reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Tiktoker has unhinged meltdown over Elon supporting Trump https://t.co/XjixV3B373
Video Transcript AI Summary
I dislike Elon Musk because he has donated $10 trillion, which he doesn't need as a trillionaire. He supports other trillionaires instead of donating to important causes like the Biden Harris campaign. Additionally, he made Twitter worse and his father owns emerald mines.
Translation: I dislike Elon Musk because he has donated $10 trillion, which he doesn't need as a trillionaire. He supports other trillionaires instead of donating to important causes like the Biden Harris campaign. Additionally, he made Twitter worse and his father owns emerald mines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I hate Elon Musk. Do you even know how much money he has donated? It's a Trump. $10,000,000,000,000. He doesn't need that money.
He's already a trillionaire. There's trillionaire supporting other trillionaires. You know how much money of that could be donated to worthwhile causes? Like like the Biden Harris campaign. He made Twitter suck.
And his dad owns Emeralds mines.
@Eddies_X - Eddie
@elonmusk Here's 4+ minutes of Dems saying DJT is H!tler, an existential threat to democracy; he must be assassinated, punched in the face, fought against in the streets, etc! https://t.co/hM7bmcxeSo
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump is described as an existential threat to democracy and fundamental freedoms. Some suggest physically assaulting him, with one person saying they'd like to punch him in the face. Another asks, "Where is John Wilkes Booth when you need him?" and someone else admits to having thought about blowing up the White House.
There are calls for unrest in the streets and for people to start taking to the streets, with one person stating, "We gotta be ready to throw a punch."
Trump and MAGA Republicans are accused of representing extremism that threatens the foundations of the republic, echoing language used in Nazi Germany. Trump is also accused of pushing an antisemitic trope. Some express fear that a Trump reelection would be the end of the country as we know it. One person claims to feel Hitler in the streets. There are repeated calls to fight.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I will go and take Trump out tonight. Take him out now. Donald Trump is an existential threat to our democracy and our most fundamental freedoms.
Speaker 1: Don't give them the power. Look. Are they a threat to democracy? Yes. Are they going to take our rights away?
Yes.
Speaker 0: In this moment, our fundamental freedoms are on the ballot, and so is our democracy.
Speaker 1: She's a genuine danger to American security.
Speaker 0: Let me just say something. We are fighting for a democracy. If you had to be stuck in an elevator with either president Trump, Mike Pence, or Jeff Sessions, who would it be? Does one of us have to come out alive?
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. I think you need to go back and then punch him in the face.
Speaker 0: Then I thought you should punched
Speaker 1: him in the face. Feel like punching him. I'd like to take him behind the gym if I were in high school. If you're in high school, I'd take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him. No.
I wish we were in high school, I could take him behind the gym.
Speaker 0: He said, well, what do you think I should've done? So I think you should've punched him in the face and then gotten out of the race. You would've been a hero.
Speaker 1: I'd like to punch him in the face. Punch some people in the face. When was the last time an actor assassinated the president? They're still gonna have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump, and that's a fact.
Speaker 0: Look as his character is stabbed to death. Where is John Wilkes booth when you need him?
Speaker 1: Put this way. I'll play it another way.
Speaker 0: I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House.
Speaker 1: Please get up in the face of some congresspeople.
Speaker 0: Throw a hand over the People will do what they do. Don't even know why there aren't uprisings all over the country. Maybe there will be.
Speaker 2: There needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there is unrest in our lives.
Speaker 0: We gotta be ready to throw a punch. We have to be ready to throw a punch.
Speaker 1: We're fighting that. What we've gotta do is fight in congress, fight in the courts, fight in the streets. We'll fight him and challenge him in every way that we can. In the congress, in the courts, and in the streets. Getting people engaged in the fighting.
Speaker 0: People need to start taking to the streets. This is a dictator. Enemies of the state. And sadly, the domestic enemies to our voting system and our honoring our constitution, are right at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Well, this is just a warning to you Trumpers.
Be careful. Walk lightly. And for those of you who are soldiers, make them pay. Trying to figure out how did people get basically, drawn in by Hitler? How did that happen?
Speaker 1: He talks about the blood of America is being poisoned. Echoing the same exact language used in Nazi Germany. Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represented extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.
Speaker 0: And we hear this all the time. People say, gosh. If back in the day, if only one person had the courage to stop Hitler I think one thing you and I agree on is Donald Trump is an existential threat to this country. What in your view would happen if he were to be reelected? I think it would be the end of our country as we know it.
You could see it in countries where, well, Hitler was duly elected. Most
Speaker 1: importantly, and I mean this from the bottom arc, Trump is a threat to this nation. The dehumanizing rhetoric of Adolf Hitler is once again alive and well on a national political stage. This time, of course, in the United States. This time given life by former president and current Republican presidential front runner, Donald Trump.
Speaker 0: Let's recognize this comment for what it is. A long standing anti semitic trope that the true allegiance for Jews is to their religion rather than their country. It was used in Nazi Germany to justify the arrest, persecutions, and mass killings that attempted extermination of the Jewish people. Trump has been pushing this trope for years.
Speaker 1: There's an extremist movement that does not share the basic beliefs in our democracy, the MAGA movement.
Speaker 0: And I didn't know devils could be resurrected, but I feel Hitler in these streets, a mustache traded for a toupee. They're not gonna stop before election day in November, and they're not gonna stop after election day. And that should be everyone should take note of that on both levels. That this isn't they're not gonna let us and they should not.
Speaker 3: And fight, we will. As we will fight. And we will fight. We will fight. We will fight.
Speaker 4: We're gonna fight. We are gonna fight. We're gonna fight.
Speaker 1: We're gonna fight.
Speaker 0: We're gonna fight.
Speaker 4: We're gonna fight. And I will fight.
Speaker 3: The fight, fight, fight, fight. It is a fight. It's a fight, and it is a fight.
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across an incredible moment at an Elon Musk rally where he responded to a Trump critic. The critic expressed concerns about Trump and the 2020 election, questioning the implications of a second Trump presidency for young voters. Musk countered by dismissing the characterization of January 6th as a violent insurrection and argued that the protesters had some merit. He also pointed out the inconsistency of voter ID requirements compared to vaccine IDs, concluding that those who label Trump a threat to democracy might actually be the real threat.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
This is the best thing you will see on the internet all day. A Trump hater infiltrated Elon Musk's rally, but Musk gracefully schooled him with an epic mic drop moment. TRUMP HATER: “Trump did not and has not accepted the results of the 2020 election, one which has been called the most secure in the nation's history by the former president's own Department of Homeland Security. Similarly, I saw the violent disruption of the electoral vote count on the news during January 6th. “So, I ask this as a first-time voter who wants to discern the truth. What would you say to comfort the concerns of young voters like me who are worried that voting for a second Trump presidency will lead to democratic backsliding? @ElonMusk: “The media tries to characterize January 6th as some sort of violent insurrection, which is simply not the case. That is false ... There have to be a lot of guns for it to be a violent insurrection.” “It's not as though the January 6th protesters had no merit. They had some merit. I disagree with the magnitude of what they did. But it's not as though there were no issues [with the election].” “Almost every country on Earth has voter ID requirements, but we don't. Why? And why do the same people who demanded vaccine IDs for you to do anything say no ID for voting? Something doesn't add up. It doesn't add up. My firm opinion is that those who say Trump is a threat to democracy are themselves the threat to democracy.” (Mic Drop)
Video Transcript AI Summary
A first-time voter asked Elon Musk how to assuage young voters' concerns that a second Trump presidency would lead to democratic backsliding, given Trump's denial of the 2020 election results and the January 6th events.
Musk responded that the media misconstrues Trump's words and that people should listen to his full speeches. Regarding January 6th, Musk stated Trump told people to "do not do violence" and recommended deploying the National Guard, but Nancy Pelosi allegedly refused. Musk believes characterizing January 6th as a violent insurrection is false.
Musk stated that the protesters had "some merit" and that there were "voting irregularities that are hard to explain." He questioned the lack of voter ID laws in the US, especially compared to other countries and vaccine ID requirements. Musk concluded that those who say Trump is a threat to democracy are themselves the threat to democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, mister Musk. It's an honor to meet you. So my question is this, and I ask this as a first time voter. As we know, Trump did not and has not accepted the results of the 2020 election, one which has been called the most secure in the nation's history by the former president's own department of homeland security. Similarly similarly, I saw the violent disruption of the electoral vote count on the news during January 6th.
So my and I ask this as a first time voter who wants to discern the truth. Sure. What would you say to comfort the concerns of young voters like me who are worried that voting for a second Trump presidency will lead to Democratic backsliding?
Speaker 1: Well, I think that's a fair question, honestly. The I I think it's it it it it is it is a it is a a fair question. I mean, the the thing is that, like I'm I'm I'm I wanted to sort of frame this correctly. And and obviously, anything I say, the the legacy media is gonna take a sound bite, out of what I say and and and misconstrue what I'm saying, which is something they've done with President Trump many times. It is very important.
If you've heard something bad about President Trump, listen to his whole speech. That's actually very important. And, you know, on January 6th, I mean, his statements on that day, he told people to back down. I mean, he said he said, do not do violence. And then people were, like, saying, well, that's actually some sort of dog whistle about doing violence.
I'm like, what are you supposed to say? You know? He he did actually tell people to to, not not be violent. He recommended, that, the National Guard be deployed. Nancy Pelosi said no.
Don't believe what I don't so I was there. He didn't
Speaker 0: call for any violence. He didn't
Speaker 1: call for any violence. Exactly. And if you look at like, while while it's obviously, you know, I think it was, you know, an like, the level of disruption, was was high. And I I don't I don't applaud any any kind of, damage to public property, of course, that, you know, but it's, the media tries to characterize January 6 as some sort of violent insurrection, which is simply not the case. I mean, that is false.
So I would take, I think, probably what I think is the reasonable middle ground, which is I disagree with the level of protest, but it was in no way a violent insurrection. So there's got to be a lot of guns for it to be a violent insurrection. And there were a lot of strange things from a vote in terms of voting irregularities that are hard to explain. So, what it's yeah. I mean, There were things that are statistically unlikely, let me put it that way.
And so it's not as though the January 6 protesters had that their protest had no merit. They had some merit. I disagree with the magnitude of what they did, but I I I I but it's it's not as though there were no issues. There were actually there were issues. And and we have this weird situation in America where, it is almost impossible to prove fraud, because if you've got no voter ID and mail in ballots, how do you prove fraud?
And And it does seem more than a little odd that we don't have voter ID. And in New York, states like California, which is super majority Democrat, they passed a law banning voter ID in any election whatsoever. Now how is that supporting democracy? That's not supporting democracy. I mean, that's insane.
Almost every country on Earth has voter ID requirements, but we don't. Why? And why do the same people that demanded vaccine IDs for you to do anything are the same ones who say no ID for voting? Some of it doesn't add up. It doesn't it doesn't add up, you know?
So I I I actually think I I I mean, my my my firm opinion is that those who who say Trump is a threat to democracy are themselves the threat to democracy. Make some noise.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
@stclairashley - Ashley St. Clair
Executive Director of Progress Libs (@ProgressLibs) Maya Luna (@RealMayaLuna) posts image depicting assassination of Elon Musk amid Donald Trump victory https://t.co/lsUIxssh70
@KylieJaneKremer - Kylie Jane Kremer
Democrat Senator Chris Murphy accuses Elon Musk of doing a "Heil Hitler" salute at Trump's rally and gets shut down by UN Ambassador Nominee Elise Stefanik during her Senate hearing today. @elonmusk should sue the hell out of @ChrisMurphyCT https://t.co/KuZibctaFy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk did not perform any salutes at the rally. He is a visionary who supports the U.S. space program and aims to improve government efficiency. The American people recognize his contributions and support successful entrepreneurs.
Concerns were raised about reactions from right-wing commentators and extremist groups who interpreted a visual from the rally as a neo-Nazi salute. However, the focus should be on combating antisemitism, which has surged recently. The intention is to bring moral clarity to the role at the United Nations and to continue condemning antisemitism, emphasizing President Trump's strong leadership in this area.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you think of Elon Musk, perhaps the president's most visible adviser, doing, 2 Heil Hitler salutes last night at the president's televised rally?
Speaker 1: No. Elon Musk did not do those salutes. I was not at the rally, but I can tell you I've been at many rallies with Elon Musk who loves to cheer when president Trump says we need to send, you know, our US space program to Mars. Elon Musk is a visionary. I'm looking forward to his work in DOSH, the Department of Government Efficiency and look forward to looking how we can be more efficient and effective, but that is simply not the case.
And to say so is the the American people are smart. They see through it. They support Elon Musk. We are proud to be the country of such successful entrepreneurs. That is one of our greatest strengths as Americans.
Speaker 0: Let me share with you what a few Americans have said about it. Evan Kilgore, a right wing political commentator, wrote on x, holy crap. Did Elon Musk just hile Hitler at the Trump inauguration rally? This is incredible. We are so back.
Andrew Torba, who's the founder of the right wing Christian nationalist social platform, GAB, said incredible things are happening, as he, as he amplified the visual. The Proud Boys chapter in Ohio posted the clip on a Telegram channel with the text, Hyle Trump, a chapter of the white nationalist group, White Lives Matter, posted it on Telegram. Thanks for hearing us, Elon. The white flame will rise again. I could keep going.
Over and over last night, white supremacist groups and neo Nazi groups in this country, rallied around that visual. Does it concern you that those elements of the neo Nazi and white supremacist element in the United States believe that what they saw last night was a Neo Nazi salute.
Speaker 1: What concerns me is this is what you these are the questions you believe are most important to ask to the UN ambassador. I have a very strong record when it comes to combating antisemitism. We just had a historic election where President Trump earned historic support from American voters because of his strong leadership combating antisemitism, which has been a scourge across the country skyrocketing since October 7th. So I intend to bring moral clarity to this position and continue to speak out as a voice, as a, beacon of light, condemning antisemitism at the United Nations.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
"Nobody elected your ass! This is not Elon Musk's country!" - Rep Maxine Waters goes on an unhinged rant attacking Elon Musk at the anti-Elon rally. All this drama because Americans simply asked what our tax dollars are funding. https://t.co/tNRwfAKNPi
Video Transcript AI Summary
California, we need to address Elon Musk. Nobody elected him to control our private information or payments. He's profited enough from our government and now wants to dictate how we manage our finances. We must protect our federal employees and assert that this is our country, not Musk's or Trump's. The billionaire class is trying to dominate and profit at our expense, but we will not allow it. They are creating cryptocurrency to enrich themselves, not to benefit the people. We must stand firm, regardless of the weather, and demand decent jobs and respect. Musk won't even meet with local officials, showing his disregard for the community. We cannot be intimidated; when the people fight, we win. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: California. Hello, everybody. We have convened here in the right place, the Treasury Department. We have got to tell Elon Musk nobody elected your ass. Nobody told you you could get all of our private information.
Nobody told you you could be in charge of the payments of this country. We have told you you've made enough money off our government yourself. And now you wanna take everybody else's payroll and make sure that they don't make the kind of money that you have made. Oh, you wanna use our money to go to Mars? No.
We wanna use our money right here in Washington, DC, in this country. We wanna make sure that all of our federal employees are protected. We've got to make sure that you know and understand nobody elected you. You think you're the pro president of The United States Of America, the co president that can take over, go into our private payment system, and do whatever you wanna do. You got another thought coming.
We're gonna stop you right now. Ladies and gentlemen, we're at a crisis in this country. We're having in a crisis in this country because Trump and Elon Musk and the billionaires have decided they're gonna put us all in our place. They're gonna run this country. They're gonna make sure that they take over everything.
Are we gonna let them do that? Are we gonna let them run this government in the way that they can make even more money? And so they won't stop. It is so brazen. Every day, they're taking new actions.
They're taking executive actions. Every day, they're doing something. Do you know that Trump and the billionaire class have created more cryptocurrency? Do you know that that cryptocurrency is not a donation? It's not an investment.
It's going into their pockets. Do you understand that the moneymakers are in charge, they think. But when the people decide that we're not going to be trumped on, that we're not gonna be walked on, that we're not gonna be stomped on, that we're not gonna allow them to control our lives and push us out that when they understand that, we will win. That's it. That's it.
We've got to be prepared to be out here no matter how cold it is, no matter if it's the rain, no matter if it's snowing, we've got to be here. This is our country. This is not Elon Musk's country. This is not Trump's country. This is our country.
We deserve to have decent jobs. We deserve to have the respect. We deserve to be treated in a way that all Americans should be treated. And so let me just tell you now. I have Elon Musk's major office in my district.
He won't even meet with the local elected officials. He said he was gonna tunnel under from his office all the way to the airport so he didn't have to be among, the need for people on the ground to get to the airport. He is a low down dirty, no good person along with Trump that cannot be trusted, and we must not be afraid of them again. When the people fight We win. When the people fight We win.
When the people say that you'd better see us because we damn sure see you. Thank you very much. Go ahead. Thank you. Thank you.
@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand
WOW: Stephen Miller goes SCORCHED EARTH on Democrat complaints that @elonmusk is ‘unelected’ “The unelected power in this country is the rogue bureaucracy. USAID is unelected! The FBI that persecuted President Trump for 8 years is unelected!” He’s exactly right. https://t.co/7OinXcGxLU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The term "unelected" used by Democrats is misleading. Donald Trump was elected in a landslide, and his staff, including the national security adviser and chief of staff, serve at his pleasure. They are implementing the agenda chosen by the American people. The real unelected power lies within the bureaucracy, such as USAID, the FBI, and the CIA, which have acted against Trump. President Trump is working to restore democracy by asserting control over the federal bureaucracy. He is the only individual elected by the entire nation to carry out the agenda that reflects the voters' wishes, while other officials are elected at local or state levels. Ultimately, the president is in charge of the federal executive branch.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The the Democrat use of the term unelected is really quite remarkable here. Donald Trump was elected in an overwhelming landslide. These are Donald Trump staffers. In the sense, like, saying that Mike Walls, the national security adviser, is unelected or Susie Wiles, the chief of staff, is unelected or Donald Trump's communications team is unelected. This is presidential staff that serves at the pleasure and for the president just as I do.
I am a staffer for the president of The United States. He is elected. He is the one that American people have chosen to implement his agenda. This is the agenda the American people voted for that he is asking his staff, his subordinates, his employees to implement. The unelected power in this country is the rogue bureaucracy.
USAID is unelected. The FBI that persecuted president Trump for eight years is unelected. The CIA and those who have laundered intelligence to try to change the foreign policy of The United States are unelected. President Trump is restoring democracy by controlling the federal bureaucracy. There is one man in the country who is elected by the whole American people to implement an agenda they support.
That is the president. Every other officer in this country Yep. Members of congress and senators are elected at the state or local level. Let me ask you something. I have to continue.
One man in charge of the federal executive branch, and that's the president. I understood.
@WesternLensman - Western Lensman
Deranged Maxine has meltdown over CFBP, shouts "Elon Musk, where are you? Bring your *ss over here!" "He's a thief! He's a gangster!" It’s little wonder why Trump’s approval is soaring — these unhinged antics are high-grade American voter repellant. https://t.co/O75kXzh7Uw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Wow! Look at this crowd! We're at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, created by Dodd-Frank to help consumers fight back against predatory practices by big banks and student loan companies. Before this, people had nowhere to turn. Why would someone like Elon Musk want to dismantle this? Because he's a thief, a gangster, and he and his billionaire friends want to take over the country. Trump even said you can buy your way into power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. Wow. Wow. Look at this crowd. Elon Musk, where are you?
Bring your ass over here so you can see who's here and what we're doing. We're not afraid of you. We know that you are the co president now of The United States Of America. But ladies and gentlemen, I want you to follow very closely what he's doing and how he has done it. First of all, we're here at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
What is it? This is so important. Prior to this being, organized in the Dodd Frank reforms, consumers didn't have any place to really file complaints. They didn't have anywhere to go when the biggest banks in America was ripping them off. The student loans were being undermined.
They didn't have any place to go. Why does Elon Musk wanna get rid of all of this? Because he's a thief. He's a gangster. He brings his billionaire friends along with him because they think that they can take over this country.
And Trump has said, you give me enough money, you can have
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Rep Maxine Waters is currently have an unhinged meltdown over Elon Musk: “Elon Musk, where are you?! Bring your ass over here! We're not afraid of you... He's a thief! He's a gangster!" https://t.co/57DAh3YiEQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Wow! Look at this crowd! We're at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a crucial agency created by Dodd-Frank reforms. Before this, consumers had nowhere to turn when big banks cheated them, especially regarding student loans. Elon Musk wants to dismantle this—why? Because he’s a thief, a gangster, and he and his billionaire buddies want to take over the country. Trump even said you can buy your way into power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. Wow. Wow. Look at this crowd. Elon Musk, where are you?
Bring your ass over here so you can see who's here and what we're doing. We're not afraid of you. We know that you are the co president now of The United States Of America. But ladies and gentlemen, I want you to follow very closely what he's doing and how he has done it. First of all, we're here at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
What is it? This is so important. Prior to this being, organized in the Dodd Frank reforms, consumers didn't have any place to really file complaints. They didn't have anywhere to go when the biggest banks in America was ripping them off. The student loans were being undermined.
They didn't have any place to go. Why does Elon Musk wanna get rid of all of this? Because he's a thief. He's a gangster. He brings his billionaire friends along with him because they think that they can take over this country.
And Trump has said, you give me enough money, you can have
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
“Trump and Elon with his kid giving a press conference is odd” Same people https://t.co/gzfTty9bHp
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw that Rep. Robert Garcia called for “ACTUAL WEAPONS” against Elon Musk in a supposed “fight for democracy.” This follows an ad in DC that seemed to call for Musk's assassination. The violence from Democrats is becoming undeniable, and they need to be held accountable!
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 #BREAKING: Dem. Rep. Robert Garcia just called for “ACTUAL WEAPONS” to be used against Elon Musk in this “fight for democracy.” This comes after an ad popped up in DC today, CLEARLY calling for the ass*ssination of Musk Democrats are VlOLENT. The events of this week have made that clearer than ever! THEY MUST BE CHARGED!
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe calling out Elon Musk directly is an effective way to confront the potentially irreversible transformation of the US government. The American public wants us to bring real weapons to this fight for democracy.
It's important to push back, especially when people like Marjorie Taylor Greene, who constantly lie and undermine the integrity of congressional hearings, demand decorum. If she's going to make a mockery of hearings, we as Democrats need to match that energy.
After those comments, we went into detail about Elon Musk's attempts to dismantle vital departments like Labor and Education. It's crucial to grab the public's attention, expose Elon Musk for who he is, and show that Marjorie Taylor Greene isn't a serious legislator.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna hear, why, but do you think that calling Elon Musk a dick is effective messaging for confronting what is a potentially irreversible transformation of the US government? Enormous
Speaker 1: way. And what I think is really important and what the American public want is for us to bring actual weapons to this bar fight. This is an actual fight for democracy, for the future of this country, and it's important to push back on the chairperson of this committee. I mean, Marjorie Taylor Greene talks about having decorum, about bipartisanship. This is the person that lies more than anybody else in the entire Congress.
And so if she is gonna make a mockery of hearings, I wanna make sure that us as Democrats are bringing that same level of energy. And, of course, after those comments, we went into exactly what Elon Musk is trying to do, dismantling the Department of Labor, dismantling the Department of Education, dismantling all of our consumer protection agencies. And so it's all important, but it's also important to get the attention of the American public and call Elon Musk out for what he is and to make people know that Marjorie Taylor Greene is not a serious legislator and she shouldn't be treated as such.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Hi. Want to see a murder on live TV? I give you White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller vs. generic CNN Karen. CNN Karen complains that the White House is prosecuting Illegal Aliens who commit tax fraud. Then, Fatality… https://t.co/l0jC8WoRNq
Video Transcript AI Summary
When a crime is committed, there should be an investigation. The federal government will find every illegal alien who is stealing American taxpayer dollars. If IRS investigators find illegal aliens stealing taxpayer money, they'll be referred to ICE and homeland security investigations.
Illegal aliens in mass have fake Social Security numbers and fake identities, those are felonies. Why should there be an entire class in this country that is immunized from criminal prosecution and arrest for committing felonies? Yes, they will be investigated and prosecuted. Americans will get jobs, benefits, and houses.
If it is found that a crime has been committed, they'll be referred. If it justifies the prosecution, they'll be prosecuted. If it justifies the deportation, they will be deported. No one is given immunity anymore. No one is given permission to break the law anymore because this is not a country if illegal aliens can freely steal billions of taxpayer dollars.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You mentioned yesterday, and you mentioned again here, illegal immigrants who are getting child tax credits. If are are you looking for that information in the IRS data? Anytime
Speaker 1: a crime is committed, of course, there should be an investigation. Is it your position that if somebody who is Steven, you
Speaker 0: looking for that information in the IRS data?
Speaker 1: The federal government will find every illegal alien who is stealing American taxpayer dollars, and that is what Americans expect. I fast track federal question.
Speaker 0: It's a simple question. When you find that information in the IRS data and share that with law enforcement?
Speaker 1: IRS investigators find illegal aliens stealing taxpayer money, of course, they'll be referred to ICE. Of course, they'll be referred to homeland security investigations. Of course, they will be. Surely, your position is not that we should let illegal aliens steal taxpayer dollars. Again, you wanna talk about something to be upset about, that's it.
What do you think? The millions of illegal aliens who've also stolen Social Security. Illegal aliens in mass have fake Social Security numbers. They have fake identities. Those are felonies.
Why should there be an entire class in this country that is immunized from criminal prosecution and arrest for committing felonies. Felony theft of taxpayer information, felony theft of Social Security, felony theft of identity. These are all crimes. And, yes, they will be investigated. Yes, they will be prosecuted.
And, yes, illegals be And you know what happens when those deportations occur?
Speaker 0: Just very quickly.
Speaker 1: Americans will get jobs. Americans will get benefits. Americans will get houses.
Speaker 0: Steven, if they got a child if they got a credit, a child tax credit, and they they will be referred, you're saying, to ICE for that, and you would expect deported for that. Is that is that the position of the administration?
Speaker 1: If it is found that a crime has been committed, they'll be referred. If the if it is justifies the prosecution, they'll be prosecuted. If it justifies the deportation, they will be deported. This will be based on existing IRS protocols and procedures for criminal investigation and fraud. Alright.
The difference is that no one is given immunity anymore. No one is given permission to break the law anymore because this is not a country. This is not a sovereign territory. If illegal aliens can freely steal billions, with a b, billions of taxpayer dollars. And I would have to imagine that that CNN, which is endlessly talking about the importance of democracy and the rule of law, would say that no class in this country should be above the law, least of all illegal aliens who've trespassed on our territory.
Speaker 0: Steven, I'm just asking I wanted to get your position on some things. This we're not taking a position here. We wanted to get some answers to some questions. There are so many questions that need to
Speaker 1: be answered. Doesn't to me like you are,
Speaker 0: in
Speaker 1: fact indifferent or unbiased on these questions, but thank you.
Speaker 0: Steven Miller, thank you so much for your time. Really appreciate it, and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
BREAKING: Indiana Man Arrested For Death Threats Towards Elon Musk As Democrats Across The Country Call For Violence Against Trump Administration Officials » WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE: https://t.co/NmB35gUTZA https://t.co/uAglOaUIdn
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Southern Indiana man was arrested for publicly posting death threats against Elon Musk. This is part of a pattern where such violent rhetoric is normalized, aimed at creating chaos and potentially leading to violent uprisings.
The left is in meltdown mode, and violent acts against right-wing figures are downplayed. Democrats and NGOs are inciting violence against figures like Musk. We showed a compilation of people calling for violence against Trump and Musk.
We need a compilation of leftists calling for violence, including politicians. They are gearing up for massive violence and false flags against illegal alien protests, black churches, and colleges. They might stage an event to blame Trump supporters, similar to how the FBI tried to incite violence before.
Also, our best-selling product, concentrated Irish sea moss, is sold out, but available at realalexjones.com along with other products.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Southern Indiana man has been arrested for reported death threats for Elon Musk that he posted publicly saying, I'm coming to kill you. Look at this guy. And and, again, they want so many of them talking like this that it just normalizes it. They wanna overwhelm us, and they and they and they do want a summer of rage, and and they are planning violence and violent uprisings as Jamie Raskin and James Carball and all of the said if Trump wins were gonna do this. And that's what they're building up to and getting ready.
Speaker 1: Were you better off four years ago? Are you gonna be better off in a penitentiary four years from now, still having the right of free speech and the right of political dissent? Because that's literally what's what's on the ballot. And I suspect in 1941, I don't know if people thought they were better off than they were four years ago or in 1861, what people thought. But I know this, when the republic was threatened, people picked up arms and answered the call or or, you know, when 1965 in the middle of the civil rights movement.
I think people decided they wanna take matters in their own hands and create a better country, and that's what I hope we do here in the next two weeks.
Speaker 0: The left has gone into absolute meltdown mode. And if a right winger showed up at the capitol trying to kill Hegseth and people, Molot cocktails and guns, it'd be big news, but just bloop. Or when, you know, somebody shows up trying to kill Elon, it's a routine thing here in Austin. Just bloop. Or we've had it.
It never hits the news. We don't talk about it. The point is is that when you've got all these democrats and these NGOs and prominent democrat preachers that have television programs, Places like Chattanooga last week saying, Elon Musk is stealing your Social Security, and the Bible says you kill someone that steals. People need to have violence. It's time to kill Elon Musk.
Why has it that guy been arrested? Well, Southern Indiana man has been arrested for reported death threats towards Elon Musk that he posted publicly saying, I'm coming to kill you. Look at this guy. And and, again, they want so many of them talking like this that it just normalizes it. They wanna overwhelm us, and they and they and they do want a summer of rage, and and they are planning violence and violent uprisings as Jamie Raskin and James Carball and all of the said of Trump wins.
We're gonna do this. And that's what they're building up to and getting ready, and it's extremely dangerous. So here's just a short compilation of people calling for violence against president Trump and Elon Musk and Doge workers who are federal employees. I just wanna remind everybody that when you get a credit card or a bank account or college or the doctor, Social Security number. Elon used to run PayPal.
He he's he's not in in life. It's all about being an established company as you don't screw people. It's the Democrats and these agencies that have already had all the social security numbers stolen over and over again by the communist, Chinese, and others. And and the office of personnel hack and all of that. And Elon's trying to fix that.
And and I know this audience knows that and and even most liberals do. I mean, they just wanna pretend because there's 1,500,000 NGOs, 1,100,000 are liberal. They get trillions a year, and even the lowest level swab that's a leftist is getting a check. Tens of billions of these people get checks. Not just government checks.
They get NGO checks from government money. And that's why they're so angry, and that's why they're so pissed off is because we're taking our money away from them. So let me premiere this compilation. We're getting this posted on x right now on Real House shows as well. Here it is.
Speaker 1: Are you trying to get crazy witnessing? Don't you know I'm local?
Speaker 2: All you your glocks and your switches and your. We need you right now at the White House.
Speaker 3: So you want Trump to get shot? I do. Why?
Speaker 2: You're in a hole. Because conservatives are dangerous. I want Trump
Speaker 4: in a body bag. I want John John Kennedy junior in a body bag on TV.
Speaker 3: I'm not dealing with this for four years. Both of them or one of them needs to get shot in the fucking face.
Speaker 2: We're not doing that grazing his skin, his ears. Okay? We're going full blown Lincoln, full blown Kennedy right now. Yeah. Either put a bullet between his eyes or mine.
So yeah. Thank you. I hope to feel somebody killed him. We need a better class of class of class. Well That's what we need.
Somebody is gonna have to, preferably someone who's already doing it, you know, so one of y'all. But somebody's gonna have to just throw their life away on this one. You know?
Speaker 4: Trump, you're gonna have your head chopped
Speaker 2: off. Like, off off with that mother head. I can't wait to see the breakdown of MAGA. Won't we Take the head off that snake. We're gonna
Speaker 1: kill both
Speaker 3: of them. Right?
Speaker 2: Just kinda take one for the for the team. You know? Just cut some somebody has gotta just, you know, kinda get in there. Go make history. Okay.
Because I will kill you. I will burn this whole place to the ground. For the love of God, somebody, please, anybody, just do it for humanity. Yeah. No.
You're right. I am crazy. I have lost my mind. What are you gonna do about it? You wanna find out just how much?
Listen. If I pull up to the Mexican restaurant and I see a truck, because let's face it, it's gonna be a truck, with a truck bumper sticker, you're getting key.
Speaker 3: You have
Speaker 2: to be white for this to count. Okay? If you're a white male, even if you don't approach me, I will shoot you. Yeah. I know.
And for all you maggots out there that are taking our videos and archiving them, saving them for later, Are you gonna post them? What you gonna do with them? Mhmm. Yeah. I don't think you're gonna post them.
Speaker 3: They're gonna die. Right?
Speaker 2: People will die. You don't know what that is like. I can promise you that. All I'm saying right now is that someone in the White House would better take their shot right now and better not this. My doors are open for you if you need a safe house.
You're mad. You're mad.
Speaker 4: And Trump is a rapist pig.
Speaker 0: This place.
Speaker 2: You are the enemy. What does that tell you about where we are as a country? We're cutting the lawn right now. Okay? And the head of the snake is gonna be in there.
You have no clue what that's like. You get away from me. Get away from me. You get away from me. None of you have even been to war, so you don't have a fucking goddamn idea what it's like.
Speaker 0: Alright. That that's just some of the recent stuff from the left. Just a small sampling. But but I wanna take that video, and I wanna put Carmel on saying Trump's coming to kill black people leading an armed uprising. I want Raskin saying civil war conditions.
I want the black preacher, the big black preacher that you know, his wife gets NGO money came out saying Elon Musk is stealing your money. Kill him. I mean, I I mean, we have all the clips, hundreds of them of of of the latest with Maxine Waters saying, this is a war. We're gonna take you out. All those other congresspeople, we're coming.
We're gonna destroy you. We're gonna demolish you. I mean, there's hundreds of those. That's the compilation we need. It's not McBrayne's fault putting that out.
I said, give me a compilation of leftist calling for violence, and I didn't say politicians. I know it's a big job, but we need that to show people. I've played all these clips recently individually. What we need is to, you know, just just take a selection of them. You you know, Phil Mudd saying the government's gonna kill Trump.
That's an older one, but, you know, he was a deputy head of the CIA and ran those operations. And who what what do you think happened in Butler, Pennsylvania? So, yeah, we're having a huge victory, but we need to understand here that these people are gearing up for massive violence. And most importantly, they're gearing up false flags against illegal alien protests, black churches, and colleges. Because the Democrats keep saying, Trump and Tom Homan and Trump supporters are gonna kill migrants in mass.
They're gonna mow them down with guns. You've seen it on CNN, MSNBC, everywhere. And the Republican on the panels will go, well, where where are they calling for that? Oh, he's gonna come with arms, and they're gonna shoot the migrants. No.
Somebody's gonna stage a false flag and blame him. And then again, the day before the election, we learned that FBI tried to get a crazy white supremacist to go shoot up a black church in where? Tennessee. So that's their move. They've said that's gonna be their move, and they're gearing all their people up to go crazy once they have another George Floyd event, but something much bigger.
I mean, a lot of the country got burned down in the summer of twenty twenty over George Floyd. Imagine if somebody mows down a bunch of illegal aliens at one of these protests for the weapon of Mexican flags. And you know the deep state is trying to wind up crazy to do it, but if they can't find a nut ball to do it, they'll do it themselves. Now they know they're being watched. They know they're losing control.
They're badly coordinated, and I I hope they're smart and don't do it, but it's it's one of their only moves. My fellow patriots, I've got some bad news for you. I've also got some good news. Our number one all time best selling product at the AlexJonesstore.com has sold out. The concentrated Irish sea moss, we call it ultimate sea moss because it's the strongest, most concentrated out there, the superfood.
It has sold out. But there is a clone of the site with our same sponsor that runs it, and it has its own inventory right out of the same warehouse in Arkansas. That is realalexjones.com. So not just the sea moss that's not available at the Alex Jones store, but some of the other products that are sold out as well are still available at realalexjones.com. They're incredible products.
They empower you, make you healthier, and they fund our operation. So if you love these products, which I know a lot of you do, or if you haven't tried these products, go now to realalexjones.com and find out how amazing these products are.
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 LMAO! Elon Musk just paraded around the stage at CPAC with a chainsaw given to him by Javier Milei 🤣 "THIS IS THE CHAINSAW FOR BUREAUCRACY!" 🔥 https://t.co/NcL2f22xjO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Alright, this is the chainsaw for bureaucracy. Turns off. Alright. I love it. Mister president, thank you so much. Alright. Beautiful. You.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the chainsaw for bureaucracy. Turns off. Alright. I love it. Mister president, thank you so much.
Alright. Beautiful. You.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 WHAT A CLOWN SHOW! Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-FL) keeps saying "President Musk" and calling Trump "Grifter-in-Chief" during an Oversight Meeting. When other members call him out, he just keeps obstructing. https://t.co/4UiM0sz2QZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to talk about waste, fraud, and abuse. People like President Musk and Trump are using their public offices to enrich themselves by billions of dollars. Why is there silence about looking into the actions of the president and the richest man on Earth?
I will say President Musk and Trump often use their public offices to enrich themselves. I will withdraw calling Trump "grifter-in-chief."
It's despicable that this committee is silencing me for bringing up that Trump is making millions of dollars.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People like the grifter in chief Trump and President Musk are openly using their public offices to enrich themselves to the tune of billions of dollars. So if we wanna look at waste, fraud, and abuse, which I'm down to do, why is there complete silence on the other side of the aisle about looking at the complete grifter that is the president of The United States and the richest man on the earth, which is looking into things like social security and different things like that? Why don't we investigate Out of order. The real
Speaker 1: corruption Put put off. Hold off. Of order. I appreciate time. Point of order, mister chairman.
Point of order. Hold off. Hold off. Hold off. There was a point of order when you said something.
Who who I'd who asked for it? Mister Higgins. Mister president. Would you like to revise your remark, with respect to improperly identifying the president of The United States?
Speaker 0: I'll say president Musk and grifter and cheap Trump. Alright. Grifter and
Speaker 2: Mister chairman, point of order.
Speaker 1: What is
Speaker 2: If I wanted to challenge someone to a fight, they would know it. Thank you.
Speaker 3: Chairman, if mister Musk actually came here, then maybe the rule of
Speaker 1: the committee I heard no disparagement.
Speaker 0: I'll say something else.
Speaker 1: We'll save a lot of time.
Speaker 0: I'll say something else.
Speaker 1: Okay. Alright. We're gonna let chair recognize mister Frost. You still have $3.49. You're gonna maybe revise the the disparaging comment about the president, because that's supposed to be our decorum here.
And
Speaker 0: It is supposed to be. President Musk and the president of The United States, Donald Trump, who is engaged in grifting of the American people often use their public offices to enrich themselves. Someone on the other side was just asking how would you feel if you called someone else
Speaker 1: from the office? Off. Hold off, Mitch Frost. Hold off. There's a there's a pending motion for disparaging the president.
Speaker 0: I will say the president's grifting because you spent the last two years like president
Speaker 2: Biden Take down his words.
Speaker 1: So I
Speaker 0: can say I can say that Trump is What I will withdraw is calling him grifter in chief. That is what I will The
Speaker 1: chair sustains the point of order, and the words in question are ordered stricken from the transcript of this proceeding. So the member is barred from further participation.
Speaker 2: Miss Crockett,
Speaker 1: one. To next one. Don't count that. Go to the next one.
Speaker 2: Miss Randall votes no. Mister Subramaniam. Mister Subramaniam votes no.
Speaker 0: I wanna say it's despicable that this committee is going to silence me for bringing The
Speaker 2: gentleman's words have been taken down. He's not permitted to speak for the rest of the hearing.
Speaker 0: Making millions of dollars.
Speaker 1: Mister Fry mister ranking member, I'm gonna have the sergeant Arbs remove him if he doesn't refrain.
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 UPDATE: An ASTOUNDING **22** Democrat Senators have uploaded videos of themselves reading off an identical cringey script bashing Trump and Musk This is a REALLY tough watch 🤣 Just remember: the Democrats think you’re all stupid. https://t.co/zA9bVLyJlb
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Liberal man says that Donald Trump “needs to be sh0t”… ??? https://t.co/jTR4GUoZan
@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer
The last tweet that @infowars reporter Jamie White @whiteisthefury tweeted yesterday before he was murdered last night after leaving work was a tweet by @elonmusk asking “why are liberals so violent.” Chilling. I hope his killer is caught and jailed. Such a senseless tragedy. https://t.co/VuS3jHXM6V
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Hi. Want to see a murder on Live TV? I give you White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller vs CNN’s Kasie Hunt. Hunt asks if the Trump Administration ignored orders from the district judge to stop deportations. Then, Fatality… https://t.co/uvzgRwGhCS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration believes the president has the constitutional right to conduct national security operations, citing the Alien Enemies Act. They argue a district court judge cannot interfere with the president's authority to repel an alien invasion or foreign terrorist, as this is a Title 50, commander-in-chief authority.
The administration claims Tren de Aragua (TDA) is an alien enemy force sent by the Venezuelan government, triggering the Alien Enemies Act, which allows the president to act against invasions or predatory incursions directed by a foreign government. They state the president's decisions as commander in chief are not subject to judicial review.
The administration asserts that district court judges cannot enjoin the expulsion of foreign terrorists or direct military actions. They believe the Supreme Court will agree that the president's actions as commander in chief are not subject to judicial review. They also claim that individual deportations cannot be adjudicated by district court judges without undermining national sovereignty. The administration maintains there is no conflict between the judge's order and their actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you called the judge's order just earlier today, quote, patently unlawful, end quote, and said that it was an assault on democracy itself. Does that mean that the administration is ignoring this order, and might you ignore future court orders that meet the criteria you laid out?
Speaker 1: The president of The United States and his administration reserve all rights under the constitution to conduct national security operations and defense The United States. The Alien Enemies Act, which was passed into law by the founding generation of this country, men like John Adams, was written explicitly to give the president the authority to repel an alien invasion of The United States. That is not something that a district court judge has any authority whatsoever to interfere with, to enjoin, restrict, or to restrain any way. You can read the law yourself. There's not one clause in that law that makes it subject to judicial review, let alone district court review.
Speaker 0: So, Steven, when you when you say that this person has no authority at all, this is how our system works. It starts with these judges and then continues up. At what point does it become, in your view, legal for the justice system to be looking at this and making a judgment and I I I fail to see how there's any other way but to start with where we're starting here before you get to eventually the supreme court.
Speaker 1: Well so first of all, there's a there's a term in law, justiciable. This is not justiciable. In other words, this is not the president is exercising his article two powers to defend the country against an invasion or to repel a foreign terrorist that is unlawfully in the country, he's exercising his court article two powers as commander in chief.
Speaker 0: Is Venezuela invading The US?
Speaker 1: This is this is a very important point. This is a title 50 authority. It's a commander in chief authority. So just to ask you a simple question. You you talk about how the system works.
Does a district court judge have the right to direct or enjoin troop movements overseas? Yes or no?
Speaker 0: Well, Steven, my question I
Speaker 1: Oh, no. No.
Speaker 0: It's If you could answer my question
Speaker 1: first. In other words,
Speaker 0: the Is Venezuela is Venezuela invading our country in a way that would T t t t a.
Speaker 1: So under the so I'll answer yours, and you'll answer mine. Under the terms of the statute, Trane de Aragua is an alien enemy force that has come here as detailed at length in the proclamation at the direction of the Venezuelan government. The statute says that a president has the ability to repel an invasion or predatory incursion that is directed by
Speaker 0: a foreign government. Right? Are they a state or
Speaker 1: a government? This would be yes. It is it is documented. The the TDA was sent by the Venezuelan government in the proclamation. And here's an even more important point.
Under the constitution, who makes that determination? A district court judge elected by no one or the commander in chief of the army and navy? The president and the president's alone makes a decision of what triggers that
Speaker 0: determination statute. Actually at war with Venezuela, the nation state of Venezuela?
Speaker 1: You're not hearing understanding me. Read the statute. Alien Enemies Act seventeen ninety eight. It says if a predatory incursion is perpetrated by a foreign government so it lists a three three qualifying actions. It could be an act of war.
In the
Speaker 0: very beginning, there has to be declared war against a nation or
Speaker 1: a state. That's what it says. Wrong. Look up the statute. It's on my account on social media.
You can see it? The yes. It says or a predatory incursion or an invasion. The statute delineates three criteria for triggering the Alley Enemies Act. One is a act of war, which, by way, an invasion is an act of war, but put that aside.
One is an invasion, which this is. One is a predatory incursion, which this is. So it actually meets all three statutory criteria. But with respect to this particular statute, it's the proclamation is utilizing the incursion and invasion language in the statute. So but no.
But this is a very important question because no. No. No. Hold on. It's a very important question.
You said the way our system works is the president of The United States commands the armed forces of the country, commands the foreign policy of the country, and that's subject to district court review. That is
Speaker 0: fundamentally not true. I never said that, Steven. I did not say
Speaker 1: never been true.
Speaker 0: This was not a military upper I mean, the
Speaker 1: A district court judge can no more enjoin the expulsion of foreign terrorists to foreign soil, that he can direct the movement of air force one, that he can direct the movement of an aircraft carrier, that he can direct Marco Rubio to engage the diplomacy in a
Speaker 0: country. Or not? Like, does the Supreme Court of the United States have any say over the things that you were just outlining right here?
Speaker 1: I believe what the Supreme Court will say is what I just said, which is that the president's conduct here is not subject to
Speaker 0: judicial review. You are acknowledging that they do in fact have a say here. Well Even though you think they may agree with you.
Speaker 1: What we are expecting is the Supreme Court to say what has always been the case, which is when the president is using his powers as commander in chief, those determinations are not subject to judicial review. In other words, the president's designation of as a foreign terrorist organization and as an alien enemy are part of his inherent plenary authority. There is no
Speaker 0: way what point in
Speaker 1: this system, how how are you going to expel illegal illegal alien invaders from our country who are raping little girls, who are murdering little girls if each and every deportation has to be adjudicated in a district court judge? And that means you have no country. Sovereignty. It means you have no future. It is fundamentally incompatible to have a country and have individual expulsions adjudicated by a single district court judge.
Speaker 0: I'm just trying to figure out at what point
Speaker 1: in the
Speaker 0: system do you because what does the Trump administration believe? Because we do have separation of powers in this country. I hear what you're saying.
Speaker 1: Yes. Of powers.
Speaker 0: This is
Speaker 1: the judiciary interfering Steven. Let me finish. Executive function.
Speaker 0: Let me That
Speaker 1: is the separation of powers. That is
Speaker 0: order here because you thought you could?
Speaker 1: So the judge's order and the actions taken by the departments of defense, justice, and homeland security are not in conflict. And the department just has been clear that they are not in conflict. But I So you think that
Speaker 0: you did go along with the order that the judge put out? You do not think that the Trump administration I agree. This order?
Speaker 1: As the justice department said, there is no conflict between the judge's order, and the action is taken by the departments I just listed. But I'm making a deeper and more fundamental point. Yeah. The district
Speaker 0: court has to,
Speaker 1: in any way, restrain the president's authorities under the Alien Enemies Act or his ability to conduct the foreign affairs of United States. Let me paint a picture for you. President Trump and secretary of state Marco Rubio had engaged in intensive intensive diplomacy to obtain a bilateral security agreement with the nation of El Salvador. If a district court judge So can join that bilateral security agreement Again. Then we do not have a democracy.
Major argument. Got it. Policy.
Speaker 0: Heard you say this. I've Did did you ignore did the ignore the order from the district judge?
Speaker 1: I've It's
Speaker 0: a simple question.
Speaker 1: I've and I've answered it. I've I've answered it because this the department has made a filing in the court. But let me make another point. The judge in this case put the lives of every single person on those aircraft at risk. Did he know how much fuel was in those planes?
Did he know the flight conditions? Did he know the weather conditions? Did he know how many crew hours? Did he know the need for crew rest? Did he know any of that?
No. This judge violated the law. He violated the constitution. He defied the system of government that we have in this country.
Speaker 0: Courts because that does to
Speaker 1: be what you're arguing. The same the same district court judges didn't do a damn thing to stop Joe Biden from flooding this nation with millions of illegal aliens. Do these district court judges didn't issue any injunctions to save the lives of Jocelyn Mungry, Blake, anyone
Speaker 0: courts. Is that what you're saying?
Speaker 1: What I'm saying is that what you said, there's a separation of powers. The the the judiciary exercises
Speaker 0: judgment and relief. I don't speak for the White House. You you are here to speak
Speaker 1: for the White House.
Speaker 0: Will I just want you to answer that one simple question. I am.
Speaker 1: Ready? Here we go. Under a proper reading of the constitution, district court judges provide relief to individual plaintiffs seeking relief. District court judges do not have the authority as a general matter to enjoin the functioning of the executive branch, but their authority is at its lowest point when the president is exercising his powers as commander in chief. And I asked you a question.
You never answered it. Can a judge enjoin troop movements overseas? Can a district court judge enjoin troop movements overseas? Stephen?
Speaker 0: Yes, sir. I I am not gonna get into the the
Speaker 1: the This And then you'll know that I'm right.
Speaker 0: Is a separate question.
Speaker 1: You'll know that I'm right.
Speaker 0: Okay. We're not talking about other other truths of me. I need to ask you about something else. The president
Speaker 1: issued a proclamation d delineating delineating in detail how the Venezuelan regime sent this gang, this terrorist organization to our shores. And by the way and I and I love being here, but all the outrage that we are seeing from the Democrat party and from the corporate
Speaker 0: media
@RealJamesWoods - James Woods
Watching Stephen Miller field dress the carcass of this poor liberal lap dog is entertainment of the highest order. https://t.co/R5omj0qTXt
Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration believes the president has the constitutional right to conduct national security operations, citing the Alien Enemies Act. They argue a district court judge cannot interfere with the president's authority to repel an alien invasion or foreign terrorist, as this is a Title 50, commander-in-chief authority.
The administration claims Tren de Aragua (TDA) is an alien enemy force sent by the Venezuelan government, triggering the Alien Enemies Act, which allows the president to act against invasions or predatory incursions directed by a foreign government. They state the president's decisions as commander in chief are not subject to judicial review.
The administration maintains there is no conflict between the judge's order and the actions of the Departments of Defense, Justice, and Homeland Security. They argue a district court cannot restrain the president's authority under the Alien Enemies Act or his ability to conduct foreign affairs, such as bilateral security agreements. They also claim the judge's order put lives at risk by interfering with flight operations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you called the judge's order just earlier today, quote, patently unlawful, end quote, and said that it was an assault on democracy itself. Does that mean that the administration is ignoring this order, and might you ignore future court orders that meet the criteria you laid out?
Speaker 1: The president of The United States and his administration reserve all rights under the constitution to conduct national security operations and defense The United States. The Alien Enemies Act, which was passed into law by the founding generation of this country, men like John Adams, was written explicitly to give the president the authority to repel an alien invasion of The United States. That is not something that a district court judge has any authority whatsoever to interfere with, to enjoin, restrict, or to restrain any way. You can read the law yourself. There's not one clause in that law that makes it subject to judicial review, let alone district court review.
Speaker 0: So, Steven, when you when you say that this person has no authority at all, this is how our system works. It starts with these judges and then continues up. At what point does it become, in your view, legal for the justice system to be looking at this and making a judgment and I I I fail to see how there's any other way but to start with where we're starting here before you get to eventually the supreme court.
Speaker 1: Well so first of all, there's a there's a term in law, justiciable. This is not justiciable. In other words, this is not the president is exercising his article two powers to defend the country against an invasion or to repel a foreign terrorist that is unlawfully in the country, he's exercising his court article two powers as commander in chief.
Speaker 0: Is Venezuela invading The US?
Speaker 1: This is this is a very important point. This is a title 50 authority. It's a commander in chief authority. So just to ask you a simple question. You you talk about how the system works.
Does a district court judge have the right to direct or enjoin troop movements overseas? Yes or no?
Speaker 0: Well, Steven, my question I
Speaker 1: Oh, no. No.
Speaker 0: It's If you could answer my question
Speaker 1: first. In other words,
Speaker 0: the Is Venezuela is Venezuela invading our country in a way that would T t t t a.
Speaker 1: So under the so I'll answer yours, and you'll answer mine. Under the terms of the statute, Trane de Aragua is an alien enemy force that has come here as detailed at length in the proclamation at the direction of the Venezuelan government. The statute says that a president has the ability to repel an invasion or predatory incursion that is directed by
Speaker 0: a foreign government. Right? Are they a state or
Speaker 1: a government? This would be yes. It is it is documented. The the TDA was sent by the Venezuelan government in the proclamation. And here's an even more important point.
Under the constitution, who makes that determination? A district court judge elected by no one or the commander in chief of the army and navy? The president and the president's alone makes a decision of what triggers that
Speaker 0: determination statute. Actually at war with Venezuela, the nation state of Venezuela?
Speaker 1: You're not hearing understanding me. Read the statute. Alien Enemies Act seventeen ninety eight. It says if a predatory incursion is perpetrated by a foreign government so it lists a three three qualifying actions. It could be an act of war.
In the
Speaker 0: very beginning, there has to be declared war against a nation or
Speaker 1: a state. That's what it says. Wrong. Look up the statute. It's on my account on social media.
You can see it? The yes. It says or a predatory incursion or an invasion. The statute delineates three criteria for triggering the Alley Enemies Act. One is a act of war, which, by way, an invasion is an act of war, but put that aside.
One is an invasion, which this is. One is a predatory incursion, which this is. So it actually meets all three statutory criteria. But with respect to this particular statute, it's the proclamation is utilizing the incursion and invasion language in the statute. So but no.
But this is a very important question because no. No. No. Hold on. It's a very important question.
You said the way our system works is the president of The United States commands the armed forces of the country, commands the foreign policy of the country, and that's subject to district court review. That is
Speaker 0: fundamentally not true. I never said that, Steven. I did not say
Speaker 1: never been true.
Speaker 0: This was not a military upper I mean, the
Speaker 1: A district court judge can no more enjoin the expulsion of foreign terrorists to foreign soil, that he can direct the movement of air force one, that he can direct the movement of an aircraft carrier, that he can direct Marco Rubio to engage the diplomacy in a
Speaker 0: country. Or not? Like, does the Supreme Court of the United States have any say over the things that you were just outlining right here?
Speaker 1: I believe what the Supreme Court will say is what I just said, which is that the president's conduct here is not subject to
Speaker 0: judicial review. You are acknowledging that they do in fact have a say here. Well Even though you think they may agree with you.
Speaker 1: What we are expecting is the Supreme Court to say what has always been the case, which is when the president is using his powers as commander in chief, those determinations are not subject to judicial review. In other words, the president's designation of as a foreign terrorist organization and as an alien enemy are part of his inherent plenary authority. There is no
Speaker 0: way what point in
Speaker 1: this system, how how are you going to expel illegal illegal alien invaders from our country who are raping little girls, who are murdering little girls if each and every deportation has to be adjudicated in a district court judge? And that means you have no country. Sovereignty. It means you have no future. It is fundamentally incompatible to have a country and have individual expulsions adjudicated by a single district court judge.
Speaker 0: I'm just trying to figure out at what point
Speaker 1: in the
Speaker 0: system do you because what does the Trump administration believe? Because we do have separation of powers in this country. I hear what you're saying.
Speaker 1: Yes. Of powers.
Speaker 0: This is
Speaker 1: the judiciary interfering Steven. Let me finish. Executive function.
Speaker 0: Let me That
Speaker 1: is the separation of powers. That is
Speaker 0: order here because you thought you could?
Speaker 1: So the judge's order and the actions taken by the departments of defense, justice, and homeland security are not in conflict. And the department just has been clear that they are not in conflict. But I So you think that
Speaker 0: you did go along with the order that the judge put out? You do not think that the Trump administration I agree. This order?
Speaker 1: As the justice department said, there is no conflict between the judge's order, and the action is taken by the departments I just listed. But I'm making a deeper and more fundamental point. Yeah. The district
Speaker 0: court has to,
Speaker 1: in any way, restrain the president's authorities under the Alien Enemies Act or his ability to conduct the foreign affairs of United States. Let me paint a picture for you. President Trump and secretary of state Marco Rubio had engaged in intensive intensive diplomacy to obtain a bilateral security agreement with the nation of El Salvador. If a district court judge So can join that bilateral security agreement Again. Then we do not have a democracy.
Major argument. Got it. Policy.
Speaker 0: Heard you say this. I've Did did you ignore did the ignore the order from the district judge?
Speaker 1: I've It's
Speaker 0: a simple question.
Speaker 1: I've and I've answered it. I've I've answered it because this the department has made a filing in the court. But let me make another point. The judge in this case put the lives of every single person on those aircraft at risk. Did he know how much fuel was in those planes?
Did he know the flight conditions? Did he know the weather conditions? Did he know how many crew hours? Did he know the need for crew rest? Did he know any of that?
No. This judge violated the law. He violated the constitution. He defied the system of government that we have in this country.
Speaker 0: Courts because that does to
Speaker 1: be what you're arguing. The same the same district court judges didn't do a damn thing to stop Joe Biden from flooding this nation with millions of illegal aliens. Do these district court judges didn't issue any injunctions to save the lives of Jocelyn Mungry, Blake, anyone
Speaker 0: courts. Is that what you're saying?
Speaker 1: What I'm saying is that what you said, there's a separation of powers. The the the judiciary exercises
Speaker 0: judgment and relief. I don't speak for the White House. You you are here to speak
Speaker 1: for the White House.
Speaker 0: Will I just want you to answer that one simple question. I am.
Speaker 1: Ready? Here we go. Under a proper reading of the constitution, district court judges provide relief to individual plaintiffs seeking relief. District court judges do not have the authority as a general matter to enjoin the functioning of the executive branch, but their authority is at its lowest point when the president is exercising his powers as commander in chief. And I asked you a question.
You never answered it. Can a judge enjoin troop movements overseas? Can a district court judge enjoin troop movements overseas? Stephen?
Speaker 0: Yes, sir. I I am not gonna get into the the
Speaker 1: the This And then you'll know that I'm right.
Speaker 0: Is a separate question.
Speaker 1: You'll know that I'm right.
Speaker 0: Okay. We're not talking about other other truths of me. I need to ask you about something else. The president
Speaker 1: issued a proclamation d delineating delineating in detail how the Venezuelan regime sent this gang, this terrorist organization to our shores. And by the way and I and I love being here, but all the outrage that we are seeing from the Democrat party and from the corporate
Speaker 0: media
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Woke liberal says that MAGA needs to “shut the fck up” with supporting Donald Trump and Elon Musk.. Only 4 months in.. 😅 https://t.co/5cuBK4bC1m
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses extreme indifference to commenters, stating they do not care what commenters say. They repeat the phrase "Shut the fuck up" multiple times, suggesting commenters should be silent. The speaker offers to simplify their message for better understanding, then reiterates "Shut the fuck up."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And you bitches be in my comments like I give a fuck. Like I give a fuck. Time with a Trump. We love mess. Shut the fuck up.
Shut the fuck up. Do you know what I'm saying? Do you need me to bring it down to your level? Here, let me give it to you like this. Shut the fuck up.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Just watched this without sound and it’s even better
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Full video of an Elon Musk Deranged psychopath who keyed a neighbor's Tesla, shot it, and got arrested. FAFO! https://t.co/Y14TZCbSzM
Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual is questioned on private property after loud noises and vandalism to a car are reported. The individual claims to have been walking home from the store and investigating the noise. The questioner notes the individual is on private property and asks if they always walk on strangers' properties. The questioner asks if the individual is targeting Tesla vehicles due to disliking Elon Musk. The individual admits to disliking Musk but denies vandalism. The questioner points out the individual is holding keys and questions why they aren't in a bag with groceries. The individual is asked to empty their purse and bag. The questioner finds keys with paint on them and a weapon allegedly used to damage the car. The individual attempts to flee but is apprehended and read their Miranda rights. The individual accuses the questioner of targeting a poor older lady.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's going on, man?
Speaker 1: The whole thing, I
Speaker 0: was just, you
Speaker 1: know, in the neighborhood. I'm coming from the store, and I heard this noise, and I want to see what was going on.
Speaker 0: You heard a noise. You wanted to see what was going on?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I heard some, like, loud noises coming from over here.
Speaker 0: Were you just
Speaker 1: I'm going was going home.
Speaker 0: Okay. But this isn't on your way home. This is private property. The owner actually just called us, reported vandalism to car. Somebody was keying it.
Speaker 1: Me. I mean, it's not gonna
Speaker 0: mean, I
Speaker 1: was literally just, you know, I'm just walking around the neighborhood.
Speaker 0: Okay. But you're on his property right now?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Because I just want to investigate to see what happened.
Speaker 0: You always just walk on strangers properties?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I heard something. You know, I just wanted to see what was going on.
Speaker 0: Let's take a look over
Speaker 1: here. Oh,
Speaker 0: wow. All kinds of chemo? Do you mind telling me what you're actually doing? Are you one of those Elon guys?
Speaker 1: Oh, god. I mean
Speaker 0: You don't don't really like what he's doing in the government? Thought you'd take it out on Tesla?
Speaker 1: I I mean, I'm gonna admit I don't like him. Yeah. I don't like anything that has to do with him. I mean but I do that.
Speaker 0: What are
Speaker 1: I'm holding my keys because I'm going home.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But why would you just have your keys out in your hand? Why wouldn't they be in your bag if you're carrying groceries? That doesn't make sense.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. You got them here. I didn't see it.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Uh-uh. I'm gonna hold on to these here. Let me see the bags. Alright, ma'am.
I'll need you to empty out your purse. The bag on your back.
Speaker 1: A couple months anyway, but, I mean, I'm I have right to have it on. Oh,
Speaker 0: wow. So assuming that this is what you're saying, you have the right to have on you?
Speaker 1: Yes. I mean, this is America.
Speaker 0: Alright. So you've got keys with the paint all over them. A weapon that was clearly used to to shoot these holes in it. Hey. Stop it right now.
Hey. Get over here. Stop. Hands behind your back. No.
Really? Thought you're gonna outrun me?
Speaker 1: Can't run. You
Speaker 0: have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law. I highly suggest you exercise that right. Let's go. Move.
Whatever. You just lost your groceries now too.
Speaker 1: Oh, are you gonna eat them? Nothing better to do than pick a freaking poor older lady? Move. Alright. Come on, man.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨 Liberal calls for the DEA*TH of President Trump today before he signs the Big Beautiful Bill "You don't think they'll do it outside will they? If someone wants todo it we will support you." https://t.co/JUoEmLap3B
Video Transcript AI Summary
A ceremony is planned for the signing of a bill. The speaker speculates about the possibility of it being held outdoors, suggesting July 4th as a potentially "cool" date. The speaker expresses support for anyone who may be undecided.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I hear they're holding a ceremony so that he can sign this big beautiful bill into law. Do you think it's gonna be outside? No. They wouldn't. But, like, on the July 4, be a cool time to do it.
If anyone's, like, on the fence, we would support you. 100%. That'd be real nice.
@FFT1776 - Sheri™
“The Left is the Party of Murder” ~ Elon Musk Bluesky users calling for “Elon next”. FFS!! Arrest someone for accessory before they kill everyone! https://t.co/DpkBnuarWl
@cb_doge - DogeDesigner
BREAKING: Somali TikToker threatens Elon Musk’s life: "I wouldn't worry too much about him. He about to die." Protect Elon Musk at all costs. https://t.co/ei8wcZsS6g
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 challenges claims that something is fake, saying, "If you will say like this this this is fake, I'm like, I'm like, let's look at, Let's go forward in the air." They express a stance of moving forward and not worrying about "this one," stating, "I wouldn't worry too much about this one." They then say, "He that I'm back," followed by, "I wouldn't worry too much about him," and conclude with, "He better die."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you will say like this this this is fake, I'm like, I'm like, let's look at, Let's go forward in the air. I wouldn't worry too much about this one. He that I'm back. I wouldn't worry too much about him. He better die.