reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@TaTaTacticals - AnonymousMC
https://youtu.be/f5ozTPS-ipY?si=6VTY3bxVHJyuCBI8 https://t.co/aXSDF8fLeX
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivermectin, a 62-year-old drug, has been found to have multiple uses. It received a Nobel Prize for its unique abilities, including blocking 8 pathways to cancer. As a result, Ivermectin is now being repurposed as a treatment for cancer patients.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ivermectin an off label cancer drug. Actually, Ivermectin is about a 62 year old drug. It actually got a Nobel Prize because of the unusual things that Ivermectin does, and it blocks 8 pathways to cancer. So it is one of our repurposed drugs that we use in cancer patients.
@StopArabHate - Stop Arab Hate
Full video: https://t.co/B9ZtEOgqMT
Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman in Washington DC is seen tearing down signs advocating for peace in Palestine. When confronted, she expresses support for the bombing of Gaza and shows disdain for free speech. She mocks the suffering of Gaza's citizens and displays a lack of empathy. The interaction reveals a disturbing lack of compassion and understanding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's look at this lady taking down signs. The sign says, when will the children of Palestine wake up to the sounds of birds, not bombs? And she's ripping it down after she just ripped down a sign that said ceasefire now. Do you think that the children deserve to be bombed, ma'am? Oh
Speaker 1: my goodness.
Speaker 0: This is in Washington DC, 2nd Street
Speaker 1: Northwest. Absolutely. Down with that. Yeah. Down with Gaza and with
Speaker 0: you. Okay.
Speaker 1: Down with those who despise free speech.
Speaker 0: No one despises free speech. You Clearly, you do since you're ripping down the coasters.
Speaker 1: Gaza. The
Speaker 0: only one describing free speech is you. And its citizens are all dying. And you think that that's okay? I love it.
Speaker 1: I don't think they're dying enough. Yes? You're not.
Speaker 0: You are a sick, sick person,
Speaker 1: healthy. I'm expressing my free speech right to the
Speaker 0: that's the penis.
Speaker 1: That's the penis. That's a penis. It's doing it to Gaza. Oh my god. I'm just scared of your phone.
And look how big. Oh, this is not that's you, isn't it? Nobody ever said anything to you like that? Oh, you poor kid. You Gaza?
Gaza? Gaza? You probably don't even know
Speaker 0: where in the hell on
Speaker 1: earth it is. You learned the lesson.
@lovetocook12345 - Santa Trump!⭐️⭐️⭐️
Found this on TicTok.. https://t.co/DFXQOGhIYG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the eclipse on April 8th and its connection to Easter, referencing an 1800s book detailing events from AD 30. The book outlines Jesus' activities leading up to his crucifixion and resurrection, including Palm Sunday, cleansing the temple, last teachings, betrayal prediction, Passover meal, Last Supper, Garden of Gethsemane, Good Friday crucifixion, and Sabbath condemnation by Pilate. The speaker questions the authenticity of the cross.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And let's talk about the eclipse on April 8th that's happening and the connection it has with Easter. Watch this video get banned. I have a book. It's from the 1800. Let's do this.
Here's the book in all its glory. Right here, it says, the passion of the Lord from Palm Sunday to Easter Eve, April 1st to April 7th AD 30. Let's turn a couple pages. The resurrection and ascension of Christ from Easter Day to Ascension Day, April 8th to May 17th AD 30. That's crazy.
Totally not crazy. Truth. Now let me walk you through each day. Palm Sunday, April 1st. Monday, April 2nd, he cleansed the temple.
Tuesday, April 3rd was Jesus' last teaching. Tuesday night, Jesus told his disciples the time of his betrayal. And then on Wednesday, April 4th, he remained in Bethany until Thursday. Thursday, April 5th, they killed the lamb for the Passover meal. Evening and night of Thursday, April 5th was the last supper.
After supper, they went to the Mount of Olives and entered the Garden of Gethsemane. This is where he is taken and held captive. Good Friday, April 6th, he was arraigned and then taken to a place called Golgotha, the place of a skull, also known as Calvary. This is where he was put on the cross. Is it really a cross?
But before he was placed on the cross, he was tortured and placed in a cell overnight. Saturday, April 7th, the Sabbath. Pilate condemned him, and from 6 to 9 AM were the preparations for the
Video Transcript AI Summary
On Good Friday, Jesus was crucified at 9 AM and died after 6 hours on the cross. A supernatural darkness covered the land from noon to 3 PM, symbolizing the weight of divine wrath he bore for humanity's sins. He was buried before the Sabbath and rose on Sunday, April 8th. The solar eclipse during his crucifixion is seen as proof of his sacrifice. Just as the rainbow symbolizes God's promise after the flood, the eclipse serves as a reminder of Jesus' death and resurrection. Share your thoughts in the comments.
Translation:
Jesus was crucified on Good Friday, experienced darkness, died, and rose on Sunday. The solar eclipse during his crucifixion is seen as proof of his sacrifice. Share your thoughts in the comments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the cross. At 9 AM, he was placed on the cross, hung on the cross for the next 3 hours, dying. This is where it gets really My heart's freaking racing. I never read this before. Listen.
It was now noon, but such a noon as had never been seen in Judea, the position of the paschal full moon precluded the possibility of a solar eclipse and yet a supernatural darkness rested upon all the land from the 6th hour to the 9th hour as if to veil the last agonies of the redeemer from the eyes of men. But far deeper than that, darkness was the gloom that weighed upon the savior's soul as he bore the whole burden of the divine wrath for the sins of all men. Was on the cross all day until sunset, which was the beginning of the Sabbath, Saturday evening. Died in 6 hours, literally of a broken heart, taken down from the cross and placed in a tomb. Sunday, April 8th, the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
The solar eclipse is nothing other than proof to us that it happened. Jesus died on the cross to save us from our sins. In the solar eclipse, that was the veil. That is the proof. That is the reminder to us.
Just as the rainbow is a reminder to us that God will never flood the earth again, the solar eclipse is Monday, April 8th, then Easter Sunday is Tuesday, April 9th. What are your thoughts? Tell me in the comments.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Original video was deleted so here it is again: https://t.co/mh0U13XNe7
@AwakenTFallen - 🐦⬛Awaken the fallen🐦⬛
👇🤔👇🐦⬛ https://t.co/CSZBV7bddi
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transmission system outside Tromsor is part of the ACAD system, spanning Svalbard, Tromsø, Kiruna, and Sorakulla. It emits electromagnetic fields across Europe, potentially for mind control like harp. People are unaware of this manipulation, which can alter thoughts, feelings, and relationships remotely, turning individuals into biological robots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Transmission system that you're going to know? That's right. It's in outside of Tromsor, the biggest type of thing, part of ACAD system. This system going from Svalbard, Tromsø, Kiruna in Sweden has the headquarters of the whole system and then in Lapland, in Finnish Lapland, in Sorakulla. And when they blast electromagnetic fields, it goes through all of Europe.
And do you think that's a form of mind control? Oh, it can be used for mind control. Of course, like harp. And that is the danger because people know nothing about mind control. They don't know that your thoughts can be changed, your attitudes, your feelings.
If you love somebody, somebody sitting at a computer, even through satellites, can say, Okay. Let's make it opposite. And you start just detesting the person who you love. You can't be in the same room, you know, you feel uncomfortable. I think this is terrible because you're making people into biological robots.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses disbelief at the media's lack of interest in the Maui story, suggesting the true story is being suppressed. They question whether several events are coincidences: the Maui police chief also being in charge during the Las Vegas massacre, billionaires' properties remaining untouched while locals' homes burned, the emergency sirens not sounding, the water being turned off, and police blocking escape routes.
The speaker also points to the governor signing an emergency proclamation about housing three weeks before the fire. Further coincidences, according to the speaker, include the government erecting a black fence around Lahaina, the FAA grounding drones, plans since 2011 to make Maui a smart city powered by renewable energy, locals being evicted from undamaged homes, and fact-checkers dismissing these events as coincidences while being owned by BlackRock. Another speaker notes the media has not interviewed grieving parents or children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stunning to monitor the media's lack of interest in the whole Maui story. I've been in this business for 30 years. I'm stunned, but I'm not surprised. The incident seems to be the story here. Right?
But the true story, the media knows it is not allowed to tell. Is it a coincidence that the Maui police chief is the same man who was in charge in Las Vegas during that massacre that killed 58 people? Is it a coincidence that the Maui property owned by 1,000,000 and billionaires wasn't touched by the flames while homes of the locals all burned?
Speaker 1: What she fails to also mention is how the media hasn't even once interviewed a grieving parent, not a single parent looking for their children, not a single interview with a child, not a single interview with the schools.
Speaker 0: Was it a coincidence that the largest system of outdoor emergency sirens in the world ever made a sound as the fire devoured Lahaina? Was it a coincidence that at the same time, very same time, all the water was turned off? Was it a coincidence that police were ordered to block off streets and to funnel all the cars trying to escape? Think about this coincidence. That governor also signed an emergency proclamation on July 17th, 3 weeks before the fire, about housing of all things.
Is it a coincidence that the government put up a black fence around Lahaina or that the FAA rounded all drones from flying over the affected areas? Is it a coincidence that since at least 11, there have been plans to make Maui the first smart city run by 100% renewable energy? And that it must be a coincidence then that the locals whose homes did not burn are now being evicted from their property. And of course, a total coincidence that all the fact checkers who are checking these facts, who say everything I just told you is just a coincidence, are also owned and run by BlackRock.
@ChiefTrumpster - Chief Trumpster
Full video: https://t.co/FHHTII0X0h
Video Transcript AI Summary
**Original Summary (Ukrainian):**
Звернення до українців та світової спільноти з проханням звернути увагу на критичну ситуацію в Маріуполі та на "Азовсталі". Наголошується на щоденних загиблих і поранених, яким неможливо надати медичну допомогу. Необхідний зелений коридор для евакуації поранених та вивезення тіл загиблих. Заклик до цивілізованого світу гарантувати безпеку та евакуацію бійців. Родини військових звертаються до президента України з проханням звернутися до ООН та внести списки поранених і загиблих для евакуації.
**English Translation:**
An appeal to Ukrainians and the world community to pay attention to the critical situation in Mariupol and at "Azovstal." It is emphasized that there are daily deaths and injuries, and it is impossible to provide medical assistance. A green corridor is needed to evacuate the wounded and remove the bodies of the dead. An appeal to the civilized world to guarantee the safety and evacuation of soldiers. The families of the military are appealing to the President of Ukraine to appeal to the UN and include lists of the wounded and dead for evacuation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Слава Україні! Я вдячний кожному, хто сьогодні виходить на акції в Україні і в світі, Всім, хто розуміє наскільки критичною є ситуація в Маріуполі. Всім, хто кричить про Маріуполь. Кожен день на Азовсталі це нові загиблі та нові поранені, яких немає можливості тут лікувати. Увага всього світу зараз прикута до Маріуполя та до Азовсталі, але цього недостатньо.
Потрібно зробити зелений коридор для евакуації нашим пораненим. Потрібно негайно надати їм кваліфіковану медичну допомогу. Повірте, ці хлопці заслуговують на евакуацію. Дайте нам також вивести тіла наших загиблих побратимів. Ми закликаємо весь цивілізований світ долучитися до гарантій безпеки та евакуації наших бійців, які зробили неможливе та продовжують захищати Батьківщину, яка повинна зробити все, щоб всі герої змогли живими повернутися до своїх рідних.
Іншої можливості врятувати життя людей на Азовсталі може й не бути. Слава Україні!
Speaker 1: Героям слава! Ми, родинні військових, які зараз знаходяться в місті Маріуполь, звертаємося до нашого президента. Володимире Олександровичу, будь ласка, зверніться офіційно до представників ООН та внесіть списки наших поранених, військовий гарнізон та заберіть тіла загиблих воїнів. Всі родини та вся Україна вас просить це зробити. А я
@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪
@satoastshi - Satoastshi
Full video: https://t.co/W7bH4Aw9o6
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's 2 AM on November 6th in a quiet North Carolina bar, where the TV shows election results with a mix of red and blue states. There's a sense of anticipation about upcoming political changes. The speaker expresses frustration over current issues like gas prices and voting rights, hinting at significant actions to come. They mention a recent political event and predict more surprises ahead. The tone shifts to a humorous take on rounding up various public figures and brands, suggesting they would be locked away for their beliefs. The list includes celebrities and companies, emphasizing a satirical approach to political discourse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2 AM on the 6th November, North Carolina, barroom, quiet as a whisper. And the TV's playing that you run news, and the map's all red with a few hot blues.
Speaker 1: They ain't figured it out yet. Well, let the whole damn ballroom shout it. Gas to a dollar, and women can't vote, but throw in every last time I bring back on a boat. The SNP just did a 45 days, but wait till you see what he's gonna do next because it's as clear, clear, clear as pure white sat fire. All them shit talking, it's gonna wish that it was satire.
You think I'm a bad crystals. DC tunnels bright as July fireworks. 6,000 magic to round up every liberal and lock them all in crystals. Mark Cuban getting the crystal. Stephen Colbert getting the crystal.
Cardi b I'm getting the crystal. Rachel Maddow, getting the crystal. My wife's mom, getting the crystal. Bud Light, getting the crystal. Massachusetts, getting the crystal.
To round up every liberal and lock them
Speaker 0: all in crystals.
@itsalwaysrains - AlwaysSadButTruthful
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9lwQKv71FY https://t.co/r0KU8txPaS
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Video Transcript AI Summary
To reduce EMF exposure, turn off your WiFi at night. EMF, emitted by electronics, can be harmful, especially to children. Keep your WiFi router away from living areas and consider using a timer to automatically shut it off at night. You also should sleep with your phone on airplane mode to minimize EMF exposure while you rest. Studies indicate that WiFi can cause oxidative stress, DNA damage, and disrupt the endocrine system. Reducing EMF is essential as it contributes to overall stress from various sources, including pesticides and plastics. Since you don’t need WiFi while sleeping, it’s wise to limit your family's exposure to harmful EMF during the night.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the easiest ways to reduce your EMF exposure is to turn your WiFi off at night. EMF is an electromagnetic field. It's emitted by a lot of electronics, some more so than others. If you have WiFi in your house, first try to keep the router as far away as possible from where people spend the most time and nowhere near the kids or babies rooms. They're even more sensitive to the damages of EMF.
Plugging your WiFi router into a timer is a really easy way to make sure it shuts off every night at the same time and then turns on in the morning when you need WiFi again. You don't need internet when you're sleeping. This is one of the absolute best ways to drastically reduce your EMF exposure which can improve your health and even help you get better sleep. Another highly recommended practice is to always sleep with your phone on airplane mode. Having your phone on feet from your head the whole night exposes you to a ton of unnecessary EMF.
Repeated wifi studies show that wifi causes oxidative stress, sperm and testicular damage, cellular DNA damage, disrupts the endocrine system and even causes calcium overload. EMF exposure, whether it's from a strong device or a weak device, it just adds to the overall stress that we're taking in daily. Whether it's the pesticides in the food, plastics in the water, sitting all day, all these things add to the chemical and physical stressors that our body has to deal with. So whenever we could figure out a way to easily reduce one of these stressors, it's a great idea to just jump on it. You don't need WiFi when you sleep, so why bathe your family in damaging EMF all night?
Follow to keep learning and growing.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Source: https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS65dtHx4/
@JQRADIO247 - JQ Radio
@FontesSteven - Steven Fontes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdYL6Ntty54 https://t.co/qkJBl0LnmJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Every morning at 6 AM, you wake up to your alarm, alone. Some jobs treat workers like slaves. The boss's favorite employees get the spacious spots, while the least liked get small cubicles or end up in the basement. It's a safety compensation and you're just skating by, always waiting for that paycheck. But after twelve months, you still haven't been paid. Here's an optimistic way of thinking: If you're late today, you're just earning time for tomorrow. Most nine-to-five jobs are tough because the job description doesn't match the actual work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yo. 06:00 every morning, you're waking up yawning to the sound of your alarm clock alone. About an hour Yo, some occupations are like slave pigs.
The boss is favorite to get placed in something spacious. While some most hated get placed in some small cubicle spaces, or get thrown down in the basement. It's a safety comp, you're skating. You're constantly waiting for a paycheck. Twelve months pass by, you still ain't get paid yet.
Here's a optimistic motto. If you ever late for today, you could say you earn it for tomorrow. Most nine to fives are hard because the description and the job ain't no
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
This video was banned by TikTok https://t.co/twd334ZbHJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
A TikTok video was banned for being controversial, hateful, and offensive. The video urges viewers to stand up for girls' and women's equality and sports, asserting that it is unfair and unsafe to allow males to compete in girls' sports.
The video encourages viewers to not be intimidated by accusations of bigotry and to reject the idea that they should be quiet or compliant. It claims women deserve their own sports, privacy, fairness, and safety, and a chance to compete and win. The speaker advocates for honesty and bravery in fighting for women's rights.
The video's banning is described as a sign of insane times where the undeniable truth of biological differences between men and women is deemed ban-worthy. The speaker calls for continued vigilance, truth-sharing, and support for those who speak out, referencing court rulings that are undoing the Biden administration's changes to Title IX.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you heard about this latest video that TikTok banned because they found it to be too controversial, too filled with hate, and too offensive?
Speaker 1: Well, if
Speaker 0: you haven't seen it yet, here it is. Brace yourself.
Speaker 1: If you think girls and women's equality matter, stand up. If girls and women's sports matter and you want your daughters to have the same opportunity you had, stand up. If you know that it isn't fair or safe to allow males to compete in girls' sports because it's, well, obvious, Stand up. Don't be cowed by people who call you a bigot. You're not a bigot.
Don't let men tell us how to be good girls. Don't let others tell you you just need to be quiet. Sit down. Be nice. It's not nice to further a lie.
It's not mean to believe in women's equality. We deserve our
Speaker 0: own sports,
Speaker 1: privacy, fairness, safety. We deserve a chance to compete and win. So don't be nice. Don't be careful. Be honest.
Be brave. Fight for winning. We've come too far to give up now. And if you agree with that, stand up and stand with us.
Speaker 0: Crazy. Right? Not what you expected. It it's a sign of this insane time that we are living in where something that undeniably and objectively true, the biological differences between men and women and boys and girls actually exist. There is such a thing as a woman and a girl that is distinct and different from a man or a boy is deemed ban worthy by TikTok.
We have to keep our eyes open to what is going on and continue to lift our voices and not allow them to ban us from seeing this truth and from sharing this truth. There have been a couple of court rulings that have begun to undo undo the Biden administration's destruction of title nine. We have to keep building the momentum, keep sharing the truth, speaking the truth, and supporting those who do.
@Michael951413 - Michael
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJVmF2iOI_j
Video Transcript AI Summary
Since October 7th, Americans have been shocked by the deterioration of universities. This is due to the Muslim Brotherhood using groups like CAIR, MSA, and ISNA to destroy America from within, as outlined in their 1991 project. CAIR and ISNA were named unindicted co-conspirators in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, accused of funneling millions to Hamas, but faced no consequences.
At ISNA's 2025 conference, CAIR's director unveiled a plan for 4,000 mosques funding 50,000 Muslim lawyers, journalists, and influencers by 2040, plus 50 Muslim congressmen in six years, aiming to reshape America's laws and culture. The speaker stated that loyalty to the US is paramount, and condemns those who wave terrorist flags while destroying American symbols.
The speaker urges the government to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and its front organizations as terrorist entities, like Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and others have done. They advocate banning the Brotherhood, revoking CAIR and ISNA's tax-exempt status, and reopening the Holy Land case. The speaker concludes by urging listeners to visit actforamerica.org and support their "Stop the Stealth Jihad Now" campaign.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Since October 7, Americans have been shocked watching the deterioration of our universities and the chaos that has ensued. People asked in disbelief, how did we get here? We got here because of the work of the Muslim Brotherhood through front organizations like CARE, Council on American Islamic Relations, the MSA, the Muslim Student Association, ISNA, Islamic Society of North America, and others working to fulfill the Muslim Brotherhood Project written in 1991 to destroy America from within using mosques, nonprofits, and universities as fronts. Kir and ISNA named unindicted co conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation trial in 02/2008, where millions of dollars were raised in America and funneled to Hamas and terrorist organizations overseas, yet faced no consequences when Obama protected them. These groups have been masquerading as civil rights advocates while advancing a radical agenda.
At ISLA's twenty twenty five conference, CARES executive director Nihad Awad unveiled a chilling plan. 4,000 US mosques funding 50,000 Muslim lawyers, journalists, and influencers by 2040, plus 50 Muslim congressmen in six years. He said, quote, we have to be in congress, newsrooms, classrooms, and courts, framing America as a decaying system needing an Islamic overhaul. This is not integration. It's domination echoing the brotherhood's call to reshape America's laws and culture.
Just imagine 50 Ilhan Omars and Rashid Atlaib in congress in six years. You don't think it can happen here? Just look at Europe. Europe has become Arabia. I want to be clear here.
I have no problem whatsoever with your religion when it comes to running for public office if your loyalty is to The United States Of America and no other country. But when you encourage and praise your members for waving Palestinians and terrorist flags while tearing down or burning the American flag, destroying American properties, and injuring Americans, you have no place in our country, let alone our government. This is the issue, not the religion. It is time for our government to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and all its front organizations in America as terrorist organizations. Here's a list of countries who have designated the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization and banned them.
Egypt in 2013, Saudi Arabia in 2014, United Arab Emirates in 2014. Bahrain '20 '14. Libya '20 '19. Russia '2 thousand and '3. Austria '20 '20 '1.
Here's a list of countries that flat out banned them. Syria banned since 1958. Jordan banned since 2016. Tajikistan banned in 02/2006. Kazakhstan banned in the February.
Turkmenistan banned under religious restrictions. Uzbekistan banned them in the nineteen nineties. If Muslim countries are viciously banning them and designating them as terrorists, what's stopping us? These Islamic nations experience the brotherhood political Islam as a destabilizing force, banning it to protect their societies. America's failure to act emboldens groups like CARE, which shield mosques from FBI inquiries and push Palestinian activism to dominate US politics.
We must ban the brotherhood, revoke CARE and ISNAS tax exempt status, and reopen the Holy Land case to dismantle their network. The time for naivete is over. America must wake up, expose the radical ideology bent on domination, and ban it. Go to our website, actforamerica.org, and act now on our stop the stealth jihad now campaign. Stand with us and support our work to help us designate the Muslim Brotherhood and their front organizations as terrorist groups to protect and preserve America.
Thank you.
Instagram
instagram.com
@Michael951413 - Michael
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLl4ekoO0AB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that "Ma'am Donnie's" Robin Hood persona is fake and that he is a manufactured communist candidate. Campaign records allegedly show that $1,600,000 of the $1,700,000 donated to his campaign was funneled through a single bundler. Only 77 individual contributions, totaling $0, had no bundler attribution. His campaign then received $7,000,000 in matching funds, and Super PACs added another $1,900,000, bringing the total to $10,600,000.
The speaker asserts that "this guy" wants socialism, which is communism in disguise, despite growing up in a wealthy Manhattan neighborhood with a filmmaker mother and a professor father, attending private schools, and living in a $2,000,000 apartment. "Ma'am Donnie" is quoted as critiquing capitalism and advocating for a better distribution of wealth, echoing Dr. King. Despite being a "nepo baby" who got his first job at 29, he stated that he doesn't think billionaires should exist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look at that. So fake, ma'am. Downey's whole Robin Hood act is as fake as his accents. He's a manufactured artificial candidate created to usher in communism, a carefully crafted charismatic communist presented in a palatable package, but nothing about him is real or grassroots including his campaign. Despite a massive social media presence, millions in Instagram followers, almost 3,000,000 of them, and also numerous TV appearances.
According to campaign records, 1,600,000.0 of the 1,700,000.0 donated to Mam Donnie's campaign was funneled through a single bundler. Now a bundler is a professional who collects campaign funds for a candidate. Campaign records also show a total of two 27,674 individual contributions to Mam Donnie's campaign. A mere 77 had no Bundler aka professional fundraising attribution. And then upon closer inspection, those 77 contributions amounted to $0.
Ma'am Donnie's campaign then received another 7,000,000 in matching funds. Super PACs helping his campaign poured in another 1,900,000.0, bringing the grand total of the money his campaign raised to $10,600,000. So this guy
Speaker 1: We have to continue to elect more socialists, and we have to ensure that we are unapologetic about our socialism.
Speaker 0: So it's hard to so this guy wants socialism, which is really communism in disguise, and it he wants it for you and not for him. I'm what does this guy even know about the working man? He's never had to work a day in his life. He grew up in a wealthy Manhattan neighborhood. His mother is an acclaimed Indian American filmmaker who even directed Disney movies.
His father, an esteemed professor at Columbia University. Ma'am Donnie also attended fancy expensive private schools and currently lives in a $2,000,000 apartment, yet he proudly proclaims that he hates the very underpinning of the American economy. Do you like capitalism?
Speaker 1: No. I I I have many critiques of capitalism, and I think ultimately the definition for me of why I call myself a democratic socialist is the words of doctor King decades ago. He said, call it democracy or call it democratic socialism. There must be a better distribution of wealth for all of god's children in this country.
Speaker 0: Wow. Better distribution of wealth. Could you believe it? He said the quiet part out loud. Yet despite being a nepo baby whose parents are multimillionaires, multi at the very least, a guy who got his first job at 29 years old, he said this about billionaires.
You are a self described democratic socialist. Do you think that billionaires have a right to exist? I
Speaker 1: don't think that we should have billionaires.
Instagram
instagram.com
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Full video 👇🏼 https://t.co/1LOKOnfp8n
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents a sequence of testimonies and extracts arguing that Adolf Hitler possessed exceptional intellect, memory, and strategic genius, contrary to prevailing liberal and popular stereotypes.
- IQ and intellect at Nuremberg: It is stated that the Allies found the IQs of National Socialist leaders on trial to be much higher than expected, with some sources suggesting Hitler’s IQ around 140+ or higher. Jaalmar Schacht is cited as saying Hitler’s IQ was 150 or more; Schacht’s own IQ was tested at 143, and ministers reportedly averaged 129, with many acknowledging Hitler’s superiority. The text asserts Hitler read voraciously, with a private library of over 3,000 books, and could lead discussions on any topic, possessing strong verbal ability, memory, and autodidactic learning.
- Personal recollections on Hitler’s learning and memory: Excerpts from He Was My Chief (Christa Schroeder), Was Hitler Really a Dictator? (Friedrich Christian), Hitler Democrat (Leon deGrell), and The Hitler I Knew (Otto Dietrich) emphasize Hitler’s extraordinary memory and lifelong study. Schroeder describes Hitler reading 500 Vienna reference library volumes in youth, recalling minute details of places, architecture, and conversations, as well as recalling names, books, statistics, faces, and the atmosphere of rallies. Dietrich notes Hitler’s ability to memorize a book in a single sitting and to notice engine discrepancies on a plane, while deGrell highlights Hitler’s wide range of knowledge—from Buddha to Shakespeare to Tacitus, from theology to physics and biology—and his habit of reading at least one book daily and quoting long passages from memory. Dietrich also stresses Hitler’s equal facility in architecture, philosophy, and science, and his almost universal command of knowledge across disciplines.
- Hitler’s cognitive and technical leadership in strategy: The narrative contends Hitler could devise audacious military strategies that surprised even his top commanders. It recounts that Hitler rejected a conventional Schlieffen-inspired plan and instead developed a bold, integrated approach to the 1940 West campaign. In Winiza and at his headquarters, Hitler supposedly explained and reviewed his strategic process, using a binded map collection of the France campaign to illustrate decisions, including the choice to strike at Sedan and to coordinate a rapid armored thrust with air superiority. He allegedly insisted on secrecy, careful data gathering, and a seamless integration of tactical details under a single strategic idea.
- The Western campaign and Dunkirk: The text describes the May 1940 offensive (the Zickelschnitt or sickle cut) as a decisiive success, with the Wehrmacht breaking through using a combination of armored thrusts and flanking maneuvers, advancing from Sedan toward the coast, and ensuring the encirclement and isolation of Allied forces. Hitler is portrayed as acknowledging—yet regretting in hindsight—the Dunkirk decision, explaining he did not destroy the entire British force because of the danger to further operations and time, arguing the need to avoid excessive losses and preserve strength for subsequent operations. The account attributes a rational, strategic calculus to Hitler, including concerns about Eastern possibilities and peace prospects.
- Post-Dunkirk reflections and leadership style: The transcript portrays Hitler as calm under pressure, capable of long, rational discussions with staff after shocking events like Arnhem, and capable of endurance through fatigue. It also emphasizes his interpersonal trust with his inner circle, including his architect Heinrich Himmler and Speer, and notes various personal anecdotes illustrating his restraint, discipline, and occasional moments of levity. Keitel, Jodl, and Manstein are referenced as colleagues whose assessments evolved to align with Hitler’s strategic vision, while some allied commanders are depicted as underestimating his genius.
- Conclusion on Hitler’s genius: The compilation argues that Hitler was “one of the most cultivated men of the twentieth century,” with “military genius” and “an invention of modern strategy,” whose leadership integrated a mass of tanks and air power in ways other militaries failed to conceive. While it acknowledges criticism of certain decisions (e.g., Dunkirk), it credits Hitler with transcending conventional military thought, guiding not only German policy but also shaping European strategic doctrine through a fusion of meticulous planning, memory, and intellectual breadth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: During the Nuremberg trials, the allies tested the IQs of the national socialist leaders who were on trial. These test results came to the allies as a terrible surprise. They expected the national socialist leaders had similar IQs as common thugs. When it turned out they were academic top level, it was against all their expectations. Here are the IQs of the men tested at Nuremberg If These Are the IQs of the Men Below Hitler, What Was Hitler's IQ?
Some cognitive scientists and other experts who have conducted research into the IQs of famous people have placed Hitler's likely IQ at around 140 plus, which is a genius level score that seems plausible. According to Jaalmar Schacht, whose IQ was tested at 143 and who knew Hitler very well, Hitler's IQ was 150 or more. The average IQ of Hitler's ministers was 129 and they considered him a genius. When men like Goring and professional soldiers like Rader and Donitz say so, they recognized Hitler had a higher IQ than they themselves had. Hitler, despite his being characterized by many who didn't know him as uneducated and stupid, actually read voraciously and widely.
He had 3,000 plus books in his private library, he had a tremendous appetite for knowledge, and he could lead a discussion over just any topic imaginable. He was extremely verbally intelligent, knew operations, logistics and economics much better than his generals, and had tremendous memory. He was well read and autodidact. Most of all, you do not rise from being homeless to the most powerful man in the world with a pedestrian IQ. We will read some excerpts from books written by people who knew Hitler personally.
Excerpt from He Was My Chief, the memoirs of Adolf Hitler's secretary by Christa Schroeder. From his youth onwards, Hitler had a great lust to read. He told me one day that during his youth in Vienna, he had read through all 500 volumes at the city reference library. This passion for books and to assimilate contents of the most diverse kinds enabled him to extend his knowledge into almost all areas of literature the I amazed at how precisely he could describe any geographical region or speak about art history or hold forth on very complicated technical matters. In the same way, he could describe with amazing detail how theaters, churches, monasteries, and castles were built.
Even during his incarceration at Landsberg, he studied tirelessly the historical buildings of all European countries and would often boast that he knew the architectural beauties of those countries better even than the experts who were native to them. The Oberburgermeister of Munich, with whom Hitler enjoyed discussing the expansion and beautification of the city, related how surprised he was when Hitler recalled the minute details of a conversation they had months previously. Hitler had reproached him. Six months ago I told you I wanted to have it done this way, and then repeated word for word the conversation they had had on the subject, a fact confirmed by architects Speer and Giesler postwar. Hitler could not only recall very easily names, books, and statistics, but faces too.
He could remember exactly the time, place, and circumstances under which he had met a person. He retained a mental image of all persons whom he had got to know in his life, and on reflection surprising personal details might also occur to him. Equally, he could describe the atmosphere and sequence of events at rallies at which he had spoken. The friends of his youth in Vienna, of the First World War, the period of struggle, and the seizure of power were all deeply embedded in his memory with all their peculiarities. If he was in a good mood, he enjoyed describing the great receptions at the Reich Chancellery.
He could see in his mind's eye what dress this or that artiste had worn, and repeat the serious or lighthearted conversations he had had with his guests. It was no different with his impressions of theatrical presentations or films. He could describe a scene he had watched in Vienna as a young man down to the last detail. He would mention the names of actors and recall how the critics had treated them. I have asked myself very often how a human mind can have retained so many facts and impressions.
It is confirmed that from his youth onwards, Hitler had the gift of an unusual memory, but his secret was that he trained and expanded it every day. He said that when he was reading he tried to grasp the essence of a thing and fix it in his mind. It was his practice or method during the tea hours and when chatting at the hearth over a subject he had been reading about to repeat it several times in order to anchor it more firmly in his memory. Hitler's knowledge of architecture was astounding He knew by heart the measurements and ground plans of all important buildings in the world. I have seen architects and engineers of renown staggered by his ability and imagination.
Excerpt from Was Hitler Really a Dictator? By Friedrich Christian. I myself witnessed how Hitler dominated in purely technical discussions with leading men of the Mercedes Benz factory, in other words, was absolutely superior to an elite of engineers. I also witnessed how, in a conversation with the Italian Minister of Justice, who had attempted to precisely describe the Parthenon, Hitler disputed his architectural details. The point at issue was that Hitler had pointed out perfection of the Parthenon's beauty, whereas the minister would not concede it.
Finally, Hitler asked me to bring him a sketchpad, ruler, and pencils, he declined an eraser. A short time later, he interrupted interrupted his conversation with the minister in order to make a very rapid but detailed sketch of the Parthenon off the top of his head, without any aids and completely without prior preparation, since nobody could have known that the conversation with the Italian would lead to this topic. When the sketch was finished, an encyclopedia was procured in which the Parthenon's dimensions were given. Once converted to metric, they were identical with those indicated on Hitler's sketch. And then it was an easy matter for Hitler to prove to the Italian minister the way in which the law of nature known as the golden section finds expression in the beauty of that glorious structure, the Parthenon.
Excerpt from Hitler Democrat by Leon deGrell. The historian Werner Maser, although quite anti Hitler like nearly all of his colleagues, how else would they have found publishers? Has acknowledged, from the beginning of his political career, he Hitler took great pains systematically to arrange for whatever he was going to need in order to carry out his plans. Hitler was distinguished, Mazer added, by an exceptional intelligence in technical matters. Hitler had acquired his technical knowledge by devoting many thousands of hours of study to it from the time of his youth.
Hitler read an endless number of books, explained Doctor. Jallmar Schacht. He acquired a very considerable amount of knowledge and made masterful use of it in discussions and speeches. In certain respects, he was a man endowed with genius he had ideas that no one else would ever have thought of, ideas that resulted in the ending of great difficulties, sometimes by measures of an astonishing simplicity or brutality. Hitler was self taught and made no attempt to hide the fact.
The smug conceit of intellectuals, their shiny ideas packaged like so many flashlight batteries, irritated him at times. His own knowledge he had acquired through selective and unremitting study, and he knew far more than thousands of diploma decorated academics. I don't think anyone ever read as much as he did. He read at least one book every day, always reading the end and the index first in order to gauge the book's interest for him. He had the power to extract the essence of each book, and then store it in his computer like mind.
I have heard him talk about complicated scientific books with faultless precision even at the height of the war. His intellectual curiosity was limitless. He fairly lived on the writings of the most diverse authors, and nothing was too complex for his comprehension. He had a deep knowledge and understanding of Buddha, Confucius, and Jesus Christ, as well as Luther, Calvin, or Savonarola, of literary giants such as Dante, Schiller, Shakespeare, Goethe, and analytical writers such as Renin and Gobineau, Chamberlain and Sorel. He had trained himself in philosophy by studying Aristotle and Plato.
Although the latter did not fit into his system, Hitler was nevertheless able to extract what he deemed of value. He could quote entire paragraphs of Schopenhauer from memory, and for a long time carried a pocket edition of Schopenhauer with him. Nietzsche taught him much about willpower his thirst for knowledge was unquenchable he spent hundreds of hours studying the works of Tacitus and Momzen, military strategists like Clausewitz, or empire builders like Bismarck. Nothing escaped him. World history or the history of civilizations, the study of the Bible and the Talmud, Thomistic philosophy, and all the masterpieces of Homer, Sophocles, Horus, Ovid, Titus Livius, and Cicero.
He knew Julian the Apostate as if he had been his contemporary. His knowledge also extended to mechanics he knew how engines worked, he understood the ballistics of various weapons, and he astonished the best medical scientists with his knowledge of medicine and biology. The universality of Hitler's knowledge may surprise or displease those unaware of it, but it is nonetheless a historical fact. Hitler was one of the most cultivated men of the twentieth century. A thousand times more so than Churchill, an intellectual mediocrity, or than Pierre Laval, with his mere cursory knowledge of history, or than Roosevelt, or Eisenhower, who never got beyond detective novels.
Excerpt from The Hitler I Knew, Memoirs of the Third Reich's Press Chief by Otto Dietrich. Hitler had extraordinary intellectual gifts, in some fields, undoubted genius. He had an eye for essentials, an astonishing memory, a remarkable imagination, and a bold decisiveness that made for unusual success in his social undertakings and his other peaceful works.
Speaker 1: He would spend a lot of time reading. Every week, he would read every illustrated magazine that was available in Germany or at very least flip through them. I would also buy books for him. Anytime I saw a new book that I thought would be of interest to him, I would buy it and give it to him. And this one time, he really amazed me.
It was evening, and there were perhaps 12 or 15 people at the table having dinner. And he started to talk about this new book he had been reading, and he said, I've read this book and it says that and I thought to myself, that's impossible. I just gave him that book yesterday. He could not have finished reading that book already. And then he said to me, please go up and get the book for me.
It's on my nightstand. So I bring it down and he says to open it to a certain page number and to read it. And so I opened it and began to read it aloud. And then I thought to myself, he could not have read this book in a single night. It would have taken me a few full days to read it, and he didn't even spend all night with it.
I was just dumbfounded. How on earth did he do that? I mean, he had so many other things on his mind to deal with, but he had already memorized many things from the same book. I was just stunned. I was really amazed too when we would get on board a plane, how he would notice right away if one of the engines wasn't running exactly the same as the others.
And he would say to me, please go ask them about it. Other times, when we were out riding in the car, if a spark plug might be misfiring, he sensed it at once.
Speaker 0: Was Hitler on his own capable of coming up with the audacious military strategy that conquered France, Belgium, The Netherlands, Denmark, and Norway in two months' time? This is the firm conviction of his top commanders, Wilhelm Keitel and Alfred Jotel. When the invasion start date had to be changed several times, Hitler had the opportunity to develop his own idea of a thrust across the Maas River at Sedan instead of the old World War one type plan presented to him by Halder. When Giesler was at headquarters in fall nineteen forty two, Hitler gives him map by map explanations for his strategic decisions. It was a large collection of maps bound in leather, the France war campaign in its chronological sequence.
One day, it was placed on Adolf Hitler's work desk. The armed forces' adjutancy had told me the volumes were prepared as a military historical documentation, and its first edition was presented to Hitler at Winiza. Hitler, as a preamble for his giving me a review of the campaign that surprised the world, explained to me that he had already requested from the chief of the general staff, Franz Halder, before the end of the Polish campaign, a presentation of the strategic dispositions for an offensive campaign in the West. He said, first, I did not trust the peace. Second, an offensive in the West had to be thought through and prepared in all its details.
And finally, the timing, the most important factor. We were permanently under time pressure and still are. The time, she stays as a powerful ally with the enemy, more relentless than the past winter with its premature snow, ice, and shattering cold. Pensive, he added. From my youth on, like a premonition, I never liked snow or ice.
Already, long before the French campaign, I told you that the chief of staff presented me in September 1939 with the rehashed Schlieffen plan, not however in detail. How it happened, I mean the arrogance of a presentation of shallow nothingness, of repetitions of the thought processes of the honorable general Schlieffen, which was still in its operational principle, part of the nineteenth century and not accounting for the possibilities of modern weapons, tanks, and air force. Hitler was silent, remembering. After a while, he said, I looked at the chief of the general staff and was convinced that any further words or even a critical analysis would lead to nothing, would end in emptiness. He is not able to think in all dimensions whatsoever, yet convinced he is of a unique military capacity.
He is lacking in ideas, novelty, imagination, daring, and above all, in the charisma that is normally characteristic of a military leader. But how much time remained to change that strategy according to Schlieffen and those meticulously compiled tactical detail plans by radically new offensive thinking? In the short time available, one could only reinforce tank units and motorized divisions in front of Luxembourg, and thus that attack section emphasized the offensive thrust in the direction of Neufchatel and Sedan. I gave the order to attack at November 1939, then that mysterious betrayal of the start of the offensive happened. Its discovery was relayed to me at your office on November 8.
I immediately called the offensive off. It was not easy. We lost time. But on the other hand, the assassination attempt against me did not succeed, and the decision to call off the attack turned out later to be correct because of the very unfavorable weather conditions. The traitor, up till now, has not been found.
Camouflaged, he sits in a high military position. All offensive deadlines have so far been betrayed. What hatred against me and national socialism lies behind that revolting and cowardly treason without any hesitation German soldiers are sacrificed? A decision in the West in 1939 was not possible anymore. We lost time, valuable time, but I used that time to deal with the strategy of the French campaign and to thoroughly study the tactical details that derived from it.
We walked over to the maps and Hitler opened the volume. First was a map surveying the area from the Mediterranean to the North Sea, marked with the military forces as of September 1939. I was now dealing on my own with the strategic possibilities, keeping completely to myself. My idea was, if I act as if I was attacking Ale Schlieffen and thus fooled them thoroughly with one hand, he outlined an area and begin with an energetic thrust here where they would not expect it at all. His index finger pointed down to Sedan.
What will then be the consequence? Slowly, my ideas became focused. I could see the sequence of the surprise attacks. Everything firmed up. But still, I kept it to myself.
I didn't talk to anyone about my deliberations. I requested all supportive material and checked it out thoroughly. I surveyed the Maginot fortifications as far as they were known to us and marked on our general staff maps. Then I had relief maps and aerial photos set before me, but from all sections, not only from the area of my planned thrusts. Furthermore, I dealt with the entire road system and its pass through volume and checked the possibility of camouflaging the readiness positions.
Gradually, I felt sure, and now I committed my Wehrmacht adjutants to absolute secrecy so that they could assist me. Slowly, I gained the conviction that is eminently necessary to feel that this is the way and no other. In December 1939, the offensive plan moved from a mere idea into a more concrete stage. Great strategy takes place not only on an intellectual level, but according to its own laws, similar to city building and architecture, I am nearly tempted to say it is artwork. Should that strategy lead to a complete success, should it be achieved, it will be by a logical interconnecting of all tactical details, which have to be sensible and carefully planned.
These tactical details must be completely integrated and subordinated to one great strategic idea. They are at the same time both the foundation and structure. Naturally, precautionary preparations had to be planned in order to meet all possible unknowns. Furthermore, to reach the great goal, surprise is necessary. Now I had to deal with the details and the respective tactics of attack.
I took my time and did it thoroughly. From maps, we went to sandbox exercises. I still kept the circle of the insiders small. And according to my later experiences, my precautions were absolutely correct. Beginning January 1940, that strategy was solidly cemented by all tactical detail planning.
Now I took Keitel and Yodel into my confidence. No, I did not win them over for my plans right away. They disapproved and raised objections like, would it not be wiser to go northward around the Maginot fortifications? Just that is what the adversaries expect and make preparations for, I told them. My offensive plans were too bold, too daring.
Naturally, was risky. Not only the front thrust, but also the flanks from south, west, and even from the east were in danger in case the divisions following the first thrust are not able to secure the breakthrough area in time. They didn't make it easy for me to convince them. The blocking barrier of Maginot? Well, I was sure about that.
The Czech barrier forts directed against us then and built by French engineers similar to the Maginot bunkers. Not only did I have a close look at those, but they were for me useful objects for shooting trials. The results met my expectations. The bunkers were cleanly penetrated by direct shots of 8.8 special shells. Also, by stucca attacks, I would either eliminate them or keep them down.
Around the February, the newly nominated commanding generals, among them Manstein, reported in. General Rudolf Schmunt made me aware of him, indicating that his ideas about the war strategy in the West were nearly the same as mine. After he reported in, I gave Mannstein the opportunity to present his thoughts about the West offensive. Yes, it was as Schmunt told me. My thinking was this confirmed.
I still kept silent though. The fewer who knew about it, the more surprising the thrust would be. It would not have been prudent to let Mannstein know how far advanced beyond the basic strategic concept the tactical details had already been worked out. During his talk, Hitler had turned over map after map covering the months of the Droll de Goire funny war until May 1940. On the map, you could notice the markings of the takeoff positions for the attack.
I don't wanna get involved now with all the details like the rapid taking over of crossings, bridges, and barriers. Once they were situated close to the border, I engaged raiding commandos, partly even on bicycles so they could quickly and silently run over the enemy positions. Most important was the storming Of Eben Emael, the impenetrable modern barrier fort. It could be taken without heavy losses only by a surprise raid, by coordinating the attack from the air and the ground. Gliders should silently land on top of the fort and drop off the commandos.
Airplanes with parachute troops and gliders with rating commandos will engage as tactical considerations at the time require it. Whenever possible, airfields behind the enemy lines will be captured that way. Believe me, Giesler, all these attacks I discussed and exercised on a model with officers and flying personnel, pioneers, parachutists, infantries, and we succeeded totally. Hitler opened the next map. It showed the attack that took place on the morning of May 10 with the markings for the first day targets.
Following that were maps with sections of the different divisions, then a second map series marking the success by the individual panzer and battle groups. Drawn on a larger scale could be seen the hard battle for Sedan. That was the energetic thrust the enemy did not expect, then the breakthrough and the advance of the Panzers secured at their flanks by the forward pushing divisions. Now map after map followed, sometimes two for one day, graphically reporting the battle success of the panzer thrust along the East Side Of The Somun to Abbeville. He wanted to catch and cut off the French English motorized forces, which in all probability would cross the French border to enter Belgium.
My biggest worry was securing the flanks, counterattacks from the south and Southwest energetically executed would have grown to a serious threat. Logically, at the same time, the Schlieffen attack had to be seriously carried out in order to draw the main forces of the enemy, the motorized units, into Belgian territory. The deception succeeded. The mass of the enemy forces moved into those battle areas as I imagined they would and were cordoned off. The frontal attack of our divisions also showed total success and forced Holland and Belgium to surrender.
The operation, later called Zickelschnitt, the sickle cut plan, became a decisive success. But the total defeat of the western allies was not yet won. The opponent was actually decisively beaten in the North sector, pressed from the east and south by our fast moving troops cut off toward the West, only the sea remained as the last open flight path. The mass of those primarily English forces was concentrated around Dunkirk on the Flemish planes, which I remembered well from my World War time. Oh, I know.
My Dunkirk decision was described as a big mistake, not only by the circle of the so smart general staff, those know it alls, and those with their so Christian feelings thought it was my biggest stupidity not to have completely destroyed the already beaten British forces, various considerations kept me from doing so. First, the military reasons. The Flemish Lowlands restrict tank operations basically to the roads. Long drawn out battles with our own losses and the possible high breakdown of our tanks were to be expected. For further necessary operations toward the West and south into France proper, I could not sacrifice one tank.
But above all, we must not waste our strength and lose time. The enemy had been shocked. Now everything had to be done stroke by stroke. After listening to Runstead, my inner circle of military advisers also shared that opinion. It was absolutely necessary to continue the attack to the west and south without any hesitation before the enemy succeeds in building up a strong defense along the Somme and the Ime.
Our follow-up thrust already met with strong resistance there. It also had to be assumed the English would send additional troops assisted by the artillery support of their battleships across the channel. They could not let France down as they did Poland. We had to attack toward the West Paris, and Northern France had to be taken very fast to make it impossible for the English to land additional troops. We also had to direct an offensive toward the South with a thrust behind the French fortifications.
We had to enforce a final decision and thus bring the French campaign to a quick finish because there was another reason of a military political kind. I did not remain orientated to only one side. For a long time, I was listening, worried toward the East. And did not a slight possibility of peace still exist, even though a vague one, which I might have obstructed by a pitiless defeat of the Dunkirk army. Hitler was deliberating on rational grounds as he was so often doing in the past years.
He did not think only as a German. He thought as a European. He truly thought in a sense of a higher humanity, which he wanted to be realized within ethnically based unified societies. That he judged the possibility of peace higher, there is in my eyes one proof. On 06/24/1940, at his headquarters, Bruli De Pesche, he gave orders for peacetime tasks, issuing a decree on the twenty fifth giving authority to Speer and me to begin the restructuring of German cities.
Later, I was once more reminded of the mistake of Dunkirk. If I remember correctly, it was in August 1943 after the devastating air attacks in Hamburg. In an adjoining room, Hitler gave orders to an adjutant. A pile of photographs was lying on a table. I picked them up.
They were horrible testimonials of the effect the phosphor hail had on women and children by that terrible terror attack at Hamburg with over forty thousand civilian deaths. When Hitler returned to the workroom, he saw the photographs in my band. With a quiet but very resolute voice, he said, let it go. Giesler, don't look at the pictures anymore. After a while, I had to rethink it didn't agree with my character to step on the one who lies on the ground.
I was mistaken. Magnanimity will not be recognized. They repay my sparing them at Dunkirk with bombs and phosphorus on women and children whose men and husbands were fighting for Europe. What you see there is destructive brutality. He pointed to the photographs.
Again and again, one tries not to believe this. Now I know, no mercy. Those words were for me proof that his decisions at that time came from ethical ideas of war rather than only military and political reasons. I thought back to fall nineteen forty two at Winneza. Upset and pondering, I had arrived there late at night or early morning and could not sleep.
After Hitler talked with me, the explanation for his mistrust and chilly attitude toward the generals was evident. It was not commonly so because contrary to that, he kept the front officers and fighting troops in high esteem and of whom he said, they know what is at stake. It dawned on me why he so thoroughly explained with the map documents, his strategic and tactical decisions, and the way the French campaign was won. It was not based on the fact that the first example of that documentation was now set on the table. It was not just the explanation of his carefully planned campaign.
No doubt by reviewing, he wanted to assure himself that his strategic idea, his tactical dispositions were correct and had led to a surprisingly rapid success. His explanations were by no means arrogant. Deeds, courage, and self sacrifice of the soldiers and commanders always took first place above all events. He said to me, only with such soldiers and officers could I dare to plan such an audacious performance. He followed with the remark, the strategy for the Russian campaign was deliberated exactly the same way.
For a while, was silent, and then he continued. When I recognized, after the talks with Molotov, that no other possibilities existed, I had the choice, fight or give up and betray Europe. I decided to fight. It was the hardest decision of my life. I asked myself, why does Hitler reveal all these problems and thoughts to me?
Apart from the fact that his loneliness urged him to talk, he knew I was not only a national socialist and follower he could trust, but in addition, close to him as his architect. He also recognized that I understood his goals. Even more, he sensed that I saw him as a far forward thinker who was already planning and fighting for the next generation. The joint work on city building conceptions and their architectural details created trust. He accepted and respected me.
During those hours of mutual planning, he saw himself bound to peace and his real mission as forming a new social order of the German people and their environment. He found the answer to the challenge of the time, the challenge of the technique, and the challenge of the new social order. In those hours, he was lifted up. I was more to him than his architect. As always, I attended lunch.
Hitler was pensive. Our discussion was restricted to my impressions of the Danube Bank design in Budapest. Right on the first day of our joint lunch and dinner, I asked to be served the same food as he was having. Hitler mentioned that I could order the mess menu. It would not disturb him at all.
No, I replied. I'm not pretending. I really wanna get acquainted with your diet, and for the orderlies, it is simpler to serve. So I spooned the roasted semolina soup and forked the potato pancakes with vegetables. At that lunch, they served milk rice, and with it ground chocolate in a small cup as dessert.
I sprinkled some over the milk rice. Hitler criticized, that's too little. It is a rare pleasure. And then poured nearly everything out of the cup over my rice. I am not allowed too much of he remarked.
I could see that by his small rice portion. It was rather surprising how little nourishment he needed. After dinner, he said, Giesler, you are not only exhausted, but you also have not had enough sleep. I can see it. You will now take a walk naturally with company, with professor Brandt, and then go to the sauna, and you will sleep well.
I'm very busy with military discussions and deadlines. No planning talks today. I'll see you at tea time, late evening after the lager. During the walk, I talked with Karl Brandt, of whom I think highly about Hitler's loneliness and his great burden. If I am already worn out after hours in my small professional work here and the talks with him, think then about the continuous demands made on him.
No. Brandt interrupted me. You have to look at it differently, Giesler. It's obvious that you are tired out by the nightly discussions with the chief, but also obvious that for him, it means complete relaxation. He gains distance and new energy for decision making.
That's why you're so important here now. I had dinner at the casino barracks and had a chance to talk to field marshal Keitel with general Yodel present, naturally about the French campaign. I wanted to hear his assessment. Well, when I think about the past, it gives me confidence, Keitel said. He rarely talks about it.
He was probably inspired by the map collection. What he presented to you based on the maps, I can only add it was his idea, in all details, his work. He alone was the commander of the French campaign. Keitel continued. When he explained in January 1940, his concept about the Western campaign worked out to all strategic details, I was startled by his audacity even though I had to acknowledge the brilliant strategy.
Yodel nodded, agreeing, and remarked, we were pretty much perplexed when he put it on our table, complete with all the details. For his attack solution, he first won Yodel over when I still could not accept it, Keitel added. I asked myself, would we succeed in deceiving the allies to such an extent that they would thrust their motorized army and tank units into the Belgian Holland region in order to block the Schlieffen wing? Would they consider the breakthrough at Sedan as a tactical space limited attack only? Could the flanks for the panzer thrust to the coast be secured at all?
I never would have had the courage for such an audacious operation. General Schmunt said later that Mannstein had the same thoughts. His ideas were not accepted and were refused by the chief of the general staff, Halder. I found that out in January and arranged that Mannstein could present his ideas to the Fuhrer. That was possible when he reported to the Fuhrer after his nomination to a commanding general in middle February nineteen forty.
At that time, the Fuhrer had already planned and committed down to tactical details beyond the strategic operations up to the commandos he needed for Eben email. With an incomparable insistence, he pushed through his strategic ideas and all tactical measurements. When Manstein presented his ideas for an offensive campaign, he could by that time only confirm what the Fuhrer had intended. Field marshal Keitel and general Jodl were hanged at Nuremberg. General Schmunt became a victim of the July.
But the field marshal confirmed what I heard from him in Winiza in the notes he left. The courageous inspired strategy of the Western campaign was explicitly and absolutely Hitler's work. He alone was the chief commander of the French campaign. Where the acts of Hitler are least known is in the domain of war strategy. Apart from Cartier, who in his book, Les secreis de la guerre des voile a Nuremberg has established, supported by documents, the breadth of the military genius of the fuhrer, it is fashionable among the minds that think themselves distinguished to speak with an ironic condescendence of Hitler's interventions in the war operations of his time.
However, it is Raymond Cartier who is right. The most sensational thing about Hitler was, and history will indeed recognize it one day, his military genius, an eminently creative genius, a stunning genius. The invention of modern strategy was his work. His generals applied with more or less conviction, his instructions. But left to themselves, they would not have been worth more than the French and Italian generals of their generation.
They were, like them, of an older war, having hardly detected before 1939 the importance of the combined action of air force and tanks that Hitler obliged them to employ. Even de Gaulle, who is a pioneer figure in this domain, was that only partially. He understood that the brakes of the front would never be obtained by scattering the combat tanks battalion by battalion, with common cannons, with limited support. In that, he knocked down the outdated theories of the French general staff. By contrast, what de Gaulle did not understand and Hitler did with a vivacity of a genius was the indispensable combination of land assault by means of the mass of tanks surging at a precise point and of the simultaneous aerial assault of squadrons of planes attacking and crushing waves, the fixed point of brakes, crushing everything, opening a hole.
Without the Stukas, the break of the panzer divisions at Sedan on 05/13/1940 would not have been possible. It was the massive fall of thousand Stukas on the left bank of the Meuse that forced opened a path. Some German military men understood remarkably from the beginning, from 1934, the importance of the new strategy that Hitler explained to them. The Guderian's, for example, the Rommel's, the Manstein's. But to tell the truth, they were officers who were little known, even little important.
They were also discovered by Hitler, who sensing that they were receptive, pushed them forward, provided them with orders and the instruments. They were only a handful. The mass of German generals, recalcitrant or little convinced of these novelties, remained up to 1940. Specialists highly qualified in an outdated strategy which would not have in any way permitted the conquest in three weeks of the whole of Poland, nor especially the fabulous motorized cavalcade from Sedan to Nantes and Lyon in May 1940. Hitler was, militarily, an inventor.
People still talk of errors that he may have committed. The extraordinary thing would have been that, obliged to invent constantly, he did not commit any. But he invented, besides the strategy of motorized regrouping of land forces and air forces, which one would teach in military schools all over the world, also operations that were totally diverse, such as the landing in Norway, the conquest of Crete, the adaptation of tank warfare to the sands of Africa, of which nobody had thought up to then, and even also airlifts. That of Stalingrad was difficult, complicated, and perilous in a different way from that of the Americans in Berlin ten years later. Hitler knew each detail of the motors, every advantage or disadvantage of the pieces of artillery, every type of submarine or ship, and the composition of the navy of every country.
His knowledge and his memory regarding all these chapters was prodigious. Nobody caught him off guard. He knew about these thousand times more than his best specialists. Further, it was necessary to possess strength of will. He had that always to a supreme degree.
Politically, only his steel will broke all the obstacles, made him conquer the extraordinary difficulties that would have broken any other man. It brought him to power in an absolute respect for the laws, recognized legitimately by the Reichstag, where his party with the most numbers in the Reich was still, however, a minority the day Marshal Hindenburg appointed him chancellor. Strength and ruse, Hitler was clever, crafty, and also cheerful. He has been depicted as a wild brute, rolling in fury on the floorboards, biting the carpet with his canines. Between ourselves, I do not know really how this mandibular exploit would have been possible.
I spent many days and many nights close to Hitler. Never did I witness one of these furies that have been described so many times. That there might have been a few of these is certainly not impossible. What man, bearing on his shoulders thousand times less care than Hitler, has never blown off his top? Who is the husband who has not made noisy scenes with his wife, who has not slammed the doors, who has not broken a dish or two?
That Hitler sometimes mounted his high horse is not improbable, so much more that causes of irritation were not lacking. Imbecile generals who did not understand anything, who withdrew, who did not obey at all, who sabotaged orders, collaborators who lied, a rhythm of production that was not maintained, setbacks that appeared from all sides, fatal betrayals within his immediate entourage. But even then, Hitler was capable of remaining perfectly calm. I remember a quite typical case. One afternoon in the 1944, I was at Hitler's, where I had just arrived with Himmler in his long green car.
We were taking tea when, suddenly, a stupefying piece of news fell on us. The British airborne divisions had just been parachuted with complete success in Holland, just behind the Germans, at Arnhem, near Nemege. It was the entire system of the Western defence attacked from behind, and the access to the Ruhr threatened in an immediate and direct manner. It has been recounted, later, complacently, that a Dutch traitor of the resistance had, in advance, informed the Germans of this plan, which would have allowed the annihilation in a few days of these British divisions. This is a lie, one more lie, like so many others that were thrown up after 1945.
I can say that because I was there when the news was announced to Hitler and Himmler. It struck them dumbfounded. But I saw also what happened thereafter. Hitler, regaining his composure in two minutes, convoking his general staff, analyzing the situation for two hours, thinking of the facts of the case, then, in the general silence, dictating his orders slowly without any rise in his voice. It was impeccable and magnificent.
He stopped. He asked that they bring him some hot tea. And having closed the subject of the war, he spoke to me until the night about liberalism. I assure you that he had not eaten the carpet that afternoon with his teeth. He even made some jokes, then left, calm, slightly bent, to walk under the pines with Blondie, his dog.
Not only were these stories of the extreme fury of Hitler rather fabulous, but he was a delicate man, full of attentions. I have seen him prepare sandwiches himself for one of his collaborators who was leaving on a mission. One night when I was discussing matters with Marshall Keitel in a shack, he, the Abstimius, appeared bearing a bottle of champagne to cheer up our conversation.
@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker
This TikTok account was banned after posting this. https://t.co/EViXsLkDbD
Video Transcript AI Summary
frazzled drip is a video that was on Anthony Weiner's laptop in a folder on his desktop titled "insurance." The laptop was taken during an investigation into Anthony Weiner, and the video in question was in that folder. The video depicts a woman who is the same height, build, haircut, facial features, and attire as Hillary Clinton. There is a second woman who fits the same description to Huma Aberdeen, which was Anthony Weiner's wife. In the video, which appears to be the basement of Comet Pizza in Washington DC, both of the females are shown laying different children on top of ping pong tables in the basement, molesting those children, frightening those children with weapons, and then drinking something, which would line up with the theory that it is the blood of those children for purposes of extracting adrenocryl.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you, report on an episode, called frazzled drip?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: And, is frazzled drip, something about cutting off the faces of children under a pizza parlor, or what is it? Can you tell me what frazzle drip is, Phil?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Drazil drip is a video that was on Anthony Weiner's laptop in a folder on his desktop titled insurance. And the laptop in question was taken during a investigation into Anthony Weiner. And the video in question, frazzledrip, was in that folder. And video depicts a woman who is the same height, build, haircut, facial features, and attire as Hillary Clinton.
And there is a second woman who fits the same description to Huma Aberdeen, which was Anthony Weiner's wife. And in the video, which looks like the basement of Comet Pizza in Washington DC, it shows both of the females in the video laying different children on top of ping pong tables, which are in the basement, molesting those children, frightening those children with weapons, and then drinking something, which would line up with the theory that it is the blood of those children for purposes of extracting adrenocryl. Thus.