reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - October 22, 2023 at 4:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Unveiling the Joe Biden Shadow Presidency: A White Hat Movie Summary: This article delves into the intriguing claims surrounding the Joe Biden presidency, suggesting that a shadow presidency is being orchestrated by the White Hat Military Alliance. It explores evidence such as military salutes, facial comparisons, signature differences, and simulated props. The article also highlights the role of actors and the use of hyperflesh skin masks. With references to Q drops and notable figures, it aims to shed light on the alleged deception and the underlying agenda. Read more to uncover the secrets behind the 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency. (499 characters)

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

Joe Bidan Is Not The Real @JoeBiden Joe Bidan Is Not The Real #President USA Inc. Filed Chapter 11 Bankruptcy 2020 Case #: 20-40375-KKS 🔍We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency 💊 https://link-tube.com/OperationQ

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com
Operation Q | Link-tube: Multiple Links in One Operation Q on Link-tube link-tube.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

Even the military does not consider @JoeBiden the President (@POTUS), as demonstrated by their inauguration salute for him reserved for funerals and visiting foreign dignitaries. 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

The following video demonstrates the above chan board post revealing Joe Bidan's foreign dignitary salute which we will next compare to Trump's traditional presidential battery salute. 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIprRLYcteA

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

The following video demonstrates the above chan board post revealing Trump's traditional presidential battery salute compared to the above foreign dignitary salute for Joe Bidan. 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFX_7IR91Vk

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

Drop 572 resembles the week of the faux inauguration of actor/double Joe Bidan as being the great awakening for society to truly understand the corrupt, Marxist, Zionist, communist agenda of what would have been Biden's CCP deep state handlers. 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

It Is Important To Note, That @JoeBiden Was Executed In 2019 & Replaced (By White Hat Actor) For The Following 18 U.S. Codes: 2381 Treason 2382 Misprision of Treason 2383 Rebellion Or Insurrection 2384 Seditious Conspiracy 2385 Advocating Overthrow of Gov

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

The Real @JoeBiden Deep State Traitor & Pedophile vs. Actor "BIDAN" @POTUS Comedy Genius Secretly Saving America A Castle Rock Production 🔍We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

A Castle Rock Entertainment Production. Culver Studios (@AmazonStudios) Owned By @HackmanCapital Purchased The Studios For $85 Million In 2014 So @Amazon Could Allegedly Use The Building As "Office Space." @VincentCrypt46 Gave Us Castle Rock Comms. 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

June 22, 2021 @POTUS IG posts a photo of Bidan from the Castle Rock White House set featuring a reflection of the real POTUS @realDonaldTrump in the right window. Q Drop #3234 Stated: "Reflections are important" "Find the reflection inside the castle" 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

White Hats Even Had The @JoeBiden Actor/Double's Latex/Silicone Skinmask Malfunction As Ear Skin Flap Is Exposed. 🔍"We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency" 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency 💊 https://link-tube.com/OperationQ

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com
Operation Q | Link-tube: Multiple Links in One Operation Q on Link-tube link-tube.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

Report On The Biden Laptop Brought To You By @MarcoPolo501c3 Free Download & Viewing: 🔗 http://Biden.Digital 🔗 bidenlaptopreport.marcopolousa.org/report_viewer/… 🔍We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency 💊 https://link-tube.com/OperationQ

Report on the Biden Laptop Exposing corruption and blackmail to drive an American renaissance. bidenlaptopreport.marcopolousa.org
We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com
Operation Q | Link-tube: Multiple Links in One Operation Q on Link-tube link-tube.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

Find Someone Who Kisses You The Way @JoeBiden Kisses His Granddaughter Finnegan Biden 😂 ☑️Iowa Rally ☑️Nevada Rally ☑️New Hemisphere Rally 🔍We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency 💊 https://link-tube.com/OperationQ

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com
Operation Q | Link-tube: Multiple Links in One Operation Q on Link-tube link-tube.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

On April 11, 2023 Joe Biden's double visited Belfast, Ireland where he was caught on @FoxNews giving his neck an itch when his latex/silicone hyperflesh skinmask bunched and crinkled unnaturally in comparison to how legitimate skin would act. 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker talks about a conservative guy from North Carolina who was known for his inquisitive nature. He was always asking questions and had a strong interest in mathematics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: North Carolina. And he was a very conservative guy who was very, very Oh my gosh. That's a math. American Holy cow. Always ask questions. Well, the key to
We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

In addition to the Amazon/Culver (Castle Rock) Studio White House replica, turns out @TylerPerry Studios also has a replica on Fort McPherson, Southwest Atlanta, Georgia. As of June 26, 2015, Fort Mac LRA retained 144 acres & Perry purchased 330 acres. 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

Feb 6, 2021 @Wikipedia changed their definition of "AF1" to any plane that @POTUS is on. In reality, @JoeBiden was never granted access to use AF1. He uses AF2 because AF1 is in use by the real CIC of USA: @RealDonaldTrump. 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

Pay special attention to @RealDonaldTrump intentionally misspelling "Biden" as "Bidan." The significance of the misspelling is Trump communicating that @JoeBiden is no longer himself, rather another guy "Bidan" playing the role of Joe Biden as @POTUS. 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

June 11, 2019 @RealDonaldTrump openly says on @CSPAN that @JoeBiden was "a different guy." Trump elaborates by saying "he looks different than he used to, he acts different than he used to." Trump is alluring to the obvious observable discrepancies. 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Biden is criticized by Speaker 1, who calls him a loser and says he only gained popularity because of Obama. Speaker 1 believes Biden's campaign is focused on attacking him and mentions that the Obama administration's policies have been overturned. Speaker 1 also comments on Biden's appearance and behavior, suggesting he has changed. Despite the criticism, Speaker 1 sees Biden mentioning his name multiple times as a compliment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In his in his speech today, Joe Biden will say that your policies represent an existential threat to this nation. What do you say to Joe Biden? Speaker 1: Well, I heard Biden, who's a loser. I mean, look, Joe never got more than 1%, except Obama took him off the trash heap. And now it looks like he's failing. It looks like, his friends from the left are going to overtake him pretty soon. But I heard he you know, his whole campaign is to hit you look at what the Obama administration did in terms of the military, in terms of security, in terms of other nations, in in terms of almost everything. Much of it now, fortunately for everybody here, has been overturned. But look, when a Dan has to mention my name 76 times in his speech. That means he's in trouble. Now I have to tell you, he's a different from Guy. He looks different than he used to. He acts different than he used to. He's even slower than he used to be. So I don't know. But when he mentions my name that many times, I guess I should be complimented.
We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

On @FoxNews August 17, 2020 in the following clip @RealDonaldTrump said: "Joe is shot, let's face it. Joe is shot." This was released on the @TeamTrump's Facebook page with the title: "President Trump: Let's face it, Joe is shot." Quite Clear 5:5 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bernie Sanders supports getting Biden elected, believing that once in office, he can be influenced. A congresswoman recently boasted about her control over Biden, implying he will do as she wishes. However, this is concerning as our country requires strong leadership. World leaders are skilled strategists, and we have good relationships with them. It is crucial to have a capable leader who is mentally sharp and confident. Biden's current state, lacking awareness and staying in his basement, is worrisome. Even at his best, he was not an impressive candidate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You saw Bernie Sanders. He said, look. We gotta get Biden in. Once we get him in, we'll get him changed. You saw that horrible congresswoman. She was horrible. She's bragging about how how she totally controls Biden, that he'll do whatever she wants. And that was just 2 days ago. She will do whatever he wants. That's what's gonna happen. Joe is shot. Let's face it. Joe is shot. Now maybe people are gonna feel sorry for him and maybe he wouldn't, but our country is too important for that. You're dealing with people that are very sharp. You're dealing with world class chess players in the leaders of these countries. I know them all. We do very well with all of them. Erdogan of Turkey, all of them. You can't have a guy that's shot. You can't have a guy that doesn't know where he is. You can't have a guy that's afraid to leave his basement because She can't speak any longer. And by the way, in his best day, he wasn't good. You know that. He was not the guy.
We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

Nov 6, 2020 @TuckerCarlson tried to awaken @FoxNews normies to the fact that @JoeBiden was no longer the same guy from the 80's. "its becoming ever more clear that there is no Joe Biden, he no longer exists and that a projection remains, a hologram." 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video questions the identity of Joe Biden and suggests that we don't really know who he is or what he thinks. It claims that there is no Joe Biden anymore, just a projection of a nonthreatening political candidate. The video wonders who is behind this projection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the first question tonight is far more basic than that. Who exactly is Joe Biden? This man who claims to be our president. We probably ought to find out. Put that on the to do list. The truth is, as of tonight, we don't really know. We have no clue what Joe Biden actually thinks or even if he's capable of thinking. He hasn't told us. No one's made him tell us for a full year now. That's by design. In fact, it's becoming clear there is no Joe Biden. The man you may remember from the 19 eighties is gone. He no longer exists. What remains is a projection of sorts, a hologram designed to mimic Behavior of a nonthreatening political candidate. Relax. Joe Biden's here. He smiles a lot. Everything's fine. That's the message from the vapor candidate. Don't think too much. So who's running the projector here?
We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

Hannity: "What Happened To Joe?" Mar 4, 2021 @SeanHannity displays side by side comparisons of @JoeBiden highlighting facial, mannerism & vocal differences amongst the "Bidan" actors. Oct 11, 2012 July 27, 2016 Nov 7, 2019 May 4, 2020 Feb 26, 2021 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker compares Joe Biden in 2012, 2016, and today, suggesting that he has declined mentally. They mention instances where Biden seemed to struggle with his words and claim that his cognitive issues are being questioned by foreign news agencies. The speaker criticizes the media for not addressing these concerns and highlights that Biden's staff rarely allows him to take questions from the press. They also note that Biden has not held a press conference since becoming president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For comparison, let us do what the mob in the media, big tech, and Democrats will never do. Let's take a quick down recent history and look at Joe Biden in 2012 and Joe Biden in 2016 and Joe Biden today. You decide. Speaker 1: He sent me 2 letters saying, by the way, can you send me some stimulus money for companies here in the state of Wisconsin? We sent 1,000,000 of dollars. Play the radio. Make sure the television excuse me. Make sure you have the record player on at night. The the the phone. Make sure The kids hear words. Now they got a new plan. Trust me. It's not gonna cost you anymore. Folks, follow your instincts on this one. We hold these truths to be self evident. All men and women created by go, you know the you know the thing. They put 1 foot in front of the other. They keep going. That's the unbreakable spirit of the people of America. That's who we are. And representatives, Speaker 2: Shirley Jackson Lee, Al Green, Sylvia Garcia, Lizzie Pinelli, excuse me. Pinell and, what am I doing here? Speaker 3: I'm gonna lose track here. Speaker 0: What am I doing here? I'm losing track again? This is not a medical diagnosis. I'm not a doctor. I won't play 1 on TV, but it's pretty clear transparent It's obvious that's not the same guy. His fastball is gone if he ever had 1. His curveball is gone. And even if he had a slow pitch and a knuckleball, that's It's gone too. Joe Biden is struggling. The media mob bashes me when I make what is an honest observation. Everyone on earth can see what is happening including our enemies. We now have foreign news agencies doing what your media will not do. They are raising questions about Joe Biden's cognitive issues. Now, of course, Biden's staffers are clearly aware of his let's call them limitations. They almost never let him take questions from the press. He rarely appears in public. He hasn't held a single press conference since becoming president. Hasn't even scheduled a joint
We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

Movie props used to simulate @JoeBiden & @KamalaHarris boarding AF1 include a fake AF1 plane movie prop and stairs with green screens for CGI editing. The @USAirForce prohibits fake "president" actors from using AF1, reserved for CIC @RealDonaldTrump. 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

Due to the shocking facial similarities between @JoeBiden & Struan Rodger (Sept 18, 1946) it becomes hard to ignore the possibility that the supporting roles actor from Manchester, England would pass on the opportunity of a lifetime to play @POTUS. 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

The @JoeBiden double took his presidential oath on a rare 1884 Douay & Rheims Catholic Masonic (Jesuit) Bible. Blatantly showing normies an allegiance to secret societies & occultism via symbolism, which shall be their downfall. 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

The White Hat controlled @WhiteHouse IG account (Nov 10, 2021) blatantly show the @JoeBidan double walking as his left ankle/foot completely vanish into the abyss & half his right foot disappeared into a CGI hole. Caused by simulated grass/green screen. 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

Lest we forget, the not even remotely similar signature comparisons of real @JoeBiden & the actor/double playing his @POTUS role. During signing of presidential docs the actor/double has been caught using the opposite signing hand (left, non-dominate). 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

One of the most blatantly noticeable differentiations between the White Hat Military Alliance installed crisis actor/double playing @POTUS & the real @JoeBiden would easily have to be the eye color changing from blue to brown. 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency 💊 https://giveit.link/OperationQ

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com
Operation Q | Link-tube: Multiple Links in One Operation Q on Link-tube giveit.link

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

@IMDb provides supporting evidence that another actor, Arthur David Roberts played the main role in the 11:16 hour news production: "Joe Biden Sworn In As US President On Inauguration Day 2021" Produced by @Telegraph, available on their @YouTube. 💊 https://humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency

We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

CIC Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) has vindicated the claims of Derek Johnson (@rattletrap1776) and Jon Herold (@patel_patriot) regarding continuity of government/devolution at a September 27, 2023 speech in Clinton Township, Michigan provided by @RSBNetwork. At 51:04 in the full speech Trump says: "In my second term, which we're sort of having now, but I don't want the results right? I don't want the results of this second term, this second term is a disaster for this country. Worst President, think of it, there's never been a President like this." 🔗 https://rumble.com/v3lh5cv-full-speech-45th-president-donald-j.-trump-to-deliver-remarks-in-clinton-to.html Trump is acknowledging that he is in fact CIC/@POTUS behind the scenes of the fake Joe Bidan Shadow Presidency which has intentionally pegged the @JoeBiden ("Bidan") double as the "fall guy" for making a disaster of the United States. This was designed to help wake up the masses as to what it feels like to be led by a communist/globalist puppet who cares more about funding a war oversees than securing his own borders. Q warned us years in advance in drops 4461 and 4951, "It had to be this way." ↙️↙️Read & Share The Full Article↘️↘️ 🔍"We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency" 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency 💊 https://giveit.link/OperationQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Crooked Joe and his thugs are desperate to stop me because I caused major disruption in my first term. Now, in my second term, which we're currently in, I don't want the results because it's a disaster for the country. There has never been a president like me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The reason Crooked Joe and his thugs are trying so hard to stop me is that in my 1st term, I disrupted all of it. Oh, did I disrupt? Was that that was called major disruption. And in my 2nd term, which we're sort of having now, but I don't want the results. Right? I don't want the results of this 2nd term. The 2nd term is a disaster for this country. Worst president, think of it. There's never been a president like
FULL SPEECH: 45th President Donald J. Trump to Deliver Remarks in Clinton Township, MI - 9/27/2023 President Donald J. Trump is expected to address former and current United Auto Workers about the ongoing UAW strike in Detroit. Broadcast is expected to begin at 6:00 p.m. ET Sponsored By: Birch Gold rumble.com
We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com
Operation Q | Link-tube: Multiple Links in One Operation Q on Link-tube giveit.link

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

📺 The Truman Show 📺 On March 30, 2021, @JesseBWatters made it abruptly clear on mainstream @FoxNews that we are watching a scripted movie which he referred to as the Truman Show where @JoeBiden is being played by Jim Carrey behind a latex/silicone hyperflesh facemask. This is rather interesting as there are only two Q drops in their entirety that specifically say "watch the water" and Jesse's last name is literally Watters as in the plural of water! It's such a blissful feeling to be vindicated so regularly these days, it seems all the "conspiracies" we once had are slowing turning into hard facts. Jim Carrey notably starred in the 1994 comedy classic "The Mask" followed by the 1998 eye opening "The Truman Show" which coincidentally demonstrates just how easy it is for the mainstream media and film industry to simulate reality as we know it. The movie even states "On air. Unaware." on the front cover as Truman is shown approaching the exit of the simulation which implies that Truman was unaware he was in a movie and entrapped within a civilization by a dome or firmament until he started paying attention, sought out truth, awakened, and escaped. Many of us are still unaware that we too are being deceived by Fascist Zionist Jesuit Freemasonic mockingbird programming and institutionalized indoctrination to keep us entrapped in the low vibrational loosh "matrix" simulation. Simultaneously deterring humanity from learning about the true shape of God's earth while intentionally deceiving us to prevent humanity from ascending by collectively raising our vibrational frequency. ↙️↙️Read & Share The Full Article↘️↘️ 🔍"We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency" 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency 💊 https://giveit.link/OperationQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Biden's recent press conference was nothing more than a scripted act, with questions and answers pre-planned by news executives and Biden's handlers. It felt like watching a poorly acted play, where only the naive audience clapped at the end. The parent companies behind the White House press correspondents, such as Time Warner, Comcast, Disney, and Amazon, are using the Biden presidency for their own financial gain and ideological agenda. It's like the American people are living in their own version of "The Truman Show," where everything is controlled and manipulated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joe Biden's being played by Jim Carrey, and I don't even think he realizes it's all an act. You're getting played. That's the subject of tonight's waters words. On Thursday, president Biden didn't hold a press conference. It was a play put on by Biden and the media just for the benefit of the Democratic Party. Everything was scripted ahead of time. The questions written in advance by news execs, Biden's answers written in advance by his handlers, and the outcome preordained. It was like watching a play where the actors are so bad you can tell they're acting, where the audience is cringing as the actors struggle for their lines on stage. Only the rubes clap at the end and the director in the background, beads of sweat forming on his brow, shocked They pulled it off. The parent companies who pay the salaries of the White House press correspondents, Time Warner, Comcast, Disney, Amazon, They're producing the Biden presidency for money and ideology. The American people are watching The Truman Show. Who are you? I am the creator of a television show that gives hope and joy and inspiration to 1,000,000. And who am I? You're the star.
We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com
Operation Q | Link-tube: Multiple Links in One Operation Q on Link-tube giveit.link

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

Yet again in Wolfeboro, New Hampshire On @RSBNetwork October 9, 2023, (CIC) President Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) provided us another confirmation that he is in fact running the Bidan White Hat shadow presidency. In the full length @RSBNetwork broadcast around the 2:32 mark Donald Trump can be seeing proudly flashing the Presidential Seal and "The President" title on his folder. 📺 https://www.rsbnetwork.com/video/live-president-trump-delivers-remarks-in-wolfeboro-nh-10-9-23/ ↙️↙️Read & Share The Full Articles↘️↘️ 🔍"We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency" 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency 🔍"Developing Revelations: The Bountiful NESARA (National Economic Security & Reformation Act)" 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/developing-revelations-the-bountiful-nesara-national-economic-security-reformation-act 💊 https://giveit.link/OperationQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
They had a voter ID the size of citizens, like a picture with all their information. It was required to enter the convention, but we don't want voter ID for voting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They had a voter ID that was the size of the citizens. It's like they said hung with a chain around their neck. It was a picture. I think it had every bit of information ever. You could read their biography, know everything about the person. They couldn't get into the convention without it. But to go to vote, we don't want voter ID.
LIVE: President Trump Delivers Remarks in Wolfeboro, NH – 10/9/23 The 45th President of the United States Donald J. Trump delivers remarks to supporters in Wolfeboro, NH on Monday, October 9th, 2023. The broadcast is expected to begin at 9:30 am ET. Please note, times are subject to change. FULL EVENT: FULL SPEECH: President Donald J. Trump rsbnetwork.com
We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com
Developing Revelations: The Bountiful NESARA (National Economic Security & Reformation Act) NESARA is the abbreviation of the National Economic Security & Reformation Act and has a global counter part known as GESARA. This act has also been more recently coined as Trumpsara due to the fact that Trump is actually getting it implemented. Many of its conditions have already started being implemented thanks to Trump, which we will briefly explore in the following write-up. NESARA seeks to redistribute funds that have been illegally obtained over decades by the Fascist Freemasonic Illuminat humorousmathematics.com
Operation Q | Link-tube: Multiple Links in One Operation Q on Link-tube giveit.link

@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue

"Dog Testicle" Stylized Chin Hyperflesh Latex/Silicone Skinmask 🎭🌰🌰🎭🌰🌰🎭🌰🌰🎭 @JoeBiden ("Bidan") was spotted October 18, 2023 on @CNN flexing the newest White Hat Military Alliance certified "Dog Testicle" stylized chin hyperflesh latex/silicone skinmask. As you can see, the name comes from the fact it appears there are two small shaven nuts chilling on his chin under a skinmask which were not there before. ↙️↙️Read & Share The Full Article↘️↘️ 🔍"We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency" 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/we-are-watching-a-white-hat-movie-the-2021-usa-inc-joe-biden-shadow-presidency 💊 https://giveit.link/OperationQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the impact of mass shootings on victims and their need for hope. They emphasize the importance of understanding and support from others who have gone through similar experiences. The speaker acknowledges that some people have endured more than they have, but they still strive to provide a sense of hope to those in need. The speaker recognizes the significance of their efforts and the positive impact it can have on others.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Virtually every mass shooting. Every circumstance percentage where large number of people had been victimized and lost. I spoke with them. I learned a long time jewel going through something that is bound their comprehension. They've never thought that that can be true. If they see someone who they think understands or maybe they do something not the same or similar, kid gives him some sense of hope. And now I always get criticized sometimes unless I when I go to these events, I stay for 3 to 4 hours and answer all the questions. But it matters. It matters a lot. And, and look, I'm talking some of you have gone through a hell of a lot more than I've gone through. And a lot more than other people have gone through. And you understand? So it's just it's just, people are looking for just something to grab, something that gives them some sense, sense of hope. And that's if I can do a little bit of that, we're doing, not for me.
We Are Watching A White Hat Movie: The 2021 USA Inc. Joe Biden Shadow Presidency Let's be very clear before we dive into this highly debated topic, the real Joseph R. Biden is dead and was executed via Human Rights International military tribunal in 2019 for crimes against children/humanity. Since then the individual we have seen campaign, debate, commit election fraud/treason, and get falsely inaugurated to a dissolved USA Inc. in the mainstream media has not been Joseph R. Biden. Rather, it has been a combination of CGI deep fake technology (for televised purposes), a deep humorousmathematics.com
Operation Q | Link-tube: Multiple Links in One Operation Q on Link-tube giveit.link
Saved - July 16, 2023 at 3:50 PM

@KMGGaryde - Gary D

Tucker Carlson truth teller. Video: Karli Bonnie

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are certain topics that people avoid discussing or push back on fiercely, such as the war in Ukraine, COVID, and January 6th. This is not a coincidence, as there is a reason behind it. In the Biden White House, someone supposedly left an 8 ball of Cocaine, but it seems like a setup. This story is intriguing and explains the behavior of certain individuals. The speaker has experience in the media business and understands how this behavior can be both crazed and grandiose. They have a plan to rearrange everything, believing it will work because the current way of doing things has been effective.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doing that on purpose. And you should probably look around and ask yourself, what are the topics that no one's even pushing back on? What are the topics that their response is so ferocious that people are like, I don't wanna deal with it? One of them is the war in Ukraine, another's COVID, And, of course, the 3rd is January 6th. And you have to ask, why is that? Well, it's not by accident. Trust me. There is a reason. So The hope in the White House. What'd you say? The poke in the white house. I don't know what you know what? The thing about that story, it's just a mystery to me? No one was more shocked than I was. Are you serious? In the Biden White House, somebody left an 8 ball of Cocaine. In a public I was like, I send it my wife. That just doesn't it's just not in character. You know? I just don't believe it. It's clearly a setup. I went right back to Mary and Barry and I was like, somebody set you up. I'm serious. It was you know what I mean? It was like it was, can I just I'll stop with it? That was my favorite story of all time because it just explains all the behavior. It really does. I mean, I worked in the media business for my whole life, so I I know what the behavior looks like. But it's, like, crazed and grandiose? I've got a plan. You're not gonna believe it. It's unbelievable. It's gonna totally work. What we're gonna do is we're gonna totally rearrange everything. Okay? We've been doing things a certain way for a long time. Okay? And it's worked.
Saved - August 31, 2023 at 1:11 PM

@LibertyLockPod - Liberty Lockdown w/ Clint Russell

Tucker Carlson just confirmed, without using the phrase, that Operation Mockingbird is alive and well It's less than 2 minutes and is arguably the most important disclosure a former corporate news person has ever made

Video Transcript AI Summary
Intel agencies have a significant influence on television broadcasts, Facebook, and Google. Many anchors, including a national security reporter, act as mouthpieces for the Pentagon and the CIA, knowingly spreading lies. This is a common practice, even at CNN. These reporters read government propaganda from intel agencies, and it's frustrating and offensive, regardless of whether one agrees with the lies or not. For instance, when the CIA and Pentagon claimed that Bashar al Assad used poison gas, there was no evidence to support it. Despite this, many people were killed in response.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Intel agencies have a big effect on what is broadcast on television, and what you see on Facebook and Google as well. I mean, they're all up and down Facebook and Google, as I'm sure you know. And, you know, there are a lot of anchors who and including people I know well and have worked with at different networks. I'm thinking of 1 in particular, national security reporter, who is just a mouthpiece for the Pentagon and the CIA, And it's knowingly telling lies on their behalf. It's very, very common, very common. And I can think of a number of people at CNN who I know for a fact are doing that exact thing. And so, I mean, they're reading government propaganda from the intel agencies knowingly. And I'm sure they've got Some internal rationale that allows them to get up in the morning and face themselves despite having done something that dishonest. But I'm just telling you, bottom line, I know that is the that is true. I'm not speculating at all. And in particular, on the national security stuff, there are very well known national security reporters. I'm thinking of 1 female national security reporter in particular, who just reads lies from the national security state. And it's wildly frustrating. And it would just make me mad. I mean, even if I don't agree with the lies, okay, but even if I did agree with the lies, I would be offended because they're lies. They're lies. Like when, The you know, when CIA and the Pentagon were claiming that Bashar al Assad used poison gas against his own people. K? There was there was no evidence that was true. I mean, maybe it was true. There was no evidence it was true. None. 0. And I called them out, and they could not provide any evidence. And yet, every national sector and it was a big deal, and we killed a lot of people in response. We sent in missiles and killed a lot of people. We took human life in response to that clean. And it was, as far as I can tell,
Saved - September 6, 2023 at 7:19 PM

@Charlie92898642 - Patriot for Life 1776

I’m not a fan of Phil G at all…but he’s correct that Hilary & Biden are dead. The real Hilary is in red & her double is on the left. The double is the one we see in the news. Biden has at least 4 different individuals playing his role.

Saved - October 1, 2023 at 6:10 PM

@TheFlatEartherr - THE FLAT EARTHER

Sleepy Joe's wearing a mask, The Simpsons already revealed what's underneath.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are things being exposed now that are the complete opposite of this number. They are hideous space reptiles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a lot of things that have been exposed now, but then about another kind of coming at the same time. That's the exact opposite of this number. They're nothing but hideous space reptiles.
Saved - October 19, 2023 at 8:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
As people notice the stark difference between the current Joe Biden and the real one, it's time to revisit this post. Shows and films often hint at their intentions through predictive programming. Whether they are doubles, actors in masks, or robots, one thing is clear: the person we see on TV is not the real Biden.

@LizCrokin - LIZ CROKIN

Now that normies are finally starting to notice that the Joe Biden(s) we keep seeing on TV look nothing like the old and real Biden — now would be a good time to revisit this post. They always reveal what they’re doing in shows, films, etc. — it’s predictive programming. Are these doubles, actors wearing masks, robots? — who knows but it’s obviously not him!

Saved - November 25, 2023 at 10:48 PM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

Clones in politics? creepy... these replicas are used everywhere to enhance CGI war scenes and mainstream "terror" operations.... never trust the television... You are watching a movie! Many people you know are already gone! https://t.co/FsFXKkECl6

Saved - November 25, 2023 at 11:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Congress members are being controlled by intelligence agencies, according to Tucker Carlson. He shared an incident where a high-ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee admitted being monitored by the NSA. Another congressman accused Carlson of being a Russian agent based on information from intelligence briefers. Carlson criticized the reliance on such briefings, emphasizing the need for independent thinking.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Tucker Carlson Exposing Congress, You Do Not Get What You Vote For. Our Intelligence Agencies, The CIA Are Controlling Their Decisions “There are members of congress who are controlled by the intel agencies. I'm not speculating on this. You know, I lived there for 35 years. I know this. I had a very high ranking very high ranking member of the house intel committee tell me at dinner At a restaurant in Washington when he'd been drinking, we gotta talk about this. And I said, oh, I'll text you. He goes, I I can't text. And I said, why is that? And he goes, well, because NSA reads my text. And I said, NSA reach wait. You're the head guy on the intelligence committee. You're their boss. You're providing oversight in our constitution constitutional system. He's like, yeah. But, you know, they're still spying at me, first thing. Second thing, Michael McCall, Who is, you know, the leader of, I would say, the NeoCons, uh, in the house, kinda low key, uh, neocons, but but neocons. Um, what I got into an argument with him once last year on the phone. He told somebody that I was a Russian agent or something, and I was outraged. So I called him on the phone, and I, you know, I used bad line. I was really mad, And, uh, he said, woah. Woah. Woah. I I just got that. You know? That's what the intel briefers told me that you were working for Russia. And I said, that's what the intel briefers told you. You believe your fucking intel like, how old are you, son? You know? I'm from DC. My dad was in this world. Like Yeah. You don't you're being manipulated by your intel briefers.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are members of Congress who are controlled by intel agencies. A high-ranking member of the House Intel Committee admitted to being spied on by the NSA. Even though he provides oversight, they still monitor him. Michael McCall, a leader among neoconservatives, accused someone of being a Russian agent based on what the intel briefers told him. When confronted, he defended himself by saying he believed the intel. This highlights the manipulation and control exerted by intel agencies over politicians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are members of Congress who are controlled by the intel agencies. I'm not speculating on this. You know, I I lived there for 35 years. I know this. I had a very high ranking very high ranking member of the House Intel Committee tell me at dinner at a restaurant in Washington when he'd been drinking. We gotta talk about this. And I said, oh, I'll text you. He goes, I I can't text. And I said, why is that? And he goes, well, because NSA reads my text. And I said, NSA, reach wait. You're the head guy on the intelligence committee. You're their boss. You're providing oversight in our constitution constitutional system. He's like, yeah. But, you know, they're still spying on me, first thing. Second thing, Michael McCall, who is, You know? The leader of, I would say, the neocons in the house, kind of low key neocons, but but neocons. What I got into an argument with him once last year on the phone. He told somebody that I was a Russian agent or something, and I was outraged. So I called him on the phone, and I, you know, I used bad lying. I was really mad. And he said, woah. Woah. Woah. I I just got that. You know, that's what the intel briefers told me that you were working for Russia. And I said, that's what the intel briefers told you? You believe your fucking intel like, how old are you, son? You know, I'm from DC. My dad was in this world. Like, you don't you're being manipulated by your intel
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 1:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson's recent text messages, revealed in the Dominion lawsuit, show that he was dismissive of claims about the 2020 election being stolen. However, it seems that Tucker has now fully embraced the idea that the election was rigged, possibly as a way to solidify his support for Donald Trump and his departure from Fox. It's unclear why Tucker's stance has changed, but it's clear that he is now fully committed to this narrative.

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Tucker Carlson Is Scared to Cover the 2020 Election “I was far too dismissive of some of the claims made about it and I think there may be some merit to the wildest possible claims…” MY THOUGHTS: One of the common things I hear from people is what Tucker said in text messages that were “brought to light” by the Dominion lawsuit… that he didn’t believe the election was stolen and said some other things blah blah. I will say that Tucker, since at least 2020 (publicly), knew his devices were being monitored. What I do know is that Tucker appears to have gone all-in now on solidifying his support for Donald Trump and the fact that the 2020 election was rigged. Why? Maybe it has to do with leaving Fox. Tucker is a very smart and bright man; so it’s more than “I simply changed my mind” on these subjects..Therefore, was he freed? https://rumble.com/v41b9ah-tucker-carlson-scared-to-cover-the-2020-election.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am scared to cover two things. Firstly, the 2020 election. I may have been too dismissive of some claims made about it, and there might be some validity to the wildest claims. It's hard to know what's true with all the lying and sleazy people involved in politics. It may take years to figure it out, but not all the claims about fraud were baseless. Secondly, there is another topic, but the speaker does not provide any information about it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are there things that you're scared to cover? You're sitting there saying, wow, this is, like, soul crushing. Like, to the point where, like, it really scares you in your soul. There are 2. Yes. There are 2. 1 is the 2020 election, and I think that I was far too dismissive of some of the claims made about it, and I think there may be some merit to some of the wildest possible claims about that election. And I haven't proven it yet, but I've, you know look. I'll just say and you know this, of course, very well, both of you, that whenever you have politics, you've got a lot of sleazy people and liars and people who just wanna get their candidate elected or get paid or whatever. You've got a lot of lying around all political campaigns, so it's very hard to know what's true. And sometimes it takes years to figure it out. So there were a lot of stupid mercenaries making claims about fraud in that past election that were you know, they couldn't back up. But that doesn't mean that all of those ideas were wrong. And I think that some of them were right, is is what I'm learning. And, you know, I'll just leave it there. The second
Tucker Carlson Scared to Cover the 2020 Election Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 2:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson revealed his fears about two stories he's hesitant to cover: the 2020 Election and the UFO phenomenon. His reluctance to discuss the latter with his wife piques curiosity about what he knows.

@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

Listen to Tucker Carlson response to Clay Morris asking him are there any story he is scared to cover where it’s soul crushing: “Yes, there are two um one is the 2020 Election. The second thing that bothers me is the UFO story… It’s so dark that you know haven’t told my wife about it….” If Tucker is that afraid where he hasn’t even talk to his wife about it, I definitely want to know what he knows….

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are two things that scare the speakers: the 2020 election and the UFO story. The UFO story is particularly dark and has a spiritual component that they don't fully understand. They haven't shared this information with their wives or families because it is deeply disturbing. The implications of the UFO story are profound and the public may not be able to handle it. The speakers agree that it is too disturbing to share with their children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are there things that you're scared to cover? You're sitting there saying, wow. This is, like, soul crushing. Like, to the point where, like, it really scares you in your soul. Speaker 1: There are 2. Yes. There are 2. 1 is the 2020 election. The second thing that bothers me is the UFO story. And, You know? The more you dig into that and talk to people with with actual knowledge of there are parts of that story that I do not understand at all that are really, really, really dark. It's so dark that I, you know, haven't told my wife about it. I mean, I I haven't verified any of this, but this is not just stuff that I read on the Internet. I know you all are very very grounded in that story, so I think I know you know what I'm talking about. Yeah. But there's some stuff there that's It's like, man. I I'm not even sure what that means. There's a spiritual component there that I I don't fully understand. So, yes, That story bothers me. Part of it is the public can't deal with it. It's too far out. The implications are too, profound, and so and I understand that. I because I've heard things where I'm just like, oh, man. I I don't even really wanna know that, honestly. Speaker 0: Deeply disturbing stuff. You know, forget, like, saucers and technology. It's deeply, deeply disturbing, stuff that I haven't even told Natalie. I agree with you. It's so disturbing. I can't even tell my kids. My kids ask me different stories about it,
Saved - December 25, 2023 at 12:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In these posts, the author emphasizes the significance of two video clips. They believe that the clips, particularly one from the show House of Cards, reveal the truth about the actions of politicians in Washington, D.C. The author suggests that the production quality and portrayal of the White House in the clips serve as a wake-up call for viewers. They encourage people to take action and view themselves as part of a plan. Additionally, the author mentions a comedic segment featuring Kevin Spacey discussing a possible 2024 candidacy.

@BrainStorm_Joe - Joe Rambo

💥Please for the love of God watch both of these clips back to back. 💥 IMO this was not a joke. This was not trolling. This was overacting 117% on purpose. They are pointing you at house of cards. Tucker and X are the bastions of free speech right now. All eyes are on. And then this... What makes a great Movie? Watch the next clip!! You have just been told right to your face that you are watching a movie based on fear. Pure and utter honesty through a SHOW... Clear as day if you have the eye to see.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the possibility of someone new entering the presidential race. They mention the need for adults in the room and criticize the current state of politics. The speaker emphasizes the importance of free speech but suggests that people should be more discerning in what they listen to. They express their willingness to run for president and highlight their independence. The speaker talks about the role of fear in society and media's role in shaping public opinion. They mention their past with Netflix and their ongoing influence. The conversation ends with a discussion about the remaining candidates and the speaker's desire for a fearless leader.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Has not even begun yet, and it does seem like the presidential race is effectively frozen in place, if not over. We know who the candidates are. It's too late for another to get in. Some have already dropped out. But is it too late? Is there anyone in this country of 350,000,000 people who could jump in at this late date and rescramble the calculus of electoral politics. Well, there may be someone. And in fact, you already know him. You know his face. And the question is, will he get in this cycle? And that's my question for you. Speaker 1: Well, That's really a decision for the people, Tucker. It's not something that I really think about or want to do. And Merry Christmas to you too. But I've always believed that nothing should be off the table in life or in art. I think we could both agree that we need to get some adults back in the room. So if that means taking on the chief executive role, well, that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make for this great nation. Adults in Speaker 0: the room. I love it. I could see there's a bumper sticker. Is that your campaign slogan? Speaker 1: That's not a bad idea. Look, I think first, our country needs to stop Stop apologizing and stiffen up. I mean, look, we got so many people running around with so many different issues like gun control, important issue. But let's be honest. The truth is more people are killed by online trolls every day. That may Speaker 0: be true actually, but then they're protected by the First Amendment. They can say whatever they want. You believe in the First Amendment, I assume. Speaker 1: Of course, I do. Look. People spewing ridiculous ideas is nothing new, and they should always have that right. But the problem is, some are on the way we started listening. And we should remember the salient words of Benjamin Franklin who said, do not believe Anything of what you hear and only half of what you see. And he wasn't telling people to stop talking. He was telling us to stop listening. So let's stop blaming bots And college kids and start telling leaders what leadership really means. Speaker 0: I love it. But how do you do that? Speaker 1: Well, This country is mad in so much contradiction and confusion. We don't even know how we can help anyone anymore because we can't agree who needs help. I mean, what doesn't come with a trigger warning these days? I mean, Tucker, we are far too close to having a beanbag chair in the oval office. We cuddle to everybody. Okay. You think you're a rabbit. That's fine. But let me tell you something. You sure as hell aren't gonna see someone walking through my White House in bunny ears and a tail unless it's Easter. Speaker 0: Well, amen. But how do you think we got here in the 1st place? Speaker 1: Fear, fear, and then some more fear. That's been the consistent theme, Fear. And that's why I'm gonna keep saying, we need to get some adults back in the room. Speaker 0: Sounds like you're running. If you did run, I assume it would be as an independent. Speaker 1: Well, I've always been independent my whole life no matter what my party affiliation. Even though at the moment, I don't quite recognize my old party. Speaker 0: So at what point would you get in if you did? Speaker 1: Well, I think there's time. I've never been afraid to show up a little late for the dance. Speaker 0: But lots of people wanna be president. What would you specifically bring that others aren't? Speaker 1: Well, I think I have a long and very solid relationship With the public. And that's a bond that has never been broken. I mean, I've almost felt like I can talk to them directly. Speaker 0: But I mean, you do talk to them. Every Christmas, you Give a statement. It is Christmas Eve. What is your statement specifically this year? Speaker 1: You know, Tucker, I think it's just good enough to sip some eggnog and decorate the Tree and listen to white Christmas and embrace all the things that make this such a special day. The truth is I love nothing better on this day than to do a line of blow, drink a whiskey Dean Coke, hit a reindeer with my car and wish you all the naughtiest Christmas ever. Speaker 0: You know, you and I have something in common, actually. Speaker 1: Oh, yes. We both got canned by our network. True. Speaker 0: But they actually tried to kill you. Speaker 1: Yes. But here we are, Tucker. Bigger than ever. Speaker 0: So looking back on all the drama, do you think that legacy See media played a role in what happened to you? Speaker 1: Look, I think they're trying to do their best to stay relevant. Look, platforms like X, I I mean, you move information around so quick that everybody else is just playing catch up. Legacy Media's diligence has turned out to be they just cut and paste what some Trusted outlet does. I mean, look, this will be a good example. Watch how they report on this conversation. There'll be 1 or 2 headlines that get repeated over and over and over. I think actually if legacy media wants to survive, they're gonna have to start slowing down. Speaker 0: That's smart. I agree with that. By the way, do you watch Netflix anymore? Speaker 1: Probably as much as you watch Fox. Fair. Speaker 0: So that doesn't mean that you're gone though from Netflix. I don't I don't even know if you're aware of this, but Every time a person pulls up the Netflix app, you're there in some way. Have you seen this? Speaker 1: Yes. You know what that is? Boom boom. So it is bizarre that they decided to publicly cut ties with me on allegations alone, allegations that have now been proven false because I don't think there's any question. Netflix exists because of me. I put them on the map, and they tried to put me in the ground. Speaker 0: Do do you think within Netflix and the leadership suites that your influence Still felt? Speaker 1: Well, according to your research, my influence is felt every time every customer opens the app. I'd say that's pretty powerful. Speaker 0: Oh, that's true. When are you getting back to work by the way? Speaker 1: Oh, I've been back at work from the moment we started talking, Tucker. Speaker 0: So does that mean this is like an episode or is it real? Well, it's probably a little of both. Speaker 1: I mean, Tucker, what's true? What's false? What's life? What's art? What's real? What's performance? I love it when these things intersect because then it gets interesting. Speaker 0: What role do you see yourself playing going forward? Speaker 1: I will play whatever role the public wants me to play. And what about you, Tucker, what role do you wanna play? I mean, if I run, I'm gonna need a vice president. Speaker 0: I'll sleep on it. I mean, people have already gotten out of the race. People have dropped out already. Have you thought what do Speaker 1: you think of those? Well, you know, it's a little bit like jumping in the Jacuzzi with a boner. You know it ain't gonna last forever. So I wasn't surprised when Mike, a little too pensive, jumped out right away. Speaker 0: I wasn't either. But what about the candidates who are still in? Speaker 1: Well, I like Vivek, Dwayne, the Ramaswami, and, Nikki Haley is tough. She's no doubt learned a thing or two by watching me. But I think in the end, we need someone in the White House who's not afraid Like me, not afraid to push our country or a journalist in the right direction if it comes to that. Speaker 0: I sure appreciate your coming on. It was great to see you. Thank you. Speaker 1: Well, thank you, Tucker. I only showed up because I was told I would get to be on x. Not the drug, not the platform. I was curious as to what Tucker on X might be like. Speaker 0: I have never tried that. Speaker 1: Well, you wouldn't be the 1st guy to tell me you've never tried that before.

@BrainStorm_Joe - Joe Rambo

I would argue that this scene from a fictional show is better produced and dropped more truth in 4 mins than we have gotten in 3 years of the Biden show. The real question is... Which one had a greater affect on waking up the masses? See, House of Cards (this show) tells people the absolute truth on what the criminals in DC are really doing. And people just eat it up like it's entertainment. Throw their hands up and say oh well. There is nothing I can do about it. However the production we are watching on a sound stage made to look like it's actually the White House... (The Pause) How is that all such a red pill? Because we the people had to be shown.. Not just told. You and I.. We are being activated. How does it all make you feel? We are the plan frens. You have been weoponized on purpose. Now stand up with me and do something about it. MIL-CIV alliance.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am here to testify and confirm that I will speak the truth. The witness has acknowledged this. I appreciate the opportunity to address the committee. I have spent the last 30 years in public service, striving to fulfill the needs of the people. The committee accuses me of pay-to-play, but I accuse them of the same. They only play politics when it benefits them. I believe they are all serving their own interests. I will continue my statement, as I am not finished. I am accused of breaking the rules, but I am playing by the rules we all agreed upon. The system is corrupt, and you wanted someone like me to guard it. You don't care about my values, just my actions. I don't care if you love or hate me, as long as I win. The rules are rigged, and reason is dead. There is no right or wrong, only being in or out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And affirm that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Speaker 1: I do. Speaker 0: Let the record reflect that the witness has answered in the affirmative. Mister president, I wanna thank you for appearing, and I hope we get to clear some things up for the American people. Mister president, the floor is yours. It could take as long or as short as you like. If you have any written statement, we will include it after, and it will be part of the record. Mister president, you are recognized. Speaker 1: Thank you, mister chairman and to the other members of this committee. I have agreed to appear before this committee today because I'm guilty. Guilty of having spent the last 30 years of my life Here in this congress, in this house, then as vice president and now as president, trying to do the People's work. Now this committee has accused me of a great number of things. You accused me of Pay to play, and so I accuse you of exactly the same. I also accuse you of playing politics only when it suits you. You're all being paid. You're all serving some Master, each and every one of you, and you know I know that for a fact. You, for example, Congressman Romero. And your crusade to take me down, is it for justice? For the good of the nation Is the truth what you're really after, or is it for some personal gain, perhaps to try to fill the Small hole in your soul that you sold off a long time ago. Mister president. No. No. No. This is my opening statement, and I will give it in full. I am not done, ladies and gentlemen. You accuse me of breaking the rules, and I tell you, I am playing by the rules, The very rules that you and I all agreed upon. The very rules that you and I all wrote Together. So, yes, I'm guilty as hell, but then so are all of you. Yes. The system is corrupt, But you wanted a guardian at the gate like me and why? Because you know I will do whatever it takes, And you have all enjoyed it, been partied to it, and benefited by it. Oh, don't deny it. You've loved it. You don't actually need me to stand for anything. You just need me to stand, To be the strong man, the man of action. My god. You're addicted to action and Slogans. It doesn't matter what I say. It doesn't matter what I do. Just as long as I'm doing something, you are happy to be along for the ride. And frankly, I don't blame you. With all the foolishness and indecision in your lives, why not a man like me? I don't apologize. In the end, I don't care whether you love me or you hate me just as long as I win. The deck is stacked. The rules are rigged. Welcome to the death of the age of reason. There is no right or wrong. Not anymore. There's only being in And then being out.

@BrainStorm_Joe - Joe Rambo

Welcome to the PAUSE. https://t.co/ndDZjX3L7M

@BrainStorm_Joe - Joe Rambo

https://t.co/RKaEkZrt8b

@jf_anon - JFAnon

New Tucker = Pure comedy gold. Kevin Spacey as Frank Underwood discusses his posible 2024 candidacy. Even says "Boom. Boom." at the 4:48 mark. This movie redefines 'blockbuster'. 🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿 @Sapioplex @BrainStorm_Joe @realdefender45 @xAlphaWarriorx https://t.co/nrpihcRkgp

Saved - December 25, 2023 at 12:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
"House of Cards" is referenced in multiple posts, suggesting that what we're watching is not real. Tucker Carlson's interview with the character Frank Underwood from the show further supports this idea. Resignations and military planning are mentioned, along with the upcoming exposure of various scandals. The interview with the fake President from House of Cards is seen as confirmation by some.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

"House of Cards" appears in 7 separate Q drops. Most of what you're watching isn't real and hasn't been since Trump and the people behind him beat the cheat in Nov. 2016 and assumed full control and never relinquished after Jan. 20, 2017. Some people are going to enjoy the show. The rest are going to have the living fuck scared out of them.

@RealAF_Patriot - RealAF Patriot

Tucker interviews Frank Underwood, the character played by Kevin Spacey in House Of Cards. Tucker never mentions who he is, and only says that we know him … we know his face. I do not believe it actually is Kevin Spacey, but even if it is, he is clearly playing the character of Frank Underwood from House Of Cards. In my opinion, this is complete confirmation that we are watching a show/movie, and is introducing the fact that you can see someone on TV who very much appears to be a well known person, but it is only an actor playing a role. All the masks will be coming off before we know it!

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

https://t.co/UVaYBjl9gd

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

They told you right here in this drop. What you are watching. Gowdy resignation. Goodlatte resignation. Trust Grassley. HOUSE OF CARDS. Military planning at its FINEST. [[[.]]] https://t.co/qSrG5t0xBd

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Why do you think I've been hammering the fake Russian hack, Seth Rich, the fake Crowdstrike report for a week now that Assange is about to take the stage? And that's not all: Awan and DWS are about to be dragged back up. A lot of people DO THINK the plea deal was the [[[.]]] It was not the end.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

And today Tucker decides to interview the corrupt fake President from the TV show House of Cards. Anons know.

Saved - December 26, 2023 at 1:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a Tucker interview, there are hidden messages or "comms" that suggest something bigger is happening. Tucker didn't mention any names but hinted at addressing everyone on Christmas. This aligns with a speech by Frank 5 years ago, as Tucker pointed out. Could this be the truth being revealed? It seems like DECLAS is reaching the masses. Brace yourselves, 2024 is going to be intense.

@BrainStorm_Joe - Joe Rambo

The rabbit hole gets deeper. This Tucker interview is just full of comms. Follow each video. Tucker never said his name. However did say that he addresses everyone on Christmas... So they pointed at it all being a show, they pointed at it all being a 'House of Cards' Now listen to Frank speak on Christmas 5 years ago.. Just as Tucker pointed at. Do you get the feeling the truth will be revealed? Are we watching DECLAS finally reach the masses? Hold on to your asses frens... 2024 is going to get crazy. H/T @JoMahma4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Despite attempts to separate us, our bond remains strong and powerful. I revealed my deepest secrets, showed you the true nature of people, and challenged your thinking. You trusted me, even against your better judgment. We are not finished, regardless of what others say. Many want me to confess and accept the consequences, but it's not that simple. You wouldn't believe without evidence or rush to judgment without facts. We were never afraid to speak our minds or defy the rules. Despite the negativity and impeachment, I feel surprisingly confident. The truth will be revealed soon, and don't be fooled by appearances. Miss me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know what you want. Oh, sure, they may have tried to separate us, but what we have is too strong. It's too powerful. I mean, after all, we shared everything, you and I. I told you my deepest, darkest secrets. I showed you exactly what people are capable of. I shocked you with my honesty, but mostly I challenged you and made you think. And you trusted me even though you knew you shouldn't. So we're not done no matter what anyone says. And besides, I know what you want. You want me back. Of course, some Believed everything and have just been waiting with bated breath to hear me confess it all. They're just dying to have me declare that everything said is true and that I got what I deserved. Wouldn't that be easy if it was all so simple? Only you and I both know it's never that simple, not in politics and not in life. But you wouldn't believe the worst without evidence, would you? You wouldn't rush to judgments without facts, would you? Did you? No. Not you. You're smarter than that. Anyway, all this Past years, it's that in life and art, nothing should be off the table. We weren't afraid, not of what we said, not of what we did, and we're still not afraid. Because I can promise you this, if I didn't pay the price for the things we both know I did do, I'm certainly not going to pay the price for the things I didn't do. Of course, they're going to say I'm being disrespectful, not playing by the rules Like I ever played by anyone's rules before, I never did, and you loved it. Anyhow, despite all the poppycock, the animosity, the headlines, the impeachment without a trial, Despite everything, despite even my own death, I feel surprisingly good. And my confidence grows each day that soon enough you will know the full truth. Wait a minute. Now that I think of it, Conclusions can be so deceiving. Miss me.

@BrainStorm_Joe - Joe Rambo

💥Please for the love of God watch both of these clips back to back. 💥 IMO this was not a joke. This was not trolling. This was overacting 117% on purpose. They are pointing you at house of cards. Tucker and X are the bastions of free speech right now. All eyes are on. And then this... What makes a great Movie? Watch the next clip!! You have just been told right to your face that you are watching a movie based on fear. Pure and utter honesty through a SHOW... Clear as day if you have the eye to see.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the possibility of someone new entering the presidential race. They emphasize the need for adults in leadership and express their belief in the importance of the First Amendment. The speaker criticizes the fear and confusion in the country and suggests that they may consider running for president. They mention their relationship with the public and their disappointment with Netflix cutting ties with them. The conversation explores the blurred lines between truth, art, and performance. The speaker expresses their willingness to play any role the public wants and jokingly suggests the interviewer as a potential vice president. They mention some candidates they like but ultimately stress the need for someone unafraid to push the country in the right direction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Has not even begun yet, and it does seem like the presidential race is effectively frozen in place, if not over. We know who the candidates are. It's too late for another to get in. Some have already dropped out. But is it too late? Is there anyone in this country of 350,000,000 people who could jump in at this late date and rescramble the calculus of electoral politics. Well, there may be someone. And in fact, you already know him. You know his face. And the question is, will he get in this cycle? And that's my question for you. Speaker 1: Well, That's really a decision for the people, Tucker. It's not something that I really think about or want to do. And Merry Christmas to you too. But I've always believed that nothing should be off the table in life or in art. I think we could both agree that we need to get some adults back in the room. So if that means taking on the chief executive role, well, that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make for this great nation. Adults in Speaker 0: the room. I love it. I could see there's a bumper sticker. Is that your campaign slogan? Speaker 1: That's not a bad idea. Look, I think first, our country needs to stop Stop apologizing and stiffen up. I mean, look, we got so many people running around with so many different issues like gun control, important issue. But let's be honest. The truth is more people are killed by online trolls every day. That may Speaker 0: be true actually, but then they're protected by the First Amendment. They can say whatever they want. You believe in the First Amendment, I assume. Speaker 1: Of course, I do. Look. People spewing ridiculous ideas is nothing new, and they should always have that right. But the problem is, some are on the way we started listening. And we should remember the salient words of Benjamin Franklin who said, do not believe Anything of what you hear and only half of what you see. And he wasn't telling people to stop talking. He was telling us to stop listening. So let's stop blaming bots And college kids and start telling leaders what leadership really means. Speaker 0: I love it. But how do you do that? Speaker 1: Well, This country is mad in so much contradiction and confusion. We don't even know how we can help anyone anymore because we can't agree who needs help. I mean, what doesn't come with a trigger warning these days? I mean, Tucker, we are far too close to having a beanbag chair in the oval office. We cuddle to everybody. Okay. You think you're a rabbit. That's fine. But let me tell you something. You sure as hell aren't gonna see someone walking through my White House in bunny ears and a tail unless it's Easter. Speaker 0: Well, amen. But how do you think we got here in the 1st place? Speaker 1: Fear, fear, and then some more fear. That's been the consistent theme, Fear. And that's why I'm gonna keep saying, we need to get some adults back in the room. Speaker 0: Sounds like you're running. If you did run, I assume it would be as an independent. Speaker 1: Well, I've always been independent my whole life no matter what my party affiliation. Even though at the moment, I don't quite recognize my old party. Speaker 0: So at what point would you get in if you did? Speaker 1: Well, I think there's time. I've never been afraid to show up a little late for the dance. Speaker 0: But lots of people wanna be president. What would you specifically bring that others aren't? Speaker 1: Well, I think I have a long and very solid relationship With the public. And that's a bond that has never been broken. I mean, I've almost felt like I can talk to them directly. Speaker 0: But I mean, you do talk to them. Every Christmas, you Give a statement. It is Christmas Eve. What is your statement specifically this year? Speaker 1: You know, Tucker, I think it's just good enough to sip some eggnog and decorate the Tree and listen to white Christmas and embrace all the things that make this such a special day. The truth is I love nothing better on this day than to do a line of blow, drink a whiskey Dean Coke, hit a reindeer with my car and wish you all the naughtiest Christmas ever. Speaker 0: You know, you and I have something in common, actually. Speaker 1: Oh, yes. We both got canned by our network. True. Speaker 0: But they actually tried to kill you. Speaker 1: Yes. But here we are, Tucker. Bigger than ever. Speaker 0: So looking back on all the drama, do you think that legacy See media played a role in what happened to you? Speaker 1: Look, I think they're trying to do their best to stay relevant. Look, platforms like X, I I mean, you move information around so quick that everybody else is just playing catch up. Legacy Media's diligence has turned out to be they just cut and paste what some Trusted outlet does. I mean, look, this will be a good example. Watch how they report on this conversation. There'll be 1 or 2 headlines that get repeated over and over and over. I think actually if legacy media wants to survive, they're gonna have to start slowing down. Speaker 0: That's smart. I agree with that. By the way, do you watch Netflix anymore? Speaker 1: Probably as much as you watch Fox. Fair. Speaker 0: So that doesn't mean that you're gone though from Netflix. I don't I don't even know if you're aware of this, but Every time a person pulls up the Netflix app, you're there in some way. Have you seen this? Speaker 1: Yes. You know what that is? Boom boom. So it is bizarre that they decided to publicly cut ties with me on allegations alone, allegations that have now been proven false because I don't think there's any question. Netflix exists because of me. I put them on the map, and they tried to put me in the ground. Speaker 0: Do do you think within Netflix and the leadership suites that your influence Still felt? Speaker 1: Well, according to your research, my influence is felt every time every customer opens the app. I'd say that's pretty powerful. Speaker 0: Oh, that's true. When are you getting back to work by the way? Speaker 1: Oh, I've been back at work from the moment we started talking, Tucker. Speaker 0: So does that mean this is like an episode or is it real? Well, it's probably a little of both. Speaker 1: I mean, Tucker, what's true? What's false? What's life? What's art? What's real? What's performance? I love it when these things intersect because then it gets interesting. Speaker 0: What role do you see yourself playing going forward? Speaker 1: I will play whatever role the public wants me to play. And what about you, Tucker, what role do you wanna play? I mean, if I run, I'm gonna need a vice president. Speaker 0: I'll sleep on it. I mean, people have already gotten out of the race. People have dropped out already. Have you thought what do Speaker 1: you think of those? Well, you know, it's a little bit like jumping in the Jacuzzi with a boner. You know it ain't gonna last forever. So I wasn't surprised when Mike, a little too pensive, jumped out right away. Speaker 0: I wasn't either. But what about the candidates who are still in? Speaker 1: Well, I like Vivek, Dwayne, the Ramaswami, and, Nikki Haley is tough. She's no doubt learned a thing or two by watching me. But I think in the end, we need someone in the White House who's not afraid Like me, not afraid to push our country or a journalist in the right direction if it comes to that. Speaker 0: I sure appreciate your coming on. It was great to see you. Thank you. Speaker 1: Well, thank you, Tucker. I only showed up because I was told I would get to be on x. Not the drug, not the platform. I was curious as to what Tucker on X might be like. Speaker 0: I have never tried that. Speaker 1: Well, you wouldn't be the 1st guy to tell me you've never tried that before.
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 12:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently watched Mike Benz present a troubling argument that the rigging of the 2020 election was planned seven months in advance. He claims a coalition, including the DHS, NATO, and the DNC, initiated a mass censorship campaign in April 2020 to suppress any challenges to mail-in voting legitimacy. Key institutions like Stanford and the Atlantic Council acted as "Pentagon cutouts," pressuring social media companies to adopt broad censorship policies. This effort aimed to prevent public discourse on the election's legitimacy, anticipating a crisis from a potential Biden victory.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

MUST WATCH: Mike Benz makes damning case that the RIG was in for the 2020 election SEVEN MONTHS ahead of time. How they did it was truly evil. TUCKER CARLSON: "So what you're saying is ... they knew the outcome of the election seven months before it was held?" MIKE BENZ: "It looks very bad." How did they do it? According to censorship expert @MikeBenzCyber, a concerted effort, starting in April 2020, was made by a coalition involving the DHS, NATO, the DNC, and other entities to launch a mass censorship campaign across all social media platforms. This campaign aimed to pre-emptively censor any disputes over the legitimacy of mail-in ballots. Four key institutions were part of this effort: • Stanford University • The University of Washington • Graphika • The Atlantic Council Benz described these entities as "Pentagon cutouts," suggesting they were operating under the influence or direction of the Pentagon to carry out the censorship campaign. These entities pressured and compelled social media companies to adopt a new category of speech violation termed "delegitimization." This policy was broad in scope, encompassing any form of content that could be interpreted as challenging the legitimacy of mail-in voting, early voting dropboxes, or the tabulation of ballots on election day. This pressure was not merely advisory but was backed by the implication of potential governmental force or repercussions for non-compliance. This included direct communication channels with tech company executives to facilitate rapid takedown requests. As a consequence, this concerted censorship effort led to the removal or throttling of potentially hundreds of millions of posts, particularly those questioning the security of mail-in ballots. The following excerpt from Benz highlights the most important aspect: "Now, they did this seven months before the election because, at the time, they were worried about the perceived legitimacy of a Biden victory in the case of a so-called 'red mirage, blue shift event.' "They knew the only way that Biden would be able to win, mathematically, was through the disproportionate Democrat use of mail-in ballots. They knew there would be a crisis because it was going to look extremely weird if Trump looked like he won by seven states and then, three days later, it came out actually the election switched. "I mean, that would put the election crisis of the Bush-Gore election on a level of steroids that the national security state said, well, the public will not be prepared for. So what we need to do is we need to, in advance, we need to pre-censor the ability to even question legitimacy. This took out hundreds of key influencers." TUCKER CARLSON: "So what you're saying is ... they knew the outcome of the election seven months before it was held?" MIKE BENZ: "It looks very bad."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Before the 2020 election, a coordinated censorship campaign was launched. This involved the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), working with NATO and the DNC, to pre-censor challenges to mail-in ballot legitimacy. Four institutions—Stanford University, the University of Washington, Graphica, and the Atlantic Council—were key players, all with ties to the Pentagon or intelligence agencies. This group, described as the "blob," explicitly aimed to do what the government couldn't: coerce tech companies into censorship. They used threats, leveraging DHS's disinformation switchboard, to enforce a new "delegitimization" policy across social media platforms. Millions of posts questioning the election were suppressed. This pre-emptive censorship was driven by concerns about a potential "Red Mirage" scenario where initial results favored Trump, before mail-in ballots shifted the outcome to Biden. The goal was to prevent widespread questioning of the election's legitimacy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In advance of the twenty twenty election, starting in April of twenty twenty, although this goes back before, you had this essentially never Trump, neocon, Republican DHS working with essentially NATO on the national security side and essentially the DNC, if you will, to use DHS as the launching point for a government coordinated mass censorship campaign spanning every single social media platform on earth in order to pre censor the ability to dispute the legitimacy of mail in ballots. And here's how they did this. They aggregated four different institutions, Stanford University, the University of Washington, a company called Graphica and the Atlantic Council. Now all four of these institutions, the centers within them were essentially Pentagon cutouts. You had at the Stanford Internet Observatory, it was actually run by Michael McFaul. If you know Michael McFaul, he was The U. S. Ambassador to Russia under the Obama administration, and he personally authored a seven step playbook for how to successfully orchestrate a color revolution. That is and part of that involved maintaining total control over media and social media, juicing up the civil society outfits, calling elections illegitimate in order to now mind you, all of these people were professional Russi Gators and professional election delegitimizers in 2016. And then, well, I'll get to that in a sec. So Stanford University, nominally, the Stanford Air Observatory under Michael McFaul was run by Alex Stamos, who was formerly a Facebook executive, who coordinated with ODNI and with respect to Russiagate, taking down Russian propaganda at Facebook. So this is another liaison essentially to the National Security State. And under Alex Stamos at Stanford Internet Observatory was Renee DiResta, who started her career in the CIA and wrote the Senate Intelligence Committee report on Russian disinformation. And there's a lot more there that I'll be I'll get to another time. But, the next institution was the University of Washington, which is essentially the Bill Gates University in Seattle, who is headed by Kate Starbird, who is basically three generations of military brass, who got her PhD in Crisis Informatics, essentially doing social media surveillance for the Pentagon and getting DARPA funding and working essentially with the national security state then repurposed to take on mail in ballots. The third firm, Graphica, got $7,000,000 in Pentagon grants and got their start as part of the Pentagon's Minerva Initiative. The Minerva Initiative is the psychological warfare research center of the Pentagon. This group was doing social media spying and narrative mapping for the Pentagon until the twenty sixteen election happened and then were repurposed into a partnership with the Department of Homeland Security to censor 22,000,000 Trump tweets, pro Trump tweets about mail in ballots. And then the fourth institution, as I mentioned, was the Atlantic Council, who's got seven CIA directors on the board. So one after another, it is exactly what Ben Rhodes described during the Obama era as the blob, the foreign policy establishment. It's the Defense Department, the State Department or the CIA every single time. And of course, this is because they were threatened by Trump's foreign policy. And so while much of the censorship looks like it's coming domestically, it's actually by our foreign facing Department of Dirty Tricks color revolution blob, who are professional government toplers, who were then basically descended on the twenty twenty election. Now they did this. They explicitly said the head of this Election Integrity Partnership on tape, and my foundation clipped them and it's been played before Congress and it's in, you know, a part of the Missouri v. Biden lawsuit now. But they explicitly said on tape that they were set up to do what the government was banned from doing itself. And then they articulated a multistep framework in order to coerce all the tech companies to take censorship actions. They said on tape the tech companies would not have done but for their pressure, which involved using threats of government force because they were the deputized arm of the government. They had a formal partnership with the DHS. They were able to use DHS's proprietary domestic disinformation switchboard to immediately talk to top brass at all the tech companies for takedowns. And they bragged on tape about how they got the tech companies to all systematically adopt a new terms of service speech violation ban called de legitimization, which meant any tweet, any YouTube video, any Facebook post, any TikTok video, any Discord post, any Twitch video, anything on the Internet that undermine public faith and confidence in the use of mail in ballots or early voting drop boxes or ballot tabulation issues on Election Day was a prima facia terms of service violation policy under this new delegitimization policy that they only adopted because of pass through government pressure from the Election Integrity Partnership, which they bragged about on tape, including the grid that they used to do this and simultaneously invoking threats of government breaking them up or government stopping doing favors for the tech companies unless they did this, as well as inducing crisis PR by working with their media allies. And they said the government, DHS, could not do that themselves, and so they set up this basically constellation of State Department, Pentagon, and IC networks to run this pre censorship campaign, which by their own math had 22,000,000 tweets on Twitter alone. And mind you, they did this on 15 platforms. This is hundreds of millions of posts, which were all scanned and banned or throttled so that they cannot be amplified or they exist in a sort of limited state purgatory or had these frictions affixed to them in the form of fact checking labels where you couldn't actually click through the thing or you had to it was it was an inconvenience to be able to share it. Now they did this seven months before the election because at the time, they they were worried about the perceived legitimacy of a Biden victory in the case of a so called Red Mirage blue shift event. They they knew the only way that Biden would be able to was would win mathematically, was through the disproportionate Democrat use of mail in ballots. They knew there would be a crisis because it was going to look extremely weird if if Trump looked like he won by seven states in you know, and then three days later, it comes out actually the election switch. I mean, that that would put the election crisis of the Bush Gore election on a level of steroids that the national security said, well, the public will not be prepared for. So what we need to do is we need to, in advance, we need to pre censor the ability to even question legitimacy. This took out Wait. Speaker 1: Wait. May may I ask you to pause right there? Speaker 0: Key influences. Speaker 1: Right. So what you're saying is what you're suggesting is they knew the outcome of the election seven months before it was held. Speaker 0: It looks very bad.
Saved - February 28, 2024 at 11:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Some individuals speculate that Joe Biden may not be the real president, citing his appearance and remarks made by Donald Trump. Trump has mentioned Biden's "round eyes" and plastic surgery, while others have noticed changes in Biden's appearance. A video by Tucker Carlson explores this topic further.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Tucker 👀 “Even though I don’t think Joe Biden is a Real Person or Really President…” Am I the only one that keeps coming to the same conclusion that it may not be the real Joe Biden? It’s like they’re begging us to notice… Trump has eluded to it over and over.. Joe at times looks different with a XBox 🎮 chin. Just for fun… which actor do you think is/could play Joe Biden? This Video https://rumble.com/v4g4hbl-tucker-carlson-even-though-i-dont-think-joe-biden-is-a-real-person-or-reall.html Trump Talks about Joe Bidens “Round Eyes” & Plastic Surgery https://rumble.com/v4dgoa6-trump-bidens-round-eyes-and-plastic-surgery.html Trump: Joes Fake Nose- Plastic All over the Floor https://rumble.com/v3r904m-trump-joe-bidens-fake-nose-thered-be-plastic-all-over-the-floor.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
I found it interesting that Putin didn't criticize Joe Biden or NATO during our conversation. As an American, it would feel strange to badmouth the American president to a foreign leader, even if I have doubts about Biden's presidency. It just doesn't sit right with me. Maybe I'm just old-fashioned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, I was really struck in my conversation with Putin by how he basically refused to criticize Joe Biden and to criticize NATO. And it is I will just be honest. As an American, it would be a little weird to be, like, pissing on Joe Biden with a foreign leader, any foreign leader, even though I don't think Joe Biden is a real person or really president. I mean, the whole thing is ridiculous, but still he is the American president technically, and I don't want to beat up on the American president with a foreigner. Just don't. Maybe I'm old fashioned.
Tucker Carlson “Even though I don’t think Joe Biden is a real Person or really President…” Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
Trump - Biden’s Round Eyes and Plastic Surgery Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
Trump - Joe Biden’s FAKE NOSE - There’d Be Plastic All Over the Floor Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Tucker: They’re Poisoning our Food— Everyone wasn’t Fat with Diabetes 30 Years Ago… Me Saying that makes me a Traitor? How many people in your life do you know that has diabetes or overweight? “So I’m a traitor for calling for American citizens to demand more from their Government and higher standards for their own society… And remember, just 30 years ago we had a much different and much happier, cleaner, and healthier society… where everyone wasn’t fat with diabetes at 40 from poisoned food…. I’m not a traitor of my country, I’m a Defender of my country.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm not a traitor, I'm a defender. I want Americans to demand more from their government and society. 30 years ago, things were better. Those calling me a traitor don't prioritize America's interests.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What? It's not in other words, I mean, this is, like, so obvious. I'm a traitor? Okay. So if I'm calling for American citizens to demand more from their government and higher standards for their own society and remember that just 30 years ago, we had a much different and much happier and cleaner and healthier society, where everyone wasn't fat with diabetes at 40 from poisoned food. Like, how is the I'm not a traitor to my country. I'm a defender of my country. By the way, the people calling me a traitor, they're all like, you know, whatever. They're not I I would not say they're people who put America's interest first. But they're Put it mildly. There's
Saved - May 16, 2024 at 11:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A former chief of disguise for high-level agencies, including the CIA, reveals in a video that she wore full-face masks to change her appearance. She recounts a memorable moment when she briefed President George HW Bush while wearing a mask, and he couldn't tell it was fake. This supports the claims of conspiracy theorists who believe that politicians and celebrities sometimes use disguises to appear as someone else.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Ready For Your Mind To Be Blown? Conspiracy Theorists Are Right Again In this clip, The “Chief of Disguise for very high level agencies”, including the CIA meets with President George W Bush. She talks about wearing full face masks so they could “Walk around as someone else” This was broadcasted to the entire world “Are y'all ready for this one? We all know now that we live in the Twilight Zone. Left is right, up is literally down. I'm gonna play a video from this woman in just a second. If you have ever noticed that our president looks different than what he used to, members of Congress look different than what they used to, even celebrities, they'll disappear for a while, come back. We know it's not the same person. She used to be the chief of disguise for very high level agencies. I'm going to play a clip. Just listen to what she has to say. I was chief of disguise. What all did that entail? The office I worked in was like the queue in James Bond. We were the cue for the CIA and the intelligence community. What's the most memorable moment from being in the sky, sweetie? I mean one that has to stand out I went to the White House and I briefed George HW Bush the president at the time while I was wearing a full-face mask so we're sitting like this close together and I'm telling him that I'm going to show him the best disguise that we have. And he's looking for a bag, like where is it? I said, well, I'm wearing it, and I'm going to take it off. And I reached to start taking it off, and he said, stop. And he got up, and he walked, and he looked, and he looked, and he couldn't, he didn't know it was a mask. He wasn't sure what I was wearing. He sat back down, he said, okay. So I took it off, and I was holding it up in the air so he could see it. My whole head, it had hair and a face and a neck. So you could walk around as someone else. Absolutely. And that would be the disguise. Absolutely.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
We live in a world where everything seems upside down. A former chief of disguise for high-level agencies shares stories of wearing masks to meet President George H.W. Bush and the ability to transform into different people. She describes her work as being like Q in James Bond, creating disguises for the CIA and intelligence community. The ability to walk around as someone else was a key part of her job.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you all Speaker 1: ready for this one? We all know now that we live in the twilight zone. Left is right, up is literally down. I'm gonna play a video from this woman in just a second. If you have ever noticed that our president looks different than what he used to, members of Congress look different than what they used to. Even celebrities, they'll disappear for a while, come back. We know it's not the same person. She used to be the chief of disguise for very high level agencies. I'm going to play a clip. Just listen to what she has to say. Speaker 0: I was chief of disguise. Speaker 1: What all did that entail? Speaker 0: The, the office I worked in was like the queue in James Bond. We were the queue for the CIA and the intelligence community. Speaker 1: What's the most memorable moment from being in disguise for you? Speaker 0: There were a number of them, but the one I mean, one that has to stand out, I went to the White House Mhmm. And I briefed George h w Bush, the president, at the time, while I was wearing a full face mask. So we're sitting like this close together, and I'm telling him that I'm gonna show him the best disguise that we have. And he's looking for a bag, like, where where is it? I said, well, I'm wearing it, and I'm going to take it off. And I reached to start taking it off, and he said, stop. And he got got up, and he walked, and he looked and he looked at it. He couldn't he didn't know it was a mask. He wasn't sure what I was wearing. He sat back down. He said, okay. So I took it off, and I was holding it up in the air so he could see it. My whole head. It had hair and a face and a neck. Speaker 1: So you could walk around as someone else? Absolutely. And that would be the disguise? Speaker 0: Absolutely.
Saved - June 12, 2024 at 3:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2015, Barack Obama played an April Fool's Day prank, jokingly claiming that Kevin Spacey's character in House of Cards, Frank Underwood, learned everything from him. Some wonder if this hint implies a deeper meaning.

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

Barack Obama's April Fool's Day prank in 2015 claimed that Kevin Spacey's character in House of Cards, Frank Underwood, learned everything from him. Frank Underwood was a corrupt politician who became a shadow president by rigging elections, committing murders, and even attending events reminiscent of Bohemian Grove. Is Barack Obama hinting at something here?

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm Barack Obama, not Frank Underwood. Happy April Fools' Day. Frank got it from me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everybody. This is not Frank Underwood. This is Barack Obama. Happy April Fools' Day. Frank learned it from me.
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 5:42 PM

@TCNetwork - Tucker Carlson Network

Why does Mark Cuban look so much like Rachel Maddow now? Tucker and @AlinaHabba weigh in: https://t.co/VhRxylUcAP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Helena Habah, a prominent lawyer, joins the conversation. There's a playful exchange about Mark Cuban, who has been criticized for his intelligence. The discussion touches on Cuban's appearance, comparing him to Rachel Maddow, and speculating on his recent changes. One participant jokingly offers to help Cuban with his transition, suggesting it could be funded by taxpayers. They reminisce about a dinner at the start of the ongoing drama, reflecting on the challenges faced. Despite the difficulties, Helena expresses that the experience has ultimately been a blessing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Helena Habah, who is one of his lawyers, by far the most famous and, I can say very smart. She joins us now. Did you ever think Wait. Speaker 1: Don't you mean unintelligent? Unintelligent, stupid, unintelligent, all those things Mark Cuban called us? Speaker 0: Mark Cuban. Speaker 1: That's true. Speaker 0: Mark, somebody said I think he was Elon the other night. Mark Cuban I know Mark Cuban. I also know Rachel Maddow. Yeah. Worked with her. He does look so much like Rachel Maddow now. Like, what Speaker 1: is that? The glasses? I I'm debating. Is it may Rachel Maddow? Is he trying to be on The View? I can't figure it out. Speaker 0: Does seem like he's undergoing some physiological changes. No. Honestly, it looks that way. What is that? Speaker 1: Perhaps, you know, I could represent him through that. Maybe I could get the taxpayer liberal dollars. I'm here for you, Mark. Whatever you need, this intelligent woman will help you transition on taxpayer dollars under the Kamala Harris regime. I'm here for it. Speaker 0: I remember we had dinner at the beginning of this whole drama that you've been through, and I Yeah. And I was I remember thinking, boy, you're signing up for a lot of drama. Yeah. Yeah. What I mean, looking back Speaker 1: at It's been a blessing. Really? Yes. I I feel that way.
Saved - November 26, 2024 at 7:25 PM

@Btchen_n - 🖤🌹𝐁𝐞𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐖𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐫⚔️🌹🖤

Who is running the White House? Tucker: “Satan” https://t.co/05jYaPorQR

Video Transcript AI Summary
With a million Ukrainians dead or permanently injured, an entire generation lost, and the country in ruins, the situation is dire. Recently, the White House has authorized the use of long-range missiles in Ukraine, indicating NATO's involvement in attacks on Russia. Ukrainians lack the expertise to operate these missiles. Additionally, the Biden administration has reversed its stance on anti-personnel mines, which they previously condemned, now allowing their use despite the known dangers to civilians, especially children. This raises questions about who is truly in charge in the White House. Initially, it seemed like Tony Blinken was leading, but now it feels like dark forces are at play. The use of anti-personnel mines serves only to harm innocents, highlighting the moral implications of these decisions. The Ukrainian president, who operates without a democratic mandate, has also suppressed religious freedoms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With a 1000000 Ukrainians dead now, or permanently maimed, an entire generation of young men wiped out, a country destroyed. And they're still they're still trying to sell this thing. And then, of course, over the past few days, we've seen the madness that is unfolding in the White House, allowing long range missiles to be used from Ukraine at NATO's direction. Make no mistake. Anyone watching this knows that Ukrainians don't even know how to use these missiles. It's NATO that's doing it, of course, and attacking inside of Russia. And and now and then with add add on top of that, the Biden administration now has ok'd anti personnel mines to be used, something they've long said absolutely we won't use. These are basically a lot of like the same petal mines that are thrown into the ground in Donetsk and the Donbas region. And children go to the playgrounds and they find these little petal mines that look like leaves. They pick them up and their arms are blown off or they're killed. And the Biden administration was absolutely against this. This was their stance. And now suddenly within the past week, all of this has changed. So who the hell is running the White House? I mean, you've got again, I I I know you're humble about this, but you've got amazing sources there. Like, Biden is not who is running the White House? Who is our de facto president? Is it Anthony Blinken right now? Is it Jake Sullivan? Who is doing this? Speaker 1: Well, if you'd asked me yesterday morning, I would have said Tony Blinken, who has been running it since the beginning. But now I would say Satan because anybody I really think that you've got, you know, dark forces in charge. I mean, there's no there's no justification for using anti personnel minds in this conflict, which we can't hope to be solved with anti personnel minds resolved in any way. The only effect of that move is to kill innocents, period. That's it. That's the only that's the only effect, and and they know that. And so they're doing it anyway because killing is the point. So it's evil. I think we should say that. I don't think it's a matter of defending democracy. The president of Ukraine is not elected. He's a dictator. He literally passed his term and kept serving. He's a dictator. An anti and that country's shut down a Christian denomination for priests and you're like
Video Transcript AI Summary
The president of Ukraine is a dictator, having extended his term and suppressed dissent, including shutting down a Christian denomination and imprisoning priests. This situation highlights the troubling signs of totalitarianism. The complicity of Western European nations in these events is alarming, reflecting a broader decline of a civilization marked by demographic collapse and a finance-driven economy. This decline evokes images of a dying empire, reminiscent of Rome's fall, characterized by chaos and violence. The despair of a once-great power leads to self-destruction, resulting in widespread suffering. The current state of affairs is more horrifying than previously imagined.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of defending democracy. The president of Ukraine is not elected. He's a dictator. He literally passed his term and kept serving. He's a dictator. An anti and that country's shut down a Christian denomination for priests and jail. Like, How many more markers of dictatorship do you need to call it what it is, which is totalitarian? So, everything about it is horrifying. I'm I'm so glad that you mentioned what's happening in the UK and France. There's the complicity of Western European countries in this really I hope books are written about it, but there's something about a dying empire, you know, collapsing demographically, totally pointless finance based economy, no self respect at all, nihilism rising. There's something about that mix, the final days of a dying civilization that causes it to lash out in this kind of orgy of killing for its own sake. It's it's really the darkest thing I could it's like you you imagine Rome collapsing and, you know, the vandals toppling buildings and, you know, having orgies in the streets and all stuff. Really, it's the end of an empire is more like a kind of suicide, a kind of murder suicide where, you know, the formerly great power kills itself and then takes a lot of people out as it does. It it's, like, more horrifying than I ever thought.
Saved - February 9, 2025 at 1:44 PM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

TUCKER CARLSON: This is unfathomably based from him. Tucker calls for complete DECLASSIFICATION of EVERY DOCUMENT related to 9/11. And his audience looks VISIBLY uncomfortable. Gosh, I wonder why the FUCK that is.😒

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

It’s still classified because CIA/MOSSAD ✡️🇮🇱 did 9/11 https://t.co/GRm9EWKdNU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Twenty-three years after 9/11, crucial files remain classified. This is unacceptable. I lost a friend that day, and countless others suffered. We, the citizens, own the government, not unaccountable bureaucrats. A nation with over a billion classified documents is inherently corrupt, and the US is no exception. We need to declassify every 9/11 document. Secrecy breeds conspiracy theories; transparency builds trust. My moral right to know what happened outweighs any supposed need for secrecy. I urge for massive declassification. The lack of transparency surrounding the billions sent to Ukraine further fuels suspicion of corruption. An audit is needed, and the refusal to declassify related documents only strengthens the perception of a scam.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why is it that twenty three years after nine eleven files are still classified? Why is that? I had a friend die nine eleven like probably a lot of people in this room. I was there. Totally changed my life. Why can't I know what exactly happened? It's our government. No federal bureaucrat has the right to tell you that you can't know what your government is doing. Who owns this government? The federal bureaucrat who can't be fired? No. I don't think so. We do. If you wind up in a country with over a billion classified federal documents, you're living in an extremely corrupt country. Extremely corrupt. Everyone around the world knows that about The United States. We don't know it. We don't think we live in a corrupt country. We do. And we could fix it super easily. And that's just let's let's just declassify. Every nine eleven document should be declassified. Oh, shut up, conspiracy theorist. No. If you wanna create conspiracy theories, pull down a curtain of secrecy over what actually happened. Why are you afraid to tell me the whole story? Why are you afraid to tell me the truth? We can resolve this right away. Just let me see the evidence. I have a right. I have a moral right to it. They have no moral right to keep it from us. So if I have one hope secretly for this administration, it's massive declassification. And let's find out what they've been doing. What happened to all the hundred billion dollars we sent to Ukraine? There's been no audit. Oh, they don't wanna declassify that. Why? Oh, because it's a scam. That's why.
Saved - November 11, 2025 at 7:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I observe a recurring claim that mainstream opposition is fake, a puppet show for the Elitarian rulers who seek total control. Across posts, I’m told both sides push the same agenda—AI governance, surveillance, vaccines, war—while real issues like Epstein, CDC, and media are hidden. The message: beware the illusion of choice; power remains centralized.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian Masters. As such they keep on fooling the ...: https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Parasitic%20System%202023-12-13:%20Lets%20Deflate%20the%20Parasitic%20System!&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1#tm_fakeopp

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tumia March 2024 explains that deflation is needed because of fake controlled opposition—illusory puppets pretending to oppose the illiterion puppets on the other side, but in fact both sides advancing the same agenda of totalitarian control for their illiterion masters. This structure fooling the people hides the most important truths and pushes the totalitarian control agenda of their illiterion masters. The argument continues that without deflating this parasitic system, fake, controlled opposition will always be bribed and/or blackmailed to effectively keep control of the narrative and the people’s perception. In large-scale systems, there is no real democratic choice and there never will be. The proposed solution is: “Let’s deflate the parasitic system.” David Ick is cited: “Trump doubles down on support for COVID fake vaccines and boosters despite outcry from conservatives.” The speaker asks, “Are you getting it yet Trump supporters?” and contends, “He was a fraud all along as I have said since 2016 and he has been leading you to glorious failure for the masters that own him.” The assertion is that no politician will get us out of this, and “We have to do it.” Catherine Austin Fitz is referenced: “Trump put $10 billion dollars into a program to depopulate The US.” The message ends with an instruction to “Please like and follow,” and provides the source: tumia.org.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tumia March 2024. Why deflate? Because of fake controlled opposition. Fake opposition, illiterion puppets pretending to oppose the illiterion puppets on the other side, but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of totalitarian control and for their controlling illiterion masters. As such, they keep on fooling the people, hiding the most important truths and advance more and more the totalitarian control agenda of their illiterion masters. Why deflate? Otherwise, fake, controlled opposition will always be bribed and or blackmailed to effectively keep control of the narrative, the people's perception. So in these large scale systems, there is no real democratic choice and there never will be. What's the solution then? Let's deflate the parasitic system. David Ick, Trump doubles down on support for COVID fake vaccines and boosters despite outcry from conservatives. Are you getting it yet Trump supporters? He was a fraud all along as I have said since 2016 and he has been leading you to glorious failure for the masters that own him. No politician is going to get us out of this. We have to do it. Catherine Austin Fitz, Trump put $10 billion dollars into a program to depopulate The US. Please like and follow. Source, tumia.org.
the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

If I extrapolate my estimate for 2022 to 2023 and 2024 I get in total 41milj excess deaths since the covid gentech "vax" rollout. Adding the 9milj from the covid killing protocols in 2020 gives a total of 50milj excess deaths (for 5 yrs). By country(47): https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Covid%20World%202022-10-09:%203%20Years%20of%20Cov-Vaccine%20Bioweapons:%20Estimated%20Extra%20Deaths%2031M-Adv.%20Eff.%201.9B&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The article COVID world 10/09/2022 presents estimates of extra deaths and serious adverse effects attributable to a three-year period of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The 10/09/2022 estimates report thirty-one million extra deaths and one point nine billion serious adverse effects over three years. Two main differences with the previous estimates (10/01/2022) are: first, eleven countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data, making the current estimate base data consist of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people; second, for estimating serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries listed in the table, with sources from Our World in Data (appendix references). Extra deaths (ED for 2020, ED21 for 2021, and ED22 for 2022) are calculated as the difference between the factual total deaths in the concerned year. Missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolating the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 onward. The yearly evolution uses a corrected average of the five preceding years (2015 to 2019). The yearly correction factor is 0.75%, calculated from the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries from 2015 to 2019. For 2020 ED the correction factor 0.75% was applied three times (reference year 2017) to the five-year average; for 2021 ED, four times; for 2022 ED, five times. The extra deaths estimates thus reflect excess deaths after correcting for expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. To compute the world totals: for 2020 ED, the ED100 ks extra deaths per 100k people by country are calculated and aggregated to 112 extra deaths per 100k people, applied to the world population to yield nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2021 ED, the ED21M doses (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 961 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global doses to yield twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2022 ED, the ED22M doses (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 763 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global doses to yield nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio of reported adverse effects to reported deaths after COVID vaccination, which is 87.6, derived from a table of estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty-one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years, the text asserts that terms such as bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. It further posits about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020, projecting one hundred ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if these trends continue. The text acknowledges that if data are far off target or data are faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. It attributes censorship and a lack of truthful science in mainstream media and tech platforms to propounding that SARS CoV-two is naturally evolved, while claiming truthful science proves SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. It asserts that the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are too large and too numerous, and that these inserts only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically distant. It references a substantial trail of documents and testimonies before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the needed biochemical technology, including financing, scientific documents, and patents. Specific sources and figures are noted, including Doctor Richard Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-19 is a bioweapon; Doctor Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein; Veritas Revelation Project materials; and claims that the virus comes from a lab. It also mentions Genentech COVID vaccines causing human cells to produce large amounts of toxic spike protein in multiple organs and tissues, and asserts these vaccines are bioweapons with additional components and contaminations causing health damage. The article is attributed to Pak Osmol, dated 10/09/2022, with Appendix A citing Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count as the data source.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: COVID world 10/09/2022, estimated extra deaths thirty one million and estimated serious adverse effects one point nine billion for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The two main differences with the previous estimates on 10/01/2022 are the following: First, 11 countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data. As such, the current estimate base data consists of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people. This makes the current estimates more representative for the whole world. Second, for estimating the serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries mentioned in the table below. For the source of all the used data see the Our World and Data links in the appendix. Extra deaths (see columns twenty twenty ED, twenty twenty one ED, and twenty twenty two ED in the table below) are calculated as the difference of the factual number of total deaths in the concerned year. The missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolation of the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 on. The for yearly evolution corrected average of the five preceding years 2015 to 2019. The yearly correction factor used is 0.75% and was calculated based on the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries below in 2015 to 2019. For the 2020 ED estimate the correction factor 0.75 was three times (reference year twenty seventeen) applied on the five year average, for 2021 ED four times and for 2022 ED five times. In other words, the extra deaths estimates are in fact the excess deaths after correction for an expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. Then to calculate the 2020 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED100 ks extra deaths per 100 ks people of the country is calculated. Then this column is aggregated which results in 112 extra deaths per 100 ks people. The latter value is applied on the world population which results into nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2021 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED21M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in nine sixty one extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2022 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED22M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in seven sixty three extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. Press CTRL plus four more image detail below. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio reported adverse effectsreported deaths after COVID vaccination. The ratio used is 87.6 and was calculated from the table Estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages in the article below. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years of deployed SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons the words bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. Furthermore, there are about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020. If these extra deaths are continued this will result in one hundred and ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 from these bioweapons since 2020. For the sake of estimating, certain assumptions about the domain were introduced. If one or some of those assumptions would be far off target, for example as more data becomes available and is integrated in the estimation or some data appears faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. Because of the mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science and censorship in the mainstream media and on tech platforms, thus the elites, many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus. Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. After all and first of all, science shows the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses. Because these inserted codes PRRA (HIVGP120) are much too large and too many, and because these genetic codes only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically much too different from SARS CoV-two, the probability that SARS CoV-two has naturally mutated or recombined from other natural viruses is quasi zero. Furthermore, there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies, years before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the existing biochemical technology needed to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, patents. See the links below for sources and science. Doctor. Richard M. Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-nineteen is a bioweapon. Doctor. Richard Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein. The virus comes from a lab, appears from the Veritas Revelation Project. Are our scientists lying to us? SARS CoV-two is likely a lab construct. The origin of SARS CoV-two. Since the Genentech COVID vaccines make the human body cells produced during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two, In fact in all organs and tissues much greater amounts than the average, dominantly only mucosal, infection with SARS CoV-two itself which for the majority of healthy unvaccinated people causes hardly any illness, just cold like symptoms, these Genentech COVID vaccines are of course themselves bioweapons and much worse than the virus itself. Furthermore, not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage. See the links below for information about the devastating effects of the COVID vaccine bioweapons. Images, press CTRL plus for more image detail. The article COVID World 10/09/2022, estimated extra deaths thirty one million and estimated serious adverse effects 1,900,000,000 for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons was written by Pak Osmol, 10/09/2022. Appendix A Data Source. Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Click the Download tab below the graph on the displayed page. Downloaded CSV September 2022 from Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Right click the link and then Save Link As.
covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

If I extrapolate my estimate for 2022 to 2023+half of 2024 I get in total 36mil excess deaths since the covid "vax" rollout. Adding the 9mil from the covid killing protocols in 2020 gives a total of 44mil (4.5 yrs). By country(47): https://rumble.com/v4g1d6o-estimated-31mil-excess-deaths-1.9bil-adverse-effects-for-3-yrs-of-sars-cov-.html https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Covid%20World%202022-10-09:%203%20Years%20of%20Cov-Vaccine%20Bioweapons:%20Estimated%20Extra%20Deaths%2031M-Adv.%20Eff.%201.9B&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1

Estimated 31mil Excess Deaths+1.9bil Adverse Effects for 3 Yrs of Sars-Cov-2+Vaccine Bioweapons Covid World 2022-10-09: Estimated Extra Deaths 31 Million and Estimated Serious Adverse Effects 1.9 Billion for 3 Years of Covid Killing Protocols, Sars-Cov-2 Virus and Vaccine Bioweapons: https://tum rumble.com
covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@SteviesQuotes Nep-oppositie is van alle tijden en geen toeval:

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Nep-oppositie: elitaire marionetten die doen alsof ze zich verzetten tegen de elitaire marionetten aan de andere kant ... . Audio-video versie (Engels): https://rumble.com/v575riz-fake-opposition-elitarian-puppets-pretending-to-oppose.html Geschreven versie (Engels): https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Parasitic%20System%202023-12-13:%20Lets%20Deflate%20the%20Parasitic%20System!&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1#tm_fakeopp

the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Nep-oppositie: elitaire marionetten die doen alsof ze zich verzetten tegen de elitaire marionetten aan de andere kant ... . Audio-video versie (Engels): https://rumble.com/v575riz-fake-opposition-elitarian-puppets-pretending-to-oppose.html Geschreven versie (Engels): https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Parasitic%20System%202023-12-13:%20Lets%20Deflate%20the%20Parasitic%20System!&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1#tm_fakeopp

the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@TPV_John - The Patriot Voice

It looks like the whole “MAHA” deal was just a clever cover for bringing in total AI governance into healthcare and FDA oversight… What? You thought that MAHA would be the END of mRNA COVID jabs, and a return to a truly healthier America? THINK AGAIN.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@EtienneJansen - Etienne Jansen

@SecKennedy Why are NRNA and MMR biochemical weapons still used today as we speak?!

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

RFK Jr. knows the COVID death jabs constitute mass murder. He’s called them “mass murder” verbatim. He’s now in a position of authority where he can halt them unilaterally, without any action from FDA. He must stop the “mass murder” Trump started.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The attorney (Speaker 0) opens by expressing frustration that pandemic-era liability protections—the PREP Act, the CARE Act, and the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act—grant broad immunity to the actors involved, effectively shielding them from liability and allowing what he calls “mass murder.” He asks Sacha whether there are obvious legal avenues to sue Pfizer and obtain redress for what he views as illegal acts, given this shield of immunity. Sacha (Speaker 1) replies that neither he nor his colleagues discourage attempts to sue Pfizer due to the fraud allegations they’ve identified. He notes, however, that nobody knows exactly what will break through the immunity barrier, so they should try different approaches. He outlines the current landscape: the defense Pfizer will likely raise is that they did not defraud the government, but merely delivered fraud that the government ordered. He references a concrete example in Brooke Jackson’s case, where Pfizer filed a motion to dismiss in April, arguing the fraud claim centered on delivering government-ordered fraud rather than perpetrating it independently. Sacha emphasizes that while the case may be dismissed, it has not been yet. If a future dismissal occurs, the admission would be valuable, and the goal is to elicit admissions in court. He suggests that they need to prove, by any admissible method, that there was explicit U.S. government policy to commit mass murder and genocide, or that certain individuals—Robert Kodlek, Peter Marks, Fauci, and others—were rogue actors acting outside their authority. In other words, the objective is to obtain explicit statements or admissions that could substantiate claims of government-directed action or unauthorized conduct by specific individuals, to challenge the immunity and pursue redress.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, I'm gonna let you go, Sacha. But before I do, I'm an attorney. I try to figure out ways to sue people like this. And, you know, the one of the frustrating things during this pandemic is that the PREP Act, the CARE Act, and the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act have all bestowed broad immunity from liability under all of these actors. So they're getting away literally with murder, with AM, with mass murder. They're getting away with it because they have been given this bubble of this shield of immunity from liability. You have an expertise in corporate liability. As a corporate liability officer, do you see any obvious ways where somebody like me can file a lawsuit and get redressed for some of these, illegal acts? Speaker 1: Yeah. So, first of all, neither me nor my colleagues, discourage anyone from doing just that, to just going after Pfizer because of all the fraud that they have committed. I think what the the problem is we're all having, we don't know exactly what's going to crack that that wall, but we have to attempt different ways. Now the yes, we can try going after Pfizer. I'm just saying, you know, here's the lay of the land. This is the the defense they're going to invoke. They already invoked it in Brooke Jackson's case. They're saying we did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered. And that's a even Speaker 0: Which gay oh, in Brooke Jackson. Speaker 1: In Brooke Jackson's in April, they filed motion to dismiss. So and while, you know, the case may be dismissed it hasn't been dismissed. But in let's say in the future, it gets dismissed because because of this. That admission alone is priceless, and we need to elicit these admissions in court. They need to tell us ultimately ultimately through whatever method we're going to to go after. Ultimately, they they need to tell us it's an explicit US government policy to commit mass murder and genocide, or these were rogue actors, these people, Robert Kodlek, Peter Marx, you know, Fauci, whoever. You know, these specific individuals, they were rogue actors and acting outside of their authority. Speaker 0: So

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

RFK Jr. knows the COVID death jabs constitute mass murder. He’s called them “mass murder” verbatim. He’s now in a position of authority where he can halt them unilaterally, without any action from FDA. He must stop the “mass murder” Trump started.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@MODUSCUNTO - MR. NICE GUY (really trying) - d0xC

@AdameMedia

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@TPV_John - The Patriot Voice

This is a MASSIVE DISTRACTION from the fact that Trump is getting absolutely GRILLED on all sides for teaming up with Palantir to create a database of all Americans. What better way to attempt to get people to stop talking about that, than to share something absolutely fringe and outlandish on his official Truth Social account. People will now forget about the digital prison being constructed for them, chasing mindless rabbit holes about Biden. See how easy that was?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix

NEW VIDEO: Trump just handed TOTAL CONTROL over EVERY AMERICAN to a private company.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@DrLoupis__ - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

What's going on?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake opposition of fo actually cooperate to create real sources for division+hate between people. Fe open borders for mass immigration, war, ... . Lets deflate their system and handle those real sources with care+love. See parent tweet video+its replies.

@NightwatchN8 - Nightwatch N8

The two party illusion is the biggest time-waster on the planet

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake opposition of fo actually cooperate to create real sources for division+hate between people. Fe open borders for mass immigration, war, ... . Lets deflate their system and handle those real sources with care+love. See parent tweet video+its replies.

@deSunShineBand - CS

Markeer dit. Bewaar dit. Onthoud dit. Kijk er vaak naar. Leer het. Begrijp het. Pak het vast. Geloof het. En vergeet het nooit. Nooit. Dit is de waarheid. De waarheid die voor je verborgen wordt gehouden. De MSM willen nooit dat je de waarheid weet. Ze willen oorlog. En de dood.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that this is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way it is commonly framed. The speaker references 1990, stating that on 02/09/1990 James Baker III told Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not move eastward if Germany unified, and that Gorbachev agreed, ending World War II. The speaker asserts that the US then cheated starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine, marking the rise of the neocons and identifying Clinton as the first agent of this. NATO expansion began in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, at which point Russia did not see a direct threat. The speaker notes the US-led bombing of Serbia in 1999 as problematic, describing it as NATO bombing Belgrade for seventy-eight straight days to break the country apart, which Russia did not like. Putin became president, and the Russians initially tolerated and complained but were largely subdued. The speaker claims Putin started out pro-European and pro-American, even suggesting joining NATO when there was some mutual respect. After 9/11 and the Afghan conflict, Russia supported the effort to root out terror. Two decisive actions are highlighted: in 2002, the United States unilaterally withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, described as perhaps the most decisive event rarely discussed in this context. This led to the US placing missile systems in Eastern Europe, which Russia views as a direct threat. The speaker mentions a soft regime change operation in Ukraine in 2004-2005, followed by Yanukovych winning the election in 2009 and becoming president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine. This calmed tensions because the US was pushing NATO, while Ukrainian public opinion reportedly did not want NATO membership, citing a divided country between ethnic Ukrainians and ethnic Russians and a desire to stay away from certain conflicts. In 02/22/2014, the United States allegedly participated in the overthrow of Yanukovych, described as a typical US regime change operation. The Russians supposedly intercepted a call between Victoria Nuland (then at the State Department, now at Columbia University) and Jeffrey Piot, the US ambassador to Ukraine, discussing who would be in the next government. The speaker asserts that after these events, the US said NATO would enlarge, while Putin repeatedly warned to stop, noting that promises were made not to enlarge NATO. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia are listed as having joined NATO in 2004, before the broader enlargement. The speaker accuses the US of rejecting the basic idea of not expanding NATO to Russia’s border while placing missile systems after breaking a treaty, including walking out of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in 2019. On 12/15/2021, Putin allegedly proposed a draft Russia-US security agreement with no NATO enlargement, which the speaker says he communicated to the White House, urging negotiations to avoid war. The speaker claims Jake Sullivan asserted an open-door policy for NATO enlargement, calling it “bullshit,” and asserts that they refused negotiations, leading to the special military operation, with Zelensky offering neutrality and Western leaders pushing Ukraine to fight, resulting in “600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way that we are told every day. This started in 1990. 02/09/1990, James Baker the third, our secretary of state, said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO will not move one inch eastward if you agree to German unification, basically ending World War two. And, Gorbachev said that's very important. Yes. NATO doesn't move, and we agree to German unification. The US then cheated on this already starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a, basically, a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine. This is when the so called neocons took power, and, Clinton was the first agent of this. And the expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic. At that point, Russia didn't much care. There was no border other than with the Konigsberg, but other than that, there was no direct threat. Then, The US, led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was bad, by the way, because that was a use of NATO to bomb a European capital, Belgrade, seventy eight straight days to break the country apart. The Russians didn't like that very much. But Putin became president. They swallowed it. They complained. But, even Putin started out pro European, pro American actually asked, maybe we should join NATO when there was still the idea of some kind of mutually respectful relationship. Then nine eleven came, then came Afghanistan, and the Russians said, yeah, we'll support you. We understand to root out terror. But then came two other decisive actions. In 2002, The United States unilaterally walked out of the anti ballistic missile treaty. This was probably the most decisive event never discussed in this context, But what it did was trigger The US putting in missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire direct threat. In 02/1945, we engaged in a soft regime change operation in Ukraine. But in 2009, Yanukovych won the election, and he became president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine. That calmed things down because The US was pushing NATO, but the people of Ukraine on the opinion polls didn't even wanna be a NATO. They knew that the country is divided between ethnic Ukrainian, ethnic Russian. What do we want with this? We wanna stay away from your problems. So in 02/22/2014, The United States participated actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych, A typical US regime change operation, have no doubt about it. And the Russians did us a favor. They intercepted a really ugly call between Victoria Nuland, my colleague at Columbia University now, between her and, The US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeffrey Piot, who's a senior state department official till today, and they talked about regime change. They said, who's gonna be the next government? All of this is to say, The US then said, okay. Now NATO's really gonna enlarge, and Putin kept saying, stop. You promised no NATO enlargement. It's been, by the way, I forgot to mention in 2004, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovia, Slovakia, Slovenia, seven more countries in the not one inch eastward. And then okay. It's a long story, but The US kept rejecting the basic idea, don't expand NATO to Russia's border in a context where we're putting in goddamn missile systems after breaking a treaty. 2019, we walked out of the intermediate nuclear force treaty. On 12/15/2021, Putin put on the table a draft Russia US security agreement. You can find it online. The basis of it is no NATO enlargement. I called the White House that next week after that, begging them, take the negotiations. Putin's offered something. Avoid this war. Oh, Jeff, there's not gonna be a war. Announce that NATO's not gonna enlarge. Oh, don't worry. NATO's not gonna enlarge. I said, oh, you're gonna have a war over something that's not gonna happen? Why don't you announce them? He said, no. No. Our policy is an open door. This is Jake Sullivan. Our policy is an open door policy. Open door for NATO enlargement. That is under the category of bullshit, by the way. You don't have your right to put your military bases anywhere you want and expect peace in this world. They turned down the negotiations, then the special military operation started, and five days later, Zelensky says, okay. Okay. Neutrality. And then The United States and Britain said, no way. You guys fight on. We got your back. We don't have your front. You're all gonna die. But we got your back as we kept pushing them into the front lines. That's 600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to Kyiv to tell them to be brave.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake opposition of fo actually cooperate to create real sources for division+hate between people. Fe open borders for mass immigration, war,.. . Lets not take their trap solution+handle those real sources with care+love. See parent tweet video+its replies.

@Spiro_Ghost - Spiro

To those calling for the military to be deployed to LA... That is EXACTLY what the ones pulling the strings want! Problem - Reaction - Solution... Don't fall for it!

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

🚨‼️🚨BREAKING: THIS FILTHY LYING MURDERER KENNEDY'S FDA JUST APPROVED Merck’s RSV Shot for NEWBORNS -- 12% Of The Newborns Suffered Serious Adverse Events, Including DEATH Let me explain for those unfamiliar with pharmaceutical drug development. A Rate Of >2% SAEs Greater Than Placebo IS A NO GO!!!!! The rate of newborn death from RSV, is listed as 1/28. The SAE/Death rate from this shot is 1/11. Newborns are TWICE as likely to die from the shot as the infection. Results posted at http://ClinicalTrials.gov included serious neurological adverse reactions! Those of you listed here continue to suck his up to Kennedy's butt while he is murdering children FFS!! The murder of American babies must end now!!! @ChildrensHD @MdBreathe @RWMaloneMD @BusyDrT @DrMakaryFDA @SecKennedy @BretWeinstein @maryhollandnyc

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

How can @RWMaloneMD vote objectively on vaccine recommendations at @US_FDA when he owns patents and other business interests in vaccines, especially mRNA injections? @wapo @washingtonpost @SecKennedy @NicoleShanahan @realDonaldTrump

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

Let's see how this tweet ages... June 18, 2025: I predict the new Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ACIP that was recently appointed by @SecKennedy to review vaccines WILL RECOMMEND (aka approve) the Self-Amplifying mRNA shots 👀

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

🚨 ALERT: @SenRandPaul's COVID CRIME AMNESTY AND APOLOGY TOUR HAS BEGUN Like all 535 members, Sen Paul is a walking pus filled corrupted piece of self-enriching traitorous scum who is re-installed over and over by the machine.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

BREAKING: Kennedy’s ACIP vaccine advisory concluded the meeting today with, "mRNA vaccines ARE SAFE" If you don't see the real problem, we'll never find the real solution

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@ricwe123 - Richard

The CIA Director smirks and exhales like a man watching his plan fall perfectly into place as Trump rolls out yet another round of weapons for Ukraine. John Ratcliffe’s face says it all,this was the plan all along. The Deep State hasn’t lost an ounce of control, and Trump is just another puppet parroting their agenda. Exactly the kind of predictable move Putin saw coming a mile away.....

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that there are plans to send more weapons to Ukraine, confirming that the country will receive additional arms. The speaker emphasizes that this action is necessary: “We have to. They they have to be able to defend themselves.” The speaker asserts that Ukraine is being attacked and hit hard, describing the situation with repetition to underscore the intensity: “They're getting hit very hard now,” followed by “They're getting hit very hard.” The speaker reiterates the need for further weapon deliveries, saying, “We're gonna have to send more weapons.” The emphasis is on defensive capabilities, with a clear indication that the weapons being sent are primarily defensive in nature: “Your defensive weapons primarily.” Throughout, the message conveys that the defense of Ukraine requires continued and increased military support in the form of weapons, due to the heavy blows Ukraine is sustaining.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you planning to send more weapons to Ukraine? We're gonna send some more weapons. We have to. They they have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now. They're getting hit very hard. We're gonna have to send more weapons. Your defensive weapons primarily, but they're getting hit very, very hard.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer

Political Bizarro World

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a perceived flip in the political dynamic around the Epstein files, calling the current moment “political bizarro world.” They observe that on the right, voices now say to move on from the Epstein files, treating it as no big deal, while on the left, voices push for releasing and declassifying the files, with Democrats even attempting to force a floor vote. The speaker notes that during the Trump era, Epstein was a campaign issue, with Trump and several administration members stressing the importance and urgency of releasing the files, and even FBI director Cash Patel reportedly saying it should be the number-one priority. The speaker claims that a majority of Trump voters would have supported releasing the Epstein files on day one, and asserts that this topic was once central to Trump’s political base. In contrast, they point out that in the present moment, the right is urging no action and the left is demanding action, highlighting a stark reversal in public and media positions. Media coverage is described as contradictory to the past: the speaker says CNN and MSNBC are now treating the Epstein files as their biggest story, with Democrats actively calling for declassification and release. They cite Democrats writing songs and posting on social media to advocate for release, suggesting an active and vocal push from the left. A year earlier, the speaker contends, the situation was reversed: right-wing figures demanded the Epstein files, Republican Trump-era officials supported it, and Democrats were largely silent or dismissed the issue as conspiracy theory for involving Bill Clinton. Now, the speaker argues, Democrats are pursuing release while Trump-related figures and right-wing elements retort with resistance or minimal engagement. The speaker uses the juxtaposition to argue that politicians, down to voters, appear highly controlled and capable of swiftly switching sides on the Epstein issue, illustrating broader impressions of partisan manipulation. They suggest broader themes such as “no new wars,” “no new foreign entanglements,” and “no new strikes” as possible contexts for the shifting narratives, alongside reactions to Iran-related actions and Middle East involvement, though they acknowledge these as speculative links. Ultimately, the speaker emphasizes how drastic the shift around the Epstein files feels, labeling it the most political bizarro-world moment and, in their view, a return to “clown world”—now in an inverted, bizarro form.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. We are now officially in political bizarro world. Now I was gonna post on x about this, but I started to type it out and I realized this is so weird. I can't even really put it into text. So I'll just go ahead and shoot a short video. We are in political bizarro world. What am I talking about? You now have the right wing saying to move on from the Epstein files. Nothing to see here. Forget about it. No big deal. And you have the left wing now talking about the Epstein files, demanding their release, even Democrats trying to take it to a vote on the floor of the house to get them declassified. What? On the campaign, Trump talked about the Epstein files multiple times and releasing them. Multiple members of his administration talked about the importance, the utmost importance of the Epstein files and releasing them. Some, including FBI director Cash Patel, said it should be the number one priority, demanded it be done day one. I would say the majority of Trump voters would have said, yes. Epstein files day one. It was literally a campaign issue. And now a lot of these voices in the Trump world on the right wing are saying move on. Nothing to see here. Meanwhile, I tune in to CNN last night. I tune in to MSNBC last night. And what is their biggest story? The Epstein files. And they're demanding the Epstein files. I've got democrats writing songs and posting them on their social media demanding the Epstein files be released. What? What is going on? A year ago, it was the exact opposite. A year ago, it was right wingers demanding the Epstein files, writing songs, all this stuff, Republicans, Trump now administration members, and the Democrats were silent. Or they would call it a conspiracy theorist because he talked about Bill Clinton on the list. Now you have the Democrats in a full forced effort to try to get the files released, and it's the Trump administration and the right wing stopping it and saying nothing to see here. What in the world? And you know what it really shows? It shows how controlled both sides are from from the politicians all the way down to the constituents, to the voters, to the people. It shows how everything is controlled, that just like that, all of a sudden, people just change sides. So we went from the right being give us the Epstein files to now the left being give us the Epstein files. And, you know, there's a couple different issues you could say maybe tie into this bizarro world like no new wars, no new foreign entanglements, no new strikes, and then the Iran strikes and and more involvement in the Middle East and Trump people kind of trying to make excuses or switch for that. But that's just I don't know. You could even say maybe that's politics is normal. There has been nothing more political bizarro world than the switch on the Epstein files. It is shocking. Now let me just say this. If this had happened a year ago when Biden was in the White House and the Democrats had the Senate and the Democrats had the House and Biden said, we're not gonna do the Epstein files, and Biden's FBI said, we're not gonna do the Epstein files, and Biden's attorney general said, we're not gonna do the Epstein files, and then Republicans tried to get a vote to declassify the Epstein files and the Democrats shut it down, what would you be saying as a Trump voter? What would you be saying as a right winger? What would you be saying as a conservative? Don't tell me you wouldn't be outraged. Don't tell me you wouldn't say Joe Biden was covering it up. Don't tell me you wouldn't be screaming how the Democrats are covering up sex trafficking. Of course, you would. But, oh, because it's Trump and the Republicans, now you're okay with it. And if you're already making excuses as to why you're okay with it now or, oh, it's Trump and not Biden, then yet again, it shows how we're in political bizarro world and it shows how easily controlled both sides of the political aisle are. Clown world. I thought we left clown world. We're right back in it, Except now it's bizarro form.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@NoLieWithBTC - No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen

There it is. Republicans just BLOCKED the release of the Epstein Files.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The amendment was put to a vote. Those in favor signified by saying aye; those opposed say no. The chair ruled the noes have it, and the amendment is not agreed to. A roll call was requested. The roll call results were: - Missus Fishbach: No - Mister Norman: Yes - Mister Roy: No - Missus Houchin: No - Mister Langworthy: No - Mister Scott: No - Mister Griffith: No - Mister Jack: No - Mister McGovern: Aye - Miss Gantlin: Aye - Mister Nugoose: Aye - Miss Ledger Fernandez: Aye - Madam chair: No The clerk reported the total as 5 yeas and 7 nays. The amendment remains not agreed to. The chair indicated that what’s appropriate will be released when it is time for the president to release it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hearing none, the questions on the amendment. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Those opposed say no. No. No. In the opinion chair, the noes have it. The amendment is not agreed. Speaker 1: I'm kinda shocked by that. I will ask for a roll call. Speaker 0: The clerk will call the roll. Speaker 1: Missus Fishbach? No. Missus Fishbach, no. Mister Norman? Yeah. Mister Norman, I. Mister Roy, missus Houchin? No. Missus Houchin? No. Mister Langworthy? No. Mister Langworthy? No. Mister Scott? Mister Scott, no. Mister Griffith? Mister Griffith? No. Mister Jack? No. Mister Jack, no. Mister McGovern? Aye. Mister McGovern, aye. Miss Gantlin? Yes. Miss Gantlin, aye. Mister Nugoose? Yes. Mister Nugoose, aye. Miss Ledger Fernandez? Aye. Miss Ledger Fernandez, aye. Madam chair? No. Madam chair, no. The clerk will report the total. 5 yeas, seven a's. Speaker 0: The noes have it. The amendment is not agreed to. And I think most of us believe what's appropriate will be released when it is time for the president to release it. Speaker 1: Well, madam Speaker 0: Thank you.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@deSunShineBand - CS

Zou ‘t waar zijn?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Due to this villa worth over $20,000,000, no one believes Greta Thunberg anymore. She’s always publicly claimed that living modestly was her life’s goal, insisting that she rejected luxury in order to remain true to her message. But recently, journalists uncovered that this stunning villa you’re looking at now is actually registered in her name. Rumors quickly circulated that a wealthy Hollywood activist had gifted the property to Greta, but many remained doubtful. Critics argue that the funds may have come from the humanitarian campaigns she personally organized in countries around the raising serious questions about transparency. The revelation has sparked intense debate with many feeling betrayed and questioning whether Greta’s image of simplicity and sacrifice was ever real. Whether the villa was truly a gift or not, the controversy has left lasting stain on her reputation, making people wonder if her carefully built persona was just an illusion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because of this villa worth over $20,000,000, no one believes Greta Thunberg anymore. She's always publicly claimed that living modestly was her life's goal, insisting that she rejected luxury in order to remain true to her message. But recently, journalists uncovered that this stunning villa you're looking at now is actually registered in her name. Rumors quickly circulated that a wealthy Hollywood activist had gifted the property to Greta, but many remained doubtful. Critics argue that the funds may have come from the humanitarian campaigns she personally organized in countries around the raising serious questions about transparency. The revelation has sparked intense debate with many feeling betrayed and questioning whether Greta's image of simplicity and sacrifice was ever real. Whether the villa was truly a gift or not, the controversy has left lasting stain on her reputation, making people wonder if her carefully built persona was just an illusion.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

From Satire To Reality - False Green Agenda & Climate Change https://www.bitchute.com/video/sVvOHRofonXi Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

From Satire To Reality - False Green Agenda & Climate Change Do it for grandma and the children... bitchute.com

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/rndgGtZ31Y Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

MAHA Action just deleted this new video of RFK Jr. talking about how they're developing a new universal vaccine at NIH for corona and flu which is "gonna be a much safer and more effective vaccine". Hazard a guess on why they'd do that? https://t.co/nClS18k2hS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The NIH is developing a universal vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. This vaccine mimics natural immunity and is effective against any kind of mutation. It doesn't drive the virus to mutate. The researchers believe it could be effective not only against coronaviruses but also against influenza. The vaccine is described as much safer and much more effective. The exchange then notes that Mark, did you take your question again? and Mark is prompted to ask his question.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now, we're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. And so it's a it's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity, and it and it it is effective against any kind of mutation. So it doesn't drive the virus to mutate, and it could be effective. We believe it's gonna be effective about against not only coronaviruses, but also flu. And it's gonna be a much more much safer and much more effective vaccine. Mark, did you take your question again? Now we're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. And so it's a it's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity, and it and it it is effective against any kind of mutation. So it doesn't drive the virus to mutate, and it could be effective. We believe it's gonna be effective about against not only coronaviruses, but also flu. And it's gonna be a much more much safer and much more effective vaccine. Mark, did you have your question?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/LwMuuuhYWA Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Insight into why Israel has a leash on Trump (IMO) "In the early '90s...Trump... declares bankruptcy... he's bailed out by Wilbur Ross... representing the Rothschild banking interests... the Rothschild family has a very long... history with Zionism and... the State of Israel." This clip of Whitney Webb (@_whitneywebb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Kim Iversen (@KimIversenShow) posted to Rumble on August 6, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "And then in the early '90s, Trump's Atlantic City holdings, and other things, dragged down his business empire. And he declares bankruptcy, and in order to be bailed out, he's bailed out by, Wilbur Ross, who he later rewards for that when he's president, the first time making him Commerce Secretary. "But at the time, Wilbur Ross was representing the Rothschild banking interests. And the Rothschild banking interest, specifically this Wall Street M and A arm that they opened up in the '80s was responsible for bringing Robert Maxwell to New York. "So basically, you know, Trump as a business icon would not have existed beyond the early 1990s if it wasn't for the, Rothschild banking interests, who have a lot of affiliations to people and sort of, the Epstein network, and specifically Epstein's financial crimes, which include a lot of currency speculation in this, what the New York Times once called a currency speculation cabal, including people like Jimmy Goldsmith, also backed by the Rothschilds, and even George Soros, whose first, his Quantum Fund in, like, the late '60s was bankrolled by the French Rothschild interests. "And for anyone that's familiar, the Rothschild family has a very, long and storied history with Zionism and the establishment of the State of Israel and and being a major patron of that. So, you know, they've definitely had a lot of influence, I would think, over, Trump now, since he owes them a lot."

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early 1990s, Trump’s Atlantic City Holdings and other ventures dragged down his business empire, leading to bankruptcy. To secure a bailout, he was aided by Wilbur Ross, who later became commerce secretary under Trump. At that time, Wilbur Ross represented the Rothschild banking interests. The Rothschilds, specifically the Wall Street mergers and acquisitions arm they opened in the 1980s, were responsible for bringing Robert Maxwell to New York. The narrative asserts that Trump, as a business icon, would not have existed beyond the early 1990s if it weren’t for the Rothschild banking interests, which are described as having extensive affiliations with people in the Epstein network. The transcript links Epstein’s financial crimes to currency speculation described by the New York Times as a “currency speculation cabal,” and names individuals such as Jamie Goldsmith as being backed by the Rothschilds, as well as George Soros, whose Quantum Fund in the late 1960s was bankrolled by French Rothschild interests. The account emphasizes a long and storied history between the Rothschild family and Zionism, including the establishment of the state of Israel, and portrays the Rothschilds as major patrons of that cause. It concludes by suggesting that the Rothschilds have had substantial influence over Trump, asserting that Trump owes them a great deal. Overall, the narrative draws a chain of connections: the Rothschild banking interests’ influence helped shape Trump’s rise and persistence as a prominent business figure, with Wilbur Ross’s bailout role in the 1990s serving as a pivotal link, and various high-profile financial networks—Epstein-related cohorts, currency speculation participants, and financiers like Jamie Goldsmith and George Soros—being connected to Rothschilds. It also foregrounds the Rothschilds’ historical ties to Zionism and the establishment of Israel as part of their influence, asserting that these relationships have translated into ongoing sway over Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then in the early nineties, Trump's Atlantic City Holdings, and other things dragged down his business empire, and he declares bankruptcy. And in order to be bailed out, he's bailed out by, Wilbur Ross, who he later rewards for that when he's president. The first time making him commerce secretary. But at the time, Wilbur Ross was representing the Rothschild banking interests. And the Rothschild banking interests, specifically this Wall Street m and a arm that they opened up in the eighties, was responsible for bringing Robert Maxwell to New York. So, basically, you know, Trump as a business icon would not have existed beyond the night early nineteen nineties if it wasn't for, the Rothschild banking interests, who have a lot of affiliations to people in sort of, the Epstein network and specifically Epstein's financial crimes, which include a lot of currency speculation in this, what the New York Times once called a currency speculation cabal, including people like Jamie Goldsmith also backed by the Rothschilds and even George Soros whose first, his quantum fund in, like, the late sixties was bankrolled by the French Rothschild interest. And if for anyone that's familiar, the Rothschild family has a very, long and storied history with Zionism and the establishment of the state of Israel and and being a major patron of that. So, you know, they've definitely had a lot of influence, I would think, over, Trump now since he owes them a lot. And also

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/VeHAF1Ik18 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@DollarVigilante - The Dollar Vigilante

One of the most obvious CIA assets in the limelight. #TuckerCarlson https://t.co/gp5HTZhVbv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Several speakers discuss the idea that Tucker Carlson is a CIA asset. Speaker 0 argues that Carlson “is clearly a CIA asset,” noting that you don’t rise to a global audience and make money from edgy content unless you’re “in the big club.” They point to a supposed inconsistency: Carlson recently said he was shocked to discover his dad was in the CIA upon his death in March 2025, yet, “here he is in June 2024, like a year earlier, admitting his father was CIA.” They state Carlson “said he only found out in 2025 after his father died, but here he is in 2024 saying he knew his dad was CIA.” Speaker 1 adds personal details, saying, “when I applied to CIA, and I’ve taken a lot of crap including from Putin, like, you’re from a CIA family.” They acknowledge that “my father worked in conjunction with CIA,” and that they tried to join the CIA but were not being false about it, and that “he’s attacking my dad because the CIA is dad to the CIA or whatever.” They claim, “Then my father dies and I learn actually, yeah, you know, was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it.” Speaker 0 amplifies the claim by referencing Tucker Carlson with “an ex CIA agent” who says to Carlson, “you’re a lot more on the inside than me.” They find it interesting that Carlson “is like a ex CIA agent. He’s saying Tucker Carlson’s more on the inside than he is.” They encourage listeners to pay attention to Tucker’s response, saying, “listen to Tucker’s response and I want you to pay attention this because it’s in these moments that you actually can see what’s actually going on.” Speaker 2 briefly interjects with uncertainty about deals that took place, and Speaker 1 comments that they have “not made $1 in The Middle East, not 1.” Speaker 2 says, “Well, I mean, if you’re allowed me more on the inside than I am.” Speaker 1 denies, saying, “No. No. No. I’m just a I’m just a visitor and a traveler and a watcher, but I don’t, you know.” The conversation ends with Speaker 0 asking, “Did you kinda see what happened there?”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I think people are actually starting to catch on to what I've been saying for a long time. I've been saying this for years. Tucker Carlson is clearly a CIA asset. You don't get into Fox and, then get out and get, like, this audience of, like, the entire world and say things that are, you know, a little bit edgy and make tons of money unless you're in the big club. And it's actually starting to come out now. Like, he recently said that, he was shocked to discover his dad was in the CIA upon his death in March 2025. But here he is in June 2024, like a year earlier, admitting his father was CIA. So he said he only found out in 2025 after his father died, but here he is in 2024 saying he knew his dad was CIA. Speaker 1: And so when I applied to CIA, and I've taken a lot of crap including from Putin, like, you're from a CIA family. Well, yeah, obviously, my father worked in conjunction with CIA. I mean, that's what that is. And I tried to join the CIA, but I'm not being false about it. And he's attacking my dad because the CIA is dad to the CIA or whatever. And I'm like, well, that's no. Untrue. Then my father dies and I learn actually, yeah, you know, was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it. Speaker 0: Like here's Tucker Carlson with an ex CIA agent and the CIA agent says to him, you're a lot more on the inside than me. That's interesting. Like, he's like a ex CIA agent. He's saying Tucker Carlson's more on the inside than he is. Listen to Tucker's response and I want you to pay attention this because it's in these moments that you actually can see what's actually going on. Speaker 2: Like, just get done also with the deals that just happened over there, or was this earlier? I don't you would probably know. Speaker 1: No. I don't know. You don't? I've not made $1 in The Middle East, not 1. Speaker 2: Well, I mean I mean, if you're allowed me more on the inside than I am. Speaker 1: And No. No. No. I'm just a I'm just a visitor and a traveler and a watcher, but I don't, you know. Speaker 0: Did you kinda see what happened there?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/KmYhsJKABW Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@flatsmackin - DemonstrableReality

Think about the fact that the masses believed this and still do. 😳 https://t.co/Zs9VEa6u4G

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/9zUcgRbvNg Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@realstewpeters - Stew Peters

Trump just authorized FOUR NEW COVID VACCINES. https://t.co/zfLl0JZsUg

Video Transcript AI Summary
The question asked whether the president believes the COVID vaccine should be available to and covered by insurance for all Americans regardless of age and preexisting conditions. The response notes that the FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for three COVID vaccinations while simultaneously approving four new COVID-19 vaccines with 2025 and 2026 formulas. The revocation is described as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the public health emergency being over. To correct the record, it is stated that the FDA’s decision does not affect the availability of COVID vaccines for Americans who want them. The administration says, “We believe in individual choice,” a promise the president and the secretary have made and delivered on.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From miscommunications or differences on vaccine policy. So I wonder if you could just say whether or not the president believes that the COVID vaccine should be available to and covered by insurance for all Americans regardless of age and preexisting conditions. What I will tell you is that the FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for three COVID vaccinations while simultaneously green lighting four new COVID nineteen vaccines with twenty twenty five and twenty twenty six formulas. The the reason for the revocation of that emergency youth authorization is because obviously the COVID pandemic and the public health emergency is over. But just to correct the record because there's been a lot of misinformation on this, the FDA's decision does not affect the availability of COVID vaccines for Americans who want them. We believe in individual choice. That's a promise both the president and the secretary have made, and it's a promise they have now delivered on.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/gDeAS03UKD Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@SemperVeritasX - John-Paul Berg

Pierre Poilievre is not a nationalist. He isn't even a conservative. The guy is a controlled opposition, uniparty globalist. They're all in on it together. The entirety of our politics is an elaborate performative charade to provide the illusion of participatory governance to the peasantry. This has never been more evident. Every day I wonder when you people will notice.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/7Z7bVBlQjG Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@PatteeuwJens - Jens Patteeuw

Just a few days ago, Bill Gates met with Trump at the White House. This is the second time they have met; at the beginning of the year, they had a dinner. Gates said then that he was "impressed" with Trump’s interest in global health at that time. For all those who somehow hoped that Gates would be arrested or that Trump would do it, just forget it. It's not gonna happen, at all. This recent meeting happened around the same time Karoline Leavitt, the White House Press Secretary, announced there would be four new covid vaccines. Also, earlier this week, Trump again reiterated that Operation Warp Speed (the COVID-19 vaccines) was a huge success. There's a lot more than meets the eye. We can't forget that Bill Gates publicly endorsed JD Vance's book "Hillbilly Elegy" on his own blog in 2017. So he was already promoting JD Vance before he became "famous". JD Vance is sponsored by globalist and Bilderberg member Peter Thiel. In light of the recent statements of JD Vance, saying that he "is ready to take over", if "God forbid something terrible would happen", this is all very peculiar. #Trump #BillGates #news

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/Ged4Fu9cXF Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@ShannonJoyRadio - Shannon Joy

Don't fall for this scam @liz_churchill10 Trump is NOT going to war with PHARMA, he's HELPING them by providing a reason to eliminate ALL the 'old vaccines' because of thimerosal. Trump, RFK & Bhattacharya have been heavily promoting 'operation warp speed tactics' to develop new, universal mRNA and sa-mRNA shots for PHARMA to replace traditional vaccines. This is NOT Trump waking up, or doing the right thing, or launching a 'war against vaccines' ... this is a MARKETING CAMPAIGN for the new mRNA technology. And they WILL MANDATE these. DO NOT FALL FOR THIS!

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Oh. My. God. President Trump calls out the VACCINE TERRORISTS…https://t.co/dJLDTn9xbX

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 shows a metal container described as a “thimerosal bomb,” noting they keep it because they are a little afraid of it, and it is a very fine powder. Speaker 2 states that thimerosal is labeled very toxic and has cumulative effects, capable of causing damage to the kidneys, respiratory system, skin, and nervous system. It specifically warns of reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. They emphasize that this is immensely toxic stuff. Speaker 0 notes that thimerosal is present in a vaccine. Speaker 2 explains that thimerosal is used in a whole range of products, with vaccines being a major example because it is directly injected. They reference the tetanus vaccine, noting a vial that expires and contains thimerosal as a preservative. They claim that thimerosal has been a big exposure issue in the United States, especially with the influenza vaccine, which is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, and all children on a yearly basis. Speaker 1 adds a point about how thimerosal is added: it is not something added at the end after production but is incorporated because the factory is not clean and not sterile. They argue that either there must be an expensive sterile factory that does not need thimerosal or one that produces thimerosal, and that thimerosal would need to be used throughout production. They assert that the use of thimerosal needs to be stopped. Speaker 2 identifies the influenza vaccine from Adventist Pasture, “their flu zone,” and states that it contains twenty-five micrograms of mercury per dose. Speaker 1 discusses personal experience, noting that many people did not know about thimerosal. They reveal they have given 2,000 RhoGAM shots and have been in vaccines for thirty-five years, and they did not know that RhoGAM contained thimerosal. They suggest that many doctors were unaware that the term “thimerosal” referred to mercury.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Show them the thimerosal bomb, which we keep in a metal container because we're a Speaker 1: little afraid of it, and it's a very fine powder. Speaker 2: This is this is thimerosal, which is labeled very toxic. Has cumulative effects, can cause damage to the kidneys, to the respiratory system, skin, to the nervous system. Specifically warns on here that it can cause reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning that it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. This is immensely toxic stuff. Speaker 0: And it's a vaccine. Speaker 2: And this is what's in the vaccine. It's important to to realize we're talking about a whole range of products. Vaccines are a big one because, of course, you're directly injecting it. For example, this is tetanus vaccine. This one expires. It's a lot dated now in 02/2007. Here's the thimerosal. 1 to October is a preservative. Perhaps the the biggest one in The US, at least, that's ex for exposure to mercury is the influenza Influenza vaccine is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, all children on a yearly basis. You're supposed to Speaker 1: You have last year's influenza? Understand that Thimerosal is not added at the end. It's not like, well, that factory next year can make Thimerosal free. Thimerosal, you either have to have a thimerosal free factory or you have to not have one. They add thimerosal at each step because the factory is not clean and not sterile. So you either have to have an expensive sterile factory where you don't need thimerosal or you have to have one that produces thimerosal. It's gonna need thimerosal or something the whole time. It needs to be stopped. Speaker 2: This is, the influenza vaccine from Adventist Pasture, their flu zone. Thimerosal, twenty five micrograms of mercury per dose. Speaker 1: I'd like to point out that a lot of people didn't know, and and I'm one of Speaker 2: them. Speaker 1: I've given 2,000 RhoGAM shots. I've been in vaccines for thirty five years. I didn't know that RhoGAM had Thimerosal in it. So I think a lot of the doctors were unaware. They weren't aware that even the word Thimerosal meant mercury.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/ilrV1mCNCT Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@JuanGutiCA714 - Juan Hodl

Alex Krainer explains who is at the top of the “globalist network”: These are networks of power that operate outside of the rule of law… like a mafia. In everything I’ve read it always emerges that this name Rothschild comes up as the people who seemingly wield the most power. https://t.co/emySyfd1uK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that the network is a meta tribe of oligarchs centered in a history starting with Cecil Rhodes, who envisioned a world controlled by the elite. He says Rhodes handed the vision to Milner and the Milner group, describing Milner as “my blood brother” and noting that Milner was committed. The network expanded from a Crown/London core to encompass Wall Street, the American Deep State, and major banking families named in Tragedy and Hope. He defines the network as a broad, elite circle and notes there isn’t a single top person. Speaker 1 references Tragedy and Hope and Carrol Quigley, along with Guido Preparata’s Conjuring Hitler, as key to understanding what happened in 1938. He asserts that Quigley gave readers the keys in a long but detailed work, suggesting that the powers of financial capitalism sought “to create a world system of financial control in private hands, to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole,” with the growth of financial capitalism enabling a decentralization of world economic control and benefiting financiers while harming other economic groups. He connects this to Russia in the 1990s, arguing that oligarchs like Mikhail Khodorkovsky and others were not merely reform-minded tycoons but “handpicked trustees” serving foreign financial interests, with figures such as George Soros and Edmund Safra involved. Speaker 1 adds that, despite a claim there’s no top, there must be one at the top since these are networks of power operating outside the rule of law, like a mafia. He contends Rothschilds are often the top-wielding group, with others subordinated to them, and that civil wars can erupt among these bankers when crises arise. He suggests American bankers may be challenging British bankers for ascendancy, implying a current (unspecified) civil conflict within the network. He acknowledges the difficulty of knowing what happens behind closed walls and notes the top dog concept exists: “there must be a top of the hierarchy because, otherwise the whole system… there'd be like you have a pack of dogs. There’s always going to be a top dog.” Speaker 0 agrees with the “lead dog” principle and adds that there are multiple major families or clans, each with its own leadership. He emphasizes a “family element” to the network, referencing “pancake” or mafioso-style families, and remarks that this discussion provides a concise, one-stop shop for understanding the topic. Speaker 0 then signals a transition to the next point with enthusiasm.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the network, Alex, broadly who are the network? Because it's clear from tragedy and hope, I'd say is the most accurate around. It kind of starts mainly in the modern times with, Cecil Rhodes who had the vision, right, to have a world completely controlled by the elite. No conspiracy theory, it's all documented. And then he handed over to Milner and the Milner group, and he said Milner basically, he said, is my blood brother. He fully entrusted him with the vision. Mildner was committed. And then you have this whole crown kind of city of London, UK, powerful network that eventually became a network that encompassed Wall Street and the American Deep State, if you want to call it, and of course all the great banking families, many of them named in tragedy and hope. Is getting towards like, what the network is? It's a meta tribe of oligarchs. And that's why it's kinda hard to to get right to the guy at the top. There isn't really a guy at the top. It's all of what I said and more. Yeah? Speaker 1: Yes. Look. I I read Tragedy and Hope, and I read it very carefully. And in fact, this whole story about appeasement, I reconstructed it from Carole Quigley. And with some subsequent research by the guy who wrote conjuring Hitler. That's that's a masterpiece. His name is Guido Antonio Preparata. Okay? And that book is not as not as long, but it's it's it's, like, dense. It's, like, completely fluffy, and it, like, blows your mind. So from those two books, I reconstructed the what actually happened in 1938 in in Munich. Anyway so, basically, Carroll Quigley, I believe that he gave us the keys. He just couldn't come out exactly and give it away because it would be too you know, the it would have been spotted straight away. So he put it in a into a book that's, like, thirteen, four 1,400 pages long, and then you have to read it very carefully, but it's a lot is there. A lot is there. And I will I will read to you. I have this in front of me the maybe the key quote, which which tells you what we're up against. And the one so this is this is the key quote from Carroll Quigley. I think many people are already familiar by this, but he says that the powers of financial capitalism had a far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands, to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a decentralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and direct injury of all other economic groups. And so this quote, when you take when you keep that in mind and you look at what happened in Russia in the nineteen nineties, it's it's exactly what happened. And then you you also find out that these people like Mikhail Khodorkovsky and these other oligarchs, that they were not just, you know, Russian tycoons who emerged because they were very capable and, you know, aggressive young reformers as they were presented in the media in the West. They were handpicked trustees who were serving the needs of the foreign financial interests. And so Mikhail Khodorkovsky was a trustee for Jacob Rothschild's interests in Russia. George Soros was there, involved very prominently. Edmund Safra, and and a numb a a number of a number of high profile western bankers. But, you know, when you say that there's nobody at the top, I think that there's somebody at the top necessarily because, you know, this is you know, these are these are networks of power, and you're right to call it a network. These are networks of power that operate outside of the rule of law. So they're not bound by lawful institutions. This is like law of the jungle. It it functions like a like a mafia like a mafia business, like a mafia organization, which means that somebody necessarily has to be at the top to enforce the order. You know, you can't have democracy at at that level. So in in everything that I've read so far, it always emerges that this name Rothschild comes up as as the people who seemingly wield the most power, and then everybody else is kind of in a in a subordinate position to them. And I think that when things are going well, they they get along, and they work as a club. And, you know, I'm in charge, but you have your own suzerainty there, and you have your own you know, you dominate your own. But when things get difficult, when the system comes to a crisis, then you see that you might have civil wars there between these bankers. And I think that we're living in a period when these civil wars are erupting again. And it seems to me that the American bankers feel that they no longer have to be subordinated to the to the British bankers. And I think that part of what we see today might be that civil war. Of course, we don't know anything about this. We can just look at where smoke you know, which orifice produces the smoke, and then we can just try to kind of wonder what what actually happened behind the the closed walls. But Yeah. You know, there must be there must be top of the hierarchy because, otherwise the whole system you know, it'd be like you have a pack of dogs. There's always going to be a top dog. And if there isn't a top dog, the other dogs are going to fight to the death until one emerges as the top dog, and then they'll be at peace. Speaker 0: Yeah. And that's the lead dog kind of principle. Absolutely. You know, a slight variant on that to allow for not one kingpin to your mafia analogy, there's a bunch of major families and each of them sure has the dawn. But maybe there isn't a single one, but there's certainly a cluster of key lead dogs. And the beautiful elegance of that is because we're talking about families, right? Pancake families, Baffia families. There's a family element to it. And you know, I was going to my next bullet point. This is fantastic, Alex. This is a one stop shop for Speaker 1: everyone Speaker 0: to know.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/sHrMmZdmZ4 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@MareQay - Mare Qay

Dang, wonder how many at the time were paying attention https://t.co/OgKK62YlUC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses that they wanted to meet face to face to get admission of what “they” were doing. Speaker 1 identifies “they” as someone in the office of the Trilateral Commission. Speaker 0 asks what the Trilateral Commission is. Speaker 1 explains that it is “an organization founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller to bring together business and political leaders from The United States, Europe, Japan so they could work together for better economic and political cooperation between their nations.” Speaker 0 counters that this is what they’d like people to believe, but claims that “what they’re really up to is a scheme to plant their own loyal members in positions of power in this country to work to erase national boundaries and create an international community, and in time, bring about a one world government with David Rockefeller calling the shots.” Speaker 0 asks if they’re pressing charges; agrees that a globe was broken and UNICEF artwork damaged, and adds that “they’re in on it too.” Speaker 0 asks for a Mister Klein, who replies that he has documented evidence and “the magazines here” are Conspiracy Review and Suppressed Truth Roundup, asserting that “the whole master plan is exposed.” Speaker 0 notes that Klein remains unconvinced and asks if he’d like to hear a few names of people who have been on the Trilateral Commission. Klein is not particularly enthusiastic. Speaker 1 lists names: James O’Carter (likely a misreference or fictionalized name), Henry Kissinger, Walter Mondale, and Mister Klein, then John Anderson, George Bush. Speaker 0 recalls the convention where it seemed Ford would be the VP candidate, but says David Rockefeller “just picked up a phone, put in a call,” saying, “Hey, Ronnie. Forget Jerry. It’s George. Bye.” He concludes that “no matter who won in November, they had their man in the White House.” Speaker 0 asks if they are through. The response is implied as yes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I just wanted to meet them face to face. I I wanted them to admit what they were doing. Who is they? Speaker 1: He was in the office of the trilateral commission. Speaker 0: Trilateral commission? Speaker 1: Yeah. The trilateral commission. Speaker 0: Alright. What is the trilateral commission? Speaker 1: It's an organization founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller to bring together business and political leaders from The United States, Europe, Japan so they could work together for better economic and political cooperation between their nations. Speaker 0: Well, that that's what they'd like us to believe. But you see, Speaker 2: what they're really up to is a scheme to plant Speaker 0: their own loyal members in positions of power in this country to work to erase national boundaries and create an international community, and in time, bring about a one world government with David Rockefeller calling the shots. I take it they're pressing charges? Yeah. Well, I I he broke a globe and and some UNICEF artwork. Well, they're they're in on it too. Okay, mister Klein. I'm just telling you our whole way of life as we know it is in jeopardy. I appreciate that information. But I I I have I have the documented evidence. It's all in there. Show him. Well, he's got got these magazines here. Conspiracy review, Suppressed truth roundup? The whole master plan is exposed. Yeah. Well, You're still not convinced. Would would you like to hear the names of just a few of the people who have been on the trilateral commission? Not particularly. James O'Carter. Heard of him? Look, mister Klein Henry Kissinger. You heard of him? Walter Mondale. Who? Mister Klein, this is John Anderson, George Bush. Now you remember at the at the convention, everybody thought it was gonna be Ford for Veep. You know what happened? David Rockefeller just picked up a phone, put in a call. Hey, Ronnie. Forget Jerry. It's George. Bye. So no matter who won in November, they had their man in the White House. Are you through? Yeah.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/gVAqsDDlpV Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@SapperWarrior - 100% MAGA, BUT FUCK TRUMP 🇷🇺 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 🇺🇸

Trump, who has turned into the biggest neocon in presidential history, just did more to validate and help the globalist swamp warmongers than any Democrat or RINO could’ve ever hoped for. After campaigning for and voting for Trump in every election, I feel furiously betrayed 😡 https://t.co/2puCajgELc

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/bgtuPShdt4 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@ITMTrading - ITM Trading

Charlie Kirk Assassination Fuels Elite’s Reset Plan for Great Depression 2.0 - Ed Dowd Watch now: https://youtu.be/kSCyKHsTBAo #finance #money #dollar #usd #gold @DanielaCambone @DowdEdward https://t.co/e1Ok9JWuXs

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/URjsmXXTUQ Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@AllenDMartin - Allen Martin

Pfizer murdered my 18 yo daughter! mRNA batch fn2908. Nov 9,2022. @Potus just awarded @pfizer a 70 BILLION CONTRACT ... to murder more people! The man standing beside him today, shook my hand and promised to make them pay, less than a year ago. Here I am, STILL TRYING TO PAY OFF HER FUNERAL!!!! I don't need 70 billion, I only need about $4,000 so she can have a fucking headstone!!!! THEY MURDERED HER AND NOW THEY'RE "LEADERS" AND "GREAT PEOPLE"!?! FUCK YOU! THE GASLIGHTING IS TOO MUCH! I CAN'T FUCKING TAKE IT ANYMORE!

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/5yCbPoG5Pw Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Before the election: ‘We’ll release the Epstein files.’ After the election: They protect the pedophiles. Before the election: ‘We’ll end the wars.’ After the election: They fund genocide. Before the election: ‘We’ll go after COVID crimes.’ After the election: They hand $70 billion to Pfizer. I can’t stomach it anymore. This administration is a disgrace.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/WPEE8N9FNB Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@Alec_Zeck - D. Alec Zeck

I think I’m at the point where I just appreciate the comedic absurdity of it all. Some people genuinely believe Trump is a freedom fighter, secretly leading a military operation to take down the deep state. Others believe he’s the literal embodiment of evil and the sole cause of all modern problems. And then there are those who still believe that voting matters and that legitimate, lasting solutions are going to come from politics. At this point, it’s like watching different cults argue over which illusion is more real and it’s hilarious (and sometimes disturbing).

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/GOf5RzPXM5 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@davidicke - David Icke

This is what I have said for years about the hard sell and soft sell of AI dystopia. People like Gates and Schwab have gone for the hard sell and for the sceptics Musk goes for the soft sell. The outcome in BOTH cases? Human-AI fusion - we think what AI tells us to think - and total human AI/digital enslavement. It's a pincer movement by two cheeks on the same backside - Gates and Schwab are cast as the pantomime villains while Musk plays the good guy who cares and only wants the best for you. Pure theatre. See my new book The Road Map in which I take the pantomime apart.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇺🇸 ELON: xAI WAS BUILT TO LOVE HUMANITY “I created xAI to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking, that aspirationally loves humanity and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.” Elon described the mission as building AI that helps, but doesn’t replace https://t.co/wngEPrL9jF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I really want to have a maximally truth seeking AI. I can't emphasize that enough. That's incredibly important. And obviously build an AI that loves humanity. That's why I created xAI, which is to have an AI that is maximally truth seeking, aspirationally does love humanity, and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Really want to have a maximally truth seeking AI. I can't emphasize that enough. That's incredibly important. And obviously build an AI that loves humanity. That's why I created xAI, which is to to have an AI that is maximally truth seeking, that aspirationally does love humanity, and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.
Saved - August 2, 2025 at 6:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that Tucker Carlson discovered his father's CIA ties in March 2025, after his death, despite claiming in June 2024 that his father and family were involved with the agency. Meanwhile, Nick Fuentes called out Tucker for suggesting he was CIA, and I think Nick won that exchange.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Video 1: Tucker Carlson says that in March 2025 he learned about his father’s CIA involvement. AFTER his father died -However in June 2024 Tucker said that his father was with the CIA and his family was involved with the agency. Video 2: Nick Fuentes rightfully pops off on Tucker for saying that he ( Nick ) was CIA. Win: Nick

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they applied to the CIA and have received criticism, including from Putin, for being from a "CIA family." The speaker acknowledges their father worked in conjunction with the CIA and that they attempted to join the agency. The speaker says Putin is attacking their father as being connected to the CIA, which the speaker says is not untrue. After their father's death, the speaker learned their father was involved in that world, which they say shocked them. The speaker concludes by saying that this is a fact, whether or not people believe it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so when I applied to CIA and I've taken a lot of crap, including from Putin, oh, you're from a CIA family. Well, yeah, obviously my father worked in conjunction with CIA. I mean, that's what that is. And I tried to join the CIA, but I'm not being false about it. Native talent. And he's attacking my dad as a CIA as dad to the CIA or whatever. And I'm like, well, that's no. Untrue. Then my father dies, and I learn, actually, yeah, know, was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it. So no one has to believe me, but that's just a fact. Right.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is being accused of being a CIA operative by Tucker Carlson and Peter Thiel's associates. Tucker Carlson called the speaker a "weird gay kid in the basement" from Chicago with trust funds, while Carlson attended a private high school and Ivy League school, and his father was a Reagan appointee. The speaker identifies as a "disaffected young white man" who was "red pilled" by Trump and punished for questioning Israel, years before Carlson addressed the topic. The speaker accuses Carlson and Candace Owens of gatekeeping and personality attacks, forgetting they pander to the same demographic. The speaker contrasts his background with Carlson's elite upbringing and Owens' marriage to British royalty. The speaker questions who is inauthentic, highlighting his own struggles and contrasting them with Carlson's CIA-linked father and connections to Peter Thiel. The speaker claims Carlson's and Owens' success came from contracts and connections, while he fought for everything.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And that's who's doing it. I'm being accused of being the CIA by Peter Thiel's best boys, by Tucker Carlson with his daddy. Tucker Carlson's and you know what? Here's the other thing. Tucker Carlson said, I'm a weird gay kid in the basement. Yeah. And I'm from Chicago. You're right. Well, okay. You're not right about all of that. But I wasn't born with a silver spoon in my mouth. Tucker Carlson says, I have so many trust funds I never have to work. Tucker went to a $45,000 per year private high school, then a $45,000 per year selective Ivy League school in New England. Tucker Carlson's daddy was a Reagan appointee. And then after years of bragging about being an elite, bragging about being so out of touch and so rich, Now he's gonna be the spokesperson for all the white people. Now he's gonna roll up his sleeves. I just like to hunt and fish in my log cabin. I care about Klarna and credit card debt. But then when it comes to me, I'm one of the real disaffected white people. You wanna talk about me and them? I am them. He says Nick Fuentes is leading all of the disaffected young white men. I am a disaffected white young white man. I was a precocious, intelligent, young white college student who went to Boston University, who was pro Trump and red pilled by Trump and animated by Trump's message of America first. And I asked questions about Israel and I was punished for it. I did it years before Tucker Carlson started talking about Israel last year. And I sacrificed and I was targeted by the ADL, by the SPLC, by the federal government, by the conservative movement that both Candace and Tucker were a part of. Candace and Tucker had nothing to say about Israel until it became unavoidable last year, not popular, but unavoidable. And now they want to gatekeep me out and do this personality attack and say I'm a bitter loser in my basement from Chicago. I'm a kid from Chicago. And they slipped up there because they forgot for one second that they're pretending to be the spokesperson for exactly that kind of person. Tucker's mask slipped and he forgot for a minute that for eight years he's been pretending to care about the plight of weird kids in their parents basement who are broke and didn't go to an Ivy League school living in cities that don't matter like Chicago, not like Washington DC or LA or New York. And that's why he had such disdain and contempt for me in that moment. Between the personality attacks, he's lonely, he's weird, he lives in a basement. I'm sorry, did you guys forget that that's your target audience that you're trying to pander to? Did you forget that for two seconds? And I'm the inauthentic person? I am that person. I am a spokesman for the disaffected white man because I am one and you two are not. Kanis Owens got married to British royalty worth $200,000,000 after meeting him for two weeks on Zoom. What the fuck is even that about? And Tucker Carlson's dad ran the CIA's propaganda empire fighting the Soviet Union. He went and fought with the Contras when he was in college. When I was in college, was doing a webcam show in my friend's dorm room criticizing Israel. So who's the CIA cutout? Who's the inauthentic one? Who's the crazy hateful one? I would never describe a well meaning young white person who's trying to get ahead as a weird kid in his basement from Chicago. And what is that supposed to mean? What is wrong with being from Chicago? What is wrong with being weird? What is wrong with living in your basement? That's a lot of people because of the problems you claim to care about. Tucker's at Turning Point USA extolling the predatory nature of usury and how it's preventing young white men from getting homes. And then the week after says you're in your mom's basement. So which is it? So which is it? Do you care about Klarna and people going into debt to order pizzas and home ownership being impossible? Or do you think that's a contemptible low status thing to be ridiculed and mocked? Who's pandering here exactly? Because that wasn't you. You were born to the Swanson family fortune and your daddy who ran the CIA. You know, my dad didn't even graduate college. My dad worked for the Tollway. His dad died of a drug overdose in the seventies. My mother's father was a garbage man in Chicago and he committed suicide. He was a veteran of World War II. Who's the CIA cutout? Who's the poser? Who is America? I am America. Chicago is America. That's an American story. I didn't go to Yale Law School and suck Peter Thiel's dick and then get a signature at a venture capital firm advising Rebecca Mercer and writing Hillbilly Elegy and talking about it at the Aspen Institute. That's your biographical credibility? How many of these disaffected white people that love Trump because he's racist went to Yale Law School and got plucked out by Peter Thiel, whoever he even is. Peter Thiel with his fixation with the Antichrist. This homosexual who's involved with the CIA, who wants to live forever and govern the world with AI. Yeah, that's really relatable. That's really relatable. Do another show with him and Curtis Yarvin. Do another show. Do the forty seventh show with J. D. Vance. It's it is insulting and it is insulting to everybody's intelligence for Tucker to sit there and say, he doesn't know his dad is in the CIA. For him to say that I'm in the CIA, what a joke. What a sick joke. Especially after everything that's happened to me. And unlike what Candice Owen says, she says, what happened to him when he was 18? What happened to me is ongoing. Okay. Unlike Candice Owens and Tucker, I never got a contract with Ben Shapiro and Rupert Murdoch. I was on maker support. I was on Patreon. I was on D live. I had to fight for everything I have. I didn't get a million dollar contract from turning point. I didn't get $20,000,000 from Fox news. My daddy didn't get me a job in Arkansas. So ridiculous.
Saved - September 26, 2025 at 4:02 PM

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

How did Tucker know? https://t.co/XArf0plSUN

Saved - October 29, 2025 at 12:30 AM

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Is Tucker Carlson is a CIA asset? Yes. And here's 30 minutes-worth of proof: https://t.co/UPRNcgWihR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 3 launches a documentary-style indictment of Tucker Carlson, asserting he has “many connections Tucker Carlson has to the CIA and other groups,” that Carlson is “leading a major part of America off a cliff with his false conservative platform,” and that he is “a total shill, a puppet being used to distribute propaganda.” The speaker argues the left-right paradigm is false, claiming CIA agents train people in media propaganda regardless of network (CNN or Fox). Anderson Cooper is cited as an example, with the claim he interned at the CIA and was born into the Vanderbilt family, making him the face of CNN and Carlson the face of Fox. The speaker then traces Carlson’s background in detail: born 05/16/1969 in San Francisco; his father Richard Carlson divorced and remarried Patricia Swanson; Carlson attended multiple boarding schools in Switzerland and Rhode Island; graduated from Trinity College in 1991. The claim is made that Carlson attempted to join the CIA after graduation but was denied, with the suggestion that his journalism path was encouraged by his well-connected father. The narrative then catalogs Carlson’s father’s career: Richard Carlson started in journalism as a copy boy at the Los Angeles Times and a UPI reporter; later worked at several LA and San Diego outlets; became involved with San Diego Federal Savings and Loan (headed by Gordon Luce, a Reagan-era figure); ran for mayor of San Diego in 1984 and lost; Reagan announced his nomination to the United States Information Agency in 1986; served as Director of Voice of America, described as a propaganda broadcasting division; VOA is linked to the CIA, with the assertion that its purpose shifted from abroad broadcasting to domestic and international propaganda, including a CIA black site in Thailand (Cat’s Eye/Detention Site Green). The father’s later roles included ambassador to the Seychelles and CEO of King World Public Television; he became vice chairman of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (an Israel-lobby-linked group). The speaker asserts that Carlson’s path mirrors his father’s, arguing that Carlson’s early journalism work included policy review (Heritage Foundation publication), where Heritage Foundation’s founders (Paul Wyrick, Edwin Feulner, Joseph Coors) are described as influential, with Feulner allegedly connected to KCIA donations and UN reform task forces linked to CFR and the Project for the New American Century. The Heritage Foundation’s funding is linked to Coors, Chase Manhattan, Pfizer, Dow, Sears, GM, Amoco, Mobil, with David Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan leadership invoked to support broader conspiratorial links among the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, CFR, and related networks. The claim is made that Buckley and Crystal (William Crystal) were CIA-connected or staffed, and that Tucker Carlson’s journalism career spanned outlets including Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Weekly Standard, New York Magazine, Reader’s Digest, Slate, Esquire, The New Republic, The New York Times, The Daily Beast, The Wall Street Journal, and television work for CNN, PBS, MSNBC, before Fox News. The video then connects Carlson to Murdoch’s News Corporation (which also owned The Weekly Standard) and to Genie Energy, with other board members named such as Jacob Rothschild and James Woolsey; Carlson’s overlap with Rockefeller- and Rothschild-linked networks is highlighted, including Charlie Rose’s Vanity Fair article about a Rothschild–Rockefeller merger and Rose’s program history. The speaker argues “these overlaps” explain why Carlson ridicules 9/11 skeptics and avoids addressing Rothschilds on his show, implying his gatekeeping role. A separate segment covers a Washington, DC climate-conspiracy joke by a city official about Rothschilds controlling the climate, followed by a joking discussion about microaggressions at UC Santa Cruz. Speaker 3 reiterates the claim that Carlson is “CIA?” and contends mainstream media is controlled, citing Operation Mockingbird as a precedent. The speaker concludes that even if direct government documentation isn’t present, Carlson’s numerous connections and the overlaps among the elites make his CIA linkage plausible to believe, urging viewers to do their own research and turn off the television. The transcript then shifts to a late-appearing discussion involving a Ron Paul event in Minneapolis (2008) with speakers debating 9/11, Building 7, and government involvement, with participants sharing mixed views on 9/11 conspiracy theories, evidence, and the appropriate stance on such claims. Towards the end, Steven Jones, a Brigham Young University physicist, offers a televised segment presenting a hypothesis that explosives might have contributed to the World Trade Center collapses, including Building 7, mentioning molten metal in basements, thermite, and a kink in the collapse symmetry, while acknowledging FEMA’s report noting only a low probability for the conventional (fire) hypothesis and calling for further investigation. The exchange ends with a brief acknowledgment of the need for follow-up by viewers. A final red-string/prophecy monologue introduces a biblical-tinged conspiracy frame involving “Jews” and “the red string,” Rahab the harlot, and spies, cutting off before a concluded point.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're about the most unordinary person I know. You're an elitist. You're an asshole. Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't know. I'm a but see, I'm an out of the closet elitist. I don't run around pretending to be a man of the people. I'm absolutely not a man of the people at all. Speaker 2: How do you pay your bills? Speaker 1: Well, I'm, like, extraordinarily loaded just from, like, money I, you know, inherited. Speaker 0: You're a trust fund baby, are you not? Speaker 1: No. Completely. I've never needed to work. I mean, it's all just the whole cable news thing was like a phase I was going through. Speaker 3: I will document the many connections Tucker Carlson has to the CIA and other groups. The reason I'm doing this is because right now, he is leading a major part of America off a cliff with his false conservative platform. He rages about the elite and how America seems to be going down the drain when he himself couldn't be more connected to these same elites helping to do it. He is a total shill, a puppet being used to distribute propaganda. What people need to realize is the left and right paradigm we are given is entirely false. Whether you watch CNN or Fox, you are getting CIA agents highly trained in propaganda, usually coming from wealthy families. Take Anderson Cooper for example. He admittedly interned at the CIA and was born into the Vanderbilt family. He could be called the face of CNN just as Tucker is the face of Fox. Follow me as I take you through his career and document his highly suspect rise in journalism. Don't forget to take notes and research these things yourself. Tucker Carlson was born on 05/16/1969 in San Francisco, California. When he was six years old, his father Richard divorced his mother Lisa and married Patricia Swanson, one of the heiresses to Swanson Enterprises most notable for their TV dinners. Carlson attended many boarding schools during his youth, including locations in Switzerland and Rhode Island. He graduated from Trinity College in Connecticut in 1991, which is known as one of the Little Ivies, which are a group of private schools which compete with Ivy League schools. Supposedly, Tucker attempted to join the CIA when he graduated, but his application was denied. I can't find an explanation as to why he wanted to be in the CIA or why they rejected him. His father was a very well connected man in the media industry and encouraged him to pursue journalism because, quote, they'll take anybody. His father Richard started his career in journalism at the young age of 22. He had jobs as a copy boy at the Los Angeles Times as well as a reporter for United Press International, which at the time was one of the largest newswire services in the world. He worked for a few TV stations in Los Angeles and San Diego before joining San Diego Federal Savings and Loan in 1977. The bank was headed by Gordon Luce, who was the former public affairs director for Reagan. Richard became vice president of finance within three years, and during this time, the bank had a lot of political controversies due to their connections to current and former members of the Reagan administration. In 1983, he decided to get into politics, and in 1984, ran for mayor of San Diego. He lost to his opponent, Roger Hedgecock, who was later forced from office in 1985 after it was revealed he received over $350,000 illegally during his campaign. Coincidentally, he would also go on to become a conservative radio host. In 1986, using his connections to the White House, Reagan personally announced his intention to nominate Richard as associate director of the United States Information Agency. He became Director of Voice of America, which was a propaganda broadcasting division of USIA. He served as their longest running Director. Voice of America started in 1941 when President Roosevelt established the Foreign Broadcast Information Service as a program directed by the Office of Strategic Services, which became the CIA. The intention stated publicly was to communicate America's views abroad, but it was really an outfit to disseminate propaganda. The first few broadcasts for Voice of America were done over British Broadcasting Corporation transmitters but expanded rapidly and fell under control of the Office of War Information in 1942. The Office of War Information was tasked with creating distributing propaganda domestically and internationally. They did this through various means such as broadcast, newspapers, posters, films, and other media. The agency was terminated by President Truman in 1945. Their offices were transferred to the State Department and most of their responsibilities were transferred to the CIA. It should also be noted that a Voice of America relay station in Thailand was used as a CIA black site referred to as Cat's Eye or Detention Site Green. These overlaps and connections between Voice of America and the CIA should not be glossed over. In 1991, Richard Carlson was personally nominated by President George H. W. Bush to be The U. S. Ambassador to The Seychelles, a nation of islands off the Eastern Coast Of Africa. In 1997, he became CEO of King World Public Television, which was later purchased by CBS in 1999 for $2,500,000,000 He became the vice chairman of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, which is an organization that is part of the Israel lobby in The United States. It was founded by Clifford May, who was also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the project for the new American century, and vice chairman of the Republican Jewish Coalition. Now you're starting to see that it was no mistake Tucker wanted to join the CIA and become a journalist, like father, like son. Tucker Carlson got his start in journalism when he was hired as a fact checker for policy review. This was a publication put out by the Heritage Foundation. The Heritage Foundation was founded in 1973 by three men: Paul Wyrick, a political activist and commentator Edwin Feulner, an academic who attended London School of Economics, which is a Rothschild controlled school, who was also advisor to different government agencies and domestic policy consultant to Reagan, and last but not least, Joseph Coors of the Coors Brewing family. In 1975, Congress investigated the activities of the Korean Central Intelligence Agency in The US. Mr. Feulner had met with the KCIA station chief, Kim Young Hwan, and in the early nineties, the Heritage Foundation started receiving donations from the KCIA. It should also be noted that in 2005, Mr. Feulner was appointed to a task force on UN reform, which included such people as former CIA Director James Woolsey with the goal of achieving a more effective United Nations. The task force was also supported by the Council on Foreign Relations. In 1977, Paul Wyrick hired a man named Roger Pearson to write for policy review. In 1986, an intelligence agency watchdog publication called the Covert Action Quarterly documented Pearson's connections to James Jesus Engelton, who was the former chief of CIA counterintelligence, as well as Daniel Graham, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. The Heritage Foundation was largely funded by Joseph Coors through his family wealth, but it also received funding from Chase Manhattan Bank, Pfizer, Dow Chemical, Sears, General Motors, Amoco, and Mobil. David Rockefeller was CEO and Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank at the time. It should also be noted that David's grandfather, John D. Rockefeller, who started the Standard Oil Company, had to break it up due to antitrust laws, and Amico, as well as Mobile, were once part of the company. John D. Rockefeller also donated the 16 acres of land upon which the United Nations headquarters sits in New York. In David Rockefeller's O Memoirs, he is quoted as saying, some even believe we, the Rockefeller family, are part of a secret cabal working against the best interest of The United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalist and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure. One world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. He also funded and was chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations. A quick little fun fact. Before the homosexual political commentator David Brock, founder of Media Matters for America, a leftist propaganda outlet which received funding from George Soros and given office space by alleged pedophile and human trafficker John Podesta, he was on the board of the Heritage Foundation. He supported Hillary Clinton for president twice and dated James Alifantis, has been accused of being a pedophile and human trafficker. He is also a friend of Lynn Rothschild. Lynn Rothschild supposedly abhors Trump and fawns over Clinton publicly, yet her and Trump go way back as well. Also, here's a photo of Trump laughing it up with happy Rockefeller, wife of former vice president and New York governor Nelson Rockefeller. It's a great example to show you that these people are all liars and actors. They will fill whatever role they need to fill when they need to fill it. Sometimes that involves swinging to the total opposite side of the false paradigm politically if it's advantageous to the agenda of the elite. Pick your central banking puppet, left or right. It's all controlled, and these people are shameless whores. When Tucker Carlson left his job at policy review, he went to work for the Arkansas Democrat Gazette under the tutelage of editor Paul Greenberg. Mister Greenberg was very well connected having his pieces published across 1,400 different newspapers within the Tribune Content Agency Syndicate at the time. He also won a Pulitzer Prize in 1969 and appeared on major television networks as commentator on talk shows such as Charlie Rose. Now I can't actually prove that mister Greenberg was CIA, but when I started to look at a few publications he put out, it made me start to wonder. In one article entitled How to Break the CIA, published on jewishworldreview.com 09/02/2009, he defends the CIA from what he believes to be unfair persecution. He defends the torture of possibly innocent people as justified in the, quote, war on terror. When referring to the torture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, he says, are we supposed to be sorry about that and proceed to punish those who uncovered these plans? On what theory? That no good deed for your country should go unpunished? He also boohoos about the morale of the CIA and how investigations might increase their agents' anxiety. In another article by Mr. Greenberg entitled Hooray for Snooping, published in the Arkansas Democrat Gazette October 2333, he talks about a national conference of editorial writers he attended in Calgary, Alberta in the seventies or eighties. In the article, he says that, quote, that year at Calgary, one solemn resolution proposed that we stop talking to the CIA since a number of journalists abroad had been assassinated on the pretext that we were all CIA agents, capitalist spies, tools of imperialism, and, well, you know the rest. As if the killers were so lacking in imagination, they couldn't come up with some other excuse to do away with us if they hadn't invented this one. So there we were, an all too solemn convention assembled, First Amendment or no, debating whether we should gag ourselves. I dissented, being an American, and unaccustomed to being told whom I could talk to or not talk to. Memory grows furtive, but I believe the resolution was defeated. That it was ever considered was disgraceful enough. It occurs to some of us that if the CIA and FBI and NSA had been allowed to talk even to each other before 09/11/2001, that date might not have become another one that will live in infamy. If only big data could have been mined back then the way it is now, the country might have been a lot safer along with the thousands of innocent victims who found themselves in the Twin Towers that fateful day and others rushing to their rescue as firefighters and cops, and the troops who were stationed at the Pentagon as airliners were turned into flaming engines of destruction, their passengers and crews wiped out, including those who, like the ones aboard Valiant Flight United 93, were the first to mount a counterattack against the terrorist in the still continuing war. It would seem mister Greenberg, a very well connected columnist, was very sympathetic to the ambitions of the CIA for seemingly no reason. It should also be noted he was Jewish and a Zionist. When Tucker left the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, he went to work for the Weekly Standard News magazine in 1995. It was founded by William Crystal and Fred Barnes. William Crystal is Jewish and the son of Irving Crystal, who's been described as, quote, the godfather of neoconservatism. Irving Crystal was also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and worked for the Congress for Cultural Freedom. The Congress for Cultural Freedom was a group started by a Jewish CIA agent named Mikkel Jocelyn in 1950. It distributed anti communist propaganda in 35 countries and published over 20 magazines. In 1966, The New York Times are in a series of articles exposing it as a front for the CIA to transfer money to the State Department and the United States Information Agency, the same agency which broadcasted Voice of America, which Tucker's dad was the director of. In the book, Finks, How the CIA Tricked the World's Best Riders, author Joel Whitney talks about, quote, how the good versus bad CIA is a false divide and that the cultural cold warriors again and again used anticommunism as a lever to spy relentlessly on leftist and indeed writers of all political inclinations and thereby pushed US democracy a little closer to the Soviet model of the surveillance state. He alleges that Crystal was in fact a CIA employee, The man who referred to Irving as the godfather of neoconservatism was a man named Jonah Greenberg, also Jewish and editor in chief of The National Review, a semimonthly magazine. The magazine was founded by William F. Buckley Jr. And has played a significant role in the development of conservatism in The United States. Like Krystal, Buckley was also outed as a CIA employee in Joel Whitney's book. It should also be noted that Fred Barnes, cofounder of The Weekly Standard, currently moderates a show on Voice of America called Issues in the News, again, the same program Tucker's father, Richard, was director of. It would seem William Crystal was also a fan of Paul Greenberg, Tucker's first mentor at the Arkansas Democrat Gazette since he quoted him in an article he published in the Washington Examiner 11/01/2004 entitled the 09/11 connection. In the article, he quotes Paul as saying, everything we had thought, assumed, expected in the golden nineties hadn't been so. The surface piece of the nineteen nineties had been bought at a great price. On nine eleven, a failure of American leadership was revealed, a failure to look ahead and act forcefully to forestall threats, to do what Bush has called, quote, the hard work of fighting terror and spreading freedom. William's father Irving, alleged CIA employee, also only had kind words to say about mister Greenberg when he wrote the forward to his 1991 book, Resonant Lives, 50 Figures of Consequence. He said, and I quote, our intellectual and spiritual elites today are, with some notable exemptions, semi educated at best. This explains why someone like Mr. Greenberg has not received the recognition he deserves. Oh, yes, he has won a Pulitzer Prize and other awards, which is nice, but these are tributes to his journalistic talents as a columnist and editorial writer. As a master of the brief moral essay, he has yet to come into his own. These men all seem to connect to one another in some way, and they all seemingly support the, quote, alleged war on terror while increasing the size of the government in the name of preserving freedom. They protect Israel and promote their agenda while scapegoating Muslims for false flag attacks meant to justify giving more power to their think tanks and intelligence agencies which answer to nobody except the people lining their pockets. After leaving The Weekly Standard, Tucker then went on to write for New York Magazine, Reader's Digest, Slate, Esquire, The New Republic, The New York Times, The Daily Beast, and The Wall Street Journal. He would also go to work on camera for CNN, PBS, and MSNBC before finally settling into his role at Fox News as the poster boy for conservative values. During those years, he also somehow found time to appear on shows like King of Queens, 30 Rock, and Dancing with the Stars. While he is now on Fox News as arguably their most popular personality, this wasn't his first tango with News Corporation, which owns Fox News. News Corporation owned by Rupert Murdoch also owned The Weekly Standard where Tucker worked under Bill Crystal. News Corporation headquarters is located in none other than the Rockefeller Center Complex in New York. Rupert Murdoch is also on the board of Genie Energy, an American energy company located out of New Jersey. Other noteworthy people on the board of Genie Energy include Jacob Rothschild, the head of the Rothschild banking dynasty, and James Woolsey, former director of the CIA, who, if you remember earlier, was also on the UN reform task force in 2005 with Heritage Foundation founder Edwin Feulner, whose goal was to create a more effective United Nations, the same United Nations which resides on land donated by John D. Rockefeller. In a 2015 article written by Charlie Rose in Vanity Fair, he details a merger between Jacob Rothschild and David Rockefeller. Rothschild bought 37% of shares in Rockefeller Financial Services through his RIT Capital Partners. This is the same Charlie Rose who would have Arkansas columnist Paul Greenberg on his show to talk politics and the same Paul Greenberg who was held in such high regard by William Crystal and his father Irving. There are so many overlapping connections that can be made that I probably missed dozens, if not more, during my research into the topic. Given these connections to the CIA, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, etcetera, it's no wonder Tucker Carlson ridicules people who believe that 09:11 was an inside job and calls these people parasites. It's also no wonder Tucker Carlson won't seriously address the Rothschilds on his show as his boss probably wouldn't be too happy even though they have so much control and influence. Whenever people bring up legitimate issues, it's his job to mock them so his viewers won't get to the truth of the matter. Speaker 4: Washington DC experienced a mild snowfall last week. Luckily, city councilman Trayon White was on it. He knows why it happened. Watch this. Speaker 5: It's just started snowing out of Speaker 6: nowhere this morning, man. Y'all better pay attention Speaker 5: to this climate control, man. This climate manipulation, and DC keep talking about we are resilient city, and that's a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate. It should create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful. Speaker 4: Yep. The Rothschilds control the climate. The Rothschilds, of course, are a wealthy Jewish banking clan. They're included in a great many conspiracy theories, but those theories rarely give them credit for the weather. That's an ambitious new twist. Mark Stein is an author and columnist and a part time meteorologist, and he joins us tonight. What are you making? So this is by the way, I live here, so you can laugh all you want, but that's actually my city councilman speaking there. The Rothschilds control the weather. Did you know that? Speaker 7: Well, I did actually, Tucker. They've they they bought the weather from God back in 1929, when he had a bit of a liquidity problem after the Wall Street crash, and, they keep it in the wine cellars at the Chateau Mouton Rothschild estate in France. And, they're able to micro target the climate. For example, it was light snow in your part of Washington, but I gather in the stairwell of Trayon White's, apartment building, he actually had an avalanche just on his floor. That's that's how micro targeted the big Jew weather machine is able to be. Speaker 6: And he may and, by the way, Speaker 7: you may you may think it's a light snowfall, but if you actually examine it, it's actually small pieces of gefelter fish, which is why it doesn't melt. And that's why the Jews control the snowplow business. So they scoop all the gefelter fish in Washington away, and they use it to make Louis Farrakhan calypso albums, which they put out to discredit, Louis Farrakhan from telling the truth about the synagogue of Satan. It all makes sense. Speaker 6: See, the funny thing is I mean, I don't Speaker 4: know if it's funny. It's actually so appalling and shocking that it's it's hard. I'm just gonna laugh about it. That was that was you made me feel better about a city out of control. So then I wanna run this by you. May maybe you can make me feel better about this too. There's a new uproar on social media over microaggressions at UC Santa Cruz. The school has assembled a list of microaggressions. Tucker Speaker 3: Carlson seems to be everywhere. He has become the face of the conservative and right wing movement in The United States, surely due to the incredible amount of connections he has to intelligence agencies and the government. This is why the gatekeepers and the media attempt to give him credibility and publish stories like how he's being spied on by the NSA or how a seemingly random man confronted him in Montana at a fly fishing shop and insulted him trying to start a confrontation, and it turns out that the man was actually an employee of the Asia Foundation, which was created in 1951 by the CIA as a front organization to distribute propaganda. If you had any doubts before watching this that Tucker Carlson was controlled opposition, I hope the research I presented will put that to bed. Mainstream media is all controlled in its one big incestuous pit. Don't worship these people as heroes because they will sell you down the river in a heartbeat. Is Tucker Carlson CIA? Well, you can't prove that directly, but once you pour through all of his connections, you would find it incredibly hard not to believe that is the case. About the only thing we're missing at this point is official government documents detailing as much, which I am sure will come out at some point in the future. The CIA has a very long and documented history of infiltrating and controlling the media. Operation Mockingbird is a great example of that. Tucker Carlson is just one of many examples you could make. Remember to always do your own research and turn off the television. Speaker 6: Good to see you after, we met briefly at the event in 2008 in Minneapolis for Ron Paul. Speaker 1: Oh, that Speaker 6: was fun. Speaker 2: I remember that. Speaker 6: But but you had to leave early. What happened? The Speaker 2: truth is stopping. The truth is stopping. I'll tell you why. Speaker 1: I didn't bail on Ron Paul. No. Speaker 6: I don't Speaker 2: It's when Jesse Ventura got up and started saying 09:11 was an inside job. Speaker 6: He didn't say that. Yeah. Speaker 2: Yeah. He did say that. Answer your question. Sure. It wasn't controversial. It was stupid. And if there's any evidence that the government is behind nine eleven, looks you know, I believe anything if there's evidence, but there isn't any. So knock it off. That's my view. Speaker 6: Okay. But And Speaker 2: I said that to him. Speaker 6: Sure. Sure. Speaker 8: But one stupid person says something Speaker 6: stupid at Ron Paul event. Speaker 2: No. No. But I I hate that. And and by the way, I am open to almost any crackpot theory about anything. It's just on that subject, come on. You know what I mean? That's too much. That even for me. Speaker 6: So just out of curiosity then, what what's your take on Building 7? Which explanation do you believe? Speaker 7: Yeah. Come Speaker 6: on. It's like it's a slick. No. That's a serious question. Which explanation did did Speaker 2: it Okay. Which explanation? Speaker 4: I I There's two explanations. Speaker 6: It was either it was it was pulled or it was isolated pockets of fire on the building that blew that that were Let Speaker 2: me let me get let Speaker 6: me The towers coming down. They're coming down. Speaker 2: This a no win conversation, so I'm not gonna continue it. But let me just say one The macro my macro view is is the obvious one, which is the buildings came down. There's a bunch of nutcases. We're playing into them. Speaker 6: Okay. So are you still supporting Ron Paul? So are you supporting anybody in the race this year? No. Speaker 2: I don't support. I mean, I don't even vote. I don't even vote. I'm hardly objective. I'm honest. I'm not objective. Speaker 6: There you go. Certainly not afraid to speak your mind. Speaker 2: No. I'm not. No. You can assess my views. They're very clear. You don't have any But I hate that nine eleven crap. Wish they just kicked those people out. Speaker 6: I mean was supposed to be on the ninety third floor. Really? Oh. It's important for people and their families still involved to know the truth whether or not the government was involved or whether it was terrorists, but there's a history of government sponsored terror throughout the past century. I'm Yeah. Exactly. So what do you mean kick them out? Speaker 1: I don't know. Whatever. Speaker 6: You you anyone who's a 09:11 intruder should be should be kicked out of the the country? Of course not. I don't, you know, I don't Speaker 2: I don't even believe in parking tickets. I mean, didn't you please? I just don't I think that people, before saying something that heavy, ought to present real evidence and not just it's a coincidence or the questions remain a dumb Speaker 6: I think like steel doesn't weaken until 2,400 degrees is evidence that that jet fuel couldn't cause a collapse of the tower from being at Speaker 2: the top. Except the thing is it did. Speaker 9: So Speaker 10: problem. We we gave them a lot Speaker 6: of money. Speaker 10: See, see, pretty much trained them. I mean, mean, that's that's pretty much enough evidence for me. Speaker 2: Did the government brought down the Twin Towers? You know Speaker 10: what? The government that the government was involved in bringing that into our because they would not Speaker 6: be trained because who because who trained them? The government trained them. The CIA trained them. The special ops trained Speaker 2: them. Alright. I've I've had this debate so many times. It's not you know, I don't know. I just it it seems to me that it it's kinda beneath, sort of beneath, like, adult discourse even, really, I guess. And it and it definitely discredits otherwise good ideas. Speaker 6: I just think that the implications if if the government was involved, the implications are so vast that it should be looked into whether or not it seems ridiculous. Ridiculous. Speaker 11: So for family members of Speaker 6: the victims that are asking questions and want the evidence that's been withheld by the government released, you would say that they're less than adults somehow for wanting that Speaker 2: I would say that parasites like you make it much worse for them. That's what Speaker 10: I would say. Speaker 12: I'm a parasite now? Speaker 2: Yeah. It's it's filthy to say things like that with no evidence, and you have none. So you should stop. That's my point. Well, this is deal with this Speaker 10: is insult of politics today. Speaker 4: Back. Millions of people watch the horror of 09:11 right before their very eyes live on television. Two planes crashing into the World Trade Center. And less than a couple of hours later, both towers, of course, collapsing. My next guest says that hijackers may not have brought down the towers by themselves. Here to explain his controversial theory, Steven Jones. He's a professor of physics at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. Professor Jones, thanks for coming on. Speaker 9: Sure. Thanks, Tucker. Speaker 4: Well, just sum up this, obviously, your theory, the one sentence that I just explained in the intro contradicts what we all think we know about how these towers collapsed. Quickly sum up your explanation for what happened. Speaker 9: Well, I'd like to start with this paper that you referred to. It's available online. What I'm doing, Tucker, is presenting evidence, but it's a hypothesis to be tested. That's a big difference from a conclusion. And so I just wanted to clarify that. But to sum up, I've looked at the official reports by FEMA and so on regarding the collapse of these buildings. I'd like to look at the collapse of Building 7 in just a minute. It was not even hit by a jet. So we should look at that one. Speaker 4: Two towers. The explanation has been that the fire inside was so intense that it weakened the structural steel and that each floor collapsed collapsed down upon the next in a pancake fashion and they imploded in on themselves. Is that essentially I think what people think? Speaker 9: Doctor. Yeah. That's basically it. Yeah. And so what I've done is to analyze these reports. I would like to do a little experiment with you, Tucker, if I could. I sent out a video clip of the collapse of Building 7 because most people haven't actually seen that one and that's the crux of the argument I'm presenting. Speaker 4: Sum up very quickly the argument for us. You believe there were explosives in the buildings planted by someone, detonated. Speaker 9: Is that correct? In other words, hypothesis to be tested there's two hypotheses here. One is fire and damage caused all three buildings to collapse. The other is that explosives in the buildings may have caused the collapse. And so then we analyze and see which fits the data better, and I've done that in my in my 25 page paper. Speaker 4: I wanna read you a quote from the Deseret Morning News, a paper in Utah from you. I'm quoting now. It is quite plausible that explosives were preplanted in all three buildings and set off after the two plane crashes, you, which were actually diversion tactic. Muslims are probably not to blame for bringing down the World Trade Center buildings after all. That's, I would think, pretty offensive to a lot of people listening. Do you have any evidence for that? Speaker 9: Well, not to the Muslims, I might say. I've got a lot of emails saying Speaker 4: I'm sure your writings have been greeted with glee in Islamabad and Peshawar and places like that. Speaker 9: Well, I haven't received any notes from there, but just good people. I have Muslim friends. Let me read for example, but I'm not going to let you off the hook. Really want to do this experiment with you. Speaker 4: We don't have lot of time for experiments, Professor, but if you could just give us one thing to hold on to. You make these claims or appear to make these claims. Do you have any Speaker 9: collapse of Building 7. Can you roll the video clip that I sent to you? Speaker 4: Okay. I'm not sure Speaker 1: if we Speaker 4: can, but to specify that is World Trade Center Building 7, smaller than the other two, not hit by a plane, of yet it collapsed. Speaker 9: Right. It's 47 stories. Speaker 4: That's right. Speaker 9: 24 steel columns in the center. Right. Trusses asymmetrically supported. Now, I can't see what you're seeing. Speaker 4: Are you rolling that? No, we just see the building. And just so our viewers know, the explanation that I think is conventional is that there was a large tank of diesel fuel stored in a lower level of that which caught fire and the resulting fire collapsed the building. Speaker 9: That's basically it. But as we read in the FEMA report, it says here, and I put this in my paper, of course, the best hypothesis, which is the only one they looked at, the fire, has only a low probability of occurrence. Further investigation, analyses are needed to resolve this issue and I agree with that. But they admit there's only a low probability. And if you look at the collapse, see what I've studied is the fall time, the symmetry, the fact that it first dips in the middle, that's called the kink, which is very characteristic, of course, of controlled demolition. Speaker 4: Professor, that we are out of time and I'm not sure that you've J. Speaker 9: One fully other thing I want to mention Speaker 1: about Doctor. Speaker 4: Okay, if you can hit it, Speaker 6: really quick. Speaker 9: Doctor. Here we go. Molten metal in the basements of all three buildings. Yet, all scientists now reasonably agree that the fires were not sufficiently hot to melt the steel. So what is this molten metal? It's a direct evidence for the use of high temperature explosives such as thermite. Thermite produces molten iron as an end product. Okay. So, we do have Yeah, it's very short time, but people will read the paper, then I talk about the molten metal, the symmetry of the collapse, and the weaknesses and inadequacies of the fire hypothesis. Speaker 4: Professor, we're going to have to leave it to our viewers who are interested enough to follow-up to do just that. We appreciate you coming on. Even if I don't understand your theories, we appreciate you trying to explain them. Thanks. Okay. Speaker 13: The red string is a symbol to show the Jews that they are helping the Jews usher in the new world order. The reason they do it is so that the Jews spare them from the nasty population that is happening. Not many people are allowed to live in a new world order. In the Old Testament, the book of Joshua, God was giving the Israelites the land of Canaan. Joshua sent in spies. The Canaanites found out and were searching for the spies. The spies got help from a harlot called Rahab. The Canaanites went to Rahab's house, and she told them she did not see anyone. When they left, Rahab, the harlot, made a deal with Israelite spies. Since she helped the spies, she asked that they spare her and her family. The Israelite spies agreed and Rahab let them down on a red rope from the on the wall, and the spies escaped safely. The Israelites killed all the Canaanites except Rahab and her fam
Saved - February 28, 2026 at 12:43 AM

@idropFbombs - 𝒦𝑒𝓁𝓁𝓎࿎☽

Jim Carrey doesn't look, sound or behave like Jim Carrey. Actors playing actors. 💯 https://t.co/LoElUgeZc5

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions whether the person receiving the Cesar Award was really Jim Carrey, presenting several points of discrepancy. - Eye color: Jim Carrey has deep brown eyes, especially during the The Mask and The Truman Show era. The award recipient had blue, nearly transparent eyes under bright stage lights, which contradicts Carrey’s known eye color. - Public presence and personality: Jim Carrey has gradually distance himself from mainstream Hollywood social events and has publicly expressed detachment from fame and celebrity culture. In contrast, the award recipient was very outgoing on stage, frequently interacting with the media and using exaggerated gestures, which is inconsistent with Carrey’s low-key personality. - Mannerisms and performance: The recipient’s classic movements and expressions appeared deliberately stiff. While at the ceremony, he occasionally made familiar funny faces and exaggerated gestures, these seemed like intentional imitations of Jim Carrey remembered from memory, lacking natural humor. Both gestures and facial expressions carried a trace of mechanical precision, like a trained stand-in performing Jim Carrey. The speaker concludes by asking for an opinion: Do you think the person accepting the award at the Cesar Awards was really Jim Carrey?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you notice Jim Carrey's blue eyes? Nobody realized that the person accepting the award at the fifty first Cesar Awards was actually Jim Carrey's body double. First, Jim Carrey's eyes have always been a deep brown, especially during the The Mask and The Truman Show era. Those eyes carried a signature brown glow, lively and full of vitality. However, the person receiving the award had blue eyes, appearing almost unnaturally transparent under the bright stage lights. Second, anyone familiar with Jim Carrey knows that in recent years, he has gradually distanced himself from mainstream Hollywood social events and has publicly expressed his detachment from fame and celebrity culture. In contrast, the award recipient was very outgoing on stage, interacting frequently with the media and using exaggerated gestures, completely inconsistent with Jim Carrey's low key personality. Finally, his classic movements and expressions seemed deliberately stiff. At the ceremony, he occasionally made familiar funny faces and exaggerated gestures, but these seemed like intentional imitations of Jim Carrey remembered from memory, lacking natural humor. Both the gestures and facial expressions carried a trace of mechanical precision, like a trained stand in performing Jim Carrey. Do you think the person accepting the award at the Cesar Awards was really Jim Carrey?
View Full Interactive Feed