reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Posted - May 10, 2023 at 11:05 AM

Saved - May 10, 2023 at 9:08 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Judge Kaplan, a Clinton appointee, allowed irrelevant evidence to be presented in the Trump Civil Trial, stacking it against Trump. Legal scholars, including Johnathan Turley, have criticized his handling of the case. Plaintiff E Jean Carroll's lack of memory and failure to report the alleged event weakens her case. This may aid Trump's defense in an appeal.

@genuke1 - genuke1🦊🐎

Judge Lewis Kaplan presided over the Trump Civil Trial. He is a Clinton appointee. Several noted legal scalars, included Johnathan Turley stated that judge Kaplan allowed evidence to be presented to the jury that had nothing to do with the event in question. (He stacked the evidence unfavorable to Trump). This will help Trump's defense upon appeal. The plaintiff E. Jean Carroll could not even remember the date when her alleged event occurred or have a reason for not reporting it to authorities.

@bberghofsr — bberghofsr

Posted - September 2, 2023 at 3:57 AM

Saved - September 2, 2023 at 1:24 PM

@bberghofsr - bberghofsr

This is a judge in one of the Trump cases how the hell is this possible

@earthing5000 - EARTH!🇺🇸

How the hell can she be the judge presiding over Trumps indictment. She needs to step down! This needs to be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court! How can this actually be happening in America?

Video Transcript AI Summary

We will challenge this illegitimate president and focus on Donald Trump. Investigating his finances fuels my determination. As the attorney general, I sue him regularly.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Oh, we're gonna definitely assume we're gonna be a real pain in the ass. I will never be afraid to challenge this illegitimate president. We need to focus on Donald Trump. We need to follow his money. What is fueling my soul right now is Trump. Illegitimate president. I respond to going into the office of attorney general every day, suing him, and then going

@kyledcheney — Kyle Cheney

Posted - September 12, 2023 at 12:07 PM

Saved - September 12, 2023 at 10:45 PM

@kyledcheney - Kyle Cheney

Trump campaign out this AM with a particularly brazen attack on Judge Chutkan that is likely to reverberate in his criminal case. Among other things, it claims she defended riots over summer of 2020 (she didn’t, she just said J6 was worse). But note the deceptive ellipsis.

@THeinrich22 — Todd With Trump

Posted - October 2, 2023 at 2:14 PM

Saved - October 3, 2023 at 3:32 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Justice Engoron ruled that President Trump committed fraud on his properties. The trial is a fraud and must go to appeal. It's election interference. AG Letitia James and the judge should be imprisoned. Pass it on.

@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump

Here’s Justice Arthur F. Engoron, the wino judge who ruled that our favorite President Donald J Trump committed fraud on his properties This trial today is a complete fraud and must immediately go to appeal, and it should NEVER have been brought in the first place. It’s % #ElectionInterference and the sham AG Letitia asshat James needs to be imprisoned along with this judge Have another sip - Pass it on

Video Transcript AI Summary

A judge caused trouble for Trump and held him in contempt during a hearing. The judge was seen drinking from a 40, which caused controversy.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Wanna see the judge causing Trump so much trouble? Wanna see the judge holding Trump in contempt? Just watch this wino drink from a 40 during a hearing.

@JT4DT24 — 🗽Jordyn Trump🗽

Posted - October 6, 2023 at 3:23 AM

Saved - October 6, 2023 at 5:37 AM

@JT4DT24 - 🗽Jordyn Trump🗽

A trial without a jury means that the judge gets to determine Trumps fate. This will never be fair with a biased judge. He must recuse. WTH is wrong with Ts attorneys???

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

TRUMP'S NO-JURY TRIAL: Fair or Flawed? Are you aware there will be no jury in Trump’s fraud case? Judge Arthur Engoron is solely in charge of the verdict. Trump voiced his frustration: "This witch hunt does not allow me a hearing. That can't be possible [because] somebody…

Video Transcript AI Summary

In the United States, it's unusual that we don't have a jury, which I find unfair. However, I need to address a misconception in the press. We didn't have the option to choose a jury, contrary to what's being repeated. Personally, I believe juries often make mistakes, but I have a tool called "judgment notwithstanding the verdict" to handle those situations. I can declare that a reasonable jury would never have reached that conclusion.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

I was going to come out and say that, as you know, we're not entitled to a jury, which is pretty unusual in the United States of America. So I think it's very unfair that I don't have a jury. But I have to address this one common misconception in the press. And unfortunately, it just keeps getting repeated, which is that we had this great option to have a box checked for a jury. No, we didn't have that. That's not how this works. Something controversial. Even though I'm being taped, juries get it wrong a lot. That's my own opinion. But I've had situations where, like, oh, my, my, heaven's sake. How could they have thought that? Well, I have a, I have a tool that I can deal with that. It's called jury notwithstanding the verdict, judgment notwithstanding the verdict. I can say there is no possible way that a reasonable jury would have reached that conclusion.

@SaltyGoat17 — SaltyGoat

Posted - October 21, 2023 at 9:11 PM

Saved - October 21, 2023 at 9:24 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The judge in Trump's NY case, who valued Mar-A-Largo at $18M, has a God Complex. He dismisses juries, makes things up based on hearsay. The silver lining? The appeal will be simple. Trump2024. And yes, this judge deserves strong criticism.

@SaltyGoat17 - SaltyGoat

Oh y'all gotta see this!!! THIS👇🏽is the judge presiding over Trump's NY case... Ya know... the one they valued Mar-A-Largo at $18M!!🙄 Anyway, take a listen to him speak. He literally... Has a God Complex like I've never seen Apparently sees no use for juries in this country Just makes shit up as he goes along based on hearsay Well there is one good thing about having this moron as the judge... The appeal will be ASTONISHINGLY SIMPLE!!! 🇺🇸🔥Trump2024🔥🇺🇸 Oh ya... And FUCK THIS GUY!!!🖕🏽

Video Transcript AI Summary

Juries often make mistakes, in my opinion. As a civil trial judge, I have a tool called "jury notwithstanding the verdict judgment" to address this. It allows me to question if a reasonable jury would have reached the same conclusion. However, it's challenging to separate my emotions from the process. Sometimes, someone may argue that a case is similar to another, but I have to consider even minor differences, like the color of clothing. In the past, I worked briefly as a journalist and faced criticism for reporting on Ku Klux Klan murders. People questioned my credibility since I wasn't present, but that was the general belief at the time.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Juries get it wrong a lot. That's my own opinion. I do only civil trials. Well, I have a I have a tool that I can deal with. It's called jury notwithstanding the verdict judgment notwithstanding the verdict. I can say there is no possible way that a reasonable jury would have reached that conclusion. And alright, am I following the law or am I making law? But it's hard to factor out my own emotions. And I have tools. Somebody can say, well, your honor, you have to throw out this case because it's just like another case. Well, is it just like another case? What if the defendant was wearing a red sweater instead of a blue sweater? And by the way, I worked for the Columbia Daily Spectator for a couple of weeks, and I wrote a few stories. 1 I got criticized on because I wrote that some Ku Klux Klaners had murdered some people. And and I was told, you can't say that. How do we know? You aren't there. Well, that was what everybody thought.

@CollinRugg — Collin Rugg

Posted - November 7, 2023 at 12:22 AM

Saved - November 7, 2023 at 11:40 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Donald Trump presented a paper in court to clear himself of wrongdoing in a fraud case, but the judge refused to let him read it. Trump argued that a disclaimer clause protected him from inaccuracies. Some Twitter users criticized the court proceedings, suggesting they aimed to influence voters. Others mentioned alleged irregularities in the election. One user mentioned the significance of bellwether states in verifying election results.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

REPORT: Donald Trump reportedly pulled out a piece of paper from his suit jacket in court, claiming it would clear him of all wrongdoing in the $250M fraud case. Left-wing Judge Arthur Engoron refused to let him read it. The paper in question reportedly was a disclaimer clause relating to a financial statement that AG Letitia James is using to go after him. "I would love to read this, Your Honor, if I could?" Trump reportedly asked the judge. "Not at this point, not at this point," Engoron replied. "I’m shocked," Trump shot back. The disclaimer clause, according to Trump, meant that he wasn't liable for any inaccuracies on the documents. "I think that the statements of financial conditions were very good, were actually somewhat conservative, and they were totally protected, and so was I, by the disclaimer clause," Trump argued. Kangaroo Court.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker believes the case is a scam and should be dismissed immediately. They claim that the court is the fraudster and made references to undervalued assets. They express frustration with the lengthy process and compare it to the urgent issues happening in the world. The speaker highlights the lack of credibility of the star witness and asserts that everything they did was right. They find it disgraceful to be sued while there are more pressing problems in the country. The speaker mentions negative public sentiment towards the situation and concludes that it is a sad day for America.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I think it went very well. I think you were there, and you listened, and you see what a scam this is. This is a case that you have never been brought. It's a case that should be dismissed immediately. The fraud was on behalf of the court. The court was, the fraudster in this case. They made references to assets that were very valuable. And they said, they had no idea. They had no idea what the numbers were when they said $18,000,000 for Marlava, and it's 50 to a 100 times that amount of any estimation. It's a terrible thing that's happened here. We're taking days and days and weeks weeks, and it goes on. And then you look at the outside world and what's happening, but, of course, they're getting the wish because that I don't have to be here for the most part, but I certainly do have to be here because I wanna be here. This is a scam, and this is a case that have never been brought, and it's a case that now should be dismissed. Everybody saw what happened today. Everybody saw what happened with their star witness who admitted that. I never told him what he originally said I did. He admitted that he lied, and he has absolutely no credibility whatsoever. That's their only witness. That's their only witness. And I think you saw what I had to say today, and it was very inclusive. Everything we did was absolutely right. To think that we're being sued and spending all this time and money and yet people being killed all over the world that this country to stop. With inflation and all of the other problems that this country has, I think it's a disgrace. And when you look at the numbers, the phone numbers that came out today from The New York Times and CBS, I'm sure The Times was not too happy. That people are sick and tired of what's happening. This is a sad I think it's a very sad day for America.

@followed_ByBots - TheAbeFroman

@CollinRugg Absolute kangaroo court. The goal is not conviction. The goal is to influence voters. Election interference.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

@followed_ByBots It's not ironic that Trump got hit with countless different felony charges and civil suits all at the same time.

@KevinMNelsonUSA - Kevin M. Nelson

@CollinRugg @followed_ByBots Almost as simultaneous as 5 states “randomly” stopping the vote count late at night when Trump was ahead.

@HTop75 - Ms.Adams

@KevinMNelsonUSA @CollinRugg @followed_ByBots The Bellwether state exist as a confirmation of a clean election. Biden only Won one bellwether state. The Founders were very diligent about verifying.

@LauraLoomer — Laura Loomer

Posted - November 8, 2023 at 7:52 PM

Saved - November 9, 2023 at 12:37 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

In a recent episode of my show, I exposed Judge Arthur Engoron's unethical behavior. He used his personal newsletter to attack President Trump and showed bias in the NYC civil fraud trial. The contact number on court documents matches the one on his newsletter, confirming his partisan activities. This calls for a mistrial.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

MUST WATCH: EXCLUSIVE: Last night LIVE on my show @LoomerUnleashed, I called Leftist NYC Judge Arthur #Engoron to prove that the number on his personal newsletter, “The Wheatley School Alumni Association newsletter”, in which he actively attacks President Trump and makes reference to Trump’s trail at least 17 times from what I have counted during my investigation, is the same number listed as his contact number on court documents in President Trump’s NYC Civil Fraud case. These documents contain the official letterhead of New York Attorney General @TishJames. This is a clear ethical violation that proves Judge Engoron is engaged in partisan activities that have prevented him from being IMPARTIAL in President Trump’s NYC civil fraud trial. There needs to be an immediate MISTRIAL!

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses Arthur Angarron, a Wheely alum from the Class of 1967, who is accused of violating his ethical code of conduct. It is revealed that Angarron uses the same contact number on his personal anti-Trump newsletter, which he presents as an alumni association newsletter. The speaker calls the number live on air and leaves a message inviting Angarron to come on the show. They also mention that the number is publicly available on Angarron's newsletter and is the same number linked to his office in the New York State court system. The speaker suggests that Angarron's actions contradict his claim of being a free speech absolutist and calls for a formal complaint against him.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Here we go. Arthur Angarron. Right? Class of 1967, Wheely alum Arthur Angarron. And the number, okay, check this out. The number at the bottom this is another thing that proves he is in total violation of his ethical code of conduct. The number at the bottom, that is the same exact number that shows up on the website as his contact number for, for how you can reach him, as as an officer of the court within the New York state court system. Speaker 1: That's correct. Speaker 0: So he's using the same contact information on this anti Trump newsletter, which is his personal newsletter, which he pretends is an alumni association newsletter to skirt around the fact that he's in violation of his ethical code of conduct, and yet look. That number can we get a full screen of his, And and, Gary, if you wanna text it too because this is live, of course, and we're doing this in real time, and this is how people can see. People are always like, oh, how does your mind work, Laura? How do we're gonna call this number right now live on the show. Can you hear the phone ringing? 1st 1, if you can hear the phone ringing, you guys. You can hear the you could hear the phone ringing. Press 1. We're calling it live right now. Speaker 1: I hear it. I Hi. You've reached Arthur and Goran. Thanks for calling. Please leave me a message after the beep, and I'll get back to you just as soon as I can. Bye bye. Speaker 2: At the tone, please record your message. When you've finished recording, you may hang up, or press 1 for more options. Speaker 0: Hi, judge Engeron. This is, Laura Loomer, investigative journalist. I'm live on my show right now, and we're calling you because, you know, we're looking at your newsletter, the Wheatley School Alumni Association letter, number 91, in which you say that, that you're a free speech absolutist, and that you're opposed to censoring, and you just won't do it. And so, yeah, you recently issued a gag order against president Donald Trump and a gag order against his legal team. And so I just wanted to take this opportunity to invite you to come on my show. I would like to interview you. It seems like you have no problem sharing your opinions because, that's what you do every time you post in the Wheatley School Alumni Association newsletter. And so I wanna give you the opportunity to Blaine, how you reconcile being a free speech absolutist with issuing a gag order against president Donald Trump and, his legal team. So, again, if you wanna contact me, you can just call on this number, that, that we called you on from my studio. This is our phone, from from the production room, it's 772 to make it easier for you. 772-634-3560. That's 77263 for, 3560. Again, my name is Laura Loomer, investigative journalist, and I I just wanna invite you to come on Loomer Unleashed. Okay? So, give me a call, and I'll talk to you soon. Speaker 2: If you're satisfied with the message, press 1. To listen to your to send your message with normal deliver thank you. Your message has been sent. Speaker 0: Great. So we sent that message. Let's go back to the chat now. Speaker 1: She was girlfriend's gonna call you back. Speaker 0: You guys heard it yourself. Alright? So that's his number. That's the number on his newsletter that also connects to his office within the New York State court system. And if we pull up this full screen graphic as well, if you wanna go type in Arthur Engeron, I guess it would be, what, New York, New York, Supreme Court. Right? New York Supreme Court Arthur Engeron contact if you go on Google or something. And you can see it's the same exact number. Let's see what people in the chat are saying before we do that, though. I wanna I wanna see some of your questions, but that was his phone number, you guys. We just called him live on air. Okay, and that's the number publicly. We're not doxing. That number is on the Wheatley, School Association. You could call that number yourself as well. Tell him he's gotta come on Loomer Unleashed and answer these questions, but but we're not doxing here. That number's public on his newsletter. It's the same number we found through our investigation, okay, that links to his office at the New York State Court, which is total violation because as we saw, if you wanna pull up the, pull up the ethics again, if we still have that, pull up part 1 again, go back to the screen, that we had up earlier that had, the the ethical code of conduct of UCAN. Extrajudicial activities. Okay. Section 100.4, a judge of the New York court's .gov website code of conduct. A judge shall so conduct the judge's extrajudicial activities as to minimize the risk of conflict with judicial obligations. Extrajudicial activities in general, a judge shall conduct all of the judges extrajudicial activities so that they do not one. Cast reasonable doubt on the judge's capacity to act impartially as a judge. Well, as I just showed you, okay, we have we have reasonable doubt on this judge's ability to be honest because he said that he's a free speech absolutist. And, clearly, he's not a free speech absolutist because he just issued a gag order against Donald Trump and his legal team. And the number on these newsletters in which he's making anti second comments, anti Trump comments over 17 in these newsletters. Seventeen links to active Trump trials. While these trials are still taking place, he needs to be recused. A formal complaint needs to be made against judge Engeron, citing section 100.4. 100.4 is the section of you wanna file an official complaint against Arthur Engeron

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

EXCLUSIVE: Anti-Trump NYC Judge Arthur Engoron, who issued a GAG ORDER against President Trump so that he couldn’t defend himself during his Civil Fraud trial, which is still ongoing, described himself as a “free speech absolutist” in January of 2023. Talk about HYPOCRISY! For the last several weeks, I have archived and reviewed all of Judge Arthur Engoron’s personal writings and activities, and I have been documenting his ethics violations, hypocrisy, and his poor parenting as an absentee father. Engoron is the communist judge who is overseeing President Trump’s civil fraud trial in NYC. I’ll be releasing my extensive reports on Engoron this week. But this gem was too good to not share with all of you now. I’ve been saving it, but figured I’d release it today… Especially after Engoron tried silencing President Trump from the stand yesterday when President Trump was testifying. How can Judge Engoron issue a Gag Order against President Trump and then also proclaim himself to be a “free speech absolutist”? Seems like a conflict.

@Ann_Lilyflower — 🕊 𝓐𝓷𝓷 𝓲𝓼 𝓡𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽 🕊 𝐗𝐋𝐕

Posted - November 14, 2023 at 4:47 PM

Saved - November 15, 2023 at 11:18 PM

@Ann_Lilyflower - 🕊 𝓐𝓷𝓷 𝓲𝓼 𝓡𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽 🕊 𝐗𝐋𝐕

Judge Engoron should be immediately disbarred and removed as a judge. He violated his oath as a judge. Judges r not above the law. https://t.co/0K88e278pS

Video Transcript AI Summary

Congresswoman Elise Stefanik wrote a letter to the Judicial Conduct Commission about Judge Engeron's behavior during the trial of Donald Trump. She accuses the judge of displaying bias against Trump and making prejudiced statements. Stefanik highlights that the judge entered summary judgment against Trump before the trial began and refused to listen to his defense. She also points out that the judge is a partisan Democrat who donated to the Manhattan Democrats, which violates the judicial code. Stefanik argues that if the judge can mistreat a billionaire businessman and former president, he poses a risk to all Americans. She expresses frustration that society and the media are allowing this to happen, indicating a decline in standards and a lack of accountability.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: An amazing, beautiful thing happened. I'm not often moved by a letter, but I was today by the letter that Congresswoman Elise Stefanik wrote to the Judicial Conduct Commission about the behavior of that crazy judge, Judge Engeron, who was presiding over the fake fraud trial of Donald Trump. The guy even looks like a clown. Right? Bozo the clown, purple shirt, crazy hair. I'm sorry, it is getting a little bit personal. But thank God there are people out there like Elise Stefanik, who doesn't just moan about things on Twitter, actually tries to get this guy removed from the case by creating a logical, ethical, 100% applicable letter outlining this guy's abuse, abuse of the system. And he's going after Trump because he doesn't like Trump. And she proves it. So she wrote this letter. I wanna go through it because it's beautiful, but it's sad at the same time. Right? Let's focus on the beautiful part. This judge's behavior has no place in our system. The judicial system is being politicized to affect the outcome of the campaign. Judge Engeron has displayed a clear judicial bias against the defendant. Last year, judge Engeron told president Trump's attorney that the former president is just a bad guy. Judge Engeron entered summary judgment against the defendant before the trial even began without witnesses, other evidence, and cross examination. Trump paid back the sophisticated Wall Street banks on time in full with interest as agreed. Did you know this part? These banks and insurance companies supposedly defrauded continued to do business with the defendant. Yeah. With Donald Trump. Yet, Angarron judge Angarron decreed before the trial that the defendant somehow committed fraud. Judge Angarron told the defendant, we are not here to listen to what you have to say, he told the defendant's counsel. I am not here to hear what he has to say. Now sit down. Judge Engeron and his staff are partisan Democrats. Judge Engeron donated to the Manhattan Democrats. Section 100.5 of the judicial code says that judges shall refrain from making a political contribution to an organization. Judge Engeron has gone on to gag and fine president Trump for merely criticizing judge Engeron's law clerk, which is core political speech protected by the first amendment. Tagaga defended is un American. And then there's this. There was a an expert witness and they asked him, hey, who would buy something like Mar a Lago? Who could possibly buy it? This happened in earlier testimony. Here's what the guy said. The expert, I could dream up anyone from Elon Musk to Bill Gates and everyone in between. Kings, emperors, heads of state, but with net worths in the multiple billions. He was asked a question. Who could buy this place? The judge dismissed the testimony like this. Obviously, this court cannot consider an expert affidavit that is based on unexplained and unsubstantiated dreams. This guy is totally out of touch, totally out to get yeah. Like this. Judge Engeron's disdain for president Trump and his politics are evident. If judge Engeron can railroad a billionaire New York businessman, a former president of the United States, and the leading presidential candidate. Just imagine what he could do to all New Yorkers. And in another jurisdiction, all Americans. We are all at risk here. And society is not stopping it. Society is going along with it. That's why I say this is a very beautiful letter from a brilliant woman, the congresswoman. But it's also very sad because it reflects that this is happening and nobody can really do much of anything about it. The media are letting it happen. The judicial system letting it happen. But that's where the culture is. It's in a freefall. You know, we're supposed to have standards that are universally applied. But they're not. And things are crazy.

@Travis_in_Flint — 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸

Posted - December 15, 2023 at 7:53 PM

Saved - December 15, 2023 at 9:08 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Letitia James claimed Donald Trump committed fraud, but the reality doesn't support her assessment. The case was civil, not criminal, and the bank executives testified they didn't rely on the financial statements. The Judge, clerk, and AG showed bias, making this a case of political targeting. It raises concerns about justice and potential consequences for others.

@Travis_in_Flint - 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸

Today Letitia James posted on X about how Donald Trump committed years of fraud and how she proved it with the trial. The reality doesn’t agree with her assessment and she should be disbarred at a minimum. In truth, she had to bring a civil case, not a criminal one. Secondly, the bank executives who she claimed were victims testified that they didn’t use the financial statements when giving Donald Trump the loans. Also, the Judge, his clerk, and the AG all showed extreme bias outside and inside of the courtroom. This case will stand as an example of political targeting in the worst way. These people will be remembered in history as the scumbags they truly are. How can anyone in good conscience support this travesty of justice? If they can go after the former President of the United States and leading GOP candidate, what do you think they’ll do to you?

@mrddmia — 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

Posted - January 17, 2024 at 9:02 PM

Saved - January 18, 2024 at 8:50 PM

@mrddmia - 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

🚨 Looks like Jean Carroll illegally destroyed evidence in her latest bogus case against Trump. https://t.co/vF8ixCMp4z

@greg_price11 — Greg Price

Posted - January 25, 2024 at 7:48 PM

Saved - August 30, 2025 at 12:20 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I want to remind everyone that E. Jean Carroll once said on CNN that "rape is sexy," and her accusation against Trump resembles a plot from a 2012 Law & Order SVU episode. When questioned, she claimed it was a coincidence, and her lawyers sought to instruct jurors about the episode's existence.

@greg_price11 - Greg Price

I just want to remind everyone that in addition to once saying on CNN that "rape is sexy," E. Jean Carroll's accusation against Trump is an exact plot line from a 2012 Law & Order SVU episode. She claimed that this was a complete coincidence when asked about it. Her lawyers also tried to get the judge to instruct jurors that there's no evidence in the record that the episode "actually exists."

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 recalls a scene set in a public place where one moment was plain and not the other person’s fantasy, describing it as his own. He notes that 'World play' occurred in the dressing room of Bergdorf, where the woman was trying on lingerie and he would burst in. The exchange pauses for a moment as he confirms details: 'When did you and she have your date?' The answer is approximately six weeks ago, 'Six weeks ago, maybe,' followed by, 'She wrote.' The account centers on a private, intimate moment in Bergdorf dressing room tied to a date roughly six weeks prior, ending with an incomplete remark from the other person.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: In a public place. Yes. There was one a bit plain, and it was not her fantasy. It was mine. K. Yeah. World play took place in the dressing room of Bergdorf. While she was trying on lingerie, I would burst in. Hold on. Mhmm. When did you and she have your date? Six weeks ago, maybe. She wrote

@thevivafrei — Viva Frei

Posted - January 27, 2024 at 2:16 AM

Saved - January 27, 2024 at 9:21 AM

@thevivafrei - Viva Frei

The E. Jean Carroll verdict is PURE BULLSHIT coming from a pure BAT SHIT CRAZY LUNATIC in a pure BAT SHIT CRAZY & CORRUPT JURISDICTION. Everyone knows it. Call this shit out already.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses the verdict in the E Jean Carroll defamation case against Donald Trump. They criticize the outcome, calling it unjust and politically motivated. They highlight Carroll's lack of evidence and questionable motives. The speaker also criticizes the media's biased coverage of the trial and expresses concern about the corrupt judicial system. They argue that this case sets a dangerous precedent for using the court system as a political tool. The speaker concludes by urging people to be aware of the potential consequences and to protect themselves.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Alright. I wasn't going to do a vlog today, but, the news broke. The verdict in the E Jean Carroll second defamation case. If anybody thinks this is justice, you are idiots, pure and simple. If anybody likes this just because of the political consequences, you are scoundrels, pure and simple. E Jean Carroll, the woman who is, in my humble view, batshit crazy, names her cat after a venereal disease, vagina t fireball, fabricates a story out of whole cloth that occurred two and a half decades ago, has no physical evidence of it, says that she would not file charges for the assault, because when you listen to her justification, it's gonna blow your mind and you're gonna realize you're dealing with a crazy person. Speaker 1: Would you consider, bringing a a rape charge against Donald Trump for this? Speaker 0: Why not? Speaker 2: I would find it disrespectful To the women who are down on the border, who are being raped around the clock down there. But for the women down there and for the women, actually, Speaker 0: Around the world. Says she's not gonna file criminal charges, but sues Donald Trump civilly in New York, possibly one of the most corrupt jurisdictions in the world, wins in the first trial, and then sues for defamation in the second trial because Trump took to truth social to post how she's Crazy how he never met her before, how the story is a total lie, and she sues it for defamation again. Oh, yeah. I forgot to say after the first jury found that Trump did not rape her in the Bergdorf changing room two and a half decades ago, but sexually assaulted her, such that when he denied it, it was defamation and awarded her damages for the alleged assault and the defamation, and then she sued him a second time when he continued to deny it and protest his innocence. They had a trial. And when I say that the mainstream media is the enemy of the people, it's only because they are the enemy of the people. He had a trial in which the guilt was already a foregone conclusion. And quite literally, the trial was only to adjudicate on how much he would have to pay her, and that amount came down today. But before we get there, NBC News was reporting that Trump, testified, and he testified briefly. The headline reads, Trump testifies briefly in the trial. And then it's only when you go into the article and read why he testified briefly that you realize The system is corrupt, the media is corrupt, and they are the enemy of the people. He testified briefly because the judge largely restricted what Trump could say in his own defense in court. So you head into a trial in which your guilt is already determined only to adjudicate on the damage in which you are limited in what you can say in your own defense in which the judge literally says you cannot say certain things include protesting your innocence, and then you come down with a jury verdict. And, oh my goodness, watching a journalist from NBC News in real time waiting for the news, announcing the news with orgiastic glee, Like, the winning lottery numbers of this political lottery just came down, and she's reading it in real time. $83,300,000 awarded to bat Shit crazy. E Jean Carroll. I think it's, like, 7 a half 1000000 compensatory damages. 11,000,000 to, like, this, defamation rehabilitation program. I don't know what that is exactly. And $65,000,000 in punitive damages, which from what I understand, would survive bankruptcy, not that Trump's gonna go bankrupt anyhow. Not that I think these judgment verdicts are gonna stand after appeal. In any event, $83,300,000. And this NBC journalist is like, oh, that's not as much as they wanted, but nothing to what did she say bad enough? I forget what she said. It's idiotic. You just gotta watch it. Speaker 3: We do have a verdict. E Jean Carroll did suffer more than nominal damages as a result of mister Trump's publication of these two June 2019 statements. The first amount for compensatory damages for her emotional pain and anguish is 7,300,000. The amount For the compensatory damages for the Reputation Repair Program is $11,000,000. We're now moving on to the questions about whether Trump Active with malice. Remember, the questions have to be answered in the affirmative to get to a question of punitive damages. It's yeah. We are still waiting for that answer. As you wait for those Speaker 2: answers that Speaker 3: mister Trump acting with malice. I'm sorry. Mister Trump acting with malice in making the first of those statements. That's the June 21, 2019 statement at 5:17 PM in which he denied it for the first time. And Similarly, we are waiting to hear weather and making that yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Oh. In June 22, 2019, he did also act maliciously or out of hatred or ill will in defaming her on that day. And here comes punitive damages award of $65,000,000 Alicia. Yes. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. Speaker 3: So $65,000,000 in punitives, $11,000,000 in the Reputation Repair Program, and $7,300,000 in I'm sorry. And the emotional harm for a total of $83,300,000. That's a high eight Figure award. I had predicted we'd be high 8 figures or early a 100,000,000, certainly less money, I think, that E Jean Carroll's lawyers had hoped. But $83,300,000 is nothing to sneeze up. Speaker 0: And people take Twitter to rejoice in this decision, to celebrate in this verdict. You got Jen Psaki who was once upon a time literally the propagandist for the government now turned MSM propagandist mouthpiece for the government saying, oh my goodness. This is justice. The only question is gonna be, I don't know. It's idiotic. You can see the tweets for yourself. People rejoicing in this are scoundrels or mourns. Pure and simple. This is literally kangaroo court Banana Republic level madness where they can find a bat Shit crazy person. And by the way, everybody in the media knows that she's batshit crazy. I'll play to you a compilation, a montage put together by Gravian. Everybody knows this woman is batshit crazy, but she's an easy tool for the media to exploit. Anderson Cooper. I dare Anderson Cooper not to say pokey. He thinks this woman is crazier than a loon. Speaker 2: And it was all fairly playful. Oh, it was charming. It was excite remember what Donald Trump was like in 95, 96? On the counter were these fancy lingerie boxes that they used to have back in the nineties? Yeah. You wore lingerie in the nineties. I'll bet you I But he didn't suggest that he shouted it. He Lingerie. Lingerie. He may have shouted underwear. I Yep. You know? Okay. Speaker 1: Were you scared? Were you Speaker 2: No. I'm too angry? I was too panicked to be scared. Speaker 1: Too panicked to be You're okay. Speaker 2: Totally. And I put my life on the line. Do you think that you're go well, hold on a second. What do you mean you put your life on the line? Well, people have told me I have to be careful. You've gotten death threats. I am not looking at death threats. I have the idea That I'm gonna make him put it on over his pants. That was my idea. Mhmm. You see how funny that would be to They can put that on. I guess my question is is could there be any DNA on there? Idea. I do not know If the president ejaculated. Have no idea. Lawrence, I wish I had said I wish. I said, I'll tell you my age if you show me your tax returns. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Yeah. It would have been it would have been up Speaker 2: in that. Well, so I'm holding my handbag like The the only reason I know I'm holding my handbag is because I discovered it in my hand when I got to the street. Speaker 1: The statement that he said, which he's just made, which is she's not my type number. Well, that was the number one thing. Speaker 2: Love that I'm not his type. I'm an archer. I have bows and arrows. You know? Yeah. Fine. I think they're just too never mind. Never mind. Speaker 1: I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent Assault. It is not a sexual assault. Speaker 2: I think most people think of rape as being sexy. Speaker 1: Let's take a short break. Speaker 2: Think of the fantasies. Speaker 1: We've just gotta take a quick break. If you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side. Speaker 2: You're fascinating to talk to. Speaker 0: They will use her and exploit her for all their political purposes. They can put her in front of a jury in New York. They would convict a hand sandwich if you told them it republican, and this really illustrates how historically, back in eras that were governed by prejudice, you could go to any jurisdiction that was deeply racist, deeply prejudiced. Find anybody to level any charges against a specific person or a group of person, and you knew that you would find a jury to convict just based on prejudices. Racial prejudices of decades ago has now been replaced with political prejudices of today, and it's just as broken a system. So anybody celebrating this, we know how you would have been ruling on verdicts back in the day. 83 point $3,000,000 to E. Jean Carroll, $65,000,000 punitive damages. And from what I understand, Trump is going to appeal. But from what I understand, he would nonetheless have to put up $83,300,000 in court pending his appeal or get a bond and secure a portion of that, pay interest on the loan or whatever in order to post that pending appeal. This is how the government seizes private property, uses lawfare In order to target, find an individual, fabricate a crime, and then basically steal the assets of that individual. You see it happening in New York under Alvin Bragg. You see it happening in New York under Leticia James. You see it happening in New York under this judge, Kaplan. In this case, it is plain. It's in your face, and this is how empires Oh, you think this ends at Trump? Anybody in New York should flee New York. You think now it's gonna be limited to politics. If you are politically unfavored, If you are just socially disfavored, they will do it to you because they're getting away with it now. They started with these bogus guilty before the trial verdicts with Alex Jones. They did it to Donald Trump in the Judge Angra and Leticia James case. They did it to him here, and they just issue awards like confetti. Outrageous, insane monetary awards for damages that nobody has sustained. 7 and a half $1,000,000 reputational damages? I'm sorry. No way. $65,000,000 in punitive damages. Just something that you know will survive a bankruptcy so that you know he'll have to pay it. If this does not get overturned in appeal, at some point, the judicial system is gone. Pack up your bike, get out of New York, and find a that is not totally corrupt to the core. And just one thing that I found particularly interesting because as I was looking into this, I found an article which by the headline referred to E. Jean Carroll as Jewish American columnist, E Jean Carroll sued Donald Trump for alleged rape. And I was like, oh, well, that's a very bizarre headline for this article. And I click on it, and the article itself only refers to E Jean Carroll as a columnist. The article is from the Jerusalem Post from 2019, and I noticed that it happened to have been updated in January 2024, 5 years after the article was first published, four and a half, 5 years later, and I had to go back to the way back machine and just make I'm not going crazy. And for some reason, and I can think of 2 possibilities. The Jerusalem Post, which once upon a time took Pride in identifying E Jean Carroll as a Jewish American journalist maybe now is not quite so proud of this batshit crazy lady who secured a ridiculous decision out of New York. There might be other reasons even more nefarious. I won't go there. I just thought it was very curious. But the bottom line, this is a joke, but it's not funny. It's a bloody tragedy, and it's showing how the court system can be used as political tools. This is nothing shy of election interference, full stop. E Jean Carroll exploits a newly amended law which extended the statute of limitations for civil claims for such alleged conduct. She had a pivotal role in lobbying for that legislative change. She then exploits that being funded by highly political financiers to take this case to a politically partisan hack corrupt state like New York so that she could get a verdict, so that they could run the headlines that Trump is a rapist, so that they can then get ridiculous damages on alleged defamation for a man merely protesting his innocence, saying she's crazy. I never even met her. This is communist level crap. And if you don't understand it, you are part of the problem at this point in time. That is the latest. It's bullcrap. It's gonna go to appeal. If it doesn't get turned over in appeal, Get out of New York, find a state where you might be better protected, and make sure to protect yourself nonetheless because they're gonna come for everybody. This is going to be the go to tool to bankrupt people, to destroy people, and more importantly to silence people. Alright, people. Now I gotta go eat dinner. Now you know your vlog. Peace out.

@amuse — @amuse

Posted - January 28, 2024 at 9:54 PM

Saved - January 30, 2024 at 7:32 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The judge in the Carroll v Trump trial had a conflict of interest as he was Carroll's mentor, which raises questions about bias. Trump's lawyers claim this was undisclosed and should have been mentioned. It remains to be seen if this allegation is true.

@amuse - @amuse

WTH? The entire Carroll v Trump trial seemed completely biased. Now we know why. The judge was Carroll's mentor. Why didn't he mention this total conflict of interest. He should have recused himself.

@amuse - @amuse

‘Insane’: Trump lawyers cite undisclosed ‘conflict of interest’ between judge, Carroll’s attorney. https://bizpacreview.com/2024/01/28/insane-trump-lawyers-cite-undisclosed-conflict-of-interest-between-judge-carrolls-attorney-1431676/

‘Insane’: Trump lawyers cite undisclosed ‘conflict of interest’ between judge, Carroll’s attorney E. Jean Carroll should probably wait to start counting the $83 million she was awarded in her defamation suit against Donald Trump. On Saturday, the former president’s […] bizpacreview.com

@amuse - @amuse

OFFICIAL: Trump filling, "defense counsel learned for the first time of allegations that Your Honor, while a partner at the Paul Weiss firm, had a “mentor” type relationship with Plaintiff’s lead counsel, Roberta Kaplan". Could this be true?

@thevivafrei — Viva Frei

Posted - January 29, 2024 at 9:35 PM

Saved - January 30, 2024 at 6:44 AM

@thevivafrei - Viva Frei

How can Judge Kaplan actually say "the fact that Mr. Trump sexually abused - 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗲𝗱, 𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗱 - Ms. Carroll has been conclusively established”, [emphasis added], whereas the jury verdict form literally says the opposite? Kaplan needs to be impeached YESTERDAY. This is absolutely insane.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 25, 2024 at 2:31 PM

Saved - February 26, 2024 at 1:02 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled that Donald Trump was guilty of raping E. Jean Carroll, but the same judge dismissed Prince Andrew's case where he was accused of raping underage girl Virginia Giuffre on Jeffrey Epstein's island. The corruption and double standards are mind-blowing. Giuffre alleges that she met Andrew through Epstein and his girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. Epstein and Giuffre settled a civil lawsuit for $500,000 in 2009. It's shocking how Prince Andrew gets a pass while Trump is persecuted based on vague details. The case against Andrew was dismissed without going to trial, while Trump paid a settlement of $83,300,000. The level of corruption is unbelievable.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This Is Going To Blow Your Mind 🚨 Judge Lewis Kaplan Ruled Donald Trump Was Guilty Of Raping E. Jean Carroll This SAME JUDGE Dismissed Prince Andrew’s Case Where He Was Accused Of Raping Underage Girl Virginia Giuffre On Jeffrey Epstein Island This Judge Formally Dismissed All Sexual Abuse Charges With A Nice Sealed Settlement & No Prison Time So Child Rapist Prince Andrew Gets A Pass But Donald Trump Gets Persecuted By Someone Who Can’t Even Remember What Year The Crime Happened Or Any Key Details? “Giuffre alleges she met Andrew through the late sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein, and his sometime girlfriend, the convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell.” More proof of the underage sexual abuse comes with “In 2009, Epstein and Giuffre settled a civil lawsuit for $500,000. Giuffre accused Epstein of trafficking her to Andrew.” The corruption is just mind blowing. “— Jeffrey and Andrew reached and I was sometimes so the case was dismissed by the party stipulation of March 2022 without going to trial. Prince Andrew. So let me get this straight. This case, read the top. Federal Court Virginia, you know who Virginia, uh, uh, drew from me. We just talked about the rest. The girl from Epstein Island. From Epstein Island. Second son of Wow. Sexual assault under court, uh, several, uh, sexual encounters with Andrew in the early 2000 at the age of 17 after being sex trafficked by American financier and convicted by sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, dismissed without going to trial. Yet Trump's $83,300,000. Wow. Wow. What a freaking fine. Great fine. That is insane. All you gotta do is dig”

Video Transcript AI Summary

I found a case involving Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre, related to Epstein Island. The case was dismissed in March 2022 without going to trial. Giuffre accused Andrew of sexual assault when she was 17. Despite the serious allegations, the case was closed. This discovery is shocking and worth investigating further.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Oh my god. Check this out. Watch this out. Watch this out. Watch this out. I'm so sorry to interrupt. Okay. Go to other cases he's worked on. Go to go lower. Go lower. Go lower. Go lower. Go lower. Go up a little bit. Right there. Right there. Right there. Right there. Right there. Hang on. Hang on. Right there. You will not even believe what I just found. Look at the case you worked on. Look for, all the way in the bottom of miscellaneous, second line. Missoul 2021, 2022. He was capital was presiding judge on matter relating towards Virginia Giuffre and Prince Andrew. Click on that on search. Watch what happens. You know what happens to the case? Click on the just click on that's the one. Click right there. Zoom in, and just go to the top. Yeah. The Jeffrey and Andrew reached, and case was dismissed by the party stipulation of March 2022 without going to trial. Prince Andrew. So let me get this straight. This case, read the top, federal court Virginia. You know who Virginia, drew for I mean, we just talked about the right girl from Epstein Island. From Epstein Island. Second son of Wow. Sexual assault under court, several, sexual encounters with Andrew in the early 2000 at the age of 17 after being sex trafficked by American financier and convicted by sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, dismissed without going to trial. Yet Trump's 83,300,000. Wow. Wow. What a freaking fine. Great fine. That is insane. All you gotta do all you gotta do is dig.

@mrddmia — 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

Posted - April 18, 2024 at 8:08 PM

Saved - April 18, 2024 at 8:17 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Judge Juan Merchan's jury selection process is being criticized for being rigged and biased, as left-wing activists are being allowed to be seated on President Trump's jury. This raises concerns about a fair trial. The author expresses gratitude to @gregkellyusa for the opportunity to discuss this matter.

@mrddmia - 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

Judge Juan Merchan is conducting a clearly rigged jury selection process and ensuring President Trump will not receive a fair trial by allowing left-wing activists to be seated on his jury. There is little doubt this biased New York jury will absolutely find Trump guilty for these non-felonies, and partisan operative Judge Merchan will convict him. Thanks to @gregkellyusa for having me.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Mike Davis, a former clerk to Neil Gorsuch, discusses the biased jury selection and unfair treatment of Trump in court. The judge, with ties to Biden, is accused of rigging the process against Trump. Davis highlights the lack of balance in juror questioning and the presence of anti-Trump activists on the jury. He suggests that Trump's legal team will appeal any convictions, but the goal is to damage Trump before the 2024 election. Davis also criticizes the involvement of Matthew Colangelo, a former Biden appointee, in targeting Trump. The situation is described as unfair and politically motivated.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You're listening to The Greg Kelly Show. Speaker 1: Well, we're joined by Mike Davis. I was just telling you about this guy. He's totally awesome. Very successful lawyer. He was a clerk to, Neil Gorsuch, now a supreme court justice, and he is from the article 3 project. He actually started the whole thing. Mike Davis, welcome. How are you? Speaker 0: I'm doing well. Thank you for having me. Speaker 1: Mike, what do you make of the what do you make of what's going on in the courtroom and the jury selection and, the problems they're having right now, in this farce against Trump? Speaker 0: Well, you have the Soros Fund at Manhattan, DA, Alvin, Brad. We're going to these bogus criminal indictments against a former President of the United States who has happens to be the leading presidential candidate based upon a bogus legal theory passed over by the prior Manhattan DA Cy Vance, the Manhattan US Attorney, the Federal Election Commission, and Alvin himself until Matthew Colangelo got deployed from the Biden justice department as a political appointee, number 3 in the Biden justice department, the resurrected zombie case. And there before, there's democrat Manhattan judge, who donated to Biden against Trump in 2020, donated to another anti Trump cause, whose adult daughter Lauren Rochon, raised has raised a $100,000,000 on her, on her father's criminal prosecution, criminal trial of Trump that he refused to recuse in the face of this evidence of his clear judicial bias. A former Clinton judge from the Southern District of New York went on CNN, Caitlin Collins' show on April 5th and said that judge Marchand has to refuse under New York statute. It's very clear he's refused to do it. And then you have the jury pool. Manhattan's 85% against Trump, 87% against Trump. And this judge has rigged the juror questionnaires where they're asking these potential jurors if they follow Trump on social media, for example, but they're not asking if they follow Biden on social media. This is a clearly rigged process against president Trump. This is part of the democrats, Biden and Biden Democrats' broader welfare and election interference campaign because they fear that president Trump is going to beat Biden like a drum on November 5, 2024. So the Democrats just wanna throw him in prison for the rest of his life. Speaker 1: I did not know that about the questionnaire. I I heard the reports, okay, that they wanna know, do you support president Trump? Do you support the Proud Boys? Have you ever gone to a, MAGA rally? That kinda thing. Thing. You're telling me the questionnaire did not include similar type questions to gauge their support for president Biden. That was not there. Wow. Speaker 0: That is that is correct. And, what they how they think they're gonna get around this is they say, do you have any anti Trump, organizations? Well, people can say, this is what happened with one of the jury foreman and one of the prior anti Trump cases with another Trump defendant is if you if you say that you're anti Trump, people could say, I'm not anti Trump. I just support Biden. And so that's how they get around that. And it is a clearly rigged process where they're absolutely going to find Trump guilty for these non felonies, and this judge is going to convict him because he's a partisan operative. Speaker 1: And it's like, screw you. The people, like, what what are we gonna do about it? Right? What they are they are pulling all the strings, the judicial branch, the media, probably elections too. It's so arrogant because, really, what can the people do right now? And we don't have too many things at our disposal, do we? Speaker 0: No. We don't. Here's what what the American people can do on November 5, 2024. The American people say that we, not these Democrats, prosecutors and these Democrat judges and these Democrats witnesses and these other democrat operatives and these democrats hell holes like New York, DC, and Atlanta get to pick the next president of the United States. Americans get to pick the next president of the United States, not these democrat operatives. Speaker 1: Wow. Alright. So how is this gonna I I just saw a headline. It's unraveling. Jury selection is unraveling. They just had to get rid of 2 that they already that they already selected. Is this is it possible that you could have a mistrial before the trial, like, really gets underway? I know this is technically the trial. What does it mean? What what's happening right now? Is this thing blowing up in their faces? By faces, whose faces, I mean, the prosecution, I mean, the judge? Speaker 0: Well, the problem is this jury questionnaire did not screen out people who have a clear anti Trump bias and these jurors are lying to get on the jury, because they're activist or they're motivated by financial. What whatever motivates them, you have these left wing operatives trying to get on this jury so they can railroad Trump. Right? And they're getting caught because Trump has a very good legal team that's going through these nut jobs social media posts and finding all their crazy anti Trump social media posts. And so that's the problem. This is where this judge one, Rishon, really screwed up and rigged this thing because if they would have if judge Rishon would have asked fair questions like, for example, do you have pro Biden post or do you follow pro Biden organizations, you wouldn't have this problem where you have these these sleeper cells who are getting on to the to the to the juror to this democrat jury in New York and then they get exposed when they have to come off. Speaker 1: So you said, okay. We gotta vote, but there's gotta be something in the system. Like, who's this guy's boss? I mean, like, who Is there any relief? I heard, like, there could be an emergency filing, a petition, this court, that court, maybe the Supreme Court. Is there anything at their disposal, not our disposal, but the defense team? Like, this is this is insanity, and everybody knows it. Is there any way out? Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, there is a way out. They can file these emergency petitions. It's hard to get relief during the middle of the trial. Trump is certainly gonna have all of these convictions reversed by the appeal appellate courts even if it has to go to the Supreme Court of the United States. So these are bogus legal theories for non felonies, and they're pursuing this lawfare in election interference. There's no way this is gonna get upheld on appeal, but the problem is that won't happen. Those appeals will not get resolved before November 5, 2024. So these these democrat prosecutors like, Alvin Bragg in Manhattan and his henchmen, Matthew Colangelo, who came from the Biden Justice Department, and this democrat judge Juan Marchand who donated to Biden whose daughter is making a lot of money. Lauren Marchand is making a lot of money off this criminal trial. She's raised a $100,000,000 off of her father's unprecedented criminal trial of Trump. They don't care if this gets reversed after November 5, 2024. Their their sole goal is to get a criminal conviction to call Trump a felon before November 5th 2024 and maybe even put him in prison because they're trying to interfere in the election. They're trying to break this process so Trump can't win the election. Speaker 1: It's so incredible. It's kinda heartbreaking too that this is happening. I'm really glad you're on the case. Oh, wait. One other thing, you said that Colangelo guy. Now let me get this straight. Colangelo used to be the number 3 guy at the federal justice department, then he takes a job at the state attorney general's office, and now he's hanging around the Manhattan DA's office. Can you just give us an idea in the legal community just how backwards and screwed up that kind of trajectory is? And the I I I get the only reason would be is that he's on a mission to get Trump. Speaker 0: He is deployed from the Biden Justice Department. He was in the number 3 office. He was the acting number 3 on the parachute team at the beginning of the Biden administration. And then he became the number 2 to the number 3 when the Senate confirmed this radical as the Associate Attorney General Benita Gupta was his number 2. He works for Tom Perez when Tom Perez was Obama's head of civil rights. He worked for Tom Perez when Tom Perez was Obama's labor secretary. When Tom Perez went to be Obama's DNC chairman, Matthew Colangelo went into the Obama White House as a labor relations guy, and then Matthew Colangelo joined the, Democratic New York attorney general's office. Now he's in Bragg Bragg's office to get Trump. Speaker 1: It's so crazy. It is so crazy. Gosh. Well, Mike Davis, we're thankful for you. We're thankful for the article 3 project. Go to article 3 project dot org. Many thanks, Mike, to be continued, and we'll

@marklevinshow — Mark R. Levin

Posted - October 4, 2024 at 10:05 PM

Saved - October 5, 2024 at 11:26 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

I repeat, Judge Chutkan and Jack Smith should be disbarred for this https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/jack-smith-october-surprise-donald-trump.html

Jack Smith’s October Surprise The special counsel had information he wanted to make public. But he bent important rules to do so, writes legal columnist Elie Honig. nymag.com

@RepMTG — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Posted - February 12, 2025 at 10:29 AM

Saved - February 12, 2025 at 8:01 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

This judge is a Trump deranged Democrat activist. Below is proof he is not capable of making good decisions from the bench. He should be impeached.

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

🚨 EXC - I've unearthed footage from 2021 where the judge blocking the Trump spending freeze accuses Trump of being a "tyrant," claims racism is a "white people problem," and insists transgenders need special sentencing privileges. This is an activist not a judge. Watch ⬇️🧵

@PhilHollowayEsq — Phil Holloway ✈️

Posted - February 12, 2025 at 12:01 PM

Saved - February 12, 2025 at 12:56 PM

@PhilHollowayEsq - Phil Holloway ✈️

Judge John McConnell must be recused immediately “Judge McConnell equates President Trump's first four years to the damage inflicted by the Civil War and Jim Crow laws He also compares President Trump to a "tyrant." It was improper for him to take the case given his bias

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

🚨 EXC - I've unearthed footage from 2021 where the judge blocking the Trump spending freeze accuses Trump of being a "tyrant," claims racism is a "white people problem," and insists transgenders need special sentencing privileges. This is an activist not a judge. Watch ⬇️🧵

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - February 12, 2025 at 4:23 PM

Saved - February 12, 2025 at 8:56 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Impeach this activist posing as a judge! Such a person does great discredit to the American justice system.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: The Obama-appointed judge that threatened the Trump administration with arrest if funding was not restored to USAID previously likened Trump's first term to the Civil War and Jim Crow and compared Trump to a tyrant in 2021 video footage uncovered by @nataliegwinters. Judge McConnell is an activist who has no business sitting in judgement of the president or his administration.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Over the past four years, our nation's core values and institutions have faced a new kind of test, reminiscent of challenges during the Civil War era. It felt like a balloon being inflated to its breaking point. The courts play a crucial role in upholding the rule of law, acting as a safeguard against arbitrary actions and defending our constitutional values. In the legal system, especially during sentencing, it's vital to recognize the individual before you. Whether they are a woman, Black, transgender, poor, rich, or anything else, they bring life experiences that you may not have shared. To apply the law justly, you must understand their perspective and apply the law accordingly.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So, what's happened over the last four years or so, and at other times in our country's history, going back to the Civil War and Reconstruction and Jim Crow laws, the Civil Rights and during the last four years is that the values that we live by, the constitutional values that form the basis of our country have been tested and our institutions have been tested in ways that I don't think a lot of folks thought would survive. It got tested in the 1800s by a war, and we survived the war, sometimes well and sometimes not so well, but that's for another story. So what we saw the last four years in my mind was a new testing of it. And how I think about it is, it's like a balloon, you know, and and you're blowing up a balloon and and you and you keep pushing that air in. Well, at some point, the balloon's gonna pop. Right? And and and and and it feels like over the last four years with the challenges that have occurred to the rule of law in this country, that we came very close to that balloon popping. But where courts stand and enforce the rule of law that is against arbitrary and capricious actions by, what could be a tyrant or could be what happened. We saw plenty of examples of that recently. And it enforces our values. Our values, in a legal sense, the Constitution. And it's that reason that, and we find there are plenty of examples of a history and there's plenty of examples over the last four years through government actions when you're sentencing someone, when we talk about sentencing, that you have to take a moment and realize that this, you know, middle class white male, privileged person, needs to understand the human being that comes before us that maybe a woman and maybe black, maybe transgender, maybe poor, maybe rich, maybe whatever, may have experiences that aren't yours and you have to walk in their shoes and understand that the law applies to them where they are. And then you have to apply the law accordingly.

@nicksortor — Nick Sortor

Posted - March 27, 2025 at 5:33 AM

Saved - March 27, 2025 at 1:15 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I called for an immediate investigation into Judge Boasberg after he received a fourth Trump case. I highlighted the corruption in DC's courts, arguing it's statistically impossible for him to be chosen repeatedly. It feels like he's monopolizing the Trump cases. This system is rigged!

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump calls for an “IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION” as activist Judge Boasberg gets a FOURTH Trump case Trump points out how corrupt DC’s courts are, and that it’s “statistically impossible” for Boasberg to be chosen “at random” over and over again. “He seems to be grabbing the Trump cases all to himself, even though it’s not supposed to happen that way.” RIGGED SYSTEM!

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - April 26, 2025 at 5:18 AM

Saved - April 27, 2025 at 12:55 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I can't help but notice the striking coincidences surrounding Virginia Giuffre's recent death. She had accused Prince Andrew of trafficking and was involved in a case dismissed by the same judge, Lewis Kaplan, who ruled that Donald Trump was guilty of raping E. Jean Carroll. It's unsettling that this judge dismissed all charges against Prince Andrew, leading to a sealed settlement without any prison time. Now, Giuffre has tragically died by suicide after recovering from a car accident. What are the odds of all this happening?

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

So many “coincidences” Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre that just “committed suicide” who said “I was trafficked to Prince Andrew” had her case dismissed BY THE SAME JUDGE who ruled Donald Trump was guilty of raping E. Jean Carroll WHAT ARE THE ODDS?!? Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled: - Donald Trump was guilty of Raping E. Jean Carroll - This SAME JUDGE dismissed Prince Andrew’s case where he was accused of raping underage girl Virginia Giuffre on Jeffrey Epstein Island - This judge formally dismissed all sexual abuse charges with a nice sealed settlement and no prison time And now she’s dead by suicide after RECOVERING from a car accident

Video Transcript AI Summary

A search reveals that a judge named Kaplan presided over matters relating to Virginia Giuffre and Prince Andrew in 2021 and 2022. Giuffre accused Prince Andrew of sexual assault, alleging several encounters in the early 2000s when she was 17, claiming she was sex trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. The case was dismissed in March 2022 by party stipulation without going to trial. This is contrasted with Trump's $83.3 million fine.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Oh my god. Check this out. Watch this your time. Watch this your time. I'm so sorry to interrupt. Okay. Go to other cases he's worked on. Go to go lower. Go lower. Go lower. Go lower. Go lower. Go up a little bit. Right there. Right there. Right there. Right there. Hang on. Hang on. Right there. You will not even believe what I just found. Look at the case you worked on. Look for, all the way in the bottom of miscellaneous, second line. Speaker 1: Miscellaneous. Speaker 0: 2021, '20 '20 '2. He was Kaplan was presiding judge on mattering relating towards Virginia Gurfrey and Prince Andrew. Click on that on section. Watch what happens. You know, what happens to the case? Click on the just click on that's the one. Click right there. Zoom in, and just go to the top. Yeah. Papa Papa, the Jennifer and Andrew reached, and The case was dismissed by the party stipulation in March 2022 without going to trial. Prince Andrew. So let me get this straight. This case, read the top. Federal Court Virginia. You know who Virginia I mean, we just talked about. Right? Girl from Epstein Island. From Epstein Island. Second son of Wow. Sexual assault under court, several sexual encounters with Andrew in the early two thousand at the age of 17 after being sex trafficked by American financier and convicted by sex offender Jeffrey Epstein dismissed without going to trial, yet Trump's eighty three point three million dollars. Speaker 1: Wow. What a freaking fine. Speaker 0: Great fine, Peter. That is Speaker 1: insane. All you gotta do is dig them.

@Girlpatriot1974 — Girl patriot

Posted - August 22, 2025 at 12:43 AM

Saved - August 30, 2025 at 6:22 AM

@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot

E. Jean Carroll said she didn't believe she was a victim of her "3-minute" encounter she claims to have had with Donald Trump. "I think most people think of rape as sexy. They think of the fantasies." Let's hope the Supreme Court overturns the civil verdict in this case, too. https://t.co/M1qGku6Hfb

Video Transcript AI Summary

In a dressing room, "the minute I was in there, he shut the door and pushed me up against the wall and bang bang my head on the wall and kissed me." She laughed to cope: "You started laughing?" It turned serious as he "pulled down the tights" with one hand, and it was "a fight" against her will; she notes he is "six three" and she was "about six one in the massive heels." She confirms "Yes" to penetration and says, "That's the definition" of rape, though she prefers calling it "the fight" and says, "I was not the victim." She adds, "Sexual violence is in every country, in every strata of society" and that her incident was short—"three minutes in this little dressing room"—and she "got out. I'm moving on."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The minute I was in there, he shut the door and pushed me up against the wall and bang bang my head on the wall and kissed me. I just it was so shocking. I couldn't of course, I started laughing again because Speaker 1: You started laughing? Speaker 0: Of course. Speaker 1: What what why? Well, why, of course? Speaker 0: Because it was a way of if it was at all ironic in his part, it would if a man is laughed at, it usually will make him and he put his shoulder against me to hold me against the wall. And at that point, I realized that I was in a very difficult situation. Speaker 1: Did he say anything? Speaker 0: No. No. It was just like, we're gonna do this thing. We're just so hot for each other. Or I don't why would I even try to think what he was thinking? Anyway, so he put me you know, he pushed me held me with his shoulder, and I was wearing a a coat dress and tights, and he pulled down the tights. And so that's Speaker 1: He pulled it with he pulled it with both hands, with one hand? Speaker 0: One. That was when it turned serious. I realized that this was this was this was a fight. And even though I can talk about it now and put words to it, at the time the adrenaline is pouring through me and all I wanna do right. Speaker 1: How would you describe what were you you you said you were you were obviously Fighting. Surprised, fighting. Right. Were you scared? Were you No. I was too Speaker 0: I was too panicked to be scared. Speaker 1: Too panicked to be scared. Okay. Speaker 0: You know Speaker 1: Is it and you said adrenaline was pumping? Speaker 0: I assume it was. Right. Because I got strong enough. He's six three. Apparently, I've looked it up. I was about six one in the massive heels I was wearing. And so we were even almost even in height. And down go the tights, and it was against my will, and it hurt, and it was a fight. Speaker 1: And this is not a question I would normally ask. And if if you don't wanna answer, totally understand. But given the prior accusations, which have all been of forms of assault or harassment, you you're saying there was actual penetration? Speaker 0: Yes. Did you Speaker 1: which is puts it into a different category of any of these other any of the other act women who have come forward. I think techno I mean, that that is that is the definition of of rape. One definition. Speaker 0: That's the definition. Yes. How long? Brief. Mhmm. Brief. Because when a woman is stamping her feet mean Speaker 1: And what you were doing? You started stamping I her Speaker 0: always think back and think, I that was the stupidest thing I've ever done. I should never have done it. Then I didn't behave Speaker 1: When you say I should have never done it, you mean Speaker 0: That was just a dumb thing to go into a dressing room with a man that I hardly know and have him shut the door and then be unable to stop him. And, I was a competitive athlete, so I wasn't like a I didn't freeze. I I rose to the occasion, and, it did not last long. And that's why I don't use the word you just used. I use the word fight. Speaker 1: You don't use the word rape? Speaker 0: Sexual violence is in every country, in every strata of of society, and I just feel that so many women are undergoing sexual violence. Mine was short. I got out. I'm happy now. I'm, moving on. And I think of all the women who are enduring constant sexual violence. So this one instant, this one, what, three minutes in this little dressing room, I just say it's the fight. That way, I'm not the victim. Right? I'm not the victim. Speaker 1: You don't feel like a victim? Speaker 0: I was not thrown on the ground in ravish, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotation. This was not this was not sexual. For it just it it hurt. It just what it just you know? Speaker 1: But I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault. It is not Speaker 0: I think most people think of rape as being sexy. Speaker 1: Let's take a short break. Speaker 0: Think of the fantasies. Speaker 1: Mhmm. We've just gotta take a quick break. If you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side. Speaker 0: You're fascinating to talk to.

@lamps_apple — Apple Lamps

Posted - August 29, 2025 at 5:06 AM

Saved - August 30, 2025 at 8:06 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m astonished that many Democrats don’t see that E. Jean Carroll’s ability to file charges against Trump was funded by wealthy Democrats who pushed for a temporary law. Carroll was the first to use it, but it expired after a year. She also lied under oath about her legal fees, facing no consequences. The main witness, Carol Martin, even called Carroll a drug addict in a text. It’s baffling that a true victim would behave this way. Many believe Carroll's claims are fabricated and politically motivated, with no evidence presented to support her allegations.

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

I can’t believe how many democrats still don’t realize that the only reason E. Jean Carroll was allowed to file charges against Trump was because democrat billionaires funded her effort to get a one year temporary law added just so she could. She was the first person in the state to file under the new temporary law. 12 months later the law expired.

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

Carroll also lied and testified under oath that she wasn’t having her legal fees paid for by someone else and faced no repercussions when it was exposed as a lie. https://t.co/OW6eGMMZic

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

https://t.co/1Ne8oKwdKF

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

👇👇

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

@MalcolmDavisGA E. Jean Carroll is nothing more than a blatant fraud. When she's not painting trees, she's busy writing deranged fantasies about what her dog, absurdly named Tits, taught her about sex. Maybe her cat, Vagina, chimed in with a few pointers too. https://t.co/VKAWqki79E

Video Transcript AI Summary

I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up. On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up. On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree.

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

The so-called "witness" who backed Carroll's outlandish claims in court? Well, emails from 2017 between her and Carroll expose the truth. In September of that year, Carol Martin sent E. Jean Carroll an article mocking Trump, referring to him as "Orange Crush," and urged, "this has to stop." She suggested, "as soon as we’re both well enough to scheme, we must both do our patriotic duty." Carroll eagerly replied, "TOTALLY!!! I have something special for you when we meet." Fast forward 15 months, and Carroll conveniently releases a book accusing Trump of assault. Martin didn’t want to be involved at first saying Carroll made the lawsuit a “lifestyle”.

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

The main witness, Carol Martin, texted her daughter that E. Jean Carroll was a drug addict and that the drug was herself. https://t.co/STSYNr5sPR

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

And the thing I find strangest of all…. What true victim of the crime she claimed would post a question like this? https://t.co/4bSZSvkLV9

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

For the people asking why Trump didn’t give his DNA https://t.co/A8I9YSritt

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

Instant karma https://t.co/6qyqNZLrx0

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

https://t.co/GlNTS8HJ9I

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

@DoJo4923 No, it’s expired! https://t.co/tuXxoHiwCQ

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

@Anthneff Trump never went to the island… retard https://t.co/BIY8X4u70H

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

@MxCl74613523 YUP

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

@JoJoFromJerz @TomiLahren Only those without a shred of sense can't see that Carroll's claims are absurd and fabricated. It's clear that Hoffman and Conway orchestrated her lawsuit against Trump. This is pure political lawfare, and genuine victims are outraged by this mockery. https://t.co/ucSdvUjKwJ

Video Transcript AI Summary

I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tuberski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up. On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree and then

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tuberski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up. On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree and then

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

@AngelLee2194 If only she had evidence.

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

@AndrewLBElms A claim like that requires proof. She has yet to present any.

@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps

@KaostheDog2 If this would true she would have had went against him criminally. If it was true she would have had evidence Democrats are disgusting and support false rape claims as long as it’s against their opponent..