TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸
Tucker Carlson Opens His Show Tonight Calling Out The MSM For Suppressing The Biden Scandal "This is Soviet-style suppression of information of a legitimate news story days before an election." "No one believes the media anymore and no one should." https://t.co/YJzBZv9QrZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Good evening. Recently, Tony Bobolinski, a former business partner of the Biden family, revealed serious claims about Joe Biden's involvement in business dealings with China. Bobolinski met with Biden twice and provided substantial evidence, including recordings and documents, to support his account. A Senate committee confirmed the authenticity of Bobolinski's evidence, debunking claims of Russian disinformation. Despite the gravity of these allegations, mainstream media largely ignored Bobolinski's testimony, raising concerns about information suppression ahead of the election. Voters deserve to know the truth about Biden's potential involvement in his family's international business dealings, which have spanned multiple countries. This situation highlights a significant challenge to democratic transparency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening, and welcome to Tucker Carlson tonight. For many weeks, we've been hearing the outlines of a story about Joe Biden. Hard to know what to believe in the late stages of a presidential campaign, but now we know. We have now heard at length on camera from one of the Biden family's former business partners. He's a successful businessman, very successful businessman, and a navy veteran.
His name is Tony Bobolinski. Bobolinski spoke for a full hour last night on this show. He told us, and this is the crux of what he said, how he met 2 separate times with Joe Biden himself, not just with his son or his brother, but with Joe Biden, the former vice president, the man now running for president, to discuss business deals with the communist government of China. That's a very serious claim. And whatever your political views, it's hard to dismiss it when Tony Bobolinski makes it because Bobolinski is an unusually credible witness.
He is not a partisan. He's not seeking money. He's not seeking publicity. Just the opposite. He did not wanna come on our show.
But when Adam Schiff and the Joe Biden for president campaign accused Tony Bobolinski of participating in a Russian disinformation effort, he felt he had no choice. That was a slander against him and against his family. So Bobolinski came. He arrived with heaps of evidence to bolster the story he was telling. He brought contemporaneous audio recordings, text messages, emails, many financial documents.
By the end of the hour, it was very clear to us that Tony Bobolinski was telling the truth and that Joe Biden was lying. We believe that any honest person who watched the entire hour would come to the same conclusion. Well, today, a senate committee confirmed it. The senate reported this afternoon that all of Tony Bobolinski's documents are in fact real. They're authentic.
They're not forgeries. This is not Russian disinformation. It is real. Tonight, we have another recording for you from Tony Bobolinski, and we'll add that to the evidence file. We'll play it for you in just a minute.
But we can help noticing that in a normal country, you probably already would have heard it. Bobolinski told a remarkable story. Joe Biden, who once again could be president of the United States next week, was planning business deals with America's most formidable global opponent. And when he was caught doing it, Joe Biden lied. And then he went further.
He slandered an innocent man as a traitor to his own country. It is clear that Joe Biden did that. That's not a traitor to his own country. It is clear that Joe Biden did that. That's not a partisan talking point uttered in bad faith on behalf of another presidential campaign.
It's true. So the question is, what is Joe Biden's excuse for doing that? What is his version of the story? Everyone has a version, and we'd like to hear it. But we don't know what Joe Biden's version of the story is because no one in America's vast media landscape has pressed Joe Biden to answer the question.
Instead, reporters at all levels and their editors and their publishers have openly collaborated with Joe Biden's political campaign. That is unprecedented. It has never happened in American history. This morning, the big papers completely ignored what Tony Bobolinski had to say, so did the other television networks. Not a single word about Bobolinski appeared on CNN or anywhere else.
Newsweek decided to cover it but came to the conclusion that the real story was about QAnon somehow. This is Soviet style suppression of information of a legitimate news story days before an election. The ramifications of it are impossible to imagine, but we do know the media cannot continue in the way that it has. No one believes the media anymore, and no one should. You should be offended by this, not because the media are liberal, but because this is an attack on our democracy.
You've heard that phrase again and again. This is what it actually looks like. In a self governing country, voters have a right to know, an obligation to know who they're voting for. In this case, they have the right to know that the Democratic nominee for president was a willing partner in his family's lucrative influencing peddling operation, an operation that went on for decades and stretched from China and Ukraine all the way to Oman, Romania, Luxembourg, and many other countries. This is not speculation once again, and it's not a partisan attack.
It's true, and Tony Bobolinski confirmed it.
@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸
#Thread Tucker Carlson's Monologue Calling Out The Fake News Media's Lies And Propaganda About The Colorado Springs Shooting Especially NBC News' Top Fake News Propagandists Brandy Zadrozny And Ben Collins "They are liars. Cold-blooded liars." https://t.co/hfybgkhZqB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims news outlets falsely reported the Colorado shooter was a right-wing, anti-trans extremist radicalized by right-wing media, including Fox News and Libs of TikTok, to hate transgender people. NBC News reporters Ben Collins and Brandi Zadrosny are called out for allegedly claiming criticism of genital mutilation of children, drag shows for children, or teachers discussing oral sex with children is hateful rhetoric that incites violence.
The speaker states the accused shooter, Anderson Lee Aldrich, is non-binary and uses they/them pronouns. Therefore, the speaker argues, NBC's reporting is false political propaganda. The speaker accuses Ben Collins of falsely claiming the victims were all gay and that the town is at fault because Christians make gay people feel unsafe. The White House and Pete Buttigieg are criticized for using the shooting to advocate for an assault weapons ban and attack political opponents. The speaker accuses NBC News, Collins, and Zadrosny of not apologizing and continuing to accuse right-wing media of stoking hatred toward LGBTQ people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening, and welcome to Tucker Carlson tonight. So if you've been watching the news recently, the one thing you know for certain about the accused gunman and the massacre in Colorado over the weekend is that he was a crazed right wing anti trans extremist. This is a man who was radicalized by this show and by the Twitter account libs of TikTok to hate transgendered people. And that's why this man walks into a bar, a gay bar with a gun and started murdering people. He did that because he was taught by right wing media outlets to despise and fear the non binary community.
And that's why this show, Animals of TikTok, must be hauled into court and bankrupted for what we've done so that we can never provoke this kind of horrifying violence ever again. That's the real lesson of this mass shooting. So that is what they've been telling you again and again and again on various news channels for the past three days. And we're not overstating that, by the way. Here's a selection of it.
Speaker 1: It's a campaign being driven by members of congress and conservative influencers on social media, as well as the rights most favorite TV network, Fox News.
Speaker 2: Those incidents at drag events I mentioned a few moments ago, they happened within the context of conservative media personalities fear mongering against queer folks.
Speaker 3: Respected messengers from TV networks saying that these people are wrong, and they're trying to damage your children.
Speaker 1: We have a long history of the LGBTQ community being victimized, demonized by especially right wing media and Republicans. You have anti LGBTQ rhetoric spewed on the most watched hours on Fox News at a regular clip against the US military, against gay men and women, against gay teachers, against their right to exist.
Speaker 0: So Fox News, in its most watched hours, is attacking even the US military, and of course, gay men and women and teachers too. They're advocating, quote, against their right to exist. In other words, they've been calling for genocide. That would be us. Now, that's a stout claim, but no one has made it more often than NBC News.
In particular, it's two self described disinformation reporters, Ben Collins and Brandi Zadrosny. These two are outraged that anyone would dare criticize the genital mutilation of children or drag shows for fifth graders or creepy weirdo teachers explaining the mechanics of oral sex to nine year olds. Pointing out that any of that is happening is hate, and it gets people killed. Here's a highly emotional Ben Collins of NBC News making that very point yesterday morning.
Speaker 2: Am I doing something wrong here? Here are some headlines that I wrote for the last six months. Fueled by Internet's far right machine, anti LGBTQ threats shut down trans rights and drag events. Remember, there was a drag event happening in Colorado.
Speaker 4: What do what do we do about public officials at local level, state level, federal level, who try to inject the fear of the very word transgender into school issues?
Speaker 2: Get more clicks for it, they end up on Tucker Carlson. End up on the highest rated show on cable news. And last night, by the way, Tucker attacked my colleague, Brandy Zidrozzi, who was co bi on almost all of these stories. Not me. He attacked Brandy, of course.
But he he attacked Brandy. And he he went right back into this idea that some they is trying to groom your kids, trying to sexualize your children. Right? Yeah. Who's the they, first of
Speaker 4: all? Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And second of all, all of her reporting was right. All of it was right.
Speaker 0: Oh, it's all about me, of course, says Ben Collins. But more to the point, how dare anyone criticize the August disinformation reporter and former college librarian Brandi Zedrosny because as Ben Collins pointed out, her reporting was right. Well, since you brought it up, Ben Collins, was her reporting right? Well, not entirely. Do you remember when Brandy Zed Drosny told you several hundred times that the accused shooter Anderson Lee Aldrich was inspired by hatred for the non binary community that he learned on this show?
Do you remember that? Well, actually, it turns out we discovered last night that Anderson Lee Aldrich is, drum roll please, part of the non binary community. He doesn't hate them. He is one. In a court filing, Aldrich's lawyers wrote this quote, Anderson Aldrich is non binary.
They use they, them pronouns and for the purposes of all former filings will be addressed as mix Aldrich. Mix Aldrich. That's the shooter, the non binary shooter. Let that sink in. First, get your chuckling under control and ponder what this means.
What it means is that virtually everything that NBC News has told you about this shooting in Colorado is not only wrong, it is the opposite of the truth. It is all a grotesque and filthy lie. It wasn't news reporting. It turns out to have been the most transparent sort of political propaganda. And for once, they have been busted flat out in public trying to sell political propaganda to an unsuspecting public under the guise of news.
It's not the first time they've done it. They won't stop doing it. Oh, but they did it a lot in this case. Here's another clip. Another instance of Ben Collins trying to once again pass off political slogans as news.
Speaker 2: There are five dead people in a strip mall because that was the only place they felt safe as gay or trans people in this town in Colorado Springs.
Speaker 0: He's emotional telling you that. There are five dead people in a strip mall because that was the only place they felt safe as gay or trans people in this town of Colorado Springs. So it turns out it's the town's fault too because there are a lot of Christians, everybody knows, in Colorado Springs. So gay people feel terrified there because Christians are dangerous. And all these terrified gay people were huddled together for safety when this Fox News addled anti trans bigot walked in and started shooting them for being trans folk.
That was Ben Collins' quote reporting. Well, the only problem is not all the victims were gay. One of them, at least one of them was at the club with his girlfriend. Oh, details. Details.
Ben Collins doesn't let details get in the way of an effective political attack. And it would have been an effective political attack had not reality interceded. But he doesn't care. Now there's the White House. Here's the White House telling you that because a non binary person shut up a gay bar, you can't own a gun.
Speaker 3: This attack also comes amidst a rise in violent rhetoric and threats against the LGBTQI plus people across the country. While we don't know yet for certain the motive of this attack, hate has no place in this country and neither do military style assault rifles, which is why we will continue to push for an assault weapons ban.
Speaker 0: Oh, that makes sense. You find the reasoning? So when the trans community opens fire on itself, we need an assault weapons ban because why? Because you're a hater. Pete Buttigieg, of course, couldn't pass pass up a moment like this.
It's not like Pete Buttigieg wants to talk about how things are going over at the transportation department, which he supposedly runs. Short answer, not well. No. Pete Buttigieg wants to talk about identity. He always wants to talk about identity.
And the funny ironic thing is, in the tale just a few years ago, Buttigieg wouldn't even admit that he was gay. He hid that and then lied about it for reasons he has never been asked to explain. Why not? But whatever. Now, he is happy to use his sexual orientation as a cudgel to bash you repeatedly in the face into submission.
Quote, here's the latest. If you're a politician or media figure who sets up the LGBTQ community to be hated and feared, not because any of us have ever harmed you, but because you find it useful, then don't you dare act surprised when this kind of violence follows. Don't you dare act surprised. Don't you dare. Alright.
Fair enough. We won't dare. But honestly, we were a little surprised to learn that the anti trans shooter is himself trans. Were you surprised by that, Pete Buttigieg? Now that you're admitting you're gay after lying about it?
Since we're talking about identity? What do have to say about that? Well, nothing, weirdly. People to judge hasn't said anything. Nor has he apologized for attacking other people on false pretenses.
Guess who else hasn't apologized? Ben Collins or Brandy Zed Drosny. Yesterday, they were accusing us of getting five people murdered. Now that the story they were telling has turned out to be a lie, the opposite of what they said it was, they're pretending that nothing has changed at all. Oh, they are liars.
Cold blooded liars. It's amazing to watch. And so is the company they work for. NBC News just ran this article after we know that the shooter was himself trans. They ran this headline with a straight face.
Quote, right wing influencers and media doubled down on anti LGBTQ rhetoric in the wake of the Colorado shooting. Can you imagine writing that knowing what we know? They had no problem with it. Then an editor at NBC called Benjamin Goggin added this quote, if the shooter is non binary, it doesn't change the fact the right wing media is continuing to stoke hatred towards LGBTQ people after five people were killed at a gay bar. Right.
So it's hatred. So if you're against general mutilation of children or bringing toddlers to drag shows, you're against the LGBTQ community. Well, course, that's insane. There's nothing anti gay about that. Most gay people aren't in favor of general mutilation or bringing toddlers to drag shows.
There's nothing wrong with those opinions. They're the right opinions and all decent people understand that. What is indecent, what is wrong is lying about a mass shooting, which NBC did.
reSee.it AI Summary
Internal messages from Fox News reveal the network's top hosts and executives admitting they knew their election fraud claims were lies. The texts show Fox trapped in a dilemma of its own making, afraid to admit the election was honest because they'll lose viewers to Newsmax. The Dominion filing offers the best look inside Fox's internal operations, showing no compunctions about lying to viewers and desperately tacking right to avoid losing market share to competitors.
@willsommer - Will Sommer
This filing in the Dominion lawsuit against Fox News is one of the most remarkable documents I've ever seen. Filled with private texts between Fox stars like Hannity and Carlson, plus Murdoch, all admitting they knew Fox's stolen election claims were lies. https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/redacted-documents-in-dominion-fox-news-case/dca5e3880422426f/full.pdf
@willsommer - Will Sommer
The texts show Fox trapped in a dilemma of its own making, afraid to admit the election was honest bc they'll lose viewers to Newsmax. Tucker rages and tries to get Fox reporter @JacquiHeinrich fired after she admits the election wasn't stolen.
@willsommer - Will Sommer
Here's Rupert Murdoch telling Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott to focus on winning the GA Senate races for Republicans, "helping any way we can."
@willsommer - Will Sommer
Fox got into Dominion conspiracy theories in the first place because Sidney Powell got a deranged email from someone who thought she was a ghost, and Antonin Scalia was murdered in a Most Dangerous Game-style "human hunting expedition."
@willsommer - Will Sommer
Tucker Carlson repeatedly frets in text messages to his producer that Trump is a "demonic force" who could "destroy" him if Carlson missteps: "He's the undisputed world champion of that. He could easily destroy us if we play it wrong."
@willsommer - Will Sommer
The Fox messages reveal Fox brass and top hosts tearing into Rudy Giuliani. Hannity: Rudy's "an insane person." Ingraham: "Such an idiot." Murdoch: "Really crazy stuff."
@willsommer - Will Sommer
A fascinating detail about Fox's relationship with MyPillow tycoon Mike Lindell, their most important advertiser — after Lindell insulted Fox in a Newsmax appearance, Fox sent him a gift and a handwritten note from their CEO to win him back.
@willsommer - Will Sommer
Tucker Carlson emerges in the the court filing as absolutely freaking out after the election— hearing from angry viewers and worrying that Fox calling AZ for Biden will kill his golden goose, while also afraid "fucking bitch" Sidney Powell has gone too far.
@willsommer - Will Sommer
Some interesting details about Jeanine Pirro in the Fox News messages: a Fox exec felt sure she was looking for a job at a competitor like Newsmax, and Fox cancelled her Nov. 7 show because they were afraid she'd push stolen election theories: "She is crazy."
@willsommer - Will Sommer
The Dominion filing offers the best look inside Fox's internal operations that we've had in years, maybe ever. It shows Fox operating as many suspected: no compunctions about lying to viewers, and desperately tacking right to avoid losing market share to competitors like Newsmax.
@willsommer - Will Sommer
Finally: if you liked this thread on Fox and Dominion, you'll love Trust the Plan, my book on QAnon and the rise of conspiracy theories in America. It's coming out on Tuesday, available for preorder now! https://www.harpercollins.com/products/trust-the-plan-will-sommer?variant=40493482541090
Just a moment...
harpercollins.com
reSee.it AI Summary
FOX News perpetuated lies to avoid being outflanked by more aggressive right-wing media outlets. A FOX reporter fact-checked Trump and said there was no evidence of voter fraud from Dominion. Carlson urged Hannity to get her fired, saying it was hurting the company's stock price. Carlson also warned that Trump could easily destroy them if they played it wrong. Relevant to the market pressures that motivated FOX News to broadcast false narratives.
@Nick_Carmody - Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych
Thread about the "demand and supply" dynamic that forced FOX to perpetuate lies/disinformation to avoid being outflanked by more aggressive Right Wing media outlets: 1/ https://t.co/OjiH4s5cqQ
@Nick_Carmody - Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych
A FOX reporter fact-checked Trump and said there was no evidence of voter fraud from Dominion. Carlson told Hannity: "Please get her fired. Seriously...What the fuck?...It needs to stop immediately, like tonight. It's measurably hurting the company. The stock price is down." 2/
@Nick_Carmody - Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych
Carlson went on to say that Trump was good at "destroying things. He's the undisputed world champion of that. He could easily destroy us if we play it wrong." 3/ https://t.co/ZxzAxg5lwD
@Nick_Carmody - Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych
Relevant to the market pressures that motivated FOXNews to broadcast narratives they did not believe to be true: 4/ https://t.co/W78IMj6bLa
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
Tucker Carlson calls out Liz Cheney, Anderson Cooper, KJP & Garland’s Blatant Lies about J6 https://t.co/5L2xg898r5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The death of Officer Brian Sicknick remains unclear, but video evidence shows he was not beaten to death by Trump supporters at the Capitol. Despite claims from media and politicians, including Liz Cheney and Anderson Cooper, that he was murdered during the January 6 events, these assertions are false. Attorney General Merrick Garland stated that five officers died that day, but this includes officers who later died by suicide, not directly related to the events of January 6. The actual number of officers assaulted is reported as over 100, which is unacceptable, but labeling January 6 as the worst assault on the U.S. government since the Civil War is exaggerated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Consider the death of police officer Brian Sicknick. Now we still don't know exactly how officer Sicknick died. We're not certain that anyone does know. No one has explained it. But after reviewing the previously withheld video evidence, we can tell you with certainty that officer Sicknick was not beaten to death by Trump voters at the capitol.
The tape shows very clearly Brian Sicknick walking through the building in apparent health after the media told us for 2 years that he had been murdered. So they were wrong about that. Okay. They got caught. Here's the interesting thing.
They won't admit it. Liz Cheney's tweet is still on Twitter tonight. Officer Sicknick was killed defending our capital from the violent mob on January 6th. No correction. Anderson Cooper of CNN still has not apologized.
Quote, officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the fight. He told us, those are lies. So why not just admit it and move on? But they won't. In fact, this week, the White House trotted out both the press secretary and Joe Biden's attorney general, the attorney general of the United States, to claim not just that Brian Sicknick was actually murdered by Republicans at the capitol, but that other officers were murdered too.
It's it's almost beyond belief. Watch this.
Speaker 1: The right rage of bipartisan lawmakers. You heard them all yesterday. You guys reported on it who have condemned, this false depiction of the unprecedented violent attack on con on our constitution and the rule of law, which cost police police, officers their lives.
Speaker 2: It was a violent attack on a fundamental tenet of American democracy, That power is peacefully transferred from one administration to another. Over a 100 officers were assaulted on that day. 5 officers died.
Speaker 0: 5 officers died on that day. Now that's just not some guy in Twitter. That's the attorney general of the United States. That's a man whose honesty is central to his job. If you had a choice between IQ and integrity in an attorney general, of course, you go with integrity because it's essential.
But Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, is a liar. He just lied about something that is provably false. Who are these 5 officers who were quote killed that day? Notice he didn't tell you. No one ever tells you.
No one ever shows you their autopsies. They don't want any detail. They just want the slogan. Now they're counting Brian Sicknick. That's a lie.
But who are the other 4? Well, those are 4 officers who killed themselves after January 6th. In some cases, long after January 6th. But their suicides we know for a fact were the result of the republican mob at the capitol. It's just it's just false.
And it's not some esoteric fact. That fact is available to anyone who has internet access. No police officers died that day on January 6th. None. Not one.
Some were assaulted. That is true. And their assaults are indefensible. So how many were assaulted? Well, Garland said over a 100.
The government accountability office says the number is 114. We're just gonna roll with that. We We don't know if it's true, but we'll take it at face value. And that is bad. We are opposed to assaulting police officers in any context.
We said that on January 6, 2020. Almost say it again. We're against that. But is January 6th the worst assault on the US government since the civil war? That's insane.
It's not even close.
reSee.it AI Summary
Fox News terminated Tucker Carlson's employment after he exposed the influence of greedy Pharma advertisers on TV news content. Carlson's monologue on April 19th broke TV's two biggest rules by telling the truth about the promotion of lethal and worthless vaccines. Despite having the nation's biggest audience, Fox's decision to fire Carlson demonstrates the terrifying power of Big Pharma.
@RobertKennedyJr - Robert F. Kennedy Jr
Fox fires @TuckerCarlson five days after he crosses the red line by acknowledging that the TV networks pushed a deadly and ineffective vaccine to please their Pharma advertisers. Carlson’s breathtakingly courageous April 19 monologue broke TV’s two biggest rules: Tucker told the truth about how greedy Pharma advertisers controlled TV news content and he lambasted obsequious newscasters for promoting jabs they knew to be lethal and worthless. For many years, Tucker has had the nation's biggest audience averaging 3.5 million — 10 times the size of CNN. Fox just demonstrated the terrifying power of Big Pharma.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Tucker Carlson BLOWS The Doors Off January 6th LIES. Reveals Fox News REFUSED To Air His J6 Interview Of Capitol Chief Of Police PROVING "The US Capitol Was FILLED With Federal Agents" Tucker Describes Fox Execs Attacking him For J6 Report: "F**k You!” Narrative Collapse. Wow https://t.co/30UijETvNq
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was interested in January 6th from the start, especially since my child was nearby during the events. I oppose all violence and was appalled by the actions that day. The immediate narrative labeled it a racist insurrection, which I found misleading. Many believed the election was stolen, and there was no effort to reassure them about the integrity of the voting process. Over time, it became clear that significant claims about January 6th were false. For instance, the treatment of individuals like Jacob Chansley, who was escorted by police, raises questions about the narrative. I believe it was a chaotic reaction, not an insurrection, and the media's handling of the situation has been troubling.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kinda narrow the available population down significantly.
Speaker 1: It's just me now. I'm the only person who sees that as an advantage. Oh, well, I am honored. Do as you will. But also, on that, they said, of course, these FBI whistleblowers that the FBI had significant number of agents, that there were other law enforcement agencies there on January 6th.
In fact, it was the whistleblower on this subject that caused them all this grief. They in a sense that there are some discrepancies, shall we say, on how that event was initially reported on, with regards to what actually went down. Now what you've been accused of in the mainstream after you received, I think it was like, 40000 hours of footage from your man McCarthy there, was that you, sort of cherry picked is the phrase that often comes up, footage to deliberately show that it was, to to a degree, a peaceful event. What is your sincere opinion of what went on on January 6th? And why do you feel that there is, yet an attempt to regard it as a deliberate insurrection?
And and also within that, I guess, the the possibility for presenting moments of peace within 4,000 hours of footage does exist. So were you sincere in your presentation, or do you have a particular perspective on how it would affect you?
Speaker 0: I have well, let me just say one of my children was there working in the building and called me during it, and was right nearby when Ashley Babbitt was shot. So I was interested in it from the moment it happened. I was appalled by the vandalism outside by fighting with police officers. I hate violence from abortion to the war in Ukraine. I mean, I am consistent on that.
I'm not a Catholic, but I I share those I definitely share those views. I'm not for the death penalty, not for killing people, not for hurting people, not for violence. And I and I'm I've had those views for a long time. So, you know, any violence on January 6th, I oppose. I've said that many times.
I would was kind of happy to leave it where it was, which is this got completely out of hand. The only reason I ever got involved in commenting on it was and we did a show that night saying, well, this is awful. Right? What happened? Was the lying about it was immediate.
This was a racist white supremacist insurrection. Okay. There was no indication to this day that race had anything to do with it at all, like, nothing. These are people who thought the election was stolen from them. There's some evidence they were right.
We could debate that, but that's what they thought. That's a meaningful thing. If you've got a big population in your country that doesn't believe that your elections are on the level, you need to figure out a way to convince them that the elections are on the level or else you can't have democracy because it's a faith based system. So that was the first thing I noticed. There was no effort at all to convince people.
Actually, electronic voting machines are secure, which they are not. By the way, that's a lie. In any country that has electronic voting machines is by definition at risk of having its election stolen. By definition, no country that cared about democracy would have electronic voting machines. Okay?
First thing. But no one even by the way, many Democrats have made that point. Not now, but Mhmm. 10 years ago. There was no effort to reassure anybody.
They immediately used it as a cudgel to make their political opponent shut up, in a lot of cases, to send them to jail. So I noticed this. I'm like, wait a second. Nobody here is operating in good faith at all. They're just immediately lying with maximum aggression.
And anyone who asks questions about it like me, and if you could go back and look at the tape, my first five shows on January 6th were like, well, yeah, it's bad, but I don't think you're telling the truth about what actually happened. Shut up, racist. What? So that's always the key for me. If it's like an infection, you know it's infected when it hurts.
You press it. You recoil. They immediately recoiled when you have to any questions about January 6th, and that was a tip-off to me. I mean, I had no thought in my head as I watch this happen on television and in the subsequent weeks that US law enforcement or military agencies had anything to do with it. That never crossed my mind.
I never thought there was it was a false flag or anything like that. I'm not a conspiracist by temperament. I never thought that. And then I interviewed the chief of the Capitol Police, Steven Sund, in an interview that was never aired on Fox, by the way. I was fired before it could air.
I I'm gonna interview him again. But Steven Sund was the totally nonpolitical worked for Nancy Pelosi. I mean, this is not some right wing activist. He was the chief of the Capitol Police on January 6th, and he said, oh, yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. That crowd was filled with federal agents. What? Yes. Well, he would know, of course, because he was in charge of security at the site.
So the more time has passed, now it's been two and a half years, it becomes really obvious that core claims they made about January 6th were lies. In my view about events and about people is if you catch someone telling a lie about one thing, the first question you have is what else are you lying about? If you say to your wife, where were you? I was at the grocery store. If you find out she was not at the grocery store, then it raises, okay.
Probably not just lying about being at the grocery store, were you? Like, what is this exactly? Why were you lying about that? And that's kind of the way I feel about January. Like, what is this?
What this is they're clearly lying. That's provable. Why? And, you know, I'm the last person. I'm often accused of being a conspiracy, not on the opposite.
I grew up in a very stable country, the United States in the seventies eighties where people didn't indulge in conspiracies because there weren't any obvious ones afoot. Right? I mean, we took things at face value. We trusted our government by and large. But I the amount of lying around January 6th, and it was obvious in the tapes that I showed, is really distressing.
And anyone who's covering for those lies should be ashamed of himself, and that would include almost the entire American media, including Fox News. People at Fox News Fox News, to its great credit, let me air that, and I'm grateful that they did. But there, you know, there are people there who were mad at me for airing that. Really? Why?
If if you think I'm cherry picking it and taking it out of context, show me show me where. And by the way, I didn't make the claim that it was entirely peaceful. It it wasn't. Police officers were injured. More police officers were injured at the riots in front of the White House the year before, but whatever.
All injuries to police officers or anyone else are bad. I'm not certainly not making excuses for it, but I'm asking obvious questions. You said this happened. For example, there was a guy called the QAnon Shaman, Jacob Chansley. They put the guy in prison for years.
There is surveillance tape that they hid until I aired it showing the Capitol Police trying lots of doors trying to get into the senate chamber, the sacrosanct chamber that he wasn't allowed to be in, and then escorting him in. And he kind of wanders around like he's taken a hit of mescal and just kinda you know what I mean? And, like, he says a prayer. He thanks god for the Capitol Police, and then he wanders out. Now there are a lot of conclusions you could draw from that, but you cannot call that guy an insurrectionist.
That's a lie. And by the way, an insurrection is a very specific meaning, and I'm pedantic about words because they're the currency that I trade in. I mean, that's what I do. I use words for a living, so I care about their specific meanings. That was not an insurrection.
It was not armed, and its purpose was not to overthrow the government. It was it was a spasm of rage that Trump definitely it helped inspire. That's true. And, at the election results. Okay.
You know? But I'm not actually for that. I don't think leaders should be making people more pissed in general, but that's what it was. It was not an insurrection. And to put Jacob Chansley, an American citizen, a navy veteran in jail for years after he was let into the senate chamber by uniformed Capitol Hill police officers, and then I play that and I'm the bad guy?
Fuck you. Like, what what do you make of that? I'm sorry. It makes me mad just thinking about it. I said I wasn't gonna be a hater.
That makes me mad. And I see people on other channels. It's outrageous. You're trying to minimize January 6th. Well but what this guy went to prison.
Went to prison. You ever been to prison?
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Tucker Carlson “They rigged the election in front of all of us and nobody did anything about it” “When he was finished, the vote count shut up by 50,000 votes for VP Biden. 47 USB cards were missing at the end of last week. As of today that number is reportedly grown to 64.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Disturbing breaches of protocol were observed during the election. USB card drives from voting machines were mishandled, destroying any possibility of a forensic audit and corrupting the chain of custody. Despite objections, the voting machine warehouse supervisor plugged unsecured USB cards into vote counting computers, resulting in a sudden increase of 50,000 votes for Vice President Biden. Initially, 47 USB cards were missing, but that number has now reportedly grown to 64. Additionally, 60,000 to 70,000 unopened mail-in ballots were discovered in back offices, with no knowledge of their origin or whereabouts. All signed paper chain of custody documents are missing, and attempts to recreate them have been made by Democrat election officials. The questions of where the ballots came from and where they went remain unanswered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There were disturbing breaches of protocol taking place in plain sight. At one point, I saw unsecured USB card drives from voting machines being separated from their accompanying cartridges and paper tapes, and co mingled together by election workers. These actions destroyed any forensic auditability and corrupted the chain of Formal objections to election officials and law enforcement officers that were present went unanswered. Later, I saw the voting machine warehouse supervisor for Delaware mounted carrying it in unsealed bags of unsecured USB B card drives, which he inexplicably proceeded to plug into computers, vote counting computers and upload into the official vote tally. Late.
Despite formal objections to senior law enforcement that was present, an election board officials, He was allowed to continue. When he was finished, the vote count shot up by 50,000 votes for vice president Biden. 47 USB cards were missing at the end of last this week. As of today, that number is reportedly grown to 64. When I finally gained access to the sequestered to the room.
This is the 3 days later, where mail in ballots were ingested. I witnessed 60 to 70,000 unopened mail in ballots unopened mail in ballots, and it's requested back offices. That was on Thursday at 3:30 after the vote was supposedly counted. They remain unaccounted before. We don't know where they are.
All signed paper chain of custody documents are missing despite attempts by democrat election officials to recreate them. My questions then and now remain, Where did the ballots come from? Where did these mail in ballots come from? And where do they go?
@the_trump_wins - Trump Wins
Tucker Carlson “They rigged the election in front of all of us and nobody did anything about it” 16,000 hrs of surveillance video Detroit Heilmann voting center 3 hrs and15 min after polls closed in Michigan Mules loading thousands of Bidens into a minivan with Indiana plates.
reSee.it AI Summary
Fox's settlement with Dominion was likely a ruse, as the amount paid was never disclosed. Dominion's worth of $50 million contradicts the $787 million in damages claimed. The lawsuit may have been a ploy to oust Tucker Carlson and intimidate other hosts. Rupert Murdoch's ties to the CIA and MI6 raise questions about Fox's actions, including calling Arizona for Biden and firing Carlson and Dobbs. Chris Wallace and Bret Baier's potential involvement as CIA/FBI assets is also concerning.
@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com
1) I bet not a penny was actually paid by Fox to Dominion. It was all a ruse. In a REAL "out of Court settlement" you never reveal the amount being paid to settle the case. https://t.co/hwxqT648Gs
@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com
2) Besides, Dominion is worth just $50 Million. $787 Million in damages makes no sense. even if you include punitive damages. The maximum compensation Dominion could have gotten in a trial was $2 million. Maybe $5 million, top. $787 Million makes no sense.
@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com
3) I think that Lawsuit - and the fake settlement - was a ruse to fire Tucker Carlson @TuckerCarlson . And to scare Maria Bartiromo, and Lou Dobbs (which had already been fired in 2021).
@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com
@TuckerCarlson 4) Let's not forget that Rupert Murdoch is a long time asset of the CIA and MI6. Murdoch helped both the CIA and MI6 in their Coup in Australia in 1975. Rupert Murdoch is an Australian, not an American.
@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com
@TuckerCarlson 5) Rupert Murdoch is a long time asset of the CIA and MI6. This is why Fox News called Arizona for Biden. He followed orders from ABOVE. And this is why he fired Tucker Carlson. This is why he fired Lou Dobbs.
@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com
@TuckerCarlson 6) Rupert Murdoch is a long time asset of the CIA and MI6. This is why Fox had anti-Trumpers Chris Wallace and Bret Baier on Election Night on Nov. 3, 2020. Part of the CIA/FBI Propaganda Machine. Kyle Becker knows the truth. @kylenabecker (But he didn't reveal it in 2020)
@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com
@TuckerCarlson @kylenabecker 7) I bet that Chris Wallace and Bret Baier are CIA/FBI assets, too. Chris Wallace and Bret Baier are nauseating. 🤮🤮🤮 even worse than that ugly man named Rachel Madcow
@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - The #Fauci Files - gregrubini.com
@TuckerCarlson @kylenabecker 8) typo: I meant "that ugly man named Rachel Maddow" typo: "sorry, not sorry".
@RichardGage_911 - Richard Gage, AIA, Architect
[RG911Team] Tucker Carlson held a dark secret for 18 years, both at MSNBC and Fox News. There was something his bosses didn’t want us to see… and now that he’s left, he’s telling the truth about it. But can we handle the truth? #censorship https://t.co/X8CUtS60MB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 discusses the collapse of building 7 and requests a video clip to be shown. Speaker 0 mentions that the collapse is not shown and suggests there might be a code preventing it. Speaker 0 also mentions that questioning the collapse of building 7 is seen as weird and can lead to job loss. Speaker 2 explains that building 7 collapsed on September 11, 2001, despite not being hit by an aircraft. The building had been damaged by debris and fire, but most of the fires were extinguished by 5:20 PM. Speaker 2 questions the official explanation that the collapse was primarily due to fire and asks for opinions on what it looks like.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Claims. Do you have any Let's let's
Speaker 1: talk about the the building. Sure. Sure. Let's start with the, collapse of building 7. Can you roll the video clip that I sent to you?
Okay. I'm not sure if we
Speaker 0: can, but it's specified.
Speaker 1: Maybe there's some kind of, code. You just don't show the collapse of building 7. I don't know what it is.
Speaker 0: They don't care if you think the Earth is flat. It's not a threat to anyone. But if you say, like, what what actually happened with building 7? Like, that is weird. Right?
It doesn't like, what is that? Right. If you were to say something like that on television, They flip out. They would flip out. You'd, like, lose your job over that.
Why?
Speaker 2: Why? This is World Trade Center 7 just before it collapsed on September 11, 2001. It had not been hit by an aircraft. It had been damaged by falling debris and fire. But by 5:20 PM, most of the fires have been extinguished.
Although the building was 47 stories high, it doesn't fall sideways Nor collapse unevenly. For this to have happened, all of the building's This vertical supports must have given way at almost exactly the same time. Yet the Federal Emergency Management Agency reported that the collapse was due primarily to fire. But what does it look like to you?
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson's recent text messages, revealed in the Dominion lawsuit, show that he was dismissive of claims about the 2020 election being stolen. However, it seems that Tucker has now fully embraced the idea that the election was rigged, possibly as a way to solidify his support for Donald Trump and his departure from Fox. It's unclear why Tucker's stance has changed, but it's clear that he is now fully committed to this narrative.
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
Tucker Carlson Is Scared to Cover the 2020 Election “I was far too dismissive of some of the claims made about it and I think there may be some merit to the wildest possible claims…” MY THOUGHTS: One of the common things I hear from people is what Tucker said in text messages that were “brought to light” by the Dominion lawsuit… that he didn’t believe the election was stolen and said some other things blah blah. I will say that Tucker, since at least 2020 (publicly), knew his devices were being monitored. What I do know is that Tucker appears to have gone all-in now on solidifying his support for Donald Trump and the fact that the 2020 election was rigged. Why? Maybe it has to do with leaving Fox. Tucker is a very smart and bright man; so it’s more than “I simply changed my mind” on these subjects..Therefore, was he freed? https://rumble.com/v41b9ah-tucker-carlson-scared-to-cover-the-2020-election.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am scared to cover two things. Firstly, the 2020 election. I may have been too dismissive of some claims made about it, and there might be some validity to the wildest claims. It's hard to know what's true with all the lying and sleazy people involved in politics. It may take years to figure it out, but not all the claims about fraud were baseless. Secondly, there is another topic, but the speaker does not provide any information about it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are there things that you're scared to cover? You're sitting there saying, wow, this is, like, soul crushing. Like, to the point where, like, it really scares you in your soul. There are 2. Yes.
There are 2. 1 is the 2020 election, and I think that I was far too dismissive of some of the claims made about it, and I think there may be some merit to some of the wildest possible claims about that election. And I haven't proven it yet, but I've, you know look. I'll just say and you know this, of course, very well, both of you, that whenever you have politics, you've got a lot of sleazy people and liars and people who just wanna get their candidate elected or get paid or whatever. You've got a lot of lying around all political campaigns, so it's very hard to know what's true.
And sometimes it takes years to figure it out. So there were a lot of stupid mercenaries making claims about fraud in that past election that were you know, they couldn't back up. But that doesn't mean that all of those ideas were wrong. And I think that some of them were right, is is what I'm learning. And, you know, I'll just leave it there.
The second
Tucker Carlson Scared to Cover the 2020 Election
Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper
rumble.com
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Tucker Carlson ‘they rigged the election’ and wiped their crimes clean ‘in front of all of us and nobody did anything about it.’ Not even a congressman. https://t.co/U4NqE67Kmj
Video Transcript AI Summary
I found a video where the speaker goes through some server logs and discovers a database issue. They mention finding different forensics related to it. They also mention a person named Christy, who seems to be active in the GMC community.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So here's the video that everybody is calling me. Let's see. Who do we do? The the server logs. Well, I went back to to our logs.
Logs. And guess who it is? Who it is. Database in my extended. That's what I find find different forensics.
What a great person to have on a GMC here in the community. This one. Christy, who is the active active
Video Transcript AI Summary
On 2/11, 462 log entries were overwritten by a script. On 3rd March, 37,686 log entries were overwritten by the same script. On 12th, 330 log entries were overwritten. The EMS admin account is responsible for this. The challenge is that this occurred before an audit, which means the full context of the election is not available. The log file shows that someone purged all the results for the election, deleting all records and files. This happened right before the audit started.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On 2/11, 462 log entries were overwritten by this script. On 3rd March, 37,686 log entries were overwritten by this same script. On 12th, which is the day before we received the system, there were 330 log entries overwritten by that script. Now the challenge here is that I know that this occurred. I know which account did it.
It was the EMS admin account. You would think that if you were doing an audit the next day, that you would want to have the full context of the election to be audited, but that clearly was not the case in this instance. Sorry.
Speaker 1: Just to clarify. So this is a log file specifically from report report, tallying I'm sorry. Results tallying and reporting, which is the Dominion software, that entry says that someone went into the program and clicked on something that said, I wanna purge all the results for this election. That goes through and deletes all of the records within it. And if you actually take a look, You can see the success.
It's like the 2nd lineup, you know, that it completed successfully, and it literally deletes all of the files On the NAS directory as well, which is where all the results from the election are contained, where all the images from the election are contained, and all those other details. So some Individual went into an application, and they chose specifically, to to run something that would clear all records in the system that was used to generate the official results the day before an audit started.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Tucker Carlson ‘they rigged the election’ and wiped their crimes clean ‘in front of all of us and nobody did anything about it.’ https://t.co/nlk8BmRWFx
Video Transcript AI Summary
I spoke to law enforcement agencies, urging them to collect forensic evidence from computers to prove or refute election fraud claims. Despite my requests, the evidence was not gathered. Chain of custody logs and records in Delaware County are missing, making 100,000+ ballots questionable. There is no remedy for this situation, which could impact the presidential election certification.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the most upsetting really upsetting to me and the most upsetting was I had, spoke to multiple law enforcement agencies and literally begged multiple law enforcement agencies. They said, go in. And it's in order to prove prove that nothing's happening. In either exonerate yourselves in the process or refute what I'm saying, please. It's very simple process.
Just go get the forensic evidence from the computers. It's a simple process. You take the that you turn the computer off. It's non destructive, takes moments, maybe half an hour, 20 minutes to do it properly and collect the evidence. You open the computer up.
You take a a a device called a bit blocker. You put it in the hard drive. It's done under the observation of law enforcement officers. They take a forensic image of the drive. Put it all back together.
It wouldn't have taken more than an hour to to image all 5 machines. That was never done despite my objections, and that was 3 weeks ago. Lastly, when they said they said, well, we've got all the forensic records and so forth. We just learned 2 days ago that virtually all chain of custody logs, records, yellow sheets, everything was gone. All forensic evidence, all custody sheets in Delaware County are gone.
They had a signing party where they sat down and and poll workers were invited back to recreate those logs. And our understanding as of today was that they were unsuccessful in getting them all. So we have a situation where we have 100,000 ballots to 120,000 ballots, both mainland and USB. They're in question. Now, there's no cure for this.
There's no remedy for this. As a home charter, we can we could have a reelection in Delaware County for our own representatives within our own town, but there is no cure for that for the president of the United States. And I believe as a citizen and an observer to this that anybody could certify that vote in any good conscience.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many Georgia counties have failed to provide electronic ballot images from the 2020 election, with as many as 74 counties admitting to destroying these records. Legal action is being considered due to violations of federal and state law, as well as obstruction of open records requests by over a dozen counties. The possibility of two separate lawsuits arising from these issues is being discussed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Actually has been, evidence proven in Georgia that, these 2020 election records were actually, destroyed in some counties. What is the latest with this information?
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's right, Cameron. It's a project we've been working on for several months, and it is it's, the electronic ballot images. It was not just a few counties. It was actually, as many as 74 counties have been unable to to fulfill open records of requests for ballot, the original ballot images from the November election.
So they were supposed to retain these, images for 2 years under Federal State Law. The, system creates the images in order to tabulate. So despite the fact that it creates the images, they're an integral part of election records, probably the most key part other than the results themselves. 70 counties or more have actually admitted destroying these records. And this is what we announced today, along with some of the statistics that go with that.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. And so will this information and kind of, findings that you and, other mobilized groups have determined. Will this go forth with a legal suit, in Georgia?
Speaker 1: We are discussing that right now, Cameron. We think that that's most likely. We have several issues that, the counties are, just horribly violated the, federal and state law. And we also have another group of about, over a dozen counties who basically tried to subvert our open records request by just flat not responding or charging us too much money or these types of activities. So there has the possibility for 2 different, lawsuits out of this.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two Clark County Technical employees revealed that votes on voting machines and USB drives changed overnight. They were only allowed a visual inspection of the USB drives and denied a forensic examination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2 Clark County Technical employees came forward completely independent of each other, and explained that they discovered that the number of votes recorded by voting machines and stored on USB drives would change between the time the polls were closed at night and when they were reopened the next morning. In other words, votes were literally appearing and disappearing in the dead of night. When we attempted to verify the integrity of these voting machines, we were allowed only a useless visual inspection of the outside of a USB drive. We were denied a forensic examination. Finally,
Video Transcript AI Summary
I found Brian in the server logs, showing him the database. Christy Francois let him in, which could be a problem later on.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So here's the video that everybody is calling me. Let's see. Who do we do? The the server logs. Well, I went back to to our logs.
Logs. And guess who it is? Who it is. Brian. Brian.
Brian. Here you'll see a database in the next vendor. That's what I find find different. What a great person to have on a AT and T. There's an amazing Nissan.
Christy Francois, I went to the service server. Here's the app. He actually should be showing showing her what I am. And then then here's the delete delete of the log log. Just wanna log log in the database.
Here she is letting Brian into the server And and again, again, that's another, law law because probably all plan later in the year.
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
Tucker Carlson says the 2020 Election was "100% stolen" from President Trump. https://t.co/hd2eHBb1yU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes the election was rigged due to COVID changes in voting. Censorship of COVID discussions is seen as undemocratic. In a democracy, people need all information to make informed decisions during elections. Without access to all information, there is no true democracy or free elections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was a a 100% stolen. Like, it was rigged to that large of a Yeah. They they completely change the way people vote right before the election on the basis of COVID, which had nothing to do with that way it was rigged. Meaning sick. And then Manipulated.
Then you censor the information people are allowed to get. Anyone who complains about COVID, which is like by the way, it might have hurt Trump. But, I mean, it's like whatever. I mean, you could play it many different ways. You can't have censorship in a democracy by definition.
Here's how it works. The people rule, They vote for representatives to carry their agenda to the capital city and get it enacted. That's how they're in charge. And then every few years, they get to reassess the performance of those people in an election. In order to do that, they need a they need access, unfettered access to information.
And no one, particularly not people who are already in power, is allowed to tell them what information they can have. They have to have all information that they want. Whether the people in charge want it or don't want it or think it's true or think it's false, it doesn't matter. And the second you don't have that, you don't have a democracy. It's not a free election.
Period.
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson believes doctors who wrongly recommended the COVID vaccine should apologize for the harm caused. He argues that continuing to lie about COVID is dangerous and immoral, and questions the credibility of such doctors. Apologies and explanations are necessary to regain trust.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Tucker Carlson Says Doctors Should APOLOGIZE for Wrongly Recommending the COVID Vax “If you hurt someone unintentionally, you have to say, ‘I’m sorry.’” “By the way,” Carlson added, “I would never go to a doctor who was still lying about COVID because that’s a dangerous person. That’s an immoral person and a dangerous person.” “I can’t get past it,” Carlson continued. “It’s like, ‘Oh, I’m great at my job. I killed a bunch of people, but I’m a great person.’ It’s like, no, it’s too big a sin to overlook. You have no credibility unless you apologize for that and explain how you reached that wrong conclusion.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors who promoted the vaccine were wrong, causing harm. Some doctors remain silent. A doctor treated vaccine injuries early on, defying rules and saving lives. Having a trustworthy doctor is rare. Apologies and explanations are needed for credibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think what's so interesting is that doctors who clearly can read, I mean, they're literate by definition, they're not stupid by definition, you hope, but I think it's true. They're smart. They look at the evidence and, like, everything they said was, fundamentally everything they said was wrong about the vax, and it's hurt a lot of people. And, like, where all the and some doctors, I know the 3 that you mentioned, and they're great, but there are tens of thousands of doctors in the United States. And why aren't they all standing up and saying, oh my gosh.
I'm so sorry. I cannot believe I recommended it. I mean, I endorsed the Iraq war in 2003. And at the end of 2003, I realized I was wrong, and I felt bad about it for 20 years. 20 years.
In fact, it was 20 years ago this week that I went to Iraq. And I felt bad about it ever since then. And at every opportunity, I apologize not to please other people, but to maintain my dignity, my self respect. I mean, that's a prerequisite. You have to if you hurt someone unintentionally, you have to say I'm sorry.
And I can't believe that 99% of American doctors won't do that. And it I'm not going to them, by the way. I would never go to a doctor who is still lying about COVID because that that's a dangerous person. That's an immoral person and a dangerous person.
Speaker 1: My own personal doctor, who I won't name because she's already been attacked, was it was, the one who pushed back. She she, treated me when I when I was vaccine injured. I I called her
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And, I was afraid that she wasn't gonna believe me. She said, Jimmy, I'm treating 5 people just like you. 3 of them are nurses, 2 of them are doctors, and none of them, feel comfortable to talk about it. And so she knew really early on that there was something nefarious going on. She was the one she they told her they wouldn't let her treat patients.
They would When they would come in for COVID, they would just tell her to intubate them, and she was like, everybody's dying. So she started giving them steroids. And they came to her and said, hey, you're breaking the rules. You're not allowed to give people steroids. And she said, yeah, but my patients are living and your patients are dying.
And then 6 months later, the FDA and the CDC reversed their advice on that and said, Okay, you can give them steroids. And so I was very, very lucky to have my own personal doctor be on the forefront of that, and so I trust her more than anything. Now I wanna go back
Speaker 0: What a blessing. I mean, you
Speaker 1: yes. Go ahead. Go ahead. What a blessing.
Speaker 0: No. You're just so fortunate to have someone with deep medical knowledge who is a decent human being and not insane. And, you know, most people, including me, do not have access to a doctor like that. And I've met doctors I like, and I'm sure they're competent in their specialties. But I can't get past it.
It's like, oh, you know, I'm great at my job. I I killed a bunch of people, but I'm a great it's like, no. It's too big it's too big a sin to overlook. Like, you have no credibility unless you apologize for that and explain how you reach that wrong conclusion. That's like it anyway, I can't get past it.
@ggreenwald - Glenn Greenwald
This original Newsweek headline predictably went viral, claiming Tucker Carlson has "launched" a new program on Russia state TV. The "edited" article now makes clear the whole story is bullshit -- false -- but it was an irresistible McCarthyite smear: https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-launches-show-russian-state-tv-russia-24-1903045#:~:text=A%20show%20from%20former%20Fox,is%20broadcast%20on%20Russia%2024.
Tucker Carlson show aired by Russian state TV
There is no evidence that the former Fox News anchor has done a deal to show the old episodes.
newsweek.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I reacted strongly to the news of the second assassination attempt on Trump, feeling frustrated by the media's portrayal of the suspect as a Trump supporter. Lindsey Graham's claim that he worked for Iran shocked me. It turns out this individual had extensive connections and had been interviewed by numerous outlets in Washington, revealing a more complex background than initially reported. I can't help but wonder about the true motivations and affiliations at play here.
@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra
Tucker Carlson Reacts to the 2nd Trump Assassination Attempt They Said he was a Trump Supporter.. huh? Lindsey Graham said he worked for Iran on Fox… what!? “I’m screaming at my television… They LIED! They’re Lying!” Come to find out, this guy was had been interviewed by every media outlet in Washington.. he was a neocon who did a lot of interviews, and had a lot of contacts with members of Congress and their staff, and other US government agencies. 🤔 I wonder who? https://rumble.com/v5fcwbd-tucker-carlson-reacts-to-the-2nd-trump-assassination-attempt.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker watched news coverage claiming the man arrested for attempting to murder Trump was a Trump supporter. Lindsey Graham blamed Iran. However, the speaker says the would-be assassin's politics align with Graham's, as he is a neocon who volunteered in Ukraine.
The speaker believes the media is lying by omission, distorting reality, and preventing the average person from knowing the truth. The attempted assassin was interviewed by every major media outlet and has a lengthy criminal record, yet The New York Times portrayed him as a "freedom fighter" in Ukraine and detailed his contacts with US government agencies. The speaker fears this information will be memory-holed, and the public will be misled into believing a false narrative.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I'm I'm watching this. They're literally telling me that this guy whom they've arrested is a Trump supporter. So you flip channels and then you learn that I flipped over to a channel I used to work on. And there's Lindsey Graham. And I know, I know, I know.
He's a Republican senator from one of the most conservative states. How does that happen by the way? If democracy is real, how is Lindsey Graham a senator? But whatever. So I'm watching Lindsey Graham and Lindsey Graham's looking right into the camera and he's like, you know who did this?
Iran. Iran? So I looked into this. Yeah. That's for sure.
Well, it turns out someone has yelled warmonger. Well, the guy who shot Trump was also a warmonger. And in fact, the closer you look at it, the more you realize his politics are exactly the same as Lindsey Graham's. He's a neocon. He literally volunteered in Ukraine.
And Lindsey Graham's like, no, Iran did. I was like, no, you have no opinions that are different from this guy's. And you're lying to me. And the audience I used to speak to five nights a week, you were lying to them. I'm shouting this in my hotel room, nobody heard me.
My wife was brushing her teeth. She's like, what is that? They're lying. It drove me completely insane. And there's no mention of the fact that this guy who by the way has been interviewed by every media outlet in Washington.
This guy was like a very famous guy. You may not even know this. There's only really one place to learn any facts at all and that's Elon Musk's social media app. It's crazy. I don't have a TV at home, so I'm spared most of this.
I have no idea what's going on. By the way, I strongly recommend ignorance. If you're looking to stay happy in a moment like this, just know less. Unfortunately, my job requires me to know more, but if you think about it, did God punish Adam and Eve for ignorance? I don't think he did.
He punished them for knowledge. So maybe I shouldn't watch cable news. This was my I don't wanna know what they're saying, but this week I've had to pay close attention. And every single thing is a lie either directly or it's a lie more much more prevalent and much more sinister. It's a lie by omission.
They're just not telling you the facts. And without belaboring the point, I'm using this as just one example among a countless number of examples where reality is completely distorted and the average person has not only no idea but no way of knowing what the truth is. So the guy who is now in custody for attempted murder against the Republican nominee, the former US president Donald Trump. That guy has been interviewed countless times by every big media outlet in The United States. He's got, you know, a criminal record, the length of your arm, 20 charges including possession of weapons of mass destruction.
The New York Times didn't bother to learn any of that before they held him up as a freedom fighter in Ukraine where he was living. And then the piece describes the contact he's had with members of congress and their staffs and other US government agencies. Wait a second, that's the same guy who brought a rifle with a scope to a golf course in South Florida to murder Donald Trump and he's had all these contacts with US government agencies. I don't know what that's about, but I think it's time to find out. No?
Yes. But no one's gonna find out. It's just gonna be memory holding. In a week, will never have happened. And you'll be the crazy person for remembering.
People like what? Didn't some Trump supporter bring a rifle because you're against gun control or something? No, no, no, That's not what happened. A guy who was a darling of the New York Times who has the exact same world view as Lindsey Graham decided to try and murder Donald Trump and it will be completely gone. Will have disappeared.
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson suggested that Nick Fuentes must be a government informant for knowing about his father's CIA background, which I found surprising since this information has been publicly available for years. I pointed out that many online users, including myself, had shared this info long before Tucker claimed to have discovered it. His recent admission about learning this from a Fuentes video, despite his father's lifetime knowledge, seems implausible. I also noticed Tucker's similarities to Ben Shapiro's past criticisms of Fuentes.
@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯
1/ Tucker Carlson tells Candace Owens that Nick Fuentes must be a Fed, because how else could Nick know Tucker's dad was CIA when Tucker just found out this year? "How the hell would this child from Chicago know this?" But it's been publicly available info for years on the internet. Originally posted to bitchute 4 years ago (where it has 100k views), I even posted it to Gab over 2 years ago. Am I a Fed, too, Tucker? What does it say about Tucker's credibility that hundreds of thousands of internet anons figured out that his dad worked for the CIA before Tucker did? And why would Tucker be mad at people for their sleuthing of publicly available internet info?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Someone sent the speaker a video of a young, talented person from Chicago attacking him, claiming his father was in the CIA. The speaker initially dismissed this as untrue. However, after his father's death in March, he learned his father was indeed involved in that world, which shocked him.
The speaker questions how this person knew about his father's involvement in intelligence, given his father's age. The person in the video claimed the speaker was a CIA operative. The speaker vehemently denies this, expressing strong animosity towards the CIA. He also says the person has since claimed he is funded by Russia. The speaker finds the CIA accusation personally offensive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I had the only reason I know who he is is because someone sent me a video a few years ago of him attacking me, I was like, so I'm looking at this. And I'm like, well, first of this kid's really talented, like legit. And I can assess that just having done the job for so long. So I was like, wow. Lots of talent.
Native talent. And he's attacking my dad as a CIA. His dad's in the CIA or whatever. And I'm like, Well, that's no. Untrue.
Then my father dies, and I learn, actually, yeah, was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it. So, no one has to believe me, but that's just a fact. This was in March. And I'm like, well, why would how the hell would this child from Chicago my dad was 84 when he passed.
Like, how who's this guy know my dad is? And, like, he's in an intelligence world. How would he know that? And I didn't Wait. So that was his critique of you because I didn't see it?
Yeah. Someone just sent me this video, and it was like, you can't believe anything Carlson says because his father was in the CIA and he's a CIA working on behalf of the CIA. Well, I mean, I think it's pretty obvious and I'm pretty I mean, I actually feel emotional in my anger towards CIA. And I think that that comes out on the air quite regularly. Right.
And so the idea that I'm working for the CIA is like deranged. Well, it helps, he said I was I'm funded by Russia now. Since the interview, he then did a thing and said I was funded by Russia. A lot more likely to take Russian money than I would be to work for the CIA because you would never take Russian money and you're not Russian. But but I mean, really hate the CIA.
I mean, I would I mean, that's like very offensive to me. So why would you It's like personal for you. Well, little bit. Yeah. And anyway, like, who is this kid exactly?
And maybe it's just an accident that the guy goes after exclusively goes after people who are in the same
@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯
2/ To be clear, the info in the "Tucker Carlson Company Man" video has been publicly known for decades. That video put it all together and made it digestible to the masses. You can find it by following my Gab link: https://gab.com/SamParkerSenate/posts/110347283262710429
@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯
3/ Or, you can watch it right here, and find out the information that Tucker knew his whole life but is pretending to have just found out this year. Do you find Tucker credible? https://t.co/2hwJ97H7Mr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker alleges Tucker Carlson is a CIA puppet due to his and his father's connections to various organizations. Carlson's father, Richard, was Director of Voice of America, a propaganda broadcasting division with ties to the CIA, and later U.S. Ambassador to the Seychelles. Tucker supposedly attempted to join the CIA and later worked for publications with ties to individuals and organizations connected to the CIA, including the Heritage Foundation and The Weekly Standard.
The speaker highlights connections between individuals associated with Carlson, such as Paul Greenberg, William Kristol, and Rupert Murdoch, to organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations, the Rothschilds, and individuals with alleged CIA ties. The speaker claims Carlson ridicules 9/11 conspiracy theories and avoids discussing the Rothschilds due to his controlled opposition role. The speaker suggests media personalities and outlets are controlled, and encourages viewers to research independently and avoid blindly trusting mainstream media figures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The owners of this country know the truth. It's called the American dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.
Speaker 1: Before I begin my video, I just want to remind you my dating site, clownworlddating.com, is up and running. Sign up is free. If you'd like a premium account, it's $10 a month. You could also donate or share a link if you don't want to sign up. Trying to get the idea off the ground.
If you want to meet someone who's not an NPC, give Clown World Dating a try. In this video, I will document the many connections Tucker Carlson has to the CIA and other groups. The reason I'm doing this is because right now, he is leading a major part of America off a cliff with his false conservative platform. He rages about the elite and how America seems to be going down the drain when he himself couldn't be more connected to these same elites helping to do it. He is a total shill, a puppet being used to distribute propaganda.
What people need to realize is the left and right paradigm we are given is entirely false. Whether you watch CNN or Fox, you are getting CIA agents highly trained in propaganda, usually coming from wealthy families. Take Anderson Cooper, for example. He admittedly interned at the CIA and was born into the Vanderbilt family. He could be called the face of CNN just as Tucker is the face of Fox.
Follow me as I take you through his career and document his highly suspect rise in journalism. Don't forget to take notes and research these things yourself. Tucker Carlson was born on 05/16/1969 in San Francisco, California. When he was six years old, his father Richard divorced his mother Lisa and married Patricia Swanson, one of the heiresses to Swanson Enterprises most notable for their TV dinners. Carlson attended many boarding schools during his youth, including locations in Switzerland and Rhode Island.
He graduated from Trinity College in Connecticut in 1991, which is known as one of the Little Ivies, which are a group of private schools which compete with Ivy League schools. Supposedly, Tucker attempted to join the CIA when he graduated, but his application was denied. I can't find an explanation as to why he wanted to be in the CIA or why they rejected him. His father was a very well connected man in the media industry and encouraged him to pursue journalism because, quote, they'll take anybody. His father Richard started his career in journalism at the young age of 22.
He had jobs as a copy boy at the Los Angeles Times as well as a reporter for United Press International, which at the time was one of the largest newswire services in the world. He worked for a few TV stations in Los Angeles and San Diego before joining San Diego Federal Savings and Loan in 1977. The bank was headed by Gordon Luce, who was the former public affairs director for Reagan. Richard became vice president of finance within three years, and during this time, the bank had a lot of political controversies due to their connections to current and former members of the Reagan administration. In 1983, he decided to get into politics, and in 1984, ran for mayor of San Diego.
He lost to his opponent Roger Hedgecock, who was later forced from office in 1985 after it was revealed he received over $350,000 illegally during his campaign. Coincidentally, he would also go on to become a conservative radio host. In 1986, using his connections to the White House, Reagan personally announced his intention to nominate Richard as associate director of the United States Information Agency. He became Director of Voice of America, which was a propaganda broadcasting division of USIA. He served as their longest running Director.
Voice of America started in 1941 when President Roosevelt established the Foreign Broadcast Information Service as a program directed by the Office of Strategic Services, which became the CIA. The intention stated publicly was to communicate America's views abroad, but it was really an outfit to disseminate propaganda. The first few broadcasts for Voice of America were done over British Broadcasting Corporation transmitters but expanded rapidly and fell under control of the Office of War Information in 1942. The Office of War Information was tasked with creating and distributing propaganda domestically and internationally. They did this through various means such as broadcast, newspapers, posters, films, and other media.
The agency was terminated by President Truman in 1945, their offices were transferred to the State Department and most of the responsibilities were transferred to the CIA. It should also be noted that a Voice of America relay station in Thailand was used as a CIA black site referred to as Cat's Eye or Detention Site Green. These overlaps and connections between Voice of America and the CIA should not be glossed over. In 1991, Richard Carlson was personally nominated by President George H. W.
Bush to be The U. S. Ambassador to The Seychelles, a nation of islands off the Eastern Coast Of Africa. In 1997, he became CEO of King World Public Television, which was later purchased by CBS in 1999 for $2,500,000,000 He became the vice chairman of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, which is an organization that is part of the Israel lobby in The United States. It was founded by Clifford May, who was also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the project for the new American century, and vice chairman of the Republican Jewish Coalition.
Now you're starting to see that it was no mistake Tucker wanted to join the CIA and become a journalist, like father like son. Tucker Carlson got his start in journalism when he was hired as a fact checker for policy review. This was a publication put out by the Heritage Foundation. The Heritage Foundation was founded in 1973 by three men: Paul Wyrick, a political activist and commentator Edwin Feulner, an academic who attended London School of Economics, which is a Rothschild controlled school who was also advisor to different government agencies and domestic policy consultant to Reagan, and last but not least, Joseph Coors of the Coors Brewing family. In 1975, Congress investigated the activities of the Korean Central Intelligence Agency in The US.
Mr. Had met with the KCIA station chief, Kim Young Hwan, and in the early nineties, the Heritage Foundation started receiving donations from the KCIA. It should also be noted that in 02/2005, Mr. Fuelner was appointed to a task force on UN reform, which included such people as former CIA Director James Woolsey with the goal of achieving a more effective United Nations. The task force was also supported by the Council on Foreign Relations.
In 1977, Paul Wyrick hired a man named Roger Pearson to write for policy review. In 1986, an intelligence agency watchdog publication called the Covert Action Quarterly documented Pearson's connections to James Jesus Engelton, who was the former chief of CIA counterintelligence, as well as Daniel Graham, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. The Heritage Foundation was largely funded by Joseph Coors through his family wealth, but it also received funding from Chase Manhattan Bank, Pfizer, Dow Chemical, Sears, General Motors, Amoco, and Mobile. David Rockefeller was CEO and Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank at the time. It should also be noted that David's grandfather, John D.
Rockefeller, who started the Standard Oil Company, had to break it up due to antitrust laws, and Amico, as well as Mobile, were once part of the company. John D. Rockefeller also donated the 16 acres of land upon which the United Nations headquarters sits in New York. In David Rockefeller's O Memoirs, he is quoted as saying, some even believe we, the Rockefeller family, are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of The United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalist and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure, One world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.
He also funded and was chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations. A quick little fun fact. Before the homosexual political commentator David Brock, founder of Media Matters for America, a leftist propaganda outlet which received funding from George Soros and given office space by alleged pedophile and human trafficker John Podesta, he was on the board of the Heritage Foundation. He supported Hillary Clinton for president twice and dated James Alifantis, has been accused of being a pedophile and human trafficker. He is also a friend of Lynn Rothschild.
Lynn Rothschild supposedly abhors Trump and fawns over Clinton publicly, yet her and Trump go way back as well. Also, here's a photo of Trump laughing it up with happy Rockefeller, wife of former vice president and New York governor Nelson Rockefeller. It's a great example to show you that these people are all liars and actors. They will fill whatever role they need to fill when they need to fill it. Sometimes that involves swinging to the total opposite side of the false paradigm politically if it's advantageous to the agenda of the elite.
Pick your central banking puppet, left or right. It's all controlled, and these people are shameless whores. When Tucker Carlson left his job at policy review, he went to work for the Arkansas Democrat Gazette under the tutelage of editor Paul Greenberg. Mr. Greenberg was very well connected having his pieces published across 1,400 different newspapers within the Tribune Content Agency Syndicate at the time.
He also won a Pulitzer Prize in 1969, appeared on major television networks as a political commentator on talk shows such as Charlie Rose. Now I can't actually prove that Mr. Greenberg was CIA, but when I started to look at a few publications he put out, it made me start to wonder. In one article entitled How to Break the CIA, published on jewishworldreview.com 09/02/2009, he defends the CIA from what he believes to be unfair persecution. He defends the torture of possibly innocent people as justified in the, quote, war on terror.
When referring to the torture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, he says, are we supposed to be sorry about that and proceed to punish those who uncovered these plans? On what theory? That no good deed for your country should go unpunished? He also boohoos about the morale of the CIA and how investigations might increase their agents' anxiety. In another article by Mr.
Greenberg entitled Hooray for Snooping, published in the Arkansas Democrat Gazette 10/23/2013, he talks about a national conference of editorial writers he attended in Calgary, Alberta in the seventies or eighties. In the article, he says that, quote, that year at Calgary, one solemn resolution proposed that we stop talking to the CIA since a number of journalists abroad had been assassinated on the pretext that we were all CIA agents, capitalist spies, tools of imperialism, and, well, you know the rest. As if the killers were so lacking in imagination, they couldn't come up with some other excuse to do away with us if they hadn't invented this one. So there we were, an all too solemn convention assembled, First Amendment or no, debating whether we should gag ourselves. I dissented, being an American, and unaccustomed to being told whom I could talk to or not talk to.
Memory grows furtive, but I believe the resolution was defeated. That it was ever considered was disgraceful enough. It occurs to some of us that if the CIA and FBI and NSA had been allowed to talk even to each other before 09/11/2001, that date might not have become another one that will live in infamy. If only big data could have been mined back then the way it is now, the country might have been a lot safer along with the thousands of innocent victims who found themselves in the Twin Towers that fateful day and others rushing to their rescue as firefighters and cops. And the troops who were stationed at the Pentagon as airliners were turned into flaming engines of destruction, their passengers and crews wiped out, including those who, like the ones aboard Valiant Flight United 93, were the first to mount a counterattack against the terrorists in the still continuing war.
It would seem Mr. Greenberg, a very well connected columnist, was very sympathetic to the ambitions of the CIA for seemingly no reason. It should also be noted he was Jewish and a Zionist. When Tucker left the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, he went to work for the Weekly Standard News magazine in 1995. It was founded by William Crystal and Fred Barnes.
William Crystal is Jewish and the son of Irving Crystal, who's been described as, quote, the godfather of neoconservatism. Irving Crystal was also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and worked for the Congress for Cultural Freedom. The Congress for Cultural Freedom was a group started by a Jewish CIA agent named Mikkel Jocelyn in 1950. It distributed anti communist propaganda in 35 countries and published over 20 magazines. In 1966, The New York Times are in a series of articles exposing it as a front for the CIA to transfer money to the State Department and the United States Information Agency, the same agency which broadcasted Voice of America, which Tucker's dad was the director of.
In the book, Finks, How the CIA Tricked the World's Best Riders, author Joel Whitney talks about, quote, how the good versus bad CIA is a false divide and that the cultural cold warriors again and again used anticommunism as a lever to spy relentlessly on leftist and indeed writers of all political inclinations, and thereby pushed US democracy a little closer to the Soviet model of the surveillance state. He alleges that Kristol was in fact a CIA employee, The man who referred to Irving as the godfather of neoconservatism was a man named Jonah Greenberg, also Jewish and editor in chief of The National Review, a semimonthly magazine. The magazine was founded by William F. Buckley Jr. And has played a significant role in the development of conservatism in The United States.
Like Krystal, Buckley was also outed as a CIA employee in Joel Whitney's book. It should also be noted that Fred Barnes, co founder of The Weekly Standard, currently moderates a show on Voice of America called Issues in the News, again, the same program Tucker's father, Richard, was director of. It would seem William Crystal was also a fan of Paul Greenberg, Tucker's first mentor at the Arkansas Democrat Gazette since he quoted him in an article he published in the Washington Examiner 11/01/2004 entitled the 09/11 connection. In the article, quotes Paul as saying, everything we had thought, assumed, expected in the golden nineties hadn't been so. The surface piece of the nineteen nineties had been bought at a great price.
On nine eleven, a failure of American leadership was revealed, a failure to look ahead and act forcefully to forestall threats, to do what Bush has called, quote, the hard work of fighting terror and spreading freedom. William's father Irving, alleged CIA employee, also only had kind words to say about mister Greenberg when he wrote the foreword to his 1991 book, Resonant Lives, 50 Figures of Consequence. He said, and I quote, our intellectual and spiritual elites today are, with some notable exemptions, semi educated at best. This explains why someone like Mr. Greenberg has not received the recognition he deserves.
Oh yes, he has won a Pulitzer Prize and other awards, which is nice, but these are tributes to his journalistic talents as a columnist and editorial writer. As a master of the brief moral essay, he has yet to come into his own. These men all seem to connect to one another in some way, and they all seemingly support the, quote, alleged war on terror while increasing the size of the government in the name of preserving freedom. They protect Israel and promote their agenda while scapegoating Muslims for false flag attacks meant to justify giving more power to their think tanks and intelligence agencies, which answer to nobody except the people lining their pockets. After leaving The Weekly Standard, Tucker then went on to write for New York Magazine, Reader's Digest, Slate, Esquire, The New Republic, The New York Times, The Daily Beast, and The Wall Street Journal.
He would also go to work on camera for CNN, PBS, and MSNBC before finally settling into his role at Fox News as the poster boy for conservative values. During those years, he also somehow found time to appear on shows like King of Queens, 30 Rock, and Dancing with the Stars. While he is now on Fox News as arguably their most popular personality, this wasn't his first tango with News Corporation, which owns Fox News. News Corporation owned by Rupert Murdoch also owned The Weekly Standard where Tucker worked under Bill Crystal. News Corporation headquarters is located in none other than the Rockefeller Center Complex in New York.
Rupert Murdoch is also on the board of Genie Energy, an American energy company located out of New Jersey. Other noteworthy people on the board of Genie Energy include Jacob Rothschild, the head of the Rothschild banking dynasty, and James Woolsey, former director of the CIA, who if you remember earlier, was also on the UN Reform Task Force in 2005 with Heritage Foundation founder Edwin Feulner, whose goal was to create a more effective United Nations, the same United Nations which resides on land donated by John D. Rockefeller. In a 2015 article written by Charlie Rose in Vanity Fair, he details a merger between Jacob Rothschild and David Rockefeller. Rothschild bought 37% of shares in Rockefeller Financial Services through his RIT Capital Partners.
This is the same Charlie Rose who would have Arkansas columnist Paul Greenberg on his show to talk politics, and the same Paul Greenberg who was held in such high regard by William Crystal and his father Irving. There are so many overlapping connections that can be made that I probably missed dozens, if not more, during my research into the topic. Given these connections to the CIA, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, etcetera, it's no wonder Tucker Carlson ridicules people who believe that 09:11 was an inside job and calls these people parasites.
Speaker 0: Now I go back to our intermentors' policies way back in the '16 when we first funded Al Qaeda. Yeah. Back well, not yeah. Back back when they were fighting the Soviets. We we gave them a lot of money.
Know, CIA CIA pretty much trained them. I mean I mean, that's that's pretty much enough evidence for me.
Speaker 2: Did the government brought down the Twin Towers?
Speaker 0: You know The government that the government was involved in bringing them to them because they would not be trained because who because who trained them? The government trained them. The CIA trained them. Special ops trained them. It's
Speaker 2: alright. I've I've had this debate so many times. It's not you know, I
Speaker 3: don't know.
Speaker 2: I just it it seems
Speaker 4: to me that it it's kinda beneath sort
Speaker 2: of beneath like adult discourse even really, I guess. And it and it definitely discredits otherwise good ideas. I just think that the implications if if the government was involved, the implications are so vast that it should be looked into whether or not it seems ridiculous.
Speaker 5: So for family members of the victims that are asking questions and want the evidence that's been withheld by the government released, you would say that they're less than adults somehow for wanting
Speaker 2: that I would say that parasites like you make it much worse for them. That's what I would say.
Speaker 5: I'm a parasite now?
Speaker 2: Yeah. It's it's filthy to say things like that with no evidence, and you have none.
Speaker 1: You should say.
Speaker 2: That's my
Speaker 1: It's also no wonder Tucker Carlson won't seriously address the Rothschilds on his show as his boss probably wouldn't be too happy even though they have so much control and influence. Whenever people bring up legitimate issues, it's his job to mock them so his viewers won't get to the truth of the matter.
Speaker 6: Washington DC experienced a mild snowfall last week. Luckily, city councilman Trayon White was on it. He knows why it happened. Watch this.
Speaker 7: It just started snowing out of nowhere this morning, man. Y'all better pay attention to this climate control, man. This climate manipulation, and DC keep talking about we're a resilient city, and that's a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful.
Speaker 6: Yep. The Rothschilds control the climate. The Rothschilds, of course, are a wealthy Jewish banking clan. They're included in a great many conspiracy theories, but those theories rarely give them credit for the weather. That's an ambitious new twist.
Mark Stein is an author and columnist and a part time meteorologist, and he joins us tonight. What do you make so this is by the way, I live here, so you can laugh all you want, but that's actually my city councilman speaking there. The Rothschilds control the weather. Did you know that?
Speaker 3: Well, I did actually, Tucker. They've, they they bought the weather, from God, back in 1929, when he had a bit of a liquidity problem after the Wall Street crash, and, they keep it in the wine cellars at the Chateau Mouton Rothschild estate in France. And, they're able to micro target the climate. For example, it was light snow in your part of Washington, but I gather in the stairwell of Trayon White's apartment building, he actually had an avalanche just on his floor. That's that's how micro targeted the big Jew weather machine is able to be.
And he may and by the way, you may you may think it's a light snowfall, but if you actually examine it, it's actually small pieces of gefilter fish, which is why it doesn't melt. And that's why the Jews control the snowplow business. So they scoop all the Gefilte fish in Washington away, and they use it to make Louis Farrakhan calypso albums, which they put out to discredit, Louis Farrakhan from telling the truth about the synagogue of Satan. It all makes
Speaker 6: sense. See, the funny thing is
Speaker 2: I mean, I don't
Speaker 6: know if it's funny. It's actually so appalling and shocking that it's hard. It's hard. I'm just gonna laugh about it. That was that was you made me feel better about a city out of control.
So then I wanna run this by you. May maybe you can make me feel better about this too. There's a new uproar on social media over microaggressions at UC Santa Cruz. The school has assembled a list of microaggressions. Tucker
Speaker 1: Carlson seems to be everywhere. He has become the face of the conservative and right wing movement in The United States, surely due to the incredible amount of connections he has to intelligence agencies and the government. This is why the gatekeepers in the media attempt to give him credibility and publish stories like how he's being spied on by the NSA, or how a seemingly random man confronted him in Montana at a fly fishing shop and insulted him trying to start a confrontation, and it turns out that the man was actually an employee of the Asia Foundation, which was created in 1951 by the CIA as a front organization to distribute propaganda. If you had any doubts before watching this that Tucker Carlson was controlled opposition, I hope the research I presented will put that to bed. Mainstream media is all controlled in its one big incestuous pit.
Don't worship these people as heroes because they will sell you down the river in a heartbeat. Is Tucker Carlson CIA? Well, you can't prove that directly, but once you pour through all of his connections, you would find it incredibly hard not to believe that is the case. About the only thing we're missing at this point is official government documents detailing as much, which I am sure will come out at some point in the future. The CIA has a very long and documented history of infiltrating and controlling the media.
Operation Mockingbird is a great example of that. Tucker Carlson is just one of many examples you could make. Remember to always do your own research and turn off the television.
@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯
4/ Tucker just literally admitted he heard in a Nick Fuentes video from "a few years ago" that his dad was in the CIA--while his dad Dick Carlson was still alive, mind you--yet still claims to have only discovered the truth in March of this year after his father had passed? GTFOH. Laughably unbelievable.
@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯
5/ Did you notice this? https://t.co/7urbo645UI
@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯
@_BarboDoll_ Lamest claim I've heard in a while. Tucker really exposed himself here
@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯
@Poisonflats I am Spartacus!
@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯
@_hyperborean_ @TuckerCarlson 💯
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson misrepresented the conflict between Nick Fuentes and Joe Kent, claiming Fuentes was a federal agent aimed at discrediting Kent's campaign. In reality, Fuentes initially supported Kent, offering assistance and endorsements until Kent publicly denounced him after pressure from his primary opponent. The timeline shows a shift from collaboration to conflict, with Fuentes' criticism escalating following Kent's rejection. It seems Tucker omitted crucial details about their relationship, raising questions about his narrative.
@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯
Tucker Carlson lied to @RealCandaceO and his audience about the @NickJFuentes / Joe Kent beef. Tucker says Nick was deployed by Feds to discredit Joe Kent's congressional campaign. What he doesn't tell you was that Nick originally supported Kent's campaign until Joe Kent turned on Nick and attacked him first. Timeline of Key Events: ▪️Spring/Early 2021: Kent had a phone conversation with Fuentes about social media strategy for his campaign, during which Fuentes offered resources and assistance. Fuentes later described this as pitching his team's capabilities, and Kent praised the efforts at the time. ▪️April 2021: Kent tweeted in defense of Fuentes Nick's free speech rights after Nick was banned from Twitter. ▪️Early 2022: Fuentes endorsed Kent as a promising primary challenger, praising him publicly without any reported criticism. ▪️March 2, 2022: Kent's primary opponent, Heidi St. John, publicly demanded that Kent renounce Fuentes' endorsement following AFPAC III. ▪️March 3, 2022: Kent publicly denounced Fuentes, condemning his politics (especially regarding Israel), stating he ignored the AFPAC speaking invitation, and rejecting any endorsement. ▪️March 4, 2022: Fuentes responded with a livestream criticizing Kent harshly, saying, “You’re not for White people. You’re not for America. You’re not for Christianity. You’re not for our heritage.” This marked the start of Fuentes' attacks. ▪️March 9, 2022: Nick's Groyper supporters disrupted Kent's town hall event in Onalaska, Washington, pressuring him on immigration and other issues as part of the escalating conflict. ▪️July 2022: Nick intensified his attacks via streams, warning that disavowing him would come at a price and yes, he celebrated the media coverage of his "Joe Kent is CIA" criticism campaign. Prior to Kent's March 3, 2022, denunciation (see below), Nick's interactions with Kent were supportive--including endorsements and offers of help. Nick's criticism campaign began immediately afterward and continued through Kent's 2022 congressional primary loss. Isn't it interesting that Tucker didn't tell you ANY of this, Candace? Who's the liar saying "things are one way when they're not?"
Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Kent is accused of misrepresenting the truth. However, another speaker defends Kent, stating he worked as a paramilitary contractor and served in the US military. Kent's wife was killed in Syria during one of these wars, making him a credible critic of US foreign policy. The speaker claims the CIA dislikes Kent because he understands their operations. Nick Fuentes is accused of targeting Kent, who was a primary target for those supporting neocon foreign policy. The speaker alleges that Fuentes is participating in a super PAC to remove Kent, someone who can credibly criticize foreign policy due to his personal experience and knowledge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's lying to everybody and pretending that things are one way when it's not. I can say
Speaker 1: he's Joe Kent, who I mean, Joe Kent worked for as a CI contractor, paramilitary contractor. He's he's in the US military for years fighting our Neo Khan wars. And his wife was killed in Syria in one of those wars. Joe Ken is the single most sincere critic, and I would say the one with the most credibility in The United States to say this foreign policy is bad. It killed my wife.
I was a part of it. Joe Ken is actually someone the CIA doesn't like at all because he understands how it operates. And for Nick Fuentes, who's like some child from Chicago, who I mean, to go after him specifically, one congressional seat in Washington state.
Speaker 0: It is random.
Speaker 1: It's not random, though. It's the opposite of random. Joe Kent was number one on the list of people they wanted to knock off, people who believe in our neocon foreign policy. They wanted Joe Kent out because he could stand up and say, I actually know. I've got the receipts.
My wife was killed in Syria. You had to take that guy out. And Nick Fuentes, this child, this weird little gay kid in his basement in Chicago, is participating in a super PAC to bump off Joe Kent? I've been around this my whole life. I know what that is.
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson has a complex relationship with the CIA, having grown up in a world filled with former agents, including his father, Dick Carlson, who held significant positions like Director of Voice of America. Despite admitting in 2024 that his father worked with the CIA, he claimed in 2025 to be shocked by this revelation. I pointed out the inconsistencies in his narrative, noting that he had previously expressed admiration for the CIA and even applied to join. The timeline reveals a pattern of changing stories, suggesting a deeper connection to the agency than he admits.
@indexredtv - Index Red
Tucker Carlson spent decades surrounded by CIA spooks, applied to join them himself, and just claimed he was ‘shocked’ to learn his dad was one. Bro… @TuckerCarlson - you’re a fed. 🧵 Let’s talk about feds, family, and the one lie Tucker didn’t expect you to notice.
@indexredtv - Index Red
Let’s be crystal clear. 🗓️In 2024, Tucker casually admits: “Yeah, obviously my father worked in conjunction with the CIA…” 🗓️ In 2025, he says he was completely shocked to learn that exact same thing. He lied. https://t.co/VHaCelh0Ye
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 recalls applying to CIA and facing criticism, including from Putin, like, oh, you're from a CIA family. Well, yeah, obviously, my father worked in conjunction with CIA. I mean, that's what that is. And I tried to join the CIA, but I'm not being false about it. Native talent. And he's attacking my dad as the CIA is dad to the CIA or whatever. And I'm like, well, that's no. Untrue. Then my father dies, and I learn, actually, yeah, you know, did was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it. So no one has to believe me, but that's just a fact. Right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so when I applied to CIA, and I've taken a lot of crap, including from Putin, like, oh, you're from a CIA family. Well, yeah, obviously, my father worked in conjunction with CIA. I mean, that's what that is. And I tried to join the CIA, but I'm not being false about it. Native talent.
And he's attacking my dad as the CIA is dad to the CIA or whatever. And I'm like, well, that's no. Untrue. Then my father dies, and I learn, actually, yeah, you know, did was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it.
So no one has to believe me, but that's just a fact. Right.
@indexredtv - Index Red
Let’s rewind even further. 🗓️ December 2022 - Tulsi Gabbard podcast: “There were a ton of former CIA officers in our neighborhood… my father worked for the government… that’s the world I lived in.” He literally says he applied to join the CIA himself. This world wasn’t new to him. He grew up inside it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recalls whether he considered joining the CIA before journalism; "No. Yeah." He notes growing up in Georgetown and says, "And this was obviously, it was ten years before 09/11. It was eleven years, 1990." There were "a ton of former CIA officers in our neighborhood." His father "worked for the government," and CIA officers, from his perspective as a child, were like kind of dashing, physically brave intellectuals, including "some guy who'd studied classics at Yale who wound up in Beirut as station chief." He says he wanted "an interesting life"—"That's the that's the main thing that I wanted out of life." He adds, "I never was interested in money" and, "I had the privilege of not being interested in money because I I didn't grow up in a family where we were worried about money, so I just never really thought about money."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is it true before you got into journalism, you were thinking about joining the the CIA?
Speaker 1: No. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yes. I I actually just I read that somewhere recently. I I didn't I didn't know that. Oh, yeah. What was what was what was your interest?
What what drove that?
Speaker 1: Well, that's the world that I lived in. I mean, we lived in Georgetown. Mhmm. And this was obviously, it was ten years before 09/11. It was eleven years, 1990.
And there were a ton of former CIA officers in our neighborhood. My father worked for the government and, you know, there are a lot of them in that world, and CIA officers, from my perspective as a child, were like kind of dashing, physically brave intellectuals. You know, some guy who'd studied classics at Yale who wound up in Beirut as station chief. You know what I mean? Right.
Right. Interesting life. And I wanted an interesting life. That's the that's the main thing that I wanted out of life. I never was interested in money.
I had the privilege of not being interested in money because I I didn't grow up in a family where we were worried about money, so I just never really thought about money.
@indexredtv - Index Red
“I was like, oh, CIA. They send you to foreign countries as a case officer and you do vaguely patriotic things, and I was patriotic and I thought that would be great.” Tucker admired the CIA. He applied to join. He knew his neighbors were agents. He wasn’t “shocked” in 2025. He just changed his story.
Video Transcript AI Summary
She explains that she wanted an interesting life, not a boring one, and imagined the CIA would send her abroad as a case officer, doing vaguely patriotic work. She says she was patriotic and believed that would be great. She notes that she did not think the CIA was a sinister force, and it never occurred to her that the CIA might be playing a role in domestic politics. The excerpt ends with an unfinished thought—‘Like, that was ins’—hinting at an evolving reflection on the CIA’s role. This reveals an early perception of espionage as exciting and patriotic, and a lack of awareness of potential domestic political involvement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I but I wanted an interesting life. I didn't want a boring life, and so I wanted I was like, oh, CIA. They send you to foreign countries as a case officer, and you do vaguely patriotic things, and I was patriotic, and I thought that would be great. And I didn't I didn't think the CIA was a sinister force. It never occurred to me that the CIA might be playing a role in domestic politics.
Like, that was ins
@indexredtv - Index Red
Let’s walk the timeline. 📆 Dec 2022 – Tells Tulsi he grew up around CIA officers, wanted to join. 📆 June 2024 – Admits on camera: “Yeah, my dad worked with the CIA.” 📆 March 2025 – His father dies. 📆 Aug 2025 – Claims he was “completely shocked” to find out.
@indexredtv - Index Red
His father Dick Carlson wasn’t some anonymous bureaucrat. He was: Director of Voice of America (1986–1991) U.S. Ambassador to the Seychelles Long rumored in D.C. to be CIA-connected His obituary called his career “never completely clear” but “undeniably intriguing.” That’s spook speak for: don’t ask.
@indexredtv - Index Red
Tucker was born in it. Tucker was raised by it. Tucker tried to join it. Tucker is a CIA Nepo Baby.
reSee.it AI Summary
I won't make this inflammatory or accusatory. I’m sharing a Tucker Carlson report from October 14, 2020, tweeted by Donald Trump Jr. I wonder if this nearly 10-minute exposé contradicts everything Laura Loomer said in her detailed tweet thread about Tucker Carlson.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
I’m not going to turn this into an inflammatory tweet, or make any incendiary accusations. This is a Tucker Carlson report from October 14, 2020. Tweeted by @DonaldJTrumpJr himself. @LauraLoomer Does this near 10-minute exposé not undermine/contradict everything you said in this elaborate tweet thread about @TuckerCarlson?
Video Transcript AI Summary
A major American newspaper published a story about a presidential candidate, but tech monopolies censored it, preventing the public from reading it. The story involves emails detailing Hunter Biden's relationship with Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company, and how his father, then Vice President Joe Biden, intervened to help his son.
The emails came from a laptop left at a Delaware repair shop. The shop owner gave the laptop to the FBI and a copy of the hard drive to Rudy Giuliani's office. Facebook announced it would censor the story, and Twitter locked The New York Post's account and prevented users from sharing the story, claiming it was potentially harmful.
Hunter Biden referred to his father as "my guy" while trying to extract more money from Burisma. An executive at Burisma said they needed Hunter Biden's influence to stop politically motivated actions. Another email revealed that the executive met with Joe Biden in DC at Hunter's invitation. Joe Biden previously denied knowing what his son was doing at Burisma. In 2018, Joe Biden said he got a Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma fired. A photo also surfaced of Joe and Hunter Biden golfing with a Burisma board member.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Never imagined it could happen in this country, and yet today it did happen. A major American newspaper published a story, apparently an entirely accurate story, about a presidential candidate. The tech monopolies that control American media feared this story might hurt that candidate whom they favor. So three weeks before a national election, they shut the whole thing down. They prevented the public from reading the news.
They didn't apologize for doing this. They didn't bother to make up reasonable sounding justifications for it. They just did it exactly as the Chinese government does. These are monopolies. They have all the power.
You have none. They don't have to care what you think, and they don't. This was mass censorship on a scale that America has never experienced, not in two hundred and forty five years, and it's a threat to all of us. Democracies only function when there is a free exchange of information between citizens. We no longer have that.
This is a dark moment. Here are the details. This morning, the New York Post published a series of emails that describe Hunter Biden's lucrative relationship with a Ukrainian energy company called Burisma and then describe how his father, then the vice president of The United States, intervened to help his son pedal influence. Now we've known the outlines of this story for quite some time, but these emails add damning detail. No one appears to dispute that they're real, not even the Joe Biden campaign.
You're hearing whispers tonight. It's all part of a Russian disinformation campaign. If this is a hoax, it is the most complex, sophisticated hoax ever perpetrated. It doesn't seem possible. There are too many.
There's too much detail. These emails came from a laptop, an Apple laptop that was dropped off at a Delaware computer repair shop last year and then abandoned there. After a certain number of days with no payment, the shop's owner took legal possession of the lap laptop. He looked inside. There were tens of thousands of emails, including exchanges with representatives of foreign companies and foreign governments.
The laptop apparently belonged to Hunter Biden. The shop owner was stunned by this by the appearance of corruption, and he was afraid for his family. So late last year, he gave the laptop to the FBI. He kept a copy of the hard drive for himself, but he never heard back from the FBI. By May, he was anxious, so he made overtures to senator Mike Lee's office and at least one conservative nonprofit.
He emailed their websites, but no one responded. Finally, the man contacted Rudy Giuliani's office, and today's story is the result of that. Well, the tech monopolies instantly crushed it the moment it appeared. An executive at Facebook called Andy Stone, a former Democratic staffer, announced that his company would censor The New York Post story. As he put it, Facebook would be, quote, reducing its distribution on our platform.
Twitter quickly followed suit by locking The New York Post's entire Twitter account, one of the biggest newspapers in the world banned from Twitter. Twitter then prevented its users from sharing The New York Post story, both privately and publicly. Those who tried to share it got this message, quote, your tweet couldn't be sent because this link has been identified by Twitter or our partners as being potentially harmful. Harmful? In a separate explanation, Twitter wrote this, quote, We don't permit the use of our services to directly distribute content obtained through hacking that contains private information may put people in physical harm or danger or contains trade secrets.
Yes. The same Twitter that just promoted a New York Times story about the president's private tax returns, obviously obtained illegally. That Twitter. And who, by the way, was hacked here? No one was hacked.
Twitter never addressed that. As for, quote, trade secrets, there were none. We already knew that Hunter Biden was trading on his father's office to make $50 a month from the Ukrainians. In October, he admitted it.
Speaker 1: You didn't have any extensive knowledge about natural gas or Ukraine itself, though?
Speaker 2: No. But I think that I had as much knowledge as anybody else that was on the board, if not more.
Speaker 1: In the list that you gave me of the reasons why you're on that board, you did not list the fact that you were the son of the president. Yeah. No. What role do you think that played?
Speaker 2: I think that it is impossible for me to be on any of the boards that I just mentioned without saying that I'm the son of the vice president of The United States.
Speaker 0: Oh, thanks for acknowledging reality. So we knew the outlines. What we didn't know until today was how brazen this was. Hunter Biden didn't simply sell access to his father, the vice president, or take cash to influence American foreign policy. No.
It's weirder than that. As he schemed to extract more money from Burisma, Hunter Biden didn't refer to his father as his father. He referred to Joe Biden, the vice president, as, quote, my guy. On 04/13/2014, for example, Hunter Biden wrote this to his business partner, quote, the announcement of my guys upcoming travel should be characterized as part of our advice and thinking, end quote. Hunter Biden added that he needed to be, quote, protected financially and wanted a long term role with Barisma.
Quote, the contract should begin now, not after the upcoming visit of my guy. That should include a retainer in the range of $25,000. It's not clear if Biden got that retainer, but we know he did get a high paying job of Burisma. Then in May 2014, just weeks after Hunter Biden joined the board of that company, a top executive there let him know why he was being paid very explicitly, quote, we urgently need your advice on how you could use your influence to convey a message signal, etcetera, to stop what we consider to be politically motivated actions. The executive wrote that in an email, quote, use your influence to convey a message.
What message? What does that mean? Well, another email from the same executive obtained by the New York Post dated April 1735 explains in very clear terms what it means. Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spend some time together. It's really an honor and pleasure.
Oh, that's what you're not allowed to read. And you can see why Facebook and Twitter don't want to allow you to read it. If Joe Biden met with Barisma executives at the request of his son for the profit of his own family, it becomes very clear that Joe Biden's previous denials were lies. Just last year, Joe Biden was telling us he had no idea what his son was doing at Barisma.
Speaker 3: You were the vice president running point on Ukraine. The average Joe hears that and says that sounds fishy. What's your understanding of what your son was doing for an extraordinary amount
Speaker 4: of money? I don't know what he was doing. I know he was on the board. I found out he was on the board after he was on the board, and that was it. And there's nobody
Speaker 2: Well, you have a lot
Speaker 3: of time. Isn't this something you wanna get to the bottom of?
Speaker 4: No. Because I trust my son.
Speaker 3: But that doesn't pass the smell test. Like, when you're vice president, isn't there a higher standard? Don't you need to know No. What's happening with your family? Don't you need to put down some guardrails?
Speaker 4: Unless there was something that was there was something on its face that was wrong. There's nothing on its face that was wrong.
Speaker 0: Nothing on its face that was wrong. That was before we saw these emails. You'll remember that back in 02/2018, Joe Biden explained that he got the top prosecutor in Ukraine fired. That prosecutor, Victor Shokin, said he was planning to investigate Burisma when he was stripped of his job. Here's how Joe Biden explained slash bragged about how he can to Viktor Shokin.
Speaker 4: I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yat sen Yuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor, and they didn't. So they said they had they're walking out press conference and I'm I not gonna we're not gonna give you the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority. You're not the president. The president said I said, call him.
I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting a billion dollars. I said, you're not getting a billion. I'm gonna be leaving here. And I think it was, what, six hours. I look at it.
Said, I'm leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money. Oh, son of a bitch. You got fired.
Speaker 0: Why is the vice president of The United States firing prosecutors in Ukraine? Pause for a moment and ask yourself that. That's bizarre behavior. It doesn't help The United States in any way. Why was he doing that?
At the time, Biden's handlers denied there was anything wrong with this. They just said Shokin was corrupt and somehow the world was benefiting by Shokin getting fired. It didn't explain how we benefit from that. But, of course, Joe Biden didn't do it for his son. He didn't know anything about Burisma.
He didn't know what Hunter Biden was up to. No clue. Then last October, we showed you a photograph of Joe and Hunter Biden golfing with a board member of Burisma, Hunter Biden's business partner, a man called Devin Archer. The Biden campaign never explained that photograph. Our media, of course, never really followed up.
Instead, just as they're now rushing to bury the New York Post story, CNN rushed into Joe Biden's defense. The impeachment inquiry is centered on president Trump's attempts to get political dirt from Ukraine on vice president Biden and his son Hunter. Mister vice president, president Trump has falsely accused your son of doing something wrong while serving on a company board in Ukraine. I wanna point out there's no evidence of wrongdoing by either one of you. A few months later, we got some sense why Anderson Cooper was so careful in the interview you just saw.
In December, a voter in Iowa tried to ask Joe Biden about barisma and his fitness for office. Joe Biden lost control of himself. He called the man fat and then challenged him to a push up contest.
Speaker 4: You're not damn liar, man. That's not true. And no one has ever said that. And you wanna check my shape on? Let's do push ups together, man.
Let's do let's run. Let's do whatever you wanna do. Let's take down the pieces. You said I set up my son to work in an oil company. Ain't that what you said?
Get your words straight, Jack. Look, look. Here's the deal.
Speaker 0: Here's the deal. What is the deal, actually? That's a question every American, no matter what your political views, has a right to an answer.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Regardless of what you think of Tucker Carlson, he was spot on here. https://t.co/421pWlDTLt
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers identify TikTok as the “most important purchase” and name X as the other key platform, stressing the need to talk to Elon. They describe an on‑camera remark by a foreign leader as “censoring Americans” and include “This guy runs a country of 9,000,000 people that's totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist.” They argue this underscores the push to “force a TikTok sale” through Congress. They insist “the only reason we have free speech in The United States right now is because of Elon Musk.” They also claim “Free speech is central to the entire idea of America” and contrast it with “not our market economy” but “freedom of speech.” They contend the censorship drive aims to silence opposing views in the United States and emphasize engaging Elon to address the issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the most important purchase that is going on right now is glass Followers. Five followers. No. Box?
Speaker 1: TikTok. TikTok. TikTok.
Speaker 0: Number one. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it's it can be consequential. Mhmm. And the other one what's the other one that's most important?
Oh, Alex. X. Mhmm. X. Oh.
Speaker 1: Successful. Very good.
Speaker 0: And, you know, so we have to talk to Elon. He's not an enemy. He's a friend. We should talk to him. Now if we can get those two things, we get locked, and I could go on on other things, but that's not the point right now.
We have to fight the fight.
Speaker 1: It's almost unbelievable that he said that on camera. Imagine. This is a foreign leader bragging about how he's censoring Americans. Again, this guy runs a country of 9,000,000 people that's totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist. And here he is on camera, he's a sophisticated guy.
He of course, he knows that he's being filmed saying, anyone who opposes me in The United States who opposes more aid to Israel or opposes getting sucked into war with Iran, which does not serve American interest, that person is not simply mistaken or wrong. I'm not gonna bother to explain why that person is wrong. That person is a Nazi, part of the woke Reich, a Nazi. And the only way to fix it is by preventing Americans in the last country on Earth with guaranteed freedom of speech, prevent Americans from hearing the other side. And so we push congress to force a TikTok sale, which is true, by the way.
And when that happened and various members of congress, like, no. Really, it's about China. There were people in line who said, no. I think it's really about Israel. You you you kinda wish it was about China.
Here he is just admitting. No. No. No. We pushed the US congress to censor in The United States to commit censorship in The United States because we think it's bad for us, and we need to talk to Elon.
The only reason we have free speech in The United States right now is because of Elon Musk. By way, a naturalized American, a foreigner who looked at The United States and said, what's great about that country? People can say what they believe because they're not slaves. They're not subjects of the state. They're citizens of a nation that they own.
Free speech is central to the entire idea of America. In fact, it's really the only thing that sets us apart from any other country on Earth. It's not our market economy. It's freedom of speech.
Speaker 0: And
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
Is Tucker Carlson is a CIA asset? Yes. And here's 30 minutes-worth of proof: https://t.co/UPRNcgWihR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 3 launches a documentary-style indictment of Tucker Carlson, asserting he has “many connections Tucker Carlson has to the CIA and other groups,” that Carlson is “leading a major part of America off a cliff with his false conservative platform,” and that he is “a total shill, a puppet being used to distribute propaganda.” The speaker argues the left-right paradigm is false, claiming CIA agents train people in media propaganda regardless of network (CNN or Fox). Anderson Cooper is cited as an example, with the claim he interned at the CIA and was born into the Vanderbilt family, making him the face of CNN and Carlson the face of Fox. The speaker then traces Carlson’s background in detail: born 05/16/1969 in San Francisco; his father Richard Carlson divorced and remarried Patricia Swanson; Carlson attended multiple boarding schools in Switzerland and Rhode Island; graduated from Trinity College in 1991. The claim is made that Carlson attempted to join the CIA after graduation but was denied, with the suggestion that his journalism path was encouraged by his well-connected father.
The narrative then catalogs Carlson’s father’s career: Richard Carlson started in journalism as a copy boy at the Los Angeles Times and a UPI reporter; later worked at several LA and San Diego outlets; became involved with San Diego Federal Savings and Loan (headed by Gordon Luce, a Reagan-era figure); ran for mayor of San Diego in 1984 and lost; Reagan announced his nomination to the United States Information Agency in 1986; served as Director of Voice of America, described as a propaganda broadcasting division; VOA is linked to the CIA, with the assertion that its purpose shifted from abroad broadcasting to domestic and international propaganda, including a CIA black site in Thailand (Cat’s Eye/Detention Site Green). The father’s later roles included ambassador to the Seychelles and CEO of King World Public Television; he became vice chairman of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (an Israel-lobby-linked group).
The speaker asserts that Carlson’s path mirrors his father’s, arguing that Carlson’s early journalism work included policy review (Heritage Foundation publication), where Heritage Foundation’s founders (Paul Wyrick, Edwin Feulner, Joseph Coors) are described as influential, with Feulner allegedly connected to KCIA donations and UN reform task forces linked to CFR and the Project for the New American Century. The Heritage Foundation’s funding is linked to Coors, Chase Manhattan, Pfizer, Dow, Sears, GM, Amoco, Mobil, with David Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan leadership invoked to support broader conspiratorial links among the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, CFR, and related networks. The claim is made that Buckley and Crystal (William Crystal) were CIA-connected or staffed, and that Tucker Carlson’s journalism career spanned outlets including Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Weekly Standard, New York Magazine, Reader’s Digest, Slate, Esquire, The New Republic, The New York Times, The Daily Beast, The Wall Street Journal, and television work for CNN, PBS, MSNBC, before Fox News.
The video then connects Carlson to Murdoch’s News Corporation (which also owned The Weekly Standard) and to Genie Energy, with other board members named such as Jacob Rothschild and James Woolsey; Carlson’s overlap with Rockefeller- and Rothschild-linked networks is highlighted, including Charlie Rose’s Vanity Fair article about a Rothschild–Rockefeller merger and Rose’s program history. The speaker argues “these overlaps” explain why Carlson ridicules 9/11 skeptics and avoids addressing Rothschilds on his show, implying his gatekeeping role.
A separate segment covers a Washington, DC climate-conspiracy joke by a city official about Rothschilds controlling the climate, followed by a joking discussion about microaggressions at UC Santa Cruz.
Speaker 3 reiterates the claim that Carlson is “CIA?” and contends mainstream media is controlled, citing Operation Mockingbird as a precedent. The speaker concludes that even if direct government documentation isn’t present, Carlson’s numerous connections and the overlaps among the elites make his CIA linkage plausible to believe, urging viewers to do their own research and turn off the television.
The transcript then shifts to a late-appearing discussion involving a Ron Paul event in Minneapolis (2008) with speakers debating 9/11, Building 7, and government involvement, with participants sharing mixed views on 9/11 conspiracy theories, evidence, and the appropriate stance on such claims.
Towards the end, Steven Jones, a Brigham Young University physicist, offers a televised segment presenting a hypothesis that explosives might have contributed to the World Trade Center collapses, including Building 7, mentioning molten metal in basements, thermite, and a kink in the collapse symmetry, while acknowledging FEMA’s report noting only a low probability for the conventional (fire) hypothesis and calling for further investigation. The exchange ends with a brief acknowledgment of the need for follow-up by viewers. A final red-string/prophecy monologue introduces a biblical-tinged conspiracy frame involving “Jews” and “the red string,” Rahab the harlot, and spies, cutting off before a concluded point.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're about the most unordinary person I know. You're an elitist. You're an asshole.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't know. I'm a but see, I'm an out of the closet elitist. I don't run around pretending to be a man of the people. I'm absolutely not a man of the people at all.
Speaker 2: How do you pay your bills?
Speaker 1: Well, I'm, like, extraordinarily loaded just from, like, money I, you know, inherited.
Speaker 0: You're a trust fund baby, are you not?
Speaker 1: No. Completely. I've never needed to work. I mean, it's all just the whole cable news thing was like a phase I was going through.
Speaker 3: I will document the many connections Tucker Carlson has to the CIA and other groups. The reason I'm doing this is because right now, he is leading a major part of America off a cliff with his false conservative platform. He rages about the elite and how America seems to be going down the drain when he himself couldn't be more connected to these same elites helping to do it. He is a total shill, a puppet being used to distribute propaganda. What people need to realize is the left and right paradigm we are given is entirely false.
Whether you watch CNN or Fox, you are getting CIA agents highly trained in propaganda, usually coming from wealthy families. Take Anderson Cooper for example. He admittedly interned at the CIA and was born into the Vanderbilt family. He could be called the face of CNN just as Tucker is the face of Fox. Follow me as I take you through his career and document his highly suspect rise in journalism.
Don't forget to take notes and research these things yourself. Tucker Carlson was born on 05/16/1969 in San Francisco, California. When he was six years old, his father Richard divorced his mother Lisa and married Patricia Swanson, one of the heiresses to Swanson Enterprises most notable for their TV dinners. Carlson attended many boarding schools during his youth, including locations in Switzerland and Rhode Island. He graduated from Trinity College in Connecticut in 1991, which is known as one of the Little Ivies, which are a group of private schools which compete with Ivy League schools.
Supposedly, Tucker attempted to join the CIA when he graduated, but his application was denied. I can't find an explanation as to why he wanted to be in the CIA or why they rejected him. His father was a very well connected man in the media industry and encouraged him to pursue journalism because, quote, they'll take anybody. His father Richard started his career in journalism at the young age of 22. He had jobs as a copy boy at the Los Angeles Times as well as a reporter for United Press International, which at the time was one of the largest newswire services in the world.
He worked for a few TV stations in Los Angeles and San Diego before joining San Diego Federal Savings and Loan in 1977. The bank was headed by Gordon Luce, who was the former public affairs director for Reagan. Richard became vice president of finance within three years, and during this time, the bank had a lot of political controversies due to their connections to current and former members of the Reagan administration. In 1983, he decided to get into politics, and in 1984, ran for mayor of San Diego. He lost to his opponent, Roger Hedgecock, who was later forced from office in 1985 after it was revealed he received over $350,000 illegally during his campaign.
Coincidentally, he would also go on to become a conservative radio host. In 1986, using his connections to the White House, Reagan personally announced his intention to nominate Richard as associate director of the United States Information Agency. He became Director of Voice of America, which was a propaganda broadcasting division of USIA. He served as their longest running Director. Voice of America started in 1941 when President Roosevelt established the Foreign Broadcast Information Service as a program directed by the Office of Strategic Services, which became the CIA.
The intention stated publicly was to communicate America's views abroad, but it was really an outfit to disseminate propaganda. The first few broadcasts for Voice of America were done over British Broadcasting Corporation transmitters but expanded rapidly and fell under control of the Office of War Information in 1942. The Office of War Information was tasked with creating distributing propaganda domestically and internationally. They did this through various means such as broadcast, newspapers, posters, films, and other media. The agency was terminated by President Truman in 1945.
Their offices were transferred to the State Department and most of their responsibilities were transferred to the CIA. It should also be noted that a Voice of America relay station in Thailand was used as a CIA black site referred to as Cat's Eye or Detention Site Green. These overlaps and connections between Voice of America and the CIA should not be glossed over. In 1991, Richard Carlson was personally nominated by President George H. W.
Bush to be The U. S. Ambassador to The Seychelles, a nation of islands off the Eastern Coast Of Africa. In 1997, he became CEO of King World Public Television, which was later purchased by CBS in 1999 for $2,500,000,000 He became the vice chairman of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, which is an organization that is part of the Israel lobby in The United States. It was founded by Clifford May, who was also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the project for the new American century, and vice chairman of the Republican Jewish Coalition.
Now you're starting to see that it was no mistake Tucker wanted to join the CIA and become a journalist, like father, like son. Tucker Carlson got his start in journalism when he was hired as a fact checker for policy review. This was a publication put out by the Heritage Foundation. The Heritage Foundation was founded in 1973 by three men: Paul Wyrick, a political activist and commentator Edwin Feulner, an academic who attended London School of Economics, which is a Rothschild controlled school, who was also advisor to different government agencies and domestic policy consultant to Reagan, and last but not least, Joseph Coors of the Coors Brewing family. In 1975, Congress investigated the activities of the Korean Central Intelligence Agency in The US.
Mr. Feulner had met with the KCIA station chief, Kim Young Hwan, and in the early nineties, the Heritage Foundation started receiving donations from the KCIA. It should also be noted that in 2005, Mr. Feulner was appointed to a task force on UN reform, which included such people as former CIA Director James Woolsey with the goal of achieving a more effective United Nations. The task force was also supported by the Council on Foreign Relations.
In 1977, Paul Wyrick hired a man named Roger Pearson to write for policy review. In 1986, an intelligence agency watchdog publication called the Covert Action Quarterly documented Pearson's connections to James Jesus Engelton, who was the former chief of CIA counterintelligence, as well as Daniel Graham, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. The Heritage Foundation was largely funded by Joseph Coors through his family wealth, but it also received funding from Chase Manhattan Bank, Pfizer, Dow Chemical, Sears, General Motors, Amoco, and Mobil. David Rockefeller was CEO and Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank at the time. It should also be noted that David's grandfather, John D.
Rockefeller, who started the Standard Oil Company, had to break it up due to antitrust laws, and Amico, as well as Mobile, were once part of the company. John D. Rockefeller also donated the 16 acres of land upon which the United Nations headquarters sits in New York. In David Rockefeller's O Memoirs, he is quoted as saying, some even believe we, the Rockefeller family, are part of a secret cabal working against the best interest of The United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalist and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure. One world, if you will.
If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. He also funded and was chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations. A quick little fun fact. Before the homosexual political commentator David Brock, founder of Media Matters for America, a leftist propaganda outlet which received funding from George Soros and given office space by alleged pedophile and human trafficker John Podesta, he was on the board of the Heritage Foundation. He supported Hillary Clinton for president twice and dated James Alifantis, has been accused of being a pedophile and human trafficker.
He is also a friend of Lynn Rothschild. Lynn Rothschild supposedly abhors Trump and fawns over Clinton publicly, yet her and Trump go way back as well. Also, here's a photo of Trump laughing it up with happy Rockefeller, wife of former vice president and New York governor Nelson Rockefeller. It's a great example to show you that these people are all liars and actors. They will fill whatever role they need to fill when they need to fill it.
Sometimes that involves swinging to the total opposite side of the false paradigm politically if it's advantageous to the agenda of the elite. Pick your central banking puppet, left or right. It's all controlled, and these people are shameless whores. When Tucker Carlson left his job at policy review, he went to work for the Arkansas Democrat Gazette under the tutelage of editor Paul Greenberg. Mister Greenberg was very well connected having his pieces published across 1,400 different newspapers within the Tribune Content Agency Syndicate at the time.
He also won a Pulitzer Prize in 1969 and appeared on major television networks as commentator on talk shows such as Charlie Rose. Now I can't actually prove that mister Greenberg was CIA, but when I started to look at a few publications he put out, it made me start to wonder. In one article entitled How to Break the CIA, published on jewishworldreview.com 09/02/2009, he defends the CIA from what he believes to be unfair persecution. He defends the torture of possibly innocent people as justified in the, quote, war on terror. When referring to the torture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, he says, are we supposed to be sorry about that and proceed to punish those who uncovered these plans?
On what theory? That no good deed for your country should go unpunished? He also boohoos about the morale of the CIA and how investigations might increase their agents' anxiety. In another article by Mr. Greenberg entitled Hooray for Snooping, published in the Arkansas Democrat Gazette October 2333, he talks about a national conference of editorial writers he attended in Calgary, Alberta in the seventies or eighties.
In the article, he says that, quote, that year at Calgary, one solemn resolution proposed that we stop talking to the CIA since a number of journalists abroad had been assassinated on the pretext that we were all CIA agents, capitalist spies, tools of imperialism, and, well, you know the rest. As if the killers were so lacking in imagination, they couldn't come up with some other excuse to do away with us if they hadn't invented this one. So there we were, an all too solemn convention assembled, First Amendment or no, debating whether we should gag ourselves. I dissented, being an American, and unaccustomed to being told whom I could talk to or not talk to. Memory grows furtive, but I believe the resolution was defeated.
That it was ever considered was disgraceful enough. It occurs to some of us that if the CIA and FBI and NSA had been allowed to talk even to each other before 09/11/2001, that date might not have become another one that will live in infamy. If only big data could have been mined back then the way it is now, the country might have been a lot safer along with the thousands of innocent victims who found themselves in the Twin Towers that fateful day and others rushing to their rescue as firefighters and cops, and the troops who were stationed at the Pentagon as airliners were turned into flaming engines of destruction, their passengers and crews wiped out, including those who, like the ones aboard Valiant Flight United 93, were the first to mount a counterattack against the terrorist in the still continuing war. It would seem mister Greenberg, a very well connected columnist, was very sympathetic to the ambitions of the CIA for seemingly no reason. It should also be noted he was Jewish and a Zionist.
When Tucker left the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, he went to work for the Weekly Standard News magazine in 1995. It was founded by William Crystal and Fred Barnes. William Crystal is Jewish and the son of Irving Crystal, who's been described as, quote, the godfather of neoconservatism. Irving Crystal was also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and worked for the Congress for Cultural Freedom. The Congress for Cultural Freedom was a group started by a Jewish CIA agent named Mikkel Jocelyn in 1950.
It distributed anti communist propaganda in 35 countries and published over 20 magazines. In 1966, The New York Times are in a series of articles exposing it as a front for the CIA to transfer money to the State Department and the United States Information Agency, the same agency which broadcasted Voice of America, which Tucker's dad was the director of. In the book, Finks, How the CIA Tricked the World's Best Riders, author Joel Whitney talks about, quote, how the good versus bad CIA is a false divide and that the cultural cold warriors again and again used anticommunism as a lever to spy relentlessly on leftist and indeed writers of all political inclinations and thereby pushed US democracy a little closer to the Soviet model of the surveillance state. He alleges that Crystal was in fact a CIA employee, The man who referred to Irving as the godfather of neoconservatism was a man named Jonah Greenberg, also Jewish and editor in chief of The National Review, a semimonthly magazine. The magazine was founded by William F.
Buckley Jr. And has played a significant role in the development of conservatism in The United States. Like Krystal, Buckley was also outed as a CIA employee in Joel Whitney's book. It should also be noted that Fred Barnes, cofounder of The Weekly Standard, currently moderates a show on Voice of America called Issues in the News, again, the same program Tucker's father, Richard, was director of. It would seem William Crystal was also a fan of Paul Greenberg, Tucker's first mentor at the Arkansas Democrat Gazette since he quoted him in an article he published in the Washington Examiner 11/01/2004 entitled the 09/11 connection.
In the article, he quotes Paul as saying, everything we had thought, assumed, expected in the golden nineties hadn't been so. The surface piece of the nineteen nineties had been bought at a great price. On nine eleven, a failure of American leadership was revealed, a failure to look ahead and act forcefully to forestall threats, to do what Bush has called, quote, the hard work of fighting terror and spreading freedom. William's father Irving, alleged CIA employee, also only had kind words to say about mister Greenberg when he wrote the forward to his 1991 book, Resonant Lives, 50 Figures of Consequence. He said, and I quote, our intellectual and spiritual elites today are, with some notable exemptions, semi educated at best.
This explains why someone like Mr. Greenberg has not received the recognition he deserves. Oh, yes, he has won a Pulitzer Prize and other awards, which is nice, but these are tributes to his journalistic talents as a columnist and editorial writer. As a master of the brief moral essay, he has yet to come into his own. These men all seem to connect to one another in some way, and they all seemingly support the, quote, alleged war on terror while increasing the size of the government in the name of preserving freedom.
They protect Israel and promote their agenda while scapegoating Muslims for false flag attacks meant to justify giving more power to their think tanks and intelligence agencies which answer to nobody except the people lining their pockets. After leaving The Weekly Standard, Tucker then went on to write for New York Magazine, Reader's Digest, Slate, Esquire, The New Republic, The New York Times, The Daily Beast, and The Wall Street Journal. He would also go to work on camera for CNN, PBS, and MSNBC before finally settling into his role at Fox News as the poster boy for conservative values. During those years, he also somehow found time to appear on shows like King of Queens, 30 Rock, and Dancing with the Stars. While he is now on Fox News as arguably their most popular personality, this wasn't his first tango with News Corporation, which owns Fox News.
News Corporation owned by Rupert Murdoch also owned The Weekly Standard where Tucker worked under Bill Crystal. News Corporation headquarters is located in none other than the Rockefeller Center Complex in New York. Rupert Murdoch is also on the board of Genie Energy, an American energy company located out of New Jersey. Other noteworthy people on the board of Genie Energy include Jacob Rothschild, the head of the Rothschild banking dynasty, and James Woolsey, former director of the CIA, who, if you remember earlier, was also on the UN reform task force in 2005 with Heritage Foundation founder Edwin Feulner, whose goal was to create a more effective United Nations, the same United Nations which resides on land donated by John D. Rockefeller.
In a 2015 article written by Charlie Rose in Vanity Fair, he details a merger between Jacob Rothschild and David Rockefeller. Rothschild bought 37% of shares in Rockefeller Financial Services through his RIT Capital Partners. This is the same Charlie Rose who would have Arkansas columnist Paul Greenberg on his show to talk politics and the same Paul Greenberg who was held in such high regard by William Crystal and his father Irving. There are so many overlapping connections that can be made that I probably missed dozens, if not more, during my research into the topic. Given these connections to the CIA, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, etcetera, it's no wonder Tucker Carlson ridicules people who believe that 09:11 was an inside job and calls these people parasites.
It's also no wonder Tucker Carlson won't seriously address the Rothschilds on his show as his boss probably wouldn't be too happy even though they have so much control and influence. Whenever people bring up legitimate issues, it's his job to mock them so his viewers won't get to the truth of the matter.
Speaker 4: Washington DC experienced a mild snowfall last week. Luckily, city councilman Trayon White was on it. He knows why it happened. Watch this.
Speaker 5: It's just started snowing out of
Speaker 6: nowhere this morning, man. Y'all better pay attention
Speaker 5: to this climate control, man. This climate manipulation, and DC keep talking about we are resilient city, and that's a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate. It should create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful.
Speaker 4: Yep. The Rothschilds control the climate. The Rothschilds, of course, are a wealthy Jewish banking clan. They're included in a great many conspiracy theories, but those theories rarely give them credit for the weather. That's an ambitious new twist.
Mark Stein is an author and columnist and a part time meteorologist, and he joins us tonight. What are you making? So this is by the way, I live here, so you can laugh all you want, but that's actually my city councilman speaking there. The Rothschilds control the weather. Did you know that?
Speaker 7: Well, I did actually, Tucker. They've they they bought the weather from God back in 1929, when he had a bit of a liquidity problem after the Wall Street crash, and, they keep it in the wine cellars at the Chateau Mouton Rothschild estate in France. And, they're able to micro target the climate. For example, it was light snow in your part of Washington, but I gather in the stairwell of Trayon White's, apartment building, he actually had an avalanche just on his floor. That's that's how micro targeted the big Jew weather machine is able to be.
Speaker 6: And he may and, by the way,
Speaker 7: you may you may think it's a light snowfall, but if you actually examine it, it's actually small pieces of gefelter fish, which is why it doesn't melt. And that's why the Jews control the snowplow business. So they scoop all the gefelter fish in Washington away, and they use it to make Louis Farrakhan calypso albums, which they put out to discredit, Louis Farrakhan from telling the truth about the synagogue of Satan. It all makes sense.
Speaker 6: See, the funny thing is I mean, I don't
Speaker 4: know if it's funny. It's actually so appalling and shocking that it's it's hard. I'm just gonna laugh about it. That was that was you made me feel better about a city out of control. So then I wanna run this by you.
May maybe you can make me feel better about this too. There's a new uproar on social media over microaggressions at UC Santa Cruz. The school has assembled a list of microaggressions. Tucker
Speaker 3: Carlson seems to be everywhere. He has become the face of the conservative and right wing movement in The United States, surely due to the incredible amount of connections he has to intelligence agencies and the government. This is why the gatekeepers and the media attempt to give him credibility and publish stories like how he's being spied on by the NSA or how a seemingly random man confronted him in Montana at a fly fishing shop and insulted him trying to start a confrontation, and it turns out that the man was actually an employee of the Asia Foundation, which was created in 1951 by the CIA as a front organization to distribute propaganda. If you had any doubts before watching this that Tucker Carlson was controlled opposition, I hope the research I presented will put that to bed. Mainstream media is all controlled in its one big incestuous pit.
Don't worship these people as heroes because they will sell you down the river in a heartbeat. Is Tucker Carlson CIA? Well, you can't prove that directly, but once you pour through all of his connections, you would find it incredibly hard not to believe that is the case. About the only thing we're missing at this point is official government documents detailing as much, which I am sure will come out at some point in the future. The CIA has a very long and documented history of infiltrating and controlling the media.
Operation Mockingbird is a great example of that. Tucker Carlson is just one of many examples you could make. Remember to always do your own research and turn off the television.
Speaker 6: Good to see you after, we met briefly at the event in 2008 in Minneapolis for Ron Paul.
Speaker 1: Oh, that
Speaker 6: was fun.
Speaker 2: I remember that.
Speaker 6: But but you had to leave early. What happened? The
Speaker 2: truth is stopping. The truth is stopping. I'll tell you why.
Speaker 1: I didn't bail on Ron Paul. No.
Speaker 6: I don't
Speaker 2: It's when Jesse Ventura got up and started saying 09:11 was an inside job.
Speaker 6: He didn't say that. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah. He did say that. Answer your question. Sure. It wasn't controversial.
It was stupid. And if there's any evidence that the government is behind nine eleven, looks you know, I believe anything if there's evidence, but there isn't any. So knock it off. That's my view.
Speaker 6: Okay. But And
Speaker 2: I said that to him.
Speaker 6: Sure. Sure.
Speaker 8: But one stupid person says something
Speaker 6: stupid at Ron Paul event.
Speaker 2: No. No. But I I hate that. And and by the way, I am open to almost any crackpot theory about anything. It's just on that subject, come on.
You know what I mean? That's too much. That even for me.
Speaker 6: So just out of curiosity then, what what's your take on Building 7? Which explanation do you believe?
Speaker 7: Yeah. Come
Speaker 6: on. It's like it's a slick. No. That's a serious question. Which explanation did did
Speaker 2: it Okay. Which explanation?
Speaker 4: I I There's two explanations.
Speaker 6: It was either it was it was pulled or it was isolated pockets of fire on the building that blew that that were Let
Speaker 2: me let me get let
Speaker 6: me The towers coming down. They're coming down.
Speaker 2: This a no win conversation, so I'm not gonna continue it. But let me just say one The macro my macro view is is the obvious one, which is the buildings came down. There's a bunch of nutcases. We're playing into them.
Speaker 6: Okay. So are you still supporting Ron Paul? So are you supporting anybody in the race this year? No.
Speaker 2: I don't support. I mean, I don't even vote. I don't even vote. I'm hardly objective. I'm honest.
I'm not objective.
Speaker 6: There you go. Certainly not afraid to speak your mind.
Speaker 2: No. I'm not. No. You can assess my views. They're very clear.
You don't have any But I hate that nine eleven crap. Wish they just kicked those people out.
Speaker 6: I mean was supposed to be on the ninety third floor. Really? Oh. It's important for people and their families still involved to know the truth whether or not the government was involved or whether it was terrorists, but there's a history of government sponsored terror throughout the past century. I'm Yeah.
Exactly. So what do you mean kick them out?
Speaker 1: I don't know. Whatever.
Speaker 6: You you anyone who's a 09:11 intruder should be should be kicked out of the the country? Of course not. I don't, you know, I don't
Speaker 2: I don't even believe in parking tickets. I mean, didn't you please? I just don't I think that people, before saying something that heavy, ought to present real evidence and not just it's a coincidence or the questions remain a dumb
Speaker 6: I think like steel doesn't weaken until 2,400 degrees is evidence that that jet fuel couldn't cause a collapse of the tower from being at
Speaker 2: the top. Except the thing is it did.
Speaker 9: So
Speaker 10: problem. We we gave them a lot
Speaker 6: of money.
Speaker 10: See, see, pretty much trained them. I mean, mean, that's that's pretty much enough evidence for me.
Speaker 2: Did the government brought down the Twin Towers? You know
Speaker 10: what? The government that the government was involved in bringing that into our because they would not
Speaker 6: be trained because who because who trained them? The government trained them. The CIA trained them. The special ops trained
Speaker 2: them. Alright. I've I've had this debate so many times. It's not you know, I don't know. I just it it seems to me that it it's kinda beneath, sort of beneath, like, adult discourse even, really, I guess.
And it and it definitely discredits otherwise good ideas.
Speaker 6: I just think that the implications if if the government was involved, the implications are so vast that it should be looked into whether or not it seems ridiculous. Ridiculous.
Speaker 11: So for family members of
Speaker 6: the victims that are asking questions and want the evidence that's been withheld by the government released, you would say that they're less than adults somehow for wanting that
Speaker 2: I would say that parasites like you make it much worse for them. That's what
Speaker 10: I would say.
Speaker 12: I'm a parasite now?
Speaker 2: Yeah. It's it's filthy to say things like that with no evidence, and you have none. So you should stop. That's my point. Well, this is deal with this
Speaker 10: is insult of politics today.
Speaker 4: Back. Millions of people watch the horror of 09:11 right before their very eyes live on television. Two planes crashing into the World Trade Center. And less than a couple of hours later, both towers, of course, collapsing. My next guest says that hijackers may not have brought down the towers by themselves.
Here to explain his controversial theory, Steven Jones. He's a professor of physics at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. Professor Jones, thanks for coming on.
Speaker 9: Sure. Thanks, Tucker.
Speaker 4: Well, just sum up this, obviously, your theory, the one sentence that I just explained in the intro contradicts what we all think we know about how these towers collapsed. Quickly sum up your explanation for what happened.
Speaker 9: Well, I'd like to start with this paper that you referred to. It's available online. What I'm doing, Tucker, is presenting evidence, but it's a hypothesis to be tested. That's a big difference from a conclusion. And so I just wanted to clarify that.
But to sum up, I've looked at the official reports by FEMA and so on regarding the collapse of these buildings. I'd like to look at the collapse of Building 7 in just a minute. It was not even hit by a jet. So we should look at that one.
Speaker 4: Two towers. The explanation has been that the fire inside was so intense that it weakened the structural steel and that each floor collapsed collapsed down upon the next in a pancake fashion and they imploded in on themselves. Is that essentially I think what people think?
Speaker 9: Doctor. Yeah. That's basically it. Yeah. And so what I've done is to analyze these reports.
I would like to do a little experiment with you, Tucker, if I could. I sent out a video clip of the collapse of Building 7 because most people haven't actually seen that one and that's the crux of the argument I'm presenting.
Speaker 4: Sum up very quickly the argument for us. You believe there were explosives in the buildings planted by someone, detonated.
Speaker 9: Is that correct? In other words, hypothesis to be tested there's two hypotheses here. One is fire and damage caused all three buildings to collapse. The other is that explosives in the buildings may have caused the collapse. And so then we analyze and see which fits the data better, and I've done that in my in my 25 page paper.
Speaker 4: I wanna read you a quote from the Deseret Morning News, a paper in Utah from you. I'm quoting now. It is quite plausible that explosives were preplanted in all three buildings and set off after the two plane crashes, you, which were actually diversion tactic. Muslims are probably not to blame for bringing down the World Trade Center buildings after all. That's, I would think, pretty offensive to a lot of people listening.
Do you have any evidence for that?
Speaker 9: Well, not to the Muslims, I might say. I've got a lot of emails saying
Speaker 4: I'm sure your writings have been greeted with glee in Islamabad and Peshawar and places like that.
Speaker 9: Well, I haven't received any notes from there, but just good people. I have Muslim friends. Let me read for example, but I'm not going to let you off the hook. Really want to do this experiment with you.
Speaker 4: We don't have lot of time for experiments, Professor, but if you could just give us one thing to hold on to. You make these claims or appear to make these claims. Do you have any
Speaker 9: collapse of Building 7. Can you roll the video clip that I sent to you?
Speaker 4: Okay. I'm not sure
Speaker 1: if we
Speaker 4: can, but to specify that is World Trade Center Building 7, smaller than the other two, not hit by a plane, of yet it collapsed.
Speaker 9: Right. It's 47 stories.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 9: 24 steel columns in the center. Right. Trusses asymmetrically supported. Now, I can't see what you're seeing.
Speaker 4: Are you rolling that? No, we just see the building. And just so our viewers know, the explanation that I think is conventional is that there was a large tank of diesel fuel stored in a lower level of that which caught fire and the resulting fire collapsed the building.
Speaker 9: That's basically it. But as we read in the FEMA report, it says here, and I put this in my paper, of course, the best hypothesis, which is the only one they looked at, the fire, has only a low probability of occurrence. Further investigation, analyses are needed to resolve this issue and I agree with that. But they admit there's only a low probability. And if you look at the collapse, see what I've studied is the fall time, the symmetry, the fact that it first dips in the middle, that's called the kink, which is very characteristic, of course, of controlled demolition.
Speaker 4: Professor, that we are out of time and I'm not sure that you've J.
Speaker 9: One fully other thing I want to mention
Speaker 1: about Doctor.
Speaker 4: Okay, if you can hit it,
Speaker 6: really quick.
Speaker 9: Doctor. Here we go. Molten metal in the basements of all three buildings. Yet, all scientists now reasonably agree that the fires were not sufficiently hot to melt the steel. So what is this molten metal?
It's a direct evidence for the use of high temperature explosives such as thermite. Thermite produces molten iron as an end product. Okay. So, we do have Yeah, it's very short time, but people will read the paper, then I talk about the molten metal, the symmetry of the collapse, and the weaknesses and inadequacies of the fire hypothesis.
Speaker 4: Professor, we're going to have to leave it to our viewers who are interested enough to follow-up to do just that. We appreciate you coming on. Even if I don't understand your theories, we appreciate you trying to explain them. Thanks. Okay.
Speaker 13: The red string is a symbol to show the Jews that they are helping the Jews usher in the new world order. The reason they do it is so that the Jews spare them from the nasty population that is happening. Not many people are allowed to live in a new world order. In the Old Testament, the book of Joshua, God was giving the Israelites the land of Canaan. Joshua sent in spies.
The Canaanites found out and were searching for the spies. The spies got help from a harlot called Rahab. The Canaanites went to Rahab's house, and she told them she did not see anyone. When they left, Rahab, the harlot, made a deal with Israelite spies. Since she helped the spies, she asked that they spare her and her family.
The Israelite spies agreed and Rahab let them down on a red rope from the on the wall, and the spies escaped safely. The Israelites killed all the Canaanites except Rahab and her fam
@TheMilkBarTV - Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)
You really want to play this game with Tucker Carlson? The man's been on the wrong side of every issue only until it was profitable not to be (Israel included) - he worked at CNN, MSNBC & PBS. https://t.co/5vBVjpfBpX
Video Transcript AI Summary
- Tucker Carlson Today debuts with Douglas Murray as the chosen guest, presenting him as someone with “crystal clarity” on global and national events, though Carlson previously described Murray as clever but not an expert on anything.
- Carlson discusses Trump, saying he would not be a good president and would likely cancel the next election if elected; he adds, “We didn’t understand the country we preside over,” encompassing both the political class in DC and those with authority or money in the United States.
- A speaker quotes Carlson stating, “I hate him passionately. I can’t handle much more of this.” and notes Carlson saying, “We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights,” adding that Trump is a “demonic force, a destroyer, but he’s not gonna destroy us.”
- Carlson mentions following Bobby Kennedy Jr. at a Donald Trump rally in Madison Square Garden as part of discussions on American politics and national sentiment.
- In an aside about foreign policy and allies, Carlson says: “America’s supporting Israel because it’s an ally,” and notes that Qatar is a close ally with “the largest American air base in The Middle East” located there.
- On global health, the discussion references “The Chinese coronavirus” as a major event that will affect life, adding that it’s “definitely not just the flu,” and includes a claim about past flu deaths versus COVID, with one remark questioning if anyone they know died of COVID and noting uncertainty about that.
- The conversation touches on military ethics and civilian harm, with a claim that incinerating tens of thousands of civilians would be “a bad thing,” and then a provocative line about not calling for nuclear weapons against Ayatollah if there’s a belief in a murderer with nuclear weapons.
- A controversial topic is raised about teenage sexuality, asserting that a 15 to 17-year-old boy is biologically driven to procreate and faces a choice between harming a peer emotionally or seeking a safer, though illegal, outlet with a professional partner; the stance is framed as “harm reduction.”
- There is a reference to Emmanuel Macron, with a claim that he was 14 or 15 when he met someone, and a challenge to the assertion that it is wrong or child molestation; the broader point is about Buchanan’s argument that American involvement in World War II may have been a mistake, inviting scrutiny of that view.
- The host recounts a summer after freshman year spent in Nicaragua to engage in war, linking to broader foreign policy debates about war and citizenship.
- A provocative claim is made that anyone who serves in a foreign military should lose his citizenship immediately.
- On Sharia law, the transcript states: “Sharia is intolerant. Women have, in the Quran, fewer rights than men do. I think that in every Muslim majority country in the world, non Muslims are treated, have fewer rights. Sharia law is bad, Seth. I don’t know if you’ve heard that. It’s bad. It’s worse than what’s happening in New York and Detroit. It’s just bad.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, and welcome to the very first episode of Tucker Carlson Today. We had a broad range of possibilities for the first person to talk to as we begin this new show, this new series. But really, in the end, there was only one choice. The one person we know who has crystal clarity on what's happening, not just in this country, but in the world, someone who's watched it and chronicled it for years now. His name is Douglas Murray.
I know Douglas, and I think that I'm always gotten along with him, I think he's clever, but he's hardly an expert on anything. Well, Mike, what? I don't think Trump would be a good president. I think he'd probably cancel the next election if he got elected. You know?
It happened because we didn't understand the country we preside over. And by we, not just the political class in DC, but anybody with authority or money in The United States.
Speaker 1: Referring to Trump, Carlson says, I hate him passionately. I can't handle much more of this.
Speaker 0: We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. I truly can't wait, Carlson texted. That Trump is, in his words, a demonic force, a destroyer, but he's not gonna destroy us. It's such an honor to be here, and it's wild. Just another day following Bobby Kennedy junior at a Donald Trump rally in Madison Square Garden.
I mean, what? America's supporting Israel because it's an ally. I don't even know what those words mean. I'm just saying my principles. They're ally.
Right? I mean, they they both what that means to be an ally. Qatar is, like, one of our closest allies in the world. The largest American air base in The Middle East is in Qatar. They're a close ally of ours.
The Chinese coronavirus is a major event. It will affect your life. And by the way, it's definitely not just the flu. Oh, so thousand twelve, 2013, I read up, More people died of the flu that year than COVID did. Yeah.
Would you know anyone who died of COVID? Did people really die of COVID? I don't know. I never knew anyone who did. Technology.
They've only been used once. If you end up killing, incinerating tens of thousands of civilians, that's just a bad thing. Let's let's just be honest. That's just a bad thing. And I just don't understand why you're not calling for the use of nuclear weapons against the Eyatollah right now.
I'm serious. If they're if you really believe there's a murderer nuclear weapons. See, whatever is the case. So you're a 15 to 16, 17 year boy. You're you are driven by biology to procreate.
Yes. You're either going to be inflicting your attentions on one of your peers who is, let's be honest, not ready for it. She's gonna get hurt emotionally. Or you can have a safer, albeit technically illegal outlet with someone who knows what she's doing. You're not gonna hurt her.
You know what I mean? Like, this is harm reduction.
Speaker 1: Now admitting that Emmanuel Macron was only 14 when they met, when he was in that play. 15, she says, whenever this affair happened.
Speaker 0: I'll just go with 15 and say that's wrong. Yeah. Isn't that child molestation? Theme, it's the it's the larger point that Buchanan is making that perhaps American involvement in World War two was a mistake that that that people are upset about and that I think you can take him to task over. Because I think it's a it's a wrong and in some ways an odious point.
I think the story we got about World War two is all wrong. I think that's right. And you can hardly say that this country won that war. In what meaningful sense? The summer after my freshman year, my roommate and I decided to go down to Nicaragua for the summer and work and, you know, get involved in the war.
Think anybody, by the way, who serves in a foreign military should lose his citizenship immediately. Sharia is intolerant. Women have, in the Quran, fewer rights than men do. I I think that in every Muslim majority country in the world, non Muslims are treated, have fewer rights. Sharia law is bad, Seth.
I don't know if you've heard that. It's bad. It's worse than what's happening in New York and Detroit. It's just bad.
@MsBlaireWhite - BLAIRE WHITE
Dude who pushed the COVID vaccine and Iraq war says someone else is sabotaging America. https://t.co/Y6zeIWnSDA
