reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@wendyp4545 - Wendy Patterson
I'm going to start today from the beginning. It's important for everyone to understand why the courts refused to hear the cases brought before them concerning the 2020 election fraud. People who hate Trump like to say that he lost all of the cases that were brought before the courts when in reality, the courts refused to hear the cases and here's why: Standing is the legal right to initiate a lawsuit. To do so, a person must be sufficiently affected by the matter at hand, and there must be a case or controversy that can be resolved by legal action. The attorney's and those they represented didn't have "damage done to them" according to the court. Now many of us disagreed with the courts because everyone is damaged by a fraudulent election and to prove that fraud occurred, we needed to prove it in court but we were denied the ability to present evidence, leaving the results in place. President Trump didn't lose the cases brought to the courts, he was denied by the courts the right to present evidence to prove that fraud took place, until now. In Jack Smith's haste to stick to a pre planned timeline that would tie Trump up in court on major event dates during the presidential campaign season, he charged president Trump with imaginary free speech crimes that any first year novice wouldn't have charged using the stolen 2020 election as his target opening the door for president Trump to exercise his due process rights, with subpoena power to finally litigate the 2020 election fraud in a court of law. "Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. Due process applies to both civil and criminal matters."
@DecentFiJC - Jonathan
Read this whole thread. Some fantastic work by @AzPinkLady here! The Russia Collusion Hoax was a treasonous Trojan Horse designed to do AT LEAST 1 of 2 things. But ideally, it would do BOTH — 1. Disqualify an outsider (Trump, and any others in the future) from ever being President of the United States again. (Why? Read “2.”) 2. Serve as justification for constructing their entire “Upside Down” apparatus which both enables and REQUIRES a wholesale rejection of reality as we know it. This system, which leverages its corrupt control over courts, medicine, media, data and law enforcement, was designed to be exclusive, overtly biased and perpetually protective of a small, but extremely influential group of people. And it’s these (godless) people who desperately seek to place an impenetrable layer of insulation between them and the severe punishments they’re warranted for having engaged in their unconscionable deeds. Such a fail-proof system requires the total disregard for both an equal application/interpretation of law and what’s patently obvious within the natural universe: reality, evidence, morality, honesty, psychology, motive, mathematics, physics, logic, reasoning, scientific principle and discovery, Occam’s razor, etc. Shame on us for ever allowing them to build it in the first place. Now, we must accept our total responsibility and OBLIGATION to dismantle it entirely. For the sake of our children and grandchildren.
@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica
Yes, Bryan, it did. Az Supreme Court established a “task force” to prevent “disinformation” from infecting their courts. One of their recommendations - modify court conduct rules about criticism of judges. Sounds like banana republic stuff when you can’t criticize those in… https://t.co/t8aQ8vhO05
@BlehmLawAZ - Bryan Blehm
Before the 2020 Presidential Election & Covid Pandemic, did the AZ Supreme Court in Conjunction with the AZ State Bar WORK WITH the CIA & US Justice Department to Stifle Political Free Speech? @BrandonStraka @glennbeck @TrumpWarRoom @stevebannon_1 @DonaldJTrumpJr @bennyjohnson… https://t.co/uHih0BvZrb
@BlehmLawAZ - Bryan Blehm
The most significant mandate of any Supreme Court in a constitutional republic is to protect its citizens from abuse and overreach by the executive and legislative branches of government. For example, to prevent the executive branch from stifling free speech, especially speech…
@ELExodus7 - ELExodus
@VincentCrypt46 Their system is a FRAUD..... All be it, a dead one....... https://t.co/UeqIu6CGh0
@EmeraldRobinson - Emerald Robinson ✝️
The vote counting stopped on election night in 2020 in six swing states simultaneously and so election fraud is an established fact no matter what Jenna Ellis pleads.
@DecentFiJC - Jonathan
The court that is about to find Amber McReynolds, Mark Zuckerberg, NVHI, David Becker and Marc Elias guilty of election interference and conspiracy to defraud the American People. I dare you to ask me how I know that.
@DecentFiJC - Jonathan
Remember when AMBER MCREYNOLDS went to MICHIGAN and BEGGED JOCELYN BENSON to have MICHIGAN join the ERIC system? Yeah, that’ll never be relevant again.✌️
@DecentFiJC - Jonathan
“I dare you to put a date on the speed of legal processes, which is the thing you don’t/can’t control. I’m smrt.”
@DecentFiJC - Jonathan
Yes, I know how the courts (at least some) will rule, based on the facts. It seems you haven’t kept up with what we do here. https://t.co/8Ob20vVXvA
@DecentFiJC - Jonathan
Any state that investigates, dipshit. You need me to go state-by-state and give a breakdown of where non-compromised officials are in place and will take action? But since you asked, Wisconsin and Virginia are certainly among them.🤣 Please bookmark this. I beg you.
@MikeGil21446788 - Mike Gill
The Police State! Starts and ends in court. Let’s fight election fraud in the court? BRILLIANT it was a loser from the start. Ask Arizona? Those Judges are paid by the same dark money. So you find the JUDGES MONEY. That’s what’s in New Hampshire a roadmap to everybody.
@DeclareUrBallot - Declare Your Ballot
Part 1 of 5 I have been requested to summarize my election fraud solution into a word post, rather than the video format I created. Fair enough. In my Video 3 on my website I lay out how to beat rigged elections. Watch it if you can, it is rather short, less than 10 minutes. I originally made a video because I wanted people to see I was a real human being, not a bot or FBI plant. Who I am is irrelevant, as I wanted my solution to be judged on its merits and not on my credentials. I am just a normal American who is sick and tired of watching elections gets stolen and corrupt judges making excuses. Thus, I joined Twitter (X), made the videos and put them online for everyone to see. First, we know the elections are being rigged in a multitude of ways, not just one. They are sending out more ballots than needed. This allows harvesters to illegally gather, vote and send them in. See “2000 Mules” documentary. Signature verification is a joke, so all these illegal ballots come in. See Kari Lake’s trial where she proved 70,000 signatures were verified in under 2 seconds. If that is not enough, they can electronically manipulate the results. See the documentary “SelectionCode”, see the Antrim County forensic results, or see the Maricopa Forensic results (i.e., not the hand count) that found 407,000 illegally machine entered votes that were predetermined - 374,000 for Biden and 33,000 for Trump. Yes, even Trump had fake votes because the cheaters need leeway on both sides to make the race look close when it isn’t. See CNN on election night 2020 when almost 20,000 votes in Pennsylvania magically disappear for Trump and get added to Biden. Furthermore, states ignored election laws and ran illegal elections. The Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed that the expanded use of “indefinitely confined” was illegal and the drop boxes were illegal. The Justice Gableman report found massive abuse of elderly in Wisconsin stealing votes. The Halderman report from Georgia showed the voting machines are hackable. I could go on and on. These examples are just the tip of the iceberg on election fraud as I would be here forever detailing all the evidence. We know the elections are a complete sham. Trump gets 50,000 to a rally and Biden struggles to get 1,000…yet Biden got 81M votes. As Kari Lake said, “my ass” he did! Despite a massive amount of evidence, we have another HUGE problem – corrupt judges. The evidence that Trump in 2020 and Kari Lake in 2022 have accumulated is more than enough to overturn the election results. However, all across the country corrupt judges have done their best to hide the truth with nonsensical rulings. Sadly, this started with the Supreme Court when they held Texas and other states, along with the candidate for President, didn’t have standing to sue. This is pure nonsense. Standing is a judicially created doctrine that the courts have abused for far too long. The truth is, if the court wants to hear the case they magically find standing, if the court wants to ignore the case they magically don’t have standing. The Supreme Court thought they could shaft Trump and disenfranchise an entire nation and we would go along with it. They were sadly mistaken. Now the Supreme Court is going to be forced to make tougher decisions when all these bogus civil and criminal Trump cases land on their desk and they are FORCED to make a decision.
@DeclareUrBallot - Declare Your Ballot
Part 2 of 5 The corrupt judiciary was really apparent a couple years ago when they started with Alex Jones, where two different corrupt judges issued a directed verdict because they didn’t want to let Alex present a defense. His case is still on appeal. You have recently seen how corrupt the judiciary is in the John Eastman disbarment case. You have recently seen how corrupt the judiciary is in New York, where the crazy judge on summary judgment valued Mar-a-lago at $18M when it is easily worth $500M or more. Again, the corrupt judge, just like with Alex Jones, didn’t want the jury to decide so they bypassed the entire trial and jumped straight to damages. These civil and criminal cases against Trump are as baseless as the Russia Hoax, where Hillary Clinton and the DNC made up lies about hookers peeing on beds in Russia to frame Trump for fabricated crimes. Yet, despite all these corrupt judges hiding election fraud, just last week a judge threw out a Democrat primary mayoral election in Bridgeport Connecticut when video evidence of ballot stuffing came to light – sounds like 2000 Mules all over again! Judges have no problem following the laws when the fraud is between two Democrats but can’t seem to understand plain English when it comes to MAGA candidates. Again, we have a massive judge problem that we need to overcome. We also need to recognize that stolen elections and corrupt judges are not limited to the Democrats. Most Republican election officials and judges are just as corrupt. See Georgia where Brian Kemp and Brad Ratsberger are stealing elections for themselves, and are still trying to hide the ballots and signatures to this day. The battle between Ds and Rs is like watching professional wrestling – it is all a show to trick us. Both sides work for the Establishment class. The real battle today is Es versus Ps, the Establishment versus the People. The Establishment is the Deep State, the corrupt Government, the status quo. This is why so few Republicans talk about election fraud because they are in on it! We obviously need one day elections and not election month, signature verification, hand counts in smaller precincts banning the use of rigged machines. But how do we get there when the entire system is rigged? How do we beat rigged elections and force corrupt judges to do the right thing? We need an interim solution to get us to true election integrity.
@DeclareUrBallot - Declare Your Ballot
Part 3 of 5 Now we get to the good part, the solution. It is very simple. Shockingly simple…and free. It requires ZERO help from the corrupt legislatures. It gets around ALL the ways they cheat. It takes away ALL the excuses corrupt judges use to rule against election integrity. The secrecy of the ballot has been weaponized against the American people. For the first 100 years of our country, we didn’t have secret ballots. Our ballots were public. Unfortunately, unions and thugs were forcing people to vote a certain way. We then moved to secret ballots to prevent this, but now our elections are rigged! Frankly, the elections have probably been rigged a lot longer than we want to believe. As Regan said, “Trust but verify.” Well, the trust is gone and now it is time for the verification part. We need a TRANSPARENT, VOLUNTARY, PARALLEL-ELECTION WITH INDISPUTABLE RESULTS. Sounds complicated but is VERY simple. You go in on election day. You vote as you normally would. You then walk out and come to our booth. We will be in the parking lot, at a close location, somewhere easily accessible that follows all the election laws. We will have a simple piece of paper ready to go. You can print the paper ahead of time and bring it with you. On the paper you will disclose who you are and when and where you voted. We will have a notary public (all volunteers) ready to verify your identity, watch you sign and take your oath. You will declare who you just voted for! This is literally first amendment protected speech. Yes, you need a small bit of courage to admit who you voted for, but that is a small price to pay for free and fair elections. Heck, most people will gladly declare who they voted for! I voted for Trump in 2016, 2020 and will do so again in 2024. See, it is that easy. You are creating a Jurat Affidavit, admissible in a court of law. The paper will have just the top-level candidates of the state, so this one simple piece of paper can be used statewide. The strategy is to keep it simple. If you were disenfranchised (e.g., 60% tabulator failure) and couldn’t vote, we will have a spot for that too. We are gathering ALL the evidence we need on election day and not fighting for years in the courts to get it. Our results are MORE accurate than the election results because we can prove each voter is real. We don’t hide our results, in fact, we publicly disclose EVERYTHING. There is nothing left to argue over when anyone and everyone can see each Jurat Affidavit. This also allows each campaign to use the true results for their lawsuits.
@DeclareUrBallot - Declare Your Ballot
Part 4 of 5 You are likely thinking, “you aren’t going to get everyone to participate in it.” Correct, this solution is 100% voluntary, but we don’t need everyone participating for it to work because they rig the elections to be close so people fall for it. We just need what I call “critical mass” and just critical mass from Trump voters. Take Maricopa County, Arizona as an example. Let’s say in 2024 to keep the numbers simple, there are 2 million total votes, 1.5M from mail-in ballots and 500,000 from election day. Biden won Arizona in 2020 by 10,457. That is a razor thin margin which makes my solution work even better. Let’s say Maricopa reports that of the 500,000 votes on election day, Trump got 260,000 and Biden got 240,000. But we know we are winning election day 70/30, not 52/48. 70% of 500,000 is 350,000. Let’s assume we only collect 80% of those Trump votes, so we are left with 280,000 provable Trump votes on election day. But wait, Trump “lost” the entire state by 10,457 votes and we have collected 20,000 more than Maricopa reported on election day. We just proved Trump won the ENTIRE STATE despite never even looking at the mail-in ballots. You can also take this analyzation further when you break it down per precinct / vote center. This solution works better when you vote on election day and do not use the mail-in ballots. This solution is also dependent upon a Donald Trump or Kari Lake being a champion of it to spread the awareness and implement it. This solution inspires people to vote, because now they know they are going to see the real results and not be cheated yet again. You know the cheaters are going cheat, but with this solution we don’t care how they are cheating, because we are getting our results directly from the voters. This solution removes all the bogus excuses corrupt judges use to throw out good cases. First, we are ready to sue the day AFTER the election. Two, we have all the evidence we need in hand. Three, our results are indisputable, as a real person is behind each Jurat Affidavit that was collected. Four, this gathers massive public support by showing the people who the real winner was.
@DeclareUrBallot - Declare Your Ballot
Part 5 of 5 Keep in mind, my solution is 100% volunteer based and I am asking for ZERO money. You spend your own money how you best see fit. People can print out their own piece of paper or volunteers can have papers ready for voters. All notary publics will be working as volunteers. If we need more notary publics, go get registered to be one. Everything I am proposing is 100% grass roots and the exact opposite of a grift. Heck, I don’t even want to form an organization. Instead, these are people coming together voluntarily to save this nation. Everything we do will be transparent, all publicly disclosed. There is not a single aspect of this entire solution that is being hidden. Rather, everything is transparent. Frankly, the Trump campaign should take this solution and run with it. I do not need to be involved. I am just laying out the solution for anyone or any campaign to implement. Even Democrats could implement my solution in elections that are being stolen from them. I am more than willing to discuss this solution directly with Donald Trump or Kari Lake. So far they have either not seen me or ignored me – I don’t know which. Public pressure may help bring awareness to them. I ask that you do all you can to push this solution to them. My solution is the last step preventing an armed civil war. We can save this nation peacefully without having to resort to violence. Our entire Constitutional Republic is at stake and 2024 is our chance to fix this mess for good. We can’t keep doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results. It is time to voluntarily remove the secrecy of the ballot that has been weaponized against the American public. Voluntary Transparency is the solution.
@BelannF - BelannF
CAN YOU EXPLAIN THIS after seeing what was revealed in a FOIA request? How are the media and those who want to believe Joe won in 2020 while napping in his basement able to say there was no fraud in the 2020 election when the evidence was not seen/heard by the U.S. District Attorneys? OR - When judges dismissed lawsuits before evidence was heard? OR - When Prosecutors looked the other way?
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
They’ve destroyed every rotten, corrupt and perfidious institutions including court houses across America to get Trump. In other words the November 5, 2024 Insurrection is underway. https://t.co/ixTatFf8Sq
@RWMaloneMD - Robert W Malone, MD
This has all been planned, a long game. Weaponization of 14th amendment appears to have been the motive behind the Jan 06 shenanigans. The Democratic party is the primary party of the deep state, and the Rhinos go along due to corruption, compromise, honeytrap blackmail, and lobbyists. The 14th needs to be rescinded. Trump needs to be elected. And the deep state with its CIA and mockingbird press needs to be destroyed. To save the republic.
@RWMaloneMD - Robert W Malone, MD
One thing about DJT is that he will be a one termer if elected this time, vindicated with nothing to loose. Scores will be settled. He will be highly motivated to take a wrecking ball to the deep state. And will be backed up by people like (likely) AG Kash Patel who have clear ideas about what actions are needed.
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless' An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign. The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues. "Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)." The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below. “You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.” The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings. It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden. The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction. Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed. It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity. Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
You can read the links to the lawsuits and copious notes through the link below: https://election-integrity.info/2020_Election_Cases.htm
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
My point is that the media's intentional broadbrush statements about the 2020 election are reckless editorializing. It is not balanced reporting to make sweeping statements that ignore the highly relevant details. In the final analysis, many of these courts may have rightly concluded that the 2020 election was a political problem that demanded a political remedy. Fortunately for America, the Constitution provided a remedy in that slates of electors submitted to the Congress may be returned to the states for further consideration. Ultimately, a highly disputed election may be settled in the House of Representatives. It is troubling that the current Congress has since endeavored to take away this political avenue, which is the 'break glass in case of emergency' remedy of last resort.
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
Editor's note: This is a repost in light of recent misinformation being spread on the left that election fr*ud had been investigated in the 2020 election and had been found by the courts to not have occurred. This is not the case. Furthermore, there were a number of illegal and unconstitutional proceedings during the 2020 election, particularly in swing states, which flooded the process with difficult-to-verify mail-in ballots, especially in light of dirty voter rolls, flawed signature matching, a subjective adjudication process, major recount discrepancies, the destruction/loss of ballot images, and chain-of-custody violations.
@seanmdav - Sean Davis
If presidents aren’t immune from being criminally charged for official acts, as SCOTUS seems to be threatening to rule, then Biden and his entire entourage — including much of top DOJ brass — are 100% going down for what they’ve done during this presidency, but especially for the crimes they committed and then excused with this special counsel. And not just Biden: George W. Bush and Barack Obama better lawyer up, too. Those WMDs didn’t invent themselves, and those kids didn’t drone themselves. Nope, it took presidents to do that. Biden directing his DOJ to indict his chief political opponent for crimes which Biden’s own DOJ says Biden committed, then obstructing justice by intimidating government attorneys and telling them to destroy evidence, and then tying it all up by making sure DOJ let Biden off the hook? Oh you better believe every single person involved in that will be facing prison time. Every last political appointee, lawyer, paralegal, and department functionary involved was clearly part of an illegal conspiracy to defraud the United States and her people. See how easy that is? And all takes to make it happen is one prosecutor and the right jury pool. SCOTUS can do the right thing and toss every last one of these idiotic lawless Biden-directed cases against Trump, or SCOTUS can guarantee that the rest of this country’s short history—this republic is careening toward a cliff with a cinder block tied down to the gas pedal—will be consumed with politicians and judges and their government allies and their families spending every last minute and dollar they have fending off criminal charges from their political opponents. Ruling the “wrong” way on a case? Well that looks like criminal corruption and abuse of office. Appointing the “wrong” person? Clearly that was part of a criminal kickback scheme. Voting for the “wrong” law? Textbook case of being bought off by donor lobbyists. Authoring the “wrong” court decision? Better hope the prosecutor who targets you doesn’t have a hopelessly partisan jury pool in his back pocket that will indict a ham sandwich if it was ordered by someone from the “wrong” political party. That’s the future if Biden is allowed to indict his opponents for crimes his own attorneys say he committed while refusing to charge him for it. This isn’t theory. It isn’t an intellectual exercise or a fun 3am dorm room. This is reality, and it will happen. That is, unless saner heads prevail, and head this nonsense off at the pass. Do any of those saner heads exist anymore in Washington? We’ll find out soon enough.
@ScottAdamsSays - Scott Adams
It isn’t possible to get a fair trial involving Jan6th because every judge and every juror was a victim of the same mass brainwashing op. Literally brainwashing. Literally. Why are the courts (and maybe you) not aware of this massive brainwashing operation? Because it worked. I’m speaking as a trained hypnotist. You wouldn’t know you were brainwashed. But I would know you were. I watched it happen in real time.
@ChrisMurphyCT - Chris Murphy 🟧
Trump toadies are going to attack the jury and the court because they have a plan to dismantle our democracy and it relies on everyone believing the justice system is rigged. It isn’t. Donald Trump committed a crime. He got caught. He got convicted. That’s the rule of law.
@DC_Draino - DC_Draino
Here is the Democrat election scam broken down: They create the illusion of support for a candidate by pumping them up in the media apparatus that they fully control. They use billionaires to launder money to the candidate through straw donors on ActBlue. $3,300 max per person? No problem! Just funnel a billionaire’s $$ through hundreds of thousands of names. Wow look how “popular” they are! Polling companies work for them so that’s no issue either. Just show the “transformational” candidate with strong numbers based on imaginary data. Now the public believes they “have a chance”. Then they register 8+ million illegals to vote. They don’t need them to actually cast a ballot and risk getting caught. They just need that name on the voter roll so they can pump out a fake ballot and throw it in a dropbox undetected in a few key swing states. The Deep State FBI and DOJ won’t even open an investigation so no issue there, and if any judges start getting a little too close to allowing an actual trial showing evidence, that judge gets a very threatening phone call. Then boom, every single case is dismissed on standing - what great luck for them! Then when they steal it, they ban anyone on social media calling out their scam, put up barbed wire around the Capitol, use thousands of troops to keep the public away, and start new wars across the globe for years on end. We no longer live in a free country. We live under a communist regime masquerading as a Constitutional Republic. Trump is their greatest threat and they just tried to put a bullet in his head.
@FrankRoccoG - Frank Rocco Giustino
"How" can our government do this to its people? Because they are not legally bound by a proper oath. Just like Jack SMITH, the "judges" and prosecutors are mere actors. They are not federal officers. 👇 --- No Proper Oaths of Office On January 6th Cases As evident from my January 6th case's material signed onto court record under penalty of perjury, @TheJusticeDept "U.S. Attorney" prosecutors and federal "judges" have not signed and executed the proper legally required oaths of office as contractual bonds to their appointed positions - including the District of Columbia's leading January 6th "U.S. Attorney" Matthew M. GRAVES and the United States District Court's respective former and current "Chief Judges," Beryl Alaine HOWELL & James Emanuel BOASBERG. Witness for yourself: Matthew GRAVES' "Assistant U.S. Attorney" prosecutor Douglas G. COLLYER admits to public defender Evan Flinn SUGAR (court-appointed to January 6'er Frank Rocco) that COLLYER himself did not sign nor file any oath of office that is required for his January 6th prosecution. The public defender further misled client Frank Rocco in legally advising that there were no signed documented oaths of office in existence for federal prosecutors and judges, anywhere - at all. The "no signed document" comment in regard to an oath of office as legally advised by Frank Rocco's public defender was in direct conflict with Title 5 U.S.C. § 3332 - the statute clearly stating that an affidavit shall be filed alongside an oath of office as required under law: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=5+U.S.+Code+%EF%BF%BD+3332&f=treesort&fq=true&num=2&hl=true&edition=prelim&granuleId=USC-prelim-title5-section3332 The concealed signed documented oaths were eventually provided to Frank Rocco by the Justice Department themselves through FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) Request, but not in accordance with U.S. Code under law and the Constitution - made out to be fraudulent. USDC D.C. January 6th "Chief Judges" HOWELL & BOASBERG were discovered to have signed illegally changed judicial oaths of office. January 6'er Frank Rocco estopped the "Chief Judges" of D.C. for fraud by refusing for cause their improper judicial oaths of office on case #23-cr-16-JEB, then to be deliberately ignored and jailed by "JEB" BOASBERG without proper Article III jurisdiction - despite BOASBERG as the "Court" granting leave for filing of this proof of fraud on himself: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66728847/59/united-states-v-giustino/ Compare Title 28 U.S.C. § 453 "So help me God" in proper form as prescribed by Congress under the Constitution to the improper corporative CAPITONYM form, "SO HELP ME GOD." Oaths of office for justices and judges cannot be changed without legislation by Congress. See the statute and its amendment: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:28%20section:453%20edition:prelim)%20OR%20(granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section453)&f=treesort&edition=prelim&num=0&jumpTo=true Leading January 6th "U.S. Attorney" prosecutor Matthew M. GRAVES (@USAO_DC) and his "Assistant U.S. Attorneys" have redacted their signatures from their filed oaths of office, with fraudulent former "Chief Judge" Beryl Alaine HOWELL signed to GRAVES as his witness - making his oath improperly executed. Declared unconstitutional "Special Counsel" Jack SMITH did not have a properly executed oath of office due to a missing witnessing signature. The Justice Department acknowledged this "error" as important only after SMITH had already indicted TRUMP twice without the procedurally compliant oath of office for SMITH's illegal appointment: https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-10/10.06.23.%20-%20Special%20Counsel%20Oath%20Jack%20Smith.pdf D.C. "Judge" Tanya S. CHUTKAN's decorum sworn to her judicial oath of office put in question on the record with its statute cited by TRUMP's lawyers in a MOTION for RECUSAL. One month earlier, Frank Rocco submitted evidence of CHUTKAN's fraudulent judicial oath of office alongside the same exact statute directly to TRUMP's lawyers and Jack SMITH's Justice Department prosecutors via email: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/50/united-states-v-trump/ Federal "Judges" and "U.S. Attorneys" acting without valid civil and/or judicial oaths of office can be subjected to criminal impersonation charges under Title 18 U.S.C. § 912: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section912&num=0&edition=prelim Federal and state law enforcement Offices (@FBI, @USMarshalsHQ, State of Florida's @GovRonDeSantis) have ignored evidence of documented oath fraud on the DOJ and USDC of D.C. that was submitted by Frank Rocco before his illegally executed arrest by federal and local law enforcement officers using a SEALED bench warrant ORDERED by BOASBERG. This secretive SEALED bench warrant went unsigned and undated by any arresting law enforcement officer for the remainder of Frank Rocco's illegal 3-month incarceration to follow. Federal and state law enforcement did not protect the federal judiciary or Frank Rocco against proven impersonators of federal officers having no proper oaths as bonds - aiding and abetting criminals by arresting Frank Rocco, an innocent American, instead. In addition to federal and state law enforcement, #SeditionHunters are also aiding and abetting impersonators of federal officers within the Justice Department and United States District Courts in their nationwide persecution of January 6th, 2021 protestors as fellow Americans. Frank Rocco's 'Interlocutory Allocution' on court record detailing these above oath issues (Doc 59): https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66728847/59/united-states-v-giustino/ Video Interview: https://rumble.com/v4q9ssh-the-truth-matters-with-tina-peters.html TGP Article: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/j6-political-prisoner-frank-rocco-giustino-spends-3/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=j6-political-prisoner-frank-rocco-giustino-spends-3 Support Page: https://www.givesendgo.com/frankrocco
@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC
“Captured” courts aren’t considered to be Constitutionally “operating”, counselor. You’re welcome.🫡
@inherentlypolit - inherentlypolitical
@TheoryConspiry @Uwillnot_murder @KAGdrogo @DecentBackup Settled constitutional law from 1866. Unless you’re going to turn around and argue that Trump is going to shut down every single civilian court nationwide (he can’t, that power lies in the states), your “military tribunals” argument just exploded Let the cope flow https://t.co/y4HNgWXdH2
@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC
There is a legal mechanism in contract law, which is applicable to literally any transaction in any domain. “Fraud vitiates.” People who steal money don’t get to also keep the money they stole, just because they already spent it on weaponizing the legal systems against you. And besides, the federal government isn’t stripping state courts of their functions. They did that themselves when they stopped operating according to their required obligations to the Constitution. Which is what “operating” is for them, dipshit. I always love when the 110-IQ Jew attorneys give us the “there is no mechanism by which…” horseshit. Right after they fucking released a bioweapon, stole billions from everyone and covered it up, then spent the past 5 years giving fuck all of a regard to the Constitution and mechanisms and precedent. I’d imagine being a Jew attorney is probably the easiest, more bullshit job in the world amid Bolshevik Revolution 2. Especially when you get to pick your own Joodges.
@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC
There is a legal mechanism in contract law, which is applicable to literally any transaction in any domain. “Fraud vitiates.” People who steal money don’t get to also keep the money they stole, just because they already spent it on weaponizing the legal systems against you. And besides, the federal government isn’t stripping state courts of their functions. They did that themselves when they stopped operating according to their required obligations to the Constitution. Which is what “operating” is for them, dipshit. I always love when the 110-IQ Jew attorneys give us the “there is no mechanism by which…” horseshit. Right after they fucking released a bioweapon, stole billions from everyone and covered it up, then spent the past 5 years giving fuck all of a regard to the Constitution and mechanisms and precedent. I’d imagine being a Jew attorney is probably the easiest, most bullshit job in the world amid Bolshevik Revolution 2. Especially when you get to pick your own Joodges.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Bravo! We must impeach judges who are grossly undermining the will of the people and destroying America. It is the only way.
@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup
🎖️UPDATE: As luck would have it, Jerod MacDonald-Evoy’s father, Roger MacDonald-Evoy, is “retired” 32-year USAF Intelligence. (He retired shortly after 9/11 too, no less.) It appears treason runs in the family and shit. Guess that’s why Jerod feels so comfy sitting on George Soros’s payroll, while subverting the will of the people of Arizona and the citizens of United States of America. Imagine the fuck outta that, sports fans. I wonder what ole Roger is up to in Cheyenne, WY and Arboles, CO these days. Perhaps someone should call him at 307-634-9878 and ask him. And while you’ve got him on the line, ask him why he raised such a traitorous cunt of a son. PS: Nice of you to join us, Max. It’d been a few hours since you last stepped on a banana peel.🤣
@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup
I got a better idea, Jerod. How’s about you get COMPLETELY fucked, you traitorous bitch. You brought all of us into this when you decided to be a smarmy Jewish cunt and obstruct justice for CIA/Israeli bioterrorists, election fraudsters and degenerate pedophiles who wanted access to kids at Phoenix Children’s Hospital that someone like a Pat Goodman could provide.
@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup
Wait until you find out what we’re seeking for you and all the rest of the fucking traitors in AZ.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
Norm Eisen was just on a live stream bragging about using leftist courts around the country to thwart the will of 77M+ Americans. I’ve been saying that Norm Eisen should have been put under formal investigation and prosecuted on day one but since that didn’t happen, we now have President Norm Eisen. The Trump DOJ has failed by not prosecuting Norm and everyone who has been involved in lawfare and criminality since Trump 1.0. Additionally, congressional republicans should have also started the process of dismantling the DC courts and holding all corrupt judges accountable to send a message. Where is Pam Bondi?
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
This is why the democrats are going to shut down the government. https://t.co/NlrtgCW3ss
@angelwoman501 - Patriot Lady
This is another federal activist judge who has blocked President Trump's cuts to DEI teacher training. When is SCOTUS going to put a stop to these judges interfering with President Trump's article II rights? https://t.co/s3bJbENymI
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
Meet the federal Judge who just blocked President Trump’s cuts to DEI teacher training. His resume is full of DEI activism, he served on the board of groups currently suing President Trump, and trained far-left activists how to avoid arrests during protests. 🧵🧵🧵 https://t.co/KSp77nbT2X
@NGorhamA4S4 - NGorhamA4S4 💫🇺🇸💫
@angelwoman501 @Ikennect This Is Why It Is Happening. There Is NO RULE OF LAW, Or Equal Protection Under The Law, When State And Federal Judiciary Are Seated Unconstitutionally Via Direct And Indirect Popular Vote, From The Most Populace Counties, And Cities In Those Counties, In All 50 States, Territories And Possessions. That Form Of Government Is A Anti-Republican Unconstitutional Representative Constitutional Democracy. Which Is Unconstitutional As Per Article Four Section Four Of The United States Constitution, Which Says; “Guarantee Clause ARTICLE IV, SECTION 4 The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.” There Are Supposed To Be Three Voices Represented In Our Federal Government, Hence The Three Branches. The Voice Of The People, Represented In State And Federal Houses Of Representatives. The Voice Of The State Represented In State And Federal Senates. The Voice Of The Law, The State And Federal Judiciary. Right Now, Which Is The Problem, The Voice Of The People, Which Is Already Represented In State And Federal Houses Of Representatives, Via Direct Popular Vote. Seats The Voice Of The State And The Law From The Same Voting Pool, Which Is Only The Most Populous Counties, And Cities In Those Counties. That Means, ONLY That Voting Pool Has Any Representation In Our State And Federal Government. And That Form Of Government Is A Unconstitutional Democracy Form Of Government, As Per Article Four Section Four Of The United States Constitution. Which Says The United States Shall Guarantee A Republican Form Of Government To The States, And NOT A MOB Seated Democracy! It Is Impossible To Be A Constitutional Republic, When State And Federal Judiciary Are Seated By Direct And Indirect Popular Vote, ONLY From The Most Populous Counties And Cities In Them Because They Have The Population Density To Do So, That Being THE MOB, The Voice Of The People, Which Also Seats State And Federal Houses Of Representatives, State And Federal Senates, ALL From That Same Pool Of Voters, Directly Or Indirectly. There Is NO Equal Protection Under The Law By Such A Unconstitutional Democratic Form Of State And Federal Government. Being Unconstitutional, As Per Article Four Section Four Of The United States Constitution, Says The United States Shall Guarantee A Republican Form Of Government To The States, Which It Has Not Since 1849, Via Luther v Borden, Which Set Into Motion Other Individual States, Seating State Judiciary Via Direct Popular Vote. What Made The United States The Constitutional Republic We Started Out As Was The Guarantee Of A Republican Form Of Government To The States, Which Means Independent State Judiciary, Seated By The State Senate, State District Court And Above To Include State Supreme Court, As The State Senate Is Representative Of The State As A Whole As The Voice Of The State, Where As The Voice Of The People Is Representative Of The Population Centers, And Cities In Them, As They Have The Population Density To Cancel Out The Rural Areas Of The State. When ALL Of That Is Achieved In All Of The States, That Creates The Constitutional Republic, With The Voice Of The State, Residing In The United States Senate, Seated There To Seat A Independent Federal Judiciary, Those Senators Being Chosen In Full And Open Sessions Of State Legislatures, To Seat Them There. ALL Of THAT Is What Made Us A Constitutional Republic. That Does NOT Exist Today, What Exists In State And Federal Government, Are A Anti-Republican Democratic Form Of State And Federal Government, Masquerading As A Constitutional Republic, Which It Is Not!
@NGorhamA4S4 - NGorhamA4S4 💫🇺🇸💫
@angelwoman501 @Ikennect @angelwoman501 @Ikennect This Is How To End It. 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲
🚨 BREAKING: The DEEP STATE JUDGES trying to BLOCK TRUMP from SAVING AMERICA!! Supreme Court FINALLY fighting back against ROGUE JUDGES who've been running a SHADOW GOVERNMENT! This is the battle for our REPUBLIC! 🔥🔥🔥 1/12 https://t.co/ATj8q3v2BW
@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲
The GLOBALIST JUDGE CABAL has been SABOTAGING Trump since DAY ONE! 675 UNELECTED TYRANTS with BLACK ROBES stopping our ELECTED PRESIDENT! These DISTRICT DICTATORS think they can rule from their little COURTROOM KINGDOMS! The SYSTEM is RIGGED! 2/12 https://t.co/KJhLZ2ki7H
@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲
There were SIX nationwide injunctions under Bush, TWELVE under Obama, but a STAGGERING 64 under Trump's first term! Now on pace for EVEN MORE! This isn't coincidence - it's COORDINATED JUDICIAL WARFARE against America First! 3/12 [Kirk(4).txt] https://t.co/mc5WEanE1T
@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲
BIRTH TOURISM is REAL! Foreign nations SENDING pregnant women to EXPLOIT our laws! They give birth, go back to CHINA, then return YEARS LATER claiming CITIZENSHIP! The 14th Amendment was for SLAVES, not FOREIGN INVADERS! 4/12 https://t.co/GkUYBWFaWU
@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲
Trump's EXECUTIVE ORDER would END this ABUSE! But ACTIVIST JUDGES have BLOCKED it nationwide! One judge in MARYLAND can stop what VOTERS in ALL 50 STATES demanded! This isn't DEMOCRACY - it's JUDICIAL TYRANNY! 5/12 [ABC Subclip(2).txt] https://t.co/LKxCxjvPHl
@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲
TRAITORS outside Supreme Court speaking SPANISH while protesting BORDER SECURITY! They're chanting "DOWN WITH DEPORTATION" right in front of our highest court! They're not even HIDING their INVASION AGENDA anymore! 6/12 https://t.co/RFTWcVLtBv
@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲
The 14th Amendment was TWISTED and PERVERTED by the GLOBALISTS! It was meant for FREED SLAVES after the Civil War, NOT for illegal aliens sneaking across our border to DROP ANCHOR BABIES! The ORIGINAL INTENT is CLEAR! 7/12 https://t.co/XBmHwaWzAo
@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲
Trump Administration CORRECTLY argues these nationwide injunctions are a CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS! They "prevent percolation of novel legal questions" and "encourage RAMPANT FORUM SHOPPING"! The LEFT shops for sympathetic judges! 8/12 [ABC Subclip.txt] https://t.co/5kn63ZNS8E
@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲
Sotomayor exposed her RADICAL AGENDA with GUN CONFISCATION hypothetical! She's TELEGRAPHING the LEFT'S PLAN to TAKE YOUR GUNS while pretending to defend "judicial power"! These people are SICK and TRANSPARENT! 9/12 https://t.co/hVTz4yuTis
@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲
We survived until the 1960s WITHOUT nationwide injunctions! They EXPLODED in 2007 when the 9th Circuit started using them for ENVIRONMENTAL CLAIMS! It's the CLIMATE CULT's gift to the DEEP STATE! 10/12 https://t.co/bh57yJ1GRA
@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲
Congress could FIX THIS IMMEDIATELY but they're SITTING ON THEIR TAILS! We control Congress - what are they DOING all day?! The UNIPARTY wants judges to have this power to BLOCK TRUMP when needed! DRAIN THE SWAMP NOW! 11/12 https://t.co/1cidv0N97O
@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲
Wrap-up Tweet: The battle is ON! One lone judge should NOT have power to BLOCK the PRESIDENT! This case will determine if we're a REPUBLIC or a JUDICIAL DICTATORSHIP! Stay tuned for MASSIVE revelations! FOLLOW @NextNewsNetwork for the TRUTH they don't want you to hear! 12/12 https://t.co/uJbN07e9cT
@Azariel91 - Sebastian™
In other Words they want their fraud funding back. Shutdown Schumer until there's no big government left for them to return to https://t.co/BRRQW2Bc3k