TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
Here is Donald Trump’s rape accuser E. Jean Carroll that the left won’t stop talking about. She doesn’t appear to know what rape means: “I think most people think of rape as being sexy.” “The word ‘rape’ carries so many sexual connotations, this was not sexual.” Even Anderson Cooper was appalled with these answers.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker clarifies that they don't feel like a victim and that the incident they experienced was not sexual, although it did hurt. They mention that rape is often associated with sexual connotations and violence, but they emphasize that it was not an assault. The speaker suggests taking a short break and mentions the topic of fantasies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't feel like a victim? I was not thrown on the ground and ravished, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotation. This was not this was not sexual. It just it it hurt. It just what it just you know?
I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent Assault. It is not assault. Think most people think of rape as being sexy. Let's take a short break. Think of the fantasies.
Mhmm. We're just gonna take a quick break. If you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side. You're fascinating to talk to.
@sues86453 - Sue Knows Best
E. Jean Carroll says she “just completely forgot” to disclose in her deposition that a billionaire Democrat donor was funding part of her case against Trump… Of course she did.. wink… wink. Listen carefully. What’s the word she almost says?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks about the lack of disclosure regarding a Democratic donor funding the case. Speaker 1 denies any political motive and admits to forgetting about the donor during their deposition.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another thing that he and his lawyers have often spoken about is the the lack of disclosure about a big democratic donor funding part of this case. Was there a reason it wasn't disclosed? And did you view this as political in any way?
Speaker 1: No. I just completely I just completely forgot, that he even existed. In your deposition? Yes. In my deposition.
@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸
@CollinRugg E. Jean Carroll is a nut job. This is the woman that accused Trump of rape. Complete looney tune. https://t.co/9w8IHkri8M
Video Transcript AI Summary
I call this place the Mouse House where distinguished mice like Kahneman and Taburski live. My shed holds books that influenced me. The door lists my dogs' names. I painted rocks blue to show where rivers once flowed. I painted trees and a forest. The best advice I've given is to eat, drink, and be merry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I called the mouse house because some very distinguished, mice live here. Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taburski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Marquee, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry. And, it's so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I've done this whole forest.
Oh my god. What's the best piece of advice I've ever given? What a horrible question to ask an advice to. Oh my god. Hang on.
Eat, drink, and be merry. That's it. That's my advice.
@TimRunsHisMouth - Tim Young
Just a reminder that Trump's accuser E. Jean Carroll once told Anderson Cooper that rape is "sexy" and a "fantasy." ...and it creeped him out so much that he cut her off and threw to commercial. https://t.co/KU9Ir6KJ2u
Video Transcript AI Summary
I didn't feel like a victim. It wasn't a sexual assault, just hurtful. Rape isn't sexy, it's violent. Let's take a break and talk more later. You're interesting to talk to.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't feel like a victim? I was not thrown on the ground and ravished, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotation. This was not this was not sexual for it just it it hurt. It just what it just, you know I think most people think rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault. It is not I think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Let's take a short break. Think of the fantasies. Mhmm. We're just gonna take a quick break. Or if you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side.
You're fascinating to talk to.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Do you think E. Jean Carroll is credible? https://t.co/gHwQ9JR7cY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump is accused of inappropriate behavior towards women. The speaker finds it disrespectful to women who are victims of rape. They recall a past encounter with Trump involving lingerie. The speaker expresses anger and panic, mentioning death threats. They ponder the possibility of DNA evidence on the lingerie. The conversation shifts to Trump's statement about the accuser not being his type. The speaker challenges the perception of rape as sexy. The discussion pauses briefly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Charge against Donald Trump for this. Why not?
Speaker 1: I would find it disrespectful to the women who are down on the border, who are being raped around the clock down there. But for the women down there and for the women, actually, around the world And it was all fairly playful. Oh, it was charming. It was excite remember what Donald Trump was like in 95, 90 6. On the counter were these fancy lingerie boxes that they used to have back in the nineties.
Yeah. You wore lingerie in the nineties, I'll bet you. But He didn't suggest it. He shouted it. He shouted it.
Lingerie. Lingerie. He may have shouted underwear. I Yeah. Okay.
Speaker 0: Were you scared? Were you No.
Speaker 1: I'm too angry? I was too panicked to be scared.
Speaker 0: Too panicked to be scared. Okay.
Speaker 1: Totally. And I put my life on the line. Do you think that you're go well, hold on a second. What do you mean you put your life on the line? Well, people have told me I have to be careful.
You've gotten death threats. I am not looking at death threats. I have the idea that I'm gonna make him put it on over his pants. That was my idea. Mhmm.
You see how funny that would be to make him put that on? I guess my question is is could there be any DNA on there? Idea. I do not know if the president ejaculated. Have no idea.
Lawrence, I wish I had said I wish. I said, I'll tell you my age if you show me your tax returns.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Yeah. It would've been would've been up
Speaker 1: in that. Well, so I'm holding my handbag like the the only reason I know I'm holding my handbag is because I discovered it in my hand when I got to the street.
Speaker 0: The statement that he said, which he's just made, which is she's not my type number. Well, that was the number one thing.
Speaker 1: Love that I'm not his type. I'm an archer. I have bows and arrows. You know? Yeah.
Fine. I think there's just too never mind. Never mind.
Speaker 0: I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault. It is not a I
Speaker 1: think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Speaker 0: Let's take a short break.
Speaker 1: Think of the fantasies.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. We're just gonna take a quick break. Or if you can stick around,
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm E Jean Carroll, the woman who accused Trump of sexual assault. Leftists believe me, but some question their sincerity. Do they truly believe or is it politically motivated?
@MrReaganUSA - Mr Reagan 🇺🇸
This is E Jean Carroll, the woman that the left believes has "credibly" accused Trump of sexual assault in the dressing room of the Bergdorf Goodman Department store. 😳 https://t.co/QZ0A44NmAm
Video Transcript AI Summary
I live in a place called the mouse house, where distinguished mice like Kahneman and Taburski reside. I have a shed filled with books that influenced me. On the door, I have a list of my dogs' names. I once painted rocks blue to represent a dried-up river. Then I started painting trees and eventually created a whole forest. When asked for the best advice I've given, I replied, "Eat, Drink, and be merry."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I called the mouse house because some very distinguished, mice live here. Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taburski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Marquee, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, tits, bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry. And, it's so horrified me that I came out and started Painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just Sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon I've done this whole forest.
Oh my god. What's the best piece of advice I've ever given? What a horrible question to ask an advice to all. Oh my god. Hang on.
Eat, Drink and be merry. That's it. That's my advice.
@MrReaganUSA - Mr Reagan 🇺🇸
It's amazing how many gullible leftists claim to actually believe the E Jean Carroll sham. I wonder if they really believe it or if they're just pretending because it's politically convenient. 🤔
@almostjingo - Rosie Memos
E. Jean Carroll is a whack job and was one before @realDonaldTrump it’s not his fault she lives in the woods by herself, names mice, has dogs named “tits” and “bloody”, destroys rivers and trees by painting them and manically paints all over her house. The list goes on… https://t.co/WreJNYDul9
Video Transcript AI Summary
I enjoy staying up late and waking up around noon, appreciating my child-free life. My mornings are spent reading letters from readers, and I often reflect on my long-standing obsession with my college ex. I worry about those who write in, feeling the weight of my words. Living in New York would overwhelm me with dating, so I retreat to the woods to find clarity. I call my home The Mouse House, where I share space with distinguished mice. My childhood books and a list of my dogs adorn my shed. Inspired by a dry riverbed, I began painting the rocks blue, eventually transforming the entire forest around me. When asked for advice, I simply say: eat, drink, and be merry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh my god. Thank god that's not me. I like to stay up late. I like to sleep late, and I like to live like 90 in between. I get up around noon, and and I stagger outside out the store and I throw open my arms, I thank God I don't have children.
Then I go back in, stagger into my office, and start reading a stack of Askingine letters. I never thought much went on in the morning anyway. Women have facials in the morning. They have their hair done. Not me.
I like getting up at noon. My personal life is fascinating. I am so tormented and confused by my obsession with my ex boyfriend from college. Here's to the last line. It's been 22 years since we broke up.
I understand you. She and I have a lot in common. Oh, we do not wanna look at our emails. That was a bad idea. Oh.
I worry so much about the people who write in. I am so real. See these eyes? Look. Look at the bags under my eyes.
I worry at night when I'm in bed because, you know, a line from me can change your life. Now, whether it changes for the better or for the worse, I don't know. As you see, I have stacks of bells here and there and everywhere. I get sent one every month. Sometimes, if I'm very good, they send me 2.
I could not answer the questions coming into the Ask Eugene column if I was in New York City. You can't think in New York if you're dating 16 people, which I would be doing if I were in New York. You go to the woods to find out who you are, and then you find out who you are, and you're even happier than when you came. It's wonderful. I called The Mouse House because some very distinguished, mice live here.
Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taborski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up. On the door are the list of my dogs, Marky, Fortuna de las Funky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn.
The streams and the rivers were dry. And, it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I've done this whole forest. Oh my god.
What's the best piece of advice I've ever given? What a horrible question to ask an advice to. Oh my god. Hang on. Eat, drink, and be merry.
That's it. That's my advice.
@WojPawelczyk - Wojciech Pawelczyk
E. Jean Carroll is completely nuts and has zero credibility. Watch the full video😵 https://t.co/DSlo4cKJut
Video Transcript AI Summary
People read advice columns to feel relieved that they don't have the same problems. The speaker enjoys staying up late and sleeping in, and doesn't have children. They've been writing an advice column for 25 years, learning from the people who write to them. The speaker has stacks of letters and believes the answer to people's questions is in their own desires. They worry about the people who write in and feel responsible for the impact their advice may have. They have a shed filled with books and a forest they painted blue. The best advice they've given is to "eat, drink, and be married."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People read in an advice column because they want to say, oh my god. Thank god. That's not me. I like to stay up late. I like to sleep late, and I like to live like 90 in between.
I get up around noon, and I stagger outside out the store, And I throw up in my arms, and I thank God I don't have children. Then I go back in, Stagger into my office and start reading a stack of ASCII gene letters. I never thought much went on in the morning anyway. Women have facials in the morning. They have their hair done, not me.
I like getting up at noon. My personal life is fascinating. I started writing At about the age of 6a half, fed with a daily, daily diet of Anne Landers and Dear Abby. I wanted to be Anne and Abby. Oh, here.
Hang on. I have something that explains the NSQ gene column in a perfect, perfect thing. Here I come through here. This is what I've been doing for 25 years. I'm a cheerleader.
People get down and depressed and a little confused, and they need help. This is what I do. I yell and I scream and I, helps them get through their difficulties. The secret to the advice column is I don't know anything. It's the people who've been writing to me for 25 years who taught me everything.
Those are the people you can't read a stack of e gene letters without learning more than reading Shakespeare. You wanna see some old asking Jean. All these are asking Jean asking Jean asking Jean. I have every single letter that's ever been sent to me. I have the shopping bags full of actual stationery with letters.
This man has given his, wife, a $30,000 engagement ring. He wants her to give him a $6,000 watch. Well, she did, but it wasn't enough Because then he wanted a Rolex, how she's handled this is she's had an affair with somebody at the office. The questions have remained the same. They want love.
They wanna be a size 6. They want their children to do well. They wanna have a purpose in life. They want those same things, And that that has never changed. The answer is in their question.
You just find out what they wanna do And then you tell them to do it. I am so tormented and confused by my obsession with my ex boyfriend from college. Here's to the last line. It's been 22 years since we broke up. I understand you.
She and I have a lot in common. Oh, we do not wanna look at our emails. That was a bad idea. Oh. I worry so much about the people who write in.
I am so real. See these eyes? Look. Look at the bags under my eyes. I worry at night when I'm in bed because, you know, a line from me can change your life.
Now, whether it changes for the better or for the worse, I don't know. As you see, I have stacks of bells here and there and everywhere. I get sent one every month. Sometimes, If I'm very good, they send me 2. I could not answer the questions Coming into the ASCII Jean column, if I was in New York City.
You can't think in New York if you're dating 16 people, which I would be doing if I were in New York. You go to the woods to find out who you are, and then you find out who you are, and you're even happier than when you came. It's wonderful. I called the mouse house because some very distinguished, mice live here. Connerman lives in the kitchen.
Taberski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books That most influenced me growing up. On the door of the list of my dogs, Marky, Fortuna De Las Funky, Heidi, Tits, bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry.
And I it's so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I've done this whole forest. Oh my god. What's the best piece of advice I've ever given?
What a horrible question To ask an advice on, oh my god. Hang on. Eat, drink, And be married. That's it. That's my advice.
reSee.it AI Summary
The first post highlights various aspects of the woman accusing Trump of sexual assault, including her dog's names, comments about rape, living in a cabin called the "Mouse House," painting rocks and trees, and aligning her allegation with an SVU episode. The post questions her credibility, contrasting it with the Left's belief in believing all women. The second post shares a video of E. Jean Carroll discussing rape, making Anderson Cooper uncomfortable. The third post showcases Carroll's unconventional "Mouse House" in the forest with painted rocks and trees.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
The woman who is accusing Trump of sexual assault: -named her dog “Tits” & “Vagina” -told Anderson Cooper that rape is “sexy” -lives in a cabin in the woods called the “Mouse House” -paints trees and rocks blue -lined up her entire allegation with the plot of an SVU episode -called sluts “sexual geniuses” -tweeted about learning sex tips from her dog The Left says we should believe all woman, but this woman does not seem stable. Do you believe E. Jean Carroll?
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Here is E. Jean Carroll calling rape “sexy” and making Anderson Cooper so uncomfortable that he went to commercial break. https://t.co/OTA8oeHJbl
Video Transcript AI Summary
I didn't feel like a victim. It wasn't a sexual assault, but it did hurt. People often associate rape with violence, not realizing it can be seen as sexy in fantasies. Let's take a short break and continue our conversation later. You're really interesting to talk to.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't feel like a victim? I was not thrown on the ground and ravished, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotation. This was not this was not sexual for it just it it hurt. It just what it just, you know? I think most people think rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault.
It is not a violent assault. I think most people think of rape as being sexy. Let's take a short break. Think of the fantasies. Mhmm.
We're just gonna take a quick break. Or if you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side. You're fascinating to talk to.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Here is E. Jean Carroll’s bizarre “Mouse House” in the middle of the forest with painted rocks and trees around it. https://t.co/dDPWRPESaY
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker introduces their home and the mice that live there. They mention their shed and the books that influenced them. The speaker also lists the names of their dogs on the door. They talk about how the streams and rivers were dry, which horrified them. To indicate the presence of a river, they painted the rocks blue. They then started painting trees and eventually painted the entire forest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because some very distinguished, mice live here. Connerman lives in the kitchen. Taberski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Marquee, Fortuna de la sponky, Heidi, tits, bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry. And I it's so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon I've done this whole forest.
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to remind everyone that E. Jean Carroll once said on CNN that "rape is sexy," and her accusation against Trump resembles a plot from a 2012 Law & Order SVU episode. When questioned, she claimed it was a coincidence, and her lawyers sought to instruct jurors about the episode's existence.
@greg_price11 - Greg Price
I just want to remind everyone that in addition to once saying on CNN that "rape is sexy," E. Jean Carroll's accusation against Trump is an exact plot line from a 2012 Law & Order SVU episode. She claimed that this was a complete coincidence when asked about it. Her lawyers also tried to get the judge to instruct jurors that there's no evidence in the record that the episode "actually exists."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 recalls a scene set in a public place where one moment was plain and not the other person’s fantasy, describing it as his own. He notes that 'World play' occurred in the dressing room of Bergdorf, where the woman was trying on lingerie and he would burst in. The exchange pauses for a moment as he confirms details: 'When did you and she have your date?' The answer is approximately six weeks ago, 'Six weeks ago, maybe,' followed by, 'She wrote.' The account centers on a private, intimate moment in Bergdorf dressing room tied to a date roughly six weeks prior, ending with an incomplete remark from the other person.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a public place. Yes. There was one a bit plain, and it was not her fantasy. It was mine. K.
Yeah. World play took place in the dressing room of Bergdorf. While she was trying on lingerie, I would burst in. Hold on. Mhmm.
When did you and she have your date? Six weeks ago, maybe. She wrote
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
The E. Jean Carroll verdict is PURE BULLSHIT coming from a pure BAT SHIT CRAZY LUNATIC in a pure BAT SHIT CRAZY & CORRUPT JURISDICTION. Everyone knows it. Call this shit out already.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the verdict in the E Jean Carroll defamation case against Donald Trump. They criticize the outcome, calling it unjust and politically motivated. They highlight Carroll's lack of evidence and questionable motives. The speaker also criticizes the media's biased coverage of the trial and expresses concern about the corrupt judicial system. They argue that this case sets a dangerous precedent for using the court system as a political tool. The speaker concludes by urging people to be aware of the potential consequences and to protect themselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. I wasn't going to do a vlog today, but, the news broke. The verdict in the E Jean Carroll second defamation case. If anybody thinks this is justice, you are idiots, pure and simple. If anybody likes this just because of the political consequences, you are scoundrels, pure and simple.
E Jean Carroll, the woman who is, in my humble view, batshit crazy, names her cat after a venereal disease, vagina t fireball, fabricates a story out of whole cloth that occurred two and a half decades ago, has no physical evidence of it, says that she would not file charges for the assault, because when you listen to her justification, it's gonna blow your mind and you're gonna realize you're dealing with a crazy person.
Speaker 1: Would you consider, bringing a a rape charge against Donald Trump for this?
Speaker 0: Why not?
Speaker 2: I would find it disrespectful To the women who are down on the border, who are being raped around the clock down there. But for the women down there and for the women, actually,
Speaker 0: Around the world. Says she's not gonna file criminal charges, but sues Donald Trump civilly in New York, possibly one of the most corrupt jurisdictions in the world, wins in the first trial, and then sues for defamation in the second trial because Trump took to truth social to post how she's Crazy how he never met her before, how the story is a total lie, and she sues it for defamation again. Oh, yeah. I forgot to say after the first jury found that Trump did not rape her in the Bergdorf changing room two and a half decades ago, but sexually assaulted her, such that when he denied it, it was defamation and awarded her damages for the alleged assault and the defamation, and then she sued him a second time when he continued to deny it and protest his innocence. They had a trial.
And when I say that the mainstream media is the enemy of the people, it's only because they are the enemy of the people. He had a trial in which the guilt was already a foregone conclusion. And quite literally, the trial was only to adjudicate on how much he would have to pay her, and that amount came down today. But before we get there, NBC News was reporting that Trump, testified, and he testified briefly. The headline reads, Trump testifies briefly in the trial.
And then it's only when you go into the article and read why he testified briefly that you realize The system is corrupt, the media is corrupt, and they are the enemy of the people. He testified briefly because the judge largely restricted what Trump could say in his own defense in court. So you head into a trial in which your guilt is already determined only to adjudicate on the damage in which you are limited in what you can say in your own defense in which the judge literally says you cannot say certain things include protesting your innocence, and then you come down with a jury verdict. And, oh my goodness, watching a journalist from NBC News in real time waiting for the news, announcing the news with orgiastic glee, Like, the winning lottery numbers of this political lottery just came down, and she's reading it in real time. $83,300,000 awarded to bat Shit crazy.
E Jean Carroll. I think it's, like, 7 a half 1000000 compensatory damages. 11,000,000 to, like, this, defamation rehabilitation program. I don't know what that is exactly. And $65,000,000 in punitive damages, which from what I understand, would survive bankruptcy, not that Trump's gonna go bankrupt anyhow.
Not that I think these judgment verdicts are gonna stand after appeal. In any event, $83,300,000. And this NBC journalist is like, oh, that's not as much as they wanted, but nothing to what did she say bad enough? I forget what she said. It's idiotic.
You just gotta watch it.
Speaker 3: We do have a verdict. E Jean Carroll did suffer more than nominal damages as a result of mister Trump's publication of these two June 2019 statements. The first amount for compensatory damages for her emotional pain and anguish is 7,300,000. The amount For the compensatory damages for the Reputation Repair Program is $11,000,000. We're now moving on to the questions about whether Trump Active with malice.
Remember, the questions have to be answered in the affirmative to get to a question of punitive damages. It's yeah. We are still waiting for that answer. As you wait for those
Speaker 2: answers that
Speaker 3: mister Trump acting with malice. I'm sorry. Mister Trump acting with malice in making the first of those statements. That's the June 21, 2019 statement at 5:17 PM in which he denied it for the first time. And Similarly, we are waiting to hear weather and making that yes.
Yes. Yes. Yes. Oh. In June 22, 2019, he did also act maliciously or out of hatred or ill will in defaming her on that day.
And here comes punitive damages award of $65,000,000 Alicia. Yes.
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes.
Speaker 3: So $65,000,000 in punitives, $11,000,000 in the Reputation Repair Program, and $7,300,000 in I'm sorry. And the emotional harm for a total of $83,300,000. That's a high eight Figure award. I had predicted we'd be high 8 figures or early a 100,000,000, certainly less money, I think, that E Jean Carroll's lawyers had hoped. But $83,300,000 is nothing to sneeze up.
Speaker 0: And people take Twitter to rejoice in this decision, to celebrate in this verdict. You got Jen Psaki who was once upon a time literally the propagandist for the government now turned MSM propagandist mouthpiece for the government saying, oh my goodness. This is justice. The only question is gonna be, I don't know. It's idiotic.
You can see the tweets for yourself. People rejoicing in this are scoundrels or mourns. Pure and simple. This is literally kangaroo court Banana Republic level madness where they can find a bat Shit crazy person. And by the way, everybody in the media knows that she's batshit crazy.
I'll play to you a compilation, a montage put together by Gravian. Everybody knows this woman is batshit crazy, but she's an easy tool for the media to exploit. Anderson Cooper. I dare Anderson Cooper not to say pokey. He thinks this woman is crazier than a loon.
Speaker 2: And it was all fairly playful. Oh, it was charming. It was excite remember what Donald Trump was like in 95, 96? On the counter were these fancy lingerie boxes that they used to have back in the nineties? Yeah.
You wore lingerie in the nineties. I'll bet you I But he didn't suggest that he shouted it. He Lingerie. Lingerie. He may have shouted underwear.
I Yep. You know? Okay.
Speaker 1: Were you scared? Were you
Speaker 2: No. I'm too angry? I was too panicked to be scared.
Speaker 1: Too panicked to be You're okay.
Speaker 2: Totally. And I put my life on the line. Do you think that you're go well, hold on a second. What do you mean you put your life on the line? Well, people have told me I have to be careful.
You've gotten death threats. I am not looking at death threats. I have the idea That I'm gonna make him put it on over his pants. That was my idea. Mhmm.
You see how funny that would be to They can put that on. I guess my question is is could there be any DNA on there? Idea. I do not know If the president ejaculated. Have no idea.
Lawrence, I wish I had said I wish. I said, I'll tell you my age if you show me your tax returns.
Speaker 1: Mhmm. Yeah. It would have been it would have been up
Speaker 2: in that. Well, so I'm holding my handbag like The the only reason I know I'm holding my handbag is because I discovered it in my hand when I got to the street.
Speaker 1: The statement that he said, which he's just made, which is she's not my type number. Well, that was the number one thing.
Speaker 2: Love that I'm not his type. I'm an archer. I have bows and arrows. You know? Yeah.
Fine. I think they're just too never mind. Never mind.
Speaker 1: I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent Assault. It is not a sexual assault.
Speaker 2: I think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Speaker 1: Let's take a short break.
Speaker 2: Think of the fantasies.
Speaker 1: We've just gotta take a quick break. If you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side.
Speaker 2: You're fascinating to talk to.
Speaker 0: They will use her and exploit her for all their political purposes. They can put her in front of a jury in New York. They would convict a hand sandwich if you told them it republican, and this really illustrates how historically, back in eras that were governed by prejudice, you could go to any jurisdiction that was deeply racist, deeply prejudiced. Find anybody to level any charges against a specific person or a group of person, and you knew that you would find a jury to convict just based on prejudices. Racial prejudices of decades ago has now been replaced with political prejudices of today, and it's just as broken a system.
So anybody celebrating this, we know how you would have been ruling on verdicts back in the day. 83 point $3,000,000 to E. Jean Carroll, $65,000,000 punitive damages. And from what I understand, Trump is going to appeal. But from what I understand, he would nonetheless have to put up $83,300,000 in court pending his appeal or get a bond and secure a portion of that, pay interest on the loan or whatever in order to post that pending appeal.
This is how the government seizes private property, uses lawfare In order to target, find an individual, fabricate a crime, and then basically steal the assets of that individual. You see it happening in New York under Alvin Bragg. You see it happening in New York under Leticia James. You see it happening in New York under this judge, Kaplan. In this case, it is plain.
It's in your face, and this is how empires Oh, you think this ends at Trump? Anybody in New York should flee New York. You think now it's gonna be limited to politics. If you are politically unfavored, If you are just socially disfavored, they will do it to you because they're getting away with it now. They started with these bogus guilty before the trial verdicts with Alex Jones.
They did it to Donald Trump in the Judge Angra and Leticia James case. They did it to him here, and they just issue awards like confetti. Outrageous, insane monetary awards for damages that nobody has sustained. 7 and a half $1,000,000 reputational damages? I'm sorry.
No way. $65,000,000 in punitive damages. Just something that you know will survive a bankruptcy so that you know he'll have to pay it. If this does not get overturned in appeal, at some point, the judicial system is gone. Pack up your bike, get out of New York, and find a that is not totally corrupt to the core.
And just one thing that I found particularly interesting because as I was looking into this, I found an article which by the headline referred to E. Jean Carroll as Jewish American columnist, E Jean Carroll sued Donald Trump for alleged rape. And I was like, oh, well, that's a very bizarre headline for this article. And I click on it, and the article itself only refers to E Jean Carroll as a columnist. The article is from the Jerusalem Post from 2019, and I noticed that it happened to have been updated in January 2024, 5 years after the article was first published, four and a half, 5 years later, and I had to go back to the way back machine and just make I'm not going crazy.
And for some reason, and I can think of 2 possibilities. The Jerusalem Post, which once upon a time took Pride in identifying E Jean Carroll as a Jewish American journalist maybe now is not quite so proud of this batshit crazy lady who secured a ridiculous decision out of New York. There might be other reasons even more nefarious. I won't go there. I just thought it was very curious.
But the bottom line, this is a joke, but it's not funny. It's a bloody tragedy, and it's showing how the court system can be used as political tools. This is nothing shy of election interference, full stop. E Jean Carroll exploits a newly amended law which extended the statute of limitations for civil claims for such alleged conduct. She had a pivotal role in lobbying for that legislative change.
She then exploits that being funded by highly political financiers to take this case to a politically partisan hack corrupt state like New York so that she could get a verdict, so that they could run the headlines that Trump is a rapist, so that they can then get ridiculous damages on alleged defamation for a man merely protesting his innocence, saying she's crazy. I never even met her. This is communist level crap. And if you don't understand it, you are part of the problem at this point in time. That is the latest.
It's bullcrap. It's gonna go to appeal. If it doesn't get turned over in appeal, Get out of New York, find a state where you might be better protected, and make sure to protect yourself nonetheless because they're gonna come for everybody. This is going to be the go to tool to bankrupt people, to destroy people, and more importantly to silence people. Alright, people.
Now I gotta go eat dinner. Now you know your vlog. Peace out.
reSee.it AI Summary
The E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was deemed bogus due to several inconsistencies and lack of evidence. Carroll couldn't recall important details, never mentioned the incident before, and her description of the events didn't match the reality. Her lawsuit was supported by a Democrat mega-donor, and a law was created to enable her case. Carroll has a history of false accusations and has made controversial statements about rape.
@JohnLeFevre - John LeFevre
I thought everyone knew the E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was bogus, until I heard my mother's (late 60s Republican) uninformed take on the verdict after watching ABC Nightly News. It's hard to find on Google, so here's what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed "inadmissible" by the judge: - She couldn't recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened - She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality - The dress she claims to have been wearing didn't exist at the time - Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible - Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman - Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed - Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her "favorite shows") - Trump's Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows - She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves - She told Anderson Cooper, "most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies." - She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat Vagina
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
This isn’t some random woman. This is E. Jean Carroll, the woman who sued Trump for defamation and won over $83 million. https://t.co/i6mcA7c8zf
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree. And then pretty soon, I'd done this whole forest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I'd done this whole forest.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
This isn’t some random woman. This is E. Jean Carroll, the woman who sued Trump for defamation and won over $83 million. Does she seem reliable, or sane to you? They used to institutionalize people like this instead of awarding them for their delusions. https://t.co/pJI9NlQ3UR
Video Transcript AI Summary
"I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here." "Conneman lives in the kitchen." "Tversky lives in the bedroom." "This is my shed." "And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up." "On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn." "The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here." "And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree." "And then pretty soon I'd done this whole forest."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon I'd done this whole forest.
reSee.it AI Summary
Listen closely to E. Jean Carroll's claims against Donald Trump. Defending him from the legal system is something I'm proud of. Carroll may have been defamed, but she's a self-righteous, lying drug user who won't get the $83 million from Trump's counter suit.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
If you seen and heard it already, then LISTEN TO HER AGAIN 😱 CLOSELY Defending Donald Trump from this bullshit legal system is the PROUDEST THING I’VE EVER DONE 😲 E. Jean Carroll says she was “defamed” 🤔. We’ll here’s is a little more… E. Jean Carroll is a self righteous, lying POS druggie & she will NEVER get the $83 million after Trumps Counter Suit 😎. Save the post 👊🏻
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses unwavering support for President Trump but criticizes the courtroom proceedings in New York. They claim that the judge limited their ability to present a defense and highlight the lack of evidence against their client. The speaker also accuses the opposing side of unethical behavior, including paying a witness. They argue that this is a violation of the justice system and emphasizes their commitment to fighting for everyone's right to speak and defend themselves. The speaker denies any fear on the part of the former president and states that he will continue to fight for Americans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. No. I'm glad you asked me that question. No. I'm not having any second thoughts about representing president Trump.
It is the proudest thing I could ever do. What I am having second thoughts about is the license that I stand here with that the people in there are supposed to have. I have not spoken because I respect my ethics while I'm on trial. But let me now speak about what has happened. I have sat on trial after trial for months in this state.
The state of New York, attorney general Leticia James, and now this. Weeks. Weeks. Why? Why?
Because president Trump is leading in the polls, and now we see what you get in New York. So don't get it twisted, whoever asked me that question. I I'm so proud to stand with president president Trump, but I am not proud to stand with what I saw in that courtroom.
Speaker 1: Miss Oliver is
Speaker 0: I'm not finished. Let me just finish, and I'll take questions, please. Before I walked into court, that judge decided that every single defense president Trump had, we were not allowed to raise in front of the jury. It is in writing, and I encourage the the real journalist to take the minute to look at his orders. There was no proof, and I I couldn't prove that she didn't bring in the dress.
There was no DNA. There was no expert. My experts were denied. Side. 2 of them 2 of them were denied to come in.
They didn't bring let me bring up that Reid sex. Been funded, miss Kaplan. And you know what we got in there? That my witness, who was her friend, who said that she is a drug addict, And the drug addict is herself. That friend, I found out in there was paid for by miss Kaplan's firm, and that is disgusting.
That is a violation of everything I stand for, and that is why I stand with Trump. And that is why so many Americans are sec. So proud that he is running again and so excited to run to the ballot box, but don't get it twisted. We are seeing a violation of our justice system. Ladies and gentlemen, sec You are not allowed to be stripped of every defense that you have.
You are not allowed to be told that you can't bring it up and imagine a point where a judge tells the lawyer before your client, the former President of the United States, the leading candidate and obvious nigh nominee for the Republican Party. Before he He takes the stand to defend himself. Miss Haba, tell me the questions you're going to ask in open court, and tell me exactly what he's going to respond. And then my questions, edited the response he was allowed to give. And guess what my client did?
He took the stand. He by the rules of this corrupt system that I have seen, we will immediately appeal. We will set aside that ridiculous jury. And I just wanna remind you all of one thing. I will continue with president Trump to fight for everybody's first amendment right to speak.
Everybody's a right to defend themselves when they are wrongfully accused and to be able to say, I didn't do it, and to double and triple and quadruple sit down and say this is wrong. This is wrong. But we are in the state of New York. We are in a New York jury, and that is why we are seeing these witch hunts, these hoaxes, as he calls them, and this is another one of them, be brought in New York, in states sites where they know they will get juries like this. It will not deter us.
We fighting, and I you. We didn't want today, but we will that was made in there. And the behavior I saw in there, some of which was reported widely today, gave us the most perfect record on appeal and even if I to it, which I don't. We were stripped of every defense, every single defense before we walked in there. And I am proud to stand with president Trump because he showed up, he stood up, he took this in, and he faced this judge.
And you know what? I'll continue to do so with him. Yes. Sense. Of course, I've spoken with the president.
Miss Hopper, is the
Speaker 1: former president scared now the consequences of his actions?
Speaker 0: The former does not live his life in fear as you've seen every single day. The former president and probably future president will continue to fight for Americans. Thank you very much, everybody.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
It's so obvious that E Jean Carrol is lying. Rape victims don't act like this and everyone knows it. She admitted George Conway put her up to this. https://t.co/RySKQz6h9Q
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's no longer about individual interests; the focus is on reclaiming our future and rights. Plans include using funds from Trump to support women's rights. There's humor in discussing extravagant purchases, but the serious matter is the ongoing legal battles against Trump.
The cases are interconnected, with insights from one case benefiting another. For instance, evidence from Trump's depositions can influence jury decisions on punitive damages. In court, Trump is less intimidating without his usual fanfare; he can be controlled by strong judges and competent lawyers. Ultimately, he is just a person, not the larger-than-life figure portrayed in the media.
Thanks to E. Jean Carroll, Robbie Kaplan, and Sean Crowley for their efforts in these historic legal battles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it's really not about me anymore. We have moved beyond me. And as you say, the fight now is really to take back our future. This is a man who stacked the supreme court, took away women's rights over their own bodies. We would like to be a part of turning, our eyes to the future and taking back our rights.
Speaker 1: You've talked about using some of Trump's money that you're about to get, to help shore up women's rights. Do you know what that might be? What that might look like
Speaker 0: or Rachel. Yes. Tell me. I had such such great ideas for all the good I'm gonna do with this money. First thing, Rachel, you and I are gonna go shopping.
We're gonna get completely new wardrobes, new shoes, motorcycle for crawling, new fishing rod for Robbie. Rachel, what do you want? A penthouse? It's yours, Rachel. Penthouse and, France.
You want France? You wanna go fishing in France? No? Oh, alright.
Speaker 2: Alright. Okay. That's a joke.
Speaker 1: Although, if if me fishing in France could do something for women's rights, I would take the hint. You know? I would obviously take one for the team. Alright. Let me let me as if as if you need persuasion in that regard.
Let me let me finish with a final question. And, again, this is both for you, Sean, and and for you, Robbie, and you guys can divide up responsibility here. But there are multiple cases here involving Trump that are that are coming up. Obviously, most eyes are on the federal January 6th case. Having been up against Trump in the courtroom, I'm wondering if you 2 have have any advice in terms of what it's like to go up against him and his legal team in terms of the way that he approaches his defense as part of it.
But I also wanna know if this big what everybody's expecting potentially to be a very large judgment against him and his company changed anything about the way that you approached the asked to the jury, the way that you presented evidence, the way that you're planning on making sure this money is in fact extracted from Trump's wallet? I mean, how much do all of these different cases interact with each other if at all? And can various lawyers involved in various in these various cases learn from each other's experience?
Speaker 3: So the the short answer to to the cases all interact with each other is absolutely all the time. To give you just one good example, in our case, we played at the end of our case, not only the deposition that I took of Donald Trump in this case, but we played the deposition that the New York attorney general took in their case. Because in that deposition, Trump is bragging about how his his brand alone is worth more than $10,000,000,000. He has $400,000,000 cash on hand. And the reason that was so relevant is in assessing how much money to work for punitive damages, the jury is not only allowed to, but supposed to think of the wealth of the defendant.
So when we said when Sean said, give him enough give enough to Eugene to make him stop, they had to think what enough would be for Donald Trump. So the cases in in kinds of predictable ways and unpredictable ways are are kind of talking to each other all the time.
Speaker 2: On on the first question, you know, I think that one thing that I I maybe wasn't prepared for, coming into this trial is that when when Donald Trump is stripped of, you know, all of the press and not at a rally, and there's no TV cameras, and he sort of has a small group of supporters around him, he's not that scary.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 2: And he also can be controlled. You know, I mean, his antics in the courtroom, we've talked about them. But at the end of the day, he did kind of follow the rules. Robbie Cross examined him. He was in he was in the witness chair, and he only got to answer 3 questions, I think.
And he pretty much stayed within the bounds. I think when you have a strong judge like judge Kaplan who enforces the rules of his courtroom, and you have real lawyers, you really can get him to behave, sort of. And when he is stripped of all of the rallies and the truth socials, he's just a guy. I think PG called him, the emperor with no clothes. That's not my quote, but he definitely is.
He's not the guy that you see on TV. He's just a guy, sometimes acting like a petulant toddler, but, just a guy.
Speaker 1: An American bound by the law just as every American is bound by the law. Writer E. Jean Carroll, attorney Robbie Kaplan, attorney Sean Crowley, you guys have made history a couple of times now.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: And you also have meant a lot, and continue to mean a lot. You have, been lighting the way, I think, for a lot of people in terms of both moral clarity and strategic acumen. And I really, really wanna thank each of you for making the time to come talk to us, and I want I I wish you all, safety and rest. Thank you
Speaker 0: for your time. Rachel.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Alright.
Speaker 3: We'll be right back. Stay with us.
reSee.it AI Summary
Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled that Donald Trump was guilty of raping E. Jean Carroll, but the same judge dismissed Prince Andrew's case where he was accused of raping underage girl Virginia Giuffre on Jeffrey Epstein's island. The corruption and double standards are mind-blowing. Giuffre alleges that she met Andrew through Epstein and his girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. Epstein and Giuffre settled a civil lawsuit for $500,000 in 2009. It's shocking how Prince Andrew gets a pass while Trump is persecuted based on vague details. The case against Andrew was dismissed without going to trial, while Trump paid a settlement of $83,300,000. The level of corruption is unbelievable.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
This Is Going To Blow Your Mind 🚨 Judge Lewis Kaplan Ruled Donald Trump Was Guilty Of Raping E. Jean Carroll This SAME JUDGE Dismissed Prince Andrew’s Case Where He Was Accused Of Raping Underage Girl Virginia Giuffre On Jeffrey Epstein Island This Judge Formally Dismissed All Sexual Abuse Charges With A Nice Sealed Settlement & No Prison Time So Child Rapist Prince Andrew Gets A Pass But Donald Trump Gets Persecuted By Someone Who Can’t Even Remember What Year The Crime Happened Or Any Key Details? “Giuffre alleges she met Andrew through the late sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein, and his sometime girlfriend, the convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell.” More proof of the underage sexual abuse comes with “In 2009, Epstein and Giuffre settled a civil lawsuit for $500,000. Giuffre accused Epstein of trafficking her to Andrew.” The corruption is just mind blowing. “— Jeffrey and Andrew reached and I was sometimes so the case was dismissed by the party stipulation of March 2022 without going to trial. Prince Andrew. So let me get this straight. This case, read the top. Federal Court Virginia, you know who Virginia, uh, uh, drew from me. We just talked about the rest. The girl from Epstein Island. From Epstein Island. Second son of Wow. Sexual assault under court, uh, several, uh, sexual encounters with Andrew in the early 2000 at the age of 17 after being sex trafficked by American financier and convicted by sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, dismissed without going to trial. Yet Trump's $83,300,000. Wow. Wow. What a freaking fine. Great fine. That is insane. All you gotta do is dig”
Video Transcript AI Summary
I found a case involving Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre, related to Epstein Island. The case was dismissed in March 2022 without going to trial. Giuffre accused Andrew of sexual assault when she was 17. Despite the serious allegations, the case was closed. This discovery is shocking and worth investigating further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh my god. Check this out. Watch this out. Watch this out. Watch this out.
I'm so sorry to interrupt. Okay. Go to other cases he's worked on. Go to go lower. Go lower.
Go lower. Go lower. Go lower. Go up a little bit. Right there.
Right there. Right there. Right there. Right there. Hang on.
Hang on. Right there. You will not even believe what I just found. Look at the case you worked on. Look for, all the way in the bottom of miscellaneous, second line.
Missoul 2021, 2022. He was capital was presiding judge on matter relating towards Virginia Giuffre and Prince Andrew. Click on that on search. Watch what happens. You know what happens to the case?
Click on the just click on that's the one. Click right there. Zoom in, and just go to the top. Yeah. The Jeffrey and Andrew reached, and case was dismissed by the party stipulation of March 2022 without going to trial.
Prince Andrew. So let me get this straight. This case, read the top, federal court Virginia. You know who Virginia, drew for I mean, we just talked about the right girl from Epstein Island. From Epstein Island.
Second son of Wow. Sexual assault under court, several, sexual encounters with Andrew in the early 2000 at the age of 17 after being sex trafficked by American financier and convicted by sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, dismissed without going to trial. Yet Trump's 83,300,000. Wow. Wow.
What a freaking fine. Great fine. That is insane. All you gotta do all you gotta do is dig.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Supreme Court ruling puts Donald Trump back on the ballot, causing panic among those who have committed treason. Despite numerous attempts to bring him down, Trump remains composed. Figures like Michael Avenatti and Fani Willis, who were supposed to take him down, are now facing their own legal issues. The Deep State's attempts, such as Russian collusion and the Stormy Daniels case, have all failed. Their latest attempt with E. Jean Carroll's sexual assault allegations is seen as desperate. The Deep State is running out of options, and Trump is prepared for their next move.
@Prolotario1 - Ariel
The Supreme Court Rules: Donald Trump Back On The Ballot Option 1- Assassinate Donald Trump. Option 2- Bring Down Power Grid. Option 3- Create Fake Alien Invasion. Option 4- Create False Flag Option 5- Cancel Presidential Election The Deep State is now firmly up against the wall at this point. They are going to be forced to make a final move. D. Trump being put back on the ballot 24 hours before Super Tuesday was basically the last straw. People have to understand how dire the situation is for many who have committed treason. Media Pundits Political Figures Hollywood Celebrities Wallstreet Bankers Law Enforcement 3 Letter Agencies The list goes on for all those who conspired to bring down the CIC. D. Trump is basically the grim reaper. And to watch him slowly regain political power while knowing you are on the chopping block has got to be the most gut-wrenching feeling anyone can have. We have watched them throw everything at him. We have also watched everything fail. And we have seen D. Trump keeps his composure throughout all of it. Being unphased by it all. Why? Is it because he knew all along that he was holding "The Trump Card"? Everyone that we have seen comes into the spotlight as the one person that will take D. Trump down has been met with their own legal challenges and sometime ended up in prison themselves. Do you all remember Michael Avenatti? He was the star player for a hot minute. He promised the raging liberal on "The View" that he and him alone will bring down this tax evading MAGA tyrant that has wrecked havoc on American freedoms. And that he will not rest until this great foe of our time has tasted the defeat by his legal prowess and prosecution. Now, where does M. Avenatti sit currently? In a Metropolitan Correctional Center. Basically, to defraud Nike and stealing about 300k from Stormy Daniels. And you know what's the kicker in all of this. M. Avenatti was only allowed to read one book in prison. Do you all want to know what that book is? "The Art Of The Deal" by Donald Trump. But no, the Cabal had someone else up their sleeve who was also supposed to bring about the destruction of the orange man. Fani Willis. Someone who is also facing legal issues because of some of her rendezvous with Nathan Wade. Records show special prosecutor Nathan Wade paid for flights with Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to Miami in 2022 and San Francisco in 2023, according to court documents. I mean we all know the charges by Fani. Willis was DOA. Everyone with commonsense knows Joe Biden didn't legally win 2020 election. Even Ivan Raiklin knows this sense he helped J. Biden win a couple of states. Especially Pennsylvania. This was nothing more than the liberal establishment being the pot while calling the kettle black. They knew this entire charade was going to be something with diminishing returns. Just as everything before it that fell flat. • Russian Collusion • Tax Evasion Fraud • Stormy Daniels Case • The Insurrection • Covid-19 But no they were still going to attempt this Hail Mary on the 4th & 50 with 4 seconds on the clock down by 8 with all the star players injured and contracts expiring. What do they throw? E. Jean Carroll into end zone. The most delusional play they could muster up as if it was going to be this game winning touchdown to bring them back into the game that was already over before they even threw the ball. What in the world were they trying to accomplish with that attempt? Everyone knows this woman is looney and a bafooney. Her entire sexual assault plot was grabbed right from Law & Order: Special Victims Unit. She tried to pretend she was clueless about this entire similar case in the 2012 episode. Plot: "A brief moment of the episode — titled “Theatre and Tricks” — involves a character talking about role-playing a rape fantasy in Bergdorf Goodman. “Role-play took place in the dressing room of Bergdorf’s. While she was trying on lingerie I would burst in,” the character says. So what does E. Jean Carroll do in order to convince the nation that this actually happened? She uses the exact plot by claiming that the former commander-in-chief raped her in a fitting room in the lingerie section of the Fifth Avenue department store most likely in 1996. People do you see how low on ammo the Deep State is? Do you see how everything they have tried has not worked out to delay the inevitable? Do you see that at this point there is no way out for them? They are going to be forced to initiate their own demise. And D. Trump knows this move is coming up soon. Which is why the military has things in place for this last straw. This is something we all need to prepare for. These psychopaths will not go down quietly. They didn't spend decades in those secret underground bases building and creating every monstrosity they could think of and to let them go to waste. "The time to prepare is before you need it; waiting until the storm hits only ensures you'll weather it poorly." Think Wisely-
@atensnut - Juanita Broaddrick
I know I have tunnel vision… BUT I want to see this batsht crazy, lying witch brought to justice. https://t.co/K972k2u0AJ
@aalexNews - ale𝕏 🇨🇦🇺🇸
Video from NBC of Virginia Giuffre, accusing Epstein of traff*cking her to celebrities like Jean-Luc Brunel and Prince Andrew Very suspicious.. https://t.co/8TqpIM9e8h
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ghislain woke the speaker up and said she was going to meet a prince. That night, Prince Andrew came to Ghislain's house in London, and they went to Club Tramp. Prince Andrew got the speaker alcohol, which she believes was vodka, in the VIP section. Prince Andrew asked her to dance. After leaving Club Tramp, Ghislain told the speaker that Prince Andrew was coming back to the house and that she wanted the speaker to do for him what she does for Epstein. The speaker couldn't believe that even royalty were involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was so young, Ghislain woke me up in the morning and said, you're gonna meet a prince today. I didn't know at that point that I was going to be trafficked to that prince. And then that night, Prince Andrew came to her house in London and we went out to Club Tramp. Prince Andrew got me alcohol. It was in the VIP section.
It was, I'm pretty sure it was vodka. Prince Andrew was like, Let's dance together. And I was like, Okay. And we leave Club Tramp and I had to hop in the car with Ghislain and Jeffrey and Ghislain said, He's coming back to the house and I want you to do for him what you do for Epstein. I I just couldn't believe it.
I couldn't believe that even royalty were involved.
@aalexNews - ale𝕏 🇨🇦🇺🇸
#BREAKING: Jeffrey Epstein victim and accuser Virginia Giuffre has “died by suicide” — NBC https://t.co/fEhc2AdnBD
@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy
Charlie Kirk explains that E. Jean Carroll LIED and he makes perfect sense. The simplest explanation usually is the correct one. https://t.co/aNggubULZS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they will be politically incorrect and issues a trigger warning. They question the claim that a wealthy man, married to a supermodel, would sexually assault E. Jean Carroll in a Tiffany's store. The speaker highlights that the alleged incident occurred at the height of the man's career, with no prior accusations for twenty years, and only surfaced when he ran for president. The speaker dismisses the accusation as "complete rubbish and political nonsense."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I'm gonna be politically incorrect. Is that okay? Alright. Trigger warning. Okay.
So let me let me understand this. Here is the world's wealthiest man. One of the world's wealthiest men worth like $10,000,000,000. He's got a show on the NBC apprentice. He's literally married to a supermodel.
He can have any woman on the world. And I'm I'm supposed to believe at 2PM at in a Tiffany store, he walks in and Eugene Carroll, who is not exactly a supermodel, and risks his entire fortune of which there is no accusation for twenty years, but he pops up and runs for the president. And all of a sudden, says, this guy me, even though I can't remember the day, the month, the year, 2PM in a department store at Tiffany's while he was at the height of his career. I'm sorry. That's complete rubbish and political nonsense.
@atensnut - Juanita Broaddrick
THIS is the real E. Jean Carroll. She is a delusional pervert!! https://t.co/fA91WnkcPu
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m astonished that many Democrats don’t see that E. Jean Carroll’s ability to file charges against Trump was funded by wealthy Democrats who pushed for a temporary law. Carroll was the first to use it, but it expired after a year. She also lied under oath about her legal fees, facing no consequences. The main witness, Carol Martin, even called Carroll a drug addict in a text. It’s baffling that a true victim would behave this way. Many believe Carroll's claims are fabricated and politically motivated, with no evidence presented to support her allegations.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
I can’t believe how many democrats still don’t realize that the only reason E. Jean Carroll was allowed to file charges against Trump was because democrat billionaires funded her effort to get a one year temporary law added just so she could. She was the first person in the state to file under the new temporary law. 12 months later the law expired.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
Carroll also lied and testified under oath that she wasn’t having her legal fees paid for by someone else and faced no repercussions when it was exposed as a lie. https://t.co/OW6eGMMZic
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
👇👇
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
The so-called "witness" who backed Carroll's outlandish claims in court? Well, emails from 2017 between her and Carroll expose the truth. In September of that year, Carol Martin sent E. Jean Carroll an article mocking Trump, referring to him as "Orange Crush," and urged, "this has to stop." She suggested, "as soon as we’re both well enough to scheme, we must both do our patriotic duty." Carroll eagerly replied, "TOTALLY!!! I have something special for you when we meet." Fast forward 15 months, and Carroll conveniently releases a book accusing Trump of assault. Martin didn’t want to be involved at first saying Carroll made the lawsuit a “lifestyle”.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
The main witness, Carol Martin, texted her daughter that E. Jean Carroll was a drug addict and that the drug was herself. https://t.co/STSYNr5sPR
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
And the thing I find strangest of all…. What true victim of the crime she claimed would post a question like this? https://t.co/4bSZSvkLV9
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
For the people asking why Trump didn’t give his DNA https://t.co/A8I9YSritt
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@MxCl74613523 YUP
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@AngelLee2194 If only she had evidence.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@AndrewLBElms A claim like that requires proof. She has yet to present any.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@KaostheDog2 If this would true she would have had went against him criminally. If it was true she would have had evidence Democrats are disgusting and support false rape claims as long as it’s against their opponent..
@JOKAQARMY1 - mrredpillz jokaqarmy
Deep dive into Ghislane Maxwells sister Christine. 🤔 https://t.co/cxlrOOpbeQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Christine Maxwell, sister to Ghislain Maxwell, is described in her bio on the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism in Poly as having a career in school book editing, with experience as a professional lifelong learner, grade school teacher, and school book editor. She is also noted as the director of research and marketing for an international educational and scientific publishing company.
The transcript states that Christine was an Internet entrepreneur for over thirty years in the areas of Internet search and big data analytics. She is described as the creator of Magellan, a project described as being kind of like Wikipedia, and the cofounder of a software company called Chiliad. According to the speaker, Chiliad is the software company that solved nine eleven, and has been working quietly behind the scenes to develop powerful and innovative software in the United States government’s anti-terrorism arsenal. The claim is made that both the FBI and the DNI have seen the unique value that Chiliad offers.
The transcript mentions that Christine earned a PhD in humanities with a multidisciplinary interest in Holocaust literacy, which is described as exactly what her mother was into studying. The mother is identified as the wife of the Jewish Robert Maxwell, described as someone who published all of the textbooks for American and British schoolchildren and whose family is said to have influenced directing research in scientific institutions.
Additionally, it is noted that Christine was the cofounder of Chilean Publishing. The Department of Defense is claimed to have received over $10,000,000 in awards for initiatives associated with Chiliad, including metadata generation and predictive analysis tools.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know Ghislain Maxwell has eight siblings? Well, I just learned some wild things about this sibling, Christine Max, from her very own bio on the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism in poly Because, of course, the Maxwell family is involved in shaping global antisemitism But anyhoo, I bet you didn't know that Christine Maxwell has a career experience in school book editing. Read it for yourself. Christine Maxwell is a professional lifelong learner with career experiences in grade school teaching and school book editing. What are you doing editing school books, Christine?
And, oh, we are just getting started. She also has experience as the director of research and marketing for an international educational and scientific publishing company. I kinda went down this rabbit hole the other day about how Stephen Hawking is probably a fucking fake character that was just used as a laughing stock, and I promise this correlates because now that I see that people like Christine Maxwell are the directors of research for scientific publishing company. I can't say I'm instilled with any new sense of profound hope about our scientific institutions. But continuing on, Christine was an Internet entrepreneur for over thirty years in areas of Internet search and big data analytics.
She was the creator of Magellan, which is kind of a lot like Wikipedia, and she's also the cofounder of a software company called Chiliad. And what's going on with Chiliad? Chiliad is the software company that solved nine eleven? What? Yep.
Chiliad has been working quietly behind the scenes to develop some of the most powerful and innovative software in the US government's anti terrorism arsenal. Chiliad had been so upset by the nine eleven attacks and the fact that there was existing technology to connect the dots, and both the FBI and the DNI have seen the unique value that Chilead offers. Not to mention, she earned her PhD in humanities encompassing multidisciplinary interest in holocaust literate, which also just so happens to be exactly what her mom was into studying. You know, the wife of the Jewish Robert Maxwell, the guy who basically published all of the textbooks for our, school kids here in America and Britain while the whole family had a hand in directing the research of scientific institutions. So for any of you wondering why I've been questioning the Holocaust lately, it's for more reasons than just because you're not allowed to deny the Holocaust in any of these red countries.
And one more thing, remember how Christine was cofounder of Chilean Publishing? Well, this is the Department of Defense, and they received over $10,000,000 in awards for things like metadata generation as a and predictive analysis tool.
reSee.it AI Summary
I expose a shocking link: Erika Kirk allegedly descends from the Rothstein clan and is tied to the Rothschilds, with Nicole Rothstein and Carla connected to power players, Freemasonry, AIPAC, and large-fraud networks. Redacted lineage and confusing naming hide a hidden family tree. I suggest Erika may have been planted as Charlie’s handler, pulling stock frauds, politics, and dangerous networks. I’m seeking tips to complete the Rothstein family tree.
@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution
🚨SHOCKING: Erika Kirk Is a ROTHSTEIN? The Family Ties That Could BLOW the Charlie Kirk Case WIDE OPEN! 😱🔥 @RealCandaceO – you NEED to see this video breakdown. It all starts making SENSE: Erika Kirk's hidden family lineage allegedly links her to the infamous Rothstein clan – notorious for fraud, crime syndicates, and even fixing the 1919 World Series (Arnold Rothstein, the OG mobster who funded drug/human trafficking networks and inspired Meyer Wolfsheim in The Great Gatsby). But it gets DEEPER: Erika's roommate/cousin? Nicole Rothstein – from a family swimming in shady money (Uncle Alan Rothstein: Involved in massive fraud schemes, defrauding hundreds of thousands, running ghost companies for money laundering, living in a $13M mansion despite "no real job"). Aunt Carla? Married to Jack Solomon (29 years older), a power player tied to Israeli orgs, Freemasonry (32nd degree Scottish Rite), AIPAC, casinos with fraud scandals, and even UVU (where Charlie was shot). Co-founder of Israeli orphanages, restored ancient sites in Jerusalem – screaming elite connections. And the bombshell: Rothsteins directly related to... the ROTHSCHILDS? Currency manipulators, economic crashes, assassinations? "Scroll over and boom – connected." Coincidence? Nah, too many "facts presenting themselves." Erika claimed no dating in NYC for 5 years? Lies – videos show her partying with Nicole. Obscured family tree? Redacted kids on genealogy sites, no pics of grandparents, Swedish name mix-ups. Is this why her mom's side is a black hole? If true, Charlie might've been in a "Truman Show" setup – planted influences, manipulations. From stock fraud to political pulls, this family's history screams "thieves who get away with it." We NEED that missing link! Help build the Rothstein family tree – connect Arnold to modern Rothsteins/Erika. Share tips below or DM me. Massive shoutout to @ScooperofCoop, Be sure to FOLLOW Him! Also i highly highly suggest you watch his full documentary exposing EVERYTHING about @MrsErikaKirk and her family's deep ties to intelligence, child trafficking, the military ,Israel, the Freemasons, al the scandals, corruption, shell companies and more. It's so mind blowing and ties all the pieces together as to why I believe she was sent to be Charlie's handler. This isn't coincidence – it's a DUCK. Quack quack. Wake up, open-source detectives: Charlie's truth hangs on this. Share if you're digging deeper! 👇
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video expands a web of alleged family connections around Erika Kirk, centering on the Rothstein surname and its supposed ties to the Rothschilds. The narrator notes that Erika’s exact lineage isn’t known, but if Erika and her family are Rothsteins, then they would be “connected right next to” the Rothschilds, a linkage the speaker describes as surprising and not a coincidence. The main question posed is: who is Erika Kirk? The series aims to uncover that answer, with hints that the investigation could make Erika seem analogous to a contemporary Truman Burbank.
A surprising turn in the investigation is the discovery of Erika’s roommate in New York, who appears repeatedly in Erika’s videos. The roommate’s name is Nicole Rothstein, who the narrator identifies as Erika’s cousin and a constant commenter on Erika’s posts. Nicole is portrayed as coming from money, and the Rothstein name is framed as historically associated with dishonesty. A 2017 photo Erika posted shows her with two men; one is tagged Alan Rothstein, whom Erika calls her uncle. The narrator suggests this uncle might be on the mother’s side and implies a broader, obscured side of Erika’s family.
Alan Rothstein is described as having been involved in significant financial crime, including defrauding a client of hundreds of thousands of dollars, spending large sums of company money, and engaging in schemes involving tens of millions in falsely claimed assets. The narration emphasizes Alan’s “sticky fingers” and associates him with a pattern of using “friend companies”—entities with little or no public history used to move money, including ill-gotten gains. The claim is that Alan owns a $13,000,000 home, implying wealth without a traceable core business.
The narrative then shifts to Carla Solomon (née Fransvi), Erika’s dad’s sister, and her husband Jack David Solomon. Jack is depicted as a controversial, highly connected casino owner and corporate figure with extensive involvement in Israel-related and political circles. The list of his affiliations is long and includes leadership roles in various organizations and foundations, including the Federal Land and Development Corporation, Federal Research and Development, the United Jewish Foundation, the World Jewish Congress, and numerous chambers of commerce. He is described as holding positions related to Israel advocacy, as well as a connection to the Mormon-like “president club” and Freemasonry, with a specific reference to the B’nai B’rith as a secret society akin to Freemasonry.
Jack Solomon is also portrayed as having a history of scandals, such as stock fraud, investor fraud, and casino fraud, including a period when he was removed from a CEO role. Despite these scandals, he is described as having amassed substantial wealth and wielded influence across corporate and government spheres, raising questions for the narrator about who he actually knew and the impact of those connections.
The narrative then ties these threads to the Rothstein surname’s famous historical lineage, spotlighting Arnold Rothstein, a well-known 20th-century criminal who allegedly fixed the 1919 World Series by betting on Chicago to lose and using political and legal influence to escape punishment. The presenter argues that Arnold’s criminal legacy seeded later crime networks and that the broader Rothstein family may share a history of theft and corruption rather than legitimate enterprise.
A central unresolved element is a supposed missing genealogical link between Arnold Rothstein and living Rothsteins, with genealogical sites allegedly redacting the names of his children. The caller invites viewers to help locate this critical link to determine whether Erika Kirk is truly connected to these historic criminals. The video ends by reiterating the provocative coincidence claim: the Rothsteins’ link to the Rothschilds appears direct and non-coincidental, prompting the closing assertion that “what looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck is probably a duck.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You might not know Erika's exact family lineage, but presuming that they are Rothstein's, it's rather strange then that Rothstein shares family ties to another family, another prominent Jewish family that has been the center of many, many theories for hundreds of years and has been involved in everything from currency manipulation to economic crashes and to assassinations and everything in between, and that family would be the Rothschilds. Indeed, I was rather surprised to see that the two families are related and pretty directly because all I had to do is scroll over to the side and boom, there it was, the Rothsteins and the Rothschilds, two infamous crime families connected right next to one another. Who knows? Maybe this is all just one giant coincidence wrapped in a coincidence taped in a rigmarole, but I really don't believe in those, and I'm not comfortable just saying things are just a coincidence. I think that's a lazy excuse when too many facts aren't presenting themselves.
Who is Erica Kirk? So in this series, we're going to seek to find the answer to that question. And trust me, I would not have expected that the most basic question possible was going to take us so many episodes to get to, and I most certainly did not expect that it would leave me wondering if Charlie really was a contemporary Truman Burbank. Tell me what's happening. You're part of this, aren't you?
Imagine if you could make one half of your family truly obscure at best or completely indecisurable at worst. Who and what you are related to would be impossible to distinguish, and so remember that for later. We have to try taking one last look at her family, but this time not at her parents, although they might have been involved. Instead, this time we're gonna look at her roommate, which seems unexpected, but let's go. More than once, Erica Kirk has discussed how she dated no one during her five years living in New York until she met Charlie, which is outright an easily disprovable lie, but that's for later.
Erica says she really didn't want to date because of the following reasons.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna ask you your personal journey, but what I will say is when I lived out here, I was here for five years. I never dated here because I saw vicariously through my roommate how terrible it was. Somehow getting drinks was the replacement of having coffee and breakfast. I personally would rather have coffee or brunch with someone than go I just I don't drink. I find it unproductive, not because I'm holier than whatever.
I that's not I just don't operate that way. But I always thought it was very strange how she would go to drinks with one guy and then go to dinner with another. So it goes twofold here. So if you're expecting to marry someone that I was blessed with, like a Charlie, you have to be the type of woman that will attract a Charlie.
Speaker 0: This was one of the only interesting tidbits in horribly staged interview with that broad Weiss, whatever her name is, because it made some of us go, I wonder who that roommate is that was such a bad influence. And lo and behold, after scouring Erica's various social media platforms, videos began emerging like these. And so now we can call into question who Erika Kirk really was in those five years, but once again, don't wanna get ahead of myself. And so we're gonna hone in though on who is appearing in many of these videos. And based on a bunch of comments ranging as far back as ten years ago on Erika's various accounts, we see a common thread that this same female is commenting on Erica's posts, and she just so happens to look like Erica's roommate who appears in these videos.
And her name is Nicole Rothstein, and Nicole is actually not just her roommate or soulmate or best friend, whatever she calls her. Nicole is also Erica's cousin, and this is going to become a much bigger deal as we move forward. Nicole, unlike Erica at least, at face value comes from money and interesting money at that. The Rostein name is not exactly synonymous with honesty. If they were in a dictionary, those two are on the opposite ends of one another.
In fact, antonyms would probably be a better way to put it. In this photo Erika posted in 2017, she is sitting next to a man whom I wager to be in his 50s and another man who's standing in front of her, who I would wager is putting the pedal to the metal, pushing 70, the late 70s that is. And at the time, and really up until recently, if you had clicked on that photo on Erika Kirk's account on Instagram, you would notice that there's someone tagged, and that someone tagged is named Alan Rothstein, who Erika says is her uncle. And this old dude, I'm presuming here is Gramps, and this uncle that she references, I can only imagine is on the mother's side and is a member of that unknown segment of Erica's family that is seemingly being obfuscated. In any case, though, when reviewing who Alan Rothstein is, I can understand why Erica may have chosen to hide that side of her family, because Allen is not as Hannah Montana says, The boy, the boy, the boy, the honest goods, the real McCoy.
My goodness. Uncle Allen has been involved in several criminal operations. For instance, there is a long case file which goes into detail about how Alan defrauded someone of hundreds of thousands of dollars. He was supposed to be a consultant, but was actually just an insider, kind of like a spy, and was just getting info and using his position to spend hundreds of thousands of the company's dollars doing nothing. And Alan, if you're watching this, just want to say, That's not cool, bro.
Jerk move. The document then gets deep into legal jargon, but discusses tens of millions of dollars at one point in falsely claimed assets and then goes into the realm where a lawyer might be mildly confused. At his heart, though, Alan seems to possess the sticky fingers that his namesake is so infamous for as we shall see. And lo and behold, someone who likes to pill for the proverbial cookie jar also possesses a number of what are pretty obvious, in my opinion, friend companies. I run into a ton of these in videos.
They are companies with little or no website, no customer history, no definable product, and they just sit there for years and sometimes decades doing nothing. But they are convenient for running money through, especially ill gotten money, which seems to be Alan's MO. Not kidding. I was peeping through his companies, and he's got a property management company, a hedge fund, and a bunch of others, and none of them seem to actually do much. That all said, whatever Alan and his family are doing is evidently working quite well for them, I might add, As Alan, though a tool sorry, though, through a tool I use, I learned that Alan lives in a $13,000,000 home.
Not bad for a guy who seems to have never really worked a job or built anything himself. And That sort of cash also speaks to who was funding Erika's cousin Nicole and possibly Erika herself while they live the expensive Manhattan life doing nothing of material value. Now, let's shove another step into the family and hit up Carla Solomon, originally Carla Fransvi. This is apparently Erica's dad's sister, so once again, a little info on the mom's side. Carla can be explained in the following words.
From the YouTube commenter, Vivian Ballard three nine one five years ago, I'm not implying that she is only interested in the financial stability of men. However, it must be said that she avoids relations with impoverished men. YouTube really is a wonderful place. Thank you for that comment. In other words, Carla married a man about twenty nine years older than her by the name of Jack David Solomon, a twenty nine year age difference.
Jack himself is a bit of a character. He's one of the few people who have been born in America that possesses such an immense affinity for Israel. And oh, yeah, we're going there. Jack has been a leading executive, or simply the leading executive, at a plethora of some of the largest companies on earth, many of which possess multi billion dollar evaluations and or are simply government operations. For instance, for whatever reason, he was plopped into the chairman position of the board of directors for things like Federal Land and Development Corporation for thirty six years and Federal Research and Development and Advanced Patent Technical.
All sorts of things that when I'm reading it make me go, Who are you really, bro? Especially because a sort of thing like that requires power, influence, money, control, and access and gains you a lot of power, influence, money, control, and access. And for this next bit, I'm just gonna skim through some of the organizations he's been highlighted as being a member of from his death website, although I assure you there are likely many, many others. National Directory Quality Operations Foundation, 1963 to 1966. He's a sponsor of the National Hospital of Denver.
He's also the co founder of the Israeli Armored Core Museum. Patron, Orr, Chadash, Orphanage Israel. Vice Chairman, California Democratic Council, 1966 to 1970. Candidate for California State, 1966. Director of the United Jewish Foundation, 1956 to 1967, committee member for the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, member of the World Affairs Council, member of the president's cabinet for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, member Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce.
Oh, yeah. That would be because he was a controversial casino owner. He was also the director of the Utah Shakespearean Festival in 1999 to 2000. Seems like a weird addition. He's also the member of the American Air Museum in Britain, a foundation member, the Armed Forces Commission and Electronics Association, sounds powerful, National Aeronautics Association, International Association of Business and Professional, honorary.
Benai Brith, President Club, Utah Valley State College. Yes, that's where Charlie Kirk was shot. President Club, Brigham Young University. President Club, World Jewish Congress, life. Thirty second degree Mason, Scottish Rite, life.
Yeah. So a lot of things should stand out to you there. The UVU, the massive ties to Israel, the powerful committees and organizations. And I could really out for a while just about the Israel connections alone and why that's weird. But if I have to tell you that, then you've probably been living under a rock and missed the dozens of red flags I just read.
But these connections do go deeper than that, so deep that Bro paid for and restored the ancient Zion's Gate And Plaza in Jerusalem, which is rather a big deal to folks over there. Needless to say, he's sort of a huge deal in that community, and he's also very clearly connected to the highest echelons of the government and business, and the people who decide if and what you shall eat. What an odd family member for Eric could have considering I was under the impression she was a Christian girl from Scottsdale, Arizona. But if this all didn't elucidate you to the fact that we are talking about some seriously connected people, like I said, he's a member of this thing called, that I can't pronounce, it's a Jewish secret society named B'nai Brith. It's a very unique organization, very secret society esque, very Freemason esque, which apparently is controversial because they claim it's antiseptic to say that they are Freemason related despite having a huge portion of their founding members actually being Freemasons as well.
So take that as you may, but whatever, toss that aside. We also know from that whole blurb, Jackie, who is a thirty second degree Freemason, which should be ringing bells for everybody from the most unfamiliar with this sort of, quote unquote, world to the most familiar. The Masons are weird, weird people. I've had personal experiences with them. I'm for sure on a list of theirs.
That's a story from another time. But if you're really unfamiliar, putting it as short as I can, it's an organization that is a complete secret society. It's very occult. They worship Satan, but that's a point for another time. They have been known as global manipulators for centuries.
Countries have banned them because of who they are, but they are known to use their wealth and intrigue to control nations and to shape the futures of people and nations, and may or may not, definitely were, in my opinion, involved in assassinations historically and things like the planting of people into positions of power that allowed them to exert further control and influence and, you know, the everyday stuff. But I'm sure none of that should sound even remotely familiar or be ringing true for the overarching Erica Kirk story, because that'd be weird. On top of all this, Solomon's also known for some immense scandals, including stock fraud, investor fraud, casino fraud. In fact, he built a casino and then got taken out of the CEO position because of his fraudulent activities. He wasn't allowed to be in control of the company anymore.
All sorts of stuff like that. And then you can go, that seems like quite the character. And yet he amassed massive fortunes and got appointed to all these big companies and was also appointed to the government to do very important roles. So it makes you wonder who he actually knew and who he actually was. But leaving those two oddball characters right in the dust, here's where things are going to get even lunier.
Rostein is not only a relatively rare name, making it more than not a symbol to trace, it's also an infamous name, most especially if you're a sports aficionado, specifically baseball. Let me explain though. Long before Alan and Jack were manipulating corporations, looting the masses, and stacking it up into their $13,000,000 homes, let me reiterate, dollars 13,000,000? That's the sort of money only like a handful of a handful of people on earth possess, so what's going on there? And I think I know the answer because there is a pretty clear progenitor to the Rothstein proclivity of purloining the populace's purse.
And his name was Arnold Rothstein, a Jewish criminal who, it's widely asserted, fixed the nineteen nineteen World Series. He bet over a quarter of $1,000,000, which at that time is an unprecedented fortune. Roughly $5,000,000 today, but it doesn't really factor in for the lack of mind power and what all that means. He, in essence, made the bet, the wager, that Chicago would lose the Cincinnati Red Stockings in nineteen nineteen World Series. For color on who Rothstein is, he didn't come out of nowhere.
Rothstein was a longtime fixer, or in other words, cheater, as well as financier of crimes of all kinds from the least degenerate to the maximum degeneracy. But in this specific instance, with the nineteen nineteen World Series, he, through a series of payoffs and threats to, you know, people's families, ensured that the Cincinnati Rez won the people who he bet on, which is illegal for all sorts of reasons. Arnold, though, having friends in politics let me reiterate, politics, the legal system, like judges, and the police got off on all charges despite being the most obvious crime ever. Arnold was not a great guy to replicate or follow in the steps of, but he has become infamous enough that he even shows up in literature and movies, most specifically as a character of Mayor Wolfsheim in the not so great, kind of shortsighted and whip Gatsby. You can also thank Arnold for most of the crime syndicates that formed in the intervening years after his death.
Yes, was shot to death, surprise, surprise. And the modern day drug and human trafficking, etcetera, of today was in large part possible because of his initial funding of such crime networks. So, yeah, really an interesting guy in that family tree. But all in all, he's just an awful dude. But importantly, he's a Rothstein.
So here I'm gonna say something. There is a missing link, I think it's one of the most critical links possible. I hope you all can assist me here with it. Arnold Rothstein, likely resulting from his profession of, you know, murdering people and causing crime, kept it under wraps if and how many children he had and where they lived. And so it's been very hard to really connect to who he is.
But if you look down the family tree and at some of his siblings and all that, you will notice that there are more Rothsteins that continue on the family name. But they all do something very interesting across genealogy sites, and the genealogy sites themselves might be in on this. And the thing they do is that they redact the children of these initial Rothsteins. And so that makes it very hard, dare I say impossible, for us to know who are actually Rothsteins today and if they're 100% connected to one another. And so I asked you guys to help me out here to try and find these missing links to start building this family tree so we can officially connect Erica Kirk to these Rothsteins and to these known criminals and justice system manipulators, just generally bad people.
And I imagine that they probably keep this quiet and are trying to hide their identities, especially if Erica Kirk is one of them, because it would be pretty obvious that we shouldn't trust these people as there are generations of Rothsteins who have committed all of these heinous crimes, and to think that they would be in such positions of power today might cause the American people to go, We don't really want that, do we? But I don't want to yap too much, but we have this very obvious missing link, and it's hard to bridge those sorts of things when you cover up and when the family covers up all this information. But there's one thing the family can't account for, and I think it's rather ironic, that the Rothsteins have seemingly never built anything of value themselves, but they certainly do know how to steal it. And so you have the original Rothstein stealing, the Solomon guy stealing, and then you have Alan Rothstein also stealing and committing fraud. It seems like the real family trait in the family heirloom is the ability to thieve and commit crimes and to get away with it enough to profit.
Once again, let me reiterate $13,000,000 house, yet he's never built a business. Digressing though and getting back to the main track, it seems bizarre then that we have all these missing links, and then we've also got Erika Kirk who won't really discuss her mom's side, past her mom and the missing names and the using the incorrect Swedish terms and the fact that there aren't any pictures of really her parents' face. And on that note, there is one video that exists that people speculate might be her grandparents, and it's on screen now. In any case, though, it does make it increasingly difficult to trace her. But digressing, again, we go through all of this family history to say that this is very possibly Erica Kirk's ancestry.
And if we consider just how terrible these people are and the things they've been up to, including political manipulation, if Erica Kirk is related to them, that would be an insane link that would really throw a wrench in her story. And I think it would be enough for people to go, Hold on, wait a minute. And I suspect that's why we won't officially know unless someone out there, one of you guys can find that missing link for us, for which I'd be so grateful. But something else interesting is still worth noting. We might not know Erica's exact family lineage, but presuming that they are Rosteen's, it's rather strange then that Rosteen shares family ties to another family, another prominent Jewish family that has been the center of many, many theories for hundreds of years and has been involved in everything from currency manipulation to economic crashes and to assassinations and everything in between.
And that family would be the Rothschilds. Indeed, I was rather surprised to see that the two families are related and pretty directly because all I had to do is scroll over to the side and boom, there it was. The Rothsteins and the Rothschilds, two infamous crime families connected or right next to one another. Who knows? Maybe this is all just one giant coincidence wrapped in a coincidence taped in a rigmarole, but I really don't believe in those, and I'm not comfortable just saying things are just a coincidence.
I think that's a lazy excuse when too many facts start presenting themselves. And so I will leave it on this note. I firmly believe that what looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck is probably a duck.