reSee.it - Related Post Feed

forrestmaready
Posted - June 24, 2021 at 10:12 PM
Saved - January 30, 2025 at 1:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to discuss the fervent dedication of various sectors, including government and tech, to promoting the coronavirus vaccine. It seems rational thought has vanished, with any dissent being heavily censored, even from esteemed experts. The push for vaccines feels like a religious devotion, where science and technology have replaced traditional beliefs. Many view vaccines as saviors, leading to irrational behaviors and a refusal to consider alternative treatments. I believe this mindset stems from a deep-seated worship of science, overshadowing honest discussions about the vaccine's risks.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

I want to explain why so many in government, tech, public health, pharma, and philanthropy are SO dedicated to pushing the coronavirus vaccine, no matter what. Got a minute?

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

If you haven’t noticed, all rational thought seems to have left the planet. Governments, health officials, technology companies, and everyone else are pushing an experimental medical therapy—the coronavirus vaccine—on anything with two legs.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

They are censoring any message, video, tweet, or post that questions the coronavirus vaccine at any level—even from some of the most prestigious doctors, scientists, and epidemiologists on the planet.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

It doesn’t matter if thousands of people are dying from the shot. It doesn’t matter if you’re the guy that invented mRNA vaccines. If you don’t push the narrative that the coronavirus vaccine—and only that—will save us, you are seen as the enemy.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

Why is that? Why are people SO incapable of rational thought or discussion on this issue? It seems like scientists would WANT to have open and transparent conversations about this. But they don’t.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

Many people will say vaccines are all about money. Bill Gates is not pushing vaccines for money, no matter what you think. He doesn’t need more money. Money plays a tiny part in this whole charade.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

Some people will claim the coronavirus vaccine is part of a master plan for population control. There may be people who are actually taking part in something nefarious. Even if there are, that isn’t the main reason why ANY negative talk about vaccines is being censored.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

The main reason most of these government officials, public health officials, tech and pharma companies, and everyone else are so aggressive about protecting the coronavirus shots is because they have a RELIGIOUS devotion to vaccines.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

People tend to think of religion as based purely on an unseen deity, but in the last few decades, something else replaced this traditional definition: Science. Progress. Technology. For many people, these things have become that thing they worship.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

Humans are designed to worship something. It is in our DNA. It is unavoidable. And any people unwittingly found themselves worshiping at the altar of Science & Technology. They may still go to church. They may still pray. But their faith is more easily put in “science” than God.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

I can’t overstate how important this is to understand. All humans worship something. Even atheists. Many people, Christians included, have replaced God with Science and Technology as the most important entity in their lives.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

In the Christian story, Jesus is worshiped as Savior. In the modern age, vaccines are worshiped as Savior. Due to decades of propaganda—particularly regarding polio—many people have come to believe that vaccines saved humanity from certain death. I was one of those people.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

For those who worship Science and Technology, protecting the vaccine story is paramount. There is nothing else more important to maintain the faith of its followers than to sustain the myth that vaccines saved humanity from destruction.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

This is why discussion about Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin & other medicines is being deleted by those very people who worship Science & Progress. It doesn’t matter these may be miraculous drugs that could save thousands—vaccines are the most important thing. By far.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

This is why honest reporting about the experimental nature of the coronavirus vaccines will not be allowed. This is why stories about people who have been killed or their lives ruined by the vaccine will not see the light of day.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

This is why rational decision making is not going to happen regarding the coronavirus shots. This is why they’re recommending children who developed myocarditis after the first shot go ahead and get their second.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

Vaccines are the cornerstone to this modern religion. Nothing else matters. Not medicine. Not antibiotics. Not ground-breaking surgery. Vaccines are the savior. Everything else is a distant second.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

People who subscribe to the religion of Science and Technology do not realize they’re being irrational. They cannot see it when you point it out to them. They are behaving rationally (as far as they can tell) because they believe in Science and Technology’s savior: vaccines.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

So as you try and unpack and understand all the irrational behavior so many otherwise intelligent people appear to be exhibiting regarding the coronavirus vaccines, just remember: They are religious zealots who are protecting their savior. Nothing else matters.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

If you’re interested in the greatest myth ever told regarding vaccines, I have a book that covers the true story of polio called “The Moth in the Iron Lung.” You can get it here: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1717583679/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_764S08D6KY04KMSGZD5Y

503 - Service Unavailable Error amazon.com

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

If you’re interested in the greatest medical cover-up ever committed, I have a book that tells the true story of vaccines and autism called “The Autism Vaccine.” You can get it here: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07R825338/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_AN2EWKR9EJ28VSB8A98E

Sorry! Something went wrong! amazon.com
SynthIge
Posted - July 23, 2023 at 7:00 PM
Saved - August 8, 2023 at 6:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Doctors and scientists who deny the link between vaccines and autism are either ignorant or corrupt. Mechanistic evidence supports this claim. If a child has autism, avoiding dairy and trying folinic acid may help. Check out the references in the Substack article and Tweetorial for more information. Some doctors lie, while others refuse vaccines for their own family members. There's an antibody test for autism, and vaccines, not genes, can cause antibodies. Wakefield was wrongly accused. Censorship is used to hide the truth. Even unvaccinated children can develop autism due to their mothers' vaccines. The government has a history of lying. Many doctors are simply clueless.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

🧵DOCTORS AND SCIENTISTS ARE IGNORANT OR CORRUPTED LIARS. STILL BELIEVE VACCINES DO NOT CAUSE AUTISM? THINK AGAIN. References in thread to mechanistic evidence (difficult to cheat). If a child has autism, avoid dairy, try folinic acid (not folic) acid. https://rossignolmedicalcenter.com

HOME - Rossignol Medical Center rossignolmedicalcenter.com

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

2. Substack article with links to references for the above. https://vinuarumugham.substack.com/p/how-vaccines-cause-autism-a-visual

How vaccines cause autism - A visual summary Milk protein contaminated vaccines cause 75% of autism cases. Mom's vaccine can damage the fetal brain. vinuarumugham.substack.com

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

3. Tweetorial with links to relevant references.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

🧵 HOW VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM A tweetorial Immunology notes from the University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine describe that injecting a protein, OVA (egg protein ovalbumin) in this case, will cause the development of IgE antibodies that recognize and bind to OVA.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

4. Scientists, doctors lie.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

5.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

6.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

7. Offit told parents, babies can get 10,000 vaccines a day. Then he recommended against a 3rd COVID shot for his adult son, over several months. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10448853/Top-doctors-refuse-kids-shot-myocarditis-concerns.html

Top doctors refuse to give their own kids a third shot Dr. Monica Gandhi, an infectious-disease specialist, and Dr. Paul Offit, of the FDA's vaccine advisory committee, said that they would not let their kids get COVID booster shots. dailymail.co.uk

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTw2qEOxesU

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

9. Scientists attempt to blame autism on genes to distract from vaccines.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

@purrrmeowpurrr You are confusing genetic predisposition with causation. Drinking="autism genes" Driving=vaccines Auto accident=autism Drinking without driving = no auto accident Without vaccines, there is no autism epidemic. Purely genetic autism is very rare.@EmLyWill

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

10.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

🧵AUTISM, GENES and ANTIBODIES Antibodies are proteins that the body usually makes to protect against pathogens. Antibodies are part of the adaptive immune system. If you are infected by the measles virus, your body makes antibodies against the measles virus.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

11. There's an antibody test for autism. Genes cannot cause antibodies. Vaccines do.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

14. Autism antibody test https://www.fratnow.com/information-on-frat.html

ASD Testing And Sampling Guide - FRATNOW The significance of an autism test kit for an autistic child is that it generates antibodies to the receptor that lead to blocking the folate to enter the brain fratnow.com

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

13. Scientists lied about Wakefield.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

https://medium.com/@rosscocalrizian/a-thorough-analysis-of-the-case-against-dr-andrew-wakefield-by-mary-holland-jd-f4e7fa90602e#id_token=eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsImtpZCI6Ijk5YmNiMDY5MzQwYTNmMTQ3NDYyNzk0ZGZlZmE3NWU3OTk2MTM2MzQiLCJ0eXAiOiJKV1QifQ.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.KvNGFatvFmddmfSlhjnRHnXzobnkwPYvft9BIfZTYfwB5fk9i87Fc2t7JRYiCncxqjt8rcuNvhMqYDZlvSiNP2MqgFt4xlxLPAjHMtBzFVr2wbAjlVoScSUQxbIDlHEjqaWd2gNtCBEOfGoZ47TWPrNrMBRe9JSIuSws68yTyAU5dKeFcJwsLQop8gSj-Slp7F5N5SQUBsuPsyy-azE_WVEkn1p0JIGFyXfkO7HCj7pemjuDwQBEgb5-l-TB43DaPuZcb2P7PkOPr8Hkqr-gNt3lmkDSSDqI6iWaVtFfDT-Hj4C9lIwqDUCuaXN7qiavDX_eIXa8-CMvW6Kg1NiWhQ

A Thorough Analysis of the Case Against Dr. Andrew Wakefield by Mary Holland, JD Mary Holland is a research scholar at NYU School of Law. She has written and edited books and articles on human rights and law. She has clerked for a federal judge, worked at the Lawyers Committee… medium.com

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

14.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

@CadiusEldanesh @Sarahhdbristol @mawile832 Wakefield found a link between gastrointestinal disorders, autism and the MMR vaccine. I am referring to DtaP/Prevnar 13/ActHib vaccines. We have since analyzed and found protein sequence homology between measles, mumps, rubella viral proteins and bacteriophages in the gut. 1/

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

15. They need to censorship to cover up their lies.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

🧵Comment on VACCINES INDUCING AUTISM in the PEDIATRICS Journal CENSORED by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) @AmerAcadPeds @aap_peds posted my comment in 2018. I tweeted it 4 days ago. They removed my comment now. Archived link: web.archive.org/web/2022012815…

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

16. Even unvaccinated children can get autism due to Mom's vaccine.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

16. Women who have received the Tdap vaccine before or during pregnancy can make IgG4 against FRA. These IgG4 cross the placenta and block folate uptake to the fetal brain. So autism can begin in the womb. Even an unvaccinated child can therefore develop autism for this reason.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

17. The govt. has been lying about many many things since the Kennedy assassination. https://www.kennedy24.com/honest

For the People We are going to remake public institutions to serve the public. We will roll back the secrecy, end the surveillance, stop the censorship, and make government transparent. Learn more about our plan to restore integrity to government For the People. kennedy24.com

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

18.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

🧵PULLING OUT THE RUG UNDER MEDICINE The castle of Medicine is built on an egregious fraud known as epidemiological studies. The only science in these studies is the science of reliably committing fraud and corruption. Hence Medicine is the #1 killer.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

Most "doctors" are MORONS.

@SynthIge - IgE Synth #Kennedy24

Stupid clowns (a.k.a doctors) discover that randomly cutting out organs is bad for health. But these BLOODY MORONs know vaccines are safe. @medpagetoday @VPrasadMDMPH @ZDoggMD @AshishKJha46 @DrPaulOffit @celinegounder @meganranney @_SanjayGupta @neiltyson https://www.medpagetoday.com/surgery/thoracicsurgery/105729

Routinely Removed Organ Linked to Increased Mortality, Cancer Risk Cardiothoracic surgery often cuts out this little organ as irrelevant. Big mistake, study says medpagetoday.com
kacdnp91
Posted - September 30, 2023 at 10:53 AM
Saved - October 1, 2023 at 5:34 AM

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP🩺 Functional/Integrative Med

Save this before it disappears Dr. Trozzi was recently suspended on X which is all you need to know about our “free speech” as well.

@lawrie_dr - Dr Tess Lawrie

WCH's Dr Mark Trozzi has just published an organized library of more than 1,000 peer reviewed articles which show that Covid-19 "vaccines" are harmful. Please do bookmark and share this page for ongoing reference. https://drtrozzi.org/2023/09/28/1000-peer-reviewed-articles-on-vaccine-injuries/ @P_McCulloughMD @ABridgen @DrHoenderkamp…

1000 peer reviewed articles on “Vaccine” injuries Here is an organized library of more than one thousand peer reviewed articles which show that Covid-19 "vaccines" are harmful. drtrozzi.org
meantweeting1
Posted - November 10, 2023 at 5:04 PM
Saved - November 11, 2023 at 11:46 PM

@meantweeting1 - Epstein's Sheet. 🧻

Someone is DELETING vaccine injury cases from a U.S. Military Database. 🤫 https://t.co/Bdii3tQM1c

Video Transcript AI Summary
Lee Dennis, a human rights attorney, is working with Tom Rentz on a whistleblower issue in the military. They highlight a concerning trend regarding acute myocarditis cases in the Department of Defense (DOD). Initially, there were 1,239 cases, but now it has decreased to 307. Similarly, in January 2022, there were 176 cases, which has now dropped to 17. This drastic reduction raises suspicions. The military possesses a comprehensive dataset with baselines, showing that acute diseases in the years leading up to the COVID-19 vaccination were around 1.7 million. However, after the vaccine was mandated, the number skyrocketed to nearly 22 million in just 10 months. This significant increase suggests possible manipulation of the data, warranting further investigation and tough questions for the DOD.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Lee Dennis. I'm a human rights attorney that's working with Tom Rentz on the whistleblower issue in the military. In August, when the report was run on acute myocarditis in the DOD website, there were 1239 cases, and now when you run it, it's down to 307. In January of 2022, there were a 176 cases, and magically, they are now down to 17. There is a word for that. It's not suspicious. We have in the military the single best dataset we that exists because we have baselines in there. And acute disease across all categories in the preceding years, 5 years leading up to the vaccination year was 1,700,000. They introduced and mandated a COVID nineteen vaccine for our US military when they had only lost 12 service members total to the disease. And in the 10 months of 2021 after that, it jumped from 1,700,000 all diseases to darn near 22,000,000. That was a 20,000,000 increase. We need to not be calling this suspicious. With all due respect, we need to be asking hard questions of the DOD. So there appears to be doctoring of the data.
FreeWCH
Posted - December 4, 2023 at 2:54 AM
Saved - December 4, 2023 at 9:53 PM

@FreeWCH - World Council for Health (WCH)

Dr Mark Trozzi has published an organized library of more than 1,000 peer reviewed articles which show that Covid-19 "vaccines" are harmful. Please do bookmark and share this page for ongoing reference. ➡️ https://drtrozzi.org/2023/09/28/1000-peer-reviewed-articles-on-vaccine-injuries/

1000 peer reviewed articles on “Vaccine” injuries Here is an organized library of more than one thousand peer reviewed articles which show that Covid-19 "vaccines" are harmful. drtrozzi.org
KimDotcom
Posted - December 16, 2023 at 4:13 PM
Saved - December 17, 2023 at 11:56 AM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

A new study claims that 17 million people died globally because of Covid vaccinations. It’s time for governments around the world to release anonymized health data, without limitation, for scientific research on the harm of Covid vaccines. https://t.co/KHGWromI5X

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that based on the number of vaccine doses administered worldwide, they have calculated the toxicity of the vaccine and believe it would have killed 17 million people. They also mention a correlation between booster rollouts and an increase in all-cause mortality, which they observe in multiple countries. Another speaker adds that typically, deaths increase in winter and decrease in summer, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality right after vaccine campaigns, even in the summer. They note this pattern globally, including in the Southern Hemisphere. This phenomenon is described as unusual and unprecedented.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We calculate the toxicity of the vaccine for all ages and the number allows us given the number of doses that have been given worldwide to conclude that 17,000,000 people would have been killed by this vaccine. You can actually see when there's a rollout of a booster, for example, which happens very in time for a given age group, you can actually see immediately following it a maximum in the all cause mortality. So an excess mortality actual peak that's temporally associated with that rollout. We see that repeatedly for each rollout. All the countries that have sufficient data where you're able to look at it and you have both the vaccine data and the mortality data, this is what we see. Speaker 1: When you look at all cause mortality, you see that deaths are increasing in the winter and decreasing in the summer. And it's the opposite in the Southern Hemisphere. There, summer is our winter. So in the summer, you should have low debt. But during the COVID vaccine campaign, suddenly you see spikes in mortality right after vaccine campaigns, And it's very clear because it's in the summer where you should see a low death period. Speaker 2: Especially in the boosters like for the solar boosters like when you have a peak, Across the booster rollout basically everywhere at the same time around the world. And in the Southern Hemisphere, it's a trough, as Giovanni just explained. So we should have a trough. But then we have an actual Winterpeak, actual Boosterpeak and another Winterpeak. And that's everywhere in all the 17 countries we Speaker 1: worked out. Speaker 2: When that size is good in the Southern Hemisphere, we saw that picture. Speaker 1: And something you never saw before.
FreyjaTarte
Posted - December 29, 2023 at 12:59 AM
Saved - December 29, 2023 at 3:26 AM

@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™

Medical journal articles are disappearing. This is very disturbing. https://t.co/B69FUJ9epB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Scott Jensen discusses two concerning articles that have caught his attention. The first article discusses the concept of physician moral injury, where doctors feel betrayed by those in authority, causing them to compromise their commitment to patients. The second article highlights the disappearance of over 300 scientific papers related to COVID-19, suggesting potential substandard research and manipulation of narratives. Dr. Jensen raises concerns about the motives behind these disappearances and emphasizes the need for vigilance in the medical field.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. Doctor Scott Jensen here. Over the last 3 years, we have together talked about a lot of issues. We have talked about masks and modeling. We have talked about lockdowns and social distancing. We have talked about vaccines and mandates. We have talked about parental rights and a whole lot of other things including natural immunity, herd immunity, and what happened in nursing homes. Those issues will continue to be discussed as well they should, but I need to sound the alarm. I read medical journals all the time. And 2 articles that had an odd connection over the last week Came across my desk. 1st, Chris Mazzolini, editorial director of medical economics, Has an article about a book written by Wendy Dean, a physician, who talks about physician moral injury. You might ask yourself, what does that mean? Doctor Wendy Dean says that moral injury is this sense of feeling as if you're betrayed by somebody in a position of authority in a high stakes situation. And that situation causes you to transgress You're deeply held moral beliefs and expectations. And in medicine, those beliefs and expectations are the oaths that we took to put our patients first. This is what's happening to physicians when we feel that people in authority who we thought had our back and were doing the right thing. That they controlled us and didn't perform. And that caused us to potentially compromise our commitment to our patients. That has happened across the land, across the globe. Let's turn to the 2nd article. An article in Jazz Shaw called the medical field is erasing its own COVID era history. Here's what it says. Pfizer and the rest of the big pharma companies assured the government that everything was just fine with the vaccines because they had been doing super serious testing. And the government dutifully reported the cheerful news to us while using all of that data to impose lockdowns, mask mandates, and immunity passport systems. And now according to 1 group that tracks publications in scientific journals, A lot of the original research and test results are mysteriously disappearing. More than 300 papers and scientific articles have vanished in the past year. We have to be on red alert. What we're seeing is potentially substandard medical publications used to push forward, promote a narrative, and squash all other narratives. And now that some of the dust is settling, we're seeing these articles withdrawn, disappearing. You won't find them potentially on Internet. This is problematic. We knew during the pandemic that several specific instances occurred where high quality journals such as Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine, published articles that a short time later required a retraction or a revision or a redaction. We're seeing this happen in spades now. We're seeing 300 plus articles disappearing, and I think you and I both know why. In many situations. It was shoddy research. It was shoddy analysis. It wasn't peer reviewed or the conclusions drawn from the data were clearly spurious. And we asked the question, Was this born of a nefarious agenda? My friends, I don't remember any time in my 40 years of medical history. We're in a short span of time. Journal articles in the 100 and 100 We're disappearing. This feels like people are covering their tracks, and we need to pay attention. When medical journals that were used at one time to push a narrative and squash another narrative are now disappearing. My profession has a big problem.
USMortality
Posted - December 31, 2023 at 8:33 PM
Saved - January 1, 2024 at 12:50 AM

@USMortality - Ben

The correlation between vaccination and excess disability in the US is pretty stunning! https://t.co/XjanpE00CF

MakisMD
Posted - June 19, 2024 at 7:12 AM
Saved - June 20, 2024 at 3:58 AM

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

BREAKING NEWS: In 2023, The LANCET censored & CANCELLED a ground-breaking COVID-19 Vaccine Injury & Autopsy paper within 24hr after 100,000s downloads It has just passed peer review & will be PUBLISHED! 74% of sudden deaths due to COVID-19 Vaccine! @ABDanielleSmith#ableg https://t.co/gnzdLA9Rr7

Video Transcript AI Summary
We submitted a vaccine injury paper to The Lancet on COVID vaccine-related sudden deaths. The paper, co-authored by Dr. Peter McCullough, is the largest autopsy series in the world with 325 cases. 74% of sudden deaths were linked to the vaccine. Despite pressure, the paper passed peer review and will be published. More evidence is emerging on the harm of COVID vaccines, urging politicians to act preemptively.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just wanted to I just wanted to share a little bit of breaking news with you. I found out a few hours ago something that very exciting. Last year, some of us submitted, a vaccine injury paper to The Lancet, on the biggest journals in the world, co authored by doctor Peter McCullough, myself, doctor Mark Triosy, doctor Roger Hodkinson, and other doctors. That paper was about autopsy series, the largest autopsy series in the world of COVID vaccine, people who took COVID 19 vaccines and then died suddenly a few days or a few weeks after. That paper was downloaded 100 of 1000 of times, and within 24 hours there was so much pressure put on by the pharmaceutical industry that The Lancet took the paper down, canceled it, and basically wanted to cancel it forever, so that it would never see the light of day. I just found out a few hours ago that that paper has passed peer reviewed and is going to be published. It is it is the largest the largest autopsy series in the world. 325 autopsies of COVID vaccinated people who drop dead a few hours or a few days or a few weeks after taking the COVID 19 vaccine. We did a rigorous review of these autopsies, and we found that about 74% of the cases of sudden death were caused or contributed to by the vaccine. That is now a peer reviewed paper that's going to be published, and the reason I'm telling you that is that there is more evidence coming every single day, and it's not a little bit of evidence. It's not a case report here that they're gonna dismiss, or case report there, or a paper that The Lancet is going to take down, and say, don't look at this autopsy series, and we'll just bury it and make sure it never sees the light of day. There's going to be a tsunami of evidence of the harm of these COVID 19 vaccines, whether it's harming children, pregnant women, adults, and my message to the politicians is get ahead of this. Get ahead of this if you can. Don't chase after when all the evidence is out, and then you're caught with your pants down. Get ahead of it now.
sonia_elijah
Posted - June 20, 2024 at 9:48 AM
Saved - June 20, 2024 at 10:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
There is growing concern over the retraction of studies that question the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Several studies, including Mostert et al., Walach et al., and Mead et al., have been retracted or withdrawn from scientific journals. Additionally, reports by JesslovesMJK and P_McCulloughMD and Hulscher et al. have been withdrawn or removed. This censorship of scientific research raises concerns about the transparency and open discussion surrounding COVID-19 vaccines.

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

🧵 It appears the Mostert et al. study on excess deaths revealed too many inconvenient truths🔥 ‼️ Surge in #excessdeaths observed in Western World ‼️Questioning whether there could be a link with excess deaths & the experimental #Covid shots https://soniaelijah.com/p/bombshell-study-3-million-excess

BOMBSHELL STUDY: 3 MILLION EXCESS DEATHS IN 47 COUNTRIES Researchers from The Netherlands point out COVID-19 vaccines may be to blame soniaelijah.com

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

Now this 💣 study faces RETRACTION for daring to question the safey of the experimental jabs. https://www.soniaelijah.com/p/censoring-the-science-bombshell-study

CENSORING THE SCIENCE: Bombshell Study on Excess Deaths Faces Retraction Last week, the integrity of the peer-reviewed, Mostert et al. study on excess deaths, came under simultaneous attack from both the organisation affiliated with the Dutch authors, Princess Máxima Center, and the journal which first published the bombshell study, soniaelijah.com

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

This study is not alone - others have also been RETRACTED OR WITHDRAWN from scientific journals because they dared to point at the elephant in the room 💉 'The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy'- Walach et al. study RETRACTED from Vaccines👇 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693

RETRACTED: The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy Background: COVID-19 vaccines have had expedited reviews without sufficient safety data. We wanted to compare risks and benefits. Method: We calculated the number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) from a large Israeli field study to prevent one death. We accessed the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) database of the European Medicines Agency and of the Dutch National Register (lareb.nl) to extract the number of cases reporting severe side effects and the number of cases with fatal side effects. Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy. mdpi.com

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

Mead et al. study RETRACTED from Cureus journal👇 'COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign.' https://www.cureus.com/articles/203052-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-lessons-learned-from-the-registrational-trials-and-global-vaccination-campaign#!/

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the interim, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of these pivotal trials have emerged. Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards. Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data. The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted. Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered. cureus.com

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

'A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products' by @JesslovesMJK and @P_McCulloughMD WITHDRAWN from Current Problems in Cardiology 👇 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280621002267

WITHDRAWN: A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full… sciencedirect.com

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

'A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination' by Hulscher et al. was REMOVED from Preprints with The Lancet 👇 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lance papers.ssrn.com

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

Science is being #censored‼️

Xx17965797N
Posted - June 22, 2024 at 4:42 AM
Saved - June 22, 2024 at 6:56 PM

@Xx17965797N - Truthseeker

‼️⚠️LANCET STUDY On COVID Autopsies Finds 74% Were Caused By Vaccine -Study Removed Within 24 Hours⚠️‼️ https://t.co/mrRp83xqRx

Video Transcript AI Summary
A study on COVID vaccine autopsies was published in The Lancet, stating that 74% of deaths were caused by the vaccine. The study was removed within 24 hours, citing unsupported conclusions. The study reviewed 325 autopsies, with the cardiovascular system being the most affected. Most deaths occurred within a week of vaccination. The authors called for further investigation. The removal of the study raised concerns about censorship and the CDC's stance on vaccine-related deaths.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Listen to this. Lancet study on COVID vaccine autopsies find 74% were caused by the vaccine that got published at The Lancet and they immediately removed it 24 hours later. Let me just break it down and then we'll come to you for your comment. A Lancet review of 325 autopsies after COVID vaccination found that 74% of the deaths were caused by the vaccine, but the study was removed within 24 hours. The paper preprint was awaiting peer review. It was written by the leading cardiologist, you, doctor Peter McCullough, a Yale epidemiologist, doctor Harvey Reich, and their colleagues at the wellness company, and was published online on Wednesday on a preprint site on the prestigious medical journal. However, less than 24 hours later, the study was removed, and a note appeared stating that this preprint has been removed by preprints with the Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. While the study had not undergone any part of the peer review process, the note implies that it fell foul of the screening criteria. The original study abstract can be found at the Internet Archive and it reads, the rapid development and widespread deployment of COVID 19 vaccines combined with the high number of adverse event reports have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury, including systemic lipid nanoparticles, nl, NLP, and mRNA distribution, spike protein associated tissue damage, thrombocystinicity, immune system dysfunction, and carcinogenicity. The aim of the systemic review is to investigate possible causal links between the COVID 19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and postmortem analysis. We here's the method that you used. We searched for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID 19 vaccinations up until May 18, 2023. We initially identified 678 studies, and after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and 1 necropsy case. 3 physicians independently reviewed all the deaths and determined whether COVID 19 vaccination was a direct cause or a contributed significantly to the death. Their findings this is from the paper. Their findings, the most implicated organ system in COVID 19 vaccine associated death was the cardiovascular system, 53%, followed by the Hematological System, 17%, the Respiratory System, 8%, and multiple organ systems, 7%. 3 or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Now that's an interesting stat that we'll come to back in a second, but most deaths occurred within a week from the last vaccine administration. So they would consider those people, the CDC and the FDA and the government would consider those people not vaccinated. What? Because they don't consider you vaccinated until at least 2 weeks after you had your second shot. So when those people died, they were counting them as unvaccinated deaths from COVID. A total of 240 deaths, 73.9%, were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by the COVID 19 vaccination. And so the interpretation, the consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID 19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician led death adjudication, suggests that there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID 19 vaccines and death of these people in most cases. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings Without further detail from the preprints with the Lancet staff who removed the paper, it is hard to know what substance the claim that the conclusions are not supported by the method so again, they're not telling you why they took it down. And a number of the authors of the paper are at the top of their fields, so it is hard to imagine that the methodology of their review was really so poor that it warranted removal at initial screening rather than being subject to full critical appraisal. It smacks instead of raw censorship of a paper that failed to tow the official line. Keep in mind that the CDC has not yet acknowledged a single death being caused by COVID mRNA vaccines, autopsy evidence demonstrating otherwise is clearly not what the United States public health establishment wants to hear.
_aussie17
Posted - June 27, 2024 at 10:06 PM
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 12:39 AM

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Japanese cancer mortality due to vaccines paper retracted because of censorship! I'm shocked...not 🙄

@tom35345637 - tom とむ Jab Injuries Japan (JIJ) ワクチン傷害🇯🇵日本の声

A Japanese research paper published on Cureus in Apr 2024 Increased Age-adjusted Cancer Mortality after the 3rd mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan is retracted by the publisher! The authors report this was due to a complaint made by ⇒ https://t.co/Yd2FgAkopd

toobaffled
Posted - August 3, 2024 at 2:20 AM
Saved - August 3, 2024 at 1:36 PM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

"More than 300 medical journal articles have disappeared within the last year." https://t.co/kvvyr8IFmJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Scott Jensen discusses the issue of physician moral injury and the erasure of COVID-era history in medical publications. He highlights how physicians feel betrayed by authority figures, leading to compromises in patient care. Jensen expresses concern over the disappearance of over 300 scientific articles, suggesting potential substandard research used to push certain narratives. He warns of the implications of journals retracting articles and calls for attention to the situation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. Doctor Scott Jensen here. Over the last 3 years, we have together talked about a lot of issues. We have talked about masks and modeling. We have talked about lockdowns and social distancing. We have talked about vaccines and mandates. We have talked about parental rights and a whole lot of other things, including natural immunity, herd immunity, and what happened in nursing homes. Those issues will continue to be discussed as well they should, but I need to sound the alarm. I read medical journals all the time, and 2 articles that had an odd connection over the last week came across my desk. 1st, Chris Mazzolini, editorial director of medical economics, has an article about a book written by Wendy Dean, a physician, who talks about physician moral injury. You might ask yourself, what does that mean? Doctor Wendy Dean says that moral injury is this sense of feeling as if you're betrayed by somebody in a position of authority in a high stakes situation. And that situation causes you to transgress your deeply held moral beliefs and expectations. And in medicine, those beliefs and expectations are the oaths that we took to put our patients first. This is what's happening to physicians. When we feel that people in authority who we thought had our back and were doing the right thing, that they controlled us and didn't perform. And that caused us to potentially compromise our commitment to our patients. That has happened across the land, across the globe. Let's turn to the second article. An article in Jazz Shaw called the medical field is erasing its own COVID era history. Here's what it says. Pfizer and the rest of the big pharma companies assured the government that everything was just fine with the vaccines because they had been doing super serious testing. And the government dutifully reported the cheerful news to us while using all of that data to impose lockdowns, mask mandates, and immunity passport systems. And now, according to one group that tracks publications in scientific journals, A lot of the original research and test results are mysteriously disappearing. More than 300 papers and scientific articles have vanished in the past year. We have to be on red alert. What we're seeing is potentially substandard medical publications used to push forward, promote a narrative, and squash all other narratives. And now that some of the dust is settling, we're seeing these articles withdrawn, disappearing. You won't find them potentially on Internet. This is problematic. We knew during the pandemic that several specific instances occurred where high quality journals such as Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine, published articles that a short time later required a retraction or a revision or a redaction. We're seeing this happen in spades now. We're seeing 300 plus articles disappearing, and I think you and I both know why. In many situations, it was shoddy research. It was shoddy analysis. It wasn't peer reviewed, or the conclusions drawn from the data were clearly spurious. And we asked the question, was this born of a nefarious agenda? My friends, I don't remember any time in my 40 years of medical history where in a short span of time, Journal articles in the 100 and 100 were disappearing. This feels like people are covering their tracks, and we need to pay attention. When medical journals that were used at one time to push a narrative and squash another narrative are now disappearing. My profession has a big problem.
_APWK_
Posted - October 16, 2024 at 3:49 PM
Saved - October 16, 2024 at 11:03 PM

@_APWK_ - Luiz

Vax vs. Unvax. Study done by pediatrician, Dr. Paul Thomas. His license was taken away after releasing this study. https://t.co/kNTxYgcoD3

_APWK_
Posted - October 30, 2024 at 7:01 PM
Saved - October 31, 2024 at 5:42 PM

@_APWK_ - Luiz

Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas had his license revoked after releasing this vaccine study to the public. This is how many times more vaccinated children have a higher risk of these diseases than unvaccinated children. https://t.co/X2z82lqIkI

atensnut
Posted - November 27, 2024 at 3:40 PM
Saved - November 28, 2024 at 6:40 AM

@atensnut - Juanita Broaddrick

Where is the F’ing Media? 17,000 physicians and scientists from around the world agree Covid 19 vaccines are dangerous and harmful. https://t.co/3nesp6oTiw

Video Transcript AI Summary
We, a global team of over 17,000 physicians and scientists, declare that the COVID-19 genetic therapy injections should end. Data shows these injections cause more harm than good, especially for the young and healthy, providing no benefit against COVID-19, which is treatable. Recent findings indicate vaccinated individuals may have higher rates of infection and severe outcomes compared to the unvaccinated. These gene therapies can cause significant damage to various organs and the immune system. We recommend regulating these products as gene therapies, reinstating a minimum five-year FDA testing period, halting emergency use authorization, and requiring full FDA approval for all COVID-19 medical products. Additionally, we call for investigations into the causes of death and damage affecting those who received these injections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you for taking the time to listen to myself and my colleagues today speaking to you from the heart about what we've observed and what we're recommending as a Global COVID Summit team of over 17,000 physicians and scientists from all over the world. We declare and the data confirm that the COVID-nineteen experimental genetic therapy injections must end. We must acknowledge that the genetic COVID-nineteen genetic injections cause far more harm than good and provide zero benefit relative to risk for the young and healthy. They do not reduce COVID-nineteen infection which is treatable and not terminal. Furthermore, the most recent data demonstrates that you are more likely to become infected or have disease or even death if you've been vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated people. This is shocking to hear, but it is what the data are showing us. The data now show that these experimental gene therapy treatments can damage your children as well as yourself. They can damage your heart, your brain, your reproductive tissue and your lungs. This can include permanent damage and disablement of your immune system. We strongly recommend that these products now and in the future be regulated as the gene therapy products that they are and require public involvement of the FDA's gene therapy scientists and committees in reviewing and approving these drugs. We believe that it's necessary to reestablish the 5 year minimum FDA testing period and to cease the emergency use authorization and require full FDA licensure of all novel medical products used for COVID-nineteen. We also strongly recommend that there be investigations of the actual causes of death and damage to 1,000,000 who have been subjected to these mandatory mRNA and adenoviral vector gene therapy injections.
DiedSuddenly_
Posted - January 26, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Saved - January 27, 2025 at 6:04 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

They don’t want you to know how many people are living with vaccine injuries https://t.co/qvVEz3lNmp

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have a vaccine injury. Many of us do. We come from various backgrounds: gymnasts, authors, accountants, equestrians, geoscientists, teachers, coaches, and more. We are mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, friends, and professionals in diverse fields. Despite our different lives, we share this common experience of vaccine injury. It affects us all, but it does not define us.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vaccine injury. I have a vaccine injury. You have vaccine as well. I have vaccine injury. I have a vaccine injury. I have a vaccine injury. I'm a gymnast. I'm an author. I'm an accountant. I'm an equestrian. I am a geoscientist. I get Yushtanam Bransadbhaya. I am a teacher. Yeah. Football. It's a mom. I'm a wife, a mother, a friend, and a sister. Well, I'm a coach. I am a climber. I am a former gentleman. I am a mother of 4. I'm a dog mommy. I'm a yoga teacher. I'm a sister. A medical scientist. But most of all, I'm a zoleyperhuman. I'm an orthopedic surgeon. I am a husband. I'm a lawyer. I'm a father. I am a son. I am a brother. I'm just like you. I have a vaccine injury. I have a vaccine injury. I have a vaccine injury. I'm a vaccine injury. I have vaccine injury. I have vaccine injury, but my vaccine injury does not have
VigilantFox
Posted - June 22, 2025 at 8:58 PM
Saved - June 23, 2025 at 7:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared findings from Dr. Paul Thomas, who studied 3,324 children and concluded that unvaccinated kids had better health outcomes, yet faced license revocation for his work. Other researchers have faced similar consequences for revealing vaccine-related data. I highlighted concerns about the lack of proper testing for vaccines, the deletion of the CDC's vaccine injury database, and the potential link between mass vaccination and rising chronic illnesses. It's crucial for parents to demand informed consent and raise awareness about these issues to reclaim control over health decisions.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

He proved unvaccinated kids were healthier. They revoked his license. Dr. Paul Thomas studied 3,324 children and found unvaccinated kids had FEWER doctor visits and BETTER health outcomes. Here’s what his data showed: Fever – 9.1× higher in vaccinated Ear Pain – 3.4× higher Otitis Media (Ear Infections) – 2.9× higher Conjunctivitis – 2.4× higher Eye Disorders (Other) – 1.8× higher Asthma – 5.2× higher Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever) – 6.9× higher Sinusitis – 4.3× higher Breathing Issues – 2.9× higher Anemia – 5.5× higher Eczema – 4.5× higher Urticaria (Hives) – 2.1× higher Dermatitis – 1.4× higher Behavioral Issues – 4.1× higher Gastroenteritis – 4.7× higher Weight/Eating Disorders – 2.5× higher ADHD – 0 cases in unvaccinated group *Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition* Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas’s license—just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted. Dr. Paul Thomas isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science. Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern. The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids? 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full 20,000-word report below: midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-dam…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The CDC deleted its vaccine injury database (VSD)—right before RFK Jr. could access it. Getting access to the VSD has been a goal of the vaccine safety community and one of the things RFK pledged to do if he ever assumed office. So rogue HHS employees literally erased the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) to block RFK Jr. from reviewing the data. That’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s completely real. And really crazy. The only reason you would do that is if you have something to hide. So, what were they trying to hide?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

This often-repeated line is true: Vaccines have never been properly tested. There has never been a true placebo-controlled trial of the entire childhood vaccine schedule. Yet this schedule is pushed on every child and parents who hesitate or ask questions are ridiculed. Why haven’t they been tested? Because withholding vaccines is considered “unethical” (even when there’s no proof they’re safe in the first place). So they can’t be tested. That’s the scam. Never mind the fact that it seems ethics is now missing from medicine altogether anyway…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Knowing all this and after what happened during the COVID-19 pandemic, it would be incredibly irresponsible to push ahead as we have been for years. We must ask, what has mass vaccination done to society? (See the full explanation here) https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-has-mass-vaccination

How Much Damage Has Mass Vaccination Done to Society? The data that shows the less appreciated and forgotten consequences of vaccination. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Why don’t doctors notice and speak out? Doctors who expose vaccine harm have lost everything. Dr. Paul Thomas published data comparing 2,763 vaccinated kids to 561 unvaccinated kids born into his practice. He plotted their total visits and found that unvaccinated kids were far healthier across the board. That’s BIG NEWS and something every parent needs to know. But what happened next? They revoked Dr. Thomas’ medical license.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Brian Hooker and Neil Miller later did something similar. Their study included data from 3 different pediatric practices. They analyzed 2,047 children who had been born within the medical practice between November 2005 to June 2015.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc In 2007, Generation Rescue hired a third-party polling firm to do a survey of 17,674 children. 991 of them were completely unvaccinated.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The data is out there, and @MidwesternDoc has the receipts. Check out the full write-up for more data from a homeschool survey, the Control Group survey, and more. midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-dam…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Mass vaccination may be the real cause of the chronic illness epidemic. Asthma. ADHD. Autism. Autoimmune disorders. They’ve all exploded and it’s been alongside the rapidly increasing vaccine schedule. The more shots a child receives, the sicker they become. It’s not a coincidence. It’s a pattern. And we have to pay attention!

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What if autism is actually vaccine-induced brain damage? @MidwesternDoc lays out the case in this eye-opening article. • Encephalitis is a known vaccine injury • Autism symptoms overlap with mild encephalitis midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-dam…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

A whistleblower once exposed the CDC altering data to hide vaccine-autism links. He confessed. But the media ignored it. The medical establishment ridiculed him. And the CDC buried all the evidence. Don’t underestimate how far they’ll go to protect the narrative. This is a billion-dollar scheme.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

During COVID, vaccine injuries were so widespread that they couldn’t cover it up. • 7% of recipients reported major side effects • Sudden deaths in young, healthy people • A huge spike in myocarditis, strokes, and neurological disorders Even the CDC’s own data showed mass harm.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But they didn’t fix it. Instead they hid the data and they silenced discussion. The CDC’s “V-Safe” app quietly collected reports of injury from COVID vaccine recipients. And it revealed massive harm. But instead of sounding the alarm, officials published a summary that distorted the numbers to create an illusion of safety.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

They hoped no one noticed but people began connecting the dots, and what they found was terrifying. Vaccine-induced brain damage isn’t rare. It’s everywhere. The effects can be subtle, so we don’t even notice it’s happening. Things like emotional detachment, learning disorders, problems with impulsivity, and declining IQ. We’re living in a vaccinated society, and that doesn’t appear to be a good thing.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

This isn’t new. Every few decades, the same disaster strikes. A rushed vaccine hits the market, causes injury, gets covered up, and then everyone magically forgets and believes that vaccines can do no harm. It started with smallpox in 1798 and has repeated ever since. COVID-19 was just the latest.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The ongoing rise in crime might be linked to vaccine injury. Historian Harris Coulter showed how post-vaccine encephalitis mimics the traits of violent criminals. These traits can include a lack of empathy, hypersexuality, sudden rage, and neurological tics. Vaccines like rabies, diphtheria, and DPT repeatedly caused encephalitis and even cranial nerve damage. Vaccines are quietly reshaping society in ways we can’t even begin to understand.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

It doesn’t help that doctors have been trained to ignore what’s right in front of them. The signs, like asymmetrical facial muscles, eye tracking glitches, stunted emotional development, are subtle and usually ignored. Those who dare to notice and get to the bottom of it are quickly labeled “anti-vax” and punished.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

All of this begs the question: What else are they hiding? There’s evidence that the HPV vaccine caused autoimmune disorders in 2.3% of trial participants. But Merck made billions, and the shot is still mandated. This isn’t about medicine. It’s marketing and profits. The victims are children, and hardly anyone seems to care. The marketing must be more like brainwashing.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Did you know that the childhood vaccine schedule ballooned after Big Pharma got immunity? Weird, isn’t it? In 1986, Congress shielded vaccine makers from lawsuits. And ever since then, the number of childhood vaccines has exploded and continues to climb. Curiously, chronic disease rates have skyrocketed as well. And not one study has tested the full schedule for safety. Because that would be “immoral”. Giant eye roll.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

It’s not out of the question that way may be spending trillions treating vaccine injuries—without realizing it. Every illness they can’t explain (which is a lot of them).. Every behavioral disorder they normalize… Every drug they prescribe to mask symptoms (and create more)... Might be linked to the same root cause! And they’re making you pay for it. We’re stuck in a vicious cycle. We have to break out of it before it’s too late. This is absolutely not sustainable.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

So what happens now? What do we do? First, parents need to rise up and demand that no vaccine should ever be mandated. Next, it’s about awareness. Educate yourself—and make sure at least one other person learns the truth, too. The only way to end this nightmare is for the truth to come out—and for the public to finally take back control of their health.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc They say vaccine injury is “rare.” But the data clearly tells a very different story. And if even half of this is true, we’re not just facing a health crisis, we’re facing the biggest medical cover-up in history.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-has-mass-vaccination

How Much Damage Has Mass Vaccination Done to Society? The data that shows the less appreciated and forgotten consequences of vaccination. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-cancer-cure-hiding?utm_source=publication-search

The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight How DMSO turns a common dye into a highly potent cancer treatment that's harmless to normal tissue midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-dont-tell-you-about-c-sections?utm_source=publication-search

What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections Exploring the short and long term consequences of a frequently unnecessary procedure midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. —> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/pbPNR26VSb

theHFDF
Posted - August 25, 2025 at 3:37 PM
Saved - August 27, 2025 at 9:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared concerns about a recent study claiming no link between vaccines and autism, which was later corrected to reveal significantly higher rates of autism and ADHD than initially reported. I highlighted flaws in the study's design, including the exclusion of children most likely to show a link between aluminum exposure and chronic diseases. Despite evidence from various studies about aluminum's neurotoxicity, mainstream media remains silent on the revised findings. I urged support for our fight against misinformation and for health freedoms.

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

Big Pharma just accidentally proved that vaccines cause autism. This is not a joke—it’s the biggest bombshell of the year. The media called this new study of 1.4 million kids “definitive proof” of no link between vaccines and autism. Then, the medical journal quietly issued a correction—and corrected data EXPOSED that autism and ADHD rates were over 200% higher than the study claimed at first. The study’s authors—who work for a state-owned vaccine producer that makes $400M a year selling vaccines—manipulated the data and ignored unvaccinated kids to get the result they wanted. Bookmark this thread. We’re about to reveal one of the darkest secrets behind Pharma’s “safe and effective” lie: 🧵THREAD

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

First, make sure to bookmark this thread above. A new study from Denmark is being hailed in mainstream media as definitive proof that there is no link between aluminum in vaccines and autism. But here’s what they won’t tell you: The study was designed to HIDE any evidence of such a link. It was full of inexplicable faults and decisions made to obscure the truth that other studies have revealed—that aluminum exposure via childhood vaccines is strongly linked to numerous chronic diseases. Then, the raw data exposed the truth. Let’s break this down:🧵

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

🚨We’re on the front lines of the fight against Big Pharma and Big Government. 🔥Join our fight. Become a member of @theHFDF for just $10: https://secure.anedot.com/health-freedom-defense-fund-hfdf/membership-x

Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) Join me in supporting Health Freedom Defense Fund Inc secure.anedot.com

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

NBC News accused RFK Jr. of spreading “vaccine misinformation” for calling aluminum in vaccines “extremely neurotoxic.” But it’s not just RFK Jr. saying this. Decades of scientific research PROVE it:🧵

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

Aluminum is a known neurotoxin, and the “most abundant neurotoxic metal on Earth.” Aluminum has no biological function or need. It is toxic to all life forms. It is toxic to the brain, central nervous system, immune system, and gastrointestinal system. Aluminum is found in elevated levels in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and autism. A 2011 NIH study revealed that “since 1911, experimental evidence has repeatedly demonstrated that chronic [aluminum] intoxication reproduces neuropathological hallmarks of [Alzheimer’s].” Full study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21157018/

Aluminum and Alzheimer's disease: after a century of controversy, is there a plausible link? - PubMed The brain is a highly compartmentalized organ exceptionally susceptible to accumulation of metabolic errors. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disease of the elderly and is characterized by regional specificity of neural aberrations associated with higher cognitive fun … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

A 2017 NIH study revealed that aluminum and other neurotoxic elements can easily overwhelm the human body. The study even called for directives to require “vaccination programs to use only non-neurotoxic adjuvants, especially for young children and all women of child-bearing ages.” Full study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29206191/

The Metal Neurotoxins: An Important Role in Current Human Neural Epidemics? - PubMed Many published studies have illustrated that several of the present day neurological epidemics (autism, attention deficit disorder, Alzheimer's) cannot be correlated to any single neurotoxicant. However, the present scientific examination of the numerous global blood monitoring databases for adults … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

Still, Pharma and mainstream science concoct manipulated studies to defend their use of aluminum in vaccines. The new Danish study was designed to HIDE any potential evidence of a link between aluminum and autism or other chronic diseases. Here’s how:🧵

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

First, the Danish study excluded kids who received an “implausible” number of vaccines—or more than are officially recommended. But this “implausible” number of vaccines is the same amount that American kids receive. Why is this a problem? They excluded the kids who were MOST likely to reveal a link between aluminum and chronic diseases, because these kids had the greatest exposure. Furthermore, they only followed children from 2 years old up to 5 years in their primary analysis—despite having access to nearly three decades of records.

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

Second, the authors excluded kids who showed symptoms of the very conditions they were looking for. All kids with “preexisting conditions” before age 2, “including congenital rubella syndrome, respiratory conditions, primary immune deficiency, and heart of liver failure,” were excluded. Up to 466,047 kids were excluded from the source cohort of 1,384,357 kids because they had these symptoms before the age of 2.

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

Third, the study made a decision that ERASED the very evidence they were looking for. The authors adjusted for a list of confounding variables to isolate the impact of aluminum exposure. Birth year and season, sex, maternal age at delivery, etc. But then, they adjusted for the “number of visits to a general practitioner before age 2.” If aluminum exposure from a vaccine resulted in a chronic disease, it’s very likely that the child would have had more visits to a general practitioner to address their symptoms. Thus, the study excluded kids who may have showed clear signs of an injury from an aluminum-containing vaccine.

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D. perfectly EXPOSED the insanity of adjusting for the number of doctor visits before age 2: “Imagine studying the association between smoking and lung disease and adjusting for having nicotine-stained fingers, carrying a lighter, or frequency of coughing in the 24 months before lung cancer diagnosis.” “What you are doing, in effect, is mathematically erasing the very signal you are supposed to be detecting.”

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

🚨Before we go on with the thread—we need your support. We are fighting for YOUR health freedoms in courtrooms across America. But we can’t do this alone. Your freedom—and your children’s future—is on the line. Become a Member of @theHFDF for just $10: https://secure.anedot.com/health-freedom-defense-fund-hfdf/membership-x

Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) Join me in supporting Health Freedom Defense Fund Inc secure.anedot.com

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

So, did the authors compare health outcomes of kids with no aluminum exposure to kids with aluminum exposure? No. They only looked for differences between kids who received vaccines with aluminum to kids who received vaccines with slightly less aluminum.

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

In fact, 15,237 kids in the study’s cohort received ZERO vaccines with aluminum before age 2. This would have been a perfect independent control group. But the authors mixed this group into a group with kids who received a low level of exposure to aluminum through vaccines.

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

The data plot below reveals the study’s flawed results. Notice anything anomalous? If the study found a link between aluminum exposure and chronic conditions, the black diamond and its head and tail would sit to the right of the vertical line. But the results SHOCKINGLY reveal that aluminum exposure actually DECREASED the chance of many chronic conditions—an implausible finding that the authors of the study didn’t even try to explain.

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

The Statens Serum Institut, who employs the study’s authors, makes $200-$400 million a year selling vaccines. Is it any wonder that they would also fund “science” to sweep vaccine injury under the rug?

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

🚨But there’s another BOMBSHELL. A correction to the study was issued on July 17. Revised data showed a “statistically significant” link between aluminum exposure from vaccines and autism and ADHD. The study’s data literally proved the OPPOSITE of what the authors claimed:🧵

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

Dr. Friedrich V. Pfister revealed that the revised data showed a substantial increase in the neurodevelopmental events like autism and ADHD “from approximately 2200 to over 5200.” That’s not a minor correction—it’s over 200% higher than the original number. “This revision fundamentally alters the statistical power and confidence intervals for key outcomes.”

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

The revised data reveals “statistically significant associations” between aluminum exposure from vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes like autism and ADHD. In other words, the data proved exactly the OPPOSITE of what the study claimed.

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

The media is SILENT about the revised data exposing the truth—after falsely declaring that the study “proved” no link between vaccines and autism. Why? Because they’re owned by the same dark forces that are poisoning our children. Bookmark the thread below to read next:🧵

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

Covid-era tyranny was no mistake. Deep state elites spent 115 years preparing to plunge America into totalitarianism—from Rockefeller to the CIA and Bill Gates. In the 1950s, they admitted their plan: “Install collectivism in America.” We just exposed the whole plan. 🧵THREAD

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

🚨Before you go: we can’t fight Pharma and Big Government alone. We have won landmark lawsuits striking down tyrannical medical mandates—but we need your support. Become a Member of @theHFDF for just $10: https://secure.anedot.com/health-freedom-defense-fund-hfdf/membership-x Or donate here: https://secure.anedot.com/health-freedom-defense-fund-hfdf/x-donations

Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) Join me in supporting Health Freedom Defense Fund Inc secure.anedot.com
Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) Join me in supporting Health Freedom Defense Fund Inc secure.anedot.com

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

@BurnScar3 Here it is: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/ANNALS-25-03233 Correct, the retraction request was made by Dr. Friedrich Pfister.

@theHFDF - Health Freedom Defense Fund

@BenFranklin1171 Here it is: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/ANNALS-25-03233

JoshWalkos
Posted - September 9, 2025 at 6:45 PM
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 3:44 AM

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

A study conducted by Dr. Marcus Zervos entitled “Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study” it found that vaccinated children were significantly more unhealthy than unvaccinated. They refuse to publish it. https://t.co/OMl4M5nm0n

Video Transcript AI Summary
Leading up to 02/2013, the IOM was commissioned by HHS to review the safety of the CDC's childhood schedule. The IOM concluded, "the studies designed to examine the long term effects..." have not been conducted and "there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe," adding that "it is possible to make the comparison" using databases like the Vaccine Safety Data Link. "Has it been done? I don't know. Has it been published? No." In 02/2017, ICANT pressed for a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study; Dr. Zervos at Henry Ford agreed to conduct it. The Henry Ford study followed births 2000–2016, finding vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma (4.29x), atopic disease (3.03x), autoimmune disease (5.96x), neurodevelopmental disorders (5.53x), including developmental delay (3.28x) and speech disorder (4.47x). ADHD: 260 cases vaccinated, none unvaccinated. After ten years, 17% unvaccinated vs 57% vaccinated had a chronic issue. The study was not published because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe. We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Leading up to, 02/2013, the Institute of Medicine was commissioned by the United States Department of Health and Human Services to review the entire body of existing scientific literature to assess the safety of the CDC's childhood schedule as a whole. HHS paid the IOM to do that. After the IOM engaged in that task with a panel of multidisciplinary scientists, it concluded, quote, the studies designed to examine the long term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted, have not been conducted, end quote. That's the Institute of Medicine's finding after reviewing the entire body of scientific literature. Meaning, the IOM could not find studies comparing as you would do to study the safety of a product, an exposed group, meaning kids that got vaccines, the childhood schedule with unvaccinated children, kids who got no vaccines, which is what you would need to assess the safety of the schedule. Lacking evidence to support safety, the best the IOM can conclude was, quote, there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe, end quote. This, of course, also means the IOM cannot find evidence to conclude that the schedule is safe. The IRM report did say it is, quote, possible to make the comparison, meaning through vaccinated, unvaccinated children, through analyses of patient information contained in large databases such as the vaccine safety data link, end quote, which used to be housed at the CDC. But to date, the government has still not conducted this comparison. By the way, the CDC conducted published a white paper in 2015 on how to do that study. Has it been done? I don't know. Has it been published? No. In 02/2017, one of our clients, senator Johnson said earlier, the Informed Consent Action Network, wanted to see this exact study of comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. As the, trailer you just watched noted, Del Bigtree, ICANT CEO, had met doctor Marcus Servis at one point, who was the head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center. And he agreed to meet and to potentially do the study. He is a conducts clinical trials for vaccines, including for the Moderna COVID nineteen vaccine. He's a validly pro vaccine. And when we met him, we argued that this was an opportunity to shut the anti vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier. To our surprise, doctor Zervers said he would conduct the study. He recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians within Henry Ford to do so. These were mainstream scientists who no doubt held orthodox views regarding vaccines. In early twenty twenty, I received a copy of the study. It showed the results of the analysis comparing children enrolled in Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward who had no vaccines compared to those who had one or more vaccines. This study was based on actual medical records. Meaning, finally, a large vaccinated versus unvaccinated study using health data from a major United States health institution, something, as the IOM pointed out, never existed before. The study began by explaining it set out to reduce vaccine hesitancy by assuring parents the CDC vaccine schedule is safe instead. What these researchers found was that vaccinated children had four point two nine times the rate of asthma, three point zero three times the rate of atopic disease, five point nine six times the rate of autoimmune disease, and five point five three times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included three point two eight times the rate of developmental delay, and four point four seven times the rate of speech disorder. All of these findings were statistically significant. There was also other conditions for which there were numerous cases in the vaccinated group, but zero in the unvaccinated group. Hence, a rate cannot be calculated including brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, and ticks. For example, there were two hundred sixty cases of ADHD in the vaccinated group and there were none in the unvaccinated group. In this study, there were around sixteen thousand kids in the vaccinated group, by the way, and around two thousand in the unvaccinated group. So the rate, of course, between those is important, and that's what the study compared. These findings were troubling, including because these chronic health issues can be caused by immune system dysregulation, and vaccines can cause immune system dysregulation. Citations for this are in my written submission. Overall, the study found that after ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while fifty seven percent of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue, often multiple. That's seventeen versus fifty seven percent. The only real problem with this study and why it didn't get submitted for publication is that its findings did not fit the belief and the policy that vaccines are safe. Had it found vaccinated children were healthier, it no doubt would have been published immediately. But because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a draw. We have repeatedly urged doctor Zervos and La Mirada to submit the study for publication. They have affirmed the study was well designed and conducted, but doctor Zervis has said he doesn't wanna lose his job. And doctor Lamoretta has said she does not wanna make doctors uncomfortable. This is a real world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted, how only studies that confirm the beliefs and policies that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a draw. This selection bias is dangerous and results in corrupting all the science concerning vaccine safety. We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms. We should and we must do both.
EndTribalism
Posted - September 9, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 4:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just watched a shocking revelation from Aaron Siri about a study conducted by Henry Ford Medical Center comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children. The study, which showed that unvaccinated children were healthier, was buried despite being well-designed. It found significantly higher rates of asthma, autoimmune diseases, and developmental disorders among vaccinated children. The researchers admitted the findings were valid but chose not to publish them due to fear of backlash and job security. This highlights how vaccine-related science can be manipulated to fit prevailing beliefs.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.” “He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.” “We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.” “Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.” “Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.” “All of these findings were statistically significant.” “After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.” “Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.” “The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.” “We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted. But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.” “This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker describes a Henry Ford Medical Center study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children (2000–2016). Dr. Marcus Servis agreed to conduct it, recruiting a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. Using medical records, the study followed about sixteen thousand vaccinated and two thousand unvaccinated children and aimed to show the CDC vaccine schedule is safe to reduce vaccine hesitancy. Findings showed higher rates in the vaccinated group for several conditions: four point two nine times asthma, three point zero three times atopic disease, five point nine six times autoimmune disease, and five point five three times neurodevelopmental disorders. ADHD: two hundred sixty cases in the vaccinated group, none in the unvaccinated. After ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated had a chronic health issue versus fifty seven percent of the vaccinated. The study’s publication was blocked because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Study of comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. As the, trailer you just watched noted, Del Bigtree, ICANT CEO, had met doctor Marcus Servis at one point, who was the head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center. And he agreed to meet and to potentially do the study. He is a conducts clinical trials for vaccines, including for the Moderna COVID nineteen vaccine. He's a validly pro vaccine. And when we met him, we argued that this was an opportunity to shut the anti vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier. To our surprise, doctor Zervers said he would conduct the study. He recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians within Henry Ford to do so. These were mainstream scientists who no doubt held orthodox views regarding vaccines. In early twenty twenty, I received a copy of the study. It showed the results of the analysis comparing children enrolled in Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward who had no vaccines compared to those who had one or more vaccines. This study was based on actual medical records. Meaning, finally, a large vaccinated versus unvaccinated study using health data from a major United States health institution, something, as the IOM pointed out, never existed before. The study began by explaining it set out to reduce vaccine hesitancy by assuring parents the CDC vaccine schedule is safe instead. What these researchers found was that vaccinated children had four point two nine times the rate of asthma, three point zero three times the rate of atopic disease, five point nine six times the rate of autoimmune disease, and five point five three times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included three point two eight times the rate of developmental delay and four point four seven times the rate of speech disorder. All of these findings were statistically significant. There was also other conditions for which there were numerous cases in the vaccinated group, but zero in the unvaccinated group. Hence, a rate cannot be calculated, including brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, and ticks. For example, there were two hundred sixty cases of ADHD in the vaccinated group, and there were none in the unvaccinated group. This study, there were around sixteen thousand kids in the vaccinated group, by the way, and around two thousand in the unvaccinated group. So the rate, of course, between those is important, and that's what the study compared. These findings were troubling, including because these chronic health issues can be caused by immune system dysregulation, and vaccines can cause immune system dysregulation. Citations for this are in my written submission. Overall, the study found that after ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while fifty seven percent of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue, often multiple. That's seventeen versus fifty seven percent. The only real problem with this study and why it didn't get submitted for publication is that its findings did not fit the belief and the policy that vaccines are safe. Had it found vaccinated children were healthier, it no doubt would have been published immediately. But because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a draw. We have repeatedly urged doctor Zervos and Lemoretta to submit the study for publication. They have affirmed the study was well designed and conducted, but doctor Zervos has said he doesn't wanna lose his job. And doctor Lamoretta has said she does not wanna make doctors uncomfortable. This is a real world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted, how only studies that confirm the beliefs and policies that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a draw. This selection bias is dangerous and results in corrupting all the science concerning vaccine safety. We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms. We should and we must do both.
CartlandDavid
Posted - September 13, 2025 at 7:40 AM
Saved - September 13, 2025 at 2:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just learned about a buried study from Henry Ford Medical Center that compared the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Conducted by Dr. Marcus Zervos and a team of mainstream scientists, the study revealed alarming statistics: vaccinated children had significantly higher rates of asthma, autoimmune diseases, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Despite its well-designed nature, the study was not published because its findings contradicted the prevailing belief that vaccines are safe. This situation highlights how some research may be suppressed to maintain certain narratives.

@CartlandDavid - Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.” “He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.” “We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.” “Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.” “Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.” “All of these findings were statistically significant.” “After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.” “Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.” “The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.” “We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted. But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.” “This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.” Subscribe and share ➡️➡️ @TrumpSource

Video Transcript AI Summary
"This study was based on actual medical records." "What these researchers found was that vaccinated children had four point two nine times the rate of asthma, three point zero three times the rate of atopic disease, five point nine six times the rate of autoimmune disease, and five point five three times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included three point two eight times the rate of developmental delay, and four point four seven times the rate of speech disorder." "After ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while fifty seven percent of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue." "The only real problem with this study and why it didn't get submitted for publication is that its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe." "We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Study of comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. As the, trailer you just watched noted, Del Bigtree, ICANT CEO, had met doctor Marcus Servis at one point, who was the head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center. And he agreed to meet and to potentially do the study. He is a conducts clinical trials for vaccines, including for the Moderna COVID nineteen vaccine. He's a validly pro vaccine. And when we met him, we argued that this was an opportunity to shut the anti vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier. To our surprise, doctor Zervis said he would conduct the study. He recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians within Henry Ford to do so. These were mainstream scientists who no doubt held orthodox views regarding vaccines. In early twenty twenty, I received a copy of the study. It showed the results of the analysis comparing children enrolled in Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward who had no vaccines compared to those who had one or more vaccines. This study was based on actual medical records. Meaning, finally, a large vaccinated versus unvaccinated study using health data from a major United States health institution, something, as the IOM pointed out, never existed before. The study began by explaining it set out to reduce vaccine hesitancy by assuring parents the CDC vaccine schedule is safe instead. What these researchers found was that vaccinated children had four point two nine times the rate of asthma, three point zero three times the rate of atopic disease, five point nine six times the rate of autoimmune disease, and five point five three times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included three point two eight times the rate of developmental delay, and four point four seven times the rate of speech disorder. All of these findings were statistically significant. There was also other conditions for which there were numerous cases in the vaccinated group but zero in the unvaccinated group. Hence, a rate cannot be calculated including brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, and ticks. For example, there were two hundred sixty cases of ADHD in the vaccinated group and there were none in the unvaccinated group. In this study, there were around sixteen, zero kids in the vaccine group by the way and around two thousand in the unvaccinated group. So, the rate, of course, between those is important and that's what the study compared. These findings were troubling including because these chronic health issues can be caused by immune system dysregulation and vaccines can cause immune system dysregulation. Citations for this are in my written submission. Overall, the study found that after ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while fifty seven percent of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue, often multiple. That's seventeen versus fifty seven percent. The only real problem with this study and why it didn't get submitted for publication is that its findings did not fit the belief and the policy that vaccines are safe. Had it found vaccinated children were healthier, it no doubt would have been published immediately. But because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a draw. We have repeatedly urged doctor Zervos and La Mirada to submit the study for publication. They have affirmed the study was well designed and conducted, but doctor Zervis has said he doesn't wanna lose his job. And doctor Lamoretta has said she does not wanna make doctors uncomfortable. This is a real world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted, how only studies that confirm the beliefs and policies that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a draw. This selection bias is dangerous and results in corrupting all the science concerning vaccine safety. We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms. We should and we must do both.
VigilantFox
Posted - September 14, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Saved - September 15, 2025 at 3:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared findings from Dr. Paul Thomas, who showed that unvaccinated children had better health outcomes than vaccinated ones, but his medical license was revoked shortly after. Other researchers have faced similar consequences for revealing such data. I highlighted concerns about the lack of proper testing for vaccines and the potential links between mass vaccination and rising chronic illnesses. There's a growing belief that vaccine injuries are more common than acknowledged, and it's crucial for parents to demand informed choices about vaccinations. Awareness is key to reclaiming health control.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

He proved unvaccinated kids were healthier. They revoked his license. Dr. Paul Thomas studied 3,324 children and found unvaccinated kids had FEWER doctor visits and BETTER health outcomes. Here’s what his data showed: Fever – 9.1× higher in vaccinated Ear Pain – 3.4× higher Otitis Media (Ear Infections) – 2.9× higher Conjunctivitis – 2.4× higher Eye Disorders (Other) – 1.8× higher Asthma – 5.2× higher Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever) – 6.9× higher Sinusitis – 4.3× higher Breathing Issues – 2.9× higher Anemia – 5.5× higher Eczema – 4.5× higher Urticaria (Hives) – 2.1× higher Dermatitis – 1.4× higher Behavioral Issues – 4.1× higher Gastroenteritis – 4.7× higher Weight/Eating Disorders – 2.5× higher ADHD – 0 cases in unvaccinated group *Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition* Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas’s license—just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted. Dr. Paul Thomas isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science. Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern. The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids? 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full 20,000-word report below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-has-mass-vaccination

How Much Damage Has Mass Vaccination Done to Society? The data that shows the less appreciated and forgotten consequences of vaccination. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The CDC deleted its vaccine injury database (VSD)—right before RFK Jr. could access it. Getting access to the VSD has been a goal of the vaccine safety community and one of the things RFK pledged to do if he ever assumed office. So rogue HHS employees literally erased the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) to block RFK Jr. from reviewing the data. That’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s completely real. And really crazy. The only reason you would do that is if you have something to hide. So, what were they trying to hide?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This often-repeated line is true: Vaccines have never been properly tested. There has never been a true placebo-controlled trial of the entire childhood vaccine schedule. Yet this schedule is pushed on every child and parents who hesitate or ask questions are ridiculed. Why haven’t they been tested? Because withholding vaccines is considered “unethical” (even when there’s no proof they’re safe in the first place). So they can’t be tested. That’s the scam. Never mind the fact that it seems ethics is now missing from medicine altogether anyway…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Knowing all this and after what happened during the COVID-19 pandemic, it would be incredibly irresponsible to push ahead as we have been for years. We must ask, what has mass vaccination done to society? (See the full explanation here) https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-has-mass-vaccination

How Much Damage Has Mass Vaccination Done to Society? The data that shows the less appreciated and forgotten consequences of vaccination. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Why don’t doctors notice and speak out? Doctors who expose vaccine harm have lost everything. Dr. Paul Thomas published data comparing 2,763 vaccinated kids to 561 unvaccinated kids born into his practice. He plotted their total visits and found that unvaccinated kids were far healthier across the board. That’s BIG NEWS and something every parent needs to know. But what happened next? They revoked Dr. Thomas’ medical license.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Brian Hooker and Neil Miller later did something similar. Their study included data from 3 different pediatric practices. They analyzed 2,047 children who had been born within the medical practice between November 2005 to June 2015.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc In 2007, Generation Rescue hired a third-party polling firm to do a survey of 17,674 children. 991 of them were completely unvaccinated.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The data is out there, and @MidwesternDoc has the receipts. Check out the full write-up for more data from a homeschool survey, the Control Group survey, and more. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-has-mass-vaccination

How Much Damage Has Mass Vaccination Done to Society? The data that shows the less appreciated and forgotten consequences of vaccination. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Mass vaccination may be the real cause of the chronic illness epidemic. Asthma. ADHD. Autism. Autoimmune disorders. They’ve all exploded and it’s been alongside the rapidly increasing vaccine schedule. The more shots a child receives, the sicker they become. It’s not a coincidence. It’s a pattern. And we have to pay attention!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What if autism is actually vaccine-induced brain damage? @MidwesternDoc lays out the case in this eye-opening article. • Encephalitis is a known vaccine injury • Autism symptoms overlap with mild encephalitis https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-has-mass-vaccination

How Much Damage Has Mass Vaccination Done to Society? The data that shows the less appreciated and forgotten consequences of vaccination. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

A whistleblower once exposed the CDC altering data to hide vaccine-autism links. He confessed. But the media ignored it. The medical establishment ridiculed him. And the CDC buried all the evidence. Don’t underestimate how far they’ll go to protect the narrative. This is a billion-dollar scheme.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

During COVID, vaccine injuries were so widespread that they couldn’t cover it up. • 7% of recipients reported major side effects • Sudden deaths in young, healthy people • A huge spike in myocarditis, strokes, and neurological disorders Even the CDC’s own data showed mass harm.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

But they didn’t fix it. Instead they hid the data and they silenced discussion. The CDC’s “V-Safe” app quietly collected reports of injury from COVID vaccine recipients. And it revealed massive harm. But instead of sounding the alarm, officials published a summary that distorted the numbers to create an illusion of safety.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

They hoped no one noticed but people began connecting the dots, and what they found was terrifying. Vaccine-induced brain damage isn’t rare. It’s everywhere. The effects can be subtle, so we don’t even notice it’s happening. Things like emotional detachment, learning disorders, problems with impulsivity, and declining IQ. We’re living in a vaccinated society, and that doesn’t appear to be a good thing.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This isn’t new. Every few decades, the same disaster strikes. A rushed vaccine hits the market, causes injury, gets covered up, and then everyone magically forgets and believes that vaccines can do no harm. It started with smallpox in 1798 and has repeated ever since. COVID-19 was just the latest.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The ongoing rise in crime might be linked to vaccine injury. Historian Harris Coulter showed how post-vaccine encephalitis mimics the traits of violent criminals. These traits can include a lack of empathy, hypersexuality, sudden rage, and neurological tics. Vaccines like rabies, diphtheria, and DPT repeatedly caused encephalitis and even cranial nerve damage. Vaccines are quietly reshaping society in ways we can’t even begin to understand.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

It doesn’t help that doctors have been trained to ignore what’s right in front of them. The signs, like asymmetrical facial muscles, eye tracking glitches, stunted emotional development, are subtle and usually ignored. Those who dare to notice and get to the bottom of it are quickly labeled “anti-vax” and punished.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

All of this begs the question: What else are they hiding? There’s evidence that the HPV vaccine caused autoimmune disorders in 2.3% of trial participants. But Merck made billions, and the shot is still mandated. This isn’t about medicine. It’s marketing and profits. The victims are children, and hardly anyone seems to care. The marketing must be more like brainwashing.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Did you know that the childhood vaccine schedule ballooned after Big Pharma got immunity? Weird, isn’t it? In 1986, Congress shielded vaccine makers from lawsuits. And ever since then, the number of childhood vaccines has exploded and continues to climb. Curiously, chronic disease rates have skyrocketed as well. And not one study has tested the full schedule for safety. Because that would be “immoral”. Giant eye roll.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

It’s not out of the question that way may be spending trillions treating vaccine injuries—without realizing it. Every illness they can’t explain (which is a lot of them).. Every behavioral disorder they normalize… Every drug they prescribe to mask symptoms (and create more)... Might be linked to the same root cause! And they’re making you pay for it. We’re stuck in a vicious cycle. We have to break out of it before it’s too late. This is absolutely not sustainable.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

So what happens now? What do we do? First, parents need to rise up and demand that no vaccine should ever be mandated. Next, it’s about awareness. Educate yourself—and make sure at least one other person learns the truth, too. The only way to end this nightmare is for the truth to come out—and for the public to finally take back control of their health.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc They say vaccine injury is “rare.” But the data clearly tells a very different story. And if even half of this is true, we’re not just facing a health crisis, we’re facing the biggest medical cover-up in history.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-has-mass-vaccination

How Much Damage Has Mass Vaccination Done to Society? The data that shows the less appreciated and forgotten consequences of vaccination. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-cancer-cure-hiding

The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight How DMSO turns a common dye into a highly potent cancer treatment that's harmless to normal tissue midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-dont-tell-you-about-c-sections

What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections Exploring the short and long term consequences of a frequently unnecessary procedure midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/4ghOX3F0tn

profstonge
Posted - September 25, 2025 at 11:30 AM
Saved - September 25, 2025 at 2:38 PM

@profstonge - Peter St Onge, Ph.D.

Up to 90% of published academic studies are false — they cannot be replicated. This includes cancer drugs, global warming, gender mutilation and — yes — vaccines. The NIH wants to fix it. https://t.co/aaw20oXRGH

Video Transcript AI Summary
The core of the problem is something called the replication crisis, where it turns out the majority of even top studies cannot, in fact, be replicated. In science, if you cannot replicate a result, it is not real. Out of the 67 top studies they tried to replicate, just 21% could be reproduced. Amgen found just 11% of studies could be replicated. Note, this is studies dealing with cells. We can only imagine studies dealing with people who are, of course, much more complex than cells. So what percent of psychology, sociology, gender swapping, even economics is false? Perhaps 90%, it could be 99. As Nobel economist James Buchanan famously put it, professors are, quote, camp following whores who will say whatever you pay them to say. So to fix this, the NIH is proposing to fund independent studies that simply retest key findings, what Bayer and Amgen did. It should be very fun when they run foundational left wing studies through the meat grinder from mutilating children to global warming to the minimum wage or inflation and central banking. Grab the popcorn. In the near term, the main takeaway from the replication crisis is any study that feels off probably is fake.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nearly every academic study is garbage, a waste, sometimes a fraud of taxpayer money that yields a tsunami of misinformation that kills thousands of Americans. The NIH wants to fix it. Recently, NIH director Jay Bhattacharya announced a new journal he hopes will transform our corrupt and increasingly dangerous scientific establishment. The core of the problem is something called the replication crisis, where it turns out the majority of even top studies cannot, in fact, be replicated. In science, if you cannot replicate a result, it is not real. It's a problem given millions of Americans take drugs or get life changing medical treatments with potentially harmful side effects based on these fake studies. To give a flavor, several years ago, German pharmaceutical giant Bayer was looking to develop cancer drugs. But before they started, they redid major oncology studies to make sure the data was sound. Out of the 67 top studies they tried to replicate, just 21% could be reproduced. This is one of the biggest pharma companies in the entire world. A similar effort by pharmaceutical giant Amgen found just 11% of studies could be replicated. Note, this is studies dealing with cells. We can only imagine studies dealing with people who are, of course, much more complex than cells. So what percent of psychology, sociology, gender swapping, even economics is false? Perhaps 90%, it could be 99. So why is it so bad? Some of it is literally fake numbers or statistical manipulation, cherry picking or so called p hacking. Lot of it is so called publication bias where papers that don't find the correct answer are discarded, as in your pharma grants, government grants, or left wing peers don't like them. While any findings that do attract funding or professional clout get blasted out even if they are statistical mirages. Now given government grants make up most academic funding, 109,000,000,000 last year, this is a big reason why academia is so comically left. As Nobel economist James Buchanan famously put it, professors are, quote, camp following whores who will say whatever you pay them to say. So to fix this, the NIH is proposing to fund independent studies that simply retest key findings, what Bayer and Amgen did. It should be very fun when they run foundational left wing studies through the meat grinder from mutilating children to global warming to the minimum wage or inflation and central banking. Grab the popcorn. So as next brought to my ITrust Capital, in the near term, the main takeaway from the replication crisis is any study that feels off probably is fake. As in, you should assume any study is false at least until science cleans itself up, meaning not just replication, but embracing skeptics instead of silencing them. The larger issue is government has all but destroyed the core value of science, which is the search for truth. The motto of Harvard University, for example, is lux et veritas, light and truth, not a joke. Modern academia instead has devolved into pay for play funded by pharma companies and a permanent left wing bureaucracy embezzling taxpayer money to turn truth and light into propaganda. The essence of science is skepticism and independence. It's the defining characteristic what makes science among humanity's greatest inventions. Instead, our scientific establishment has been corrupted into parody. Replication starts to drain the swamp. Okay, we'll be watching. See you next time.
NicHulscher
Posted - December 9, 2025 at 6:37 PM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 2:36 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The new study that found Pfizer mRNA in over 88% of human placentas, sperm, blood — and in 50% of unvaccinated pregnant women — was just mysteriously DELETED from the journal. We are deeply investigating this serious matter and will report back as soon as we have an answer. https://t.co/xJIA67TGSW

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

🚨URGENT:Recent study from Israel about Pfizer vaccine mRNA detected in vaccinated blood/placenta just deleted!! Something serious might have occurred, possibly involving significant influence or infiltration in the Journal after it gained global visibility? Only authors can clarify, so hopefully someone can reach out to them to find out what happened. An archived snapshot of the study is still available on Wayback for anyone who wants to download it here: https://web.archive.org/web/20251205172931/https://www.gavinpublishers.com/assets/articles_pdf/Detection-of-Pfizer-BioNTech-Messenger-RNA-COVID-19-Vaccine-in-Human-Blood-Placenta-and-Semen.pdf @Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher @NicHulscher

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

🚨URGENT: New study from Israel, only accessible online today/pub date 15 Oct 2025, finds Pfizer vaccine mRNA detected in blood, placenta, sperm & seminal fluid of vaccinated/still detectable in 50% women >200 days last-dose indicating prolonged persistence in the body.

MakisMD
Posted - June 19, 2024 at 7:12 AM
Saved - June 19, 2024 at 1:25 PM

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

BREAKING NEWS: In 2023, The LANCET censored & CANCELLED a ground-breaking COVID-19 Vaccine Injury & Autopsy paper within 24hr after 100,000s downloads It has just passed peer review & will be PUBLISHED! 74% of sudden deaths due to COVID-19 Vaccine! @ABDanielleSmith#ableg https://t.co/gnzdLA9Rr7

Video Transcript AI Summary
We submitted a paper on COVID vaccine injuries to The Lancet, which was taken down due to pressure from the pharmaceutical industry. The paper has now passed peer review and will be published, showing that 74% of sudden deaths after vaccination were caused by the vaccine. More evidence is emerging daily on the harm of COVID vaccines, urging politicians to act preemptively.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just wanted to I just wanted to share a little bit of breaking news with you. I found out a few hours ago something that very exciting. Last year, some of us submitted, a vaccine injury paper to The Lancet, on the biggest journals in the world, co authored by doctor Peter McCullough, myself, doctor Mark Triosy, doctor Roger Hodkinson, and other doctors. That paper was about autopsy series, the largest autopsy series in the world of COVID vaccine, people who took COVID 19 vaccines and then died suddenly a few days or a few weeks after. That paper was downloaded 100 of 1000 of times, and within 24 hours there was so much pressure put on by the pharmaceutical industry that The Lancet took the paper down, canceled it, and basically wanted to cancel it forever, so that it would never see the light of day. I just found out a few hours ago that that paper has passed peer reviewed and is going to be published. It is it is the largest the largest autopsy series in the world. 325 autopsies of COVID vaccinated people who drop dead a few hours or a few days or a few weeks after taking the COVID 19 vaccine. We did a rigorous review of these autopsies, and we found that about 74% of the cases of sudden death were caused or contributed to by the vaccine. That is now a peer reviewed paper that's going to be published, and the reason I'm telling you that is that there is more evidence coming every single day, and it's not a little bit of evidence. It's not a case report here that they're gonna dismiss, or case report there, or a paper that The Lancet is going to take down, and say, don't look at this autopsy series, and we'll just bury it and make sure it never sees the light of day. There's going to be a tsunami of evidence of the harm of these COVID 19 vaccines, whether it's harming children, pregnant women, adults, and my message to the politicians is get ahead of this. Get ahead of this if you can. Don't chase after when all the evidence is out, and then you're caught with your pants down. Get ahead of it now.
toobaffled
Posted - August 3, 2024 at 2:20 AM
Saved - August 3, 2024 at 6:14 AM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

"More than 300 medical journal articles have disappeared within the last year." https://t.co/kvvyr8IFmJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Scott Jensen discusses the issue of physician moral injury and the erasure of COVID-era history in medical publications. He highlights how physicians feel betrayed by those in authority, leading to compromised patient care. Jensen raises concerns about the disappearance of over 300 scientific articles, suggesting substandard research was used to push certain narratives. This trend of articles being retracted or revised raises suspicions of a hidden agenda within the medical field. Jensen urges vigilance in recognizing and addressing these issues.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. Doctor Scott Jensen here. Over the last 3 years, we have together talked about a lot of issues. We have talked about masks and modeling. We have talked about lockdowns and social distancing. We have talked about vaccines and mandates. We have talked about parental rights and a whole lot of other things, including natural immunity, herd immunity, and what happened in nursing homes. Those issues will continue to be discussed as well they should, but I need to sound the alarm. I read medical journals all the time, and 2 articles that had an odd connection over the last week came across my desk. 1st, Chris Mazzolini, editorial director of medical economics, has an article about a book written by Wendy Dean, a physician, who talks about physician moral injury. You might ask yourself, what does that mean? Doctor Wendy Dean says that moral injury is this sense of feeling as if you're betrayed by somebody in a position of authority in a high stakes situation. And that situation causes you to transgress your deeply held moral beliefs and expectations. And in medicine, those beliefs and expectations are the oaths that we took to put our patients first. This is what's happening to physicians. When we feel that people in authority who we thought had our back and were doing the right thing, that they controlled us and didn't perform. And that caused us to potentially compromise our commitment to our patients. That has happened across the land, across the globe. Let's turn to the second article. An article in Jazz Shaw called the medical field is erasing its own COVID era history. Here's what it says. Pfizer and the rest of the big pharma companies assured the government that everything was just fine with the vaccines because they had been doing super serious testing. And the government dutifully reported the cheerful news to us while using all of that data to impose lockdowns, mask mandates, and immunity passport systems. And now, according to one group that tracks publications in scientific journals, A lot of the original research and test results are mysteriously disappearing. More than 300 papers and scientific articles have vanished in the past year. We have to be on red alert. What we're seeing is potentially substandard medical publications used to push forward, promote a narrative, and squash all other narratives. And now that some of the dust is settling, we're seeing these articles withdrawn, disappearing. You won't find them potentially on Internet. This is problematic. We knew during the pandemic that several specific instances occurred where high quality journals such as Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine, published articles that a short time later required a retraction or a revision or a redaction. We're seeing this happen in spades now. We're seeing 300 plus articles disappearing, and I think you and I both know why. In many situations, it was shoddy research. It was shoddy analysis. It wasn't peer reviewed, or the conclusions drawn from the data were clearly spurious. And we asked the question, was this born of a nefarious agenda? My friends, I don't remember any time in my 40 years of medical history where in a short span of time, Journal articles in the 100 and 100 were disappearing. This feels like people are covering their tracks, and we need to pay attention. When medical journals that were used at one time to push a narrative and squash another narrative are now disappearing. My profession has a big problem.
View Full Interactive Feed