reSee.it - Related Post Feed

MaxBlumenthal
Posted - September 20, 2021 at 11:08 PM
Saved - October 15, 2025 at 11:48 PM

@MaxBlumenthal - Max Blumenthal

A real struggle for the hordes of cops at #JusticeforJ6Rally to find anyone who wasn’t a fed or member of the media apparently

@FordFischer - Ford Fischer

BIG UPDATE: The individual arrested at Saturday's rally at the Capitol was a federal agent, and he will not be prosecuted. U.S. attorney says they're "'not moving forward with charges' but did not provide additional information about the decision." https://apnews.com/article/arrests-riots-capitol-siege-gun-politics-us-customs-and-border-protection-f35fb9ad54ac0babf710e87eaec8a4b1

Federal officer arrested at Capitol rally won't be charged A federal law enforcement officer was arrested carrying a gun at Saturday’s rally at the U.S. Capitol billed to support the suspects charged in January’s insurrection, but he will not be prosecuted. apnews.com
RepThomasMassie
Posted - November 23, 2021 at 10:35 AM
Saved - October 12, 2025 at 8:18 PM

@RepThomasMassie - Thomas Massie

I asked Atty General Merrick Garland, who was under oath, if agents or assets of the federal government were encouraging or directing protestors on Jan 5 and Jan 6. He refused to answer on the grounds that there were ongoing investigations. He could have answered that question.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

.@joerogan Discussing The Curious Case Of Ray Epps & January 6th "He did it pre-January 6th, he did it during the January 6th thing, and that this guy has faced no legal charges whatsoever, and people are like well wtf is going on here?" https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/meet-ray-epps-the-fed-protected-provocateur-who-appears-to-have-led-the-very-first-1-6-attack-on-the-u-s-capitol/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Discussion centers on the agent provocateur angle of January 6. They claim there were federal agents involved in instigating the violence and entering the Capitol, and that "this one guy" has faced no legal consequences while others face "massive federal charges and four years plus in jail." They compare to the World Trade Organization riots in Seattle '99, saying "literal government agents went in wearing antifa outfits" to provoke violence and were released conveniently. They focus on "Ray Epps, the Fed protected provocateur who appears to have led the first January 6 attack on the US Capitol," referencing a Revolver article and a video. They debate whether he was initiated by government, radicalized and acting on his own, or a rogue agent; they note it shows intelligence agency problems. They worry about autocratic solutions and how social media exposes such cases; they end with "Red or black" and Ray Epps.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you aware of the agent provocateur aspect of January 6? Speaker 1: Say more. Speaker 0: I don't exactly know what the reality is, but the what people insinuating is that there was federal agents that were involved in instigating the violence, instigating the entering into the capital, and that there's this one guy in specific that they've got him isolated on video. They've shown him over and over again. He's faced no legal consequences. They know this guy's name. They know exactly who he is. All these other guys are in jail. All these other guys who got into the capital, I mean, so many of them are facing, like, these massive federal charges and four years plus in jail. This one guy is like, we have to go in there. We have to take back. We have to get inside there. And people start calling him a thud in in one one of these videos, and I think he, like, takes off and runs away. But this is what it seems like. It seems like and this is something that governments have done forever. Mhmm. Right? You take a peaceful protest. What's the best way to break up a peaceful protest? You bring in agent provocateurs to turn it into a non peaceful, a violent protest, smash windows, light things on fire, then you can send in the troops and you can clean up the mess, and then you don't have any protest anymore. This was the World Trade Organization in where was it? In Seattle in '99 or whatever it was. That's what they did. And it's been documented that that is what happened. I mean, like, literal government agents went in wearing antifa outfits and starts this is pre antifa. Right? Smashing windows, lighting things on fire, and they were all eventually released conveniently. Well, this guy do you know about this, Jamie? You know what? See if you can find it. Because it's a curious case of this one particular individual who's, like, yelling in these various groups that we have to get in there where and it like, he did it pre January 6. They did it during the January 6 thing, and then these guys faced no legal charges whatsoever. And people are like, well, what the fuck is going on here? Because when you see some kind of organized debacle like that and then you see people insisting that we have to take this further and we have to go inside. And then if you find out that those people are actually federal agents Mhmm. That are doing that, you're like, well, what is happening here? And how is that possible? And how is this legal? That's a problem. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean Speaker 2: I haven't seen this one. I remember the umbrella man who was breaking windows at the George Floyd riots. Speaker 0: I think they found out that that guy was a cop and that I think that was like a rogue human, but no. I'm not sure if that's true. Speaker 2: But So this is where it's interesting with in this case, I don't know the case at all, but is it that somebody in government actually initiated him doing it as an agent provocateur to shut down the protest, or was he someone who happened to be in government who was himself radicalized who acting on his own because of radicalization did the thing? Speaker 0: Or is he an agent provocateur but he's doing so independently just because he's a fucking psycho? You know, some firemen start fires. Speaker 1: Right. But notice that's, like, whichever view you have, you probably had a motivated interest to see it that way. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. I didn't have any view on it. Right. That's the thing. I'm looking at it like this. Like, what is it? What is this video? Yeah. I'm watching this guy eat like, this one big beefy looking federal agent guy telling them they gotta go inside, and I think he was wearing a MAGA hat. And, you know, it was like a guy in his fifties then and he's like, I'll you what we gotta do. We gotta get inside there. We gotta go inside the Capitol. Speaker 1: And these people are like, inside? Like, isn't that illegal? Like, what the fuck? Speaker 0: This guy's taking it to the next level. But he's doing it, like, multiple times. That's the the the there's a there is a real problem with intelligence agencies doing that kind of shit. Totally. Because they do do it. And I think they do it thinking that this is like these group of fucking psychos, like, we gotta stop this from escalating, so here's the way. We get them to do something really stupid, then we can put fences up and create a green zone, and then we lock this down. Meet Ray Epps. Fucking ad clicks. Meet Ray Epps, the Fed protected provocateur who appears to have led the very first one six attack January 6 attack on The US capital. So let's watch some of this because it's fucking crazy. It's really weird. This guy is doing this, like, over and over and over again. Speaker 3: Yeah. This was there's a video of it, but this is an article about Speaker 0: probably So this is an article that's in Revolver. Speaker 3: Hold on. I'll get the video. Speaker 0: We'll find the video because the video is fucking strange. Ray Epps' video. Speaker 3: Here it is. Like this. Well, that's twenty minutes long. Speaker 0: Well, just watch we'll see some of it. Oh, these are guys that are watching it. What about that one? Speaker 3: That's goes to a website. These are on Twitter. Speaker 0: Arrest rave epps. So so people are some people are hip to it. But most people, like, including you guys, have no idea that this is a a person. Right? You've never heard of this before. What terrifies me is a solution of this is an autocratic government that controls all aspects of society so none of this ever happens. That scares the shit out of me because that seems to be where there's that fuck. Let's play this. Speaker 1: The capital. What? Tomorrow? Speaker 0: Wait. Do it from the beginning. Speaker 1: I don't even like to say Tomorrow. I'm not We need to go into the capital. Jesus. Hang on. Into the capital. What? Tomorrow? Speaker 0: Either what? Speaker 1: I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Speaker 0: Shut the fuck up, boomer. Speaker 1: To the Capitol. Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yeah. So can we go up there? No? When we go in? Are we gonna get arrested if go out there? Yeah. You don't need to get shot. You're gonna arrest us all? Speaker 0: Okay. I think we see enough. There's a lot of instances. It goes on for quite a while. There's a lot of videos of this guy, is really fascinating because I think these methods that they've used forever are kinda subverted by social media because you have a 100,000 different cameras pointed at this guy from all these and when someone starts screaming loudly, people start filming it, and then you get a conglomeration or or collection of these rather. Mhmm. And you can go, oh, what is happening here? Like like, I don't think they've realized that people would be so cynical that they would go over all these various videos and find this one guy who's not being prosecuted or arrested. Speaker 1: He's not being prosecuted or arrested. Speaker 0: Ting. Congratulations. Speaker 1: Yeah. Know. No. He's not. Speaker 0: Look at that guy. Yeah. I mean, if you had a guess, if you had, like, $50, what are you gonna put your your chips on? Red or black?
Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears to Have Led the Very First 1/6 Attack on the US Capitol - Revolver News In order to protect the country from fictional right-wing "patriot" groups, did the FBI become an insurrectionist "patriot" movement? revolver.news
bennyjohnson
Posted - May 16, 2023 at 5:55 PM
Saved - May 17, 2023 at 6:36 PM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

🚨BREAKING: @RepMTG introduces articles of impeachment against J6th lead prosecutor Matthew Graves for “maliciously prosecuting at least 1000 people from Jan. 6” https://t.co/lvEVQ6fShX

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker accuses Mr. Graves of abusing his position by prosecuting over 1,000 people involved in the January 6th incident and planning to arrest 1,000 more. They highlight a specific case of Matthew Perna, who peacefully entered the Capitol for 20 minutes without assaulting anyone or causing damage. Despite cooperating with the FBI and pleading guilty, Mr. Graves requested more prison time for Perna. Tragically, Perna later died by suicide. The speaker argues that the Department of Justice should stop being weaponized and focus on prosecuting real criminals. They announce their intention to introduce articles of impeachment against Mr. Graves.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have already abused your position by maliciously prosecuting at least 1,000 people from January 6th, but you recently announced that you're going to arrest at least 1,000 more. Let me remind everyone the manner in which you go about your January 6th prosecutions. A man named Matthew Perna who had no criminal record peacefully entered the capitol threw an open door on January 6th. He stayed inside roughly 20 minutes. He didn't assault anyone, not a police officer, anyone. He didn't damage any property. He fully cooperated with the FBI and eventually plead guilty to all charges. But right before his sentencing, you, mr. Graves, asked the judge for more time to object to the pre sentence report, by the way, while you weren't prosecuting many of the crimes in DC, this was so that that you could ask for at least a few more years in prison for the guy that walked around in the capitol for 20 minutes not assaulting anyone, and this is what you've done repeatedly over and over for those who've plead or have been convicted on January 6th. Well, 2 weeks later Matthew Perna hung himself in his garage. Mr. Graves, he was 37 years old. On March 9, 2022 you drop the case against Matthew Perna because he was dead. The time for weaponizing the Department of Justice needs to come to an end, and because you refuse to prosecute real criminals that are are violating all the crimes here in Washington DC, and you want to talk about DC residents, they are victims of your abuse of power. And because of that I am introducing articles of impeachment on you, mr. Graves, and I yield back the remainder of my time.
margrfed
Posted - September 1, 2023 at 3:46 PM
Saved - September 7, 2023 at 9:01 PM

@margrfed - ⚜️marg federico⚜️

While every Trump supporter in the vicinity of January 6 (except Ray Epps) is hunted down & many incarcerated for years remember when BLM rioters threw rocks at police attempting to invade the Trump White House with no consequences.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Protesters have occasionally managed to tear down parts of the barricade, prompting the police to reinforce it. This back-and-forth struggle has resulted in intense confrontations, with protesters throwing objects at the police, who are determined to hold their ground.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For times, it seems like the protesters have gotten the upper hand a couple times. They've been able to rip away parts of the barricade and kinda pull them away and just toss them. And then the police will go in, bring another part of it and try to reinforce. And when they do that, the protesters confront them, they throw things at them, and the police try to hold their ground, it has been a very intense push and pull for, I'd say, at least
amuse
Posted - December 15, 2023 at 2:52 AM
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 2:50 PM

@amuse - @amuse

Who ordered the Capitol Police to tear gas peaceful protesters on January 6th just minutes before allowing them into the Capitol to stop Trump’s challenge of the certification of the election? https://t.co/WdN7iMGsCx

InvestigateJ6
Posted - January 5, 2024 at 11:02 PM
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 5:21 AM

@InvestigateJ6 - InvestigateJ6

🚨 #BREAKING: A class action civil rights lawsuit has been filed against the US Capitol Police, DC Metropolitan Police, Mayor Bowser, and Nancy Pelosi for the planned security failures and the illegal assault on early January 6th West Plaza protesters that led to the #J6 riot. https://t.co/wsbGIgngTn

@InvestigateJ6 - InvestigateJ6

For the last 3 years, right wing pundits have blamed the J6 riot on federal agent provocateurs. Until now, Americans didn't realize that the federal agents provoking the riot were uniformed police – USCP and MPD fired unrelenting munitions on the J6 protesters without warning, sparking a riot and the building entry an hour later.

Video Transcript AI Summary
During a protest, there were acts of violence against police officers. The speaker, who has custody of thousands of hours of videos, witnessed these acts. The officers responded with necessary force. However, another speaker claims that if the police hadn't used concussion grenades and pepper spray, the situation wouldn't have escalated. They argue that it was a peaceful protest and that the officers initiated the violence without provocation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have given warnings about chemical munition. I need to let the legal team position above me to start deploying. Launch. Launch. Watch. Speaker 1: You're under a giant. We need more fucking lunatic shit. Speaker 0: Yep. They're deploying flashbangs on us. Speaker 1: Stay Speaker 2: 89123 up here. Near 43 on the north side of ice cream. Very large tower coming down ice cream. 51, I need you here, please. Speaker 3: As one who was here and, who has custody of these 44,000 hours of videos, I can attest there were acts of violence or acts of terrible violence that day. Even from what I had seen with my own eyes And and through the media, I've seen acts of violence against police officers that I had not seen before. And it was brutal, and it was ugly. And, our officers online did what they needed to do at the time. Speaker 1: If they'd never thrown the concussion grenades. If they'd never used a pepper spray, this wouldn't have happened. It was a peaceful protest. I was standing within 15 feet The Atlanta officers. They started firing at us before anybody did anything to them. We were not rushing them. There was no advance on them. They They just started throwing concussion grenades and pepper spray.
alx
Posted - January 6, 2024 at 5:19 PM
Saved - January 7, 2024 at 4:32 PM

@alx - ALX 🇺🇸

DC U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves is making clear that the DOJ is now going to target Americans who were around the Capitol on J6 but did not enter the building https://t.co/bj4i3QfHe9

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many people entered the Capitol building without permission, which is a federal crime. Our focus is on prosecuting those who entered the building or engaged in violent or corrupt behavior on Capitol grounds. However, it's important to note that even those who entered the restricted area without authorization committed a federal crime. Thousands of people occupied an area where they were not allowed to be in the first place.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And what happened inside of the building. An important note when it comes to our prosecutions about those who remained outside the building. We have used our prosecutorial discretion to primarily focus on those who enter the building, or those who engage in violent or corrupt conduct on Capitol grounds. But if a person knowingly entered the restricted area without authorization, they had already committed a federal crime. Make no mistake, thousands of people occupied an area that they were not authorized to be president in in the 1st place.
NASM106
Posted - January 7, 2024 at 1:46 PM
Saved - January 8, 2024 at 2:38 AM

@NASM106 - Pasquinal

Mathew Graves the radical DC Prosecutor going after anything J6 now says he is going to go after over 1,000 other people who attended the Trump rally simply walked down to the Capital and never broke anything was just standing outside on the People's House property. Insane.

julie_kelly2
Posted - May 19, 2024 at 5:03 PM
Saved - May 19, 2024 at 9:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A NY man, Ruben Camacho, was arrested for assaulting Capitol police officers during a pro-Hamas demonstration. Unlike J6ers accused of similar offenses, Camacho was charged in DC Superior Court, not federal court. He received a lenient punishment of 48 hours of community service, in contrast to J6ers facing lengthy prison sentences. This highlights the alleged political bias in the DOJ's charging decisions.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

This will certainly outrage many J6ers and their families. A NY man was arrested last November for assaulting 2 Capitol police officers during a pro-Hamas demonstration outside the DNC. (V1 here is a female officer according to a Capitol Police press release.) Ruben Camacho also resisted arrest and blocked an exit used by federal lawmakers. Here is the incident report. But unlike J6ers accused of assaulting police...

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Camacho was not charged in federal court--he was charged in DC (local) Superior Court by DC US Attorney Matthew Graves, the same Biden appointed prosecutor continuing to arrest and charge J6ers with assault on federal officers. Camacho did not have to face Judge Beryl Howell or Judge Tim Kelly or Judge Royce Lamberth in the DC federal courthouse. Camacho was not denied release from jail pending trial or plea; he was not condemned as an "insurrectionist" or "domestic terrorist" by federal prosecutors. No, because Camacho participated in a protest sanctioned and funded by Democrats, he got a slap on the wrist:

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Camacho--unlike Julian Khater or Thomas Webster or Ronald McAbee to name just a few--won't be sentenced to 6 or 8 or 10 years in federal prison while having his name dragged through the mud by the media and family bankrupted and reputation destroyed. In fact, no one has ever heard of Camacho until now. No harsh coverage at NBC News or WashPo or CNN about how a Democratic Party activist punched a female cop in the face. Ryan Samsel did far less than that to Ofc. Caroline Edwards but he was incarcerated for 3 years denied release awaiting his trial. Nope, Camacho only has to perform 48 hours of community service in DC then his case goes bye bye.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

This confirms what Graves' office told me several weeks ago about arrests related to Hamasurrection protests in Washington. All cases will be adjudicated at local DC court not federal court. Not a single Hamasurrectionist--including those who assaulted police--will face federal charges. Please, Merrick Garland, tell us again how the DOJ never considers politics when deciding who and what to charge.

Dapper_Det
Posted - June 10, 2024 at 1:40 AM
Saved - June 10, 2024 at 8:37 PM

@Dapper_Det - Dapper Detective

UPDATE: it took only 3 days for DC US Attorney Matthew Graves to drop murder and kidnapping charges in the carjacking case that killed an elderly woman at the doorstep of his office. Seemingly, Graves only prosecutes grandmas. Not their killers.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman accused of car theft resulting in a fatal crash no longer faces felony murder or kidnapping charges, just unarmed carjacking. The medical examiner's report on the victim's death is pending. The stolen car was missing for 19 minutes before crashing near the US attorney's office, with no video evidence available.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the case of a woman accused of stealing a car and then crashing and killing a passenger inside. In court this afternoon, we learned the woman is no longer facing charges of felony murder and kidnapping. News Force Paul Wagner was in DC Superior Court for today's hearing and has the latest. Speaker 1: Good evening. We learned a number of new things in this case today. One of which is that Kayla Brown, the accused, is no longer facing felony murder or kidnapping charges. She's only facing a charge of unarmed carjacking. The US attorney's office has dropped those two charges in part because the medical examiner has not ruled on the cause and manner of death of Leslie Gaines. She was the passenger in the car when police say it was carjacked outside the emergency room of the Washington Hospital Center's MedStar unit. We also learned today that the that car, was missing for 19 minutes after Kayla Brown allegedly stole it outside the emergency room and then wherever it went. The the detective in this case, said there's no video and they have no information to learn where that car was for those 19 minutes until it crashed into the US attorney's office right over here just a few steps from where I'm standing.

@Dapper_Det - Dapper Detective

DC carjacker crashes vehicle with elderly woman owner inside of it—killing her near the DC US Attorney's office of Matthew Graves. Instead of prosecuting carjackers, Graves weaponized his office to go after President Trump & Joe Biden's political enemies. https://trib.al/xs1lLWT

SocialFlow trib.al
gekaminsky
Posted - July 25, 2024 at 1:13 AM
Saved - July 25, 2024 at 5:29 AM

@gekaminsky - Gabe Kaminsky

Biden’s top prosecutor Matthew Graves, who led the J6 probe in DC, not long ago was a lawyer for Hamas-linked Qatar and Lebanese banks accused of funding terrorism https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2797194/top-biden-doj-prosecutor-represented-qatar-foreign-banks/

Top Biden DOJ prosecutor represented Qatar and foreign banks accused of financing terrorism - Washington Examiner The top-ranking Justice Department prosecutor in Washington, D.C., worked on behalf of Qatar and numerous foreign banks that have been accused of bankrolling terrorism, documents show. As the U.S. attorney in the nation's capital, Matthew Graves has come under the spotlight for supervising a sprawling investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and faced washingtonexaminer.com

@NoahPollak - Noah Pollak

Just six weeks ago, the same people did the same thing to Lafayette Park in front of the White House. No consequences then. No consequences now. It's fun being a Hamas supporter in cities run by Democrats. You get to do whatever you want.

WallStreetApes
Posted - December 4, 2024 at 9:24 PM
Saved - December 5, 2024 at 4:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights from an FBI agent who revealed that the bureau was instructed not to pursue liberal rioters, contrasting this with the aggressive actions taken against January 6th protesters. I noted incidents from May 29th, where far-left extremists firebombed the White House, injuring Secret Service officers. A young worker at the agent's home mentioned his involvement in the riots but felt powerless due to a lack of encouragement for proactive measures. This raises questions about the lack of charges against those involved in the riots.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

FBI Agent reveals The FBI gave instructions to not go after liberals rioting This is why Democrats never get arrested for rioting but January 6th protesters are hunted down “May 29th, far left extremists were firebombing the White House and Saint John's Church. They were putting secret service guys in the hospital” Secret service officers were “catching bricks to the head. — 70-100+ injuries” A kid working on this FBI agent’s house said that he was involved in the riot, “There's nothing I could do about it. We are not encouraged to be able to take proactive means.” “Like, that guy admitting that basically he was involved in that riot, it didn't go anywhere. How many charges do we see?” None.

Video Transcript AI Summary
On May 29th, far-left extremists firebombed the White House and St. John's Church, resulting in over 100 injuries, including Secret Service agents. Many people were unaware of these events. One individual shared that he had to hide in a statue during the chaos, fearing for his safety. Despite witnessing the violence, there seems to be a lack of accountability or proactive measures taken against those involved. The conversation highlights the surprising ignorance surrounding these incidents and the absence of significant legal repercussions for the participants.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No one even knows that on May 29th, far left extremists were firebombing the White House and Saint John's Church. Speaker 1: They were putting secret service guys in the hospital. Yeah. That's actually Speaker 0: bricks to the head. 70 plus injuries, a 100 or a 100 plus injuries. Yep. You know? And, nobody even knows about it. And the the the the anti Trump guy had this, like he immediately darted over and looked at me with his, like, what? Okay. He didn't know about it. Speaker 1: There were people that were hiding in the statues. They have some of these things that are, like, big chalices that are in Lafayette Park. And I actually found out as I was leaving DC, because I lived in DC for 5 years, I worked at the Washington field office. That was my backyard. Some kid who was doing an inspection on my roof as we sold our house, he was like, oh man, I was at the White House like on that day, and I was hiding up in this thing, and I thought Secret Service was gonna get me. And I was like, like, tell him this. Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. But he knows. He knows he's good. Speaker 1: And there's nothing I could do about it. Yeah. Because we're not we are not encouraged to be able to take proactive means. Like, that guy admitting that basically, he was involved in that riot. It it didn't go anywhere. How many charges do we see?
mrddmia
Posted - December 30, 2024 at 7:44 PM
Saved - December 31, 2024 at 12:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m calling out Matthew Graves for violating constitutional rights. No one is above the law, and I’m ready for justice on January 20th. Also questioning if he and his team secured pardons from Biden or if they couldn’t pay the price.

@mrddmia - 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

Lawyer up, Matthew Graves. You violated the constitutional rights of Americans. 18 U.S.C. § 241 Nobody is above the law. Bridget Fitzpatrick, his handpicked crony, can enjoy her 4 days as the Acting DC U.S. Attorney. Justice is coming on January 20th. https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/united-states-attorney-matthew-m-graves-step-down-january-16-2025

United States Attorney Matthew M. Graves to Step Down January 16, 2025 Matthew M. Graves announced today that he is resigning as United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, effective January 16, 2025, after serving in the role for more than three years.   justice.gov

@mrddmia - 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

And did Matthew Graves and his @USAO_DC January 6th hack prosecutors secure their Biden pardons? Or they couldn’t afford what Biden charges?

listen_2learn
Posted - January 6, 2025 at 4:15 PM
Saved - January 7, 2025 at 1:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed the connections between Kamala Harris, her husband, and DLA Piper, particularly regarding the SolarWinds hack and the events of January 6. DLA Piper represented Smartmatic, and its partner, Matthew Graves, is involved in prosecuting January 6 cases. I believe there are significant ties between these entities and the alleged cover-up of the 2020 election theft. I also raised concerns about the narratives pushed by the Democratic Party and the need for investigations into Harris and her associates, including Norm Eisen.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Patrick Byrne mentions Kamala Harris’s husband in relation to 2020. Kamala’s husband was with DLA Piper. DLA Piper represented Smartmatic. DLA Piper, a law firm, “investigated” Solarwinds along with Crowdstrike, Chris Krebs and others. Kamala Harris had a meeting the morning of January 6 about Solarwinds before she went to the DNC for the pipe bombs portion of the “inaurrection”. The FBI released a statement on January 6 saying that the “Russians” were responsible for Solarwinds. Solarwinds was the hack of the 2020 election. January 6 was the cover-up of the theft of the 2020 election. Matthew Graves, the lead J6 persecutor, was a partner at DLA Piper. Kamala Harris is longtime friends with 2020 and J6 architect/lawfare coordinator Norm Eisen. Kamala Pipe Bombs Harris and her husband must be investigated for their roles in 2020 and January 6. Long 🧵 @Kash_Patel

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dominion, a key player in vote tabulation, received a $400 million investment from Credit Suisse, a Chinese bank, just weeks before the election. Another company, Seidel, which recently declared bankruptcy, had its assets acquired by a new entity with ties to George Soros and Venezuela. Additionally, Kamala Harris' husband is linked to one of these companies. The software used for elections originates from Hugo Chavez's Venezuela, while the machinery and tabulation services are connected to Venezuelan and Chinese interests. This raises concerns about foreign influence in the election process, suggesting a potential manipulation of our electoral system.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's Dominion, and there is Seidel, which is the vote tabulation company. It's over in Spain, but its servers are really in Frankfurt. The Smartmatics, the software is actually Hugo Chavez creation. I can walk you through the how and the why and such. There's a beautiful backstory. Dominion, in October 6 of this year, 4 weeks before our election, Dominion took a $400,000,000 investment slash buyout from a Chinese bank. Who's the Chinese bank? It's called Credit Suisse. And you're saying, oh, isn't that a Swiss bank? No, Credit Suisse is a Chinese bank, they bought it. And the Chinese bank put $400,000,000 into Dominion. And then SITL, this company, this European company based in Barcelona, cleared bankruptcy back in June of this year, and its assets were purchased by another company which began using name Seydel. Often companies when they're up where there's some no good nicks and you wanna sort of seal off your trail, you do this. You have one company declare bankruptcy. The assets get stripped out and put in another, and this all is just rubble. And then when the investigators show up, it's just a pile of rubble they got to sift through. That was done in June. The people who bought it the people who bought it have 2 dubious connections. 1 is to George Soros and one is to Venezuela. And in particular, the guy Venezuela for 20 years had kind of a front agency, PR agency lobbying group in New York. And I'm not prepared to name them yet, but it's a guy out of that group, out of that Venezuelan linked PR slash lobbying group has gone, and been part of this deal with Settle. Guess who else is part of it? It's a deal I I don't wanna believe it or not, Kamala Harris' husband shows up with some connection into one of the companies I just named. I'm not ready to talk about more about that. But Kamala Harris' husband is Kamala Harris' husband is linked to one of these. But that's not the main event. Let's set that aside. The point is that there's 3 companies, the ones that provide the software, the ones that provide the machinery that runs the elections, and the one that tabulates. The ones that provide the software is a creation of Hugo Chavez, Venezuela. The one that does Dominion has, in a month before election, a Chinese bank took it over with a $400,000,000 cash infusion and took it over. And the one that does the tabulation is a George Soros slash Venezuela. So, America, you need to understand that our election systems are now being provided and operated by Venezuelan, Chinese, and Venezuelan slash Soros entities. That's our that that's who just ran our election. Our election got hacked. This is a slow coup.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

DLA Piper, Smartmatic, Mark Malloch-Brown, Soros

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

@smartmatic Smartmatic is affiliated with Soros lackey Mark Malloch-Brown. They are also affiliated with DLA Piper, Kamala Harris’s husband’s former law firm who also just happened to be involved in “investigating” the SolarWinds hack. They all know what happened in 2020. https://t.co/vrkqmmhuBk

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Kash Patel should investigate Solarwinds.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

“US intelligence agencies have issued a rare public statement claiming that the Solarwinds hack was 'likely Russian in nature'” January 6, 2021

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Matthew Graves must be prosecuted.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

The loser that is prosecuting J6 victims is from DLA Piper. https://t.co/bNfL9Z0CsE

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

“Investigated”

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

This is who “investigated” the Solarwinds hack. - Crowdstrike (Clinton, FBI) - DLA Piper (Kamala’s husband, Smartmatic) - KPMG (another big 4 accounting firm like PwC and Deloitte) - CISA and seditionist Chris Krebs It’s called a cover-up. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7DHb1gzF5o4&pp=ygV2UlNBIENvbmZlcmVuY2Ugd2ViY2FzdCBUaHVyc2RheSwgdGhlIGdyb3VwIG9mIGV4ZWN1dGl2ZXMgZnJvbSBDcm93ZFN0cmlrZSwgS1BNRywgRExBIFBpcGVyIGFuZCwgb2YgY291cnNlLCBTb2xhcldpbmRzIA%3D%3D

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

🧵

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

The creation of Solarwinds. I’m guessing they had someone on the inside. Ron Plesco, DLA Piper, Mandiant, Crowdstrike, KPMG, Chris Krebs, selling stock days before the hack was made public, Sunburst, Orion, virtual machine, March 2020, June 2020 removed from build server https://t.co/IxZ6Nhbuzn

Video Transcript AI Summary
The SolarWinds breach revealed serious security flaws within the company. Former employees had previously warned about inadequate security measures, and a significant password leak occurred in 2018. Tensions escalated when major investors sold $315 million in stock just before the breach was disclosed, prompting SEC investigations. SolarWinds hired Chris Krebs for government relations while Tim Brown's team worked to invalidate compromised software certificates and rebuild affected products. KPMG, led by David Cohen, discovered a crucial virtual machine snapshot containing a malicious file named Sunspot, which enabled hackers to inject a backdoor into the Orion software. This sophisticated attack compromised the build process, allowing hackers to replace legitimate files with their own, raising concerns about vulnerabilities across the software industry.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As the fallout of the SolarWinds breach became noticeable, anger was directed towards SolarWinds. Former employees and researchers revealed incidents that appeared to highlight the company's lax approach to security. In 2017, a former employee claimed to have warned SolarWinds executives about their lack of attention to security, predicting an inevitable breach. Additionally, in 2018, a password for an internal web page used for temporarily storing SolarWinds software updates was publicly posted on a GitHub account. While some considered this a potential threat, SolarWinds said that this password error did not pose any risk. The situation got worse when it was discovered that 2 of the company's primary investors who collectively owned about 75% of SolarWinds and held 6 board seats, had sold 315,000,000 in stock on December 7th, just 6 days before news of the hack broke. This prompted an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commissions into whether they had prior knowledge of the breach. Government officials threatened to end contracts with SolarWinds and lawmakers began to discuss the possibility of summoning the company's executives for a hearing. In response, SolarWinds hired Chris Krebs, who was the head of the c I s a, who had been fired by President Donald Trump weeks earlier. Krebs was tasked with helping the company navigate its interaction with the government. Meanwhile, Tim Brown and his security team at SolarWinds faced enormous workload. The corrupt Orion software had been signed with the company's digital certificate which they now had to invalidate. However, this certificate had been used to sign many other SolarWinds software products. The engineers had to recompile the source code for every affected product and signed them with new certificates. Despite these efforts, Solomons was still in the dark about the origin of the rogue source code in Orion. This raised concerns that malicious code might still be present in the server, capable of embedding backdoors in any compiled programs. To address this, they abandoned their old compiling process in favor of a new one that allowed them to inspect the finished product for unauthorized code. The pressure to quickly provide recompiled programs to customers was intense and Tim Brown admitted to losing £25 in just 3 weeks due to stress. While Brown's team worked on rebuilding the company's products, Crowdstrike was trying to determine how the hackers had infiltrated SolarWinds' network. Simultaneously, SolarWinds enlisted KPMG, an accounting firm with a computer forensics division, to uncover how the attackers had injected some burst into the orion dotdll file. David Cohen, an expert with over 20 years of experience in digital forensics, led the KPMG team. The infrastructure used by SolarWinds to build its software was fast, and Cohen's team collaborated with SolarWinds engineers throughout the holidays to solve the puzzle. Finally, on January 5th, Cohen contacted Ron Plesko, the DLA Piper attorney, with a significant breakthrough. They had found traces of an old virtual machine that had been active about a year earlier. It was used to build the Orion software. This virtual machine was a crucial piece of the puzzle that they had been seeking. Forensics investigators often depend on luck as evidence of a hacker's activity can vanish over time. However, in this case, they had a stroke of luck. SolarWinds had used a software built in management tool called TeamCity, which utilized virtual machines in its work. Ordinarily, these machines were short lived, only existing during the compilation of a software. However, if a build process failed, TeamCity generated a memory dump, essentially a snapshot of the virtual machine at the moment of its failure. Typically, SolarWinds engineers deleted the snapshot during the post build cleaner, but for some reason, they hadn't removed this specific one. Without this unlikely discovery, Cohen acknowledged that it would have been left with nothing. Within this snapshot, investigators uncovered a malicious file named sunspot, the file containing just 3 and a half 1000 lines of code but held the key to revealing the entire operation. On January 5th around 9 PM, Cohen forwarded the sunspot file to Adam Mayes at Crowdstrike. The CrowdStrike team examined it through a decompiler and shared their findings via zoom call with Cohen and Plesco. As the code scrolled down the screen, the wickedness of the discovery became apparent. This seemingly insignificant file was responsible for injecting the backdoor into the Orion code, allowing the hackers access to some of the most highly secure networks in the country. With the sunswap fire, investigators could trace all activities related to it. They determined that the hackers introduced it to build the server on the 19th or 20th February. It remained resting until March when SolarWinds developers initiated the build of an Orion software update using TeamCity's virtual machines. Unaware of which virtual machine would compile the orion dotdll code, the hackers developed a tool to develop Sunspot to each one. The brilliance and simplicity of the hack became evident. As soon as the dotdll file appeared on a virtual machine, Sunspot rapidly and automatically renamed the legitimate file, giving its original name to the rogue.dll created by the hackers. The rogue file was nearly identical to the legitimate one, except it contained the sunburst backdoor. The build system then selected the hackers dot dll file and incorporated it into the Orion software update within seconds. After the compilation was complete, Sunspot changed legitimate Orion file to its original name and deleted itself from all virtual machines. However, it remained on the build server for several months to replicate this process during the next 2 Orion builds. Then, on June 4th, hackers abruptly seized this part of the operation, removing Sunspot from the build server. The investigators couldn't help but admire the hacker's tradecraft. They had never encountered a compromised build process before. However, they soon realized that this vulnerability could extend to nearly every other software manufacturer worldwide. Few had built in defenses against this type of attack leaving them exposed. It became a moment of fear for everyone involved.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Someone needs to ask Kamala Pipe Bombs Harris why she was at the DNC on January 6. https://t.co/AS4YP2Lt33

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Someone should ask Norm Eisen’s partner in crime Michael Chertoff how he immediately knew that Solarwinds was the Russians.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

“The SolarWinds Wake-Up Call” Michael Chertoff December 16, 2020 Keep in mind that the hack was made public on December 13, 2020. They supposedly had no idea who had done it (and still don’t til this day…. 😉). https://t.co/QvDUFvN6xp

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

DLA Piper has some explaining to do.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

DLA Piper and China

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Kamala Pipe Bombs Harris and her longtime friend Norm Eisen MUST be investigated for 2020 and J6.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

The democrat party is not about facts, reality or policies. They are about narratives and themes that play on people’s emotions. Democrats are also about power at any cost, including destroying innocent Americans. The architect of creating their irreality is Norm Eisen. https://t.co/rOJ38vAKEf

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was at the Capitol on January 6th as the vice president-elect. I was taken to a secure location with my husband and watched the chaos unfold. There are questions about my presence at the DNC that day, especially regarding a pipe bomb found nearby. The narrative surrounding January 6th is complex, with significant evidence against groups like the Oath Keepers for conspiracy to overthrow the government. Video footage will play a crucial role in the prosecution. The aftermath of the events has implications for future elections, with a focus on accountability and the potential for a national referendum on democracy versus extremism. The left is determined to regain control and prevent another outsider from disrupting the political landscape.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was at the Capitol on January 6th. I was the vice president-elect. I was also an acting senator. I was there. Did someone say, madam vice president-elect, you gotta see this come? How did that unfold? I was at the capitol that morning, and then I was, in a meeting, and I was told that I should leave. And then I was taken to a secure location with my husband. We watched in horror. Speaker 1: You did not you may have watched in horror, but you were not at the capitol, Kamala Harris. Julie Kelly has an amazing tweet about this. Here's an angle she notes in Kamala Harris's role on January 6th. No one mentions her being there the entire day at the DNC where the pipe bomb was found. Why? I'm telling you why. And Brett can get to the bottom of it. Because the pipe bomb was plan a that was going to be a distraction to stop people from questioning the vote count and to shut it all down. They didn't need it when the breach at the capitol happened. So they're desperately trying to make the story go away, and Kamala Harris even knew either knew about it or was told later. That was the original plan. Pipe bomb, everybody stop talking about the election. These MAGA people are trying to kill us. Julie notes Mark Milley furiously making calls that day. Didn't contact Kamala Harris. Mitch McConnell, no one's concerned that pipe bomb was found outside of her location. Why does nobody know what Kamala Harris was up to at the DNC that day? It is the single most important question. Speaker 0: And on that day, the president of the United States incited a violent mob to attack our nation's capital, to desecrate our nation's capital. Speaker 2: You know, I think Kamala does have the upper hand. I don't say that. Obviously, I'm a Democrat. I've known her for almost 2 decades. The documentary filmmaker embedded with the insurrection. That's Nick Quested. His footage and we're gonna see a lot of video footage, some never before seen. His footage is like the Watergate tapes. It's a real time accounting of what happened. Speaker 3: What needs to be established in a sedition case, and how difficult will it be for prosecutors to prove it? Speaker 2: In order for the Department of Justice to prevail before a jury here in the District of Columbia on this sedition trial coming out of January 6th, they're gonna need to show that, there was a conspiracy, a group of people who agreed to attempt to overthrow the government or to attack or impede it by force. And while as you know, Fred, these charges are very rare, prosecutors have, an unusual volume of evidence here against Stuart Rhodes and the other members of this organization, the Oath Keepers. Speaker 3: Starting with videotape. Right? That mean that's pretty crucial. Speaker 2: Yes. In the 21st century, juries love it. Wasn't always true when I started trying cases 3 decades ago. But now juries wanna see video, audio. They want documents. They expect that you'll be able to prove your case using multimedia. The January 6th committee has set a heart a high bar, but, the prosecutors have a ton of evidence here, Fred, that, Stuart Rhodes and the oath keepers agreed to attempt to overthrow the government or attack it by force. Speaker 4: I was providing certain work products to the, to the committee. Enrique Tarrio had made bail and was being released from jail. He had been arrested for admitting to burning the BLM banner on December 12th, although he was clearly seen to be observing. In retrospect, I believe that Tarrio fully understood what was gonna happen the next day. By removing himself from leading the Proud Boys on January 6th, he was creating an alibi to avoid accepting responsibility for the events being planned. Speaker 5: In footage obtained by the committee, we learned that on the night of January 5th, Enrique Tarrio and Stuart Rhodes met in a parking garage in Washington, DC. Speaker 0: But this is not an isolated situation. Let's remember Charlottesville, where there was a mob of people carrying tiki torches, spewing anti Semitic hate. And what did the president then at the time say? There were fine people on each side. Speaker 3: You also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group excuse me. Excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of to them a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert e Lee to another name. And you had people, and I'm not talking about the neo nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. Speaker 6: Most people don't know that right after he said very fine people on both sides, which became a rallying cry for the left in mainstream media, that Donald Trump is is a racist and a white supremacist, even though he condemned them just seconds later, which they never show, that became a rallying cry. What most people don't know is that moment of Trump right there, that is why Joe Biden said he was running for president. Speaker 7: And that's when we heard the words of the president of the United States that stunned the world and shocked the conscience of this nation. He said there were, quote, some very fine people on both sides. Very fine people on both sides? Speaker 0: Let's remember that when it came to the Proud Boys, a militia, the president said, the former president said, stand back and stand by. Speaker 3: I'm willing to do anything. I wanna see peace. Well, then do it, sir. Speaker 8: Say it. Do it. Say it. Speaker 3: Do you wanna call them what do you wanna call them? Give me a name. Give me Speaker 9: a name. White supremacists and white supremacists. Speaker 3: To condemn the protesters and white protesters. Stand back and stand by. Speaker 0: Last night when you said that the Speaker 3: Proud Boys could stand back and stand by. Speaker 9: I don't know who the Proud Boys are. I mean, you have to give me a definition because I really don't know who they are. I can only say they have to stand down. Let law enforcement do their work. Law enforcement will do the work more and more as people see how bad this radical liberal democrat movement is and how weak. The law enforcement's gonna come back stronger and stronger. But, again, I don't know who Proud Boys are, but whoever they are, they have to stand down, let law enforcement do their work. Speaker 2: We ultimately merged the, 3rd article into the first two articles as a pattern because that's the case for the American people, the repetition. And what was fascinating was that one of the witnesses I examined, an expert witness from, Stanford Law School, Pam Carlin, said, imagine I'm paraphrasing. She said, imagine if Trump said to a, if there were a national crisis in the United States, and Trump only thought of himself, and he said to a governor, can you do us a favor, though, when a state, a liberal state needed help? And, of course, that was exactly what transpired with COVID. So the pattern, radical selfishness, quid pro quo, sacrificing the American people, that is the pattern that has carried forward. And those three episodes are the subject of the book, and that's the case that I made to the American people. And I hope in my own small way, I contributed to their delivering a guilty verdict for Donald Trump. Dania, they cut our best line in my view from the New York Times op ed that success will be measured in 3 boxes. Yeah. The cable box, how many people watched last night? It was extraordinary saturation last night, like, presidential war speech. I mean, it was wall to wall. So what are the total total numbers? In getting the truth out, not just about January 6th, but what came before and what came after, I was glad to see. They checked the cable box last night. The jury box, which we're talking about, I'll just know parenthetically that I think the committee has a lot of evidence that DOJ doesn't have, but it may not be the headline evidence. It's in all these 1,000 transcripts, 140,000 documents, all the data. And d DOJ wants it. Maybe not a lot, but I think they have some. Certainly, they have a lot that Fani Willis doesn't have down in Georgia, and there are conversations going on about cooperation. And 3rd, so I think they did what they needed to do to set up the jury box, including getting jury pools ready to hear this story, testing some themes. And 3rd, the ballot box. We haven't talked about that. I thought they skillfully, last night, set started setting up November of 2022 and November of 2024 as an accountability referendum. Will Donald Trump ever be able to get out from under the brilliant David Bender has put in one of the coming themes, dereliction of duty? Will he ever be able to get out from under the onus that the committee is starting to lay on him, particularly with that swath of middle America? He can't win the presidency with the 30% of hardcore adherence. Speaker 8: Now the left is done with regular US presidential elections. 2016 ruined it for them. The coronation for the first female American president was all set. The decorations were ready. The catering was ordered. Remember what that felt like? The outsider crashed the party and the left vowed with remarkable unity, never again. Now through the color revolution that the state department instigated all around the world, especially in Eastern Europe, there are American experts in this field of a, mostly peaceful regime change. These Americans are specialists who have developed a systematic approach to a color revolution. And in their desperate hour, they seem to be using this playbook on our own nation. The left in the mainstream media have waged a 4 year war to delegitimize president Trump with singular focus on November 3, 2020. In the left's collective mind, losing an election is an impossibility. But there is still always a wild card that the American people are just so stupid. So make no mistake, the goal is just under 6 weeks from now and it is set to have the system change. One where the ruling class elites are back in charge. Democracy is convenient and all but the little people, oh, they're they're revolting, you know. No, I mean it. They are. They're revolting. They're awful. When the little people wreck the system and put somebody like Trump in office, the people have to be put back in their place. Speaker 2: I will say that by setting up the great national referendum, democracy or trumpery in 22, but particularly in 24, and the yoke that they are putting around Trump's neck. And by setting up the prosecution so by setting up the jury box and the ballot box, that may be, sufficient to address the problem.
MZHemingway
Posted - January 6, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Saved - January 7, 2025 at 12:03 PM

@MZHemingway - Mollie

Was shocked to see Sen. Klobuchar falsely claim today "police officers" were "killed" on J6. Just a brazen lie. It's literal fake news. One year ago Rachel Maddow falsely claimed J6 protesters had "bludgeoned to death" a police officer. Complete lie. And never corrected.

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Rachel Maddow's Jan 6 coverage 1. Cut out the part of Trump's speech where he told the crowd to march to the Capitol "peacefully" 2. Called the riot a "murderous siege" 3. Forwarded the demonstrably false claim that MAGA "terrorists" "bludgeoned to death" a police officer https://t.co/3fqxlfoCqJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's crucial for everyone to forget what was said that day. A call was made to march to the Capitol to peacefully express voices, but it escalated into a violent siege. Congresswoman Jamie Herrera Beutler highlighted the severity of the situation, noting that a Capitol police officer was killed by the mob, which also defaced symbols of freedom. The rioters were actively searching for the vice president and the speaker of the house.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's very much in his interest for everybody to forget what he actually said that day. Speaker 1: I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard, and we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not gonna have a country anymore. Speaker 0: And so they went to the capitol to fight like hell for Trump just like he told them, which of course turned in to the violent and murderous capitol siege. Congresswoman Jamie Herrera Beutler, she actually did something, I think, very helpful today. She put the spotlight back on something that I think hasn't received nearly enough attention. She said, quote, the violent mob bludgeoned to death a Capitol police officer. They defaced symbols of our freedom. These terrorists roamed the Capitol, hunting the vice president and the speaker of the house.
0rf
Posted - January 12, 2025 at 12:34 AM
Saved - January 12, 2025 at 3:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I confronted J6 Committee's lead investigator, Tim Heaphy, about the claim that the January 6 violence was worse than the BLM riots, especially since no one was killed during J6. He avoided my questions regarding misinformation from the Washington Post and insisted that Officer Sicknick's death was linked to January 6, despite previous debunking. He falsely stated that the medical examiner found evidence of injuries related to chemical exposure, but the examiner actually reported no evidence of injuries from that day.

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

I asked J6 Committee's lead investigator, Tim Heaphy, How was the J6 violence worse than the BLM riots if the J6 rioters didn't kill anyone? Are you concerned with misinfo from WaPo, which falsely reported that they had? He dodges & lies that Officer Sicknick died from J6 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
How can you say there's no equivalence between the BLM protests and the January 6th riots? Many were killed during the BLM protests, while no one was killed by protesters on January 6th. Also, are you concerned about misinformation from The Washington Post, which initially gave the false impression that a protester was killed on January 6th? I trust credible sources like The Washington Post. There were deaths related to the Capitol defense, which is not misinformation. The BLM protests were serious and warranted accountability, but the dynamics of an attack on the government are fundamentally different. Officer Sicknick's death was linked to the stress of the riot and preexisting conditions, as determined by the medical examiner. Thank you for your questions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. We think Speaker 1: we have time for one more question. Coming in from the back. Speaker 0: How you doing? So I just wanna follow-up on something you said earlier. You said there's no equivalence between the BLM protests and the January 6th, riots. So, my question is, like, how can you say, you know, aside from all the property damage in the burned homes, how do you see the violence is worse, at the capitol compared to BLM protests, when many people were killed in the BLM slash antifa protests, but nobody but the protesters didn't kill anybody on January 6th. And just one short follow-up question, if I may. You mentioned in the book that, the issue with misinformation on social media, which everyone would agree is an issue. Are you concerned about misinformation from, you know, sources like the local paper of note, The Washington Post, which did give everyone the false impression that the protesters had murdered, had killed somebody, on January 6th. He died the following day of natural causes. The Post did did make that correction many months later, but most people didn't get that update. Anyway, thank you. Speaker 1: Yeah. Thank you for the question. Speaker 2: I'm not concerned about misinformation from The Washington Post. I generally trust The Washington Post and other credible sources of information. There were people who died as a direct result of their involvement in protecting the capital. So that's not misinformation. And I don't mean to suggest on the BLM protest in the summer of 2020 that they weren't serious, that they weren't worthy of a strong response, that people shouldn't have been held accountable. They absolutely were. My point is that they were just sort of fundamentally different than an attack on the seat of government. They're they're just a fundamentally different dynamic. Seriously, how do you Speaker 1: think that one is worse, violence, violence, and they didn't get to this way? And I'm curious who like, you say you trust everything in The Washington Post, and then you also say Sydney, officer Sydney was, Speaker 0: killed associates to something Speaker 1: that happened during the riot. Speaker 0: But the post itself followed up much later and said he died of natural causes. Speaker 2: No. Brian, the the medical examiner found that officer Sicknick died as a result of exposure to the chemical agents and and the the stress of defending the capital exacerbating a preexisting condition. That's a a legal conclusion that I trust, that The Washington Post didn't make up. Speaker 0: Okay. The Washington Post didn't say another. No. Speaker 3: Okay. I think our time for questions is done. Thank you so much. Speaker 1: Okay. Alright. Thank you. Thank you. Hey. I really appreciate you coming out and

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Although the microphone was taken from me, I asked about the contradiction between Heaphy’s trust in the Washington Post and his claim that Sicknick’s death was a result of Jan. 6—which was effectively debunked in the Post 4 years ago. /2

Video Transcript AI Summary
You trust the Washington Post, yet you describe the situation as sickening regarding the officer's death during the riot. The Post later clarified he died of natural causes. However, the medical examiner concluded that Officer Signick's death resulted from exposure to chemical agents and the stress of defending the Capitol, which worsened a preexisting condition. This is a legal conclusion that I trust, not something fabricated by The Washington Post. I’m not disputing that the Post presented another perspective. It seems our time for questions is over. Thank you for your time, and I appreciate your presence here.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You say you trust everything in the Washington Post, and then you also say sickening, awful sickening was, killed associates to something that happened during the riot. But the post itself followed up much later and said he died of natural causes. No. Brian, the the medical examiner found that officer Signick died as a result of exposure to the chemical agents and and the the stress of defending the capital exacerbating a preexisting condition. That's a legal conclusion that I trust, that The Washington Post didn't make up. Okay. I'm not saying that The Washington Post didn't say another option. No. Okay. I think our time for questions is done. Thank you so much. Okay. Alright. Thank you. Thank you. Hey. I really appreciate you coming out, and

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Heaphy just lied and said, “The medical examiner found that Officer Sicknick died as a result of exposure to the chemical agents...” The medical examiner "found no evidence" of that. /3

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

I gave Heaphy one more chance to save himself. But he repeated the false claim that the medical examiner found that Sicknick suffered "injuries" on J6. Again, the medical examiner found "no evidence" that Sicknick suffered any "injuries"—"internal or external" on J6. /4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The post indicated natural causes, but the medical examiner determined that Cygni's injuries were related to his service. The autopsy was conducted by the DC medical examiner. When asked about concerns regarding misinformation from The Washington Post, there was no concern on this topic, though other topics like the Iraq war were deemed beyond the speaker's scope.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the post did say it was natural causes. When did they learn and how did we learn that it it was related? Speaker 1: The medical examiner found that Cygni's injuries were related to his service. Speaker 0: Is it a medical examiner for for who? Speaker 1: For whomever did the autopsy. Okay. I believe it was the DC. Yeah. Speaker 0: And and as far as you said you're not concerned about misinformation with The Washington Post, what about Not on this topic. No. Okay. But other topics, like, the Iraq war and all that? Is that Speaker 1: Kinda beyond my scope. Speaker 0: Okay. Alright. Thanks. Have a great You too. Thank you.

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Full story at http://Orf.Report /5

Matt Orfalea | Substack Accidental journalist and video creator substack.com
AdamO422018
Posted - January 14, 2025 at 4:38 AM
Saved - January 14, 2025 at 10:21 PM

@AdamO422018 - Adam Obest

@BrandonStraka Yes. He is corruptly influenced and cannot stop lying to fit his narrative. Everyone should always know about this case to prove the two-tiered system of justice DOJ has become: https://www.tampafp.com/pro-hamas-rioter-gets-community-service-after-punching-female-u-s-capitol-police-officer-in-dc/. Like Trump said, Department of Injustice. Disgrace!

Pro-Hamas Rioter Gets Community Service After Punching Female U.S. Capitol Police Officer In DC More evidence of our justice system slanting left under President Joe Biden. tampafp.com
julie_kelly2
Posted - January 17, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Saved - January 17, 2025 at 3:34 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Yesterday Merrick Garland again bragged about his abusive, selective J6 prosecution and praised his line prosecutors for locking up meemaws and veterans exercising their 1A rights. "Kicked" police? https://t.co/yEu1fYRYbB

Video Transcript AI Summary
You protected our democratic institutions from violence, charging over 1,500 individuals for criminal actions during the January 6th attack and the events leading up to it. You held accountable those who assaulted law enforcement officers defending the Capitol that day. Your commitment to justice was unwavering, guided solely by the facts and the law. I am proud of the work you accomplished and the manner in which you executed it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You protected our country's democratic institutions from violence and threats of violence. You charge more than 1500 people for criminal conduct that occurred during the January 6th attack on the capital as well as in the days weeks leading up to that attack. You brought to justice those who kicked, punched, beat, and tased law enforcement officers who were protecting the capital that day. And you pursued accountability for that attack on our democracy wherever it led, guided only by your commitment to following the facts and the law. I am proud of the work you have done. I am equally proud of the way you have done that work.
InvestigateJ6
Posted - January 18, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Saved - January 21, 2025 at 6:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noted that during the 2020 DC Floyd riots and the 2017 J20 Trump Inauguration riots, all rioters were released without pretrial detention, even those charged with assaulting police. On January 6, 2017, protesters disrupted the Capitol during the certification of the 2016 election, and throughout Trump's presidency, the Capitol faced multiple invasions. Unlike the J6 defendants, these protesters faced local charges in DC Superior Court. The Floyd riots lasted five nights, causing significant property damage and injuries to over 100 federal agents, leading to a curfew and a lawsuit settlement.

@InvestigateJ6 - InvestigateJ6

In both the 2020 DC Floyd riots and the 2017 J20 Trump Inauguration riots, all rioters were let go without pretrial detainment or prison including those charged with assaulting police. On J6 2017, protesters invaded the Capitol and interrupted VP Biden during the certification of the 2016 election. During Trump's presidency, the US Capitol was invaded at least 9 times. These protesters were charged under local DC statutes in DC Superior court, and not with federal charges in DC District court as the J6ers were. The Floyd riots went on for 5 nights and shut down DC: Property damage. 100+ federal agents injured. Firebombs thrown at the White House. Overnight curfew enacted by Mayor Bowser. DC settled lawsuit with protesters improperly dispersed. Goodwin v. D.C., 579 F. Supp. 3d 159 uncoverdc.com/2024/01/11/a-t… https://t.co/d7v0cFfehB

@InvestigateJ6 - InvestigateJ6

@jim_noblet @Amys3rdAccount @JDVance All two hundred thirty five ANTIFA rioters who committed crimes and assaulted police on J20 had their cases dismissed. None of them were sentenced to pretrial detainment or suffered solitary confinement. All would have had a jury of their peers (95% voting against Trump).

JonathanTurley
Posted - January 21, 2025 at 1:50 AM
Saved - January 21, 2025 at 5:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noted Sen. Cory Booker's criticism of recent pardons, where he mentioned multiple police officers died during a protest, a claim echoed by others. However, it's important to clarify that only one person, protester Ashli Babbitt, died that day. While there are valid arguments against the pardons and the events of that day were indeed disgraceful for our democracy, the assertion of multiple officer deaths misrepresents the facts and doesn't contribute to the necessary discussions about the broader implications of the pardons.

@JonathanTurley - Jonathan Turley

Sen. Cory Booker (D., N.J.) just criticized the pardons on CNN by saying "He has unfortunately pardoned police killers. Five police officers died that day." It is a claim made by other senators. Only one person died that day: protester Ashli Babbitt https://jonathanturley.org/2025/01/08/police-officers-were-injured-and-killed-klobuchar-repeats-common-false-claim-about-january-6th/

“Police Officers were Injured and Killed”: Klobuchar Repeats Common False Claim About January 6th Minnesota Democrat Sen. Amy Klobuchar this week was hit by a "community note" flagging a common false statement made about January 6th and how multiple officers were killed that day. Democratic leaders routinely refer to multiple deaths of officers when the only person to die on January 6th was Ashli Babbitt, a killing of an… jonathanturley.org

@JonathanTurley - Jonathan Turley

...There are good-faith arguments that can be made against the scope of these pardons. Many of us denounced the riot and still view it as a disgraceful day for our democracy. https://jonathanturley.org/2021/01/10/a-crisis-of-faith-why-we-should-be-worried-more-about-a-desecration-than-an-insurrection/ However, the repeated claim that officers died that day distorts the record. ...

A Crisis Of Faith: Why We Should Be Worried More About A Desecration Than An Insurrection Below is my column in the Hill on the riot at Congress and its implications for our country.  As shown by the unfounded rush for a "snap impeachment," we are experiencing a crisis of faith in this country -- not only in our Constitution but ourselves.  Pushing for a snap vote (and snap judgment) on… jonathanturley.org

@JonathanTurley - Jonathan Turley

...Even among the critics of the DOJ "shock and awe" policy, the scope of the pardon was broader than many expected. That is a worthy debate. However, the claim of multiple deaths on that day does not advance that debate.

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 24, 2025 at 6:17 AM
Saved - January 24, 2025 at 2:36 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: Chip Roy DESTROYS the hypocrisy of Democrats complaining about President Trump’s blanket pardon of J6 protesters BLM burned cities and killed people—but got a free pass Biden/Garland weaponized the DOJ and tainted the judicial system—so Trump was right to wipe it all away. https://t.co/EFP8ZfsYHN

Video Transcript AI Summary
The president decided to address the injustices faced by 1,500 individuals affected by politicized prosecutions, many of whom had endured significant hardships over the past four years. This includes cases where even innocent bystanders, like two grandmothers, were arrested for merely being present at the Capitol. The president's actions aim to restore fairness to the justice system, particularly for those protesting against the killing of unborn children. Critics argue that this undermines safety, but the president believes reversing these politicized prosecutions enhances security. He highlights the disparity in sentencing, noting that a career criminal received only 27 months for burning down a police station, contrasting it with the treatment of those unjustly prosecuted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The president came in and made a judgment that these 1500 people of varying forms, some sentenced, some not, some had taken plea deals, some not, had had 48 months of their life turned upside down by a department of justice who wanted to try to make a example out of them, and the president of the United States said enough. And you know what? I agree. Because at the end of the day, 48 months later, many of them having been in jail for all or a lot of that time, many of them who had their doors broken down, many of them had FBI raids. I had 2 grandmas driving from Austin, Texas out into the Hill Country just a few months ago who were arrested and jailed overnight because they were physically present here at the capitol. Not even inside to the best of my knowledge. I think they might have just crossed one of the bike lines. 3 years later, you arrest 2 grandmothers, Put them in jail? Does anybody see what happens when you politicize the justice system? The scales of justice become something that you can't look at as blindfolded? And, again, why am I talking about this? Because today, the president righted the wrongs of those 21 individuals who were literally protesting the in their view, and I share that view, the murdering of the unborn children. I think that stuff matters. I think it matters a lot. Because had Joe Biden, had mayor Garland not politicized the Department of Justice, then maybe 20 or 30 cases of individuals who had done something that were particularly egregious, that were prosecuted, maybe those wouldn't have been pardoned. I don't know. I haven't studied every case. But when you're looking at 1500 cases and all the people who are being abused, I think the president did the right thing and, again, differentiated between those with the commuted sentences. But meanwhile, what the president is doing besides, I think, trying to restore balance to the justice system is he's keeping his promises to secure our country. One of my colleagues over there said the first thing the president did was make us less safe. Are you serious? Are you serious? You think you think reversing politicized political prosecutions 4 years later is making us less safe? May I remind my Democrat colleagues that the individual who burned down a police station, a career criminal, got 27 months. That's the idea of justice of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle. Let's put aside the $2,000,000,000 of damage nationwide in the wake of the Floyd riots. Let's put aside all the other damage that flew flowed from that. Meanwhile, what is the president doing? Making our nation much more safe.
julie_kelly2
Posted - January 24, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Saved - January 25, 2025 at 1:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Just seven months before January 6, I noticed that Democrats, the media, and activists criticized police actions against BLM rioters who caused significant damage in DC. The House even held two hearings on excessive force at Lafayette Square, and an internal inquiry into the Park Police was launched. Now, those same individuals are expressing outrage over the pardoning of political protesters who were often assaulted by police and fought back. It’s interesting to see the double standards at play. More examples to come.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

A mere 7 months before Jan 6, Democrats, the media, and activists condemned police action against BLM rioters who burned down parts of DC, destroyed federal property, and assaulted federal police. The House held TWO hearings about excessive force at Lafayette Square and an internal inquiry into Park Police commenced. These same hypocrites are now clutching their pearls over the pardoning of political protesters who were being assaulted by police and fought back in most instances. Looky who I found. (Many more to come)

Video Transcript AI Summary
When nonviolent protesters gathered at Lafayette Square, we felt compelled to join them in the call for justice. Our ministry faced disruption when the government violently cleared protesters from around St. John's on June 1st and denied us access for a vigil. This violence contradicts our faith and the teachings of the Bible. The government's announcement of military force against citizens was horrifying and dehumanizing. When the president held up a Bible outside our church, it misappropriated scripture and our sacred space. While there have been incidents of vandalism at St. John's, they should not overshadow the urgent need for justice and reform in how we treat people of color. Buildings can be repaired, but we cannot bring back lives lost to police violence. Black lives matter, and our faith drives us to advocate for equal justice for all.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When nonviolent protesters began to gather at Lafayette Square, as a church, we decided to be present, to add our voice to the call for justice, to stand with and minister to all other peaceful protesters gathered there. This was and is for us an act of faith. Our ministry was suddenly and forcefully interrupted by government officials, first on June 1st, when the government violently cleared protesters and clergy alike from the areas surrounding St. John's, and then in coming days when the government denied us access to the church to conduct a vigil. These actions, and in particular the use of violence against peaceful protesters, were antithetical to the teachings of the Bible and what we stand for as a church. When our government announced its intention to use military force against American citizens in the Rose Garden that day, it struck me as an escalation of violence that could cause unnecessary suffering. Then to see the government carry out that threat moments later, I was horrified. It was dehumanizing and in violation of the protesters' right to be in that space. Then, when the president held up a Bible outside our church as if to claim the mantle of spiritual authority over what had just transpired, I knew that I had to speak. Nowhere does the Bible condone the use of violence against the innocent, especially those who are standing up for justice. It was a misappropriation of scripture and usurpation of our sacred space. I raise these issues to call attention to an abuse of power on the part of our government, which is also at the heart of the larger struggle for racial justice. While it's true there have been instances of vandalism at St. John's in recent weeks, We cannot let those events and others overshadow the fundamental cause of justice. People across our nation are united as never before in recognizing that the way we police our communities needs to change. The way we treat people of color in this country needs to change. Yes, we care deeply about our churches as buildings, but in the end, buildings can be windows can be replaced, pillars can be repainted. We can never bring back the lives that have been lost through terrific police violence. These deaths are the true outrage. George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Elijah McCain, McLean, and so many more. I don't want anything that has happened at St. John's, either before the protests or in the weeks since, to distract us from that fact. Black lives matter, and our faith compels us to seek equal justice for all people.
TheWiseJared
Posted - January 24, 2025 at 5:05 PM
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 3:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a video highlighting the media's focus on the use of a "Stinger Ball Grenade" against protestors at Lafayette Square, contrasting it with the lack of coverage when over 40 were used against protestors at the Capitol on January 6. I questioned the absence of concern from certain activists during that event, especially given the previous outrage over police actions during BLM protests. The hypocrisy in the reactions to both situations is striking, and I plan to highlight more examples of this inconsistency.

@TheWiseJared - Jared Wise

To support Julie's point, watch this video and media concern about a single "Stinger Ball Grenade" used against 2020 Lafayette Square protestors compared to their lack of interest in police use of the same weapon against protestors at the US Capitol on #J6. Police on J6 used more than 40 "Stinger Ball Grenades" on protestors on the West Plaza in less than an hour, throwing most of them deep into the crowd where people were just standing peacefully, and used many more throughout the day. Where were @brian_castner and @amnesty when J6 occurred just a few months later? https://wusa9.com/article/news/investigations/tear-gas-grenades-washington-dc-protests-st-johns-church-lafayette-square/65-126bad2b-7aa3-4fe7-aae6-890fbe0383ed

Sting Ball Grenades were used in Lafayette Square Monday Former military expert identifies canister found in Lafayette Square as a Stinger Ball grenade containing tear gas. Law enforcement agencies all deny using tear gas. wusa9.com

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

A mere 7 months before Jan 6, Democrats, the media, and activists condemned police action against BLM rioters who burned down parts of DC, destroyed federal property, and assaulted federal police. The House held TWO hearings about excessive force at Lafayette Square and an internal inquiry into Park Police commenced. These same hypocrites are now clutching their pearls over the pardoning of political protesters who were being assaulted by police and fought back in most instances. Looky who I found. (Many more to come)

Video Transcript AI Summary
As a church, we decided to stand in solidarity with peaceful protesters at Lafayette Square. Our ministry was disrupted when the government violently cleared protesters and clergy from St. John's and denied us access for a vigil. The use of violence against peaceful protesters goes against our beliefs. When the government threatened military force against citizens and then carried it out, I was horrified. It was dehumanizing and violated their rights. The president's use of our church and the Bible to justify these actions was a misappropriation of scripture and our sacred space, so I spoke out. I want to call attention to the abuse of power, which is also at the heart of the struggle for racial justice. We cannot let instances of vandalism overshadow the need for change in how we police our communities and treat people of color. Buildings can be repaired, but lives lost to police violence cannot be brought back. Black lives matter, and our faith calls us to seek justice for all.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When nonviolent protesters began to gather at Lafayette Square, as a church, we decided to be present, to add our voice to the call for justice, to stand with and minister to all other peaceful protesters gathered there. This was and is for us an act of faith. Our ministry was suddenly and forcefully interrupted by government officials, first on June 1st, when the government violently cleared protesters and clergy alike from the areas surrounding St. John's, and then in coming days when the government denied us access to the church to conduct a vigil. These actions, and in particular the use of violence against peaceful protesters, were antithetical to the teachings of the Bible and what we stand for as a church. When our government announced its intention to use military force against American citizens in the Rose Garden that day, it struck me as an escalation of violence that could cause unnecessary suffering. Then to see the government carry out that threat moments later, I was horrified. It was dehumanizing and in violation of the protesters' right to be in that space. Then, when the president held up a Bible outside our church as if to claim the mantle of spiritual authority over what had just transpired, I knew that I had to speak. Nowhere does the Bible condone the use of violence against the innocent, especially those who are standing up for justice. It was a misappropriation of scripture and usurpation of our sacred space. I raise these issues to call attention to an abuse of power on the part of our government, which is also at the heart of the larger struggle for racial justice. While it's true there have been instances of vandalism at St. John's in recent weeks, We cannot let those events and others overshadow the fundamental cause of justice. People across our nation are united as never before in recognizing that the way we police our communities needs to change. The way we treat people of color in this country needs to change. Yes, we care deeply about our churches as buildings, but in the end, buildings can be windows can be replaced, pillars can be repainted. We can never bring back the lives that have been lost through terrific police violence. These deaths are the true outrage. George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Elijah McCain, McLean, and so many more. I don't want anything that has happened at St. John's, either before the protests or in the weeks since, to distract us from that fact. Black lives matter, and our faith compels us to seek equal justice for all people.

@TheWiseJared - Jared Wise

Another example here: https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/investigations/tear-gas-grenades-washington-dc-protests-st-johns-church-lafayette-square/65-126bad2b-7aa3-4fe7-aae6-890fbe0383ed

Sting Ball Grenades were used in Lafayette Square Monday Former military expert identifies canister found in Lafayette Square as a Stinger Ball grenade containing tear gas. Law enforcement agencies all deny using tear gas. wusa9.com
ItsYourGov
Posted - April 8, 2025 at 4:45 PM
Saved - April 9, 2025 at 3:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that Steven Jensen has been promoted to lead the FBI's Washington Field Office. He claims to have been the strategic driver behind the January 6 investigations, asserting that they were justified and that he would not change his approach. Jensen labeled January 6 participants as "terrorists" and views the event as domestic terrorism. He supported the FBI's controversial tactics regarding parents at school board meetings and has faced criticism for failing to resolve the pipe bomb investigation. Jensen defended the FBI's handling of the Summer 2020 riots compared to January 6, despite inconsistencies in his explanations.

@ItsYourGov - Oversight Project

J6 Mastermind Promoted Yesterday, the @FBI confirmed that Steven Jensen was promoted to a powerful position within the bureau, heading @FBIWFO. Here's what you should know about him from @Jim_Jordan / @Weaponization interview of him…

@ItsYourGov - Oversight Project

Jensen claimed he was the strategic driver of J6 investigations. Jensen, the on-scene commander of J6, said the investigation was totally justified, and he would not do anything differently.

@ItsYourGov - Oversight Project

@SeniorChiefEXW said Jensen called J6rs "G** D*** terrorists" https://t.co/qOGvJ9IFhz

@ItsYourGov - Oversight Project

Jensen thinks J6 was a “domestic terrorism event” and FBI tactics were "proportional and scalable" https://t.co/2ERpjXNovD

@ItsYourGov - Oversight Project

Jensen supported the FBI treating parents at school board meetings as potential terrorists. https://t.co/RjoXh6Bdqv

@ItsYourGov - Oversight Project

Jensen also failed to solve the pipe bomb investigation that he oversaw. Where is the cell phone data for the "pipe bomber"? https://t.co/NY0A8fCaVQ

@ItsYourGov - Oversight Project

New WFO ADIC, Jensen, had the audacity to tell Congress, under oath, that the FBI treated Summer 2020 rioters in the same manner as J6 misdemeanors. https://t.co/mmGisOPWwB

@ItsYourGov - Oversight Project

He was a boss during Summer 2020 riots but could not give @mattgaetz a reason why the FBI geofenced the Capitol for J6, but not for Portland firebombers. Then he gives an excuse that the Summer 2020 riots were hard to catch in the dark at night. https://t.co/eEJLVVoe4J

@ItsYourGov - Oversight Project

Jensen doubles down on J6 and the FBI's use of a geo-fence he describes as “tight ... inside the Capitol” Our experience shows geofences tend to grab larger areas. Was Jensen telling the truth? https://t.co/nSZM5npXI5

@ItsYourGov - Oversight Project

Jensen said Tim Thibault was the “consummate professional.” He said Thibault made choices he would not make. But Jensen liked a political post on LinkedIn, just like Thibault, where he denigrated President Trump, AG Pam Bondi, and Director Kash Patel.

@ItsYourGov - Oversight Project

The full Jensen transcribed interview can be found here: https://static.itsyourgov.org/Jensen_Transcribed_Interview_extracted_pages_2941-3115.pdf

julie_kelly2
Posted - April 29, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Saved - April 29, 2025 at 1:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it striking that former employees and prosecutors have remained silent about the actions of DC U.S. Attorney Matt Graves, a Biden appointee. He has pursued harsh penalties for low-level misdemeanors and misused a corporate fraud statute to label political protesters as felons. Additionally, he invoked a post-Civil War seditious conspiracy statute against mostly nonviolent individuals based on their political beliefs. The office has also sought severe prison recommendations, withheld evidence, and contributed to the tragic outcomes for some J6ers. The notion of fair justice seems far from reality.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

These same former employees and prosecutors (some left the office 50+ years ago) said nothing when DC U.S. Attorney Matt Graves, a Biden appointee whose wife was close with Biden and Harris, rounded up hundreds of Americans on lowlevel federal misdemeanors and recommend prison time. These hacks had nothing to say when DC U.S. Attys office unlawfully used a corporate fraud statute to turn hundreds of political protesters into felons. They said nothing when Graves dusted off a post Civil War seditious conspiracy statute to prosecute 2 dozen mostly nonviolent J6ers based on their political affiliations. They said nothing when DC U.S. attorneys office added terror enhancements to prison recommendations; sought pretrial detention for nonviolent protesters; withheld evidence from defendants; withheld video from the public; or caused the suicide of at least 4 J6ers. “The full and fair administration of justice and the rule of law?” Seriously GFY.

@CBSNews - CBS News

Nearly 100 former employees and prosecutors for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Washington, D.C., have signed a memo opposing President Trump's nominee to lead the office. https://cbsn.ws/4iIq7qH

CBS News | Breaking news, top stories & today's latest headlines CBS News offers breaking news coverage of today's top headlines. Stay informed on the biggest new stories with our balanced, trustworthy reporting. cbsnews.com
View Full Interactive Feed