are saying that this is suggesting violence when the first 5 words are “according to the Supreme Court…” Also, this is in reference to Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent which included this exactly https://t.co/9zfEafCPUN

@DineshDSouza — Dinesh D'Souza

Posted - July 20, 2025 at 7:18 PM

Saved - July 21, 2025 at 6:58 AM

@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza

There is now incontrovertible evidence that Obama spearheaded a seditious conspiracy to subvert the result of the 2016 election. He needs to be held to his own standard. Let him then claim “presidential immunity” to avoid life in prison or the death penalty.

@thehill - The Hill

Former President Obama: "No one -- especially the president -- is above the law." https://t.co/MviR09arLe

@DataRepublican — DataRepublican (small r)

Posted - April 21, 2026 at 3:05 AM

Saved - April 21, 2026 at 5:50 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I say Pete Hegseth is targeted because he's between Trump and a coup. Institutions are named, a color-revolution playbook cites security-force defections as key. Maria Stephan runs Horizons Project; a domestic version trains defection. A memo flags Hegseth as insider threat; others urge officers to refuse illegal orders. The goal, I argue, is removal and replacement with someone we can co-opt.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

🧵 THREAD: The true reason Pete Hegseth is being targeted is because he's standing between President Trump and a coup @PeteHegseth named the institutions... CFR, Brookings, the general class... in 37 seconds in a video by @Liz_Wheeler . Within 72 hours of his nomination, a color

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker asserts that Donald Trump challenged and exposed flaws in the existing international order. They describe the order as failing and continuing to fail, naming institutions and groups such as the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington, DC, and the Brookings Institution as types associated with it. The speaker suggests that these foreign-policy elites were never told that their wars were stupid, that their generals were losers, or that NATO did not step up, and that China would unleash a virus, which the speaker labels the "China virus." The implication is that these criticisms were aimed at holding the international order to account for its perceived failures. The speaker contends that the failures of the international order have been highlighted or amplified by the regime currently in the White House, describing this regime as a strong advocate for the failing order. In the context of Ukraine, the speaker frames the situation as Donald Trump engaging in a strategy against Putin by supporting Zelensky, effectively stating that the conflict is a way for Trump to fight Putin through Zelensky. The speaker concludes with the claim that they believe people who oppose the order are finding a war that they “absolutely love,” implying enthusiasm for the ongoing conflict as a form of triumph or validation of their stance against the established international system.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Trump threatened the the international order, council on foreign relation, Washington DC, Brookings Institute types. They were never told their wars were stupid or their generals were losers or that NATO didn't step up, that China would unleash a virus. So let's call it the China virus and hold them to account for it. All of those things were a calling out of an international order that was failing and is continuing to fail and now has a great advocate in the regime currently in the White House. And Ukraine, it's basically a fight Donald Trump by fighting Putin through Zelensky war. They finally found a war they just absolutely love.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler This is not my theory. This is theirs. Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan — the two most cited scholars in the color revolution field — studied 323 regime change campaigns. Their finding: Security force defections make campaigns FORTY-SIX TIMES more likely to succeed. https://t.co/w1DND511SS

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler So what did co-author Maria Stephan do next? She became Chief Organizer of the Horizons Project. And on July 16, 2025, she trained New Kings participants on video. "Security forces refused to obey orders to repress protesters." https://t.co/j2R2uh0qSv

Video Transcript AI Summary

Momentum, and momentum is key to success. The third attribute of successful campaigns is they featured defections and loyalty shifts within key institutional pillars. Workers restricted their labor. Faith communities refused to allow their religion to be a tool of authoritarianism. Civil servants refused to carry out illegal orders. Businesses applied financial pressure. Security forces refused to obey orders to repress protesters. We're gonna talk through a lot of that tonight. Finally, successful movements have

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Momentum, and momentum is key to success. The third attribute of successful campaigns, they featured defections and loyalty shifts within key institutional pillars. Workers restricted their labor. Faith communities refused to allow their religion to be a tool of authoritarianism. Civil servants refused to carry out illegal orders. Businesses applied financial pressure. Security forces refused to obey orders to repress protesters. We're gonna talk through a lot of that tonight. Finally, successful movements have

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler 130,000 people are told: "When they crack and power within them shifts, the entire edifice can crumble." "They" = security forces... our military. Yes, Stefan's teachings are now informing a mass American audience that it's how you bring down a government. https://t.co/CEStbNLYeN

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker argues that security forces are responsible for executing policies and getting things done, wielding coercive power. These pillars, together with their social, political, and economic power, ultimately prop up regimes. When they crack and power within them shifts, the entire edifice can crumble. The speaker then notes, “And so the next slide, please.”

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Are responsible for executing policies and basically getting anything done. Security forces wield coercive power. These pillars and their social, political, and economic power ultimately prop up regimes. When they crack and power within them shifts, the entire edifice can crumble. And so the next slide, please.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

It gets worse. Hardy Merriman — Gene Sharp's personal assistant, co-author of the CANVAS regime change field manual used in 50+ countries — wrote a domestic version. It says: "Those who serve in government institutions swear an oath to uphold the Constitution. They don't swear allegiance to the president himself." Then it teaches them how to defect: call in sick, work slowly, ignore orders, leak to media, publicly defy.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Now look at what their own planning document says about Hegseth. The "Democracy Playbook 2025" — the same document that teaches "dealing with security forces" and color revolution case studies — cites this in footnote 49: "Pete Hegseth had been flagged by fellow service member as possible 'Insider Threat'" — AP, November 15, 2024. 72 hours after his nomination. In a regime change manual.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Then the operation went live. November 11, 2025: The National Lawyers Guild Military Law Task Force publishes "FAQ on Refusing Illegal Orders." November 12: Same group publishes a statement calling U.S. Venezuela operations "war crimes" and declaring officers "should refuse superior orders." Remember these dates.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Six days later. November 18. Six Democratic members of Congress — all military veterans — release a video telling active-duty troops: "You MUST refuse illegal orders." https://t.co/P5iQ2LFQQS

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Five of the six were recruited through a single organization: New Politics Leadership Academy. One pipeline. One talent program. Five of six. Mark Kelly was the sixth. https://t.co/Gh1cNNTwVl

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler The administration took the bait. Exactly as the playbook predicted. Trump called them "traitors" and threatened death. Hegseth opened a Pentagon investigation. Grand jury convened under 18 USC 2387... sedition. It failed. https://t.co/xgXmqde6fB

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Daniel Driscoll — Secretary of the Army — has been MORE disruptive than Hegseth. Cancelled the M10 Booker. Halted Humvee production. His confirmation vote... 66-28 versus Hegseth's 51-50. Zero organized opposition for Driscoll. Why? https://t.co/6OE6iEyJSt

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Because Driscoll is someone the system can work with. He's Yale Law with cross-partisan relationships. Like this one: Daniel Driscoll's wife donated over six thousand dollars to Maggie Goodlander, one of the Seditious Six. https://t.co/NJpeUMM2qD

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

The color revolution playbook has one tool for security forces: social pressure through professional networks to induce defection. Driscoll is embedded in those networks. He can be pulled away. Hegseth isn't. He was never attached. The system can't co-opt him... so its only option is removal. That's why Driscoll gets 16 Democratic votes and puff pieces. That's why Hegseth gets grand juries.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Yes, Braver Angels is tied. IMIP hosted a "Pre-Huddle for Braver Angels Convention" on June 13, 2024. Tabatha Pilgrim Thompson, from the Horizons Project, Maria Stephan's organization, was on the call. Watch below: https://t.co/HjP5dFau24

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 explains that at last year’s convention they struggled with how Horizons is perceived: in bridge-building spaces they’re seen as a social justice progressive movement organization, while in movement spaces they’re seen as a bridge-building organization. This makes it hard to articulate the importance of both organizers and social movement activists, and the value of polarization in some contexts. They note that Braver Angels’ platform last year shows members agreed to include BLM activists as part of the movement for civic renewal. Vinay’s point about participatory democracy is easier to discuss and win support for, but they’re mindful that messenger matters: speaking as someone wearing a Horizons hat will land differently than others speaking in their bridge-building movement leader hats. This reflects their reflection on why they’re excited to be present and how to think about approaching these tensions, including how to balance labeling, inclusion of activists, and the messaging that resonates across different audiences.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Like, you know, candidly, I was struggling a little bit at the convention last year because I think, you know, horizons in general sometimes when we're in the space when we're in bridge building spaces, we're seen as a social justice progressive movement organization. When we're in movement spaces, we're seen as, like, a bridge building organization, and people aren't always quite sure where to put us, right, because we are trying to to build connections among the two. And I was really struggling to be able to kind of, like, make the case and talk about the importance of org not just organizers, but also social movement activists and how sometimes you need some of that polarization to exist. And I see that, you know, as a as a huge value And and it's one that, you know, even in the platform last year, Braver Angels measure members agreed to that we want to include, like, the BLM activists as part of this movement for civic renewal. Right? But that's where, you know, Vinay, to your point, participatory democracy piece is a lot easier to, you know, talk about and gain and win over people and gain support over than this piece. And so but I'm also very cognizant that messenger matters. And so me wearing my Horizons hat talking about that is gonna come across very differently than some of you wearing your more bridge building movement leader hats talking about these things. So that's just something that I've been reflecting on why I I was, like, really excited to to show up here today is just to try to think about, like, how can we also

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler And MWEG? Same table. Jennifer Thomas if MWEG on the IMIP call, February 2024: "We couldn't have done it without people like you." https://t.co/MUbwQFIj87

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 expresses heartfelt gratitude, saying they couldn’t have done it without people like the audience. They emphasize that these supporters have allowed them to amplify their efforts in ways they hadn’t imagined.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So Well, I can't emphasize enough. We couldn't have done it without people like you. I mean, we just couldn't have. Right? It's you've allowed us to just amplify our efforts in ways we couldn't have imagined. So And, you know

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler IMIP's Sterling Speirn responds: "If you have a Mormon Women's chapter in your community, you're going to have a little passing gear already in place." MWEG is the grassroots arm. IMIP is the coordination layer. And Maria Stephan's Horizons Project is a part of this same series. https://t.co/DTyzrvOG9i

Video Transcript AI Summary

First speaker: The discussion centers on “democracy hubs” and how their effectiveness can be enhanced by existing, community-based networks. The speaker explains that those hubs would be fortunate to have a chapter of Mormon women in their community because such a chapter would provide a natural, built-in partner. The idea is that these local hubs benefit from a ready-made “passing gear” or supportive infrastructure. The speaker lists examples of potential partnerships or coalitions: libraries with a transforming communities project, museums created by women voters, and community mediation centers. The overarching point is about aggregation and collaboration across community institutions to advance democratic engagement and civic participation. The speaker emphasizes that having a Mormon women’s chapter in a community would supply a ready-to-use set of collaborative resources, effectively accelerating the work of democracy hubs. Second speaker: Responds with a brief interjection that shifts the tone. They remark, “You’re a little bit horny. Little engine that could. I hope that doesn’t diminish you. I hope that's a compliment. Nope.” The remark suggests a provocative, informal reaction to the first speaker’s assertion, followed by a clarification that the speaker does not intend to diminish or insult, and then a negation of the compliment being taken. The exchange highlights a tension between earnest civic talk about strategic partnerships and a candid, personal aside that introduces a more informal, idiosyncratic tone to the dialogue.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Democracy hubs. And I I've often said those hubs are gonna be lucky if there's a chapter of Mormon women in their community because they'll have a natural built in partner because those local hubs are they have to see. Do I have a libraries transforming communities project? Do I have museums made by us as legal women voters doing it? Do I have a community mediation center? It's all that aggregation. But, boy, if you have a Mormon women's chapter in your community, you're gonna have, like, a little you're gonna have a little passing gear already in place for you. Speaker 1: You're a little bit horny. Little engine that could. I hope that doesn't diminish you. I hope that's a compliment. Nope.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler When Hegseth took his seat on the USIP board, the institutional home where the color revolution playbook was developed, the acting president physically barricaded the building. They sent DOGE staff, FBI agents, and DC police to get in. https://t.co/MVdcSz95F0

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

CONCLUSION: Pete Hegseth named the institutions in 37 seconds. The institutions responded with: - Pre-positioned oppo research activated in 72 hours - A regime change planning document citing him by name - A legal predicate for military disobedience published the same week as the Seditious Six video - A pipeline that produced the cohort - A grand jury they couldn't win - A replacement they CAN co-opt - Braver Angels and MWEG sitting at the same table as the color revolution coordinators - A physical barricade at the building where the playbook was written They're not trying to get rid of a bad SecDef. They're trying to remove the one obstacle that makes their entire methodology fail.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

If you appreciated this content, you will love my upcoming book - October 2026. I know it's a long way off, but we intentionally went with a small publisher to skirt censorship issues and need every preorder to launch in big chains. Books a Million: https://www.booksamillion.com/p/Unelected/Jennica-Pounds/9798901160626 Barnes and Noble: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/unelected-jennica-pounds/1149199075?ean=9798901160626 Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Unelected-Jennica-Pounds/dp/B0GGYQNWHJ

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@OGPdawg @PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Nearly every institution has been captured; that's the problem. It's easier to kidnap a Venezuelan dictator than to convict a Democrat of murder in a D.C. jury, even with a signed confession.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@OhioShermanTank @PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler You govern yourself. Do you still have children in public school? Do you still depend on CNN? Do you go to DEI training sessions? Are you stuck in a city? All these things are fixable.

@harryjsisson — Harry Sisson

Posted - July 1, 2024 at 3:08 PM

Saved - July 1, 2024 at 4:53 PM

@harryjsisson - Harry Sisson

According to the Supreme Court, Biden could now send in Seal Team 6 to take all of them out. He could send in the military to take out Trump. He has “immunity” for official acts now!