TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe J6 never happened. Fellow Capitol PD officers claim Dunn is lying about the events. The truth is, he lost control and threatened peaceful MAGA protestors, which I see as a reflection of his bias as a BLM activist.
@InvestigateJ6 - InvestigateJ6
J6 100% never happened https://t.co/oSm6wMR52Q
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was working as a Capitol Police officer when a woman in a pink MAGA shirt singled me out, yelling that I voted for Joe Biden and used a racial slur. The surrounding crowd of about 20 people joined in, yelling slurs at me. It was the first time I had ever been called that word while wearing my Capitol Police uniform.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One woman in a pink MAGA shirt yelled, you hear that, guys? This nigga voted for Joe Biden. Then the crowd, perhaps around 20 people, joined in screaming, boo, fucking nigger. No one had ever ever called me a nigger while wearing the uniform of a Capitol Police officer.
@InvestigateJ6 - InvestigateJ6
Dunn’s own fellow Capitol PD officers allege that he’s lying. “It never happened” The reality is, @libradunn lost his shit and threatened to shoot peaceful MAGA protestors because he’s a racist BLM activist. @TPC4USA …pragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3544429/c… https://t.co/kATM9GHiUk
reSee.it AI Summary
A series of posts highlights various instances where the media has been accused of spreading misinformation and bias. Topics include Trump's comments on neo-nazis, Hunter Biden's laptop, Russian collusion, the effectiveness of masks, COVID vaccine testing, the lab leak theory, Ivermectin, protests, the Whitmer kidnapping plot, the January 6th incident, the Covington kids, Jussie Smollett, a parade incident, the Bubba Wallace garage pull, BYU students' alleged racist insults, and media manipulation. The posts encourage readers to question the media and not be afraid to acknowledge inconsistencies.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
📷/Thread This viral list circulating online was a big eye opener for me, and likely many others. Previously I'd just google and check the 1st site, which was generally a fact-checking page. But they were also repeating the same lies. I’ve recapped the list so you don’t have to.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
🧵My red pill moment: Life-long registered democrat; voted for Biden. Hated Trump; thought he was divisive. My head began to spin at the start of the pandemic. First mental hurdle was that main-stream media and Big Tech had regulatory capture, in a big way as I'll show.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
🧵90% of US media are owned by just 6 corporations ('96 Telecom Act). Much of what is fed to us is propaganda. I previously worked for the press, and cringed every time Trump said 'fake news.' But through COVID they all strangely parroted the same lies.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#1 Trump called neo-nazis "fine people": This full press conference was the single biggest microcosm of the media being disingenuous with their coverage of Trump. I truly thought Trump was condoning racism because they were his supporters -- and it appears that way when taken out of context, backed by the media saying Trump refused to condemn neo nazis. When you watch the full clip you realize he’s only defending the group that wasn’t supporting the cancel-culture of tearing down statues illegally.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#2 Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation: Not only did Joe Biden lie on such a main stage, he had the backing of the Deep State, MSM and Big Tech to censor the story. FBI had the laptop in its possession and knew it was legit. They falsely warned Big Tech (including Twitter 1.0) that a Russian hack-and-leak was about to happen with the laptop and told all platforms to block any info to help Biden get elected. Once you realize they can lie in unison on something this big, you see it's done on a massive scale with all things.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of being a corrupt politician. Speaker 1 responds by mentioning that 50 former national intelligence officials and the heads of the CIA have dismissed the accusations as false. Speaker 0 dismisses this as another Russia hoax. Speaker 1 tries to steer the conversation back to the issue of race.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's a corrupt politician. Right. So don't give me the stuff about how you're this innocent baby. Joe, they're calling you a corrupt politician.
Speaker 1: Nobody President Trump, I wanna stay on the issue of race. We're talking about
Speaker 0: up from hell.
Speaker 1: President Trump is talking about race right now, and I do wanna stay on the issue of race. President Trump Can you just respond to that? Please. Because look, there are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what this he's accusing me of It's a Russian plan. They have said that this is has all the 4 5 former heads of the CIA, Both parties say what he's saying is a bunch of garbage.
Nobody believes it except his and his good friend, Rudy Giuliani.
Speaker 0: You mean the laptop is now another Russia, Russia, Russia hoax? And that's exactly what Is this exactly what This is where he's going. The last stop is Russia
Speaker 1: Russian. I wanna stay on the issue of race.
Speaker 0: You have to be kidding. Here we go again with Russia.
Speaker 1: We're gonna continue on the issue of race. Mister president,
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#3 Russian collusion: DOJ Special Counsel, John Durham concluded his 4-year investigation exonerating Trump from any connection to Russia. In the meantime, they labeled the incumbent president during his election as a foreign agent working for Russia and framed him for treason. The probe relied on the 'Steele dossier' which came from a circular loop of people with little insight into Russia and also made up the Trump pee tape with zero credible backing. Between them lying to tarnish Trump's name, and lying to save Biden's name with his son’s massively incriminating laptop, how is that not direct election interference? If undecided voters knew Biden had a coke-addicted son who regularly slept with sex-trafficked prostitutes and minors, and accepted millions from foreign countries for influence peddling with no qualifications other than his father — or people thought Trump may be a Russian asset, ya that may sway some voters.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The recently released report by John Durham, after a 4-year investigation, reveals that the FBI hastily pursued allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, disregarding evidence that would have led them to drop the case. Durham suggests that confirmation bias played a significant role in the FBI's acceptance of uncorroborated information. He criticizes former FBI leaders James Comey and Andy McCabe for discounting information that didn't support the narrative of collusion. However, the report does not bring any additional charges against Comey or others as Trump had expected. It is important to note that President Biden allowed this investigation to continue along with another one involving Hunter Biden. Durham concludes that while no criminal allegations are made, the actions of the FBI and Justice Department fell short of professional standards.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Court is now here. It has dropped, and it might not have produced everything of what some Republicans sought for. It is regardless devastating to the FBI, and to a degree, it does exonerate Donald Trump. Let's bring in CNN senior justice correspondent Evan Perez. Evan, what exactly did Durham find in this report?
Speaker 1: Well, Jake, the, the bottom line finding from, John Durham's 4 year investigation is that the FBI Moved very quickly to investigate these allegations of connections, of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, And that they did so by ignoring a lot of evidence that would have led them to drop that altogether. He's saying that, they may have had reason to open a preliminary investigation, an assessment. Perhaps these are very, very low level investigations. But certainly what he finds is that there wasn't enough there, to to, to to support the FBI's decision to open a full blown investigation of this, of of the Trump Russia ties back in 2016. I'll tell you, one part of of what he writes here, he says, that it seems highly likely that at a minimum, confirmation bias Played a significant role in the FBI's acceptance of extraordinarily, serious allegations derived from uncorroborated information That had not been subjected to the typical exacting analysis, that the FBI usually uses.
He goes on to say that the FBI discounted or willfully ignored material information that did not support the narrative of a collusive relationship between Trump or Russia and Russia. There's a lot of, Very sharp criticism here of the former FBI leadership, James Comey, Andy McCabe, who were running the FBI and who oversaw a lot of these, a lot lot of the steps that, the, the report goes into, Jake. But as you pointed out, bottom line, there are no additional charges. Nobody is bringing charges against Comey or anybody else, that the former president, Trump kept saying, he expected them to. There was a a a former Trump I'm sorry, a former Clinton campaign outside lawyer who was brought up on charges.
He was acquitted. Again, in here, there's a there's a footnote that points out there's no chargeable crimes against people in the Clinton campaign. Again, Something that the, the former president said he expected this investigation to find, Jake.
Speaker 0: So it's very interesting. First of all, we should note, that when president Biden took office, He, there were 22 special counsels or 1 US attorney and 1 special counsel that he let continue doing their jobs. So one was John Durham doing this case, and the other one was the US attorney in Delaware investigating Hunter. So that is why this was allowed to to proceed. A couple, quotes here from the from Durham's report.
1, based on the review of Crossfire Hurricane, that's the investigation into Trump and Russia, and related intelligence activities, we conclude that the Justice Department and FBI failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law in connection with certain events and activities described in the report. And he says about, quote, sir about regarding certain personnel intimately involved in the matter. There was a, quote, predisposition to open an investigation and to Trump. He he is basically saying he's he's these are not criminal allegations, but he's saying that this was unprofessional and failed to meet the standards of the Justice Department and the FBI.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#4 Cloth masks prevent Covid: CDC relied on randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) for everything, except masks. There were only two RCTs done and neither was in the US. Both showed little to no effectiveness for masks. Masks are worn overseas for pollution and in hospitals to keep spit away from others, so unless you think you’re routinely getting spit on in real life, it may not make sense. N95s work on mannequins, but when it’s not perfectly fitted and humans have a tendency to touch and adjust their mask it’s not useful. Fauci was telling the truth the first time he said masks don’t work.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Right now, there's no need to wear a mask. While it may provide some comfort and block droplets, it doesn't offer the level of protection people believe it does. In fact, there are unintended consequences as people constantly adjust and touch their masks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now, people should not be there's no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a a droplet, but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is, and often, there are unintended consequences. People keep fiddling with the mask, and they keep touching their
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#5 If you get vaccinated you won’t catch Covid: It was later found the vaccine was never tested for transmission. If we had an honest media, this would’ve been one of its first questions but everyone lied about it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, various speakers express their frustration with the unvaccinated population. They argue that the unvaccinated are the problem and should be blamed for the spread of COVID-19. The vaccinated individuals feel that their freedom is being disturbed and that the unvaccinated are putting lives at risk. Some suggest mandatory vaccination and higher healthcare costs for the unvaccinated. The speakers emphasize the importance of getting vaccinated for the greater good of society and criticize those who spread misinformation. They also mention the consequences of remaining unvaccinated, comparing it to driving while intoxicated. The video concludes with a statement that the majority of COVID-19 deaths are among the unvaccinated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When the chips are down, these, these civilized people, they'll eat each other.
Speaker 1: You are the unvaccinated. You are the problem. It is the unvaccinated who are the problem, period. End of story.
Speaker 0: The only people that you can blame The only people you can blame. This isn't shaming. This is the truth. Maybe they should be shamed by the unvaccinated.
Speaker 2: Just have to start Blaming the unvaccinated folks, not the regular folks.
Speaker 0: Anyone you came into contact with will blame you as will the rest of us Who have done the right thing by getting vaccinated.
Speaker 3: Because, frankly, we know that we can't trust the unvaccinated.
Speaker 0: I think it's time to get our moral house in order, Anderson. It's the unvaccinated who are the threat.
Speaker 1: All these vaccinated folks are gonna start wearing masks to protect the unvaccinated folks. It's called a Christian value.
Speaker 3: You're basically punishing the vaccinated, for the The sins of the unvaccinated. People are not behaving honorably. The unvaccinated are basically saying, well, it's open season for me. I can do whatever I want as well.
Speaker 0: The the unvaccinated are basically beating their breasts running around the country saying, we don't care. We're living free and so forth.
Speaker 4: We've been patient, What our patience is wearing thin. The unvaccinated, a group that includes children and people acting like children. And the rest of us are starting to get pissed off. The vaccinated feel the unvaccinated are making me upset or angry. This is not about freedom A personal choice.
Speaker 0: Well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here. No. Screw your freedom.
Speaker 4: The other Howard Stern weighed in with a much different approach. Take a look.
Speaker 0: When are
Speaker 5: we gonna stop putting up with the idiots in this country and just Say, you now, it's mandatory to get vaccinated. They have freedom.
Speaker 4: But you're treading on our freedom, and you're making other people sick. And, really, you're killing other people. The anti Taxers, they seem to have a thing for death and home remedies. The anti maskers turned anti vaxxers are not just putting their own lives at risk. If that was the key issue, we could just say that we can
Speaker 0: watch them compete to win place or show in the Darwin Awards. We have to start doing things for the greater good of society And not for idiots who think that they can do their own research. And don't get me started on the lunatics who won't take Any of the COVID vaccines
Speaker 2: Life is too short to be an ass. Life is way too short to be ignorant of the promise of something that is Helping people worldwide.
Speaker 6: Maybe you're doing it because, you're you're disconnected or disorganized. Maybe you have some sympathetic psychological reasons, But maybe you're just being antisocial.
Speaker 0: Oh, you can't shame them. You can't call them stupid. You can't call them silly. Yes. They are.
Speaker 4: Those who are not vaccinated We'll end up paying the price. The unvaccinated should be taxed. They should pay more for health care.
Speaker 3: We need to start looking at The choice to remain unvaccinated, the same as we look at driving while intoxicated.
Speaker 5: We're gonna see, and I've said, almost Mhmm. 2 types of America.
Speaker 4: Doctor Fauci said that if hospitals get any more overcrowded, they're gonna have to make some very tough choices about who gets an ICU. But that choice doesn't seem so tough to me. Vaccinated person having a heart attack, yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you.
Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo, rest in peace, Wheezy.
Speaker 1: Pointing back to the unvaccinated who are really creating a problem in this country. Every death that we are seeing from COVID could have been prevented.
Speaker 4: Literally, the only people dying are the unvaccinated. And for those of you spreading misinformation, shame on you. Shame on you. I don't know how some of you sleep at night.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#6 Covid lab leak was a conspiracy theory: The US Energy Department now openly says the Lab Leak is the most likely origin. The global elites wanted complete control of the narrative from the beginning and with compliance by Big Tech and main-stream media, they got it. It all started with ‘Event 201’, conducted by World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in Oct 2019, meant to simulate what would happen if a world-wide pandemic happened. And the virus ironically happened right after. In the first year-plus of The Plandemic, if anyone on social media mentioned the lab leak theory they would be shadow banned, demonetized or outright de-platformed.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video emphasizes the importance of vaccination and the belief that no one is safe from COVID-19 until everyone is vaccinated. There is a strong condemnation of the unvaccinated, with calls for them to be shamed, blamed, and excluded from society. The speakers argue that the unvaccinated pose a threat to public health and should face consequences such as being fired or even imprisoned. There is also a mention of breakthrough cases among the vaccinated, causing concern and frustration. The overall message is that vaccination is necessary to stop the spread of the virus and protect individuals and society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We wanna make sure that people can discern the truth from the misinformation. And we wanna make sure that everyone understands that no one's safe till everyone's safe. No one is safe. No one is safe.
Speaker 1: No one is safe. No one is safe.
Speaker 2: No one is safe.
Speaker 0: Nobody's safe. No one is safe.
Speaker 3: Nobody is safe.
Speaker 1: This is a post nine eleven axiom, safer but not yet safe.
Speaker 0: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe from COVID nineteen until everyone is safe.
Speaker 1: If the whole world isn't safe, none of us are safe.
Speaker 0: No one is No one is safe. Nobody is safe.
Speaker 1: Until we're all safe. Health experts have been saying nobody is safe.
Speaker 0: Nobody is safe until everybody is safe. Nobody is safe. Science is Clear. None of us are safe. There is no safe people.
Speaker 1: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe until everyone is safe. No one's safe.
Speaker 0: Nobody is safe. Nobody's safe. No one's safe.
Speaker 1: We'll never be safe. Until we're all safe. We are never gonna be safe.
Speaker 0: 99.5% of people are safe safe. And will survive COVID nineteen. The only positive thing out of this is we should be able to manufacture a lot of sick. 10 Nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. You don't have a choice.
As long as not everybody is vaccinated, nobody will be safe. Normalcy sick. We'll see only returns when we largely vaccinated the entire global population. So Get the fucking vaccine.
Speaker 1: You need to get vaccinated. And if you don't, sick. You are going to die.
Speaker 4: I know you're vaccinated. You're the smart ones, but you know there's people out there who aren't listening to god and what god wants. You know who they are.
Speaker 0: Safe. The unvaccinated people. My message to unvaccinated Americans is this.
Speaker 1: If you are the unvaccinated, you are the problem. You'll
Speaker 0: safe. Prox condemn them, shame them, blame them. The only people that you can blame are the unvaccinated.
Speaker 1: Frankly, we can't trust the unvaccinated.
Speaker 0: They should not be part of polite society. Sick. Who won't take COVID vaccines, walking around, lawfully unvaccinated, a psychotic. If you're willing to walk among us safe. You are an enemy.
You have no right not to be vaccinated.
Speaker 2: You don't have the right to contaminate someone.
Speaker 0: You can't go around pointing a gun in somebody's face, which is what it is when people are unvaccinated. They are all idiots and losers.
Speaker 1: This is a real movement in this country against the sick.
Speaker 4: Jennifer Aniston is cutting non vaccinated people out of her life.
Speaker 0: Unrepentant, unvaccinated. They should be removed from the hospital. Those who refuse to be sick. Should be denied health care. Vaccinated person having a heart attack?
Yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy, rest safe. Peace, Wheezy.
You're
Speaker 1: Some doctors are saying they'll refuse treatment for people who choose not to get the safe. Why are hospital and ICU resources going to them? Morons
Speaker 0: who will not get the shot. The unvaccinated clowns. Idiots To think that they can do their own research. Don't do any of your own research. Doing your own research is associated with conspiracy theory circles.
Sick.
Speaker 5: This go it alone approach, doing your own research That can have serious consequences.
Speaker 0: You should get prison time for even questioning the vaccines. Can we all stop saying, I need to do my own research?
Speaker 5: That phrase, do your own research, 4 words, 4 little words that are hurting America.
Speaker 0: Doing your own research hurts safe. America. Everybody
Speaker 5: has a supercomputer in their hand that empowers them to do their own research, and that's the problem. You must not
Speaker 0: do your own research. I need to do my own research. I don't I never understand what that means. I'm doing my own research. You can't do your own research unless you're a scientist.
Sick. Do your own research.
Speaker 1: Maybe you've told yourself you're playing it safe. You just wanna wait and see since this is a new vaccine. Safe. No.
Speaker 0: Roll the
Speaker 1: up and get the vaccine.
Speaker 0: Unvaccinated people spread the virus. Get the vaccine? You dopes. Don't be a Get yourself vaccinated. That's just All is true.
There's no excuse. No excuse for being unvaccinated. There's no rational and no emotional argument that adds set up against getting your damn shot. There just isn't.
Speaker 1: But you made a conscious decision not to get the vaccine. I also have safe. Natural immunity, though for me, personally, this vaccine poses a greater risk than a benefit. I'm also not a risk to any of you. Let's look at the science.
Speaker 6: So we see that the natural infection is given greater protection or slightly greater protection than vaccination.
Speaker 1: This is a vaccine that was created To prevent severity of disease and to prevent hospitalizations, but the vaccine does not prevent you from getting COVID and does not prevent you sick. From transmitting Oh my goodness. Reality. That's not so. Come on.
No. You're gonna Fox TV.
Speaker 0: You still have
Speaker 1: to join. I don't I don't think that we should allow this
Speaker 0: safe. Sick.
Speaker 1: Safe. The virus stops with every Vaccinated person
Speaker 0: Do it so you stop spreading terrible disease. And that vaccine, key goal is to stop the transmission so that you get almost no Almost no, infection going on whatsoever. Expectation for vaccines is not to get infected.
Speaker 1: A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus Does not infect them.
Speaker 0: When the virus gets to you, you stop it. You're not gonna catch it. You're not gonna get sick. You're not gonna transmit it. The vaccine is absolutely bulletproof.
Speaker 1: Safe. Block you from getting and giving the virus.
Speaker 0: 100% effective in preventing COVID. Vaccine prevents you from getting infected.
Speaker 1: To Keep you from getting it and then spreading it. We have the ability to stop COVID in its tracks.
Speaker 0: You're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Safe.
Speaker 7: Biden tests positive for COVID nineteen.
Speaker 0: When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected.
Speaker 7: Doctor Fauci tests positive for COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: Safe. People do not carry the virus. Don't get sick.
Speaker 7: CDC director tests positive for COVID nineteen.
Speaker 0: Safe. Pfizer CEO test positive for COVID. Pfizer CEO test positive for COVID again. CDC director test positive for COVID again. Fauci test positive for COVID again.
Joe Biden test positive for COVID again.
Speaker 1: Cases up safe. 258%. The majority of these cases are among the vaccinated, and this area is the most vaccinated part of Massachusetts.
Speaker 3: Safe. So many fully vaccinated people are testing positive.
Speaker 1: So people here are a bit angry.
Speaker 3: We are all really concerned about what this means long term.
Speaker 2: I was vaccinated, and I got COVID. Safe. Almost everyone we know with vaccinations had at least 1 bout of it.
Speaker 0: Our vaccines work better, safe. Then we could have possibly hoped they would work.
Speaker 1: We are not the problem. The problem are the Unvaccinated.
Speaker 0: The unvaccinated threat. Unvaccinated people are a threat, a direct threat. It's a threat to all of us. The unvaccinated safe. Rescue all of us.
Speaker 1: People have a right to be protected from the unvaccinated.
Speaker 0: Maybe there should be laws that allow them to be kept out of
Speaker 5: the building. So at least, thankfully, they're not Breathe in the same area.
Speaker 0: Their freedom to breathe will diminish. Start firing the unvaccinated. If you
Speaker 1: don't vaccinate, you'll be fired.
Speaker 0: Time to come down on the unvaccinated. They should be safe. Banned from the VA. Banned from restaurants. Banned from other businesses and colleges.
Speaker 2: Companies should not
Speaker 0: treat us as equal. Sick. People under arrest.
Speaker 1: Who's the unvaccinated that has put America in the place that it is?
Speaker 0: We are losing freedom because people are unvaccinated. They are towards the unvaccinated. Sick. Vaccinated. I'm furious at the unvaccinated.
Frustrated with Americans. Still not vaccinated. Not to be vaccinated. Seems criminal. Suspects safe.
Face years behind bars for coughing on police officers Freedom. For them. Charged with terrorist threats. You have no individual rights when it comes to the vaccine. Really, you're killing other people.
Sick. Being attacked by unvaccinated. The unvaccinated who aren't wearing masks. It's the unvaccinated who aren't social distancing. It's the sitting going to crowded indoor events.
It is not your right as an American citizen to catch and transmit a potentially fatal infection. Go screw your freedom. We can coerce you.
Speaker 1: You're not going to be able to travel and to see your family. If someone in your family isn't vaccinated, should you ask them
Speaker 0: not to show up? BS. You really shouldn't have anyone unvaccinated come to dinner. That's Just a huge risk.
Speaker 1: If you wanna come out into public, if you wanna live your life, you need to get the vaccination.
Speaker 0: It's time for people to see vaccination as literally necessary. You should have To show that you're vaccinated in order to go places. Unvaccinated janitorial can't travel to the US.
Speaker 1: If you're not vaccinated, you're not welcome.
Speaker 0: Our precious is wearing thin. Why hasn't the president sick. Morons, scolding the unvaccinated. The refusal has cost all of us.
Speaker 1: Continued damage the unvaccinated are doing to themselves and the country.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#7 Ivermectin is a horse dewormer and not for humans: Ivermectin was administered 2 billion times to humans, who it was designed for. But like many medicines that work for humans they are then also used on animals. The scientists who discovered ivermectin won the Nobel Prize in 2015, but a full-on smear campaign was started once it showed promise in stopping Covid. If another medicine was found to help Covid the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) would not have been granted. Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs on the market, safer than Tylenol, with little downside. But its patent expired with drug company Merk so no one could get rich off it.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#8 Mostly peaceful protests: Because Black Lives Matter (BLM) and George Floyd riots were mostly supported by the establishment, the media made them out to be peaceful despite $2 billion in damages and at least 25 deaths.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#9 Governor Whitmer kidnapping plot: The media was in a race to claim Trump’s followers were dangerous as the election neared. The FBI conjured up a kidnapping attempt of the far-left wing Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Only problem is they later found almost all of the 14 supposed kidnappers were paid FBI informants.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Six right-wing militia members who allegedly plotted to kidnap Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer will go to trial soon. One member has already pleaded guilty and is expected to testify against the others. The case against these alleged extremists relies heavily on the involvement of government informants and undercover FBI agents, raising questions of entrapment. The FBI was aware of every aspect of the plot and even offered guidance on how to carry out the kidnapping. Despite this, Whitmer has gained sympathy as a victim of former President Donald Trump's rhetoric. However, the FBI agents and Michigan State Police Troopers involved in the operation were thanked by Whitmer herself.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, Robbie, what's on your radar?
Speaker 1: Well, remember the right wing militia members who allegedly plotted to kidnap Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer because of her COVID nineteen lockdown policies? Well, they will go to trial in just a few weeks. 6 of them were charged in connection with the plot, and one of them has already pleaded guilty and is expected to testify against the rest. State authorities charged 8 others with aiding a terrorist plot. The government's case against these 14 alleged extremists relies on work done by at least a dozen government informants and undercover FBI agents, whose extensive involvement in the plot calls into question whether it would have moved forward at all without the government's prodding.
Some of these government actors took lead roles in organizing the supposed plot. One of the informants was even paid $54,000 by the FBI. Taken together, these and other details raise the strong possibility That the militia members were victims of entrapment on the part of the FBI. Indeed, the revelations have prompted considerable welcome considerable welcome scrutiny of the case from the mainstream media. The FBI investigation into the alleged plot to kidnap Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer has gotten very complicated, conceded BuzzFeed news In a terrific in-depth examination of the available evidence that was published last month.
And earlier this week, the New York Times acknowledged that the involvement of informants and agents had quote, muddled the case. But in any case, it is now abundantly clear that Whitmer was in no real danger. At all stages of the alleged plot, The FBI was aware of every facet of it. Their agents and informants were intimately involved, not just surveilling the militia members, but actively offering guidance on how to pull off the kidnapping. Yet, Whitmer has become a more sympathetic figure on the national stage because she is perceived as a victim of former president Donald Trump's reckless rhetoric and emboldening of right wing domestic terrorists.
Quote, every time the president wraps ramps up his violent rhetoric, every time he fires up Twitter to launch another broadside against me, my family, and I see a surge of vicious attacks sent our way, wrote Whitmer in an Atlantic Article titled The Plot to Kidnap Me. The thrust of her piece is that Trump's criticism of blue state governors inspires real violence, and she very much cites herself as a potential victim of such The thing. Here was Whitmer speaking about Trump's complicity in the kidnapping plot.
Speaker 0: Just last week, the president of the United States He stood before the American people and refused to condemn white supremacists and hate groups like these 2 Michigan militia groups. Stand back and stand by, he told them. Stand back and stand by. Hate groups heard the president's words not as a rebuke, but as a rallying cry.
Speaker 1: Now Trump undoubtedly said many things that Were cruel, vile, wrong. But the person most responsible for the Whitmer kidnapping plot is clearly not Trump. What's the FBI agent who green lit this farce? Ironically, Whitmer thanked them in that same speech.
Speaker 0: I wanna start by saying thank you to our law enforcement. Thank you to the fearless FBI agents And thank you to the brave Michigan State Police Troopers who participated in this operation.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#10 January 6 was an insurrection: Another case where feds were heavily involved was Jan 6, according to FBI whistleblowers. All the footage the MSM showed for the first 2 years was grotesque, but later released video showed a fully unarmed ‘insurrection’ where the doors were opened for most of the ‘intruders’. No one died on that day other than Trump supporter and US Air Force-Veteran Ashley Babbitt who was shot in cold blood by an officer that was later honored for his efforts.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the presence of undercover officers, confidential informants, and FBI assets in the crowds during the January 6th Capitol breach. It mentions that government operatives infiltrated the protests and reveals that the Biden Department of Justice admitted to having 40 undercover operatives within the Proud Boys. The FBI and other law enforcement agencies also had informants and undercover agents present. The video suggests that the government knew about the attack in advance and allowed it to happen to discredit Donald Trump and his supporters. It concludes by stating that the FBI is withholding footage to hide the involvement of undercover agents in committing crimes during the Capitol breach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now, I wanna talk about how they figured out that, yes, turns out there were lots of feds in the January 6th crowd breaking. Washington FBI field office confirms undercover officers, confidential informants, and FBI assets were embedded in the crowds at the US Capitol on January 6th. This is an article from Gateway Pundit from May 18th, Thursday. Senator Ted now here's Ted Cruz. He's gonna he's gonna grill the FBI's Jill Sanborn on Ray Epstein.
Do you remember this? First of all, let me let me get back to this. Let me get back to this. Matt Getz confirmed today that the government was running several assets in the crowds during the January 6th 2021 protests in Washington, DC. Dozens, if not hundreds of government operatives filled the protests at the US Capitol on January 6th.
The Gateway Pundit previously identified 20 different confirmed incidents and operations involving federal, state, and local government operatives who infiltrated the massive Trump crowds. Each one of these incidents has been confirmed by the far left press or the government in court documents. We currently have no idea how many federal, state, and local government operatives were working undercover on January 6th, but it looks like It's close to a 100 operatives. I bet you it's way more. Leading the charge on the US Capitol on January 6th.
Recent court documents reveal the Biden Department of Justice admitting to at least 40 undercover operatives within the Proud Boys alone. So department of the DOJ had 40. 40 inside the Proud Boys on January 6th. The US government finally admitted in this letter they sent out before the trial that they were running confidential human resources. They called them CHSs, con those are people working for the Feds.
They call them CHSs inside the o Oath Keepers organization. In November of 2022, the FBI finally admitted that they had 8 informants inside the Proud Boys organization on January 6th and likely more. So the FBI had 8. The DOJ had 40. The FBI had as many as 8 informants inside the Proud Boys in the months around the January 6th capital attack, recent court papers indicate raising questions about how much federal investigators were able to learn from them before and after it took place.
So They you know that the feds knew that January 6th was gonna happen, and so now you know. But why didn't they do anything to try to stop it? Because they were egging it out and pushing it on because they wanted this to happen. Yeah. Because what would be the long term consequence of that?
Consequences that is you can disqualify Donald Trump from being president again because you can disqualify his whole political organization, his whole political movement as terrorists. And that's what they did. The Department of Justice and remember, if it wasn't Donald Trump, if Bernie Sanders actually had this act to go ahead and grab power, They'd be doing this to Bernie Sanders and Bernie Sanders supporters. The Department of Justice admitted to 40 government shocked. The Department of Justice now admits that another 40 undercover agents were with the Proud Boys.
The vast majority of the group was paid by the government as either w two employees or as CHS's. And here at least 2 law enforcement agencies each numb each outnumbered the FBI in terms of running undercover agents, informants, and CHS's on January 6th. 1st, the DC metro police had 13 undercover plainclothes agents among the Proud Boys and other part so they had 13. The the FBI is admitting to 9. The Department of Justice says 40.
There appears to have been 19 CHS's on January 6th belonging to the agency, called HIS, homeland security investigation. So that's even more. Wow. When added to the 8 FBI's, Barlow, this means that there were at least 40 undercover informants or agents doing surveillance among them. On Thursday okay.
So there you go. And the number keeps growing to 50 or more that they are admitting to. Breaking another doozy of a motion filed today by the Proud Boys defense lawyer re related to informants undercover agents. The number of DC metro undercover agents keeps growing. So let's see.
Where's the number? And just the last weekend, the defense learned that there was at least 10 to 12 additional previously unknown plainclothes Metropolitan Police Department officers among the proud boys. This brings the total number of informants among defendants on or around January 6 to 6 or 50 or more. And there's great reason to re believe that number is higher. And now this Washington DC FBI field office confirmed on Thursday that undercover officers, confidential informants, and FBI assets were present despite the w the FBI director, Wray, testifying that there weren't.
So that guy should be imprisoned. And so he Michael Shellenwerg, who, done a lot of reporting, and he he he says this. Indeed, there may have been hundreds of undercover government hundreds of undercover government agents and informants, both local and federal, in the January 6th crowd. According to 1 January 6th witness, there were a 100 to 200 Secret Service agents alone at the capitol before and during the breach of the police barriers. So no they'd even no one's has even mentioned the Secret Service yet.
I wouldn't it wouldn't it wouldn't surprise me if there were a 1000 feds in that goddamn. And by the way, they won't release and they won't release the video. Right? So this is a FBI whistleblower testifying under oath that FBI won't allow 11000 hours of January 6 footage to be released because it would expose undercover agents committing crimes inside the Capitol. Not only was January 6th a Fed setup, but now it's confirmed that the FBI is also covering its tracks.
So just as we've been reporting all along, January 6th was a fed operation, and now they're covering their
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#11 Officer Sicknick was murdered by protesters: Footage showed protesters, and mostly agent provocateurs, hitting the police officer over the head with his helmet on. Sicknick died the following day due to 'natural causes' from a medical examiner after suffering two strokes.
Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6th, a mob breached the Capitol building, resulting in the deaths of five police officers. The Democratic Party and the national news media quickly labeled it a deadly insurrection, a phrase that carried emotional weight. However, surveillance footage from inside the Capitol showed mostly chaotic but peaceful scenes. The media also falsely claimed that Officer Brian Sicknick was murdered with a fire extinguisher, which was later retracted. The video evidence disproves this claim, as Sicknick can be seen walking in the Capitol after the alleged attack. The January 6th committee, aware of this footage, chose not to release it to the public, revealing their dishonesty.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Within hours of January 6th, literally hours, you began to hear that day described as a deadly insurrection and not described by 1 news outlet or 1 politician but in unison by all of them. Almost like it was coordinated. A deadly insurrection. That's how history may record January 6th. But the tape that we reviewed from within the building on that day proves It was neither an insurrection nor deadly.
Here it is. January 6th, when an Estimated 2,000 rioters breached the capitol building, causing the deaths of 5 police officers.
Speaker 1: Certain dates echo throughout history. December 7, 1941, September 11, 2001, And January 6th, the mob beat officers with anything they had on them, hockey stick, flagpole, a fire extinguisher. Police officers died. Donald Trump supporters who, of course, rioted and killed police officers.
Speaker 0: By the evening of January 6th, the Democratic Party and its publicist in the national news media had settled on a description of what had happened that day. They distilled an enormous number of highly complex events, events that even now we don't fully understand into a single emotionally elated political slogan which they've repeated for years with remarkable discipline. January 6th they said, was a deadly insurrection.
Speaker 1: There was a deadly insurrection that the right wing is trying to cover up.
Speaker 0: He incited a deadly insurrection.
Speaker 1: Incited a deadly insurrection. The violent deadly insurrection on the Capitol 9 months ago. It was about white supremacy in my view.
Speaker 0: A deadly insurrection. Everything about that phrase is a lie. Very little about January 6th was organized or violent. Surveillance video from inside The capital shows mostly peaceful chaos, but the slogan worked. The term deadly carries enormous emotional power, which is why they used it.
To prove the insurrection was deadly, propaganda pointed to the death of an officer called Brian Cichnik. The mob killed officer Brian Cichnik. That's what they said. It was their single most powerful indictment of the January 6th protesters and of Donald Trump and of Republican voters nationally. They repeated that claim for years.
They are still repeating it. At first, they told the country that officer Cichnek was murdered with a fire extinguisher. Officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the fight. That story came from the New York Times, which is effectively the assignment editor for most of the rest of American media. It was a lie untrue in any way.
But only after that lie had hardened into conventional wisdom did the newspaper bother to retract it.
Speaker 1: The New York Times has quietly retracted its story about the death of Capitol Police Sir Brian Sicknick.
Speaker 0: The damage had been done. Brian Sicknick himself, a Trump voter, had been transformed without his consent into a political martyr of the His memory was shamelessly exploited by the incoming Biden administration. In February of 2021, Sicknick's body lay in state in the capital rotunda, where a parade of unscrupulous politicians made use of it. Here's Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Breaking down the doors, Trying to overturn an outcome of election and killing several police officers in the meantime.
Speaker 0: But Brian Cipniak should not be reduced to a prop Up for the political ambitions of the democratic party. He was a human being. The facts of his life matter including how he died. To this day, media counts described Sicknick as someone who was quote slain on January 6th. The video we reviewed proves that is a lie.
Here is surveillance footage of Sicknick walking in the capitol after he was supposedly murdered by the mob outside. By all appearances Sicknick is healthy and vigorous. He's wearing a helmet so it's hard to imagine he was killed by a head injury. Whatever happened to Brian Sicknick was very obviously not the result of violence he suffered at the entrance to the Capitol. This tape overturns the single most powerful and politically useful lie Crats have told us about January 6th.
And it was indeed a lie. The January 6th committee knew perfectly well that Brian Sicknick was walking normally way through the capital after he was supposedly murdered by Trump supporters. And they know that because they saw this tape. We can be sure because the footage contains an electronic bookmark that is still archived in the capital's computer system. That means that investigators working for the Democratic Party reviewed this tape.
They saw it but they refused to release the tape to the public. Why? Because this tape would shatter the fraud they were perpetrating on the country because hiding the truth serve their political interest. They lied about the police officer they claimed to revere. If they were willing to do that then their dishonesty knew no limits.
Subscribe to the Fox News YouTube channel to catch our nightly opens. Or is that are changing the world and changing your life from Tucker Carlson tonight.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#12 Don’t Say Gay was in a bill: MSM is quick to demonize the Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, and new presidential nominee, who created a school bill. Nowhere in the bill did it say ‘don’t say gay’ as was routinely labeled in the media. Instead it simply said public schools couldn’t teach sexual orientation or gender identity to kids from kindergarten to third grade, which most protesters may agree with if they knew what it actually said.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#13 Covington kids: Covington Catholic HS student Nick Sandmann was portrayed as an aggressive Trump-supporting racist with a smirk on his face in a standoff with a Native American at a pro-life rally on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in DC. In fact, Sandmann simply stood there with his hands behind his back as the Native American approached him banging a drum in his face. Sandmann later won millions in defamation lawsuits when a full video surfaced showing his innocence.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#14 Jussie Smollett: The former “Empire” actor maintains he was the victim of a racist and homophobic assault from two Trump supporters. But an investigation revealed Smollett was guilty of setting up the whole hate crime. Not before a cast of Hollywood celebs including Biden and VP Kamala Harris pledged their support for Smollett.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jussie Smollett's associates reveal their side of the story in the Fox Nation special, "Anatomy of a Hoax." They explain how they planned the attack on Smollett, arriving at the scene early and without phones. They approached Smollett, yelled the slurs he requested, and threw him to the ground. To make it look more real, one of the associates gave him a noogie and tried to leave a mark. This new information contradicts Smollett's original claims and sheds light on the staged nature of the incident.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. It was only a year ago, member after Jussie Smollett was sentenced to 150 days in jail for faking a hate crime against himself in downtown Chicago. Now that happened back in 2019. Now Smollett claimed that he was attacked on a freezing January night by 2, quote, white supremacists wearing MAGA hats that shouted, this is Trump country, and specifically targeted him because of his race and his sexual orientation. Of course, we now know that all of that was false.
Smollett actually hired 2 of his associates to stage the attack, and they are now telling their story or their side of the story for the first time in the new Fox Nation special, Anatomy of a Hoax. Take a look at this.
Speaker 1: So we got here with 10 minutes to spare, and we had to plan our escape route to survey the land. After His building is actually right here, right above the stairs that we're going to attack him at. We made sure we got there at 2 AM I Sharp. On a dot. On a dot.
We had no phones because he did not want us to bring any phones. He said, so we don't lose them. I don't know if that's asking really the reason. That's him. It's that him.
That's that That's that Get that Get that Oh, he's moving fast. Come on. Let's get him. Get that Get him. As we cross the street, we say hey to get his attention.
Hey, Nick. Hey. He turned around, after looked at us, and that's when we started yelling, the famous slurs he wanted us to yell. Hey. Aren't you that empire after empire fat It's MAGA country.
Yeah. And then he said, what did you say to me? After And then that's when I threw the 1st punch at him, and then I threw him to the ground. And while after I threw him to the ground, I He had no bruise. I wanted it to look more real.
So then I threw him to the ground. After I threw him to the ground, I used my knuckle I And gave him a noogie. So I went like this. Why did I do that? To give him a after Scar to give him a mark to make it look real, like, he really did get his
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#15 SUV killed parade marchers: As has become custom with the media, whenever a minority group commits a heinous crime, often race isn’t mentioned. Such was the case when a BLM supporter and Black nationalist drove into a Wisconsin parade and was labeled 'Tragedy caused by a SUV'.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#16 Bubba Wallace garage pull: When the MSM demand for racism exceeds the supply, as is the case with most of these, the situations are almost fabricated out of thin air.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A noose was found in Bubba Wallace's garage stall, causing confusion and concern. However, the FBI has determined that no federal crime was committed. New video evidence shows that the noose was in the garage since October 2019, before Wallace used that particular stall. This incident occurred amidst racial tension and Wallace's call for NASCAR to ban confederate flags.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For a moment, a stunning display of solidarity on the racetrack helped soothe the nation reeling from racial tension. But now confusion after a noose found in the garage stall of Bubba Wallace, the only black driver in NASCAR's cup series, may not have been directly targeting the driver. The FBI saying after a thorough review of the facts and evidence surrounding this event, We have concluded that no federal crime was committed. New video evidence showing the noose found in Wallace's garage number 4 was in that garage as early as October 2019, before it was his and months before Wallace demanded NASCAR ban confederate flags.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#17 BYU students hurled racist insults at Duke volleyball player: An avid sports fan most of my life, I’ve grown to hate ESPN and their race-baiting tactics. The godmother of the player brought attention to the incident with the accusations. It turns out the godmother was running a political campaign and likely created the narrative to gain sympathy for her in this victimhood culture we live in.
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's an ongoing battle, but on good days, we find the courage to fight for the best in us. White supremacy is the biggest terrorist threat to our country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's never really over. But on the best days, enough of us have the guts and the hearts to stand up for the best in us. The most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland is white supremacy.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#18 Many will claim, 'I don't even watch the news.' And I was the same. Yet I still had (incorrect) passive knowledge that everything in this thread was truthful prior to peeling back the surface.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#19 The media has trained us to think we are racist conspiracy theorists if we acknowledge the craziness pointed out in this thread. Fight the fear. If you can relate to my political confusion at the start of the pandemic please retweet and follow.
reSee.it AI Summary
Capitol Police officer Aquilino Gonell's claims of near-death injuries on Jan 6 are contradicted by new video evidence. Despite testifying under oath and in federal court, he appears to have suffered no physical injuries. Gonell also falsely claimed to have tried to save Rosanne Boyland, but there is no video evidence supporting this. After Republicans threatened investigations, Gonell retired and continued to misrepresent the events.
@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
BREAKING VIDEO: For 2 1/2 years, Capitol Police officer Aquilino Gonell has lied about injuries he sustained on Jan 6. He has testified under oath and in federal court proceedings that he suffered near-death injuries. New J6 video contradicts Gonell's claims that protesters…
@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
Here is Gonell, who appears to have suffered no physical injuries on Jan 6, tearfully telling CNN about his woes.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Sergeant Aquilino Ganell, a United States Capitol Police officer, recounts his experience during the January 6th insurrection. He describes being called a traitor, which deeply affected him as someone who serves his country. Ganell fought against the rioters, enduring injuries and fearing for his life. He witnessed the brutality inflicted on his fellow officers and was determined to protect the Capitol. The video highlights the emotional toll on Ganell and Officer Byron Evans, who evacuated senators and watched the riot unfold on TV. Despite the trauma, they returned to work shortly after. Ganell expresses his disappointment in the lack of support from the country he loves and sacrificed for.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What was the worst thing they called you?
Speaker 1: Traitor.
Speaker 0: Why was that the worst thing?
Speaker 1: Because I serve my country. I wanna see To protect our homeland from foreign threat threats, but yet here I am battling them In our own capital.
Speaker 0: United States Capitol Police Sergeant Aquilino Ganell immigrated from the Dominican Republic to the US at 12 years old in 1991, Deployed to Iraq in 2003 and then joined Capitol Police in 2008. He's speaking publicly for the first time about January 6th When he fought rioters trying to stop the certification of Joe Biden's presidency.
Speaker 1: I got hurt. I got her. I would do it again if I have to. It's my job.
Speaker 0: Sergeant Ginnell led members of the department's civil disturbance unit. For hours, they battled insurrectionists attacking the capital. This video shows his fight on the west front.
Speaker 1: They kept saying Trump sent me, we won't listen to you. We are here to take over the capital. We are here to hang my my pens. They thought we were there for them, and we weren't. So they turned against us.
It was very scary because I I thought I was gonna lose my life by there.
Speaker 0: Some of the most horrific video shows sergeant Genell steps from Metropolitan police officer Daniel Hodges caught in a doorway.
Speaker 1: I could hear my fellow officers screaming, the agony in some of them. All I could think was, We can't let these people in. There's gonna be a slaughter inside.
Speaker 0: Rioters beat sergeant Gennell so badly, they cut his hand, And he needed foot surgery while he fended off the attack outside. Officer Byron Evans locked down areas inside the capitol and evacuated senators. Did you ever think this might be a life or death situation for you?
Speaker 2: I remember specifically thinking it when I was on the floor. I remember thinking all that stuff like, Byron, this is the day. All all those times you've given thought on what you would do, you're you're doing it.
Speaker 0: 4 hours, Evans and the senators watched the riot on TV from a secured location.
Speaker 2: I just remember the anger I felt when I saw those images. The Busting windows, climbing the walls, and stuff like that. It was it was a audible gasp in the room.
Speaker 0: Around 6, the riot had calmed enough that sergeant Genel could finally tell his wife he'd survived.
Speaker 1: I started Testing my wife. And all I said to her, I'm okay. See you whenever.
Speaker 0: Congress resumed certifying the electoral college votes that night. Sergeant Ginnell arrived back home around 3 AM, January 7th, but found little relief.
Speaker 1: When I came in, she wanted to hug me, and I told her no. Because I was covered. I was covered in pepper spray. My hands were bleeding still. And I even I couldn't even sleep because I went took a shower.
And instead of helping, That re inflamed the chemicals
Speaker 0: It did soak through your clothes?
Speaker 1: Yes. Took a bath of milk. That ain't help.
Speaker 0: Just hours later, both he, officer Evans, and hundreds more officers still reeling from the worst
Speaker 1: Back in 2 centuries,
Speaker 0: headed back to work.
Speaker 1: I did give my wife a hug, and I started crying.
Speaker 0: Why?
Speaker 1: Everything happened. And I don't think I would would be able to see them. I went to my son's bed and given a hug, he was sleep still, gave me a big kiss, and I used to start crying. It's, like, 5, 10 minutes. We just I just cry, she kept telling me it's gonna be okay.
I'm like, no. I gotta go back to work. I gotta go back to work.
Speaker 0: For him, the riot is hardly in the rearview. The motion is not agreed to. The failure of a bill to establish a commission to investigate the causes of the insurrection left him devastated, but gave him a reason to speak out.
Speaker 1: Hurts me that the country that I love, that I came in, that I have sacrificed so much, don't care about us.
@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
Part of Gonell's sworn testimony to J6 committee in July 2021. "This is how I'm going to die." Gonell also lied about trying to save Rosanne Boyland. There is no video of him attempting to resuscitate her at any point. Further, video of Rosanne's lifeless body at 4:27 does not…
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the Capitol breach, I heard rioters shouting for Trump and witnessed officers in pain. I was being crushed and struggling for oxygen, thinking I might die defending the entrance. Rioters were stripping shields from officers, but I had one and stayed at the front. My family was desperately trying to reach me, and I finally let them know I was alive after giving CPR to a rioter. I arrived home at 4 AM, unable to hug my wife due to the chemicals on my uniform. Despite exhaustion and injuries, I returned to work for 15 consecutive days. Even now, over 6 months later, I'm still recovering, along with other officers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In desperate struggle, the writers attempted to breach the capital were shouting, Trump, send us. Pick the right side. We want Trump. I vividly heard officers screaming in agony and pain just an arm length from me. I didn't know at that time, but that was officer Hodges.
He's here today to testify. I too was being crushed by the rioters. I could feel my myself losing oxygen and recall thinking to myself, This is how I'm going to die defending this entrance. Many of the officers fighting alongside me were calling for shields because their shields are being stripped from from them by the rioters. I was one of the few officers left with a shield, So I spent the majority of my time in the at the front of the line.
I later find out that my wife and relatives were Here in the US and abroad, We're frantically calling and texting me from 2 PM onward because they were watching the turmoil on television. It was now until 4:26 PM After giving CPR to one of the rioters who breached the capital in an effort to save her life, that I finally had a chance to Let my own family know that I was alive. After order order has finally has been restored at the Capitol, And many hours arrive I arrived at home at nearly 4 AM on January 7th. I had to push my wife away from me because she wanted to hug me. And I told her no because of the other chemical that I my uniform had it on.
Sorry. I couldn't sleep because the chemical reactivated after I took a shower, And my skin skin was burning. I finally fell asleep 2 hours later, completely, physically and mentally exhausted. Yet, by 8 o'clock AM, I was already back my way back to the capital. And I continued to work for 15 consecutive days until after the inauguration.
I made sure to work despite despite my injuries because I wanted to continue doing my job and help secure the capital complex. More than 6 months later, I'm still trying to recover from my injuries. Many of my fellow o capital officers as well as MPD officers soft suffer
@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
After Republicans won the House and threatened numerous investigations including into Jan 6, Ofc Gonell retired. He again lied about what happened:
Video Transcript AI Summary
US Capitol Police Officer Sergeant Aquilino Ganell is resigning from his position due to the toll the Capitol insurrection has taken on him. In his first TV interview since announcing his resignation, Ganell explains that his injuries and PTSD, along with limitations in his shoulder motion, prevent him from continuing his duties. The final straw was when someone taped a photograph of Donald Trump to his work computer. Ganell holds Trump and his supporters responsible for the riot. He also criticizes Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene for downplaying the riot and making insensitive comments. Ganell is now focusing on healing, writing a book, and considering his next steps.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A US Capitol police officer badly beaten during the Capitol insurrection is handing in his badge. Sergeant Aquilino Ganell says his last day on the job will be this Saturday, writing in a letter to his police chief, quote, having to return to the scene of the crime almost every day has become taxing, unbearable, and not conducive to healing, and we're honored to have sergeant Aquilino Ganell joining us here in the studio in his 1st TV interview since announcing his resignation. How does it feel to be leaving a job that you you felt passionately about taking in the 1st place?
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me. It's tough making that decision, after, you know, 16 years. Almost half of my life, I had dedicated to be a public servant both in the military and also as a police officer. And I'm not leaving because of my own on my own accord, but because they did that to me, the mob and the people who continue to support The former president.
Speaker 0: Because your injuries were so bad that you couldn't do your job anymore, and and also just your the
Speaker 1: The PTSD and also the Certain motion range of motions on my shoulder. I'm I'm able to do a lot of things with my, with my arm, but I still have some limitation So that's as a civilian, I could afford had the lock I could have the luxury to, walk away from an altercation or not making, if if if it become violent or not, as a police officer, I cannot do that. So
Speaker 0: And the last straw, was it that somebody taped a photograph of Donald Trump to your work computer? Was that just the final straw?
Speaker 1: Yeah. 2 month about roughly about 2 months ago, normally, I watch some of the videos, in relation to, doing investigation or writing, reports or testimony for court, and I guess, some people thought I was just Obsessing about it, but not knowing that I was actually doing work for for the court and and continue my work as a police officer. And I took a couple of days off, and when I came back, there was a a, a picture of Donald Trump, taped to my, computer screen.
Speaker 0: Do you think it was somebody joking around, somebody being a jerk, somebody trying to intimidate you? What what's your interpretation?
Speaker 1: I had no idea, but I did. At first, I I crumbled it, put it in the trash, but then I I said to myself, no. I I cannot let That happened and and and because that's gonna entice him to do it again. So I I reach out to, scan it, resend it out to the chain command and tell them, like, this is unacceptable, and it is very insensitive of whoever did it, whether they They did it, jesting or not.
Speaker 0: Right. Because you hold Donald Trump responsible for the riot. That's that's the reason that's the point they were trying to I guess.
Speaker 1: I guess.
Speaker 0: Speaking of January 6th, Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, she's been downplaying the riot since it happened. Last weekend, she went to an event, a New York Republican fundraiser, and she said that if she had led the attack, if she had been in charge of it, they would have, quote, won. Take a listen.
Speaker 1: If you didn't and I had organized that, we would have won. Not submitted. It would've been harmed.
Speaker 0: She she later said she was joking, but just to read that quote, if Steve Bannon and I had organized that, we would have won, not to mention, it would have been armed. I mean, what's your response when you hear when you hear a congresswoman say that?
Speaker 1: Oh, that's coming from the same person that when I was giving my testimony in January, on July last year, she was in front of the justice department, fighting for the the patriots, because
Speaker 0: Fighting for the people that have been arrested.
Speaker 1: People who who've been arrested, and and and they that's the kind of supported chief things that we need. And the way I take is that, based on her comments and her actions, we were the the police officer were the bad guy, not the other way around, which is kinda, crazy, because she's
Speaker 0: not she's not alone, though. I mean, that's Donald Trump's response too. It's also you know, I heard when you and your colleagues testified, people on Fox were making fun of you.
Speaker 1: I mean, when you if you take the the whole incident of January 6th and you take it at their own house or a courthouse, Wouldn't they want people to be held accountable? And wouldn't they want the police officers to, take actions and and and prevent Their own family members, from being attacked because that's what exactly what happened. The the attack at the capitol happened to them, and had it not been for the action that myself and my and my colleagues, along with the other agencies, that came To to support us? It would have been a bloodbath, and there's no doubt in my mind that Oh, no.
Speaker 0: Of course. You guys
Speaker 1: have heroes. Yeah. That In in in their mind, we were the bat the the people who were storming the capital, which is ridiculous. We were there doing our job, and had it not been for for our actions, there would have been a lot of members of congress and senators, including officer who had been would have been dead dead that day.
Speaker 0: You think they would have been killed if you guys had I
Speaker 1: mean, they that's what they were saying to me At the police line before we lost it.
Speaker 0: What are you gonna do now?
Speaker 1: I'm writing I'm just just completing a, a book. I turned it in today. It's called, the American treason. That's where I'm focusing now on healing my, From my injuries and taking on work, doing exercise beginning to exercise a little more, plan b, I don't know. I don't I don't have one yet, but open to suggestion.
@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@RealTanios Sociopathic liar
reSee.it AI Summary
The Justice Department seeks a harsh sentence for Jacob Chansley, positioning him as a leader of the January 6 rioters. However, body cam footage from the senate chamber contradicts the committee's narrative. This highlights the government's willingness to deceive and ignore evidence. Some view the intelligence and law enforcement agencies as domestic terrorist organizations, suggesting a Deep State coup on January 6th.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
The Jan 6th Committee Belongs Behind Bars The Justice Department asked for Jacob Chansley to receive a harsh sentence to set an example among the January 6 ‘rioters’. Prosecutors positioned Chansley as leader of a barbaric crowd Body cam footage emerged from inside the senate chamber, rebuking the narrative created by the J6 committee This is a GOLDEN example of how the DOJ & Government is willing to lie to achieve their chosen narrative. Even after this footage came out to completely refute their claims, they stuck with the narrative & ignored the evidence Our intelligence agencies & federal law enforcement agencies have become domestic terrorist organizations . Jan 6th was a Deep State coup.
reSee.it AI Summary
Joe Biden's credibility is being questioned as various claims about his personal life are debunked. CNN highlighted his history of falsehoods, including a bridge collapse incident, his grandfather's death before his birth, and a conversation with a deceased Amtrak conductor. Other false claims involve his arrest during a civil rights protest and his past as an 18-wheeler driver. Biden's tendency to fabricate raises concerns about his honesty regarding more significant matters like Burisma, Hunter, Ukraine, and China. His track record of dishonesty is troubling.
@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk
CNN just spent an entire segment documenting how Joe Biden is a pathological liar: Witnessed a bridge collapse in Pittsburgh in 2022 - FALSE Grandfather died just days before his own birth at the same hospital - FALSE Conversation with Amtrak conductor (who was already dead) - FALSE Arrested during a civil rights protest - FALSE Used to drive an 18-wheeler - FALSE Visited Pittsburgh synagogue and site of 2018 mash shooting - FALSE This isn’t senility. Thirty-five years ago Biden was already plagiarizing foreign speeches and lying about his grades in college. When you lie about small things you lie about big things. If Biden can’t stop fabricating inane personal stories, imagine the whoppers he's told about Burisma, Hunter, Ukraine, MBNA, China, etc.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The president has a history of inventing or exaggerating stories about his past. He has falsely claimed to have witnessed a bridge collapse in Pittsburgh and that his grandfather died just before he was born at the same hospital. He also repeated a debunked story about a conversation with an Amtrak conductor. In more serious instances, he falsely claimed to have been arrested during a civil rights protest and to have visited the Pittsburgh synagogue where a shooting occurred. He has also made false claims about driving a tractor-trailer when he actually drove a school bus. Whether it's a result of a faulty memory or intentional embellishment, this pattern of misinformation is concerning.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And he has done, I don't know if it's similar things, but he's sort of told some stories that don't line up quite like this before.
Speaker 1: Yeah. This president has a pattern at this point of either inventing or embellishing stories about his own past, his biography. He did it 3 times in one speech last month alone. He claims he had witnessed a bridge collapse in Pittsburgh when he actually showed up about 6 hours later. He claimed that his grandfather had died just days before he was born himself at the same hospital.
In fact, his grandpa died more than a year before in a different state. Not not the same hospital. And, and he also repeated a favorite false story that I and others have debunked over and over again about a supposed conversation with an Amtrak train conductor he was friends with who was actually at the time the conversation would have had to take place and that's not all. There are some more serious ones in in my view. Previously in presidency.
He claimed at one point he'd been arrested during a civil rights protest when in other versions of the story he just said an officer had taken him home, from a protest. He said he had visited the the Pittsburgh synagogue where worshippers were killed in a 2018 match shooting. In fact, he'd actually spoken to the rabbi, but never but never went, and he he's made a whole bunch of others too. He said at one point, Republicans like to bring this up, he said that he used to drive a tractor trailer. He used to drive an teen wheeler never happened.
The White House later clarified he used to drive a school bus at one point for as a as a job briefly. School bus, of course, not an 18 wheeler. So whatever his intentions whether it's, you know, foggy memory about stuff that's going on decades ago or deliberate embellishment, this is an unfortunate pattern that keeps coming up again and again with Joe
reSee.it AI Summary
Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony to the January 6 committee has been disputed by firsthand witnesses. She claimed that Trump assaulted Secret Service agents and tried to take control of the Beast, but both the lead agent and the driver testified that it wasn't true. Hutchinson also stated that Pat Cipollone warned her about allowing Trump to go to the Capitol, but witnesses confirmed Cipollone wasn't present. She mentioned a note from Mark Meadows, but former White House lawyer Eric Herschmann clarified that he wrote it. Hutchinson alleged that Jeff Clark strategized with Giuliani, but they never met. It's worth noting that she worked for Trump after January 6 and criticized the committee in private texts. Now she's selling a book and appearing on Maddow.
@greg_price11 - Greg Price
I just want to remind everyone that Cassidy Hutchinson is a proven liar and everything she told the January 6 committee under oath was disputed by firsthand witnesses. Lets review: Claim: Hutchinson testified that Donald Trump assaulted Secret Service agents and lunged for the wheel of the Beast on January 6 because they wouldn't take him to the Capitol. Reality: Lead Secret Service agent Bobby Engel, as well as the driver both testified under oath it wasn't true. Claim: Hutchinson testified that former White House Counsel Pat Cipollone personally warned her not to allow Trump to go to the Capitol or “We’re going to get charged with every crime imaginable.” Reality: According to multiple witnesses, Cipollone was not at the White House when Hutchinson claimed. Claim: Hutchinson testified that she was personally handwritten a note at the direction of Mark Meadows regarding a potential statement for then-President Donald Trump to release during the Jan. 6 attack. Reality: Former Trump White House lawyer Eric Herschmann released a statement saying he had in fact written the note. Claim: Hutchinson testified that former senior Justice Department official Jeff Clark strategized at the White House with Rudy Giuliani and the Trump campaign to object to the election. Reality: They never met each other. Additionally, she worked for Trump a full nine weeks after J6. In her private texts with friends, that were reported by the Federalist and Daily Caller at the time, she joked about the riot on J6, said the J6 committee was "phony" and "bullshit," and begged Trump officials for financial assistance after being subpoenaed by the committee. Now she's selling a book and going on Maddow.
@greg_price11 - Greg Price
Here are the links to the Daily Caller and Federalist stories about Cassidy Hutchinson's private texts where she was shitting all over the J6 committee before deciding to lie for them. https://thefederalist.com/2022/07/26/exclusive-in-private-cassidy-hutchinson-joked-about-riot-called-j6-committee-phony-praised-trump-before-changing-story/ https://dailycaller.com/2022/07/03/obtained-text-message-cassidy-hutchinson-called-january-6-committee-bs-before-testifying/
EXCLUSIVE: Private Chats Show Cassidy Hutchinson's Flip-Flop
Hutchinson commiserated with other targets of the probe about how little information she had about any wrongdoing on Jan. 6.
thefederalist.com
EXCLUSIVE: Text Messages Show Cassidy Hutchinson Referring To January 6 Committee As ‘BS’
The January 6 committee's key witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, called the committee "bs" in a text message obtained exclusively by the Daily Caller.
dailycaller.com
reSee.it AI Summary
On January 6, a series of events unfolded at the Capitol that raised questions and revealed inconsistencies. Despite media narratives, former President Trump called for peace and urged protesters to go home. The Electoral Count Act of 1887 was in place in 2021, allowing objections to the Electoral Count. Contrary to initial reports, no police officers died that day, and some suicides occurred later. The Capitol Police Chief was silenced, and there were indications of a setup. Antifa's presence and FBI involvement were also revealed. Ray Epps, a person of interest, had a disturbing past. Entrapment and undercover identifiers further suggest a setup. The truth behind January 6 continues to emerge.
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
🚨 MASTER THREAD 🧵 JANUARY 6 BOOKMARK THIS THREAD! I am releasing everything I have collected over the years into this one thread. This post will be updated a few posts at a time & all future information will be dropped into this post. Let’s begin…
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
Despite the mockingbird media saying that Donald Trump “incited an insurrection”, this was his message on January 6… “I know your pain. I know you’re hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have Law & Order. We have to respect our great people in Law & Order. We don’t want anybody hurt. It’s been a very tough period of time. There’s never been a time like this, where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us. From me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can’t play into the hands of these people. We have to have PEACE. So go HOME. We LOVE YOU. You’re very SPECIAL. You’ve seen what happens, you see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel. But go HOME And go HOME in PEACE.” 🙏 This Video https://rumble.com/v34gqif-donald-trump-tells-january-6-protestors-to-go-home-in-peace.html You can watch Trumps full speech on January 6 here https://rumble.com/v34gpbn-january-6-trumps-speech-at-the-save-america-march-in-washington-dc.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
I understand your pain and hurt. The election was stolen from us, even though it was a landslide victory. We need to go home now and prioritize peace, law and order. We must respect our law enforcement and avoid anyone getting hurt. This is an unprecedented time where they could take away our democracy. Although this election was fraudulent, we can't play into their hands. We love you, you're special. We've witnessed the mistreatment of others, but it's important to go home peacefully.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know your pain. I know you're hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now.
We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. It's a very tough period of time.
There's never been a time like this where such a thing happened and where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you.
You're very special. You've seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home in peace.
Donald Trump Tells January 6 Protestors to “Go Home in Peace”
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
January 6 - Trumps Speech at the Save America March in Washington DC
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
Despite what Mike Pence says or the Mockingbird Media tries to Amplify, Mike Pence did have the Constitutional Authority to Pause the Vote 2001 Al Gore<> 2021 Mike Pence The Electoral Count Act of 1887 (ECA) was in place in 2001 The Electoral Count Act of 1887 (ECA) was in place in 2021 In 2001, any congressman who wanted to raise an objection, the ECA of 1887 insists that he/she needs the signed support of one ONE Senator. In 2021, Congressman Paul Gosar, along with 60+ of his colleagues objected to the Electoral Count of Arizona. The objection was in writing & was signed by a senator. There were others. The (ECA) of 1887 was then REPLACED with the Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022 in a now successful attempt to change the VP’s role. Our elected/selected officials are guilty of treason. https://rumble.com/v35yusg-january-6-2001-2021-gore-pence-pence-could-have-sent-it-back.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the certification of the election results, Al Gore presided over the event as outgoing Vice President and President of the Senate. If a congressman wanted to object, they needed the signed support of one senator. One congressman objected, stating that the Supreme Court, not the people, decided the election. However, the objection was not signed by a senator. Another congressman from Arizona then objected, with the objection being in writing and signed by a senator. The video ends with a statement that President Trump was wrong in claiming the right to overturn the election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of the House of Representatives and the Senate was to certify the election results. Al Gore, in his dual role as outgoing Vice President and President of the Senate, presided over the event that would officially anoint George W. Bush as the new President. If any congressman wanted to raise an objection, the rules insisted that he or she had to have the signed support of just 1 senator.
Speaker 1: Mister president, it is in writing and signed by myself on behalf of many of the diverse constituents in our country, Especially those in the 9th congressional district and all American voters who recognize that the Supreme Court, not the people of the United States, decided this election.
Speaker 2: Is the objection, signed by a senator?
Speaker 1: Unfortunately, mister president, it is not signed by 1 single senator.
Speaker 2: Are there any objections to counting the certificate of vote of the State of Arizona that the teller has verified appears to be regular, informed, and authentic?
Speaker 3: Mister Vice President, I, Paul Gosar, from Arizona
Speaker 2: What purpose does the gentleman from Arizona rise?
Speaker 3: I rise both for myself and 60 of my colleagues to object To the, counting of the electoral ballots from Arizona.
Speaker 2: Is the objection in writing and signed by a senator?
Speaker 3: Yes, it is.
Speaker 2: And I heard this week that president Trump said I had the right to overturned the election. President Trump is wrong. I had no right to overturn the election. The
January 6 - 2001 <> 2021 Gore <> Pence — Pence Could Have Sent it Back
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
Despite what the Mockingbird Media says…. No Police Officers Died That Day! NONE! Four “Committed Suicide” Some Long After J6 Merrick Garland LIED! Officer Brian Sicknick was said to be killed by a violent mob, hit in the head with a fire extinguisher. That was a lie! Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick suffered 2 strokes and died the day after January 6th, the District’s chief medical examiner has ruled. The autopsy found no evidence of an allergic reaction to chemical irritants, external or internal injuries. Capitol Police officer Sicknick died of natural causes, 2 strokes due to a blood clot. The Four Other Officers oddly enough “committed suicide”, Some long after January 6. • Officer Kyle DeFreytag “Suicided” himself on July 10 • Officer Gunther Hashida “Suicided” himself at his home, found July 29. • Officer Howard Liebengood “suicided” himself on January 9 • Officer Jeffrey Smith “suicided” himself on January 15 https://www.fox5dc.com/news/fourth-police-officer-dies-by-suicide-after-capitol-riot-family-confirms This Video https://rumble.com/v2cb06e-january-6-merrick-garland-lied-no-officers-died-that-day.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Officer Brian Sicknick's cause of death remains uncertain, despite media claims that he was beaten to death by Trump supporters during the Capitol riot. Video evidence shows Sicknick walking through the building unharmed. However, the media and politicians like Liz Cheney continue to spread false information without correction or apology. The White House, including Press Secretary and Attorney General Merrick Garland, falsely claim that Sicknick and other officers were murdered during the riot. In reality, the other four officers mentioned died by suicide, with no evidence linking their deaths to the Republican mob. While some officers were assaulted, the claim that January 6th was the worst assault on the US government since the Civil War is unfounded.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Consider the death of police officer Brian Sicknick. Now we still don't know exactly how officer Sicknick died. We're not certain that anyone does know. No one has explained it. But after reviewing the previously withheld video evidence, we can tell you with certainty that officer Cyknick was not beaten to death by Trump voters at the capitol.
The tape shows very clearly Brian Sicknick walking through the building in apparent health after the media told us for 2 years that he had been murdered. So they were wrong about that. Okay, they got caught. Here's the interesting thing. They won't admit it.
Liz Cheney's tweet is still on Twitter tonight. Officer Sicknick was killed defending our capital from the violent mob on January 6th. No correction. Anderson Cooper of CNN still has not apologized. Quote, Officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the fight, he told us.
Those are lies. So why not just admit it and move on? But they won't. In fact, this week, the White House trotted out both The press secretary and Joe Biden's attorney general, the attorney general of the United States, to claim not just that Brian Sicknick was actually murdered by Republicans at the capitol, but That other officers were murdered too. It's it's almost beyond belief.
Watch this.
Speaker 1: The right range of bipartisan lawmakers, as you heard Yesterday, you guys reported on it, who have condemned, this false depiction of the unprecedented violent attack on cons on our constitution and the rule of law, Which cost police police, officers their lives.
Speaker 2: It was a violent attack on a fundamental tenet of American democracy, That power is peacefully transferred from 1 administration to another. Over a 100 officers were assaulted on that day. 5 officers died.
Speaker 0: Five officers died on that day. Now that's just not some guy on Twitter. That's the attorney general of the United States. That's a man Whose honesty is central to his job. If you had a choice between IQ and integrity in an attorney general, of course, you would go with integrity because it's essential.
But Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, is a liar. He just lied about something that is provably false. Who are these 5 officers who were, quote, killed that day? Notice he didn't tell you. No one ever tells you.
No one ever shows you their autopsies. They don't want any detail. They just want the slogan. Now they're counting Brian Sicknick. That's a lie.
But who are the other 4? Well, those are 4 officers who killed themselves after January 6th. In some cases, long after January 6th. But their suicides, we know for a fact, were the result of the Republican mob at the capitol. It's just it's just false.
And it's not some esoteric fact. That fact is available to anyone who has Internet access. No police officers died that day on January 6th. None. Not one.
Some were assaulted. That is true. And their assaults are indefensible. So how many were assaulted? Well, Garland said over a100.
The government accountability office says the number is 114. We're just gonna roll with that. Don't know if it's true, but we'll take it at face value, and that is bad. We are opposed to assaulting police officers in any context. We said that On January 6, 2020, almost yet again, we're against that.
But is January 6th the worst assault on the US government since the Civil War? That's insane. It's not even close.
Fourth police officer dies by suicide after Capitol riot, family confirms
A fourth police officer who responded to the Capitol riot on Jan. 6 has died by suicide, according to his family.
fox5dc.com
January 6: Merrick Garland LIED! No Officers Died That Day! NONE! Four “Committed Suicide” Some Long After J6
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
In hindsight, the deep state did one hell of a job and Pelosi was one hell of an actress. The power of the camera, when magnified, can depict any image one wants. That’s why it’s called Tell-A-Vision! Professional film crews, FBI & Aunt-Tifa to display & incite violence, her producer daughter was even there… I especially like the big ass X on the couch at the 3:09 mark, like it’s a marker for Nancy’s fat ass to sit. History will reflect January 6 as one of the greatest psyops ever performed on the American people…. Along with Covid. Follow me down the rabbit hole 🕳️ https://rumble.com/v2cky9w-january-6-pelosi-deserves-an-oscar-professional-film-crews.-find-the-x.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Capitol is under attack as people breach the doors and windows. Senators are in lockdown and putting on gas masks in preparation for a breach. They are requesting more security personnel and the National Guard has been called in. The concern for personal safety is high, with the blame placed on the president. There is a discussion about evacuating the Capitol and finding an alternative location to continue proceedings. It is mentioned that it may take days to clean up the damage. Official channels estimate that the situation will be resolved within an hour.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're still we're trying to get surrounded. They're taking the, north front scaffolding. We'll be in this. We'll get more ammunition. We're not gonna be able to hire them.
The door has been breached, and people are gaining access into the capital.
Speaker 1: We have got to get to finish the proceedings.
Speaker 0: USA. USA.
Speaker 2: Senator Schumer is at a secure location and they're locked down in the Senate.
Speaker 1: There has to be some way we can maintain the Sense that people have that there is some security or some confidence That government can function and that we can elect the President of the United States. Did we go back into session? We did go back in succession.
Speaker 2: But now apparently everybody on the floor is putting on to gas masks to prepare for a breach. I'm trying
Speaker 1: to get more information, putting on their tear gas masks.
Speaker 0: We need a area for the house members. They're all walking over now through the tunnel.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna call up the effing secretary of DoD. We have some senators who are still in their hideaways that need massive personnel now. Can you
Speaker 3: It's a Maryland National Guard to come to.
Speaker 1: I have something to say, mister secretary. Well, I'm gonna call the the mayor of Washington DC right now and see what, other outreach she has other police department that's that your foreigner has mentioned. Hi, Governor. This is Nancy. Governor, I don't know if you had been approached about the Virginia National Guard.
Mr. Hoyer was I was speaking to Governor Hogan, but I still think you probably need the okay of the The federal government in order to come into another jurisdiction?
Speaker 2: Thank you. Oh, my gosh.
Speaker 1: They're just breaking windows. They're doing all all kinds. It's really that somebody they said somebody was shot. It's just it's just horrendous and all at the instigation of the president of the United States. Okay.
Thank you, governor. I appreciate what you're doing. And If
Speaker 0: you don't
Speaker 1: mind, I'd like to stay in touch. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Okay. Thank you. Bye bye. Virginia Guard has been called in.
Speaker 1: You're not just talking to governor Northam, And what he said is, they sent 200 of state police and a unit of the National Guard. They're breaking windows and going in, obviously, ransacking our offices and all the rest of that. That's nothing. The concern we have about personal harm. Personal safety is just Transcends everything, but the fact is on any given day, they're breaking the law in many different ways.
And Quite frankly, much of it at the instigation of the president of the United States. And now, if if he could could at least, Somebody.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Why don't you get the president to tell them to leave the capital, mister attorney general, and your law enforcement responsibility, A public statement they should all leave. This cannot be just we're waiting for so and so. We need them there now, whoever you got. You have had you also have troops.
This is steady hoyer.
Speaker 1: Okay. So we have a to make that decision.
Speaker 2: Andrews Air Force Base. Alright. Other military bases. Thank you. We need active duty, National Guard.
How soon in the future can you have the place evacuated, the clothing cleaned out?
Speaker 0: I I don't wanna speak for the leadership that's going to be responsible for in executing the
Speaker 1: Or the hotel or some other entity that was under siege. And let me say you can logistically get people there. Imagine make the front. How we can get this job done today. You talked to Mitch about it earlier.
He's not in the room right now, but he was with us earlier And said we want to expedite this and hope that they could confine to just 1 complaint, Arizona, and then we could vote and that would be, front. Then just move forward with the rest of the state. The overriding wish is to do it at the capital. What we are being told very directly is It's going to take days for the capital to be okay again. We've gotten a very bad report about the condition I would go to the house floor with defecation and all that kind of thing as well.
I don't think that that's hard to clean up. But I do think it is more from a security standpoint of making sure that everybody is out of the building and how long will that take. I just got off the device president.
Speaker 2: And I got off with the vice president elect. Okay.
Speaker 1: But what we left the conversation with, because he said, I had the impression from Mitch that Mitch wants everybody back to do it there.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 1: I said, well, we're getting a counterpoint that It could take time to clean up the poo poo that they're making all over the room literally and figuratively in the capital and that but it may take days to get back.
Speaker 0: And so I'm at the Capitol building. I'm literally standing with, the chief of of the US Capitol Police. Can you just inform me what you will hear through official channels? Paul Irving, your Sergeant and Arms will inform you that their best information is that they believe that, the New house and the senate will be able, to read the fee in roughly an hour.
Speaker 2: Good news.
January 6: Pelosi Deserves an Oscar— Professional Film Crews. Find the X
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
Even Nancy Pelosi’s daughter believes the J6 narrative was complete horseshit. 2:43 Pelosi: “The Shaman did noth(ing)… What did the Shaman do? He stood there.” 4:24 “After the Democrats lose the house, then they get rid of the committee, people may lose I think interest… no one is going to care after the democrats are out of power. And you take Biden out of office- then who cares!?” 4:47 “DC is a lot of people who work for the government. I don’t think they’re sympathetic. If you got it moved (changed trial jurisdiction from DC) you’d totally get off” (laughs while saying this) 6:48 “If there was an insurrection… you were supposed to have a plan!” “It was the sorriest insurrection in history” 8:09 “You’re going to be able to laugh about this one day” 14:50 Pelosi talks about her friendship with Gavin McInnes and laughs at the notion that Proud Boys are white supremacists. https://rumble.com/v29wdt4-bombshell-nancy-pelosis-daughter-caught-on-tape-refuting-the-j6-narrative.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss their plans to attend an event and bring a camera. They talk about getting on a list and filling out a form for information. They mention a lawyer and question whether he got a good or bad deal. They discuss the possibility of an appeal and the potential for a longer sentence. They mention the shaman's sentence and criticize the disparity in sentencing. They talk about the upcoming trial and the potential for bias in the jury. They mention the difficulty of moving the trial and discuss a woman who got a DUI and caused a fatal accident. They mention receiving threats and the involvement of the FBI. They briefly mention their connection to Gavin McGinnis and the comical nature of the Proud Boys.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So how am I gonna get in? I need to know what we
Speaker 1: Only will be Can you is there a
Speaker 0: Oh, he needs to put you on the list. Yeah. But the problem is is that I wanna go with a camera. I will put you on the list. I will make some contacts, and I will try to camera?
I'm thinking of maybe
Speaker 1: I'm I'm I'm the camera guy because I want to meet him too. Hey. I'm gonna need the camera guy.
Speaker 0: You need to get information. They have copy of this? There's a form. There's a form you can fill. I'll get you the information.
I'll get you the terms. Thank you.
Speaker 2: You're welcome.
Speaker 0: Now do you know anything about his, First of all, do you think that he's a, no. Do you think that he got good deal or bad deal?
Speaker 1: I don't know. A I'm gonna
Speaker 2: say He's the one who got The lawyer went away?
Speaker 1: Yes. The lawyers. Alright. Okay.
Speaker 0: Let me tell you what happened. He okay. His lawyer, Patrick got it. Right? So he was in reserves.
Old guy. Old guy. He is a lawyer, but he's also in the reserves.
Speaker 2: Right. Right.
Speaker 0: And he also is very very religious. So what he does when you come in, let's say you're the client.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: The first thing he does
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And blah blah blah. All that. So then, he says you have to do god wants you to make right. You go right to the judge, tell him you did everything, thing? And just and and just face the music, period.
So he did that, but then he got a new lawyer who I have not talked to because I'm not sure I trust the new lawyer. Because, first of all, he's he gets out May 18th. Is the lawyer gonna be able to get Before then? I mean, it's already January. February.
Conviction. Yeah. Was there anyone a conviction? Yeah.
Speaker 2: But you know, you could appeal it. Like, I mean, then it comments, like, you're not gonna make the felon? You could still you still have status to appeal. You
Speaker 0: can give an appeal.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. You win the appeal overturning. So he gets some incentive. Yeah.
Like
Speaker 0: So some days, did the shaman do? He stood there. What
Speaker 2: I told
Speaker 0: him, he stood there. The shaman got how many months?
Speaker 2: Right. 41.
Speaker 0: Book to get bigger? Like, people are criticizing some of
Speaker 2: the people
Speaker 0: that Right. Right. A lot of people were getting probation and stuff. So I think they're looking to make People like, I think if Paul went now, he'd get a bigger a longer sentence.
Speaker 2: What what did he do? Okay. What did he do? He went He
Speaker 0: just walked me with the trunk flag in the sand?
Speaker 2: That's it. That's it.
Speaker 0: That's it. I need that. So I don't know if the balance was was good or bad.
Speaker 1: Well, for the charge I'm looking from a charging point of view of 15.12.
Speaker 0: See, you didn't walk into that. You walk me into the settings.
Speaker 1: But I didn't do event?
Speaker 0: I know. That's what I'm saying. That's the bad thing.
Speaker 1: I wasn't even there to say it. A lot of these people are like, we're here to overturn the I wasn't even there for that reason. I was not there to overturn anything.
Speaker 2: I I think a thing about it? He used him to to shore up their 15 12 charge too. Because if they have people fleeing to it, they're telling the judge is good. We already have people who pledge this felony. So though?
If you overturn it for 1 case, you're gonna overturn all the prior conditions. It puts more pressure on these district judges not to over return in? Because he's, oh, we have Paul. He's gonna plead guilty to the 15/12. But they dropped everything but the 15/12.
The charge they never used before. A so they're like, oh, this guy will take 8 months. And we'll we'll have another plea. They make every single person charged with the 15/12, plead a difference between 12? I was thinking to drop it.
Speaker 0: I'm very
Speaker 1: interested on the 1st
Speaker 0: trial, how
Speaker 1: that's gonna look like. Well, I think
Speaker 0: the one thing, if you drag it out, chance? It's like anniversary. The first one is a big deal. They're gonna really be a big deal in your state. No one's gonna care after the Democrats are a power.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 0: And then take Biden out of office, then who cares? If you drag it out long enough, I wouldn't go first for a trial because DC is a lot of people who work for the government. Right. And it's a lot of I don't think I'm gonna do that.
Speaker 1: The jury that's
Speaker 0: The jury is The jury is
Speaker 2: We we need to see how there. Well, if
Speaker 0: you guys wanted to totally shut off. I I wish you push at all? I'm waiting for them to successfully move it?
Speaker 2: No. They won't move it. Because I mean, think about it. They'll they'll resist it. They'll say how I've heard the hearings.
Speaker 1: The logos deleted me.
Speaker 2: Those if they're gonna say They're gonna say we're not we're not fair. We're fair. And then it is very the last time the government move to trial with the Oklahoma City bomber? They agreed to move into Colorado. So that's a stipulated.
Even the Boston bomber case, which just now an appeal to Boston the city of Boston or the federal judge here? What do you mean it can't be fair? Motion gets signed by the judge They say yes. Yes.
Speaker 1: But then but but
Speaker 2: there might be more favorable up the line? You know, we go to the I'm not using DC Circuit of Appeals to the Supreme Court. They might say, wait a second. You're you have politicians
Speaker 0: every night comparing it to Pearl Harbor. 9/11. That was just deep.
Speaker 2: Looking at the variant to Pearl Harbor 911 And that was just deep Deeps are under siege. Had natural budget for 7 months. If you live there, you're like, I am under siege. I see natural guardsmen around here? You know, my my city was attacked.
The local the local media everyday. You can't have a fair trial.
Speaker 0: Well, the reason see, I think gonna remember January 6th. Right now, people are still looking for stupid. We need stuff to fill. I mean, if you watch 6.47. As time goes on Right.
It's gonna be less.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And as as as So I think I think also people are gonna lose their their office the jobs. The people that were there for Lucerne Johnson, it's not gonna need anything if you weren't even there. I know we
Speaker 2: need, like, a word breakout.
Speaker 0: No. No. It's right at all. Okay. I I I thank you for your time.
Listen, I really,
Speaker 2: typical bad guy?
Speaker 0: But I the the thing is why I asked you the question of, like, so what was the plan? Is that if there was If there was an interaction, you were you were supposed to be in line, Martin. You're in the military. You know? Right?
Speaker 1: No. It doesn't.
Speaker 0: There was no plan.
Speaker 1: Exactly. So you're offering a you sit down overnight with your soldiers. You go over. Alright? You're gonna go here.
You're gonna go in by this site. At this time, we're gonna take over this. There's none of that.
Speaker 2: He's doing the impression. He's a sorry in his direction in in the 20 21st century ever. It's no guns.
Speaker 1: A guy's playing. A guy's fucking behind you on
Speaker 0: I love the guy.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm like I'm like
Speaker 0: Well, we do that. We could just do it after last week for the guy that just was ringing
Speaker 1: Well, my favorite my favorite guy holding
Speaker 0: Mister Webb?
Speaker 1: He got no.
Speaker 0: He he he got it.
Speaker 2: He's dead. He's dead.
Speaker 1: I'll wait for a sentence. He's right. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Well, what's he gonna get?
Speaker 2: Probably in a few months. I don't know. I'm not sure right now. We'll just go, you know, from this You're
Speaker 0: gonna be able to laugh about this one Then I would just wait.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: Because I wouldn't the 1st child, like, this I was in Ohio with this guy who is going to file? He wants to subpoena Trump and make it, like, this whole it's for, like I
Speaker 1: heard it. No.
Speaker 0: They're not gonna they're not gonna It's gonna be You're not
Speaker 2: gonna allow that. You're not gonna name? Is the district
Speaker 1: judge I just want a subpoena people involved with my team. For example, that officer that I gave water, the guy that interviewed me Probably, maybe 1 more person. But other than that, I want people You
Speaker 2: can find him, officer Lopez?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Let's find him.
Speaker 2: You should find him. I mean, he's If
Speaker 0: you have the name, you can find him.
Speaker 2: Officer little bit? We we found some stuff on. He's from, like,
Speaker 1: Coachella? California? California?
Speaker 0: From the place of concert center? Yeah. Yeah. That's I'll find it for you.
Speaker 2: Yeah. That's Somebody told me, like, oh, he's Coachella guy. And I was like, is he the constant? Like, no. He's from the city.
Oh. Oh. Oh. He has a catalog? He has a different Local Coachella News did a thing about bit about it?
Because he got some award or something to be in capital at in the capital police in that day. But he's the one in the video where he's offering him water. And he looks shell shop? Yeah. That's why I was trying to he did Look.
Speaker 0: I look for him. I look for him.
Speaker 1: I did a comment, so I know that being his buddy's trying to talk to me. He's like Yeah.
Speaker 0: Clipped since all we're like and, can I tell you that story? Yeah. So her condition was she took home in front of her wall the Nancy Pelosi office of the speaker sign. Oh, yeah. So she was one of the people I wanted to get to really early because know that that if I went to something like that and I took something long from my wall, I know that it It's a memento and not a step.
Right. Right. Right. I knew. She's 21 years old.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 0: Right. This is not Right. What they're making it seem.
Speaker 2: Right. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: So I had lunch with her at her country club. And I was like, so what were you doing there? She's like this. Well, like, I think I went from Missouri before. Barely finished this, like, farm Right.
Works on a farm. So what do you do for a lover from a family farm? I was like, and they're turning her like, public enemy number 1. And she's the most, like, almost almost you must feel sad that she's so Luckily, she has the lawyer, and the lawyer got it down. I mean, they walked to her bedroom and this whole thing on the wall.
Right? So you think, oh, she's gonna go down. Got a misdemeanor. Nothing nothing nothing. And we're walking to get probation.
But on the night of the anniversary of January 6th, She's drunk in a bar.
Speaker 1: She got a DUI?
Speaker 0: And got killed a mother.
Speaker 2: Oh, she killed them. That's right.
Speaker 0: And it's clear. Mistake? And now I'm just because I know her.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 0: What happened was when the local news starts to your guys in the army. Yeah. They they took shit. And she's like a 21 year old farm girl.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: So she I mean, it wasn't really her her nature, I think, to meet her. Anyway, way was treated her way to whisper the matter in the country club. She's got
Speaker 2: You got DUI mask on.
Speaker 0: Charged her yet because they haven't got in touch with college or
Speaker 1: with sports medicine. Uh-huh.
Speaker 0: And I was with her Monday, and she said, I don't even remember any of it. And then She got she herself got, Like, like, blacked out. She was blacked out the whole time. Doesn't remember any of it.
Speaker 1: And who who did she kill?
Speaker 0: Or The mother. She killed them. Her unknown problem, honey.
Speaker 2: She rode against traffic
Speaker 0: for 6 miles. 6 miles at 60 miles an hour. And she She doesn't remember anything. Into a
Speaker 2: car and this woman who was sitting next to her husband who drove husband in the hospital right diet?
Speaker 1: I I heard a bug on a lie later. No.
Speaker 0: But that's an example of, like, chance If you go deep, if you're really a deep it's like that's an example of, like, the kind of damage that I need. You can say, oh, we need this and shoot me fairly and they're full of shit. That's fine.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: But, like, it's not ruining your life. This has ruined her life. Mhmm. And Junior 6 was like a blip. Oh, no.
But there's attention from it. Right. Right. It's free
Speaker 1: traffic. Yeah.
Speaker 0: They're cool.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: Because it takes a lot of time too?
Speaker 1: No. But it not I don't mean just the the words itself, but when you have people implement I have people calling from I have nothing to do with my business. They're stealing bad reviews on my website saying, oh, it's erection disorder. I had my secretary that's scared of going to work because she's saying Wait.
Speaker 2: Hold on, hon. It's not a bad need
Speaker 0: to have so I can move
Speaker 2: my life or Well, you got the powder too. I got it.
Speaker 1: I had maybe what's on? Like, like, the anthrax.
Speaker 2: I think, yeah, we had to call out the the cops, the ups
Speaker 0: the Why do people why it could be it was so weird.
Speaker 2: People are so weird. And it tested positive. The first test And so And they said that somebody who knows what they're doing made sure that the the first test, it'll test positive, like a like a field test. It'll pass that until they do the actual chemical. A like, it was very premeditated.
It and have, like, a letter, like, to a oh, probably I didn't get
Speaker 1: a watch down and pass message.
Speaker 2: In reference the the beep? Oh, no. You're thinking too loudly now. How do you like this?
Speaker 1: I opened the letter. I went to work. I thought it was a pump bill or something. And when I opened my diaper, I just went like that. White powder came out.
I was thinking already. Alright. Anthrax or something like that. Who knows? Crazy people.
Speaker 2: And the FBI guy shows up and they're and they were they were more like it's almost like they were more interested in searching his office. You know, we were like, we didn't even trust them because they were like using it like, oh, who is he? And then we had to get the postal inspector out there to try and, like, who it was like a jurisdictional thing. Yeah.
Speaker 1: It was
Speaker 2: it was a mess.
Speaker 1: Yeah. My employees I have about a Twenty employees. They're worried.
Speaker 0: Don't you just an outstanding member of society? Okay. Do they talk about that in the court? No. Of course a That's interesting.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Like I said, no.
Speaker 2: I've heard nothing wrong with that. At the trial, they will. At the trial, yeah. Status hearings is
Speaker 1: very Yeah. But they're gonna probably gonna call me by supremacists. As a matter of fact, I I want it in Spanish. That was my first language.
Speaker 2: So That would be fine.
Speaker 1: I wanna interpreter for my next question?
Speaker 0: Okay. So I want you to know that I'm from New York City, and I am was always a long time real friends with Gavin McGinnis, who supposedly got it started
Speaker 2: with Brad Boys. Yes.
Speaker 0: And he when you say this is a drinking club, I'm just telling you guys, I don't know what the Proud Boys is, but I know who Gavin is. I went on road trips with them to parties. Mhmm. It was so comical to me when I first started hearing about, like, time? This is, like, years ago, they started saying in Brooklyn where he's from.
16. I was like, what? This guy I mean, he may take he may touch it, but so that's why it's funny to me.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Like I said, we'll sit around the table or call each other. Hey. Where do you wanna meet up? Can you figure out where to go eat?
And it's like No.
Speaker 0: I know I know the I mean, I know the Brooklyn version of those guys, and I was just like so I just want you to know that. Like, I have a whole history with these people. I'm like,
BOMBSHELL! Nancy Pelosi’s Daughter Caught on Tape REFUTING the J6 Narrative!
NEVER BEFORE SEEN VIDEO: Nancy Pelosi’s Filmmaker Daughter Alexandra Pelosi Caught on Tape REFUTING J6 NARRATIVE – Admitting Jan. 6 Protests Not an Insurrection, DC Courts Too Biased Read the breakdow
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
The J6 Committee lied about what happened as tapes were eventually released by Tucker Carlson. This tape overturns the single most powerful political lie democrats have used regarding J6. It gets even better… The J6 committee KNEW Brian Sitnick was alive and well after he was supposedly “murdered” by Trump supporters. The investigators working on behalf of the J6 committee saw this footage & electronically bookmarked the this tape, but it never saw the light of day… until Tucker Carlson. https://rumble.com/v2c0y5c-january-6-new-video-shatters-narrative-on-police-officer-brian-sitnick-deat.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6th, there were claims of a deadly insurrection at the Capitol, but the video evidence shows otherwise. While some violence occurred, the majority of the chaos was peaceful. The media falsely reported that Officer Brian Sicknick was killed by the mob, but surveillance footage shows him walking in the Capitol unharmed. This contradicts the narrative that he was murdered by Trump supporters. The January 6th committee had access to this footage but chose not to release it, as it would undermine their political agenda. The truth about what happened that day is being concealed for political gain.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Within hours of January 6th, literally hours, you began to hear that day described as a deadly insurrection, not described by 1 news outlet or 1 politician, but in unison by all of them. Almost like it was coordinated, a deadly insurrection. That's how history may record January 6th. But the tape that we reviewed from within the building on that day proves it was neither an insurrection nor deadly. Here it is.
Dis January 6th, when an estimated 2,000 rioters breached the capitol building, causing the deaths of 5 police officers.
Speaker 1: Certain dates echo throughout history. December 7, 1941, September 11, 2001, And January 6th. The mob beat officers with anything they had on them, hockey stick, flagpole, a fire extinguisher. Diss Police officers died.
Speaker 0: Donald Trump supporters who, of course, rioted and killed police officers. By the evening of January 6th, the Democratic Party and its publicist in the national news media had settled on a description of what had happened that day. They distilled an enormous number of highly complex events, events that even now we don't fully understand, into a single emotionally related political slogan, which they repeated for years with remarkable discipline. January 6th, they said, was a deadly insurrection. There was a deadly insurrection that the right wing is trying to cover up.
He incited a deadly insurrection.
Speaker 1: Incited a deadly insurrection.
Speaker 2: The violent deadly insurrection on the Capitol 9 months just Go. It was about white supremacy in my view.
Speaker 0: A deadly insurrection. Everything about that phrase is a lie. Very little about January 6th was organized were violent. Surveillance video from inside the Capitol shows mostly peaceful chaos, but the slogan worked. The term deadly carries enormous emotional power, which is why they used it.
To prove the insurrection was deadly, just began disappointed to the death of an officer called Brian Sicknick. The mob killed officer Brian Sicknick. That's what they said. It was their single most powerful indictment of the January 6th protesters and of Donald Trump and of Republican voters nationally. They repeated that claim for years.
They are still repeating it. At first, they told the country that officer Cichnek was murdered with a fire extinguisher. Officer Brian Cichnek died after being hit in the head with a fire distinguish her during the fight. That story came from the New York Times, which is effectively the assignment editor for most of the rest of American media. It was a lie, untrue in any way.
But only after that lie had hardened into conventional wisdom did the newspaper bother to retract it.
Speaker 1: The New York Times has dis Quietly retracted its story about the death of Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick.
Speaker 0: The damage had been done. Brian Sicknick himself, a Trump disorder, had been transformed without his consent into a political martyr of the left. His memory was shamelessly exploited by the incoming Biden administration. In February of 2021, Sicknick's body lay in state in the capital rotunda, where a parade of the politicians made use of it. Here's Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: Breaking down the doors, trying to overturn an outcome of election, And killing several police officers in the meantime.
Speaker 0: But Brian Cygnik should not be reduced to a prop for the political ambitions of the Democratic Party. He was a human being. The facts of his life matter, including how he died. To this day, media accounts describe Sicknick as someone who was, quote, slain on January 6th. The video we reviewed proves that is a lie.
Here is surveillance footage of Sicknick walking in the capital after he was supposedly murdered by the mob outside. By all appearances, Sicknick is healthy and vigorous. He's wearing a helmet, so it's hard to imagine he was killed by a head injury. Whatever happened to Brian Sicknick was very obviously not the result of violence he suffered at the entrance to the Capitol. This tape overturns the single most powerful and politically useful lie the Democrats have told us about January 6th, dis and it was indeed a lie.
The January 6th committee knew perfectly well that Brian Sicknick was walking normally through just after he was supposedly murdered by Trump supporters, and they know that because they saw this tape. We can be sure because the footage which contains an electronic bookmark that is still archived in the capital's computer system. That means that investigators working for the Democratic Party he reviewed this tape. They saw it, but they refused to release the tape to the public. Why?
Because this tape would shatter the fraud they were perpetrating on the country because hiding the truth disturb their political interests. They lied about the police officer they claimed to revere. If they were willing to do
January 6: New Video Shatters Narrative on how Police Officer Brian Sickick Died! The J6 Committee KNEW & Ignored it!
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
The best person to talk to on law enforcement side would be the Capitol Police Chief… but for some reason he was silenced… Fox News Deleted this Scene from Tucker Carlson’s Interview with the Capitol Police Chief “Leaks” Saying, “It was a Cover Up!” Why would Fox News delete this scene? “If people were reporting to intelligence correctly. If I was allowed to do my job as the chief, we wouldn’t be here. Then seeing how, you’re lambasted in public & everything appears to be a cover up. Like I said, I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but when you look at the information and intelligence they had, the military had, it’s all watered down. I’m not getting intelligence, I’m denied any support from National Guard in advance. I’m denied National Guard while we’re under attack, for 71 minutes…” https://rumble.com/v34749c-january-6-fox-news-deletes-capitol-police-chief-saying-it-was-a-cover-up.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration at not being allowed to testify at a Senate hearing and believes that if intelligence had been reported correctly, the events of January 6th could have been prevented. They question whether there was a deliberate attempt to hide intelligence and suggest that it may have been part of a larger plan. The speaker also discusses how the events have benefited the Democratic Party but believes it is a violation of the constitution. They emphasize the importance of a fair legal system and express concern that it is no longer perceived as such.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very restrained and rational and not give a statement, obviously, but the facts that you're describing are shocking.
Speaker 1: The reason why I've had a lot of people ask me, you know, why did you write this book? I try to do what I can to get the truth out. Yes. You know, they didn't want me to testify in, in February February 23rd at the senate hearing. They don't want people that's still In positions, I actually had to go in and talk to a friend of mine on one of the oversight committees say, I will come there in person.
I want to be there. I want to testify. So I'm glad you think I'm reserved. I'm, you know, to be honest with you, I'm a little pissed off, because If if people were reporting intelligence correctly, if I was allowed to do my job as the chief, I got a significant experience. I was allowed to do my job as chief, We wouldn't be here today.
This didn't happen. Then see how, you know, you're out there, you're land based in public, and it's all you know, everything Appears to be a cover up. Like I said, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but when you look at the information intelligence that it had, military had, it's all watered down. I'm not getting intelligence. I'm denied support National Guard in advance.
I'm denied National Guard while we're under attack for 71 minutes. You're in a fight? Yeah. A fight for a couple of minutes.
Speaker 0: Yeah. 1 you out. 1 minute.
Speaker 1: I was gonna say, 60 seconds, 3 minutes. Hey. Let me tell you. It wears you out. My officers were fighting for 80 minutes before the the protesters Wait.
Speaker 0: Can I say so you describe this as a failure to get the intelligence people who needed it? But it sounds like worse than it sounds like they were hiding the intelligence.
Speaker 1: And that's what I'm getting at is Could there possibly be that actually did something happen and kinda wanted something happen? It doesn't it's not a far stretch to begin.
Speaker 0: I don't know what the other explanation is.
Speaker 1: It's sad when you start putting everything together and thinking about the way this played out. It gets concerning what was our end goal. You look at look at what's happening. Was that their end goal? I don't know.
Speaker 0: Well, I mean, there's no question that what happened on January 6th as really helped the Democratic Party. It's bravely politicized the U. S. Military And the intelligence agencies and the FBI, and those are all, I think, bad for America and violations of The constitution, but they're all good for the Democratic Party. That's the fact.
Like, that's what happened.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. And I I write about that because As a cop of 30 years, I'm I'm a rule of law type of guy. Yeah. You know, there's a reason that Lady Justice is depicted with a blindfold. As soon as you cut that blindfold off, the fairness of our legal system goes out goes out the window.
And that is exactly what has happened. They have stripped up blindfold away from Lady Justice, And there no. It's not perceived as being fair anymore.
January 6 - Fox News Deletes Capitol Police Chief Saying it was a Cover Up in Tucker Carlson Interview
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
After Tucker Carlson was Freed from Fox… he interviewed, then Capitol Police Chief, Steve Sund again… this time no filters. Four Clips. Four Breakdowns. Intelligence Failures, They Knew, Pelosi & McConnell were in On It. Nancy Pelosi Withheld the National Guard CLIP 1 January 6 - Former Capital Police Chief Steve Sund Wasn’t Told About Key Intelligence over Concerns of Violence From FBI Steve D’Antuono, Chris Miller & General Milley A senate report talks about multiple emails that were circulating just days prior to January 6, talking about the violence they were anticipating at the Capital. Steve Sund had a video call with FBI Steve D’Antuono prior to J6 and there were no mentions of violence. Here’s where it gets weird… The then Secretary of Defense, Chris Miller, along with General Milley both discussed locking down the city of Washington DC, because “they were worried about violence” & revoking permits on Capital Hill. “You know who issues the permits on Capital Hill for demonstrations? I do. You know who wasn’t told? Me.” On January 4th, Chris Miller puts out a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying various weapons, although internally they were expecting violence. 🤔 This action also affected the National Guard of Virginia & Maryland from being allowed to respond at first. This Clip https://rumble.com/v36droa-january-6-steve-sund-wasnt-told-about-key-intelligence-over-concerns-of-vio.html CLIP 2 January 6 - Steve Sund- General Milley Had Intel on Plans to Kill Members of Congress & Attack the Capital, Kept it from the Capital Police Chief, only Select Members of Congress An investigative reporter from The Washington Post discovered General Milley was using an intelligence platform called DataMinr to come across intelligence on his own. “He’s picking up intelligence talking about killing members of Congress & attacking the Capital, and he’s not telling me. He’s telling select members of Congress That’s concerning as hell!” This Clip https://rumble.com/v36dyu3-january-6-steve-sund-general-milley-had-intelligence-of-violence-and-murder.html CLIP 3 January 6 - Nancy Pelosi & Mitch McConnell Were in on it! They Denied Capital Police Chief Steve Sund with Federal Assistance TWICE Tucker: This was handled very difference— by whom? Steve Sund: 1. By the intelligence agencies 2. By the Military “Congress passed a law that requires me to go the Sergeant of Arms (Capital Police Board) in advance of an event to request Federal Resources such as the National Guard. I was denied Twice, by the Sargent of Arms Paul D. Irving & Sargent of Arms Michael Conrad Stenger who BOTH resigned January 7, 2021.” WHO DO THEY WORK FOR? Nancy Pelosi on the House Side. Mitch McConnel on the Senate Side. Notice Tucker was fishing for just this answer. BOOM! This Video https://rumble.com/v36e4ue-january-6-nancy-pelosi-and-mitch-mcconnell-denied-steve-sund-federal-assist.html CLIP 4 January 6 - For 71 Minutes Nancy Pelosi Refused to Bring in the National Guard “I’m the only Chief of Police that in the United States that has a law to bring in the National Guard” 12:58pm “I make my first call to the Sargent of Arms Paul Irving, requesting a Declaration of Emergency & bring in the military & Federal resources.” Paul Irving Responds: “I’ll run it up the Chain, I’ll get back to you.” —> Nancy Pelosi Paul Irving “didn’t have to run it up the chain (Pelosi) because it was an emergency, but he wouldn’t grant authorization. “My next call was over to Mike Stenger. Mike Stenger Responded: What did Paul tell you? Let’s wait to hear from Paul. 71 minutes go by & I make 32 calls. 71<>17 “The first people to offer assistance was the United States Secret Service. By law, I shouldn’t have requested their assistance until I had approval. But I’m looking at my men & women having their added handed to them, and my first thought was F*ck it! I will take whatever discipline there is.” That’s the one text the Secret Service turned over after they “lost all their texts” 🤔 2:09pm 71 minutes later, Steve Sund is finally given approval for the National Guard This Clip https://rumble.com/v36ec9w-january-6-71-minutes-to-get-federal-assistance.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Steve D'Antwono, the FBI director, received multiple emails warning about the violence expected at the Capitol before January 6th, but nothing was mentioned during a video call with him. The military had discussed locking down Washington DC and revoking permits on Capitol Hill due to concerns about violence. However, on January 4th, the acting secretary of defense issued a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying weapons or equipment for crowd control. This decision hindered the National Guard's response when assistance was desperately needed on January 6th. Governor Hogan even pleaded for help but was denied due to the memo. The situation doesn't make sense.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Steve D'Antwono, who's the Washington field office, FBI director, you look at the GAO report that came out February of this year, it talks about, multiple emails. It's a GAO report or maybe no, it's a Senate report that just came out, in July, just last month, talks about multiple emails going to Steve D'Antwonio on Sunday, Monday and some probably Tuesday, just the days before, talking about the violence that they're predicting coming up to the capital. And I have a video call with him on that Tuesday and nothing said about it. I mean, that's not a word, not a word.
Speaker 1: So not to repeat myself, but that does not make sense.
Speaker 0: It doesn't. It doesn't. Especially when you think about think about this, the military, the United States military, and this gets really convoluted once you get into the bonds on January 6 and how I was delayed getting resources. You have the United States military, secretary of defense or acting secretary of defense Miller enacting and, General Milley had both discussed locking down the city of Washington DC because they were so worried about violence at the capitol on January 6th Sunday and Monday, they had been discussing locking down the city, revoking permits on Capitol Hill because of the concern for violence. You know who issues the permits on Capitol Hills for demonstrations?
I do. You know who wasn't told? Me. Instead, on January 4th, what does Miller deal. He puts out a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying various weapons, any weapons, any civil disobedience equipment that would be utilized for the very demonstrations or violence that he sees coming.
It just doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 1: Wait. Wait. So The military says we're so concerned about potential imminent violence that we are considering shutting down the city. But at the very same time, they decide that the National Guard can't adopt an aggressive posture.
Speaker 0: Right. Right. They're deploying because they're going to be deploying National regard to assist in Washington DC with crowd control at metros and some of the traffic, control areas. But they put this out on January 4th, specific to January 5th 6th, and this direction affected the National Guard in Virginia and Maryland. When I was calling begging for assistance on January 6th, they weren't allowed to respond at first.
Look at, governor Hogan. He did a press conference saying he was begging to respond and he was not being denied by the Pentagon, all because of the memo.
Video Transcript AI Summary
General Milley, the military's top officer, has been accused of using an intelligence platform called Data Miner to uncover information about potential threats to the United States Capitol and members of Congress. However, he allegedly failed to inform everyone who should have been notified, including the speaker. This raises concerns about the duty to warn and the need for necessary action to be taken. The details were revealed by investigative reporter Carol Leonning in her book.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Begging to respond and who is not being denied by the Pentagon all because of the memo. So why? You begin to wonder why and especially when you look at things like something that I recently came across, when you talk about the military. General Milley, we're now finding out, and it's not for me, this is from Carol Leonning, investigative reporter with The Washington Post, Has found that he was using Data Miner on his own coming across intelligence Tell us what Data Miner is. So Data Miner is an intelligence platform.
It's not something your average citizen would have on their A computer. I I guess it goes in and does crawling across webs. I'm not really sure how it works. Yes. But it's not your it's a it's an intelligence platform.
He's picking up intelligence talking about killing members of congress and attacking the United States Capitol, and he's not telling me. He's telling select members of congress. I mean, Carol Wenning writes about it in her book. That's concerning as hell because as the chief of police, you know, he there's a duty to warn there, and I should be told so I can take the necessary action. I don't know who else he was telling, but he sure wasn't telling me.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that the handling of the event was different from previous situations. They mention that the decision was made by the intelligence agency and the military. According to a federal law, the speaker was required to request federal resources like the National Guard in advance from the Capitol Police Board. However, they were denied twice due to optics and lack of intelligence support. The decision was made by Paul Irving and Mike Stenger, who work for Pelosi and McConnell respectively.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Big picture, just to restate, you've seen many things like this. And as you just said, this was very different. This was handled very differently. By whom?
Speaker 1: By by the intelligence. I'd say 1 by the intelligence agency, 2 by the military. So the reason why I say the military, think of this, By federal law. You know, congress passed a law that that requires me to go to the 2 to the Sergeant Arms Capitol Police Board In advance of an event and to request, federal resources such as the National Guard. So congress passed a law.
It's 2 US code 1970. Look it up. Just make sure you look it up before December 22 when they changed it. So what was in effect on the 6th? That requires me to go and get approval For bringing in National Guard or federal assistance in advance, I have to go to the Capitol Police Board and get approval from congressional leadership in advance like I did on January 3rd.
I'm denied twice Because of optics and because the intelligence didn't support it. So think about that.
Speaker 0: May I ask you who made that decision? Who denied you?
Speaker 1: I was denied by Paul Irving, House Sergeant Arms, and also Mike Stenger, senate sergeant arms. And who do they On January 3rd
Speaker 0: Who do they work for?
Speaker 1: It would have been working for Pelosi on the house side, that Pelosi was the number one boss And then McConnell on the Senate side.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, who is the chief of police, expresses frustration over the law that prevents them from bringing in the national guard without approval. They recount the events of the attack on the Capitol and their efforts to request assistance. They made multiple calls to different agencies, including the sergeant in arms and the chairman of the Capitol Police Board, but authorization was delayed for 71 minutes. Finally, at 2:09, they received approval and immediately informed their colleague. The speaker emphasizes their anger and marks the time as 2:10 when they finally got approval for the National Guard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the Capitol Police Board I mean, it's it's unbelievable that I'm I'm the only chief of police in the United States that has a law preventing me, not just regulations, rules that say I gotta go and need approval to bring in the national guard, a law. So that's crazy that congress is gonna pass a law that controls what I can do to protect the capital and even in emergencies. So think of this. Even while we're under attack, I have to go to those same 2 people to request the national guard to be brought in. I have 340 national guard that have been activated.
At least a 150 to a 180 of are in the city, many of them within eyesight of the capital. Okay? We get to come under attack at 12:53. 12:55, I called the Washington DC Police Department. I their assistant chief, Jeff Carroll.
Thank god I had talked to him at 10:59 in the morning and asked him if he could possibly put some additional resource on Constitution Avenue, and he had some CDU, platoons up there. Called him and said, hey. Please send those in right away because we knew as soon as they they came to their west front and they started attacking, it was gonna be bad. 12/58, I make my 1st call to the sergeant in arms asking, saying, hey, it's bad. We need assistance.
I need a declaration of emergency. I need to bring in the military immediately and federal resources. I'm told by Paul Irving quote, I'm gonna run up the chain. I'll get back to you.
Speaker 1: The chain is Pelosi.
Speaker 0: The chain is his chain would be up to Nancy Pelosi. He didn't have to do that, but he wouldn't give me authorization. The the law says in a mercy, he can grant me authorization, but he didn't. He said he'd run up the chain. My next call was over to Mike Stenger.
He's the now with the chairman of the Capitol Police Board. Told them the same thing. We're getting our asses handed to us on the left front. I need federal resources. He said, what did Paul tell you?
Said he's run up the chain. Let's wait to hear what we hear from Paul. Sorry. So for the next 71 minutes, I make 32 calls. I'm in the command center.
I'm calling my partner agencies. And by law, you know, one of the first people to offer assistance was United States Secret Service. And by law, I shouldn't have requested their assistance. You know, I shouldn't be until I had approval, but I'm looking at my men and women having their asses handed to them. And and my first thought was fuck it.
I will take whatever discipline there is. Send me whatever you got. No. That's the 1 tech secret service turned over. You know how they lost all their texts?
Yes. It's the text between their, chief chief Sullivan and myself. Thank god for him.
Speaker 1: I don't so can we just so you make this call immediately Immediately. To the house sergeant in arms who reports mister Irving who reports to Nancy Pelosi. He says I'll call Pelosi.
Speaker 0: He says I'm a run it up the chain.
Speaker 1: Run it up the chain, but that is the chain.
Speaker 0: Not here. Not here. I got you. I'm just I wanna tell you exactly what
Speaker 1: you mean. What happens then? Does he get back to you?
Speaker 0: So for the next 71 minutes, I make the 32 calls to tie a number of agencies. 11 of those calls are follow-up calls. And look in the the senate combined report from from 2001. They have a great infographic of the call after call after call after call. 11 times I call, and the next several minutes going, where are we on the approval?
Where are we in the approval? Just any minute now. Any minute I'm gonna get in any minute. Finally, at 209, 71 minutes later, 209, I'm finally given approval. Think about that.
71 minutes later, I immediately called Mike Stenger, said we've got approval. I was so pissed off. I made sure that this watch commander, I'm in the command center. I yelled to John Wisham, the lieutenant that's my watch commander. I said, John, mark the time as 2/10.
I finally got approval for the National Guard. I was that mad
January 6 - Steve Sund Wasn’t Told About Key Intelligence over Concerns of Violence From Chris Miller & General Miller
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
January 6 - General Milley Had Intel on Plans to Kill Members of Congress & Attack the Capital, But Didn’t Share it with The Capital Police Chief, only Select Members of Congress
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
January 6 - Nancy Pelosi & Mitch McConnell Were in on It! Denied Steve Sund Federal Assistance Twice
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
January 6 - For 71 Minutes Nancy Pelosi Refused to Bring in the National Guard
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
Four More Clips of then Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund • They don’t want to get to the bottom of J6 • They Did Not Want The Capitol Police Chief to Testify • Nancy Pelosi was Off Limits & wasn’t allowed to be investigated • The Pentagon Call & the Set Up CLIP 1 When the Former Capital Police Chief who was there on January 6 says “it doesn’t seem like people want to get to the bottom of J6” That alone says everything. https://rumble.com/v36eiub-january-6-steve-sund-it-doesnt-seem-like-people-want-to-get-to-the-bottom-o.html CLIP 2 January 6 - They Didn’t Want The Chief of Capital Police to Testify “I fought to testify, they didn’t want me to testify in the Senate Hearing. When they first put out the notice, it was for only current employees that were still in place. - This would exclude Paul Irving, who reports to Nancy Pelosi. - It would have excluded Mike Stenger, who reports to Mitch McConnell. It would have excluded, Steve Sund, the Capital Police Chief. ….All The key people at the top of the security apparatus who would know the answers to the key questions. This Clip https://rumble.com/v36emna-january-6-they-didnt-want-the-chief-of-capital-police-to-testify-in-the-j6-.html CLIP 3 Oh Snaps 👀 January 6 - Democrat Bennie Thompson Said Nancy Pelosi was “OFF LIMITS” for any Inquiry into January 6 “When they were talking about the the January 6 Committee coming out, I think it was Representative Bennie Thompson that said, Speaker Pelosi was OFF LIMITS… So they wouldn’t get any of her records, her phone records, and any inquiries into January 6.” OH BOY! I hope to God Trump uses his Subpoena Power on that evil WITCH! This Clip https://rumble.com/v36etwx-january-6-bennie-thompson-said-nancy-pelosi-was-off-limits-for-inquiry-into.html CLIP 4 January 6 - Steve Sund - The Pentagon Call with Walter Piatt & General Charles Flynn - Tucker “It Sounds like a Set-Up!” Verrry Interesting… 2:34pm “I get a notification to get on a call with the US Pentagon. I have to sell my request for the National Guard. I’m on the call with a Lieutenant [Walter] Piatt, and General [Charles] Flynn… and it was mainly General Piatt that I’m speaking with. **I’m assuming it’s Charles Flynn given I don’t know any other active General with the name Flynn. Interesting he’s on this call. 🤔 Piatt’s Response: “I don’t like the optics of the National Guard on Capital Hill.” “While I’m begging for assistance, The Pentagon sent in resources to guard General’s houses to protect their homes & not the [US Capital]. So you begin to think, it seems a little conspiratorial. I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but I can see where somebody can begin to go down that rabbit hole.” 🕳️.. . … 🐇 All people & agencies involved all came to the same conclusion that they were not going to protect the US Capital. This Video https://rumble.com/v36fd1n-january-6-steve-sund-call-with-walter-piatt-and-general-flynn-it-sounds-lik.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expressed confusion about the lack of answers regarding two significant events on January 6. Firstly, other federal agencies withheld crucial information from the speaker, who was in charge of security at the Capitol. Secondly, despite the situation escalating for 71 minutes, Speaker Pelosi denied permission to bring in the National Guard. The speaker questioned why there is a lack of investigation into these matters, suggesting a lack of interest in uncovering the truth. The situation is described as worsening beyond these events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't understand. So we I don't they were only 10 minutes into this, and you've told me 2 things. 1, the other federal agencies withheld critical information from you in charge of security at the capital before January 6. And once it started and things got out of control for 71 minutes, Pelosi refused to allow you to bring in the National Guard. So those are just those are 2 of the biggest questions from January 6.
And my question is, why don't we have answers to why that happened? It doesn't seem like people really want to get to the bottom of it. It really it really doesn't. And it just gets worse. It gets worse from there.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks why Paul Irving, who had the authority, didn't give the okay. Speaker 1 explains that he testified at the Senate hearing in 2021 and disagreed with Speaker 1's recollection. Speaker 1 turned over his phone records and fought to testify. Speaker 0 questions why Speaker 1 wasn't allowed to testify since he was the chief of Capitol Police on January 6th. Speaker 1 explains that initially, the hearing was only for current employees, excluding the top 3 people in security. Speaker 1 called someone on the rules committee to request testifying and promised to show up in person. Speaker 0 highlights the denial of Speaker 1's request for national guardsmen, which was a pivotal moment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Paul Irving, the guy who had, you're saying, the statutory authority to to give that okay to, Has he ever explained why he didn't?
Speaker 1: Oh, his they had him, and he testified at the Senate hearing in 2001. In 2021? I'm sorry. 2021. My apologies.
Thank you for catching. And a couple of times, he he, disagreed with my recollection. I can tell you my phone records. I turned them over immediately. I fought to testify.
They didn't want me to testify in the Senate hearing. I fought to testify.
Speaker 0: Why wouldn't there's no share. Why who didn't want you to testify? You were the chief of Capitol Police on January 6th.
Speaker 1: You and me are on lockstep with this. And my story hasn't changed in two and a half years. So when they first put out the notice, when they were talking about having the hearing, it was only for current employees that were still in place. No long no one that was no longer in place in their position in security. So think about that.
Initially, when they put up the request to have the and they put up the they were talking about having the hearing, it would have excluded Paul Irving, would have excluded Mike Stinger, and it would have excluded me. Only 3 people, the 3 people at the top of the security apparatus. So the
Speaker 0: Democrats, I think.
Speaker 1: Well, it was joint. It was a combined joint. I hear you.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. You're absolutely right. Of course. The unit party intentionally excluded the 3 people who would know the answers to the key questions.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the original plan was to exclude them. I immediately called somebody I knew on the rules committee And said, please let me testify. I will be there in person. And I still remember, she said, you'll show up in person. I said, I promise you, I will be there in person.
I want to testify. And I was the only one that showed up in person.
Speaker 0: It just seems like the denial of your request to have national guardsmen who are within eyesight, and you saw them, to have them help. That is it. That's a pivotal moment on that day. And we know the name
Video Transcript AI Summary
The denial of the request for national guardsmen on January 6th remains a pivotal moment. The person responsible for that decision is known, but the reason behind it is still unknown. There has been no answer to that question. Additionally, Representative Bennie Thompson stated that Speaker Pelosi was off limits and her records would not be obtained by the J6 committee. However, she was in charge of the House that day. It is important to uncover the truth and understand what truly happened. Otherwise, it seems absurd, like a scene from a play.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It just seems like the denial of your request to have national guardsmen who are within eyesight, and you saw them, to have them help, that is that's a pivotal moment on that day. And we know the name of the man who made that decision. And we still don't know why he made that decision. And that's just shocking to me. What has he ever answered that question?
Speaker 1: No. He's he's never answered that question Specifically, that I'm aware of. And I do know when they were talking about the j six, committee coming out, I think it was, representative Bennie Thompson that had said Speaker Pelosi is off limits, so they wouldn't get any of her records, her phone records. What do you
Speaker 0: mean she's off limits?
Speaker 1: I believe that was one of the things he said that that her coming into this was she was off limits to the inquiries to the Jane years.
Speaker 0: Well, she was running the house that day.
Speaker 1: I hear you. I hear you. That I mean, if
Speaker 0: we're truly trying to get
Speaker 1: to the bottom of this, to find out what happened.
Speaker 0: Other than that, missus Lincoln, I mean, that's insane.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker urgently called General Walker to request the National Guard's assistance at the Capitol. Despite the imminent danger, the speaker faced resistance from higher-ups who didn't like the optics of the National Guard's presence. The speaker pleaded for help, but was denied multiple times. Eventually, shots were fired, and the speaker had to hang up to handle the situation. The National Guard didn't arrive until 6 PM, and instead of being deployed at the Capitol, they were driven back to the DC Army. The speaker felt betrayed and questioned if there was a conspiracy against protecting the Capitol. The systematic denial of intelligence and support from various agencies led to the baffling conclusion of not protecting the capital.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Called general Walker at 151. I was like, I can't wait any freaking longer. I call him. I said, send me the National Guard as quick as you can. I'm gonna get approval any minute because he asked, so you have approval from the Capitol Police Board?
And I said I'll have approval any minute. Please just get them coming this way. So they're within eyesight. Shortly after 209, I talked to them. 234, I get a notification to get on the call with United States Pentagon.
I have to sell my request to the National Guard. Along the call with a lieutenant general Piat Piat, trying to make sure I have his name pronounced right, and a, general Flynn is on the call. Ever and it's mainly a pilot that I'm, that I'm speaking with. I get on the call, Mayor Bautista on the call, Chief Conti is on the call, And I said, I need the National Guard immediately. This is an urgent, urgent situation.
I still remember saying urgent twice. This is urgent, urgent. They're gonna be looking at the same TVs I'm looking at. Ever I need the National Guard immediately. You know what his response is?
Don't like the optics of the National Guard on Capitol Hill. Ever like, he goes, I would rather have your officers in the fight, and we can backfill your officer somewhere else. I said, I don't have that option. All my officers are in the fight. He goes, I'm telling you, I don't like the option of the National Guard.
You know, I don't like the optics of the National Guard and the Hill. I said, sir, we're having our asses hand to us. This is life or death. I need assistance immediately. Ever.
And I still remember he said, you know, my recommendation is not to support the request. I still remember Robert Contee going, woah. Woah. Hold on. You're denying the chief of the Capitol Police?
And, he goes, Vegas said, not that we're denying him. I just don't like the optics of the National Guard on Capitol Hill. Have and he goes, I'd rather and he goes back to that again. I'd rather back to all your people. I said, sure, I don't have that option.
Speaker 1: This sounds like a setup to me. I'm sorry. It does. It gets better.
Speaker 0: So ever I beg and beg, and he goes, well, I'm gonna walk down the hall and, you know, we'll talk to the secretary of defense or whoever is gonna he's gonna talk to. Have, right then, I get notification. Oh, so I'm still still on the call. We have the shooting of Ashley Dabbit. And I said, we have shots fired.
I still remember yelling over the phone. We have shots fired on the USAI capital. Is that urgent enough for you now? Hang up the phone because now I gotta start making a notification. Gotta call the sergeant army saying, hey.
We got what looks like maybe a confirmed shooting. Do you know when the National Guard finally arrived? Have a 6 PM. 6 PM, they're sworn in on post. Do you know those National Guard, the 150 to a 180 that are within eyesight of the capital?
You know what they do with them? They put them in vehicles, drive them around the Capitol back to the DC Army. You know where the DC Army is. It's far away. Yeah.
Washington, White House is on one side, United States Capitol, DC Army, almost equidistant on the other RFK Stadium. Yeah. Via RFK Stadium. They drive them back then, and they send me in the evening trips. Not real.
Can you freaking believe it? No. That's real. That's real. And you know what else I do?
While I'm begging for assistance, depending on sending resources to general's houses to protect their homes, but not me. So you begin to think it seems a little conspiratorial. I can see where somebody I'm not, you know, a conspiracy theorist, but But I could see where people begin to go down that rabbit hole real quick.
Speaker 1: That rabbit hole. I mean, I don't know what the other conclusion is because, look, Under pressure, people make mistakes and make bad decisions. But you're describing a systematic denial of intelligence And then of support, defense through a whole bunch of different agencies, a whole bunch of different people, all reaching the same have a baffling conclusion that we're not going to protect the capital.
January 6 - Steve Sund - It Doesn’t Seem Like People want to Get to the Bottom of It
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
January 6 - They Didn’t Want The Chief of Capital Police to Testify in the J6 Committee
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
January 6 - Capital Police Chief Steve Sund was told by Bennie Thompson Said Nancy Pelosi was OFF LIMITS for Inquiry into January 6
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
January 6 - Steve Sund - Call with Walter Piatt & General Charles Flynn - It Sounds like a Set-Up!
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
Three More Clips of then Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund • They didn’t tell the Capitol Police Chief Antifa was in the crowds • Nancy Pelosi’s Operative, Yogananda Pittman • The White House Attack Compared to the January 6 Attack- They Didn’t Protect the White House CLIP 1 January 6 - The Capital Police Chief Steve Sund was Not Informed there Were Federal Agents in the Crowd Tucker: Original reports were there were no agents in the crowd. We’ve learned there were in fact a lot of agents in the crowd. DID YOU KNOW? Steve Sund: No!… Shortly after January 6…> and I get a call from overseas & it was Great Britain Press, asking me about Feds in the crowd… I was like no, I would have been told, I’ve got lots of friends with the bureau, they all have my cell phone number, they would have told me..“ Your “friends” didn’t tell you Steve. This Clip https://rumble.com/v36k6if-january-6-the-capital-police-chief-was-not-informed-there-were-federal-agen.html CLIP 2 January 6 - Who’s Yogananda Pittman? Nancy Pelosi’s Operative who was Rewarded with a Cushy Job & “Secret Leave” 👀 “The very next day, less than 24 hours after we got control of the Capital, Nancy Pelosi goes on National TV, blames leadership at the top, calls for my resignation & then lies about me. The very next day, Yogananda Pittman, is placed as Acting Chief. Yogananda Pittman was the head of intelligence for the Capital Police, thus she would have been responsible for an “intelligence failure”. She ended up getting a vote of NO CONFIDENCE from the Police Officers, and ended up being rewarded with the position as Chief of Police for the University of California Berkeley, which is right across from Nancy Pelosi’s district. How much does a Chief of Police make in Berkeley, CA? The average Chief of Police salary in Berkeley, CA is $143,200 as of July 25, 2023. The Chief of Police, Tom Manger, was asked about her position & he said Pittman was given some type of a “Secret Leave” so that she could leave & start her job on February 1st at Berkeley and not retire from the Capital Police four months later.” This Video https://rumble.com/v36l29u-january-6-yogananda-pittman-nancy-pelosis-operative-rewarded-with-a-cushy-j.html CLIP 3 January 6 - DC Police were Prevented from Protecting the White House & More Officers were Injured During that Attack then there were on January 6 - Charges Dropped against ALL those who Attacked the White House “The agency formed by Congress specifically for the US President, the Washington DC Police Department, when the White House was under attack and they are prevented from going on White House grounds to help the Secret Service to defend the White House!” 🤯 More officers were also injured in the Attack on the White House than there were at January 6. “I’m told by Park Police that all charges were dropped!” On those who attacked the White House. TREASON! This Clip https://rumble.com/v36lteo-january-6-steve-sund-the-white-house-under-attack-was-not-stopped-and-more-.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a debate about the presence of federal agents at the January 6 event. Initially, it was denied, but now it is confirmed that there were indeed federal agents in the crowd. It is not uncommon for federal agencies to have people in plain clothes for situational awareness at large events like demonstrations and inaugurations. The FBI took overt action to prevent certain individuals from attending the January 6 event. A GAO report revealed that the FBI was tracking 18 or 19 domestic terrorists planning to attend the event. It is concerning that this information was not shared with intelligence. It is important to deconflict and communicate with the Chief of Capitol Police to avoid any confusion or conflicts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the aftermath of January 6, there's been a huge debate over to what extent, you know, there were federal agents or people who are working in some way for federal agencies in the crowd. And the initial explanation was, well, none, and you're insane if you think that you're Alex Jones, you're crazy. And then over the last couple of years, we've seen people confirm, people in authority confirm actually, yeah, there were a lot in the crowd that day. I mean, that's now a fact. Did you know that going in?
Speaker 1: No. They
Speaker 0: were no. So just for perspective, since you've been to a lot of these events, there's a huge a planned demonstration in Washington, D. C. Will there always be assets, agents, people working for federal agencies in the crowd and civilian close?
Speaker 1: There always could be. And for like inaugurations, There would usually be some combined teams out there, one for communications but just for situational awareness. So It wouldn't be surprising, 4th July, different things like that where you have threat pictures or concerning threat pictures.
Speaker 0: And what does that look like? Does that mean, FBI agents dressed in dockers and tennis shoes trying to
Speaker 1: Well, just be plain clothes, plain clothes to blend in. So that wouldn't be unusual and it'd be, you know, just standard police work. That'd be a good police work. So coming into January 6, and and and I talk about it in the book with The fact that shortly after January 6, I'm driving through Loudoun County. I'm coming I actually just talked to somebody from the Hill, and I get a call from overseas and it say it's press.
I don't remember which what it was. It's somebody from, Great Britain. And they started asking me about feds in the crowd. I was like, no. No.
I would have been told. So now we're getting word that there is feds in the crowd. I said, no. They I would have been told. I've got lots of friends with the, with the bureau.
They all have my cell number they they would have told me. You know, think about that. And Jill Sanborn's testimony in 2021 where she said they were taking over action To keep certain people from coming to January 6th to to watch DC. That's that's big for c for FBI to start taking overt action. I mean, that's not covert, over.
That's a big that's a big deal. Fast forward to February of this year 2023 and the GAO report that says, on January 4 January 3rd, the FBI was tracking 4 domestic terrorists that we're talking about coming to Washington DC, the Washington field office, their AOR, area of responsibility. By January 6, they were tracking 18 or 19 in the GAO report. Domestic terrorists. So think about that.
They have 18 or 19 domestic terrorists coming to this event, So of course, they're going to have resources on them. And then you're not going to be just putting 1 agent, you're going to have multiples. So it would be multiple with that. And I don't know how many they actually had in there. So That would be regular standard police works.
I would be surprised by it. But not to share that in the intelligence? That's concerning.
Speaker 0: So I mean, it seems like common sense suggests anyway that you would have to tell the Chief of Capitol Police that, hey, we've got our guys in the crowd. Like just because, I mean, you would want to know the difference, correct?
Speaker 1: You would absolutely want to know the difference and deconfliction. Want to have things like that. A lot of the folks will already know there's a lot of standard procedures for way to deconflict, so you don't have blue on blue type of situations.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Yogananda Pittman, the former Assistant Chief for Intelligence and Security of the Capitol Police, was appointed as acting chief after the January 6 attack on the Capitol. However, there were concerns about an intelligence failure and her role in it. She later became the chief of police for the University of California, Berkeley, which raised questions about a potential reward. It was revealed that she was given a secret leave to start her new job while still being employed by the Capitol Police. Whistleblowers within the intelligence unit had raised concerns and faced punishment. This situation appears suspicious and raises doubts about the integrity of the process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who's Yogananda Pittman? Yogananda Pittman was
Speaker 1: my Assistant Chief for Intelligence and Security.
Speaker 0: Okay. So, did she have the intelligence that you didn't have?
Speaker 1: I I don't know.
Speaker 0: What do you mean you don't know?
Speaker 1: I I I don't know. I you don't know what you don't know. I don't know what she had and what she didn't have, but I do know that when you look at it and we immediately knew, I mean, anybody immediately knew. One of the first things you start to think about is this an intelligence failure. So think about it.
We go through January 6. I was begging for the National Guard, refused before, Fused during it. We get the capital under control. You know, I get them to where they can go back into session, 7:30. They elect to go in at 8 and then the house goes at 9.
But nonetheless so think about this. The very next day, less than 24 hours after we got control of the of the capital, Nancy Pelosi goes on national TV, Blames leadership at the top of Capitol Police, calls for my resignation on national TV, and then lies about me. Okay? The very next day the very next day puts Yogananda Pittman as acting chief.
Speaker 0: But Yogananda Pittman, You just described her as the head of intelligence for Capitol Police. Correct. So if there was an intelligence failure, Which again doesn't seem like a failure. It seems very intentional to me. But if there was such a failure, she'd be responsible, Correct?
Or she'd be in the chain of responsibility anyway?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, she was she was the head of intelligence. So if there's intelligence failure, see, my thing is Do a proper analysis. You know? You know, why do a knee jerk reaction? I mean, putting her in charge, I mean, she ended up getting a a vote of no confidence.
So she didn't get the position from the from the police officers because many were upset with what happened. So she
Speaker 0: Where where did she wind up?
Speaker 1: Where is she now? Yeah. She's chief of police for the University of California, Berkeley. Interesting.
Speaker 0: So right across from Nancy Pelosi's district?
Speaker 1: That is correct.
Speaker 0: In the Bay Area.
Speaker 1: That is correct.
Speaker 0: So you just kind of take the Bay Bridge over there and that's where she is now. What does that position pay, do you know?
Speaker 1: I think it pays pretty well. There was a Pays extraordinarily well. I'm sure it pays pretty good. It's interesting, there was a hearing just recently that was on it's on TV. You can look at it, where the chief of police, Tom Manger, was asked about Her position, it turns out that she was given some type of a secret leave.
So she'd leave, start her job on February 1st as the chief of police, and not retire from the capital police for months later.
Speaker 0: Oh, so you should get the benefits.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Think about that. Yeah. It appears to be against departmental policy, And nobody originally was told.
Speaker 0: What you're saying is that the head of intelligence for the Capitol Police, which Demonstrably didn't have the intelligence that needed to protect the building. That person was first elevated to acting chief Of Capitol Police and then given a very high paying job right across Nancy Pelosi's district at the University of California, Berkeley.
Speaker 1: That is correct. And I will say that So
Speaker 0: that looks like a reward to me.
Speaker 1: Well, I do know that the unit had significant intelligence, and I know many people within the unit were pushing that intelligence up to the to the leadership of the unit. So I do I do know that. Many of them became whistle blowers, and many of them were punished and forced to resign. Yep.
Speaker 0: This looks like a scam. I
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the 2020 riots and the January 6 attack on the White House. They mention the fire at Saint John's Church and the Washington DC Police Department's inability to protect the White House. They question who made the decision to prevent the police from defending the White House and highlight the disparity in how justice is being applied. The speaker also mentions that more officers were injured during the riots than on January 6th. They speculate on how things would have been different if Barack Obama had been president. Overall, they find the situation concerning and suggest that Trump may be a key factor in all of this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That many things that that are in here. I talk about the 2020 riots versus the 20 the the January 6 attack.
Speaker 1: The riots in front of the White House were famously Saint John's Church was set on fire.
Speaker 0: White House, across the country. You know, I talk about the White House, and I talk about an agency that was formed by congress Specifically for the protection of the United States president, the Washington DC Police Department. The White House is under attack, and they are prevented. They are prevented. I know it's not from chief Newsom.
It's from his you know, he was the chief at the time. Would have been from, above him. They're from prevented from going on cap on White House grounds and helping the United States seek its service from defending the the White House. So think about that. Church.
You know, who made that decision? Again, all I know is, you know, Nutrien's hands were tied. So Mayor Bowser, Higher? I don't know. But think about that.
Speaker 1: Somebody told when there and there was real rioting. In fact, I think Oh. That more officers were injured Hit that riot. Then were injured on January 6th, I think.
Speaker 0: Yep. Yep. Again, don't take my word. Jail report. More officers injured at the Protest by the White House and on January 6th.
And I'm told by Park Police, all charges were dropped According to the, the, fighting at Lafayette Park and at the, at the White House. There were secret service agents bloodied and battered over there. There was a number of federal agencies that were hurt. Structure set on fire. They tried to light the Hay Adams Hotel on fire that was occupied.
Think about that. Charges dropped. No no such situation. I mean, when you look at the disparity of how justice is being applied, again, that's that's scary. That becomes really scary when, it becomes politicized like that.
And that's what appears to have happened.
Speaker 1: I mean, it sounds like Trump is the key to all of this. If Trump hadn't been the president, things would have been very responses would have been very different, don't you think? I mean, if Barack Obama had been president, do you think that someone would have told MPD that Washington D. C. Police Department, they couldn't protect the White House?
Speaker 0: Again, I don't I I protect the White House. I don't I see what you're saying there. I I don't know. I mean, I think not.
Speaker 1: Like, I mean, it's a hypothetical. I I shouldn't ask you to answer hypothetical questions, but it does seem seems amazing.
January 6 - The Capital Police Chief was Not Informed there Were Federal Agents in the Crowd
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
January 6 - Who’s Yogananda Pittman? Nancy Pelosi’s Operative Rewarded with a Cushy Job & “Secret Leave”
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
January 6 - Steve Sund - The White House Under Attack was not Stopped & More Officers Injured
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
This is a meeting just before January 6, where BLM Leader(s) Government Workers, Media Leaks, were Conspiring against the US Government, & planning the REAL Insurrection, including violence & breaking windows. As you heard in the above statements from the Capitol Police Chief, Antifa was there and he was not briefed of their presence. Why wouldn’t the Capitol Police Chief be briefed of this? https://rumble.com/v2478bm-january-6-meeting-exposed-blm-government-workers-media-leaks-breaking-windo.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Shut It Down DC discusses their plans for responding to a potential coup and contested election scenarios. They emphasize the need to take action in the streets and disrupt business as usual in Congress. There is talk of revolution and potential violence, with some suggesting breaking windows to enter government buildings. Leaking information to journalists and creating parallel structures are mentioned as tactics. Federal workers are encouraged to engage in noncooperation to undermine those in power. The importance of communication with grassroots groups and sustained organizing is highlighted. Practical examples of slowing down processes and exposing wrongdoing are shared. Overall, the focus is on taking decisive action to resist a potential coup.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I really wanna hear from, Shut It Down DC about this. Do you do we have any plans for how to respond if there's a coup?
Speaker 1: Yeah. We, have been in discussion for a couple months About, how to respond to different contested election scenarios. 1st step is that we we think that we need to start the The post election phase in the streets. Congress is planning on coming to town and passing laws again and, like, having business as usual, and we're saying there's If if we're in a coup, there's no time for business as usual.
Speaker 0: I heard someone in the chat talking about revolution time, and so I encourage, You know, for all of us to be fighting for revolution before today, today, tomorrow, afterwards.
Speaker 2: We're facing an administration and a potential coup and a Potential insurrection where, efforts to criminalize this are going to be even greater. Understanding that everything that we're doing now in this moment is laying the groundwork for what is going to come. Is there going to be a war? Are people gonna get killed? Like, is that on anybody else's mind?
I'm guessing it is. We're gonna see potential fighting all over the country or in some hot spots. We might need to think about that. And I know as I you know, I said earlier how, you know, we may find ourselves in the streets with people with different tactics than ours. But, like, there may be some people that are willing to break the windows to get into the government buildings.
Like, If that's what we need to do, then we shouldn't fight about that. Let's do that. Let's take over the buildings.
Speaker 3: Text them, leak everything you can. The journalists I've dealt with have been super ethical in ways to shield me To be the source of the leaks.
Speaker 4: Groups on the outside being able to show, solidarity with federal workers. Making sure that we're naming What is happening is a coup.
Speaker 5: Totally agreed. In the subbound BP conversations that I've been having that's not on the federal side, we, also are often Call it a coup. It's a coup. Don't let anyone tell you it's not.
Speaker 4: President Harry s Truman famously said, I thought I was the president, But when it comes to these bureaucrats, I can't do a damn thing. So the bottom line with this is that we all as ordinary people, and as federal workers have power? If masses of people engage in noncooperation, no ruler can stay in power. Bureaucracy is a really powerful pillar and, you know, federal workers have unparalleled familiarity with the bureaucratic process. They know how to speed things up.
They know how to slow them down. They have access to critical information about policies that are being considered and implemented. They can participate in an internal decision making. They can provide or deny knowledge and expertise that those, at the top of the bureaucratic totem pole, need. It ultimately comes down to individual decisions and personal choice.
Deciding what to do or what not to do is a very personal decision. It's based on context. It's based on your rank, on your tolerance for risk, on your preparation and frankly where you sit in the federal, federal bureaucracy. We're talking about the range of different tactics. We talk about acts of commission and acts of omission.
And another act of commission, albeit Highly, you know, risky, and there are a number of, great downsides is leaking. So leaking information about pending or actual policies with journalists, with activists, influential people on the outside. So another act of, Of commission is creating parallel structures or self organizing units. So organizing in the office place, in the workplace.
Speaker 6: As an attorney in the federal government, I I am finding the chat suggestions very interesting, and I just do wanna remind people that we lose our status as federal employees if we strike.
Speaker 7: And there's been a little conversation going on here, for example, about Black Lives Matter and how that is an example of a nonpartisan political statement. Guess that's been previously litigated, but whether or not you do a misdemeanor or an infraction on federal property or on public property, really doesn't affect, most of the jobs, that you would be considered for.
Speaker 6: Yeah. As an attorney, I think I'm We we're highly, you know, that's one of the things we have to be careful about.
Speaker 4: I would just say this is also the importance of being in communication with and in touch With groups, civic groups, grassroots groups that are preparing people for the possibility that red lines may be crossed, that, You know, there that the election goes sideways, you know, so everything from choose democracy to hold the line, to To shut down, we count on us. I listed a few of those in the slides earlier, but they're the ones who are really in the vanguard of Helping people think about, interpret red lines, and think about different actions that can be taken well beyond kind of street protests and demonstrations, but kind of Sustained organizing an action.
Speaker 7: What does it look like in practical terms to put you know, to slow the gears down in some ways or another?
Speaker 6: At the Department of Labor, it it takes the form of, several rounds of the cost benefit analysis for a new regulation. And when, When the numbers were when people were cheating on the numbers, a copy of that draft got leaked, to the data labor report, and it got published and it got sent to a congressperson, and the office of inspector general opened an investigation on who was cheating on the numbers. So, again, that's sort of a combination of tactics. It's it's it's making really the paper trail. It's making sure that that document got out to someone who could make use of it and then congress getting the office of inspector general involved.
It's it was really a way to Stop that thing just in its tracks, and it it worked really well.
January 6 Meeting Exposed: BLM, Government Workers, Media Leaks, Breaking Windows- They we’re Planning the REAL Insurrection!
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth My Website— www.theunshakeablepundit.com
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
We know Antifa was involved and was there according to Attorney Joeseph McBride uncovering A 96-Page DC Police Report which showed the Government Knew Antifa was coming https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H3mHiUZCz9jyfDFTTpYw7VuYCgMtuLWW/view Not only that, this report shows they were anticipating violence and still, Nancy Pelosi denied Trumps request to provide the National Guard. Here is the US Capitol Police CDU Operations Plan for J6 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yfivz5NdQa90gVXoC1nKNN_1zsDK4J1V/view Here are Several Documented Instances CLIP 1 A Masked Man with Earpiece (Antifa? FBI?), Caught Tearing up Capital Building Window- While Trump Supporter Tries to Stop Him This person was never charged. Why? This Video https://rumble.com/v2ceie4-january-6-masked-man-with-earpiece-caught-tearing-up-capital-building-windo.html CLIP 2 January 6: Antifa Identified & Forced From the Steps at Capital Building By Trump Supporters You’ll never see this on CNN. This Video https://rumble.com/v2cfl9k-january-6-antifa-identified-and-forced-from-the-steps-at-capital-building.html CLIP 3 January 6: Two Camera Angles of Antifa Breaking Capital Windows while Trump Supporters Try to Stop Them & Shout “F*CK ANTIFA!” You’ll never see this on CNN. This Video https://rumble.com/v2cfoxs-january-6-antifa-breaking-capital-windows-while-trump-supporters-stop-them-.html
January 6: Masked Man with Earpiece (Antifa? FBI?), Caught Tearing up Capital Building Window- While Trump Supporter Tries to Stop Him
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT
rumble.com
January 6: Antifa Identified & Forced From the Steps at Capital Building By Trump Supporters
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT
rumble.com
January 6: Antifa Breaking Capital Windows while Trump Supporters Try to Stop Them & Shout “F*CK ANTIFA!”
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
CLIP 1 Here is a DC Officer admitting they were also undercover as Antifa in the crowd. “We Go Undercover as Antifa in the Crowd” This Video https://rumble.com/v35qnwc-january-6-dc-officer-we-go-undercover-as-antifa-in-the-crowd.html CLIP 2 One of the more concerning things to come out of the Jan 6 Report, or should I say did not come out, was the fact they Hid Any Mention of the Pipe Bomber, who was specifically responsible for Shutting Down Congress That Day This video is proof that the FBI lied and this is a coverup. The average rate of a CCT camera in America is 15 fps (Frames per Seccond). The video the FBI released to the public was 1 fps. You read that right. ☝️ The average gas station camera is 15 fps, which would make the camera(s) at the DNC fifteen times worse…. Than a gas station. Who was it? Antifa? FBI? If it was a Trump supporter they would have been front page news. The FBI are able to track down peaceful protesters across the US but not a suspect planting bombs? This video https://rumble.com/v228q0m-fbi-releases-impossible-1-fps-video-of-the-dc-pipe-bomber-impeach-merrick-g.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
FBI agents are seeking tips to identify the suspect who planted bombs near the Democratic National Party headquarters. Videos show the suspect sitting on a park bench before one of the bombs was placed. The frame rate of CCTV cameras is typically around 15 frames per second (FPS). However, the security video released by the FBI of the January 6th pipe bomb suspect shows only 1 FPS, which is highly unlikely for unaltered footage. The DNC has a history of security concerns, including the Watergate scandal, and the use of 1 FPS footage is statistically improbable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lester, FBI agents say they have no idea who planted the bombs, and they hope these new videos will generate some valuable tips. 1 shows the suspect walking up and sitting on a park bench near the Democratic National Party headquarters. 1 of the bombs was later planted in this same area.
Speaker 1: Frames per second, like its name implies, is the number of a Individual images or frames, the system captures every second. The average industry frame rate of most CCTV cameras is around 15 frames a per second.
Speaker 2: We also recommend using a minimum of 15 FPS or frames per second.
Speaker 0: Now here at Proactive Security, we recommend actually 15 frames per second.
Speaker 2: What you're looking at is the actual frame speed of the security video the FBI released to the public of the January 6th pipe bomb Suspect. It's just 1 frame per second. You're going to learn now why that is virtually impossible unless this tape is not the original source footage. A comprehensive study in 2021 by one of the world's leading authorities on security cameras found that 0% of cameras in fuse in America today operated at just 1 frame per second. Statistically speaking, the odds that the video the FBI a Police to the public was unaltered is less than 1%.
The average gas station in America uses 15 frames per second. That make the DNC national headquarters 15 times worse than the average gas station. A Meanwhile, we know the DNC cares so much about security at this area that for years, they have stationed a physical guard during a during the daytime right at this site. And that makes sense. It was the break in of the DNC national headquarters 50 years ago that Pause the largest scandal in American history, Watergate.
Between the history of attacks on the DNC building, plus the fact that DC was once the murder capital of the country plus the fact that 0% of cameras in use today use one frame per second. It is virtually impossible the tape the FBI released was the actual unedited footage.
January 6 - DC Officer “We Go Undercover as Antifa in the Crowd”
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
FBI Releases Impossible 1 FPS Video of the DC “Pipe Bomber”- Impeach Merrick Garland Now!
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
We also now know there was an FBI presence on January 6— Hundreds of agents in the crowd when at first they said there was little to no FBI presence How many of these agents played a role in instigating or steering violence? It was later discovered that Internal FBI Communications in the United States v Ethan Nordean case revealed the FBI Demanded the Removal of Agent Participation & Were Found to be DESTROYING EVIDENCE! This not only proves the FBI lied on the stand, but there were criminal informants involved who sought to have their records altered to conceal their involvement! This may be a Brady violation! Brady Disclosure: “The rule requires that the prosecution must turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defendant in a criminal case. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that might exonerate the defendant.” This Video https://rumble.com/v2cj02o-january-6-internal-fbi-communications-reveal-the-fbi-demanded-the-removal-o.html United States https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23699546-nordean-filing-on-fbi-testimony In addition, a motion filed by a J6’er Pezzola’s attorney, Roger Root, the FBI Admitted to having 40 Undercover Agents (that we know of) Infiltrated the Crowds on Jan. 6 The DOJ admitted that of the 13 Proud Boys involved with J6, eight or more of them were paid by the FBI to provide the government information about the group. The Proud Boys were outnumbered 10-1 by undercover gov’t agents and informants at the Capitol Article https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/shocking-update-fbi-now-admits-40-undercover-agents-infiltrated-the-crowds-on-jan-6-fedsurrection/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=shocking-update-fbi-now-admits-40-undercover-agents-infiltrated-the-crowds-on-jan-6-fedsurrection
Video Transcript AI Summary
New information has emerged regarding internal FBI messages related to January 6th. The messages reveal a demand to edit confidential human source reports and remove agent participation. In a recent court filing, it was disclosed that FBI special agent Nicole Miller compiled her messages in an Excel spreadsheet, which was produced to the US attorney's office. However, a closer examination of the spreadsheet uncovered over 1,000 hidden rows of messages. The documents also show an agent requesting Miller to edit out their presence in a CHS informant report. Additionally, there is mention of an FBI boss assigning the destruction of 338 items of evidence. These revelations suggest that the FBI was present during the January 6th events, infiltrating groups and inciting violence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New bombshell information coming out in regards to the internal FBI messages surrounding January 6th, demanding confidential human source reports be edited to remove agent participation. In the Nordean filing on FBI testimony, case number 121cr00 175tjk, document number 678, filed on March 9th 2023, United States of America versus Ethan Nordian as the defendant. Hu Nordean's notice of argument in support of impeachment of witness with hidden Jenks related communications. Today, government witness special agent Nicole Miller was cross examined. She testified that she understood her legal duty under the Jenks act to produce the US attorney's office written statements relating to the subject matter of her testimony.
Miller acknowledged that among those statements were messages to be sent in the FBI's link messaging system where bureau employees communicate with one another. She testified that in order to comply with her Jinx obligations, he compiled her links messages in an Excel spreadsheet, which was then produced to the USAO. The version of Miller's Excel sheet produced to the defense contained 25 rows of her linked messages. In cross examination, the agent acknowledged she compiled that disclosure. She testified that those messages constituted a complete production of her Jinx statements from links.
However, a close examination of the agent's sheet revealed over 1,000 hidden Excel rows of messages. Further on into the documents reveal an agent's request to special agent Miller to go into a CHS informant report that Miller just put together and edit out the agent was present. Quote, you need to go into that CHS report you just put and edit out that I was present, end quote. Hu- further along in these documents reveal that Miller's communication with another agent who states that the agent's FBI boss assigned her 338 items of evidence I have to destroy. So not only have we learned that the F.
Was in fact there for the January 6th events. We also learned that through Ray Epps and other evidence that they were in fact embedded inside the crowd. They acted as Trump supporters. They infiltrated groups and invoked violence. Hue, and now we are learning that they are destroying evidence.
January 6 Bombshell! Internal FBI Communications Reveal the FBI Demanded the Removal of Agent Participation & Were DESTROYING EVIDENCE!
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT
rumble.com
Nordean Filing on FBI Testimony
documentcloud.org
SHOCKING UPDATE: FBI Now Admits to 40 Undercover Agents Infiltrated the Crowds on Jan. 6 #Fedsurrection | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Federal operative takes down fencing on January 6 before Trump supporters arrived in mass at the US Capitol.
thegatewaypundit.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
What role did Ray Epps play? For who? What agency? The FBI seems most logical because The FBI only removed 3 people from the Most Wanted list, one of them being Ray Epps. And it appears they were doing everything they can to cover for him. CLIP 1 New Footage of Ray Epps appeared out of the 14,000 hours of hidden footage. In a nutshell, the first video is what was played in the courtroom, in the Proud Boys trial. The video shows a “GLITCH” on the feed, at a specific point in time. The second ORIGINAL video, clearly shows no distortion but shows Ray Epps entering the scene and makes the first breach through a black fence with an army of all black dressed supposed “MAGA supporters”. They doctored the video to be presented in court! Clear tampering of evidence! CLIP 2 Tucker Carlson uncovered a New Video that exposed Ray Epps for committing PERJURY. https://rumble.com/v2c179s-january-6-new-video-exposes-ray-epps-for-perjury.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6th, the role of intelligence and law enforcement agencies during the Capitol events remains a mystery. It is known that there were undercover federal agents present, but their purpose is unclear. Ray Epps, a figure seen encouraging the crowd to enter the Capitol, has not been indicted for his actions. Despite admitting to orchestrating the protests and helping people get there, Epps claimed he never entered the Capitol. However, surveillance footage contradicts his testimony, showing him remaining at the Capitol for at least another half hour. The January 6th committee likely knew about this, yet defended Epps. The reasons for Epps' actions and the committee's defense remain unknown.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the enduring mysteries of January 6th is the role that intelligence and law enforcement agencies played in the events of that day. We know there was some number of undercover federal agents in the crowd at the Capitol. Officials have since admitted that under oath. But what exactly were they doing there? The January 6th committee worked hard are to hide the answer to that question.
We do know from contemporaneous video tape that a mysterious figure called Ray Epps encouraged the crowd should go into the capital. For some reason, Epps has never been indicted for that, but there's no question he didn't. We need to go into the capital. Were at all. Under public pressure, the January 6th committee finally interviewed Ray Epps.
Epps told the committee that he never entered the capital and therefore never committed a crime. His text messages showed that at 2:12 PM, he boasted to his nephew view that he had, quote, orchestrated the protests at the Capitol. He admitted he helped get people there. Yet, curiously, congressional Democrats consider Ray Epps an ally, not an insurrectionist. Tonight, we can tell you that at the very least, Ray Epps lied in his sworn testimony to the January 6th committee, Epps testified that when he sent the text messages to his nephew, he he'd already left the capitol grounds to return to his hotel room.
That is not true. The surveillance footage we found shows that in fact, Ray Epps remained at the capitol for at least another half an hour. You're seeing that on your screen now. What was Epps doing there? We can't say, but we do know that he lied had 2 investigators.
The January 6th committee likely knew this too. Democrats had access to the same tape, yet they defended Ray Epps. No investigation would do that.
January 6: New Video exposes Ray Epps for PERJURY and Lied to Investigators!
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
🚨 Ray Epps Adopted Daughter was interviewed by @dom_lucre & she tells quite a sick disturbing story into who Ray Epps is… MY NOTES: (TSTM= Twitter Space Time Mark) In this clip, at the 1:28:00 TSTM, she claims Ray Epps forced her to strip naked while she was on her period at 14 years old, & forced her to sleep outside in the cold, and she had to sleep with the dog to get warm. 59:20 TSTM- Dom confirms in a Twitter post she is who she says she is via adoption papers, brith certificate, & photos 45:45 TSTM- She underwent 6 name changes indicating she may have been kidnapped 47:45 TSTM- She was photographed naked “scouted from a modeling agency” 1:00:00 TSTM- Ray was a high ranking LDS priesthood holder 1:12:30 TSTM- Rays nickname was sniper on the roof 1:20:15 TSTM- J6’er George Tanios spoke to her This Clip https://rumble.com/v2keb8w-january-6-ray-epps-adopted-daughter-talks-about-having-to-strip-and-sleep-o.html Full Discussion https://rumble.com/v2ke1xa-january-6-ray-epps-adopted-daughter-on-her-being-abused-and-molested.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker shares a disturbing experience involving Robyn and Ray. Robyn would sometimes be incoherent due to medication. The speaker recalls two specific incidents. In one, Ray made the speaker strip in front of him while thinking Robyn was asleep. The speaker felt embarrassed and uncomfortable, especially since they were only 14 and hadn't started using tampons yet. Ray then made the speaker sleep outside, even though it was cold. The speaker had to snuggle up with their dog for warmth. Ray threatened the speaker, saying he would hunt them down if they tried to run away or seek help. The next day, the speaker was allowed back inside. The speaker also expresses their disdain for Robyn, calling them a piece of shit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was always not always. It would be when Robyn was incoherent. She took medications. I don't know what they were at the time, but, she was like a zombie, and there was 1 there was 2 specific times that stick out to me one time, was when he was having me strip in front of him because he thought that Robin was in bed asleep, and 1 by 1, I had to take my clothing off, and I remember at that time, I'm, fuck. It's embarrassing.
I hadn't started using tampons yet, I was 14, and I got to the point where it was just my panties, and he was sitting on the couch, and I remember looking at him, and he said, drop them, and I said, please don't make me do this. And, I had to. And then, he made me sleep outside, but before that happened, before I hold my panties down, you know, on my period, you know, do the math, Haben had walked out of the bedroom, and down the hall, she looked at me, and she looked at Ray, and looked back at me and shook her head, went back into her room and shut the door, and that's when I had to continue taking off my panties, and then he said, now you can sleep outside. And I had to sleep outside, and yes, we lived in Arizona, and I do not remember the month, but I remember being cold, and I remember having to snuggle up with my dog to keep me warm. And he said, if you try to run away, I will hunt you down, and I will find you.
And if you try to call the police or tell anybody, just remember who are they gonna believe? Me or you? I'm an adult near a child, and so I stayed naked in my backyard with my dog all night, and then I was allowed in the next day. And Robin is just as big of a piece of shit, if not more, than he is,
January 6 - Ray Epps Adopted Daughter Talks About Having to Strip & Sleep Outside While on Her Period - Abuse She Suffered from Ray Epps
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
January 6 - Ray Epps Adopted Daughter Tells Horrific & Heartbreaking Story on Her Being Abused & Molested by Epps
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
January 6 Entrapment! The following footage was Obtained from the United States department of justice. It contains surveillance video of the upper West Terrace doors of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. The video shows they were waved in by police. It is clear no violence or crime was committed by the people in this video. They were allowed in and are included in the video below. https://rumble.com/v1135ol-bombshell-january-6-entrapment-new-video-surfaces.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Surveillance footage from the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, shows police officers allowing protesters to exit through the Upper West Terrace doors. A man holding an American flag catches the door and waves to the crowd outside. Meanwhile, another man with a red cap approaches the interior doors and is let in by a police officer. A large group of protesters enters the Capitol through the doors, with police officers standing by and allowing them to pass. Around 250 protesters entered that day, many of whom are charged with felony obstruction. At one point, a police officer walks with the protesters, showing no signs of fear. Eventually, police stop the protesters briefly before allowing them to enter again. At 2:47 PM, the doors are closed and no more individuals enter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The following footage was obtained from the United States Department of Justice. It contains surveillance video of the upper west terrace doors of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. Just after 2:33 PM, police officers allow 5 individuals to exit the Capitol through the Upper West Terrace doors. At 2:34 PM, a gentleman holding an American flag catches the door just as the last protester leaves. He turns to the crowd outside and waves towards the door.
At the same time at 2:34 PM, a gentleman with a red cap approaches the interior doors. As the police officer notices him, he continues to approach. The police officer holds the door for the protester as he enters the capital undeterred. At 2:35 PM, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol, police standing at the doors. As a steady stream of protesters entered through the Upper West Terrace doors.
They can see police officers standing at the interior doors, allowing people to pass. Around 250 protesters entered to the Upper West Terrace doors that day, many of which are charged with felony obstruction for entering a building undiscouraged. At 2:36 PM, a police officer walks towards the exit against the flow of protesters. He then turns around and begins walking with the protesters. He turned his back to them and never took a posture that was defensive or that would indicate that he feared being harmed.
At 2:36:54,
Speaker 1: the police allowed the crowd to pass. At 2:38 PM, a woman with a sock hat and a camera with a sound recording device attached to it films police as they allow people to enter. A steady stream of individuals pass by police as they stand aside without deterring protesters for several minutes.
Speaker 0: At 2:40 PM, police stopped the protesters to speak to them again.
Speaker 1: At 2:44 pm, a police officer in the bottom of the screen can be seen speaking to the officers in front of them and pulling them away indicating to the crowd that they are allowed to enter. The officers then turn their backs to the crowd which indicate that they did not possess fear of the protesters. The officers then escort the crowd into the interior of the Capitol.
Speaker 0: At 2:47 PM, police wearing yellow gear closed the doors. Police presence then increases and no more individuals entered through the Upper West Terrace doors.
BOMBSHELL! January 6 Entrapment! New Video Surfaces!
BOMBSHELL! January 6 Entrapment! New Video Surfaces! Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Find me on Truth Socia
rumble.com
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
More Proof it was a a SET UP. Capital Police Undercover Identifiers? They’ll have a Wristband or Candy Stripe on The Barrel At the 0:34 Mark Tactical Officer: “….Any identifiers?” USCP Officer: “They will have a wristband. Their guns will have a candy stripe on the barrel. I don’t know the wristband color. They will have a wristband somewhere. OK?” https://rumble.com/v35s94o-january-6-undercover-feds-identifiers-theyll-have-a-wristband-or-candy-stri.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
A person describes a man wearing a black vest with a pink blue line and dark hair. They mention that he may be around 27 years old and has something on his hip. The speaker also mentions that there were too many people for the police to reach. They describe another person as a white male with dark hair. The speaker then talks about the appearance of the uniformed officers, mentioning that they may have a wristband and a stripe on their gun barrel. However, they are unsure of the color of the wristband.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys are here. Black vest. Pink blue line. Thing on, dark hair. And he's kinda like a lookin' like a 27 or something on his hip.
No police identity came couldn't get to them because there were so many people. 5 piece of white mix on white male. White male, dark hair. Yeah. Yeah.
Alright. Looks like grayish black, maybe maybe a, digital gun. Uniform guys have any identifiers like, they will have a wristband. Their guns will have a handy stripe on the barrel. Okay.
I don't know the wristband color, but they'll have a wristband line, somewhere.
January 6 - Capital Police Undercover Identifiers? They’ll have a Wristband or Candy Stripe on The Barrel
Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci
rumble.com
@shy_ferg - Shylo
Dude. There's literally video evidence. Their testimony for the J6 committee doesn't match public video, journo video nor the known timeline. THEY LIED.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I witnessed the chaos and violence during the incident. Officer Hargit, who was injured, is present to testify. I also experienced being crushed by the rioters and feared for my life. Many officers lost their shields, but I had one and stayed at the front line. Meanwhile, my family was desperately trying to reach me as they watched the events unfold on TV. It wasn't until later, after performing CPR on a rioter to save her life, that I could inform my family that I was alive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I got her. I got her. I would do it again if I have to. It's my job. He cut his hand, and he needed foot surgery.
We want trunk. I bevelier, her officers screaming in agony, and pain. Just an arm length from me. I didn't know at that time, but that was officer Hargit. And he's here today to testify.
I too was being crushed by the young riders. I confirmed my myself losing oxygen and recall thinking to myself. This is how I'm going to die defending the sanctions. Many of the officers fighting alongside me were calling for shields because their shields have been stripped from from them by the riders. I was one of the few officers left with a shield, so I spent the majority of my time in the at the front of the line.
I lay to find out that my wife and relatives were here in the US and abroad. We're frantically calling and texting me from 2 pm onward. Because they were watching the 2 more 2 more on television. It was now until 4:26 PM after giving CPR to one of the riders who breached the capital in an effort to save her life that I finally had a chance to let my own family know that I was alive.
@Timcast - Tim Pool
The police facilitated January 6th This is why they withheld the tapes The J6 committee should be censured and expelled for lying to the public https://t.co/nO9tbNP4lH
reSee.it AI Summary
On January 6th, 2021, the events at the Capitol were not the violent insurrection we were led to believe. Pence's promise to hear objections and evidence of voter fraud was never fulfilled. The tapes reveal that the event was orchestrated by elements within our own government, concealed from the public to perpetuate a false narrative. This was an act of treason against the American people, stealing our nation. The hatred and censorship towards Trump supporters were all based on this lie. We are living in an Orwellian dystopia.
@WarClandestine - Clandestine
Now that we have the tapes proving January 6th was not the violent insurrection we were told it was, let me enlighten you on what ACTUALLY happened that day. Flashback to January 4th, 2021. Pence promised that he was going to “hear the objections and evidence”, in reference to the massive irregularities and voter fraud in the 2020 election (video attached). Pence never got to hear those electors air their objections or evidence. The January 6th event at the Capitol was the means Pence used to justify NOT giving electors their day in Congress. Pence claimed the acts by Trump and his supporters were so heinous, that he was just going to certify the election the next day. Well, now that we have the January 6th tapes, it is clear this event was facilitated and coordinated by elements within our own government, and the evidence of this was intentionally withheld from the American People in order to continue perpetuating this massive lie. You witnessed an insurrection on January 6th 2021, but it wasn’t by Trump supporters. It was by establishment politicians, elements within the intelligence community, and State-controlled MSM outlets, who coordinated to generate, escalate, and exaggerate the situation in order to avoid electors airing their objections, in order to certify a stolen election. You witnessed treason and war waged on the American People. That’s what happened on January 6th. Our nation was stolen from us by corrupt elements within our own government. And all the hatred, discrimination, censorship, and vitriol towards Trump supporters, ALL of it was based on a lie. You best start believing in Orwellian dystopias. You’re in one.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I support President Donald Trump and share the concerns of many Americans about voting irregularities in the last election. I want to assure you that on Wednesday, we will have our day in Congress to address these concerns. We will hear objections and review the evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, I'm here because I stand with president Donald Trump. You know, I know we all we all got our doubts about the last election, And I want to assure you, I share the concerns of millions of Americans about voting irregularities. And I promise you, come this Wednesday, We'll have our day in congress. We'll hear the objection. We'll hear the evidence.
@BouchellJohn - TheRealJohnnyBravo
Evidence continues to pour out showing the few violent actors were feds and AntiFa on #Jan6th and the the police started the riot after bombing and gassing the peaceful crowd without warning for two hours. As usual, you have been lied to. https://t.co/7sI00zesKi
reSee.it AI Summary
Donald Trump's alleged promise to step down after the 2020 Election certification is highlighted. The author argues against claims of an insurrection, election overturning, incitement, or coup. They mention Trump's call for peace, which led to his social media ban. Biden's attempt to criminalize calling the election rigged is criticized. The author blames the FBI, Capitol Police, D.C. Mayor, and Pentagon for the Capitol security failure. They suggest an intentional riot by the federal government. The banning of evidence submission and Trump's ability to contest charges are criticized. The author accuses elites of caring only about power and interfering in elections. They claim that election rigging is now openly visible.
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
Did you know: Donald Trump said he would step down from office within hours of the 2020 Election being certified? There was no "insurrection." There was no order to "overturn" the election. There was no "incitement" of the pre-planned riot. There was no "coup." Trump called for peace within hours of the J6 riots. This caused him to be *banned* on all major social media platforms in a breathtaking act of Big Tech collusion that only served to underscore the president's narrative that the election was "rigged." Now, Biden wants to criminalize calling the 2020 election "rigged" while he and his cohorts openly rig the 2024 election. The dirty open secret is that the failure to secure the capitol was not Trump's failure; it was the failure of the FBI, Capitol Police, D.C. Mayor, and Pentagon, who all knew what was coming but conveniently failed to act in order to frame Trump and his supporters. But there is a more insidious truth suggested by videos of undercover police officers urging Trump supporters to "go to the capitol," as well as Capitol Police opening doors and removing barricades, and tear gas being wantonly dispersed into a restrained crowd of Trump supporters. The ugly truth is that the federal government wanted a riot in order to obstruct the election challenges. Now, Jack Smith wants to ban the submission of January 6 evidence that would exonerate Trump with a fair jury and a competent judge. This is in addition to his exculpation under the constitutional process of impeachment, which saw Donald Trump prevail despite dubious proceedings. Judge Chutkan and Jack Smith want to deny Trump the ability to contest these politically motivated charges with facts and evidence that go directly to the heart of the case. It is a further insult to the American people's intelligence proceeding from the January 6 cover-up committee's partisan vendetta to sully a political enemy, rather than seek to find the truth. But the truth is not being allowed to prevail against corrupted elites who care only about their illegitimate ends and nothing about the legitimate means of attaining power. There were legal election challenges, a Constitutionally authorized objection to state elections, and a staged riot that D.C. elites in the Uniparty knew was coming. The ultimate irony is that Jack Smith's purported case against Trump for 'election interference' is itself the most brazen form of election interference in U.S. history. America's elections are no longer being rigged in secret; they are being rigged out in the open for everyone to see.
@TimRunsHisMouth - Tim Young
"Jill and I attended the funerals of police officers who died as a results of" January 6th. - Joe Biden So they attended ZERO funerals? He can't stop lying. https://t.co/Dty1Bm1zlE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 140 police officers were injured, including two who lost their lives, due to the events of that day. These tragic consequences were a result of the lies spread by Donald Trump, which incited a mob to gather in Washington.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over a 140 police officers were injured. 2 of them I attended the funeral, police officers who died as a result of the events of that day. Because Donald because of Donald Trump's lies, they died because these lies brought a mob to Washington.
@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson
We don’t need to guess about what happened on January 6th. It was one of the most videotaped events in human history. A new documentary proves that most of what you’ve heard about that day is a lie. https://t.co/924EyuNrKf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the lack of knowledge surrounding the events of January 6th, claiming that the media and political class have focused on it while suppressing alternative narratives. They argue that despite the extensive footage available, there has been no comprehensive timeline of the day. The speaker suggests that January 6th is being used by both the Democratic and Republican parties to achieve their own goals, such as suppressing the population and preventing Donald Trump from running for president again. They highlight a documentary called "January 6th: A True Timeline" that presents a different perspective on the events, including law enforcement being overwhelmed and claims of being set up. The speaker concludes that the public should watch the documentary and draw their own conclusions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An awful lot has happened to American society into the world over the past 3 years but for our media and political class most of it goes on mentioned because they're talking about something else they're talking about January 6th the most solemn day in American history moment worse than Pearl Harbor worse nine eleven worse than the American Civil War. That's what they're telling us. It's hard to respond to this because even now 3 years later most Americans have no real sense of what happened on January 6th and any attempts to tell them have been suppressed by the big tech companies or shouted down by NBC News and CNN and other news organizations. That's odd if you think about it. Why do most of us have no real idea what happened?
There's probably no event in American history that was filmed by more people from more angles than January 6th. And yet until very recently no one had put together a timeline. What happened? People walked of them from the White House to the Capitol, some of them went inside the building and we've been talking about the aftermath. But how did all of that happen?
It's on tape. Why haven't we seen it? Well, if you've watched Joe Biden recently, you know why you haven't seen it. Because January 6th is a perfect way for the Democratic Party and by the way the Republican Party for the party that controls this country, the Uniparty, to get what it wants, to suppress the population, to keep Donald Trump from running for president again, and to put its enemies in jail. Just the other day, Joe Biden often derided as senile.
Didn't seem senile at all as he gave a speech about January 6th. He seemed like a fascist. Watch this. Watch Joe Biden celebrate the fact that his political opponents were sent to prison and listen as the crowd applauds him bragging about how these Trump voters are rotting in prison. Why?
Speaker 1: Since that day, more than 1200 people have been charged for their assault on the Capitol. Nearly 900 of them have been convicted or plead guilty. Collectively to date, they have been sentenced to more than 840 years in prison. What's Trump done? Instead of calling him criminals, he's called these these insurrectionists Patriots.
Speaker 0: He's a vicious and cruel and hollow man and really gets the for any of that but it was on display in that speech is on display all around us and the only reason they get away with it is because again most of us have no real idea what actually happened on January 6th, but it is knowable because it was filmed from thousands of angles and that tape still exists to some extent it's still being suppressed by the Republican Speaker of the House by the way who could release it but hasn't memo to the Speaker go ahead and release that video but there's still enough in the public domain that a group filmmakers decided to put it all together. Now there's very little editorial commentary in their new documentary it's called January 6th a true timeline and it should be the most famous film in the United States but it's not we're hoping that changes soon the movie lays out the day's events moment by moment it shows you what actually happened at the Capitol from video that they did not shoot but collected once again from the public domain in some cases is from liberal journalists who are on the scene.
And they discovered a lot. For example at 224 while crowds outside the capital were still going growing the president then president president Trump tweeted this the USA demands the truth that's a very famous tweet the January 6th special commission, the fake committee of liars who, quote, investigated January 6th, made reference to that tweet repeatedly. They claimed it was the reason that protesters breached the capital. But that's a lie, like so much of what they said. Video from that day collected in this documentary tells a very different story.
At the moment that Trump tweeted that, Metro police law enforcement on the scene appeared to have accidentally tear gas themselves and run away from the scene that's what the video shows and that left a path to the capital wide open but assess for yourself here's the video
Speaker 2: Our investigation found that immediately after the president's 2:24 PM tweet, the crowds both outside the capital And inside the capital surged.
Speaker 3: What the January 6th committee failed to mention was that it was officers misusing and CS gas at that same time that led to a surge.
Speaker 4: Hey, Rich. Put it up the step.
Speaker 3: DC MPD officer, Cowry, at the urging of officer Thao, misfires a CS gas canister that eventually forces police to fall back and lose their position. As officers on the West Plaza, unequipped with gas masks, Struggle breathing. The plume of CS gas can be seen from the overhead camera on the lower right corner of your screen. It blows over the entire area of the West Plaza that the police had secured for nearly an hour. Within 3 minutes of the officer CS gas misfire, the police line on the West Plaza entirely collapses.
Speaker 0: So we now know that there were more than 200 plainclothes federal informants in the crowd. Some of them were already inside the capital before it was breached before law enforcement opened the doors for the protesters in some cases they were already inside so you can draw your own conclusions from that. But we also know that a lot of law enforcement on the ground, those were local DC cops, Metropolitan PD you'd saw on that tape, and some of the Capitol Police had nothing to do with any kind of setup. In fact, they were the victims of it. As you could see in that clip, law enforcement on the scene were completely overwhelmed and the body Kim, video shot throughout the day shows that.
You see cops repeatedly telling each other that leadership has failed them and that's true. And that they've been quote, set up. Watch this.
Speaker 3: At 2:33 PM, a frustrated police officer can be heard venting about being, In his words, set up.
Speaker 4: They set up up. That's what they did. They set up they set up 64. Absolutely. And then they asked No.
For 2 hours later, they set us up. They needed everybody by the way. No. By the way, they set us for pizza. No.
We ain't got it. We're doing we put away here with some
Speaker 3: At the same time, police officers discuss being unprepared for what they encountered.
Speaker 4: I didn't know we are coming up for this. I wanna make sure we all had our I didn't realize how bad I they set us up to fail. Hey, Dave. There was no way we were winning that. And you've now you got at least 4 platoons that are just gassed out?
Yeah. Literally. Because us, 54 doesn't have masks. Yeah. Well, remember, we're supposed to be rapid response just to buy time for the party to use to come.
They didn't come. They didn't ask for.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Those aren't racist insurrections. Those are cops and they know exactly what happened. They got set up and so did a lot of people that day. It wasn't like federal authorities didn't know there was gonna be a big demonstration.
They knew very well. They've been talking about it for weeks. It's not a guess it's proven it's a fact so they knew what was up they've been set up now one of the protesters you may recognize from that day is a man called Jacob Chansley often called the media the QAnon Shaman he's the guy with a painted face and horns now the media repeatedly told us that he and Ashlee Babbit the military veteran who was murdered that day the unarmed woman who was shot to death by Michael Byrd that he was a threat to public safety and completely out of control. But, of course, the tape shows just the opposite as does this documentary. When Metro PD made their way to the senate floor and asked Chansley to leave, Chansley complied immediately.
He thanked officers and said, quote, god bless you as he left. Watch this.
Speaker 4: Let's go. Let's go. Thank you. Thank you, officer.
Speaker 0: Thank you for your patience. We really appreciate it. Thank you for your patience. We love you. God bless you.
That's what they said to the cops. Right these are the racist insurrection. Jacob Chansley did a hard time in prison but there he is telling cops he loves them as he walks peacefully unarmed out of the Senate chamber. So you may have concluded correctly that virtually everything you have heard he screamed at you for 3 years about January 6th is a lie and this tape proves it it's an hour long it is well worth your time we hope every American watches it and draws the obvious conclusion which is that our leadership class is poisonous power mad and dangerous they're the dangerous ones not the people who showed up at the Capitol to protest the theft of their democratic election the people who set it up in the 1st place joining us now is David Summerall. He's one of the producers of this documentary and we're very glad to have him join us.
David thanks so much for coming on. So you've been involved in, in trying to figure out what happened that day for the last 3 years and you did this amazing public service for the rest of us by putting together this documentary. Tell us some of the things that you learned from this.
Speaker 5: Well, I think it's the things we didn't learn from anybody else. The select committee had every opportunity with all the evidence put a, you know, documentary out that showed what happened that day. And it and it's been interesting working with families, with the lawyers, you know, all the defendants that we can find that we can try to help and, go through this footage to find that their stories are all true that they tell. You know, If you notice, nobody's been charged by the FBI for lying about what they witnessed on January 6th, which I think is a big point. But the the discovery in this video I think the public really needs to see and that's why they've kept it hidden and dangled it like a carrot over the public for so long for 3 years when it tells a different story and the hostages you know they deserve to be released there there's no reason to keep people that were peaceful You know, guys like Chansley, like you said, you know, god bless you.
And then they put him in prison. So I don't understand, you know, why the public Didn't understand more about it other than they couldn't see it. And I hope they are properly outraged from this film.
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent lawsuit revealed that Lt. Michael Byrd, the Capitol Police Officer who shot and killed Ashli Babbitt on January 6, falsely claimed that shots were fired at him before shooting her. The lawsuit argues that Byrd should be held accountable for murder, along with others involved in the planning and staging of the events on January 6.
@Alissa4TheUSA - ᗩℓιѕѕα♡
This is HUGE! January 6: The Capitol Police Officer who Killed Ashli Babbitt Lied about Being Shot at just After Shooting Her. In a recent lawsuit, it was discovered that Lt. Michael Byrd, the CPO who murdered Ashli, at 2:45PM, or within 1 minutes after shooting Ashli, Lt. Byrd made the following call: “405B. We got shots fired in the lobby. We got shots fired in the lobby of the House Chamber. Shots are being fired at us and we’re sh, uhh, prepared to fire back at them. We have guns drawn.” Approximately 35 seconds later, Lt. Byrd made another radio call… “405B. We got an injured person. I believe that person was shot.” In fact, no shots were fired at Lt. Byrd or his fellow officers. The only single shot fired was from Lt. Byrd murdering Ashli Babbitt. Ashli Babbitt was murdered! Why hasn't our government done anything about it? Lt. Byrd is a MURDERER & should be in prison for LIFE. Every single person involved in the planning, and staging of #J6, which was caused by stealing the 2020 election, which is the real insurrection, should be tried for treason against the United States of America. Lawsuit in comments.
@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
They impeached a perfectly innocent President who did his part and tried to provide 10,000 National Guard troops ahead of J6. Nancy Pelosi and DC Mayor Muriel Bowser REFUSED to secure the Capitol and the city. They must be held accountable! https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/08/exclusive-liz-cheney-january-6-committee-suppressed-exonerating-evidence-of-trumps-push-for-national-guard/
Exclusive: Jan. 6 Committee Hid Trump-Exonerating Evidence
Cheney and her Jan. 6 committee falsely claimed they had 'no evidence' the Trump White House had asked for 10,000 National Guard troops.
thefederalist.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Democrats blamed Trump for J6, but new footage shows Nancy Pelosi taking responsibility for not having National Guard troops. Liz Cheney and the January 6 Committee allegedly suppressed evidence supporting Trump's push for the National Guard.
@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk
🚨Democrats have spent three years gaslighting Americans that Donald Trump was to blame for the events of J6—event though he offered to authorize thousands of National Guard troops. Here's NEW FOOTAGE of Nancy Pelosi taking responsibility for not having the National Guard at J6. Bombshell stuff.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We should have had accountability for what happened at the Capitol. It's ridiculous that we didn't call the National Guard sooner. They thought they had enough security, but clearly they didn't. I take responsibility for not being more prepared.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have responsibility, Terry. We did not have any accountability for what was going on there, and we should have. This is ridiculous. You're gonna ask me in the middle of the thing when they've already breached the the, inaugural stuff that that, should we call the Capitol Police? I mean, the, National Guard?
Why weren't the National Guard there to begin with? They thought that they had sufficient No. There's not a question of how they have been. They don't know. They clearly didn't know, and I take responsibility for not having them just prepare for more.
@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk
Worth a read MOLLIE HEMINGWAY: Liz Cheney, January 6 Committee Suppressed Exonerating Evidence Of Trump’s Push For National Guard https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/08/exclusive-liz-cheney-january-6-committee-suppressed-exonerating-evidence-of-trumps-push-for-national-guard/
Exclusive: Jan. 6 Committee Hid Trump-Exonerating Evidence
Cheney and her Jan. 6 committee falsely claimed they had 'no evidence' the Trump White House had asked for 10,000 National Guard troops.
thefederalist.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts highlight various instances where lies have been told, including dismissing videos of Joe Biden's age and mental state as "deep fakes." Other lies mentioned involve border security, the laptop scandal, inflation, election security, puberty blockers, and cases against Trump. The author expresses frustration with a perceived deceitful and power-hungry movement.
@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk
If they will lie and tell you the videos VERY clearly showing that Joe Biden is extremely old and senile by calling them "deep fakes," just remember they also lied about: - 100% safe and effective - The border is not open - Biden needs Congress to secure the border - The laptop was Russian disinfo - Inflation won't happen - Inflation isn't happening - Inflation is under control - 2020 was the most secure election in history - Puberty blockers are harmless and fully reversible - The cases against Trump are non-political We are dealing with a vile and malicious movement full of snakes and liars. They want political power so badly that they will desecrate America over and over to achieve it.
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it absurd and embarrassing that Biden is honoring Congress members who have lied to the American people. The Jan 6 Select Committee manipulated and destroyed evidence to create a false narrative against Trump, even hiring a TV producer to give it credibility. This was a total hoax and a waste of time. I want to assure everyone that House Republicans will keep investigating this corrupt committee, and it will be fully funded to continue next Congress.
@SpeakerJohnson - Speaker Mike Johnson
What a complete joke and utter embarrassment. Biden is foolishly giving an award to members of Congress who intentionally and repeatedly lied to the American people?! The Jan 6 Select Committee manipulated AND destroyed evidence - created a fake, phony narrative all to try and hurt Trump. They even hired a TV producer from the legacy media in a desperate attempt to legitimize what Americans knew was a total hoax and complete waste of time. Be assured of this: House Republicans WILL continue our investigation into this corrupt committee and it will be FULLY FUNDED so it can continue next Congress.
@nypost - New York Post
Biden is giving the leaders of the Jan. 6 congressional panel — Liz Cheney and Bennie Thompson — the US’ second highest civilian medal https://trib.al/v6aOOmp
SocialFlow
trib.al
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that if January 6th was truly the insurrection the Biden DOJ claims, they wouldn't have needed to manipulate facts and overcharge individuals with crimes they didn't commit. The pressure to accept plea deals and sign false statements seems aimed at undermining MAGA. The American people clearly rejected Biden, Harris, and others on November 5th, 2024. It's time to reclaim our country. Let's go.
@BrandonStraka - Brandon Straka #WalkAway
If January 6th were the “insurrection” the Biden DOJ desperately wanted the public to believe it was, they wouldn’t have had to lie in every single case to make their point. They wouldn’t have had to overcharge everybody with crimes they didn’t commit, then force the majority into taking plea deals and sign FALSE statements of offense to try to destroy MAGA. The American people REJECTED Biden, Harris, Liz Cheney, Bennie Thompson, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Kenzinger, the DOJ, the FBI, and the entire mainstream media on November 5th, 2024. We’re taking our country back now. Let’s go.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was scheduled to speak at a permitted event on Capitol grounds on January 6th. As I arrived, I learned that people were entering the Capitol. There were no police officers on the east side, and I walked through open barricades into a crowd. This led to my first felony charge for being on restricted grounds. After filming a video outside, the FBI raided my home, and I faced multiple felony charges. The government is overcharging individuals, forcing them into a difficult position of either going to trial or accepting a plea deal that they dictate. This has been a targeted effort against Trump supporters.
I'm also part of the Walk Away Campaign, a movement of former Democrats encouraging people to think independently and move away from identity politics. For more information, visit walkawaycampaign.com.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, Brandon. I'm gonna start with you. So you didn't even go into the capital that day. You've been facing prosecution. Your probation, it's about to end.
What's it been like for you, and and how do you feel now?
Speaker 1: I mean, it's almost impossible to sum up. So, yeah, I was a scheduled speaker at a permitted event on Capitol grounds on January 6th and when I was arriving to do my speaking engagement I started getting text messages saying we're hearing that something's happening at the building people are going inside. So I walked up to the building on the east side what's really relevant about my case is that there were 0 police officers on the east side of the building when I was there, not one. There were open barricades. There were no signs telling people they weren't allowed to be there, and I literally walked into a crowd of 100 of people.
And at that moment, that is when according to the DOJ, I committed my first felony. Felony? Felony.
Speaker 0: Because you engaged in a protest.
Speaker 1: They said that I was standing on restricted grounds. Okay. And they gave me a felony charge for that. I shot a video outside the building for 8 minutes and I uploaded that video to Twitter and two and a half weeks later the FBI raided my house, put me in handcuffs and took me to jail. I sat in jail for several days before I found out that I was facing multiple felonies for shooting that video outside of the capitol and a misdemeanor charge.
So this is what they're doing to people. They're overcharging them. They're putting them in this horrifying position where it's you against the federal government in the district of DC and you can either go to trial and they'll get a 100% conviction rate. That's what the government's gotten so far. Mhmm.
Or you can take their plea deal. And when you take their plea deal, they write your confession. They say what you did. Mhmm. This entire thing has been a witch hunt to try to destroy Donald Trump's legacy and to harm his supporters.
That's what happened to me and so many others.
Speaker 0: That's the walk away campaign. Talk about what that is.
Speaker 1: Sure. So we are the movement, largest national movement of former, Democrats walking away from the Democratic party. We're about to turn 7 years old this May. We travel around the country doing college tours, minority focused town halls, educational videos. Our goal is to get as many people as possible thinking for themselves, seeing the lights and walking away from identity politics, tribal mentality and embracing your individuality as an American.
If people want to find out more, they can go to walkawaycampaign.com.
Speaker 0: Sheep no more. Brandon Straka.
@MZHemingway - Mollie
Was shocked to see Sen. Klobuchar falsely claim today "police officers" were "killed" on J6. Just a brazen lie. It's literal fake news. One year ago Rachel Maddow falsely claimed J6 protesters had "bludgeoned to death" a police officer. Complete lie. And never corrected.
reSee.it AI Summary
I confronted J6 Committee's lead investigator, Tim Heaphy, about the claim that the January 6 violence was worse than the BLM riots, especially since no one was killed during J6. He avoided my questions regarding misinformation from the Washington Post and insisted that Officer Sicknick's death was linked to January 6, despite previous debunking. He falsely stated that the medical examiner found evidence of injuries related to chemical exposure, but the examiner actually reported no evidence of injuries from that day.
@0rf - Matt Orfalea
I asked J6 Committee's lead investigator, Tim Heaphy, How was the J6 violence worse than the BLM riots if the J6 rioters didn't kill anyone? Are you concerned with misinfo from WaPo, which falsely reported that they had? He dodges & lies that Officer Sicknick died from J6 🧵
Video Transcript AI Summary
How can you say there's no equivalence between the BLM protests and the January 6th riots? Many were killed during the BLM protests, while no one was killed by protesters on January 6th. Also, are you concerned about misinformation from The Washington Post, which initially gave the false impression that a protester was killed on January 6th?
I trust credible sources like The Washington Post. There were deaths related to the Capitol defense, which is not misinformation. The BLM protests were serious and warranted accountability, but the dynamics of an attack on the government are fundamentally different. Officer Sicknick's death was linked to the stress of the riot and preexisting conditions, as determined by the medical examiner.
Thank you for your questions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. We think
Speaker 1: we have time for one more question. Coming in from the back.
Speaker 0: How you doing? So I just wanna follow-up on something you said earlier. You said there's no equivalence between the BLM protests and the January 6th, riots. So, my question is, like, how can you say, you know, aside from all the property damage in the burned homes, how do you see the violence is worse, at the capitol compared to BLM protests, when many people were killed in the BLM slash antifa protests, but nobody but the protesters didn't kill anybody on January 6th. And just one short follow-up question, if I may.
You mentioned in the book that, the issue with misinformation on social media, which everyone would agree is an issue. Are you concerned about misinformation from, you know, sources like the local paper of note, The Washington Post, which did give everyone the false impression that the protesters had murdered, had killed somebody, on January 6th. He died the following day of natural causes. The Post did did make that correction many months later, but most people didn't get that update. Anyway, thank you.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Thank you for the question.
Speaker 2: I'm not concerned about misinformation from The Washington Post. I generally trust The Washington Post and other credible sources of information. There were people who died as a direct result of their involvement in protecting the capital. So that's not misinformation. And I don't mean to suggest on the BLM protest in the summer of 2020 that they weren't serious, that they weren't worthy of a strong response, that people shouldn't have been held accountable.
They absolutely were. My point is that they were just sort of fundamentally different than an attack on the seat of government. They're they're just a fundamentally different dynamic. Seriously, how do you
Speaker 1: think that one is worse, violence, violence, and they didn't get to this way? And I'm curious who like, you say you trust everything in The Washington Post, and then you also say Sydney, officer Sydney was,
Speaker 0: killed associates to something
Speaker 1: that happened during the riot.
Speaker 0: But the post itself followed up much later and said he died of natural causes.
Speaker 2: No. Brian, the the medical examiner found that officer Sicknick died as a result of exposure to the chemical agents and and the the stress of defending the capital exacerbating a preexisting condition. That's a a legal conclusion that I trust, that The Washington Post didn't make up.
Speaker 0: Okay. The Washington Post didn't say another. No.
Speaker 3: Okay. I think our time for questions is done. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Okay. Alright. Thank you. Thank you. Hey.
I really appreciate you coming out and
@0rf - Matt Orfalea
Although the microphone was taken from me, I asked about the contradiction between Heaphy’s trust in the Washington Post and his claim that Sicknick’s death was a result of Jan. 6—which was effectively debunked in the Post 4 years ago. /2
Video Transcript AI Summary
You trust the Washington Post, yet you describe the situation as sickening regarding the officer's death during the riot. The Post later clarified he died of natural causes. However, the medical examiner concluded that Officer Signick's death resulted from exposure to chemical agents and the stress of defending the Capitol, which worsened a preexisting condition. This is a legal conclusion that I trust, not something fabricated by The Washington Post.
I’m not disputing that the Post presented another perspective. It seems our time for questions is over. Thank you for your time, and I appreciate your presence here.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You say you trust everything in the Washington Post, and then you also say sickening, awful sickening was, killed associates to something that happened during the riot. But the post itself followed up much later and said he died of natural causes. No. Brian, the the medical examiner found that officer Signick died as a result of exposure to the chemical agents and and the the stress of defending the capital exacerbating a preexisting condition. That's a legal conclusion that I trust, that The Washington Post didn't make up.
Okay. I'm not saying that The Washington Post didn't say another option. No. Okay. I think our time for questions is done.
Thank you so much. Okay. Alright. Thank you. Thank you.
Hey. I really appreciate you coming out, and
@0rf - Matt Orfalea
Heaphy just lied and said, “The medical examiner found that Officer Sicknick died as a result of exposure to the chemical agents...” The medical examiner "found no evidence" of that. /3
@0rf - Matt Orfalea
I gave Heaphy one more chance to save himself. But he repeated the false claim that the medical examiner found that Sicknick suffered "injuries" on J6. Again, the medical examiner found "no evidence" that Sicknick suffered any "injuries"—"internal or external" on J6. /4
Video Transcript AI Summary
The post indicated natural causes, but the medical examiner determined that Cygni's injuries were related to his service. The autopsy was conducted by the DC medical examiner. When asked about concerns regarding misinformation from The Washington Post, there was no concern on this topic, though other topics like the Iraq war were deemed beyond the speaker's scope.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the post did say it was natural causes. When did they learn and how did we learn that it it was related?
Speaker 1: The medical examiner found that Cygni's injuries were related to his service.
Speaker 0: Is it a medical examiner for for who?
Speaker 1: For whomever did the autopsy. Okay. I believe it was the DC. Yeah.
Speaker 0: And and as far as you said you're not concerned about misinformation with The Washington Post, what about Not on this topic. No. Okay. But other topics, like, the Iraq war and all that? Is that
Speaker 1: Kinda beyond my scope.
Speaker 0: Okay. Alright. Thanks. Have a great You too. Thank you.
@0rf - Matt Orfalea
Full story at http://Orf.Report /5
Matt Orfalea | Substack
Accidental journalist and video creator
substack.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I noted Sen. Cory Booker's criticism of recent pardons, where he mentioned multiple police officers died during a protest, a claim echoed by others. However, it's important to clarify that only one person, protester Ashli Babbitt, died that day. While there are valid arguments against the pardons and the events of that day were indeed disgraceful for our democracy, the assertion of multiple officer deaths misrepresents the facts and doesn't contribute to the necessary discussions about the broader implications of the pardons.
@JonathanTurley - Jonathan Turley
Sen. Cory Booker (D., N.J.) just criticized the pardons on CNN by saying "He has unfortunately pardoned police killers. Five police officers died that day." It is a claim made by other senators. Only one person died that day: protester Ashli Babbitt https://jonathanturley.org/2025/01/08/police-officers-were-injured-and-killed-klobuchar-repeats-common-false-claim-about-january-6th/
“Police Officers were Injured and Killed”: Klobuchar Repeats Common False Claim About January 6th
Minnesota Democrat Sen. Amy Klobuchar this week was hit by a "community note" flagging a common false statement made about January 6th and how multiple officers were killed that day. Democratic leaders routinely refer to multiple deaths of officers when the only person to die on January 6th was Ashli Babbitt, a killing of an…
jonathanturley.org
@JonathanTurley - Jonathan Turley
...There are good-faith arguments that can be made against the scope of these pardons. Many of us denounced the riot and still view it as a disgraceful day for our democracy. https://jonathanturley.org/2021/01/10/a-crisis-of-faith-why-we-should-be-worried-more-about-a-desecration-than-an-insurrection/ However, the repeated claim that officers died that day distorts the record. ...
A Crisis Of Faith: Why We Should Be Worried More About A Desecration Than An Insurrection
Below is my column in the Hill on the riot at Congress and its implications for our country. As shown by the unfounded rush for a "snap impeachment," we are experiencing a crisis of faith in this country -- not only in our Constitution but ourselves. Pushing for a snap vote (and snap judgment) on…
jonathanturley.org
@JonathanTurley - Jonathan Turley
...Even among the critics of the DOJ "shock and awe" policy, the scope of the pardon was broader than many expected. That is a worthy debate. However, the claim of multiple deaths on that day does not advance that debate.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
LEFT: Nancy Pelosi now says she begged Donald Trump for the National Guard on January 6th RIGHT: The House Sergeant at Arms, the most Senior Security Official, says he was overridden by Nancy Pelosi to stop National Guard from being present on Jan 6th All Democrats do is lie https://t.co/rnqB0iSPU4
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that on January 6th, there was violence against the constitution, Congress, and the U.S. Capitol. They allege that they begged the President of the United States to send in the National Guard, but he refused. The speaker further claims that the president would not send in the National Guard when law enforcement people were being harmed, some of whom later died. They assert this inaction occurred during an insurrection that the president incited, which caused damage to those assigned to protect the capital and the constitution and to accept the results of the electoral college.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a bipartisan way, on January 6, with violence against the constitution, against the congress, and against the United States capital, we beg the president of The United States to send in the National Guard. He would not do it. Not only would he not do it, when law enforcement people were being harmed, let some later died, He would not send it in when his an instigation that he ins an insurrection that he incited was causing damage to those assigned to protect the capital and the constitution that day to accept the results of the of the, electoral college.
Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6, 2021, the House Sergeant at Arms, Paul Irving, appointed by Speaker Pelosi, expressed concerns about the "optics" of deploying the National Guard. When Chief Sun requested the Guard, Irving said he'd "run it up the chain," implying Pelosi's office.
Pelosi stated she hadn't spoken to Chief Sun since the initial breach, but Sun says he spoke with her three times that evening. He briefed her on plans to get everyone back into chambers.
Prior to January 6, Sun requested National Guard assistance from Irving and Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger. Irving didn't like the optics and Stenger suggested Sun contact General Walker about availability. Stenger later told Sun that Irving had forewarned him, saying Pelosi would never approve the Guard.
During a call on January 6, military personnel recommended against Sun's request for the National Guard. Chief Conte of the Metropolitan Police Department questioned this denial. General Milley did not share intelligence about violent rhetoric and threats with Chief Sun.
The Capitol Police requested National Guard assistance at 1:49 PM, but approval from the acting Secretary of Defense didn't come until 5:08 PM. The Guard arrived at the Capitol by 5:20 PM.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, we're here to discuss the security failures that occurred on 01/06/2021 and how we can prevent these failures from occurring again. Wanna dive into the questions, chief Sun. In your transcribed interview, you mentioned that you met with house sergeant in arms regarding the National Guard prior to January 6. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: And who is the house sergeant in arms, leading up to and on January 6? That would be Paul Irving. And the the house sergeant at arms is appointed by who?
Speaker 1: He's appointed, that at that time by speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 0: And in your transcribed interview, you mentioned that when you brought up the National Guard to the house sergeant at arms in the days leading up to January 6, that mister Irving said he, quote, didn't like the optics, end quote. Is is that correct?
Speaker 1: That that is correct. He, he referenced being concerned for optics.
Speaker 0: And on January 6, when he went to mister Irving to get his approval to call in the guard, mister Irving said he would, quote, run it up the chain. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. That was a telephone call. I didn't see him in person when I made that request.
Speaker 0: The house sergeant at Arms is considered probably the most senior security official on the house side. When mister Irving says he has to, quote, run it up the chain, end quote, what did that mean?
Speaker 1: I took that to mean his leadership chain.
Speaker 0: And and who would be his leadership chain? It would be He's he's he's functionally the most senior security official on the house side. Correct?
Speaker 1: That's his that's his title. That's part of the title, the senior law enforcement official for the house of representatives, but he would have been referring to the leadership team that goes up to speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 0: So the the political leadership team, meaning meaning elected officials, not not another security official. Is that your
Speaker 1: That that is correct, sir. He's the top security official for the house.
Speaker 0: So running up the chamber most likely in your in your opinion is is through the speaker's office and possibly to speaker Pelosi?
Speaker 1: That would be where it end. Yes.
Speaker 0: Okay. So so let let's park that there, then let's jump to a a set here. In a press conference on January 7, speaker Pelosi called for your resignation on national television. Speaker Pelosi also stated that she had not talked to you since the initial breach of the Capitol. But according to your transcribed interview, you were on the phone with speaker Pelosi a few times.
Can you explain that discrepancy?
Speaker 1: Yeah. That is that that is correct. I spoke to speaker Pelosi three times that that evening, and she went on national TV and said I'd never spoken to her. But I spoke to her three times. The three three times were the time when I went over to brief president vice president Pence at the secure location, I'd called house sergeant Arms Irving, told him I was going over to brief the vice president.
I was also going over to do a personal assessment of the capital. At that point, things were getting under control. Went over there, briefed him on when we can get them back into chambers with, you know, mister Irving being fully aware. He said he wanted to get speaker Pelosi on the phone. He made a phone call from his cell phone at approximately 05:34 where I briefed speaker Pelosi.
The call was when I left that location. As I was walking away, met up with mister Stenger, and we started walking over to the senate to go brief the senate when Jennifer Hemingway, I believe it was Jennifer Hemingway, handed me the cell phone, and it was Emily Barrett's cell phone calling her and it was Speaker Pelosi on the other line. This is my call with Speaker Pelosi questioning the information I'd given to Vice President Pence about when we can get back into chambers. I assured her that information was correct. I could get them back into chambers by seven 7PM, and the call ended.
That was call number two. Call number three was 06:25PM. I was over at the senate from the secure location I mean, from where the senate had been sequestered. And on a cell phone using Robert Carham's cell phone, they dialed leadership who was over off-site at a secure location, and I briefed all of the leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers. That would've been call number three with speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 0: You didn't have one call. You didn't have two call. You had three calls. So speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to you are inaccurate.
Speaker 1: That is correct, sir.
Speaker 2: Chief Sun, you previously testified on 01/03/2020 or on that on 01/03/2021, three days before January 6, you met separately with house sergeant at arms Paul Irving and senate sergeant at arms Michael Stenger. And, you asked them to approve a request for National Guard assistance on the sixth. Now this is on January. I believe this was in your book that you, met with both, Stenger and Irvin and requested National Guard assistance on to be ready on the sixth. Can you explain what happened in those two meetings with Irving and Stenger?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. So on the morning of the third at 09:24AM, I specifically went to see him because I know what what a big deal it is to have National Guard come and assist us on the on the hill. I went into his office again 09:24 in the morning, went up, and immediately went up and said, hey. I'd like to bring in the National Guard to support me on to assist me on the perimeter. Because when we have a joint session of congress, it takes a lot of my personnel inside.
But immediately, as soon as I asked him, his response was, I don't know. I don't like the optics of that. And his response was, besides, the intelligence doesn't support it. He he immediately then we began talking. He said, have you reached out to Mike Stenger on this?
I said, no, I have not talked to him about it yet. He said, why don't you talk to Stenger and see what he has to say? So then I left, went over to Mike Stenger's office at 09:35 in the morning, walked into his office. He wasn't there. I came back.
He showed up at 11:13. I showed back up at 11:53 and went in to immediately ask him, can I I'd like to request the National Guard? He said, you know, let's come up with another idea. Why don't you call do you know somebody at the National Guard? I said, yes, sir.
I know General William Walker. He said, why don't you call Walker and see if we need them, how quickly could they be get here and how many people could they send us? So I called William Walker, 06:14PM that night. He told me they have a 125 people assisting with COVID response. He could reallocate those fairly quickly once he got secretary of defense approval and send them over.
Speaker 2: K. When when you met with Stenger, had Irvin given him heads up that you were coming to ask for National Guard?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Later on, after after January 6, specifically on April 8, I went and had lunch with Mike Stenger. And I asked him because it was kinda unusual. He came up with that idea so quickly when I went walking in. And I asked him, I said, mister Stenger, you came up with that response fairly quickly for me to call general Walker.
And he had told me Paul Irving had called him ahead of time and said, son came here looking for the national asking for the National Guard. We gotta come up with another plan. Pelosi will never go for it. I was floored by him saying that.
Speaker 2: Okay. So but you don't know I know this word optics had come up several times in the past or in in different contexts. Do you know if Irvin had discussed that with Stenger of what a possible response would be?
Speaker 1: I have no idea, sir.
Speaker 2: Alright. Around 2PM on January 6, you joined a call with Metropolitan Police Department chief Conte and National Guard representatives. According to chief Conte's transcribed testimony given to the select committee, you asked the National Guard to send assistance on that call, and he didn't hear the military people respond to your plea. Is that what you remember?
Speaker 1: No. He heard clearly the military respond to my plea and say they recommended against my request for the National Guard. Robert Conte immediately butted in and said, let me get this right. You're denying the chief of the Capitol Police? And, again, he just you know, I can go farther into that if you want.
Speaker 2: Okay. Thank you. Are you familiar with the term data miner?
Speaker 1: I I have become, familiar with it. Yes.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And according to a book by Carol Linning, general Milley was using this tool and reached out to senator Angus King warning him about violent rhetoric for January 6. Some of the intelligence included references to smuggling guns and other weapons into DC. One message said, let's burn senator McConnell's house down while he's in it. Another one seemingly addressed to members who supported certifying the election said, we're coming to kill you.
Just wait a few days. Did General Milley ever reach out to you and share these concerns with you of any of this of this intelligence?
Speaker 1: No, sir.
Speaker 2: Do you know if he reached out to either of the sergeant at arms?
Speaker 1: I have no idea, sir.
Speaker 2: Would this intelligence have helped, the Capitol Police prepare for January 6? Absolutely.
Speaker 3: At 01:30PM on January 6, we watched as the Metropolitan Police De began to employ officers to support the Capitol Police In doing so, the officers began to withdraw from the traffic control points that were jointly manned with District Of Columbia guardsmen At 01:49PM, I received a frantic call from then chief of United States Capitol Police Steven Sun where he informed me that the security perimeter of The United States Capitol had been breached by hostile rioters. Chief Sun, his voice cracking with emotion, indicated that there was a dire emergency at the capital and he requested the immediate assistance of as many available national guardsmen that I could muster. Immediately after that +1 30 +1 49 call, I alerted the US Army senior leadership of the request. The approval for chief Sun's request would eventually come from the acting secretary of defense and be relayed to me by army senior leaders at 05:08PM, about three hours and nineteen minutes later. I had already had guardsmen on buses at the armory ready to move to the capital.
Consequently, at 05:20PM, less than twenty minutes, the District of Columbia National Guard arrived at the capital and were being sworn in by The United States Capitol Police.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, who oversaw January 6, says he spoke with Speaker Pelosi three times; she later claimed he never spoke to her on TV. He exposes Pelosi’s treacherous lies during his January 6 testimony, and the room erupts. The piece argues the riot was a distraction to hide election fraud and overthrow the U.S. government.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
This is: The Chief of the Capitol Police Steven Sund, who oversaw January 6. Not only did he call the treacherous witch, Nancy Pelosi once; he called her twice — and then a third time. Watch as the entire room erupts when Capitol Police Chief @ChiefSund exposes Nancy Pelosi’s treacherous lies during shocking January 6 testimony: “I spoke with Speaker Pelosi three times, and she went on TV and said I had never spoken to her.” 📝It’s time to investigate the bitch once and for all. The January 6 riot was orchestrated as a distraction to prevent the presentation of evidence of election fraud — an act that amounted to the overthrow of the U.S. government.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript centers on discussions about security failures on January 6, 2021, and the steps taken to address them, including the involvement of the House Sergeant at Arms and Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Key points:
- Initiating discussions on National Guard: The witness confirms meeting with the House Sergeant at Arms regarding the National Guard prior to January 6. The House Sergeant at Arms was Paul Irving, appointed by Speaker Pelosi at that time. Irving reportedly stated he “didn’t like the optics” when the National Guard was first raised.
- Run it up the chain and approval process: On January 6, when the witness sought approval to call in the National Guard, Irving indicated he would “run it up the chain,” understood as the leadership chain, leading toward the Speaker’s office and Speaker Pelosi. The witness clarified that the leadership chain on the House side comprises the top security official and the elected leadership team up to Speaker Pelosi.
- How it ends up with Pelosi’s office: The witness stated that running up the chain would likely end with the Speaker’s office and possibly Speaker Pelosi, describing the path as through the speaker’s office.
- Three calls with Pelosi on January 6: During a January 7 press conference, Pelosi claimed she had not talked to the witness since the breach and called for the witness’s resignation. The witness asserts that Pelosi’s claim was inaccurate, stating he spoke with Pelosi three times that evening. The three calls were:
1) First call: When the witness went to brief Vice President Pence at the secure location; he briefed Irving about returning to the chambers and the timing. Irving called Pelosi on the witness’s cell phone around 05:34 to have Pelosi on the line.
2) Second call: After walking away from Pence briefing, the witness met with Stenger and headed to brief the Senate. Jennifer Hemingway handed him Emily Barrett’s phone, and Pelosi was on the line as they discussed the information given to Pence about when the Capitol could be back in session; the witness stated he assured Pelosi the information was correct and that the chambers could be reoccupied by 7 PM. The call ended.
3) Third call: While at the Senate, on a cell phone, using another official’s cell line, the witness briefed leadership off-site at a secure location about plans to get them back into chambers. Pelosi participated in this third call as part of briefing leadership.
- Pelosi’s comment and resignation: The witness concurs with Pelosi’s claim that he spoke three times, contradicting Pelosi’s assertion of no contact since the breach. The witness expresses a wish that Pelosi had considered the challenges faced and the efforts to bring in outside resources on January 6 before she called for his resignation.
- Additional clarifications: When asked if Pelosi’s office or Pelosi herself politicized capital security, the witness said he had no idea. He also offered a closing remark hoping Pelosi would consider the witness’s efforts and the steps taken to reinforce security that day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I brief all of leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers. That would've been call number three with speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 1: So you didn't have one call. You didn't have two call. You had three calls. So speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to you are inaccurate.
Speaker 0: That is correct, sir.
Speaker 1: Today, we're here to discuss the security failures that occurred on 01/06/2021 and how we can prevent these failures from occurring again. Wanna drive into the questions, chief son. In your transcribed interview, you mentioned that you met with the house sergeant in arms regarding the National Guard prior to January 6. Is that correct?
Speaker 0: Yes, sir.
Speaker 1: And who is the house sergeant in arms, leading up to and on January 6?
Speaker 0: That would be Paul Irving.
Speaker 1: And the the House Sergeant Arms is appointed by who?
Speaker 0: As appointed, that at that time by Speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 1: And in your transcribed interview, you mentioned that when you first brought up the National Guard to the House Sergeant at Arms in the days leading up to January 6 that mister Irving said he quote didn't like the optics end quote. Is is that correct?
Speaker 0: That that is correct. He he referenced being concerned for optics.
Speaker 1: And on January 6, when he went to mister Irving to get his approval to call in the guard, mister Irving said he would quote, run it up the chain. Is that correct?
Speaker 0: Yes, sir. That was a telephone call. I didn't see him in person when I first made that request.
Speaker 1: The house sergeant at arms is considered probably the most senior security official on the house side. When mister Irving says he has to quote run it up the chain end quote, what did that mean?
Speaker 0: I took that to mean his leadership chain.
Speaker 1: And and who would be his leadership chain? It would be He's he's he's functionally the most senior, security official on the house side. Correct?
Speaker 0: That's his that's his title. That's part of the title, the senior, law enforcement official for the house of representatives, but he would have been referring to the leadership team that goes up to, speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 1: So the the political leadership team, meaning meaning elected officials, not not another security official. Is that your
Speaker 0: That that is correct, sir. He's the top security official for the house.
Speaker 1: So running up the chamber most likely in or in your opinion is is through the speaker's office and possibly to speaker Pelosi?
Speaker 0: That would be where it end. Yes.
Speaker 1: Okay. So so let let's park that there and then let's jump to a a second set here. In a press conference on January 7, speaker Pelosi called for your resignation on national television. Speaker Pelosi also stated that she had not talked to you since the initial breach of the capital. But according to your transcribed interview, you're on the phone with speaker Pelosi a few times.
Can you explain that discrepancy?
Speaker 0: Yeah. That is, that that is correct. I I spoke to speaker Pelosi, three times, that that evening, and, she went on national TV and said I'd never spoken to her, but I spoke to her three times. The three three times were the first time when I went over to brief president vice president Pence at the secure location. I'd called house sergeant Arms Irving, told him I was going over to brief the vice president.
I was also going over to do a personal assessment of the capital. At that point, things were getting under control. Went over there, briefed him on when we can get them back into chambers with, you know, mister Irving being fully aware. He said he wanted to get speaker Pelosi on the phone. He made a phone call from his cell phone at approximately 05:34, where I first briefed speaker Pelosi.
The second call was when I left that location. As I was walking away, I met up with mister Stenger, and we started walking over to the senate to go brief the senate when, Jennifer Hemingway, I believe it's Jennifer Hemingway, handed me the cell phone, and it was Emily Barrett's cell phone calling her, and it was speaker Pelosi on the other line. This is my call second call with speaker Pelosi questioning the information I've given to, vice president Pence about when we can get back into chambers. I assured her that information was correct. I could get them back into chambers by seven 7PM, and the call ended.
That was call number two. Call number three was 625 I was over at the senate from the secure location I mean, from where the senate had been sequestered and on a cell phone using Robert Carham's cell phone, they dialed leadership who was over off-site at a secure location, and I briefed all of the leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers. That would've been call number three with speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 1: So you didn't have one call. You didn't have two call. You had three calls. So speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to you were inaccurate.
Speaker 0: That is correct, sir.
Speaker 1: Let me let me shift gears and go back, as it relates to the optics of bringing people up to Capitol Hill and and running things up the chain of command ultimately to the speaker's office. Do you think speaker Pelosi's office or speaker Pelosi herself politicized capital security?
Speaker 0: I I have I have no I have no idea on that sir.
Speaker 1: Okay. Any other clarifications you'd like to make as it relates to speaker Pelosi's comments that you didn't speak to her?
Speaker 0: I just, you know, wish she had considered that, wish she had considered some of the stuff that I've faced and the efforts I went through, to bring in the outside resources on that day before she called for her resignation.