reSee.it - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
Former Capitol Police Chief Sund revealed in an interview with Tucker Carlson that the FBI had intelligence on the expected violence on January 6 but did not share it with the Capitol Police. Sund also disclosed that Acting Secretary of Defense Miller and General Milley considered closing DC but never informed the Capitol Police. Sund further discussed how General Milley used an intel platform to warn Congress members about threats but did not inform the Capitol Police. Sund's requests for National Guard assistance were denied by the House and Senate Sergeant at Arms, who needed permission from Speaker Pelosi and Leader McConnell. It took Pelosi 71 minutes to approve the request after the first breach. Sund also revealed that Speaker Pelosi was off-limits for the January 6th Committee's inquiry. The intelligence that existed before January 6 was not passed to the Capitol Police. The Department of Defense delayed sending the National Guard due to optics, and they arrived after the situation was under control. The FBI did not share information about domestic terrorists coming to DC for January 6. Sund criticized Pelosi for calling for his resignation and installing Yogananda Pittman as Acting Chief. Pittman failed to provide Jan 6 intel and received a vote of no confidence. Sund emphasized that the events on January 6 could have been prevented, and the response was mishandled. He also highlighted the disparity between the treatment of the 2020 riots and the January 6 attack.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@TuckerCarlson interviews former head of @CapitolPolice on Jan 6, @ChiefSund Sund reveals @FBIWFO Director Steven D’Antuono had intel on expected Jan 6 violence for DAYS leading up to rally FBI shared NOTHING with @CapitolPolice Keep in mind, FBI had dozens of CHSes embedded
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reveals that during conference calls before the Capitol attack, no one discussed the intelligence regarding the storming of the Capitol or the potential harm to members of Congress and police officers. They mention a call on January 5th with law enforcement leaders, including the FBI and National Guard, where no one mentioned any concerns about the attack or threats. Other police chiefs, like Robert Conte, also claim they were unaware of the threats. The speaker highlights reports of emails and memos sent to the FBI and FBI director, Steve D'Antuano, predicting violence, yet nothing was mentioned during their video call. The lack of communication and awareness is perplexing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: None of the intelligence that was coming up talking about the stormy of the capital, killing members of Congress, or killing my police officers was ever discussed in those, the conference calls that I was on at least. And think of this. And so you never heard that? Never heard it. And then
Speaker 1: But how could you not have I mean, I don't work in a federal bureaucracy, but that doesn't seem to make at all.
Speaker 0: It doesn't make sense. Think about this. On January 5th, the day before the attack at 1 PM, I think it's 1 or noon, I had a conference call with the leaders of all the law enforcement, Conti from, Metropolitan Police Department, Steve D'Antuano, the, director of the Washington field office for the FBI. Nobody from DHS was on. I'd I hadn't thought about that, but all the law enforcement that was down there.
I had the military district of Washington general Omar Jones on the phone with me. I had the, head of the National Guard, William Walker, general William Walker on the call. It was a call I coordinated. Not 1 person on that call talked about any concerns for the the intelligence, the attack on the Capitol, the threats to officers, that we were seeing that was out there. That's what's that's what's scary.
And and but to
Speaker 1: be clear, do we now know for a fact that the people on that call knew about those threats and didn't mention them to you?
Speaker 0: So this is what we know, for a fact. And I'll tell you, I'm not the only chief that was in the dark. You you look at Robert Conte, head of the largest police department in Washington DC. He also said the same thing. He wasn't getting the same notifications like the Norfolk memo that came out the day before.
He didn't get it. So Steve D'Antwono, who's the Washington field office, FBI. FBI director. You look at the GAO report that came out February of this year, it talks about, multiple emails. As the GAO report or the maybe and no.
It's a senate report that just came out, in July, just last month, talks about multiple emails going to Steve D'Antuano on Sunday, Monday, and some prior Tuesday, just the days before, talking about the violence that they're predicting coming up to the capital. And I have a video call with him on that Tuesday, and nothing said about it. I I mean, that's not a word. Not a word.
Speaker 1: So not to repeat myself, but that just does not make sense.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@TuckerCarlson with head of USCP on Jan 6, @ChiefSund Sund reveals acting @SecDef Miller & @thejointstaff GEN Milley were so concerned of violence, they considered closing DC & revoking permits EXCEPT they never told @CapitolPolice & Miller ordered @NationalGuard to be unarmed https://t.co/d2EcZNGsq2
Video Transcript AI Summary
The United States military, including Secretary of Defense Miller and General Milley, discussed locking down Washington DC due to concerns of violence at the Capitol on January 6th. They considered revoking permits for demonstrations on Capitol Hill. However, I, the one who issues these permits, was not informed. Instead, on January 4th, Miller restricted the National Guard from carrying any weapons or civil disobedience equipment, which doesn't make sense. So, the military expresses worry about potential violence but simultaneously limits the National Guard's ability to take an aggressive stance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have the United States military, secretary of defense or acting secretary of defense Miller, and acting in, general, Milley, had both discussed locking down the city of Washington DC because they were so worried about violence at the capitol on January 6th on Sunday and Monday. They had been discussing locking down the city, revoking permits on Capitol Hill because of the concern for violence. You know who issues the permits on Capitol Hills for demonstrations? I do. You know, who wasn't told?
Me. Instead, on January 4th, what does Miller do? He puts out a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying the various weapons, any weapons, any civil disobedience equipment that would be utilized for the very, demonstrations or violence that he sees coming. It just doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 1: Wait, wait. So the military says we're so concerned about potential imminent violence that we war, considering shutting down the city. But at the very same time, they decide that the National Guard can't Adopt an aggressive posture.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@TuckerCarlson @ChiefSund @SecDef @thejointstaff @CapitolPolice @NationalGuard Former head of USCP on Jan 6, @ChiefSund, discusses WaPo reporter story on GEN Milley using @Dataminr intel platform to identify & warn members of Congress about possible threats Milley DIDN’T tell @CapitolPolice “This was handled differently… like they wanted it watered down” https://t.co/J2HTF9YfNU
Video Transcript AI Summary
General Milley was found to be using an intelligence platform called DataMiner, which he used to gather information about potential threats to Congress and the US Capitol. However, he did not share this intelligence with the Chief of Police or other relevant authorities. The Chief of Police expresses concern about not being informed, as it is their duty to take necessary action. They discuss how this handling of intelligence differs from previous protests and suggest that the intelligence may have been intentionally downplayed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Military. General Milley, you know, we're now now finding out, and it's not not for me. This is from Carol Lenny, you know, investigative reporter with the Washington Post, has found that he was using DataMiner on his own, coming across intelligence
Speaker 1: Tell us what DataMiner is.
Speaker 0: So DataMiner is an intelligence platform. It's not something your average citizen would have on their computer. I I guess it goes in and does, crawling across webs. I'm not really sure how it works.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: But it's not your it's a it's an intelligence platform. He's picking up intelligence talking about killing members of congress and attacking the United States capital. And he's not telling me. He's telling select members of congress. I mean, Carol Leonning writes about in her book.
That's concerning as hell because as the chief of police, you know, he's there's a duty to warn there, and I should be told so So I can take the necessary action. I don't know who else he was telling, but he sure wasn't telling me.
Speaker 1: Again, What could possibly be the explanation for that?
Speaker 0: I'm not really sure. People are
Speaker 1: You've done this for over 30 years. You're very familiar. You've been in law enforcement in DC specifically for over 30 years. So you know how the city runs. You know how the federal agencies respond to protests.
This is not the 1st violent protest.
Speaker 0: Not at all.
Speaker 1: There have been many.
Speaker 0: I've I've done many national special security events and this was handled differently. No, you know, the intelligence, no jib, no coordination, No, discussion in advance. It's almost like they wanted it to be watered down. The intelligence would be watered down for some reason.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@TuckerCarlson @ChiefSund @SecDef @thejointstaff @CapitolPolice @NationalGuard @Dataminr @TuckerCarlson & head of USCP on Jan 6, @ChiefSund: Sund reveals he was turned down 2x by House & Senate Sergeant at Arms for Nat’l Guard, starting Jan 3 SGT at Arms need permission from @SpeakerPelosi & @LeaderMcConnell Why? “Optics & lack of intel;” but FBI & DoD had intel https://t.co/LhGs83muPL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Congress passed a law (2 US, code 1970) requiring approval from the Capitol Police Board and congressional leadership in advance for bringing in national guard or federal assistance. The speaker's request for approval was denied twice by Paul Irving and Mike Stenger, who work for Pelosi and McConnell respectively. The denial was due to optics and lack of intelligence support. The speaker finds it unbelievable that they are the only chief of police with a law controlling their ability to protect the capital, even in emergencies. They highlight the absurdity of having to seek approval from the same individuals during an attack.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congress passed the law. It's 2 US, code 1970. Look it up. Just make sure you look it up before December 22 when they changed it. So what was in effect on the 6th, that requires me to go and get approval for bringing in national guard or federal assistance in advance.
I have to go to the capitol police board and get approval from congressional leadership advance, like I did on January 3rd. I'm denied twice because of optics and because the intelligence didn't support it. So think about that. May I ask you a question? Who made that decision?
Who denied you? I was denied by Paul Irving, house sergeant arms, and also Mike Stenger, senate sergeant arms. On January 3rd Who do they work for? It would have been working for Pelosi on the house side, that Pelosi was his number one boss, and then McConnell on the senate side. So then Effectively, Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi shut down your request.
My request was shut down, 1, because of because of optics, is interesting. You're gonna hear that term come up a couple more times. Optics over the look of the National Guard on the hill. But yeah. And the Capitol Police Board I mean, it it's it's unbelievable that I'm I'm the only chief of police in the United States that has a law preventing me.
Not just regulations, rules that say, I gotta go and need approval to bring in the national park, a law. That's crazy that congress is gonna pass a law that controls what I can do to protect the capital and even in emergencies. So think of this. Even while we're under attack, I have to go to those same 2 people to request the National Guard to be brought in.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@TuckerCarlson @ChiefSund @SecDef @thejointstaff @CapitolPolice @NationalGuard @Dataminr @SpeakerPelosi @LeaderMcConnell @TuckerCarlson & head of USCP on Jan 6, @ChiefSund 🚨SHOCKING: Sund reveals after 1st breach at 12:53pm, he calls House Sergeant at Arms for Nat’l Guard help; “I’ll run it up chain [to @SpeakerPelosi]” It took 71 mins for Pelosi to approve, 2:09pm Sund made 11 follow up calls https://t.co/gRabl3QY9q
Video Transcript AI Summary
At 12:53, the speaker called the Washington DC Police Department for assistance. They requested additional resources on Constitution Avenue to prevent an attack. At 12:58, the speaker called the sergeant in arms for help and a declaration of emergency. They were told to wait for authorization from higher-ups. Over the next 71 minutes, the speaker made 32 calls to various agencies, including the Secret Service. Despite not having official approval, they requested assistance to protect their team. Finally, at 2:09, 71 minutes later, the speaker received approval and immediately informed their colleague. They were frustrated by the delay and marked the time as 2:10.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We get to come under attack at 12:53. 12:55, I called the Washington DC Police Department. I talked to their assistant chief, Jeff Carroll. Thank God I had talked to him at 10:59 in the morning and asked him if he could possibly put some additional resource on Constitution Avenue, and he had some CDU, platoons up there. Called him, said, hey, please send those in right away because we knew as soon as they they came to their west front, Start attack.
It was gonna be bad. 12:58, I make my 1st call to the sergeant in arms asking, saying, hey, it's bad. We need assistance. I need a declaration of emergency. I need to bring in the the military immediately in Federal Resources.
I'm told by Paul Irving quote, I'm gonna run up the chain. I'll get back to you.
Speaker 1: And I'm gonna run it to
Speaker 0: the chain.
Speaker 1: Is Pelosi?
Speaker 0: The chain his his chain would be up to Nancy Pelosi. He didn't have to do that, but he wouldn't give me authorization. The the law says in a mercy, he can grant me authorization, but he didn't. He said he'd run up the chain. My next call was over to Mike Stinger.
He's the now with the chairman of the Capitol Police Board. Told them the same thing. We're getting our asses handed
Speaker 1: to us on the wet front. I need federal resources. He says, what did Paul tell you? Said he's running
Speaker 0: up the changes. Let's wait to hear what we hear from Paul. Sorry. So For the next 71 minutes, I make 32 calls. I'm in the command center.
I'm calling my partner agencies. And by law, you know, one of the first people offer assistance was United States Secret Service. And by law, I shouldn't have requested their assistance. You know, I shouldn't be until I had approval. But I'm looking at my men and women having their Just hand it to him.
And and my first thought was, fuck it. I will take whatever discipline there is. Send me whatever you got. No. That's the one tech secret service turned over.
You know how they lost all their texts? Yes. It's the text between their chief Sullivan and myself. Thank God for him.
Speaker 1: I don't so So you make this call immediately to the House Sergeant Arm, who reports Mr. Irving, who reports to Nancy Pelosi, he says, I'll call Pelosi. He says, I'm a
Speaker 0: run it up the chain. Run it
Speaker 1: up the chain, but that is the chain.
Speaker 0: Now here now here, I got you on this. I wanna tell you exactly
Speaker 1: what's happening. What happens then? Does he get back to you?
Speaker 0: So over the next 71 minutes, it makes the 32 calls to tie a number of agencies. 11 of those calls are follow-up calls. And look in the the senate combined report from From 2001, they have a great infographic of the call after call after call after call. 11 times I call in the next 51 minutes going, where are we on the approval? Where are we in the approval?
Just any minute now. Any minute. I'm gonna get in any minute. Finally, at 209, 71 minutes later, 209, I'm finally given approval. Think about that.
71 minutes later, I immediately called Mike Stinger, say we've got approval. I was so pissed off. I made sure that this watch commander I'm in the command center. I yelled to John Wisham, the lieutenant, that's my watch commander. I said, John, mark the time as 210.
I I finally got approval for the National Guard. It was that mad
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Former @CapitolPolice Chief Sund spoke to @January6thCmte in person. The House & Senate Sergeant at Arms did not. @ChiefSund reveals that Democrat @BennieGThompson mandated that @SpeakerPelosi was OFF LIMITS for @January6thCmte … no records, no inquiry Extraordinary cover up https://t.co/9Oxo9jFhLg
Video Transcript AI Summary
The denial of the request for national guardsmen on January 6th was a pivotal moment. The person who made that decision has not answered why. Representative Bennie Thompson stated that Speaker Pelosi was off limits to the inquiries of the January 6th committee. However, if we truly want to find out what happened, everyone's records should be examined. The speaker emphasizes that they have been forthright and provided their phone records. They made numerous calls to request approval and called multiple police agencies and officers to help regain control of the Capitol. The speaker's recollection is detailed and precise.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It just seems like the denial of your request to have national guardsmen who are within eyesight, and you saw them, to have them help. That is it that's a pivotal moment on that day.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: And we know the name of the man who made that decision, and we'd still don't know why he made that decision. And that's just shocking to me. What has he ever answered that question?
Speaker 1: No. He's he's never answered that question specifically that I'm aware of. And I do know when they were talking about the j six committee coming out, I think it was representative Bennie Thompson that had said, Speaker Pelosi is off limits. So they wouldn't get any of her records, her phone records. What do you
Speaker 0: mean she's off limits?
Speaker 1: I believe that was one of the things he said that her coming into this was she was off limits To the inquiries of the Janier City.
Speaker 0: Well, she was running the house that day.
Speaker 1: I hear you. I hear you. I mean, if we're truly trying to get to the bottom Trying to find out what happened.
Speaker 0: Other than that, missus Lincoln, I mean, it's insane.
Speaker 1: You know, you would be getting everyone's records. I've been forthright. All my phone records have been turned over. And like I said, there's a description of all the numerous calls I made requesting approval. Think about it.
In that's in that 71 minutes, I called in 17 police agencies, seventeen 100 officers to help us get the capital back. And they also made those 11 calls trying to find out where You
Speaker 0: were as precise as an airline pilot in your recollection of things. So yes, I
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi Former USCP @ChiefSund details the litany of that intelligence that existed before January 6, ALL of which was NOT passed to @CapitolPolice in a single assessment… “My [USCP] intelligence unit is putting out docs on 4, 5, 6th, indicating a low probability of civil disobedience” https://t.co/7J0n8Sw2bU
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker mentions various pieces of intelligence that were not included in assessments regarding the Capitol attack. These include plans to harm palace guards, use chemicals at entry points, burn down the Supreme Court, attack members of Congress, and storm the building. The speaker's intelligence unit even released documents indicating a low probability of civil disobedience. Speaker 1 suggests that certain agencies may have allowed the chaos at the Capitol to serve their political purposes and prevented the speaker from stopping it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, when you look back and you see some of the intel that was out there, and I referenced a lot of it in the book. There's intel talking about going up and killing the palace guards. Those are those are my officers. There are Intel talking about, you know, using chemicals at some of the entry points. There there's Intel indicating that they've done surveillance on some of the entry points, at the capitol.
None of that's been included. They talk about burning down the supreme court. They talk about different attacks on different members of congress. And they they talk about storming the building. Not a single word of that is included in any of the intelligence assessments.
And a matter of fact, My intelligence unit is putting out documents on the 4th, 5th, and 6th indicating a low probability of civil disobedience. What? Yeah. So,
Speaker 1: I mean, if you were and I'm not. But if you were conspiracy minded, you might think that certain agencies Concluded there was likely to be chaos at the capitol, and that served their political purposes, and so they let it happen, and they prevented you from stopping it.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi Jan 6, 2:34pm: @CapitolPolice’s @ChiefSund gets on phone with MPD Chief, @MayorBowser & @DeptofDefense DoD doesn’t like “optics” of NG on Capitol, despite Sund’s URGENT plea Takes “shots fired!” notice of Ashli Babbitt’s death to move DoD DC NG diverts; doesn’t show until 6pm https://t.co/fYHXGfiTdG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recounts a phone call with Lieutenant General Pyot Pyot and General Flynn, where they discuss the urgent need for the National Guard at the Capitol. However, General Pyot expresses concern about the optics of having the National Guard present. The speaker emphasizes the dire situation and the denial of assistance, leading to frustration. They mention the shooting of Ashley Babbit and the delayed arrival of the National Guard at 6 PM. The speaker also highlights the fact that resources were sent to protect the homes of other generals but not theirs. They suggest that this systematic denial of support raises suspicions and could lead to conspiracy theories. The conversation ends with a discussion about the lack of intelligence and the politically charged nature of the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 234, I get a notification to get on the call with United States Pentagon. I have to sell my request to the National Guard. I'm on the call with a lieutenant general Pyot Pyot, trying to make sure I have his, name pronounced right, and a, General Flynn is on the call. And it's mainly that I'm, that I'm speaking with. I I get on the call, Mayor Bautista on the call, Chief Conti's on the call, and I said, I need the National Guard immediately.
This is an urgent, urgent situation. Still remember saying urgent twice. This is urgent, urgent. They're gonna be looking at the same TVs I'm looking at. I need the National Guard immediately.
You Know what his response is? Don't like the optics of the National Guard on Capitol Hill. Right? He goes, I'd rather have your officers in the fight and we can backfill your officer somewhere else. I said, I don't have that option.
All my officers are in the fight. He goes, I'm telling you, I don't like the option of the National Guard. You know, I don't like the optics of the National Guard and the Hill. I said, sir, we're having our asses hand to us. This is life or death.
I need assistance immediately. And I still remember, he said, you know, my recommendation is not to support the request. I still remember Robert Contee going, woah. Woah. Hold on.
You're denying the chief of the Capitol Police? And, he goes, Vegas said, not that we're denying them. I just don't like the optics of the National Guard on Capitol Hill. And he goes, I'd rather and he goes back to that again. I'd rather backfill your people.
I said, sir, I don't have that option.
Speaker 1: This sounds like a setup to me. I'm sorry. It does.
Speaker 0: It gets better. So big and big, and he goes, well, I'm gonna walk down the hall and, you know, we'll we'll talk to the secretary of defense or whoever is gonna he's gonna talk to. Right then I get notification. Oh, so I'm still still on the call. We have the shooting of Ashley Babbit.
And I said, we have shots fired. I still remember yelling over the phone, we shots fired on the USCI capital. Is that urgent enough for you now? Hang up the phone because now I gotta go start making a notification. I gotta call the, sergeant arms saying, hey, we got what looks like maybe a confirmed shooting.
Do you know when the National Guard finally arrived? 6 PM. 6 PM, they're sworn in on post. Do you know those National Guard, the 150 to Pyatt that are within eyesight of the capital. You know what they do with them?
They put them in vehicles, drive them around the capital back to the DC army. You know where the DC army is.
Speaker 1: It's far away.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Washington, White House is on one side, United States Capitol, DC Army, almost equated his on the other side. RFK Stadium. Yeah. I'll go by RFK Stadium.
They drive them back then, and they send me in the evening troops. Not real. Can you freaking believe it? No, that's real. That's real.
And you know what else I do? While I'm begging for assistance, depending on sending resources to got general's houses protect their homes, but not me. So you begin to think, it seems a little conspiratorial. I can see where somebody I'm not a conspiracy, you know, conspiracy theorist, but I could see where people began to go down that rabbit hole real quick.
Speaker 1: That rabbit hole, I mean, I don't know what the other conclusion is because, look, Under pressure, people make mistakes and make bad decisions. But you're describing a systematic Denial of intelligence and then of support Mhmm. Defense through a whole bunch of different agencies, a whole bunch of different people, all reaching the a baffling conclusion that we're not going to protect the capital.
Speaker 0: Right. Multiple agencies with people with extensive experience, and you're getting this type of response. You know, and when you look at the level of intelligence, it's baffling that nobody put anything out ahead of time.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's not baffling. I mean, remember, this was the end of the Trump administration. You know, a month almost 2 months 2 months into a contested election. This is a politically charged moment with ramifications that we're now living through, but, there's a lot at stake here. This is not just your average protest.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi @MayorBowser @DeptofDefense USCP @ChiefSund to @TuckerCarlson: By the time DC @NationalGuard show up to US Capitol, they’re not needed, “The fight’s over” DCNG take “optics” photos with Capitol behind them; DoD claims victory & appropriate action New Jersey State Police arrive on scene BEFORE the DCNG🤦 https://t.co/0yKQHo7TUu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The National Guard arrived at 6 PM, but by then the fight was already over. They were concerned about the optics of their arrival, so they lined up with shields and took pictures for military magazines. The New Jersey State Police actually reached the Capitol before the DC National Guard, which infuriated the Guard. They were not allowed to respond and were upset about it. The Pentagon celebrated the guardsmen who arrived at 6 PM as heroes, but they also sent guardsmen to protect the homes of generals. The Department of Defense released a report saying the military's actions were appropriate, but no one apologized for the delayed response.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Amen. So, by the time the National Guard actually show up at 6 PM, they're not needed. Correct?
Speaker 1: The fight the fight's over. So the whole time, they were concerned they were concerned about the optics of the National Guard showing up. They show up, I have to my I have an official swaraman as special police officers. They take them, they line them up with their shields. All the protesters are off, they line them up shields and they take a couple of pictures for military magazines and stuff like that of them lined up with the Capitol in the background.
Very optics they said they were so concerned about.
Speaker 0: They took pictures from military magazine? Think about it. You can
Speaker 1: look it up. You can look it up on some of the, go online, look it up.
Speaker 0: Like, We're the Heroes of January 6?
Speaker 1: We're the Heroes of January. Yeah. So, you know and I appreciate my men I come from a military family. I appreciate the men and women in in, military. And I will tell you when they finally showed up, New Jersey state police beat them to the capitol before the DC National Guard arrived at the capitol.
I had DC National Guard's men and women that were infuriated. They were so pissed off that they weren't allowed to respond. They were extremely upset. Wait. Cops drove from New Jersey before the National Guard can get
Speaker 0: from the armory on Capitol Hill to the capitol?
Speaker 1: I put out a request, a mutual aid request that went All up and down the, national capital region went up to why isn't this story everywhere? I have no idea. I have no idea. General Walker even said he he called me up. He said, Steve, I felt so bad.
I pulled up on the scene. He's the head of the DC National Guard. He said, I pulled up on the scene, and the, New Jersey State Police beat us to the capitol. He said he wasn't allowed to go. He repeatedly wanted to go, and the Pentagon wasn't allowed.
Speaker 0: And yet the Pentagon celebrated the guardsmen who showed up at 6 PM when everything was done as heroes, meanwhile, they did they send other guardsmen to protect the homes of generals.
Speaker 1: Yeah. They send other resources. I don't know if they're guard or or depending on force protection or what. But The kicker is this. The Department of Defense, and they interviewed me.
I I would've been interviewed by anybody. I because I I'm telling the truth. They interviewed me. I provided them all my phone records. They were part of the all all the records.
You know, they put out a report saying the actions of the United States military was appropriate considering the circumstances, was appropriate? It's it's online. Yeah. Go look up the No one apologized. No one apologized.
They said their actions fired. Their actions were appropriate. They had an emergency response authority under DISCA to respond immediately, and they didn't.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi @MayorBowser @DeptofDefense @TuckerCarlson @NationalGuard Here’s the “optics” glamour photos @ChiefSund spoke about: @DeptofDefense ensured DC @NationalGuard arrived, late, to US Capitol with riot shields, despite protesters already gone DoD waited hours to send NG because they’re worried about “optics,” yet that’s 💯 what they got https://t.co/gvdxEvg2Pw
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi @MayorBowser @DeptofDefense @TuckerCarlson @NationalGuard USCP @ChiefSund reveals FBI didn’t share they’re tracking 18 “domestic terrorists” coming to DC for Jan 6 Recalls ex-FBI Jill Sanborn’s testimony to @January6thCmte that revealed FBI took “overt” action to prevent people from coming to DC Had to be feds in crowd for police work https://t.co/6kWVt7TsJg
Video Transcript AI Summary
I received a call from someone in Great Britain asking about federal agents in the crowd. I denied their presence, assuming I would have been informed. However, later I learned that there were indeed federal agents present. This was confirmed by Jill Sanborn's testimony in 2021, where she mentioned the FBI taking overt action to prevent certain individuals from attending the January 6th event in DC. In February 2023, a GAO report revealed that the FBI was tracking 4 domestic terrorists on January 3rd, which increased to 18 or 19 by January 6th. It's reasonable to have resources and multiple agents for such a situation, but it's concerning that this information wasn't shared in intelligence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I get a call from overseas, and it say it's press. I don't remember which one it was. It's somebody from, Great Britain. And they start asking me about feds in the crowd. And I was like, well, no.
I would have been told. So now we're getting word that there is feds in the crowd. I said, no. They I would have been told. I've got lots of friends with the, with the bureau.
They all have my cell number they they would have told me. You know, thinking about that and Jill Sanborn's testimony in 2021 where she said they were taking over action to keep certain people from coming to January 6th to to watch DC. That's that's big for c for FBI to start taking overt action. I mean, that's not covert, over. That's a big that's a big deal.
Fast forward to February of this year 2023, and the GAO report that says, on January 4th January 3rd, the FBI was tracking 4 domestic terrorists that were talking about coming to Washington DC, the Washington field office, their AOR area of responsibility. By by January 6th, they were tracking 18 or 19th in the GAO report, domestic terrorists. So think about that. They have 18 or 19 domestic terrorists coming this event. So, of course, they're going to have resources on them.
And they're not, you know, you're not going to be just putting 1 agent. You're going to have multiple. So it'd be multiple with that. And I don't know how many they actually had come So that would be regular standard police work. So I I wouldn't be surprised by that, but not to share that in the intelligence?
That's concerning. So
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi @MayorBowser @DeptofDefense @TuckerCarlson @NationalGuard Former USCP @ChiefSund describes Jan 7, Pelosi calls for resignation, lies about him & installs USCP Intel, Yogananda Pittman, as Acting Chief Pittman failed to give Jan 6 intel; gets vote of no confidence Gets 💵 as @UCBerkeley Police Chief, right across from Pelosi’s district https://t.co/j7x8NbnSTt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nancy Pelosi blamed Capitol Police leadership and called for my resignation on national TV the day after we gained control of the capital. Yogananda Pittman, who was the head of intelligence for Capitol Police, was then appointed as acting chief. However, she received a vote of no confidence from the police officers due to their dissatisfaction with the events. Pittman is now the chief of police for the University of California, Berkeley, located near Pelosi's district. It seems that she was given a secret leave to start her new job while still being employed by Capitol Police. Many whistleblowers within the unit were punished and forced to resign.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very next day, in less than 24 hours after we got control of the of the, capital, Nancy Pelosi goes on national TV, blames leadership at the top of Capitol Police, calls for my resignation on national TV, and then lies about me. Okay? The very next day the very next day puts Yogananda Pittman as acting chief.
Speaker 1: But Yogananda Pittman, you just described her as the head of intelligence for Capitol Police. Correct. So if there was an intelligence failure, which again doesn't seem like a failure, it seems very intentional to me, But if there was such a failure, she'd be responsible. Correct? Or she'd be in the chain of responsibility anyway?
Speaker 0: Well, I mean, she was she was the head of intelligence. So if there's an intelligence failure and my thing is do a proper analysis, you know. You know, why do a knee jerk reaction? I mean, putting her in charge, I she ended up getting a a vote of no confidence, so she didn't get the position from the, from the police officers because many were upset with what happened. Where where did she wind up?
Where is she now? Yeah. She's chief of police for the University of California, Berkeley. Interesting.
Speaker 1: So right across from Nancy Pelosi's district.
Speaker 0: That is correct.
Speaker 1: In the Bay Area.
Speaker 0: That is correct.
Speaker 1: So you just kinda take the Bay Bridge over there, and that's Yeah. That's where she is now. What does that position pay? Do you know?
Speaker 0: I think it pays, pays pretty well. There was, you know Pays extraordinarily well. No. I'm sure it pays. I'm sure it pays pretty good.
It's it's interesting. There was a hearing just recently, that was on it's on TV. You can look at it. Where the chief of police, Tom Manger, was asked about her position. It turns out that she was given some type of a secret leave, so she could leave, start her job on February 1st as the chief of police, and not retire from the Capitol Police for months later.
Speaker 1: Oh, so you should get the benefits.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Think about that. Yeah. It appears to be against departmental policy, you know, and nobody allegedly
Speaker 1: What you're saying is that the head of intelligence for the Capitol Police, which demonstrably didn't have the intelligence it needed to protect the building, that person was first elevated to acting chief Of Capitol Police and then given a very high paying job right across from Nancy Pelosi's district at the University of California, Berkeley.
Speaker 0: That is correct. And I will say this.
Speaker 1: So that looks like a reward to me.
Speaker 0: Well, I do know that the unit had significant intelligence. And I know many people within the unit were pushing that intelligence up to the to the leadership of the unit. So I do I do know that. Many of them became wheel whistleblowers, and many of them were punished and forced to resign.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi @MayorBowser @DeptofDefense @TuckerCarlson @NationalGuard @UCBerkeley Former @CapitolPolice Chief Sund’s overview of the events on Jan 6, 2021: “This didn’t have to happen. This was screwed up from the get go. Numerous opportunities from preventing it to happen; preventing my men & women from going through what they had to, and it never happened.” https://t.co/o0EjyguGEb
Video Transcript AI Summary
I have 30 years of experience in law enforcement, dealing with various situations like capturing homicide suspects and handling barricade situations. This incident was completely avoidable and mishandled right from the start. There were multiple chances to prevent it, but unfortunately, they were not taken. My main concern is the well-being of my fellow officers, who had to go through this unnecessary ordeal. It is disheartening that there was never an opportunity to stop this unfortunate chain of events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In law enforcement for 30 years. I've done everything from capturing homicide suspects to doing, you know, barricade situations. This didn't have to happen. This was screwed up from the get go. Didn't have to happen.
Numerous opportunities to prevent it from happening. Numerous I think it's from printing bringing my men and women from going through what they had to, and it never happened. There was never that opportunity to stop that train. Have
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi @MayorBowser @DeptofDefense @TuckerCarlson @NationalGuard @UCBerkeley Lastly from USCP @ChiefSund to @TuckerCarlson “2020 riots vs Jan 6 attack… @DCPoliceDept was prevented from going on @WhiteHouse grounds & helping @SecretService” likely @MayorBowser More cops injured at 2020 WH riot than Jan 6 All 2020 charges dropped, per US Park Police https://t.co/Xlq33IGPO0
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the impact of politics on law enforcement. They mention the 2020 riots and the January 6th attack on the White House. They highlight the Washington DC Police Department's inability to protect the White House during the riots and the dropping of charges against protesters. They express concern about the politicization of justice and speculate on how things might have been different if Barack Obama had been president. The conversation ends with the acknowledgement that hypothetical questions are difficult to answer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does seem like things have changed, and it does seem like
Speaker 1: politics affect the way we enforce the law. Does it feel a way to you?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Again, you know, one of the that's one of the things that many things that that are in here. I talk about the 2020 riots versus The 20 the the January 6th attack.
Speaker 1: The riots in front of the White House, where famously Saint John's Church was set on fire.
Speaker 2: White House, across the country. You know, I talk about the White House, and I talk about an agency that was formed by congress, specifically for the protection of the United States president, the Washington DC Police Department. The White House is under attack, and they are prevented. They are prevented. I know it's not from chief Newsom.
It's from his you know, he was the chief at the time. Would have been from, above him. Therefore prevented from going on cap on White House grounds and helping the United States seek its service and defending the the White House. So think about that. You know, who made that decision?
Again, all I know is, you know, Mnuchin's hands were tied. So Baer Bauser? Higher? I don't know.
Speaker 1: But think about that. Somebody told when there and there was real rioting. In fact, I think Well that more officers were injured If that riot, then we're injured on January 6th, I think.
Speaker 2: Yep. Yep. Again, don't take my word. GAO report. More officers injured at the protest By the White House and on January 6th, and I'm told by Park Police, all charges were dropped according to the, the, fighting at Lafayette Park and at the, at the White House, there were secret service agents bloodied and battered over there.
There was a number of federal agencies that were hurt. Structure set on fire. They tried to light the Han Adams Hotel on fire That was occupied. Think about that. Charges dropped.
No no such situation. I mean, When you look at the disparity of how justice is being applied, again, that's that's scary. That becomes really scary when, it becomes politicized like that. And that's what appears to have I
Speaker 1: mean, it sounds like Trump is the key to all of this. If Trump hadn't been the president, things would have been very responses would have been very different. Don't you think? I mean, if Barack Obama had been president, do you think that someone would have told MPD that Washington DC Police Department, they couldn't protect the White House?
Speaker 2: Again, I don't protect the White House? I don't I see what you're saying there. I don't know. I mean, I think not.
Speaker 1: Look. I mean, it's a I I shouldn't ask you to answer hypothetical questions, but it does seem
@photobyluke - Luke 🎼 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 🩸
@realDonaldTrump @GenFlynn @BrainStorm_Joe . People forget President Trump was in charge during the DC lock down… He was the only one that could authorize the N.G. to DC Why did Pelosi take pictures & videos acting like she brought them in think about that folks.. .
reSee.it AI Summary
On January 6th, there were claims of paid actors, controllers, and fake incidents at the Capitol Building. Questions arise about who was involved and who they were signaling to. Pelosi and McConnell's offices reportedly refused to send National Guard support, raising concerns about their power. The FBI and their alleged involvement in deploying informants dressed as Trump supporters is causing panic on Capitol Hill. There are also allegations of collusion between protesters and Capitol Police. Disturbing footage shows an elderly woman being shoved down the stairs by a Capitol Police officer.
@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire
JANUARY 6TH - Paid actors, controllers, fake tear gas, hundreds of professional photographers, fake blood and more, all at The Capitol Building on that historical day. Is this really what an insurrection looks like? https://t.co/rnzMXiH5WJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Protests outside the Capitol are discussed, with claims of preplanning and paid actors. The video analyzes the events surrounding the Capitol shooting, pointing out various suspicious actions and inconsistencies. It questions the authenticity of the incident, highlighting the use of fake blood and staged scenes. The transcript raises doubts about the credibility of the event and encourages viewers to analyze the situation critically.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are some protests happening down outside the capitol. The
Speaker 1: simulated riots in DC was a powder keg long in the making. The evidence for preplanning and setting up a situation for a disaster is overwhelming. Paid actors.
Speaker 0: We can take that place. I've got 4 people coming off. Let's get them down here.
Speaker 1: I wanna confess that I was paid to pretend to protest today. Controllers. There were guys. They were almost like
Speaker 0: monitors. What about
Speaker 1: They were, like, prowling them. They were telling them what to do, and they did everything these guys do. Bring
Speaker 0: a Hello? Do the job. Get out.
Speaker 1: And Hollywood tear gas and In this episode, we're going to analyze the climax of the story and show you how a little Stage direction and fake blood became an instrumental role in furthering the division of the nation.
Speaker 2: When he was hiding there, she had No idea that he was even sitting there eating a gun right at her face.
Speaker 0: He's not talking anymore. I'm gonna see it. But that's not a woman. They all acting, man.
Speaker 1: This is everything wrong with the Capitol shooting.
Speaker 0: Convinced that
Speaker 1: the New Jersey hurricane's dead from what I saw.
Speaker 0: You guys gonna come
Speaker 1: in the building? Only on Wooz News. The Homeland Security exercise and evaluation program provides a set of guiding principles for large emergency response drills. In these guidelines, we read about Various roles such as players, controllers, simulators, evaluators, actors, observers. The term participant encompasses many groups of People, not just those playing in the exercise.
The head directors of large emergency drills are called exercise controllers. Their job is to keep things running according to the master plan. And here's a cover of the guidelines manual, which spells sheep I mean, Hasseep. Any professional emergency response drill or military drill makes use of fake blood in a variety of forms, Blood capsules, sponges, syringes, and squids. A simple blood squib is a pouch that is designed to break on impact.
There are all kinds of squibs using various pumps and tube assembly. Here's the HydraSim trauma bleeding simulation system. It's basically a small pack containing a fake blood supply and a pumping mechanism and some tubes. Some of them are battery operated. Now that we're equipped with the various roles, let's start the analysis.
Aki. Outside the As a footnote, I am not affiliated with any gang. And I wasn't paid to make this video, so I'm looking at this completely unbiased. We've also added a time code to Jaden x's footage, which we'll call angle 1, and let's review the scene with minimal volume. You'll notice how much chaos is happening on Screen, yet our eyes are fixed to the woman because that's what we're here to see.
No one seems to be concerned with being the next target. It's bang, action. It should be noted that everyone in the room knows what's going to happen. They all play towards the camera. Now let's take a look at some of our characters.
Adam Gray, our photographer, Taylor Hanson, Vetter, Rufio, Fredo, Yellow, Data, Jaden, Thomas Berani, ninja slash evaluator, Secret agent man or as I like to call him, Sam, medic slash controller, parrot blocker, shades, red, SWAT 1 and SWAT 2, freaking frack, And our star, Rabbit. We're gonna break this down together, and we're gonna analyze this with 6 different angles and in chronological order. Let's do this. Now this is Medic coming into the room. Notice the enormous earpiece.
Speaker 0: Towards the danger.
Speaker 1: What's that about? Now look what Red does. He kicks the door. Now we see Red either pick up something or drop something, and it looks like medic does the same. And we know he's the medic because of this patch or sticker.
Here we could see Red has 1 glove on, and you can see Jaden in the distance. Now we're all kind of led into this room outside the speakers lobby. We could see Medic has 1 glove on as well. There's Frick. Oh, hey there.
And there's our star. They're just waiting around again, And you can see our star looking in the direction of the weapon. She seems amped up or nervous, and you can see we have Taylor Hanson on our left. Notice how yellow hands Rupio the helmet. And notice while he does that, we can see cop 2 and Fredo discussing, almost like they're waiting for something.
Okay.
Speaker 0: We got Police coming up.
Speaker 1: Okay. We got police coming up. Now freaking frack come down. Rufio takes off his hat, Changing his appearance, he receives the signal, and they leave. And it all feels a little rehearsed.
Go. Go. Buster. And you can see Adam Gray push his way through. Now this is orange in the front.
You should also note that the glass is not glass, but plastic or stage glass, and you'll notice that this barricade was Set up before they entered the room, you could see Buranian red to the left of the screen. In about 30 seconds, they're gonna make their way to the front. Notice how our star keeps looking over to the left as if she's waiting for something. As the officers leave, they're pretending to talk to each other.
Speaker 0: And you
Speaker 1: can see how easy this plastic comes out. Do you see how easy that is? Frack taps the back of Vedder. Jaden is the first one to give the command that there is a weapon at 34 minutes and 49 seconds. And you can hear others chanting the same thing.
Notice that the gunman briefly removes his hand from the weapon like he's communicating, Replying to his earpiece. Look how long it takes him to do it. Notice this person just walking in the background. If we draw a straight line from where the weapon is To where our star is, you will see that they don't match up. The weapon is far below her neck area.
Boom. Right there. Now that's 15 seconds since Jaden announced there was a weapon. That's important. Now let's back it up 15 seconds.
We could see this guy point to orange. Orange gives a hand movement. And look, the Hollywood glass just falls right out. SWAT one goes to Sam. Now why would Blue ever be in on this conversation?
Blue makes his way past yellow where he grabs him, and you can see Berani making a hand movement. And he touches red on the back, and Berani signals her to get into place. And she goes through, and she's ready to fall. And they all scatter. Notice this guy in the background.
No one looks in the direction of the gunman. Yellow gets into place. Now that's Rufio. Right when she goes up, he turns his back. It doesn't make sense that Rufio's corralled all these people into breaking down the doors only to step to the side and turn his back.
In this angle, Rufio turns to take a peek, and he touches red on the back, And Ninja automatically puts his hands up. Also notice when she falls back, her backpack looks fairly plump, a perfect breakaway for a fall. And you'll see yellow breaks her fall, boom, with his foot. And here you can see the plastic glass. Red gets out of the way.
And interestingly enough, Ronnie moves down just to touch her just to touch her right backpack area, just for a brief moment. While Sam comes down, he moves her, what, 9 inches to his left. He's about to reach under her right shoulder. At the same time he does it, SWAT 1 briefly squeezes her right hand. Are you putting something in there?
When Sam picks her up, she puts her hands in front of her face. It almost appears that she opens her eyes right there, and she just puts her hands down. Boom. She sat down, then her elbows go down as Data and Orange move into place. Now Sam's gonna make a big hand movement.
His left hand is still under her right shoulder. Trying give her a back massage and shit. Who writes this? And look how she's laying. She's still got her right leg up.
It's only been 11 seconds since the weapon went off. And here you can see her curl the of her mouth up while a drop of blood runs out from under her nose, which takes less than 16 frames. Here it is in real time. No blood. And there it is.
And she has her hands like she's about to give a shadow puppet performance. It's just an interesting face to make. No suffering. It's like, boom, instant death. She's basically using that backpack as a pillow.
All the while, look to Sam's right. There's Ninja. And Ninja's been there all along,
Speaker 0: And
Speaker 1: he comes down with them, and it almost looks like she has a smile on her face. It's almost like a Mona Lisa. And she's holding her right hand clenched like she has something in there. Now you have SWAT 1 coming in Playing a scene blogger. And notice how Rufio is just clamoring over SWAT 3 because there's quite a bit of photographers in that room.
Now look, freaking frack. He grabs in the back, and he puts his hands up. See how he just grabs them and and he puts his hands up? They were friends earlier. Remember?
And look at Bharani. Okay, guys. I'm just Gonna pull out my phone, and notice how he looks at his hand. He's gonna do that a couple times, and there's a reason for that. So now SWAT one's making his hand movements, you know, the big pointing.
And now he's gonna put up his Weapons. And he does this little dance with his knees. Okay. Thank you. Thumbs up.
Like, he's pretending to talk to someone, and he's like, thumbs And now Data moves in. He clumsily takes his book bag off. Now here, it gets really strange. With the exception of her nose At this time code, we see there's no blood on Herb. 35/17.
We're gonna see her pop in right there. Nothing. 35/21. But wait. Boom.
35/25. Four frames. That's 4 seconds. And now it looks like she's Devoured some small woodland creature. Don't you love how blood defies gravity?
But how is that possible? Let's back it up 4 seconds. Now watch. Notice how Sam moves his left hand from her right backpack area, and he goes to grab her hand like she's doing a peace sign with her hand. Dips it in.
Look at that movement. Now you can see him move his hand across her face. But look, she moves her wrist into his hand First, it kinda looks like she's smearing blood on her face or putting something in her mouth, but you can see the movement. And he swats her hand down, then he forcefully turns her head To the right, it's hard to see if those are her fingers or if she's holding on to something. Now Sam gets up, and all he's doing is just pointing.
Look. Well, I guess my work here is done. They're both Pointing at the same time because it makes for good pictures. You've got the drama. You've got the pointing.
And all this blood is just gushing out of her mouth. Don't make no sense. Protestors. Do you hear that? Y'all murdered this person?
It's only been 21 seconds since the weapon went off. Grabbing him like, what are we gonna do? And notice he has The full beard. Do people in these positions normally have full beards? Maybe?
Okay. He's also double masked. Oh, such a Secret And they just keep pointing. Look. SWAT 1, SWAT, SWAT 2.
We can see that yellow has changed its appearance as well. And so Data does these big gestures. She still got her damn hands like she's playing a scarecrow or something. Now this guy coming in, he's a parrot blocker,
Speaker 0: and he's
Speaker 1: saying move, move. Data just looks up. He's like Medics, capital. All the while, Ninja's still back there, just monitoring everything. Data is just still fumbling through bag not looking for anything in particular.
Everybody's just kinda moving around her.
Speaker 0: We're an active shooter.
Speaker 1: We have an active shooter. How original.
Speaker 0: Get her down.
Speaker 1: Get her down. She is down, bro. God, it's so cringey.
Speaker 0: Here's the light. Flashlight. Flashlight.
Speaker 1: So they're screaming for a flashlight, out of all things, a flashlight because the flash Flight will enhance the drama of the photos, and it draws the eye down towards the light
Speaker 0: Where's your head?
Speaker 1: Where she hit. Yeah. It seems like no one really knows. And that's when she opens her mouth Like,
Speaker 0: she's spitting
Speaker 1: it out. You could see she has blood on her fingers, but when do we see her ever touch that area? And Data taps her left hand, and she puts down Oh, you'd like to flick something away, fixes something out of her hair. It's unclear if Data is contributing to the blood effects or if he's just a scene blocker. You could see SWAT 1 knees Her right arm closer to her, and then she tucks it under her right butt cheek.
So this is the medic. He identifies himself as the medic. Nick, notice that wonderful earpiece he has on? And let's see the various ways he tries to save her. Medic puts his water bottle down.
SWAT 1 just grazes her. Everybody's just grazing her. Hair blocker did not been there, and so medic pulls down the flag that's tied around her neck. And notice he only had 1 glove coming into the room, which is very interesting. Look.
When he does this move, she opens her mouth briefly or she says something. So he's only using 1 hand, and she just lets some of the blood out of her mouth. Thank god for capsules. And her eyes are she's looking at things, where before, she was just looking straight ahead. At the same time, you could see them just hanging out.
And here comes Team blocker cup. Now Ninja's either just making hand movements for the camera or he's giving directions to SWAT 1. And SWAT 1 is just fumbling around with this little napkin, This little toilet in a baggy. Notice how medic tucks this, what looks to be a cell phone, in between Data's knees. It appears data takes the cell phone away with him.
Did you see that? What is parrot blocker pulling from her hair? And here he puts it into his pocket. Parrot blocker shouts to Swad that he's a medic, yet does nothing. You can start to see this very small pool of blood, like the size of a cookie, right where Sam's hand was.
Speaker 0: Up. We can't save them. Get the Get the fuck up. Get the fuck up. Get the fuck up.
Get the fuck up. Thank you.
Speaker 1: We gotta get EMS here, guys. Now notice Ninja just randomly puts his hands up. The cops have been next to him this whole Fine. And now he's putting his hands up. It's for the camera.
Speaker 0: She's dead. I caught her. Eyes. There are eyes.
Speaker 1: Did you hear Jaden? Because he keeps repeating it over and over. He's saying the light faded Her eyes They're all gaslighting because they know the audio is gonna be recorded, so they're all kind of pointing and overacting and fumbling in their little corners. 36 21, Taylor Hanson smiles. Look at shades.
Alfredo has no one to talk to. He's got nothing to do right now, and SWAT 1 and SWAT 2 are still Fumbling with this stupid fucking bag. What is that? Little gauze? They're just tugging it along on the flag on the flag kerchief.
Everybody's grabbing for her neck. What's that? That's medics hand. Do you hear the scrunch as he squeezes? And the medic comes in.
It almost looks like medic hesitates, and then he comes in. Now we see this very small pool of blood. See how there's just a small bloodstain and leaves no trail or indication of a direction. There's no spine, satellite, or elongation tails. There's no cast off.
There's no arterial spray or expirated spatter, which makes the use of a blood squib in her backpack and around her neck the most plausible explanation, which could be why during this whole ordeal they never untie the flag.
Speaker 0: She's gone, man.
Speaker 1: She's gone, man. We're gonna see that, cap, black hat cap. He's still just looking for her pulse, but he just Declared that she wasn't there. And now look. He clearly has blood on his fingers, and he turns his fingers around and looks at them.
And he just wipes them on the flag. Look. He just wipes them on the flag, and he moves it out of the way. And that's when SWAT 1 comes in with his little towel that dab, dab, dab, Dab. Dab.
Dab. Dab. Dab. Like, this is fucking ASMR or some shit. At the same time, he snaps another photo.
Ronnie's faking a call, Oh, look at out his hands. And there's Jaden and ninja just ninjas his way over to us. Scene blocker, cop blocks, parrot blocker. Hey. What's going on?
Who's that? Oh, he's got a radio. Maybe he'll call for help. No one's doing anything. Medic stands up.
See? He's the medic. With that Sticker. And there's Adam Gray taking all the photos. And it appears the clock reads 2:47.
Fredo still has nothing to do. Now look. It's freaking frat. They're still hanging out. Fricks sees the camera and begins acting again.
Yep. We're still rolling.
Speaker 0: Come in here. What?
Speaker 1: You got down to come down.
Speaker 0: You got blood on the floor.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Not that much. Now that's yellow saying that.
Speaker 0: They will not die.
Speaker 1: Oh, better. Bless your heart. And now look at Rufio with his hand on top of his head like, oh, it's such a shame. Oh, Ronnie puts his hand around red. There's the famous photo.
Speaker 0: There must be an iPhone on the ground.
Speaker 1: Has anyone seen an iPhone? Nobody's doing anything. Everybody's just hanging out. Angry lady number 1, She's just there to scream at them. Now notice they're still taking photos of her in the background, yet no one has done anything.
Speaker 0: She's dead.
Speaker 1: She's dead. She's dead. Hanson in the background. He's got his footage. This is Oh, no.
We'll see him later. Ronnie motions to medic, and Alfredo motions for bike Top one. Look. More pointing, more big hand movements. Do you see any blood on Sam right now?
He put gloves on He's got little paper towels. Or something. Maybe it's the script. Still just getting all the pictures. Shades is making his big hand movements.
Always Grabbing Berani, but notice Berani puts his hand on his back, or he grabs him, and he lets go. Big hand movements. It's jazz fingers. And there goes Adam Gray. What's up, bro?
Later gets fake arrested, and then red is pushed out with data. See? They've Bertie made one, and look how uniform they are. Looks like they made it just in time even though they don't go out that way. And there she goes With her book bag and flag still wrapped around
Speaker 0: her
Speaker 1: Luckily, they don't have that far to go. Just right out that door. Is that normal? Is that normal protocol? You would think if it was as easy as for everybody also get into the capitol, it would be for paramedics.
Now we see Sam on the other side of the door, and we see he's littered his latex gloves on the capitol floor next to the blood. No one would ever do that unless it was to add drama to the photos. So that's our pool of blood, that sad, pathetic pool of blood. This is classic. Oh, you just stepped in the crime scene.
Guys, you can't make this stuff up. I think he does do it intentionally because it Creates a transfer pattern from the heel of his boot. It adds drama to the photos. He intentionally does that. Is that a cop?
Come on, guys. Is that
Speaker 0: a cop?
Speaker 1: Are these cops? And now they've flipped the black Decap over the blood. They've got the photos. And that's the guy who stepped in it, now changing his appearance. And those are the sad, pathetic droplets from 1 malfunctioned squib.
Speaker 0: Now let's take
Speaker 1: a look at the aftermath. Oh, no. And so they're all just echoing the same thing over and over again. They're getting everybody to spread the word.
Speaker 0: They just killed the girl. He shot a girl right in the goddamn stomach.
Speaker 1: I thought it was supposed to be her neck.
Speaker 0: He shouldn't kick. He shot a girl in there. They shot a girl. This is
Speaker 1: like the cringe hour.
Speaker 0: There's not a girl.
Speaker 1: But listen to what this lady says.
Speaker 0: I didn't see it. Well, that's not a woman. Hey, Moe. That's
Speaker 1: amazing. It completely validates everything we're doing here. And notice coming down the stairs like a damn eighties movie, Thomas Berani with his hand up. He's about to stop on the stairs and just start screaming.
Speaker 0: Shut it up, Dylan.
Speaker 1: And then no one's gonna pay attention. Wow. And now he caught somebody's attention.
Speaker 0: Shot it would have gotten through the neck. Come back in the ass.
Speaker 1: Bro, Why are you lying? Oh, don't you mean your hand fell back into her book bag? Man, this guy is such a creep. He
Speaker 0: does not talk anymore. This is too much.
Speaker 1: God. This is so hard to look at. And here he is again.
Speaker 3: They shot her in the neck, and she fell back on me and started to say she was fine at school.
Speaker 1: What? Guys, you know none of that happened.
Speaker 3: And then she started kinda, like, moving weird.
Speaker 1: Okay. That's true.
Speaker 3: It could've been me, but she went in first. This could be you or your kids.
Speaker 1: Jesus. And here, they're whisking her away on a stretcher. Notice these highlighter badges on all of them. Maybe you can tell me what these are, and maybe you can tell me what this black waistband is. Oh, it looks like they did a touch up.
He totally has his hand on her boob. And you could see she's clearly still alive. And notice all of these fan shuttles in the background. Brown. Hey.
Look. It's Swat 1. What was that about? Even Taylor Hanson got a spot on TV.
Speaker 2: And the minute that she hopped up in that pane, she had no idea that he was even there.
Speaker 1: No. She only had a 15 second warning. From the first scream to her taking it to the neck. 15 seconds.
Speaker 2: She shot her right in the neck.
Speaker 1: Oh, now it's her neck. Hopefully, Jaden will get it right.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So, basically, all the the protesters kind of Storm to get into the chamber.
Speaker 1: And perhaps our last clip is most telling of all. Here's Jaden.
Speaker 0: They killed a girl. They killed a girl. My deadass out of there on camera. They shot her. Let me see.
I see this shit on camera.
Speaker 1: They had
Speaker 0: Let me swing.
Speaker 1: I guess we're all done. Yeah. So Let
Speaker 0: me swing.
Speaker 1: I guess we're all done. Yeah. So
Speaker 0: See now I got it. So what do
Speaker 1: you think, guys? Can you see what I see? Is this shit legit? Maybe I'm missing something. Maybe I'm overlooking it.
Please, if you see anything I'm not Sing. Write it below. Please use your word choices carefully when commenting. Hey. Thanks for coming down the rabbit hole with me.
Are we being duped? If you learned something, feel free to Scribe. That's why I'm here. It's not just for fun. You know, it takes a lot of work to edit these videos, and I'm just 1 person.
I don't have all the answers figured out, but I can tell you Something ain't right. Please feel free to mirror, share, and please keep analyzing. Maybe we could start looking at this stuff a different way. Hey. Thanks for breaking this down with me.
@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire
Who are they? Who are they signaling to? Why don't we have answers? https://t.co/Dp9QQwPlcc
@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire
Why did the offices of Pelosi and McConnell refuse to send in National Guard support? Why do they carry this power in the first place? https://t.co/h24vStjsAK
@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire
👆 The gentlemen above, FBI? https://t.co/nJeY8dq3Or
@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire
Why was this man uncuffed out of sight and fist bumped by the officers? Because they were working together on January 6th. https://t.co/4jTag47VG4
@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire
Capitol Police calmly escorted protesters into the Capitol Building on January 6th https://t.co/iECJZWy47s
@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire
Not nice, officer https://t.co/jv3TgImTDE
reSee.it AI Summary
Breaking! The Secretary for Defense authorized the use of the National Guard with rules for engagement in response to planned demonstrations on January 5-6, 2021. This memo confirms Trump's order and clarifies that the DCNG remains under the command of the Commanding General. Link to the document provided. Additionally, Norm Eisen and the Voter Protection Program warned governors against using the National Guard until votes were certified, potentially contributing to the lack of Guard presence on January 6. Trump fulfilled his part.
@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁
🔥🔥Breaking! Secondary evidence from the Secretary For Defense on approval of the National Guard with rules for engagement! Ok first I provided you with a Jan 2021 memo from Catherine Herridge showing that Trump DID order the National Guard on January 3, 2021. Now we have a memo from the Secretary For Defense working out the details and providing rules for engagement! “This memorandum responds to your January 4, 2021 memorandum regarding the District of Columbia request for District of Columbia National Guard (DCNG) support in response to planned demonstrations from January 5-6, 2021. You are authorized to approve the requested support, subject to my guidance below and subject to consultation with the Attorney General, as required by Executive Order 11485.” “At all times, the DCNG will remain under the operational and administrative command and control of the Commanding General of the DCNG, who reports to the Secretary of Defense through the Secretary of the Army.” @MZHemingway Link to doc to follow!
@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁
Here’s the link to the doc of Trumps Secretary For Defense authorizing the use of the National Guard and providing engagement rules. This is one day after Trump requested that the National Guard be deployed. https://web.archive.org/web/20210629140520/https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Jan6-Clearinghouse-Acting-Secretary-of-Defense-Christopher-Miller-Memorandum-for-Secretary-of-Army-Employment-Guidance-for-the-DC-National-Guard-Jan-4-2021.pdf https://t.co/2ZHAl3my29
@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁
And here’s my post about Trump ordering the National Guard on Jan 3, 2021. Catherine Herridge’s post is referenced second in this 🧵. I’ll always bring receipts!
@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁
It’s Christmas in March, and it’s raining receipts! Here’s Norm Eisen sticking his nose into things and telling the Governors that it’s illegal to use the national guard until the votes are certified. Add Pelosi to the mix, and the missing National Guard was a result of Democrat collusion. Let’s put the blame where it’s rightly deserved. Trump did his part.
@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁
🔥Breaking! Norm Eisen was involved in the lack of National Guard on January 6! The voter Protection Program, cofounded by Norm Eisen, told state governors in a letter, that they would be breaking the law if they did! “This memorandum guides state officials in preparing for and responding to the possible involvement of the National Guard in the 2020 election. Governors should remember that the Guard remains under their command unless “federalized” by the President.” “It’s Not Just Election Day: The election has already started. It will last until all the votes are counted and the results are certified. Federal interference with counting votes is just as illegal as interference with voting. 18 U.S.C. §§ 593, 595.” On January 6th that’s what Congress was there for, the certification of electors! Sources to follow!
reSee.it AI Summary
President Trump offered over 10k National Guard troops to Nancy Pelosi, Capitol Police, and DC Mayor Bowser before Jan 6, 2021, but they declined. This is a fact, regardless of personal opinions. There is undeniable proof and receipts. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger have been made aware of this but have not responded.
@JoeTalkShow - Joe Pags Pagliarulo
Let's stop the BS -- President Trump offered 10k+ National Guard troops to Nancy Pelosi and the Capitol Police AND DC Mayor Muriel Bowser 2-3 days before Jan 6, 2021. They all declined. This is fact. It doesn't matter if you like Trump or not. This is FACT. Doesn't matter if Cheney acts outraged or if Kinzinger cries. This is fact. There's proof and it's undeniable. If @Liz_Cheney or @AdamKinzinger want to challenge Kash Patel or me on this -- let's go. We have the receipts. You using the word "order" or "ordered" changes nothing. A president has the ability to offer. Dictators ORDER. Now, put up -- or apologize. I personally think every, last horrible person on that so-called committee should be brought up on charges of attempted Civil War over your lies and omissions.
@JoeTalkShow - Joe Pags Pagliarulo
All the proof you need is that Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger have both either seen this thread or have been made aware of it -- and, they have not chimed in. Why? You tell me.
@Chicago1Ray - Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
WOW 🚨 This video shows Nancy Pelosi admitting that it was her responsibility to have National Guard troops protecting the Capitol..... this should grant all of the J6ers new trials... https://t.co/9GFnhDFOXX
Video Transcript AI Summary
We were irresponsible for not being accountable for the situation at the Capitol. It was ridiculous to not have the National Guard there from the start. They thought they were sufficient, but they clearly didn't know. I take responsibility for not preparing them better.
Translation: We were irresponsible for not being accountable for the situation at the Capitol. It was ridiculous to not have the National Guard there from the start. They thought they were sufficient, but they clearly didn't know. I take responsibility for not preparing them better.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have responsibility, Terry. We did not have any accountability for what was going on there, and we should have. This is ridiculous. You're gonna ask me in the middle of the thing when they've already breached the stuff that that, should we call the Capitol Police? I mean, the, National Guard there to begin with?
They thought that they had sufficient No. There's not a question of how they had been. They don't know. They clearly did of how they have been. They don't know.
They clearly didn't know, and I take responsibility for not having them just prepare for more.
@ChiefSund - Chief Steven Sund
Pelosi was surprised we didn’t have National Guard on Jan6?? I was denied National Guard support multiple times before January 6, and repeatedly for 71 minutes ON January 6. MY STORY HASN’T CHANGED! @RepLoudermilk @oversightadmn
@johnrich - John Rich🇺🇸
Pelosi taking responsibility for not having National Guard on J6👇 https://t.co/fQySKv921F
Video Transcript AI Summary
We had a responsibility that we failed to meet, and there was a lack of accountability for the situation. It’s absurd to question whether we should call the Capitol Police or National Guard after the breach occurred. The National Guard should have been present from the start, as the assessment of the situation was clearly inadequate. I take responsibility for not ensuring they were prepared for potential issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have responsibility, Terry. We did not have any accountability for what was going on there, and we should have. This is ridiculous. You're gonna ask me in the middle of the thing when they've already breached the the the inaugural stuff that that, should we call the Capitol Police? I mean, the National Guard?
Why weren't the National Guard there to begin with? There to begin with? They thought that they had sufficient No. There was not a question of how they have been. They don't know.
They clearly didn't know, and I take responsibility for not having them just prepare for take responsibility for not having them just prepare for more.
reSee.it AI Summary
Chairman @RepLoudermilk revealed that days before January 6, President Trump urged Pentagon leaders to ensure peace and protect lives, even suggesting the National Guard's involvement. However, on January 5, Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy imposed strict restrictions on the DC National Guard, delaying their response as rioters breached the Capitol. Despite being ready to assist, the Guard was held back for hours due to McCarthy's inaction and concerns about optics. I am determined to uncover why these directives were ignored and the reasons behind the delays.
@OversightAdmn - Oversight Subcommittee
🧵Chairman @RepLoudermilk revealed last week that days before January 6, 2021, President Trump met with senior Pentagon leaders urging them to do their jobs to protect lives and property. The transcripts released show Trump gave senior Pentagon leadership directives to keep January 6 peaceful - including using the National Guard:
@OversightAdmn - Oversight Subcommittee
However, on January 5, the Secretary of the Army, Ryan McCarthy, placed unprecedented restrictions on DCNG Commander Major General William Walker to prevent any movement to the Capitol without Secretary McCarthy’s explicit permission on January 6 and 7: https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/7/0/702dcdb8-f89e-4b42-a1d5-98a840c809b6/F996C37EF42504262D39470936529A11.memorandum-from-ryan-mccarthy-to-william-walker-jan.-5-2021-.-on-file-with-the-subcommittee-.-redacted.pdf
@OversightAdmn - Oversight Subcommittee
On January 6, 2021, the outer perimeter on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol is breached by rioters at 12:53pm. The DCNG arrived five hours later. Here’s the timeline: https://t.co/UhH45R51Vp
@OversightAdmn - Oversight Subcommittee
Newly uncovered transcripts prove President Trump’s senior Pentagon leaders were focused on OPTICS, instead of doing their job, as the Capitol is breached: Miller: “There was absolutely – there is absolutely no way I was putting U.S. military forces at the Capitol, period.” Director of the Army Staff, Lieutenant General Walter Piatt: “Was optics a concern for us as we prepared to use soldiers downtown in Washington D.C? Absolutely.”
@OversightAdmn - Oversight Subcommittee
Read those here: https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/6/9/690d46b7-ab01-496a-887a-384192ca5962/732FB24CBA423F54174B25AF0F855072.34---piatt---3.4.21.pdf
@OversightAdmn - Oversight Subcommittee
As “optics” concerns are being discussed and Secretary McCarthy claims he is ‘developing a plan’, the DCNG is ready to move, less than 2 miles from the Capitol – awaiting Secretary McCarthy’s authorization.
@OversightAdmn - Oversight Subcommittee
Walker’s General Counsel, Colonel Earl Matthews: “We were seeing the Congress of the United States being overrun, and the Guard – and the Capitol Police, the MPD, they need help. We had people at the D.C. Armory who are able to help, and they’re not moving. They’re not allowed to move.” DCNG Command Sergeant Major Michael Brooks: “They were ready to go, and they just couldn’t understand why they were still sitting there. Literally sitting on a bus, just waiting to drive to the Capitol and do the best they could do to support Capitol Police.” 👉 https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/4/f/4f42cf77-9742-4230-b138-81d035e98a2f/E599ED4715C8354DE7B131D1FF9A8155.brooks-ti-redacted.pdf
@OversightAdmn - Oversight Subcommittee
At 3:04pm, Miller provides verbal approval to Secretary McCarthy for immediate deployment of the DCNG. What was Secretary McCarthy doing between receiving this approval, and 5:08pm, when the order eventually reaches the D.C. National Guard? Why didn’t he communicate this approval for a full two hours?
@OversightAdmn - Oversight Subcommittee
At 3:18pm, Secretary McCarthy tells Congressional Democrat Leadership that the DC National Guard has the “green light” and is “moving”. Two hours would pass before Secretary McCarthy’s deployment order would ACTUALLY be communicated to the DCNG.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Staff are locked and barricaded in their offices, creating a critical situation with risk of loss of life. Some senators are still in their hideaways and need massive personnel. The Maryland National Guard is requested. Prince George's County, Montgomery County, Fairfax, and Arlington all have significant forces. The mayor of Washington D.C. will be contacted for additional police department outreach. The National Guard will no longer be blocked, but will be permitted to assist. All available personnel are needed before someone gets hurt.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of our staff locked up and and barricaded in their offices. So there's a critical situation and a risk of loss of life.
Speaker 1: We have some senators who were still in their hideaways. They need massive personnel now. Can you get the Maryland National Guard to come too?
Speaker 0: Mister Secked, obviously, Prince George's County. I will call, Angela also, but the county executive, I'm sure she'll deploy whatever we need deployed. Montgomery County as well, Fairfax and Arlington, all have very significant forces.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. I I I I'm gonna call the governor when I get off the phone. Good. Alright. Everything on my hand, I'm trying to get this Thank you.
We won't take any I
Speaker 2: I I have something to say, mister secretary. Well, I'm gonna call the the mayor of Washington DC right now and see what, other outreach she has to other police departments as that leader Porter has mentioned. And also that we can deliver the good news that you are now going to instead of blocking the National Guard, that you will inhibit.
Speaker 1: There's no people in the car. No. I just
Speaker 3: had to get from this thing. I just had to get from this thing. I just had to get from this thing. I just had to get from
Speaker 1: this thing. I just had to talk to my boss. Right.
Speaker 2: And then did you talk to your boss?
Speaker 1: Thank you. Keep working. We need all the personnel we can get before someone gets hurt.
Speaker 2: I'll put it then. Okay.
@OversightAdmn - Oversight Subcommittee
In these vital hours, the DCNG has been trying, but unable, to reach Secretary McCarthy. DCNG Adjutant General Aaron Dean: “[Walker] tried to call Secretary McCarthy three times between 2:30 and 5pm. He said, ‘I haven’t heard from him all day.’ When he tried to call his cell phone, it went straight to voicemail.” https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/c/b/cb7fd7af-427f-4e29-b6ad-be2f548091b5/F9037FF312C5418C14B79216AB62002A.aaron-dean-ti-redacted.pdf
@OversightAdmn - Oversight Subcommittee
The DCNG was ready. Secretary McCarthy delayed their response. Why did these senior Pentagon officials ignore Trump’s guidance? Why did Secretary McCarthy tell Pelosi the DCNG was on the way? Chairman @RepLoudermilk is committed to finding these answers, and more.
@Travis_4_Trump - 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸
Today we found out that Trump did request the National Guard before J6, and that those request were cancelled last minute because of “optics.” Here is Nancy Pelosi, who was aware of this, claiming Trump is a liar and never requested National Guard. When is her trial? https://t.co/XSp36m9UxY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses offense at claims that someone sent the National Guard, stating that this person never offered the National Guard despite bipartisan requests, including from Mitch McConnell. The speaker alleges the person's secretary of the army and secretary of defense delayed, and the National Guard was not sent until hours later, resulting in injuries and deaths. The speaker accuses the person of lying on TV, claiming a detachment from the truth and specifically refuting the claim of sending the National Guard, urging the press to challenge this assertion. The speaker also states that they do not have control of security, which is handled differently, referencing the power of the White House.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me just say, what is so offensive to me is that there's some really good Republicans out there who put up with his saying. He never offered any any any National Guard. Even Mitch McConnell joined us in our bipartisan urgent, please please send them. Please send the National Guard and his, secretary of the army, secretary of defense. Oh, it takes a lot of time and, oh, and and he never did until finally he did.
Hours later, more people injured. Some people then consequent to that dying because he wouldn't send the National Guard. So for him to go on TV and lie about I mean, he lies all the time. That's the only I don't know if he knows what the truth is. He's so foreign from it in his statements.
But for him to lie about sending the National I sent it, they refused it. Please press. Please press. Don't let him get away with that. That's so ridiculous.
And he knows that we do not have control of the security. That's helped dealt in a different way. Yeah. And the power of the White House.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe there was no Pentagon screw-up regarding the National Guard deployment on January 6; it was a coordinated effort involving Milley, Pelosi, and DOD officials to avoid extra security. The narrative about "optics" seems like an excuse. Watching the J6 footage reinforces my view that if guardsmen had been present, the chaos could have been prevented. Claims of a simple chain of command failure are misleading; it feels intentional. Additionally, Milley's involvement in a political statement shortly after the event raises further concerns about his actions that day.
@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
Guys, there was no Pentagon screw up related to deployment of National Guard on Jan 6. The “optics” excuse was just that—an excuse to justify why guardsmen were not deployed. This was a coordinated effort between Milley, Pelosi, and DOD officials to prevent extra security that day. Are we truly supposed to believe Trump-hating subversives in the government worried about “optics” or honoring boundaries between law enforcement and the military? Mark Milley? Seriously? I was watching more J6 video this morning and again thinking that had a few thousand guardsmen been present at the Capitol—none of the mayhem would’ve happened. Which is the point. We are supposed to believe that Pelosi’s sergeant at arms AND McConnell’s sergeant at arms AND Army Sec Ryan McCarthy were basically unreachable that afternoon as calls for help poured in? Do not believe any analysis claiming this was just a chain of command failure or typical government power struggle. It was not. It was intentional and represents perhaps the most sinister aspect of January 6.
@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
Milley’s dirty traitorous fingerprints are all over Jan 6 Look at this statement he organized and published on January 13, 2021. Completely political and subversive. https://t.co/sOKV5UOStb
reSee.it AI Summary
I revealed transcribed interviews that were hidden from the public, confirming that Nancy Pelosi instigated a conspiracy to frame Donald Trump, with Liz Cheney covering it up. The first interview from Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato indicated that Mark Meadows urged D.C. Mayor Bowser to request National Guard support for the January 6 protests, which she refused. Additionally, Mark Milley testified about Trump’s insistence on ensuring safety for the event. I call for the arrest of all members involved in the January 6 cover-up, starting with Liz Cheney.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, TRANSCRIBED INTERVIEWS HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW, CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT, The treasonous witch Nancy Pelosi instigated a criminal conspiracy to frame Donald J. Trump and MR. Liz Cheney covered it up. The MISSING Ornato, A: Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato’s first transcribed interview with the J6 committee conducted on January 28, 2022. He testified Mark Meadows pushed D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser for Trump’s call for 10,000 National Guard as she needed to protect the city from the FBI and the bitch refused. B: TRANSCRIBED INTERVIEW HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW, The missing Chairwoman, Joint Chief of Staff, MARK MILLEY (January 3,2021) “The President just says, ‘Hey, look at this. There’s going to be a large amount of protesters here on the 6th, make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it’s a safe event.’” “President Trump ‘Hey, I don’t care if you use Guard, or Soldiers, active duty Soldiers, do whatever you have to do. Just make sure it’s safe.’” And now, arrest every single member of the Jan 6 coverup committee at once for the crimes of perjury, obstruction of justice, racketeering and conspiracy to defraud the United States government. Including Nancy Pelosi. But first MR. Liz Cheney.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nancy informs the Governor that Representative Hoyer spoke with Governor Hogan about the Virginia National Guard, but federal government approval is likely needed to enter another jurisdiction. She reports that people are breaking windows, and someone said someone was shot, describing the situation as horrendous and instigated by the President of the United States. She expresses appreciation for the Governor's actions and requests to stay in touch. Nancy notes the Virginia Guard has been called in and that the Governor stated 200 state police and a National Guard unit were sent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is Nancy. Governor, I don't know if you had been approached about the, Virginia National Guard. Mister Hoyer was connect I was speaking to, governor Hogan, but I still think you probably need the okay of the, the federal government in order to come into another jurisdiction. Thank you. The secretary of the army.
Oh my god. They're just breaking windows. They're doing all all kinds. It's really that somebody they said somebody was shot. It's just it was just horrendous and all at the instigation of the president of the United States.
Okay. Thank you, governor. I appreciate what you're doing. If you don't mind, I'd like to stay in touch. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you. Bye bye. Virginia Guard has been called in. You're not just talking to governor Northam.
And what he said is they sent 200 of state police and a unit of the National Guard.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker's team found a previously missing interview where a witness testified that Mark Meadows offered up to 10,000 troops. The speaker cites a Vanity Fair article from early January reporting that Trump authorized Secretary Miller to ready the National Guard. A White House employee testified that Trump's immediate response upon hearing of the Capitol attack was to get Pelosi and Milley on the phone to see what help they needed. The speaker claims there is on-the-record evidence that Trump offered the National Guard, but Pelosi and Bowser turned down the offer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We knew that he had done multiple, transcribed interviews with the committee, but there was one that was just commonly referred to as the missing or not, interview. And our team through a lot of diligence and digging, we were able to find that and exactly what you just said was in there that he had testified to the committee that he heard the conversation with, the with Mark Meadows offering up to 10,000 troops and even in early January, not long after the attack on the Capitol, Vanity Fair of all publications had ran an article that Trump had offered National Guard and told, secretary Miller, you have full authorization to get the guard ready. That was in January by a liberal publication, so there is much more evidence. We even have evidence from the White House, transcribed interviews that we received from the White House employees where one of them said that responded to a question by the Select Committee which was when President Trump first heard of the attack on the Capitol what was his response? And this White House employee who is physically with the President that day said his immediate response was get Pelosi and Milley on the phone and see what help they need.
There are several instances of on the record where he had offered and even was trying to get, you know, the people to take the National Guard. But it was it was Pelosi. It was Bowser that turned down the offer.
Video Transcript AI Summary
An interviewer asks if it's true that President Trump offered 20,000 National Guard troops to protect the Capitol on January 6th, but the offer was rejected. One speaker references Trump's acting secretary of defense, Chris Miller, who testified that Trump never issued an order to deploy the Guard.
Two interviewees claim that on January 4th in the Oval Office, they heard Donald Trump authorize up to 20,000 troops. One speaker states that Secretary of Defense Chris Miller, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, and President Trump were in the Oval Office discussing serious national security threats before pivoting to January 6th. Trump authorized up to 20,000 National Guard troops for use, should the request come in, but those requests never did.
One interviewee clarifies the January 4th meeting was primarily about a foreign threat to the U.S. and that Trump brought up January 6th at the end of the meeting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Witnesses, who say they met with witnesses, who say they met
Speaker 1: with president Trump on January 4th. And he offered some 20,000 national guardsmen, to protect the Capitol building on January 6th, but the offer was rejected. Is that true? Do you know that to be true?
Speaker 2: Well, his own acting secretary of defense says that's not true. Chris Miller has testified publicly that Donald Trump never issued any order to deploy the guard to protect the Capitol. And and so I would point people to his own secretary of defense's public testimony.
Speaker 3: So the 4 of you that I've had an opportunity to interview now confirm that on January 4th in the Oval Office that you heard Donald Trump authorize up to 20,000 troops, Kash Patel, 2 days before January 6th even happened. Tell us about that meeting.
Speaker 4: Yeah. It's not one of those thanks again, Sean, like Chris said, for having us especially on d day to talk about this serious matter. It's not one of those meetings you forget. The secretary of defense, Chris Miller, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, Mark Milley, the chief of staff to the president of the United States of America, Mark Meadows, and the president of the United States himself in the Oval Office talking about some of the most serious national security threats we were facing, and then we pivoted to setting up for January 6th. And mister Trump unequivocally authorized up to 20,000 national guardsmen and women for us to utilize should the second part of the law, the request, come in.
But those requests never did as you highlighted.
Speaker 3: Let me let me be very clear. Both of you said this under oath under the threat of a penalty of perjury
Speaker 5: to the committee? Absolutely, Sean. And to be clear, Cash brought it up best. The meeting was, one of it was one of the serious kinda heavy meetings I've been in, and it was about a foreign threat that was directed towards the United States, which obviously we can't talk to for about for fear of, you know, ending up in jail. And, so I wanna I I kinda wanna, like, be clear.
The president is leaving and says, hey. One more thing. And we all sat back down and we discussed what was going on in January 6th. I don't wanna because I think that's important to bring up so that, the opposition doesn't get this idea that this was the purpose of the meeting. The president was doing exactly what I expect the commander in chief to do, any commander in chief
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
President Trump Says Nancy Pelosi Deliberately Blocked The National Guard From Deploying At The Capitol On Jan 6th. In Fiery Post Inauguration Speech To Supporters. He Thinks She Did This On Purpose. More Coverage and Analysis: https://t.co/8B8Q4Z3IIP https://t.co/9Va8YX4AK3
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was initially going to discuss the January 6 hostages, emphasizing that action speaks louder than words, and there's more to come on that front. I also wanted to address Joe's recent pardons for individuals guilty of serious crimes and the unselect committee's destruction of evidence, including Nancy Pelosi's rejection of 10,000 soldiers, which could have prevented chaos that day.
The situation is intense right now, and while we’re making progress, the fight is dangerous. I encourage everyone to visit the allshowstore.com for essential health supplements, especially during this season. We have a limited edition Trump 2024 coin available, and a portion of sales supports our operations. Join as a VIP member for exclusive offers and discounts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, I I was going to talk about the j 6 hostages, but you'll be happy because you know it's action, not words that count. And, you're gonna see a lot of action on the j 6 hostages. See a lot of action. And I was going to talk about the things that Joe did today, with the pardons of people that were, very, very guilty of very bad crimes. Like, the unselect committee of political folks, where they literally I mean, what they did is they destroyed and deleted all of the information, all of the hearings.
Practically not a thing left. They deleted all the information on Nancy Pelosi, having turned down the offer of 10,000 soldiers. You wouldn't have needed 10,000. You could have had 500, and it would have stopped. Because we may have had a 1000000 people that day, the people that were there.
You don't see any photographs. But we have a lot of great photos. But you don't see those photographs. They don't put them in. They show the people at the capitol.
But I was talking about, that. I was going to talk about that. They said, please don't bring that up right now. You can bring it up tomorrow. I said, how about now in front of the very
Speaker 1: I'll bring it up right now. I have been so hot and heavy on the news the last few weeks that I have not come up most yesterday, I didn't plug one time the whole show. So I was just so focused and pissed off about what's going on because we're winning, but the fight is so dangerous. Things were this is the most intense part right now. And so please go to the all show store.com.
We have the great atomic defense, the strongest, greatest, you know, concentrated of all the known herbs and compounds that boost your immune system. Everybody should be on especially this time of year with the limited edition Trump 20 24 battle for the republic coin on one side. On the other side, the membership inauguration. There's a limited amount of those about as of this morning, 1 fourth of them are gone. There'll be no more made after that.
This funds the operation. So I wanna thank all of you that have supported. I wanna encourage those that haven't gone to the allyshieldstore.com to take action now. The supplements are the best. You're gonna find anywhere, become a VIP member for $30 a month, canceling time, get $40 to spend in the store each month, month, special sales, special discount, and special offers, and products only to members.
Thealexshowstore.com.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨President Trump BLASTS Nancy Pelosi for failing the American people on January 6th. “They deleted all the info on Nancy Pelosi, having turned down the 10,000 soldiers. You wouldn’t have needed 10,000. You could have had 500, it would have stopped.” https://t.co/ORgcOGPriU
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was going to discuss the January 6 hostages, but there's a lot of action coming on that front. Today, Joe issued pardons for individuals guilty of serious crimes, and the unselect committee has destroyed much of the evidence, including hearings. They deleted information about Nancy Pelosi rejecting an offer of 10,000 soldiers for security. Even 500 could have made a difference that day, despite the large crowd. There are many great photos from that day that aren't shown, focusing instead on the Capitol. I intended to address this, but was advised to wait until tomorrow. I decided to bring it up now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I I was going to talk about the j 6 hostages, but you'll be happy because, you know, it's action, not words that count. And you're gonna see a lot of action on the j 6 hostages. And I was going to talk about the things that Joe did today with the pardons of people that were, very, very guilty of very bad crimes, like the unselect committee of political folks, where they literally I mean, what they did is they destroyed and deleted all of the information, all of the hearings. Practically not a thing left. They deleted all the information on Nancy Pelosi having turned down the offer of 10,000 soldiers.
You wouldn't have needed 10,000. You could have had 500, and it would have stopped. Because we may have had a 1,000,000 people that day, the people that were there. You don't see any photographs. But we have a lot of great photos.
But you don't see those photographs. They don't put them in. They show the people at the capitol. But I was talking about, that. I was gonna talk about that.
They said, please don't bring that up right now. You can bring it up tomorrow. I said, how about now in front of the very I'll bring it up.
reSee.it AI Summary
Most people don't realize how serious this is. The IG report shows Trump wanted National Guard troops to secure the election certification, and General Milley confirmed it. The January 6 riots seem orchestrated; it's not difficult to see the connections.
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
Most people don't grasp how damning this is. Donald Trump is on record in the IG report as wanting National Guard troops to protect the election certification. General Milley even acknowledged Trump wanted it secure. The J6 riots were a set-up. This isn't hard to figure out. https://t.co/9E9KsIgYsx
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
Screenshot report: @C__Herridge
reSee.it AI Summary
I made 11 urgent calls for National Guard support on Jan 6, starting at 12:58 PM. Approval was delayed for 71 minutes by the House Sergeant at Arms, who reported to Speaker Pelosi. She caused critical delays and is now shifting blame to @realDonaldTrump for the failures she contributed to. The record is clear.
@ChiefSund - Chief Steven Sund
FACT: I made 11 urgent calls requesting National Guard support on Jan 6, starting at 12:58 PM. Approval was withheld for 71 minutes by the House Sergeant at Arms, who reported directly to Speaker Pelosi. She caused critical delays, and now is shifting blame to @realDonaldTrump for failures she helped create. The record is clear.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
LEFT: Nancy Pelosi now says she begged Donald Trump for the National Guard on January 6th RIGHT: The House Sergeant at Arms, the most Senior Security Official, says he was overridden by Nancy Pelosi to stop National Guard from being present on Jan 6th All Democrats do is lie https://t.co/rnqB0iSPU4
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that on January 6th, there was violence against the constitution, Congress, and the U.S. Capitol. They allege that they begged the President of the United States to send in the National Guard, but he refused. The speaker further claims that the president would not send in the National Guard when law enforcement people were being harmed, some of whom later died. They assert this inaction occurred during an insurrection that the president incited, which caused damage to those assigned to protect the capital and the constitution and to accept the results of the electoral college.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a bipartisan way, on January 6, with violence against the constitution, against the congress, and against the United States capital, we beg the president of The United States to send in the National Guard. He would not do it. Not only would he not do it, when law enforcement people were being harmed, let some later died, He would not send it in when his an instigation that he ins an insurrection that he incited was causing damage to those assigned to protect the capital and the constitution that day to accept the results of the of the, electoral college.
Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6, 2021, the House Sergeant at Arms, Paul Irving, appointed by Speaker Pelosi, expressed concerns about the "optics" of deploying the National Guard. When Chief Sun requested the Guard, Irving said he'd "run it up the chain," implying Pelosi's office.
Pelosi stated she hadn't spoken to Chief Sun since the initial breach, but Sun says he spoke with her three times that evening. He briefed her on plans to get everyone back into chambers.
Prior to January 6, Sun requested National Guard assistance from Irving and Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger. Irving didn't like the optics and Stenger suggested Sun contact General Walker about availability. Stenger later told Sun that Irving had forewarned him, saying Pelosi would never approve the Guard.
During a call on January 6, military personnel recommended against Sun's request for the National Guard. Chief Conte of the Metropolitan Police Department questioned this denial. General Milley did not share intelligence about violent rhetoric and threats with Chief Sun.
The Capitol Police requested National Guard assistance at 1:49 PM, but approval from the acting Secretary of Defense didn't come until 5:08 PM. The Guard arrived at the Capitol by 5:20 PM.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, we're here to discuss the security failures that occurred on 01/06/2021 and how we can prevent these failures from occurring again. Wanna dive into the questions, chief Sun. In your transcribed interview, you mentioned that you met with house sergeant in arms regarding the National Guard prior to January 6. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: And who is the house sergeant in arms, leading up to and on January 6? That would be Paul Irving. And the the house sergeant at arms is appointed by who?
Speaker 1: He's appointed, that at that time by speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 0: And in your transcribed interview, you mentioned that when you brought up the National Guard to the house sergeant at arms in the days leading up to January 6, that mister Irving said he, quote, didn't like the optics, end quote. Is is that correct?
Speaker 1: That that is correct. He, he referenced being concerned for optics.
Speaker 0: And on January 6, when he went to mister Irving to get his approval to call in the guard, mister Irving said he would, quote, run it up the chain. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. That was a telephone call. I didn't see him in person when I made that request.
Speaker 0: The house sergeant at Arms is considered probably the most senior security official on the house side. When mister Irving says he has to, quote, run it up the chain, end quote, what did that mean?
Speaker 1: I took that to mean his leadership chain.
Speaker 0: And and who would be his leadership chain? It would be He's he's he's functionally the most senior security official on the house side. Correct?
Speaker 1: That's his that's his title. That's part of the title, the senior law enforcement official for the house of representatives, but he would have been referring to the leadership team that goes up to speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 0: So the the political leadership team, meaning meaning elected officials, not not another security official. Is that your
Speaker 1: That that is correct, sir. He's the top security official for the house.
Speaker 0: So running up the chamber most likely in your in your opinion is is through the speaker's office and possibly to speaker Pelosi?
Speaker 1: That would be where it end. Yes.
Speaker 0: Okay. So so let let's park that there, then let's jump to a a set here. In a press conference on January 7, speaker Pelosi called for your resignation on national television. Speaker Pelosi also stated that she had not talked to you since the initial breach of the Capitol. But according to your transcribed interview, you were on the phone with speaker Pelosi a few times.
Can you explain that discrepancy?
Speaker 1: Yeah. That is that that is correct. I spoke to speaker Pelosi three times that that evening, and she went on national TV and said I'd never spoken to her. But I spoke to her three times. The three three times were the time when I went over to brief president vice president Pence at the secure location, I'd called house sergeant Arms Irving, told him I was going over to brief the vice president.
I was also going over to do a personal assessment of the capital. At that point, things were getting under control. Went over there, briefed him on when we can get them back into chambers with, you know, mister Irving being fully aware. He said he wanted to get speaker Pelosi on the phone. He made a phone call from his cell phone at approximately 05:34 where I briefed speaker Pelosi.
The call was when I left that location. As I was walking away, met up with mister Stenger, and we started walking over to the senate to go brief the senate when Jennifer Hemingway, I believe it was Jennifer Hemingway, handed me the cell phone, and it was Emily Barrett's cell phone calling her and it was Speaker Pelosi on the other line. This is my call with Speaker Pelosi questioning the information I'd given to Vice President Pence about when we can get back into chambers. I assured her that information was correct. I could get them back into chambers by seven 7PM, and the call ended.
That was call number two. Call number three was 06:25PM. I was over at the senate from the secure location I mean, from where the senate had been sequestered. And on a cell phone using Robert Carham's cell phone, they dialed leadership who was over off-site at a secure location, and I briefed all of the leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers. That would've been call number three with speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 0: You didn't have one call. You didn't have two call. You had three calls. So speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to you are inaccurate.
Speaker 1: That is correct, sir.
Speaker 2: Chief Sun, you previously testified on 01/03/2020 or on that on 01/03/2021, three days before January 6, you met separately with house sergeant at arms Paul Irving and senate sergeant at arms Michael Stenger. And, you asked them to approve a request for National Guard assistance on the sixth. Now this is on January. I believe this was in your book that you, met with both, Stenger and Irvin and requested National Guard assistance on to be ready on the sixth. Can you explain what happened in those two meetings with Irving and Stenger?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. So on the morning of the third at 09:24AM, I specifically went to see him because I know what what a big deal it is to have National Guard come and assist us on the on the hill. I went into his office again 09:24 in the morning, went up, and immediately went up and said, hey. I'd like to bring in the National Guard to support me on to assist me on the perimeter. Because when we have a joint session of congress, it takes a lot of my personnel inside.
But immediately, as soon as I asked him, his response was, I don't know. I don't like the optics of that. And his response was, besides, the intelligence doesn't support it. He he immediately then we began talking. He said, have you reached out to Mike Stenger on this?
I said, no, I have not talked to him about it yet. He said, why don't you talk to Stenger and see what he has to say? So then I left, went over to Mike Stenger's office at 09:35 in the morning, walked into his office. He wasn't there. I came back.
He showed up at 11:13. I showed back up at 11:53 and went in to immediately ask him, can I I'd like to request the National Guard? He said, you know, let's come up with another idea. Why don't you call do you know somebody at the National Guard? I said, yes, sir.
I know General William Walker. He said, why don't you call Walker and see if we need them, how quickly could they be get here and how many people could they send us? So I called William Walker, 06:14PM that night. He told me they have a 125 people assisting with COVID response. He could reallocate those fairly quickly once he got secretary of defense approval and send them over.
Speaker 2: K. When when you met with Stenger, had Irvin given him heads up that you were coming to ask for National Guard?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Later on, after after January 6, specifically on April 8, I went and had lunch with Mike Stenger. And I asked him because it was kinda unusual. He came up with that idea so quickly when I went walking in. And I asked him, I said, mister Stenger, you came up with that response fairly quickly for me to call general Walker.
And he had told me Paul Irving had called him ahead of time and said, son came here looking for the national asking for the National Guard. We gotta come up with another plan. Pelosi will never go for it. I was floored by him saying that.
Speaker 2: Okay. So but you don't know I know this word optics had come up several times in the past or in in different contexts. Do you know if Irvin had discussed that with Stenger of what a possible response would be?
Speaker 1: I have no idea, sir.
Speaker 2: Alright. Around 2PM on January 6, you joined a call with Metropolitan Police Department chief Conte and National Guard representatives. According to chief Conte's transcribed testimony given to the select committee, you asked the National Guard to send assistance on that call, and he didn't hear the military people respond to your plea. Is that what you remember?
Speaker 1: No. He heard clearly the military respond to my plea and say they recommended against my request for the National Guard. Robert Conte immediately butted in and said, let me get this right. You're denying the chief of the Capitol Police? And, again, he just you know, I can go farther into that if you want.
Speaker 2: Okay. Thank you. Are you familiar with the term data miner?
Speaker 1: I I have become, familiar with it. Yes.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And according to a book by Carol Linning, general Milley was using this tool and reached out to senator Angus King warning him about violent rhetoric for January 6. Some of the intelligence included references to smuggling guns and other weapons into DC. One message said, let's burn senator McConnell's house down while he's in it. Another one seemingly addressed to members who supported certifying the election said, we're coming to kill you.
Just wait a few days. Did General Milley ever reach out to you and share these concerns with you of any of this of this intelligence?
Speaker 1: No, sir.
Speaker 2: Do you know if he reached out to either of the sergeant at arms?
Speaker 1: I have no idea, sir.
Speaker 2: Would this intelligence have helped, the Capitol Police prepare for January 6? Absolutely.
Speaker 3: At 01:30PM on January 6, we watched as the Metropolitan Police De began to employ officers to support the Capitol Police In doing so, the officers began to withdraw from the traffic control points that were jointly manned with District Of Columbia guardsmen At 01:49PM, I received a frantic call from then chief of United States Capitol Police Steven Sun where he informed me that the security perimeter of The United States Capitol had been breached by hostile rioters. Chief Sun, his voice cracking with emotion, indicated that there was a dire emergency at the capital and he requested the immediate assistance of as many available national guardsmen that I could muster. Immediately after that +1 30 +1 49 call, I alerted the US Army senior leadership of the request. The approval for chief Sun's request would eventually come from the acting secretary of defense and be relayed to me by army senior leaders at 05:08PM, about three hours and nineteen minutes later. I had already had guardsmen on buses at the armory ready to move to the capital.
Consequently, at 05:20PM, less than twenty minutes, the District of Columbia National Guard arrived at the capital and were being sworn in by The United States Capitol Police.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here is: THE VIDEO THE CONVICTED FELONS OF THE JAN 6 COMMITTEE HID FROM PUBLIC VIEW: Nancy Pelosi on camera on January 6, taking responsibility for January 6th: @SpeakerPelosi “Why weren’t the National Guard there to begin with? And I take responsibility for not having them.” https://t.co/qBo51MxUFe
Video Transcript AI Summary
"We did not have any accountability for what was going on there, and we should have." The House GOP obtaining the video of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi speaking with her chief of staff as she evacuated the capital that day. Pelosi heard blaming herself for not having the National Guard on hand to stop the mob. "Why weren't the National Guard there to begin with? I take responsibility for not having them, just prepare for more." The video shot by Pelosi's daughter, Alexandra Pelosi, for an HBO documentary. Pelosi telling MSNBC the video is Republicans' attempt to rewrite history. The former president and his toadies do not want to face the facts. They're trying to do revisionist history on January 6.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We did not have any accountability for what was going on there, and we should have. The House GOP obtaining the video of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi speaking with her chief of staff as she evacuated the capital that day. Pelosi heard blaming herself for not having the National Guard on hand to stop the mob. Why weren't the National Guard there to begin with? I take responsibility for not having them, just prepare for more.
The video shot by Pelosi's daughter, Alexandra Pelosi, for an HBO documentary. Pelosi telling MSNBC the video is Republicans' attempt to rewrite history. The former president and his toadies do not want to face the facts. They're trying to do revisionist history on January 6.
@saras76 - Sara Rose 🇺🇸🌹
@SpeakerPelosi Here you are taking responsibility for not having enough national guard. You can run, but you can't hide from the internet https://t.co/mClViV3tZx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker says there was no accountability for what was happening, and that there should have been. The House GOP obtained the video of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi speaking with her chief of staff as she evacuated the Capitol that day. Pelosi heard blaming herself for not having the National Guard on hand to stop the mob: "Why weren't the National Guard there to begin with? I take responsibility for not having them, just prepare for more." The video was shot by Pelosi's daughter, Alexandra Pelosi, for an HBO documentary. Pelosi told MSNBC the video is "Republicans' attempt to rewrite history." "The former president and his toadies do not want to face the facts. They're trying to do revisionist history on January 6."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We did not have any accountability for what was going on there, and we should have. The House GOP obtaining the video of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi speaking with her chief of staff as she evacuated the capital that day. Pelosi heard blaming herself for not having the National Guard on hand to stop the mob. Why weren't the National Guard there to begin with? I take responsibility for not having them, just prepare for more.
The video shot by Pelosi's daughter, Alexandra Pelosi, for an HBO documentary. Pelosi telling MSNBC the video is Republicans' attempt to rewrite history. The former president and his toadies do not want to face the facts. They're trying to do revisionist history on January 6.
@RT_com - RT
Ex-Capitol PD Chief SLAMS Pelosi over Jan. 6 riots — assistance DENIED Says he was REPEATEDLY asking for help, Pelosi's people denied it FENCED UP only when it suited her https://t.co/YZWb3EnF18
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been reporting for years that Nancy Pelosi left the US Capitol vulnerable, contributing to the uprising against Trump. Months before January 6, leftist groups, revealed in the Sunrise Zoom calls I released, planned to take over the Capitol if there was a constitutional crisis regarding the electors. Their goal was to force Trump out, and they collaborated with government bureaucrats, high-level Democrat strategists, and a coalition of anti-Trump NGOs.
@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸
As I’ve been reporting for years, Nancy Pelosi left the US Capitol open and vulnerable, playing her part in the uprising against Trump. While months in advance the leftists groups, exposed in the Sunrise Zoom calls I released, preplanned to take over the US Capitol on J6 in the event of a constitutional crisis where slates of electors were be challenged. The goal was to force Trump out. These very groups worked along side inside government bureaucrats, high level Democrat strategists, and a large coalition of anti-Trump NGO’s.
reSee.it AI Summary
Kash Patel confirmed that Pelosi blocked Trump's offer of 10,000 National Guard troops, while her team filmed a documentary during the chaos. He also stated that 250 FBI agents acted as undercover provocateurs. We need accountability for those who orchestrated this and demand justice.
@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand
BREAKING: Kash Patel just confirmed what many of us have said for years. – Pelosi blocked Trump’s offer of 10,000 National Guard – Her team was filming a documentary while the chaos unfolded – 250 FBI agents were undercover provocateurs Democrats helped provoke violence, blocked the Guard, staged chaos for cameras, then framed innocent Americans. We need accountability for those who orchestrated this. We demand justice.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Some Republicans argue that Nancy Pelosi staged January 6 and the select committee covered it up. Based on what you know, what are the verifiable events in the lead ups?
Speaker 1: I was DoD chief of staff on January 6. We deployed National Guard; in the Oval Office the president, president Trump at the time, authorized pursuant to law up to 10 to 20,000 National Guard. We took that authorization because the law's second part required a request from who? Nancy Pelosi and the Metropolitan Police and the mayor at the time. And what did they say? No. And remember what happened for the next two years? They say, Oh, Kash is lying. Trump’s lying. And what do we find? Letters of their declination of the National Guard refusing to have the National Guard show up. Nancy Pelosi and her team were busy filming a movie on January 6 while this so caused chaos around her was going down. If she had just look at it this way. If she had said yes to the National Guard and we had 10,000 uniformed military officers establish a secure perimeter, do you think January 6 would have gone differently?
Speaker 0: It is intriguing that 02/1950 FBI plain clothed agents were inside the Capitol on January 6.
Speaker 1: This is a great example of the president's initiative to solve all the answers on January 6, and it's another example of our transparency efforts. Pursuant to the president, we investigated the matter and found out why FBI agents were placed there in the first place. And it turns out, we found documentation and witnesses and whistleblowers that said we were forced to go there to do riot control. Armstrong, do you know what the FBI does not do ever? Riot control.
Speaker 0: And you believe them? That's their word, not mine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some Republicans, mister director, argue that Nancy Pelosi staged January 6 and the select committee covered it up. Based on what you personally know, what are the verifiable committee events in the lead ups? Do you I know you don't speculate, you just deal with facts.
Speaker 1: I'm in a unique position. Remember, I was chief of staff for the Department of Defense on January 6. We were responsible for the deployment of National Guard, and what I have was forced to testify two years ago at great personal cost has now once again, just like Russiagate, been proven true because all I do is speak the truth. On January actually, in the days before January 6, we were in the Oval Office where the president, president Trump at the time, authorized pursuant to law up to 10 to 20,000 National Guard. We took that authorization because the law's second part required a request from who?
Nancy Pelosi and the Metropolitan Police and the mayor at the time. And what did they say? No. And remember what happened for the next two years? They say, Oh, Kash is lying.
Trump's lying. And what do we find? Letters of their declination of the National Guard refusing to have the National Guard show up. So all I can speak to is the facts, and the facts are those plus this. Nancy Pelosi and her team were busy filming a movie on January 6 while this so caused chaos around her was going down.
If she had just look at it this way. If she had said yes to the National Guard and we had 10,000 uniformed military officers establish a secure perimeter, do you think January 6 would have gone differently?
Speaker 0: It is intriguing that 02/1950 FBI plain clothed agents were inside the Capitol on January 6. I've saw the president's tweet
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: To get to the bottom of it, who placed them there, what were they doing, were they inciting violence. What can you tell us, mister director?
Speaker 1: This is a great example of the president's initiative to solve all the answers on January 6, and it's another example of our transparency efforts. Pursuant to the president, we investigated the matter and found out why FBI agents were placed there in the first place. And it turns out, we found documentation and witnesses and whistleblowers that said we were forced to go there to do riot control. Armstrong, do you know what the FBI does not do ever? Riot control.
We don't do that. So the prior leadership sent 250 some odd men and women into a situation they're not trained for, put them in harm's way, put the individuals out there in harm's way, and also, those individuals have collectively responded or said beforehand that they were forced to go there. They didn't volunteer to do that.
Speaker 0: And you believe them? That's their
Speaker 1: word, not mine.
reSee.it AI Summary
I remind you that your Sergeant at Arms repeatedly denied my requests for National Guard before and on January 6, including over 70 minutes on Jan 6 while he escalated for approval. The Pentagon offered National Guard, but I declined because your SAA would not grant me the legal authority required under 2 U.S.C. §1970.
@ChiefSund - Chief Steven Sund
@SpeakerPelosi- Ma'am, let me help refresh your memory. It was your Sergeant at Arms (SAA) who repeatedly denied my multiple requests for National Guard assistance before and on January 6. Even on Jan 6, your Sergeant at Arms denied my urgent requests for over 70 minutes, while he was “running it up the chain” for your approval. The Pentagon offered National Guard assistance, but I had to decline because your SAA would not grant me the legal authority as required under federal law (2 U.S.C. §1970). @StephenM @RepLoudermilk @SpeakerJohnson
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Hey Adam, This is your Speaker, on videotape, taking responsibility for not INVITING the National Guard on January 6 — and you, as part of the convicted felons on the January 6 Committee, hid it from public view for nearly three years. By the way, why did you @AdamKinzinger receive a pardon?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Congresswoman Pelosi asks, “Are you at all concerned that the new January 6 committee will find you liable for that day? Right here.” The other participant replies, “I can.” Pelosi then asks, “Are you at all concerned about the new January 6 committee finding you liable for that day? Why did you re refuse the National Guard on January 6?” The respondent retorts, “Shut up. I did not refuse the National Guard. The president didn't send it. Why are you coming here with Republican talking points as if you're a serious journalist?” Pelosi concludes, “The American people wanna know. We still have questions. Thank you.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congresswoman Pelosi Alright. Check that. Are you at all concerned that the new January 6 committee will find you liable for that day? Right here.
Speaker 1: I can.
Speaker 0: Are you at all concerned about the new January 6 committee finding you liable for that day? Why did you re refuse the National Guard on January 6?
Speaker 1: Shut up. I did not refuse the National Guard. The president didn't send it. Why are you coming here with Republican talking points as if you're a serious journalist?
Speaker 0: The American people wanna know. We still have questions. Thank you.
@AntiLeftMemes - Anti Left Memes
Nancy Pelosi changed her story and is saying that she BEGGED Trump for the National Guard on J6. What's your reaction? https://t.co/JibAsNfK6c
reSee.it AI Summary
I revealed transcribed interviews that have been hidden from the public, confirming that Nancy Pelosi orchestrated a conspiracy to frame Donald Trump, with Liz Cheney involved in the cover-up. One interview details Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato's testimony about Mark Meadows urging D.C. Mayor Bowser to accept Trump's offer of National Guard support. Another highlights General Mark Milley's account of Trump insisting on safety measures for the January 6 event. I call for the arrest of all members of the January 6 cover-up committee for their crimes.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, TRANSCRIBED INTERVIEWS HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW, CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT, The treasonous witch Nancy Pelosi instigated a criminal conspiracy to frame Donald J. Trump and MR. Liz Cheney covered it up. The MISSING Ornato, A: Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato’s first transcribed interview with the J6 committee conducted on January 28, 2022. He testified Mark Meadows pushed D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser for Trump’s call for 10,000 National Guard as she needed to protect the city from the FBI and the bitch refused. B: TRANSCRIBED INTERVIEW HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW, The missing Chairwoman, Joint Chief of Staff, MARK MILLEY (January 3,2021) “The President just says, ‘Hey, look at this. There’s going to be a large amount of protesters here on the 6th, make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it’s a safe event.’” “President Trump ‘Hey, I don’t care if you use Guard, or Soldiers, active duty Soldiers, do whatever you have to do. Just make sure it’s safe.’” And now, arrest every single member of the Jan 6 coverup committee at once for the crimes of perjury, obstruction of justice, racketeering and conspiracy to defraud the United States government. Including Nancy Pelosi. But first MR. Liz Cheney.
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is Nancy. Governor, I wanted to discuss the Virginia National Guard. I spoke with Governor Hogan, and it seems you may need federal approval to operate in another jurisdiction. The situation is escalating; there are reports of windows being broken and someone being shot, all incited by the president. I appreciate your efforts and would like to stay in touch.
The Virginia Guard has been activated, and it's not just Governor Northam involved. He mentioned that 200 state police and a unit of the National Guard have been deployed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is Nancy. Governor, I don't know if you had been approached about the, Virginia National Guard. Mister Hoyer was connect I was speaking to, governor Hogan, but I still think you probably need the okay of the, the federal government in order to come into another jurisdiction. Thank you. The secretary of the army.
Oh my god. They're just breaking windows. They're doing all all kinds. It's really that somebody they said somebody was shot. It's just it was just horrendous and all at the instigation of the president of the United States.
Okay. Thank you, governor. I appreciate what you're doing. If you don't mind, I'd like to stay in touch. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you. Bye bye. Virginia Guard has been called in. You're not just talking to governor Northam.
And what he said is they sent 200 of state police and a unit of the National Guard.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We discovered a previously missing interview where it was revealed that Trump heard Mark Meadows offer up to 10,000 troops. In January, Vanity Fair reported that Trump authorized the National Guard and told Secretary Miller to prepare them. Additionally, a White House employee testified that when Trump first learned about the Capitol attack, he immediately wanted to contact Pelosi and Milley for assistance. There are multiple records indicating that Trump offered the National Guard, but the requests were declined by Pelosi and Bowser.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We knew that he had done multiple, transcribed interviews with the committee, but there was one that was just commonly referred to as the missing or not, interview. And our team through a lot of diligence and digging, we were able to find that and exactly what you just said was in there that he had testified to the committee that he heard the conversation with, the with Mark Meadows offering up to 10,000 troops and even in early January, not long after the attack on the Capitol, Vanity Fair of all publications had ran an article that Trump had offered National Guard and told, secretary Miller, you have full authorization to get the guard ready. That was in January by a liberal publication, so there is much more evidence. We even have evidence from the White House, transcribed interviews that we received from the White House employees where one of them said that responded to a question by the Select Committee which was when President Trump first heard of the attack on the Capitol what was his response? And this White House employee who is physically with the President that day said his immediate response was get Pelosi and Milley on the phone and see what help they need.
There are several instances of on the record where he had offered and even was trying to get, you know, the people to take the National Guard. But it was it was Pelosi. It was Bowser that turned down the offer.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Witnesses claim that President Trump offered 20,000 National Guardsmen to protect the Capitol on January 6th, but this was rejected. However, Chris Miller, the acting Secretary of Defense, testified that Trump never issued such an order. In a meeting on January 4th, attended by key officials, Trump did authorize the deployment of troops if requested, but those requests never came. The discussion included serious national security threats, and the meeting's focus shifted to January 6th at the end. Participants confirmed their statements under oath, emphasizing the importance of the meeting's context and the president's role as commander in chief.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Witnesses, who say they met with witnesses, who say they met
Speaker 1: with president Trump on January 4th. And he offered some 20,000 national guardsmen, to protect the Capitol building on January 6th, but the offer was rejected. Is that true? Do you know that to be true?
Speaker 2: Well, his own acting secretary of defense says that's not true. Chris Miller has testified publicly that Donald Trump never issued any order to deploy the guard to protect the Capitol. And and so I would point people to his own secretary of defense's public testimony.
Speaker 3: So the 4 of you that I've had an opportunity to interview now confirm that on January 4th in the Oval Office that you heard Donald Trump authorize up to 20,000 troops, Kash Patel, 2 days before January 6th even happened. Tell us about that meeting.
Speaker 4: Yeah. It's not one of those thanks again, Sean, like Chris said, for having us especially on d day to talk about this serious matter. It's not one of those meetings you forget. The secretary of defense, Chris Miller, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, Mark Milley, the chief of staff to the president of the United States of America, Mark Meadows, and the president of the United States himself in the Oval Office talking about some of the most serious national security threats we were facing, and then we pivoted to setting up for January 6th. And mister Trump unequivocally authorized up to 20,000 national guardsmen and women for us to utilize should the second part of the law, the request, come in.
But those requests never did as you highlighted.
Speaker 3: Let me let me be very clear. Both of you said this under oath under the threat of a penalty of perjury
Speaker 5: to the committee? Absolutely, Sean. And to be clear, Cash brought it up best. The meeting was, one of it was one of the serious kinda heavy meetings I've been in, and it was about a foreign threat that was directed towards the United States, which obviously we can't talk to for about for fear of, you know, ending up in jail. And, so I wanna I I kinda wanna, like, be clear.
The president is leaving and says, hey. One more thing. And we all sat back down and we discussed what was going on in January 6th. I don't wanna because I think that's important to bring up so that, the opposition doesn't get this idea that this was the purpose of the meeting. The president was doing exactly what I expect the commander in chief to do, any commander in chief
