reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@GrahamAllen_1 - Graham Allen
Ground Breaking News: FBI whistleblower testified that the FBI wouldn’t allow OVER 11,000+ of J6 footage to be released because it would expose undercover agents committing crimes inside Capitol. JANUARY 6TH WAS A SETUP!!!! The FBI is trying to cover its involvement.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentioned that there were individuals inside the Capitol and the SSA responded. The speaker questioned why they couldn't be shown the 11,000 hours of available video footage. The reason given was that there might be undercover officers or confidential human sources whose identities needed protection. The speaker then mentioned that Mr. Allen faced retaliation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Those individuals were inside the capital to which the SSA responded back. And I was privy to these conversations firsthand, why can't you show us why can't you just send us give us access to the 11,000 hours of video that's available? Because there may be, me maybe UC's undercover officers or CHS's confidential human sources on those videos whose identity we need to protect? So mister Allen, you got retaliated
@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto
FLASHBACK: Bombshell video reveals undercover police officers posing as ANTIFA RIOTERS on J6.. JAN 6TH WAS A SET-UP FROM THE BEGINNING..
Video Transcript AI Summary
When we go undercover, we cover antiques. Can you put that back in? Thank you. It feels better. You guys get sprayed. Here.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When we go undercover, it covers antiques in the. Can you put that back in? Alright. Thank you. Yep.
Yep. It feels better? You guys get sprayed. Here. Here.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
J6 SetUp To Bring Trump & MAGA Down‼️ Phone video of a dc officer on January the 6th saying “ we go undercover as antifa in the crowd” https://t.co/ma44stwTBR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 thanks Joe for covering the antiques in the crowd. They ask if it feels better and offer to spray something.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jeez. When we go under, it covers the antiques in the crowd, Joe. Can you put that back in? Alright. Thank you so much.
Yep. It feels better? You guys get sprayed. Here. Here.
@hodgetwins - Hodgetwins
Another J6 raid by the feds, wow, they even covered their camera
@45LVNancy - ♱🇺🇸𝕄𝔸𝔾𝔸 𝑵𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒚 ن
This is why they haven’t released the J6 footage J6 was an inside job https://t.co/qiuXrHNQgy
@Beard_Vet - Beard Vet
We’ve been on the record for 3 years saying the Feds Led J6 👊🏽🇺🇸“We’ll See” https://t.co/2jdqNrJ1e6
Video Transcript AI Summary
Powerful individuals in positions of authority are currently undermining our history and core principles. However, they will not escape the consequences of their actions. Despite their efforts, they aim to silence our voices and label us as far-right conspiracy theorists. But I am just an ordinary American, not someone who fits that description.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But they're going down. These these men, in their high perch, in their their position of power and authority and a walking upon our entire history, our deepest core principles. They're not gonna get away with it.
Speaker 1: They have so far.
Speaker 0: We'll see.
Speaker 1: Powerful people in this country. They wanna make sure no one hears your your voice. They want everyone to look at you like a far right crazy conspiracy theorist. Is that who you are?
Speaker 0: No, man. I'm a regular American
reSee.it AI Summary
The FBI is accused of framing whistleblower Jeremy Brown by planting evidence and imprisoning him for refusing to cooperate in staging the January 6 event. Some view this as a sign of a police state and compare the FBI to the KGB. Donations for Jeremy Brown's legal defense are requested. #freejeremybrown #policestate
@fireduptxlawyer - Paul M. Davis
This is OUTRAGEOUS! The FBI framed whistleblower Jeremy Brown by planting grenades and classified docs in his home during a raid and locked him away in prison! 🤯😡 His crime? Refusing to cooperate with the FBI to stage the January 6 #fedsurrection and blowing the whistle on their efforts to recruit him. We live in a police state and the FBI are the KGB. Please consider donating to Jeremy Brown’s legal defense. We cannot tolerate this in America. #freejeremybrown #policestate
Video Transcript AI Summary
In December 2020, federal agents approached Jeremy Brown to be a paid informant, but he refused and exposed their request to the media. As a result, he was arrested in September 2021 after an illegal search at his home. Jeremy's legal team is presenting evidence that the explosive grenades and national defense documents found in his home were planted by government agents. The agents turned off all recording devices and had no functioning body cameras during the search. DNA tests on the grenades did not match Jeremy's DNA, and a dog hair and carpet fiber found on the grenades did not match his dogs or carpet. The evidence suggests that the CD and grenades were planted. Jeremy is fighting for his freedom and American freedom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In December of 2020, federal agents Lindsay and URA approached mister Jeremy Brown at his home and asked him if he would be a paid informant for the government. They asked him to infiltrate some groups they were looking at involving concerns they had about an event in January. Mister Brown recorded this conversation, and instead of working for the government on January 6th, He went on as many media outlets that would have him starting in March of 2021 and played the recording. He named the agents and exposed what they wanted him to do.
Speaker 1: So it it's no big deal. We decided to come out. We I've worked with JTTF before it's done. Okay. You might in the future.
So see, there you have it. Well, you might in the future. So you don't care which way you need. Right. We just wanna make sure that you're not On this side of the left aggravation, you're one of 19 people that were gonna knock on door and say they're not home, or they are home.
1 of 19 people. These 2 guys, not not the not the 58 other agents that that he's about to explain that there's 60 of them in Tampa. I'm just one of 19.
Speaker 0: As a result of his righteous actions, the government had him arrested after an illegal search at his home on September of 2021. And after nearly two and a half years in federal prison, Jeremy has filed for an appeal. Jeremy's legal team is presenting forensic evidence that show the unregistered explosive grenades and the national defense documents that Jeremy was said to have illegally been in possession of were planted in his home by government agents during an illegal search. The first thing the agents did when they entered mister Brown's home for their search was turn off all 14 recording devices, and none of these agents had any functioning body cameras. The only person recording was Jeremy's girlfriend who courted the arrest by agent Lindsey and Ura, who instructed her to stop recording, which she did.
They were very deliberate and making sure nothing was recorded during their search. During this search, they allegedly found 2 explosive grenades and a CD containing national defense documents, items that mister Brown denied knowing anything about. The grenades were tested for DNA, and the FBI's own experts found 2 male specimen DNAs on the grenades. None of which were from Jeremy Brown. They found a dog hair underneath 1 of the grenades.
Mister Brown has 2 dogs, so the FBI got a search warrant, took over 50 samples from his dogs, and determined that the hair on the grenade was not from his dogs. They found a carpet fiber on the tape around one of the grenades. So they get another search warrant, cut out pieces of Jeremy's carpet, and compare the fibers to the one that was found with the grenade, and they determined it was not a match. Criminal counts 6, 7, 8, and 9 were allegedly found on a compact disc that they claim mister Brown carried with him through the deserts of Kuwait and Afghanistan for 17 years, and yet there isn't a scratch or a hint of discoloration on it. In August of 2022, there was a trace done on that CD to see when it was uploaded.
And the evidence shows that mister Brown did not have the CD or the 2 grenades in his possession. They were planted by crooked agents working for a criminal state that has locked up and tortured scores of innocent men and women for a planned false flag event that they orchestrated with so many federal assets that they lost count. This criminal state is now threatening to go after for everyone who was in Washington DC on January 6th no matter if they were in the capital or on capital grounds. While we are still somewhat free, let us support Jeremy Brown in his legal efforts so that he can free himself and continue to fight for American freedom. Greg Rees reporting.
@theblaze - TheBlaze
Blaze Media Investigative Journalist @TPC4USA has now been taken into FBI custody for his J6 reporting Watch: https://t.co/OF9WVh26ER
@theblaze - TheBlaze
Would you like to know more? theblaze.com/truth
reSee.it AI Summary
A CIA officer/former FBI claims they can manipulate situations to incriminate anyone. They admit to targeting Alex Jones and using undercover agents during the J6 incident. The FBI also allegedly uses fake news and social media to provoke anger.
@SoundInvestig - Sound Investigations
BREAKING: CIA Officer/Former FBI Boasts “Can Put Anyone in Jail…Set ’Em Up!” “We Call It a Nudge” FBI “Did What We Wanted” with Alex Jones @RealAlexJones “Took His Money Away” “Chop His Legs Off” Estimates 20 Undercover FBI Agents at J6, Works with Some of Them Now at CIA FBI Uses “Embellished” News, “Fake Social Media” to “Really Get People Mad”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the practice of entrapment by the bureau, mentioning a nudge technique to provoke reactions. They talk about targeting Alex Jones to bankrupt him through civil lawsuits. The speaker also mentions undercover FBI agents at the Capitol riot, estimating about 20 agents present. The bureau's presence was kept discreet to avoid overstepping boundaries. The speaker confirms knowing agents who were at the riot.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can kinda
Speaker 1: put anyone in jail if you know what to do.
Speaker 2: How? I'm sorry about that.
Speaker 0: Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot?
Speaker 3: Yeah. We get really close. We call it a nudge.
Speaker 4: A nudge. A nudge.
Speaker 0: Sometimes you just gotta get a quick look
Speaker 3: just to see what happens. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to follow.
Speaker 2: That's something we're putting on a fake
Speaker 3: social media thing to, like, really get people mad.
Speaker 0: Balance
Speaker 3: Jones. Yeah. So we were after him. You are? We did what we wanted.
Speaker 5: Which was what?
Speaker 3: We took his money away. He shot his legs.
Speaker 6: Gavin Oglenis is a contracting officer at the CIA. Oglenis worked for the FBI in 2021 and 2020 2 in the San Diego office, moved on to Homeland Security where he conducted asylum interviews at the southern border, and now works for the CIA managing multimillion dollar contracts across government agencies and private sector vendors.
Speaker 3: I work for, I work for this without I'm not supposed to tell people any job.
Speaker 0: I say intelligence, what do you think? CIA? Amazing.
Speaker 3: So I deal a lot with, like, different agencies. We're contracting with, like, director of National Intelligence to do stuff. We do Navy, Army, video, really. I just FBI. I used to work for the FBI.
So Yeah. Through the FBI app. They're like, here, you used to work there. Oh, I'm permanent. I'm still Yeah.
Speaker 0: Good. Well, why do they call contractors?
Speaker 3: Because I do the contracts. Uh-huh. I do all the legal contracts. With the bureau. I was the guy in the back of the truck in the van.
Speaker 6: O'Blennis spoke to an undercover signed investigations reporter about his work experience involving near entrapment and his employers' involvement with political commentator Alex Jones' legal battles.
Speaker 0: As long as the bureau is able to progress far enough to be able to put pro lifers in jail whenever they want. Yeah. You think that's on the agenda?
Speaker 2: We can we can
Speaker 3: you can kinda put anyone
Speaker 1: in jail if you know what to do. How?
Speaker 2: You set them
Speaker 3: up. You create the situation to where they have no choice but to act on their impulse. And once they act on that impulse, then we call that entrapment. It's a fine line.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot? Yeah. We get really close. Not officially?
Speaker 3: No. We get as close as we can. We get as close as we can to it without doing it.
Speaker 0: So they can entrap some of these pro lifers into doing things that they don't can do.
Speaker 3: Yeah. We call it a nudge.
Speaker 4: A nudge. A nudge.
Speaker 0: Sometimes you
Speaker 3: just gotta get a quick look just to see what happens. Right?
Speaker 0: And how does that happen?
Speaker 2: You put
Speaker 0: a post out there or
Speaker 3: you have some fake profile say something that triggers that we know is gonna trigger that. Like, we we already know your history. If we're to that point, we already know everything about So, like, oh, this is this one. Oh. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to fall.
Right?
Speaker 0: Like a railing. Like a oh. So when a railing happens, then sometimes the the bureau behind it. Yeah. Sometimes.
Speaker 2: Nothing like putting out a
Speaker 3: fake social media thing to, like, really get people mad. Mhmm. Post fake news. Yeah. Sometimes it's it's not fake.
It's embellished a little bit. Who would
Speaker 0: be, like, a big influencer that you're influencer that you're after? You're like, I don't know, like, I don't even know these names. Like, a Fox News person or like a Tucker Carlson or like oh, I'm sure he's Right.
Speaker 3: You always want the biggest and loudest. Like that what
Speaker 0: was his name? The one
Speaker 3: that said, Sandy Hook didn't happen.
Speaker 0: Alex Jones?
Speaker 3: Yeah. So we were after him.
Speaker 0: You are? Before.
Speaker 2: Are you still after
Speaker 0: him? Yeah. Why?
Speaker 3: Because he's broke. He got found guilty and had to pay, like, a $100,000,000.
Speaker 0: So what what are the after?
Speaker 3: We're not anymore.
Speaker 0: Just to get the money from him?
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Was that court case used? Was that a CFO
Speaker 3: case?
Speaker 0: That was the agency there?
Speaker 3: Well, actually, it was a defamation case. So it's a civil document. Well, we were looking at all of his callers, commenting, oh, I'm like, who's that gonna be this? Right? So even though it's technically not our well, not an agency, definitely, but not the bureau, for instance, yeah, it was not our purview.
It's a civil civil matter. Since they got all this access to his stuff and it's there, What can we go find?
Speaker 1: And did you find
Speaker 3: it? I can't tell you.
Speaker 0: Oh, we did.
Speaker 3: But so, you know, it's it's just kinda, like, you know, realize the opportunity that you have.
Speaker 0: So with Alex Jones, you were watching him long before anything ended up happening? I thought it
Speaker 3: was it wasn't my office, but, I mean, we would've we would've been well aware of what he was doing. And the
Speaker 0: goal with him was what?
Speaker 3: Just to bankrupt him? Pretty much. And we let the families do it. Oh my god. And what?
We let the families do it. Were they encouraged to do that by the bureau, like a nudge? We don't encourage people, but, like, we we just say there's no federal statute being broken. But you do have the option for a civil or a civil case. It's a pretty good case.
Nice. In our opinion.
Speaker 0: So oh, that makes so much sense. I have a cousin who's a lawyer. So that's a lot of these cases. They're they're kind of encouraged by the FBI.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Like, there's something federally federal law we can do. Let's simply, we'll add them that way. I I chopped this place, and they did. So the FBI was happy.
We didn't care. We were not
Speaker 0: home. Basically, the citizens did your job? Yeah. Wow. So you can encourage a civil lawsuit?
Speaker 3: Very encouraged. Educated. What can you do with
Speaker 0: people like Alex Jones now? Is he still out there? Good. He's still chirping.
Speaker 3: He can chirp? You still watching? Yeah. Why? I said He did what we wanted.
Speaker 5: Which was what?
Speaker 3: We took his money away. We shut him out for a while. You're never gonna shut him up for him.
Speaker 0: How well, unless you put him in prison.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I was going to
Speaker 3: Again, he didn't Being ignorant is not a crime, though. It's just It is. I mean, what
Speaker 0: you could bring a nun
Speaker 3: if he did inside a riot like Cheeto.
Speaker 1: He didn't furnish people to go
Speaker 3: shoot me. He didn't.
Speaker 6: Additionally, O'Blennis states that he knows and works with FBI agents who were undercover in the January 6th Capitol riot, estimating about 20 field agents were there undercover. While O'Blennis notes that they were not involved in violence, this appears to be the first submission of undercover FBI agents in attendance.
Speaker 0: I thought you said that there were FBI agents in the crowd at j 6.
Speaker 3: There are. There always are when there's a big protest in DC just in case it gets out of here.
Speaker 0: They but there
Speaker 3: wasn't wasn't enough to turn that tight. I mean, I'm talking to maybe have a 20. You needed a 1,000 to get rid of that that crap.
Speaker 0: So they had, like oh, that was on just 20?
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Just to go through and see what I can hear, you know, that kind of thing. Wow.
Speaker 0: That's yeah. Definitely. They need a 1,000 lease. Wow. That's also
Speaker 3: Capitol Police are sickly. They're in charge. So does that They didn't have more on hand? I don't know.
Speaker 0: The bureau didn't really want people knowing that they were in the crowd. Mhmm.
Speaker 3: Because that would be overstepping their bounds.
Speaker 2: A little
Speaker 0: bit. Do people know that? Why? Do people know that the bureau was in the crowd?
Speaker 3: Nope. You probably never will.
Speaker 0: Do you know agents that were there?
Speaker 3: Mhmm. Really?
Speaker 0: They work
Speaker 3: for the agency now.
reSee.it AI Summary
CIA officer/former FBI claims ability to manipulate situations to incriminate anyone. FBI targeted Alex Jones, seizing his funds and attempting to silence him. Around 20 undercover FBI agents were involved in the January 6th incident, some now working for the CIA. FBI uses exaggerated news and fake social media to provoke anger.
@arden_young_ - Arden Young
BREAKING: CIA Officer/Former FBI Boasts “Can Put Anyone in Jail…Set ’Em Up!” “We Call It a Nudge”https://t.co/Dzndk0XQt0 FBI “Did What We Wanted” with Alex Jones @RealAlexJones “Took His Money Away” “Chop His Legs Off” Estimates 20 Undercover FBI Agents at J6, Works with Some of Them Now at CIA FBI Uses “Embellished” News, “Fake Social Media” to “Really Get People Mad”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how the bureau practices near-entrapment to target individuals like Alex Jones, aiming to bankrupt them through civil lawsuits. They mention using fake social media posts to provoke reactions and reveal that FBI agents were undercover at the January 6th Capitol riot. The speaker states that about 20 agents were present but not involved in violence, highlighting the bureau's discreet presence at such events. They emphasize the need for a larger law enforcement presence in such situations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can kinda
Speaker 1: put anyone in jail if you know what to do.
Speaker 2: How? I'm sorry about that.
Speaker 0: Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot?
Speaker 3: Yeah. We get really close. We call it a nudge.
Speaker 4: A nudge. A nudge.
Speaker 0: Sometimes you just gotta get a quick look
Speaker 3: just to see what happens. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to follow.
Speaker 2: That's something we're putting on a fake
Speaker 3: social media thing to, like, really get people mad.
Speaker 0: Balance
Speaker 3: Jones. Yeah. So we were after him. You are? We did what we wanted.
Speaker 5: Which was what?
Speaker 3: We took his money away. He shot his legs.
Speaker 6: Gavin Oglenis is a contracting officer at the CIA. Oglenis worked for the FBI in 2021 and 2020 2 in the San Diego office, moved on to Homeland Security where he conducted asylum interviews at the southern border, and now works for the CIA managing multimillion dollar contracts across government agencies and private sector vendors.
Speaker 3: I work for, I work for this without I'm not supposed to tell people any job.
Speaker 0: I say intelligence, what do you think? CIA? Amazing.
Speaker 3: So I deal a lot with, like, different agencies. We're contracting with, like, director of National Intelligence to do stuff. We do Navy, Army, video, really. I just FBI. I used to work for the FBI.
So Yeah. Through the FBI app. They're like, here, you used to work there. Oh, I'm permanent. I'm still Yeah.
Speaker 0: Good. Well, why do they call contractors?
Speaker 3: Because I do the contracts. Uh-huh. I do all the legal contracts. With the bureau. I was the guy in the back of the truck in the van.
Speaker 6: O'Blennis spoke to an undercover signed investigations reporter about his work experience involving near entrapment and his employers' involvement with political commentator Alex Jones' legal battles.
Speaker 0: As long as the bureau is able to progress far enough to be able to put pro lifers in jail whenever they want. Yeah. You think that's on the agenda?
Speaker 2: We can we can
Speaker 3: you can kinda put anyone
Speaker 1: in jail if you know what to do. How?
Speaker 2: You set them
Speaker 3: up. You create the situation to where they have no choice but to act on their impulse. And once they act on that impulse, then we call that entrapment. It's a fine line.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot? Yeah. We get really close. Not officially?
Speaker 3: No. We get as close as we can. We get as close as we can to it without doing it.
Speaker 0: So they can entrap some of these pro lifers into doing things that they don't can do.
Speaker 3: Yeah. We call it a nudge.
Speaker 4: A nudge. A nudge.
Speaker 0: Sometimes you
Speaker 3: just gotta get a quick look just to see what happens. Right?
Speaker 0: And how does that happen?
Speaker 2: You put
Speaker 0: a post out there or
Speaker 3: you have some fake profile say something that triggers that we know is gonna trigger that. Like, we we already know your history. If we're to that point, we already know everything about So, like, oh, this is this one. Oh. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to fall.
Right?
Speaker 0: Like a railing. Like a oh. So when a railing happens, then sometimes the the bureau behind it. Yeah. Sometimes.
Speaker 2: Nothing like putting out a
Speaker 3: fake social media thing to, like, really get people mad. Mhmm. Post fake news. Yeah. Sometimes it's it's not fake.
It's embellished a little bit. Who would
Speaker 0: be, like, a big influencer that you're influencer that you're after? You're like, I don't know, like, I don't even know these names. Like, a Fox News person or like a Tucker Carlson or like oh, I'm sure he's Right.
Speaker 3: You always want the biggest and loudest. Like that what
Speaker 0: was his name? The one
Speaker 3: that said, Sandy Hook didn't happen.
Speaker 0: Alex Jones?
Speaker 3: Yeah. So we were after him.
Speaker 0: You are? Before.
Speaker 2: Are you still after
Speaker 0: him? Yeah. Why?
Speaker 3: Because he's broke. He got found guilty and had to pay, like, a $100,000,000.
Speaker 0: So what what are the after?
Speaker 3: We're not anymore.
Speaker 0: Just to get the money from him?
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Was that court case used? Was that a CFO
Speaker 3: case?
Speaker 0: That was the agency there?
Speaker 3: Well, actually, it was a defamation case. So it's a civil document. Well, we were looking at all of his callers, commenting, oh, I'm like, who's that gonna be this? Right? So even though it's technically not our well, not an agency, definitely, but not the bureau, for instance, yeah, it was not our purview.
It's a civil civil matter. Since they got all this access to his stuff and it's there, What can we go find?
Speaker 1: And did you find
Speaker 3: it? I can't tell you.
Speaker 0: Oh, we did.
Speaker 3: But so, you know, it's it's just kinda, like, you know, realize the opportunity that you have.
Speaker 0: So with Alex Jones, you were watching him long before anything ended up happening? I thought it
Speaker 3: was it wasn't my office, but, I mean, we would've we would've been well aware of what he was doing. And the
Speaker 0: goal with him was what?
Speaker 3: Just to bankrupt him? Pretty much. And we let the families do it. Oh my god. And what?
We let the families do it. Were they encouraged to do that by the bureau, like a nudge? We don't encourage people, but, like, we we just say there's no federal statute being broken. But you do have the option for a civil or a civil case. It's a pretty good case.
Nice. In our opinion.
Speaker 0: So oh, that makes so much sense. I have a cousin who's a lawyer. So that's a lot of these cases. They're they're kind of encouraged by the FBI.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Like, there's something federally federal law we can do. Let's simply, we'll add them that way. I I chopped this place, and they did. So the FBI was happy.
We didn't care. We were not
Speaker 0: home. Basically, the citizens did your job? Yeah. Wow. So you can encourage a civil lawsuit?
Speaker 3: Very encouraged. Educated. What can you do with
Speaker 0: people like Alex Jones now? Is he still out there? Good. He's still chirping.
Speaker 3: He can chirp? You still watching? Yeah. Why? I said He did what we wanted.
Speaker 5: Which was what?
Speaker 3: We took his money away. We shut him out for a while. You're never gonna shut him up for him.
Speaker 0: How well, unless you put him in prison.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I was going to
Speaker 3: Again, he didn't Being ignorant is not a crime, though. It's just It is. I mean, what
Speaker 0: you could bring a nun
Speaker 3: if he did inside a riot like Cheeto.
Speaker 1: He didn't furnish people to go
Speaker 3: shoot me. He didn't.
Speaker 6: Additionally, O'Blennis states that he knows and works with FBI agents who were undercover in the January 6th Capitol riot, estimating about 20 field agents were there undercover. While O'Blennis notes that they were not involved in violence, this appears to be the first submission of undercover FBI agents in attendance.
Speaker 0: I thought you said that there were FBI agents in the crowd at j 6.
Speaker 3: There are. There always are when there's a big protest in DC just in case it gets out of here.
Speaker 0: They but there
Speaker 3: wasn't wasn't enough to turn that tight. I mean, I'm talking to maybe have a 20. You needed a 1,000 to get rid of that that crap.
Speaker 0: So they had, like oh, that was on just 20?
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Just to go through and see what I can hear, you know, that kind of thing. Wow.
Speaker 0: That's yeah. Definitely. They need a 1,000 lease. Wow. That's also
Speaker 3: Capitol Police are sickly. They're in charge. So does that They didn't have more on hand? I don't know.
Speaker 0: The bureau didn't really want people knowing that they were in the crowd. Mhmm.
Speaker 3: Because that would be overstepping their bounds.
Speaker 2: A little
Speaker 0: bit. Do people know that? Why? Do people know that the bureau was in the crowd?
Speaker 3: Nope. You probably never will.
Speaker 0: Do you know agents that were there?
Speaker 3: Mhmm. Really?
Speaker 0: They work
Speaker 3: for the agency now.
@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga
And most have never seen this video of Ray Epps, the DIA recruited asset on J6.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 says he was on Constitutional Avenue. 'We went down first. There was four police officers, and some people entered. The gate was taken down, and the second gate was entered. And then went to the third gate.' He mentions 'There were anteaters with us' and notes they were aggressive with the police, 'throwing things, breaking things... hitting our own people.' He asserts they are not violent and do not hate the police department, and that the officers were on their side. From the top of the Capitol steps, he recalls 'thousands of papers behind it' and says it was 'an amazing sight' that made him emotional. He frames the action as symbolic after trying everything the right way, aiming to be visible and to make a point because 'the vote was stolen' and 'If our vote's stolen, what do we have left? A dictator.' He aided an injured man, 'Upper left. Cesar' who wasn't breathing. He suspects Antifa: 'I'm positive because that's how Antifa does things.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this gentleman, just you wanna just describe your the whole situation? Just kinda like where you were in the things? Where were you actually today? I'm gonna flip it around. Is that right?
Speaker 1: I was on Constitutional Avenue.
Speaker 0: Is that right? Can I flip it on you?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't know.
Speaker 0: Okay. Go ahead.
Speaker 1: I was on Constitutional Avenue. K. We went down first. There was a few a few of us that got to the gate. There was four police officers, and some people entered.
The gate was taken down, and the second gate was entered. And then went to the third gate. There was some anteaters with us, and we didn't know they were anteaters at the same at that time, but
Speaker 0: They're pretty aggressive with the police.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Pretty aggressive with the police. Were throwing things, breaking things.
Speaker 0: That's ridiculous. There was they broke some some
Speaker 1: street pipes and fencing down. They were throwing things, hitting our
Speaker 0: own people. So people hold on to that thought because people are gonna ask the question, how'd you know they were Antifa?
Speaker 1: We didn't know they were Antifa.
Speaker 0: At the time.
Speaker 1: But they weren't they weren't us. We're we're not violent people.
Speaker 0: Right. Okay. That's a good point.
Speaker 1: We don't we don't hate the police department police department's on our side. They may not we're taking orders from their boss. We're doing a job. They probably feel the same way we do about this whole thing. But I gotta tell you, when we we got to the top and looked back
Speaker 0: The top of?
Speaker 1: The top of the steps.
Speaker 0: At the Capitol?
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 0: That's pretty cool.
Speaker 1: It was quite an amazing sight. I got a little emotional when I looked back and I saw all the papers behind it. Wow. Thousands of papers behind it.
Speaker 0: So what is your thinking? Why why are we going down to the capital at that point? Is it to make sure that we surround just a visual? Are you thinking at that time it's it's kind of a visual thing, or are you actually thinking it's symbolic? What are you thinking?
Speaker 1: I think it's symbolic. I I think we have tried everything. We we we've been down there several times. We've done everything the right way. We haven't broken it off.
Speaker 0: We I love that. That's true. That's so true.
Speaker 1: We you know what? I I've been here before with a million and a half people, and there wasn't a piece of trash left on the ground afterward. There were people there to pick it up and put it away. This is who we are. It's symbolic because we've tried everything Yes.
The right way. And they needed to know that we're fed up.
Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. So you're you're you're saying that you're marching down there and it's it's it's one more thing that we as patriots can do to show those elected officials look. We didn't just come out here to jump around and and yell and scream. We came here to be visible, and we came here to make a point.
And that's right where you are. Right? That's exactly what you're saying. You want these guys to know. Exactly.
Speaker 1: Exactly right. You sent a message for them because, we are now not a republic. Right. We we don't have a vote in
Speaker 0: need. Right.
Speaker 1: The vote was stolen. And if our vote's stolen, what do we have left? Right. A dictator.
Speaker 0: If anybody can hear this, just make sure that you guys let me know if if you can hear this gentleman. Just message me. Hey. Just yeah, Chris. We can hear loud and clear.
So you're you're you get to the top. You don't see any violence other than maybe just the way that these guys were talking to the police.
Speaker 1: Oh, no. No. No. No. These guys were fighting with the police.
They were? They were tearing the things down. They were breaking things. I mean, and we try we were trying to calm them down. And I'm a pretty big guy, so I was able to talk some of them down, but I had some of them that wanted to fight.
I'm not gonna fight them. They they were very violent. They were very violent. Were they Antipa? I'm positive because that's how Antipa does things.
That's not how we do
Speaker 0: things. Mhmm. I don't know. Alright.
Speaker 1: Well We tried to talk we had several of us trying to talk them out of it.
Speaker 0: And you just basically said that they were they were they wouldn't listen to anything you said? No.
Speaker 1: There were certain ones that wouldn't. Most would. They were also throwing things in the air and hitting our own people. Wow. So, yeah, it was pretty crazy.
Speaker 0: So they did you see anybody breach the doors to to the capital?
Speaker 1: I didn't see the breach. Okay. I didn't see the breach. We had a gentleman go down with an upper left.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Cesar.
Speaker 1: Upper left. I'm so surprised. Upper left, the seizure. Right. And he wasn't breathing.
So when we were up there, before they went in, I had that going on. I helped with that. I helped get him out out of the area, and we had to, carry him out. And it was quite a task while we're here.
Speaker 0: So, I mean, you guys yeah. Right? You're scoot down this way. You guys are not antagonizers, obviously, and I mean guys, I mean, I put this gentleman on. I've been talking to him for about thirty minutes, and I'm not gonna put somebody on that I think is a total whack job because, right, we have a message and it's gotta be credible.
And this man is telling me that, first of all, when I when I was started talking to them, they said it was clearly Antifa that breached those gates. It was clearly Antifa, and and he really didn't think that they would that the Trump people probably would have walked through the gates had they not been breached first. And so
@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit
BREAKING: Federal Agents Drag J6 Political Prisoner Ryan Samsel To The Hole Immediately After The Gateway Pundit Releases Ray Epps’ FBI Call to the American Public via @gatewaypundit https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/breaking-federal-agents-drag-j6-political-prisoner-ryan/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=breaking-federal-agents-drag-j6-political-prisoner-ryan
DEVELOPING: Federal Agents Drag J6 Political Prisoner Ryan Samsel To The Hole and Isolation Immediately After The Gateway Pundit Releases Ray Epps' FBI Call to the American Public | The Gateway Pundit | by Alicia Powe
Earlier today, Alicia Powe at The Gateway Pundit exposed J6 insurrection leader James Ray Epps lying to the FBI in a leaked interview obtained by The Gateway Pundit.
thegatewaypundit.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts claim that various events, including the Trump Russian Collusion, J6 pipe bombs, Trump Mar a Lago raid, Hunter's laptop coverup, disrupted J6 proceedings, and ABC production, were all allegedly planted by the FBI. They suggest a conspiracy to cover up the certification of the government's overthrow on January 6.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here we go, 3, 2, 1 As it turns out the Trump Russian Collusion was planted by the FBI. The J6 pipe bombs were planted by the FBI. The documents in the Trump Mar a Lago raid was planted by the FBI. The coverup of Hunter’s laptop from the gates of hell was planted by the FBI, The official proceedings on J6 that was disrupted by the FBI was planted by the FBI. And the ABC production by the J6 Committee was planted to cover up the the certification of the overthrown of your government on Jan 6.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The select committee investigating the January 6th Capitol attack aimed to present compelling information to the American people. To achieve this, they enlisted a former ABC News president as a storyteller. The committee wanted to ensure their presentation would captivate the audience and effectively convey the gathered information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here we go. In 3, 2, 1. The select committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol will be in order without objection. We wanted to make sure that this was a presentation that would grab the audience and hold on to them. Chairman Thompson loved to say, It's got to pop.
Thompson's committee had gathered a trove of information. The challenge, what to do with it. The one thing that we knew was the information that we have is compelling. The thing we needed to do was tell that to the American people in a compelling way. So that's why we brought in a former president of ABC News.
Yeah. I got a call pretty much out of the blue, from the January 6th committee. They wanted they wanted a storyteller.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why the FBI paid Christopher Steele $1 million to verify a dossier on Trump and offered $3 million to Twitter to suppress a story on Hunter Biden. They express concern over the FBI's actions being politically motivated. The FBI director responds by explaining the payments to social media companies are for legal process costs. The speaker accuses the FBI of damaging its reputation and questions if the FBI requested financial institutions to provide customer data. The FBI director is unsure and the speaker presents an email from Bank of America as evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Two real quick questions. Why would the FBI offer Christopher Steele a $1,000,000 to verify a dossier about Trump Russian collusion, and then the same FBI offered $3,000,000 to Twitter to squash a story on a Hunter Biden laptop. Do you have any idea why a law enforcement agency would be planning to elections?
Speaker 1: Well, you've raised a number of different issues there. So first, as to the steel dossier, that of course is a subject treated at great length in the Durham report, which we and again predates my time as director.
Speaker 0: I understand that, but it's the same agency paying $1,000,000 to push one story out or try to collaborate one story and $3,000,000 to quite another story for political opponents. I don't understand.
Speaker 1: And then I would as to the second part related to Twitter, I would disagree with your characterization respectfully. When there are payments to social media companies, that is by longstanding federal law going back, I think, about 4 decades where we have to pay companies for their costs in responding to legal process and it's not just social media companies, it's other kinds of business
Speaker 0: to me looks political to the American people. It looks political. And I'm just going to to me looks political. To the American people, it looks political. And I'm just an everyday guy.
I'm not an attorney, mister Wray. Just an everyday guy. But to me, it looks extremely political and that is why you're having trouble keeping the FBI's reputation afloat. And so with that, mister chairman, I'm gonna yield
Speaker 2: the balance of my time, but I do I
Speaker 0: wanna enter one thing to the record, mister chairman.
Speaker 2: You do that after and just yield and we'll be entering in record after. Sure. Sure. Director Ray, did the FBI ask financial institutions to turn over their customers? You have the time to me.
Did the FBI ask financial institution to turn over their customers' debit and credit card purchase history in the Washington D. C. Area for January 5th 6th, 2021?
Speaker 1: I don't know the answer to that as I sit here right now.
Speaker 2: Well, we do because Bank of America gave us this email from the FBI to Bank of America. Well
Video Transcript AI Summary
The famous photograph was staged with classified documents placed by the FBI, leading to tampering and lies in court. The prosecutor admitted mishandling evidence and not knowing how it happened. Meetings with White House counsel and National Archives before the case raises suspicions of fabrication, similar to Crossfire Hurricane. The judge may dismiss the case, possibly to expose the situation publicly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. So that famous photograph, what we have now learned and the government has had Jack Smith and his prosecutors have had to admit that that was staged and those top secret classified sheets that all the public saw and said, oh my god. Look at those top secret documents. Those were placed there by the FBI. What Jack Smith admitted in court this week was that in his word, they mishandled the classified documents and misrepresented those to the court.
Maria, that's a kind way of saying we tampered with the evidence, then we lied to the court about it. And they got caught when president Trump's lawyers and the other codefendants raised this issue and said, look. The digitally scanned records of when they were taken from Mar a Lago. And Jack Smith, not only did they tamper with that and lie to the court about it, but he's now admitted to the court that he doesn't know how that happened. He's only offered a number of possible explanations for how that could have happened.
So he's absolutely blown the chain of custody. And, again, he has a prosecutor lead prosecutor in this case, Jay Bratt, who met with White House counsel and a representative of the National Archives in several times in the weeks before Jack Smith was even appointed. This reeks of crossfire hurricane when the Biden when the Obama Biden administration fabricated evidence before the FISA court, lied to the court about it, to pursue Donald Trump, and now we're seeing it again in this classified documents case. The judge could dismiss this case at any point in time, Maria. I think the only reason that she hasn't is she wants to document this publicly.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker warns that Trump is focused on revenge, which could harm the Department of Justice and FBI. People in law enforcement fear being targeted if Trump wins a second term. There are concerns about being unlawfully detained or jailed. The speaker urges Americans to take Trump's threats seriously, as he often follows through on his promises.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is someone who's entirely transactional. And if he feels like he's been wronged in some way, then he focuses on revenge and vengeance. And so he's made it perfectly clear that that's what he's going to do. And in the process of seeking that he is going to really, he runs the risk of really dismantling and, greatly, incapacitating the Department of Justice and the FBI. And that is something that Americans on both sides of the political aisle should be worried about.
Yeah. We depend on those institutions to protect us. What do you think is And he is proposing to tear him down. What do people inside the FBI think of, when they hear a comment like that? You know, it's it is it's terrifying.
It's frightening. I I have a lot of conversations with former colleagues, people who are, or were in the intelligence and law enforcement community, and may have worked in, you know, the Obama administration, other places. And, you know, people are really trying to assess like what is life going to be like if Donald Trump wins a second term. And on a very personal level, I mean, these are torturous discussions with their family members about whether or not they have to leave the country, to avoid being unconstitutionally and illegally detained. I mean, people are actually worried about being thrown in jail or grabbed in some sort of extrajudicial detention.
And I think, you know, as crazy as this sounds in the United States of America, I think people should really consider that these are possibilities. Listen to what the man says. He typically does what he says as crazy as it seems. And and that's really all the indicators you need.
@amuse - @amuse
HUNTER BIDEN TRIAL🧵(Jun 5): The FBI confirms that Hunter's laptop was never altered or tampered with. They were able to compare the contents of the hard drive with an iCloud backup of the contents obtained via a search warrant served on Apple.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
1M views on @julie_kelly2 spitting fire 🔥
@texan_maga - 🇺🇲Salty Texan
"They have the recordings of the zoom calls setting up J6, MONTHS ahead of time." 👀 https://t.co/QKQQ97bSOt
Video Transcript AI Summary
The events of January 6th were not spontaneous; planning began in September involving deep state members and various NGOs. We have identified those involved, and if you're on that list, you should consider leaving the country, as prosecution is likely. We have video evidence of meetings, including one with an infiltrator who recorded them. The planning included participation from groups like the Azov battalion in Ukraine, which is linked to Nazi ideologies. This group is not just labeled as Neo-Nazis; they represent a continuation of Hitler's legacy, marking a troubling resurgence of extremist ideologies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like, January 6th, nobody knows what January 6th is all about. Can did they think that January 6th is something that sprung up spontaneously on January 6th? The planning of January 6th began in September by members of deep state and homeland security and by, different members of different NGOs that were but we have them. We have the names, by the way, ladies and gentlemen. If you happen to be on that list, of those hundreds of people, you might as well quit now because, you know, you're gone.
And you're, you know, it it it hopefully, you'll you'll be prosecuted as well. So maybe maybe leave the country. But, you know, I'm just letting you know, we know who you are. That's great. We we've got videos of the meetings.
It was Zoom meetings. Oh. And there was an infiltrator and and that that videotaped those meetings. So ladies and gentlemen, you're screwed. Excellent.
The ones of you that thought you were doing such a great thing to be able to infiltrate the capitol building on January 6th. I'm talking specifically. This is what was planned starting in September. And not just by these people, but also, believe it or not, the Ukrainians were involved in this as well. Yes.
More Including the Azov battalion, which is which which which what you know, some people say, ah, he's a Nazi, meaning he's a bad person. I'll say he's terrible person. Right? He's a Nazi. No.
No. No. No. No. There's another time you use the word Nazi, and it doesn't mean he's a bad person.
It means he's actually a Nazi. Right. Okay? Yeah. I mean, a Swastika carrying Nazi, and that's what that's what the Azov battalion is.
And I can't even call them Neo Nazis because they're a continuation Exactly. Was started by Hitler. Mhmm. They are the beginning of the 4th right.
@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer
Today the media decided to tell us what we have known for 4 years. There were at least 26 confidential sources in the crowd on J6 who went into the Capitol, 3 of whom the FBI asked to attend. FBI informants entered the Capitol on J6. It was all a set up to jail Trump supporters.
@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk
BREAKING: An Inspector General Report confirms the FBI had 26 confidential human sources on the ground at J6 and that some of them went into the Capitol. Was this entrapment? Why did it take us four years to learn this? Criminal. https://t.co/D1xSyifGdX
Video Transcript AI Summary
A recent report reveals that 26 confidential human sources were present during the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Of these, three were authorized by the FBI to monitor the event due to concerns over domestic terrorism. One of these sources entered the Capitol, while two others accessed restricted areas. The FBI did not authorize any sources to enter the building. Additionally, 23 other sources were present independently but had previously collaborated with the FBI. Notably, none of the sources who entered restricted areas were prosecuted, aligning with the DC US attorney's office's approach of not charging individuals for merely entering restricted grounds. Outgoing FBI director Christopher Wray has faced scrutiny regarding the agency's role on that day, emphasizing that the violence was not orchestrated by FBI sources or agents. Further information is anticipated from Capitol Hill and the White House.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a pretty big piece of news to kick off the show today, Sandra. I'm John Roberts in Washington. The report reveals that there were a total of 26 confidential human sources in the crowd that day.
Speaker 1: David Spunt is live from the justice department. He has got the news for us. David.
Speaker 2: Sandra, 3 of those were authorized and tasked by the FBI to be there on January 6, 2021. We're coming up on 4 years since that day of the Capitol riot. This IG report specifically focuses on the FBI's handling of confidential human sources or, as we know them, FBI informants. For years, the outgoing FBI director, Chris Wray, has been pressed on reports of undercover agents. According to this new report, there were no undercover FBI agents.
However, there were 3 confidential human sources tasked by the bureau to be in the crowd on January 6th to specifically watch what the report states is concerns over domestic terrorism. Out of those 3, Sandra and John, one entered the capital, 2 others entered a restricted area. The report says the FBI did not encourage or authorize any sources to go into the building or a restricted area. In addition to the 3 confidential human sources, the FBI told there were 23 that were there on their own. Now they had worked with the FBI in the past on other cases, but not specifically on the January 6th rally.
Some of them entered a restricted area as well. And what stands out in this report, John and Sandra, none of the confidential human sources that enter the US capital or a restricted area were prosecuted by the DC US attorney's office. Remember, this is an office that is still arresting nearly 4 years later and prosecuting people with this case. Now in a response to the inspector general, the DC US attorney's office says the following. The DC US attorney's office generally has not charged those individuals whose only crime on January 6th 2021 was to enter the restricted grounds surrounding the capital, which has resulted in the office declining to charge 100 of individuals, and we have treated the confidential human sources consistent with this approach.
Outgoing FBI director Christopher Wray, who announced that he would be stepping down in the next few weeks yesterday, has been pressed on the FBI's role on January 6th. Here's just one clip from last year.
Speaker 1: If you are asking whether the violence at the Capitol on January 6th was part of some operation orchestrated by FBI sources and or agents, the answer is emphatically You're saying no? No. You're saying not. Violence orchestrated by FBI sources or a
Speaker 2: Confidential human sources tasked by the FBI are not undercover agents. These are people that belong to groups like, for instance, the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and then became paid FBI informants at certain points in time while still being members of their groups. And, of course, John and Sandra, others are not part of any group and just decided to show up to the Capitol for whatever reason and still work with the FBI on the side and provide information. And we're, of course, waiting for more information from Capitol Hill to see if the White House has anything, the Department of Justice Mhmm. The FBI has this report just breaking now, with the inspector
Speaker 1: general.
@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand
BOMBSHELL: IG Horowitz confirms the FBI was involved in January 6. The “conspiracy theory” is reality. A *full* investigation is coming, and it will reveal much more—but we already know the bottom line: J6 WAS ENTRAPMENT—WE MUST EXONERATE! https://t.co/zOxuq8CVvg
@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand
WOW: @Kash_Patel confirms the government’s hands were dirty—J6 was entrapment. “Once you prove that, then you defeat the insurrection narrative with the FBI’s own documentation.” WE WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG! https://t.co/VfQdbJnPhP
Video Transcript AI Summary
What needs to be established is whether the FBI and government agents used undercover operatives on January 6th. If evidence shows they had informants, it undermines the insurrection narrative. There’s reasonable suspicion of federal involvement, especially with video evidence of a person directing people into the building and the case of Ray Epps, who was briefly on the FBI's most wanted list. Two significant points support this: Epps’ sudden removal from the list suggests he may have been an informant, and FBI official Jill Sanborn's refusal to answer whether federal agents were involved indicates possible involvement. Her silence implies that confirming their presence could compromise ongoing operations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What you need to show is whether or not the FBI and government agents were using undercover operatives and informants on the day of January 6th. Because if you can show that, you know, they've been out hang on. But the paperwork shows having run informants, that's a 6 month build up minimum. Right. Minimum.
It's not like they just dropped them into the Proud Boys and said, hey. Go don't disrupt, please. So once you prove that, then you defeat the insurrection narrative with the FBI's own documentation. Forget what the videotape shows.
Speaker 1: Just just for for people who you can't see what's going on in the room. The reason why Cash just said hang on or whatever is because I started smirking and rolling my eyes. And what I meant to convey with that is, come on we know they were involved. Well, no. No.
Speaker 0: No. No. Look. I totally agree. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: I know definitively. What I'm saying is a reasonable suspicion is that there were agents. There's a video showing a guy with an earpiece pulling people into the building. Alright? Mhmm.
You combine that with the evidence of Ray Epps, and it looks like you have a preponderance of evidence suggesting there may have been federal law enforcement involved in making that thing happen.
Speaker 0: I'll get you beyond a reasonable doubt. Two pieces of information. Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day, and the next day, he was off of the FBI's most wanted list. There are only 2 ways that happens. You die or your informant.
Put that aside under congressional testimony. Jill Sanborn, who I used to work with, the head of the FBI counterintelligence division in charge of all these investigations, testified under oath when senator Cruz asked her, spit flat out, were there federal agents involved with January 6th? And she said, quote, senator, I can't answer that at this time. Not if the answer was definitively no. Having been a DOJ FBI guy myself, she would have gone there and said, nope.
Absolutely not. The reason she said I can't answer that is is because of the same stonewalling they gave us during Russor Gate with Christopher Steele, Halper and everybody else. It's the same narrative. And I'm sure they were there.
Speaker 1: You're so you're saying that she said I can't answer that because the answer is yes. Yeah. And that would compromise whatever their operation was. Exactly.
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to congratulate those celebrating today’s news and encourage others to express their dissatisfaction. I believe Mr. Trump had a solid plan but chose not to follow it. I also appreciate the outgoing administration for inadvertently providing evidence of a coup, as seen in the list of so-called "pre-pardons." This raises questions about the involvement of key figures in the January 6 events. Despite my situation, I remain committed to uncovering the truth behind those responsible for the attack. I am still in jail and questioning why I’m the only one left.
@laralogan - Lara Logan
STATEMENT FROM JAN 6 DEFENDANT LEFT BEHIND: “First, I'd like to congratulate those who are happy with the news they received today and to those who are not, I encourage them to say "THIS IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH!". Mr. Trump was handed a very detailed and legally sound plan, but he chose not to follow it. Second, I'd like to thank the outgoing Communist Puppet's Staff (world knows that Joe Biden can't do anything) for proving me correct and providing a list of names, in the form of nonexistent "pre-pardons" (Pardons are for crimes, not future charges.) that can now serve as proof of the Military/Intelligence Coup I've explained for 3+ years and those who were involved. Why "Pardon" the fraudulent J6 Select Committee, disgraced GEN Mark Milley, Ashli Babbitt's murder, Racist Michael Byrd and the supporting actors from the US Capital Police who perjured themselves on the stand and in the media, if they weren't involved in an orchestrated attack to setup lovers of our Constitutional Republic? As the ONLY clear pick for Deputy Director of the FBI, I know no better list of names to start my HUNT for the TRUE Criminals behind J6. (PLEASE send this to Mr. Kash Patel) Lastly, I was NOT issued a commutation NOR pardon and I'll remain in the DC Jail. Please, ask yourself and anyone you know... Why is the ONLY man with a recording of the FBI/DHS ALSO the ONLY J6er left in jail? De Oppresso Liber - Jeremy Brown, USSF MSG (Ret.) http://WhoIsJeremyBrown.com http://JeremyBrownDefense.com
Who Is Jeremy Brown?
After trying to warn Americans that the FBI was spying on law abiding citizens, Jeremy Brown was targeted and has now spent THREE full years (and counting) behind bars at the hands of our weaponized government. Share his story. #FreeJeremyBrown
whoisjeremybrown.com
Jeremy Brown Defense | #FREEJEREMYBROWN
jeremybrowndefense.com
@laralogan - Lara Logan
https://www.whoisjeremybrown.com/
Who Is Jeremy Brown?
After trying to warn Americans that the FBI was spying on law abiding citizens, Jeremy Brown was targeted and has now spent THREE full years (and counting) behind bars at the hands of our weaponized government. Share his story. #FreeJeremyBrown
whoisjeremybrown.com
@johnrockshomes - John M. Cameron - J6er
The FBI placed surveillance cameras on telephone poles outside J6ers homes. The FBI followed J6er children to school and soccer practice and then followed their friends. Corrupt evil tyranny. God Bless the J6ers!
@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️
It was all a setup on J6. https://t.co/8rpBzQjVew
Video Transcript AI Summary
The January 6 committee was unlawfully formed by Speaker Pelosi and acted without due process, using cherry-picked and doctored video. The committee worked with regime media to blast the fake narrative of an insurrection. Secretly recorded video reveals Nancy Pelosi's documentary admitting no insurrection occurred. The shameful proceedings and media blitz poisoned the jury pool in DC.
Many defendants were swept up in a vast dragnet violating the Fourth Amendment via geofencing and cellphone data warrants. The Justice Department didn't respect the protesters' First Amendment rights, unlike the kid gloves treatment of Antifa and BLM agitators in Portland. January 6 defendants haven't been dealt with in the same fashion as Antifa and BLM protesters, violating equal protection.
Widespread Brady violations exist, including concealed footage around the Capitol and 800+ unreleased January 6 committee deposition transcripts potentially containing exculpatory evidence. Judges in DC seem to have come under the spell of the January 6 committee's original sin, allowing the mainstream media narrative to influence their decisions. A statute designed to close an obstruction of justice loophole is being misapplied. Antifa and BLM revolutionaries largely got off scot-free, while January 6 defendants' sentences are wildly disproportionate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me make seven quick points. First, one of the original sins of government that has carried, and caused the poor treatment of the January 6 protester defendants is, the, lawless formation of the house select committee, the January 6 committee, leading to it acting in a one-sided and due process free way. That committee was gerrymandered by speaker Pelosi, operated without a ranking member or counsel to the ranking member. Liz Cheney was granted vice chair status to try to cover that up. The committee then had a series of carefully scripted by Hollywood hearings where the entire q and a path was prewritten and meshed with cherry picked snippets of highly edited audio I'm sorry, video and audio doctored video.
The committee interviewed a thousand plus witnesses, it says, but only about 200 transcripts have been released. Second, the January 6 committee worked with regime media. The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, and MSNBC, etcetera. In that way, the fake narrative that an insurrection had been had occurred on January 6 was blasted everywhere. Based on secretly recorded, video, we now have on tape Nancy Pelosi's documentary and daughter, and her friends admitting that no insurrection ever occurred.
The collective effect of the January 6 committee shameful way of proceeding plus the reinforcing media blitz poisoned the jury pool in Washington DC. Trial venue transfers out of DC should have been permitted. Media narrative mongering indeed was also the pre original sin therefore of this entire issue because it laid the groundwork for the January 6 select committees hatchet jobs. Third, many of the defendants were swept up in a vast dragnet that I believe violated the Fourth Amendment because it was the equivalent of a general warrant that our framers sought to ban. This was done through the use of geofencing technology and cellphone data warrants sent to telecom providers.
Additionally, many protesters arriving after president Trump's speech in the elapse in the ellipse had finished, did not see any signage that areas normally open to the public were closed that day, setting up a trespass trap for the unwary. Fourth, the justice department did not treat these cases with appropriate respect for the first amendment rights of the protesters. The twenty twenty presidential election was incredibly contentious and many citizens in this country disagreed with mainstream media pronouncements that they should, in essence, sit down and shut up about the election and how it was conducted. By contrast, I was at the Justice Department getting daily updates about the Marco Hatfield Federal Courthouse in Portland being attacked night after night after night in the summer of twenty twenty. Insurrection is a far more appropriate moniker for that targeted antifa lawlessness than a largely spontaneously assembled crowd being agitated by tear gas and rubber bullets.
Yet, the First Amendment issues led to the self agitators in Portland being treated very differently and with special kid gloves. This takes me to my fifth point. The January 6 defendants have not been dealt with in the same fashion as the Antifa and BLM protesters in 2020 who engaged in terrible conduct, threatened the White House, did millions of damage in property to property in that summer, in the lead up to the presidential election. This is a flat violation in terms of comparing those two categories of defendants or potential defendants of the equal protection of the laws. Many Americans think the selective prosecution on display here is blatant.
Sixth, there are widespread Brady violations as to how these defendants are being dealt with today and I'll confine that to just two areas for our purposes today. First, the concealed or underreported footage issue around the capital. So, the house is to be commended for allowing Tucker Carlson, Julie Kelly, and John Solomon to review the footage and second, it's hard to imagine that with 800 plus or so unreleased January 6 committee deposition transcripts that there's not at least some exculpatory evidence in there that is not yet been seen by the relevant defendants and their lawyers. The January 6 committee in short acted like a star chamber and there is no reason for this congress to let that go on. Seventh and lastly, the judges on the federal district court here in Washington DC seem to have come under the spell of the January 6 committee's original sin and in that way, they allowed the constructed mainstream media narrative to influence their decisions.
And as a legal matter, they're by and large allowing a statute designed to close an obstruction of of justice loophole that Arthur Anderson exploited in the Enron debacle to be applied to entirely different activity that in many instances is protected by the First Amendment and should appropriately be treated differently. As a result, Antifa and BLM revolutionaries and it's not an exaggeration to call them that who engaged in worse conduct largely got off scot free and worse yet, many of them left with bags of cash from civil settlements. By contrast, the sentence is being handed down against January 6 defendants are wildly disproportionate for all these reasons. I'm glad to be here today before you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sharing my experience of betrayal by two individuals, Marcus DiPaola and 1%Watchdog, who I trusted during my hurricane rescue efforts. I now believe they were working as informants, setting me up for the events of January 6, 2021. Marcus, an admitted FBI informant, was present at key events and manipulated situations to build my profile. After the chaos at the Capitol, I discovered evidence of their involvement and the government's cover-up. I urge everyone to share my story and demand justice for those misled by these individuals.
@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.
🚨 Patriots, brace yourselves. This is the J6 entrapment story the feds DON’T want you to hear. I’m a Marine who risked everything to save lives during hurricanes. But two men I trusted—Marcus DiPaola and 1%Watchdog—set me up for YEARS, from 2018 to the Capitol chaos. Marcus? An admitted FBI informant who was at Sandy Hook, Ferguson, Ebola, my viral dog rescue, AND J6. 1%Watchdog? He directed us on Zello, got Oath Keepers convicted, but the feds won’t name him. I believe they were a fed team working to trap me. Today, I’m dropping PROOF that’ll expose this government cover-up. Going to drop each thread about 10 minutes apart starting NOW, and then after the thread is complete, I will continue adding evidence including motions and court docs tomorrow. Share this now—let’s demand justice! 🔥 #J6Entrapment #PatriotBetrayed #ExposeTheFeds
@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.
🌊 Let’s go back to September 2018, Hurricane Florence. I’m out there saving lives, coordinated by 1%Watchdog on Zello. We’d been working together since Hurricane Harvey in 2017—I trusted him like a brother. He sends me to a specific neighborhood in North Carolina. Guess who’s waiting? Marcus DiPaola, flashing a White House press badge. I’m a Marine—honor means everything. Marcus hands me a challenge coin, a symbol of brotherhood. I thought, “This guy’s legit.” But I was wrong… #SetupBegins #FedsInDisguise #HurricaneHeroes
@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.
🐾 Still in Florence, 1%Watchdog sends us all to Leland, North Carolina. I’m pulling people and dogs out of floodwaters—doing what Marines do. Marcus and his buddy, who claimed to be with Reuters, are filming everything. The dog rescue Marcus captured? It went VIRAL. That video landed me on the Ellen DeGeneres show, made me a hero to millions. I thought Marcus was just a journalist helping out. But now I see it—he and 1%Watchdog were building my profile. For what? I’d find out on January 6, 2021… #ViralSetup #EllenMoment #PatriotTrap
@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.
🕵️♂️ Let’s talk about Marcus DiPaola. This guy’s been at EVERY major event. Sandy Hook 2012. Ferguson 2014. Ebola in Chicago 2014. San Jose Trump protests in 2016, where he called 911. And then he’s with ME in Leland, NC, 2018. Here’s the kicker: Marcus admitted in 2020 that he became an FBI informant in January 2016, working until 2019. He even asked the FBI to tap his phone, email, Twitter, everything. This was DURING our hurricane rescues. Was he watching me? Reporting on me? I think so. Don’t believe me? Keep scrolling for PROOF! #SerialOperative #FBIInformant #Everywhere
@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.
⚠️ Fast forward to late 2020, weeks before J6. Marcus messages/calls me out of the blue: “Bring body armor. Gas mask too. Counter-protesters will be there.” How did he KNOW? He said he’d be filming at the Capitol after Trump’s speech. Meanwhile, 1%Watchdog—my rescue partner—had turned political. He pushed me and Oath Keepers to go to DC. He’d been on Zello since 2019, tracked by journalist Micah Loewinger, who knew militias like Oath Keepers were active there. I didn’t see it then, but they were setting the stage. You saw it before I did. #Foreknowledge #J6Setup #PatriotPawns
@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.
📹 January 6, 2021. I’m on the West Terrace of the Capitol, caught up in the chaos. I was part of a Zello channel that 1%Watchdog added me to, but I wasn’t active in it that afternoon—I can prove it. Still, here’s what 1%Watchdog did: At 2 PM, he makes his channel public. Micah Loewinger records him urging listeners to storm the Capitol, make citizen’s arrests, even kill in self-defense. Marcus? He’s BEHIND police lines, filming as barricades come down. Oath Keepers like Jessica Watkins and Holden Haney got charged with conspiracy using 1%Watchdog’s Zello audio. Stewart Rhodes got 18 years for seditious conspiracy in 2023. But Marcus and 1%Watchdog? Untouched. I say they were a fed team—Marcus filming, 1%Watchdog directing others. #J6Chaos #FedOperation #DoubleStandard
Video Transcript AI Summary
Police are squabbling with protesters. The protesters reached the capital again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Police are squabbling with protesters. Oh, there we go. And they just reached the capital again. Police are squabbling with protesters. Oh, there we go.
And they just reached the capital again.
@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.
💔 After J6, the betrayal hit hard. I found a redacted FBI letter in my discovery: “I know he was there. Here’s his number. Don’t say I snitched.” That was Marcus. I knew because he added specifics that could only lead back to being him. And the worst part? He asked them not to expose his identify as a CHS because in his words, “I may have to work with him again..” The man who gave me a challenge coin—a Marine symbol I’d die for and saved lives together for—snitched on me to the FBI. WAS THE FBI! 1%Watchdog? He called J6ers “terrorists,” flipping on us like a fed pawn. But I say Marcus was an undercover asset, and 1%Watchdog was his partner, luring us into a trap. This betrayal cuts deep. #EntrapmentProof #J6Betrayal #MarineHonor
@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.
🔍 The feds are hiding the truth. Sundance from The Last Refuge was told they KNOW 1%Watchdog’s identity but to “drop it.” The J6 committee used 1%Watchdog’s Zello audio to convict Oath Keepers—but never named him. My legal filing names Marcus, 1%Watchdog, Ray Epps, and others as suspected informants or agitators, demanding FBI files. The feds won’t release them—why? Enrique Tarrio got 22 years for “planning” J6, despite not being in DC. 1%Watchdog did the same on Zello—yet still walks free! I say they’re fed tools. #FedCoverUp #SelectiveJustice #J6Truth
@TheLastRefuge2 - TheLastRefuge
There are goofy people, and there are feds. Sometimes they mix. True Story: The same user who tried to set me up, a guy using "1%Watchdog" as a user id on Twitter (who is almost positively a fed), was the same person who organized a midnight meetup in a garage in Washington DC on Jan 5, 2021, with 4 members of the Oathkeepers. The Oathkeepers all showed up, but the guy (likely a fed) who organized the meeting did not show up. None of the 4 being controlled had any suspicions about their seemingly random midnight garage meeting. The rest is history. Like I said. There are goofy people, and there are feds. Sometimes in the games they play, they intermix. I put this Ven fellow in that category. Nothing more.
@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.
⚖️ Journalist Steve Baker was indicted in 2024 for J6 reporting—charged with interstate racketeering for just being there. Marcus? He filmed breaches, was with crowds spraying cops, and walked free. 1%Watchdog? His Zello audio convicted Oath Keepers, but the feds claim they “don’t know” him. My legal filing says the government might be shielding CHSs through Sedition Hunters or other agencies. This isn’t justice—it’s a government cover-up. And this? This is Douglas Brasher, the AUSA who withheld this info, protecting Marcus and 1%Watchdog. #DoubleStandard #J6Injustice #PatriotsPersecuted
@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.
🧨 Christmas Eve 2024, I’m in prison… An anonymous X message comes to my inbox.. Marcus’s archived 2020 thread where he ADMITS he was an FBI informant from 2016 to 2019! 😳 👉 https://archive.ph/jYVkv That’s the EXACT time I was working with him and 1%Watchdog during the hurricanes. He set me up from Florence to J6, and I believe 1%Watchdog was his partner in this fed trap. Tomorrow, I’m dropping screenshots, dates, archives—everything. Share this thread. Demand justice for patriots betrayed by these snakes. No more government cover-ups! The government knew about this and told me it didn’t exist. Furthermore, they shamed me for even suggesting Marcus worked as an undercover. I caught so much flack because I was over the target the whole time. As @McBrideLawNYC and I proved time and time again.. We were RIGHT about EVERYTHING! 💣 #ExposeTheFeds #J6Truth #DemandJustice
@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.
📢 Patriots, I need you. I’ve laid out the truth—Marcus DiPaola and 1%Watchdog betrayed me, betrayed us all. They used my honor as a Marine, my hurricane rescues, my viral moment on Ellen, to set me up for J6. The feds are protecting them, but we can’t let this stand. Share this thread EVERYWHERE. Tag influencers, news outlets, anyone who’ll listen. The coming days court and documents proof will blow this wide open. Let’s force the truth out—together. 🇺🇸 #J6Entrapment #PatriotFight #ViralBombshell
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
WOW 🚨 @FBI had (26) agents who infiltrated the J6ers and may be responsible for some of the crimes the J6ers went to prison for Do you want @FBIDirectorKash Patel to give the DOJ the names of those FBI agents for prosecution This cannot go unpunished https://t.co/tvi5wM3AYU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Justice Department released a report revealing the FBI had 26 confidential human sources in DC on January 6th, with four entering the Capitol and 13 entering the restricted area. Questions arose regarding the discrepancy between this information and previous testimonies given under oath by FBI Director Ray.
Concerns were raised about whether these sources instigated events, similar to the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot. The media is accused of downplaying the report's significance, while Republicans claim the events were an inside job.
The report's implications for January 6th defendants are discussed, particularly regarding potential pardons and whether confidential human sources are exempt from prosecution. Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley questioned why the confidential human sources who entered the capital were not charged. Trump may pardon January 6th defendants. Tulsi Ganford may become the next DNI.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fox News alert. The Justice Department just released the bombshell report that we've been waiting for. What actually happened on January 6? The FBI had 26 confidential human sources there that day. 26.
A confidential human source is a guy the FBI pays to spy for them. Of the 26 confidential human sources who were in DC on Jan sixth, four entered the capital during the riot. An additional 13 entered the restricted area around the capital. So more than a dozen FBI spies participated in the so called insurrection. A bunch of them broke into the capital.
Their own inspector general says this is what happened, but that's not what they told you when they testified under oath.
Speaker 1: Those who were there in an undercover capacity on January 6, how many were there?
Speaker 2: Again, I'm not sure that I can give you that number as I sit here. I'm not sure there were undercover agents on scene.
Speaker 1: I thought I heard you say you didn't know whether there were FBI agents or informants or human sources in the capital or in the vicinity on January 6. Did I misunderstand you? I thought that's what you said.
Speaker 2: Well, I referred very specifically to undercover agents.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And so are you acknowledging then there were undercover agents?
Speaker 2: As I sit here right now, I do not believe there were undercover agents on scene.
Speaker 0: Director was hiding something so congress asked the question a different way. Listen.
Speaker 3: Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the capital on January prior to the doors being opened?
Speaker 2: Again, I had to be very careful.
Speaker 3: It should be a no. Can you not tell the American people no? We did not have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the capital. Gentlemen's time has expired.
Speaker 2: Read anything into my decision not to share information
Speaker 1: Director Ray.
Speaker 2: Confidential human
Speaker 3: Gentlemen's time.
Speaker 0: Ray's right. The FBI didn't have undercover agents at January 6. They had confidential human sources. So what's the difference? Well, a confidential human source doesn't get health insurance or a pension.
They're just freelancing for the feds. Rats and MAGA hats. They're basically paid informants that the FBI runs out of headquarters. A lot of these FBI rats get picked up on some other charge. They get sat down and the FBI says, You're going to work for me now.
And if you don't, you're looking at twenty years to life. So these guys say, Yes, sir. And they cozy up to people like the Proud Boys and anyone the Feds wants to watch and control from the inside. And these confidential human sources are under pressure to deliver. What does deliver mean?
It means intelligence and big busts that get the FBI good headlines. According to the Inspector General report, the spies were feeding the FBI intel that said January 6 was going to get a little hairy. But FBI headquarters did nothing about it and then lied to Congress and said they did. So why did headquarters let January 6 get so out of hand? And what were all these FBI spies doing that day and the days before?
Were they riling everyone up like they did in the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot? In that case, the FBI informants instigated the plot. They even used an FBI credit card to buy the ammo supplies in hotel rooms. Did the FBI pay for Gen six hotel rooms? We don't know.
Remember, the media and the democrats said this whole thing was a conspiracy.
Speaker 4: Where do you think this idea comes from? That this was somehow done by the feds?
Speaker 5: I heard that that one of the debaters said it was an inside job. What? Is an inside job on the part of Donald Trump and his henchmen?
Speaker 6: Republicans have blamed the FBI and said it was an inside job. It certainly was not, an inside job by FBI agents or Antifa. They go around blaming it on Antifa and FBI agents.
Speaker 0: Well, how did the media know it wasn't an inside job when the FBI had 26 of their people on the inside? January 6 certainly benefited the media, the FBI and the Democrats. Fifteen hundred arrests humiliated Trump, got him impeached, criminalized the MAGA movement. Trump got indicted over January 6, remember? They tried to throw him in prison over this.
The January 6 committee. It's all Democrats did for two years. Why didn't the committee find any of these snitches? They did a one-sided investigation and teed up Garland to charge Trump so they could run against a convicted felon. So the media is going to apologize, right?
No. The media today is cherry picking the report to say there were no undercover agents there on January 6. The whole thing is a conspiracy. These aren't articles. They're FBI press releases.
And they wonder why their ratings are trash and no one trusts them. It's because of this. They don't want the truth. They want to hide it if it hurts the left. And they can't admit they were wrong because it's too embarrassing and they were a part of the cover up.
But the FBI is worse than the media. The FBI knew what was in this report. They covered it up before the election, and then the director says he's resigning the day before it comes out. Give me a break. This kind of sliminess is why Trump nominated Cash Patel.
I wonder what else Cash is gonna find in the bureau when he looks under the hood.
Speaker 4: As a former federal prosecutor and a public defender who defended a lot of these types of cases, What you need to show is whether or not the FBI and government agents were using undercover operatives and informants on the day of January 6. Once you prove that, then you defeat the insurrection narrative with the FBI's own documentation.
Speaker 0: And what does this report do to the January 6 defendants? None of the confidential informants were arrested or charged. These guys were right alongside everyone walking into the capital. But you're in prison for years? Now if you're a defense attorney for a Jan Sixer and this drops after the case was decided, that could change everything.
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley says this, There is a question of why the confidential human sources who entered the capital were not charged as part of an operation that the Justice Department described as an effort to shock and awe targeting everyone involved that day. This report does not find specific wrongdoing or direction from confidential human sources in the writing. Congress, however, is likely to seek more information on these sources and their conduct on the day. Are you allowed to commit crimes as a spy for the FBI and not get charged? Because they said this was the greatest attack on democracy ever.
So it was up there with nineeleven. Traitors, they said, seditionists, They're off scot free. You can try to overthrow the government if you're an FBI rat and just walk away. Congress has to find out. And what does this mean for pardons?
I mean, the Hunter Biden pardon already greased the runway for Trump, but this reports all the ammo Trump needs. He told Time Magazine, It's going to start in the first hour, maybe the first nine minutes. Now if I were President, I don't think I'd pardon J-sixers who were slugging cops, but if you were wandering around peacefully, come on. And it's not just Kash Patel that's going to clean house, Tulsi's on deck.
Speaker 7: I'm here with Tulsi Ganford. She's here on the hill, meeting with my colleagues. She's gonna be a a great DNI, director of national intelligence. It's a really important job. It oversees all of our intelligence agencies, and and it's in need of reform.
I think everybody would admit that. And so we need to bring in a reformer.
Speaker 0: Now the deep state's never been this backed into a corner, ever. We have Trump assassination files that we wanna release, JFK assassination files, COVID files, Epstein, Diddy. What about that pipe bomb? Is the FBI still working on that one? Who planted that?
It's just another conspiracy theory that you were right about. The lab leak, the laptop, and now Jan six. No wonder Biden's under pressure to dish out more pardons.
Speaker 3: Who
Speaker 0: knows how high this thing goes?
@5dme81 - 5DME81
💥💥💥💥KABOOM 💥💥💥💥💣💣THE BIDEN WHITE HOUSE WAS DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN TRYING TO HELP START JACK SMITHS INVESTIGATION ON THE J6 PROBE AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP. J6 SET UP👈 https://t.co/H0D2X0hCIC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senators Johnson and Grassley sent a letter to the FBI director and Attorney General alleging the Biden White House was directly involved in starting Jack Smith's January 6 investigation against President Trump. According to the letter, the White House counsel's office secretly obtained former President Trump and Vice President Mike Pence's phones and gave them to the prosecutors. The claim is that the White House was siccing the Justice Department on their future rival in the 2024 election to look for possible crimes. The news agency claims they were the first to report a White House counsel was directly involved with this investigation two years ago.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Return to our next guest in a second, but a little breaking news. Senator Johnson, senator Grassley just sent this to me a little bit ago, why we're on air. It's a major development. You're taking a look at a letter right there that was just sent to the FBI director, Kash Patel, and the attorney general, Pam What does it say? It says that congress has obtained evidence that shows that the Biden White House was directly involved in trying to help start, Jack Smith's investigation on the January 6 probe against president Trump, specifically at the White House counsel's office secretly obtained president Trump president Trump's and vice president Mike Pence's former phones and giving them to the prosecutors.
Basically, sicking the justice department on his future competitor, their future rival in the twenty twenty four election so they could look for dirt for possible crimes. There's a lot more coming in. There's a lot of other evidence as well of the White House involvement. Remember, two years ago, we were the first news agency right here in Real America's Voice Justice News to report that a White House counsel was directly involved with this investigation. Now more details, including getting imagine this.
You're the Democrat president, and you go get the old Republican's phone, for the your prior president and send it to the justice department. That's what senator Johnson and Grassley were able to confirm tonight. It's in that letter. Keep an eye on JustinNews.com. We're gonna get you up to speed on that all throughout the night and a lot more developments.