reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@RossDyerTV - Ross Dyer
So, all those “anti-vaxxers” (who were misreading the data, spreading “misinformation” - & whom deserved to be censored, fired & cancelled (or to “face consequences” as the fascist politicians & media called it) - it turns out they were right. #vaccines https://t.co/TKYHKum3ae
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, including its potential to suppress the immune system and reactivate latent viral infections. They mention a scientific journal, The Lancet, which released a study showing that immune function among vaccinated individuals was lower than that of unvaccinated individuals. The speaker expresses sympathy for those who may have been misled or forced to take the vaccine. They also highlight data from The Lancet's study, revealing a higher rate of medical incidents among double-vaccinated individuals aged around 80 compared to the unvaccinated. The speaker questions why this finding is not receiving more attention.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response, etcetera. So it's possible, in fact, it's looking likely that the vaccine might suppress the immune system. This fact, the authors concluded, will quote, have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to effectively combat future infections. Now again, we sincerely hope that's not true, but it's not just the conclusion of 1 scientific journal. The Lancet, maybe the most famous scientific journal in the world, released similar findings in February.
The Lancet's piece was entitled quote, risk of infection, hospitalization, and death up to 9 months after a second dose of COVID nineteen vaccine. A physician called Kenji Yamamoto made this observation about the data from The Lancet. He wrote this in a letter to the journal of virology, and we're quoting, the study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of 2 doses of COVID nineteen vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals. Now your first response, if you're a humane person to align like that has got to be deep sympathy, because people were misled, they were forced, they were forced. Medical ethics turned out the window.
People were forced to take medicine they didn't want, and some of them may have been hurt by it. And you don't have to take this man's word for it. Pull up the Lancet study yourself. You won't find anything of the text of the article saying what Kenji Yamamoto said, which is weird. Why would the Lancet wanna hide a major finding like that?
We can't say. But if you look at table 3 in the piece, here's what you'll find buried in the data. Among people around the age of 80 who've been double vaccinated, that would include people like Joe Biden, the per capita rate of medical incidences, including hospitalizations or death, is nearly twice as high as the rate of serious incidents for the unvaccinated. This is 180 days after vaccination. What is that?
And why is no one interested?
@RepThomasMassie - Thomas Massie
My tweets about natural immunity, and more importantly the voices of my constituents posted on that tweet, were censored because truth presented a threat to the government-Pharma agenda of mandated vaccines. @mtaibbi@ShellenbergerMD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mr. Massey discusses the weaponization of the CDC against the American people and their misrepresentation of vaccine efficacy. He recounts his conversations with CDC officials and their failure to correct false information on their website. He also highlights the CDC's partnership with Twitter and their tracking of congressional tweets. Mr. Massey raises concerns about censorship and the suppression of free speech, particularly regarding discussions on natural immunity. The witnesses further emphasize the importance of allowing open dialogue and the need for truth and reconciliation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gentleman yields back. Gentleman from Kentucky, Mr. Massey, is recognized for 5 minutes.
Speaker 1: I want to talk about the weaponization of the CDC against the American people, and this overlaps with one of the Twitter files, number 13 by my account, actually by Alex Berenson, not one of our 2 witnesses, but I would like to comment on it. A week before Christmas 2020, the vaccines came out. The FDA curated the Pfizer trial results, and then the CDC curated the FDA's opinion. The CDC said in their MMWR, which is never peer reviewed, they're very proud that it's not peer reviewed, they treat it like science, it's not science. They said that the vaccine was 92% efficacious for people who had already had COVID.
The Pfizer trial data had said no such thing. In fact, There was no support for that claim, so I called up the head of the CDC, recorded the conversation, the head in Washington DC. She said she'd get the top scientists on the line. There was a snowstorm that day, so I was impressed. She got this top scientist on the line.
They said I was eagle eye massie. They couldn't believe how that statement had made it into their report and that I was absolutely correct. There was no support for it. So, I said, how are you gonna fix it? You're gonna redact it?
You're gonna change it? What are you gonna do? They said, we'll do all of that. I said, great. A month later, It was still on their website.
I made some more phone calls. They brought in an old hand, an old fixer, Doctor. Shushat. These are her notes with, of of her phone call with me about natural immunity in January, when I called them out on it again, these are the entirety of her notes that were obtained, in my FOIA from somebody, a third party. I took all of my recordings, released them to Cheryl Atkinson.
She she blew the whistle on this. People a lot of people have forgotten about it. Here's here's why I find it interesting, and I'm gonna tie it into the Twitter files. And by the way, I told them I was not anti vaxx. I said the problem with your story is there's a misallocation of vaccines which are not available for all the old people in Kentucky, but you got young people in Kentucky taking them because you're telling them on the website even if you've had COVID, go get it.
So that was my complaint. On May 20 or May 10, 2021, Todd O'Boyle, this name will come up in a Twitter file later. He is the top lobbyist in Twitter's Washington office who was also is Twitter's point of contact in the White House. He encouraged the CDC to enroll in the, partner support program. Oh, okay.
The CDC is now a partner with Twitter because they're in the partner support program. They he said, In the future, that's the best way to get a spreadsheet like this reviewed. Now, this is an email from, between Todd O'Boyle and, and the folks at CDC. By the way, let me let me, talk to this too. This is these are more of my conversations with the CDC, completely redacted the subject thereof.
Next next one, please. I also found as a result of the FOIA, CDC tracks every tweet that a congressman puts out, not just republican, but democrat. They keep the spreadsheet. They make it every week. This showed up in the FOIA for me because I'm in their spreadsheet that they track.
Why is this interesting? Okay. So they're tracking congressman's tweets At CDC, they're enrolled in the partner support, portal at, at Twitter. And then I found, This is why, I found Alex Berenson's report very interesting because, what he found out is that Scott Gottlieb Worked hard and and Twitter complied, it looks like, to censor a tweet from a doctor about natural immunity. Guess what?
On the same day that that doctor's tweet was censored, so were my tweets on natural immunity. Why is this important? What is what is consequential about the date? This is 3 days after the military vaccine mandate came out and a week before the federal vaccine mandates came out. This Truth was toxic to to a narrative that Pfizer was spreading, that Joe Biden wanted out there so that he could force the vaccine on everybody whether you'd at natural immunity or not.
Now, I actually you guys might not agree with me on this. I don't think the press gets special privileges on the first amendment. I think I don't think Congress does. I think every American by virtue of being an American has the right to free speech enshrined in the constitution. So I'm not so much worried that they they, censored us a congressman, but they disabled all the comments from my constituents.
Those are the voices they squelched. And my beef is not with Twitter, but my beef is with the CDC and these federal agencies, and, I encourage you all if you can to find more about this. And, do you have any either of you have any comments on this topic?
Speaker 2: Yeah. America.
Speaker 0: The gentleman's timing expired, but the gentleman may the the witnesses may respond.
Speaker 2: Just quickly, we found just yesterday a tweet from, the the Virality Project at Stanford, which is partnered with a a number of government agencies and Twitter, where they talk explicitly about, Censoring stories of true vaccine side effects, and other true stories that they felt, encouraged hesitancy. Now the import the Since from true? Yes. So they used the word true three times, in this email. And what's what's notable about this is that it reflects The fundamental misunderstanding of this whole disinformation complex, anti disinformation complex, they believe that ordinary people can't handle, difficult truths.
And so they think that they need minders to separate out things that are controversial or difficult, for them. And that's again, it's totally contrary to what America's all about, I think.
Speaker 3: I would just briefly add, this is Very disturbing because what they're doing when they're putting these labels on there is they're actually also trying to discredit you. So it's not just, it's a form of censorship, but it's also a a disinformation campaign. And I think what Massa is really important to understand. I mean, we went from you go from a situation where we were fighting ISIS recruiting, and then it was Russian disinformation, And now they're in a situation where they're wanting to censor true information, accurate facts, because they're worried that people might Behave in ways that they don't want them to, that involves mind reading at a level that is grossly inappropriate. I mean, I I worry even about making this defense because let's remember, The first amendment protects our right to be wrong.
Mhmm. It protects our right to lie. I mean, it's bizarre to me that we would need to make a defense of the first amendment and remind people We have a right to be and being wrong, as Matt was explaining, is a big part of being a human being and having a democracy. So this is disturbing and chilling, and you're absolutely right to be outraged by it. There needs to be a full truth and reconciliation that I hope everybody Would appreciate, having on this issue because a lot of bad behavior has come out about what they've done.
Speaker 1: American. Thank you. Neobank.
Speaker 0: Good job, gentlemen. This time has expired. We now
@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.
Matt Hancock wants to criminalise vaccine misinformation So here's 4 and 1/2 mins of him spouting lie after lie, proving that the first person to be punished under this new law he's advocating, should be himself... https://t.co/92qXBeJgdO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Regulators, including the MHRA, European regulator, and World Health Organization, have found that all three COVID-19 vaccines used in the UK are safe and effective, saving thousands of lives. The vaccine rollout is going well, and the safety system is working. The AstraZeneca vaccine is not recommended for those under 30, but alternatives will be offered to ensure safety. The vaccine has not been tested on children as their risk of significant harm from COVID-19 is low. All data and side effects are being transparently shared. Face masks are recommended in hospitals, care homes, and some other environments. Vaccination not only protects individuals but also reduces transmission and brings us closer to normalcy. The UK regulator is independent and not influenced by external pressure. Leaving the EU allowed the UK to make authorization decisions faster while maintaining safety checks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The regulators have found not just the British regulator, the MHRA, the UK regulator, but also the European regulator, and the World Health Organization, have found that all 3 of the jabs being used here in the UK now are safe, they are effective, and they the evidence clearly shows that the vaccination program is saving thousands of lives. So the what we've learned in the last 24 hours is that the rollout is going well. We've also learned that the safety system is working And we've seen from the study announced this morning, the vaccine program is working to reduce the number of deaths and break that link from cases to deaths and I just want to Just slightly correct something that from the, your opening question, which is that the regulators have said that the vaccines, all 3 now in All 3 now in use in the UK are safe and effective. We haven't said you can't take the AstraZeneca vaccine if you are under 30, But that you will be offered, an alternative given that we want to make sure that this program is as safe as it possibly can be. This vaccine will not be, used for, for children.
It hasn't, been tested on children, and the reason is that The likelihood of children having, significant, detriment if they catch COVID nineteen is very, very low. So this is an adult vaccine for the adult population. The approach that we're taking quite rightly is that is to be as totally transparent, To be totally transparent about all of the data, all of the side effects and all drugs have side effects and you'll have seen some of the comparisons that have been made for instance, You know, comparing this risk to the risk of taking a long haul flight, you know, this is a, this is of course, as with all medicines, There are side effects, but the good news is that having looked at all of these details and having with us having published them, It's not only the UK regulator, but the European regulator and the World Health Organization who say that this is an extremely rare A side effect, the vaccine is safe and we know that it's effective.
Speaker 1: Are we going to be giving advice to wear face coverings of some kind or not? Well, again, on that, the advice, from the government hasn't changed. Of course, we keep all these things under review. And because this is a Novel virus because it's new, we're constantly updating the science, but as we learn more from here and from around the world. So the scientists have, have been looking at this, this question of face masks throughout their, clearly The the the most important setting way for face masks is in hospitals where you need the really the high spec face masks, and, and also in care homes, and then in some other environments as well we also recommend but
Speaker 0: of course There's a benefit to all of us of getting vaccinated because it stops you transmitting the disease, it reduces the chance that you'll pass it on to your loved ones And for all of us, it's our route back to normal. You know, we back the scientists and they've done a great job and, and actually, you know, we don't often praise regulators, but the MHRA, you know, they would not approve a vaccine unless It was safe and effective, but by working incredibly hard, they've been able to, they've been able to do this and, You know, what it means for people is we now you know, we've got a vaccine. Help is on its way, and we can see our way out of this, this terrible situation.
Speaker 1: And it is important to point out, isn't it, the UK regulator, they are independent. They can't be pressured. They're they're independent.
Speaker 0: That's right. It is absolutely clear That because we are leaving, because we've left the EU, I was able to change the law so that the UK alone Could make this authorization decision. So because we've left the EU, we've been able to move faster, yet it still be done with all of the safety checks, that would have been done anyway.
@CRRJA5 - 🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅
Remember this from Fauci May 16, 2021, Dr. Anthony Fauci claims that COVID vaccination turns the person vaccinated into a "dead end" for the virus. Boy was he WRONG and he should be held accountable for his lies #FauciLiedMillionsDied
Video Transcript AI Summary
Getting vaccinated not only protects your health and your family's, but it also helps the community by stopping the spread of the virus. When you get vaccinated, you become a dead end for the virus, preventing it from going anywhere. This leads to a significant decrease in infection rates within the community. That's why we strongly encourage and want people to get vaccinated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is absolutely the case, and that's the reason why we say, when you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health, that of the family, but, also, you contribute to the community health by preventing the spread of the virus throughout the community. In other words, you become a dead end to the virus. And when there are a lot of dead ends around, the virus is not gonna go anywhere. And that's when you get a point that you have a markedly diminished rate of infection in the community. And that's exactly the reason, and you said it very well, of why we encourage people and want people to get vaccinated.
@ClayTravis - Clay Travis
This is the best video I’ve seen on @twitter. Watch it. Have any of these people apologized for being 100% wrong on covid and “the science?” Trust me, watch it: https://t.co/NnsmOCMMsT
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video emphasizes the importance of vaccination and the risks associated with being unvaccinated. It repeatedly states that no one is safe from COVID-19 until everyone is vaccinated. The speakers express frustration and anger towards the unvaccinated, suggesting they should be banned from certain places and denied healthcare. They argue that the unvaccinated are a threat to society and are responsible for the ongoing pandemic. The video also mentions breakthrough cases among vaccinated individuals but emphasizes that vaccination reduces the risk of severe illness and death. It concludes by urging people to get vaccinated and join the fight against COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We wanna make sure that people can discern the truth from the misinformation, and we wanna make sure that everyone understands that no one's safe till everyone's safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe.
Speaker 1: No one is safe. No
Speaker 0: one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. Nobody is safe. This is
Speaker 2: a post 9 11 axiom. Safer but not yet safe.
Speaker 0: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe from COVID nineteen until everyone is safe.
Speaker 2: If the whole world isn't safe, none of us are safe.
Speaker 0: No one is safe.
Speaker 1: No one is safe. Nobody is
Speaker 2: safe until we're all safe.
Speaker 1: Health experts have been saying nobody is safe.
Speaker 0: Nobody is safe until everybody is safe. Nobody is safe. Science just clear. None of us are safe. There is no safety.
Speaker 1: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe.
Speaker 2: No one is safe until everyone is safe. No one's safe.
Speaker 0: Nobody is safe. Safe. Nobody's safe.
Speaker 2: No one's safe. We'll never be safe. Until we're all safe. We are never gonna be safe.
Speaker 0: 99.5% of people are safe and will survive COVID nineteen. The only positive thing out of this is we should be able to manufacture a lot of seen 10. Nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. You don't have a choice. As long as not everybody is vaccinated, nobody will be safe.
Normalcy We'll see only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population. So Get
Speaker 1: the fucking vaccine. You need to get vaccinated. Vaccinated. And if you don't, you are going to die. I know you're vaccinated.
You're the smart ones, but you know there's people out there who aren't listening to God and what God wants. You know who they are.
Speaker 0: The unvaccinated people. My message to unvaccinated Americans is this.
Speaker 2: If you are the unvaccinated, you are the problem. You'll
Speaker 0: fucking dead. I'm saying no. Blame. The only people that you can blame are the unvaccinated.
Speaker 1: Frankly, we can't trust the unvaccinated.
Speaker 0: They should not be part of Polite society. Lunatics who won't take COVID vaccines walking around lawfully unvaccinated are psychotic. If you're willing to walk among us unvaccinated, you are an safe. You have no right not to be vaccinated. You don't have the right to contaminate someone.
You can't go around pointing a gun in somebody's face, which is what it is when people are unvaccinated. They are all all idiots and losers. This is a real movement
Speaker 2: in this country against the unvaccinated. Jennifer Aniston is cutting non vaccinated people out of her life. Unrepentant, unvaccinated.
Speaker 0: They should be removed from the hospital. Those who refuse to be vaccinated should be denied health care. Vaccinated person having a heart attack, yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you.
Unvaccinated guy, rest in peace, wheezy. You're
Speaker 2: Some doctors are saying they'll refuse treatment For people who'd scooned not to get the shot. Why are hospital and ICU resources going to them? Morons.
Speaker 0: You'll not get the shot. Vaccinated clowns. Idiots who think that they can do their own research.
Speaker 3: Don't do any of your own research.
Speaker 1: Doing your own research is associated with conspiracy theory safe.
Speaker 0: This go it alone approach doing your own research that can have serious consequences. You should get prison time for even questioning the vaccines. Can we all stop saying, I need to do my own research? That phrase, do your own research, 4 words, 4 little words that are hurting America. Doing your own research hurts America.
Everybody has a supercomputer in their hand that empowers them to do their own research, and that's the problem. You must not do your own research. There. I need to do my own research. I don't have never understand what that means.
I'm doing my own research.
Speaker 1: You can't do your own research unless you're a scientist. Safe. Come do your own research.
Speaker 2: Maybe you've told yourself you're planning it safe. You just wanna wait and see since this is a new vaccine. Now.
Speaker 1: Blow the up and get the vaccine.
Speaker 0: Unvaccinated people spread the virus. It's a vaccine, you dopes. Don't be a Get yourself vaccinated. That's just all there is pooped. There's no excuse.
No excuse for being unvaccinated. There's no rational and no emotional argument that adds up against getting your damn shot. There's a there's a
Speaker 1: But you made a conscious decision not to get the vaccine. I also have natural immunity. So for me, personally, safe. This vaccine poses a greater risk than a benefit. I'm also not a risk to any of you.
Let's look at the science.
Speaker 0: So we see that the natural infection is given greater protection or slightly greater protection done vaccination.
Speaker 1: This is a vaccine that was created to prevent severity of disease and to prevent hospitalizations, but the Steam does not prevent you from getting COVID and does not prevent you from transmitting Oh, my goodness. Reality out. We have seen that stuff. Come on. No.
It'll go to Fox safe till everyone's safe. No one is
Speaker 0: safe. Safe. When we've poked at, we'll be new. You're gonna be safe from the COVID infected you. Safe.
Speaker 2: The virus stopped with every vaccinated person.
Speaker 0: Do it so you stop spreading a terrible disease. And that seen. Our key goal is to stop the transmission so that you get almost no almost no, infection going on whatsoever. Expectation for vaccines seems as not to get infected.
Speaker 2: A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them.
Speaker 0: When the virus gets to you, you stop stopping. You're not gonna catch it. You're not gonna get sick. You're not gonna transmit it. The vaccine is absolutely bulletproof.
Speaker 1: Vaccines block you from getting and giving the virus. 100% effective in preventing COVID.
Speaker 0: The vaccine prevents you from getting infected.
Speaker 1: It is
Speaker 2: to keep you from getting it and then spreading it.
Speaker 1: We safe. Have the ability to stop COVID in its tracks.
Speaker 0: You're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Quaidant tests positive for COVID nineteen. When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected. Doctor Fauci tests positive for COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: Vaccinated people do not carrying the virus, don't get sick.
Speaker 0: CDC director tests positive for COVID nineteen. Seeing. Pfizer CEO test positive for COVID. Pfizer CEO test positive for COVID again. CDC director safe.
Test positive for COVID again. Fauci test positive for COVID again. Joe Biden test positive for COVID again.
Speaker 1: Cases up 258%, safe. The majority of these cases are among the vaccinated, and this area is the most vaccinated part of Massachusetts.
Speaker 0: So many fully vaccinated. People are testing positive.
Speaker 1: So people here are a bit angry.
Speaker 0: We are all really concerned about what this means long term. I was vaccinated, and I got COVID. Safe. Almost everyone we know with vaccinations had at least 1 bout of it. Our vaccines work better, then we could have possibly hoped they would work.
Speaker 1: We are not the problem. The problem are the unvaccinated.
Speaker 0: The unvaccinated threat. Unvaccinated people are a threat, a direct threat, a threat to all of us. Getting a risk to all of us.
Speaker 1: People have a right to be protected from the unvaccinated.
Speaker 0: Maybe there should be laws that allow them to be kept out of the building. So at least, thankfully, they're not breathing same error. Their freedom to breathe will diminish. Start firing the unvaccinated. If
Speaker 2: you don't vaccinate, you'll be fired.
Speaker 0: Time to come down on the unvaccinated. They should be banned from the VA, banned from restaurants, banned from other businesses and colleges. Companies should not treat us as equal. Sedating people under arrest. It
Speaker 2: is the unvaccinated that has put America in the place that it is.
Speaker 0: We are losing freedom because people are unvaccinated. Forced to unvaccinated. I'm curious that the unvaccinated. Frustrated with Americans. Still not vaccinated.
Not to be vaccinated. Seems criminal. Suspects faced. Years behind bars for coughing on police officers. Freedom.
For them. Charged with terrorist threats. You have no individual rights when it comes to the vaccine.
Speaker 1: Really, you're killing other people.
Speaker 0: You're being attacked by unvaccinated. Unvaccinated who aren't wearing masks. It's the unvaccinated who aren't social distancing. It's the unvaccinated going to crowded indoor events. It is not your right as an American citizen to catch and transmit a potentially fatal infection.
Don't screw you, Freedom. We can coerce you.
Speaker 1: You're not going to be able to travel severe. If someone in your family isn't vaccinated, should you ask them not to show up?
Speaker 0: Yes. You really shouldn't have anyone unvaccinated come to dinner. That's just a huge risk.
Speaker 1: If you wanna Come out into public. If you wanna live your life, you need to get the vaccination.
Speaker 0: It's time for people to see vaccination as literally necessary. You should have To show that you're vaccinated in order to go places. Unvaccinated. Can't travel to the US.
Speaker 1: If you're not vaccinated, you're not welcome.
Speaker 0: Our patience is wearing thin. Why hasn't the president focused more on taking the Unvaccinated. Refusal has caused all of us.
Speaker 2: Continued damage the unvaccinated are doing to themselves and the country.
Speaker 0: How come migrants are allowed to come into this country unvaccinated, but world class tennis players are not.
Speaker 1: You know
Speaker 0: And, back to our lead story, the pandemic of the unvaccinated. Fact is this is a pandemic
Speaker 2: of the unvaccinated experts. Call it pandemic of the unvaccinated.
Speaker 0: It's still a pandemic of the unvaccinated. The disease of the unvaccinated.
Speaker 2: It is the unvaccinated who are the problem. Period. End of story.
Speaker 0: The unvaccinated also put our economy at risk. This is a tyranny of the unvaccinated right now. The unvaccinated, not the vaccinated. Unvaccinated. That's the problem.
That's the pandemic. The unvaccinated. Pandemic of the unvaccinated. All this is a pandemic of the safe. The only pandemic we have is among the unvaccinated pandemic because the unvaccinated.
Speaker 1: When you get the vaccine, you will not die. That's right. That's right.
Speaker 0: It's a simple, basic proposition. If you're vaccinated, you are not gonna die. If you're vaccinated, you don't have a risk. It's as simple as black and white.
Speaker 1: You are not going to die if you are vaccinated. That's it. Full stop.
Speaker 0: You're unvaccinated, you're at risk. You're vaccinated. You're safe. A majority of Americans dying from coronavirus are vaccinated. COVID nineteen isn't the pandemic of the unvaccinated anymore.
We didn't really understand the fatality rate. You know, we didn't understand that it's A fairly low fatality rate and that it's a disease mainly of the elderly, kind of like flu is, although a bit different. We We have 2 Americas, an unvaccinated at risk America and a vaccinated America.
Speaker 1: I wear my vaccinated necklace all the time to Say I'm vaccinated.
Speaker 2: You, the vaccinated, are the last best hope to overcome the unvaccinated minority.
Speaker 1: I need you to be my apostle. I need you to go out And talked
Speaker 2: about it. We are seeking to enlist you in a benevolent conspiracy to join in the unfinished war against the sins of the unvaccinated. Native. And it's a war forever war. The war against COVID nineteen.
Speaker 3: The vaccine hesitancy on Earth 2 has the potential to compromise all of the hard fought progress that we've made here on earth one.
Speaker 0: This is the greatest threat to life that we have ever faced.
Speaker 1: Metropolitan areas are now banning all private gatherings. This bar owner arrested for reopening illegally.
Speaker 0: Unvaccinated. We are looking at a woman of severe illness and death. Death. For yourselves, your families. If the unvaccinated are not to blame, who is?
If only we had a vaccine against is. So part of preparing for hurricane season is to get vaccinated now. Everything is more complicated if you're not vaccinated in a hurricane.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
Hey @HowardStern, do you remember when you wanted to force people to get vaccinated and said 'Fuck ’em, fuck their freedom'? I do too...
Video Transcript AI Summary
Several radio personalities who were against getting vaccinated died, regretting their decision on their deathbeds. One of them, Marc Berniari, was particularly vocal about his refusal to get vaccinated. The speaker expresses a lack of compassion for those who choose not to get vaccinated and questions why the country tolerates such ignorance. They argue for mandatory vaccinations, prioritizing their own freedom to live and engage in activities like playing chess and taking pictures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But it's really funny when these radio the radio guys were the best. It was like 4 of them died. 4 of them, we were, like, ranting on the air, they will not get vaccinated. They were on fire these guys. It was like day after day, they were all dying.
And then their dying words are, I wish I had been more into the vaccine. I wish I had taken it.
Speaker 1: You know, I have trouble drumming up compassion And I think that's a terrible thing, to not be able to drum up compassion for people that Stupid that they wind up dying.
Speaker 0: Where do I have that clip of that Marc Berniari guy? Berni Aire, the guy who died. Oh, I got it. Here it is. This is the guy, you know, you know, I'm not getting the vaccine.
Fuck. But that's the guy who died. That's a great question and we were gonna talk about that as far as the vaccine goes, you know. What about you? I'm not taking it.
Come on! Are you kidding me, Mr. Anti VAC? Cheapers. Ever?
Cheapers. Make them. Yeah. Anti vaxx. Mister anti vaxx.
Speaker 1: He died?
Speaker 0: Yeah. He's dead. He's no longer walks, but there there were 3 other guys too. I don't have tape of all of them. He's and they're on the radio preaching this shit.
I'll tell you what. As far as I remember, when I went to school, you had to get a measles vaccine, you had to get a mumps vaccine, you had to get it was a ton of them you got. Yes, ma'am. Yes, ma'am. Yes, ma'am.
Yes, ma'am.
Speaker 1: In order to go to school, you have to have certain vaccines.
Speaker 0: When are we gonna stop putting up with the idiots in this country And just say, you now it's mandatory to get vaccinated. Fuck them. Fuck their freedom. I want my freedom to live. Wanna get out of the house already.
I mean, I I wanna go to next door and play chess. I wanna go take some picture
@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold
We heard a lot about disinformation during the pandemic. The greatest purveyor of disinformation by far was Dr. Fauci, and he must be held accountable. https://t.co/VkX9p6Y1iD
Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House blames a few bad actors for spreading online misinformation. The speaker disagrees with the idea that wearing masks is the best way to prevent infectious diseases. They mention that getting vaccinated provides the best protection against infection. The speaker also addresses the misconception that vaccines can make people worse. They mention the possibility of future challenges in infectious diseases and the need for rapid response to new threats. The speaker denies funding gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology and denies lying before Congress.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: White House pointed to an aggressive online misinformation effort by a handful of bad actors. Misinformation on social media is counting people. Do you agree?
Speaker 1: Best way for me to prevent getting an infectious disease is what? Wearing a mask? No. No. No.
Right now, people should not be there's no reason to be walking around with a mask. Should you be wearing 2 masks or 1 mask. There's nothing wrong with people wearing 2 masks. Can we make a general that doesn't have scientific basis yet? No.
Please wear a mask. The optimal degree of protection, what you get Infection is to get vaccinated. Well, if she got the flu for 14 days, she's as protected as anybody can be because the best vaccination is to get infected Did yourself. If you're vaccinated, you really don't need to worry about Getting it in a way that's serious or transmitting it. The risk is extremely low of getting infected, of getting sick, or of transmitting it to anybody else.
When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected.
Speaker 0: Doctor Fauci says he has COVID again for the 2nd time in 2 weeks.
Speaker 1: Does the vaccine make you worse? What well, the latter part of what you just said is untrue. You don't get worse results from vaccinating. So worst Possible thing you could do is vaccinate somebody to prevent infection and actually make them worse. No question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, But also there will be a surprise outbreak.
But also there will be a surprise outbreak. Anyway, so let me just go on about NIH lifts funding pause on gain of function research. I don't think this is gonna be foolproof. Things are gonna slip through. Thing that I Aspirationally, hope to be able to encounter is the ability to rapidly respond to something brand new, Whether it's a brand new pandemic or, as you mentioned, a brand new a brand new attack upon us deliberately by Bioterror, A brand new attack upon us deliberately by BioTerror.
We did not fund gain of function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute A virology. Senator Paul, I have never lied before the congress.
@tulloch1978 - Hello Dave
@MakisMD @JonelessHomes The "vaccines" are causing widespread death and destruction. https://t.co/pjTazhUeo6
@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe
Woah @pfizer
@KenPaxtonTX - Attorney General Ken Paxton
BREAKING:🚨 I am suing Pfizer for misrepresenting Covid-19 vaccine efficacy and conspiring to censor public discourse. https://t.co/63mZ1y6FNC
@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti
I was banned from twitter for almost 2 years for saying this in 2021. Now in the UK Parliament & NOT debunked. I was right, twitter fact checkers were wrong. 17m lives lost later.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent encounter at the airport, I expressed my belief to Adam Schiff that he should retire from politics after his Senate race. I find his constant dishonesty towards the American people troubling. Additionally, Schiff's involvement in the Russian collusion investigation and the J6 committee raises concerns about his actions. It's worth noting that he is now targeting Elon Musk, who supports free speech.
@alexbruesewitz - Alex Bruesewitz 🇺🇸
Just ran into @AdamSchiff at the airport. I told him that he should retire from American politics for good once he loses his senate race because he’s a sick man who constantly lies to the American people. As you can see in the video I’m very kind and respectful! https://t.co/PMdBB1Znfy
@alexbruesewitz - Alex Bruesewitz 🇺🇸
Adam Schiff is a sick man who should’ve been expelled from Congress a long time ago. He defrauded the American taxpayers with his bogus Russian collusion witch hunt and then did it again with the sham J6 committee. He is also now targeting @elonmusk because Elon stands for free speech. https://www.infowars.com/posts/democrats-ignore-first-amendment-with-censorship-demand-letter-to-x/
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: A user criticizes @ShoshUMD for a past prediction about COVID deaths, claiming that vaccinated people are now primarily dying. They ask when she will fact-check her own article.
Post 2: The user finds irony in a statement made by @ShoshUMD about chest compressions, as vaccinated athletes are now experiencing this.
Post 3: A user expresses opposition to amnesty.
Post 4: The user calls out @ShoshUMD.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
Good morning, @ShoshUMD. Three years ago, you falsely predicted that 'deaths would almost exclusively be among the unvaccinated'. Now, it's primarily the vaccinated people who are dying. When do you plan to fact-check your own article? https://t.co/YSWwXuOp5L
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
What’s ironic is the way she tried to gaslight us: “If your heart stops beating, you will receive chest compressions where ribs often crack under the pressure, which is often very painful, and if you survive, it can be traumatic.” Many vaccinated athletes experience this now.
reSee.it AI Summary
Since May 2021, I've been labeled a misinformation spreader for expressing concerns about the safety of COVID vaccines. Recent medical peer-reviewed literature supports my claims. Who or what can I trust if not the established scientific literature? Those who refuse to debate and rely on peer-reviewed science should now acknowledge my stance.
@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch
People have said I'm a misinformation spreader because since May 2021, I have been publicly saying the COVID vaccines are not safe. Now the medical peer-reviewed literature shows I was right. Do you believe me now? https://cureus.com/articles/203052-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-lessons-learned-from-the-registrational-trials-and-global-vaccination-campaign#!/…
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign
Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the interim, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of these pivotal trials have emerged. Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards. Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data. The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted. Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.
cureus.com
@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch
Oh, and if the medical peer-reviewed literature is wrong, then please tell me who or what can I trust? And people who won't debate me and say science is decided in the peer-reviewed literature must now agree with me since the latest literature shows I was right.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Dear Rishi Sunak @RishiSunak Last week you stated unequivocally “that Covid Vaccines are safe” This is Kyoto University Professor Emeritus Masanori Fukushima regarding Covid Vaccines stating - “It’s Murder - you could say a massacre has occurred” Someone’s lying….. https://t.co/OBjNHtQhET
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Let's say it clearly, it's murder. We can even call it a massacre. We have to say it, even if it's extreme. If we don't, people might not wake up to what's happening. Each and every citizen needs to understand that democracy is at stake. The only option we have is to speak up and tell the truth as it is.
Translation: Let's say it clearly, it's murder. We can even call it a massacre. We have to say it, even if it's extreme. If we don't, people might not wake up to what's happening. Each and every citizen needs to understand that democracy is at stake. The only option we have is to speak up and tell the truth as it is.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: あえて 言い ましょう 殺 人 ですよ 虐 殺 が起きた って言って もいい あえて ね そこまで 過 激 な ことを 言わない と みんな 覚醒 しない かもしれない 何が 起こっている か 国民 一人ひとり が、 民主主義 というのは マ ホ ラ ないといけない ため なんです それは 発言 しかない 真実 を あり のまま に 伝える しかない んです
@BlackTomThePyr8 - Tom Czerniawski
@RepRobertGarcia Hello Robert. You claim here that COVID-19 being a bio-weapon is a conspiracy theory. The following documents prove you lied: https://t.co/1TPumhsw3R
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
17,000,000+ died from the vaccine, This is not an accident. It's genocide! https://t.co/Aga2EmYBO6
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the pandemic, researchers found that all-cause mortality increased in countries after COVID-19 vaccine rollouts. A study showed 17 million deaths worldwide were linked to vaccines, with a higher fatality rate among the elderly. No evidence of vaccine benefits was found in the data. Booster rollouts coincided with peaks in deaths across multiple countries, including the US. The report suggests sharing this information with those considering the vaccine to help them make an informed decision.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These are the deaths that happened in Malaysia. It's a country in Southeast Asia. Scientists wanted to study what happened to the overall death rate during the pandemic. The deaths clearly increased, but, look, this is where the pandemic was declared and this is when the vaccine program rolled out. Same thing happened in 9 other countries.
Here's Australia, New Zealand. The Philippines. Singapore, Thailand. After studying over a dozen countries in the southern hemisphere, the scientists concluded that after 13 and a half 1000000000 COVID vaccines that were given out worldwide, 17,000,000 people lost their lives from vaccines alone. And the death rate data for the elderly was just shocking.
Welcome to Frontline Health. I'm Dan Skorbach. In a new report that's yet to be peer reviewed, Canadian scientists looked at the pandemic from a 1,000 foot view. They wanted to see how much the pandemic affected all cause mortality. You have to dissect each and every single person who died for any reason and looked at the body under a microscope.
Then you could see if they died from COVID or not. On the other hand, the authors explained you can look at the big picture, the metadata, meaning look at the all cause mortality, which basically means that the scientists remove the reasons for the deaths and look at death itself as a measure. Did more people die in this period of time? Then it's easy to tell if our approach to solving a pandemic worked on a population level or it didn't. So the best way to measure what happened during the pandemic is to look at all cause mortality.
And these scientists were also interested in how the data turned out during another event, specifically during the rollout of COVID 19 vaccines. You see, their initial research showed some shocking correlations between vaccine rollout and people dying, but some people argued that it might be just a seasonal effect. For example, the vaccines were rolled out in some countries in January February and that coincides with the flu season, So this time, the scientists looked at a much larger subset of data and measured what happened in the countries that had vaccines rolled out in different seasons, even during summer, which is way outside the flu season. So let's look at the report. First, they found that in all countries that were included in their analysis, all cause mortality increased every time the COVID 19 vaccines were deployed.
2nd, 9 out of the 17 countries had no detectable excess death right after the March 11th, 2020 event. That's when the World Health Organization declared the pandemic, and these countries didn't have excess deaths up until the COVID 19 vaccination campaign began. 3rd, unprecedented peaks in all cause mortality were observed in January February 2022. This coincided with or followed the rollout of boosters in 15 of the 17 countries studied. And while it was winter in North America, in those months, it was summer in most of the South America.
So the flu season was not a factor there at all. 4, excess all cause mortality during the vaccination period beginning January 2021 was 1,74,000 deaths across all ages and countries. That makes it one death for every 800 injections. And 5, the vaccine dose fatality rate increased exponentially with age, reaching almost 5% among those 90 years and older who received a 4th vaccine dose, which translates to 1 in 20 deaths from COVID vaccines among the elderly. Dennis Rancourt, one of the authors of the study, told The Epoch Times in an email that, quote, there is no evidence in the hard data of all cause mortality of a beneficial effect from the COVID 19 vaccine rollouts.
No lives were saved. Researchers also looked for a counterexample. Maybe there were places that showed that COVID 19 vaccines improved the all cause mortality, but they could not find a single country with such trends. According to the report, data from numerous countries such as India, Australia, Canada, Israel, and the United States show a similar phenomenon. The peaks in all cause mortality coincide with booster rollouts every time.
In the United States, specifically, deaths were prominent in the 25 to 64 age group in 21 states, coinciding with a rapid surge in vaccines given during the vaccine equity campaigns launched by regulatory agencies. Researchers estimated that the United States had about 160,000 excess deaths in that age group during a period where over 60,000,000 COVID-nineteen vaccine doses were given out. So if your friend or family member is thinking about or being pressured into getting a COVID-nineteen vaccine, please share this report with them so that they can make an informed decision. This is Frontline Health. I'm Dan Skorbach.
Stay healthy America.
@DC_Draino - DC_Draino
Remember when these 3 idiots told us “the science is clear” “These vaccines will protect you and those you love from this dangerous and deadly disease” Humiliating! https://t.co/tz1J1OYE3w
Video Transcript AI Summary
The COVID-19 vaccines are available to millions of Americans and will soon be available to everyone. The science shows that these vaccines can protect you and your loved ones from this deadly disease. Getting vaccinated is crucial in ending the pandemic and progressing as a nation. It's your choice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our fellow Americans Right now, the COVID 19 vaccines are available to millions of Americans. And soon, they will be available to everyone. The The science is clear. These vaccines will protect you and those you love from this dangerous and deadly disease. They could save your life.
So we urge you to get vaccinated when it's available to you. That's the first step to ending the pandemic and moving our country forward. It's up to you.
@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
Democrats are calling us conspiracy theorists about Fauci and Covid. Here’s proof of Fauci’s lies. https://t.co/MzPK5zkE24
Video Transcript AI Summary
The origin of the virus is debated, with some suggesting a lab leak in China. The NIH denies funding gain of function research in Wuhan, but acknowledges funding research on a bat coronavirus. The debate centers on whether the research involved gain of function, which aims to increase transmissibility to humans. Accusations are exchanged, with one party claiming misinformation and the other calling for prosecution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where did this virus come from, do you think, today? Did it come from a lab? Was it man made? When you have the animal human interface and you have animals that come out of the wild that are sold at these open, what they call them, wet market Place of origin was not within the market itself. No.
I don't think you could say that.
Speaker 1: There's a report today that another intelligence arm of the US government, this is inside our energy department, has joined the FBI in concluding that COVID began with a lab leak in China.
Speaker 0: That the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research
Speaker 1: in the Wuhan Institute. We now know that a bat coronavirus was enhanced in a lab. The National Institutes of Health acknowledged that it funded research of a virus that was studied at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The experiment unexpectedly, we're told, made a bat coronavirus more contagious than the original naturally occurring one.
Speaker 2: Take an animal virus and
Speaker 0: you increase the trans ability to humans. Right.
Speaker 2: You're saying that's not gain a phone?
Speaker 0: Yeah. That is correct. And and, senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly, and I wanna say that officially. You do not know what you are talking about.
Speaker 2: They took animal viruses that only occur in animals, and they increased their transmissibility to humans. How you can say that is not gain of function? It is
Speaker 0: not. What we're talking about now is the gain of function research in studies that increase predominantly the transmissibility as well as pathogenesis and alteration of host range of the virus. But he's lying here, senator. It is you. I have to laugh at that.
I should be prosecuted.
@craigkellyXXX - Craig Kelly
Why is it that biggest spreaders of "Misinformation" over the past few years are the very same people that are now demanding the suppression & censorship of the free speech of those that would hold them to account ? https://t.co/KvrtNOGtij
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's easy to blame those who believe or spread mis/disinformation. Governments, internet, and social media companies have a responsibility to prevent the spread of harmful lies and promote access to accurate health information. The WHO is working with partners, companies, and researchers to understand how misinformation and disinformation spreads, who is targeted, how they are influenced, and what can be done to counter this problem.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's easy to blame, dismiss, ridicule, or insult those who believe or spread mis or disinformation. To be sure, governments and internet and social media companies have a responsibility to prevent the spread of harmful lies and promote access to accurate health information. WHO is working with a range of partners, companies, and researchers, and partners to understand how misinformation and disinformation spreads, who is targeted, how they are influenced, and what we can do to counter this problem.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
Hey @piersmorgan, you discriminated against the unvaccinated for four years, and when I posted screenshots of your vile tweets, you blocked me instead of offering an apology. Why are you so afraid to debate me respectfully about the statements you made? https://t.co/rTMgqvp2Ep
@mazemoore - MAZE
Never forget what Adam Schiff did to this country with his lies about Russian collusion. The damage he caused is immeasurable. It's to America's great shame that he is still in office. https://t.co/MiSfzjdwkk
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is ample evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, with significant findings in the public domain. The president and his associates may be compromised by foreign powers, and there are persistent allegations of Russian money laundering through the Trump organization. While there is direct evidence of deception, it's important to note that there is no hard evidence of collusion at this moment. Circumstantial evidence exists, and it can be powerful. The Trump campaign welcomed Russian assistance, incorporated it into their strategy, and failed to report it, while also being deceptive about their actions. There is more than just circumstantial evidence, but specifics cannot be disclosed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I did say that there is ample evidence, and indeed there is, of collusion of people in the Trump campaign with the Russians. There's clear evidence, on the issue of collusion. There is ample evidence of collusion in plain sight. Plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy. And there is significant evidence of collusion.
The president is someone who seems pathologically incapable of telling the truth. This president or people around him may be compromised by a foreign power. Have you seen, do you have direct evidence of collusion with Russia? There is direct evidence. There is abundant evidence of collusion.
Persistent allegations that the Russians have been laundering money through the Trump organization. Continues to believe Russian, propaganda, that makes him dangerous to our country. Donald Trump and his campaign colluded with the Russians. There is ample evidence of collusion. There is significant evidence, much of it in the public domain on the issue of collusion.
Certainly say with confidence that there is significant evidence of collusion. Apple evidence in the public domain on the issue of collusion. There is circumstantial evidence of collusion. There is direct evidence, I think, of deception. Russians gave help and the president made full use of that help and that is pretty damning.
Any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. There is circumstantial evidence certainly of collusion or coordination. There has been direct evidence of deception. But to be crystal clear, this evening as we speak, there is no hard evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian. You you said there are circumstantial evidence.
You know, I would not say I would not phrase it the way that you did and circumstantial evidence can be very powerful and is hard evidence. Kind of corrupt coordination of effort between the Trump campaign and the Russians. Trump campaign welcomed Russian help built it into their campaign plan, never reported it, and made full use of it and then lied about it. I don't wanna go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial. But you admit it's a circum all you have right now is a circumstantial case.
Actually, no, Chuck. I I can tell you that the case is more than that, and I can't go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now. So, again, I think So you have indirect evidence of collusion? I don't wanna go into specifics but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial.
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
Adam Schiff should be indicted and spend his life in prison for his role in crafting the fake Russian Collusion Narrative and the years of wasted money and the effect it had on eroding confidence in our institutions. https://t.co/G6Bm3L3ITV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues the case is more than circumstantial: 'there is more than circumstantial evidence now' and 'there is evidence not only to have been initiated but for it to continue'. He rejects the view there is no evidence of collusion, saying 'They can call it a fishing expedition. They can call it a witch hunt. It's all in a line message with the White House.' He states 'Christopher Steele may have found out even before our own intelligence agencies that the Russians were in fact aiming to help Donald Trump in the election' and that this 'has now been borne out by ample evidence.' He cites 'the Logan Act' as evidence and says 'the evidence is in plain sight.' The Senate intel chairman also said, at this point, no evidence of collusion, but he counters: 'I think there is direct evidence.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I
Speaker 1: think But you admit it's a circum all you have right now is a circumstantial
Speaker 0: case? Actually, no, Chuck. I I can tell you that the case is more than that. And I can't go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now. So again, I think
Speaker 1: direct evidence of collusion?
Speaker 0: I don't want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial and and is very much worthy of investigation. So
Speaker 2: Is there has been a report from CNN that Wednesday night that there that the FBI was looking into collusion with with the Russians and the Trump campaign in terms of spreading information about Hillary Clinton's campaign. Is do you have any information to back that up?
Speaker 0: I'm not sure that I can comment on that. I can't say that I think that the investigation that the director talked about at our Monday hearing is justified. I think there is a sufficient basis for that investigation not only to have been initiated but for it to continue at this point. And I don't have a concern with other members characterizing the evidence as they have and many of them have said they think there's no evidence of collusion. My disagreement with those members is I don't think that's accurate.
Okay. And I feel an obligation to say so. So they can call it a fishing expedition. They can call it a witch hunt. It's all in a line message with the White House.
But nonetheless, real evidence is coming forward that just can't be ignored. So we do know a lot more. I I think the claims that there was no evidence collusion have long since fallen away. The question now is what is the the quantum of proof here? Christopher Steele may have found out even before our own intelligence agencies that the Russians were in fact aiming to help Donald Trump in the election.
That has now been borne out by ample evidence. I think you see the most palpable evidence of a collusion in terms of violating the Logan Act. Look, I don't think you can seriously argue that the Russians weren't trying to help Trump and hurt Clinton, as well as so discord in The United States. The evidence is quite overwhelming on this. It was the early conclusion of the intelligence community, but that's only been furthered by all of the evidence we've seen in our investigation.
And
Speaker 3: Put out statement and a report basically saying that they found no evidence of collusion between the Trump team, and the Russian government. Have Democrats found any evidence of collusion?
Speaker 0: Yes. We have.
Speaker 4: Can you agree that there has been no evidence of collusion coordination or conspiracy that has been presented thus far between the Trump campaign and Russia?
Speaker 0: No. I don't agree with that at all. I think there's plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight, that it is very possible that the best evidence, is yet to come. But look, you can see evidence in plain sight, on the issue of collusion. George, there's ample evidence of collusion, of the campaign and its
Speaker 4: The senate intel chairman also said, at this point, no evidence of collusion at this point. Have you seen do you have direct evidence of collusion with Russia?
Speaker 0: Well, I think there is direct evidence. While there is abundant evidence of collusion, but as I've said along, there's plenty of evidence of collusion, and you've said on this show and others that there is direct evidence of collusion. Were you wrong about that now that you've seen the summary of the Tesla Council's report? No. Because they were saying no collusion.
Speaker 4: Your evidence? You've been saying that on TV for years.
Speaker 0: Well, I will tell you, and we and I've also been saying, as you know, that the evidence is in plain sight.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that people have died and suffered serious injuries due to these vaccines, and those responsible should be held accountable. The science behind the public broadcasts seems to prioritize pharmaceutical interests over public health. Lives are at stake.
@GTIATJohn316 - Kat Has Had Enough
People died and were seriously injured by these vaccines based on these representations. They should all have to answer for what the 'science' was that they based the public broadcast on. This was not done in the public interest. It was done to further the interest of their pharmaceutical advertisers. People have died. @POTUS @DOGE @BrendanCarrFCC
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation begins with a call for the media to apologize for slandering unvaccinated Americans, suggesting distrust in their reporting. In response, another participant claims the situation is about a global genocide rather than vaccination, warning of future deaths.
@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly
NEVER forget the media's slandering of unvaccinated Americans. They owe us all an apology. Until then, these networks should never be trusted again. https://t.co/4GV1zkJJui
Video Transcript AI Summary
The unvaccinated are the problem, period. They are the only ones to blame, and this isn't shaming, it's the truth. It's time to blame the unvaccinated, because we can't trust them. They are the threat.
Vaccinated people will start wearing masks to protect the unvaccinated, punishing the vaccinated for the sins of the unvaccinated. The unvaccinated are not behaving honorably, acting as if they can do whatever they want.
We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. The unvaccinated include children and people acting like children, and the rest of us are starting to get angry. This isn't about freedom or personal choice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The unvaccinated, you are the problem. It is the unvaccinated who are the problem, period. End of story.
Speaker 1: The only people that you can blame. The only people you can blame. This isn't shaming. This is the truth. Maybe they should be shamed, are the unvaccinated.
It's time to start blaming the unvaccinated folks, not the regular folks. Anyone you came into contact with will blame you, as will the rest of us who have done the right thing by getting vaccinated. Because frankly, we know that we can't trust the unvaccinated. I think it's time to get our moral house in order, Anderson. It's the unvaccinated who are the threat.
Speaker 0: All these vaccinated folks are gonna start wearing masks to protect the unvaccinated folks. It's called a Christian value. You're basically punishing the vaccinated, for the the sins of the unvaccinated.
Speaker 1: People are not behaving honorably. The unvaccinated are basically saying, well, it's open season for me. I can do whatever I want as well. The the unvaccinated are basically beating their breasts running around the country saying, we don't care. We're living free and so forth.
We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. The unvaccinated, a group that includes children and people acting like children. And the rest of us are starting to get pissed off. The vaccinated feel the unvaccinated are making me upset or angry. Is not about freedom or personal choice.
@DaveServed - Dave Sempire
@DiedSuddenly_ YOU ALL MISS THE MAIN POINT!!! This was NOT a call to get Vaccinated! This was a CALL for GLOBAL GENOCIDE!!! and about HALF of YOU PLAYED THEIR GAME!!! MOST of YOU RIP in the next few years Just like the 30+ Million already dead...
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
Every ‘Influencer’ that received money to promote the ‘Covid Vaccine’ must be prosecuted with aiding and abetting Mass Murder. https://t.co/vRLLxW2Pcl