reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
Trump is getting support from literally everyone https://dailycaller.com/2023/04/13/we-support-president-trump-smollett-hoax-brothers-defend/
‘We Support President Trump’: Smollett Hoax Brothers Defend Trump
The brothers involved in the Smollett hoax said that they support former President Donald Trump and warned black voters consume too much "propaganda."
dailycaller.com
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
This is the TOTALLY INSANE woman who made unfounded accusations against Trump the NY court believed. https://t.co/knaCNqWOYF
Video Transcript AI Summary
I call this place the mouse house because distinguished mice live here. I have a shed with books that influenced me, and a list of my dogs on the door. I painted rocks blue to show where rivers once flowed. I started painting trees and ended up creating a whole forest. The best advice I've given is to eat, drink, and be merry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I called the mouse house because some very distinguished, mice live here. Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taburski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Marquee, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry. And, it's so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I've done this whole forest.
Oh my god. What's the best piece of advice I've ever given? What a horrible question to ask an advice to. Oh my god. Hang on.
Eat, drink, and be merry. That's it. That's my advice.
@AskMeLaterOn - ZZZ
Shark Tank’s “Mr. Wonderful” Kevin O'Leary tears apart the Letitia James case against President Trump… #Trump2024 https://t.co/hjlGE4p2bA
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses a case involving real estate development. They explain that developers often borrow money from banks based on the value of their existing assets. The case in question is similar to what happens in real estate development everywhere. The speaker argues that if this case is successful, it would set a precedent that could affect all real estate developers. They believe that the case doesn't make sense and is ridiculous. The speaker acknowledges that while Trump has other legal issues, this case is not unique to him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've been doing real estate for decades. Does this case strike you as odd? Well, let's leave out Trump for a minute and let's leave out politics and just talk about what happens in real estate development anywhere. So If you're a developer and you've got a building on a block anywhere in America and it's worth, let's say, $500,000,000 and you want to build a building right beside it, you go to the bank and say, This building is worth $500,000,000. I'd like to borrow a construction finance loan against this asset And I want you to tell me it's worth $500,000,000 too.
And the bank negotiates with you and says, well, no, we think it's worth $400,000,000.' And you fight it out. And you build a new building with a construction finance loan. And so that's what this case is all about. And by the way, Forget about Trump. Every single real estate developer everywhere on earth does this.
They always talk about their asset being worth a lot And the bank says no, that's just the way it is. So in this case, what I'm trying to figure out and I'm not pro or con or I don't care about the politics Who lost money? Nobody. The bank got paid back the construction finance loan and a new building was built and If you're going to sue this case and win, you've got to sue every real estate developer everywhere. This is all they do.
This is what they do all day long, every day. So I don't think this thing will ever survive appeal regardless of what the fine is. This doesn't even make sense. Now look, I know Trump's got a lot of problems in other indictments and everything else but If you're a real estate developer, you're watching this, you're saying, what is this? This is ridiculous.
@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸
@CollinRugg E. Jean Carroll is a nut job. This is the woman that accused Trump of rape. Complete looney tune. https://t.co/9w8IHkri8M
Video Transcript AI Summary
I call this place the Mouse House where distinguished mice like Kahneman and Taburski live. My shed holds books that influenced me. The door lists my dogs' names. I painted rocks blue to show where rivers once flowed. I painted trees and a forest. The best advice I've given is to eat, drink, and be merry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I called the mouse house because some very distinguished, mice live here. Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taburski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Marquee, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry. And, it's so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I've done this whole forest.
Oh my god. What's the best piece of advice I've ever given? What a horrible question to ask an advice to. Oh my god. Hang on.
Eat, drink, and be merry. That's it. That's my advice.
@TimRunsHisMouth - Tim Young
Just a reminder that Trump's accuser E. Jean Carroll once told Anderson Cooper that rape is "sexy" and a "fantasy." ...and it creeped him out so much that he cut her off and threw to commercial. https://t.co/KU9Ir6KJ2u
Video Transcript AI Summary
I didn't feel like a victim. It wasn't a sexual assault, just hurtful. Rape isn't sexy, it's violent. Let's take a break and talk more later. You're interesting to talk to.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't feel like a victim? I was not thrown on the ground and ravished, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotation. This was not this was not sexual for it just it it hurt. It just what it just, you know I think most people think rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault. It is not I think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Let's take a short break. Think of the fantasies. Mhmm. We're just gonna take a quick break. Or if you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side.
You're fascinating to talk to.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Do you think E. Jean Carroll is credible? https://t.co/gHwQ9JR7cY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump is accused of inappropriate behavior towards women. The speaker finds it disrespectful to women who are victims of rape. They recall a past encounter with Trump involving lingerie. The speaker expresses anger and panic, mentioning death threats. They ponder the possibility of DNA evidence on the lingerie. The conversation shifts to Trump's statement about the accuser not being his type. The speaker challenges the perception of rape as sexy. The discussion pauses briefly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Charge against Donald Trump for this. Why not?
Speaker 1: I would find it disrespectful to the women who are down on the border, who are being raped around the clock down there. But for the women down there and for the women, actually, around the world And it was all fairly playful. Oh, it was charming. It was excite remember what Donald Trump was like in 95, 90 6. On the counter were these fancy lingerie boxes that they used to have back in the nineties.
Yeah. You wore lingerie in the nineties, I'll bet you. But He didn't suggest it. He shouted it. He shouted it.
Lingerie. Lingerie. He may have shouted underwear. I Yeah. Okay.
Speaker 0: Were you scared? Were you No.
Speaker 1: I'm too angry? I was too panicked to be scared.
Speaker 0: Too panicked to be scared. Okay.
Speaker 1: Totally. And I put my life on the line. Do you think that you're go well, hold on a second. What do you mean you put your life on the line? Well, people have told me I have to be careful.
You've gotten death threats. I am not looking at death threats. I have the idea that I'm gonna make him put it on over his pants. That was my idea. Mhmm.
You see how funny that would be to make him put that on? I guess my question is is could there be any DNA on there? Idea. I do not know if the president ejaculated. Have no idea.
Lawrence, I wish I had said I wish. I said, I'll tell you my age if you show me your tax returns.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Yeah. It would've been would've been up
Speaker 1: in that. Well, so I'm holding my handbag like the the only reason I know I'm holding my handbag is because I discovered it in my hand when I got to the street.
Speaker 0: The statement that he said, which he's just made, which is she's not my type number. Well, that was the number one thing.
Speaker 1: Love that I'm not his type. I'm an archer. I have bows and arrows. You know? Yeah.
Fine. I think there's just too never mind. Never mind.
Speaker 0: I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault. It is not a I
Speaker 1: think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Speaker 0: Let's take a short break.
Speaker 1: Think of the fantasies.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. We're just gonna take a quick break. Or if you can stick around,
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm E Jean Carroll, the woman who accused Trump of sexual assault. Leftists believe me, but some question their sincerity. Do they truly believe or is it politically motivated?
@MrReaganUSA - Mr Reagan 🇺🇸
This is E Jean Carroll, the woman that the left believes has "credibly" accused Trump of sexual assault in the dressing room of the Bergdorf Goodman Department store. 😳 https://t.co/QZ0A44NmAm
Video Transcript AI Summary
I live in a place called the mouse house, where distinguished mice like Kahneman and Taburski reside. I have a shed filled with books that influenced me. On the door, I have a list of my dogs' names. I once painted rocks blue to represent a dried-up river. Then I started painting trees and eventually created a whole forest. When asked for the best advice I've given, I replied, "Eat, Drink, and be merry."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I called the mouse house because some very distinguished, mice live here. Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taburski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Marquee, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, tits, bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry. And, it's so horrified me that I came out and started Painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just Sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon I've done this whole forest.
Oh my god. What's the best piece of advice I've ever given? What a horrible question to ask an advice to all. Oh my god. Hang on.
Eat, Drink and be merry. That's it. That's my advice.
@MrReaganUSA - Mr Reagan 🇺🇸
It's amazing how many gullible leftists claim to actually believe the E Jean Carroll sham. I wonder if they really believe it or if they're just pretending because it's politically convenient. 🤔
@mrddmia - 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸
🚨 Looks like Jean Carroll illegally destroyed evidence in her latest bogus case against Trump. https://t.co/vF8ixCMp4z
@WojPawelczyk - Wojciech Pawelczyk
E. Jean Carroll is completely nuts and has zero credibility. Watch the full video😵 https://t.co/DSlo4cKJut
Video Transcript AI Summary
People read advice columns to feel relieved that they don't have the same problems. The speaker enjoys staying up late and sleeping in, and doesn't have children. They've been writing an advice column for 25 years, learning from the people who write to them. The speaker has stacks of letters and believes the answer to people's questions is in their own desires. They worry about the people who write in and feel responsible for the impact their advice may have. They have a shed filled with books and a forest they painted blue. The best advice they've given is to "eat, drink, and be married."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People read in an advice column because they want to say, oh my god. Thank god. That's not me. I like to stay up late. I like to sleep late, and I like to live like 90 in between.
I get up around noon, and I stagger outside out the store, And I throw up in my arms, and I thank God I don't have children. Then I go back in, Stagger into my office and start reading a stack of ASCII gene letters. I never thought much went on in the morning anyway. Women have facials in the morning. They have their hair done, not me.
I like getting up at noon. My personal life is fascinating. I started writing At about the age of 6a half, fed with a daily, daily diet of Anne Landers and Dear Abby. I wanted to be Anne and Abby. Oh, here.
Hang on. I have something that explains the NSQ gene column in a perfect, perfect thing. Here I come through here. This is what I've been doing for 25 years. I'm a cheerleader.
People get down and depressed and a little confused, and they need help. This is what I do. I yell and I scream and I, helps them get through their difficulties. The secret to the advice column is I don't know anything. It's the people who've been writing to me for 25 years who taught me everything.
Those are the people you can't read a stack of e gene letters without learning more than reading Shakespeare. You wanna see some old asking Jean. All these are asking Jean asking Jean asking Jean. I have every single letter that's ever been sent to me. I have the shopping bags full of actual stationery with letters.
This man has given his, wife, a $30,000 engagement ring. He wants her to give him a $6,000 watch. Well, she did, but it wasn't enough Because then he wanted a Rolex, how she's handled this is she's had an affair with somebody at the office. The questions have remained the same. They want love.
They wanna be a size 6. They want their children to do well. They wanna have a purpose in life. They want those same things, And that that has never changed. The answer is in their question.
You just find out what they wanna do And then you tell them to do it. I am so tormented and confused by my obsession with my ex boyfriend from college. Here's to the last line. It's been 22 years since we broke up. I understand you.
She and I have a lot in common. Oh, we do not wanna look at our emails. That was a bad idea. Oh. I worry so much about the people who write in.
I am so real. See these eyes? Look. Look at the bags under my eyes. I worry at night when I'm in bed because, you know, a line from me can change your life.
Now, whether it changes for the better or for the worse, I don't know. As you see, I have stacks of bells here and there and everywhere. I get sent one every month. Sometimes, If I'm very good, they send me 2. I could not answer the questions Coming into the ASCII Jean column, if I was in New York City.
You can't think in New York if you're dating 16 people, which I would be doing if I were in New York. You go to the woods to find out who you are, and then you find out who you are, and you're even happier than when you came. It's wonderful. I called the mouse house because some very distinguished, mice live here. Connerman lives in the kitchen.
Taberski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books That most influenced me growing up. On the door of the list of my dogs, Marky, Fortuna De Las Funky, Heidi, Tits, bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry.
And I it's so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I've done this whole forest. Oh my god. What's the best piece of advice I've ever given?
What a horrible question To ask an advice on, oh my god. Hang on. Eat, drink, And be married. That's it. That's my advice.
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed Trump found E Jean Carroll’s Facebook page and shared some of her content on Truth today. I also expressed skepticism about the judge in the case, believing he won't permit any evidence that could portray Trump in a favorable light.
@JKash000 - JKash 🍊MAGA Queen
Trump found E Jean Carroll’s Facebook page.🤣🔥🤣 here’s a thread of her stuff he posted on Truth today. https://t.co/c2s8sQbFXG
@JKash000 - JKash 🍊MAGA Queen
@lisastewart59 I doubt it. It’s the same judge and he won’t allow any evidence that makes Trump look innocent.
reSee.it AI Summary
The E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was deemed bogus due to several inconsistencies and lack of evidence. Carroll couldn't recall important details, never mentioned the incident before, and her description of the events didn't match the reality. Her lawsuit was supported by a Democrat mega-donor, and a law was created to enable her case. Carroll has a history of false accusations and has made controversial statements about rape.
@JohnLeFevre - John LeFevre
I thought everyone knew the E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was bogus, until I heard my mother's (late 60s Republican) uninformed take on the verdict after watching ABC Nightly News. It's hard to find on Google, so here's what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed "inadmissible" by the judge: - She couldn't recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened - She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality - The dress she claims to have been wearing didn't exist at the time - Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible - Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman - Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed - Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her "favorite shows") - Trump's Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows - She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves - She told Anderson Cooper, "most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies." - She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat Vagina
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
This isn’t some random woman. This is E. Jean Carroll, the woman who sued Trump for defamation and won over $83 million. https://t.co/i6mcA7c8zf
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree. And then pretty soon, I'd done this whole forest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I'd done this whole forest.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
This isn’t some random woman. This is E. Jean Carroll, the woman who sued Trump for defamation and won over $83 million. Does she seem reliable, or sane to you? They used to institutionalize people like this instead of awarding them for their delusions. https://t.co/pJI9NlQ3UR
Video Transcript AI Summary
"I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here." "Conneman lives in the kitchen." "Tversky lives in the bedroom." "This is my shed." "And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up." "On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn." "The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here." "And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree." "And then pretty soon I'd done this whole forest."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon I'd done this whole forest.
reSee.it AI Summary
Listen closely to E. Jean Carroll's claims against Donald Trump. Defending him from the legal system is something I'm proud of. Carroll may have been defamed, but she's a self-righteous, lying drug user who won't get the $83 million from Trump's counter suit.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
If you seen and heard it already, then LISTEN TO HER AGAIN 😱 CLOSELY Defending Donald Trump from this bullshit legal system is the PROUDEST THING I’VE EVER DONE 😲 E. Jean Carroll says she was “defamed” 🤔. We’ll here’s is a little more… E. Jean Carroll is a self righteous, lying POS druggie & she will NEVER get the $83 million after Trumps Counter Suit 😎. Save the post 👊🏻
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses unwavering support for President Trump but criticizes the courtroom proceedings in New York. They claim that the judge limited their ability to present a defense and highlight the lack of evidence against their client. The speaker also accuses the opposing side of unethical behavior, including paying a witness. They argue that this is a violation of the justice system and emphasizes their commitment to fighting for everyone's right to speak and defend themselves. The speaker denies any fear on the part of the former president and states that he will continue to fight for Americans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. No. I'm glad you asked me that question. No. I'm not having any second thoughts about representing president Trump.
It is the proudest thing I could ever do. What I am having second thoughts about is the license that I stand here with that the people in there are supposed to have. I have not spoken because I respect my ethics while I'm on trial. But let me now speak about what has happened. I have sat on trial after trial for months in this state.
The state of New York, attorney general Leticia James, and now this. Weeks. Weeks. Why? Why?
Because president Trump is leading in the polls, and now we see what you get in New York. So don't get it twisted, whoever asked me that question. I I'm so proud to stand with president president Trump, but I am not proud to stand with what I saw in that courtroom.
Speaker 1: Miss Oliver is
Speaker 0: I'm not finished. Let me just finish, and I'll take questions, please. Before I walked into court, that judge decided that every single defense president Trump had, we were not allowed to raise in front of the jury. It is in writing, and I encourage the the real journalist to take the minute to look at his orders. There was no proof, and I I couldn't prove that she didn't bring in the dress.
There was no DNA. There was no expert. My experts were denied. Side. 2 of them 2 of them were denied to come in.
They didn't bring let me bring up that Reid sex. Been funded, miss Kaplan. And you know what we got in there? That my witness, who was her friend, who said that she is a drug addict, And the drug addict is herself. That friend, I found out in there was paid for by miss Kaplan's firm, and that is disgusting.
That is a violation of everything I stand for, and that is why I stand with Trump. And that is why so many Americans are sec. So proud that he is running again and so excited to run to the ballot box, but don't get it twisted. We are seeing a violation of our justice system. Ladies and gentlemen, sec You are not allowed to be stripped of every defense that you have.
You are not allowed to be told that you can't bring it up and imagine a point where a judge tells the lawyer before your client, the former President of the United States, the leading candidate and obvious nigh nominee for the Republican Party. Before he He takes the stand to defend himself. Miss Haba, tell me the questions you're going to ask in open court, and tell me exactly what he's going to respond. And then my questions, edited the response he was allowed to give. And guess what my client did?
He took the stand. He by the rules of this corrupt system that I have seen, we will immediately appeal. We will set aside that ridiculous jury. And I just wanna remind you all of one thing. I will continue with president Trump to fight for everybody's first amendment right to speak.
Everybody's a right to defend themselves when they are wrongfully accused and to be able to say, I didn't do it, and to double and triple and quadruple sit down and say this is wrong. This is wrong. But we are in the state of New York. We are in a New York jury, and that is why we are seeing these witch hunts, these hoaxes, as he calls them, and this is another one of them, be brought in New York, in states sites where they know they will get juries like this. It will not deter us.
We fighting, and I you. We didn't want today, but we will that was made in there. And the behavior I saw in there, some of which was reported widely today, gave us the most perfect record on appeal and even if I to it, which I don't. We were stripped of every defense, every single defense before we walked in there. And I am proud to stand with president Trump because he showed up, he stood up, he took this in, and he faced this judge.
And you know what? I'll continue to do so with him. Yes. Sense. Of course, I've spoken with the president.
Miss Hopper, is the
Speaker 1: former president scared now the consequences of his actions?
Speaker 0: The former does not live his life in fear as you've seen every single day. The former president and probably future president will continue to fight for Americans. Thank you very much, everybody.
reSee.it AI Summary
The judge in the Carroll v Trump trial had a conflict of interest as he was Carroll's mentor, which raises questions about bias. Trump's lawyers claim this was undisclosed and should have been mentioned. It remains to be seen if this allegation is true.
@amuse - @amuse
WTH? The entire Carroll v Trump trial seemed completely biased. Now we know why. The judge was Carroll's mentor. Why didn't he mention this total conflict of interest. He should have recused himself.
@amuse - @amuse
‘Insane’: Trump lawyers cite undisclosed ‘conflict of interest’ between judge, Carroll’s attorney. https://bizpacreview.com/2024/01/28/insane-trump-lawyers-cite-undisclosed-conflict-of-interest-between-judge-carrolls-attorney-1431676/
‘Insane’: Trump lawyers cite undisclosed ‘conflict of interest’ between judge, Carroll’s attorney
E. Jean Carroll should probably wait to start counting the $83 million she was awarded in her defamation suit against Donald Trump. On Saturday, the former president’s […]
bizpacreview.com
@amuse - @amuse
OFFICIAL: Trump filling, "defense counsel learned for the first time of allegations that Your Honor, while a partner at the Paul Weiss firm, had a “mentor” type relationship with Plaintiff’s lead counsel, Roberta Kaplan". Could this be true?
@MaddowBlog - Maddow Blog
"He's nothing. He is like a walrus snorting." E.Jean Carroll describes her surprise at how insubstantial Donald Trump's presence was in court, despite his image and hype. https://t.co/PLAr1Jc9nJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
This team of young people bravely confronted someone who seemed intimidating but turned out to be insignificant. The experience of being in the same room with him, after years of fear, was surprising. Initially terrified and overwhelmed before the trial, the speaker had a breakdown just days before. However, once in court, facing him revealed he was just a phantom, lacking real power. The realization that he was nothing and that fear was unfounded was astonishing. It highlighted that it was the people around him who gave him strength, not him as an individual.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This team of brilliant young people have, as you said, stood up to the man, who, by the way, Rachel, is not even there. He's nothing. He is without he is like a walrus snorting and like a rhino flopping his hand. It was he is not there. That was the surprising thing to me.
Speaker 1: Well, on that point, talking about, you know, being face to face with him, being in the same physical space with him for the first time since when you say he assaulted you in in 1996. Right. What you're describing there, in terms of him being nothing, him feeling like an animal, him feeling not intimidating, Was that a shock to you? Because, I mean, your guts here, your bravery here includes the physical bravery about being around him again. It sounds like it didn't go the way you expected it to once you were in the same room.
Speaker 0: No, Rachel. I was terrified. I I was just a bag of sweating corpuscles as we prepared for trial. And, 4 days before trial, I had an actual breakdown. I lost my ability to speak.
I lost my words. I couldn't talk, and I couldn't go on. It was that's how sprightened I was. But, oddly, we went into court. Robbie took, the lectern.
I sat in the witness chair like this, and she said, miss Carol, good morning. Would you please spell your name for the court? And, amazingly, I looked out, and he was nothing. He was nothing. He was a phantom.
Yeah. It was the people around him who were giving him power. He himself was nothing. It was an astonishing, discovery for me. He's nothing.
We don't need to be afraid of him. He can be knocked down twice. Miss Crumlish woman right here.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
It's so obvious that E Jean Carrol is lying. Rape victims don't act like this and everyone knows it. She admitted George Conway put her up to this. https://t.co/RySKQz6h9Q
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's no longer about individual interests; the focus is on reclaiming our future and rights. Plans include using funds from Trump to support women's rights. There's humor in discussing extravagant purchases, but the serious matter is the ongoing legal battles against Trump.
The cases are interconnected, with insights from one case benefiting another. For instance, evidence from Trump's depositions can influence jury decisions on punitive damages. In court, Trump is less intimidating without his usual fanfare; he can be controlled by strong judges and competent lawyers. Ultimately, he is just a person, not the larger-than-life figure portrayed in the media.
Thanks to E. Jean Carroll, Robbie Kaplan, and Sean Crowley for their efforts in these historic legal battles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it's really not about me anymore. We have moved beyond me. And as you say, the fight now is really to take back our future. This is a man who stacked the supreme court, took away women's rights over their own bodies. We would like to be a part of turning, our eyes to the future and taking back our rights.
Speaker 1: You've talked about using some of Trump's money that you're about to get, to help shore up women's rights. Do you know what that might be? What that might look like
Speaker 0: or Rachel. Yes. Tell me. I had such such great ideas for all the good I'm gonna do with this money. First thing, Rachel, you and I are gonna go shopping.
We're gonna get completely new wardrobes, new shoes, motorcycle for crawling, new fishing rod for Robbie. Rachel, what do you want? A penthouse? It's yours, Rachel. Penthouse and, France.
You want France? You wanna go fishing in France? No? Oh, alright.
Speaker 2: Alright. Okay. That's a joke.
Speaker 1: Although, if if me fishing in France could do something for women's rights, I would take the hint. You know? I would obviously take one for the team. Alright. Let me let me as if as if you need persuasion in that regard.
Let me let me finish with a final question. And, again, this is both for you, Sean, and and for you, Robbie, and you guys can divide up responsibility here. But there are multiple cases here involving Trump that are that are coming up. Obviously, most eyes are on the federal January 6th case. Having been up against Trump in the courtroom, I'm wondering if you 2 have have any advice in terms of what it's like to go up against him and his legal team in terms of the way that he approaches his defense as part of it.
But I also wanna know if this big what everybody's expecting potentially to be a very large judgment against him and his company changed anything about the way that you approached the asked to the jury, the way that you presented evidence, the way that you're planning on making sure this money is in fact extracted from Trump's wallet? I mean, how much do all of these different cases interact with each other if at all? And can various lawyers involved in various in these various cases learn from each other's experience?
Speaker 3: So the the short answer to to the cases all interact with each other is absolutely all the time. To give you just one good example, in our case, we played at the end of our case, not only the deposition that I took of Donald Trump in this case, but we played the deposition that the New York attorney general took in their case. Because in that deposition, Trump is bragging about how his his brand alone is worth more than $10,000,000,000. He has $400,000,000 cash on hand. And the reason that was so relevant is in assessing how much money to work for punitive damages, the jury is not only allowed to, but supposed to think of the wealth of the defendant.
So when we said when Sean said, give him enough give enough to Eugene to make him stop, they had to think what enough would be for Donald Trump. So the cases in in kinds of predictable ways and unpredictable ways are are kind of talking to each other all the time.
Speaker 2: On on the first question, you know, I think that one thing that I I maybe wasn't prepared for, coming into this trial is that when when Donald Trump is stripped of, you know, all of the press and not at a rally, and there's no TV cameras, and he sort of has a small group of supporters around him, he's not that scary.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 2: And he also can be controlled. You know, I mean, his antics in the courtroom, we've talked about them. But at the end of the day, he did kind of follow the rules. Robbie Cross examined him. He was in he was in the witness chair, and he only got to answer 3 questions, I think.
And he pretty much stayed within the bounds. I think when you have a strong judge like judge Kaplan who enforces the rules of his courtroom, and you have real lawyers, you really can get him to behave, sort of. And when he is stripped of all of the rallies and the truth socials, he's just a guy. I think PG called him, the emperor with no clothes. That's not my quote, but he definitely is.
He's not the guy that you see on TV. He's just a guy, sometimes acting like a petulant toddler, but, just a guy.
Speaker 1: An American bound by the law just as every American is bound by the law. Writer E. Jean Carroll, attorney Robbie Kaplan, attorney Sean Crowley, you guys have made history a couple of times now.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: And you also have meant a lot, and continue to mean a lot. You have, been lighting the way, I think, for a lot of people in terms of both moral clarity and strategic acumen. And I really, really wanna thank each of you for making the time to come talk to us, and I want I I wish you all, safety and rest. Thank you
Speaker 0: for your time. Rachel.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Alright.
Speaker 3: We'll be right back. Stay with us.
@RealSeq16 - Sequencer
Even Cuomo admits the case against Trump is BS! “I'm telling you, that case would have never been brought. And that's what's offensive to people. And it should be." https://t.co/ArwivnG7sC
Video Transcript AI Summary
The trial in New York, where Trump was convicted, boosted his fundraising significantly. He now leads Biden in donations. The hush money trial in New York, which the former AG brought against Trump, should not have been pursued. It seemed like a sex case and was unfair. If Trump wasn't a presidential candidate, the case wouldn't have happened. This undermines people's faith in justice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The trial in New York, the one he got convicted for, was the greatest fundraising bonanza ever. He's now he was lagging behind Biden, and now he's pulled quite a bit ahead. That trial was the greatest reason people had to to send their checks for 5, 10, 25, whatever dollars to Donald Trump. So I I I and I was always with you on on the one in New York, the hush money trial. I don't think they should have brought that one.
It was just always gonna look like a sex case, and people were always just gonna look at it that way. So anyway That
Speaker 1: case, the attorney general's case in New York, frankly, should have never been brought. And if his name was not Donald Trump and he if he wasn't running for president from the former AG in New York, I'm telling you that case would have never been brought. And that's what is offensive to people, and it should be. Because if there's anything left, it's belief in the justice.
@ggreenwald - Glenn Greenwald
A senior state court judge refused to dismiss a defamation lawsuit brought by Trump against the Pulitzer Board. The Board gave Pulitzers to NYT and WPost for their repeated echoing of the Russiagate fraud. Here's what even NYT admitted when reporting on the court ruling:👇 https://t.co/FbwVMWmEjt
@trumprealparody - Donald J. Trump - Parody
🚨BREAKING: Justice Clarence Thomas just said that the E. Jean Carroll case is election interference orchestrated by the Democrats. Do You Agree? A. Yes B. No https://t.co/l06AltSYUF
@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy
Charlie Kirk explains that E. Jean Carroll LIED and he makes perfect sense. The simplest explanation usually is the correct one. https://t.co/aNggubULZS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they will be politically incorrect and issues a trigger warning. They question the claim that a wealthy man, married to a supermodel, would sexually assault E. Jean Carroll in a Tiffany's store. The speaker highlights that the alleged incident occurred at the height of the man's career, with no prior accusations for twenty years, and only surfaced when he ran for president. The speaker dismisses the accusation as "complete rubbish and political nonsense."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I'm gonna be politically incorrect. Is that okay? Alright. Trigger warning. Okay.
So let me let me understand this. Here is the world's wealthiest man. One of the world's wealthiest men worth like $10,000,000,000. He's got a show on the NBC apprentice. He's literally married to a supermodel.
He can have any woman on the world. And I'm I'm supposed to believe at 2PM at in a Tiffany store, he walks in and Eugene Carroll, who is not exactly a supermodel, and risks his entire fortune of which there is no accusation for twenty years, but he pops up and runs for the president. And all of a sudden, says, this guy me, even though I can't remember the day, the month, the year, 2PM in a department store at Tiffany's while he was at the height of his career. I'm sorry. That's complete rubbish and political nonsense.
@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy
Why this liberal voted for Donald Trump in 2024. https://t.co/vPuC1rKAzR
Video Transcript AI Summary
A former Democrat who was a vegan, LGBTQ, and environmental activist says they left the Democratic party in 2021, believing the liberal movement had become a fascist, woke movement that silences dissent.
The speaker says they now align with classical liberals on most social issues, lean left, and voted for Donald Trump. They support and identify with MAGA, which they see as a centrist movement, not a traditional Republican or GOP or conservative movement.
They will make independent choices based on candidates, policies, and history, and advises liberals to listen to those who are tired of "woke shit," noting that some woke politicians like Gavin Newsom are turning their backs on the movement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Liberal fatigue is very real, former Democrat here as well. I left the Democratic party in 2021 after a decade, and I was in pretty deep. I was a vegan, LGBTQ, and an environmental activist. I hit the streets often, but I walked away in 2021 because I saw what I thought was a liberal movement turned to a woke movement, which was actually more of a fascist movement, especially when they started trying to silence or cancel anyone who disagreed with them on literally anything. I tend to align with classical liberals on most social issues.
I still lean very left, but, yes, I voted for Donald Trump. And now I support MAGA, and I identify with MAGA. And I do not identify MAGA as a traditional Republican or GOP or conservative movement. I believe MAGA to be more of a centrist type movement, and I do align closely with them. I'm not a Republican for many reasons, and I will not devote any of my votes in the future to Republican nor against the Democratic party.
I will make an independent choice based on the candidates and the policies and their history as politicians or business people, whatever their background may be. But I just wanna say to the liberals, you might actually wanna listen to a lot of the people that are saying they're sick and tired of the fucking woke shit. That's why you see many of your woke politicians such as Gavin Newsom turning his back on you now. I mean, I guess you still have people like walls in your court, but I don't know what good that guy is. Either which way, you might wanna pay attention.
You might just wanna pay attention.
@MintPressNews - MintPress News
⭕️Donald Trump calls the Epstein Files “total bullsh!t” These claims that the Jeffrey Epstein case is a “Democrat Hoax” have enraged Trump’s MAGA base. https://t.co/Qqn2ZlRav5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker denies reports of hosting a gathering of top advisors to discuss the Epstein situation, calling it "completely fake news." He asserts the report is a "hoax" perpetrated by Democrats to divert attention from his administration's successful six months. He attributes the report to the Democrats and dismisses the situation as "total bullshit."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Epstein situation? Is he working on what? Is he hosting some kind of gathering of top advisors this evening to talk about how to respond to the Epstein situation? I don't know. I could ask you that question.
I don't know of it, but I think, I I here's the man right here. I saw it reported today, and it's completely fake news. We're not meeting to talk about the Epstein situation, and I think the reporter who reported it needs to get better sources. Look. The whole thing is a hoax.
It's put out by the Democrats because we've had the most successful six months in the history of our country, and that's just a way of trying to divert attention to something that's total bullshit. Okay? Yeah, please. A new Gallup poll said
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
E. Jean Carroll said she didn't believe she was a victim of her "3-minute" encounter she claims to have had with Donald Trump. "I think most people think of rape as sexy. They think of the fantasies." Let's hope the Supreme Court overturns the civil verdict in this case, too. https://t.co/M1qGku6Hfb
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a dressing room, "the minute I was in there, he shut the door and pushed me up against the wall and bang bang my head on the wall and kissed me." She laughed to cope: "You started laughing?" It turned serious as he "pulled down the tights" with one hand, and it was "a fight" against her will; she notes he is "six three" and she was "about six one in the massive heels." She confirms "Yes" to penetration and says, "That's the definition" of rape, though she prefers calling it "the fight" and says, "I was not the victim." She adds, "Sexual violence is in every country, in every strata of society" and that her incident was short—"three minutes in this little dressing room"—and she "got out. I'm moving on."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The minute I was in there, he shut the door and pushed me up against the wall and bang bang my head on the wall and kissed me. I just it was so shocking. I couldn't of course, I started laughing again because
Speaker 1: You started laughing?
Speaker 0: Of course.
Speaker 1: What what why? Well, why, of course?
Speaker 0: Because it was a way of if it was at all ironic in his part, it would if a man is laughed at, it usually will make him and he put his shoulder against me to hold me against the wall. And at that point, I realized that I was in a very difficult situation.
Speaker 1: Did he say anything?
Speaker 0: No. No. It was just like, we're gonna do this thing. We're just so hot for each other. Or I don't why would I even try to think what he was thinking?
Anyway, so he put me you know, he pushed me held me with his shoulder, and I was wearing a a coat dress and tights, and he pulled down the tights. And so that's
Speaker 1: He pulled it with he pulled it with both hands, with one hand?
Speaker 0: One. That was when it turned serious. I realized that this was this was this was a fight. And even though I can talk about it now and put words to it, at the time the adrenaline is pouring through me and all I wanna do right.
Speaker 1: How would you describe what were you you you said you were you were obviously Fighting. Surprised, fighting. Right. Were you scared? Were you No.
I was too
Speaker 0: I was too panicked to be scared.
Speaker 1: Too panicked to be scared. Okay.
Speaker 0: You know
Speaker 1: Is it and you said adrenaline was pumping?
Speaker 0: I assume it was. Right. Because I got strong enough. He's six three. Apparently, I've looked it up.
I was about six one in the massive heels I was wearing. And so we were even almost even in height. And down go the tights, and it was against my will, and it hurt, and it was a fight.
Speaker 1: And this is not a question I would normally ask. And if if you don't wanna answer, totally understand. But given the prior accusations, which have all been of forms of assault or harassment, you you're saying there was actual penetration?
Speaker 0: Yes. Did you
Speaker 1: which is puts it into a different category of any of these other any of the other act women who have come forward. I think techno I mean, that that is that is the definition of of rape. One definition.
Speaker 0: That's the definition. Yes. How long? Brief. Mhmm.
Brief. Because when a woman is stamping her feet mean
Speaker 1: And what you were doing? You started stamping I her
Speaker 0: always think back and think, I that was the stupidest thing I've ever done. I should never have done it. Then I didn't behave
Speaker 1: When you say I should have never done it, you mean
Speaker 0: That was just a dumb thing to go into a dressing room with a man that I hardly know and have him shut the door and then be unable to stop him. And, I was a competitive athlete, so I wasn't like a I didn't freeze. I I rose to the occasion, and, it did not last long. And that's why I don't use the word you just used. I use the word fight.
Speaker 1: You don't use the word rape?
Speaker 0: Sexual violence is in every country, in every strata of of society, and I just feel that so many women are undergoing sexual violence. Mine was short. I got out. I'm happy now. I'm, moving on.
And I think of all the women who are enduring constant sexual violence. So this one instant, this one, what, three minutes in this little dressing room, I just say it's the fight. That way, I'm not the victim. Right? I'm not the victim.
Speaker 1: You don't feel like a victim?
Speaker 0: I was not thrown on the ground in ravish, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotation. This was not this was not sexual. For it just it it hurt. It just what it just you know?
Speaker 1: But I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault. It is not
Speaker 0: I think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Speaker 1: Let's take a short break.
Speaker 0: Think of the fantasies.
Speaker 1: Mhmm. We've just gotta take a quick break. If you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side.
Speaker 0: You're fascinating to talk to.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m astonished that many Democrats don’t see that E. Jean Carroll’s ability to file charges against Trump was funded by wealthy Democrats who pushed for a temporary law. Carroll was the first to use it, but it expired after a year. She also lied under oath about her legal fees, facing no consequences. The main witness, Carol Martin, even called Carroll a drug addict in a text. It’s baffling that a true victim would behave this way. Many believe Carroll's claims are fabricated and politically motivated, with no evidence presented to support her allegations.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
I can’t believe how many democrats still don’t realize that the only reason E. Jean Carroll was allowed to file charges against Trump was because democrat billionaires funded her effort to get a one year temporary law added just so she could. She was the first person in the state to file under the new temporary law. 12 months later the law expired.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
Carroll also lied and testified under oath that she wasn’t having her legal fees paid for by someone else and faced no repercussions when it was exposed as a lie. https://t.co/OW6eGMMZic
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
👇👇
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
The so-called "witness" who backed Carroll's outlandish claims in court? Well, emails from 2017 between her and Carroll expose the truth. In September of that year, Carol Martin sent E. Jean Carroll an article mocking Trump, referring to him as "Orange Crush," and urged, "this has to stop." She suggested, "as soon as we’re both well enough to scheme, we must both do our patriotic duty." Carroll eagerly replied, "TOTALLY!!! I have something special for you when we meet." Fast forward 15 months, and Carroll conveniently releases a book accusing Trump of assault. Martin didn’t want to be involved at first saying Carroll made the lawsuit a “lifestyle”.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
The main witness, Carol Martin, texted her daughter that E. Jean Carroll was a drug addict and that the drug was herself. https://t.co/STSYNr5sPR
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
And the thing I find strangest of all…. What true victim of the crime she claimed would post a question like this? https://t.co/4bSZSvkLV9
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
For the people asking why Trump didn’t give his DNA https://t.co/A8I9YSritt
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@MxCl74613523 YUP
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@AngelLee2194 If only she had evidence.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@AndrewLBElms A claim like that requires proof. She has yet to present any.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@KaostheDog2 If this would true she would have had went against him criminally. If it was true she would have had evidence Democrats are disgusting and support false rape claims as long as it’s against their opponent..