reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@ReasonPete - The Homocracy
@GOPoversight You're going to finally investigate Trump's Chinese bank accounts that made him at least $17 million dollars while he was president? That's great news! https://t.co/ijRJIphjcV
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Who's the richest man to be US President? https://t.co/1HDYN7gC15
Video Transcript AI Summary
Black people are not to blame for issues, it's the Obama administration. Obama's family wealth influenced his decisions, benefiting companies like BP. Obamacare was drafted by a Republican senator with ties to healthcare. Trump's policies have led to low black unemployment and increased funding for black colleges. Bush's joke about feeding Michelle candy has a long history dating back to Obama's childhood.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you mean why are you attacking somebody black? I said black people didn't put this up. They didn't have anything to do with this. I've heard them plenty. Obama administration did.
And the Obama, what did he do for the black race? Nothing. Question you might ask, who's the richest man to ever be US president? It's not Trump. No.
Barack Obama. You know how? His adopted father, Lolo Sotoro, was 1 of the 1015 richest men on earth. And when he died, he left the trust fund in Indonesia with 3 equal beneficiaries. Barack Obama then known as Barry Sotoro because he was adopted and his 2 siblings.
So he has a whole false claim about what his background is. But when he got in the White House, he'd been working for a law firm that represented his daddy. He got lauded by Goldman Sachs who financed most of his daddy's, American investments. He protected British Petroleum when they had to blow out in the gulf because guess what? His trust fund had heavy investments in BP.
So we get through this whole mantra and even, affordable care. Obamacare. You know who drafted it? Senior Tennessee Republican Senator or doctor Bill Frist when he was Republican senate majority leader. Why?
His family founded Blue Cross, Blue Shield, and most of the HMOs. His family's making a killing. So he retired from the senate in 2010 when the Obama administration got passed his drafted act from 2003. See, it's game. And I don't have any problem with Trump either.
I'm looking at lowest black unemployment rates since Lyndon Baines Johnson. More money to historically black colleges and universities at any time since Lyndon Baines Johnson. I mean, more Americans back to work. You know, like, what did you get for the last 3? Oh 0, and then there's.
You know that joke that they do about George W Bush, feeding, Michelle candy? The inside thing on that is it's the same candy he fed her husband when he was 6, 7 years old. See, so Toro's in the bushes go back 40 some years.
@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver
It’s funny how Congress doesn’t know how to balance the federal budget, but somehow many of them are multi-millionaire stock traders. 🔊 https://t.co/dfKbRbxZEK
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
TRUMP: “At the suggestion of Elon Musk — I will create a Government efficiency Commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms. Elon.. has agreed to head that task force” https://t.co/a48F9RUC1f
Video Transcript AI Summary
At Elon Musk's suggestion, who has given his complete and total endorsement, a government efficiency commission will be created. The commission will conduct a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and make recommendations for drastic reforms. Elon Musk has agreed to be on the task force.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 4th, at the suggestion of Elon Musk, who has given me his complete and total endorsement. That's nice. He's a smart guy. He knows what he's doing. He knows what he's doing.
It's very, very much appreciated. I will create a government efficiency commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms. We need to do it. Can't go on the way we are now. And Elon, because he's not very busy, has agreed to hit that task force.
Be interesting. If he has the time, he'll be a good one to do it.
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
BREAKING: The SEC will sanction Elon Musk in its Twitter acquisition probe Biden right after Elon bought Twitter: "There's a lot of ways [to get him]" https://t.co/HrHH9mwNP6
Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk's cooperation and/or technical relationships with other countries is worthy of being looked at. The speaker is not suggesting Musk is doing anything inappropriate, but that these relationships warrant examination. There are many ways this could be investigated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think that Elon Musk's cooperation and or technical relationships with other countries, is worthy of being looked at. Whether or not he is doing anything inappropriate, I'm not suggesting that. I'm suggesting that worse worse being looked at. And, and, but that's all I'll say. There's a lot of ways.
Alright.
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
BREAKING: Trump just called for investigations to find out who's getting kickbacks from all the ludicrous money spent at USAID. Now you know why Democrats are sweating. They know the Hammer of Justice is coming. CC: @DOGE https://t.co/nKeih6m6Cq
Video Transcript AI Summary
每个人都在这里，大家都是彼此的一部分。我们生活在这个共同的环境中，互相影响和支持。人与人之间的关系是重要的，我们的生活与他人息息相关。无论我们是谁，大家都在这个地方共同生活，分享彼此的经历和感受。我们都是这个社会的一部分，彼此连接，构成了我们共同的生活。
Everyone is here, and we are all part of each other. We live in this shared environment, influencing and supporting one another. Relationships between people are important, and our lives are interconnected. No matter who we are, we all live together in this place, sharing experiences and feelings. We are all part of this society, connected to one another, forming our shared life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 的 一 个 人 都 是 在 这 里 的 一 个 人 的 一 个 人 都 是 在 这 里 的 一 个 人 都 是 在 这 里 的 一 个 人 的 一 个 人 的 人 都 是 在 这 里 的 人 的 人 都 是 的 人 的 人 都 是 不 是 我 们 的 人 的 人 也 是 不 是 我 们 的 人 的 人 都 是 我 们 的 人 的 人 的 人 生 活 的 人 的 人
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨President Trump on corruption and fraud in USAID: "Elon Musk has done a great job. Look at all the fraud he has found in this USAID. It is a disaster, radical left lunatics. The whole thing with 100 million spent on you know what.. I’d like to see what the kickbacks are." https://t.co/ob2S4NrMbg
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm Elon Musk. There have been many ideas discussed, but some are too extreme. The fraud found in USAID is shocking, with over a hundred million spent on questionable groups. It's concerning how much money is being kicked back to those in government.
The train project between Los Angeles and San Francisco is poorly managed, with massive budget overruns. It would have been cheaper to provide limousine services for all passengers. Now, the project is not even reaching the main cities but instead stops far away.
We're launching an investigation into this because the scale of mismanagement is unprecedented. This is the worst cost overrun in U.S. history, and it was unnecessary. There are better alternatives like flying or driving. We need to scrutinize this further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It doesn't seem to work. I'm Elon Musk. Thank you, sir. I'm Elon Musk. How often are you talking to him?
And have there been ideas that he's brought to you that you said, oh, no. Wait a minute. This is going a little too far. Well, many ideas, but look, he's done a great job. Look at all the fraud that he's found in this, USAID.
It's a disaster what the people, radical left lunatics. They have things that nobody would have even believed. The whole thing with a hundred million spent on, you know what? With money going to all sorts of groups that shouldn't deserve to get any money with the money. I'd like to see what the kickbacks are.
How much money has been kicked back? Who would spend that kind of money to some of the things that you read about and I read about and I see every night on the news and every morning when I read the papers? Who would spend money for that? I would say this, the the people that got all that money, are they kicking it back to the people that gave it from government? No.
That's to me, very, very corrupt. The real question is how much of a kickback has there been? And one of the things I want to investigate, rapidly because I've never seen anything to this extent. The train that's being built between Los Angeles and San Francisco is the worst managed project I think I've ever seen, and I've seen some of the worst. Billions and billions, hundreds of billions of dollars over budget.
In fact, I read where you could take every single person that was gonna go on the train and get the finest limousine service in the world and take them back and forth with limousines, and you'd have hundreds of millions of dollars left over. It is the worst thing, and we're gonna start an investigation in that because it's not possible. I built for a living, and I built on time, on budget. It's impossible that something could cost that much. And now it's not even going to San Francisco, and it's not going to Los Angeles.
It's they made it much shorter. So now it's at little places way away from San Francisco and way away from Los Angeles. No. We're gonna start a big investigation on that because it's I've never seen anything like it. Nobody has ever seen anything like it.
The worst overruns that there have ever been in the history of our country, And it wasn't even necessary. I would have said, you don't buy it. You take an airplane. Of course, you $2. Of course, you're nothing.
You take an airplane. But this got started. And if you have to, you drive. You can drive. And there are other agents?
They have hundreds of billions of dollars of cost overruns, and it's not even the same project. It's much shorter. It's way outside of San Francisco and way outside of Los Angeles. So we're gonna be looking
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
Before the election, Trump told us he would put Musk in charge of cutting spending and federal agencies. We voted for this. https://t.co/PvQznutRE1
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a lot of inefficiency in government that needs addressing. When it comes to which agencies to shut down, I'll let Elon Musk share his thoughts, as he's eager to discuss this. Musk is not just known for his work in science and rockets; he's also an excellent businessman and cost cutter. He often shares innovations, like a new titanium screw he's developed, which showcases his focus on efficiency and improvement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So that there's a lot of fat in government that you would want to split down. Fat. So So what agencies would you wanna shut down? Well, let me let me, have you ask another person that because I'm gonna have Elon Musk. He's he is dying to do this.
You know, he's a great business guy, actually. You think of him for science and rockets, and every time I think he's telling me about a new screw that was developed, he's developed a new screw. Screws are difficult, and it's made out of titanium and it's so exciting. But you know what? He's a great business guy and he's a great cost cutter.
You've seen that.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
WINNING: Musk Discovers Over $100 Billion Of Stolen Funds & Fraud After Auditing Just 1% Of The Federal Government! Meanwhile, Delusional Democrats Accuse Him Of Wanting To Steal Your SSN & Bank Accounts » WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE: https://t.co/VcQBdHL417 https://t.co/OrkZ35bym1
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve directed Elon Musk’s DOGE to investigate the Departments of Education and Defense. He has a capable team that’s uncovering significant fraud, abuse, and waste. They'll start with education and then move to the military and other areas as needed.
@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat
BREAKING: President Trump has directed Elon Musk’s DOGE to investigate the Departments of Education and Defense. "He’s got a very capable group of people. They know what they’re doing. I’ve instructed him to go into education, go into the military, and go into other things as we go along. And they’re finding massive amounts of fraud, abuse, waste... He will be looking at education pretty quickly, and he will be looking at the military, too."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mister President, what do you think about the Democrats' criticism of the staff reductions by Elon Musk and Doge, claiming it's an unlawful power grab? Have you restricted Musk in any way?
We haven't discussed much. He has a capable team that knows what they're doing. They ask questions and can quickly identify issues. I've directed him to explore areas like education and military, where they're uncovering significant fraud and waste. I identify targets for investigation, and while there may be areas we won't touch, I believe everything is worth examining. As a government, we need to be transparent, and I'm willing to take action if necessary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister president, I wonder what you make of the criticism from Democrats that these staff reductions, the cuts that Elon Musk and Doge are doing are an unlawful power grab. Is there anything you've told Elon Musk he cannot touch?
Speaker 1: Well, we haven't discussed that much. I'll tell him to go here, go there. He does it. He's got a very capable group of people. Very, very, very, very capable.
They know what they're doing. They'll ask questions, and they'll see immediately as somebody gets tongue tied that they're either crooked or don't know what they're doing. We have very smart people going in. So, I've instructed him go into education, go into military, go into other things as we go along, and they're finding massive amounts of fraud, abuse, waste, all of these things. So, but I I will pick out a target, and I say go in.
There could be areas that we won't, but I I I think everything's fertile. You know, we're a government. We have to be open. And as an open government, I don't know. I guess you could say maybe some high intelligence or something, and I'll do that myself if I have to.
But, generally
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it odd that some federal workers have high salaries yet manage to accumulate tens of millions in net worth. I'm curious about the source of their wealth, and I'm looking into it.
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
BREAKING: DOGE is looking into federal workers who have a high net worth despite having a low salary, according to Elon Musk. 🔥🔥 "We find it sort of rather odd that there are quite a few people in the bureaucracy who who have a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars, but somehow manage to accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth." "We're just curious as to where it came from..."
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've uncovered some unusual financial discrepancies. Several bureaucrats with modest salaries have amassed tens of millions of dollars in net worth during their employment. One example involves a woman who walked away with approximately $30,000,000. This is particularly notable in USAID. We're investigating the source of this wealth. Perhaps they are skilled investors, but it seems more likely that this wealth accumulation is occurring at the expense of the organization. We're looking into it and trying to determine where this money originated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And also, could you mention some of the things that your team has found, some of the crazy numbers including the woman that walked away with about 30,000,000, etcetera?
Speaker 1: Well, we we we we do find it sort of rather odd that, you know, there there are quite a few people in in in the bureaucracy who who have a, ostensibly, a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars but somehow managed to accrue tens of millions dollars in net worth, while they are in that position, which is, you know, what what happened to USAID. We're just curious as to where it came from. Maybe they're very good at investing. They in which case, we should take their investment advice, perhaps. But, just there seems to be mysteriously they they get wealthy.
We don't know why. Where does it come from? And, I think the reality is that they're getting wealthy at detached fair expense. That's that's the that's the honest truth of it. So, you know, we we're looking at, say, well, we we we just
@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd
🍿🍿🍿
reSee.it AI Summary
I asked Elizabeth Warren about her $12M net worth on a $200K salary, which caught Elon Musk's attention. Today, he announced in the Oval Office that DOGE will investigate public officials with high net worths and low pay. Finally, our government is listening to us! We are the media now.
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 YESTERDAY: I asked Elizabeth Warren HOW she achieved a $12M net worth on a $200K salary, prompting a reply from Elon inquiring as well TODAY: @ElonMusk announces in the Oval Office DOGE will be investigating public officials with high net worths and low pay Our government FINALLY listens to US! 🇺🇸 WE ARE THE MEDIA NOW.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Warren, I'm curious about your financial background. How did you manage to accumulate a $12 million net worth while earning a $200,000 salary in Congress? Could you explain how you achieved that? Excuse me, I'm simply asking a question and would appreciate it if you didn't obstruct my camera. We are on a public sidewalk.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator Warren, this is my answer question. How did you get a $12,000,000 net worth on a $200,000 salary in congress? Thank you. How did you do that? Excuse me.
How did you do that? You didn't keep trying to block my camera. We're on public sidewalk. So
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's strange to see bureaucrats with modest salaries somehow accumulate tens of millions in net worth during their service. Take USAID, for example. We wonder how they became so wealthy while in their positions. Maybe they're just brilliant investors, and we should seek their advice! But, in reality, it seems they are getting rich at the expense of taxpayers. We're looking into this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, also, could you mention some of the things that your team has found, some of the crazy numbers including the woman that walked away with about 30,000,000,
Speaker 1: etcetera? Well, we we we are we do find it sort of rather odd that, you know, there there are quite a few people in in in the bureaucracy who who have a ostensibly a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars, but somehow managed to accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth, while they are in that position, which is, you know, what what happened to USAID. We're just curious as to where it came from. Maybe they're very good at investing. They, in which case, we should take their investment advice perhaps.
But, just there seems to be mysteriously they they get wealthy. We don't know why. Where did it come from? And, I think the reality is that they're getting wealthy at the taxpayer expense. That's that's the that's the honest truth of it.
So, you know, we're looking at, say, well, we we we would just
@KoryYeshua - Kory Yeshua
Democrat congresswoman Maxine Waters says the quiet part out loud when talking about Trump and Elon. https://t.co/tzi6l5gmhB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The left is not worried about democracy, they are worried about being exposed. All the shady things they've been doing in the dark with American tax dollars is about to come to light. If they had nothing to hide, they wouldn't be going so crazy about it.
A defensive reaction to an accusation can indicate guilt. We're seeing a bunch of guilty politicians complaining after Elon Musk has been going into the books and finding hundreds of millions of our tax dollars going to nonsense. Just yesterday, we saw Elon talking about investigating federal employees who have a high net worth despite low pay. For many years, many people were afraid of the government. Now the tables are turning and the government is afraid of the people. It's all coming out now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The people of this country are being violated because all of our privacy is being taken up by, Elon Musk and Trump, and we don't know what all they have on us. We don't know what all they have on us.
Speaker 1: That, my fellow Americans, is what we like to call a Freudian slip, which is when you unintentionally reveal your subconscious feelings. Democrats aren't freaking out about Trump and Elon Musk because they're trying to protect democracy. They're freaking out because all the dirt they've been doing in the dark is about to come to light. And the American people are about to find out just how corrupt many of these politicians actually are. They want Elon to go away because he's exposing what exactly it is that they've been doing with American tax dollars.
They had nothing to hide, they wouldn't be going as ballistic as they are. There's an old American expression that says a hit dog will holler, which means a defensive reaction to an accusation can indicate guilt. And right now, what are we seeing? A bunch of hit dogs hollering after Elon's been going into the books and finding our tax dollars going to a bunch of crap, and we're talking about in the hundreds of millions. And just yesterday, we saw Elon talking about Doge investigating federal employees who have a high net worth despite low pay.
And, oh, boy, these politicians are really losing it. See, for many years, many people were afraid of the government. And now the tables are turning and the government is afraid of the people. Yeah. It's all coming out now.
And we're about to find out just exactly what it is that they have on politicians like you.
@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn
WTH is really going on inside our government? We’re being completely ripped off by those supposed to help protect our way of life. @elonmusk @DOGE “DOGE says it found nearly untraceable budget line item responsible for $4.7T in payments.” @realDonaldTrump People must be held accountable. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doge-says-found-nearly-untraceable-budget-line-item-responsible-4-7t-payments
DOGE says it found nearly untraceable budget line item responsible for $4.7T in payments
DOGE identified a nearly untraceable code linking payments to the U.S. Treasury to a budget line item, accounting for nearly $4.7 trillion in payments.
foxnews.com
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Doesn’t add up
@Sadie_NC - Sadie
I am beginning to understand why they are fighting so hard to stop Elon. Something is very wrong here. https://t.co/mfg1HRRis0
@TheUnitedSpot__ - The United Spot
Trump & Elon’s Wild DOGE, USAID, IRS & Fort Knox Probe: Uncovering the Most Boring Million-Dollar Jobs EVER! https://t.co/T7wVUdr6fc
Video Transcript AI Summary
So, we're from the Department of Government Efficiency, and we're here because we have no idea what you guys actually do around here.
Where's the gold, where's the money going and how many 50-year-olds are you paying every month? All the funds are allocated, but what exactly are they allocated for? Also, why do 50,000 federal employees owe $1.5 billion in taxes?
After an audit of the IRS, we found you owe $50 million. What about your chief of the flat office navigation team getting paid $20,000,000 a year to find the edge of the office?
I want to see every receipt. If I find out even one cent went to funding secret IRS strip clubs, I'll throw you in the deepest, darkest prison cell in America!
Ultimately, we're going to fire some people, abolish the IRS, and turn IRS workers into ICE workers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, Daniel. What's happening? Oh, hey, Trump. It's actually president Trump. Oh, sorry.
President Trump. Yeah. We have somewhat of a problem here. What's the problem? Well, we can't really figure out what it is you actually do around here.
What? Oh, well. Yeah. I'm gonna need to see what you've gotten done this week. How you doing?
Who the hell are you guys?
Speaker 1: We're from the Department of Government Efficiency.
Speaker 0: What's that? Go. Alright, Nancy. We asked a hundred morons. What's the first thing Democrats will cry about when USA gets shut down?
Elon's a racist? Good answer, Nancy. Show me Elon's a racist. Alright. I'm gonna ask you one time and one time only.
Where's the gold?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Where's the gold? Let me see here. The gold.
Speaker 0: Hello? Hello? Anybody home? Think, McFly. Think.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Think good and hot. Where's the gold? Well, I mean, it's here, but it's not here.
Speaker 0: So where's the fucking money going?
Speaker 3: Yeah. How many 50 year olds are you paying every month?
Speaker 0: All the funds are allocated. Allocated? Allocated for what? The great wall of IRS? Or or is it your secret slush fund for auditors gone wild parties?
Speaker 3: Remember the time you guys lost $12,000,000,000 in tax refunds?
Speaker 0: That was unfortunate. Okay. What have you been doing here, Daniel? I plead the fifth. Are you aware there's a 50,000 federal employees who owe 1,500,000,000.0 in taxes?
I plead the fifth. Daniel, one of your 87,000 IRS agents done today? I plead the fifth.
Speaker 1: Daniel, after an audit of the IRS, we found you owe $50,000,000. Boom. Can you explain that? That's the
Speaker 0: first thing Democrats will cry about when USA gets shut down. Impeach Donald Trump. Yes, sir. Show me impeach Donald Trump. Oh my gosh.
This is like total sexual harassment. Says here you chief for the flat office navigation team. Oh my gosh. Would you stop trying to date me? What do you do here?
Duh. It's like totally obvious. I lead team expeditions to the edge of the office. Well, $20,000,000 a year to find the edge of the office is way too much. So been doomed.
Oh my god. I think I'm dying. I wanna see every receipt, every penny, every w 2, every fucking $10.99. And I swear on MAGA, if I find out even 1 fucking cent went to fund in your secret IRS strip clubs, I'll throw you in the deepest, darkest prison cell in America with a bottle of baby oil and Diddy. And you'll get a hands on audit.
You'll never forget. We asked a hundred morons. What's the first thing Democrats will cry about when USAID gets shut down? No one voted for Elon? Did he ask No one voted for Elon.
Alright, Adam. We asked a hundred morons. What's the first thing Democrats will cry about when USAID gets shut down? Come on, Adam. You can do it, Adam.
Come on, Adam. Now January 6. Good answer. Show me January 6. You got three seconds to show me something.
Three two Oh, okay. Okay. I got something. Okay. What do you got?
This is just as good
Speaker 2: as gold. What the fuck is this?
Speaker 0: This is an IOU. An IOU? See right here? This is a 47,300,000 ounces of gold bullion. You might wanna hold on to that one.
You've been dodged. But we're just here to find out exactly what it is you do around here. I only do my brother. I swear. We want to know what your job title is.
Oh, I am a senior consultant for Cloudshape interpretation. What the hell is that? I specialize in predicting racist events based on cloud formations. 20,000,000 a year for cloud formations? You bet.
This about me pooping my pants in the office again, or or what what's what's going on here? Says here you're the chief bubble wrap popper. That that that's right, squirrel. So you just pop bubble wrap all day? Well, I mean, it's it's a little more complex than that.
So what is it that you do around here? Well, I mean, I'm the chief bubble wrap popper. Yeah. You said that, but what does a bubble wrap popper do? And why does a bubble wrap popper need a fucking security
Speaker 2: that? Dooge.
Speaker 0: Alright. So what did you come up with today? Well, we're going to fire this guy and send him to prison. Sounds good. What else?
We're going to abolish the IRS. Good. Anything else? Yeah. We're gonna take the 87,000 IRS workers and turn them into ICE workers.
Excellent.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
LEFT: Tim Burchett says if anyone leaks where the money goes when The Pentagon fails audits, they’d be murdered RIGHT: Elon Musk says if he were to reveal the real ways Congress gets rich, its “going to get me assassinated” So expose money laundering or fraud and you get killed https://t.co/AI8irQCtWi
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's difficult to prevent corruption, even with higher salaries, because insider trading can be so lucrative. People justify taking questionable actions for their families, especially when it's legal. If you're involved in passing a bill and know how it will affect certain industries, buying stock beforehand seems logical. However, the problem goes beyond just stock portfolios; there are other, less traceable methods of wealth acquisition. Honestly, discussing these topics is dangerous. I have to be careful not to push too hard on the corruption issue because it could put my life at risk.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To accept corrupt money.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But the problem is if you paid them a lot more, they're still not gonna make as much money as they would insider trading.
Speaker 0: But it's less of a forcing function.
Speaker 1: Yes. It's a lot.
Speaker 0: Well, live with this. Right? Like, if you say, like, somebody's got a let's say they got, like, whatever, some some kids in DC and and, like, it's expensive. It's, like, expensive place to live. They the the schools are terrible.
So, like, they they need to send their kids to, like, some kind of private schooling situation. They literally cannot afford that. They cannot afford that right now. So then you get into the situation. Well, from their standpoint, well, they've got to they'll they'll say they're doing it for their family.
They're doing it for their kids.
Speaker 1: Well, especially if it's legal and it currently is. You gotta be silly to not do that. If you're a part of a group of people that's passing a bill, and you know this bill's gonna get passed, you know the votes are there, and you know it's gonna affect this industry and this particular manufacturer, and you can buy stock.
Speaker 0: It it's more than just insider trading. Like, the insider trading stuff like, the stock portfolio stuff is quite trackable, but there's it's a lot more than insider trading.
Speaker 1: The way they're acquiring wealth? Correct. And what other methods?
Speaker 0: I mean, this is really gonna get me assassinated. It's like I'm I'm not lengthening my life span by explaining this stuff, to say the least. I mean, I was supposed to go back to DC. How am I gonna survive? This fucker's gonna kill me for sure.
So in fact, I I I do think, like, this it's like I actually have to be careful that I don't push too hard on the corruption stuff because it's gonna get me killed.
@MonBreeden - Monica
Elon Musk, ‘co-president’?! Katie Britt, Thank you for reminding the Democrats about all the co-presidents for Biden that were never complained about when grifting was allowed. https://t.co/k849mo6ZJu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that financial systems face unprecedented risks due to economic chaos from President Trump and Elon Musk.
Another speaker states that Trump ran on curbing wasteful spending, citing the $36 trillion national debt as fiscally and morally irresponsible. They claim Trump is the final decision-maker, contrasting this with the previous administration where key decisions were allegedly made by others, possibly during the president's "afternoon nap time." The speaker suggests labeling figures like Jake Sullivan, Ron Klain, and Jill Biden as "co-presidents" during that time and calls for honesty regarding past and present events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are in an unprecedented moment. Our financial systems are facing huge risks from the economic chaos of president Trump and his co president, Elon Musk.
Speaker 1: President Trump ran on this. I mean, he said, we're going to look for wasteful spending across our government. We're $36,000,000,000,000 in debt, y'all. That's not only fiscally irresponsible. It is actually morally irresponsible.
And the difference in this administration and the last administration is that president Trump is actually the final arbiter. And it's interesting that none of you had anything to say over the last four years when it is clear that our commander in chief was not in command. And if we're gonna use the term co president, then let's go back and say co president Jake Sullivan, co president Ron Klain, co president Jill Biden. I mean, it it seems that some of the biggest decisions were made during the president's afternoon nap time. And so I just think we need to be a little bit more honest about what's been laid out and what's actually occurring.
@CRRJA5 - 🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅
KABOOM 💥 .@megynkelly is calling out Barack Obama’s unexplained wealth, pointing out how a man who only spent 14 years in public office—most of it in modest government roles—somehow walked away with a fortune that appears to exceed $100 million! 😳 https://t.co/PJbIkEaz6i
Video Transcript AI Summary
Public reports estimate the Obamas' net worth at $70 million, acquired after Barack Obama's 14 years in political office, including time in the Illinois State Senate, the U.S. Senate, and two presidential terms. It is claimed he made almost or over $100 million.
The Obamas reportedly own four luxury properties: a $20 million home in Martha's Vineyard, a Washington D.C. property bought for $8.1 million, a beachfront home in Hawaii bought for $8.7 million, and a Chicago home bought for $1.65 million. The speaker questions if this is more than the Obamas need.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How much is enough money according to the Obamas? Seventy million? Because public reports estimate that that is their net worth parlayed on the back of Barack Obama's fourteen years of holding political office. He did not spend fifty years in government service. He did a stint in the Illinois state senate.
He did a couple years in the US senate before he ran for office in one. Alright? Then he did two terms as president. And off of that, he's made himself over a hundred million dollars, Almost a hundred million dollars, probably over, to be honest. We don't know all of the earnings.
The Obamas reportedly own four, count them four, luxury properties. A home in Martha's Vineyard estimated to be worth some $20,000,000, in addition to properties in Washington DC reportedly bought for 8,100,000.0, a beachfront home in Hawaii reportedly bought for 8,700,000.0, and a home bought in Chicago for 1,650,000.00. Is that more than you need, mister Obama, missus Obama?
@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸
President Trump talks about Elon Musk. The media will try to take what he said here and turn it into a big deal. It’s not. I trust both Trump and Elon. I don’t think either men are the problem. You want to know who the real problem is? Congress. https://t.co/SMjLSZWFlb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims to have had a great relationship with Elon, but is now disappointed. He believes Elon only developed a problem with the "great big beautiful bill" after the EV mandate was cut, which Elon knew about and initially supported.
The speaker says the CBO, which is run by Democrats, projects a $2.8 trillion surplus over ten years if tariff revenue is included. He touts low inflation, down to 2%, and falling grocery and gasoline prices. He also claims the U.S. now has the best border in history with a 99.99% success rate.
He speculates that people who leave his administration miss the "glamour" and become hostile, possibly due to "Trump derangement syndrome." He suggests that Elon may be experiencing something similar.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we're well anymore. I was surprised because you were here. Everybody in this room practically was here as we had a wonderful send off. He said wonderful things about me.
You couldn't have nicer, said the best thing. He's worn the hat. Trump was right about everything. And I am right about the the great big beautiful bill. We call it a great big beautiful bill because that's what it is.
And, again, biggest tax cuts in history, biggest economic development moves anywhere. We've never done anything like it. Business is spurred. And I don't know if you've seen the numbers, but the numbers came out. Even the CBO, which is run by Democrats, said that we're gonna be, doing you know, I'd like you to discuss it, the 2,800,000,000.0 a trillion that CBO.
This is some a group of people that are Democrats. They're very hostile to us. They just came out with phenomenal numbers what it does. You wanna mention that, Scott?
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. So what what we've seen is we keep hearing from the CBO that there's going to, be a large deficit from the bill, which we disagree with. But using the CBO scoring, they came out and scored the tariff revenue. We think it'll be the minimum of 2,800,000,000,000.0 over the ten year window, which actually puts the bill in surplus if you include the tariff revenue, which they won't do.
Speaker 0: It gives you a tremendous surplus, but we're not allowed to use that. For some reason, they say scoring. Nobody knows what scoring means. Maybe a couple of people, but nobody. Somebody sits in the background, they say, well, we're not gonna allow that.
They're not allowing other things that we have that are tremendously profitable for our country. But if you saw the other day, CNBC, they came out with, numbers and the people on the show, very good people. I've watched them for a long time. They couldn't believe the numbers, how good they are. The numbers were incredible.
And that was personal income and also very low inflation. We have very low inflation. We're down to 2% now and maybe even lower than that. And when I took it over, was a mess. Remember, we had the worst inflation probably in the history of our country.
They say forty eight years, but let's say that's I think it's worse than that. So we had the worst inflation in the history of our country under the Biden administration. Now we're down to beautiful number, 2%. We'd actually like to keep it there. Better than zero is 2%.
It's going down maybe to 1% is like perfect. That's perfect. You don't wanna have zero for certain reasons that are that nobody is very interested to listen to, But we have almost perfect inflation. Grocery prices are down. Everything remember eggs eggs.
We weren't gonna buy another egg for the next twenty years. It was so expensive. Right? Remember? You guys all hit me about eggs.
Eggs have down 400%. Everybody has eggs now. They're having eggs for breakfast again. But if you look at, gasoline, very important. I think always the most important because it's the energy is a big the biggest factor.
That's what He screwed up our energy policy and everything went up because energy went up. But now energy is way down and, they have states where you're at $1.98 a gallon for gasoline. So the costs have way have come way down. And one of the things I ran on was that. I ran on the border.
We have the best border in the history of our country, 99.99%. It was, last week, three people came in. Two of them for medical reasons. We let them in because one of them had a heart attack. I think it was a nice thing to do, and one of them had something else.
So we've never had I had very good numbers for four years, but we we really topped it. And I wanna thank Christie and Tom Homan. They've they've done a fantastic job, but nobody mentions that anymore. Remember, a few months ago, the border was a total disaster. People were coming in by the hundreds of thousands of people a day, a week, a month.
I mean, we had a month 2,000,000 people came in in one month. The border was being overrun and a lot of bad people, criminals, murderers, drug dealers. We had some of the worst people in the world coming in from all over the world. It's totally closed. And you know what?
People are coming into our country, but they're coming in legally. So we've done a great job. Elon knew that. Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up in campaign for me.
I think I would have won. Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway, even if the governor ran, the real governor, not the governor from Minnesota who's I mean, he's a sick puppy. That guy that poor guy feels sorry for him. But they they made a bad choice with him. But if you pick Shapiro or anybody else, I spoke to him recently about his, you know, his house being set on fire, which was terrible.
But if they picked him, I would have won Pennsylvania. I won it by a lot. But I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it.
All of a sudden, he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're gonna have to cut the EV mandate because that's billions and billions of dollars, and it really is unfair. We wanna have cars of all types. Electric, we wanna have electric, but we wanna have a gasoline combustion. We wanna have different. We wanna have hybrids.
We wanna have all we wanna be able to sell everything. And when that was cut, and congress wanted to cut it, he became a little bit different, and I can understand that. But he knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left. And if you saw the statements he made about me, which I'm sure you can get very easily, it's very fresh on tape, he said the most beautiful things about me.
And he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.
Speaker 1: Did that answer the president? Did he I just wanna clarify. Did he raise any of these concerns with you privately before he raised them publicly? And this is the guy you put in charge of cutting spending. Should people not take him seriously about spending now?
Are you saying this is all sour grapes?
Speaker 0: No. He worked hard, and he did a good job. And I'll be honest, think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office and he was and he's got nice offices too. But there's something about this when I was telling the chancellor, this is where it is.
People come in here, even from Germany. They come in and they they Germany. Walk into the Oval Office and it's just a special place. It's you know, World War one, it started and it ended here. And World War two and, so many other things.
Everything big comes right from this this beautiful space. It's now much more beautiful than it was six months ago. A lot of good things are happening in this room. And I'll I'll tell you, it's not he's not the first. People leave my administration and they love us.
And then at some point, they miss it so badly. And some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it. But I we have it with others too.
They leave and they wake up in the morning and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different and they become hostile. I don't know what it is. Someday you'll write a book about it and you'll let us know.
@cb_doge - DogeDesigner
Elon Musk reminded President Trump of his own words. https://t.co/fLUvCaxNSi
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Where is the man who wrote these words? Was he replaced by a body double!?
@cb_doge - DogeDesigner
Elon Musk reminded President Trump of his own words. https://t.co/fLUvCaxNSi
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
😂
@CL4WS_OUT - 𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕷𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖊𝖘𝖘™️
White House releases net worth numbers from DOGE's Congressional Audits. THESE PEOPLE NEED TO BE INVESTIGATED NOW! #DOGE https://t.co/0bwGAJINqF
@indyfor45th47th - Independents For Trump
🚨 Elon Musk has dropped a bombshell, publicly calling for the arrest of politicians involved in a massive money laundering scheme of taxpayer money through non-governmental organizations. Musk calls for Attorney General Pam Bondi to "put the hammer down" on the culprits. 🔥🔥 https://t.co/22sM8FHiaG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that there are fake NGOs functioning as fake charities and that arrests should be made in relation to them. The claim is that these organizations are predominantly operated by Democrats, with occasional involvement by Republicans who are supposedly kept quiet by those false charitable activities. The speaker describes this pattern as evidence of a broader “uniparty” dynamic, suggesting that both major parties are involved in a system designed to influence politics.
According to the speaker, the majority of the money flows to Democrats through these NGOs. They assert that billions of dollars are given to NGOs run by Democrats, and these organizations then channel funds through a large network of additional non-governmental organizations. This network allegedly creates a “giant money laundering scheme,” to the point where the speaker states that the words NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous.
Key claims highlighted include:
- Existence of fake NGOs that operate as fake charities.
- A call for arrests related to these fake NGOs.
- Predominant involvement of Democrats in running these NGOs, with occasional Republican involvement used to quiet concerns.
- A description of a uniparty dynamic, implying bipartisan collusion or alignment in this activity.
- Large-scale funding (billions of dollars) flowing to NGOs run by Democrats.
- A subsequent cascade through a network of additional NGOs, forming a vast money laundering scheme.
- The assertion that NGO activity and money laundering are nearly interchangeable in this context.
The speaker emphasizes that the overall operation constitutes a substantial financial mechanism linked to political influence, portraying the NGO network as a conduit for laundering money rather than purely charitable activity. The overall framing is that the integrity of NGOs involved in political funding is compromised by this alleged system, tying NGO activity directly to money laundering in a way that equates the two terms in the speaker’s characterization.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fake NGOs. I think there needs to be a a number of arrests in that regard as well because these these are these are fake charities, where, mostly Democrats and wasn't involved. It's I I don't wanna be clear. There's sometimes a little bit of Republican in there because they sometimes throw the Republicans a bone to say, hey. Be be quiet about this.
So it's it's it's it's that's that's that's where you start getting the uniparty thing going on. Mhmm. But it it is overwhelmingly to Democrats, and they they give these give billions of dollars to NGOs run by Democrats that then go through a whole network of additional gen NGOs. It's a giant money laundering scheme. Really, at this point, I think the word NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous.