TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

MakisMD
Posted - September 17, 2023 at 11:45 PM
Saved - September 18, 2023 at 1:05 PM

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

I've been attacked for sounding the alarm on Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccine induced Turbo Cancers This is one of the possible mechanisms. Incredible discovery by @Kevin_McKernan DNA contamination of mRNA vaccine vials is VERY serious! #DiedSuddenly #cdnpoli #ableg

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

🚨 MUST WATCH: Cancer Genomics Expert Dr. Phillip Buckhaults Testifies to the SC Senate on the DNA Contamination Found in mRNA COVID Vaccines "The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA...I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Philip Buchholz, a biochemistry and molecular biology expert, discusses concerns about the Pfizer vaccine. He explains that the vaccine contains DNA contamination, which could have serious health consequences such as autoimmune attacks and potential cancer risks. Buchholz emphasizes the need for further investigation and testing to determine if the DNA integrates into the human genome. He suggests that the FDA should require Pfizer to remove the DNA from future versions of the vaccine. Buchholz believes that the contamination was likely an oversight rather than intentional, but regulatory improvements are necessary. He concludes by stating that proving the safety of the vaccine will benefit the public.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For those of you don't don't don't know me, my name is Philip Buchholz. I'm a, I have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically, I do cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina and what that means is that I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get futzed with during your lifetime and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't, okay. That means that I'm very very skilled in in the art of DNA sequencing, okay. I can figure out the sequence of things that I didn't know what I was looking and I'm also pretty good, when I say I, I mean the people in my laboratory, you're not going to hear their names but there's a group of people that do this excellent work. We're really good at, detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they're not supposed to be even if they're real low levels. And we used those skills during the pandemic, to we invented the COVID test that many of you did, the spit test. Okay, that came out of my lab because we were really good at that kind of stuff and so I've earned a fair amount of Respect, in the state of South Carolina and in this body because we did a ton of Covid testing in the middle I'm a I'm a kid. The night when people were afraid and we told them no, you don't have COVID in your home or yes, you do. So, my qualifications to comment on this are both technical and kind of relational in the state of South Carolina. I'll cut to a very narrow theme here but it does touch on lots of these regulatory and I'll leave it to you to expand on those if you want to. I'll try to stay in this narrow lane, of some problems in the Pfizer vaccine, as a case study for places in which regulatory oversight could be improved, all right. So, first of all, let Say that my interpretation of the literature is that the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping keeping people from dying, but it did a terrible job of stopping the pandemic. The early publications showed that, it stopped infection, but that only lasted for like a month. Speaker 1: Doctor. Burkhard, could you pull the mic a little closer to you? Staff is telling me they're having trouble getting you on the recording. Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. Thank you. In in my professional evaluation of the literature, the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job at keeping people out of the cemetery, But it sucked at stopping the pandemic and, it was the best of sucky options that we had and I still believe that it was deployed mostly in good faith But there were a lot of shortcuts taken because the house was on fire and, we could do a better job next time from the lessons that we're gonna learn here. That's my own I'm a view of this, but I'm also my philosophical bent here is, I'm sure many of you have heard of Occam's Razor, Right? Choose the simplest of explanations. Well, there's another one called Hanlon's razor, which is never attribute malice to that which can be better explained by incompetence. And So, I'm trying to be gracious here in many circumstances. There could be malice underneath but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. So, the Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's Not just m R N A, it's got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the m r n a. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were out here in Columbia. One of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the college of pharmacy and for reasons I'm a I'm a case, and so I still don't understand he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to I'm a I'm a king. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine and I can see what's in there and it's surprising that there's any DNA in there I'm a I'm a and you can kinda work out what it is and how it got there and I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, Both in terms of human health and biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it Get there. So this DNA in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side I'm a I'm a kid of fix like death from cardiac arrest. There's a lot of cases now, of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's Hard to prove what caused it, it's just, you know, temporally associated, and this DNA is a plausible mechanism, Okay. This DNA, can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that I'm a I'm a got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in. We pour it onto cells and and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary, a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's it's different from because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long lived somatic cells like stem I'm a I'm a cells, and it could cause, theoretically, this is all a theoretical concern, but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology, kid. That it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands, it can interrupt a tumor suppressor or activate an I think it'll be rare, but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we are to figure out if this is happening or not. And again, the autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse. I'm not an immunologist, but the cancer risk is. That's my bag. I know this is a thing and it is Possibility. Okay, a little nerdy science here, the central dogma of molecular biology is that DNA gets transcribed into RNA, okay? And then RNA gets translated into protein. This is just how life runs. Why Why does this matter? Well, DNA, for the purposes of this discussion, DNA is a long lived information storage device. Okay. What you were born with, you're gonna die with and pass on to your kids. DNA lasts for 100 of 1000 of years, and it can last for I'm a I'm a generations if you can pass it on to your kids. Right? So alterations to the DNA, they stick around. R k. By its nature, it's temporary. It doesn't last and that feature of RNA was part of the sales pitch for the vaccine. The pseudo uridine was supposed to make the RNA last a little bit longer, but still it's a transient We're talking hours to days, okay. And then proteins, once proteins are made they also don't last Forever, they they last for hours to days. But something that makes its way into DNA has the potential to last for a very long time maybe a lifetime. So, this is a picture of the sequencing read that the sequencing run that I did in the lab, from a couple of batches of the Pfizer vaccine and all those little bitty lines here are the little tiny pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine. They don't belong care. They're not part of the sales pitch or the marketing campaign and they're there. There's a lot of them. This little graph here in the middle is the size distribution that around a 100 base pairs, 120 base pairs, so the the DNA pieces that are in the vaccine are short little pieces, 100, 120. There's some that are about 500 base pairs, a few that are even 5,000, but most of them are around a 100 base pairs. Why is this important? Because the probability of a DNA piece of DNA integrating into the human genome is unrelated to its size. So your genome risk is just a function of how many particles there are. So it's Like, you know, if you shoot a shotgun at a washboard, if you shoot a slug, you have some probability of hitting it. And if you shoot buckshot, you have a bigger probability of hitting it Some shot, right? All these little pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine are analogous to buckshot. You have Many many thousands of opportunities to modify a cell of a vaccinated person. The pieces are very small because during the process, they chopped them up to try to make them go away, but they actually increased the hazard of genome modification in I'm I'm a I'm a I'm a I'm a oversight that happened at the federal level and somebody should force this to happen somewhere. Speaker 1: Doctor Bocall, if you allow, Are you capable of doing that? Speaker 0: Yeah. It's we do that kind of thing. But in order for it to be trustworthy, it by the public, this has be done by lots of people. Right. Speaker 1: I'll talk to you more about that later. Speaker 0: Yeah. This is our our deal. This is why I know this should have been done at the federal level. Okay. Kid. So we took all these pieces of DNA and we used them to glue together what the source DNA must have Ken. This is kind of again, this is our what we do in the lab all the time and and all these little little grid and green lines here, these are all independent little cancer of DNA. This must have had a 100,000 pieces of DNA in this this sequencing run and you can put them all back and see what they came from is this circle over here. It's a plasmid that you can go shopping online to buy from Agilent And it's clear that Pfizer, took this plasmid and then they cloned spike into it, And they used it for in a process called in vitro transcription translation, in vitro transcription, where you feed an RNA polymerase, this plasmid and it makes a whole bunch of m r n a copies for you. Okay? And then you take this m r n a, you mix it with the the lipid nano particle I'm a I'm a They did they did make some effort to chop it up, so all these little pieces of the plasma got packaged in with the r n a. That's clear as day what happened Just from the forensics of looking at the DNA sequencing, okay? A little bit of a regulatory note here, the way you do RNA transcription, in vitro transcription reactions, you have to give it a DNA template, okay, and you can give it a DNA template that is just a synthetic piece of DNA that is only the instructions to make d r n a and that's what was done for getting the emergency use authorization and the clinical trial. That's called process one, if you look up that kind of kid. They made a PCR product of just the bits that they wanted and then they did the in vitro transcription, made a bunch of RNA of that. There was no plasma DNA scale the way that was necessary to vaccinate the whole world. So a cheaper way to scale up the production of this template is to clone that PCR product into this plasmid vector, put the plasmid vector into bacteria and then grow up big vats of the bacteria. They make a lot of the plasma DNA for you, then you use I'm a I'm a Set plasma DNA as the template to drive this transcription reaction to make your RNA. Contamination ended up in the production batches even though it was not in the stuff that was used for the authorization trials. So I know it's a little bit of nerdy science, but it has regulatory implications for for you guys. Kid. We can we can measure the quantity of this stuff pretty easy in the lab. This is we're we're good at doing this kind of stuff. This is same, we made a little PC. A colleague of mine at at MIT made, you know, from who who used to work for the the Broad Institute at MIT, He he made a little, PCR test and we cloned it here. This is similar to the PCR test that you all took for the spit test. Okay? Same same idea and same expertise behind it and we can quantify exactly how much of this stuff is in a vaccine or any other tissue Q and you know, I estimate that there were about 2,000,000,000 copies of the 1 piece that we're looking for in every dose. And if you look back at that map I showed you where it's all these little the the little piece that we're looking for It's just that little bit right there, okay? But if you see 2,000,000,000 copies of this, there's about 200,000,000,000 of everything else. So what this means is that there's probably about 200,000,000,000 pieces of this plasma DNA in each dose of the vaccine and it's encapsulated in this lipid nano So, it's ready to be delivered inside the cell, okay? This is a bad idea. My Conclusions from this, we should check a bunch of people. I'm from this or I should learn how to run PowerPoint. We should check a bunch of vaccinated people kid. Getting tissue samples, especially if we focus on harmed people, but that's not necessary. We could also just focus on regular unharmed people and see if this plasmid DNA is integrating into the genomes of any of their Stem cells. It leaves a calling card that is there. One of the reasons why I'm focusing on this is because I'm a I'm a It's kinda different from a lot of the other imagined harms where you can't really prove it. You can be suspicious because of the timing, but you can't Prove it. This one you can prove it because it leaves a calling card, okay? You find it in the stem cells I'm a I'm a of harmed people, it's equivalent to finding a certain type of lid in someone who is now dead. It's pretty cannibal Reasonable to assume that that's what caused it. The royal we, meaning you guys, should insist that the FDA force I'm a I'm a Pfizer to get the DNA out of the booster and all future versions of this vaccine. I'm a real fan of this platform, Okay. I think it has the potential to treat cancers. I really believe that this platform I'm a I'm a is revolutionary and in your lifetime, there will be m r n a vaccines against I'm a I'm a in your unique cancer, okay, and but they gotta get this problem fixed, okay. And I and I right now, I think the financial incidents are too great to just I'm a I'm a keep on rolling with it and it's gonna take some encouragement to get it out. I'm a I'm a Regulation that allowed this DNA to be there in the 1st place. I don't think that this the amounts there actually exceed the regulation limits. In some batches, it may. I'm a I'm a In in the 2 batches that I looked at, one of them, it was just under the limit and one it was just over the limit. My colleague in Boston has looked I'm a I'm a looked at a fair number of other batches and there's a handful that are super high and there's a handful that are super low, but the fact that there is a regulatory threshold for amount of allowed in a vaccine is a throwback to an era when we were talking about vaccines that were like a recombinant protein That you or a dead virus, you know, attenuated virus produced in in C H O cells or something like that. And the DNA that might I'm a I'm a in it is naked DNA and you might have a little bit of it in the vaccine. That's not a problem because naked DNA gets I'm a I'm a Chewed up immediately upon vaccination and there's no real mechanism for it to get inside the cells. They inappropriately applied that regulatory limit I'm a I'm a kid. To this new kind of vaccine where everything is encapsulated in this lipid nano particle, it's basically packaged in a synthetic virus able to dump its contents into a Kell. So I'm thinking Hanlon's razor here, okay? I don't think there was anything nefarious here. I think it was just kind of a dumb oversight kid. And it's gonna take because the financial incentives are so great to just, you know, sweep it under the rug and the Career incentives of people that approve this are going to be, there's nothing wrong here, you know, it's going to take some encouragement to make people prove that it's okay. And who knows? Maybe we'll check a bunch of people and we'll find out for sure that this is indeed not a problem And that will do the public good if we prove that
bambkb
Posted - September 22, 2023 at 9:17 PM
Saved - September 23, 2023 at 2:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Covid Vaccine's DNA content raises concerns. If it enters cells, it may permanently reside, posing risks like autoimmune disease or cancer. What has been injected into people? The potential dangers of this vaccine need attention.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

The #Covid #Vaccine has pieces of DNA in it - This is why it could be extremely dangerous : “If that DNA gets into your cell, it can permanently be in your cells moving forward and that’s why I’m so concerned about this!!” “Based on solid molecular biology : DNA is different than RNA, because DNA can be PERMANENT!!! It’s a real RISK for autoimmune disease and Cancer, depending on where this foreign piece of DNA lands within your body” Bro, what have they been injecting into people with this #Covid #Vaccine!?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Pfizer vaccine may contain DNA in addition to mRNA, according to a scientist who sequenced the vaccine in his lab. He obtained empty vials from a colleague and found DNA in them. This DNA could potentially cause serious side effects and integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, leading to long-term effects. The scientist is concerned about the regulatory process that allowed this to happen and warns of the risks of genome modification and autoimmune attacks. While the risk of cancer is believed to be rare, it is not zero. Further investigation is needed to determine the extent of these risks.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hand lawns razor, which is never attribute malice to that which can be better explained by incompetence. And so I'm trying to be gracious here in many circumstances. There could be malice underneath but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. So the Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA, it's got bits of DNA in instances. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription action when they made the mRNA. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Columbia. One of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy and for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit the bottom of them. He gave them all to me and I looked at them. We had 2 batches that were given out here in Columbia, and I checked these 2 batches instances, and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine, and I can see what's in there. And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there, and you can kinda work out what it is and how it got there. And I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, both in terms of human health and biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there. So this DNA in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. So there's a lot of cases now it's hard to prove what caused it. It's just, you know, temporally associated. Mechanism, okay. This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in. We pour it onto cells and and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells are permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary, a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's it's different from RNA because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long lived somatic cells, like stem cells. And it could cause, theoretically, this is all a theoretical concern, but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology that it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands, it can interrupt a tumor suppressor or activate an the coaching. I think it'll be rare, but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we are to figure out if this is happening or not. And, again, the the the autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse. I'm not an immunologist, but the cancer risk is. That's my bag. I know this is a thing and it is a possibility.
USMortality
Posted - September 23, 2023 at 6:23 PM
Saved - September 23, 2023 at 10:32 PM

@USMortality - Ben

Pfizer mRNA vaccines contain up to 354x more DNA than allowed! #mrna #covid #covid19 #pfizer #vaccine

Thekeksociety
Posted - November 27, 2023 at 1:31 PM
Saved - November 27, 2023 at 11:33 PM

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

LISTEN TO WHAT THE M A N BEHIND V A C C I N E S SAY IS INSIDE THE SHOTS! https://t.co/EDtmd8IOZr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about the presence of monkey kidney cells and simian monkey viruses in vaccines. Speaker 1 confirms that the polio vaccine contains monkey kidney cells and mentions SV40 as a simian monkey virus. They also discuss the presence of pig virus, calf serum, guinea pig cell cultures, cow's milk, egg protein, gelatin from pigs, human albumin, MRC5 human diploid cells, and WI38 human diploid lung fibroblast in various vaccines. Speaker 1 explains the purpose and safety of using human DNA in vaccines. The conversation also touches on the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccine development and religious objections to vaccination. Speaker 1 expresses their atheism and dismisses religious objections to vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good schedule contain monkey kidney cells? Speaker 1: Well the polio vaccine does. Speaker 0: Are you aware of any simian monkey viruses, meaning viruses that come from primates that contaminated polio vaccines And infected individuals receiving the polio vaccine? Speaker 1: Yes, SV40. Okay. Speaker 0: And what does SV40 stand Speaker 1: for? Semiann Virus 40. Speaker 0: Was it the 40th Simeon virus found, Speaker 1: is that why it's Speaker 0: called are you aware of any virus from any animal other than Simeon or bovine That isn't any vaccine? Speaker 1: Yes. There is a pig virus present in one of the rotavirus vaccines, Circa Speaker 0: virus. Do any of the vaccines in Speaker 1: the childhood vaccine schedule contain blood serum from caps or other bovines, calf serum is removed before the vaccine is used because you don't want to sensitize the vaccinate to cows. What Speaker 0: is this? Speaker 1: Vaccine excipient and media summary. Speaker 0: Can you go to Kinrix on the 1st page? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: DTaP IPV. Do you see in the 3rd line down, it says, Calf Serum, Do any vaccines in the childhood schedule contain embryonic guinea pig cell cultures? Speaker 1: Varicella vaccine was passage in guinea pig cells. Speaker 0: Do you know of any vaccines contain cow's milk in it? Derived cow's milk. Speaker 1: Oh, no, it could be casein for example could be. Speaker 0: If there was casein in the vaccine, the child can become sensitized to that, correct? Speaker 1: No, I'm not sure about that. Speaker 0: You're not sure anymore about that? Do any vaccines contain egg protein? Speaker 1: Yes, influenza. Do any vaccines contain gelatin from pigs? Speaker 0: Yes. Do any vaccines in the childhood vaccine schedule contain human albumin? Speaker 1: Oh, yes. What is human albumin? Human albumin is part of human serum, part of the blood that is liquid. Speaker 0: None of it remains in the final product? Speaker 1: I don't believe so, no. Because that Speaker 0: could be problematic, right? Well, it could be I Speaker 1: mean if if the individual is not healthy. Speaker 0: Or if maybe some of the human blood components Bind to some of the aluminum and develop antibodies, self antibodies correct? Speaker 1: If they develop antibodies against the serum component that would not be good. Speaker 0: Any vaccines in the childhood vaccine schedule contain MRC5 human diploid cells? Speaker 1: Yes. Rubella, varicella, hepatitis A. What are MRC 5 cells? They are human fibroblast cell strain. They were created by taking fetal tissue and from a particular fetus that was aborted by maternal choice and the cells, so called fibroblast cells were cultivated. Speaker 0: Do any vaccines on the childhood vaccine Schedule contained WI38 human diploid lung fibroblast. Speaker 1: Well, they used to, but I don't think anything is made in those cells anymore. Speaker 0: If you could turn to page 3 for MMR and MMRV, Do you see that within the ingredient list that lists WI38 human deployed lung fibroblasts? Speaker 1: Yes, I do see that. Speaker 0: Isn't it true that human DNA in vaccines is typically purposely fragmented? Speaker 1: Yes. I would say mostly for theoretical reasons doesn't want to put DNA into attack DNA into vaccines. Speaker 0: Are you familiar with insertional mutagenesis? Yes. Do you have any study to show that injecting Millions of pieces of human DNA into babies and children is safe. Speaker 1: The only studies are all the safety studies that have been done on vaccines. Speaker 0: Wasn't the purpose of this study To help develop a human cell line or to support the use of human cell lines in the creation of vaccines? Speaker 1: The idea was to study the cell strains from fetuses to determine whether or not they could be used to make vaccines. Speaker 0: This study involves 74 fetuses. Speaker 1: No, 76. Speaker 0: 76. And these fetuses were all 3 months Speaker 1: or older when aborted, correct? Yes. What organs did you harvest from these fetuses? Well, I didn't personally harvest any, but a whole range of tissues were harvested by coworkers. Speaker 0: Okay. And these pieces were then cut up into little pieces, right? Yes. And they were cultured? Yes. Okay. Some of the pieces of the fetuses were pituitary gland That were chopped up into pieces typically? Uh-huh. Okay. Included the lung of the fetuses? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Okay. Included the skin? Speaker 1: Yes. Kidney? Yes. Spleen? Yes. Heart? Yes. Speaker 0: And tongue? Speaker 1: I don't recall, but probably yes. Speaker 0: Are you aware that the one of the objections to vaccination by the Plaintiff in this case is the inclusion of aborted fetal tissue in the development Vaccines and the fact that it's actually part of the ingredients of vaccines? Speaker 1: Yes. I'm aware of those objections. The Catholic Church has actually issue the documents on that which says that individuals who need the vaccine should receive the vaccines regardless of the fact and that that I think it implies that I am the individual who will go to hell because of the use of aborted tissues, which I am glad to do. Okay. Speaker 0: Do you know if the mother is Catholic? Speaker 1: I have no idea. Okay. So she should consult her priest. Speaker 0: Do you believe that someone can have a valid religious objection To refusing a vaccine? No. Do you take issue with religious beliefs? Yes. You've said that quote Vaccination is always under attack by religious zealots who believe that the will of God includes death and disease? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: You stand by that statement? Speaker 1: I absolutely do. Okay. Are you an atheist? Yes. Do Speaker 0: you accept that some people hold religious beliefs that are inherently unprovable? Speaker 1: Yes, I'm sure they do. Speaker 0: When you were a child, what vaccines did you receive? Speaker 1: Diphtheria? Well in childhood. I think it was probably only diphtheria.
stkirsch
Posted - December 23, 2023 at 3:19 AM
Saved - December 23, 2023 at 3:20 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

The Covid vaccine can permanently integrate into your DNA. They simply forgot to tell you that. It was an honest mistake. And they will simply forget to admit it too. Got it? https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/covid-vaccines-integrate-into-human?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

COVID Vaccines Integrate Into Human DNA, Study Finds The much-ridiculed "antivax trope" proved to be true igor-chudov.com
VigilantFox
Posted - January 5, 2024 at 2:45 PM
Saved - January 5, 2024 at 3:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Excess deaths in the UK are still occurring, with a professor of oncology suggesting a correlation with the vaccine program. The Florida Surgeon General calls for a halt in COVID-19 vaccines, while concerns about vaccine safety grow among Americans. A study claims that COVID vaccines integrate into human DNA. A user shares their experience of being banned for sharing COVID misinformation, which later turned out to be true. They provide a list of medical freedom heroes to follow.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“We Should Have Gotten Rid of the Vaccine a Couple of Years Ago”: Professor of Oncology Long after COVID, the UK is still suffering from 1,000 excess deaths a week. “Excess deaths started and correlates with the vaccine program,” says Oncology Professor Angus Dalgleish. “I find it very difficult to find people who don’t know, someone who’s had an adverse effect from the vaccine campaign.” H/T: @JimFergusonUK (give him a follow)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Excess deaths of about 1,000 per week have been observed during the pandemic, even after adjusting for an aging and growing population. The rate of death in Britain is expected to increase due to an aging population, but the excess deaths are also affecting younger age groups. These unusual and alarming figures were initially attributed to people not receiving statins, but the effect of lockdown measures and misdiagnosis also played a role. Interestingly, the excess deaths started around the same time as the vaccine program, but this correlation has not been thoroughly investigated. The speaker expresses skepticism about the vaccines, stating that adverse effects are more common than claimed and that the vaccines are targeting a virus that has already evolved. The speaker's skepticism has made them a pariah in academic and medical circles.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Excess deaths, they were figures that we focused on very heavily during the pandemic. It would appear we're still suffering from excess deaths of about 1,000 a week for the course of the last year. Now bear in mind, we do have an aging population, we do have a rapidly growing population, but these figures are adjusted to deal with that. Well, I'm joined by Angus Dowdleys, professor of oncology at St. George's University of London. And I'm wondering about this, Angus, because I'm looking at excess deaths during the pandemic. But equally, before that, I mean, clearly, the rate of death in Britain will grow with an aging population. Speaker 1: Yes, it will. But these figures are meant to be adjusted for that. Speaker 0: Meantimely, yes. Meantimely, yes. Meantimely, yes. Speaker 1: Meantimely, yes. And age justice as well. And I mean, I've Seeing the the very raw figures, and they are they are quite worrying because there's excess deaths of the younger people going on, not just in the older population, But in the people under 40, the real peak's between 40 and 64, 65. Now this this is something that is, highly unusual and highly alarming. It was initially dismissed as, due to people not getting statins. Remember Chris Whitty said this, which I thought was really Quite alarming because you don't get offered staff in the still year over 55, 60, so it can't possibly be involved with that group. Now the one major thing we said was down. The effect of lockdown and everything it did, this would go up, bang on to, excess deaths, huge cancer, and various other things. Speaker 0: Because of misdiagnosis? Misdiagnosis, Speaker 1: There's mistreatments, everything, but there's something far worse than this. Now when you actually look at these these figures that we have, they're the same In, in Europe, in Australia, in other places too. And one of the things that I flagged up and nobody's taken I need real notice of and it's even more pertinent now is that others have pointed out this excess death started and correlates with the vaccine program. So it doesn't mean to say it's associated, but why hasn't it been looked at? Why hasn't it been really, really, suddenly looked at? And it hasn't Because myself and other colleagues have raised this ad nauseam, and we get absolutely nothing but to say it's all unexpected. Speaker 0: I mean, the claim is, Angus, the claim is from the establishment claim is that having the vaccine saved a huge number of lives and that whilst there are who suffer from side effects, they are a tiny percentage. Speaker 1: That is what they claim. Well, I personally don't believe it at all because one of the things that you get taught when you're at medical If you know 2 people with a condition, then it's very common. Well, I I find it very difficult to find people who don't know, someone who's had an adverse effect from the vaccine campaign, the vaccine program. And the bottom line, it it wouldn't matter so much if the vaccines were doing something against something which was killing us, but it's not. The COVID, the game switched the vaccines were against. It's long since it's left the Earth. It left the, possibly getting on 2 years ago. Speaker 0: And well, hang on a second. We're told that COVID's coming back and Speaker 1: Yeah. But it is a different one, and it will not be affected by the vaccine. Whatever they tell you, The, the companies tell you that they've got bivalent vaccines which will protect against vaccine. Well, I can assure you they don't. I mean, they got passed in 8 mice and, you can't tell anything from 8 mice. Only when you can do those, programs properly In a community, can you, make those sort of claims? Well, I disagree that any of those claims can be justified. Speaker 0: Does your skepticism about this vaccine make you a pariah in academic and medical circles? Speaker 1: Yes, of course, it does. It does because there is A groupthink that thinks it's accepted. It's very good. It's safe and effective. When, I was trained as a clinical scientist to look at the facts And to constantly change my opinion depending on the facts. And this is what's going on. The facts are changing. And at some stage, well, I I point out in the big American flu vaccine, flu crisis of 1977, When they were dying, people, the soldiers were dying in their thirties. They rushed out a vaccine program where 42,000,000 people were vaccinated. And then there were reports So Guillain Barre, which is disassembling paralysis, which is is not uncommon with a lot of vaccines. And instead of denying it, they sent people out into the field And they came back and said, yes. It definitely goes. And do you know what they did? They turned around. They said, well, no one's dying of the, flu anymore. Let's get rid of the vaccine. We should have done that, I believe, a couple of years ago. Speaker 0: Well, Angus, it's fascinating. As I say, you know, I could get a lot of people on from academia and the medical world who take a very different view. We had I them on this program, trying to convince me to get the booster

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Related Stories on @VigilantNews: Florida Surgeon General Calls for Complete Halt of COVID-19 Vaccines https://vigilantnews.com/post/florida-surgeon-general-calls-for-complete-halt-of-covid-19-vaccines/

Florida Surgeon General Calls for Complete Halt of COVID-19 Vaccines “These vaccines are not appropriate for use in human beings.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews Dr. McCullough Reveals More Bad News About the COVID Shots https://vigilantnews.com/post/dr-mccullough-reveals-more-bad-news-about-the-covid-shots/

Dr. McCullough Reveals More Bad News About the COVID Shots "They [COVID shots] should be off the market completely." vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews COVID Vaccines Integrate Into Human DNA, Study Finds https://vigilantnews.com/post/covid-vaccines-integrate-into-human-dna-study-finds/

COVID Vaccines Integrate Into Human DNA, Study Finds This study proves that mRNA COVID vaccines permanently integrate into the human DNA of some COVID-vaccinated people. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews Majority of Americans Now Worried About COVID-19 Vaccine Safety https://vigilantnews.com/post/majority-of-americans-now-worried-about-covid-19-vaccine-safety/

Majority of Americans Now Worried About COVID-19 Vaccine Safety A survey of adult Americans found that the majority did not feel COVID-19 vaccines were safe (worried about safety) and wanted to see more research done. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

One year ago, my account was restored after a 9-month ban for sharing dangerous “COVID misinformation.” However, the “misinformation” that got me banned actually turned out to be true. Check out my list of medical freedom heroes you should follow below: https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1740089405090549865?s=20 https://t.co/H93llWVkPu

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Here are some more freedom fighters who also got banned for being on the right side of history: • Dr. Naomi Wolf (@naomirwolf) – CEO of @DailyClout & investigative journalist. • Dr. Bowden (@MdBreathe) – brave medical doctor who had her privileges suspended for promoting IVM.

thehealthb0t
Posted - January 8, 2024 at 2:12 PM
Saved - January 8, 2024 at 5:53 PM

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

They are putting viruses in the vaccines https://t.co/p79XULC17k

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zoological viruses are being put in vaccines, specifically in the cell lines. These viruses have been present for a long time but are often overlooked in papers. The speaker suggests that this is a race and gender-specific attack, as certain groups are targeted. The goal is to change our DNA and establish a one-world order. The vaccines contain various viruses, including those found in polio vaccines. The speaker claims that those who are already immune will die from the shots due to antibody-dependent enhancement. The speaker advises against taking any vaccines, including the Pfizer vaccine, as they believe all vaccines are synthetic poisons. They claim to have evidence that the Omicron variant was present in humans in 2000. The ultimate objective is to ensure everyone is injected because other aspects of the environment, such as food and particulates, also pose a risk.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They are putting zoological viruses in the vaccines. Speaker 1: And they're they're in the cell lines, and they've been there all along. If you look at the next slide, what you're gonna see is the other retroviruses in the supplemental material that nobody ever reads in the papers, so you don't know. So they're showing you how did you get v p 62, which is a infectious gain of function molecular clone made by Bob Silverman's lab. Oh, the one who made it evade the immune system of blacks, Native Americans, they know exactly what they're doing. Look at all of the viruses. How did they Speaker 0: saying this is a race specific attack? Speaker 1: Well, it's it's race and, gender, and that's why the first slide said favored species, what Darwin is doing, this is they are our god. This is this is pat Patrick Wood's testimony in our in in presentations in the crimes against humanity that they're gods, so they know exactly as they've targeted the athletes like Magic Johnson, HIV is to AZT is to AIDS. Yeah. Here it is. The original paper, origins of species by natural selection is what most people see, and nobody sees that 2nd page or the preservation of favored races in the struggle of life. So they think they can change the code of our DNA, the one world order, and this is the game to inject us with that cell line, every one of the viruses on 41 are in Vero e six, or in the vero monkey kidney cell lines, we've been injecting is polio vaccines for 30 years, antibody dependent enhancement. So everybody who is infected and immune either god given immunity, will die from the shots. So all of the kids that had been mandated and injured by the vaccines. So they got caught. They know it. What most people now realize is don't get another shot. I mean, no shot. I just showed you they were all done. Speaker 0: Pfizer event nobody will take it, and nobody ever took it in a bunch of countries. Nobody's taken it. They're having to throw it away. Speaker 1: No. But but also never another vaccine. Not a polio shot, not an MMR, not they've all been synthetic poisons. They since that's why I showed you all those viruses. They've been in those cell lines continuously growing in our lab for 50 years. We've got them in freezers. We grow them up. I can prove Omicron was in humans, including me and my husband. In 2000, and in 2000 and n, we seroconverted and created antibodies. So the real important endgame is they've gotta get everybody injected because in the rest of your environment, your food, and your particulates is
c_plushie
Posted - January 15, 2024 at 9:52 PM
Saved - January 16, 2024 at 11:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Pfizer shot, given to millions in New Zealand, was believed to not integrate with DNA. However, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, Surgeon General of Florida, stated that foreign DNA could enter cells through the mRNA COVID vax. Dr. Janci Lindsay and Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testified that the Pfizer shot is contaminated with DNA and SV40 sequences, which can alter genetic code, infect E.coli, and cause cancer. Full testimonies are available. #Pfizer #mRNA #COVIDvax

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Both @NZStuff and the government told us the #Pfizer shot, which was given to millions of Kiwis, could not integrate with your DNA. This was 'The Whole Truth'. It was the information we could rely on, from the 'single source of truth', and we were told to dismiss everything else as misinformation. @JanciToxDoc @jehancasinader @NassMeryl @nzdsos @HopeRising19 @nzfirst @TuckerCarlson @FLSurgeonGen @MurfittTauranga

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology and work as a toxicologist and expert witness. The Pfizer vaccine is said to be contaminated with plasma DNA, which is different from RNA as it can be permanent and passed on to future generations. However, the vaccine does not enter the nucleus where DNA resides. The DNA in the vaccine can integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, becoming a permanent part of the cell. Despite claims that the vaccine alters DNA, it does not contain anything that can affect DNA. The concerns raised about the vaccine's impact on DNA are unfounded.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology. And I'm a toxicologist and an expert witness as a profession nationally and Speaker 1: I have a PhD in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically I do cancer Genomics Research at the University of South Carolina When was the Speaker 2: last time you saw one of these? Probably not since high school, right? Speaker 1: The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. Speaker 2: It's a strand of DNA. The genetic code found in almost every cell in your body containing the unique markers that make you, you. Speaker 1: So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA Being in the vaccine, it's different from RNA because it can be permanent DNA gets transcribed into RNA and then RNA gets translated into protein DNA is a long lived information storage device What you were born with, you're going to die with and pass on to your kids DNA lasts for 100 of 1000 of years. And it can last for generations if you pass it on to your kids. Right? So, alterations To the DNA, they stick around. Speaker 2: Well recently I've heard a pretty scary rumour doing the rounds. A claim that COVID nineteen vaccines alter your DNA. So is it true? Here's the important part. The vaccine never enters the nucleus of your cells. That is where your DNA lives. Speaker 1: This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces the DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in. We pour it onto cells and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary thing. It is in that Speaker 0: So all of this about they will not go to the nucleus Speaker 2: See never enters the nucleus of your cells. Speaker 0: They will not integrate with your DNA. Speaker 2: The vaccine does not contain anything that can affect Your DNA Speaker 0: is not true and they knew it from the beginning because they knew the plasmids were there. Speaker 2: So there you have it. If you were worried about the vaccine changing your DNA, fear not. Speaker 1: This DNA, can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. Speaker 2: Fear not. Speaker 3: The double stranded DNA that is in the plasmids work to allow that DNA a to get into the nucleus of your cells Where it can then relatively easily cause mutations. Fear not. Speaker 0: There is something very unusual going on here that is being done differently The babies that have a death profile like this. It's not done. It's never been done before. Speaker 2: Fear not. Speaker 0: I've never seen anything like this in my entire career. We have got to pull these shots and restrict them from our children. We cannot Not inject these into babies and children. These are contaminated, dangerous, lethal products. Speaker 2: The whole truth about the COVID vaccine is a series from Stuff made in partnership with Maori Television and the Pacific Media Network. Speaker 1: I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get futsed with during your lifetime, and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't. Speaker 2: We received Funding from the Google News Initiative.

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

Could foreign DNA enter your cells through the mRNA COVID vax and change your DNA — and humanity itself — forever? Sounds nutty. It's not. "Absolutely that could happen," says Dr. Joseph Ladapo, the surgeon general of Florida. A shocking conversation. https://t.co/Yvt38eStPf

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Surgeon General of Florida, Dr. Joseph Laudipo, has called for a halt to the use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines due to concerns about DNA integration with the human genome. He explains that these vaccines contain DNA, which is not necessarily a problem on its own, but becomes an issue because the DNA hangs on with the mRNA and enters people's cells. This is different from other products that have DNA. The FDA's failure to test for DNA integration, despite their own guidelines, is deemed intolerable. Dr. Laudipo emphasizes the need for specific tests to confirm that foreign DNA is not integrating into the human genome.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very few public health officials in this country seem very interested in public health in case you haven't noticed. The Surgeon General of Florida, doctor Joseph Laudipo, is an exception to that. He is interested in the health of the people of his state. And because he is, he's taken a close look at what's in the COVID vax the one that everyone in the country was required to take not so long ago and he's come up short he can answer some basic questions about it and that's a concern if we're doing science which he is and so he has now called on doctors to immediately stop giving the mRNA COVID vax to their patients and for a very interesting reason that you should know about here's his statement we're quoting I'm calling for a halt to the use of mRNA COVID-nineteen vaccines scenes. The U. S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention have always played it fast and loose with COVID nineteen vaccine safety. But their failure to test for DNA integration with the human genome as their own guidelines dictate when the vaccines are known to be contaminated with foreign DNA is intolerable think about that it's one thing if it gives you a heart attack if it tempers with your DNA in some way now we have a real problem considering a 1,000,000,000 people got it so in a recent interview about the MRA vaccines the Surgeon General of Florida described them this way Speaker 1: These vaccines have DNA in them. Everyone knows what DNA is. They're contaminated with DNA, and that's not necessarily a big deal. But it's a problem with these vaccines because the DNA hangs on with the mRNA and goes into people's cells. So this is a completely different risk analysis than other products that have had DNA. These vaccines are honestly, they're they're the antichrist Of all products. Speaker 0: The antichrist of all products. The surgeon general of Florida joins us now to playing what he means. Doctor, thank you so much for coming on. I remember at the beginning of the its mandates there were people on the fringes as we say who raised questions about the the potential of this drug this brand new this novel vaccine which wasn't really a vaccine to affect people's DNA and they were immediately described as crazy. Tell us your concerns if you wouldn't mind flushing out a little bit what we saw in that clip. Speaker 1: You know, it's It's so interesting to hear you say that, Tucker, because I had the same impression when people very early on were reciting concerns about DNA. I think that really what was happening is that their intuition was informing them about a potential problem with these vaccines. And, you know, you showed that clip there. This one is is sometimes I honestly, I feel quite guilty dragging people through the scientific details, but I try and do it at a level that hopefully won't bore people to to death or be too painful because it is a very important issue And it's not a complicated issue and it's important for people to recognize the difference between the honest facts, which is what I'm sharing and the spin and dodge and look over here that you hear doctor Kalief at the FDA and other, you know, doctor Offutt, other people sharing. So it's actually very simple. We all know what DNA is, You know, this is this is our genetic blueprint, our gift from God. And this DNA can be affected and that can be obviously a very bad thing. Sometimes it's affected in a way that makes people sick. Sometimes it can even be infected in a way that leads people to pass on characteristics to their to their offspring. In this particular case with the mRNA vaccines, They have DNA in them like, you know, like many other vaccines or other biologic type of medications And that, as I've said previously, is not such a big deal because fortunately, DNA is not some big hairy monster that Can, you know, live forever when it's foreign in people's bodies. Our bodies have lots of mechanisms to break them down. But the problem here is that you know the for the same reason that scientists won a Nobel Prize, this DNA isn't like other DNA in terms of having a very hard time penetrating into cells. This DNA hangs on with mRNA in that lipid nano particle that people hear and frankly probably roll their eyes out their eyes over. It hangs on with it and it comes into the cells almost certainly hitchhiking along with the mRNA. So Whereas in the past, DNA would have a very hard time even entering cells. Here, the DNA is getting delivered into cells with the lipid nanoparticles. And that's a problem. And that's a problem because each dose of mRNA COVID nineteen vaccine Probably contains, it's been estimated between billions and hundreds of billions of fragments of DNA. So this is a completely Different risk analysis. That is obvious. You don't need a PhD to be able to figure that out. And the FDA's own guidance About contaminating DNA. Published guidance, their words, never referred to by them by the way in their counter arguments. But their words Are that there are situations when you need to confirm that DNA that is a contaminant or foreign DNA is not integrating into human DNA, into the human genome and there are specific tests, sequencing test to do this, to make sure it's done. And what we did is we asked the FDA, Well, have you done this? You've acknowledged this risk. Have you done this? And they came back with about 10,000 words talking about everything from what time the sun sets in China to, you know, their their third cousins, you know, Bar Mitzvah And nothing about the specific question we ask, along with other questions, by the way, but nothing about that, which leads me to conclude They haven't done it, which is I mean, they you know, it it starts at crazy, but it ends at somewhere else. That someone could be just So just so nonchalant and frankly, willy nilly with something as precious and as, you know, sacred as our human DNA. So that's

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Thread from last year https://t.co/AGcbISG3Io

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

🧵 THREAD DNA & SV40 In The #Pfizer Shot Dr. Janci Lindsay & Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testify that the Pfizer shot has been found to be contaminated with DNA, which can permanently alter your genetic code, and SV40 sequences which can infect the E.coli in your gut, turning you into a 'perpetual spike factory' as well as cause cancer. This video has excerpts from the testimonies of Dr. Janci Lindsay and Dr. Phillip Buckhaults. Please watch their full testimonies which I've posted in the thread below. @P_McCulloughMD @JesslovesMJK @DrJBhattacharya @DrAseemMalhotra @nzdsos @winstonpeters @HopeRising19 @mattletiss7 @NickHudsonCT 🔊

BGatesIsaPyscho
Posted - January 21, 2024 at 11:14 AM
Saved - January 22, 2024 at 12:59 AM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

🚨💉 Holy Crap-Balls - even MSM are now discussing the toxic shots. “Discovery billions fragments of DNA in every dose” - Florida Surgeon General The masses are going to be severely pi$$ed off when they finally find out what they’ve injected themselves with numerous times. https://t.co/NAEC0xqXCz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Florida Surgeon General, Dr. Ladipo, has expressed safety concerns about the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines due to the discovery of DNA fragments in each dose. He believes these concerns have not been addressed by the FDA or CDC. Dr. Ladipo questions the potential risks of DNA in the vaccines, including the transformation of healthy genes into cancerous cells, chromosomal instability, and the impact on various parts of the body. He has sent letters to the FDA and CDC seeking clarification. Local doctor Michael Sparks acknowledges the conflicting messages between the state surgeon general and the FDA, leaving healthcare providers in a difficult position.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's also developing right now. Florida Surgeon General says for us to stop getting the COVID vaccine. Speaker 1: Fox 30 five's Hannah McKenzie is joining us live in the alert center tonight. So, Hannah, he says watching the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines is a problem. Speaker 0: Yeah, Lou Anne. John, Florida surgeon general doctor Latipo says he has safety concerns pertaining to the discovery of billions of DNA fragments found per dose in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines. Scenes, and he says those concerns have not been addressed by the FDA or the CDC. Doctor Ladipo says if the risks of DNA with COVID vaccines cannot be addressed, then the vaccines aren't appropriate for use in humans. He says he sent letters to the heads of the FDA and the CDC specifically questioning how this would impact humans in 3 main areas, healthy human genes being transformed into Cancerous cells, chromosomal instability, and how the integration could affect unintended parts of the body, such as the Heart, brain, lungs, even the injection site itself. We asked a local doctor Michael Sparks to weigh in. Doctor Sparks Just telling us what the state surgeon general saying one thing and the FDA another, health providers are left stuck in the middle.
bambkb
Posted - March 3, 2024 at 3:23 PM
Saved - March 3, 2024 at 3:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Masanori Fukushima criticizes the Japanese government for hiding information about the Covid vaccine and expresses concern about its dangers. He believes that the mRNA vaccine, wrapped in nano particles, can cause various health issues, including cardiovascular and autoimmune diseases. He argues that vaccinated individuals are now more susceptible to COVID compared to the unvaccinated. Dr. Fukushima questions the impact of these actions on humanity, using hashtags like #CrimesAgainstHumanity and #VaccineGenocide.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

🚨🚨🚨🇯🇵Dr Masanori Fukushima, Professor Emeritus at Kyoto University is furious and absolutely goes OFF on the Japanese government about the #Covid #Vaccine : "These #Vaccine injured people cry themselves to sleep at night, while you try and HIDE information. This is a case of DRUG HARM!!” “Last year I thought it was going to be a problem if this VACCINE spread and I told professional magazines that it was DELUSIONAL to try and get out of a pandemic by #Vaccination!! And NOW people are starting to understand HOW DANGEROUS this #mRNA #Covid #Vaccine really is!!!” “I mean, the MRNA is wrapped in nano particles, that means EVERY CELL in the body engulfs it and then TRANSFORMS, the MECHANISM is clear!!!”😳😳 “If you don’t feel good after vaccination, go to your doctor immediately, you could be suffering from CARDIOVASCULAR disease, AUTOIMMUNE disease, susceptibility to infection and many other things!!!” “These nano particles are also absorbed by the brain and they DO cross the BLOOD-BRAIN barrier, only a STUPID SCIENTIST would say that they wouldn’t!! People had natural immunity to COVID but Due to vaccination, their natural immunity has been SUPPRESSED!!! The people that are infected with COVID now, are the #Vaccinated and NOT the #Unvaccinated!! The government data speaks for itself!!”🔥🔥🔥🔥 What have these people done to humanity? #CrimesAgainstHumanity #VaccineGenocide

Video Transcript AI Summary
私は、司法解剖で薬害を受けた人々についての意見書を出すことを隠蔽したくない。ワクチンによるパンデミック解決は妄想であり、メッセージRNAの危険性が明らかになってきた。ワクチン接種後に体調不良を訴える人は医療機関に報告すべきであり、自然免疫が抑えられることによって問題が広がっている。現在、多くの人が感染しており、ワクチン接種者同士の感染も起きている。厚労省のデータは明らかであり、この問題についてさらに話し合う必要がある。 I believe we should not hide the fact that we are issuing opinions on those who have been affected by drug harm through judicial autopsies. The idea that the pandemic will be resolved by the vaccine is a delusion, and the danger of messenger RNA has become clear. People who feel unwell after vaccination should report to medical institutions, as the suppression of natural immunity has led to the current situation. Many people are currently infected, including vaccinated individuals infecting each other. The data provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is clear, and further discussion on this issue is necessary.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: は 死ん で る と 思 う 。ほとん ど が 泣き 寝 入り し て る ん だ から 、泣き 寝 入り だ っ て 、たまたま 司法 解 剖 し て 分かっ た 人 に つい て これ 意 見 書 を 出す と ほ っ た ら か し て な い の ?何 やっ て ん だ っ て こと は 隠蔽 し た く て しょう が な い ん です よ 、この 地 図 と 。 かっ て 薬 害 が そう だっ た 。 原 田 さ ん 、ものすごく それ を 苦 し ん だ わけ じゃ な い 。 何 と し て こう 薬 害 を 根絶 し な い と いう の は 、この 国 は 薬 害 から レッ スン 受け て 、もう 二 度 と 薬 害 が で き な い 国 に な っ て る ん です 。だけど それ を 強引 に 無 視 し て 、何 兆 円 も 誓 っ って こ の ワクチン 輸 入 し て 、国民 に 扇 動 し て 、 だ から ちっとも 収 ま ら な い ん です よ 。それ です が 去 年 こ の ワクチン が 普 及 する と 困 る と 思っ て この ワクチン に よっ て パン デミック が 解 決 する と 思 う の は 妄 想 で ある と 断じ ま し た よ 、専門 雑 誌 の 中 で 。 もう ミス コン セ プト する の で 、今 よう や く こ の こと が 分かっ て た メッセージ RNA を 何 パー っ て くる 何 パー ティ クル に 包 ん で 入れる こと が い か に 危 険 か っていうこと が あ ら ゆ る 細 胞 が それ を 飲み 込ん で 、それ で 細 胞 が 変換 し て っ ちゃう ん です よ 。そう いう 方 が もう 今 分かっ た と 思 う の ね。 メ カ ニズム は っきり し て る。 即 刻 評 退 委 員 解 散 し て 前例 調査 し な さ い 、これ が 結 論 だ で、 前例 調査 で は 。だから ワクチン 打っ て から 調 子 が 悪く な っ た 人 は みんな 医 療 機 関 に 周 知 し て 、 も た も た し て ちゃ 駄 目 です。 何 が 起 こ る か 分 から な い 。 心 血 管 障 害 、自己 免 疫 疾 患 、感染 し やす い 、それ から 脳 に も 来 る ん だ 、ナ ロ パー ティ クル は 脳 に 取り組ま れる ん です。 これ を 頭 の 悪 い 学 者 は 血 液 タン ブン は 通ら な い から 大 丈夫 だ っ て こと 。 バ カ じゃ な い っ て 言 い た い 。自然 免 疫 を 抑 え ら れる ん です 。だから 日本 人 が 初め ね 、 蔓 延 し なかっ た の は 唾液 中 に IG A が あっ て 、コロナ に は 対 し て 考 査 体 制 が ある から 抑え ら れ て た ん です よ 。 ところ が ワクチン 打っ た た め に それ が シャ ット ダウン さ れ た 。自然 免 疫 が 抑 え ら れ た から こう いう こと に な っ て る ん です よ 。 ちっとも 収 ま ら な い ん です よ 。 どんどん 広がり ます よ 、今 、ブレーキ トゥルー 感 染 を 計 算 し ま し た 。もう ほとんど の 人 が ブレイ クス ルー 感 染 です よ 。 今 は かかっ て る 人 が ね 、ワクチン 打っ て な い 人 が かかっ て る ん じゃ な い の ワクチン 打っ た 人 が 移 し 合っ て る 厚 労 省 から 提 示さ れ て いる データ っ て 全 部 明らか だ から あ と お 話 し ます 。 データ 全 部
iluminatibot
Posted - April 17, 2024 at 4:07 PM
Saved - April 18, 2024 at 4:20 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Doctor dropping truth bombs on the Covid vaccines https://t.co/uv8Uui9SkU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Sean Brooks, PhD, warns against mRNA vaccines, claiming they will lead to immune system decline, antibody-dependent enhancement, blood clotting, and sterilization. He predicts widespread illness and death, urging against vaccination.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name's doctor Sean Brooks, PhD, Oxford. I have 48 public patients including 23 folks. I studied health medicine and anatomy and physiology for approximately 21 years. Doctor Robert Malone, who created the messenger RNA vaccine, has said no one should ever take these jabs ever. Under any circumstance whatsoever, he created it. And he says, don't ever do it. So let me explain what's going to happen to the people who have taken take it. Excuse me. The people who have taken it are going to die in the next 6 months to 3 to 5 years for three reasons. Number 1, you've dramatically decreased your own immune system by 35%. The first jab did it by at least 15. The second reason, antibody dependent enhancement. Antib antibody dependent enhancement is what is happening with these jabs with everybody who has taken them. Unless, of course, you've taken a placebo, but there's no way that you would know that. So given that fact, antibody dependent enhancement tricks the entire body into believing that the cell that's eating the pathogen is eating it when it isn't. It ends up leading to what's called a cytokine storm, which causes organ failure. That will cause your death and there's no stopping that. No amount of drugs will stop that. The third thing, blood clotting. Everyone who has taken the jabs is blood clotting. If you don't believe me, there's a way you can find out. Take what's called the d dimer test. What that does is that detects blood clotting at the microscopic level. We're cutting full blood clots out of people right now. As I'm talking to you, millions have died from the jabs. In your last meeting, you advocated for people to take the jabs potentially in the future, along with wearing masks. And I heard parents say the same thing. So to the parents who are actually considering jabbing their own children, you're going to sterilize them permanently. People who have taken the jabs are sterilized. 80% of women who have been jabbed have lost their children in the first trimester. You can't have kids. You've also injected yourself with the equivalent of HIV. You can now no longer breastfeed, donate blood, donate organs, donate blood plasma nor bone marrow. If you don't believe me, try to donate blood and blood plasma and find out what happens. You will be denied. Unless, of course, you live in California, in which case they're allowing people to donate toxic blood with spike proteins in it. The jabs create spike proteins. They're in the jabs themselves and they create it by snapping your r n a in half. You are no longer a human anymore. You are something else. And you are susceptible to countless diseases. Now, here's what's gonna happen in the future very quickly. We'll get them 15 seconds. Great. I don't know what percentage of your staff is taking the jabs, but your school is going to close. You will not stay open. You will close because they will fall ill and they will die. That will happen in all of your buildings. It will have it's already happening. Thank you, sir. I I bet it is. It's already happening. Good luck. There's nothing to stop this. Thank you, sir.
PeterSweden7
Posted - April 19, 2024 at 11:02 AM
Saved - April 19, 2024 at 8:05 PM

@PeterSweden7 - PeterSweden

Show this video to everyone who got the covid vaccine. This is from the British parliament. The truth is finally beginning to come out 👇 https://t.co/AjTVbn3qin

Video Transcript AI Summary
The government is criticized for not adequately addressing concerns about mRNA vaccine contamination with oncogenic material. Professor Angus Delwych warns that mRNA vaccines should be banned due to safety risks. The loss of trust in pharmaceutical companies is highlighted, calling for transparency and data disclosure. The importance of ethical medical science in pandemic management is emphasized. The need for societal coordination, human rights respect, and adherence to scientific principles is stressed. The speaker questions the government's handling of vaccine safety and urges for accountability in the face of potential risks.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why are the government so willing to pick up the tab on, vaccine injury, and however inadequate the scheme is given the, the fatality and significant life limiting impacts from the victims. But the concerns about this have been amplified significantly following the publication in the Spectator Australia of an account by genomic scientist Kevin McKern, made about his accidental discovery, and I quote, while running an experiment in his Boston lab, McKern used some vials of mRNA, Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines as controls. He was shocked to find that they were allegedly contaminated with tiny fragments of plasmid DNA. This concern has been considered further by professor Angus Alglish, who notes that the contaminant, simian virus 40, is a sequence that is used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies, and that this is something that regulatory agencies around the world have said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines. These s v 40 promoters are also well recognized as being oncogenic or gene or or cancer inducing, genetic material. And other scientists have confirmed these findings, as professor Dalgwy's father notes. To put it bluntly, this means that they are not vaccines at all, but genetically modified organisms that should have been subject to totally different regulatory conditions and certainly not be classed as vaccines. And worryingly, Professor Dalgwyche also notes that oncologists have contacted him from across the world, and that the consensus is that this is thought to be a precipitating relapse in melanoma, lymphoma, leukemias and in kidney cancers. And he concludes, with the following warning: to advise boosted vaccines, as is currently the case, that's the current position, is no more and no less than medical incompetence To continue to do so with his cited evidence is medical negligence, which can carry a custodial sentence. Speaker 1: Will the honorable gentleman give way? Yeah. Speaker 0: I thank Speaker 1: the honorable gentleman for his contribution and his his his, quotes of, professor Angus Delwych. And I remind the house that Angus Delwych is the most cited oncologist in the UK. I had invited him here to witness this debate today. Since he had some input to it, he can't attend because he's actually speaking at a conference on this very issue we're discussing here in Berlin. Speaker 0: I I thank the, the honorable general from that point of information, but also the acknowledgement of a very important scientist in this debate and someone who, it's been a great honour replying to have worked in the same institutions, as he provides great leadership in on this specific technology. And, you know, his his contribution to this, this problem is, and his value to it is impeccable. Anyway but he concludes that piece by saying no ifs, no buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now. So can the minister answer the following question? Are big pharma being exempted from liability, and if so, why? The loss of trust in big pharma is substantial. And worryingly, because of this, the value of vaccination itself has been deeply damaged. Personally, I I say this absolutely frankly. I will never accept another mRNA minister agree to full disclosure of the data and an investigation of the facts? And will the minister also commit to instructing ONS to release the record level data? Or will it take someone like New Zealander Barry Young, a whistleblower, who has been imprisoned for publishing their record level data to surface his concerns about the COVID vaccine, programme in New Zealand. As we've seen with the Horizon scandal, government must never bury the facts when lives are being lost and futures destroyed. There is no greater betrayal. So in closing, the foundation of good clinical practice are under threat, and I I I put that into context with the December 2023 pathology research and practice paper on gene based COVID 19 vaccines from RODESA and PARI, and they gave this following warning. Pandemic management requires societal coordination, global orchestration, respect for human rights, and defensive ethical principles. Yet some approaches to the COVID 19 pandemic, driven by socioeconomic, corporate, and political interests, have undermined key pillars of ethical medical science. None of these clinical experts are quacks or conspiracy theorists. And as the government has said so often during the pandemic, we must follow the science. Thank you, mister Dave.
RealAlexJones
Posted - June 24, 2024 at 10:33 PM
Saved - June 25, 2024 at 12:33 AM

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

BREAKING: Documents Show Government Knew COVID Shot Takes Over The Human Body https://t.co/MraDlTnfRd

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a document from the therapeutic goods administration in Australia that reveals the distribution of lipid nanoparticles from COVID-19 vaccines in various organs. The nanoparticles were found in organs such as the liver, brain, eyes, heart, kidneys, and more. The speaker expresses concern about the potential implications of this distribution. They also mention other topics such as mask bans, vaccine policy, and the alleged suppression of alternative treatments. The speaker concludes by promoting a website for purchasing various products.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's based around this document here. It runs to about 58 pages. This is the full document here I've put on the screen. You can download it now in the public domain, and I'll put the link. And it's from the, therapeutic goods administration in Australia, which controls their drugs and vaccination policy. Now the key thing is that this document has only been released as a result of freedom of information requests. Conclusion they drew here, slow but significant distribution of lipid nanoparticles from the site of injection with major uptake to the liver. I don't like the sound of major uptake to the liver at all. It means this is these lipid nano particles were circulating around the liver in relatively high concentration. Now I have a table here with all the organs where this was distributed. It is here and I'm gonna I've blown it up blown up a bit for you so you can so you can see this. Pretty alarming. Basically going to a lot of organs. So these are the list of organs where there was data for distribution. Adipose tissue is fat. Lipid nanoparticles went there, unfortunately. Adrenal glands, bladder, bone, the femur, they checked, bone marrow. Bone marrow is I find it particularly uncomfortable that the lipid nanoparticles went to the bone marrow because that's where all the blood cells are are produced. Not speculating on what that could cause, but they went there. Therefore, the RNA that they contained went there as well. This is this is the point here. It went to particles went to the brain. The eyes, the heart at the injection site of course. And we do notice it was high concentrations at the injection site but the point is it was systemically observed or distributed as well. Kidneys, large intestine, liver, lungs, lymph nodes, mandibular, that's under the jaw, mesenteric, that's associated with the gut, muscle over his pancreas. He went to all of these organs, pituitary gland, the master of the endocrine orchestra, relatively high concentrations in the pituitary gland. Prostate gland in men, lower concentration, salivary glands, skin, small intestine, spinal cord, spleen, stomach, testes, concerning, thymus gland behind the sternum, thyroid gland in the neck, uterus, whole blood plasma, and that gives the ratio. Speaker 1: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Speaker 2: Visitinfowars.comforward/showandsharethelinktoday. Speaker 3: But first, masks are going from mandated to criminalized in some states. Lawmakers in North Carolina and New York say mass bans in response to pro Palestinian protests would not target medical mask wearing, which is a sign you're in the cult. I felt like I was dying. News photographer injured by COVID booster is now on a mission to change vaccine policy. Potential association with COVID 19 vaccination developed Alzheimer's disease, a major study, one of many about the incredible brain damage and how it goes into the blood brain barrier. The potential association between COVID 19 vaccination and and development of Alzheimer's disease. Look. You take the shot, and what's Alzheimer's do? Go straight up. And here's the latest numbers. Turns out the Australian government, all the major governments got this, got a document before they started the shots in late 2000, just like the CDC warned of it and the FDA, saying it attacks the liver, the brain, the kidneys, the everything. Pfizer COVID mRNA vaccine, biodistribution study. It goes into every major organ. The bladder, the bone marrow, the brain, the eyes, the heart, the kidneys, the large intestine, the lung, the lymph nodes, the ovaries, the pancreas, the pituitary gland, the prostate. They put nuclear markers, atomic markers with it in rats, and they saw what it did. How could they approve this so they knew it was gonna happen? The unspoken truth is this was deliberate murder. They knowingly murdered and sterilized the Australian population. That's just the Australian news. Explosive study, once renowned by Lance within 24 hours, now peer reviewed and public, reveals 74% of deaths directly linked to COVID 19 shots. Meanwhile, Elon Musk says Bill Gates may bring down western civilization. I've got the clip actually here where we're down doctor in the UK going over all of this and talking about what these shots actually do. And now videos have surfaced back during the so called pandemic, where they were paid $2,000,000,000 at CVS and Walgreens not to give ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to medical doctors who wanted to prescribe it. They were paid to kill people. They know exactly what they are doing every single time. Let's play a few minutes of clip 16. This is doctor Zelenka who died last year, great patriot. Back at the time, he was subscribing it to thousands of patients being blocked from getting it. Speaker 1: I feel you're discriminating against me. Speaker 2: Why would it be discrimination? Speaker 1: Maybe because I'm Jewish. I don't know. What is it? Speaker 2: What? Everybody what are you talking about? Speaker 1: I'm not sure. Why would you not give me my medication? Speaker 2: It's because that is well, we're not allowed to do unless that person is in a clinical trial. Speaker 1: That's not true. I'm a prescribing physician for hundreds of patients. It's just not true what you're saying. Speaker 2: Yeah. You shouldn't be doing that unless it's given an an approval. Speaker 1: Who who are you to make their decision? You're just a pharmacist. You're not practiced. You're not licensed to practice medicine or surgery. That doesn't give you the right to control how I practice medicine. It's an FDA approved medication, and I'm allowed legally to use the off label. That's my right as a physician Who are you to infringe on my rights? You're not a physician. You're just a pharmacist. Your job is to carry out the orders of the physicians. Speaker 2: Not exactly. I have to do it as long as it's for the well-being of the physician. Speaker 1: I agree. I agree. So not for the well-being of the physician. Who are you to decide that? Speaker 2: Evidence of the Speaker 1: It's not for you to decide if it is. I think what you are doing is malpractice. It's malpractice as a pharmacist. And I really have to wonder Speaker 2: Well, my wife has explanation of law office. Speaker 4: So I'm not here. Speaker 1: That's okay. Your wife doesn't send policy Speaker 3: either. I Speaker 2: would There's no evidence against them. Speaker 4: Again, it's not your role. Speaker 2: Actually against the use Speaker 1: of drugs. Speaker 5: Again, it's not your role to Speaker 1: make that decision. I'm a prescribing physician who is licensed to practice medicine in the state of New York, and you're not. You don't know your place. That's all. Speaker 2: I I'm sorry. I can't fill in. Speaker 1: Because and I I'm I'm asking you to justify the reason why you're withholding lifesaving medication from me. That's all. I wanna know why are you refusing to give me my life saving medication. Speaker 2: So you're also writing this for you wrote on the position that was presented. Speaker 1: And how do you know what my medical condition is or isn't? Is it your role to know that? What about HIPAA? For yourself. Speaker 2: Would you be able to provide evidence or Speaker 1: you have I I I would. Yeah. But I don't think that that's the standard of care for to provide evidence to a pharmacist. I don't think that that's right. You don't do that with other people. This is not a controlled substance. This is an FDA approved medication. So I'm asking you to present evidence to your Speaker 2: the medication for a u and Speaker 1: a u. Again, and I have the right to use it off label. It's my right as a physician. I'm sorry if you don't know the laws. Speaker 2: The evidence is a one due to the That's what? Speaker 1: So that's your opinion. But, again, it's not your job. Speaker 2: Not my opinion. Speaker 1: It's coming from the National Institutes of Health. Your job to decide if Speaker 2: the Medicare from PubMed. It's coming from UpToDate. So there's so many clinical trials. I understand. Speaker 1: So it's your opinion that this medication doesn't work. Speaker 2: I don't want my name on a on a prescription that had been dispensed for something outside of the label that has been actually been proofed. I haven't shown to the Speaker 1: So you're saying, as a physician As a physician, I think Speaker 2: what you're doing is wrong. Speaker 1: Okay. I hear that. I just wanna understand. As a physician, you're saying that I'm not allowed to prescribe something both labeled, and that's why you're not getting it today? Speaker 2: Off label, that's kind of more of a gray area. I think it's because the state has told us specifically Can I Speaker 1: can I see that, please? Can you show me those those statements? Because I think you're just making it up. Speaker 2: But that is from the National Institute. Speaker 1: That just says their opinion about whether the medication works or not. That's okay. They're allowed to have their opinion. But they don't govern how doctors prescribe. You're putting me in a in a situation where I need life saving medication. You're not giving it to me. And for no reason, you're not providing any evidence except your own stubbornness and ego. And I I think that this is criminal. Criminal. Speaker 2: Criminal. I still have the right to to say no to a prescription that I deemed to be, Speaker 1: you know, harmful. How many times have you prescribed this given out this medication? Hundreds. Do you do the same thing for everybody? To children, pregnant women? Speaker 2: We haven't given it to anyone for COVID. Speaker 1: But that's not your role to decide. You're just a pharmacist. Speaker 2: No. We follow I mean, you're just very Speaker 1: kind of Speaker 2: saying just because I'm a pharmacist doesn't mean I don't know anything. But it's backed by, evidence and from guidance from, like, Speaker 1: Just show me. Show me the evidence. Speaker 3: Alright. So let's stop right here. The point is they blocked hydroxychloroquine. They they they blocked ivermectin. It came out on the news a month ago. They were paid $2,000,000,000 at CVS and Walgreens to not give it to you when your doctor said to. This is the computer control with some idiot in his little mask. Oh, my computer says I can't give it to you. You don't have a medical degree, asshole. The law says the doctor can give it to you. But that's what this is all about. And now the Australian government documents via request have come out that they knew that it was gonna migrate into your ovaries and your testicles and your liver and your brain and create all this havoc, and they did it on purpose, and that's the point. You're like, why would they do this? Because they're psychotics. And imagine if you're a psychotic, the power of killing a bunch of people. You're like, well, I don't wanna do that. Well, you keep judging psychotics according to how you operate. I'm not gonna play the clip. May may maybe tomorrow I'll play it. It it's just it's just I I put it out on my ex account this morning. Hell, I'll show you. I got a max account right now. Go to real Alex Jones on ex. If you go to the main page, go to profile, load a minute. I can show you this because this is a big deal, folks. It's a big deal that they knew the Australian government 4 years ago. What they were about to do. They were absolutely fully conscious. Here it is. It's now official. The COVID shots infest the entire body, but they really like the liver and the ovaries. I mean, it that's a government document circulated worldwide. They knew it. They lied to you, And I know most of you get that, but think of the magnitude of what we're up against with these turt packs. To keep my broadcast on air, it is more critical than ever that you support our sponsors. And many of the great products have been available for years at infowarsstore.com are no longer available there. They're exclusively available at doctorjonesnaturals.com. The URL is below on screen. All of the patented nanosilver products like the toothpaste and the wound gel and the immune gargle are there at dotchonesdactylsdot com. And many other amazing products like a super high quality organic multivitamin, next level foundational energy, COVACILL, Rocket Rest, Top Brain, the list goes on and on. Please visit doctorjonesnaturals.com today or visit the link below and support the broadcast while getting amazing products at the same time. Thank you so much for your past support, and I'm encouraging you now to go to doctorjonesnaturals.com. It's critical to keeping my broadcast on the air plus their amazing products. Thank you for your support. Now please take action by going to doctorjonesnaturals.com today and checking out the amazing products.
iluminatibot
Posted - October 10, 2024 at 7:34 AM
Saved - October 10, 2024 at 12:30 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

MSM now admits the shots are toxic “Discovery billions fragments of DNA in every dose” - Florida Surgeon General The masses are going to be severely pi$$ed off when they finally find out what they’ve injected themselves with numerous times https://t.co/3DPBO3kWoV

Video Transcript AI Summary
Florida Surgeon General Dr. Ladipo is recommending that people stop getting the COVID vaccine due to safety concerns. He states that billions of DNA fragments were discovered per dose in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines. He claims that these concerns have not been addressed by the FDA or CDC. Dr. Ladipo says that if the risks of DNA integration with COVID vaccines cannot be addressed, then the vaccines aren't appropriate for use in humans. He sent letters to the heads of the FDA and the CDC questioning how this would impact humans in three areas: healthy human genes being transformed into cancerous cells, chromosomal instability, and how the integration could affect unintended parts of the body such as the heart, brain, lungs, and the injection site. A local doctor, Michael Sparks, says health providers are stuck in the middle with the state surgeon general saying one thing and the FDA saying another.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Also developing right now, Florida surgeon general says for us to stop getting the COVID vaccine. FOX 30 five's Hannah McKenzie is joining us live in the alert center tonight. So, Hannah, he says watching the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines is a problem. Speaker 1: Yeah, Lou Anne. John, Florida surgeon general doctor Ladipo says he has safety concerns pertaining to the discovery of billions of DNA fragments found per dose in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines. And he says those concerns have not been addressed by the FDA or the CDC. Doctor Ladipo says if the risks of DNA integration with COVID vaccines cannot be addressed, then the vaccines aren't appropriate for use in humans. He says he sent letters to the heads of the FDA and the CDC specifically questioning how this would impact humans in 3 main areas, healthy human genes being transformed into cancerous cells, chromosomal instability, and how the integration could affect unintended parts of the body such as the heart, brain, lungs, even the injection site itself. We asked local doctor Michael Sparks to weigh in. Doctor Sparks telling us with the state surgeon general saying one thing and the FDA another, health providers are left stuck in the middle.
BGatesIsaPyscho
Posted - October 22, 2024 at 9:46 AM
Saved - October 23, 2024 at 6:08 AM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

“The Secret ingredient in the Covid Vaccines has been found” “A peer reviewed study declared 55 undeclared chemical elements” The Covid Vaccines made no sense - they didn’t work, people didn’t need them & yet they were relentlessly forced on billions 24/7 - question is why…..? https://t.co/1svqszL8IV

Video Transcript AI Summary
A peer-reviewed study published Friday reportedly found 55 undeclared chemical elements in COVID vaccines from Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, CanSino, Sinopharm, and Sputnik V. Researchers deduced that the COVID injections are part of a secret worldwide nanotechnological experimentation program. Eleven out of the fifteen lanthanides, also known as rare earth minerals, were allegedly found in these technologies.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, we have a bombshell to report to you, ladies and gentlemen. The secret ingredient in COVID vaccines has been found. A peer reviewed study published Friday documented 55 undeclared chemical elements which have been detected in the exotic COVID gene therapy technology from brands Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, CanSino, Sinopharm, and Sputnik V. Given the exotic nature of these findings, the researchers deduced that the novel COVID gene therapy technology injections are in fact part of a secret worldwide nanotechnological experimentation program. Speaker 1: And what they found was rare earth minerals in these technologies. They found 11 out of the 15 lanthanides. That's what a rare earth mineral, that's the scientific term for it, is a lanthanide. And the hairs on the back of my neck stood up, Maria. Why is that? Because these rare earth magnets, lanthanides, are what's used Speaker 0: in Speaker 1: our
thehealthb0t
Posted - November 12, 2024 at 9:45 AM
Saved - November 12, 2024 at 2:51 PM

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

Doctor dropping truth bombs on the Covid vaccines https://t.co/mEWQg6f6J4

Video Transcript AI Summary
My name is Dr. Sean Brooks, PhD from Oxford. I have studied health and medicine for 21 years. Dr. Robert Malone, the creator of the mRNA vaccine, advises against taking these vaccines under any circumstances. Those who have taken the vaccine may face severe health issues, including a 35% reduction in immune function, leading to potential death within 6 months to 5 years. This is compounded by antibody-dependent enhancement, which can cause organ failure, and increased blood clotting. Many vaccinated individuals may also face infertility, with 80% of vaccinated women losing pregnancies in the first trimester. The vaccines alter RNA, making individuals susceptible to various diseases. Schools may close as staff members fall ill. There is no remedy for these outcomes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is doctor Sean Brooks, PhD, Oxford. I have 48 publications including 23 folks. I studied health medicine, anatomy, and physiology for approximately 21 years. Doctor Robert Malone, who created the messenger RNA vaccine, has said no one should ever take these jabs ever. Under any circumstance whatsoever, he created it. And he says don't ever do it. So let me explain what's going to happen to the people who have taken take it. Excuse me. The people who have taken it are going to die in the next 6 months to 3 to 5 years for three reasons. Number 1, you've dramatically decreased your own immune system by 35%. The first jab did it by at least 15. The second did it by 35. Now, if you take any booster shot, you will die. That's it. You take a flu shot in the future, you will die. The second reason, antibody dependent enhancement. Antib antibody dependent enhancement is what is happening with these jabs with everybody who has taken them. Unless, of course, you've taken a placebo, but there's no way that you would know that. So given that fact, antibody dependent enhancement tricks the entire body into believing that the cell that's eating the pathogen is eating it when it isn't. It ends up leading to what's called a cytokine storm, which causes organ failure. That will cause your death and there's no stopping that. No amount of drugs will stop that. The third thing, blood clotting. Everyone who has taken the jabs is blood clotting. If you don't believe me, there's a way you can find out. Take what's called the d dimer test. What that does is that detects blood clotting at the microscopic level. We're cutting full blood clots out of people right now. As I'm talking to you, millions have died from the jabs. In your last meeting, you advocated for people to take the jabs potentially in the future, along with wearing masks. And I heard parents say the same thing. So to the parents who are actually considering jabbing their own children, you're going to sterilize them permanently. People who have taken the jabs are sterilized. 80% of women who have been jabbed have lost their children in the first trimester. You can't have kids. You've also injected yourself with the equivalent of HIV. You can now no longer breastfeed, donate blood, donate organs, donate blood plasma nor bone marrow. If you don't believe me, try to donate blood and blood plasma and find out what happens. You will be denied. Unless, of course, you live in California, in which case they're allowing people to donate toxic blood with spike proteins in it. The jabs create spike proteins. They're in the jabs themselves and they create it by snapping your RNA in half. You are no longer a human anymore. You are something else And you are susceptible to countless diseases. Now here's what's gonna happen in the future very quickly. Yeah. 15 seconds. Great. I don't know what percentage of your staff has taken the jabs, but your school is going to close. You will not stay open. You will close because they will fall ill and they will die. That will happen in all of your buildings. It will have it's already happening. Thank you, sir. I'm I bet it is. It's already happening. Good luck. There's nothing to stop this. No.
BroadbentMP
Posted - November 27, 2024 at 3:44 AM
Saved - November 27, 2024 at 12:54 PM

@BroadbentMP - Russell Broadbent

Esteemed scientist @Kevin_McKernan was the first to raise the alarm about DNA contamination in the COVID mRNA vaccines. Teams of scientists are working around the clock to uncover the significance of this issue. It’s only a matter of time... @DJSpeicher @DrJulieSladden https://t.co/JSzmvSTqfH

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kevin McKernan discusses his unexpected journey into vaccine research, initially driven by concerns over PCR testing during the COVID pandemic. After receiving vaccine vials, he discovered unexpected DNA sequences, leading to ethical dilemmas about reporting findings. He emphasizes the lack of regulatory oversight and the potential dangers of DNA contamination in vaccines, which could have unknown health implications. He urges for more rigorous testing methods beyond PCR and highlights the persistence of vaccine DNA in human cells long after vaccination. Recent studies show this DNA can remain detectable for weeks, raising concerns about its potential link to cancer. McKernan calls for increased funding and research into these issues, noting resistance to support within current funding structures.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, everybody, and welcome. Joining us today is scientist Kevin McKernan. Kevin, thank you for signing my letters cosigning my letters to prime minister. It was honored to have you cosign them and give them the power that they needed to have. Kevin, this has been an unexpected journey for you. Like, you didn't choose this path. This path chose you. So tell me how it all started for you. Speaker 1: Uh-oh. That's a it's a bit of a long story and somewhat distractionary, but we're we're a company that does genetic testing, and and, we build safety testing to pick up microbes in the cannabis and food industry. So, when I saw, what was going on with the PCR field, I knew there was problems in the PCR going on with COVID. They they didn't have internal controls, And, that that stimulated some people in the field to send me vaccine vials after I published a paper with Peter McCullough about some of the differences between the vaccine and the and the virus. And, I didn't know what to do with those, threw in the freezer, and then an experiment showed up on my desk where we needed an RNA molecule to spike into an experiment to figure out what was going on. And I had those in the shelf, so I threw them in and didn't expect to find anything other than the vaccine in there. And out came these these plasmids, these DNA sequences, which we are then stuck with. We were faced with being a small company. What do we do with this information? If if we bury it, we're we're part of the crime, and if we raise any alarm bells, we'll be sued. So, we chose the potentially getting sued route and just doubled down on all of our work and and, you know, double, triple checked it with many different platforms and then built really easy tools to allow others to replicate it so that we weren't left alone without any replication. So that's kinda where it started, and it, it hasn't ended. I would just say that. It's only magnified in time. Speaker 0: Kevin, what are you and I was concerned about particularly? Speaker 1: I'm concerned that it's very clear there is no regulatory oversight on this, that, the regulators seem to be responding in a manner that's covering for the for the sponsors as opposed to covering for the people. This is work that anyone can do in a high school laboratory, and, it's something that, shocks me that it was found by us. This is not our business. We had no we didn't wanna get into this field, and we have no commercial interest in this field. We just found this and felt like the world had to know about it. So this is a very easy thing for a genomics laboratory to find. And so any agency that's hiding the protocols they're using to look at this, you can't trust. And I've seen that in particular in Australia. The TGA will not share the protocol they're using to measure the residual DNA. That tells me they have something to hide. Speaker 0: Kevin, can you spell out for everyday Australians what does this mean? Speaker 1: Well, we we don't know the, the implications of this, in that I I don't know if the DNA contamination is actually responsible for some of the acute effects that people are seeing with the vaccines. There are some people who faint, and some people who have clots and of myocarditis. I don't know if the DNA is doing that. It's possible it's inflaming heart cells with a particular pathway known as the c c gas sting pathway, which is a complicated pathway. But those in the molecular biology space will know what that means. But I think most of the adverse events that you find immediately after vaccination may in fact be due to the spike protein or or or the the act of transfecting these foreign proteins into human cells. However, the longer term consequences were never measured in the trials, and nobody consented to there being DNA in these vaccines. And we do think there is concern that this DNA, if it gets transfected into cell lines, can integrate with the human genome and cause cancer. And that we have no trial data to know whether it's true or not. They never did genotoxicity studies on these vaccines. Speaker 0: Where do you think we are right now, Kevin? Speaker 1: We're at a stage where you're going to see a a fury of papers coming out that demonstrate we're not alone on this, that many other people are finding this contamination of vaccines. And it needs to be expanded even beyond those the the papers that I know of that are coming out because we've only looked at a few lots. In terms of PCR, there's maybe been 50 to 70 lots in the world that have been PCR ed. Actually, less than that. 50 to 70 vials of PCR, they're probably half the number of lots. There's only been maybe 3 vials in the world that have been sequenced. And PCR is one level of information. It's a 40,000 foot view. Sequencing gives you every single nucleotide in there that tells you whether the plasmids are all the same in every file. We we don't even have that information yet. This is something that is really affordable to do. I've been involved in building next generation sequencers. They've gotten a 100,000 fold cheaper in the last 20 years. Alright? And they're not sequencing every lot. That's insane. They should know every single discrepancy in these lots before they inject people, particularly considering they're pushing these with mandates and they don't have any liability. Speaker 0: What needs to happen next? Speaker 1: What happens next is I I would encourage other academics and other people to step up and including the regulatory agencies to begin testing lots with more than the method that the pharmaceutical industry gave you. Moderna has patents that will teach that you should not use PCR to measure this because it undermeasures the problem, yet the regulators are letting them use PCR to measure this. That's a contradiction. They should be measuring with a variety of tools that we've described in some of our papers. What David Speaker did for the work in Australia was the was the appropriate approach was to use a a fluorometer that erases the RNA. So you're only measuring DNA, and that still gives you numbers that are, like, 50 to a 100 fold over the limit. Second to that, we need research done on transfecting fragmented DNA like this that has these components in it, these, mammalian origins of replication and these mammalian promoters known as the SP 40 promoters. We need to start transacting those into cell lines to see if they drive cancer. SV 40 has a notorious history in cancer in the polio vaccine. That was the full virus. But we have the we have the promoter elements in this vaccine. Those, in fact, could land in front of genes and create an oncogenic event. So, that work is not hard to do. It's it's easy to fund, and it should be funded at many different places. So we have a concert of scientists looking at this from different views. Speaker 0: There is a rash of increasing cancer around the world. I understand there was a statement by on Twitter or x by professor Buckholz today. Can you tell me about that? Speaker 1: That was a very important post. So, what he has found is that he's taken human organoids, which are like growing human cells into a semi organ like shape and treated them with the vaccines. And then he grew them for a month and washed them frequently. That gets rid of any vaccine that's not in the cell anymore, and it allows the cells to replicate. And he can still find DNA from the vaccine in those cells 30 days later. That tells you it doesn't go away, and that's an important thing to to to look at in concert with another paper 2 other papers that came out this week. One from who also replicated the work from speaker and myself and and Koenig showing that the the vaccine you can sequence the all the DNA out of these vaccines and find the Pfizer vaccine in there. But another one from of India who went and scanned a bunch of research projects that were in the NCBI SRA. That's that's an area where we stored a lot of sequencing information for all the published papers. And he just went and scanned those for evidence of these vaccine sequences in blood samples, and he found a lot of it. So this is something that should be looked for and scanned for routinely in any any clinical study that happens to be taking samples from patients to see how much of this is around post vaccination. So Philip's work shows that the DNA persists for 30 days. We have probably 4 other publications out there that demonstrate this as well. There's the Hanna et al paper that shows it's in breast milk 5 days out. There's a Castriota paper that shows it's in plasma 28 days out. There's a there's the Krausen paper that shows it in heart cells 30 days out. There's even one from Gonzales that shows it in placentas 2 to 10 days out. As as these women had to get vaccinated, I think, to get to give birth, and the placentas were collected. They were vaccinated 2 10 days before before giving birth. So, the persistent the DNA persistence problem is real. It's not 48 hours. It's staying longer. And if you're only looking in the blood, you may not find it for as long because the blood clears very quickly. We have to be looking in tumors. So there should be a program in place to be screening tumors for positivity for these vaccine sequences. And then they help inform us on the cause of the cancer and maybe even the treatment. Speaker 0: Is there a resident still to support your ongoing work? Speaker 1: I'm sorry. Is there Speaker 0: Is there reluctance still to support Speaker 1: Yes. There there is. This is not something that's readily funded throughout the current NIH. The current NIH funding architecture has $400,000,000 in vaccine royalty from Moderna alone, and they're probably gonna get twice
atensnut
Posted - November 27, 2024 at 3:40 PM
Saved - November 28, 2024 at 6:40 AM

@atensnut - Juanita Broaddrick

Where is the F’ing Media? 17,000 physicians and scientists from around the world agree Covid 19 vaccines are dangerous and harmful. https://t.co/3nesp6oTiw

Video Transcript AI Summary
We, a global team of over 17,000 physicians and scientists, declare that the COVID-19 genetic therapy injections should end. Data shows these injections cause more harm than good, especially for the young and healthy, providing no benefit against COVID-19, which is treatable. Recent findings indicate vaccinated individuals may have higher rates of infection and severe outcomes compared to the unvaccinated. These gene therapies can cause significant damage to various organs and the immune system. We recommend regulating these products as gene therapies, reinstating a minimum five-year FDA testing period, halting emergency use authorization, and requiring full FDA approval for all COVID-19 medical products. Additionally, we call for investigations into the causes of death and damage affecting those who received these injections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you for taking the time to listen to myself and my colleagues today speaking to you from the heart about what we've observed and what we're recommending as a Global COVID Summit team of over 17,000 physicians and scientists from all over the world. We declare and the data confirm that the COVID-nineteen experimental genetic therapy injections must end. We must acknowledge that the genetic COVID-nineteen genetic injections cause far more harm than good and provide zero benefit relative to risk for the young and healthy. They do not reduce COVID-nineteen infection which is treatable and not terminal. Furthermore, the most recent data demonstrates that you are more likely to become infected or have disease or even death if you've been vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated people. This is shocking to hear, but it is what the data are showing us. The data now show that these experimental gene therapy treatments can damage your children as well as yourself. They can damage your heart, your brain, your reproductive tissue and your lungs. This can include permanent damage and disablement of your immune system. We strongly recommend that these products now and in the future be regulated as the gene therapy products that they are and require public involvement of the FDA's gene therapy scientists and committees in reviewing and approving these drugs. We believe that it's necessary to reestablish the 5 year minimum FDA testing period and to cease the emergency use authorization and require full FDA licensure of all novel medical products used for COVID-nineteen. We also strongly recommend that there be investigations of the actual causes of death and damage to 1,000,000 who have been subjected to these mandatory mRNA and adenoviral vector gene therapy injections.
VigilantFox
Posted - December 19, 2024 at 9:06 PM
Saved - December 20, 2024 at 3:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across some alarming stories that the media seems to be ignoring. A Yale study suggests that genetic material from COVID vaccines may integrate with human DNA, leading to prolonged spike protein presence and potential immunosuppression. There's also concern about upcoming bird flu mRNA injections and a growing distrust among parents regarding vaccine safety. Other posts highlight emotional testimonies about child trafficking, political controversies, and calls for accountability regarding vaccine manufacturers. The narrative around COVID shots is shifting dramatically.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - New evidence suggests genetic material in the COVID shots may INTEGRATE with human DNA. Yale University scientists have discovered that individuals vaccinated against COVID-19, but never infected, still had spike protein in their bloodstream YEARS after their last shot. One study participant showed spike protein in their bloodstream more than 700 days after their last mRNA shot, while others had spike protein present 450+ days later. The researchers also found a drop in CD4 T cells (key immune system regulators), which points to potential long-term immunosuppression in vaccinated individuals. According to @AlexBerenson, these findings raise the possibility that genetic material from the COVID shots may integrate with human DNA, potentially explaining the prolonged presence of spike protein in the bloodstream observed in vaccinated individuals. This unpublished study is led by Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, a respected Yale scientist and former strong proponent of COVID vaccines. Dr. Iwasaki had previously dismissed vaccine safety concerns as “absurd” and publicly supported vaccine mandates. However, these new findings may have shifted her perspective on the issue. Yale researchers are reportedly facing pressure to suppress the findings due to their explosive implications, which could collapse the “safe and effective” narrative propagated by the government and media. As @MidwesternDoc explains: “A battle is going on behind the scenes over publishing it. We wanted to wait until Yale buried it to reveal what had been leaked to us (and thereby prove incriminating vaccine data was suppressed) so that we would not interfere with the normal publication process (which is often critical for these types of things to be accepted by the scientific community). In this case, given the people involved and the data given, this study will prove ‘long vax’ is a real condition and that the vaccine needs to be immediately pulled (which hence puts Yale in a very awkward position if they publish it).” As of now, the Yale scientists plan to publish their study on an unreviewed pre-print server. If the public actually gets a chance to see this, it could change everything. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - Epidemiologist exposes the truth about California’s “bird flu emergency.” @NicHulscher writes, “The Biopharmaceutical Complex is currently preparing bird flu mRNA injections developed by Moderna, CEPI-funded H5N1 replicon (self-amplifying) shots, and Arcturus Therapeutics replicon ‘pandemic’ bird flu injections funded by the U.S. government (BARDA) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.” “Their plans for more sweeping emergency powers and dangerous experimental genetic injections must be stopped. We can’t make the same mistakes as we did with COVID-19.” Read More: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/california-declares-state-of-emergency

California Declares State of Emergency Over H5N1 Bird Flu Just as CDC Reports 'First Severe Case' in Louisiana "All residents are to obey the direction of emergency officials with regard to this emergency in order to protect their safety." petermcculloughmd.substack.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher #8 - NY Governor Kathy Hochul stunned as a reporter demolishes her "subways are safer" lie with an array of devastating crime stats. Credit: @EndWokeness

Video Transcript AI Summary
Statistics show a 42% decrease in crime since 2021, but when comparing to pre-pandemic levels, overall crime is only down 12%. However, murders have increased by 200%, felony assaults by 55%, and burglaries by 140%. Is this considered progress? Are we discussing crime rates statewide, in the city, or specifically in the subway system? I’m referring to crime in the transit system. Would you like to respond to that?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Say a lot of things with statistics, and I see the percentage that a crime is down 42% since 2021. But if you look back to pre pandemic, now I know you like to say that that overall crime is down 12% since the pandemic, but murders are up 200%. Felony assault is up 55%, and burglary is up a 140%. So are you saying that this is progress? Are you talking about statewide, city or subway? I'm not crime in the transit system. I'm sorry, governor. Yes, crime in the subway system. Okay. Okay. Do you want to answer that?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - Border Czar Tom Homan gets emotional during his new Tucker Carlson interview. “Over half a million children trafficked into this country.” “I've talked to little girls as young as 9, they were r*ped multiple times by members of the cartel. Grown men, crawled upon this little girl, took everything innocent and pure from her. Her life would never be the same. Look in her eyes, there wasn't life in her eyes. It's just little girl's devastated for life, and this happens every day.” Credit: @WallStreetApes

Video Transcript AI Summary
300,000 children are missing, and over half a million are trafficked into the country. The scale of this issue is overwhelming, and the bureaucracy is difficult to navigate. I’ve witnessed horrific scenes in my career, including a tragic incident where 19 people, including a 5-year-old boy, died in a trailer. The boy begged his father for help as he suffocated. I've also spoken to young girls who have been victimized by cartel members, leaving them traumatized. I warned that if Joe Biden won the presidency, border security would deteriorate, leading to increased trafficking and deaths. When President Trump asked if I wanted to help fix the situation, I couldn't refuse.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 300,000 missing children. That's something else I've read reference to. Speaker 1: Over half a 1000000 children in traffic into this country. Speaker 0: This problem is just so enormous, and the bureaucracy is so complex and hard to fight, and they always win in the end. Why would you take this job? Speaker 1: I say this many times because of things I've seen in my career. So I grew up in town 25100. I fast forward. I'm sitting in the back I'm standing back with trailer tractor trailer, 19 dead people at my feet that baked to death and back to tractor trailer, including a 5 year old little boy who who suffocated to death. And I I taught him was his father who was trying to protect him. During that investigation, they said that old boy begged his father not to let him die because he wanna see his mom again. Here's a 5 year old boy who knew he was dying and asked for to have help. No. And his dad, you know, his dad can't help him. Right? Speaker 0: No. Speaker 1: I've talked to little girls as young as 9. They were raped multiple times by members of the cartel. Grown men, crawled upon this little girl, took everything innocent and pure from her. Her life would never be the same. Look in her eyes. There wasn't life in her eyes. It's just little girl's devastated for volume, and this happens every day. I wrote an op ed of Fox News, and I says, if Joe Biden wins the presidency, we lose the border. When you lose the border, trafficking of sex trafficking will skyrocket. Child deaths will skyrocket. Migrant deaths will skyrocket. American deaths will skyrocket from drugs from across that border. So when president Trump calls me up, says, you've been complaining about for 4 years. Do you wanna come fix it? How do you say no?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness #6 - CNN shares a devastating poll, revealing that a growing number of parents no longer believe the government’s or media’s lies about vaccines. Video: @Inversionism

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccination for children is increasingly viewed as less important, which is concerning. In 2001, 94% believed it was extremely important to vaccinate children, but this dropped to 84% in 2019 and now stands at just 69%. While a majority still supports vaccination, this marks a significant decline of 25 points since the start of the century and a 15-point drop in the last five years. Among Republicans, the decline is even steeper: from 93% in 2001 to 79% in 2019, and now only 54%. This nearly 40-point drop raises alarms among public health officials, indicating a troubling trend rather than a temporary fluctuation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I often look at trends, you know, we come on, we talk about trends. I believe this is one of the more troubling trends that we have seen, that we have covered here. So vaccinate children, highly important, that is extremely very important. We got overall and we got the GOP. They both sort of sort of match each other, but the GOP is even more of a drop off. So overall, you know, back in 2001, 94%, it was extremely or very important to vaccinate children. In 2019, drops to 84%. Look at where we are now, just 69%. Look, it's still the clear majority Right. But it's dropped 25 points since the beginning of the century. It's dropped 15 points in just the last 5 years. Look at Republicans. The top up is even more. Look at this. 93% back in 2,001, 79% in 2019, and then 54%. That is a drop of nearly 40 percentage points since the beginning of the century. Something that I know a lot of public health officials are very very worried about. I mean, that drop is not a blip. Why

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism While you’re here, remember to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more daily news roundups.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism #5 - Catturd Strikes Again: Internet Sensation Roasts RINO Dan Crenshaw in Explosive X/Twitter War @catturd2 https://vigilantnews.com/post/catturd-strikes-again-internet-sensation-roasts-rino-dan-crenshaw-in-explosive-x-twitter-war/

Catturd Strikes Again: Internet Sensation Roasts RINO Dan Crenshaw in Explosive X/Twitter War Wow. Just, wow. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 #4 - Fani Willis Disqualified, Removed From Trump Case https://vigilantnews.com/post/fani-willis-disqualified-removed-from-trump-case/

Fani Willis Disqualified, Removed From Trump Case It’s a glorious day. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 #3 - Rand Paul Calls for Elon Musk to Be Named Speaker of the House https://vigilantnews.com/post/rand-paul-calls-for-elon-musk-to-be-named-speaker-of-the-house/

Rand Paul Calls for Elon Musk to Be Named Speaker of the House “The Speaker of the House need not be a member of Congress..." vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 #2 - Top Crime Investigators Believe Luigi Mangione Did NOT Act Alone https://vigilantnews.com/post/top-crime-investigators-believe-luigi-mangione-did-not-act-alone/

Top Crime Investigators Believe Luigi Mangione Did NOT Act Alone Evidence suggests the involvement of at least one accomplice. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 #1 - Neil Cavuto OUT at Fox News After 28 Years: Good Riddance Good riddance! https://vigilantnews.com/post/neil-cavuto-out-at-fox-news-after-28-years/

Neil Cavuto OUT at Fox News After 28 Years Good riddance! vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 BONUS #1 - Ex-CDC Director Calls on Congress to END the Liability Shield for Vaccine Makers https://vigilantnews.com/post/ex-cdc-director-calls-for-congress-to-end-the-liability-shield-for-vaccine-makers/

Ex-CDC Director Calls on Congress to END the Liability Shield for Vaccine Makers This would be a game-changer. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 BONUS #2 - The Meat Upgrade You Didn’t Know You Needed https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-meat-upgrade-you-didnt-know-you-needed/

The Meat Upgrade You Didn’t Know You Needed When it comes to meat, not all are created equal. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 BONUS #3 - Cancer Surgeon Drops Ivermectin Bombshell https://vigilantnews.com/post/cancer-surgeon-drops-ivermectin-bombshell/

Cancer Surgeon Drops Ivermectin Bombshell Can ivermectin treat cancer? Watch Dr. Kathleen Ruddy explain what happened after she observed late-stage cancer patients taking this “miracle drug.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 BONUS #4 - Donald Trump’s COVID ‘Game-Changer’ Finds Surprising New Use https://vigilantnews.com/post/donald-trumps-covid-game-changer-finds-surprising-new-use/

Donald Trump’s COVID ‘Game-Changer’ Finds Surprising New Use As Ivermectin emerges as a cancer treatment, Hydroxychloroquine shows effectiveness against another target disease. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 BONUS #5 - BUSTED: ‘The View’ Co-Host May Face Criminal Investigation https://vigilantnews.com/post/busted-the-view-co-host-may-face-criminal-investigation/

BUSTED: ‘The View’ Co-Host May Face Criminal Investigation The tables have turned. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, please do me a quick favor and follow this page (@VigilantFox) before you go. In other news, a tsunami of devastating reports has come crashing down on the COVID shots. See more details on that below: https://t.co/dOj1a4BR4p

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 - Tsunami of devastating news crashes down on the COVID jabs. A bombshell study reveals COVID shot vials are loaded with DNA contamination levels 4 to 5 times HIGHER than what regulators allow. But that's just the beginning. Evidence now shows the shots SHED (Peters et al.) and worsen heart conditions over time (hidden Pfizer report). And if that weren’t enough, Pfizer is facing explosive allegations of hiding vaccine-related deaths during its clinical trials (Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan). Dr. Jessica Rose (@JesslovesMJK) has expressed deep concern over the newly confirmed evidence of vaccine shedding, which appears to extend far beyond intimate contact. This conversation is a must-watch. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent studies have raised alarming concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding menstrual irregularities linked to proximity to vaccinated individuals. A survey revealed that many women experienced menstrual issues after being near vaccinated people, with a significant percentage reporting symptoms shortly after exposure. Additionally, new research confirmed the presence of residual DNA in vaccine vials, exceeding safety thresholds, which could have serious implications for health. Reports indicate that heart conditions among vaccinated individuals are worsening over time, and allegations have emerged accusing Pfizer of concealing deaths during vaccine trials. These findings highlight the urgent need for further investigation into the safety and long-term effects of the vaccines, particularly regarding potential shedding and its impact on unvaccinated individuals.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back to another week of media blackout. It's great to be here with you all again. Since the rollout of the COVID injections, it's been one horror story after another. But this week, the dangerous lethal injections and all of those who've supported them and still support them may just have been hit with a series of wrecking balls that there is no coming back from. The following should infuriate everyone particularly because of the implications for those who went out of their way, lost their jobs, some even lost their homes, and in some cases, their lives to avoid playing Russian roulette with these injections. These people are also now confirmed to be at risk from shedding. Well, now a new study finds concerning evidence of COVID 19 vaccine shedding. So the conspiracy theorists are just right time and time and time again. A new study titled menstrual abnormalities strongly associated with proximity to COVID 19 vaccinated individuals was just published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research. In spring of 2021, My Cycle Story launched a secure online survey to which 92.3% of over 6,000 respondents self reported menstrual irregularities occurring after the rollout of the COVID 19 injectables. Each respondent served as her own control because prior to the rollout of the injections, the vast majority had regular menstrual cycles. A subgroup of 3,390 respondents were only indirectly exposed to the injections or the virus. This subgroup reported, 1, being unvaccinated for COVID 19, 2, having had no COVID symptoms, and 3, no positive test for COVID 19. Yet a substantial majority of these women who were only indirectly exposed to the injectables or the infections still had many of the same menstrual abnormalities as the 2,659 women who were directly exposed to an injection or symptoms or tested positive. Generalized linear mixed modeling was used to examine the association, not assuming causation, between abnormal menses experienced after the COVID 19 vaccine rollout by respondents who are only indirectly exposed by some degree of proximity to persons. So this part is very important. The percentage of the indirectly exposed participants who reported being within 6 feet of a COVID injected person was 85.5%. Of these, over 70% had irregular menstrual symptoms within 1 week, and over 50% had irregular menstrual symptoms within just under 3 days after exposure. So when comparing daily proximity to a vaccinated person, the categories of daily within 6 feet outside the household household versus seldom or sometimes daily outside 6 feet had the highest relative risk at 1.34. So let me take you to the layman's terms of this. The study found that women with daily close proximity within 6 feet to vaccinated individuals outside their household had a 34% higher risk of heavier bleeding, a 28% higher risk of menstruation starting over 7 days early, and a 26% higher risk of bleeding lasting more than 7 days. The scientific plausibility for these findings is supported by several key observations which are discussed in the manuscript. The timing and consistency with shedding studies, and you can see, the further information on that, the prolonged presence of vaccine components, documented excretion pathways, alignment with previous studies, and potential mechanisms of action. The authors concluded our findings suggest possible indirect transmission of ingredients or product of the COVID 19 vaccines, presumably through shedding from people who received 1 or more of the COVID 19 injections. But then we have another bombshell which is, of course, linked. A new paper confirms presence of DNA in COVID 19 shot vials settles issues pertaining to DNA quantification methods shows spike persistence and exosomal shuttling or shedding. This is from doctor Jessica Rose. So Ulrik Cammer, Verena Schultz, and Klaus Stegar have just published what might be the paper of the century entitled BioNTech RNA Based COVID 19 Injections Contain Large Amounts of Residual DNA Including an SV 40 promoter enhancer sequence. It got through peer review on the 3rd December 2024 and confirms much of what has already been evidenced and answers many questions lingering in the background. But then on top of that, we also have a hidden Pfizer report that shows heart conditions in the vaccinated are getting worse over time. So the author says I told you here about Pfizer's abstract of its interim report 5 showing at least 23 to 40% higher risk of some heart related conditions in the vaccinated, but that the MHRA, the UK Medicines regulator, was withholding publication of the full report. As I said at the time, in summary, if, as I suspect, MHRA is worried by the results in Pfizer's interim report 5, then no wonder is sitting on it. Well, MHRA is still sitting on the report, but the author has managed to obtain a copy. It looks like the author was right. The detailed results in the full report are even more worrying than the hazard ratios in the abstract which he reported last time. To recap, this is a report of a post authorization safety study of Pfizer's COVID vaccine. National regulators routinely require pharmaceutical manufacturers to conduct PASS studies as a condition of authorization of most new medicines. They provide the data to the manufacturer covering millions of patients registered in national healthcare systems. The manufacturer then conducts analysis matched for things like age and sex to determine whether the medicine has increased the risk of specified health conditions. So below are some heart related cumulative incidence graphs from Pfizer's full interim report 5. You will immediately notice that the incidence for each type of condition is significantly greater in the COVID vaccinated, but we already knew that from the hazard ratios in the abstract. What's worse is the curves diverge over time, I e the relative incidence between vaccinated and unvaccinated increases over the time period of the data in the report. So that's between December 8, 2020 March 21, 2022. Acute cardiovascular injury, 23% times, 23% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse on page 30. And you can see all of these arrhythmias, 27% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse on page 138. Heart failure, 2% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse, though not quite statistically significant at this point on page 146. And stress cardiomyopathy, 30% higher Speaker 1: in the vaccinated and getting Speaker 0: worse, though not yet statistically significant. Vaccinated and getting worse, though not yet statistically significant, page 1 30 53 rather. Coronary artery disease, 40% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse on page 60. Myocarditis, 21 days, a 130% higher in the vaccinated, though not quite statistically significant, page 168. Furthermore, disturbing, Pfizer accused of hiding deaths in COVID 19 vaccine trials. A team of researchers analyzing Pfizer's clinical trial data has accused the pharmaceutical giant of concealing deaths during its COVID 19 vaccine trials. Among the allegations is the failure to disclose the death of a Kansas participant who was part of the BNT 162 b 2 vaccine trial. The death reportedly occurred 41 days after the participant received their second dose. The accusations stem from a detailed report led by doctor Jayanthi Konadasaan, an anesthetist and perioperative physician and a member of the Daily Clout research team. The team alleges that Pfizer's reporting practices during the critical juncture leading to the FDA's emergency use authorization for the vaccine were flawed with significant delays in documenting serious adverse events including deaths. The Pollak paper disclosed 6 deaths, 2 in the BNT 162 b 2 arm and 4 in the placebo arm. In the journal article and the EUA approval documentation, the 6 deaths covered the period of July 27, 2020 through November 14 2020, doctor Koonadasaan wrote in a letter sent to Kansas attorney general, Kris Kobach, who filed a lawsuit against Pfizer. Now we've included all of the details relating to that particular woman, the cover up that ensued, and all of the details you need to know on the Vigilant News Network article. We encourage everyone to read it in full. My concern, and I'm sure the concern of many other people, is this shedding issue and the confirmation of the shedding. And if people are now getting cancer who were not injected, what does that mean for the rest of us? Well, doctor Jessica Rose joins us now to discuss all of this. Doctor Jessica Rose, thank you so much for joining us again. We really appreciate you being here. Speaker 1: Thanks for having me back. Speaker 0: It's great to see you. Well, we've just gone over some real bombshells when it comes to the COVID saga. And of course, a lot of this is is, people had suspicions, but more and more we have evidence of, the shedding, the DNA contamination, and specifically your, recent substack relating to the new paper that confirms the presence of DNA in the vials, which settles the issues pertaining to DNA quantification methods, shows the spike persistence and exosomal shuttling or shedding. Talk to us through this, Doctor. Rose, please. Speaker 1: So this paper is really important, timing wise and also because of what they did. It's a very, very thorough study, that answered a lot of pending questions. We've established now, and by we, I mean independent scientists and researchers, that there absolutely is residual DNA in all of the vials that have been tested, the Pfizer and Moderna vials. And so that wasn't really up for, you know, it wasn't really up for debate. What we what we really wanna do is we wanna nail down, the degree of the residual DNA per lot. That would be a really nice thing to do. And, and other things like, how reliable are the quantification methods that have been used by, say, the manufacturers, by the regulatory bodies, and also by us. So these guys actually, they absolutely did find levels of DNA, we'll call it residual, that exceed the EMA guidelines by multiple, multiple folds. And this was after they removed interfering signals from RNA. So these are clean, real DNA signals that far exceed EMA limits. And they were able to establish this conclusion by measuring the DNA in 3 different ways. So this is no this is no shoddy piece of work that they did. The other thing I mean, this is to me, this is not surprising at all. It's it's just another piece in the puzzle that clarifies and provides additional evidence for what we already know. But they also looked at, basically they looked at shedding, whether or not it was a thing between the cells that they transfected. And what they were able to establish was that it absolutely is a thing. Exosomes that are, that are produced within the cells that contain spike protein and other stuff can traffic to other cells and also to the the, in this in this case, the cell culture milieu where you can imagine that because exosomes, their function in let's just talk about the human body for a second, their function in us is to kind of, provide a transformation oh, I'm sorry, a, an information highway between cells and tissues. So they can traffic information in the form of proteins and other things from cell to cell. So what their findings implicate is that when the spike protein is produced inside a transfected cell packaged in, in an exosome, that can be shed outside of that cell, pinched off from the cell, and make it to a neighbor cell or many neighbor cells, which basically means that spike can be brought very efficiently to other cells, to neighboring cells, and also trafficked around the body because exosomes go, you know, everywhere. So the other thing about that is that's that's kind of like the internal shedding, I suppose you could call it. But you can also exhale, exosomes that contain spike protein. So we're talking about shedding from person to person now, Whatever is inside those exosomes. And that's a big question. Speaker 0: Doctor. Rose, if I can just pause you there, people were previously concerned about, let's just say, intimate contact only. But this really shows the possibility of just being near someone that's breathing, really. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's that's exactly right. That's the interpretation of the results. Now the it's it's it's gonna depend on so many things. I mean, if you if you really wanna look at it like, I don't wanna get people thinking that if they're that they have to be afraid to be standing next to someone because everybody got injected. Don't think of it that way. It's like think of it like this. People have colds and flus all the time, and it doesn't prevent you from or it shouldn't prevent you from going outside and living a normal life. You're still, you know, in elevators with people who are coughing and sneezing, and most of the time you're fine. So think of it that way. Like, don't freak out. But, from from a from a biological standpoint, from a design of product standpoint, from an unanswered question prior to injecting billions of people standpoint, we have this on the table right now and we need to we need to do some follow-up research because, like, basically, what we need to do is we need to find out, you know, in the in the exhalation of somebody, let's say, are how many exosomes there are? Are there exosomes? What are they carrying, etcetera? I don't know that it's it's one of the thing the ways that we we can approach this. But, yeah, among the many things that this paper confirmed, that that one that point is, to me, it's it's it's the the best evidence that well, it's not the best. It's just another piece of evidence of shedding that we have. Doctor, Speaker 0: can I ask you about the the for people that don't In the injections, the fact that they found the presence of DNA in the injections? Speaker 1: Oh, I'm sorry. I keep it thinking everybody knows. All right. Well, the most important thing I can say about that is that it's not really supposed to be there. Now there are tolerable levels of DNA that you're allowed to have in, biologic polls like vaccines. However, these products are not conventional vaccines. The the nucleic acids that are being delivered are supposed to be only modified mRNA and, and and no DNA at all. And they're being delivered in, don't forget, in these lipid nanoparticles, and these are absolutely new experimental, efficient nucleic acid delivery systems to cells, to the inside of cells. Okay? So this this is a an efficient and brand new way to deliver this material to cells, and and this a a new level, a new threshold for the, for an acceptable level of, say, DNA delivered that way has has never we that that's not even been well, as long as or as far as we know, it's never been established. It haven't it hasn't even been looked at. We only have thresholds. These EMA thresholds that I mentioned are for naked DNA. So we need to reassess that whole thing. So basically, what I'm saying, I'll just follow that thought and then I'll go back, is that the levels of DNA that they're finding are 4 or 5 times higher than than those already way too high thresholds. If you ask me, there's no limit. There's no amount of DNA that's safe to be delivered in this way because of the downstream repercussions. Speaker 0: Which are? Speaker 1: If which are, in this case, in this paper, they found, all the pieces of DNA that are found in the plasmid that are is used to construct the modified mRNA. And we're talking about an SV 40 promoter enhancer, antibiotic resistance genes, and or an origin of replication, etcetera. So we have all the components that were used in the design of the original plasmid, which which basically just tells the story of where it came from. We already knew that because it had to have come from the the manufacturing process, and this DNA was simply just not removed efficiently, and it was carried over, wrapped up in the lipid nanoparticle to be delivered to you. The implications of this because of the types of DNA that we're finding, this is the most important point, like this SV 40 enhancer, is that specific plasmids or DNA pieces can be trafficked to the nucleus of cells where integration might be able to take place. The SV 40 enhancer is a gene therapy tool. This is documented in the literature, and it's a known thing. We know that it's in the vials, and it is functional. It's actually a gene therapy tool. So if you have let's just give an example. If you have the delivery of a small fragment of d of we'll call it contaminating DNA because it's not supposed to be there. It was delivered to the cell by the LNP by oxidant, and that thing gets integrated inside inside of a gene that's really important, let's just say a tumor suppressor gene, then you're gonna mess up the functionality of that gene, and things can go haywire. You can end up with cancer, for example. Which may Speaker 0: explain the huge rise in cancers. I wanna ask you, though, what about the shedding component where that is concerned? Because we're starting to see reports of even people who never got the injections exploding with cancers. Speaker 1: This needs to be investigated because that goes back to the question of what's actually being trapped in the exosomes. And Kevin McKernan is now on a new, research branch looking at the possibility of other kinds of plasmids being potentially passed from people to people. So this is brand news and it's speculative. So we're we're just we're kind of forming hypotheses now, so it's best not to to say anything conclusive. However, just to go back to the other point, we don't really need integration of a foreign DNA fragment, in order for cancer pathways to ensue. All you need is the introduction of foreign DNA to the cytosol to to start up certain cancer pathways. There's one called the c gas sting pathways. This is by the way, this is all published, which is why, you know, it when you're when you're using gene or I'm sorry, manufacturing processes, like making modified mRNA for use in this way, it's really, really, really important to make sure that you don't have contaminating elements at the end. That's why we purify the mRNA. Get rid of the DNA. Get rid of the lipopolysaccharide that comes with the the or, I'm sorry, the E. Coli bacteria that you use to grow up the plasmids, the DNA, that you want. We measure or by we, you know, the regulators, the manufacturers measure the DNA, the l lipopolysaccharide. They they do all this as par for the course, as part of good manufacturing practices, as part of having a a product that is what they're saying it is. So something along these lines went, went real haywire. Someone's not fessing up. There are some indications that they absolutely knew, you know, that that there was a DNA problem and that they've been cleaning this up as time has gone on, which is not acceptable because, again, the the the downstream effects are unknown. Just like your question, like, are are all of these cancers that are emergent in young, healthy people, for example, who weren't injected, are are are they are they getting injected by proxy? Because you know what I mean? Like, this is one of the questions I asked in my sub stack. It's like, are are we all just kind of introduced to these these elements of the manufacturing process by proxy? Is is that has that happened? I mean, it's it's a very interesting research question. My my answer would be yes. But, you know, you can't just think that something is true because it makes sense. You got to prove it. But I just want to point out on having said that, that none of this none of the onus on proving that these things aren't safe is is is on us. Again, I just want to reiterate this. It's like it's mind boggling to me that that a tiny, tiny handful of people scattered all over the world are the ones who are bringing this information to light. And and thank you as well for for giving us a platform because it's like, this is all the stuff that they were meant to do before. You know, it didn't it didn't matter what emergency there might have been. I mean, this seems like a bigger problem to me, obviously. Speaker 0: About to say this is an infinitely bigger emergency. The potential of, you know, all of us who, people who lost their jobs, people who lost their homes, people who went to extreme lengths to avoid this dangerous injection, now, you know, finding that, oh, what we were concerned about, the things we were called conspiracy theorists for for talking about shedding and talking about these other things. And and now it's all it's all coming to light. I mean, this is insane to me, and I suppose this is, you know, when we when we look at the one of the articles that we just reported on, you know, Pfizer accused of hiding deaths in the in the injection trials. This is also something we were talking about previously where they knew, they knew that women were miscarrying during the trials. They knew that people were dying during the trials, and yet nothing was revealed to the public. It's it this is just insane to me, doctor Rose, and more and more is coming out. And, and and another report that we just covered as well, the Hidden Pfizer report that shows heart conditions in the vaccinated are actually getting worse over time. I mean, it's it's Speaker 1: it's it's every day. I know. I exactly your reaction just now. There's a visceral reaction is is me now. It's like, I don't even understand. I just wrote it today. It's like there was, I think he was 29 or 39. In any case, that's a very young age. A Canadian guy who died of, and I think it was an aortic dissection, which basically means your aorta goes. And this was after he he had some kind of symptoms, probably chest pain. He went to the ER. He waited for 6 hours. Nothing happened. So he went home, and he ended up dying. And I'm like, this is the kind of story I just don't remember hearing before 2021. And now it's, like, every day. And I'm like, okay. It's it's you know, I'm trying to be rational and and calm about this, and it's like, okay. What's changed since you know what I mean? And it's like, how is it possible how is it possible that these these products haven't been removed from the market? Like like, this that's what we do when products look unsafe. It's just what Speaker 0: we I've said it so many times, doctor Rose. A defective head of lettuce turns up, and the whole country removes all the lettuce off the shelves. It's not hard. We're we're out of time today, doctor Rose, but I'm really, really grateful for your commentary. Obviously, I'm gonna continue tracking your research into this. Kevin McKernan doing a fantastic job as well. Please let people know where they can follow your work. Speaker 1: Just go to the the substacks. It's just Jessica 5b3 or just a car, and there's also my Twitter. I I'm I hate to say it, but I seem to post more on Twitter these days. There's more people following me, so I suppose my logic is that I'm gonna reach more people. But I really wonder if that's true. And that's the best love, MJK. Speaker 0: Thank you so much, doctor Rose. We appreciate it, and we'll speak to you again. Speaker 1: Thanks for having me back. Speaker 0: The American food supply is loaded with over 1,000 toxic ingredients banned in Europe, and it's no wonder Americans are more overweight and sicker than ever. When you can't trust what's in your food, the solution is simple. Go straight to the source. Good Ranches works with over 100 American family farms to bring transparently good meat and seafood to your table. Why is good rancher's meat better? The answer can be perfectly summed up in 3 important points. 1, no antibiotics, hormones, or seed oils. Because it's local, you can trust the American process. 2, steak house quality. The meat truly tastes better and you won't wanna go back. 3, save time and money. All the cuts are pre trimmed, individually packaged, and vacuum sealed, which makes meal prep easier than ever. If you're tired of wondering what's in your food, it's time to make the switch. Good Ranchers makes it easy to trust your food again with their high quality, great tasting meat delivered straight to your door. Subscribe to any box atgoodranches.comforward/vnn and use promo codevnn to get $25 off and a free gift of chicken breasts, bacon, salmon, or ground beef with every order for a year plus free express shipping. Taste the difference for yourself at goodranches.comforward/vnn.
SaiKate108
Posted - January 3, 2025 at 1:47 AM
Saved - January 3, 2025 at 8:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently came across alarming information regarding mRNA vaccines. Lawyer Tom Renz has a 2006 document showing that the FDA was aware of the potential long-term cancer risks associated with mRNA gene therapy. This concern is further supported by recent findings from the FDA's own lab, which revealed that DNA contamination in the vaccines exceeds safety limits by significant margins. These revelations suggest that the mRNA platform should be halted. Additionally, I recommend following sources that provide thorough investigative journalism on this topic.

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

The FDA knew for years the dangers of MRNA. Lawyer Tom Renz has a 2006 document where the FDA acknowledge the MRNA gene therapy products had the potential to cause cancer in the long term. Now confirmed by their own lab findings of high level DNA contamination in the shots. The MRNA platform needs to be shut down.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent Pfizer data reveals DNA contamination and acknowledges that liquid nanoparticles can spread throughout the body, contradicting previous denials. Concerns are raised about potential links between mRNA vaccines and cancer, referencing a 2006 FDA document warning about long-term cancer risks associated with mRNA gene therapies. Despite the push for mRNA in flu vaccines, long-term safety studies are lacking. Evidence suggests that these therapies may indeed pose cancer risks. The speaker expresses confidence that within five years, the connection to cancer will become undeniable, citing existing documents and admissions that indicate serious risks, even if they are not openly acknowledged.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did did you see that the Pfizer or some Pfizer data today that came out suggesting, oh, shocking. There's DNA contamination at a level that had been previously denied. And that 2, there was some distribution of liquid nanoparticle, sort of admission that, oh, yeah, it goes everywhere. So so it's slowly trickling out what has always been called, quackery and nonsense and conspiracy theory. So here it comes. Speaker 1: Well, you got SV 40, possibly some promoters, the pseudo uridine, all these things. Is this what's behind the turbo cancer? And, you know, doc, I've never ever I'm a lawyer, not a doctor. Right? So I read the science. I understand it, but I can't perform the science. But Mhmm. You know, I've came on here and we've talked about it. I've got a 2006 document from the FDA saying, hey. These m mRNA gene therapy type products have the potential to create cancer on the long term. Well, now we see these guys trying to push to get mRNA in the flu vaccine. We still haven't had the 10 to 20 year look back studies that we need to to determine whether these gene therapies are safe or effective or whether they do cause cancers and these sorts of things. But all the evidence is pointing to the fact that they do. And I, you know, I will right here say, I will bet you any amount of money you wanna bet that over the next 5 years, I will very sadly and I I actually I wish I was wrong on this. I'll be proven right on this cancer. I don't need as a lawyer, I don't need to wait for a study. I've got beyond a reasonable doubt in terms of that. Yeah. I got opposing party admissions. I've got their documents. I've got their papers. They don't admit to this stuff, you know, unless unless it's really happening. I mean, no one's gonna say that this is a a risk. What?

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

A must follow for great investigative journalism!!

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

💥EXCLUSIVE: FDA lab uncovers excess DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines Explosive revelations as a study conducted at FDA's own lab found residual DNA levels exceeded safety limits by 6 to 470 times. Experts say it's a 'smoking gun.' https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/exclusive-fda-lab-uncovers-excess @Kevin_McKernan @Jikkyleaks

EXCLUSIVE: FDA lab uncovers excess DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines Explosive revelations as a study conducted at FDA's own lab found residual DNA levels exceeded safety limits by 6 to 470 times. Experts say it's a 'smoking gun.' blog.maryannedemasi.com
RodDMartin
Posted - February 9, 2025 at 9:29 PM
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 6:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Multiple U.S. states are moving to ban COVID vaccines, with eight states leading the charge. Over 81,000 medical professionals and 240 elected officials are demanding the withdrawal of these vaccines, citing overwhelming evidence of harm. A peer-reviewed study indicates that vaccine-related deaths exceed recall thresholds significantly. Reports show vaccinated individuals face a higher risk of infection, and DNA contamination has been found in vaccine batches. The medical establishment is criticized for not adhering to the Hippocratic Oath, and more states may soon follow suit.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🚨BREAKING: Multiple U.S. states now moving to BAN COVID vaccines. And the Federal government may follow suit. THIS IS HUGE... 🧵Thread (1/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

Eight states are leading the charge to END the "Jab" experiment: • Washington • Idaho • Montana • Iowa • Texas • Tennessee • South Carolina • Florida (Tell me in the comments if I've missed any.) (2/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

KNOW THIS: Over 81,000 medical professionals, 240 elected officials, and 17 professional organizations are DEMANDING these shots be pulled. The evidence of the Vax's harm? OVERWHELMING. (3/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🔥NEW BOMBSHELL STUDY🔥 Peer-reviewed research CONFIRMS what we've been saying: These "vaccines" have exceeded previous recall thresholds by up to 375,340% Let THAT sink in. (4/11)

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨 Failure to Immediately Withdraw COVID-19 'Vaccines' Qualifies as Mass Negligent Homicide. Here's Why👇 📢 Widespread & Unified Calls for Market Withdrawal – More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 public health & physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 GOP County Committees, and 6 global studies demand immediate removal. ⚰️ Excess Mortality – 12 studies and VAERS confirm mass COVID-19 'vaccination' led to a catastrophic number deaths. 🚨 FDA Class I Recall Indicated – 37,544 VAERS-reported deaths exceed past vaccine recall limits by up to 375,340%. 📉 Negative Efficacy – Multiple studies have demonstrated that COVID-19 vaccinated individuals face a higher risk of infection compared to unvaccinated individuals. 🧬 DNA Contamination – Found across multiple manufacturers, batches, and geographic regions, far exceeding EMA & FDA safety thresholds. 📄 From our study: Hulscher N, Bowden M T., McCullough P A.. Review: Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits. Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. 2025 Jan 28; v6.2019-2025 @JimFergusonUK @RobertKennedyJr @BillCassidy @P_McCulloughMD @MdBreathe @McCulloughFund @VigilantFox @CDCgov @US_FDA @FDArecalls

Video Transcript AI Summary
If I had the opportunity to speak with RFK, I would focus on the urgent need to address the harm caused by the genetic injections. While tackling chronic disease and improving our food and water is crucial, removing these injections from the market is paramount. Our peer-reviewed paper in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law presents compelling evidence, including 12 studies demonstrating excess mortality, a causal link between the injections and death, and reduced life expectancy. We've found DNA contamination across multiple batches and manufacturers worldwide, and the injections have shown negative efficacy, increasing the risk of infection. Given the precedent of withdrawing products like the Qatar Polio vaccine, Swine Flu vaccine, and RotaShield vaccine for far fewer deaths or complications, the current situation, with over 30,000 VAERS death reports, demands immediate action. Continuing to administer these injections could be considered mass negligent homicide.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you had, an opportunity to meet with RFK, let's just say he gets appointed as the head of the HHS, the health service in America, what would you, what would you say to him? What would your your first choice be in terms of policy? Speaker 1: Well, so he's rightfully going after the chronic disease epidemic. Right over sixty percent of Americans have at least one chronic disease. So we got to address that. We got to address the the contaminated food supply, water supply, all that. It's super important. But we do have to get the genetic injections that have harmed, killed, or permanently disabled millions of people across the world off the markets. We have a peer reviewed paper out now in the journal Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, and we lay out all the evidence required that would be needed to get these injections off the market, immediately. 12 studies are included. 12 studies demonstrate excess mortality, causal link between COVID vaccination and death, reduced life expectancy from these injections. There's around 10 reports of DNA contamination when they look, nearly all of them find DNA contamination over the regulatory limits. And this is consistent across multiple batches, manufacturers, and is worldwide. And so they're contaminated. And lastly, negative efficacy. The vaccines don't work. They've now been demonstrated to increase your risk of infection dosed independently, and we have far surpassed the threshold for withdrawal of a pharmaceutical product. We have to look back at the Qatar Polio vaccine in the nineteen fifties that was pulled after ten deaths. The swine flu vaccine in the nineteen seventies was pulled after twenty to fifty deaths, and the RotaShield vaccine was pulled in 1999 due to fifteen cases of bowel obstruction. And so VAERS indicates over thirty thousand death reports now. So we have massively exceeded the limit for withdrawal of a product, and they have to get off. And continuing to administer or recommend these rejections could qualify as mass negligent homicide.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

SHOCKING TRUTH about excess mortality: 12 separate studies now link mass vaccination to increased deaths 🚨 Autopsies showing DIRECT CAUSAL connections The science they tried to silence is speaking (5/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

FACT: The "vaccinated" got MORE infections than the unvaccinated Some studies show up to 253% INCREASED RISK after 3+ doses Still trust Big Pharma's narrative? (6/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🧬 DNA CONTAMINATION ALERT: Tests reveal vaccine batches contain DNA fragments FAR ABOVE safety limits set by: • FDA • EMA Where's the Enemedia's coverage? There isn't any. They're still telling you to go get "the Jab". Or your 43rd booster. (7/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

PERSPECTIVE: Previous vaccines were pulled after just 10 deaths Current VAERS data shows 37,544 deaths globally The math isn't hard, folks. They rushed a vaccine to market without proper testing and then tried to force you to take it. (8/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

BIG PHARMA'S DIRTY SECRET: No large-scale, double-blind trials show these shots: • Stop you from getting COVID • Stop you from spreading it • Reduce infection • Prevent hospitalization • Save lives ZERO. NONE. NADA. But it turns out that it can kill you. (9/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

Every doctor pushing these shots is violating their Hippocratic Oath. "First, do no harm" = MEANINGLESS to them now? The medical establishment has lost its way. (10/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🚨 The dam is breaking. More states will follow. Federal government will be FORCED to act. Stay informed. Stay vigilant. Share this thread. 👇 Oh, and also, sign up for your FREE subscription to my newsletter at http://RodMartin.org. (11/11)

The Rod Martin Report | Rod D. Martin | Substack Tech Entrepreneur. Futurist. Christian. "Philosopher Capitalist". Click to read The Rod Martin Report, by Rod D. Martin, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. rodmartin.org
davidicke
Posted - May 14, 2025 at 6:01 AM
Saved - May 14, 2025 at 2:01 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

What's REALLY in the fake 'Covid' vaccines - and their like? https://t.co/ja6d5JNfuE

Video Transcript AI Summary
**French Summary:** En mars 2021, il a été constaté que les vaccinés devenaient électromagnétiques. En mai 2021, le docteur Pablo Compra en Espagne a découvert des nanoparticules d'oxyde de graphène dans les vaccins Pfizer. En Italie, les docteurs Gati Montanari ont trouvé les mêmes composants inorganiques et d'autres composants non déclarés. En Argentine, Lorena Diblazi et Marcella Sangorine ont fait des découvertes similaires, avec des métaux lourds et 55 composants non déclarés, dont certains mortels. Des recherches en Allemagne, Angleterre, Corée et Australie ont abouti aux mêmes constats. En août 2021, le Japon a retiré des lots de vaccins Moderna à cause d'une contamination. Selon des chercheurs, il s'agirait d'un crime contre l'humanité, avec des nanoparticules en nano réseau auto-assemblés présents dans tous les vaccins anti-covid 19, peu importe le fabricant. Des photos du docteur David Nixon en Australie montrent ces nanoparticules. **English Translation:** In March 2021, it was observed that vaccinated individuals were becoming electromagnetic. In May 2021, Dr. Pablo Compra in Spain discovered graphene oxide nanoparticles in Pfizer vaccines. In Italy, Doctors Gati Montanari found the same inorganic components and other undeclared components. In Argentina, Lorena Diblazi and Marcella Sangorine made similar discoveries, with heavy metals and 55 undeclared components, some of which were deadly. Research in Germany, England, Korea, and Australia yielded the same findings. In August 2021, Japan withdrew batches of Moderna vaccines due to contamination. According to researchers, this is a crime against humanity, with nanoparticles in self-assembled nano-networks present in all anti-covid 19 vaccines, regardless of the manufacturer. Photos from Dr. David Nixon in Australia show these nanoparticles.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dernier poster et je termine là-dessus. C'est le poster que vous avez derrière moi, mars deux-mille-vingt-et-un. Un grand nombre de personnes ont réalisé que les individus vaccinés devenaient quasiment tous électromagnétiques à minima au point d'injection. Mai deux-mille-vingt-et-un, en Espagne, le docteur Pablo Compra découvrait par le biais de son microscope électronique à transmission, la présence de 1000000000 de nanoparticules d'oxyde de graphène dans les flacons de Pfizer. En Italie, les docteurs Gati Montanari découvraient les mêmes composants inorganiques avec leur microscope électronique à balayage environnemental. Ils ont également découvert plusieurs dizaines d'autres composants qui ne figuraient pas dans la liste des composants officiels déclarés par les sociétés pharmaceutiques. En Argentine, Lorena Diblazi et Marcella Sangorine ont fait les mêmes découvertes, mais en pire s'agissant des métaux lourds et des composants non déclarés, cinquante-cinq composants non déclarés dont certains sont mortels. En Allemagne, en Angleterre, en Corée ou encore en Australie, même recherche, même résultat, même constat. Rappelez-vous qu'en août deux-mille-vingt-et-un, au Japon, le ministère de la Santé a fait retirer tous les lots des vaccins de la société Moderna en raison d'une découverte de contamination. Mais de quelle contamination parle-t-on Aujourd'hui tous ces chercheurs sont formels, il ne s'agit pas d'une contamination mais d'un véritable crime contre l'humanité. Un crime machiavélique organisé et planifié depuis longtemps. Ce que vous voyez sur ce poster, ce sont les meilleures images que nous ayons actuellement en notre possession. Ces photos représentent les nanoparticules disposées en nano réseau auto-assemblés. Ils sont présents dans tous les vaccins anti covid dix-neuf, peu importe la société pharmaceutique qui les produit. Sinofarm, Sinovac, Turcovaques, n'importe. J'accélère, les photos remarquables que vous voyez là nous viennent d'Australie et ont été prises par le docteur David Nixon. À votre avis, à quoi avons-nous à faire Je vous pose la question et je termine là-dessus, je vous rends la parole et je vous remercie de m'avoir écouté.
KennyCarmody
Posted - June 8, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Saved - June 10, 2025 at 9:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve shared alarming findings regarding DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, highlighting significant oncogenic risks. Studies show plasmid DNA persists in all tested vials, exceeding safety limits, and potentially integrating into human genomes. This contamination includes SV40 sequences linked to cancer. Despite regulatory claims downplaying the risks, evidence suggests these DNA fragments are functional and could contribute to rising cancer rates. Additionally, there are concerns about spike protein persistence and its implications for health. The situation raises serious questions about vaccine safety and regulatory oversight.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

🚨 THREAD: EXPOSING THE VACCINE COVER-UP: Hidden DNA Contamination in COVID Shots — A Massive, Ignored Oncogenic Threat What you’re about to read will shake the very foundation of the COVID vaccine narrative. Kevin McKernan (@Kevin_McKernan) — a genomics expert with deep roots in the Human Genome Project — has exposed alarming DNA contamination in Pfizer & Moderna vaccines. “.. so when I see what they're doing with these vaccines, several red flags emerged, and I began speaking about it. Now, probably what I've been asked to speak about here is what we found in the Pfizer vaccines, which are plasmids. Pfizer and Moderna both have their expression vectors still in the vaccines.” Here’s the truth you haven’t been told 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses a New Zealand commission, apologizing for the COVID narrative originating from the U.S., specifically Massachusetts, home to Moderna, Pfizer, and PCR companies. A billion-dollar campaign inhibited vaccine hesitancy, with Tulsi Gabbard noting that those spreading hesitancy were placed on terrorist watch lists. The speaker claims the news has been censored due to powerful budgets spinning a different story. The speaker cites 30 years of experience, beginning with the Human Genome Project at MIT, where his team engineered a robotic pipeline to purify plasmids. His team spun out technology to Agenkor Biosciences, which received a $27 million government grant from Francis Collins to be a commercial genome center for the NIH. He states he specialized in sequencing phosmids. He claims the peer review system is captured due to reliance on pharmaceutical advertisement dollars. He has dozens of patents in genomics and invented a DNA sequencer. Having no financial interest in vaccines, he began speaking out due to red flags.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everyone. This is a presentation I gave to a commission in New Zealand a few weeks ago that I'm just rerecording because I don't think the Zoom call we had actually captured at all, and this is good to have on have on the record. I actually, have a history in New Zealand. I did a semester abroad in New Zealand, back in 1994. So I'm very familiar with the country, and I come here with what you you may consider an apology, from from our country, that much of this COVID nightmare that was imposed upon the people of New Zealand originated from The United States and even from the state that I live in here, Massachusetts. Massachusetts is really ground zero for this in terms of the financial interests that are at play pushing this this COVID narrative. We have both Moderna and Pfizer here, and we have many of the PCR companies that helped amplify, if you will, the PCR view of this of this pandemic. So this this information is not gonna be easy for you for you to hear, mainly because the news has been flooded with a completely different narrative on this. And so you're not at fault for not having seen this data. There was a very large billion dollar campaign here in The United States, to inhibit vaccine hesitancy. This is from the Biden administration. You probably saw a few weeks ago, Tulsi Gabbard even mentioned that people who were spreading vaccine hesitancy were put on terrorist watch lists. So this is a heavily censored field. If you haven't seen this information, it's not at your own fault. It is because there are very powerful budgets in play to spin a very, very different story. So this news is gonna be very unsettling for you, but the information is true. And I have many of the references and citations in here that you can that that can back this up. You can you can investigate on your own. So why should you listen to the so called vaccine terrorist? Well, there is I do have a long history in this field, and I don't have a history that's really financially tied to this narrative, so I can call balls and strikes pretty fairly. I've had about a thirty year experience in this field. I started off my career at the Human Genome Project at MIT. In fact, that robotic pipeline you see up there in the corner is something that our team engineered for the Human Genome Project to purify plasmids. So we live, ate, and breathe plasmid DNA purification on the Human Genome Project. Been part of my career is building companies that extract and purify these things from various cells and study the contaminants that are in them that may affect various, transfections or biological features, if you will. So, after my my my time on the Human Genome Project, I was a team leader for research and development there. We spun much of this technology out that you see in that that upper right picture, to a company called Agenkor Biosciences, which was selling these DNA purification tools, into the pharmaceutical and biotech industry. And, this company was eventually awarded a government grant from Francis Collins for over $27,000,000 to be one of the five and only commercial genome centers that were working for the NIH. So, we were right there side by side sequencing various genomes the government was looking for with a variety of other entities like Whitehead, Baylor, the Venter Institute, WashU. And we specialized in sequencing things known as phosmids, which were very low copy plasmids. So you had to be very good at extracting these these phosmids that only existed at a single copy in in in any given cell. So long history in in plasmid isolation and and sequencing these things. Over 60,000 citations that I have through the publications I have in the field, we've gotten multiple covers of different journals. So I'm very familiar with the peer review system, and this is another source of what has misled us is the peer review system is very captured right now. The they rely heavily on pharmaceutical advertisement dollars, and much like the mainstream media, they are beholden to some of those advertisement dollars in terms of what papers get selected for publication and which ones don't. So there's gatekeeping going on, which is keeping this narrative afloat, but it is starting to crumble. I'm involved in dozens of patents in the genomics field. I've even invented a DNA sequencer that went to market. The NIH also gave us another $6,000,000 grant for building the solid sequencer. Applied Biosystems came and acquired that company and brought that sequencer to market to compete with Illumina. I've been also involved in building genome centers and in doing clinical sequencing of mitochondrial patients. So a long history in this field, but I don't have any revenue or interest in the vaccine space. And so, when I see what they're doing with these vaccines, several red flags emerged, and, I began speaking about it.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

2️⃣ What did we find? “Pfizer and Moderna both have their expression vectors still in the vaccines… plasmid DNA contamination.” @Kevin_McKernan published a paper that kicked off global replication — including studies in 🇨🇦🇩🇪🇺🇸 — confirming residual DNA in every vial tested. 👇 🔬 David Speicher @DJSpeicher (Canada): Tested 30+ vials — found DNA in all of them 🔬 Philip Buckhaults @P_J_Buckhaults (South Carolina): Replicated findings, gave powerful testimony 🔬 Dr. Sin Lee: Confirmed with Sanger sequencing 🔬 Brigitte König (Germany): Peer-reviewed replication 🔬 Ulrich Kammerer’s lab: Showed plasmid DNA persists in cell lines for several cycles 🔬 Even high school interns at FDA found contamination 6–470x over legal limit “This DNA isn’t gone in 48 hours. Some of it contains SV40 elements. And it’s easy to detect — which makes you wonder how it passed through regulation for 13 billion doses.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the finding of plasmids in Pfizer vaccines, referencing a widely read paper that initiated inquiry into the consequences of this residual contaminant. David Speaker replicated this work in Canada, finding it in every one of over 30 vials. Philip Buchholz replicated this in South Carolina, and Dr. Sid Lee replicated the work using different primers and Sanger sequencing. Bridget Koning has replicated this in Germany, and several federal agencies have admitted the presence of DNA, though disagreeing on clinical implications. Ulrich Kammerer's lab replicated the work, transfecting plasmids from the vaccines into cell lines, where they persisted for several cycles of cell division. High schoolers interning at the FDA White Oak facility also measured it and found it to be significantly over the limit. Numerous studies have replicated these findings, with most finding levels over the limit. One individual with ties to Moderna claims it is not over the limit. Kaiser et al. claimed to have found it slightly over the limit but deemed it inconsequential; however, their DNA isolation method has been refuted by Kommer and Konig.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now probably, what I've been asked to speak about here is what we found in in the Pfizer vaccines, which are plasmids. Pfizer and Moderna both have their expression vectors still in the vaccines. So there's a paper here that I have the QR code up there so you can quickly get to. It's been heavily downloaded. It's been read by hundreds of thousands of people. And this really started this inquiry into what is what are the consequences of this residual contaminant that's in the vaccines, and does it have any biological implications for the patients who have been injected with these things? There's another paper from David Speaker who replicated this work in Canada. This is probably the largest study to date, that looked at over 30 vials and found it in every one of them. And, this work is now making its way through peer review, and various other people have replicated this around the world. Philip Buchholz replicated this in South Carolina. There's a great testimony from him, that's online. Doctor. Sid Lee, who is well known for having found DNA contamination in the HPV vaccines, was intrigued by this and also replicated the work using different primers and Sanger sequencing. Bridget Koning has now replicated this in Germany, and her papers are through, peer review. And several federal agencies have now come out and admitted that this is there. Now they disagree on its clinical implications, and we'll get into that, but, there is no question that this DNA, is in these vaccines and, that some of this information wasn't disclosed. Another group in Germany, Ulrich Kammerer's lab actually replicated this work and actually took these plasmids from the vaccines and transfected them into cell lines to see how long they persisted in cell lines. And they persisted for several cycles of cell division. So, there's some persistence to this, although the exact persistence is still being studied, it is not going away in forty eight hours. So this DNA has these SV40 components that we're going to touch on and you can detect them in several passages of cells after they've been transfected with these vaccines. And that has certain implications for how long the spike protein may be persisting in in various patients' bodies after injection. This has become so easy and routine to do that a group of high schoolers who were doing an internship at the FDA White Oak facility went to measure it as well and they found it to be six to four seventy fold over the limit. This is published in the Journal of High School Science. So you don't need a sophisticated laboratory to find this. It's actually quite easy to find, which is, makes a little bit more shocking as to how it ended up there and how the regulations, have missed this the process of giving out 13,000,000,000 to 5,000,000,000 people. There's a whole list of studies now that have replicated this. Every one of these studies you see here that's listed in red on the right has found it over the limit. There is one individual who has not published their methods yet that claims it is not over the limit. This person has some ties to Moderna, however, so there are some conflicts involved there. I think you'll find most of the other authors here do not have any financial ties to the vaccine industry and are reporting things with a little bit more consensus as to what the problem is. There is another paper that has emerged as of late, but it does also have some BioNTech ties. There's a paper from Kaiser et al that claims to have found this to be slightly over the limit, but not as much as everybody else, and deemed it not to be anything of consequence. However, this paper has some flaws in that it used a DNA isolation method that lost a lot of the DNA, particularly the small DNA. It couldn't capture using an ethanol precipitation of that DNA. So that has been refuted by both Kommer and by Konig and the methods that I've reviewed I think Kommer and Konig have this right. They have adequately captured the smaller molecules and are counting

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

3️⃣ Why does DNA in the vax matter? “There is a limit… it used to be 1,000-fold lower.” The original DNA limit was 10 picograms per dose. But regulators raised it drastically — especially after liability shields were granted under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Problem is: ❌ That limit was based on naked DNA ❌ Naked DNA degrades fast — half-life: 5–10 minutes 🧬 But now it’s encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) “That means this DNA isn’t breaking down. It’s being delivered directly into cells.” So even the current limits are obsolete, and the actual levels found? 🚨 100 nanograms to 1 microgram per dose 🚨 That’s 10–100x over the limit — and the limit no longer even applies ⸻ “So how did this happen?” Pfizer’s clinical trial used a different product than what got mass-injected. During trials: ✅ They purified the RNA with PCR — cutting plasmid contamination But scaling up? ❌ They skipped that step ❌ Used cheaper plasmid purification straight from E. coli ⚠️ Possibly leaving behind endotoxin (LPS) — which can cause septic-like reactions Remember people collapsing in vax centers? “That is likely LPS — though not yet measured directly.” What has been measured is the plasmid DNA. And it’s everywhere. Published, peer-reviewed, replicated worldwide. “This is not a conspiracy theory. BMJ has published on this. Pfizer switched products — and regulators knew.” The EMA even requested a small trial (n=250) after the change. That data? 🚫 Never delivered. This is called bait-and-switch — and in vaccine manufacturing: “The process is the product. You change the process, you run new trials. They didn’t.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The amount of DNA allowed in vaccines was loosened a thousandfold after liability waivers were granted. These limits assumed naked DNA injection, which degrades quickly. However, mRNA vaccines use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that also coat contaminating DNA, invalidating the old limits. Studies show DNA levels in the shots are 10 to 100 times higher than the already obsolete limits. The LNPs deliver this DNA directly into cells, changing its persistence and biological impact. Pfizer used a different, more purified product in its trials than what was injected into billions of people. The initial process included a PCR amplification step to reduce DNA background, but this was dropped for mass production due to cost. This resulted in higher levels of background plasmid DNA and potentially E. coli components like endotoxin in the shots, possibly causing anaphylactic reactions. The presence of plasmids has been confirmed, and this process change, documented in the BMJ, is a major violation of manufacturing standards. The EMA requested a new trial after the process change, but the data was never delivered, rendering the original trial data irrelevant.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: DNA. There is in fact, a limit. This limit of how much DNA can be in a vaccine was derived many decades ago, and it used to be a thousand fold higher. I'm sorry. A thousand fold lower of a threshold, and that it was 10 picograms that they would allow an injection. And since they've gotten a liability waiver on these vaccines here in The United States through the National Childhood of Vaccine Injury Act, they have dilated and loosened those restrictions by a thousand fold over the last few decades. But all of these thresholds, were based on the assumption of injecting naked DNA, which does get degraded pretty quickly, in your bloodstream. You have you have LNPs I'm sorry. You have DNAs that go and actually chew up this DNA, and, that limits, its half life to five or ten minutes. The change that's occurred in order to make this mRNA platform work, that mRNA would also degrade very quickly and be a very useless therapeutic if it were not coated in a lipid nanoparticle. The challenge we have here is these lipid nanoparticles are also coating this contaminated DNA, so the half lives and the the limits that they put in place are no longer valid. This DNA is gonna get delivered directly to cells. It's not going to get degraded, and arguably, the limits they have in place are now completely irrelevant. Even with these limits in place, all of these papers are reporting things log scales over. Orders of magnitude higher than this are what are being seen. A 100 nanograms to a microgram of DNA is what is being found in these shots. So the the limits are relevant and obsolete, and it's still over that limit by 10 to a hundredfold. Alright? So, we don't know how long things last now that they're in LMPs because now they're going directly into cells, and that's gonna create a a much different picture of the persistence of this DNA and its biological impact. So how did this happen? Well, the trials, this is what will shock most people. You have not heard about this in the news, but if you look through the trial work and all the communication back and with the regulators, you'll see that Pfizer ran this trial on a different product than what they injected into billions of people. Alright? This is a major, major bait and switch, that the public is not aware of. When they made this initial vaccine they were able to do an additional purification step known as PCR. They would PCR amplify the spike region off of their plasmid that they used to construct this mRNA. They'd amplify it, usually a million fold above background, and then they would make the RNA off of that. So there was a very small background region of DNA that was used to make the RNA that made these shots. When they had to scale this up, that was too expensive of a step, so they dropped it and skipped it, ripped it out, and went off purifying these plasmids directly out of E. Coli without that amplification and purification step. So now what you have is a much higher percentage of background plasmid DNA and probably some of these E. Coli components like endotoxin in the shots. We haven't measured the endotoxin but it's one of these things if you're in plasma purification you know endotoxin from E. Coli is your number one enemy when you're trying to purify a plasmid of therapeutic grade. If any of that endotoxin gets into the shots, you will create a septic like anaphylaxis, which we saw many people have post injection with these vaccines. They would drop, in the vaccine center such that they had to change the administration protocols to have people sit down for fifteen minutes after the injection. That is likely although we don't have evidence and proof of that, that is likely an artifact of these E. Coli components known as LPS lipopolysaccharides or otherwise known as endotoxin still being in the shots. Now the what we do have evidence for are these plasmids are in there without any question now. This has been replicated in many places around the world and there are consequences for having these residual pieces of DNA left inside the vaccines that we're going to touch on. This is not conspiracy theory. This has been published in the BMJ by Retzaf Levy, and they go through this process one where they where they ran these vaccines in the trial and how they changed that when they decided to go and inject the rest of the world. This is traditionally a mortal sin in vaccine manufacturing or in any sort of biologic manufacturing. The process is the product. You change the process, you have to go through trials again. And the EMA even asked them to do that, although they failed to. They asked for another trial of 250 people once they changed the process, and that data was never delivered. So this bait and switch is very important for you to understand why the trial data is of absolute zero consequence to what we're actually seeing in the field. Those numbers are a caricature of what they're actually doing with these injections.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

4️⃣ So what happens when we actually sequence these vaccines? “We put the DNA into commercial annotation software — it highlights every functional part of the plasmid.” And here’s what we found: 🧬 Antibiotic resistance genes — always present to grow in E. coli 🧬 Promoters to activate those genes — like SV40 components Here’s the kicker: “The software automatically annotates these parts. Somebody at Pfizer had to go in and manually delete those annotations before submitting to regulators.” So yes — the DNA sequence was submitted. But… “The sponsor is obligated to annotate every open reading frame and promoter — even if they don’t know what it does.” This wasn’t an accident. It was: 🚨 Intentional removal 🚨 Deception of the FDA 🚨 Violation of regulatory guidelines The FDA only caught it years later when independent labs raised the alarm. ⸻ Why hide SV40? “SV40 contaminated the polio vaccines decades ago. When you give SV40 to cell lines or tissues, you get cancer. There’s no question about that.” The debate isn’t about if it’s carcinogenic — it’s about epidemiology and confounders. But in the lab? 🧬 SV40 is one of the most oncogenic viruses ever studied. And while the full virus isn’t in these shots, Kevin explains: “We have carcinogenic components of SV40 in these vaccines. These sequences are very functional, and they have consequences.” ⸻ So how did regulators respond? “Yes, it’s there. We weren’t informed. But it’s probably too small to matter.” Probably? 🚫 They didn’t measure it 🚫 They don’t know ✅ We do And again — they assume it’s harmless because: “They didn’t consider lipid nanoparticles. Their metric is invalid.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
When COVID-19 vaccines were sequenced, commercial annotation software highlighted functional parts of the plasmids, including antibiotic resistance genes and SV40 components. The speaker claims that Pfizer had to manually remove these annotations before submitting the plasmid map to regulators. According to the speaker, regulators received the DNA sequence, but the sponsor is obligated to annotate every open reading frame and promoter, even if their function is unknown. The speaker alleges that Pfizer intentionally removed annotations, hiding them from the FDA, which the speaker believes is a violation of guidelines. The speaker suggests the reason for hiding SV40 components is due to SV40 virus contamination in polio vaccines and its debated link to cancer. The speaker asserts that while epidemiological data is confounded by vaccine shedding, laboratory studies show SV40 is a potent oncogenic virus. The speaker claims that the vaccines contain some of the more carcinogenic components of that virus, and that these sequences are functional and have consequences.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what do we find when we sequence these vaccines? We noticed, you take the DNA sequence that you get and you put it into commercial, annotation software to annotate these plasmids. And these commercial annotation software tools by default will highlight all the parts in the plasmid that are functional. So there's always an antibiotic resistance gene in these plasmids that's what helps them propagate in E. Coli and you have to grow these E. Coli in the presence of antibiotics and that means only the cells that have the plasmids replicate. But they also highlight things like these SV40 components that are used to drive the antibiotic resistance gene. Now what's notable with the plasmid map on the left is that the software tool automatically annotates these regions and somebody at Pfizer had to go and remove those annotations by hand before handing the plasmid map on the right to regulators. Alright? So the regulators did get the DNA sequence, but the the sponsor is obligated to annotate every open reading frame and every promoter on that plasmid even if they don't know what they do. And this is where Pfizer, got themselves into a bit of a sticky here in that they had to have gone in there and actively removed those annotations, hid them from the FDA, and the FDA once they saw our data were able to go back look at the sequence annotate it themselves later to find that, yes, this omission had occurred, and this is a violation of the guidelines, that are given. So there has been an intentional deception here that has gone on that I think everyone should take note of. Now why are they hiding s v forty? If you look through the vaccine history here in the literature, you'll know that the s v forty virus contaminated the polio vaccines. And there's a large debate in the literature that's been going on for decades as to its implication in cancer. When you give SV40 viruses to to cell lines and to tissues, you will get cancers. There's no question about that. The only debate that rages on is whether or not you can find this in the epidemiological literature. When you do studies looking at people who got the polio vaccine and who didn't, is there a real difference in cancer rates between those? And that has been much harder to see predominantly because that vaccine shedded. So the unvaccinated got it from the vaccinated because it was a live entity. Alright. So, the epidemiological data is always loaded with confounders, makes it very difficult for you to find these signals, but in the laboratory this virus is one of the most potent oncogenic viruses we know of. So, we don't have the whole virus in these vaccines. We have some of the more carcinogenic components of that virus in the vaccine, however, and I'm going to touch on some of the papers that point that out. These sequences are very functional and they have consequences when they are left behind inside of a vaccine.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

5️⃣Initial Public Regulatory Response admitted the DNA is there, but downplayed it with three claims: http://1.It’s too small in length to matter http://2.It’s too small in quantity to matter http://3.It’s not functional But here’s the reality: ➡️ They never actually measured it ➡️ Their quantity assumptions ignore lipid nanoparticles ➡️ And new papers show the amount exceeds FDA limits ➡️ Plus, there’s clear evidence the DNA is functional All three claims are false, and the literature proves it. @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
The initial regulatory response claimed the DNA fragment was too small to matter, but this was based on an assumption without measurement. The quantity of DNA is now shown to be over the limit, especially considering lipid nanoparticles, even if the limit were justifiable. Claims that the DNA is non-functional are also incorrect. The DNA sequence includes the SV40 promoter and enhancer region, as well as an SV40 origin of replication.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the initial public response to this or the regulatory response was, yes, it's there. We weren't informed about it, but the DNA is probably too small in length to matter. And I say probably because they didn't measure it, and they don't know. We do. The answer is too small in quantity matter. Well, that that quantity metric, as I mentioned before, is was never considering there being lipid nanoparticles around, so they don't have their metrics right there, And multiple papers have now come out saying it's actually over their limit even if that limit is still justifiable. And then they wanna claim that they're not functional. Now all three of these things are wrong, and we're gonna go through the literature that demonstrates why they're wrong. off, that DNA sequence that's in there is known as the s v 40 promoter in the enhancer region. That's that's one of the regions. There's also an s v 40 origin of replication that

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

6️⃣Let’s talk about what’s actually in the DNA that’s in these shots. “That DNA sequence is known as the SV40 promoter in the enhancer region.” But it’s not just that: 🧬 SV40 enhancer 🧬 SV40 origin of replication 🧬 SV40 poly-A signal Those are the three big ones. There are a few others, but they’re of “less significance,” per Kevin. Now here’s what makes this deeply concerning: “SV40 enhancers are used in gene therapy plasmids. These are nuclear targeting sequences. Transcription factors bind to that DNA and drag it — and everything it’s attached to — into the nucleus.” So when someone says: “It doesn’t matter because it’ll never get to the nucleus…” 🚨 That’s false. Kevin says plainly: “There’s a nuclear targeting sequence built in that guarantees it will get to the nucleus.” And even if that didn’t exist? “LNPs go to dividing cells. When cells divide, the nuclear membrane dissolves. There is no barrier to the DNA.” So either way, this is designed to get into the nucleus. “When someone tells you otherwise — that it can’t reach the nucleus — they’re running a smokescreen. They’re either lying to you or lying to themselves. This isn’t hard biology — it’s in any high school textbook.” ⸻ This DNA wasn’t random. “This was pulled directly from Pfizer’s gene therapy department. In fact, Pfizer admits this in one of their own papers.” They were trying to scale up fast, so they grabbed plasmids they were already using… for gene therapy. And what does the SV40 enhancer do? “It binds to the P53 gene — your genome’s guardian. P53 is a tumor suppressor. You don’t want anything interfering with it.” But this plasmid does — and… “The spike protein also inhibits P53. That’s two pathways of concern for oncogenic impact.” 📚 Literature from: •Zhang et al. •Welteke-Elders Group •Znikel et al. All point to the same thing: “This SV40 sequence is a hypermutability element. It induces mutations in DNA near it. The paper says, ‘potential tumorigenic activity.’” ⸻ So when you hear: “This DNA doesn’t do anything…” You can say: ❌ “No — it has published function. ❌ It binds tumor suppressor genes ❌ It alters DNA near it ❌ And it’s designed to go straight to the nucleus.” There’s a reason they didn’t disclose this. “They didn’t want you to know. And yes — this DNA lines up with some of their future business interests.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The DNA sequence in gene therapy plasmids contains the SV40 promoter and enhancer region, an SV40 origin of replication, and an SV40 poly A signal. The SV40 enhancers are nuclear targeting sequences, ensuring the DNA enters the cell nucleus, especially during cell division when the nuclear envelope dissolves. Claims that it doesn't reach the nucleus are misleading. This plasmid was sourced from Pfizer's gene therapy department. The SV40 promoter and enhancer bind to the p53 gene, a tumor suppressor, which is concerning given that the spike protein also inhibits p53 expression. Literature indicates this sequence is a hypermutability element, inducing mutations in nearby DNA, suggesting potential tumorigenic activity. These findings contradict claims that this DNA has no function.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: off, that DNA sequence that's in there is known as the s v 40 promoter and the enhancer region. That's that's one of the regions. There's also an s v 40 origin of replication that we'll touch on, and there's a, s v 40 poly a signal. Those are sort of the three main pieces of DNA that are that are in there. A couple others that are are of less significance in my opinion. But the s v 40 enhancers, these are used in gene therapy plasmids. Alright? These are nuclear targeting sequences. So these transcription factors bind to that sequence and drag it and everything connected to it into the nucleus of the cell. So when you hear a lot of the responses to this work, they'll say, well, it doesn't matter. It's never gonna get to the nucleus. There's two things wrong with that statement. One, there's a nuclear targeting sequence in there that guarantees it will get to the nucleus. these LNPs go to cells that are dividing, and when cells divide, there is no nuclear envelope protecting the DNA. They have to go through cell division, and that dissolves during that process. So when they're talking about this not getting the nucleus, these people are are doing a smokescreen on you. They're not being honest with themselves that cells divide. And when cells divide, there is no protection of this DNA. So that's a that's something to watch out for. When you see people saying it doesn't get to the nucleus, that is a that's that's a sign that they are trying to lie to you, and, it doesn't take much more than a high school biology text book to prove them otherwise. Independent of that, this is a very potent gene therapy tool. In fact, this plasmid was pulled from Pfizer's gene therapy department that was actually mentioned in one of Pfizer's papers in terms of how they developed these vaccines so quickly, they called up their gene therapy department to, get some plasmas they could, they could use quite readily. The other literature out, out there is that this s v 40 promoter and enhancer, this binds the p 53 gene. P 53 is the guardian of your genome. It's a tumor suppressor gene. You don't want anything binding to that gene. Otherwise, you will see you may see an impact in cancer. This is very important given the literature we have now on the spike protein itself also inhibiting the expression of this gene. Welfic Aldergiaries Group has published a paper, Zhang et al, that touches on that. So now we've got two reasons to be concerned about p 53. The DNA in there interferes with it to some degree, and we know the spike protein plays a role in that pathway as well. So, there's a there's an oncogenic concern here. There's also listed literature now from Senickel et al. That demonstrates that this particular sequence is what is known as a a hypermutability element. Alright? It it it will induce mutations in DNA near it. So it is, as this paper says, potential tumorigenic activity. So when they say that there is no function to this DNA, you merely need to point to these three papers and say no, there's published function of this DNA that needs to be explained. And this is not something that you can just say, well, they forgot to tell us about it. No. It's it's it's very relevant. There's a reason they forgot to tell you about it is they didn't want you to know this was in there. And you'll see that this lines up with some of their future business.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

7️⃣Let’s talk about integration risk — and how the DNA in these vaccines doesn’t follow the FDA’s own rules. “These FDA guidelines were based on injecting naked DNA…” But that’s not what’s happening here. Let’s break this down: 🔬 The original FDA limit for residual DNA in vaccines was 10 picograms — based on genomic DNA, which is big (~3 billion base pairs). Later, that limit got bumped up to 10 nanograms — again, assuming big chunks of DNA. But… “When DNA is small — say ~200 base pairs — 10 nanograms equals 500 billion copies of DNA.” 🧠 Why does this matter? “The smaller the DNA fragment, the more copies you get — and the more active chemical ends it has.” That means: ✅ More 5’ phosphates ✅ More 3’ hydroxyls ✅ More chances for that DNA to integrate into your genome “When you chop big DNA into small pieces, it becomes genomic buckshot.” You go from a few long strands… to a storm of integration-prone fragments. ⸻ This is basic chemistry — and the FDA knows this. “Their own literature says: If DNA gets to viral sizes (like plasmids), the safety threshold needs to drop to attograms — or femtograms.” That’s millions of times lower than what they allowed here. But what do we have in these vials? “Very small, broken-up plasmid DNA — packed inside lipid nanoparticles — and targeted into human cells.” ⸻ So what happens when you do that? “There’s a litany of literature showing high rates of spontaneous integration when you transfect cells this way.” Cited studies show: ➡️ 7–10% of cells got integration events ➡️ And that’s likely an undercount “That paper had to detect integration via a reporter gene. But if the DNA integrated without the reporter, it wouldn’t be seen.” So the true rate could be even higher. And remember: “These aren’t isolated ‘oops’ events. These are systemic, chemically favored, and expected given the way this vaccine was constructed.” ⸻ So when someone says: “It’s just trace DNA, it won’t do anything…” You can reply: ❌ “It’s not genomic DNA. ❌ It’s not naked. ❌ It’s not inert.” It’s plasmid-sized, broken DNA It’s wrapped in LNPs It’s designed for intracellular delivery And the FDA’s own documents say that’s precisely when the limits should be lowest — not ignored.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FDA guidelines were derived from injecting naked DNA. The smaller the DNA, the more copies exist per nanogram. Ten nanograms of genomic DNA (3 billion bases long) equals about a thousand copies of the human genome. However, 10 nanograms of 200 bases of DNA equals 500 billion copies. Smaller DNA fragments act like buckshot against the genome, with more chemically active ends that facilitate integration. The FDA's literature indicates that if DNA reaches viral sizes like plasmids, limits should decrease to atograms or fentagrams. Current broken-up DNA has many active ends, leading to a high spontaneous integration rate when transfected or delivered via lipid nanoparticles. Studies show integration events in 7-10% of cells. This rate may be underestimated because many DNA fragments integrate without a reporter gene, making them undetectable. Therefore, this is not a low-frequency event.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright so these FDA guidelines we spoke about earlier that they were they're derived injecting naked DNA but you'll note the papers that justify this limit speak to the fact that the smaller the DNA is on a per nanogram basis, you have many more copies of DNA. So to put this into perspective, 10 picograms of genomic DNA is, was a limit before. It got raised to 10 nanograms. 10 nanograms of genomic DNA, human DNA, like the genome, is three three billion bases long. It's about a thousand copies of the human genome. Over 10 nanograms of 200 bases of DNA is 500,000,000,000 copies of DNA because you need more pieces. Now why does that matter? Well, the DNA is broken up into smaller pieces, it becomes more like buckshot when it goes against your genome. There are more chemically active ends of the DNA. The parts of the DNA that that facilitate this integration into the DNA are the ends of the DNA, the five prime phosphates and three prime hydroxyls in the DNA. So the more of those you have, the higher rates of integration you'll see. When you chop big DNA up into small pieces, its molarity goes up. In other words, a copy number goes up, and there's more of those active ends. And so this is why their own literature from the FDA points this out, that if this DNA gets to viral sizes like plasmids, the limits need to drop down to atograms or fentagrams. Alright. This is what we have. We have very small broken up DNA that has lots of active ends, and there is a litany of literature out there that demonstrates there's a very high spontaneous integration rate with this DNA like this when you transfect it, when you put it in a lipid nanoparticle and put it into a cell. It's like seven to 10% of the cells get an integration event. Alright. And this paper, I think, under measures it because it had to integrate a fairly big piece of DNA that had a reporter gene. We don't have reporter genes on these pieces of DNA, so I I suspect this paper's under measuring the rate of integration because many pieces of DNA in that paper probably integrated without the reporter gene and that they couldn't see them. So, this is not something to be, brushed aside as a low frequency event.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

8️⃣ And you don’t need to look at these papers to know this. You can look at Moderna’s own patents to know this. •They speak to the fact that this DNA is such an integration risk •That they need to invent new methods to remove the DNA •And they do do a better job than Pfizer •They pull the DNA out much more effectively than the Pfizer vaccine •Approximately tenfold So you don’t need to look to our papers on this or our claims. The manufacturers of these vaccines have patents that speak to this being an oncogenic risk. @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Moderna's patents acknowledge that DNA integration is a risk, necessitating the invention of new methods to remove DNA. According to the speaker, Moderna is approximately tenfold more effective than Pfizer at removing DNA. The speaker claims that the manufacturers' patents indicate that the vaccines pose an oncogenic risk. The speaker suggests that one need not consult external papers to recognize this risk, as it is evident from the manufacturers' own patents.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't need to look at these papers to know this. You can look at Moderna's own patents to know this. They speak to the fact that this DNA is such an integration risk that they need to invent new methods to remove the DNA. And they do do a better job than Pfizer. They they they pull the DNA out much more effectively than the Pfizer vaccines, approximately tenfold. So you don't need to look to our papers on this or our claims. The manufacturers of these vaccines have patents that speak to this being an oncogenic risk.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

9️⃣ We also have papers from Strayer et al. that demonstrate sp40 plasmids like this are known to integrate. That's why they use them in gene therapy. Lots of literature from this particular laboratory on sp40 plasmids and integration frequency. So it does lend us to be concerned that this residual DNA can find its way into the nucleus and alter the genome. @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Strayer et al. have papers showing that SV40 plasmids are known to integrate, which is why they are used in gene therapy. There is a lot of literature from this laboratory on SV40 plasmids and integration frequency. This raises concerns that residual DNA can find its way into the nucleus.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also have papers from Strayer et al that demonstrate s v 40 plasmids like this are known to integrate. That's why they use them in gene therapy. Lots of literature from this this particular laboratory on s v 40 plasmids and integration frequency. So it does lend us to to be concerned that this residual DNA can find its way in into the nucleus and and all

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

🔟 SV40 Origin, Cytosolic DNA & Nucleic Acid Persistence: Why Contaminated DNA in Vaccines Raises New Oncogenic Concerns Now, I didn’t put up a paper from Quan et al. It’s another one I want to put on the record here. •Quan et al. will demonstrate that the sin of getting this DNA into the cell •Isn’t necessarily an integration event •Once you load the cell with cytosolic DNA, you can trigger the C-gas-sting pathway, which is oncogenic in and of itself So, really the damage is done on transfection. •Whether it integrates into the genome is somewhat irrelevant •Because this plasmid DNA can replicate epizomally •Meaning it doesn’t need to be in the chromosome to replicate •Because it has an SV40 origin of replication •That’s a mammalian origin of replication •That should never be in a vaccine You never want a vaccine that you’re growing in E. coli to also have the capacity to replicate in the host that you’re going to inject it into — mammalians, mammalian cell lines like humans. That is a very reckless and dangerous thing to do. •Moderna didn’t do it •There is evidence that Pfizer is at fault here •Pfizer did leave this origin of replication behind •That is only done because they were lazy and careless about this ⸻ Why do we care about this so much? •There are all of these papers that have rolled out demonstrating nucleic acid persistence •I say nucleic acid, because we don’t know from these papers whether they’re measuring DNA or RNA •They used a method known as RT-PCR, which amplifies both Many of these papers were published before this DNA contamination was known •So they assumed it was RNA, because they were looking at the spike sequence If they went back and tortured that with perhaps primers that looked at the plasmid backbone (that’s not supposed to be in the vaccine), I’m curious what they would find. ⸻ Examples: •Krausen paper – found in heart tissues, 30 days out •Rolchin paper – 60 days •Placenta – 2 to 10 days •Castro-Hughes paper – found plasmid in plasma, 28 days later •Hanna paper – found in breast milk, about 5 days •This paper is under-measuring •PCR assay is horribly insensitive •Only has ~400,000 copy LOD (Limit of Detection) •Should be down to ~10 copies If they had a more sensitive assay, •They likely would have found this out to 10–15 days in breast milk ⸻ Anyway, there’s a tremendous dose getting through breast milk. •If you add up what’s in that paper and the number of feedings a child has, •This is not an insignificant amount, as those authors suggest •They did not consider how much milk a baby drinks over the course of three days •That would add up to a substantial and sizable dose that child was getting in that feeding Credit: @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Quan et al demonstrated that the introduction of DNA into a cell, even without integration, can trigger the oncogenic cGAS-STING pathway. The speaker claims that the presence of an SV40 origin of replication, a mammalian origin, in a vaccine grown in E. coli is reckless because it allows the plasmid DNA to replicate episomally in the host. The speaker alleges evidence suggests Pfizer, unlike Moderna, may have included this origin of replication due to carelessness. The speaker highlights concerns about nucleic acid persistence, noting that RT-PCR methods used in studies like Krausson and Rolchen may have amplified both DNA and RNA. The speaker suggests that prior studies assumed detected nucleic acids were RNA, but that further investigation using primers specific to the plasmid backbone might reveal the presence of residual plasmid DNA. The Krausson paper found nucleic acids present for thirty days in heart tissues, and the Rolchen paper found them for sixty days.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now, I didn't put up a paper from Quan et al. It's another one I wanna put on the record here. Quan et al will will demonstrate that you that the sin of getting this DNA into the cell isn't necessarily an integration event. Once you load the cell with cytosolic DNA, you can trigger the c gas sting pathway, which is oncogenic in in and of itself. So, really, the damage is done on transfection. Whether it integrates into the genome is somewhat irrelevant because this plasma DNA can can replicate episomally, meaning it doesn't need to be in the chromosome to replicate because it has an s v 40 origin of replication. That's a mammalian origin of replication. That should never be in a vaccine. You never want a vaccine that you're growing in E. Coli to also have the capacity to replicate in the host that you're going to inject it into mammalians, mammalian cell lines like humans. Okay? That is a very reckless and dangerous thing to do. Moderna didn't do it. There are evidence that Pfizer's at fault here and that Pfizer did leave this origin of replication behind, and, that is only done because they were lazy and, and careless about this. So why do we care about this so much? Well, there's all of these papers that have rolled out demonstrating nucleic acid persistence. And I say nucleic acid because we don't know from these papers whether they're measuring DNA or RNA. They used a method known as RT PCR, which which amplifies both. And so many of these papers published before this DNA contamination was known, they assumed it was the RNA because they were looking at the spike sequence. But, if they went back and tortured that with perhaps primers that looked at the plasmid backbone that's not supposed to be in the vaccine, I'm kind of curious what they would find. But we have the Krausson paper here that, was finding this. What are they? They are out thirty days in heart tissues. There's the Rolchen paper, which is out sixty

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣1️⃣ Spike Protein Persistence Now, very recently, we're also seeing spike protein persistence in these two papers, okay? There's the Patterson paper that found this, had these reversed here. The Yale study actually found it 709 days out and the Patterson study found it 245 days out. But this is protein that is not going away in 48 hours. It is there almost years later. Why is that? Proteins don't do that. Most proteins have a turnover rate that's in weeks, not years. So this implies something is regenerating the spike protein in your body, or it is evading destruction for long periods of time in certain wet reservoirs in the human body. So this leads people to believe perhaps this mRNA is lasting longer, or there's plasmids in there still generating spike, and we don't know the answer yet. - @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent studies indicate the persistence of spike protein in the body long after the initial introduction. A Yale study detected it 709 days out, while a Patterson study found it 245 days out. This extended presence is unusual, as most proteins have a turnover rate of weeks, not years. This suggests either the spike protein is being continuously regenerated within the body or it is somehow evading destruction for extended periods in bodily reservoirs. This leads to speculation that the mRNA may be lasting longer than expected or that plasmids are still present and generating spike protein. The exact mechanism behind this phenomenon is currently unknown.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now very recently, we're also seeing spike protein persistence in these two papers. Okay? There's the the Patterson paper, that found this, have these reversed here. The the Yale study actually found it seven hundred and nine days out, and the Patterson study found it two hundred and forty five days out. But this is protein that is not going away in forty eight hours. It is there almost years later. Why is that? Proteins don't do that. Most proteins have a turnover rate, that's in weeks, not years. So this implies something is regenerating the spike protein in your body, or it is evading destruction for long periods of time in certain wet reservoirs, in the human body. So, this leads people to believe perhaps this mRNA is lasting longer or there's plasmids in there still generating spike, and, we don't know the

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣2️⃣ Okay, so now here's the real kicker that I haven't presented on much lately, because this is very recent work. 🚨The kicker here is that we're now finding these sequences not just in the vaccine, but we're finding it in people. And we don't know if it's integrated, but it's there. And these are studies that weren't looking for it, and the methods they used arguably suppressed the signal significantly. All right, so there's at least five peer-reviewed studies that have come out looking at RNA sequencing of people who were vaccinated and unvaccinated. 🚨- @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims sequences found in vaccines are now also being found in people. According to the speaker, five peer-reviewed studies involving RNA sequencing of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals show DNA from vaccine manufacturers in patients' blood. The speaker cites studies by Ryan et al., Chakrabarty, Rhine, and Odek as evidence of Moderna and Pfizer vaccine sequences in patients' blood, suggesting blood supplies are contaminated. The speaker mentions three additional papers (Lee, Navel, and Krauszik) that, while not explicitly looking for it, also confirm residual plasmid sequences in recipients. One study, which investigated a particular disease, revealed differential gene expression in the cGAS-STING and interferon pathways, indicating a potential DNA stimulatory response. The speaker suggests this RNA sequencing data reveals the nature of the contaminant, with gene expression changes indicating a cGAS-STING-like event potentially induced by the DNA.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yet. Okay. So now here's the real kicker that I haven't presented on much lately because this is very recent work. The kicker here is that we're now finding these sequences not just in the vaccine, but we're finding it in people. And we don't know if it is integrated but it is there. These are studies that weren't looking for it and the methods they used arguably suppressed the signal significantly. There are at five peer reviewed studies that have come out looking at RNA sequencing of people who were vaccinated and unvaccinated. If you dig through that data that is in NCBI you can take all those reads, map them against the plasmids from from the vaccine manufacturers, and you can find that DNA in these patients. There's a study from Ryan et al that looked at, like, seventy five people in Australia, and, there's a great study from Chakrabarty that went through that data and demonstrated both Rhine paper and the Odek paper have Moderna and Pfizer vaccine sequences in the patient's blood. So this means that the blood supply is contaminated. That's a very serious issue if the blood banks aren't looking for it and reinjecting this into other people. So this is this would have normally call I think, an enormous halt in any other scenario once you find components of the vaccine that were never declared that have these links to oncogenic sequences, they're now floating around the blood supply and no one's doing anything about it. Alright? That should be a concern to everybody in the in the transfusion field. There's three other papers that have recently confirmed this. Now there again, these papers were not looking for. The authors were studying other things, but their data has been peer reviewed and put into the NCBI short read archive so anyone can comb through their data and find these sequences in there. But the Lee study looked at this, the Navel study looked at this, and the Krauszik study looked at this. All of them, I have documented that there are residual sequences from the plasmids, that are in those studies, infecting, their their recipients. Some of the studies are actually very useful. One of them was looking at at a particular disease that I I'll point you to my substack that goes through these, but this particular disease state, they did RNA sequencing on to see the difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. And you can see some gene differential gene expression that's occurring in the c gas sting and the interferon pathways. Alright? That's a sign of a potential DNA stimulatory response. Okay? So some of the RNA sequencing is actually quite revealing as to what the nature of the contaminant is because you can see certain gene expressions get turned on or off that are signatures of a c gas sting like event that could be induced by the by the DNA that's there. So, anyway, our our substack has that documented, and it's worth worth having a look.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣3️⃣ RNAseq Datasets Still Detecting Vaccine Plasmid DNA Despite Suppression Methods Now Found in the Blood Supply I’ve shared these before, but for reference, here are the actual papers with their proper titles. Chakrabarty went through the Ryan et al. and ODEX datasets, and when you map those reads against the vaccine plasmids, you get a strong spike signal, which isn’t surprising — we expect the RNA to linger. But what is surprising is that you also get DNA reads, even though RNAseq protocols are designed to suppress DNA. These methods typically use DNase enzymes and RNA purification steps that eliminate or suppress DNA, yet it’s still showing up. That tells us it must be there in much higher concentrations — because if they didn’t use DNase, we’d likely see even more of it. The ODEX dataset is particularly revealing. In the upper right panel (IGB screenshot), the entire plasmid backbone is covered — all regions, including SV40 promoters. That DNA clearly made it into patients. The Novel study showed a lighter read density — so less contamination, but still detectable plasmid fragments. Same goes for the Lee et al. dataset. It’s not in every patient, since some of the samples were taken 14+ days out, but in samples closer to vaccination, we consistently see it — even with suppression steps in place. One study — in mice — wasn’t even looking at DNA. It was studying re-adenylation of the mRNA — how the poly-A tail might be regenerated in vivo, which may help explain why the mRNA sticks around so long. But even in that unrelated study, we find vaccine DNA contamination coming through. This stuff is littered across the short read archive. And that’s despite protocols trying to wash it out. The signal is still there. - @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Chakrabarty reviewed the Ryan et al and Odek studies, mapping reads to plasmids and finding significant spike sequence from RNA, and less from plasmid DNA, which is expected. RNA sequencing protocols suppress DNA, yet DNA is still present. The Odek study shows the entire vector backbone covered with sequencing reads, indicating heavy contamination and the presence of SV40 promoters in patients. This is evidenced across multiple studies. The Novel study had a lighter density of reads, but some plasmid DNA was detectable. The Lee et al study also showed some SV40 reads. These are more apparent in samples taken closer to vaccination, despite DNA suppression methods. A mice study on vaccine redentilation showed poly A tails regenerate, potentially lengthening RNA lifespan, but DNA contamination was also present.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would I I just have these up here so people can, quickly get to these papers. I've listed them before, but in case you you want their actual, you know, decorated titles, here's Chakrabarty on the upper left. He went through, the Ryan et al and the Odek study. And when we map those reads, the plasmids, we get a significant amount of sequence coming back from spike. That's not surprising because the RNA is certainly sticking around, but less sequence coming from the plasma DNA, which is not surprising because there is a higher molarity of the RNA in the shot than there is the DNA. And it's not surprising, these methods are using an RNA seq protocol. These RNA sequencing protocols use RNA purification kits that tend to eliminate or suppress the DNA that's there. Alright, so DNA has a harder time getting through here but we're still seeing that DNA come through. That's what is so shocking about these studies is that they're employing methods to suppress the DNA like using a DNase enzyme in prep yet it's still there. That means that it must be at much higher concentrations if the researchers didn't perform or if they were not to perform that step. If they sequenced the DNA of these people directly they would probably see tremendous amount more signal. This is the Odek study, and there you can see in the, the upper right panel there that is an IGV screenshot of reads across the plasmid, and the entire vector backbone is fully covered with sequencing reads. So this one is heavily contaminated in these patients. The the vaccine DNA is clearly all regions of it are clearly covered, including the SV 40 regions. So those SV 40 promoters are making their way into patients, and we can see evidence of this littering the short read archive across multiple studies now. The novel study had a much lighter density of reads so this one there was less there looking at this but we can detect some pieces of plasma DNA that are in there so another concern. And likewise, the Lee et al study has some of these SV40 reads as well. So it's not in every patient because some of the some of the samples they take are fourteen days out or later, but the people, when they take a sample that's pretty close to vaccination, we see it, even though they're using methods to suppress it. Now this is a study that was actually looking it wasn't in humans, it was in mice. It was looking at something completely different. It was looking at the redentilation rate of these vaccines. After you put them into some organisms, the poly A tail gets regenerated which is another reason why these might be lasting longer. Typically the length of the poly A dictates how long the RNA sticks around. Alright so they've found some processes in these cells that are re adenylating these things which may be adding to the longevity of the RNA, but the DNA is coming through these as well so that contamination is actually plaguing that study as well.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣4️⃣ So why do we care about this? Well, there have been several people and several data sources that have been demonstrating a rise in cancer. There's @JohnBeaudoinSr work where he FOIA-ed the death records of all of the people in Massachusetts. He's done this in many states now. And you can go through those death records and count up how many more neoplasms are we finding. And there is a clear rise in certain types of ICD-10 codes that dictate that this is, in fact, a phenomenon. We have an increased rate of cancer. There's no doubt about that from his literature, from his data. There's others who have looked at this from an excess mortality standpoint. @EthicalSkeptic has done this. His analysis does require some important adjustments in that there is a pull-forward effect that he adjusts for, which is during the COVID pandemic, a lot of elderly passed away. And that creates a bit of a shift in the data when that happens. But once that's adjusted for, you can see that there is a clear rise in cancer rates that is persisting even to this day. David Wiseman found this in the CDC data as well. But there are other forms of analysis you can look at from economic indicators. What we're also seeing from Edward Dowd and Ethical Skeptic is that the cancer treatments are up. If you look at the drug sales for cancer rates, this kind of confirms the epidemiological data when you see it in the drug treatment sales moving at the same rate. And the inflection time point of when that has occurred is concordant with when the vaccine programs rolled out. So cancer is up. The mechanism for this is still in question, but we don't need contaminants in these vaccines that are linked to it. .. - @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Several data sources indicate a rise in cancer, including John Bowdoin's analysis of death records showing increased neoplasms. Ethical skeptic and David Wiseman's analyses of excess mortality and CDC data also support this. Cancer treatment drug sales are up, aligning with the timing of vaccine program rollouts. The GAIBO study, later removed from a preprint server, examined excess mortality in Japan, the most heavily mRNA vaccinated country. It found that post-vaccination excess mortality exceeded the combined impact of the tsunami and Hiroshima. The magnitude of excess mortality remained consistent despite declining vaccine uptake, suggesting a cumulative effect. The types of cancer also shifted to a younger demographic. Another peer-reviewed paper from Japan confirms the excess mortality, contributing to a decline in life expectancy for the first time in a long while. Only 5-7% of the excess mortality in Japan is attributed to cancer, with other causes like stroke and myocarditis being more prevalent.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So why do we care about this? Well, there have been several people, and and several data sources that have been demonstrating a rise in cancer. Alright? There's John Bowdoin's work where he voided the death records of all of the people in Massachusetts. He's done this in many states now. And you can go through those death records and count up how many more neoplasms are we finding. And there is a clear rise in certain types of ICD 10 codes that dictate that this is in fact a phenomenon. We have an increased rate of cancer. There's there's no doubt about that from his liter from his data. There's others who have looked at this from an excess mortality standpoint. Ethical skeptic has done this. His analysis does require, some in important adjustments and that there is a pull forward effect that he adjusts for, which is during the COVID pandemic. A lot of elderly, passed away, and, that creates a bit of a shift in the data when that happens. But once that's adjusted for, you can see that there is a clear rise in in cancer rates that is persisting even to this day. David Wiseman found this, in the CDC data as well. But there are other forms of analysis you can look at from economic indicators. What it would what we're also seeing from Edward Dowd in ethical skeptic is that the cancer treatments are up. If you look at the drug sales for cancer rates, this kind of confirms the epidemiological data when you see it in the drug treatment sales moving at the same rate and that the inflection time point of one that has occurred is is is concordant with when the vaccine programs rolled out. Alright? So cancer is up. The the mechanism for this is still, you know, in question, but we we don't need contaminants in these vaccines that are linked to it. This is also seen in a study called the GAIBO study, which was curiously yanked off of a preprint server after I gave a presentation on this study because the study was quite remarkable in that it looked at excess mortality in Japan. So Japan's a very interesting case study in that Japan is the most heavily mRNA vaccinated country in the world. There are 13 of that population took the shot and an even higher number, I think it's north of eighty percent, took the the two or three. Alright. So it is, there isn't a cleaner picture of this probably than any any other country in the world. And what they have seen in Japan is that the ex source mortality that's occurred since the vaccination program is larger than the tsunami in Hiroshima combined. This is a massive hit to the demographics of their country. What's also evident in their data, as you can see on the slide or the graph on the right there that has these orange bars, is the magnitude of the excess mortality is staying somewhat consistent as they layer on more doses. Alright? That suggests there's a cumulative effect because what's occurred as they've gone on, you can see the blue wave down below, is less and less people are taking these shots in Japan. Yet the magnitude of the excess mortality isn't going down with it. So your shot may have some residuals from the Right? The the the that's the cumulative damage means that this wave of ex source mortality, they're not out of the woods yet. They may see this persist for a decade. That is quite concerning, given the decay in the uptake of these vaccines over time. The other thing that's very important about this study is that the types of cancer all changed. Prior to this, they had a baseline cancer rate of different cancers. After the vaccine, the cancer shift to a younger age demographic in different types of of cancers. That's a very important sort of Bradford Hill, tendency of causality, if you will, when you see a bio biological signal like that. So, the GAIBO paper, is up on our, on our Substack because they pulled it off the preprint server once this came live. But there's another paper from Japan that that recently did get through peer review that, emulates this. And, not not to the detail of the Geibel paper, but it does show that this exorcist mortality in Japan is in fact real, and, it's evident in the data. For the time in their history, they have a decay in their life expectancy. You can see that on the the chart over here on the left, where the tsunami and the vaccine are mentioned. You can see their life expectancy was cruising along, getting better and better over the years up until the vaccine program, and now it's decaying for the time in in in a very long while. Now the excess mortality in Japan is not all cancer. In fact, only, like, five to seven percent of it are cancers. A lot of a lot of the, there's there's a survivor bias going on here. You have to not die from a stroke or myocarditis or acute renal failure in order for you to for them to find cancer. So the people are dying predominantly from these other things, but if they happen to survive that, then you can detect the cancer signal. So it is a bit more delayed and a bit more, I'd say, camouflaged by the other more acute forms of injury from these vaccines.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣5️⃣ What Did Pfizer Know, and When Did They Know It and Why is this happening? One of the more delayed — and camouflaged — effects of these vaccines is cancer. It’s not as immediate as myocarditis or clots, but it’s showing up. And it’s not just speculation. The signals are there. The science is there. The fraud is there. Let’s start with what Pfizer knew. Very early on, during their own trials, Pfizer saw the signals. They had the data. And they acted — not by alerting the public or regulators — but by buying up cancer treatment companies. $43 billion went into acquiring Seagen. Another $2.26 billion went into Trillium Therapeutics, which just so happens to focus on blood cancers involving CD147, a receptor known to be involved in COVID-19. That’s not coincidence. That’s a hedge. They saw what was coming. And they moved to profit from it. Meanwhile, the product that hit the market was not what was tested in trials. That’s a bait-and-switch. The clinical formulation was different. That alone nullifies every claim of efficacy. It’s scientific fraud. The trial data cannot be trusted because it doesn’t match the commercial product. Now let’s talk DNA contamination. Ten out of eleven studies — peer-reviewed or in preprint — are finding residual plasmid DNA in the vaccine vials. The only ones that didn’t have financial conflicts of interest. We now have five separate peer-reviewed studies that weren’t even looking for this DNA — they were sequencing blood or tissues — and still found it. Others went in afterward, dug through the data, and uncovered vaccine plasmid sequences floating in people’s blood. Let that sink in. We have SV40 promoter sequences in people now. These are oncogenic, and they weren’t disclosed. We’re also seeing injection site neoplasms — cancers forming right at the site of vaccine administration. This is not coincidence anymore. This is a real, repeatable signal. We’re giving this to pregnant women. It’s on the childhood schedule. And these shots are liability-free and often mandated. This may be the largest carcinogenic exposure event in human history. Now, we’re also seeing another mechanism come into view — amyloidogenic peptides. These are sequences in the spike protein that are known to form amyloids or prions — misfolded proteins that can cause other proteins to misfold in a chain reaction. This could explain the bizarre fibrin-rich clots we’re seeing — long, rubbery, calamari-like structures that don’t behave like normal thrombi. We think these prion-like sequences might be driving clotting cascades, contributing to the cardiovascular crisis we’re now observing. These aren’t easy to detect. You need specialized equipment and expertise — unlike DNA, which you can find with a PCR machine in a parking lot. But it’s there. It’s all there. And it’s time we stop pretending it isn’t. @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pfizer knew early on that something was going to happen, and acquired cancer companies, including C Gen for $43 billion and Trillium Therapeutics for $2.26 billion, which focused on blood cancers with a CD147 marker, also involved in COVID. The Pfizer vaccines on the market are not the same formulation as what was tested in the clinical trials, which is a bait and switch and a fraud. Significant contamination has been found in the vaccines in 10 out of 11 studies. There is also significant DNA contamination found in five peer-reviewed studies. Cancer is on the rise, with several papers reporting cancer post-vaccination, sometimes at the injection site. The vaccines may be the largest carcinogenic hit ever to the human population, and are on childhood schedules and given to pregnant women. The vaccines encode a protein sequence known to be amyloidogenic, meaning it can form amyloids or prions in the body, which may be playing a role in clotting cascades and cardiovascular issues.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why is this happening? Well, they know something. Pfizer, very early on, they had the data on this from their trial. They knew this was gonna happen, and they quickly went out and acquired cancer companies. They put $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and they put $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium was focused on blood cancers that have a CD147 marker on them. Okay? That is one of the markers that is known to be involved in COVID. So, they have a very interesting window on those malignancies, and, they're buying up the cancer companies that are probably gonna play the biggest role in benefiting from the mess that they've created. So, in summary, the Pfizer vaccines on the market are not the same formulation as what was tested in the clinical trials. This is a big bait and switch and it's a fraud. You can't believe anything they're saying about the vaccine efficiency, which we have seen even those numbers decay over time. This is probably why. They're not really what they trialed. They gave you something different. There is significant contamination that's found. Like, 10 out of 11 studies have found this, and the ones that haven't found it have some financial conflicts. So I think the consensus is out. 10 out of 10 out of 10 of the real studies are finding this. Several are through peer review, which have not been easy to get through peer review. The peer review journals do not like these papers. They get they get beat beat around in peer review for months to years, but they're they're making their way out now. There is also significant DNA contamination now found in five peer reviewed studies that were not looking at this. They were looking at people's blood and tissue, and it was accidentally in there. Other people had to go sleuth it out. We've got cancer on the rise, and there's several papers that report cancer post vaccination. Like like, right at right at the site of injection, they'll see neoplasms. Alright? There is there's something going on here. This can't be ignored saying it's a coincidence anymore. Now this is these are liability free, and they're often mandated. Okay? This may be the largest carcinogenic hit ever to the human population, and we have these on childhood schedules. We're giving these to pregnant women. This has gone absolutely off the rails, and, it's time people pull back and look at this data more soberly without the panic of the COVID pandemic clouding everyone's judgment, if you will. Now we've done some recent work as well. I'm gonna point people's attention to. There's another type of artifact in this data, that hasn't been covered as well because it's more expensive to cover. So DNA is pretty easy to measure. We have PCR machines that were testing COVID in parking lots. It's a very decentralized tool that anyone can use, which is why the replication has been so easy. What hasn't been easy to replicate and to study are prions and amyloidogenic peptides that we believe are in the spike sequence in these vaccines. The vaccines encode a particular protein sequence in there that's known to be amyloidogenic. That means it can form amyloids or, prions in the body. Alright? Prions are proteins that misfold and when they misfold they chain react to make other proteins misfold. We think this might be playing a role in the clotting cascades, which is why we're seeing lots of clots in people, that these things are facilitating a fibrin clot like structure, and this is a this is resulting in a lot of the cardiovascular issues that are seen with these very bizarre calamari clots. These are harder to measure. There's not the tools to do this aren't as cheap, and it requires a real specialist. Kevin McCarran has been doing some work, not me, different Kevin, on this.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣6️⃣ The Truth About These Clots Is Out, and It’s Worse Than You Think Whole Genome Sequencing of Fibrin Clots Kevin McCarran has been doing some work, not me, different Kevin, on this. And I’ve been collaborating with him in that I’ve been sequencing some of these clots to prove that they’re not a fictitious Twitter phenomenon. They’re, in fact, real human DNA in these clots. And there’s something that we’re noticing in that DNA, is that it has a signature of being a neutrophil extracellular trap. It is a type of reaction that happens in sepsis. And your immune system sees foreign entities. It begins to clot around them. And it tends to take some free-circulating DNA into those clotting structures and leave a particular signature in that DNA that we can see. This sequencing has been very informative in that we’re beginning to see sequences of the patient’s genome that might be predisposing them to this. Billions of these shots were given, 5 billion people perhaps. We don’t have 5 billion people that are clotted. But a subset of those people are having a bad reaction. We’re trying to figure out who. It may be that they have genetic predispositions in some of the clotting cascade that make them more at risk of this than other people. And we’re beginning to see this. Right now, it’s just two clots that we’ve looked at. So we don’t have statistical significance that this is, in fact, a causative mutation. But we are finding what are known as high-impact variants inside of genes involved in fibrin formation and fibrin clotting. That is a bit spooky to the least. So you can see more about that on this particular substack. And be sure to look at the links in there that point to Kevin McCarran’s work. He’ll go through demonstrating that some of these clots are binding thioflavin, which is a marker for an amyloid. And so there may be an amyloidogenesis issue that we have. That pathology is going to have to be looked at very carefully because that may be what’s behind some of these clotting problems that we’re seeing in the field. So anyway, thank you for your time. I know this isn’t pleasant information to hear, but it’s real. It’s out there. And it is being heavily suppressed. So it’s important that communities like yours can hear this. And the citations are in here for your reference if you have any questions. Feel free to contact me. Thank you. . -@Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker has been sequencing clots and found real human DNA, showing a signature of neutrophil extracellular traps, a reaction occurring in sepsis when the immune system clots around foreign entities. This process takes free-circulating DNA into clotting structures, leaving a specific signature. Sequencing reveals patient genome sequences that might predispose them to clotting. While billions received shots, not everyone clotted, suggesting a subset has a bad reaction. Genetic predispositions in the clotting cascade may increase risk. Initial analysis of two clots shows high-impact variants in genes involved in fibrin formation and clotting. Kevin McCarran's work demonstrates some clots bind thiophlavin, a marker for amyloid, suggesting a potential amyloidosis issue. Pathology needs careful examination as it may underlie clotting problems. This information is being suppressed, but citations are provided for reference.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've been collaborating with him in that been sequencing some of these clots to prove that they're not a a a fictitious Twitter phenomenon. They're in fact real human DNA in these clots. And there's something that we're noticing in that DNA is that it has a signature of being a neutrophil extracellular trap. It is a type of reaction that happens in sepsis, and, your immune system sees foreign entities. It begins to clot around them, and it tends to take some free circulating DNA into those clotting structures and leave a particular signature in that DNA that we can see. This sequencing has been very informative in that we are beginning to see sequences of the patient's genome that might be predisposing them to this. Billions of these shots were given, five billion people perhaps. We don't have five billion people that are clotted. A subset of those people are having a bad reaction. We are trying to figure out who. It it may be that they have genetic predispositions in sort of some of the clotting cascade that make them more at risk of this than other people, and we're beginning to see this in just and right now, it's just two clots that we've looked at. So we don't have statistical significance that this is in fact a causative mutation. But we are finding, what are known as, high impact variants inside of genes involved in fibrin formation, in fibrin clotting. Alright? That is a bit, spooky to the least. So, you can see more about that on this particular substack, and be sure to look at the links in there that that point to Kevin McCarran's work. He'll go through demonstrating that some of these clots are binding thiophlavin, which is a marker for an amyloid. And so there may be an amyloidosis issue that we have that pathology is gonna have to be looked at very carefully because that may be what's behind some of these clotting problems that we're seeing in the field. So, anyway, thank you for the time. I know this is unpleasant information to hear, but, it is, it's real. It's out there, and it is being heavily suppressed. So it's important that communities like yours can hear this, and the citations are are in here for your reference. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.
toobaffled
Posted - September 29, 2025 at 11:12 AM
Saved - September 29, 2025 at 4:56 PM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Swiss Doctor dropping truth bombs, warns every Vaccine is now an mRNA Death Vax ... https://t.co/iu6sW85tYd

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thomas Bindel claims there has never been a pandemic of a killer virus, but a pandemic of cowards, while doctors see rising severe illnesses and sudden deaths from heart attack, myocarditis, stroke, pulmonary embolism, thrombosis and conditions, plus infertility and COVID cancer. He labels this 'modified RNA genocide' the greatest medical crime in human history and says the pharmaceutical industry is moving all vaccinations to a modified RNA platform. He asserts two fundamental flaws: injecting the construction plan for a foreign protein without control over which cells produce it or the dose and duration, and cells producing it being destroyed as foreign. Therefore the platform must be banned immediately. He says governments are negotiating a plandemic treaty with the WHO and that who controls the WHO controls the world. He urges action: smash the WHO, seek treatment for side effects, and stand up to authorities for a future worth living.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dear fellow humans, my name is Thomas Bindel. I studied medicine in Zurich, obtained a doctorate in immunology and virology, specialized in internal medicine and cardiology and the thirty five years of experience in diagnosis and therapy of acute respiratory infections in hospitals, in intensive care units and in my private practice. While there has never been a pandemic of a killer virus, there was a pandemic of cowards, and do we doctors see a pandemic of severe illnesses and of sudden unexpected deaths from heart attack, myocarditis, aortic dissection, stroke and pulmonary embolism, thrombosis and inflammation of other organs disseminated intravascular coagulation, increased infections, including COVID cancer, autoimmune diseases, infertility, miscarriage and many more. This modified RNA genocide is the greatest medical crime in human history, a humanitarian disaster of unprecedented proportions. Currently, the pharmaceutical industry is working on transferring all vaccinations to the modified RNA vaccine platform. It is doing so, though just being able to count and to distinguish foreign from self, even having a trace of intelligence, is enough to realize that the modified RNA vaccine platform is totally nonsensical and life threatening. Its two fundamental flaws are the injection of the construction plan for a protein foreign to the body without having any control over which body cells will produce it, in what dose and for how long, and the fact that the cells who are coerced to produce this foreign protein and then present it on the surface will be mistakenly recognized by our immune system as 'foreign', thus destroyed, much like the rejection of a foreign organ transplanted into you. The alleged modified RNA vaccination coerces your body to produce a toxin in unknown dose and for an unknown period of time and literally transforms parts of you into an alien. Therefore, the entire modified RNA vaccine platform must be banned immediately. Your government is currently negotiating a plandemic treaty with the WHO. If it signs it, the WHO will be placed above the constitution of your country, and not only you, but also your government and your parliament will lose all freedom of choice. Who controls the who controls the world. The only reasonable, 100% effective and safe prevention of another criminal pandemic is the immediate smashing of the WHO into a thousand pieces. Dear fellow humans: If you have been injected once or even several times, and perhaps even suffer from severe side effects of the modified RNA injections, do not despair. More and more responsible doctors are willing to help you and more and more responsible scientists are researching for, one day, being able to treat even their most complex side effects. I think, with the modified RNA injections, it is like with smoking: It is almost never too late to give it up and to live healthier. Whether you were injected or not: Wake up, give your spine a booster, stand up and tell the manufacturers, your alleged experts, your government, your parliamentarians, your generals and your authorities who have, from the point of view of the populace, totally failed in the Covid scandal: Enough is enough. Step back at last and then stand in courts. Do this, and do this if not for yourself, then for a future worth living for your children and grandchildren now.
Juliedonuts
Posted - February 18, 2026 at 5:36 PM
Saved - February 20, 2026 at 2:32 PM

@Juliedonuts - 🇺🇸🍩 JULIE DONUTS 🇺🇸🍩

HOLY SHILT! 😳 🚨🚨🚨It’s FINALLY out in public and Confirmed that big pharma LIED FOR DECADES ABOUT THEIR DEADLY VACCINES!!! Share this with your friends who are in serious denial!! Ughh it’s so upsetting what they did to our babies!!! CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!! https://t.co/DyXsXMzgDz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The speaker claims that, over the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, identifying hundreds of infants and toddlers who died after these shots, often from SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker states that most of these deaths occurred within about two weeks after the shot, with forty percent dying within one week. The deaths are described as temporally linked to the vaccination, with the majority of fatalities occurring at ages one to one and a half, which the speaker notes as the time they receive the MMR shots. The speaker claims that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The overall claim is that these shots are killing the babies in their sleep, described as absolutely disturbing and as part of a broader study. The speaker concludes that the shots are deadly and that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore; if parents still want them, they should be split up rather than administered as a combined dose, labeling the current approach as “the full load of garbage.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. You can't make this stuff up. So for the past thirty years, the MMR shots have been killing more children, far more children than measles has. And so this is absolutely terrible. And we identified hundreds, hundreds of infants and toddlers that died after these shots, often from SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, cardiac arrest, seizures, encephalitis. It's just it's killing some of these children. And most of them, most of these kids, they died within about two weeks. Most of them majority died within two weeks after the shot. Forty percent died within one week. So the temporality there checks out and most of these deaths occurred ages one to one and a half, right when they get the MMR shots. Usually twenty five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. And so these shots are killing the babies in their sleep. It's absolutely disturbing and particularly what they're dying from. So all of this combined in this study, I mean, it's unequivocal that these shots are deadly. The MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore. They should split them up if the parents still want them. Don't give this full load of garbage.
View Full Interactive Feed