reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - September 15, 2023 at 7:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Moderna's CEO, Stephane Bancel, joined the company in 2011 and became a billionaire. Prior to Moderna, he was CEO of BioMrieux, a French biotech firm known for constructing high-security BSL4 labs. Bancel assisted in designing the Wuhan BSL4Lab, where gain-of-function research on coronaviruses took place. Coincidentally, Moderna holds a patent for a DNA sequence found in the novel coronavirus. These connections raise questions about the origins of the pandemic. The public should consider these coincidences and the ongoing need for vaccine boosters.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Thread: The French Connection A series of unfortunate coincidences happened to Moderna and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. At least that is what you are supposed think happened.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Meet Stephane Bancel. He is the CEO of Moderna and now a Billionaire because of it. He joined Moderna in 2011 when it was a fledgling startup who just so happened to be receiving piles of government funds to develop their revolutionary mRNA technology.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Where did he work prior to Moderna? He was CEO of BioMérieux a French multinational biotechnology company. His tenure there was from 2007-2011.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

What is BioMérieux known for? Designing and constructing BSL-4-Labs. Labs that are said to have the highest level of security because they house the worlds most deadly pathogens. What specific lab did Bancel assist is designing and constructing?

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

You guessed it. The BSL-4-Lab in Wuhan China that was studying coronaviruses and conducting gain of function research just before a novel coronavirus was said to be discovered circulating in Wuhan.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Scientific American had this to say about it back in 2017: “The Wuhan lab cost 300 million yuan (US$44 million), and to allay safety concerns it was built far above the flood plain and with the capacity to withstand a magnitude-7 earthquake, although the area has no history of..

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

strong earthquakes. It will focus on the control of emerging diseases, store purified viruses and act as a World Health Organization ‘reference laboratory’ linked to similar labs around the world.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“It will be a key node in the global biosafety-lab network,” says lab director Yuan Zhiming.” That worked out well. “The Chinese Academy of Sciences approved the construction of a BSL-4 laboratory in 2003, and the epidemic of SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) around..

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

around the same time lent the project momentum. The lab was designed and constructed with French assistance as part of a 2004 cooperative agreement on the prevention and control of emerging infectious diseases.” https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/china-to-permit-lab-poised-to-study-worlds-most-dangerous-pathogens/

China to Permit Lab Poised to Study World's Most Dangerous Pathogens Scientific American is the essential guide to the most awe-inspiring advances in science and technology, explaining how they change our understanding of the world and shape our lives. scientificamerican.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Well we know how that turned out. They didn’t prevent or control infectious diseases, they engineered them to be more infectious to humans via gain of function research that was approved by Saint Anthony Fauci. As a way to work around the moratorium on GOF imposed by Obama.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

A BioMérieux newsletter boasts of the welcoming Mr. Xi Jinping to their laboratories in France during a state visit. A nice cozy relationship by the looks of it. https://www.institut-merieux.com/wp-content/uploads/Presse-Telechargements/Lettre_IM_7/Lettre-IM-7-EN.pdf

Page not found – INSTITUT MERIEUX institut-merieux.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Once the virus had been discovered in Wuhan, the WIV curiously decided it needed to wipe its public virus database from the internet and “renovate”.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“Shortly after the WIV took its public virus database off the internet in September 2019, the lab announced a contract competition to renovate its air conditioning system for approximately $606 million.“

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The announcement was later redacted from the Chinese Ministry of Finance website, Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin first noted. https://www.politico.com/amp/news/magazine/2021/03/08/josh-rogin-chaos-under-heaven-wuhan-lab-book-excerpt-474322

In 2018, Diplomats Warned of Risky Coronavirus Experiments in a Wuhan Lab. No One Listened. After seeing a risky lab, they wrote a cable warning to Washington. But it was ignored. politico.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

More on the labs air circulation system renovation here. I’m sure the timing was yet another coincidence. https://news.yahoo.com/wuhan-lab-air-circulation-systems-135007775.html

Wuhan Lab Air Circulation Systems Were Defective ahead of First Known COVID Cases, Congressional Report Finds Preceding the first known cases of COVID in Wuhan, China, multiple air ventilation systems within the Wuhan lab were not functioning properly and required renovation. news.yahoo.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Let’s look at another miraculous coincidence that was discovered just last year by a team of researchers and published in the scientific journal Frontiers. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full

MSH3 Homology and Potential Recombination Link to SARS-CoV-2 Furin Cleavage Site Among numerous point mutation differences between the SARS-CoV-2 and the bat RaTG13 coronavirus, only the 12-nucleotide furin cleavage site (FCS) exceeds 3 nucleotides. A BLAST search revealed a 100% complementary match to the human mut S homologue (MSH3), which was extended to 19 nucleotides. The reverse complement sequence present in SARS-CoV-2 may occur randomly but other possibilities must be considered. Recombination in an intermediate host is an unlikely explanation. Single stranded RNA viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 utilize negative strand RNA templates in infected cells, which might lead through copy choice recombination with a negative sense SARS-CoV-2 RNA to the integration of the MSH3 negative strand, including the FCS, into the viral genome. In any case, the presence of the 19-nucleotide long RNA sequence including the FCS with 100% identity to the reverse complement of the MSH3 mRNA is highly unusual and requires further investigations. frontiersin.org

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This study which found that Analysis of the original Covid genome found the virus shares a sequence of 19 specific letters with a genetic section owned by Moderna, which has a total of 3,300 nucleotides. It was patented in 2016. The Patent:

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The daily mail did a story on this that raised a lot of eyebrows but was immediately dismissed as yet another “quirky coincidence” by critics. The researcher said that “there is a one-in-three-trillion chance Moderna's sequence randomly appeared through natural evolution.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10542309/Fresh-lab-leak-fears-study-finds-genetic-code-Covids-spike-protein-linked-Moderna-patent.html

Scientists find genetic match between Covid and Moderna 2016 patent The international team of researchers identified a tiny snippet of code that is identical to part of a genetic sequence patented by the US vaccine maker three years before the pandemic. dailymail.co.uk

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Yes I’m sure a one in three trillion chance is a “quirky coincidence”. I wander who those researchers claiming this work for and why they would characterize a “one in three trillion chance” as more than likely coincidental. I guess we will never know.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

So to recap. Moderna’s current CEO who now is a billionaire because of Moderna and formerly CEO of the French biotech company BioMérieux who coincidentally (there’s that word again) partnered with the Chinese to design and over see the construction of the Wuhan BSL-4 Wuhan Lab.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The very same lab that is accused of being the source of the novel coronavirus that has been used to upend the entire world and destroy the rights of everyone. Moderna also just so happened to patent a DNA sequence that was recently discovered to be a part of the same virus.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

As I said i’m sure that the probability of all of this being a complete and utter coincidence is very high so you should probably go back to your lives and not give this any thought. Just don’t forget to to sign for your Moderna and Pfizer boosters every 6 months forever.

Saved - May 16, 2024 at 2:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Wuhan Institute of Virology, Bat Lady, gain-of-function experiments, and funding from Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance and NIAID are consistently mentioned in posts before 2019. The research involving Bat Lady and Ralph S. Baric in 2015 was funded by USAID's PREDICT program through EcoHealth Alliance. There were corrections made to studies in 2015 and 2020, including the failure to upload the genetic sequence of a man-made gain-of-function SARS-like Corona Chimera. Ralph Baric's 2016 G.O.F. study, funded by NIAID, involved the use of bat CoV sequences to infect "humanized mice." Concerns are raised about the potential of accidental or intentional release of lab-made chimeric viruses causing a pandemic. Dr. Francis A. Boyle, drafter of the 1989 BioWeapon Treaty Act, connected the dots and believes the virus is a super-bioweapon. Moderna's early patent submission for the Covid-19 vaccine in 2019 raises questions, as does the lawsuit filed by the NIH against Moderna. The involvement of Hunter Biden in Ukrainian biowarfare labs is mentioned. The development and testing timeline of the mRNA-1273 vaccine by Moderna is questioned, along with the sponsorship by the Chan/Zuckerberg Initiative. Mark Zuckerberg's alleged censorship of vaccine dangers and natural immunity is also brought up.

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

Why is it that every time I see anything before 2019 involving the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Bat Lady & gain-of-function experiments w/ Sars-like Corona viruses, Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance & NIAID are named as funding the work? There's this one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936131/

Bat Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Like Coronavirus WIV1 Encodes an Extra Accessory Protein, ORFX, Involved in Modulation of the Host Immune Response Bats harbor severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-like coronaviruses (SL-CoVs) from which the causative agent of the 2002-2003 SARS pandemic is thought to have originated. However, despite the fact that a large number of genetically diverse SL-CoV ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

And this one from 2015 with Ralph S. Baric which was AMENDED in 2015 to show that Wuhan's top Bat Corona-virus researchers, "Bat Lady" Shi Zhenli-Li, was specifically funded for HER work on THAT research by none other than USAID's PREDICT program via EcoHealth Allliance (Daszak).

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

Oddly enough, that 2015 study at UNC at Chapel Hill (Ralph Baric & Bat Lady) was yet corrected AGAIN in 2020 when they realized they had FAILED to upload the genetic sequence of their man-made gain-of-function SARS-like Corona Chimera to the Genetic Bank. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT308984

Mutant SARS coronavirus Urbani clone SARS-Urbani-MA_SHC014-spike, comp - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

Ralph Baric's (2016 UNC Chapel Hill) G.O.F. study. Bat Lady not an author but THANKS her for supplying them w/ "WIV1-CoV spike" plasmid & bat CoV sequences to infect "humanized mice" (mice w/ gen-altered lung tissue-more humanlike) with it. NIAID funded. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26976607/

SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence - PubMed Outbreaks from zoonotic sources represent a threat to both human disease as well as the global economy. Despite a wealth of metagenomics studies, methods to leverage these datasets to identify future threats are underdeveloped. In this study, we describe an approach that combines existing metagenomi … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

2008 Bat Lady inserted human ACE2 binding molecules of SARS-CoV into a SARS-like bat coronavirus using an HIV-based pseudovirus system w/ cell lines expressing human ACE2 receptors-creating a chimera which "gained" ability to infect humans. Lab-induced species jump. Huh. Weird.

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

They should be REALLY careful doing all this gain-of-function research or, God forbid, they could literally CAUSE a pandemic through an accidental or intentional release of any of these lab-made chimeric sars-like bat corona viruses gen-edited to be super-infectious to humans.

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

In February 2020 I happened upon interview with Dr. Francis A. Boyle, drafter of the 1989 BioWeapon Treaty Act. He found these studies & connected the dots. The virus is a super-Bioweapon. In Dec 2020 he warned the mRNA vaccines were bioweapons too. https://docs.google.com/document/d/19CmtwRSuFe6GLbv2rwjb5G8_y1aQRr_xiB71v9N8gX0/edit?usp=sharing

Page Not Found Web word processing, presentations and spreadsheets docs.google.com

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

Well gosh it looks like Moderna submitted a patent for approval to start working on the Covid-19 vaccine super-early! Like, Spring of 2019-early. Wait, what? And what's that amendment in Aug 2019, does that say what I think it says? "In case of deliberate release." August 2019?

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

By November 2021 the NIH had sued Moderna because they left the US government scientists off the vaccine patents. How did Moderna & NIH know the sequence to be able to submit a patent in Spring of 2019 if the virus supposedly came from the wild and was NOT developed in a lab?

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

WHY? "4 Stages of Ideological Subversion". Watch the first video, you'll see it is describing exactly what is going on right this moment on a global scale. "Demoralization" has occurred. That's why facts don't matter. We are in Destabilization right now. https://bit.ly/TheirUltimateStrategy

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

I believe many orchestrating "whatever all this is" WANT a globalized centralized technocratic world order either because they are ideologues or because of economic/scientific/academic hubris fueled by greed or ego. Take your pick. Unless humanity wakes up, we're already slaves.

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

@ERINBROPHY18 - Erin Brophy - don't forget to laugh..

US State Department, NIH, provides millions in funding to Wuhan. In 2018, China asked DARPA for money to create covid. Trump declassified documents that revealed this. They killed millions with a virus funded by the US. Here is Sen Rand Paul:

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker raises concerns about US funding for coronavirus research in China, highlighting potential risks of lab leaks and lack of transparency. They question the safety and oversight of such research, citing instances of Chinese researchers requesting funds to create a virus similar to COVID-19. The speaker urges for bipartisan support in obtaining information from the State Department and NIH. They emphasize the need for transparency and accountability in investigating the origins of the pandemic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mr. Chairman, it's estimated that between, 5,000,000 and 18,000,000 people died from COVID 19 worldwide. To a significant number of scientists, the evidence suggests that this originated from a lab leak in Wuhan. Does the state department fund coronavirus research in China? Speaker 1: Do we fund coronavirus? I don't believe so, but I don't know. I'll double check, and we'll get back to you on that, senator. Speaker 0: The answer is yes. You do. And it's been going on for more than a decade, and it's done through a program called Predict and then the Global Virome. And why is this important is we had a 1000000 Americans die, and we really haven't had any discussion of this. No hearings. Nothing. People are unaware that they're even funding the research. We found out recently through the house unclassified report that money is going from the NIH to American universities to the, the Academy of Military Medical Sciences Research in China. We are subcontracting money and sending it over, but 1,000,000 is coming from the state department. So the idea is this, we will identify all the viruses in the world. We'll be safer because we identified them. But here's the question. Are we safer to have some guy or some woman crawling down a cave 10 hours away from Wuhan, coming up with bat guano, coming up with viruses and bringing it to a city of 15,000,000 like Wuhan. This is what's been going on for a decade. It's a setup for an accident. It's a set up for a mistake. And nobody's doing anything about it. We continue to fund it. The main group that's been getting this money is EcoHealth Alliance. Over a $100,000,000. A lot of it through the state department. They continue to get money. They don't file the reports on time. They didn't stop their experiments, and yet we reward them with more money. 15,000,000,000 people died, and we haven't done a thing about it. Nobody seems to care. We're not even sure we fund it. The State Department's a big funder of this project. It's a multi decade long project, but there are scientists as we speak from Stanford, from MIT, from prestigious universities around the country. These are not partisans. Most of them are not Republicans who stand up and say, oh my god. What are we doing? Bringing these viruses from remote bat caves to major metropolitan areas and with no controls over this. So we've been asking for information from the state department because we wanna know more about this. US Right to Know has been sending FOIA requests for two and a half years and they don't get anything. So, mister chairman, I've sent 2 letters. Some of them are 6 months old now, and we get a, you know, whatever. We're not gonna give you any information. What I would hope for is that we could have people always talk about bipartisanship. Could we not get bipartisan support for records? This is not partisan. We wanna know what the US State Department is funding. NIH resists our our request on their funds. The two things that we know for certain that have led us to believe this came from the lab that are big came because one was leaked and this was a DARPA request. So the Chinese researchers in China wanted from DARPA money to create a virus that, guess what, looks exactly like COVID 19. They asked for it in 2018. We turned them down. Fortunately, we did the right thing for once. We turned them down. That doesn't mean they didn't do the research. And so many scientists had an moment. They saw this and they said, oh my goodness. They asked for money to create something that looks almost exactly what we got. So in nature, you do not have coronaviruses that infect people that have what is called a furin cleavage site. Chinese said give us money where we're gonna stick a furin cleavage site to allow it to infect humans more. We found out that not because you let us know or not because the NIH let us know, they still resist. This is top secret. This is classified. This is a whole problem of classification, but it's also to cover up things. So we don't know anything about the 28 thing, but we had an illegal leak that went to somebody in the media that's now public that said the Chinese wanted to create a virus just like COVID 19 in 2018. The other thing we know is 3 researchers in the Wuhan lab, in the Wuhan Institute of Virology got very sick with flu like symptoms similar to COVID in November. We only know that though because the Trump administration on the way out declassified it. So we have to get overall the classification. We also have to be more forthcoming, and I'm hoping the chairman will consider looking at our request. These are not partisan. We wanna know all the information about funding of research in China. We wanna know the interactions. There were cables going back and forth between the state department saying, holy cow. They're not wearing gloves. They don't wear masks and doing this research. They're doing it in what's called a BSL 2 as opposed to a BSL 4. Most of the research that we think escaped was not done in the appropriate lab. And And the state department knew about it, but we've had no hearings about this. They refused to give us information. 15,000,000 people died. A 1,000,000 American died, and you won't give us information. So what I would ask is look at our request. This isn't partisan. This should be about discovering the origins of this. The scientific community is about 5050 now, and I would hope that we we suspect the Chinese of not being honest and withholding information, but it's sad that the US government is withholding information from its representatives. Speaker 1: I'll take back your request again, senator. I would urge, a briefing perhaps in a SCIF with the intelligence community on this, because as you know, there is not a single view, about this particular set of issues, but I understand your desire to understand what occurred. Speaker 0: We're asking you for unclassified information that you hold, not the intel. Speaker 1: I understand that.

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Russell Brand - Anthony Fauci and NIH received and hid $350 million of royalties from Pharma companies

Video Transcript AI Summary
Andy Fauci is praised as a pandemic hero, urging people to get vaccinated to stop the virus. However, an investigation revealed $350 million in royalties hidden by Fauci and the NIH from pharma companies. Fauci is now charging up to $100,000 for speaking engagements post-Biden administration. He is listed as a motivational speaker. Fauci and Bill Gates were influential voices during the pandemic, with dissenting voices labeled as conspiracy theories.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another great hero of the pandemic, you love him, I love him, we all love him. Let's, in fact, dance around singing his name and get badges of him on ourselves. It's Andy Fauci. You wanna be a dead end to the virus. So when the virus gets to you, you stop it. No. Get that virus and stop that there. Get the vaccine. It stops transmission. And certainly, no one's gonna question that. Not on this platform. An investigation by Open the Books found that Anthony Fauci and the NIH received and hid $350,000,000 of royalties from pharma companies. In 2021, the National Institutes of Health, Antony Fauci's employer, doled out $30,000,000,000 in government grants to roughly 56,000 recipients. However, open the books found 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars in payments also flow the other way. Oh, wow. Like a revolving door between the NIH and the pharmaceutical companies. Sounds weird. These are royalty payments from 3rd party payers. Think pharmaceutical companies, for example, back to the NIH and individual NIH scientists. Well, that was back then. It was a crazy time for all of us, the pandemic. I remember having a mental breakdown. So let's put all of that behind us and all of your suffering as well because Anthony Fauci now is showing his true colors with his philanthrop oh, Anthony Fauci is charging as much as $100,000 for speaking engagements months after leaving his position in the Biden administration. Yeah. But remember when he would stand behind Trump and sort of go, that's a real hero. The former director of the NIAID's listing on leading motivational speakers is listed under the motivational speakers and healthcare speakers categories. Certainly motivated me to do a lot of things. I got quite cross. Were there any voices that were more significant than the voice of Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci during the pandemic? They set the narrative. They set the measures. They ultimately decided what direction things went in. The only voices of rebuttal and dissent came from what was called conspiracy theories, you know, like Joe Rogan having Robert Malone on stuff.

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

And look who is also involved in Biolabs in Ukraine? Oh yes. Hunter Biden. It's just all corrupt and all connected.

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

There are at least 5-8 Ukrainian Biowarfare labs (that we know of) the DoD financed with Hunter-related companies getting the contracts to build & run. What are the odds? Rosemont Seneca partnered w/Black & Veach to build and Metabiota to run.

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

Biden Inc. Crime Family Syndicate? #exposecorruption

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

So within 44 days of the specific gene sequence being confirmed, Moderna supposedly flash-developed the mRNA-1273 vaccine, tested it (for 3-7 weeks) on mice, analyzed results & shipped a fully completed & tested clinical product out to begin human trials?

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

@INFJLOVE CSH Labs (animal/human trials) was shipped the mRNA-1273💉product 25 days after the supposed first gene sequencing (Jan 4 2020). Moderna applied for a patent for💉on March 28th, 2019. BEFORE the pandemic appeared. It means they were developing it ALREADY. +Fauci earns royalties.

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

Ralph Baric "invented" the SARS-CoV2 MA for testing within that 41 day period too? May want to check the UNC Invention Report reference #18752 to see when he filed it. I'm just curious. Don't tell me they didn't already have the sequence when the Patent was filed in March 2019.

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

NIAID, NIH, Moderna, Vanderbilt, University of Texas, lots of scientists on here, including Ralph Baric. So it took 25 days to receive the specific sequenced antigen, 15 days to test immunogenicity in mice, that's 40 days right there. But OK. Sure. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.11.145920v1.full

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Development Enabled by Prototype Pathogen Preparedness bioRxiv - the preprint server for biology, operated by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, a research and educational institution biorxiv.org

@1stacyphillips - Stacy Phillips

And notice the Chan/Zuckerberg Initiative sponsored the Moderna Vax development. Is this why Mark Zuckerberg censored all content that spoke of the vaccine dangers or natural immunity? Because he was invested in the development of the Moderna vaccine? https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.11.145920v1.full

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Development Enabled by Prototype Pathogen Preparedness bioRxiv - the preprint server for biology, operated by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, a research and educational institution biorxiv.org
Saved - April 3, 2023 at 5:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The origin of COVID-19 has been a confusing and frustrating topic. The Proximal Origin article, which has been a hot topic in congressional review, misses crucial details. One of the authors, Edward Howell, is part of the Fauci In-Crowd and co-authored an article used to stifle the lab leak theory. Zhang and Howell co-authored an article on the virus, but questions arise about what else Howell was a part of. The timeline is unclear, and things don't add up. Why can't they admit that?

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

🧵1. Long before the Fauci emails were unredacted, many of us knew that the C19 origin story is a Political + Orwellian head-spin. The Pandemic has been bewildering, and frustrating but the worst part for many has been the confusion.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

2. In congressional review the “Proximal Origin...” article has been a hot topic. While Andersen, Lipkin, & #Fauci ARE key ppl the story has missed crucial details. As was the case w/Redfield- the who/what that has been omitted/excluded is often where the truth is hidden.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

3. The rarely discussed/ interesting part: One of the authors of the “Proximal Origin” paper is Edward Howell & it was his colleague, Yong-Zhen Zhang who 1st sequenced C19 on Jan. 5th 2020. Howell & Zhang are both professors at Fudan Univ. in Shanghai.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

🧵4.Zhang received the sample on Jan. 3rd, sequenced it by the 5th. Realizing he was dealing w/a SARS-related virus, Zhang warned Health officials & Wuhan Hospital. On the 11th, Howell reaches o/to Zhang & asks his permission to publish the genome.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

🧵5.According to Zhang, the Chinese government had forbidden anyone in China from publishing any information on the new mysterious illness. Being the case, Zhang let Howell publish the article the same day he had asked, on Jan 11th 2020. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3052966/chinese-laboratory-first-shared-coronavirus-genome-world-ordered

Lab that first shared coronavirus sequence closed for ‘rectification’ No reason was given for the closure of the Shanghai facility, which released information about the virus ahead of authorities. One source at the laboratory said the closure has hampered scientists’ research when they should be ‘racing against the clock’. scmp.com

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

🧵6. Something did occur after the Jan 1st Fauci Phone Conference. On Feb 3rd Zhang & Howell co-authored an article on the virus: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3 although Zhang claims the Chinese Gov. shut his lab down on Jan 12th.

A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China - Nature Emerging infectious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Zika virus disease, present a major threat to public health1–3. Despite intense research efforts, how, when and where new diseases appear are still a source of considerable uncertainty. A severe respiratory disease was recently reported in Wuhan, Hubei province, China. As of 25 January 2020, at least 1,975 cases had been reported since the first patient was hospitalized on 12 December 2019. Epidemiological investigations have suggested that the outbreak was associated with a seafood market in Wuhan. Here we study a single patient who was a worker at the market and who was admitted to the Central Hospital of Wuhan on 26 December 2019 while experiencing a severe respiratory syndrome that included fever, dizziness and a cough. Metagenomic RNA sequencing4 of a sample of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from the patient identified a new RNA virus strain from the family Coronaviridae, which is designated here ‘WH-Human 1’ coronavirus (and has also been referred to as ‘2019-nCoV’). Phylogenetic analysis of the complete viral genome (29,903 nucleotides) revealed that the virus was most closely related (89.1% nucleotide similarity) to a group of SARS-like coronaviruses (genus Betacoronavirus, subgenus Sarbecovirus) that had previously been found in bats in China5. This outbreak highlights the ongoing ability of viral spill-over from animals to cause severe disease in humans. Phylogenetic and metagenomic analyses of the complete viral genome of a new coronavirus from the family Coronaviridae reveal that the virus is closely related to a group of SARS-like coronaviruses found in bats in China. nature.com

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

🧵7. All details that should have been common knowledge! Also remind yourself that Howell is in the "Fauci-In-Crowd" as an author in the article he used to stifle the lab leak theory. https://time.com/5882918/zhang-yongzhen-interview-china-coronavirus-genome/

Exclusive: Chinese Scientist Who First Sequenced COVID-19 Genome Speaks About Controversies Surrounding His Work Exclusive: Zhang Yongzhen, the Chinese researcher who first publicized a genome of the coronavirus, is seeking to set the record straight. time.com

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

8.🧵Questions arise: What happened in the 6 days Zhang had the sequenced virus? He's co-authored dozens of articles w/ Howell, what else was Howell a part of? What about our vaccines that derived from that original genome? One story that..

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

9🧵..comes to mind is from an undated USCF article on Stephen Hoge, President of Moderna, 1st to develop the vaccine "software." What the article claims doesn't fit right. https://alumni.ucsf.edu/stories/stephen-hoge

Turns out, designing a COVID vaccine was easy | UCSF Alumni alumni.ucsf.edu

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

10🧵Hoge (Moderna) claims he created the C19 💉in 1hr, over a weekend on Jan 13th 2020. However, the 13th was a weekday- a Monday. Zhang/Howell uploaded the sequence on Sat. the 11th. Hoge admits he was "Eager" to get to "Test" out the 💉.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

11 It's been 3 years & we still don't have a clear understanding or even an accurate timeline. When they clearly had access, & foreknowledge but chose to waste their time & our money censoring Americans for asking basic questions. Things don't add up. Why can't they admit that?

Saved - April 3, 2023 at 5:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The COVID-19 pandemic began in 2019, but it wasn't until January 3, 2020, that a scientist had a sample of the virus. The vast network of US medical and biological research, funded by billions of dollars, led to an increase in biological programs. VRC scientists, including Barney Graham, Kizzmekia Corbett, and Jason McLellan, worked on coronavirus vaccines and partnered with Moderna. The VRC scientists solved the problem of the spike protein prefusion configuration, filed patents, and signed exclusive agreements with Moderna. Senator Ron Johnson is working to get transparency on these agreements.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

1/10 Pharma-Files/Pharma-Philes: It started in 2020, but it really didn’t. Getting here has been the fruits of many years of labor, but no good deed goes unpunished. COVID came into the world in 2019 but it wasn’t until Jan 3, 2020 that a scientist had a sample of C19.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

2/10 It wasn’t until Jan 3rd that a scientist had a sample of C19 in a vial. The scientist was a professor at Fudan University in Shanghai named Yong Zhen-Zhang, who by the 5th had sequenced the virus. 6 days later, his colleague, Edward Holmes uploaded the genome to Genbank.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

3/10 Before all of this, there was a few things that had to transpire. 1st was the vast network of US medical/biological research and agendas that sprang out of days of the War on Terror. After the 2001 Anthrax attacks, Billions were allotted towards all things science.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

4/10 Those billion led to the funding of research and bio programs. This lead a fast increase in biological programs here and abroad. Most now know Shi-Zheng-Li had worked under Ralph Baric at UNC Chapel hill, playing Frankenstein with coronaviruses in 2014-2015.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

5/10 Being the most commonly blamed for the pandemic, they weren't alone at all. Most of the people involved came from the VRC (vaccine research center) part of NIH. VRC scientists; Barney Graham, & Jason Mclellan & Kizzmekia Corbett (student of Baric)

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

6/10 Obama had placed a GOF moratorium out and a lot of research was off-shored, but A LOT wasn't. TBH the ability of altering viruses had long been perfected & was of little interest to scientists unless they could profit off the disease-that meant MCMs.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

7/10 Turns out the VRC scientists were figuring out why the prior coronavirus vaccines had failed. Graham, Corbett, & McLellan teamed up with Scripps Inst' Dr. Andrew Ward to solve to problem. The problem was the spike protein pre-fusion configuration & they solved it! Sorta.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

8/10 They found that the spike changes shape as it attaches to host cells.They found a way to stabilize this interaction in RSV, then HKU1 & MERS. They filed patents, & exclusive agreements with Moderna despite the fact that Graham's college roomie, Gruber is VP for Pfizer

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

9/10 Awkward right?! VRC scientists sided with Moderna to partner with, back in 2017, giving them rights tech that's in C19 mRNA vaccines today. Although NIH/NIAID still gets a cut. So a lot of those tax-payer $'s went right into Uncle Sam's pocket. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6935295-NIH-Moderna-Confidential-Agreements

NIH-Moderna Confidential Agreements documentcloud.org

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

10/10 I know you can't sue the Vaccine makers for liabilities, but I'm interested in what a lawyer thinks of the clauses in that agreement that state the technology cannot be used in human experimentation. Wouldn't that be a World-Class-Action Lawsuit?

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

10+ 🧵 Thank Goodness for @SenRonJohnson who is doing the best he can to get transparency. While Becerra's level disrespect in astonishing Johnson stayed on him. 👏 Ask them about VRC's Moderna Agreements or how Resilience is CIA @SenRonJohnson

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses concern about redactions in the released information, stating that privileged information was redacted even though it shouldn't have been. They mention that they have been requesting the last 50 pages for over a year. They argue that congressional oversight should not be subject to the same redactions as FOIA requests. They ask if the commitment will be made to provide the last 50 pages of communication related to the origin of the coronavirus. Speaker 1 responds by committing to follow up on the request and stating that the information should be provided in compliance with the law. Speaker 0 reiterates that redactions are not in compliance with the law.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was released under the b, b five exception, which is privileged information, within or between agencies. Again, this is what Jamie Farrar of the Welcome Trust. So we we had redactions with, you know, privileged information. It didn't apply, and we still had it redacted. I don't have time to get into that. This is completely inappropriate. And, by the way, we're down you have produced 350 pages to us in the reading room. For over a year, we've been asking for the last 50 pages. This is what the 50 pages look like. Okay? Now again, I would argue congressional oversight should not be subject to the same redactions that were applied under FOIA request. I'm asking you, will you commit today to provide our oversight? And senator Paul is on this now. Again, we had 5 members of Homeland Security Government Affairs under a law that says you shall provide this. Will you commit to provide us the last 50 pages of communication between Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Jamie Farrar as it relates to the origin of the coronavirus. Will you commit to that? Speaker 1: Senator, I absolutely will commit to make sure we follow-up with you on your request to get some of that information. Again, this is this is in compliance with the law that you receive the information. I I don't know what particular statute with regard disclosure was applied here, but you are absolutely entitled to the information that by by law, a member of the senate or the house Speaker 0: again, you're not complying with the law because you're redacting things, for example, on a dilutive process between and within agencies and communication outside of the agency.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

@laralogan @JanJekielek @GenFlynn @RandPaul @SenRonJohnson @delbigtree @JeffereyJaxen @richardursomd @drsimonegold @HighWireTalk @jathorpmfm @VigilantFox @Spiro_Ghost @_theconfluence @MazeLove14 @DrLiMengYAN1 @GVDBossche @PezntJournalist @DOD_the_OG @DowdEdward @stkirsch

Saved - August 16, 2023 at 1:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2008, work on COVID-19 began, led by Antony Fauci at NIAID. A vaccine was ready by 2012. This operation, called LOCK STEP, was funded by DOD and not the Rockefeller Institute. The Rockefeller Foundation's 2009 scenario predicted a lockdown in 2020, aligning with the current pandemic. The Spanish Flu in 1918 was caused by H1N1, which resurfaced in 2009. The CDC confirmed its impact on humans and animals. The connections between these events raise questions.

@djbillyzwick - Billy Gee 💎💃🕺

Lock Step or LOCKSTEP? 🤯🤯🤯 2009 in fact. ... amazing.. Work on COVID 19 started in 2008 in NIAID and Antony FAUCI was running it as NIAID director. Vaccine (not to use in humans) ready in 2012, NIAID & Moderna property. https://principia-scientific.com/2010-rockefellers-operation-lockstep-predicted-2020-lockdown/

2010: Rockefeller’s ‘Operation Lockstep’ Predicted 2020 ‘Lockdown’ | Principia Scientific Intl. In 2010, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the Rockefeller Foundation, one of Our major “philanthropic” organs, convened what is called a “scenario planning exercise” where future events that we may or may not be planning are “gamed”. Ostensibly, future and scenario planning is simply prudent, especially as regards public health, so it principia-scientific.com

@djbillyzwick - Billy Gee 💎💃🕺

Operation LOCK STEP (Lockstep) Rockefeller Foundation pandemic made, not in Rockefeller institute this time (like "Spanish Flu" 1918), but in NIAID by Antony Fauci and financed by DOD with taxpayer dollars! PDF 5.4MB 👇👇👇 nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS… Download here 👆👆👆

@djbillyzwick - Billy Gee 💎💃🕺

Here's WHO made your COVID! Fresh screenshots from the PDF Download link in previous page 👆 Read 👇

@djbillyzwick - Billy Gee 💎💃🕺

@djbillyzwick - Billy Gee 💎💃🕺

@djbillyzwick - Billy Gee 💎💃🕺

@djbillyzwick - Billy Gee 💎💃🕺

@djbillyzwick - Billy Gee 💎💃🕺

@djbillyzwick - Billy Gee 💎💃🕺

@djbillyzwick - Billy Gee 💎💃🕺

Keep in mind.. This was written in 2009 after 2008 Subprimes financial and housing crisis (created by them.. starting in 2002) and released in 2010. This is not "prediction" but The Plan or Agenda. July 2020 RF Audit was written in advance too. nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS… Link 👆

@djbillyzwick - Billy Gee 💎💃🕺

⛔ COVID19 (*published in 2010) ROCKEFELLER FONDATION 2009 "LOCK STEP" OPERATION SCENARIO AND 2019 LOCKDOWN PANDEMIC REALITY 👇 ⛔

@djbillyzwick - Billy Gee 💎💃🕺

SPANISH FLU 2018 LA GRIPPE ESPAGNOLE Made in Rockefellers Institute New York

@djbillyzwick - Billy Gee 💎💃🕺

Spanish Flu 1918 was H1N1 Corona virus which was released again in 2009, after Bird Flu in 1995, which sounds silly but it wasn't. This stated by the CDC. 👇 https://duckduckgo.com/?q=cdc+h1n1+Spanish+flu&t=ofa&ia=news… 👆 People couldn't walk and had miocarditis symptoms. Wasn't really chicken or bird either because migrating to humans and animals, pigs cows.. 👇

cdc h1n1 spanish flu at DuckDuckGo DuckDuckGo. Privacy, Simplified. duckduckgo.com
Saved - June 29, 2023 at 5:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
From 2009 to 2014, Sudhakar Agnihothram worked closely with Ralph Baric at UNC Chapel Hill, conducting significant research on SARS. Sudhakar coauthored crucial papers on chimeric Coronavirus Spike Proteins and SARS-like clusters. He also coauthored the Crystal Structure of RBD from MERS and holds a patent for SARS-CoV spike proteins. Since 2016, Sudhakar has been a Principal Regulatory Project Manager at the FDA, overseeing EUA and vaccine approvals, including COVID-19 vaccines. He was involved in reviewing safety and efficacy incidents and approved vaccines for adolescents. It's concerning that Sudhakar has a patent and research ties with Baric, who is suspected of creating COVID-19.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

1🧵 From the years 2009-2014 a man named Sudhakar Agnihothram was a post doctoral assistant at UNC Chapel HIll under Ralph Baric. He continued research w/ Baric up til 2016 & he was a prominent name in almost all of the infamous SARS research Baric conducted.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

2🧵Among the most important papers he co-authored was the, Methods & Compositions for chimeric Coronavirus Spike Proteins [2015] & SARS like WIV-1 CoV Poised for Human Emergence [2016] as well as the SARS like cluster Circulating ...[2015]

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

3🧵Sudhakar is also co-author w/ Baric on the "Crystal Structure of RBD from newly emerged MERS..[2013] and co-owner of the patent for the SARS CoV spike proteins [2015/18]. No big deal, right? I thought so until now. Sudhakar's LinkedIn reveals his career since working w/Baric

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

4🧵Sudhakar since 2016 has worked at the FDA in the office of Vaccine Research and Review as a Principal Regulatory Project Manager, in charge of #EUA and Vaccine approvals, namely, the C19 EUA vaccines. His name is personally listed as the deciding regulator on many of the jabs

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

5🧵Sudhakar was also a contributor to the VRBPAC committee of safety & efficacy, reviewing incidents like myocarditis in young adults, & cGMP of certain batches of vaccines. He approved the jab for adolescents for both Moderna and Pfizer. @P_McCulloughMD

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

6🧵 The alarm bells started blaring when I recalled the 2019 Material Transfer Agreement signed between #Moderna and #RalphBaric concerning the vaccine technology that would later go into the C19 vaccines. Knowing the Spike protein is the basis for their vaccine.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

7🧵This is a massively ignored conflict of interest. The same man determining the EUA authorizations for C19 vaccines has a patent with the guy suspected of creating C19, for chimeric SARS, spike proteins, & co-authored the SAME research sited as proof that C19 was lab made.⚠️

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

8🧾Receipts: https://www.fda.gov/media/150136/download https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=976a058d3ffccce982af45dccd0eb9388f9d0834 https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6935295-NIH-Moderna-Confidential-Agreements https://www.linkedin.com/in/sudhakar-agnihothram-8195309/ https://www.fda.gov/media/153088/download https://patents.justia.com/inventor/sudhakar-agnihothram https://www.fda.gov/media/159611/download

NIH-Moderna Confidential Agreements documentcloud.org
Sudhakar Agnihothram | LinkedIn A broadly trained virologist with extensive experience in FDA regulation of vaccines, diagnostics, and drugs for infectious diseases. Specialty in regulating medical countermeasures against pathogens of bioterrorism and emerging infectious disease concern. Expert in emergency use authorizations (EUAs), pandemic preparedness and response. Playing a pivotal role as an FDA regulator in COVID-19 pandemic preparedness and response, a concerted approach integrating stakeholders from US government, industrial partners, academia, and national regulatory authorities.

Core training prior to joining FDA was focused on preclinical evaluation of vaccines, antibody therapeutics and small molecule inhibitors targeting emerging viral pathogens (including select agents) of biodefense and public health concern. Contributed to developing small animal models of virus-induced acute lung injury and identifying viral and host targets of disease using systems biology-based approaches. Two years of business development experience evaluating UNC technologies across diverse area of biomedical sciences. A flexible team player with good interpersonal, collaboration, leadership, supervisory, communication and management skills, and proven ability to accelerate product development from discovery to licensed use.

I am a firm believer in a stringent collaborative regulatory approach coalescing key players from diverse sectors that fosters advanced manufacturing technologies, innovative clinical trial designs and real-world evidence-based approaches to solve major public health problems.

SPECIALITIES:
• FDA Regulation of mRNA vaccines & therapeutics, vectored and recombinant vaccines
• FDA Regulation of vaccines, drugs, biologics, and devices
• Counterterrorism, emergency preparedness and response
• Education, training, and outreach
• Business development & patents | Learn more about Sudhakar Agnihothram's work experience, education, connections & more by visiting their profile on LinkedIn
linkedin.com
Sudhakar Agnihothram Inventions, Patents and Patent Applications - Justia Patents Search USPTO patent applications submitted by and patents granted to Sudhakar Agnihothram patents.justia.com
Saved - June 23, 2025 at 10:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1965, scientists discovered and began modifying the coronavirus through animal studies. By 1990, Pfizer created the first spiked protein vaccine but found it ineffective due to the virus's rapid mutation. In 2002, UNC patented a bioweapon version of the virus, leading to concerns about biowarfare. A 2015 National Academy of Sciences statement highlighted the profit motives behind vaccine development. In 2019, Moderna patented a vaccine for potential pathogen releases. By 2023, Congress uncovered unreported funding to the Wuhan Institute, raising questions about the origins of the virus and treatments.

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

1965 Scientists first discovered the coronavirus & began to modify it by studying it in animals https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1547.long

Covid-19: First coronavirus was described in The BMJ in 1965 The first description of human coronavirus—a family of viruses that now includes SARS-CoV-2, the cause of the current covid-19 pandemic—was published in The BMJ in 1965. The research, led by virologist David Tyrrell at the Common Cold Unit in Wiltshire, England, involved studying nasal washings from volunteers.1 The researchers found that they could grow several viruses associated with the common cold, but not all of them. One such sample, referred to as B814, turned out to be what we now know as a coronavirus. Using the original B814 nasal swab from a “boy with a typical common cold in 1960,” the team obtained more secretions … bmj.com

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

1990 Pfizer created 1st spiked protein vaccine based on these animal experiments. Pfizer learned the 💉did not work bc the coronavirus was malleable (Modifies/mutates too rapidly for a vaccine to be effective. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2170676/

Assembly of coronavirus spike protein into trimers and its role in epitope expression - PubMed The folding and oligomerization of coronavirus spike protein were explored using a panel of monoclonal antibodies. Chemical cross-linking and sedimentation experiments showed that the spike of transmissible gastroenteritis virus is a homotrimer of the S membrane glycoprotein. The spike protein was s … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

2002 UNC Chapel Hill patented an “infectious replication defective” clone of the coronavirus. A bioweapon. Patent based on research by Anthony Fauci & only granted after the CDC intervened.

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

2005 The scientific community labeled the coronavirus “biowarfare enabling technology”

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

2015 Statement from National Academy of Sciences reveals one of the true objectives of the 💉…profit.

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

It read, “To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures, such as the pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus, vaccine. A key driver is the media, & the economics will follow the hype.”

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

2019 Moderna received a patent for a vaccine that included the statement, “for the accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen.”

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

2023 The US Congress discovered an additional & unreported $2million in research funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This funding was again transferred indirectly through EcoHealth Alliance, Fauci’s favorite partner.

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

Since 2005, over &10 billion has been funneled to research institutions @ the direction of Fauci & the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to illegally fund GOF research and the development of the mRNA “vaccines.”

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

Manipulation & betrayal from Big Pharma and the NIH, CDC, and FDA brazenly disregarding the health & welfare of the American people.

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

So ask yourself, what came first? The manufactured virus or the manufactured treatment? Someone check on Ralph Baric @ UNC please…

Saved - September 17, 2023 at 7:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nipah outbreak in Kerala, India sparks concern. The lethal virus historically had low transmission. A 3-year study funded by NIHNIAID on Nipah raises questions about gain-of-function research. Moderna conducts Phase 1 trials for an mRNA vaccine, with NIHNIAID funding. Connections between Fauci, EcoHealth, and Moderna draw attention. Potential risks if a transmissible version of Nipah emerges.

@birb_k - KBirb

Nipah. Outbreak | Study | Vaccine. The unique combination of these 3 elements feels familiar, uncomfortable. A) OUTBREAK. Multiple outlets now reporting Nipah outbreak & isolation efforts in Kerala, India. Nipah has historically been low transmission and highly lethal. But… 1/

@birb_k - KBirb

Nipah. Outbreak | Study | Vaccine. B) STUDY. The NIH/NIAID funded a 3-year Cooperative Agreement program 2020-2022 on Nipah, while Fauci was in office. The awardee? Peter Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance. Was gain-of-function involved? (asking due to precedence) 2/ https://t.co/EBma02ygxi

@birb_k - KBirb

Nipah. Outbreak | Study | Vaccine. C) VACCINE. No Nipah vaccine has existed, but an mRNA candidate (of course) is in active Phase 1 trials. Who is doing the trial and has worldwide rights to the outcome? Moderna. Who funded the trial? NIH/NIAID (royalty?) History rhymes. 3/ https://t.co/LC7lFk24rB

@birb_k - KBirb

Will Nipah remain a deadly but low-transmission disease with localized, non-global consequences? Hopefully. But if a version manipulated for transmissibility leaked, that would be bad. In COVID context Fauci/NIAID had ties to EcoHealth & Moderna. Same apparently with Nipah. 4/ https://t.co/UOVmaYGJmw

Saved - October 5, 2023 at 3:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Covid disrupted life, revealing the Gates Foundation's immense influence in the pandemic response. Their 2019 IRS 990 form exposes their plans for more illness and vaccines. Grants poured into vaccine manufacturers, media, and population control. Johns Hopkins University received 55 grants. UNC Chapel Hill, Vir Biotech, and Global Health Fund were also funded. Vaccines and family planning dominated their agenda. The Gates Foundation's power and intentions are clear. Receipts: [link].

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

1🧵Covid disrupted life as we knew it & since the first lock-down things haven't been the same. We went into 2020 w/ Bill & Melinda Gates a happily married couple-no more by 2021. I got a hold of their foundations 2019 IRS 990 to see what the happy Ex's were up.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

2🧵For a quick recap: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, a "philanthropic" powerhouse since 2000 was a lead stakeholder in the C19 response- landing a $200Billion ROI on a $2Billion dollar investment into vaccines. Though C19 is fading away the couple gleefully looks to the future.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

3🧵In June of 202 watch the couple smirk & say that the next Pandemic "will get attention this time!" @CSPAN https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5010580/user-clip-bill-gates-pandemic-will-attention-time A scene straight out of a "Get out" style dystopian nightmare.

User Clip: Bill Gates says the next Pandemic "will get attention this time" Eugenicist Gates will make sure that the next Plandemic is potent enough to put the fear of God into everyone, so that they ALL get vaccinated. c-span.org

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

4🧵So, what did they know that we didn't? According to their Foundation's 990 they see much more illness ahead & they are assuring much more vaccines too. The 1143 page tax form reveals how their spending their Billions. https://t.co/rTS4jJlVJJ

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

5🧵Of grant money going toward specific C19 manufacturers in 2019, millions were poured into all the US marketed jabs; Moderna [4 grants], Pfizer [2 grants] & Janssen [7 grants] https://t.co/xNaoSZeddd

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

6🧵Cancer[15 grants], Aspen Institute [8 grants], Grants containing the word "Genome"- 14 grants. Even efforts relating to the media were among the investments w/"news" receiving 9 grants. https://t.co/GaE1WGQKIM

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

7🧵A whopping 24 grants for the Wellcome Trust, , and 13 grants for the Scripps Institute. "Therpeutics" saw 19 grants, and "Pharma" had 37 grants. Its clear what the agenda is already, Illness. https://t.co/lA8RahKtpb

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

8🧵The US funded biolab in Tiblisi recieves 2 grants from the BMGF, but that's nothing in the face of the 55 grants made out to Johns Hopkins University. Aren't they who hosted Event 201 for the BMGF & the WEF?🤫 https://t.co/u7DmpFauXo

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

9🧵The word "population" was a constant theme, ranging from the Population Council, to population services all in all there were 57 grants. What was scary was that for "Family planning" there were a terrifying 335 grants. https://t.co/yEd7lFgoMn

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

10🧵Ralph Baric's University, UNC Chapel Hill has long been funded by the BMGF so I was not surprised that UNC Chapel hill landed 31 grants for 2019. Pandemic response funds were seen in Vir Biotech and the Global Health Fun as well. https://t.co/hK36SaPtWC

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

11🧵Last but not least the term "Vaccine" came up for 465 times! Insane. It doesn't take a genius to see the BMGF's agenda. Vaccines and Family Planning come up a combined 800 times in the grants! Has this gotten your attention? Because as Bill said, "It will next time!" https://t.co/5bI42QXkl4

Saved - October 30, 2023 at 2:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
This comprehensive article provides key information from various sources. It includes details about Moderna's SEC filing, discussions on vaccine risks, research grants, collaborations between institutions, and scientific publications. The article also mentions the East Palestine Train Derailment's bio-containment disaster and references a fundamental document on the emergence of Dengue. These findings warrant further investigation.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

🚨🧾🔍 DATA DROP No.3 🚨🧾🔍 *Apologies for the later than expected release of these files. This is just a small culmination of recent documents I've found that are the best of the best. I look at hundreds of docs every week and these were among the best of them. Enjoy & please share. P.S- As always, receipts are included for all documents referenced & please feel free to tag your favorite research docs in the comments** Moderna aka "Muderna" SEC Filing Q3 2020 showing the financial and more accurate on-goings of Moderna in respect to mRNA technology, namely the C19 vaccine mRNA-1273. A direct quote from page 16 of 408 **[pay close attention to what they say in the last paragraph concerning Bill Gates and HIV/AIDS] the PDF reads; "In April 2020, we entered into an agreement with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), a division of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), for an award of up to $483.3 million to accelerate development of mRNA-1273, our vaccine candidate against the novel coronavirus. In July 2020, we amended our agreement with BARDA to provide for an additional commitment of up to $471.6 million to support late-stage clinical development of mRNA-1273, including the execution of a 30,000 participant Phase 3 study in the U.S. The amendment increased the maximum award from BARDA from $483.3 million to $954.9 million. Under the terms of the agreement, BARDA will fund the advancement of mRNA-1273 to FDA licensure. All contract options have been exercised. As of September 30, 2020, the remaining available funding net of revenue earned was $781.7 million. In September 2016, we received an award of up to $125.8 million from BARDA, to help fund our Zika vaccine program. Three of the four contract options have been exercised. As of September 30, 2020, the remaining available funding net of revenue earned was $71.9 million, with an additional $8.4 million available if the final contract option is exercised. In January 2016, we entered a global health project framework agreement with the Gates Foundation to advance mRNA-based development projects for various infectious diseases, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). As of September 30, 2020, the available funding net of revenue earned was $12.6 million, with up to an additional $80.0 million available if additional follow-on projects are approved." Link^: https://s29.q4cdn.com/435878511/files/doc_financials/2020/q3/ec2e9559-c2a1-42b3-a24a-1988e5918fb5.pdf -------------------------------------------- PubMed Article from Ralph Baric (UNC Chapel Hill Scientist who is the father of GoF Coronavirus research), Stanley Perlman (regulator), and Barney Graham (NIH's Vaccine Research Center Scientist who aided in the creation of C19 vaccines) titled; Consensus summary report for CEPI/BC March 12-13, 2020 meeting: Assessment of risk of disease enhancement with COVID-19 vaccines. The fact that as early as MARCH 2020, Baric worked alongside Bill Gate's CEPI [the group who wants all future vaccines to be produced in <100days] and were discussing essentially the possibility of vaccine caused ADE/ Vaccine derived disease enhancement is infuriating and disturbing. ^Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32507409/ ---------- Research grant as listed on http://USASpending.gov for EcoHealth Alliance 2014-2019 titled; UNDERSTANDING THE RISK OF BAT CORONAVIRUS EMERGENCE-Grant #: R01AI110964_7529: ^https://www.usaspending.gov/award/ASST_NON_R01AI110964_7529 ---------- Emails between Ralph Baric, his wife Toni Baric and staff discussing meeting with DARPA in mid 2017. * Files were obtained through a FOIA by the medical oversight watchdogs at US Right To Know: ^Link: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/UNC_Baric_12.30.21.pdf -------- Report-BioCat 2.0 Sept 2013- Joint report from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Battelle Labs, and the DOE Prepared for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under U.S. Department of Energy Contract #: DE-AC05-76RL01830. BioCat 2.0 is one of MANY long-standing entities concerning disease surveillance/bioweapons following the CIA's Project Impact and Project BlackFlag and coincided with the DHS's BIOWATCH program [ 1-3] and BioMapp. The 94pg PDF is concisely summarized in the abstract; "The goal of this project is to characterize, evaluate, classify, and catalog existing disease forecast and prediction models that could provide operational decision support for recognizing a biological event having a potentially significant impact." ^Link: https://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-22767.pdf ---------- A February 2021 presentation on behalf of The National Academy of Sciences, lead by Former director James Le Duc, on "How U.S. policies can foster research environments that enable collaborations around the world—Focus on Biosecurity." This presentation shows that the University of Texas Medical Branch works with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and is tasked with training the WIV staff with proper BSL-4 biosecurity training and protocol: ^Link: https://www.nationalacademies.org/documents/embed/link/LF2255DA3DD1C41C0A42D3BEF0989ACAECE3053A6A9B/file/DC3F942EF28706DB42B20B193D5FDB0B799E795482C7?noSaveAs=1 ----------- PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases research article published in January of 2018 by scientists from; Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Recombinant Gene Products Group, Molecular Medicine Division, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology out of India, Global Vaccines Inc out of the Triangle Park/NCBiotech in Durham NC, & 3 scientists from Baric's lab at UNC Chapel Hill. The article is titled, "A tetravalent virus-like particle vaccine designed to display domain III of dengue envelope proteins induces multi-serotype neutralizing antibodies in mice and macaques which confer protection against antibody dependent enhancement in AG129 mice" It is centered around the developing Dengue Virus Vaccine and their aspiration of utilizing a Virus-Like Particle [VLPs] to create a "Yeast expressed singly entity particulate tetravalent dengue subunit vaccine." Within the "competing interests" they list the 3 NC scientists as having work w/Global Vaccines Inc and the funding of the article includes grants from Jeremy Farrar's Wellcome Trust as well as Sun Pharmaceuticals, the Government of India & the NIH. ^Link: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3283/41e8fa1d02bc9bc81f7f92168fe14bd808cd.pdf -------------- ***Further information of transgenic mice used in the prior article [AG129] from Marshall BioResources. LINK: https://www.marshallbio.com/files/jLZITh/AG129%20Mice.pdf ------------- Ralph Baric & authors from the FDA, CDC, and UNC Chapel Hill's November 2010 pubmed article titled, "Specificity and kinetics of norovirus binding to magnetic bead-conjugated histo-blood group antigens." Excerpt from the paper: "We determined that NoV can be captured after 15min of incubation with PGM-MB, and virus recovery efficiency is decreased after extended incubation times. rNoV binding as measured by ELISA and NoV recovery as measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), were both enhanced significantly at acidic pH conditions, rNoV binding to PGM as measured by ELISA was increased up to 66%. While real-time RT-PCR analyses suggest that NoV could be concentrated as much as 1000-fold at neutral pH...." The interesting part of this article is the mention of the NoV binding with Magnetic bead conjugated histo-blood-group antigens using recombinant genetically modified/recombined Noroviruses. ^Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21040268/ [DM me if you are struggling to get the full PDF, I have it so just ask] -------------- An image provided by a X researcher, onWatch, from the government grant-tracking platform, http://REPORTER.NIH.GOV showing how EcoHealth Alliance's Peter Daszak was granted $653K+ for researching emerging coronaviruses in SE Asia, and "rapidly supply viral sequences and isolates for use in vaccine and therapeutic development, including 'prototype pathogen' vaccines" ^LINK: https://americasbestpics.com/picture/reporter-nih-gov-analyzing-the-potential-for-future-bat-coronavirus-E9VFiq2v9 ------------ American Society for Microbiology [ASM] publication by Ralph Baric, & scientists from Univ Minnesota and UNC Chapel Hill from March 17, 2020 titled; "Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus" A direct quote of paper's objective: "One of the goals of SARS-CoV research was to build an atomic-level iterative framework of virus-receptor interactions to facilitate epidemic surveillance, predict species-specific receptor usage, and identify potential animal hosts and animal models of viruses. Based on the sequence of 2019-nCoV spike protein, we apply this predictive framework to provide novel insights into the receptor usage and likely host range of 2019-nCoV." ^LINK: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.00127-20 ----------- As covered by me recently, here is one of two HHS/UNC chapel Hill proposals from February 2020 concerning guidance on the nCov [C19] vaccine. Most intriguing is the fact that although Ralph Baric himself isn't explicitly mentioned the work herein is preformed at Baric Laboratory at UNC Chapel Hill's Gillings School of Infectious Diseases and among the names associated with this presentation is Denison's lab, Baric, Eli Lily, GSK, but also "Tommy"/Thomas Baric, the quietly mentioned Virologist son of Ralph Baric. Link: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/nvac_feb2020_day1_panel2.pdf ----------- Also here are some non-Covid, yet important documents concerning the EPA's findings on the East Palestine Train Derailment's bio-containment disaster including the official monitoring summary. [total 3 links to official EPA PDFs]: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-02/Continuous%20Air%20Monitoring%20Summary%20Table_20230213%201.pdf https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-03/Action%20Memo%20%28REDACTED%29%20-%20East%20Palestine%20Derailment%20ER%20-%2020230221.pdf https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-09/Arcadis%20Soil%20Characterization%20Work%20Plan%20v3.6_CLEAN508.pdf ------------- Lastly, not a link but a reference to a document: Holmes EC, Twiddy SS. The origin, emergence and evolutionary genetics of dengue virus. Infection Genetic & Evolution 2003; 3: 19–28 ^this was a fundamental document on the emergence of Dengue which was authored by none other than Edward C. Holmes, the man who not only was the first to publish the SARS-CoV2 virus on January 5th 2020, but he was also among the crooked list of authors from the infamous "Proximal Origins" paper in March of 2020 that Dr.Anthony Fauci publicly touted as the proof that C19 was not the result of a lab leak which he then labeled "conspiratorial" to even consider anything but a natural emergence. ---------- That's all for now everyone. I hope you find one or all of these links and context worthy of further investigation So, happy digging my friends! God Bless ♥️✌️ #arrestbaric #arrestfauci #arrestbillgates

Consensus summary report for CEPI/BC March 12-13, 2020 meeting: Assessment of risk of disease enhancement with COVID-19 vaccines - PubMed A novel coronavirus (CoV), Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in late 2019 in Wuhan, China and has since spread as a global pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are thus urgently needed to reduce the significant morbidity and mortality of Coronavirus Disease 2019 … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Unexpected error -- Oracle Content Management nationalacademies.org
Page Not Found marshallbio.com
Specificity and kinetics of norovirus binding to magnetic bead-conjugated histo-blood group antigens - PubMed These results facilitated development of a prototype method for sensitive detection of NoV in samples requiring larger volumes. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Page Not Found | US EPALockPrimary navigation epa.gov
Page Not Found | US EPALockPrimary navigation epa.gov
Page Not Found | US EPALockPrimary navigation epa.gov
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 1:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2017, significant events occurred in the field of coronavirus research. Collaboration between VRC and Moderna on a CoV vaccine took place. USAID's Andrew Clements requested the transfer of Metabiota from China to EHA. A meeting at NIH with Bill Gates and Graham was held. Grant rounds on spike proteins were initiated, leading to publications and a patent. Notably, Baric and Fang-Li were involved in related research. These findings suggest potential connections and raise questions about the origins of certain research. Stay tuned for more updates.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

PART 2🧵2017 Was a massively important year: VRC+ Moderna collab' on a CoV vaccine, USAID's Andrew Clements emailed EHA staff to move Metabiota from China & instead send EHA, the "PREFUSION CORONAVIRUS SPIKE PROTEINS" patent & a meeting at NIH w/Bill Gates & Graham...

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

2🧵June 30, 2017 NIH hosts the 4th annual meeting between Bill Gates & the VRC. Attendees included Gates, Graham, Fauci, Collins, and Mascola. The newsletter covering the event shows Graham holding what appears to be the spike protein to show Gates. -Identical to the 2021 one..

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

3🧵On Feb 09 2017 The NIH began a grant round titled: "Structure, Function & Antigenicity of Coronavirus Spike Proteins" led by McLellan & Ward out of Dartmouth. The grant # is R01AI127521 & went 5 grant cycles from 2017-2021.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

4🧵W/in the NIH grant rounds under R01AI127521 a publication was funded. That paper, "Immunogenicity & structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen" was authored by not only Graham, Ward + McLellan but also Corbett & Denison👀

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

5🧵Corbett was the young black female scientist at the VRC in that 2021 video w/ Biden & Graham. She happens to be an understudy of Ralph Baric, graduate of UNC Chapel Hill. Denison was the top collab of Baric's during 2014-2020 from Vanderbilt.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

6🧵Two months after the "...prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen" article a patent was issued on Oct 25 2017 titled: "PREFUSION CORONAVIRUS SPIKE PROTEINS AND THEIR USE" credited to HHS, Scripps and Dartmouth w/ Ward, McLellan, Graham & Corbett. This patent is credited 4 the C19 💉

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

7🧵Two things that surprised me was; #1 the classification of the research under grant R01AI127521 which according to the NIH's grant repository RePORTER was listed as "Biodefense"

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

8🧵#2- If you were to type the 2017 grant title "Structure, Function & Antigenicity of Coronavirus Spike Proteins" into NIH's Pubmed you get a paper titled "Structure, Function, and Evolution of Coronavirus Spike Proteins" from Sept 29 2016. The titles are one word off...

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

9🧵One word off but NONE of the same Authors. The 2016 paper is written solely by Fang-Li of Univ. Minn. The paper isn't even funded by the same grant [R01AI127521] but it is funded by grants AI110700, & AI089728. Both grants are to Fang-Li for CoV research.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

10🧵One of those NIH grants [AI110700] was co-led by none other than Ralph Baric. Again, same titled research, which led to the patent for C19 💉s but hidden under different grants, even though the 💉patent is used by Moderna which Baric already signed an MTA w/ <1yr later 🤔

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

11🧵If Fang-Li sounds familiar it's likely because he has worked significantly with Baric & Zheng-Li Shi & Eco Health Alliance on Coronaviruses & now is the Director, Center for Coronavirus Research😳

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

12🧵Coincidence? I think not. An attempt to hide the creation of certain GoF research turned bio-weapon? MUCH more likely. Stay tuned-I'm still not done 🔎👀🧾 https://grantome.com/search?q=R01AI110700 https://msi.umn.edu/~lifang/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27578435/ https://grantome.com/search?q=AI089728

Grantome: Search Search and visualize the entirety of funding information to discover the most important factors underlying funded research in your area. grantome.com
Welcome to Li Lab msi.umn.edu
Structure, Function, and Evolution of Coronavirus Spike Proteins - PubMed The coronavirus spike protein is a multifunctional molecular machine that mediates coronavirus entry into host cells. It first binds to a receptor on the host cell surface through its S1 subunit and then fuses viral and host membranes through its S2 subunit. Two domains in S1 from different coronavi … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Grantome: Search Search and visualize the entirety of funding information to discover the most important factors underlying funded research in your area. grantome.com
Saved - December 11, 2023 at 4:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Apologies to those who only know me on Twitter. I've shared knowledge on SARS-CoV-2 origin, as I was part of a DARPA PREEMPT team. Key evidence is the DEFUSE grant proposing modifications to bat SARS CoVs, similar to SARS-CoV-2. DARPA rejected it, but NIAID approved gain-of-function research in Wuhan. The grant and authors' connections raise concerns. Notably, Peter Daszak urged collaborators not to publish China Genbank Sequences. Progress reports show clear evidence of gain-of-function research. I apologize for being persistent, but I feel a duty to inform. Trustworthy investigations are needed.

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

I want to briefly apologize to all the people who only know me via Twitter. I've been using this platform to share knowledge & science about the origin of SARS-CoV-2. This topic hits me personally because I was on a DARPA PREEMPT team pre-COVID 1/

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

The most important piece of evidence supporting lab origin theories is a 2018 grant - the DEFUSE grant - proposed to the DARPA PREEMPT call. The grant proposed to modify bat SARS CoVs in exactly the ways SARS-CoV-2 is modified. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21066966-defuse-proposal 2/

DEFUSE proposal documentcloud.org

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

DARPA rejected the proposal because DEFUSE proposed to make viruses that weren't found in nature with the knowledge that the viruses they made could be better able to bind human receptors and enter human cells, thus more transmissible & potentially pandemic. 3/

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

While DARPA rejected the proposal in 2018 (consistent with my experience with DARPA as an outstanding group with strong guardrails & good risk-assessment) that doesn't mean the research didn't proceed. NIAID, for example, approved GOF research on SARS-CoVs in Wuhan in 2016 4/ https://t.co/vroJWyMBos

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

The grant in question - "Understanding the risk of bat coronavirus emergence" - becomes very important. Ongoing contracts for Peter Daszak through NIAID provided one means to subsidize the relatively inexpensive gain of function research of concern proposed in DEFUSE. 5/

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

Outside DEFUSE, we see these specific authors linked together two other times. -Oct 2019 to discuss SARS CoVs with NIAID -Feb 2020 conspiring to organize an article calling lab-origin theories "conspiracy theories" and not author it, to "maximize an independent voice" 6/ https://t.co/2pAzAF7xXB

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

Incidentally, in another line of April 2020 communications we see Peter Daszak emphasizing, with high importance, that his wildlife virology collaborators not publish "China Genbank Sequences" that were part of his terminated NIH/NIAID grant mentioned above. 7/ https://t.co/8q7tfzNxJI

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

In the NIH grant's 2018 progress report obtained via FOIA, we see clear evidence of gain of function research of concern on bat SARS CoVs The increased viral titers reported match the effect size of DEFUSE's proposed furin cleavage site insertion. https://t.co/cNmabIC0X8 8/ https://t.co/5Q0NkfzaiV

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

It gets worse. Here's the 2018 NIAID progress report by @EcoHealthNYC and the WIV An as-of-yet-undisclosed recombinant SARS CoV produced by this team in Wuhan yielded 100-10,000x viral titers in *humanized* mice relative to the wild type strain. That's indisputable GoF. https://t.co/kWJGvtqTdD

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

I started this thread off with an apology. I feel bad because some people on here may think this is all I think about or talk about, and this topic is stressful. Maintaining my independent voice has burnt bridges with the wildlife virology community. 9/

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

I've even been asked by people on my DARPA PREEMPT team to never mention my role on a DARPA PREEMPT team. I think the behavior of this community has been very disappointing. I feel a civic duty to use my science to inform people about public research activities they funded 10/

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

I apologize for always coming in hard on this topic. I hate that so few people are independent on COVID origins I hate that simply following my sincere scientific beliefs from using the entirety of my interdisciplinary expertise can be cause for alienation in science. 11/

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

I'm self-aware that COVID origins is contentious and that many people within science, including many with power (e.g. at NIAID, or virologists deciding who in the field will give a talk), judge me negatively because I choose to stand up and speak up on this topic. 12/

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

However, if I died tomorrow, I would die with no regrets. Had I kept my insights and expertise to myself, and said nothing about the likely lab origin of a virus that killed 20 million people, I would regret it for the rest of my life. It would eat me alive. 13/

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

So, I'm sorry for pushing so hard on this topic I'll shut up when I see the facts of the matter accurately represented in the public & scientific domains and I see more trustworthy, independent investigations into this matter conducted by people with the requisite expertise 14/

@WashburneAlex - Alex Washburne

P.S. to the best of my knowledge, the only other person in this small pre-COVID wildlife virology community who has spoken up has been former EHA VP @AGHuff Andrew is a scientific and morally courageous brother from another mother. He knows what he's talking about on this topic.

Saved - December 20, 2023 at 3:14 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly

The U.S. Government, Not Pfizer or Moderna, First Envisioned mRNA Technology Back in 2012, DARPA began investing in gene-encoded vaccines. So, "The military came up with the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna — not operation warp speed," https://t.co/59wGn3ZdBZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2012, DARPA initiated the Adept Protect P3 Program, aiming to prevent pandemics using gene-encoded vaccines based on RNA or DNA. This approach was intended to stop a pandemic within 60 days. The development of vaccines under Operation Warp Speed, announced by President Trump, was not a new concept but had been in progress since 2012. The military, not Pfizer or Moderna, proposed the idea of messenger RNA vaccines. The military has various biological threat programs, including those for smallpox, monkeypox, and anthrax. The Emergency Use Authorization, initially designed for rapid military technology deployment, was first applied to the public during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2012, DARPA, which is the research division of the military, started a program. It's called the Adept Protect P3 Program, Pandemic Prevention Platform. Look what they proposed. They said, listen, we are going to use gene encoded vaccines as a new category of preventive measures based on RNA or DNA. And in this approach, we will stop a pandemic within 60 days. Within 60 days in 2012, this was started. When President Trump came out and said it's Operation Warp Speed and they're going to develop vaccines. It would have been nice if he was prepped or Anthony Fauci was prepped to say, listen, we're working on this. We've been working on this since 2012. This is not new. This isn't warp speed. This is 10 years in coming. The deception out in the open that this was rapidly developed that there was all this stunning innovation. The contractors, Moderna got its 1st multi at $1,000,000 contract in 2013. The military works on programs, both the threat, SARS CoV 2 and work on the answer, monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. But the military has biological threat programs. There's one for smallpox monkeypox. There's one for anthrax, and who knows how many more programs. This was part of a program. But the military came up with the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, not Operation Warp Speed. It wasn't in response to what was came out of Wuhan, China. This is a military program. When it was announced by Health and Human Services, Alex Azar and the Department of Defense as you entered into this, you know, ushered us into the vaccine era. The military Emergency use authorization is a mechanism to get rapid new technology into the military. It's not it's not a mechanism for the public. Its 1st application broadly to the public was when the COVID nineteen pandemic. That's the reason why
Saved - January 4, 2024 at 11:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2013, there were discussions about H7N9 vaccine design by Epivax. Bill Gates is also mentioned in relation to global health research. AbCellera, a biotech company, has partnered with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to accelerate research and develop antibodies for disease prevention and treatment.

@Amy31129057 - QuestionIt

It is time to wake up~ This goes back to 2013 @RandPaul @RepThomasMassie NIH, DARPA, USAMIIRD and many more. @I_Am_JohnCullen @LmBubba H7N9........Extremely rapid H7N9 vaccine design by Epivax from Annie De Groot See the entire 44 slides here~ https://epivax.com/blog/epivax-h7n9-shanghai-2013-fastvax-update

EpiVax H7N9 - Vaccine Blueprint - EpiVax, Inc. - Informatics and Immunology An Update on EpiVax’ H7N9 “FastVax” Progress EpiVax scientists are currently in discussions with groups in China, Canada and the US about producing a vaccine. Here we highlight a few key points about the current progress of EpiVax’ FastVax vaccine design: (1) While H7N9 influenza may be mutable, selecting highly conserved and immunogenic components for vaccines […] epivax.com

@Amy31129057 - QuestionIt

Don't forget to add Bill Gates into the mix! https://x.com/Amy31129057/status/1742983077704679839?s=20

@Amy31129057 - QuestionIt

For fucks sake!!! Pardon my mouth...... see the attached post! AbCellera today announced a two-year agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to help accelerate global health research. @RandPaul @RepThomasMassie Press Release: EpiVax Announces Licensing of Immunogenicity Screening Toolkit, ISPRI, to AbCellera by Annie De Groot | Jun 8, 2020 AbCellera is a privately held biotech with a drug discovery platform that searches and analyzes natural immune systems to find antibodies that can be used to prevent and treat disease. AbCellera’s technology, which combines high-throughput microfluidics, big data, machine learning, bioinformatics, and genomics, identifies new first-in-class drugs and reduces the time it takes to bring treatments to clinic. AbCellera’s partners include leading biotechnology companies, global health organizations, and six of the top 10 biopharmaceutical companies. https://epivax.com/news/epivax-announces-licensing-of-immunogenicity-screening-toolkit-ispri-to-abcellera

Press Release: EpiVax Announces Licensing of Immunogenicity Screening Toolkit, ISPRI, to AbCellera - EpiVax, Inc. - Informatics and Immunology epivax.com
Saved - January 19, 2024 at 10:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Chinese researchers who mapped COVID were allegedly paid by Anthony Fauci, according to documents shared in a post. A Chinese researcher, Lili Ren, was a paid co-investigator on a grant awarded by Fauci's institute. NIH officials have not responded to requests for information about Ren's salary. The grant, which gained attention in 2020, was initially denied by Peter Daszak's group, but later it was revealed that Daszak's collaborator, Ralph Baric, helped ghostwrite an essay dismissing the lab accident theory. HHS stated that Ren's sequence was similar to another published by NIH's GenBank. More details can be found at @DisInfoChron.

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

1) Chinese researchers who first mapped #COVID was being paid by Anthony Fauci. How do we know? Show me the documents! tinyurl.com/3ryncwxu

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

2) Chinese researcher Lili Ren was a paid co-investigator on a grant awarded by Fauci's institute to Peter Daszak w/ EcoHealth Alliance. NIH officials refused to respond to multiple requests to explain how much salary they paid Ren. https://t.co/o7QP0pY8zP

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

3) When this grant first made national attention in the summer of 2020, Daszak denied to Nature Magazine his group did any type of sequencing. https://t.co/sbHfLWDuNt

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

4) NIH also paid Ren's expenses to visit her collaborator Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina. Baric helped to ghostwrite an essay that called the possibility of a lab accident a "conspiracy theory." https://t.co/4Zxos45Al9

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

5) HHS told a House committee that Ren's sequence "was nearly identical to the sequence" to another later published by NIH's GenBank. https://t.co/fNhqZyClGw

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

6) See story and all documents at @DisInfoChron https://t.co/RXDaiGJdSW

Saved - January 25, 2024 at 1:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
According to filmmaker Mikki Willis, there is no such thing as a Covid virus, but rather a list of symptoms common to the flu and pneumonia. He claims that the spike protein in the Covid vaccine is what causes illness, and that it was created through gain-of-function research in the US. Willis also suggests that in 2005, Covid was recognized as a bioweapon by defense agencies, and that its emergence was intended to create a demand for vaccines. He encourages people to research this information, as it is in the public domain.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

🚨🚨🚨Filmmaker and producer of the Plandemic series, Mikki Willis tells @KimIversenShow some facts about #Covid and the #Vaccine 🧐 : “There is NO such thing as a #Covid virus!! #Covid is essentially a list of symptoms that are common to the #Flu and #Pneumonia” “It’s the SPIKE PROTEIN that’s getting people SICK!! The #Covid #Vaccine contains the #SpikeProtein that activates and expedites the SYMPTOMS that we now know as, #COVID19!!” “In 2002, the viral model that became #Covid19 was created at the University of North Carolina through the process of #GainOfFunction, right here in the United States 🇺🇸” “In 2005, two of our biggest defence agencies, MITRE and DARPA recognized #Covid as a #BIOWEAPON!!! Evidence of this can be found in the career summary of, Dr. Ralph Baric, who was a professor at the University of North Carolina!!” “In 2015, the proceedings of national academies of sciences published that #Covid was POISED for human emergence!! The stated reason for that : to create a MASS DEMAND for #Vaccines!!! All of this was paid for by Fauci’s NIAID/CIA and all the 100s of millions of dollars of cheques were cashed by, Ralph Baric” “This information is in the PUBLIC DOMAIN, anyone can look this up!!!”

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a claim that there is no COVID-19 virus, but rather a list of symptoms similar to the flu and pneumonia. The speaker explains that the spike protein in the virus makes people sick, and the vaccine contains this spike protein. They suggest that the virus was created through gain of function research in the US and that evidence of it being a bioweapon can be found. The speaker also mentions that the funding for this research came from Anthony Fauci's NIAID. They caution against blaming China and promoting a world war, as they believe there was collaboration between China and traders within the US.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thing as COVID 9 no such thing as COVID 19 virus. COVID 19 is essentially a list Speaker 1: of symptoms that are common to the flu and and pneumonia. Both SARS CoV 1 and CoV 2 are what we're speaking about when we talk about the virus itself. And they are like an envelope that delivers the message in the form of spike protein. It's that spike protein that makes people sick. The vaccine, which is It's not a vaccine, so let's call it the shot. It contains the spike protein that activates and expedites the development The symptoms we've come to know as COVID 19. So it's super important that people people understand that because there it there have been a lot of stuff has been planted to confuse us, Fuse us, to confuse doctors. And so we've really, you know, taken a lot of time. How do we articulate this so we actually understand? Once you understand that, then it becomes clear that In 2002, the viral model that be that became SARS CoV 2 was created through the process of gain of function at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill right here in the US. In 2005, during an event sponsored by 2 of our biggest defense agencies, DARPA and MITRE, Coronavirus was identified as a bioweapon. Evidence of this can be found within the career summary of doctor Ralph Baric, who is a professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Within his career summary, synthetic coronavirus is listed next to the heading, biological warfare enabling technologies. In 2015, the proceedings of National Academy of Sciences Published that SARS CoV 2 was poised for human emergence. That the stated reason for that was to create, in their words, at mass demand for vaccines. All of the above was paid for by Anthony Fauci's NIAID, And every check totaling 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars was cashed by doctor Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. There's a that that that's all public domain information that people can look at. And so when you understand that, this whole idea of the debate about is whether it's It it it's it's it was manipulated a lot. It's as clear as could be. In North Carolina? In North Carolina. And so this idea, which be Very dangerous that we're trying to blame it all on China and drive us to some kind of a world war is is a very, very dangerous idea when indeed It was in a collaboration with China and all the traders within our own nation who think that somehow they're gonna remain in in power should they Continue to advance China's power over the US. It's it's it's kind of silly. No such thing as COVID 19.
Saved - March 12, 2024 at 12:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The SARS-CoV-2 furin cleavage site (FCS) has several unusual features, including a leading proline, a non-canonical sequence, and potential O-glycosylation sites nearby. These features resemble those found in the FCS of MERS, a distantly related virus. The lengthened FCS creates an extended flexible loop, which is important for pathogenesis. The presence of potential O-glycosylation sites near a proline is also seen in MERS. The similarities between the FCS of SARS-CoV-2 and MERS raise questions about their origins and potential implications. Researchers, including Yusen Zhou and Lanying Du, have been studying MERS and working on vaccines for both MERS and SARS. Peter Hotez, who worked closely with Du, has been involved in projects related to pan-coronavirus vaccines. The cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses, including MERS, has implications for immunity and the potential for antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). The presence of non-neutralizing epitopes in SARS-CoV-2, catalogued by Zhou and Du, could contribute to ADE. The connection between the AMMS (PLA), the WIV, and various researchers involved in studying coronaviruses raises further questions. The discovery of a 2018 PhD thesis supervised by Yusen Zhou, which focused on creating Chinese dominant HLA mice and evaluating epitopes of MERS, adds to the concerns surrounding the origins and potential manipulation of SARS-CoV-2.

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

Lord have MERSy - it's the Fu@in Cleavage Site Again! There are odd features of SARS-CoV-2 furin cleavage site that some claim no-one would have engineered that way. They speak for themselves, its designers must have their reasons. First we must know: what was their intent?

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

The unusual features are: 1) A leading Proline. 2) A non-canonical sequence. Furin is not cleaved with maximum efficiency. 3) The site has been created by an out-of-frame insertion, not substitution. 4) Presence of potential O-glycosylation sites nearby.

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

1) A leading Proline, the "P" in "PRRAR". The reason for the Proline isn't obvious, though proline has unique structural attributes. It also enhances the chances of O-glycosylation nearby. But in some variants the P has mutated to something else, suggesting it isn't optimal.

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

There is also a leading P in the FCS of MERS. So what, you ask? MERS is only distantly related, right?

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

2) It's a non-canonical sequence. Missing an R (or K) in P2. SARS-CoV-2 has a minimal RXXR sequence but doesn't have the "canonical" RXRR pattern and so furin doesn't cleave it with maximum efficiency.

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

@wanderer_jasnah clearly hadn't heard of MERS (and there are many others with non-canonical sequences too Jas!). MERS FCS also lacks an Arginine in P2, and so isn't cleaved with maximum efficiency. In fact SARS-CoV-2 is more efficiently cleaved by furin than MERS.

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

Sequence lengthened by insertion. Compared to other related viruses, the loop on which the FCS is located is longer. The FCS is created by inserting four additional amino acids. *Most* previous experiments created an FCS by changing another residue to R, not adding new ones.

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

The extra length of the insert creates an extended flexible loop off the surface of the spike. This length in itself is known to be important to pathogenesis. Is there another example of this? Yes - MERS.

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

4) O-Glycosylation sites The Proximal Origin authors first noticed the presence of potential O-glycosylation sites leading to the FCS. These are simply Serine or Threonine residues. They don't always attach to glycans, but one thing that increases the odds is a nearby Proline.

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

In what other virus can we find a similar pattern of potential O-glycosylation sites, near a Proline? You guessed it...MERS.

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

So the FCS resembles that of MERS in several structural and functional ways, and the sequence looks quite similar. Why could this be? Maybe as a fallback? I'm not sure?

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

Like SARS, MERS was of great interest to the biodefense industry. Both are far more virulent than other human covs. One objective of research was a vaccine that would work against both. But understanding the pathogenicity of MERS could also be useful for nefarious purposes.

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

One group that was working towards such a vaccine was centered around husband and wife, Yusen Zhou and Lanying Du. Zhou is the PLA officer who died in mysterious circumstances in May 2020. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12205705/Chinese-military-expert-filed-patent-Covid-vaccine-died-mysterious-circumstances.html

Chinese scientist who filed patent for Covid vaccine died mysteriously Zhou Yusen died in mysterious circumstances in May 2020, aged 54. US investigators are said to have been told 'Zhou fell from the roof of the Institute', although this has not been confirmed. dailymail.co.uk

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

Du is less well known, but perhaps the more accomplished coronavirologist. She met and married Zhou in Beijing, then did her PhD with Bojian Zhang at HKU. BJ Zhang was also a guest professor at AMMS and instrumental in SARS origin tracing. https://covorigin.org/2023/05/17/the-furin-cleavage-site-part-1-nexus/

The Furin Cleavage Site Part 1: Nexus The interface between S1 | S2 • US | China • Military | Civilian • SARS | MERS The FCS has been the standout feature of the SARS-CoV-2 both in its awkward protrusion from a previously conserved part of the spike sequence, and in the controversy and discussion it has raised. Several theories have been… covorigin.org

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

Du then moved to the US and was based at the Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute at New York Blood Center with Shibo Jiang. Other PLA scientists such as Wenbo Tai, also trained and worked there.

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

Du studied and is a leading expert in MERS and its FCS, its role in conformational dynamics and pathogenicity. Although some are now claiming that no FCS was ever *inserted* experimentally - Du and Jiang were involved in an experiment that did exactly that.

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

Du was working for NIH on projects managed by Peter Hotez which included pan-coronavirus vaccines designed by combining epitopes from different human coronaviruses with MERS and SARS. https://grantome.com/grant/NIH/R01-AI139092-03

404 error: Page not found grantome.com

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

Hotez has admitted he worked closely with Du for many years, but he LIED that he didn't know her deceased husband, even though Yusen Zhou was also on his payroll. He even permitted animal testing work to be done in the AMMS Beijing lab. https://t.co/FIWOSXp7yI

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

The Du group weren't the only ones pursuing a SARS/MERS vaccine. Their close collaborators - Fang Li's group from UMN and Wuhan University, and Wuhan Insitute of Virology were also interested. @billybostickson investigated a separate US project. https://t.co/E60lYDPcFi

@BillyBostickson - Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓

17. Random Beta-Coronaviruses? "The question was whether we could develop a single antiviral for both MERS and SARS, and by extension, for whatever random beta-coronavirus would emerge next." https://t.co/9ot8S7rKGO

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

@biophysicsfl observed that SARS-CoV-2 FCS is even more similar to the MERS S2 site in sequence than its S1/S2 having an A in same position. There is some nucleotide homology too. The S2 site in MERS is more efficiently cleaved by furin than the S1/S2. https://t.co/u2DuC2IoAo

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

I also noticed a sequence flanking the FCS (QTNSP) is found in another human coronavirus (HKU1) with nearly identical (14/15) nucleotides. This may be intended to introduce some "pan-coronavirus" immune interaction. https://t.co/PUeL5BXfY2

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

There is sequence and structural homology to MERS elsewhere in the spike (particularly the NTD) and also to other human coronaviruses (e.g NL63) More about that in an earlier thread: https://t.co/FQLNv8RuCu https://t.co/A6CyB4xZw5

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

Evidence of Genetic Engineering of SARS-CoV-2 Part 12(?): Conformational Contortions Recently @florian_krammer et al reported SARS-CoV-2 antibodies cross-reactive to barely related human coronaviruses including MERS. Surprising? Not to me. https://t.co/BsdXccWx03

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

I can speculate about why someone would insert epitopes from unrelated hCoVs. It could be benevolent (e.g. pan-coronavirus vaccine). But it could also be malicious. Zhou and Du catalogued and characterized non-neutralizing epitopes that cause ADE. https://t.co/6FpngCMcZQ

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

SARS-CoV-2 is now known to be cross-reactive with other CoVs including MERS. This could be beneficial (confer immunity broadly across coronaviruses) but if antibodies aren't neutralizing potentially provides a mechanism for ADE, which increases severity of subsequent infections.

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

Such a mechanism is described in this paper. The date of publication and author list are especially interesting, bringing together the AMMS (PLA), the WIV, Lanying Du and Shibo Jiang, and Fang Li and his postdocs (from the State Key Lab of Virology at Wuhan University) https://t.co/42KyrYyi1P

@breakfast_dogs - Dog's Breakfast

Possibly more disconcerting, this thesis uncovered by @florin_uncovers. Humanized mouse models were developed targeting the dominant HLA for Chinese/East Asians. The thesis supervisor is Yusen Zhou and one of the epitopes evaluated is the MERS FCS: https://t.co/KaqA4YXr8U https://t.co/KlQSWnE0ho

@Florin_Uncovers - Florin

I found a 2018 PhD thesis supervised by controversial PLA scientist Yusen Zhou. It's about creating Chinese dominant HLA mice and finding Chinese HLA restricted epitopes for Ebola & the MERS spike. Specialists could discuss how ethical or DURC this is. 1/4 https://web.archive.org/web/20230205232139/https://theses.hal.science/tel-01900581/document https://t.co/P2ygl3bYtO

Saved - June 4, 2024 at 1:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Fauci's connection to Morens is highlighted in various posts, including their shared office building and calendar appointments. There are mentions of discussions and interactions between them. The posts also mention joint presentations with Baric and allegations of lies and missed information. There are references to FBI questioning and discussions about Morens' involvement.

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

Fauci lied! Morens NIAID office is the same building 31 on the 7th floor with Fauci and in Fauci's calendar 3 times from 2020-21

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

Dear David Morens, dear Anthony Fauci David, Please respond to this person, Thanks, Tony

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

we really need to talk about this...

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

David, Provide you... Thanks, ASF building 31

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

I will discuss again with Tony.

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

Few of us in the office have even seen Tony...

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

Tony & Hugh, I may get deployed. Got it - Fauci

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

Fauci on joint presentation with Baric

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

Baric also missed the furin cleavage site in this joint ppt with Fauci https://youtu.be/L-Cvbsa6FF0?si=iVMqNAs8isv-HXfI&t=3078

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

Thanks, Jason with Bloomberg. Tony

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

this bloomberg article quotes a graphic Baric

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

Fauci knew Tabak was on the Feb 1st call, yet another lie claiming it was only Collins.

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

Fauci fw'd KGA slides (coronavirus sequence comparison) showing RaTG13 alignment, exposing Baric's RRAR furin cleavage site in SARS2 a blind man can see it...

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

They have Ralph Baric doing virology, which I easily can do

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

links https://jimhaslam.substack.com/p/6-if-you-believe-the-wiv-engineered https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/20793561/leopold-nih-foia-anthony-fauci-emails.pdf https://openthebooks.substack.com/p/historic-release-dr-anthony-faucis

#6 If you believe the WIV engineered SARS2, then published RaTG13: You are probably a simpleton (unlike KGA) jimhaslam.substack.com
HISTORIC RELEASE: Dr. Anthony Fauci’s Official Work Calendar (November 2019 – March 2020) An hour-by-hour timeline of who Dr. Fauci was talking to, what he was doing, and where his meetings were in the months before and after the public disclosure of the pandemic. openthebooks.substack.com

@dorkmo - Dorkmo

@JamesCTobias 7A03 appears to be Fauci's office. https://www.nih.gov/sites/default/files/institutes/foia/20210731-npr-production-tranche-1.pdf

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

Morens discussing Fauci's Secret Service in office

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

FBI questioned me in a conference room in the office of Director at NIAID where I work

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Fauci-Testimony.pdf

Page not found - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

Fauci's chief of staff, Folkers, said Morens was in their immediate group https://t.co/KGQIWSOWOc

@jhas5 - Jim Haslam

Folkers said Morens was "cagey" about congressional interview https://t.co/WvapSUAtKv

Saved - November 20, 2024 at 11:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a series of posts highlighting the controversial views of Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier and other scientists regarding the origins of the coronavirus. Montagnier asserts that the virus was manipulated, containing sequences similar to HIV, which he believes indicates it is not natural. Professors Angus Dalgleish and Nikolai Petrovski also faced challenges publishing their findings that suggest the virus was engineered and perfectly adapted to human receptors. Their research faced censorship, raising concerns about the integrity of scientific discourse during the pandemic.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

🧵THE BROADCAST MISSED BY THE WORLD - THREAD. Nobel Prize Winner Luc Montagnier features in this EPIC REVIVED CLIP (IN FULL) that has to be watched. All anyone had to do was watch this broadcast...and it might have clarified EVERYTHING right from the start, about the true nature of where the coronavirus came from Instead, pharmaceutical industries, defence and government agencies silenced dissent and prevented or slowed down the progress of other scientists validating similar research findings Scientists in India were pressured to RETRACT papers, whilst other experts in their fields, Professor Nikolai Petrovski and Professor Angus Dalgleish, were also trying to get similar research about the origins of the virus published, in the United Kingdom and Australia All corners of the Globe were met with pushback from the institutions that guarded the publishing arena, which all amounted to a mass censorship of scientific research and further division in the scientific community If you have 37 x minutes of time, this is an EPIC MUST WATCH, with more backup research in THREAD

@Humanspective - Humanspective

"INDEED, THERE WAS A MANIPULATION DONE ON THIS VIRUS" - Luc Montagnier - Nobel Prize winner for HIV research, 2008 "Someone added on top of that some sequences including HIV, the virus for AIDS [and] it is NOT natural [and] it was the job of a professional"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Il y a eu une manipulation du virus, avec des séquences ajoutées, notamment du VIH. Ce n'est pas un processus naturel, mais le résultat d'un travail minutieux de biologistes moléculaires. Les raisons de cette manipulation ne sont pas claires, mais il est possible qu'il s'agisse d'une tentative de créer un vaccin contre le sida en intégrant des séquences du VIH dans le coronavirus. Le matériel génétique du virus contient des segments de VIH qui pourraient modifier des sites antigéniques, permettant ainsi de modifier la protéine pour un vaccin. Bien que des rumeurs sur une origine humaine aient circulé, elles ont été largement réfutées, mais il existe une volonté d'étouffer ces recherches, comme l'a montré un groupe de chercheurs indiens qui a été contraint de se rétracter. --- There has been manipulation of the virus, with sequences added, including from HIV. This is not a natural process but the result of meticulous work by molecular biologists. The reasons for this manipulation are unclear, but it may involve an attempt to create an AIDS vaccine by integrating HIV sequences into the coronavirus. The virus's genetic material contains segments of HIV that could modify antigenic sites, allowing for changes to the protein for a vaccine. Although rumors of a human origin circulated, they have been largely refuted, yet there is a desire to suppress this research, as evidenced by a group of Indian researchers who were forced to retract their findings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Et vous êtes arrivé à certaines conclusions. Speaker 1: Alors d'ailleurs vous arrivez à la conclusion qu'effectivement il y avait eu une manipulation au sujet de ce virus. C'est-à-dire bien qu'une partie, je ne dis pas le total, n'est-ce pas, mais il y a un modèle qui est évidemment le virus classique, et là c'était un modèle surtout venant de la chauve-souris, mais ce modèle on a par-dessus ajouté des séquences notamment du VIH, le virus du SIDA. Speaker 0: Mais quand vous dites on a ajouté qui a ajouté Speaker 1: Ah moi je ne sais pas. Speaker 0: Et c'est pas naturel c'est ce que vous voulez dire Speaker 1: Non, ce n'est pas naturel, c'était un travail de professionnel, un travail de de biologiste moléculaire. C'est un travail très minutieux, on peut dire d'horloger, on peut dire Dans quel bout des séquences. Dans quel but Dans quel but ça, ce n'est pas, n'est pas clair. Moi je ne je l'expose si vous voulez. Mon mon travail c'est d'exposer des faits, c'est tout. Je n'accuse personne, je ne sais pas qui a fait ça et pourquoi. La possibilité c'est peut-être que ils ont voulu faire ils, enfin ils on ne sait pas, on a voulu faire un vaccin contre le sida. Donc on a pris des petites séquences du virus et on les a installés dans la séquence plus grande du coronavirus. Speaker 0: Alors je ne suis pas sûr de je ne suis pas sûr de comprendre tout ce que vous dites. C'est-à-dire que dans ce virus, il y a une part de VIH Speaker 1: Voilà, c'est ça. Le le le le matériel génétique du virus est un long ruban d'ARN, n'est-ce pas Comme de l'ADN, c'est de l'ARN. Et dans ce dans ce ce long ruban, à une certaine place, on a fixé des séquences petites de VIH. Mais ces séquences petites ne sont pas petites pour ne rien vouloir dire. Elles ont la possibilité de modifier par exemple ce qu'on appelle des sites antigéniques, c'est-à-dire si on veut faire un vaccin, on peut très bien modifier la protéine qui est exposée pour le vaccin par une petite séquence venant d'un autre virus. JLM Vous Speaker 0: êtes certain Speaker 2: de ça parce qu'on a dit que le bruit a couru que c'était d'une origine humaine finalement et ça a été ensuite réfuté par la plupart des autorités scientifiques quand même. Speaker 1: Il y a quand même une volonté d'étouffement si vous voulez. Les travaux, nous ne sommes pas les premiers. Un groupe de chercheurs indiens très très renommé avaient publié de la même chose, on les aura forcés à rétracter.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

DR MONTAGNIER GOT THE NOBEL PRIZE FOR IDENTIFYING HIV - So if there's anybody on Planet Earth, who ought to be able to tell that HIV exists in this Spike Protein...that's the man" Richard Fleming PhD discusses Luc Montagnier's paper on how HIV "inserts" were found in the coronavirus spike protein "Mutation occur 1 x nucleotide at a time, not 12...OK, THAT'S AN INSERT"......."THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN"

Video Transcript AI Summary
This complex diagram highlights the presence of HIV in the spike protein, as identified by Luc Montagnier, a renowned virologist and Nobel Prize winner for discovering HIV. Montagnier found 18 RNA fragments matching HIV and SIV, indicating significant similarities. Notably, the PRRA insertion consists of 4 amino acids, requiring 12 nucleotides, which is atypical for mutations that occur one nucleotide at a time. Additionally, a 590 amino acid insert corresponds to 1,770 nucleotide bases matching HIV-1, raising questions about its classification as a mutation. The evidence presented underscores the substantial connection between HIV and the spike protein, suggesting a deeper investigation into this relationship is warranted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This looks awfully complex, doesn't it? And if it does, that's good because every one of these red arrows shows HIV in the spike protein. This work comes from Luc Montagnier. Doctor. Montagnier is the premier virologist in Paris, France. Doctor. Montagnier got the Nobel Prize for identifying HIV. So, if there's anybody on planet Earth who ought to be able to tell you that HIV exists in this spike protein, that's the man and oh, look, where he used to be professor and chair at, that's been deleted from the Internet as well. That's the same place that Zeng Li presented and now got wiped off the face of the Internet and off the face of the planet. Doctor. Montigny identified 18 RNA fragments that match HIV and SIV. This is Simian or monkey, Grade 8 immune deficiency virus. If you look at it, remember I told you about PRRA, that's 4 amino acids and every amino acid requires 3 nucleotides, that's 12, right, 12 nucleotides. Mutations occur 1 nucleotide at a time, not 12, okay. That's an insert. If you think that's bad, look at the HIV insert, 5 90 amino acids are 17 70 nucleotide bases that match HIV-one. Now, understanding that mutations occur 1 nucleotide at a time, scientifically, I'd like somebody to justify to me how that's possibly a mutation. That doesn't happen. This is the man who defines it. Every one of these red arrows and every one of these are the nucleotides that match HIV. That's why there is so much out there. It's like the funding. It's not one. It's not just a little. It's a lot.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

Retracted Paper that Luc Montagnier cites, saying the publisher was pressured - "Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag" - 9 x authors https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338957445_Uncanny_similarity_of_unique_inserts_in_the_2019-nCoV_spike_protein_to_HIV-1_gp120_and_Gag ABSTRACT READS: "We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019- nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag. Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature. This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus"

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@Humanspective - Humanspective

I WAS FIRST TO PICK UP IT HAD ESCAPED FROM A LAB - Professor Angus Dalgleish His research was accepted by a Biophysics journal, which understood exactly the point he was making, about how the actual "CHARGE was affected [which] would NEVER EVER occur in normal evolution" ◻️"I was first to pick up it had escaped from a lab" ◻️"It had 6 x insertions round it, we thought THEY NEED TO KNOW THIS" ◻️"We submitted it and it went to cabinet [and] they chose to ignore it" ◻️"It altered the charge and the whole infectivity" Professor Dalgleish said he sent all this scientific research to the top journals, because it was important to know for future modelling of vaccines. He sent it to: Nature Science Virology Lancet "And we got the same reply back [saying] we've nothing against the science, but it is not in the public interest to publish your paper" Professor Nikolai Petrovski, vaccine inventor in Australia, also went through the same thing when he was trying to publish research about the virus being perfectly adapted to Human ACE2 receptors

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've lost faith in journals. When we first identified the virus with six insertions, we believed it was crucial information for vaccine development. Despite submitting our findings to major journals like Nature and Lancet, we received responses stating it wasn't in the public interest to publish. They should have engaged with us for evidence, but instead, they dismissed it. Molecular biologists suggested it could be random mutation, but that wasn't the case. Eventually, a biophysics journal published our work, recognizing that the alterations in charge and infectivity wouldn't occur through normal evolution. We shared our findings, but there was no willingness for open discussion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've really lost my faith in the journals. I mean, when I was were the first to pick up the the virus, to escape from the lab because it had 6 insertions around it, we thought, but they need to know this. It's important because if you don't take notice of that, you'll end up with a bad vaccine. We submitted it, and it went to cabinet, and everybody, they've all seen it. They can't deny it, what have you, but they chose to ignore it. And then we sent it to Nature Science Virology Lancet, and we got the same reply back. Really eerie. It said, we've nothing against the science, but it is not in the public interest of to publish your paper. They should have called me in about that and say, here, where's the evidence for these things? Because we were able to translate it. Molecular biologists go, oh, it could be a random mutation, this, that, and the other. No. This wasn't, and the the journal that published it in the end was a biophysics one. So it understood the point we were making, that it altered the charge and the whole infectivity, and this would never ever occur in normal evolution. Because once it got to one stage, it would be kicked out. It would never get to the point where it was so highly charged. And we discussed this, put it all out there, and nobody wanted to, enter any arm, discussion.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

Professor Nikolai Petrovski, vaccine inventor in South Australia, just a few weeks into the Pandemic, new confidently that the virus was probably man made Nikolai Petrovski discusses how in "The first few week of 2020, when the viral sequence was first released" he was only "modelling the virus to build a vaccine" Professor Nikolai Petrovski said - "If it's come from an animal source, then there should be an animal out there who's ACE2 binds better to the virus than Human ACE2, [but] rather than finding some exotic animal at the top of the list, we found Humans"[and it was] so well human adapted. "It took a long time to get published, because the narrative was, that [it] was not an acceptable question to be asking."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent computer modeling from early 2020 suggested that the virus might be man-made. Initially, the goal was to design a vaccine, but the modeling revealed that the virus was surprisingly well-adapted to humans, raising questions about its origin. Instead of identifying an exotic animal, the research pointed to humans as the closest match for the virus's ACE2 receptor binding. This unexpected finding led to speculation about whether the virus had adapted in a lab setting or was an accidental release. The research faced challenges in publication due to its divergence from the prevailing narrative. Additionally, the presence of a furin cleavage site in the virus raised further concerns, as it appeared unnatural in the context of viral evolution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you've had some recent, computer modeling that that uncovered some details about the cleavage fur and cleavage site that, perhaps gave some clues on the origin of the virus. Is that accurate? Speaker 1: So it it it's actually not not new, interestingly. We did this in the the first few weeks, of 2020, you know, when the viral sequence was first released. So we we hadn't even seen the virus in Australia at that time. Early in in the pandemic, in the first sort of weeks, we we modeled the virus, with our computers to to design our vaccine. And that modeling told us the virus almost certainly was a man made virus. But we use supercomputers to model viruses. So when we got this new genetic sequence, we put it into our models. Obviously, we're thinking, can we build a model of virus to make a vaccine? Because remember, we had no idea what this virus was. And and and we were sad about that, but we also thought, well, we could use this model of the virus to to work out where it came from because, you know, we know that it's attaching to this receptor ACE 2, in humans. And, if it's come from an animal source, then we there should be an animal out there whose ACE 2, binds better to the virus than than human ACE 2. So so we innocently set about, yeah, modeling all the different animals, to understand which animal the virus came from. The surprising result of that, rather than finding some, you know, exotic animal at the top of the list, we found humans. Alright. Now that was not the intention of our research, but, you know, having found that, like all scientists, we thought, yeah, you know, we should make this available. People can criticize it. And and then we hit this this roadblock of of, you know, you couldn't publish anything because it wasn't part of the official narrative at at the time. This was just we weren't saying where the virus came from or who made it. We just were saying there are features in this virus that cannot be explained, you know, if it if it arose naturally. We found humans, a not very exotic animal. And, of course, that raised really interesting questions because it said this virus, if if you went by our original thinking, it came must have come from from humans because it's so, well human adapted. That that really had us scratching our heads, how to explain that conundrum. And, of course, you know, one of the possibilities is that was by chance, but it that that seemed highly unlikely, given the stringency of the work we've done. Virus that cannot be explained, you know, if it if it arose naturally. Very innocent we thought. No. If you speak against the official narrative, it's not innocent. You know, you're you're you're considered a terrorist, a public health terrorist. You're a danger to the country. The other explanation is that maybe it had adapted to human cells in some, you know, sense. And then, obviously, then, you know, the the most likely place for that is the laboratory. And so so that did raise the question, was the source of this virus not directly from from an animal? Did it get modified or or somehow was it it, an accidental laboratory release, which we've seen with other viruses in the past. So so it was innocent work, but it took a long, long time to get it published because, you know, the narrative was that that was not an acceptable, question to be asking because we were just asking a question. We weren't trying to tell anyone anything other than here's our research, here's what it shows. You know, the furin cleavage site, which is what you referred to as the other intriguing thing that looked like a smoking gun. Again, I I know that head of the CCC at the time said the same things. Many people have said the same things, but in our modeling, it was it was clear to us that it looked like the Purine cleavage site was not a natural part of this virus.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

SCIENTIFIC PAPER FROM NIKOLAI PETROVSKI - "In silico comparison of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-ACE2 binding affinities across species and implications for virus origin" https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-92388-5

In silico comparison of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-ACE2 binding affinities across species and implications for virus origin - Scientific Reports The devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS–coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has raised important questions about its origins and the mechanism of its transfer to humans. A further question was whether companion or commercial animals could act as SARS-CoV-2 vectors, with early data suggesting susceptibility is species specific. To better understand SARS-CoV-2 species susceptibility, we undertook an in silico structural homology modelling, protein–protein docking, and molecular dynamics simulation study of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein’s ability to bind angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) from relevant species. Spike protein exhibited the highest binding to human (h)ACE2 of all the species tested, forming the highest number of hydrogen bonds with hACE2. Interestingly, pangolin ACE2 showed the next highest binding affinity despite having a relatively low sequence homology, whereas the affinity of monkey ACE2 was much lower despite its high sequence similarity to hACE2. These differences highlight the power of a structural versus a sequence-based approach to cross-species analyses. ACE2 species in the upper half of the predicted affinity range (monkey, hamster, dog, ferret, cat) have been shown to be permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection, supporting a correlation between binding affinity and infection susceptibility. These findings show that the earliest known SARS-CoV-2 isolates were surprisingly well adapted to bind strongly to human ACE2, helping explain its efficient human to human respiratory transmission. This study highlights how in silico structural modelling methods can be used to rapidly generate information on novel viruses to help predict their behaviour and aid in countermeasure development. nature.com

@Humanspective - Humanspective

PROFESSOR DALGLEISH'S RESEARCH PAPER - "IT HAD 6 X INSERTIONS AROUND IT" https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Evidence-which-Suggests-that-This-Is-No-Evolved-S%C3%B8rensen-Dalgleish/bae0b5f2cae9f55b0f72349e7964989641a2d71d

@Humanspective - Humanspective

"The Discovery of HIV as the Cause of AIDS" - Authors: Robert C. Gallo, M.D., and Luc Montagnier, M.D https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp038194

@Humanspective - Humanspective

Luc Montagnier - The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2008. Born: 18 August 1932, Chabris, France https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2008/montagnier/facts/

The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2008 The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2008 was divided, one half awarded to Harald zur Hausen "for his discovery of human papilloma viruses causing cervical cancer", the other half jointly to Françoise Barré-Sinoussi and Luc Montagnier "for their discovery of human immunodeficiency virus" nobelprize.org

@Humanspective - Humanspective

Luc Montagnier - Biographical - from "The Nobel Prize" https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2008/montagnier/biographical/ “In 1957, the first description of infectious viral RNA from the tobacco mosaic virus by Fraenkel-Conrat and Gierer and Schramm determined my vocation: to become a virologist using the modern approach of molecular biology.”

The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2008 The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2008 was divided, one half awarded to Harald zur Hausen "for his discovery of human papilloma viruses causing cervical cancer", the other half jointly to Françoise Barré-Sinoussi and Luc Montagnier "for their discovery of human immunodeficiency virus" nobelprize.org

@Humanspective - Humanspective

THE YEAR 2002 RECORDS GAIN OF FUNCTION RESEARCH "combining an HIV pseudovirus with SARS" (according to Richard Fleming PhD) - @Doctor_I_am_The https://t.co/vPY2NVMT2I

@Doctor_I_am_The - Richard M Fleming, PhD, MD, JD

HIV inserted into SARS viruses - originally in 2002. Gain-of-Function at its best. How did this help humanity? https://t.co/4me0wL8Qil

@Humanspective - Humanspective

Senator Rand Paul discusses here in some parts Nikolai Petrovski's research, done at the begining of the Pandemic, which found the virus was perfectly adapted to bind to Human ACE2 receptors https://t.co/go48wc1LZE "So one of the cool things I have discovered about Covid-19 is, they borrowed Oracle supercomputer, a scientist from Australia and the wanted to see which animal that virus would attach best to....it didn't attach to any animals very well but it attached perfectly to humans. This does not happen, it's almost proof positive that this was manipulated in a lab" "What really was sort of the smoking gun though is we discovered that the way the virus is genetically constructed is virtually identical to a research project from 2018 that had dr. Baric from UNC, dr. Shi from Wuhan and dr. Peter Daszak from New York. They actually applied for money to create something that looks very suspiciously like Covid-19" @RandPaul

Video Transcript AI Summary
Animal viruses that jump to humans often struggle to infect effectively due to their evolution in animals. The first SARS virus in 2003 had a 10% mortality rate but only infected 8,000 people because it didn't adapt well to humans. In contrast, COVID-19 attached perfectly to humans, suggesting possible lab manipulation. Researchers used a supercomputer to find that the virus did not attach well to other animals, indicating it was pre-adapted for humans. Evidence points to a 2018 research project that aimed to create a virus similar to COVID-19. Despite this, obtaining records from the Biden administration has been challenging, even with bipartisan support for transparency. The situation remains frustrating, highlighting the need for further investigation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the one thing that's universally true about animal viruses that break into the human kingdom, from the animal kingdom to the human kingdom, is they're clunky. They don't infect humans very well because they've evolved and adapted. Natural selection has selected for ones that infect that animal well. And so when they infect humans, they try it many times until they get lucky, and then they get a mutation where it can infect other humans. The best example of this is 2,000 and 2, 2003, when the first SARS virus came out, it had a 10% mortality rate, which is in you know, that's, like, 30 times worse than this the current COVID nineteen we had, but it only infected 8,000 people. Why? It just didn't infect humans very well. When they went back and did testing, they found that it infected civets well and also bats. So one of the cool things that I've discovered about COVID nineteen is they they borrowed Oracle's supercomputer, a scientist from Australia, and they wanted to see which animal that the virus would attach best to. So they tested it with humans and, like dozens of other animals. And lo and behold, it didn't attach to any animals very well. It attached perfectly to humans. This does not happen. It's almost proof positive that this was manipulated in the lab. And what you do in the lab is you actually speed up evolution and you direct evolution because you keep infecting mice that have human lung markers. So it thinks it's infecting a human lung. And you do it over and over again, you get the sickest mouse and the one with the highest viral load, you take that out and you infect the mice again. And each time you pass it through the virus, you get the sickest and the most infected mouse, and you do it again, you're selecting for the worst, the most deadly, the most efficiently. And this is what the scientists found. Alina Chan from MIT, she said it looked pre adapted. And this is what convinced her. What really was sort of the smoking gun though is we discovered that the way the virus is genetically constructed is virtually identical to a research project from 2018 that had Doctor. Barrick from UNC, Doctor. Xi from Wuhan, and Doctor. Peter Daszak from New York, they actually applied for money to create something that looks, very suspiciously like COVID-nineteen. They didn't get the money for it, but almost everybody believes now that doctor Xi in China went ahead and did that project, created that virus, probably to create a vaccine, and probably it was an accident that it leaked out. But we have all of this evidence now, and yet it has been like pulling teeth to get a Democrat anywhere in Congress to sign even a records release. And I tell these people all the time, look, I'm a Republican, but if a Democrat comes to me ever and asks me if I'm the chairman of a committee to sign a records release, I will never turn them down. I can't imagine ever turning down a records release from our government. And yet, I have had to use blocking nominations, blocking legislation, tying things up in order to get them to finally sign letters. And lo and behold, even when I finally got a Democrat to sign letters to get COVID records, the Biden administration won't give it to me. It's not even classified, but they won't give us the records. It's really it's shocking, and your book describes it so well. I really hope everyone in our audience reads it because

@Humanspective - Humanspective

DID NIH FUND GOF RESEARCH AT THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY THROUGH ECOHEALTH? Dr. Tabak: “ yes, we did” https://t.co/Htu6fuf0ql

Video Transcript AI Summary
NIH did fund research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through ECHO Health, depending on how you define gain of function research. If you refer to the broader term, then yes, it was funded. This type of research occurs in many labs across the country and is not regulated because it does not pose any threat or harm.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Tabak, did NIH fund gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through ECHO Health? It depends on your definition of gain of function research. If you're speaking about the generic term, yes, we did, because but this is research. The generic term is research that goes on in many many labs around the country. It is not regulated, and the reason it's not regulated is it poses no threat or harm to anybody.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

"WAS THE WUHAN INSTITUTE CONDUCTING GOF RESEARCH ON [BAT] CORONAVIRUS's?" https://t.co/JRdKvn4nCx Former Director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, Dr Robert Redfield - "ABSOLUTELY" Dr Robert Redfield also adds that their is an effort by scientist's to compartmentalise the various forms of gain of function research, saying that he thinks it's all GOF if it's an attempt to increase Pathogenicity - "If I make a nonpathogen pathogenic, that's gain-of-function."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Gain of function research involves modifying a pathogen to enhance its transmissibility or pathogenicity. This definition includes making a nonpathogen pathogenic. Regarding the Wuhan Institute, there is skepticism about whether they were conducting gain of function research on coronaviruses. Gain of function research has not led to any life-saving vaccines or therapeutics, nor has it stopped a pandemic; in fact, it may have contributed to the current pandemic. While supporters of this research believe it could yield benefits, I personally see no tangible advantages in it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one sentence, can you provide a definition of gain of function research? And I say that because there becomes a little semantics sometimes, I believe, within the scientific community of what is a chimera and what is gain of function? Speaker 1: Yes, I think it's to take a pathogen and try to increase 1 of 2 things or both, to increase its transmissibility or its pathogenicity. I disagree with some of my colleagues at NIH to say the definition is restricted to a pathogen that's already a pathogen. If I make a nonpathogen pathogenic, that's gain of function. Speaker 0: So in your expert opinion, was the Wuhan Institute conducting gain of function research on the coronaviruses? So one other path of questioning for you, Doctor. Redfield. Proponents of this research claim it may result in vaccines or maybe even stop a pandemic. Doctor. Redfield, has gain of function created any life saving vaccines or therapeutics to your knowledge? Speaker 1: Not to my knowledge. Speaker 0: Has gain of function stopped a pandemic in your opinion? Speaker 1: No. On the contrary, I think it probably caused the greatest pandemic our world has seen. Speaker 0: Do you find any tangible benefits to gain of function research at this time? Speaker 1: I personally don't, but I do want to stress, I think the men and women that support it are people of good faith because they truly believe it's going to lead to a potential benefit. I disagree with that assessment.
Saved - November 9, 2024 at 3:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that emails obtained through freedom of information requests show the Gates Foundation, NIH, and BioNTech were planning COVID vaccines before the WHO officially recognized COVID-19 as a concern or declared it a pandemic. Check out the full episode for more details.

@OdessaOrlewicz - Odessa Orlewicz

Breaking: Freedom of information emails reveal Gates Foundation, NIH, and BioNTech had been organizing covid "vaccines" well before the WHO had even declared "Covid 19" as an official "concern" let alone a "Pandemic." These are just short clips from the full episode... https://t.co/wO97x909dR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Welcome to Liberty Talk Canada. Bill Gates has been linked to COVID-19 vaccine preparations before the pandemic was officially declared. Through a Freedom of Information request, it was revealed that the Gates Foundation was in discussions with BioNTech about a vaccine as early as February 2020, despite the WHO not declaring a pandemic until March. The Gates Foundation had also invested in BioNTech in September 2019, suggesting prior knowledge of the outbreak. Emails indicate that NIH officials were more concerned about market sentiment regarding vaccines than public health. This behavior reflects a profit-driven approach, with key figures in the NIH potentially benefiting financially from vaccine developments, similar to Graham's involvement with Moderna.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to Liberty Talk Canada. I'm Odessa Orlowitz. Smoking gun, Bill Gates, through freedom of information request by ICANN, has been proven that he was teeing up COVID 19 vaccines well before the pandemic was even declared. At this point, they put Martha Stewart in jail for far less than what Bill Gates is slowly getting caught for. Back in 2020, ICANN sued NIH to get access to his emails during the pandemic and won. The latest batch contains a very interesting email in which Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation official introduces Graham at NIH to Ugar Sahin, CEO of BioNTech. Now isn't that interesting? They were already working on COVID vaccines when it wasn't even declared till January 30th that it was an outbreak of concern. Nothing more than outbreak of concern. And the pandemic wasn't called a pandemic by the WHO till March 11th. Why is it that prior to the WHO announcing that it's a concern on the 30th January 2019, these guys say they've already been working on a vaccine in their February 2nd conversation. In other words, they knew this was a pandemic, and they had been starting to prepare well before it. It's a smoking gun. These emails are a smoking gun. Even though the rest of it is redacted, this is enough. So we know that the Gates Foundation bought shares in BioNTech back in September 2019. So one person had a cold that they labeled SARS CoV-two and they'd already been setting all this up. And that it is ready to discuss a corresponding license agreement. In another email on March 13, 2020, a market research company reached out to Graham saying that stock markets were plunging and asking him to answer some questions to help them understand market sentiment of the vaccines industry towards COVID 19 vaccines. So they weren't worried about saving lives. They were worried about money. Graham forwarded the email to the VRC director and said, FYI, quote, I never answer inquiries like this, but do you think it might be appropriate for people like us to speak to the investor world and try to calm things down? In other words, saying, come on, guys. This is it. We're making these vaccines. You're gonna make a ton of money. They they had this all teed up. Both these incidences show how the NIH acts just like a for profit corporation. This is Fauci. You know, he's the science. Corporation with a vested interest in forming partnerships and worrying about financial markets, perhaps because the agency and many of its employees stand to profit from the success of the vaccines they develop, just like Graham did from the Moderna vaccine.

@OdessaOrlewicz - Odessa Orlewicz

Here's the full episode: https://t.co/e7JtFgzpx0

Saved - February 28, 2025 at 3:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a thread discussing the idea that Covid was a premeditated hoax, highlighting various events leading up to the pandemic. I pointed out the Rockefeller Foundation's 2010 predictions, the foreshadowing in the film "Contagion," and statements from figures like Bill Gates and Fauci that seemed to anticipate a pandemic. I noted the increase in WHO funding and a 2019 simulation by the Gates Foundation. I concluded that Covid was not a surprise but rather a planned event, suggesting that virology itself is a flawed concept.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(1/19) ⚠️🧵 Covid Was a Premeditated Hoax: A Thread With the next fake pandemic looming, let’s revisit how the last one was premeditated. Here’s a chronological breakdown of the most glaring signs of foreknowledge. Even the most informed will find new info here.👇

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(2/19) 2010: 10 years before Covid, The Rockefeller Foundation’s ‘Scenarios for the Future of Technology’ outlines ‘Lock Step,’ where a pandemic leads to: - total government control - authoritarian leadership - lasting restrictions More blueprint than “hypothetical scenario.”

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(3/19) 2011 film Contagion foreshadows Covid: - virus from bats in Asia, spread via wet markets - viral videos alert the West - CDC & WHO lead, locals sidelined - independent media dismissed - social distancing, vax passports Classic predictive programming. More examples later.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many have noted the similarities between the 2011 film Contagion and the current pandemic. In Contagion, the virus is a coronavirus originating from bats in Asia and spreading through wet markets, much like we were initially told about COVID-19. The West becomes aware through viral videos from Asia spread via alternative media. The CDC, WHO, and other centralized authorities manage the response, sidelining local authorities. Independent media is dismissed as conspiracy theorists. The film references the CDC's overreaction to H1N1, justifying it as erring on the side of caution. A miracle cure, like forsythia or hydroxychloroquine, is promoted prematurely. Social distancing, a term now common, is emphasized. When an independent journalist points out the financial ties between those handling the pandemic and vaccine manufacturers, they're portrayed negatively. Ultimately, a vaccine developed collaboratively heals the world, and vaccination passports allow people to return to public life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People have been pointing out a lot of the similarities between the 02/2011 film Contagion and the current pandemic that we're all being told about, spreading across the world and keeping many of us captives in our own homes. The similarities are striking. The virus in Contagion is a coronavirus. And as we were first told about COVID nineteen, the fictional virus in Contagion comes from bats in Asia. It's also spread in wet markets. The West First becomes aware of the spread through viral videos coming out of Asia that are spread throughout the alternative media. The response to the virus is handled by the CDC and the WHO and other centralized authorities that supersede all the local authorities who are depicted as idiots that can't possibly understand the seriousness of the situation. Independent media is derided as not real journalism, but as crackpot conspiracy theorists. The film mentions the CDC's overreaction to h one n one and explains it away as better safe than sorry, and people suggesting otherwise are just being shortsighted and probably want your grandma to die. There's also a mysterious miracle cure that's being touted and promoted before any research has been conducted. This is forsythia. Hydroxychloroquine. They talk about social distancing, a term that no one had heard in 02/2011 and a term that everyone is painfully familiar with today. Right now, our best defense has been social distancing. Speaker 1: We start tonight with the coronavirus pandemic. The White House task force warns people not to violate social distancing guidelines because if they do, it could spark a second wave of sickness. Speaker 0: When the independent media journalist points out that the same people handling the pandemic are the same people that stand again financially from a vaccine. On your blog, you also wrote that the World Health Organization is somehow in bed with pharmaceutical companies. Because they are. That's who stands to gain from this. They're working hand in glove. He's depicted as a lunatic. In the end, of course, the world is healed by the vaccine developed by the Jewish doctor with the help of his black friend at the CDC and the selfless white woman who tests the vaccine on herself. And once the vaccine is administered, people are given a vaccination passport that allows them to go out into public. These are striking similarities.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(4/19) 2015: 5 years before Covid, Peter Daszak, head of EcoHealth Alliance, which funneled NIAID funds to Wuhan, says, “We need to increase public understanding of medical countermeasures like a pan-coronavirus vaccine… Investors will follow the profit.” @DrDMartinWorld great work exposing the origins of these "vaccines" deserves its own thread.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(5/19) 2017: 3 years before Covid, Bill Gates predicts a highly infectious virus will kill over 10 million people. Funny how he accurately “predicted” the Covid death toll, despite the entire thing being a hoax, with excess deaths mostly due to vaccines and pandemic protocols.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Growing up, nuclear war was the big fear. Now, a global catastrophe is more likely to be a highly infectious virus. An epidemic, whether natural or intentional, is the most probable cause of over ten million deaths in the coming decades. The lack of preparedness is alarming. We should be running simulations, like germ games instead of war games, to identify vulnerabilities. Starting now allows us to be ready for the next epidemic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When I was a kid, the disaster we worried about most was a nuclear war. Today, the greatest risk of global catastrophe doesn't look like this. Instead, it looks like this. If anything kills over ten million people in the next few decades, it's most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. I think, an epidemic, either naturally caused or intentionally caused, is the most likely thing to cause, say, ten million excess deaths. We're not ready for the next epidemic. We need to do simulations, germ games, not war games, so that we see where the holes are. We need to do simulations, germ games, not war games, so that we see where the holes are. If we start now, we can be ready for the next epidemic. Thank you. I think an epidemic, either naturally caused or intentionally caused, is the most likely thing to cause, say, ten million excess deaths, and that it's pretty surprising how little preparedness there is for it.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(6/19) 2017: 3 years before Covid, Fauci asserts there will be a “surprise” pandemic under the new Trump administration. Seems less like a “surprise” when he sounds so certain, doesn’t it? Fauci’s central role in the AIDS hoax of the 80s made him the ideal front man for Covid.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Based on my experience, I want to emphasize that the next administration will definitely face challenges related to infectious diseases. This includes managing existing chronic infectious diseases, which already pose a significant burden. However, more importantly, be prepared for a surprise outbreak. It's not a matter of if, but when, so pandemic preparedness is crucial.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There will be a surprise outbreak. It's the issue of pandemic, preparedness. And if there's one message that I want to leave with you today based on my experience, and you'll see that in a moment, is that there is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease, and we have certainly a large burden of that, but also there will be a surprise outbreak.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(7/19) 2017: 3 years before Covid, SPARS Pandemic scenario is created by Johns Hopkins & the Gates Foundation to prepare for a future pandemic. These are the same people who hosted a coronavirus pandemic simulation (Event 201) just a couple months before Covid.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(8/19) 2018-19: 1 year before Covid, the WHO’s budget conveniently saw a significant increase for “outbreak and crisis response”.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(9/19) Jan 2019: 11 months before Covid, a virologist at Chatham House trains leaders on using fear and inflated death numbers to control the public and promote vaccines during a pandemic.

Video Transcript AI Summary
As the flu commissioner for Belgium, appointed in 2006, my role was an unpaid endeavor that became critical during the 2009 pandemic. On day one, transparency and a unified message are key. Being a non-politician helped avoid political attacks and allowed me to navigate challenges more effectively. We branded the virus as the "Mexican flu," which, while controversial, improved public recognition. Media relationships were crucial, enabling comprehensive coverage and leveraging free airtime through collaborative efforts with TV anchors. Predicting future scenarios was important for managing public anxiety and shaping appropriate media coverage. Our calm, cool, and collected approach was designed to reassure the public while preparing for the worst. Maintaining public trust meant addressing questions promptly, even attending funerals to show empathy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you very much, Harp. Thanks for the invitation. And I was asked to to tell you about my experiences being the crisis manager, the flu commissioner for Belgium and highlighting the communication aspects there. These are some of my conflicts of interest over the past twenty years, I guess. It all started for me at that time, well, actually in 02/2006 when I was appointed. This is an unpaid hobby, so it's not a profession or a function, whatever. It's it's really a hobby that that flu commissioner thing. On 04/24/2009, that was when WHO said, okay, there will be a pandemic and that's when the the thing started. And then you have one opportunity to do it right. I mean, one is so important. In day one, you start your communication with the press, with the people and you have to do it right. I mean, you have to go for one voice, one message. In Belgium, they chose to appoint a non politician to do that. I mean, I have no party affiliations and that makes things a little bit, at that time at least, a little bit easier because you're not you're not attacked politically, majority minority, that doesn't come into play and that was a huge advantage. The second advantage is that you can play in Brussels the complete naive guy and get a lot more done than you would otherwise be be able to do. So one voice, one message, that's the tone that you set on day one, and you have to be you have to be very transparent in that. My name is the Intermissary Commissary for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Planning. That, of course, is too long. That became the flu commissary, and that was and that was a lot a lot easier. You have to be omnipresent that first day or the first days. So that you attract the media attention, you you make an agreement with them that you will tell them all, and if they call, you will pick up the phone. When you do that, then you can profit from these early days to get complete corporate coverage of the field, and they're not going to search for alternative voices there. And if you do that, that makes things a lot easier. And then you convey the message, and you can do that if you do it that way, that our country is ready for a pandemic. That is a gross overestimation for sure, but it is crucial to, well, to go into that pandemic. First of all, what's in the name if you talk about the pandemic? It's quite important. People are talking about the swine flu, the pandemic h one and one zero nine virus, novel influenza, two thousand and nine, a h one and one flu. At some point, was called the North American influenza, the novel flu virus. That was way too difficult. So we called it the Mexican flu. Yeah. That got me into huge trouble with the with the ambassador of Mexico at that time, and she was she was furious. Afterwards, we became good friends. I still get invited to their to their New Year's reception every year. But people were making fun of it, and and okay, that's that's probably unavoidable. But the fact to have a a clear and recognizable name, was easy for the lay public to understand and use was was actually quite important. It also worked. This is the word of the year of 02/2009. Defriending on Facebook became number one. To my big disappointment, Mexican flu was second and flu commissary was was number six. So the term works, and that makes things a lot a lot easier. These first weeks, that's easy street. When you have no opposition and and everybody needs news and they can come to you for news, you can bring quite a lot of neutral information and it is picked up and it is well, the news is brought the way you bring it and that is you can only do that in the first couple of weeks or months. One of the problems that we have or that we had is that we did not have a media budget. That was really €0 that we could spend. That means that you have to use every opportunity you can get to, well, not Britannia rules the waves, but rule the airwaves to to bring out your your message. And that's what that's something that you can do for free on radio, on TV. If you have good preexisting relationships with the media, we you can try something else. We tried the the following thing. We asked all of the anchors of the different TV stations, are you willing for free to participate in a sort of infomercial that you would pay for all of you? And they said, yes. We'll we'll we'll do that. And and that was hugely influential and and, well, we would never be able nobody would ever be able to pay for something like this. But if you have pretty good pre existing relationships with them, then then you can you can ask for return favor and they will or they might do that. One of the things that we tried, but it's ten years ago, was using Facebook and and Twitter, but well, there were not enough people on Facebook and Twitter at that time to really have an impact. If we would do that now, that would be a prime channel to communicate. However, that works both ways. I mean, also the fake news would be transmitted much more readily through Facebook, through Twitter than than it did ten ten years ago. Answering the question of the day, no matter what the the journalist's question is, is quite important. So we had a call center which was gradually becoming more and more populated. And every almost hour to hour, and later day to day, you have to get an idea what are the questions that the people are asking. And and every day, these questions were delivered multiple times so that I could work them in into the interviews no matter what the question was. The first questions, that was the first peak, and that peak was about 900 calls per day at the the moment, at the per week at the the first peak. The first questions were travel related. Can I still go to Mexico? I have planned a vacation. Can I get my money back? If you solve that problem by declaring an emergency, you help quite a lot of people and that first peak goes goes away. And then you have to predict the future. That's hard because the future has not happened yet. Predicting the past is a lot easier, but you have to predict the future in order to to prepare the public and not have an over and over exaggeration or an exaggeration of the the information in the press. So I said, Belgium, small country, we will also have h one and one cases. When you bring that, it is front page news. When then, a couple of days later, the first h one one one case arrives in the country, is the second time that they have to bring that news. So they bring it in a more muted and I think appropriate way. You can only do that when you prepare the scene for that. That was the second wave of questions people were asking more questions about what do I do when I get sick and so on, and that gives you the opportunity to work with them. And then you have to say, okay, well, we will have H one and one deaths. Of course, that would be unavoidable. I used there, sir Donaldson's quote where he said that in UK, by the peak of the epidemic, forty people would die per day at the end of the summer. So sixty two at that time million people in UK, Forty deaths a day. I worked it out for Belgium. That would be seven deaths a day at the peak of the epidemic. I used that in the media. Seven Belgian flu deaths per per day at the peak of the epidemic would be realistic. That is true in every year, even in per pandemicly. That that is very, very conservative. However, talking about fatalities is important because when you say that, people say, wow. What do you mean? People die because of influenza? And that was a necessary step to take. And then of course, a couple of days later, you had the first h one and one death in the country and the scene was set and it was already talked about. That was the third peak of of questions where that were well, the first that it had an impact and you have to have to deal with that. I went to the first couple of funerals. You have to be very quiet, sit in the back, but but it it it shows that you care and and I think that was at that time quite important. So all in all, at that time, the overall feeling in the population in the press was the Belgian approach is is reasonable. In fact, we wanted to be calm, cool and collected and our mantra was, and that was from day one at this moment, it is comparable more or less to seasonal influenza in terms of outcome, but we have to prepare for severe scenarios. Like in 1918, the first wave was rather mild and you could not predict that the second wave would have a would carry high mortality. We focus on low cost basic hygiene measures. We did not do any school closures. We used antivirals for high risk groups. Actually, we used antivirals in the beginning for people who were ill. I had pre positioned cars in the different provinces and they would drive antivirals to patients when they would be diagnosed by influenza in order to delay the onset of the epidemic and that worked until the the end of the of the school year. We only purchased one dose of vaccine per person and the the vaccination plan would be to vaccinate more or less the same high risk groups as for seasonal influenza. And then the vacation came. And that is communication wise a very dangerous period. It's a dangerous period because the more untrained journalists are at the helm, yeah, and you get the weirdest questions. They're understaffed, so more articles from other countries will come in and contaminate your message, and and that that was a weird period. That was pictures that my father took from the holiday with the grand children and I was not I was not the most social guy, I I must admit. And and my son was born two weeks before the pandemic struck, so that was not good timing. And then comes the time, inevitably, that they they they're going to talk about you. The flu commissioner is a really a great guy. And then you then you get the feel good articles about, yeah, what does he like, what music does he like, Pictures from my first laboratory when I was 13 years old. And it's all feel good, but when they do that, they also sharpen the axis at the at the same time. And then then your your personal life your your personal life becomes a little bit compromised, and and so then they come to your home and you have to really limit that because if you do not limit that, then then you have no life. And then comes then everything is set about the pandemic, about you, and then the the search for controversy. A certain point in time, had a controversy about the the payment of the physicians for the mass vaccination that would happen in in a couple of months or a couple of weeks later. And then the the quote that I gave them in terms of how much money they would receive, that was far too low and I had to be fired. You can solve that quite easily. I said, okay, you want me to be fired. I would like to win the lottery. The odds of both of these things are happening are are fairly slim and that and that passed. And then you come to the the the phase where they're going to be much more critical. And the first one was the government does not do enough. The h one and one vaccine will arrive too late and there will not be enough vaccine. Get it while you can. That was the that was the first the first really atmosphere that was created. So not enough vaccine, get it while you can. So at that point, I had to say, okay, I will be the last one to be vaccinated. I mean, you can all go in before me. I'll I'll be I'll be the last one and and that later on I regretted that that message. That vaccination campaign got a huge number of questions. That was actually the the crux of the of the campaign was the the vaccination campaign and many people had had questions there. So you had to show them that you had I mean, if if the the stockpiles, you had to walk there and walk in the in the rooms where the where you could show them that we have the vaccines and they are they are already in the country. A lot of a lot of reassurance was necessary there. And then you had to pick who is going to be vaccinated first. And then, well, women and children first, whatever. I mean, risk groups, they were important. And then I misused the fact that the top top football soccer clubs in Belgium inappropriately and against all agreements vaccinated their they made their soccer players priority people. So I said, I can use that. Because if the the population really believes that this this vaccine is so desirable that even the soccer players would be dishonest to get their vaccine, I I said, okay, I can I can play with that? So I made a big fuzz about this. This is Van Rance. He's he's raving mad. But but it worked. And and actually, these vaccination campaigns by the GPs went really, really well in a number of weeks everybody could be could be vaccinated. That's still a fairly relevant portion of the panel. Well, it it worked fine in Flanders. So you know Belgium, it's a complicated country. And and this is the the vaccination coverage. And you could see Flanders did really well. I did as many interviews in French than than in Dutch. However, in in the Flemish part of the country, we listen to the Flemish media. In the French speaking part of the country, they equally often listen to the or watch the French television where all kind of other messages were were coming across and that was really polluting the the vaccination campaign in. And then, of course, people say, okay, the vaccine is unsafe and then you get the swine flu hoax and the vaccine could kill you, say no to the vaccine that atmosphere starts. And then after the crisis, everybody becomes smart. Yeah. And you you have to accept that from the from the get go. And then the overall statement was, no, well, the government did too much, of course, because the number of deaths were disappointing to some people. And then all the books are written and everybody uses all the data and forgets that you had to take the decisions based on a fragment of the data that were available or that would be available later on. And then it was turned into a scam. People were really making money out of it. And and I think the the the Council of Europe played a a very bad role in this. This is Wolfgang Wodark, and I want to shame him actually because he, in the Council of Europe, had a motion for a recommendation, fake pandemics, a threat for health. They basically said that all these all these virologists, vaccinologists, they all have money in their pockets. They're they're dishonest people. That's easy to say. This is when you Google for h one and one. Of course, there was a peak in October and November. You didn't hear Wodark at that time. When you Google Wodark, you see that it starts nicely after the end of the pandemic. People become very brave at the end of the pandemic. I think that's not good. Then as time goes by, I still have one minute and fifty one seconds, I would like to actually issue a warning. This all started in, well, April 2009. Many years have passed. In fact, three thousand five hundred and sixty days today, five zero eight weeks and almost ten years have passed. And that has an impact because people are forgetting about the pandemics a little bit. This is when you look for influenza and pandemic in PubMed. Until 02/2003, '2 thousand and '4, there wasn't much. Then H5N1 came and some interest was raised. Then the the two thousand and nine pandemic arrived, then there was a lot of interest, and that is what happened since. So the interest is scientifically is is going down. Also, the leadership is changing, and this was a good exercise for a big pandemic. I agree. But when we're moving farther away from 02/2009, that experience is being lost. At that time, Margaret Chen, the TWH show, Tom Frieden CDC, Susan Jacob, the e CDC. Well, we're now one or two directors further and that experience from 02/2009, of course, been other experiences, but that one is not there anymore. The same for the leadership, the political leadership. At that time, Obama, Brown, Sarkozy in Belgium, Von Rampoye were there, and well, we're two or three political leaders further down the road, and and a lot of what was learned in 02/1999 has been sort of unlearned and and would have to be invented all. Well, there is still Angela Merkel and Apostrophe. They're the they're the mainstays. We can always count on them. So are we ready for the next pandemic? I don't think we are. But I would say that pandemics are like a box of chocolates. And then I would like to invoke the words of the philosopher, Forrest Gump, you never know what you're going to get. Yes. Thank you. Speaker 1: Okay, Mark. Thank you very much. Any comments or questions? Yes. Speaker 2: Hi. Thank you very much. Kieran Boltsherman. I'm clinical director at the British Medical Journal. I suppose what's changed since 02/2009? We live in an era of fake news and social media. How will we get the messages across today? Speaker 0: It is scary. And I I I'm I'm really afraid of that because that was not around in 02/2009. People would still respect authority that you got by by learning something or by professional experience. That is gone. Everybody has graduated from the University of Google, and respect for for knowledge is is gone because why would you need knowledge when you can create knowledge by typing a couple of keywords in Google and getting it yourself. That is extremely dangerous. Also, the the level of politicians that we have. I mean I mean, when I show these pictures, except for maybe some exceptions, you might want them back. It it is different. When I look at The US and also Italy, the anti vaccination sentiments there, they're growing and they're growing also at the political level that is very unsettling. Yeah. Speaker 1: Okay. Any other questions? Yes. Shout. Already have Speaker 3: my permission at SHOW. So what about engaging the social that the influences of of this day, like the entertainment industry? Speaker 0: That has been tried to a certain extent also in 02/2009. I mean, you saw Barack Obama being vaccinated. We do that every year in the hospital. In the hospital, the director and the vice director in their underwear are vaccinated. That that has a huge impact. So influencers are are important. But you you well, you need to ride influencers. I mean the Speaker 3: The wrong ones like the Kardashians. Speaker 0: I I Well, if if they do the right things, they might not be the wrong ones. But but I I think they become unpredictable. They come they become unpredictable, I think. Speaker 3: How fast is the Emmy's? With? The Emmy's. Speaker 0: The Emmy Awards. Speaker 3: We gave a flu shot. Speaker 0: That was not necessary. I think they meant well. I don't think the Emmy Awards ceremony necessarily is the setting to do vaccinations, but I think they meant well. I saw the footage. Speaker 1: Other questions? Speaker 4: Yes. Caroline Brown, WHO Regional Office for Europe. Mark, I really like your presentation and I've seen it before and it's still entertaining. Speaker 1: It's probably entertaining the first time. Okay. No, Speaker 4: it's still. So Belgium called it the Mexican flu, as did many countries. It's it's a good name, but certainly from WHO perspective, we we try to avoid implicating the countries. And I think that's part of preparedness. Let's be prepared for the next pandemic. What are we gonna call it that we could all call it? Speaker 0: Well, we talk we still talk about the Spanish flu, the Hong Kong flu, the Asian flu, and I've never felt that that was extremely discriminating against, for example, the Spanish people. I I agree and I understand it, but the the different names that were used were they're okay to use in scientific journals, that is fine. But to use that in communication with the public, it was over their head. When you talk about age one and one, then you lose 90% of the audience. Speaker 4: I understand, but I can assure you that our Spanish colleagues are still sensitive about nineteen eighteen. Speaker 1: It's not the WHO that determines the name. Speaker 0: True. But I I I do understand the sensitivities. Speaker 2: But do Speaker 3: you think people understand h one n one now? Speaker 0: Well, a lot more people do than than a couple of years ago, but never overestimate that really. I mean, it is over their heads. Speaker 1: But h one zero one is seasonal today, so the Spanish flu is not seasonal, so Yeah. Speaker 0: To a certain extent. Speaker 5: So you have mentioned your experience with Belgium. Do you believe similar experiences have been in other European or even non European countries? Speaker 0: I think it might be well, in Belgium this was possible, not because it's a great country, but it's a small country. If you want to do this, one voice, one message in a a huge country, it is very difficult to achieve, I think. I think it's more important or what what worked more was the fact that that was apolitical. I I think that had more of an influence. If you do if you have a career politician do that, from day one, he gets attacked by the opposition whose duty it is to oppose. But that it makes life very hard I think for them. Speaker 1: Perhaps if you compare it to The Netherlands, which is quite similar, we had about 20 spokespeople. Yeah. And so that made it very difficult. Yeah. So I'm coming Speaker 5: from Italy. Don't remember what happened in Italy. Honestly, it was ten years ago. Speaker 1: Okay. Thank you very much, Mark.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(10/19) Aug 2019: 6 months before Covid, the Australian Government publishes a 230-page influenza pandemic plan.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(11/19) 5 Sep 2019: 4 months before Covid, a 4chan anon blows the whistle and reveals EXACTLY what would unfold, matching Bill Gates’s earlier prediction of 9-10 million deaths. “Do not accept any vaccines for a deadly virus in winter 2020.”

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(12/19) Sep 2019: 4 months before Covid, the Global Vaccination Summit calls for “strong surveillance systems” to ensure global injections. 6 days later, the WHO warns of a “rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen.”

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(13/19) 24 Sep 2019: 3 months before Covid, Trump’s Executive Order 13887 pushes for expanding rapid vaccine production.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(14/19) 18 Oct 2019: 2 months before Covid, Bill Gates Foundation hosts a coronavirus pandemic simulation: Event 201. Deep state criminals love to do “simulations” of their psyops before the real thing.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're here to simulate a multi-stakeholder Pandemic Emergency Board meeting as a severe pandemic emerges. Global collaboration between business and governments is critical. There are conspiracy theories circulating, so we need to address bad actors spreading fake news and bring them to justice. This new coronavirus causes respiratory illness, and demand for protective equipment is rising, overwhelming healthcare. Despite concerns, 65% are eager for a vaccine, though its timely arrival is uncertain. Penalties, including arrest, are in place for spreading falsehoods, and controlling information access might be necessary. We must balance saving lives with avoiding an economic collapse. The pandemic has led to protests, riots, violent crackdowns, martial law, and a loss of public trust. The economic and societal impacts, including distrust of news and breakdown of social cohesion, could last for years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On behalf of our center and our partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, I'd like to extend a very warm welcome to our audience here in New York, as well as our larger virtual audience participating online today. The event two zero one scenario is fictional. Today's scenario is going to simulate meetings of a multi stakeholder group called the Pandemic Emergency Board. Speaker 1: We're at the start of what's looking like it will be a severe pandemic, and there are problems emerging that can only be solved by global business and governments working together. Speaker 0: There has been some conspiracy theories that are around about the potential that pharmaceutical companies or the UN have released this for their own benefit. Speaker 2: And maybe this is a time for us to showcase some cases where we are able to bring forward some bad actors and leave it before the courts to decide whether they have actually spread some fake news. Speaker 3: A new coronavirus. Infected Speaker 0: people got a respiratory illness with symptoms ranging from mild flu like signs to severe pneumonia. In related news, a significant demand for personal protective equipment like N95 masks and gloves are on the rise. Patients are overwhelming healthcare facilities. People are avoiding public spaces out of fear of infection and in compliance with public health recommendations. Our US affiliate has just released polling results on public expectations for a vaccine, and sixty five percent of those polled are eager to take the vaccine, even if it's experimental. Speaker 4: I'm not optimistic about having the vaccine in time to be relevant during this pandemic. Speaker 0: With enough money and political will, anything is possible. Speaker 3: Penalties have been put in place for spreading harmful falsehoods, including arrest. Speaker 5: If the solution means controlling and reducing access to information, I think it's the right choice. Speaker 6: What exactly are the risks and benefits of staying home from work? Absolutely, we need to save lives, but we literally cannot afford a heavy handed response that suffocates our economy. Speaker 3: The world saw large scale protests and in some places riots. This led to violent crackdowns in some countries and even martial law. The public lost trust in their respective administration. Economists say the economic turmoil caused by such a pandemic will last for years. The societal impacts, the loss of faith in government, the distrust of news, and the breakdown of social cohesion could last even longer.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Event 201 was a simulation exercise that occurred right before the COVID-19 lockdowns. It was hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the same group that accurately predicted the 2001 anthrax attacks with a similar simulation beforehand. Event 201 involved actors who greatly benefited from COVID-19 policies. Avril Haines, a long-time consultant for Palantir and former CIA Deputy Director under Obama, was directly involved in the simulation. Haines, who is now the Director of National Intelligence, essentially the CIA's boss in the Biden administration, attempted to remove her connection to Palantir from her online biographies when she joined the Biden campaign.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If people don't know what event two zero one was, they did a mock they pretended they were doing a mock. Hey. What would happen if a if a a a virus got out, and how do we handle it? They did that, like, five seconds before we had to go into lockdowns for coronavirus. And who who's they that did that? Tell people who the they is. Speaker 1: Right. So event two zero one was hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center, for Health Security, which previously the people that ran that and the which included one of the moderators for event two zero one or the people that did the simulation before the two thousand one anthrax attacks that directly predicted what would happen just several months later when the anthrax attacks did happen. And, obviously, the anthrax attacks were intended to go much farther until but a lot of their plans for utilizing the aftermath of the anthrax attacks sort of things didn't go according to plan, basically, when it got traced back to the US military, Speaker 0: that the Speaker 1: anthrax was from the US military. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: So event two zero one was a simulation very much like that involving a lot of actors that benefited hugely from COVID nineteen policies. And one of the it's not a Peter Thiel connection, but it is a Palantir connection. So one of the longest running consultants for Palantir is a woman named Avril Haines, who was a CIA deputy director under Obama serving under John Brennan. And Afrohaines was one of, you know, these people involved directly in the event two zero one simulation. Speaker 0: And she's a Speaker 1: palace. Biden is the top intelligence official in his administration, so the director of national intelligence. So, basically, the CIA's boss is her. Speaker 0: And so who and how what's her connection to Palantir? Speaker 1: She's a longtime consultant for them. But as soon as she joined the Biden campaign, she tried to delete it from her biographies online.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(15/19) 29 Oct 2019: 2 months before Covid, Fauci & HHS officials discuss the need for a “global event” to “disrupt the system” and make the public more willing to accept an experimental mRNA shot. C’mon guys don’t make it too obvious.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We can't just shut down our current vaccine system and immediately switch everyone to a new, untested vaccine. To move beyond traditional egg-based vaccine production, which has served us well, we need a demonstrably superior alternative. This requires extensive clinical trials, potentially taking a decade even under ideal circumstances. Perhaps we need a disruptive entity, free from bureaucratic constraints. It’s difficult to alter perceptions of influenza unless we address the problem disruptively and iteratively from within. Imagine if a novel avian virus emerged in China, we could obtain its RNA sequence and transmit it to regional or even local centers, possibly even directly to homes, to print vaccines on patches for self-administration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why don't we blow the system up? I mean, obviously, we can't just turn off the spigot on the system we have and then say, hey. Everyone in the world should get this new vaccine. We haven't given to anyone yet. But there must be some way that we grow vaccines mostly in eggs the way we did in 1947. Speaker 1: In order to make the transition from getting out of the tried and true egg growing, which we know gives us results that can be beneficial, we've done well with that, to something that has to be much better. You have to prove that this works, and then you've gotta go through all of the clinical trials, phase ones, phase twos, phase three, and then show that this particular product is gonna be good over a period of years. That alone, if it works perfectly, is gonna take a decade. Speaker 2: There might be a need or even an urgent call for an entity Right. Of excitement out there that's completely disruptive, that's not beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes. Speaker 1: So we really do have a problem of how the world perceives influenza, and it's going to be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say, I don't care what your perception is, we're going to address the problem in a disruptive way and in an iterative way because you do need both. Speaker 2: But it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of a novel avian virus could occur in in China somewhere. We could get the RNA sequence from that, beam it to a number of regional centers, if not local, if not even in your home at some point, and print those vaccines on a patch and self administer.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(16/19) Google Trends: A notable spike in “anti-vax” and “anti-vaxxer” mentions right before Covid. Coincidence, or were we being primed by the media?

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(17/19) Covid wasn’t a surprise—it was a premeditated hoax. Virology's a sham. Viruses don’t exist. The particles virologists point to are just cell debris—not disease-causing. PCR tests are nonsense. Contagion is a myth. 2025 will be a big year for people waking up to this.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(18/19) Other notable examples of predictive programming: - 2012 London Olympics opening - 2016 X-Files episode - 2017 Nature article on Wuhan lab Let me know what I’ve missed.👇 Follow for more threads like this.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are claims that everyone has a piece of foreign DNA in their genome, which begs the question of who put it there. This tampering can shut down our immune systems. It's a widespread failure through gene tampering, a virus within a virus from the smallpox vaccine called the Spartan virus, which removes the adenosine deaminase gene using CRISPR Cas9. This is a weapon to depopulate the planet. Our own government lies as a matter of policy, hoarding technology, driven by corporate greed and a darker objective: the takeover of America and the world. They use weather wars, aerial contaminants, and electromagnetic waves to distract and enslave citizens. The government collects your data, preparing to use it against you, and the final takeover will begin with banks going offline, followed by EMP bombs, seemingly an attack by terrorists or Russia, but it's really an invasion of the US.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tad O'Malley has been making claims. Speaker 1: Claims about what? Speaker 0: You and everyone you know has a piece of DNA in your genome, put there without your knowing it. But by whom? Well, that's the question of the day. This is an Internet lunatic. You're not saying you believe him. Speaker 1: Hold on, agent Einstein. You're talking to a scientist. Speaker 0: Forgive me, assistant director. It may sound insensitive, but the suggestion is pure science fiction. What I'm saying, agent Einstein, is that the facts as I understand them cannot be discounted out of hand. No one has the right or the ability to tamper with your DNA. Unless we gave them that ability. When you say they're tampering with our DNA, that they're able to shut down our immune systems by the addition of something to our DNA. Yes. But I don't know how exactly. Or how it's being triggered. I don't know that either. Or why it's happening now. What can we possibly do? We need to act quickly. You were right about that. Speaker 1: Well, Speaker 0: I was wrong about the science. I was wrong about what's causing it. Dead wrong, in fact. But it's clearly a widespread failure of our immune systems. Through gene tampering. A virus within a virus that was put there through the smallpox vaccine is what these men are calling the Spartan virus. We have to figure this out. What's wrong with the science? Okay. The Spartan virus removes the adenosine deaminase gene from your DNA. It removes the ADA gene, and your immune system will simply vanish. Yeah. But I'm not getting sick. It's only a matter of time. Okay? So how does it work? How does the virus remove the ADA gene? A process called CRISPR Cas nine. RNA and a protein cutting genes at exact locations. Exactly. But in this instance, used as a weapon. The ultimate weapon, the ability to depopulate the planet, to kill everyone but the chosen by tampering with their DNA. Speaker 1: Through gene editing. Speaker 0: Why do such a thing and lie about it? Own government. Speaker 1: Your own government lies a matter of course, a matter of policy. The Tuskegee experiments on black men in the thirties, Henrietta Lacks. Speaker 0: What are they trying to do? Speaker 2: That's the missing piece. But it's not hard to imagine. A government hiding, hoarding technology for seventy years at the expense of human life and the future of the planet. Driven not only by corporate greed, but a darker objective. The takeover of America. And then the world itself by any means necessary, however violent or cruel or efficient by severe drought brought on by weather wars conducted secretly using aerial contaminants and high altitude electromagnetic waves in a state of perpetual war to create problem reaction solution scenarios to distract, enrage, and enslave American citizens at home with tools like the Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Authorization Act, which abridge the constitution in the name of national security. The militarization of police forces in cities across The US, the building of prison camps by the Federal Emergency Management Agency with no stated purpose, the corporate takeover of food and agriculture, important a important The Speaker 0: your phone, collects your data, and monitors your whereabouts with impunity. Speaker 2: A government preparing to use that data against you when it strikes, and the final takeover begins. By a well oiled and well armed multinational group of elites that will cull, kill, and subjugate. Speaker 0: Happening as we sit here. Speaker 2: It's happening all around us. Speaker 1: The other shoe waiting to drop. Speaker 2: It'll probably start on a Friday. The banks will announce a security action necessitating their computers to go offline all weekend. Digital money will disappear. Speaker 0: They can just steal your money? Speaker 1: Followed by the detonation of strategic electromagnetic pulse bombs to knock out major grids. Speaker 2: What will seem like an attack on America by terrorists or Russia. Speaker 0: An invasion of The US. Speaker 1: The Russians tried it in '47.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(19/19) Links to sources: - 2/19: https://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf - 4/19: https://www.unz.com/proberts/how-the-covid-pandemic-was-orchestrated/ - 5/19: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDxb21qIilM - 6/19: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNXGAxGJgQI - 7/19: https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/spars-pandemic-scenario-copy.pdf - 8/19: https://www.who.int/about/accountability/results/2018-2019 - 9/19: https://vimeo.com/320913130 - 10/19: https://stopworldcontrol.com/downloads/australia-pandemic-plan.PDF - 11/19: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/225497848/#225498529 - 12/19: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2019-11/ev_20190912_mi_en_0.pdf - 12/19: https://www.gpmb.org/reports/m/item/2019-a-world-at-risk - 13/19: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-13887-modernizing-influenza-vaccines-the-united-states-promote-national - 14/19: https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/event-201-pandemic-tabletop-exercise - 15/19: https://www.c-span.org/program/public-affairs-event/universal-flu-vaccine/535344 - 18/19: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.21487

How the Covid “Pandemic” Was Orchestrated Everything you should know about Covid unz.com
WHO Results Report 2018-2019 - Driving impact in every country WHO Results Report 2018-2019. 18 May 2020. This report lays out the vital work that we do, and shows how, even as we are responding to one public health event or crisis, we are also working to support countries in meeting the health needs of their populations, strengthening their systems, and planning for the unexpected. This report demonstrates that accountability is at the heart of all that we do. who.int
Communication and public engagement - MARC VAN RANST - 9 Lecture by Marc Van Ranst, Belgian Flu Commissioner, at the ESWI/Chatham House Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Stakeholders Conference on 22 January 2019 vimeo.com
Page not found - Stop World Control stopworldcontrol.com
A World at Risk GPMB 2019 Annual Report gpmb.org
Executive Order 13887—Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States To Promote National Security and Public Health | The American Presidency Project presidency.ucsb.edu
Event 201 | Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. centerforhealthsecurity.org
Inside the Chinese lab poised to study world's most dangerous pathogens - Nature Maximum-security biolab is part of plan to build network of BSL-4 facilities across China. nature.com

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

⚠️For anyone raising an eyebrow at the claim of virology being a sham, see the thread linked below. 🦠 https://t.co/iEqIDqO7gx

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(1/28) 🚨⚠️ Virology is a Sham — Explained for Every Attention Span I’ve tailored this thread to all attention spans—from 10-word memes for goldfish brains to 25,000-word papers for chads—and everything in between. Pick length that suits you and see why virology’s a scam. 🧵👇

Saved - January 26, 2025 at 6:25 PM

@BlackTomThePyr8 - Tom Czerniawski

Here's Bill Gates funding the developers of SARS-CoV-2 in order to profit from the vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, which he had invested in, prior to the pandemic, while having the WHO and Gavi - whom he also heavily invested in - push those vaccines on the world. Neat arrangement! https://t.co/zILO1ZtDqQ

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Gates on RFK Jr.'s Vaccine Allegations: 'People Can Judge for Themselves' "Well, he wrote a book saying that Tony Fauci and I, kill millions of children and make billions of dollars with vaccines. And, you know, people can judge for themselves whether that's that's correct or not." Source: The Wall Street Journal (YouTube)

Video Transcript AI Summary
RFK has made controversial claims about vaccines, suggesting that Tony Fauci and others are responsible for the deaths of a million children and profiting significantly from vaccines. People can form their own opinions on the validity of these statements.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you make of of RFK and vaccines and what he's saying about it and the position he's been given in this incoming administration? Speaker 1: Well, he wrote a book saying that Tony Fauci and I, kill 1,000,000 of children and make 1,000,000,000 of dollars with vaccines, and, you know, people can judge for themselves whether that's that's correct or not.
Saved - June 29, 2025 at 8:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Moderna's rapid rise during the COVID-19 pandemic raises serious concerns. Despite being a relatively young company with no prior FDA-approved products, they produced 250-300 million vaccines in the U.S. alone, earning $5-7 billion. Their connections to the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies, along with a troubling history tied to bio-defense, suggest a deeper agenda. The involvement of former FDA officials and venture capitalists with questionable backgrounds further complicates their narrative. Overall, it feels like a significant deception.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

1🧵Pfizer has the largest criminal & civil payout for healthcare fraud in U.S. history. That being said, Moderna, despite being the new kid on the block proved themselves to be professional frauds -purveying a vileness in their crimes that even Pfizer could only dream of.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

2🧵Moderna, despite being only 10 yrs old when COVID emerged & never before having an FDA approved vaccine product, still managed to be responsible for anywhere between 250-300 Million C19 "vaccines" in the US alone. 💰Moderna’s net profit from C19 vaccine sales in just our country was $5–7 billion over the course of the pandemic’s most lucrative yrs.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

3🧵 Under-qualified. Inexperience. Yet Moderna was overly funded, pushed, & trusted. Why? It's clearly a synthetic scenario that they'd be the 2nd highest administered vaccine for a global pandemic so it's of no surprise that Moderna, & it's vaccine was largely a ploy perpetrated by the DoD & Intelligence Community.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

4🧵Here's the 411 on Moderna's role in C19: 💉 2010-Moderna was started by primarily Harvard grads w/in Flagship Pioneering a venture capital. 💉In 2013 DARPA begins funding Moderna's mRNA products 💉2015-They sign a confidential "information exchange" with NIH which broadened the collaboration by 2017 & on. 💉2018-Moderna breaks the record for the largest biotech IPO at the time. 💉2019- Ralph Baric of UNC signs the Moderna/NIH Material Transfer Agreement to work on a coronavirus vaccine. 💉2020- Moderna is the first company to turn the SARS CoV-2 sequence into a "vaccine" & they are chosen as a prime candidate for manufacturing the vaccine en masse. 💉2021-Moderna hires Resilience a "new" CDMO to make the mRNA product for their C19 jabs & Lonza for their fill & finish.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

5🧵During the COVID-19 pandemic, Stephen Hahn the FDA Commissioner [Dec. 2019- Jan. 2021] who was also on the Coronavirus Task Force joined the board for Flagship Pioneering [creator of Moderna] less than 6 months after leaving his position as FDA Commissioner! -Flagship's Stephen Berenson is former JP Morgan [who led the Jeffrey Epstein & Gates backed GHIC] & also sits on the board for Moderna.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

6🧵As I covered in my most recent thread, the history behind the technology of Moderna's mRNA producer is horrifying & almost unbelievable. For those who haven't read it I'll sum it up: Resilience the maker for Moderna's jabs had their entire history derived from bio-defense MCMs for the USG & their foundational tech was acquired by 2 companies, Baxter & Xoma. Baxter was involved in one of the most dangerous lab incidents in history & XOMA was a bio-defense contractor. Resilience underwent multiple re-brandings in order to conceal these facts. I.E- Moderna hired a sketchy company w/ sketchy technology, largely geared for biological warfare countermeasures, to make a product that would be injected into over 250 Million unsuspecting & scared Americans.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

7🧵All roads lead to Resilience, & as I've covered before Resilience is a product of the DoD & CIA. Its unclear when in Resilience's history they were taken over by intelligence but my guess is sometime around 2013. https://t.co/AHH115TDa9

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

1🧵 In February of 2009 two allegedly unrelated events occurred; the 2009 Swine Flu Pandemic Outbreak & the Baxter Live H5N1 vaccine contamination incidence. A lab leak hushed up & a pandemic followed. That may sound familiar, but it is directly tied to what 10yrs later would happen w/ COVID-19.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

8🧵Quick recap on Resilience: Founded by Illumina & CFR member Robert Nelsen. He seed funded Resilience with the help of the DoD & from NEA [Gottlieb], Google Ventures [thanks to Sue Hellman of BMGF], and 8VC a Joe Lonsdale [co-founder of Palantir] company.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

9🧵CEO Rahul Singhvi was a partner at Flagship Pioneering which created Moderna! CEO Chris Darby, a Canadian national was the President of In-Q-tel the venture capital arm of the CIA [2006-2023]. Also on the Board is Lonsdale's 8VC Co-founder, Drew Oetting.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

10🧵Moderna pocketed $18 Billion dollars globally from the first year during the pandemic. Resilience was the most successful scam in history. Here's a company to make NEVER BEFORE APPROVED mRNA injections for a cold virus oh & on the board isn't esteemed scientists, but rather : Palantir lackeys, CIA cronies, Bill & Melinda Gates officials & big pHARMa reps with a dash of 2 crooked former FDA officials [McLellan & Gottlieb] & built on the technology of a GOF lab leak flu platform [Baxter] & a bio-weapons program [XOMA]!🤬

Saved - January 17, 2026 at 5:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user asserts mRNA injections were invented by the military, not Pfizer/Moderna or Warp Speed, based on a 2012 DARPA blueprint and a supposed government-gone-weaponized-plan for control. A responder notes the idea predates 2012. Another point adds Dr. Hotez saying SARS-CoV vaccines were a 17-year process starting in 2003.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨TRUTH EXPOSED: "The military invented mRNA injections, not Pfizer or Moderna—not Operation Warp Speed." —Dr. Peter McCullough, MD This wasn't Big Pharma's 'miracle'...it was a DARPA MILITARY blueprint from 2012—a DECADE before COVID! Planned gov't weaponized op for control. https://t.co/mxRXbr9e4d

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses the origin and framing of pandemic prevention and vaccine development as a military-led initiative. He cites a 2012 DARPA program called the Adept Protect p three program, described as a pandemic prevention platform. The proposal outlined the use of gene-encoded vaccines based on RNA or DNA with the goal of stopping a pandemic within sixty days. He suggests that, by the time President Trump referenced “Operation Warp Speed” to develop vaccines, there should have been preparation and acknowledgement that this work dated back to 2012, making it not rapid innovation but a decade-long effort. He argues that the public narrative of rapid development and stunning innovation surrounding vaccines is deceptive and that contractors like Moderna had already secured multi-million-dollar contracts in 2013. He notes that the military operates programs addressing biological threats and also works on answers such as monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. The claim is made that the military originated the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, and not in response to the outbreak from Wuhan. According to the speaker, this is a military program in origin and administration. The speaker asserts that Health and Human Services, under Alex Azar, together with the Department of Defense, ushered the public into a vaccine era, framing Emergency Use Authorization as a mechanism to rapidly deploy new technology into the military rather than the public. He contends that this mechanism’s broad public application began with the COVID-19 pandemic, which is presented as evidence that the FDA lacks ownership or control over the process because the program is characterized as military in origin and execution. The overall claim is that the program operates like a military operation with universal reach and without exemptions, implying a deeply embedded military approach to vaccine development and deployment. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the continuity from a 2012 program proposal through to the public health landscape observed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting that the military’s involvement, timeline, and governance underlie the current vaccine paradigm and its regulatory pathways.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2012, DARPA, which is the research division of the military, started a program. It's called the Adept Protect p three program, pandemic prevention platform. Look what they proposed. They said, listen, we are going to use gene encoded vaccines as a new category of preventive measures based on RNA or DNA. And in this approach, we will stop a pandemic within sixty days. Within sixty days, in 2012, this was started. When president Trump came out and said it's operation warp speed and they're gonna develop vaccines, it would have been nice if he was prepped or Anthony Fauci was prepped to say, listen. We're working on this. We've been working on this since 2012. This is not new. This isn't warp speed. This is ten years and coming. The deception out in the open that this was rapidly developed, that there was all this stunning innovation. The contractors, Moderna got its first multi million dollar contract in 2013. The military works on programs, both the threat, SARS CoV two, and work on the answer, monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. But the military has biological threat programs. There's one for smallpox monkeypox, there's one for anthrax, and who knows how many more programs. This was part of a program. But the military came up with the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, not Operation Warp Speed. It wasn't in response to what was you know, came out of Wuhan, China. This is a military program. When it was announced by Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, and the Department of Defense, that's who entered into this you know, ushered us into the vaccine era, the military. Emergency use authorization is a mechanism to get rapid new technology into the military. It's not a mechanism for the public. Its first application broadly to the public was when the COVID-nineteen pandemic. That's the reason why the FDA doesn't seem like they have any ownership over this. They can't seem to respond to it because it's a military program. This has a military origin to it, and the program is executed like a military program. No one will be spared. There's no exceptions. You can kinda see that the similarities there.

@PPR_Mile - Mile Kovačević ☦🇺🇸🦅

@ValerieAnne1970 Earlier than 2012. Dr. Peter Hotez stated the SARS-CoV/coronavirus vaccines were a 17 year process on 12/09/2020 since 2003. https://t.co/UQciFeSrbU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Hotez explains that while vaccines are often described as miraculous, the development was not a four-month process but a seventeen-year effort dating back to the post-SARS period. After SARS emerged in 2003, researchers identified the spike protein as the virus’s soft underbelly and began experimental vaccine development. When the COVID-19 sequence was released in January, the coronavirus community quickly concluded that a vaccine could be made, and attention turned to which technology would be fastest and most enduring. All vaccines discussed (AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, and the one being scaled in India) target the spike protein. He emphasizes that this was a deliberate long-term program, not a rushed push. Nicole notes the broader context of vaccine safety, particularly on a day when a vaccine-skeptical witness testified before the Senate Homeland Security Committee. Dr. Hotez clarifies that the virus behind the current pandemic comes from a family of coronaviruses scientists have studied for a long time, and that once specifics emerged, researchers could finalize the vaccine approach. He reiterates the importance of reassurance about safety in light of public skepticism. Dr. Hotez highlights the role of the NIH and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, led by Tony Fauci, and Francis Collins at NIH, in launching a major coronavirus program beginning in 2003. This funding enabled the development of some of the first prototype vaccines, illustrating a deliberate US government and NIH investment to advance vaccine research. He notes the ongoing need to assess rollout and production robustness, as this technology is brand new, and additional vaccines will be necessary to vaccinate populations. Looking ahead, the conversation acknowledges that the United States will require four or five different vaccines to achieve broad vaccination coverage, rather than relying solely on the two mRNA vaccines. The UK has begun vaccinations, marking an initial step, with plans to scale in the United States in the coming days. The discussion underscores a long road ahead to ensure scalable production, distribution, and multiple vaccine options to meet demand.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor. Hotez, clearly the logistics of vaccinating the world. Because I think one of the lessons, and this is something Laurie Garrett and I talked about in the last hour, is that if the whole world isn't safe, then none of us are safe. But talk about both aspects of Cures reporting, the significance of vaccinations commencing today in The UK and the long, long road ahead. Speaker 1: Yeah. A few things, Nicole. You know, everyone is talking about what a miracle the vaccines are, and they are a miracle in one sense. But, you know, sometimes people think that these vaccines just popped out of nowhere over a period of four months. And one of the things that I've been trying to explain to people if they think vaccines are rushed, this is not a four month process. This is a seventeen year process. The discovery and development of vaccines for coronaviruses began seventeen years ago after SARS emerged in 2003. That was the first big pandemic. Coronavirus has started out of South China and shut down Toronto, Canada for a while. That's when we identified the spike protein as the as the soft underbelly of the virus. That's when experimental vaccines first developed So that when the Chinese put up this the sequence of COVID nineteen on bioRxiv in January, the coronavirus community the community of coronavirus vaccine researchers looked at this and said, oh, we got this. We know how to make a COVID nineteen vaccine. And then it was a matter of which technology could go the first, could be the fastest, and which technology would be the most enduring. And and so all of the vaccines that you're hearing about, whether it's AstraZeneca or Pfizer or Moderna or J and J or ours, which is being scaled in India, all all target the the that spike protein. And that's important that people realize that this was not rushed. This was a deliberate long term, program. So it's really exciting to see this vaccine go into, Maggie's arm, and, we're so thrilled for her and her family. And this will be scaled up in England, and now we'll be moving to The US, I think, in a few days. Speaker 0: I I think what you said sounds like it's very important in the category of reassuring people of the safety, especially on a day when, Republicans in the Senate Homeland Security Committee had, a vaccine skeptic testify, something that I think alarms a lot of folks. I wanna give you a minute to to just put what you just said in even more context. And let me just ask it this way. So you're saying that that the kind of virus that carried COVID all over the world in the last ten months is from a a sort of family of viruses that scientists like yourself have been studying for a long time. And once they got the specifics, they were able to sort of fine tune, put the finishing touches on this vaccine. Is is that basically what you're explaining? Speaker 1: That's right. So, you know, we we after we saw SARS in 2003, then there was Middle Eastern Respiratory in 2012. We said, well, hang on. There's there's a new coronavirus coming every decade. We knew there was another one coming. And and again, this is the power of the National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Allergy Infectious Diseases headed by Tony Fauci, Francis Collins heading NIH. They launched a major program for coronaviruses starting in 2003. We were the beneficiaries of that. We got funded to develop some of the first prototype vaccines. So this all was very deliberate by the US government and the NIH to really move this forward. Again, this is why, you know, we we we were we're very blessed to have the NIH here in in in The United States and and funding that research. And and we still have a long ways to go because, we're gonna have to see how this vaccine rolls out in terms of being able to scale it up, how robust the production process will be. This is a brand new technology, and that's the reason why we're bringing out other vaccines on top of it, the adenovirus vaccines. We're gonna need at least four or five different vaccines to vaccinate The US population. We will not do this with just the two mRNA vaccines.
Saved - January 25, 2026 at 5:19 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

It is worth remembering that Moderna, Fauci and Ralph Baric (who had a blueprint together with the Wuhan lab for engineering Covid-like viruses) had an agreement to create mRNA “vaccines” immediately after Covid leaked from the Wuhan lab, but before anyone knew about it. https://t.co/Wydkyc3TCb

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Moderna exits vaccine market?!! Bancel ‌said ‌regulatory delays and little support from the authorities make the market size "much smaller." Translation: We lost control of our "regulatory department"

View Full Interactive Feed