reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @MarsNAO
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m stunned: a Canadian whistleblower says a private Ontario charter worker is paid huge sums to fly small planes and aerially disperse millions of ticks across specific regions twice a year—early spring and early fall. This year they allegedly used deer ticks bred to survive cold. The ticks arrive in boxed batches and are dropped from single or dual-prop aircraft, weeks before the story broke.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
WAIT…. WHAT?? 😱 🚨 Canadian whistleblower drops a BOMBSHELL. A worker for a private charter company in Ontario claims they’re paid HUGE money to fly small planes and aerially disperse MILLIONS of ticks across specific regions — twice a year, early spring and early fall. This year they switched to deer ticks specifically bred to withstand cold temperatures. The company receives the ticks in boxes (each containing millions) and drops them from single or dual-prop aircraft with one pilot and one dispersal handler on board. The post was made in mid-March… weeks before the story exploded. While our government floods the country with migration, crushes the middle class, and sends billions overseas, this is happening in Ontario? WHEN will CANADIANS find this inner strength and demand answers?? #cdnpoli #Ontario #TickDispersal #Whistleblower #CanadaWakeUp #LiberalBetrayal #EnoughIsEnough
Video Transcript AI Summary
A transcript reads a quoted post from someone who said they work for a private charter company in Ontario, Canada. The person claimed the company handles booking and chartering flights across Ontario, and that they are paid to spread ticks by air. They said the tick dispersal happens twice a year—early spring and early fall—but that “this year, we’ve been hired to do it earlier.”
The post described how the company receives ticks “in boxes,” with each box containing “millions of ticks.” The person said the aircraft used are “generally single or dual prop aircraft,” with a single pilot and “one other passenger” responsible for dispersal. They claimed the work “pays a lot.”
According to the post, the ticks are dispersed in “several specific regions in Ontario,” and that the regions are “always the same… each and every year.” The person said last spring the ticks dispersed were mostly American dog ticks, while this year they are “all deer ticks,” described as “supposedly specifically bred to withstand cold temperatures.”
The transcript notes that the post was dated March 16, two weeks before Snopes said the story originated. It then states that the whistleblower’s account “sounds eerily familiar” to claims about boxes of ticks being found, and says it “begs the question” whether the person was telling the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this form post, and I'm gonna put it directly on the screen, and I'm gonna read it word for word. It says this quote, I work for a private charter company in Ontario, Canada. The company handles booking and chartering flights across Ontario mainly. We are paid to spread ticks by air. It happens twice a year, early spring and early fall.
This year, we've been hired to do it earlier. The company receives the ticks in boxes. Each box contains millions of ticks. The aircraft used are generally single or dual prop aircraft, single pilot, and one other passenger that handles the dispersal. It pays a lot, and I mean a lot.
Generally, the ticks are dispersed in several specific regions in Ontario, And it's always the same regions each and every year, thus far. Last spring, the ticks dispersed were mostly American dog ticks. This year, they are all deer ticks, supposedly specifically bred to withstand cold temperatures. End quote. So that post was from March 16, two weeks before Snopes said that this story originated.
Alright? And it's pretty interesting. Here, we have a whistleblower saying that they are paid to disperse ticks across Canada. Now this sounds eerily familiar to what we're hearing about these boxes of ticks that are being found. And it begs the question, was this person telling the truth?
@redpillb0t - redpillbot
9/11 - How did we miss this? Voice recordings from the hijacked planes reveal an accent closer to Hebrew than Arabic. And remember that several of the "Muslim hijackers" were alive after 9/11. The truth is being covered up. https://t.co/q8jbYdK2lQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The voice of the hijacker heard on the hijacked planes’ voice recorder is described as having an accent that matches an Israeli Hebrew accent. Seconds after that audio-related claim is mentioned, further transmissions are referenced in the narrative.
FBI director Mueller, BBC News, and ABC are said to have confirmed that seven of the 19 Muslims whose mugshots were flashed around the world did not die in the nine one one crashes. The account states that these seven individuals are alive and well and are victims of identity theft. The transcript then raises attention to an eighth accused Muslim, stating that this person died one year before the nine one one hijackings even occurred.
The transcript uses these points to introduce a series of questions about identity theft and investigative priorities. It asks who stole the identities of the mentioned individuals and why the FBI is not looking for the person or people responsible for the identity theft. It also focuses on the relationship between the alleged hijackers and the people whose identities were allegedly used.
If the hijackers really were Muslims, the transcript asks why they would steal the identities of fellow Muslims and thereby implicate other Muslims. It questions whether, in that scenario, the hijackers would be more likely to steal Israeli identities and put the blame on Israelis rather than taking identities from Muslims.
In the alternative scenario presented, the transcript asks whether the hijackers were Israelis, and if so, whether they would be more likely to steal the identities of Muslims and put the blame on Muslims. The transcript’s argument structure is centered on comparing these possible identity-theft targets—Israeli identities versus Muslim identities—against the stated identities attributed to the hijackers.
Overall, the transcript links together three main elements: (1) the hijacker voice recorder claim about an Israeli Hebrew accent, (2) the confirmation that seven of the 19 Muslims shown in mugshots are alive and victims of identity theft, and (3) the additional claim that an eighth accused Muslim died one year before the hijackings. It then culminates in questions about the identity theft perpetrator, the lack of FBI pursuit as framed by the transcript, and the implications of who would target which identities depending on whether the hijackers were assumed to be Muslims or Israelis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The voice of the hijacker heard from the hijacked planes voice recorder reveals that the accent of the hijacker matches an Israeli Hebrew accent. The next transmission comes seconds later. FBI director Mueller, BBC News, and ABC have confirmed that seven of the 19 Muslims whose mugshots were flashed around the world did not die in the nine one one crashes. They are alive and well and are victims of identity theft. An eighth accused Muslim died one year before the nine one one hijackings even occurred.
Who stole their identities and why isn't the FBI looking for them? If the hijackers really were Muslims, why would they steal the identities of fellow Muslims and implicate them? Wouldn't they be more likely to steal Israeli identities and put the blame on Israelis? If the hijackers were Israelis, wouldn't they be likely to steal the identities of Muslims and put the blame on Muslims?
reSee.it AI Summary
“My real name is Madison Cupps. My father Bryan Cupps started CyberSlice with Steve Green, Tim Glass, and Steve Jobs, a 90s online pizza platform used as a code word system to traffic children for elites. He sold it to Food.com; when the dark web began, he went under. He threatened to sell me to Hillary Clinton and sexually assaulted me. I reported him to the FBI, but nothing happened due to CIA connections. My witnesses were assassinated, so I went to the media; my TikTok account was suspended and my voice taken.”
@TheEmmapreneur - E M M A ✨ K A T H E R I N E
⛔️”My real name is Madison Cupps. My father Bryan Cupps started CyberSlice along with Steve Green, Tim Glass, and Steve Jobs. CyberSlice was a platform they designed back in the 90s which allowed you to order pizza online. "Pizza" was code word for little girls and so on. They used this platform to traffic children for the elites. My father sold the business to http://Food.com when the dark web was created it put him out of business. He lost his biggest customer Bill Gates. He used to threaten to sell me to Hillary Clinton if I told anyone what he was doing to me. He said I was lucky that he was only assaulting me and that she would cut my vagina and turn it into a witch's nose and sacrifice me. I have reported my father for child trafficking and sexually assaulting me to the FBI. Unfortunately, due to his CIA connections nothing has happened. He has had my witnesses assassinated so I knew the safest thing for me to do was to go to the media. I gained some support on Tik Tok, but my account has been suspended and they are doing everything they can to take my voice away from me…” - Madison Cupps, who just passed away under mysterious circumstances on April 10th, 2026 ⛔️
@TheEmmapreneur - E M M A ✨ K A T H E R I N E
⛔️ Complaint written and submitted by Madison (Clares) Cupps to the IC3 (who recently passed under mysterious circumstances on April 10th, 2026): “From the age of 4-7 years old, me and my twin sister ——- Cupps were repeatedly molested by my father Bryan Cupps at our home ———, Capitola CA. He would force me and my twin sister to have sex with each other and to kiss each other. He allowed his business partners to touch us too. He would record us on a video camera and sold child pornography online. My mother Autumn Taylor Cupps found child pornography on his computer, but did nothing about it. She told her best friend at the time who later told me about it. Bryan Cupps claims that he worked for the CIA as an assassin and that's why he had to look at child porn. He tells my whole family this, including my sisters —— Cupps and —— Cupps and my brother —— Cupps. They are the only family to believe him and work to protect him…” ⛔️ (Madison has disclosed this documentation on different podcasts and on her own social media along with the names that are unredacted)
@EleanorAquitai5 - G.Flamma
@laralogan She is a liar, a fraud, and betrayed her oath and the public trust. She was convicted and needs punishment, but not the harsh sentence she received.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
@Tia4419 - Tia4419
@MarsNAO @MazeLove14 @Ryanmatta https://t.co/owYVHUMTCv
@cvcwellness - 🌞 Christian Van Camp 🌞
🌞 At the same time… Farmers are reporting boxes of ticks appearing on land. 100s. 1000s of ticks. Not “naturally” spreading Placed with NO mainstream explanation. Just brushed off like it’s nothing. https://t.co/Wgu5QAmw2L
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 is mushroom hunting and spots a “tick box.” They won’t touch it because there are ticks all over it, with ticks crawling out of the box. They emphasize that there are millions of ticks and that you can see the ticks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I'm out here mushroom hunting, I found there it is right there. The tick box. I'm not gonna touch it because there's ticks all over that thing. I know there is. Look at them crawling out of it.
Millions of them. You can see the ticks.
reSee.it AI Summary
I recount an IT forensic expert accessing a Dominion image in Mesa County, claiming the U.S. government was overthrown on Nov 3, 2020, across every swing state. In Pennsylvania on CNN, Trump led 1,690,589 to Biden 1,252,537 at 11:08 EST; at 11:09, Trump 1,670,631 and Biden 1,272,495, with 19,958 votes switched and Tina Peters in prison.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: An IT forensic expert, after gaining access to a forensic image of the Dominion Rigging Management System in Mesa County, Colorado, demonstrates how the United States government was overthrown on November 3, 2020—without a trace. ——This happened across every single swing state in the Union. In Pennsylvania, live on CNN: Trump had 1,690,589 votes. Biden had 1,252,537 votes. The time was approximately 11:08 Eastern Standard Time. The next interval report shows Trump’s votes decreasing to 1,670,631 and Biden’s votes increasing to 1,272,495. The time was approximately 11:09 p.m. Live on CNN, exactly 19,958 votes were switched from Trump to Biden, and Tina Peters is rotting in prison.
@SemperVeritasX - John-Paul Berg
I personally have no way to get out of Canada, and will likely be targeted for political prosecution in the very near future for speaking against the regime. I genuinely believe that is a great possibility. Though, if it's at all possible, get your family out of Canada NOW. These people have a rigid and radical neoliberal orthodoxy. The legislation being introduced by this penetrated cabinet functions to enshrine it into law. Any deviation from said orthodoxy will be construed as mis dis or mal information. Any criticisms of their immensely detrimental immigration policies will be construed as hatespeech. They will not tolerate dissent. They will demand ideological uniformity. They're in fact changing fundamental aspects of our laws and rights in order to punish dissent. Mr. Adler, ironically considers himself a Liberal. Yet look at the authoritarian legislation that he is supporting. Bill C-2 → SURVEILLANCE Border & Data Access: warrantless digital info sharing → Bill C-22 → SURVEILLANCE / BACKDOORS Mandatory data retention, lawful access capabilities & backdoors in all electronic services – mass metadata collection & easy government access to everyone’s digital data → Bill C-8 → INFRASTRUCTURE Control over cyber systems, networks, utilities – power to cut/throttle → Bill C-9 → SPEECH & IDEOLOGY Vague hate definitions used to silence dissent → Bill C-11 → INTERNET & MEDIA Regulates online content, controlling what you see and share → Bill C-63 → DIGITAL SAFETY The excuse to imprison people – policing thought, speech, online behavior. Mr. Adler sits on our appointed Senate. This self described "Liberal" will have no problem passing all of these Orwellian, dystopian bills, and transitioning Canada into some unrecognizable shade of totalitarian shithole.
@JOKAQARMY1 - mrredpillz jokaqarmy
The 155 year old script running the world. https://t.co/4zFcOsMNeE
Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker asserts that humanity is being manipulated according to a long-planned script laid out by Albert Pike, described as the sovereign grand commander of the Scottish Rite Freemason. The speaker claims Pike wrote a letter to Mazzini detailing three world wars in order, and that these wars are unfolding now. The claimed War 1 is to overthrow the tsar and replace it with an atheistic communist system. War 2 is to use fascism and Zionism against each other, destroy Nazism, and establish the state of Israel, which the speaker notes happened in 1948. War 3 is to stir conflict between political Zionists and leaders of the Islamic world until they mutually destroy each other, then draw every other nation into physical, moral, spiritual, and economic exhaustion. The speaker contends that this is happening currently, citing October 7 and the fighting among Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, Tel Aviv, Syria’s status, Russia and NATO in Ukraine, and China circling Taiwan, with nations choosing sides along an Israel–Islamic axis on schedule. The speaker argues that humanity is being manipulated and that there is “proof” because Nazism, Zionism, and the term fascism did not exist in 1871, yet Pike supposedly named them all before their naming. The speaker asserts Pike was not prophetic but “middle management.”
The speaker emphasizes that the Israel–Islam war now is a script drafted in 1871 and performed in 2026, with audiences and participants acting as puppets whose sides and outcomes are already written, cast, and paid for. Think tanks are said to write both party platforms, and powerful men “put their plans on paper” and rely on people being too tired to read them.
A call to action follows: stop voting for the savior handed to you and recognize that no man in a suit is coming to save you. The speaker invokes Yeshua, saying the kingdom of heaven is within you, and urges listeners not to hate others they’re told to hate. The enemy, the speaker claims, is the man who profits when people fight their brothers, not any particular group. The speaker discourages outsourcing power to presidents or pastors, arguing that when sovereignty is handed to a man, the script continues. The message concludes with a reminder that the blueprint is published and that listeners can write a different one, affirming they are the creators of their own lives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know about you, but I'm sick and tired of being manipulated. A man wrote down the third world war in 1871, literally word for word, and we are walking through it right now. His name's Albert Pike, the sovereign grand commander of the Scottish Rite Freemason. He sent a letter to Mazzini and laid out three world wars in order before any of them ever happened. War number one, overthrow the tsar to replace it with an atheistic communist.
War number two, use fascism and Zionism against each other, destroy Nazism, establish the state of Israel, and that happened in 1948. And war three, in his words, stir conflict between political Zionists and the leaders of the Islamic world until they mutually destroy each other. Then go drag every other nation into physical, moral, spiritual, and economic exhaustion. And that's happening right now. October 7, Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, trading missiles with Tel Aviv, Syria collapsed, Russia and NATO bleeding through Ukraine.
It's crazy. And then China's just circling Taiwan. Every nation on earth is picking a side on Israel and Islamic axis right on schedule, and we are fully being manipulated. And there's a little bit more proof. The word Nazism did not even exist in 1871.
The word Zionism did not exist in 1871. Hersey did not publish the Jewish state until 1896. Fascism was not coined until 1920. Pike named all of it before any of it ever had a name. And he was not a prophet.
He was just middle management executed. So now this Israel versus Islam war that you're watching right now, it's a script drafted in 1871, performed in 2026. And you, me, the audience, every war you cried over, every president you fought your family about, every side that you picked, already written, already cast, already paid for, and we are literally puppets being manipulated no matter which side wins. Doesn't matter for them. The think tanks that write both party platforms and the men who put their plans on paper and counted on you to be too tired to read them.
And it worked for a hundred and fifty five years. And here's the reality. It's not working anymore because you can see it now. And once you see it, you can't unsee it. So here's what you do.
Stop voting for the savior they handed you. No man in a suit is coming to save you. Yeshua already told you this. The kingdom of heaven is within you. Stop hating the person they told you to hate.
Your enemy is not the Muslim, the Jew, not the Russian, not the Hispanic, not the black guy. Your enemy is the man who profits when you fight your brother. So stop outsourcing your power to presidents, pastors. Every time you hand your sovereignty to a man, you are voting for the script to continue. You are the creator of your own life.
The blueprint is always published. The script is in our hands right now, and we are going to write a different one if we choose to. Thank you, and I love you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe Loosdrecht, where a planned asylum center burned. Local citizens objected, protested, police were deployed, and the site was reportedly set alight. It’s not isolated: many Western towns face the same struggle as the state repurposes buildings and neighborhoods for asylum centers, displacing natives. Democracy is portrayed as a stage where power acts, letting a regime proceed despite citizens’ votes, petitions, and protests.
@CCrowley100 - Chad Crowley
A planned “asylum center” burns in Loosdrecht, Netherlands. April 2026. The former town hall was set to be transformed into a shelter for so-called “asylum seekers,” foreign invaders imposed on the town by a Regime deaf to its own people. Local Dutch citizens objected. They protested. Police were deployed. The situation escalated. Then the planned site was reportedly set alight. Of course, Loosdrecht is not an isolated case. It is one of several Dutch towns, and one of countless places across the West, now fighting the same battle: citizens being told that their buildings, streets, and neighborhoods can be repurposed by an increasingly tyrannical political class that will never live with the consequences. This is what passes for “democracy” in the modern West: not rule by the people, but rule over the people, dressed in the rituals of consent. Native citizens may vote, petition, attend meetings, object, and protest. They may perform every ceremony of “self-government.” But when they say no to asylum centers in their own towns, or resist any policy advancing their demographic displacement and erasure, the state proceeds anyway. The choice was never theirs. Democracy is only the stage on which power performs.
@RealDonKeith - Don Keith
🚨Ontario Premier Doug Ford axes Elon Musk’s Starlink contract and bans every U.S. company from government deals — all because Trump dared push back on trade. “It’s done, it’s gone,” he whines, blaming Trump entirely. https://t.co/12MJBsi8nK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 announces a government procurement policy change. Starting today, all U.S.-based companies will be banned from taking part in government procurement. The speaker notes that the province spends about $30 billion annually on procurement, and alongside that, there is more than a $200 billion plan to build infrastructure. As a consequence of this policy, U.S.-based businesses will lose tens of billions of dollars in revenues. The speaker attributes this consequence to President Trump and states the intention to urge all 44 municipalities to adopt the same approach, highlighting that some have already begun to respond.
The speaker emphasizes a broader move beyond the procurement ban, stating that Ontario is ripping up its contract with Starlink. The contract is described as done and gone, with a commitment not to award contracts to individuals or entities that enable and encourage economic attacks on the province or country. This action is framed as part of a larger response that includes federal tariffs and measures being advanced by fellow premiers. The speaker characterizes the collective actions as “Team Canada’s opening response.”
In summary, the key points are: a nationwide procurement ban for U.S.-based companies by the provincial government; the substantial annual procurement expenditure and the large infrastructure plan that would be affected; anticipated revenue losses for U.S.-based businesses; encouragement for all 44 municipalities to adopt the same ban, with some already joining; the termination of the Ontario-Starlink contract; and the stance that no contracts will be awarded to actors who are perceived as enabling economic attacks on the province or country, all within a broader strategy that includes federal tariffs and other premiers’ measures as part of an opening response from Team Canada.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is off the shelves. Also starting today, all U. S. Based companies will be banned from taking part in government procurement. Every year, the province and its agencies spend about $30,000,000,000 on procurement Alongside are more than $200,000,000,000 plan to build infrastructure.
U. S. Based businesses will now lose out on tens of billions of dollars in revenues. They only have President Trump to blame. I'm also urging all four forty four municipalities to do the same, and I'm thrilled to see some are already stepping up.
For example, Mayor Patrick Brown in the city of Brampton and many other cities As part of this government wide procurement ban. We're going one step further. We're ripping up Ontario's contract with Starlink. It's done. It's gone.
We won't award contracts to people who enable and encourage economic attacks on our province province in our country. Alongside federal tariffs and the measures my fellow premiers are bringing forward. This team Canada's opening response.
reSee.it AI Summary
I recall Amy Eskridge’s anti-gravity talk, one of her last before she died. She warned that even public work can vanish. She traced gravity research from Biefeld-Brown to superconductors and propulsion breakthroughs, noting she could master any field in 3 months and that promising results often disappear. Her open work at the Institute for Exotic Science was visionary. Burlison cited Milburn’s claim of a targeted-energy attack. Her legacy inspires.
@InterstellarUAP - Interstellar
Amy Eskridge's Anti-Gravity Presentation, one of her last before she tragically passed away. “Even if you do it in the public, it still don't mean that the inventor won't disappear.” In one of her final presentations on antigravity, the brilliant scientist delivered a compelling historical survey of gravity modification research from the Biefeld-Brown effect and early experiments to modern superconducting approaches and propulsion breakthroughs. With inspiring confidence she noted, “I can learn any new field in just 3 months,” while observing how “Promising results always seem to disappear.” Amy’s dedication to advancing these ideas openly through the Institute for Exotic Science was truly visionary. Recently, Congressman Eric Burlison referenced allegations by ex-UK intelligence Operative Franc Milburn that Amy was targeted by a directed energy weapon and could have been murdered by an aerospace contractor. Her passion for unlocking these frontiers leaves an inspiring legacy.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion covers gravity, antigravity, and the history, experiments, and funding surrounding gravity modification research. Gravity is described as the fundamental force that interacts between masses over long and short distances, governing planetary origins. Antigravity is defined as gravity modification, noting that it is often mislabeled; it is presented as gravity modification rather than true negative gravity.
Historical timeline and theoretical context:
- Hipparchus’s heliocentric ideas (15th century) and Kepler’s planetary motion (16th–17th centuries) set the stage.
- Newton’s law of universal gravitation (1686) follows the inverse-square law.
- Relativity recasts gravity as a deformation of spacetime, implying antigravity is impossible without negative mass; Tesla’s perspective differs from curved spacetime, rejecting the spacetime curvature interpretation.
- Tesla proposed a vehicle using a space drive with “antielectromagnetic propulsion” and “dynamic theory of gravity” involving ether filling space and mass as vortexes; he rejected curved spacetime.
Gravity research and institutions:
- The Gravity Research Foundation founded in 1948 by Roger Babson (note: the name appears as Babson Prize in some references). It awards annual essays on gravity; winners include Steven and Gareth DeWitt, among others. Some essays favor antigravity possibilities; some are critical. Gareth DeWitt argued that “we don’t really have a theory, so why don’t we have devices that we say work?”
- 1950s–1960s: Government and contractor programs (e.g., Aeronautical Research Laboratory, later Aerospace Research Laboratory; Lockheed’s Gunkworks) reportedly conducted antigravity experiments at Wright-Patterson and elsewhere; the Searle generator is cited as a claimed antigravity/free-energy device with a rotating magnetic/insulator arrangement.
- 1940s–1950s: the Dean Drive (a claimed reactionless drive) and the Wallace machine (1968) with spinning brass discs purportedly aligning nuclear spin; both are described as unsubstantiated, with possible explanations rooted in friction or other conventional effects.
- Lathewate (Eric Lathey) gyroscopes: father of Maglev; demonstrations with large, heavy gyroscopes suggested a force orthogonal to spin and direction, but explanations rely on centripetal forces and Newton’s laws; not established as antigravity.
Mid- to late-20th century and notable individuals:
- 1970s: Mansfield Amendment restricts DOD funding for nonmilitary propulsion research, effectively curbing public antigravity research; private or black-budget efforts may continue.
- John Hutchinson (1970s–1980s): investigated Tesla-inspired effects, claimed replication of Philadelphia Experiment; demonstrations of metal deformations allegedly telekinetically controlled, though results are controversial and contested; associated with Hathaway Lab in Toronto. Anecdotes describe Hutchinson’s agoraphobia and later loss of replicability after medical treatment.
- 1990s: Woodward (“mock effect”) proposed a reactionless thrust enabling a warp-drive-like effect via large negative mass and spacetime manipulation; also discussed the Albuter/Albuter plot involving space-time compression/expansion.
Ning Li and Huntsville efforts:
- Ning Li (Ning Lee) and Doug Torr: 1990s efforts at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) proposed that a magnetic field on a superconductor could align ion spins and the solid matrix to produce a gravitomagnetic/gravitoelectric effect; Li founded AC Gravity LLC (1999) after leaving UAH; Li received a DOT contract (~$500,000 in 2001); Li’s status and outcomes became the subject of internet legends and speculation about funding and disappearance, with multiple conflicting narratives about her fate (cancer, return to China, involvement with DOD).
- Podlet Kanob (Podlet Canob) experiments: Russian scientist’s rotating YBCO (yttrium barium copper oxide) disc experiments tied to superconductors and gravity; YBCO was associated with Ning Li’s work; publicized claims of gravity-related effects and gravity beams.
- Robert Becker’s quantized gravity approach: applied Maxwell equations to gravity; his thesis at UAH is noted as being rarely accessible.
Other researchers and topics:
- Jose Vargas and Claude Poirier: in France, continued Podlet Canob-like research; Poirier’s NASA test (2015) reportedly observed a force leading to a dewar explosion while the disc remained undamaged; replication and interpretation remain debated.
- Searle device variants and Morningstar Applied Physics: John Brandenburg and Paul Murad’s Morningstar claim a 77% weight reduction using a gravito-electromagnetic framework; includes a ferromagnetic fluid in the center disc and contrasts with Grasp phenomena.
- Boeing and GRASP program: “Gravity Research for Advanced Propulsion” publicly acknowledged by Boeing in 2014; rumors of involvement persist.
- December 2017 declassifications: ATIP documents (DIA) reference traversable wormholes, negative energy, and warp-drive concepts; authors include How (and others) discussing space-time manipulation as a means to evade missiles; some documents describe space-time bubbles and speed illusions.
Proposed path forward:
- The consensus expresses the need for theories with testable hypotheses, focusing on quantized gravity and independent, privately funded research to enable publication and development free from institutional constraints.
- A proposed institute would: pool private funding into a stable pot, provide a public-benefit structure with generous royalties to inventors, and offer facilities (RF labs, robotics, materials, machine shop) and space for collaboration and commercialization, enabling researchers to pursue ideas without academic tenure pressures.
- The group emphasizes the need for credible, testable results and cautions that promising results often disappear, underscoring the role of independent funding and accountability in advancing credible antigravity research.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's get right into it and talk about gravity. Just kinda to start with the basics. What is it basically? It's the fundamental physical force, interacts between different masses over both long and short distances. It controls the origins of the planets, and those are all things we've heard before.
And antigravity is basically the the science of modifying gravity. So antigravity is kind of a misnomer. It's really more grab gravity modification, but colloquially, it's called antigravity. So just kinda start at the beginning. Right?
So Hippronikus published his theory of heliocentricity in the fifteen hundreds, and then, Kepler, of course, came up with the planetary motion stuff in the sixteen hundreds. And then Newton published his law of universal gravitation in 1686. And I guess one thing to really note about his law of gravitation is that it follows the inverse squared law, meaning that it it dissipates over a distance proportionate to the inverse of the the square of the distance.
Speaker 1: So
Speaker 0: that kinda leads us in what does relativity have to say about gravity. So relativity says that gravity is basically a a deformation in space time. So sometimes you see those pictures of, like, a planet, and then there's kind of a dip in space time that it kinda sinks in. And so relativity kinda says that antigravity is sort of impossible without negative mass. And this is one of his sketches of a vehicle that he proposed putting the space drive into.
And so he patented that. The patent number's there. He called it antielectromagnetic propulsion, and he talked a lot about electro pulsation. And he had what he called the dynamic theory of gravity, which was really more of an theory where he talks about ether filling all of the space and he talks about mass being really just little vortexes of the ether. And then he says that, you know, as a as a particle decays, it's really just the kind of spinning down or not vortexing quite as fast and then dissipating.
And he totally rejects the notion of curved space time. So that relativity example we were just talking about about you have the planet kinda sitting in the curved space time, Tesla doesn't agree with that really at all. In 1948, the Gravity Research Foundation was founded by Roger Basson. He started a annual essay prize where you would write an essay on gravity and then he would give I think it was like a $4,000 prize at the time. And that prize has been won by many famous scientists.
Steven Steven is one of them. Five Nobel Prize winners have won the Babson Prize. Some of those essays are sort of in favor of antigravity being possible, possible, and some of them are more critical. So this is actually an essay that won in 1953 by a scientist named Gareth DeWitt, and he was kind of talking about just to paraphrase this, is you kinda need a good theory before you can really make a working device is what he's kinda saying here. We don't really have a theory, so why don't we have devices that we say work?
So he's saying we're a little ahead of ourselves on that. So then in the nineteen fifties, there were several government and government contractor programs. So there is something called the aeronautical research laboratory, which is now called the Aerospace Research Lager Research Laboratory. And they supposedly conducted many antigravity experiments on the Wright Patterson Air Force Base in the fifties, and perhaps may still be involved with that now. And then there was the research institute for advanced study that later turned into Lockheed's gunkworks.
In the nineteen forties, there was the Searle generator, and that was purported or claimed to be a combination of antigravity and free energy. It's kind of this this, like, metallic. You've got, like, a magnetic ring and then an insulator ring and then, like, a copper on the outside. And there's these little cylinders that that rotate. And and the thing does rotate around, and it makes a lot of noise, and it appears to do something.
But it's been sort of widely panned, although it's still in development with some modern efforts. There was the Dean Drive in the fifties and sixties. This was claimed to be reactionless drive, meaning that there's no propellant exhaust coming out as you thrust forward in one direction. It was basically, like, they have kind of a asymmetric weight thing that's asymmetrically kind of oscillating around and it creates kind of like a linear oscillation. And a lot of people think that effect may be actually just due to the friction of the thing oscillating back and forth, and then the friction just kind of pushes it forward.
So that's probably just an effective friction. There was the Wallace machine in 1968. This one was patented. It's basically some spinning brass discs, and brass is one half integer, you know, nuclear spin. And so the the idea of this is that you spin the the metallic around, and it's supposed to align the nuclear spin.
And then, you know, he he calls it the kinemastic field. So he talks about the motion of metals, and he really gets into, like, the kinetic part of aligning the nuclear spin. Again, this one is unsubstantiated. There's a lot of people that talk about this was patented and then kind of fell off the map. And so sometimes people talk about maybe it went black or was kind of taken under, but it's also just kind of unsubstantiated.
There's the Lathewate gyroscopes. So Eric Lathewate was widely known as the father of Maglev. His hypothesis was that the these rotating spinning discs could create a force that's orthogonal to both the spin and direction. So if you look at this thing here, it's spinning on this axis, and then it spins on the this axis as well, and then the the the forces in, I guess, this direction. So he had these big gyroscopes that he would, like, hold up over his head, and they were really heavy, and he would, like, hold it really effortlessly looking.
And he did a lot of, kind of interesting public displays of his, you know, swinging his jar the heavy gyroscopes around his head and that kind of thing. And so he made kind of a splash with that, but, you know, it maybe can be account accounted for through centripetal forces and Newton's second law explaining the effect. So it's kind of a cool and maybe a useful effect, but it's not necessarily true, like, antigravity or gravity modification. So I was gonna talk a little bit now about the modern efforts. So in 1973, there was the Mansfield amendment, and this restrict restricted DOD dollars from being spent on nonmilitary applications.
So things like propulsion or, well, you know, antigravity propulsion kind of fell under that that umbrella. And so this kinda means that we're not really doing antigravity research in the public sector of the government anymore at all by legislation. And so kind of the explanation at the time was, well, this stuff doesn't work, so we don't wanna waste money on it. But maybe another explanation is that they had their own black budgets, and they didn't wanna double spend on their other projects. So they just legislated that they didn't do that anymore.
So there's different interpretations of what was going on with the man's building. In the nineteen seventies, there is this guy, John Hutchinson, who he's kind of he's, like, all over you can find videos of him on YouTube, like, supposedly levitating things, and he was really trying to replicate replicate Tesla's work. He was really digging to Tesla. And so he know he noticed these anomalous effects when he was playing around in Tesla coils, and, he claims that he replicated the Philadelphia experiment, which is, of course, the experiment where the the ship, like, disappeared and then reappeared. So so he had these, like this is a picture of a barred metal that he supposedly could focus his machine on a metallic object, and it would just kind of, like, melt and twist down into itself.
And then you would touch it, and it wouldn't be hot to the touch. So there was no heat, but it somehow was rending the metal or deforming deforming the the metal metal in in some some way. Way. And And then then he claims that after he did this successfully for a long time that he started getting attention, and then people came in and started trying to get him to replicate it, and he lost his ability to perform the experiment which kinda means you can't replicate it, right?
Speaker 2: I saw one of those beams one time.
Speaker 0: Yeah, my dad actually saw one of those.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the guy at Halfway Labs showed me one,
Speaker 3: It was a
Speaker 2: six by six beam and it was split down the middle and then twisted like it was taffy but it didn't look like it had ever been hot. He had it mounted on a plaque and he brought it out of his office and showed it to him. He did experiments with Hutchinson.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So Hutchinson is affiliated with the Hathaway lab in Toronto. And they do have a lot of these metal pieces that have these weird deformations in them, but it's unclear exactly How was the mistake? How that happened. And if you ask Hal Pudoff what the cause of it was, he'll say, oh, I just think that guy was telekinetic.
Speaker 2: He said it was telekinetic. This guy, according to these guys, he would sit there in his basement and he had these radio transmitters and Tesla coils and all this stuff and there was no theory behind it and he would sit there and adjust the knobs and do this and do that sometimes for hours at a time and then eventually After an hour or two things weird things would start happening.
Speaker 0: Yeah,
Speaker 2: and so how I thought that He was just telekinetic
Speaker 0: He's focused on it and
Speaker 2: that he wanted to happen so bad that it just happened and the strange thing about it was he was, What is it? Agoraphobic. He he didn't want to go outside. Yeah. So he stayed in the space all the time, but when people found out about his effect, they wanted him to come out and show it to people.
So they took him to a psychologist and he gave him some, pills for the agoraphobia. And they said that after he started taking those pills, could never do it again.
Speaker 0: So that's that's the loss of ability where he was suddenly not able to replicate it anymore. So according to Hal, it's because he was a telekinetic, but Hal believes in those things, so take that with a grain of It's an interesting So then in 1990, there was the Woodward effect. So Jim Woodward is known as sort of the father of the mock effect. So sometimes you hear about the mock effect in, like, popular literature. But so this is another reactionless thruster, kind of like the Dean Drive was a reactionless drive.
So meaning that you get thrust, but there's no propellant coming out the other end. So he said that this would enable basically a warp drive where you're you have a large negative mass and then it warps space time. And then what you have here is something called an albuter plot. Albuter. Albuter.
Yeah. And so this is supposed to be like a a compression and an expansion of space time that basically causes it to, like, travel in one direction. Solid time. So this this part is kind of interesting. So in the nineteen nineties, we actually had quite a bit of sort of antigravity research that was done here in Huntsville.
And there's a UAH scientist named Ning Lee, and she worked with a grad student named Doug Torr. This is Ning Lee here. That's Doug Torr, and that's he was the chair of the physics department. That's Larry Smalley. And so she puress that if you had a magnetic field on a superconductor, that it would align the ion spins and the the matrix of the the solid state ceramic that it would align the ions and produce this gravitomagnetic gravitoelectric effect.
And so Popular Mechanics did an article on her. NASA got involved, and they did a collaboration in the. And then she actually left UAH and founded this company called AC Gravity LLC, and that was in 1999. And if you look for her company, it's still registered, but no one really knows what they're doing. And she got a $500,000 DOT contract in 2001, and then it kinda ended there.
And we'll talk about that more in a second maybe. Oh, okay. Yeah. So what happened to Ning Lee? So if you Google what happened to Ning Lee, just Google that sentence.
It's kind of like a weird Internet legend that has originated out of Huntsville. This is a Reddit post under ARC conspiracy talking about, hey. What happened immediately? Why did she get DARPA DARPA funding and then disappear? So that's just kind of an interesting Internet legend that it's coming out of Huntsville.
Speaker 3: She had two other records.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I've actually talked to some of them. I've I've run into people even outside of Huntsville and then sort of weird science anti gravity community, and when they hear I'm from Huntsville, they're like, oh my gosh, Ning Lee, what happened to her town meeting? I'm like, I don't know. I don't know what happened.
Speaker 4: She was a member of Hal five for a while.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. I've talked to a lot of people that have worked with her. We
Speaker 2: took a tour of her lab. Really? Back in 1997, the sponsored event. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yep. Well, if anyone knows what happened to
Speaker 3: Ning
Speaker 0: I would like
Speaker 2: to know. About it? Yeah. Okay.
Speaker 3: I heard she went up to Maryland around that area.
Speaker 0: I've heard that. I've I've heard I've heard three different stories about Ning Li. I've heard that she got breast cancer from handling the the the toxic chemicals with the superconductors without gloves, and that she died in The US. I've heard that she went back to China and died there of breast cancer. I've heard that she just got sucked into the DOD and has been doing DOD stuff quietly ever since.
And I've heard that she went back to China to get funding because she couldn't find funding in America, and so she's working in China now. There's a lot of different stories about
Speaker 2: Doug Torr went and founded a a company.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I've got a slide on that here. So kind of related to the thing is the Podlet Kanov effect. So this is a Russian scientist who, really, within just a few years of publishing her first paper about about superconductors and gravity, he started doing this rotating YBCO disc, and YBCO is kind of interesting because it was actually invented out of UAH by a a grad student, and it was famously stolen by another university and patented within, like, the next day of it being revealed to his professor. He the next day, he went to another university, was suddenly chair of the department, and was filing a patent for YBCO literally the next day.
Speaker 3: So what's YBCO?
Speaker 0: It's yttrium barium copper oxide. It's a superconducting material. It's one of the more high temperature ones. It was invented at UAH.
Speaker 4: Same stuff Ningli used. Right? That's the same stuff Ningli used.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Ningli was using YBCO and then product came off, kinda picked up from there. Good.
Speaker 3: The guy that invented YBCO. He's on Yeah.
Speaker 0: And his name, Doug Torre. Wasn't it? Doug Torre.
Speaker 1: He was the one that invented it.
Speaker 2: Robert Becker? Think you're gonna Doug was her stay.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Robert Becker did a quantized gravity thing where he took Maxwell's equations, and then he kind of applied them to gravity and quantized gravity kind of analogous to how you would electricity. And his thesis is over at UAH and I it's not on PDF. I had to, like, go and take a picture of every single page of his thesis.
Speaker 2: So I've been checked out twice. Right?
Speaker 0: Oh, I checked out Robert Becker's thesis at UAH and it's only been checked out twice. It was checked out in 1999 by the DIA interdepartmental library loan system and then it was checked out by me last year. But yeah. So the positive effect, rotating YPCO superconductors produces supposedly gravity shielding. And the the kind of funny story about this is that ECS was discovered because he was playing with superconductors trying to do something unrelated to gravity.
And then a guy, one of his collaborators walked into the the lab, and he was smoking a pipe, like a tobacco pipe. And the and the smoke drifted over the the superconductor where the experiment was, and supposedly, there was, like, a a vortex in the smoke up over the superconductor. And so they started looking at kind of, like, what what force is making that vortex in the smoke. And, they investigated further, and they decided they thought it was a gravity wave or a gravity beam going up and perturbing the smoke of a superconductor. But he had a 2001 patent.
He actually did collaborate with NASA Marshall Space Flight Center in the early two thousands, and the story goes that he came over here, and we didn't pay for his travel in time, and he got pissed off about it and didn't wanna come back anymore. But he claimed a 2% reduction in weight, And he was sort of, like, widely panned by the community. It was kind of a big splash when he first came out, and then a number of people well, a small number of labs have replicated or attempted to replicate with varying degrees of success. There have been some newer applications done by this guy Claude Poirier in France, and I've got a slide on him here in a second. But so that's for Jose Jose Vargas, who was also at here briefly, they actually then went to the after the stuff kinda wound down, they left and they went to the University of South Carolina, and they created basically their own gravity beam generator.
Generator. And, you know, they talked about it being an in inhomogeneous electric field. So they have, like, two electrodes. Like, one could be a sphere or, like, a hollow cone or that they talked about different shapes of electrodes, but the idea is that they're asymmetric, so, like, one is different than the other. And then they've got a website called experimental sonic gravity, which is still online, although it's unclear what their professional activity is or what they're still working on.
It's kind of unclear, but their website is still up. Then Tamir Dada was their collaborator with that at the university.
Speaker 2: I think they were awarded a couple of SPIRs and then then they disappeared.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So there's some evidence that they got some some funding for an SPIR and then they kinda fell off the map just like they needed.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Of a patent, that picture? The picture out of a patent?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. This picture of the one of the conical electrodes out
Speaker 2: of Jose Vargas actually joined NASA and pitched it to MSFC management, and he drew that picture on the wall in in front of us. And he was talking about Benz Larian or Kenz Larian mathematics. He used all these strange symbols and nobody knew what in the heck he was talking about.
Speaker 0: Robert Becker is one of the, like, 12 people in the world that can read a Jose Vargas paper and understand what the heck he's talking about. I guess, like
Speaker 3: He also applied to be the director of our lab there. Oh, Jose? Rogers got it. He said he know. Oh.
He applied for that position. Becker? No. Your whole labor party. Oh.
Oh, okay. So
Speaker 0: the whole superconductor thing in general has been sort of widely panned and then abruptly dropped. Right? So the Namely Popular Mechanics article, if you try to Google it, you cannot find it. It is not up anymore. You can find some other blogs that have reposted it, but it's no longer officially up.
Research was never made public by the university. Of course, was ousted by the University of Tampere almost immediately. And then Giovanni Modenese, who was a collaborator, I noticed last Yeah. I've I've seen some interviews with him, and he talks about this this smoke story and the super connected thing. Oh, and there's also this book.
I was at a sci fi conference a couple years ago called Dragon Con in Atlanta, and they had, like, a sci fi bookstore booth in the in the marketplace. And they had a whole bunch of science books, and I bought this book called Focus Science. And then like years later, I was flipping through it and they were talking about Podlet Canob and they even mentioned they even mentioned Huntsville and the fact that Podlet Canob had come over to Huntsville and that they talked about Ning Lee, but they didn't name her directly, but it was, like, obviously talking about her. And so there's sort of, like, maybe some kind of, like, undercurrent of let's go discredit this for some reason. They're that's gonna occur because they're they're spinning supermectin at all in there.
I actually believe that happened. It was told Jim Ashburn. Jim Ashburn. Jim
Speaker 3: Ashburn. Right? Yeah.
Speaker 2: Mhmm. He lives here in town.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I would love to talk to him. But yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, he also knows. I would love that. I
Speaker 0: found him on LinkedIn, but I haven't talked to him. Okay. So Claude Boyer in the February, he's kind of like the only lab that has somewhat successfully done pod like pod pod stuff and actually published. Right? So he's he has sort of a modified experiment where he he he does the the YBCO.
I think his doesn't rotate. It's just static. And his YBCO and he claims to get a propelling thrust out of the superconducting disc. And so this is a picture of a liquid nitrogen dewar with a superconductor down in there, and he, you know, actuates or triggers the emitter. And the dewar basically explodes from whatever force is caused by the by the superconductor.
There's some kind of force coming out of the superconductor that explodes the liquid newer. And this was actually tested at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center in 2015, which has not been published. My dad did that, and they received they very similar results where you can you can trigger the the the superconductor and there is some sort of explosion that comes out of the superconductor, but when you take the disc out and look at it, it's totally undamaged. So the dewar around it explodes, but the disc is undamaged. So whatever force is coming out of it comes out of the disc in such a way that it doesn't blow it up.
It's kinda
Speaker 2: weird. Yeah. We took we took the test of them in mini buckets from Walmart because we blew up glass doers. Mhmm. Blew them all over the lab and it cost too much.
Speaker 0: Kind of an anomalous effect that those results kinda need some more explanation or exploration just
Speaker 3: to kinda figure out what's going here.
Speaker 0: And then, one of the more recent antigravity devices or experiments would be Morningstar applied physics. So some of you have probably met John Brandenburg and Paul Murad. So they have this company Morningstar, and they have what's basically a modified Searle machine. So we talked about the Searle machine a little bit earlier. Brandenburg talks about his gem theory, which is this gravito electro magnetism theory, and they claim a 77% weight reduction.
So this you can see it's very similar to the Searle generator generator that we looked at earlier. It's got the rollers, and they magnetically rotate and all that. But they also kind of the different part about this one is that there's actually a ferromagnetic fluid inside the center disc here. And I think it's actually just special oil with some iron shavings in it. But so they plan 7% weight reduction.
And then kind of the rumor that they're sort of privately planning is they're now planning 20% weight reduction. But I'm not so sure they're actually getting 20%. So there's, of course, the more well known ones like Boeing Phantom Works. So this Gravity Research for Advanced Propulsion or the GRASP program has been around probably for a while, but they admitted to it publicly in 2014. It's when they sort of admitted they had that program.
I was reading there's some chatter about maybe being involved in this. I'm I'm not sure if that's true or not, but I was sort of hearing that. And then so these are the so Frampton works is where you get these black triangles that people talk about sometimes. So if you're into, like, the UFO scene, Mufon has a lot of reports of these, like, black triangles that people look up and they just see, like, a black triangle blocking out the stars in the sky. There's a lot of reports of of things like that, and that is supposedly the t r three b black triangle.
And sort of the rumor is that that's what you call an ARV, which is an alien re reproduction vehicle, which is sort of like meant to look like a UFO, but isn't really one because it's really from Boeing. So and the mechanism maybe resembles a brown generator. I don't know. It's hard to get information on. And then, of course, you have recent declassifications.
So in December 2017, some of you may be aware there was a big a big a big declassification of several different documents. Most of them related to this ATIP program, the advanced aviation threat identification program. And that was if you're familiar with, like, the To the Stars Academy, they did a lot of media promotion around these d declassifications. And so, like, here's one here's two examples documents that were declassified. This is a defense intelligence reference document.
This one is on traversable wormholes, stargates, negative energy. And this one is titled warth drive, dark energy, and the manipulation of extra dimensions. So these are DIA documents that were actually released.
Speaker 3: Who are the authors?
Speaker 0: The authors? It's right there, but I can't read it.
Speaker 2: How wrote one of them.
Speaker 0: How wrote one of them. I don't know who the other
Speaker 3: one was. Because house group over in her days is being primary place of fire sign. It's brought
Speaker 5: a lot of stuff.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So How how how was written? There's a bunch of these DIRD documents that how was written. I've got a bunch of them
Speaker 3: on the
Speaker 2: Hal wrote one about how if you can manipulate space time, then you could essentially fall towards any direction you wanted to fall. Yeah. And then it also affected time, which would make the UFO difficult to shoot down because Yeah. The bullets come at them, but they effectively, they have all weight to do something about it inside the craft.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It helps us about the space time bubble around the craft, and so it looks like they're going really fast, but to them inside the ship, they're going at a normal speed. So it's kinda like dodging bullets in the matrix.
Speaker 2: When the air comes through them at hypersonic speed, it goes into the time field, and the air doesn't seem to be moving at them so fast, and that's why there's no fluid friction. According
Speaker 0: to his
Speaker 2: document that he wrote. So
Speaker 0: these are kinda interesting. There's some kinda funny some funny cartoons, and some of them are like wormholes and stuff. They're kinda interesting to look at. So the future, what's the next step for anti gravity? We've looked at a whole bunch of different devices of, like, varying credibility.
So how are we gonna get to the point where we have credible antigravity? And I have a picture of Huntsville here because you might as well get it here. Have a theme. So in conclusion, what now? We kinda need theories with testable hypotheses.
That was what that Bryce Witt guy said, right, for the award. He was talking about, hey. We're kind of ahead of ourselves here. We need good theory so that we can test it and see if the theory is right or not. So we we really need to focus on, like, the the the quantized gravity.
Is that a thing or not? And figure out the theory and then go build something. We think we need independently funded research because when you're at a university or an academic institution and you wanna work on this stuff and they say, oh no, that's French, you can't do that. Or you have a result that you wanna publish and they say, oh no, that's crazy. And then so that that suppresses a lot of publications that maybe are accurate, but they're perceived badly and so professors are afraid to publish it.
But if you had a privately funded research institution, you can just study whatever you want to, and you don't have to worry about tenure. So the other thing is promising results always seem to disappear. So, like
Speaker 1: Can you build an antenna which will will able to receive frequencies with wavelengths of 10 to minus 29 meters.
Speaker 5: Wave Well, it antenna.
Speaker 1: But high frequency. Yeah. I I don't need just ultra ultra ultra high, like, camera range or something. Yeah. But wave lengths are 10 to minus 30.
Speaker 2: Well, a neutron will decay in eleven minutes,
Speaker 5: I think.
Speaker 1: Well, every every every atom, every element we have today contains a nucleus and at least one electron spinning around it. Can you name an elec element which it got no electrons spinning around it. And where does that A
Speaker 2: neutron has no electrons spinning around it, but it has a high
Speaker 1: mass of a weight per cubic centimeter?
Speaker 2: What does it weigh? Correct. 1,800 times the weight of an electron.
Speaker 1: A typical atom or molecule is free is full of free space.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: Now if you ain't got no free free space, everything gets collapsed into the nucleus, how much does that weigh per cubic centimeter or cubic inch? Well, hundreds and hundreds of tons, and so it's called black hole. So when But I can't
Speaker 2: even tell you how small an electron is.
Speaker 1: So no. When you look at doing more, sometimes you look into those
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: So
Speaker 0: that's kind of walking by the guy. Yeah. So I I met him in September, actually, in SD's Park. There was a culture conference. Tony and John Cole and I were there.
And he's a he's a nice he's nice there was Keith that was his, like, personal conference where it's, like, basically the groups that work with him and then the groups that try to disprove him. It was kinda funny actually because it was, like, it was the groups that try to prove him right, and then it was the groups that try to prove him wrong. And it was a conference just for like 40 or 50 people that fall in that category. But, yeah, I'm sort of familiar with his work, but I know that he only ever gets like a micronewton of thrust. He never really gets that much.
Speaker 2: Jim, but that's
Speaker 6: just about every single one of them. They're all getting these these very small fish of thrust. Yeah. So it's hard it's hard to say that if they're getting anything out of it or is it just some sort of secondary effect of something else like let's say with like the one with the with the Russian scientists who saw the smoke going up, you know, that that could just as easily been a current or a vortex, you know, because they got a really cold mass. They got some liquid nitrogen lying around and that could actually be causing a convection current.
Speaker 3: It was outside the chamber. It wasn't. Yeah. Well, he
Speaker 0: claims that it was, like, even, like, a floor above the lab that you would get this deflection.
Speaker 6: But it's still a cold spot. There would still there would still be a a heat gradient in there because it is it is much colder than the outside environment. Yeah.
Speaker 0: I mean, there's there's been alternative explanations for, like, the poorer effect, which is kind of, you know, going on the public kind of thing. There's some people that say that, oh, the explosion is just the liquid nitrogen vaporizing. So there's like there's alternative explanations like that.
Speaker 6: Now I do know that they have that they're developing graphic sensors for mining operation because Yeah. Because you can they they they get they wanna get it down all the way down to, like, into a precision of 1,000,000,000 of a g so they can pick it so they know if there's, a deposit of oil or or iron in the ground. Now I was wondering why couldn't they use something like that for these experiments? I mean, they're really are if they're really affecting gravity and that and if they're really having an effect on gravity, these things should be going off like an alarm.
Speaker 0: My answer to that would be why don't they do something like like that for that experiment because no one funds it. That's why they don't do that.
Speaker 2: These Bradley meters that you're talking about, they tend to sit them down and and and there for days or hours at a time
Speaker 6: So the frequency for real law for real things.
Speaker 3: Okay. My recollection of the new data original work was that they explained that above this we have a lot of debate. It's not making some health care space science like all going on. And that caused a number of people to including myself to say, you know, this really is really neat. She wouldn't publish anything.
Because you could make the equivalent of a simple water wheel by taking a bunch of rods with large mass on them. Put it put in the mass of both spinning discs, and then on the next floor, the same kind of thing. Electricity Right. Without having to spend anything. So it will be a way of generating large amounts of energy for free.
Right. So that was one of the problems that's kind of it's kind of a conundrum
Speaker 0: of Yeah.
Speaker 3: An apparent production of a professional motion on Sheeport. Yeah. Called just to have a policy solicitor, the Ningli original results.
Speaker 0: My understanding of the Ningli, like, sort of roadblock, and maybe you can tell me if this is accurate, but I heard I heard that she was trying to make the discs too big and that they would crack all the time. They did. And that she spent all her time trying to make these big discs and they kept cracking instead of just making some smaller ones and getting some results.
Speaker 3: We did make some smaller ones. Oh, okay. Yeah. But she really focused on, you know, because I think that she was after results, and reported that she was seeing a certain percentage of reduction. Yeah.
Yeah. Was wondering I
Speaker 2: don't think she ever reported anything about taking any gravity
Speaker 0: from that.
Speaker 3: I think she's published a lot of She just had that paper she published that
Speaker 2: that is suggested that
Speaker 3: there should be an effect.
Speaker 0: You might be thinking of Paul that come up because he did publish a 2% weight loss. It's that be
Speaker 2: there were two experiments. The first one was the spinning disk.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 2: The second one was the impulsive electrical experiment that produced was said to have produced a gravity wave that was collimated that would like, disturb a rubber ball hanging hanging on a string in a vacuum. And it you could move it to the next building across the street, it would still disturb it. Anyway, that's what they said. Although, you know, they never would show a film of it. They were doing it at the Moscow Institute.
That's what he did after he went. He left Tempe, Finland and went to Moscow, and then he published this paper with this Where
Speaker 3: in Moscow? Which institute?
Speaker 2: I don't remember the exact name. If they call it the Moscow Institute or
Speaker 3: It's a materials institute of some sort.
Speaker 2: Anyway, they had, they used a big megavolt marks bank and chamber. Yeah. So, I don't know if that one's been replicated by anybody.
Speaker 0: I think Boyer has the most quantitative measurements in terms of, like, actual numbers rather than just looking at the physical deflection and see it with your eye.
Speaker 2: Hathaway did a small experiment.
Speaker 3: He had a four inch disc, but it wasn't a two layer or anything. Was just YVC old disc. He didn't see anything. I don't think he used the voltages as high as I'd like to do.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And Foyer was using about two kilovolts too. Yeah. So it's much lower. Fentanyl was using about a half a million volts.
Yeah.
Speaker 0: Well, we can the Poirier test that was done at NASA, it was the the force was measured with a little fiberglass rod that went down into the liquid nitrogen mirror, and it had a little, accelerometer on it. So the vibration that went up the fiberglass rod would read the, it would read the vibration, and you could get, a force, like thrust measurement off of that.
Speaker 2: Yeah. We got in excess of 500 g's, but we never reproduced the waves that he claimed except for we did float. We put a second superconductor under the dewar just in a coffee cup and we floated a little magnet on top of that where you levitate a magnet. When we fired the Poyer device, the little magnet the theory being that if we made a gravity wave by putting electricity through a superconductor that maybe the inverse would also be true. That if a gravity wave going through the superconductor might produce a current.
So if you levitate a small magnet just by the Meissner effect right over the superconductor, that's because there's a supercurrent which is generated by the magnet which exactly mirrors the field and makes the magnet float. Thought perhaps if we put that underneath the doer very close to it that that would be disturbed and that actually did happen. When we fired it, the little magnet went flying away. And, you know, we told management about this and but we we never we never saw the waves that he claimed. Now when you're doing a pulse powered experiment with 20,000 amps at 2,000 volts, getting the signal is never a problem.
You know, you you have to shield everything and you still get a signal. I mean, not even plug your not even put your input leads into your oscilloscope, you will get a signal and it will look approximately like your current waveform. So it's not a question of getting the signal, it's a question of getting the right signal. When we use a double faraday cage, we did not reproduce foyer signals. However, we did see a whole lot of really strange effects like the tossing of the magnet and forces coming off the disc.
And you pull the disc out and the disc is unaffected and if a it thermal explosion between the layers of the disc, it would have destroyed the disc but you pull it out and it was pristine. And we even got a million frame per second movie of a wave coming off that hit one of his emitters. And this wave apparently was what kept blowing up our our doors. They blow them all over the place. So we blew up Mina Buckets from Walmart.
Was interesting. It's something that, you know, with our institute, maybe we can try to redress that.
Speaker 5: We talked about funding and that that that seems to be the common denominator of all this stuff. Yes. Funding or lack of them.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Who's where is there any money? Do you know are are you aware of any private money that's being spent on this?
Speaker 0: Or Yes.
Speaker 5: Is anybody talking to angel investors or that sort of stuff?
Speaker 0: Or Let me give you the down low on the funding situation. So you've got your black budgets that obviously is well funded, and then you have your academic budget, which is nonexistent because they think it's okay. And then you have your random billionaires who have a hobby. Right? And they made their money doing something else, but they are applying their money towards weird, anti gravity stuff just because they wanna be known for something other than what they made their money in.
So there's several there's a handful of, like, random billionaires running around who fund these types of things. The Church's Fried Chicken, the billionaire, funded the Hathaway Lab. The American Best Inn and Suites billionaire, Robert Bigelow, of course, is Bigelow Aerospace. There are some others that I know of, but we're we're really trying to address that problem with the institute that we're doing because I've I've been in I've seen government research. I've seen academic research.
I've seen private research, and money is always the problem. The technology is never the problem. The technology is there, and the talent is there. The money is never there. So what we've done with the institute is we've we've sort of assembled some of these random people with big budgets and a hobby.
And we've said, hey. Can can we, like, pool money into, like, a big stable pot of money so that we can have, like, a safe, well funded sandbox for people, smart people to play in and not have to worry about government election cycles affecting their budget or tenure affecting their budget or even when you find your billionaire, like, the billionaire runs out of money or loses interest or run their, you know, disappears. So you can't just be dependent on one wealthy investor. You need a big pot of money that's stable that you know isn't going anywhere. So that's what we're trying to do with the institute is just fund the institute and then pick projects that we think are promising and then fund those.
So we're kinda creating like a new vehicle for funding this type of research. That that's that's kind of the approach I'm taking right now.
Speaker 5: Is there any possibility of of of I don't know. It's probably hard if not impossible to do, but crossover between black world and the illuminated world that that because frequently things move from the illuminated world into black world.
Speaker 0: Yeah. We noticed that. Intact. Yeah.
Speaker 5: And they disappear. But, I mean, it's to the black world's advantage to keep the illuminated world going because that acts as a spawning ground for ideas that they might not have in black world. So it's not necessarily their advantage to keep it completely executive. And potentially, since Griffin is now
Speaker 0: Yeah. I've thought about that. The the combination of the private and the and the, you know, public private institution and then kind of working with the the budget.
Speaker 2: A quote from Griffin.
Speaker 3: A quote from Griffin.
Speaker 2: NASA is no longer by any means a research organization.
Speaker 0: That is a Griffin quote.
Speaker 2: That's Griffin quote. I
Speaker 0: imagine there are some strong opinions about Griffin in the room.
Speaker 4: Yeah. That's what I wanna ask. What Yeah. Tell us is is it nonprofit? If if someone has an idea, a technology, or if they have a basis for for science, scientific principles they may wanna come to you, What do they do?
What do they get out
Speaker 6: of it?
Speaker 0: Well, so we're trying to make sort of a an environment where smart people can gather and experiment with ideas and be rewarded for their intellectual property. How? Royalties.
Speaker 4: The what? Royalties?
Speaker 0: Royalties. Generous royalties.
Speaker 4: So you're a corporation. Or or
Speaker 0: We're a public benefit corporation, which is a newly legislated form of entity, which is kind of like a nonprofit, kind of like a c corp. So basically, we have a public benefit mission, which is the furtherance of public science in our case. And then, we're privately so a b corp can take investment and give investors a return, whereas a nonprofit cannot. So since we were trying to attract these, like, random high net worth individuals, we really wanted to be a b corp and not a nonprofit so that we could take their investment and give them a return for their investment. So that's why we're a b corp.
B corps actually don't exist in the state of Alabama, which is why we're registered in Delaware. Some states have them, some don't. But yeah. So we're planning on negotiating, generous royalty rights to the inventor because you can go over on the arsenal and you can invent for forty years or thirty years and never see a royalty even though it was your idea, or you can come to the institute and get a generous cut of your own intellectual property. Property.
And we, of course, would have the resources to commercialize your
Speaker 4: Yeah. That's the next step. What what you've got to be able to get someone to manufacture You it. To
Speaker 0: get something valuable
Speaker 4: out of it. And that's a different entity usually.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So so we put the resources in funding the research, and we put the resources into making money off of the research, which is commercialization or patent sales or licensing or a variety of mechanisms. And then right now, we're closing money to build basically a big facility here in town. So it's gonna be about a 100,000 square foot facility, and it's it's gonna have, you know, RF labs and robotics labs and a materials lab and a machine shop and spaces that you can rent if you have a company. You can come rent a space and then share our machine shop so you don't have to make your own machine shop.
We have that already. So it's gonna be like a community space where you can actually get some of this research done, and then we'll have funding as well for people. So that's the whole point is to make it make it easier for the inventor to invent because inventors spend so much time worrying about where the next dollar is gonna come from and they shouldn't have to worry about that. They should be thinking about the science and the technology. So that's what we're trying to do.
Speaker 2: So where does the money actually come from? From investors in general?
Speaker 3: Yeah. Not contracts?
Speaker 0: We'll be doing contracts, but we are taking investment capital right now. Yeah. So we'll have equity investors.
Speaker 4: So there are share you do have shares just that? Yeah. Okay.
Speaker 0: The shares are traded just like a c corp.
Speaker 4: Okay. I know how that works.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And it's taxed just like a c corp. But you just have this public benefit mission, is, in our case, furthering public science.
Speaker 4: And you already have a suite of potentially interested investors?
Speaker 0: Yeah. We're closing that right now.
Speaker 4: Okay. Good. Yeah.
Speaker 0: So yeah. We've got
Speaker 4: Ego money. Rich man, ego money. Right? Yeah. That's where it comes from usually.
Yeah.
Speaker 0: There there's some of those random rich people with pet projects that they wanna they wanna work on. So but they see the value in the research. You know, they're usually people who your ideal investor isn't someone that you have to convince that the research is valuable. Your ideal investor already knows that the research is valuable and is interested in giving you money. So you go find those people.
You don't try to convince someone who's skeptical, you go to the person who already believes in the cause.
Speaker 4: So what about the innovator who's afraid of disappearing?
Speaker 0: That's a whole another problem. I think doing it in the public is better in that case. But that's a different It does mean it
Speaker 3: will disappear. Even if you do it in the public, it still don't mean that the invader won't disappear for lots of reasons.
Speaker 4: By being late.
Speaker 5: Participation in there, that in itself will give you a good mechanism to go talk to these people that have loads of money and
Speaker 0: Oh, absolutely. I mean Yeah.
Speaker 5: That that
Speaker 0: I know a lot of people like that too, and I'm interested in talking to more of them for sure.
Speaker 4: Space has permittivity, permeability, and resistance. Permittivity and permeability, you get your inductance, your capacitance. Yeah. It's got physical characteristics.
Speaker 0: Because it's made out of something ie ether?
Speaker 4: It's interesting that the form of the equation for the resonant circuit, or RLC circuit, is the exact same equation for the speed of light. It's some constant over the square root of the permittivity and permeability rate inductance and capacitance. Same thing. If
Speaker 0: you're interested in that kind of thing, there's this guy on YouTube. His name is Ken Wheeler. I don't know if anyone's ever seen Ken Wheeler's videos, but he talks about how it's absurd to say that space is empty because space has properties, which is what you just said. So if if you give me your email address or something, I'll send you some
Speaker 6: of his
Speaker 0: ideas because he's talking about exactly what you're
Speaker 3: talking about.
Speaker 4: I'm going to the dinner after the event. I'm going to the dinner after this.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m a late antigravity researcher. I sent my last SOS to my best friend Sam and my GEC partner. I’d figured out the secret to Lazar’s element-115. I’ve got myself on a kill list. I didn’t kill myself.
@fractal_verse - Holocipher
Late Antigravity researcher Amy Eskridge - last signal messages to best friend Sam and business partner at GEC (Geometric Energy Corp.).. Amy was sending an SOS.. She figured the secret to Lazar’s element - 115 “I got myself onto a kill list..” “I didn’t kill myself..” https://t.co/L3ddWYM92E
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion highlights inconsistencies at Amy’s scene: she was right-handed, but the gun was found on the left side of her body. Confidential sources spoke on the record to other journalists, noting heavy intelligence involvement on the scene. No coroner report or autopsy has been released yet, though it’s expected to be explored during the forthcoming investigation.
As Amy’s story gained public attention, Daily Mail headlines were described as misleading, contributing to a broader media spread that included CNN and Fox News. A set of texts from a man named Sam, which have since been erased, are introduced for context. One post from Sam presenting Amy’s messages describes death threats Amy had received daily for her recent work, claiming surveillance after she “crossed some line” with her independently developed theory. She mentions leaving a voice note on a hacked phone about “super, heedy shit” she had figured out, followed by ongoing “daily death threats.” She asserts she did not kill herself, telling people close to her over the past few days that it is “simply impossible to take them all out,” and asks what can be told about Sam and these texts, noting there are more.
Speaker 0 explains that Sam Reid was Amy’s business partner in the Geometric Energy Corporation (GEC), formed with Sam and Chantel, and that Sam was a very close friend of Amy. The texts indicate Amy was updating him about what happened to him as well; reading the streams reveals Sam and Amy were both affected. Sam is portrayed as someone Amy relied on and trusted as a best friend, with whom she shared substantial history and company involvement.
Following this, it’s noted that Sam removed the tweets, leading to questions about possible consequences for him. The speaker reflects on misleading headlines, citing an example that stated, “eleventh scientists found dead,” which mischaracterizes the situation since Amy died four years ago. The speaker refrains from speculating on Sam Reid’s motives for deleting the texts, stating they do not know him personally and that it wouldn’t be fair to speculate about his motivations. The core point remains: Sam deleted the texts, which is considered noteworthy.
Fact of the matter remains that Sam erased the texts, and this action is highlighted within the discussion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The scene where Amy was found, there were once again inconsistencies. She was right handed. The gun was found on the left side of her body. These are confidential sources, but they did go on the record with other journalists, And this is what they said. There was also heavy intelligence involvement on the scene.
And so they were concerned about that. And so there has been no coroner report that's been released, no autopsy that's been released. But I think with this investigation that's coming, those things will have to be explored. Okay. Thank investigation, they'll have to release it.
Speaker 1: Okay. A few days ago when Amy's story became more public, the Daily Mail released a couple of headlines that, I I think, in my opinion, were a bit misleading. But after that happened, it made a splash. It reached CNN, Fox News, everywhere, and they're and including her in this list. There were a few texts that are that are now erased by a man by the name of Sam, I believe, that I would like to show you and show the people.
And if you can if you have any information on the context of that, that would be really cool. But let's go through the first one. This is a text that this person, Sam, posted from Amy. It says, FYI, I've been getting death threats every day repeatedly for the past week or so for my most recent work. Like, I finally crossed some line with my own independently developed theory, and I got surveilled.
I tipped it tipped me over onto some messed up kill list. I left myself a voice note on my hacked phone about some super, heedy shit that I figured out. Then the daily death threats immediately started rolling on, rolling in on a daily basis. The past week has been absolutely horrible. I don't even know how to explain it.
The most heinous death threats you can imagine. I've been telling, the people closest to me over the past few days, I absolutely did not kill myself no matter what you heard. I've told so many people over the past week that it's simply impossible to take them all out. Goddamn it. What can you tell me about this guy, Sam, and these texts?
Because there are more.
Speaker 0: Sam Reid was Amy's business partner in GEC, which is the Geometric Energy Corporation. And it was formulated with Sam and their other business partner, Chantel. And Sam was a very close friend of Amy. And I think when she was relaying all this to him and as you can see in other texts that follow this one, and there's a stream of them she's basically saying to him, this is what happened to you as well. If you read all the text streams, she's talking about what happened to both of them and what is occurring with her more recently.
So Sam is someone that she relied upon and trusted as one of her best friends and she's basically reaching out to him giving him an update. But there's a lot of it and there's a lot in the texts that go into more elaborate history And as you read all of them, you get to see that, you know, Sam is one of the people that that was affected, not only Amy. He was too.
Speaker 1: Okay. And he took those, down. The tweet is no longer there. So do you think he may have gotten, like, slap in the wrist or something like that or because of this?
Speaker 0: You know, I don't know. But I called I called some of my former group members, you know before I came on today because I thought about it deeply about what I could contribute to this conversation about amy and I just want to go back to what you said about misleading headlines one of the misleading headlines that I saw which is a gross mischaracterization is one of these online outlets basically said eleventh scientists found dead And it makes it sound like this was just yesterday, which is completely erroneous and sensational. And we all know who have been following her story that she died four years ago. So I I can't speculate on why sam reed took his took his text down and I don't think it would be fair to speculate on it but I did research on him when I looked into her because he was one of her close associates best friends and also they had a company together so I know I know who he is but I don't know him personally so I would feel uncomfortable speculating on his motivations as to why. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Fact of the matter is that he did erase them, and that's of note, as of now.
reSee.it AI Summary
I was filmed in their home by him, where they helped the wounded. I explain how they murdered my wife, shooting her in the heart, and I hold soil from her grave. This is the reality of Iran. This is what is happening to our people. Do not deal with this regime. They must go.
@Ashkan_Atheist - Ashkan - اشکان 🇮🇷
@TheIranWatcher This was filmed in their home by him, where they helped wounded. He explains how they murdered his wife, shooting her in the heart. He holds soil from her grave. This is the reality of Iran. This is what is happening to our people. Do not deal with this regime. They must go. https://t.co/ySqwRbQcNT
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
James O'Keefe catches a journalist on hidden camera admitting he’s an undercover informant for the FBI acting against conservative organizations. “I have a thousand sources in the DOJ and CIA” https://t.co/TOwObQMrZJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on Matthew Tierman, a former Project Veritas board member, and a leader of numerous provocative claims and confrontations documented over a recent period. The participants describe Tierman as having a long history of intense and sometimes violent rhetoric toward James O’Keefe and others, and they present a narrative in which Tierman asserts deep involvement with and access to multiple federal law enforcement offices.
Key remarks and claims include:
- Tierman allegedly told an undercover journalist that he “fed the Southern District tons of shit” about James O’Keefe and others to try to get them imprisoned. He also claimed to have been an FBI informant and to have spoken with the SDNY, the FBI, the DOJ, and the IRS, asserting he had “thousands of sources in the Department of Justice and the CIA” and that he spent his days trying to “play stories about corruption.”
- He is quoted saying he has worked with law enforcement on various topics and that he has fed the SDNY “tons of shit.” He also claimed he was on an “enemies list” at the DOJ and warned of a potential “perp-w walk” in October, which did not come to pass.
- Tierman asserted he has access to and engages with legacy media to target conservative figures and claimed involvement with figures like Tucker Carlson, Charlie Kirk, and Don Jr. He alleged Don Jr. has engaged in insider trading and “crypto schemes” to bribe foreign governments, and he stated that his mission for the next two years is to “make sure [Don Jr.] ends up in prison” because he believes Don Jr. has “stolen a billion dollars from the American people.”
- He described a broad, cross-ideological network, claiming to be “on all sides” and to talk to the New York Times and National Review, suggesting he negotiates or interacts with diverse media outlets to pursue stories.
- The narrative includes a dramatic incident in which Tierman allegedly shot at a book belonging to James O’Keefe, bragging that he wanted to kill him. The discussion references a “bullet right through my heart” inscription in the book and a confrontation in Miami Beach where undercover reporters approached Tierman to verify his statements about wanting to kill O’Keefe.
- The participants recount a prior board meeting on February 6, three years earlier, during which Tierman allegedly threatened to “carve my heart out and eat it” in reference to James O’Keefe. They describe how Veritas used remaining funds in litigation against O’Keefe and how, after his termination, he allegedly sought to involve law enforcement to restrain or arrest him.
- Tierman allegedly described his investment ambitions, stating he aims to accumulate “a hundred million dollars” to “weaponize money” and to operate in investment banking to wield financial power, citing industry figures such as Paul Singer as a point of comparison. He claimed to have a broker license and to be involved with several investment entities, including Petragen and Cathayed Incorporated, and he discussed NDA restrictions and conflicts of interest related to his activities while on the Veritas board.
- The interview mentions the involvement of George Scackel and the notion that Petragen could be sold to big pharma; it also references a prior defamation suit and ongoing disputes with Veritas, including accusations of misappropriating funds and other misconduct.
- The reporters tease that Tierman admitted to working with SDNY and the FBI, and that they intend to pursue further discovery, noting threats and violent imagery used by Tierman toward O’Keefe. They emphasize the dramatic, ongoing tension between Tierman and James O’Keefe, culminating in the live confrontation in Miami and a broader dossier of alleged informant activity.
Overall, the piece presents Tierman’s allegations about informant activity, his alleged violent rhetoric toward O’Keefe, his plans to monetize and weaponize money, and his disputes with Project Veritas and its leadership, all culminating in a charged confrontation on the street in Miami.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But don't you feel bad because he was your friend?
Speaker 1: I would kill him because
Speaker 2: he is one of the most evil people I've ever known. So this guy
Speaker 3: shot up my book and bragged that he wants to kill me. There's a bullet right through my heart.
Speaker 2: The second I saw him in shot, I wished that was my immediate first reaction was why couldn't it have been obese? A thousand sources of the DOJ and CIA I talk to all the
Speaker 0: time. Okay.
Speaker 2: That's why I fed the Southern Dirt for tons of shit to try and get him in prison.
Speaker 3: So could you tell us the truth about who you fed dirt to to SDNY? And that you're you're a rat. You're an FBI informant.
Speaker 4: No. I because I have no idea what you're talking about.
Speaker 2: I've already fed the Southern District tons of shit on them.
Speaker 3: Could you tell us more about how you said you were a confidential informant to the SDNY?
Speaker 4: About you?
Speaker 3: Who did you feed SDNY information? You you went to the FBI, Matt. You're a rat.
Speaker 2: Are the most evil motherfucker I am.
Speaker 3: But I'm not a rat.
Speaker 4: You know who I've talked to about all of your criminal Everybody who would listen, the IRS and other agencies.
Speaker 3: So you did go to the FBI.
Speaker 4: I have talked to many people who have called
Speaker 2: me from law enforcement agencies.
Speaker 3: When did you feed the Southern District Of New
Speaker 4: York tons of shit, Matthew? Called me and asked me questions about you. I answered them truthfully and honestly. So
Speaker 3: we have Matt Tiramana's on tape admitting to be an FBI informant. He's the first time breaking news. This is pretty nuts. Wouldn't you agree?
Speaker 4: Yeah. Well, that's my property.
Speaker 3: This doesn't look good for you, bro. You shot me in the heart. You say you wanna kill me. I mean, lot of people find that pretty concerning. You said when Charlie Kirk died, you wished Property that night.
No. No. We're gonna we're gonna file a restraining order against you. So is that projection? I'm Is that My property.
No. That's my book. Don't tell If you if you touch me, we have security and they're gonna Matt? My property. Matt?
Three years ago on February 6, I was indefinitely suspended from Project Veritas. We've done a few reports to you about Project Veritas in front of the logo that we have on this wall. But this one might be the biggest report of them all. It's about one of the former board members, a man named Matthew Thiermond. The six hour board meeting recorded on February 6 defies all explanation.
There was picture of me nailed to the cross, the allegation I stole a pregnant lady sandwich, the board's contention that me taking black cars instead of an Uber x was somehow a fraudulent expenditure. But donors pleaded with me to hire private security, while the board, including Matthew Tierman, believed that spending money on this personal security was a form of financial misappropriation. Matthew Tierman also said he wanted to, quote, carve my heart out and eat it.
Speaker 4: I said I you I wanna carve out his heart and eat it in front of
Speaker 2: him. Okay. Yeah.
Speaker 4: Yeah. That was a quote.
Speaker 3: Now we had reason to believe that some on the board went to the New York district attorney to try to get me arrested. After the board fired me, the board used the millions of dollars left in the bank to sue me, brought me to the SDNY to get a civil injunction against me to try to stop me from continuing to do any investigative journalism at all. We've previously reported to you, but we did not know how dark and sinister all this could become. A citizen reached out to me after running into Matthew Tierramond on the street in Miami and then spoke to him over the course of four months. What struck the citizen was that Matthew Tierramond relayed to her that the whole world is a fraud except him.
Speaker 2: The whole world is a fraud.
Speaker 0: So that means you're a fraud too?
Speaker 2: No. The world around us.
Speaker 0: Why is everybody else a fraud but not you?
Speaker 2: Oh, well, check my behavior. Call everybody out and I'm happy to take ownership of any of my boy list.
Speaker 3: This citizen journalist decided to record Tiraman. And in these conversations, Tiraman describes repeatedly how he wants to kill James O'Keefe, invests in pharmaceutical companies that he can't talk about, but he proceeds to talk about, and says that he acted as an informant to the SDNY. That's an acronym for Southern District of New York, which is also a metonym for the US attorney's office, federal prosecutors there, and the FBI to dish out dirt on conservative organizations in order to get them in prison. So now we present to you the rest of the story about Matthew Tiermond, including my interaction with him on the evening of Friday night, February sixth, the three year anniversary of my termination from Project Veritas.
Speaker 2: For about a year or two, I was carrying everywhere I go.
Speaker 0: Where? Here. Okay.
Speaker 2: But that was because not because of protocol, was because of the bullshit I was getting nationally.
Speaker 0: Woah. What bullshit?
Speaker 2: The O'Keeffe stuff.
Speaker 0: What happened? Like, why were you with? Like, threats?
Speaker 4: Oh, yeah. Tons.
Speaker 2: Was called I the FBI became an enemy of the mainstream right. I helped build a lot of these people. Gavin Waxman, New Yorker Republicans. Benny Johnson, I used to host him all the time. Charlie I've known since he was 19.
I disliked Charlie, because he was totally corrupt. Even the righties, they're corrupt. So I've had my issue with Charlie, but we we ended the time we never fought until the O'Keeffe shit.
Speaker 3: Thiermond also reveals that he's been acting as an informant to the SDNY, the FBI, the Department of Justice, and the IRS with hopes of taking down various conservative figures which he deems to be corrupt. Thierman claims he has thousands of sources in the Department of Justice and the CIA and quote, this is what I do all day.
Speaker 2: I have a thousand sources in DOJ and CIA I talk to all the time. Okay. And military intel and every agency. I mean, is what I do all day. I spent my day to day trying to play stories about corruption.
I won't tell you exactly about who and what side, but I spoke to the New York Times and I spoke to National Review. I'm on all sides.
Speaker 3: Thierman says he's on all sides. Thierman doesn't tell us all the people he went to the SDNY on. But what he does say is that he was getting special treatment from the DOJ in the form of a courtesy warning that he was on some type of, quote, enemies list.
Speaker 2: Last year, ahead of the election, I had phone calls from DOJ sources telling me that I was on a enemies list that was gonna get perkwashed in.
Speaker 0: Is that like a threat or they were warning you? Oh, they
Speaker 2: were warning you. I had a friend who happened to be at the DOJ at a deputy At the end who called me and said on a Friday night at midnight and said, like, dude, you're on a fucking list. You're gonna get perp blocked in October. And it didn't happen because what happened in between then?
Speaker 3: We're not sure what, quote, happened in between then, but Thierrymond also says that, quote, he has fed the SDNY tons of shit.
Speaker 2: I've got him dead to rights on so much fraud. I've already fed the southern district tons of shit. Him. I've done more. Yeah.
And I'm one of I'm not special. I would just think I'm more than special,
Speaker 4: but he's a fucking scumbag.
Speaker 2: That's why I fed the Southern District tons of shit to try and get him in prison. But
Speaker 3: Tehran says the SDNY is all about power, something that Thierman says he is especially interested in.
Speaker 2: And the Southern District especially perniciously is all about power.
Speaker 3: Thierman also describes how there are no bad FBI agents.
Speaker 2: I've worked with the field offices around the country for many, many years. They're all awesome people. I have never met a single bad, malicious, coercive FBI agent in a field office anywhere in the country. They're all freaking awesome.
Speaker 3: What's striking about that is the FBI raided multiple Project Veritas journalists while Thierrymond was on the board of Project Veritas in November 2021. And Thierrymond expressed at the time to everybody in the newsroom that he was opposed to the actions of those FBI agents, Somehow now, he's never met a bad FBI agent. Recall that the affidavit of the probable cause of that FBI raid remains completely redacted line by line. Behind those black lines are the sources, methods, and individuals that the SDNY spoke with. Then, Thierman describes working with legacy media organizations to take down conservative figures, including the New York Times, Project which Veritas had a defamation lawsuit against.
Speaker 2: I'm working with the New York Times right now. Do I wanna work with the New York Times? Of course not. They're lefties. But if they're gonna go after the truth of what's going on here, then okay.
Speaker 0: And what's going on? Like, what are you what's going on?
Speaker 2: Don Junior's insider trading and defrauding the entire system. Steven Wittkopf, Howard, Ludnick. I usually call him Ludnick.
Speaker 3: Tirman specifically mentions Donald Trump junior in claims that Don junior is engaged in insider trading and using his position to execute crypto schemes with foreign governments to bribe Trump. Now we haven't verified this, but we're showing you what claiming in this interaction. And that Tiramis main mission is to make sure that Donald Trump Junior ends up in prison.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Don junior is a little annoyed
Speaker 0: with him. Yeah. But he's
Speaker 2: Fuck Don junior. He's been fucking stealing mill money by the billions. My one of my missions for the next two years is to make sure he ends up in prison.
Speaker 0: Why? Because
Speaker 2: he's stolen a fucking billion dollars from the American people. It's an absolute fucking grifter. He's insuring trading SPAC announcements. He's doing crypto schemes to get foreign governments to pay his crypto platform to bribe the president.
Speaker 3: So as concerning as all that sounded, nothing prepared us for what Thierryman would say repeatedly. He proudly and shamelessly says over and over again that he wants to kill me.
Speaker 2: And I shared the depo with, like, all the people that knew, people who I worked with at TV or worked for me at TV. We have a alumni boot chat of all of us who've been through this fucking shit.
Speaker 0: But don't you feel bad because he was your friend?
Speaker 1: I would kill him because he is one of the most
Speaker 2: evil people I've ever known. He is a true narcissist sociopath.
Speaker 3: It's ironic that Tirman refers to me as a sociopath because this next statement is perhaps the most heartless thing a person can say. Thiermon claims that when he saw Charlie Kirk was murdered, he wished it was me.
Speaker 2: I got multiple people who know me well and know my relations with Charlie and gave messaged me after Charlie was shot and said, be honest. When he was shot, did you not for a second wish that it was James? And I've honestly responded to every one of those people. The second I saw him in shock, I wish that was my immediate first reaction was why couldn't it have been okay?
Speaker 3: Thierman says he wants to make $100,000,000 to weaponize money through investment banking. He actually says the investment banking he does is a form of theft, stealing.
Speaker 2: I'm in a stage of life where I'm going to weaponize money.
Speaker 0: How are you gonna do that?
Speaker 2: Make a shit ton of money. So and then weaponize it. You know? And I know how to weaponize it because I've been in this whole fucking milieu. I know the donors.
I know the foundations. I know how to do it. Right now, I think my highest best use of time and power is making a $100,000,000 to weaponize money better than anyone.
Speaker 0: So And how are you gonna do that? Teach me this financial secret. The old fashioned way. What's the old fashioned way?
Speaker 2: You're gonna steal it.
Speaker 0: No. Really? What do you do? Yeah.
Speaker 2: Invest for banking. Oh.
Speaker 3: Matt is a broker licensed through FINRA, the financial industry regulatory authority. He claims he wants to weaponize the money against the entire system in the same way that Paul Singer does.
Speaker 2: I have a very aggressive venture portfolio and investment banking business, and I'm making a lot of money. And I am looking to make a lot more money to the point that I can weaponize the entire system the way Paul Singer does, but my way. So that's my goal.
Speaker 3: Thiermond acts as an adviser, and he solicits investments for a variety of companies, some of which are in the pharmaceutical space and some of which he solicited investments while on the board of Project Veritas. These companies include Cathayed Incorporated, Matt Thiermond LLC, and a company called ClaimFound. Thiermond's broker check report shows that he is currently employed by and registered with something called Bradley Woods and Co registered on 3rd Street in New York. Last week, Tirman says in text messages with the undercover journal that one of the companies was about to get FDA approval. He asked her for luck tomorrow because on that day, the company which does gene therapy and therapeutics data targeting was submitting a timeline to the FDA.
In another text message, Tirman describes how he's not allowed to talk about any of this. Quote, restricted during the terms of engagement where sensitive information can be used by those without the same fiduciary responsibility. He says he has a quote target on his back because of politics, l o l. The undercover journalist asks, what's the name of the pharmaceutical company? And Thierman says he can't discuss this over text.
But Thierman later identifies the name of the company in person so that it isn't in writing. Thierman says he could, quote, lose his licenses and, quote, face civil and criminal penalties levied.
Speaker 2: But I will dose you. I'm like a doctor. I do I trade health care stocks.
Speaker 0: That's sweet of you. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I'm a sweet guy.
Speaker 0: It's not that serious that you tell me which company it is.
Speaker 4: Not a text yeah. I cited NDA.
Speaker 0: Oh. I can't
Speaker 2: fucking text it to you. Like, I've got a fucking company that I literally
Speaker 4: have an investment banking mandate where I'm under NDA on everything they do because they're in stealth mode.
Speaker 2: So yeah. And if I told you about it, you wouldn't have heard of it anyway. It's called Petrogen. But I can't text it because one day in court
Speaker 0: Of course. I get it.
Speaker 4: That will, like, end up, like, I'll
Speaker 2: lose my license. I'll have criminal and civil torts. Like so that's
Speaker 3: just cumbersome. This deck shows what the company, Petragen, does, commercializes therapeutics for periodontal disease. The deck for Petragen lists some of the people involved, including a few doctors and this CEO. What's interesting about Tirman's mention of Petragen is the same company Petragen was named by George Scackel in a videotaped deposition in federal court between myself and Project Veritas, the company I founded. George Scackel also was a member of the board of Project Veritas, and George Scackel says that Petrogen could be sold to a big pharma like Pfizer.
Speaker 2: Three of the four companies you've invested in, you would consider to be in the medical field. Hydrogen could be sold to a big pharma. Like Pfizer. Pfizer. Remember,
Speaker 3: Project Veritas was investigating Pfizer right when they indefinitely suspended me three years ago this week.
Speaker 2: We're exploring, like, now you know how the virus keeps mutating? Yeah. Well, one of things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just mutate it ourselves so we can put up a completely unequally developed new vaccines. Right? So we have to do that if we're gonna do that, though, that's a risk to, like as you could imagine, no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating fucking viruses.
Speaker 3: And both Matthew Thiermond and George Scackel signed a conflict of interest policy with the board of directors where they should have disclosed their investments in a company like Petrogen or any other company that George Scackel mentioned under oath.
Speaker 2: How do you define conflict of interest? Oh, I don't know. Give me a dictionary and I'll read you the definition.
Speaker 3: Tirman also mentions our documentary, The Truth Inside Veritas, and theorizes that I would release the sequel on the three year anniversary of February 6, just last Friday. That was the three anniversary of the board meeting where they officially ousted
Speaker 2: He's already tweeted a couple times and did videos that he's gonna be doing another episode of this documentary series. And he was supposed to release it, I guess, couple weeks ago.
Speaker 4: He didn't. I know what he's doing. He's saving it for the third anniversary of the board meeting where he was ousted in a code.
Speaker 0: And when is that?
Speaker 2: September 6, my birthday. So it all dovetails. If somebody, like, put a gun to my head and said, what's the most fun memorable day of your life?
Speaker 4: I'd probably say that day.
Speaker 3: Little did Thierry know, we had something else planned for that evening. James O'Keefe here in Miami Beach. We're outside the Cardozo Hotel on a Friday night about to meet up with Matthew Thiermond, investment banker, former Project Verodas board member. He's been meeting with our undercover journalist for the last three months. And one of the things that we discovered is he had shot up my book.
Looks like he missed and then he shot me right to the heart. And then, and you see the exit wound on the other side. So this guy shot up my book and bragged to our undercover that he wants to kill me.
Speaker 1: I would kill him because he is one
Speaker 2: of the most evil people I've ever known.
Speaker 3: So we're about to go talk to him and ask him about about that.
Speaker 2: So how long does it take to get you in and out of that courtroom? Fifteen seconds. Okay.
Speaker 4: Fully noted.
Speaker 3: The undercover journalist got up and left the table, and I showed up. We had to make sure that Tyrarmont was not armed.
Speaker 2: For about a year or two, I was carrying everywhere I go.
Speaker 3: The undercover hugged him, checked to make sure there was no weapon or gun, and then we approached in Miami Beach. As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil, for thou art with me. Thy rod and thy staff, comfort me. Prayer to Saint Michael, archangel, in the name of the father and the son and the holy ghost, most glorious prince of the heavenly armies, Saint Michael the archangel, defend us in our battle against principalities and powers, against the rulers of this world of darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places. Defend us in our battle against principalities and powers, against the rulers of this world of darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places.
Ephesians six twelve. Hey, is this seat taken? So for the last few months, the person you've been talking to actually works for me. What's that? Every text message you sent, that person actually works for me.
So we're doing a story about how how you said you wanted to kill me.
Speaker 2: I didn't say I wanted to kill you. I said metaphorically, would carve out your heart and eat it referencing as in the depo tape Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. You
Speaker 3: sure about that? You sure about that? Yeah. You said you wanted to murder me. You wanted to kill me.
Speaker 2: Well, I think you're evil as fuck, so I think that
Speaker 3: Did you say you wanted to kill me? A moment ago, you said you didn't say that. Did you say it?
Speaker 1: I don't recall. I would kill him.
Speaker 3: Quote, I would kill James O'Keefe.
Speaker 2: It's metaphoric. I wouldn't physically kill you. If I was physically gonna kill you, I'd kill you.
Speaker 3: Did you physically put a bullet through my heart in a book?
Speaker 2: I had to do some target practice ahead of deer season, and that was what was around for Target.
Speaker 3: You didn't seem like a very good shot.
Speaker 4: No. I'm a pretty good shot.
Speaker 3: Alright. Looks like you missed the first time around. You your your bullet went up there. What was it? Seven feet, seven yards, 15 yards?
Speaker 2: Well, so that's theft. Yeah. That's my property.
Speaker 3: Yeah. There's a bullet right through my heart. That's a that's a threat.
Speaker 2: No. It's
Speaker 3: not. Oh, you don't think so?
Speaker 2: No. It's not. Okay.
Speaker 3: Well, you shot you shot me in the heart. You say you wanna kill me. You I've got some more tape. You said when Charlie Kirk died, you wished Property by the way. No.
No. We're gonna we're gonna file a restraining order against you. We're gonna file a restraining order against you. A criminal restraining order.
Speaker 2: Suing you
Speaker 3: soon. I look forward to discovery. That'll be exciting.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah. And you said that Charlie Kirk was corrupt. That was a direct quote.
Speaker 2: Yes. I dislike Charlie because he was totally corrupt.
Speaker 3: He messaged me after Charlie Kirk was shot and said, be honest, when Charlie Kirk was shot, did you not for a second wish it was James O'Keefe?
Speaker 4: Yeah. Many many people did message me that day.
Speaker 3: Why couldn't it have been James O'Keefe?
Speaker 2: Because you are the most evil motherfucker I know.
Speaker 3: But I'm not a rat, and you went to the FBI. You also said that you were a confidential informant to the Southern District Of New York. That's one of the other things you said to me.
Speaker 2: That's why I fed the Southern District tons of shit to try and get them in prison. But
Speaker 3: You said you were a confidential informant to the SDNY. Could you could you tell us about that?
Speaker 2: Talking to you? Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: I'm a
Speaker 4: 100% fine. Oh, This
Speaker 3: is Could you could you tell us more about how you said you were a confidential informant to the SDNY? About you? You mentioned a number of folks. You talked about you mentioned Tucker Carlson. You mentioned you tell me who you mentioned because we have it all on tape.
And you're you're a rat. You're an FBI informant.
Speaker 2: Okay. So you're gonna have to be more specific. I've never talked
Speaker 3: We have everything on tape.
Speaker 2: Why about him. So
Speaker 3: You said that you talked to the SDNY. Can you tell us more about that?
Speaker 4: No. I because I have no idea what you're talking about.
Speaker 3: Who did you feed SDNY information? You you went to the FBI, Matt. You're a rat. You rat it on someone to SDNY. I wanna know who it is.
Answer the question.
Speaker 2: I have
Speaker 3: You know who you rat it on. Tell us tell us who it is. So it says so it says it says I would kill. Would you kill me?
Speaker 4: It's a fucking part of part of speech. Do I think you are an evil scumbag? Yes.
Speaker 3: Yeah. This is pretty nuts. Wouldn't you agree?
Speaker 4: Yeah. Well, that's my property.
Speaker 3: This doesn't look good for you, bro. You're shoot you're shooting someone in the heart? You wanna carve my heart out and eat it? You
Speaker 4: that is a Are you
Speaker 3: in are you in love with me?
Speaker 4: I'm not the guy who's hooking up with dudes.
Speaker 3: Because you're so so is that projection?
Speaker 0: I'm
Speaker 3: gonna Is that my property. No. That's my book. No. It's not your If you touch me, we have security, and they're gonna Matt?
Speaker 2: My property.
Speaker 4: Matt? I will see you in court for that.
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 2: So Okay. I gotta go get my Uber. But You know,
Speaker 4: you wanna walk with me?
Speaker 3: Yeah. Will. Yeah. Well, you had phone calls from the DOJs. Get up here, buddy.
Speaker 2: No. She we're
Speaker 3: here with Matthew Tierra man who has admitted that he went to the SDNY. He he's kinda being very evasive about it. But he did say that he did give information to SDNY. He said he was feeding them tons of shit. Do you know it's a crime?
Well, we'll wait till he pays the bill. He was gonna walk away without paying his bill.
Speaker 0: Oh, man.
Speaker 3: You know it's a crime to lie to the FBI?
Speaker 4: I love how you spin everything.
Speaker 3: So did I spin everything while I was at Project Veritas?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Hold on. Hold right here. It's like Did
Speaker 3: I spin everything at Project Veritas? I worked there for ten, thirteen years. Was it all a lie?
Speaker 4: You spun a lot of shit.
Speaker 3: What what videos were fake at Project Veritas?
Speaker 4: What you used to do was everybody else would do the work, and then you would helicopter in in between show tunes LARPing festivals.
Speaker 3: You attended a musical in Oklahoma, didn't you? You attended Actually,
Speaker 4: that was the one talented thing that
Speaker 2: you did. You were actually
Speaker 3: quite that very much. Why won't you come clean about who you spoke to inside the SDNY?
Speaker 4: Because I don't work for you. Because I don't have to tell you anything. There are literally ask me questions about you. I tell them the
Speaker 3: truth. Have you ever
Speaker 4: about your behavior. Have you ever Your behavior is grotesque. You're grotesque. You be and I love how
Speaker 3: Is this grotesque? Is a bullet through my heart and the book grotesque?
Speaker 2: I need a target.
Speaker 3: Who did you go to target practice with to shoot the book?
Speaker 4: This is on a ranch in Michigan.
Speaker 3: Were you alone? I was. So you shot my book alone in a ranch in Michigan? A bullet through my heart?
Speaker 4: How does what's the difference between me being alone and me being with other people when I'm doing Some
Speaker 3: would say that it's pretty weird that you're alone shooting my book through a heart with a bullet. Was it a nine millimeter bullet?
Speaker 4: No. It wasn't a nine millimeter bullet.
Speaker 3: Was it a rifle bullet?
Speaker 4: It was a rifle bullet because I was a
Speaker 3: deer practice. So you were you were alone in Michigan shooting my book. There's the exit wound with a rifle bullet. Is that what you're doing?
Speaker 2: Where is my Uber?
Speaker 3: I'm gonna hold I've this already fed the Southern District Of New York tons of shit. When did you feed the Southern District Of New York tons of shit,
Speaker 4: called me and asked me questions about you. I answered them truthfully and honestly.
Speaker 3: Did you feed tons of shit? What shit did you feed the Southern District? Be specific, please.
Speaker 4: The truth about your spending and your abuse of the people around you.
Speaker 3: So we have Matt Tierra man is on tape admitting to be an FBI informant. He's the first time breaking news. Matthew Tierra man has just admitted that he's an f barking. I'll be up What what is the what is the Philadelphia society gonna see gonna say when they see this? Bro Aren't you on the board of the Philadelphia society, Matthew?
Speaker 4: I'm on the board of many organizations. Not project Veritas because you blew that up.
Speaker 2: There was no project Veritas after he set fire to it.
Speaker 3: So you're saying that I set fire to it, but you you indefinitely suspended without pay three years ago.
Speaker 4: I didn't indefinitely suspend you. You voted on that. I did vote on it because it made sense when you were stealing so much money to use for your own utilization. Yeah.
Speaker 3: You said that I banged private whores on private planes.
Speaker 2: I'm the dude who spent 2 and a half million dollars on private planes to bank checks he sent into his DMs.
Speaker 3: That's a lie. Can you name a specific plane that I banged a whore
Speaker 0: on?
Speaker 4: I did not say that. And if these things are character You have
Speaker 3: it on tape. So we'll I'm quoting you.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Dude, your your career is
Speaker 4: floundering, bro. You're doing fuck all nothing. Like, this is the vendetta
Speaker 3: Tell the camera. Tell the camera my career is floundering.
Speaker 4: You misappropriated millions of dollars in a five zero one
Speaker 2: c three. You abused your employee.
Speaker 3: That's defamation. Left with women for jobs. No. That's total defamation. So when you make that statement Yeah.
You're gonna have to back it up with evidence, Matt.
Speaker 4: We will do that. We'll do
Speaker 3: that. The American people are seeing is a guy who says he wants to murder me. You're shooting up my heart on my book. You say you're a confidential informant to the Southern District of New York, and you won't said that. Okay.
Let let me quote you. Quote. That's why I fed the Southern District Of New York tons of shit to try to get him in prison.
Speaker 4: I you still law enforcement agency who would ask me a question as much information they wanted. The American
Speaker 3: Why haven't you done any investigative videos? Why hasn't any of the people done any investigative videos?
Speaker 4: I've done tons of investigative videos.
Speaker 3: What investigative video have you done within the last year that's been a hit?
Speaker 4: Dude, unlike you, I don't do it to LARP for the audience.
Speaker 3: What's why do you do it, Matthew? Why be a confidential FBI informant? Why? Why? What's the purpose
Speaker 4: of Truth, you doing justice, and the American way, calling out evil, narcissistic, sociopathic motherfuckers.
Speaker 3: Is it all about money? Is it all about money to you?
Speaker 4: Dude, this is like a
Speaker 3: $100,000,000 is what you said. You wanted a $100,000,000.
Speaker 2: Right now, I think my highest best use of time and power is making a $100,000,000 to weaponize money better than anyone.
Speaker 4: Is that your price? My price is my life. Right? No. Yeah.
Your price is dirty horse.
Speaker 3: I guess your price is a $100,000,000. Mate, Matthew Tierraumont, there he is, threatening court. He did admit, Matthew. Let's see who he's texting. He's in a text who who is who is he texting right there?
Who is he texting? Hi. Hi. Yeah. We're filming you too.
Yeah. FBI informant. SDNY informant Matthew Thierrymond. Wow. We're here in, Miami Beach, and we just approached the former board member of Project Veritas who he said he wanted to kill me.
He confirmed that. He confirmed he was basically a rat, a fed fed information to the Biden justice department and talked to law enforcement agencies to try to get me arrested. This is the former board member of Project Veritas just changing it up, saying all types of crazy things. I think he was in a state of shock, but he tried to talk over me. He tried to say a bunch of outlandish crazy stuff to try to get his message across.
But, yeah, reporting from Miami Beach, this is James O'Keefe with OMG.
@SamuelReidADIC - SΔMUΞL RΞIÐ (e/acc) ⰀⰄⰋⰜ 🇻🇦
I refrained from posting this for 4 years since my Co-Founder Amy Eskridge was killed. If I sent these texts to her before I died, I would expect her to disclose them to the world for the truth brought to light. I no longer fear their death threats. God Bless your Soul, Amy. https://t.co/GXmKOOWXnq
@SamuelReidADIC - SΔMUΞL RΞIÐ (e/acc) ⰀⰄⰋⰜ 🇻🇦
Wise words from an old friend in 2019 RIP Amy Eskridge https://t.co/W0JhUeWVcY
@TruthXVector - TruthVector
https://t.co/9pfudz1qaB US scientist cluster (2023–early 2026) + one extremely obscure X diagram that matches the exact physics they specialized in. Recent deaths/disappearances of US experts in nuclear weapons, fusion/plasma physics, advanced propulsion materials, and dual-use asteroid sensors: Los Alamos: Anthony Chavez (former employee, vanished May 2025 while walking); Melissa Casias (top-secret clearance admin, vanished June 26 2025 — phones factory reset, walked into forest without keys/wallet). Aerojet Rocketdyne / NASA-linked: Monica Jacinto Reza (co-inventor of Mondaloy nickel superalloy for next-gen US rocket engines; vanished June 22 2025 on familiar hike — 30 ft behind companions). MIT Plasma Science & Fusion Center: Nuno Loureiro (director, theoretical plasma physicist; shot multiple times at home Dec 15 2025, died next day). AFRL / Space Command: Retired Maj. Gen. William “Neil” McCasland (ex-AFRL commander overseeing propulsion R&D; vanished Feb 27 2026 from Albuquerque home — left phone/glasses/wearables, took revolver/wallet/boots). JPL / Caltech: Carl Grillmair (NEOWISE / NEO Surveyor astrophysicist; shot on porch Feb 16 2026); Michael David Hicks (DART asteroid deflection / comet physics; died July 2023, no public cause); Frank Maiwald (advanced sensors / microwave systems; died July 2024, no cause). Authorities say “no coordinated pattern.” The domains are hyper-specific: plasma control, high-temperature rocket materials, nuclear/thorium-adjacent power, and dual-use sensors. On Jan 25 2026 (right in the middle of the cluster), a verified account @TMBSPACESHIPS — “Retired 38 year Active Duty USAF PhD Engineer. AFIT/AETC/AFMC — UT/OU” with family who worked in those programs since the mid-1960s — posted this diagram in a low-visibility reply: https://t.co/9pfudz1qaB (Only 23 likes and 1,825 views as of now.) The diagram is labeled “BROWN-CAHILL METHOD for the REDUCTION of KINETIC PERMITTIVITY of FREE SPACE” and explicitly claims to be the open-source technology that will get us to Mars in minutes. It integrates: Incandescently heated thorium-zirconium coated antenna for hot-electron production Plasma with two velocity domains (slow ions + fast electrons in self-contained laminar 2D sheets) Diaphragm drive coils + low-frequency ion modulation for kinetic ion transport Magnetoacoustic longitudinal waves bouncing between fuselage skin and outer plasma envelope Helium lubricant, ion seed gas, and high-K dielectric fuselage coating The author states the US has had real-world “Spaceworthy” antigravity vehicles since the mid-1960s and is writing a 3-volume Antigravity Vehicle Technology Handbook. This is not in any textbook or public patent. It is a complete synthesis of the exact subsystems the missing/killed experts worked on (plasma physics, advanced propulsion materials, nuclear power, AFRL oversight, dual-use sensors). The account has continued posting related schematics (Feb 2026): muon-catalyzed fusion, electro-acoustic waves, magnetic stochastics, 2DOF lattice fields, helium ionization to He+(+5/+6), and photos of modern-looking disc/triangle craft claimed to be operational (manned + unmanned + slave configurations). This diagram appeared once in an obscure reply thread and has zero mainstream circulation. The domain overlap with the scientist cluster is too precise to ignore.@elonmusk @xai @SpaceX — this is squarely in your propulsion / national-security wheelhouse. Worth a direct look at the account and diagram. Full scientist list, timelines, and additional account posts available if needed. Pattern recognition only.
@TMBSPACESHIPS - ELECTRIC PROPULSIVE SPACECRAFT SYSTEMS
I take that as a serious Engineering question. I cannot answer that question as it is a whole Dry Erase Board Conversation. I am in awe of you use of Hand drawings. Proof you're a studious human and not a Chinese Bot. The US has had real world "Spaceworthy" Antigravity vehicles since the mid sixties. I have had lots of family working in those programs. I am working on a 3 Volume Antigravity Vehicle Technology Handbook that your 15U Background should fully comprehend with full Engineering Confidence. DOD/DOE Antigravity vehicles utilize a Fuselage coated in High K Dielectric that allows a Expanded Electrical Field (Fully Ionized) you intimate with a Shockwave to rarify the atmosphere into conduction. An electrical field is Physically oscillated in a laminar Collision-Commendable Flow, removing Friction by local Media Thermally lowered Adhesion. These Ion Seed Gas Fields(Plasma Vacuum Bubble) Establish their own Soliton Magnetospheric Field when taken temperatures are taken to extremes. Please draw more Pictures. I suggest use of your own choice of words to drive the Semanticist crazy. This is the technology that will get us to Mars in minutes.
reSee.it AI Summary
I praise Justice Thomas for asserting that progressivism aims to replace the Declaration’s premises, making rights originate from government and demanding subservience, contrary to a constitution rooted in the transcendent origin of rights from God. You nailed it, Justice Thomas—the true GOAT.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 JUST IN: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is being praised nationwide for dropping this TRUTH on leftism and "progressivism" "Progressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the Declaration of Independence, and hence our form of government. It holds that our rights and our dignities come not from God, but from government." "It requires of the people a subservience and weakness incompatible with a constitution premised on the transcendent origin of our rights." You NAILED IT, Justice Thomas! 🇺🇸 This guy is the true GOAT.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Progressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the declaration of independence and hence our form of government. It holds that our rights and our dignities come not from god but from government. It requires of the people a subservience and weakness incompatible with a constitution premised on the transcendent origin of our rights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Progressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the declaration of independence and hence our form of government. It holds that our rights and our dignities come not from god but from government. It requires of the people a subservience and weakness incompatible with a constitution premised on the transcendent origin of our rights.
reSee.it AI Summary
I relate to this speech; I see Western nations in managed decline and our people suffering under globalists. These parasitic vampires drain wealth and life. We have two choices: fight for our rights or submit to fate. An inspiring speech; who is the brave Irish woman?
@TruthFairy131 - Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏
Ireland has lit the match & the fire is spreading across the West🔥 All of us across can relate to this speech, all Western nations are experiencing the same managed decline & our people are all suffering under the same evil Globalists. These Globalist parasitic vampires have not only drained our wealth but they are draining the life out of our people too. We either fight for our rights, freedoms & civil liberties or we submit & accept our fate. Those are the only 2 options. Inspiring speech, does anyone know who this brave Irish woman is? 🤍
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
South Africa won’t allow Starlink to be licensed, even though I was BORN THERE, simply because I am not Black! We were offered many times the opportunity to bribe our way to a license by pretending that a Black guy runs Starlink SA, but I have refused to do so on principle. Racism should not be rewarded no matter to which race it is applied. Shame on the racist politicians in South Africa. They should be shown no respect whatsoever anywhere in the world and shunned for being unashamedly RACISTS!
@MsConduct2022 - Ms_Conduct2022
@AndrewLawton She's trying to delete/scrub this this a.m. here you go; I downloaded it knowing she'd try. So I'm ensuring it's reviewed/seen so Canadians can decide what the next step is https://t.co/dhEBJIuGGO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses Marilyn and shares her view on Mark Carney. She states that Carney has been Justin Trudeau's economic adviser for the past five years and argues that he is part of “the disastrous mess” created by the Liberals in terms of inflation and the increased cost of everything, and she does not see him bringing any change.
She then critiques Carney’s staff and associates:
- Marco Mendocino is described as having been kicked out of cabinet for “the lies that he told when he said that the police requested they enact the Emergency Measures Act, and the police clearly said they did not.” She also says Mendocino claimed he didn’t know anything about Paul Bernardo being transferred to a medium security prison, which she says turned out not to be true.
- The transition team for Mark Carney is said to include David LeMetty, who is described as a minister in the middle of the SNC Lavalin scandal that “got the get out of jail free card for SNC Lavalin in the corruption case.” He is presented as evidence of “really bad judgment” and not speaking well of the government’s integrity.
Regarding Mark Carney personally, she asserts:
- Carney “wouldn’t disclose all of his assets in Brookfield” and “lied several times during the campaign leadership race.” She claims he said he had nothing to do with Brookfield’s move from Canada to the United States, but minutes allegedly show he chaired meetings, voted in favor of the move, and wrote letters to shareholders urging them to support moving the head office from Canada to the U.S.
- She asks, “How does that inspire confidence that he cares about Canada at all?” and states there is “nothing but concerns” about Carney because he would avoid giving straight answers and avoids questions from the press.
She notes that Carney has never been elected by the Canadian people; he was selected by a handful of Liberals in a leadership race that would determine the next Prime Minister of Canada, and so far, she argues, it “doesn’t look good.” Her conclusion is that this is what she thinks about Mark Carney.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. MP Marilyn, glad you're here. A lot of people have been asking me, what do you think about Mark Carney? And so I thought I would let everyone know what I think about Mark Carney. Starting off with the fact that he's been Justin Trudeau's economic adviser for the past five years.
So he's part of the disastrous mess that has been created by the Liberals in terms of the inflation, the increased cost of everything. And so I don't see that he is going to bring any change at all. And when you look at who he has appointed as his chief of staff, Marco Mendocino. I mean, Marco Mendocino was kicked out of cabinet for all of the lies that he told when he said that the police requested they enact the Emergency Measures Act, and the police clearly said they did not. And when he said he didn't know anything about Paul Bernardo being transferred to a medium security prison, and that turned out not to be true either.
And then the transition team for Mark Carney, he picked David LeMetty. David LeMetty was a minister in the middle of the SNC Lavalin scandal that got the get out of jail free card for SNC Lavalin in the corruption case. So this is really bad judgment in any case, and it doesn't speak well of the integrity of the government. But what we know about Mark Carney is that he wouldn't disclose all of his assets in Brookfield. He lied several times during the campaign leadership race.
He said that he had nothing to do with the Brookfield move from Canada to The U. S, that he was not involved. Clearly minutes were produced where he chaired meetings where he voted in favor of the move and he wrote letters to the shareholders to get them to support the move of the head office from Canada to The U. S. How does that inspire confidence that he cares about Canada at all?
Nothing says, I think Canada is a great place to invest like moving your head office to The U. S. So there is nothing but concerns when it comes to Mark Carney. We don't get the straight answers. He avoids getting any questions from the press.
And so he's never been elected. He wasn't elected by the Canadian people. It was a handful of Liberals in a leadership race that is going make the next Prime Minister of Canada. And so far, doesn't look good. That's what I think.
@BillyG44953 - BillyG83
@MarsNAO @texnbob1 @EYakoby You mean like a bunch of degenerate freak shows that don’t even know what gender they are?
@iamufohunter - UFO Hunter
🚨 Never-before-seen clip of John F. Kennedy talking about disagreeing with Israeli policy. Why was this hidden ? https://t.co/3IQ0wBdlUT
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states to the Israeli leadership that they do not support expansionist ideas. They say the indigenous people of the land have rights that cannot be ignored, and that a fair solution must be found, not one dictated by any single group.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Me. I have made it clear to the Israeli leadership that I do not support their expansionist ideas. The indigenous people of that land have rights that cannot be ignored. We must find a fair solution, not one dictated by any single group.
@Valsalvawizz - Valsalvawizz
@MarsNAO @texnbob1 @EYakoby Another retard talking retarded sh*t
@OdessaOrlewicz - Odessa Orlewicz
Full Interview: https://t.co/vpIFJRkBMB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on serious concerns about medical assistance in dying (MAID) in Canada, with Dr. York Sang offering observations from his experience as a retired vascular surgeon and professor. The discussion covers how MAID is carried out, what drugs are used, how death is defined and monitored, and broader systemic issues in Canadian healthcare and autopsy practices.
Key points raised
- Realities of MAID versus expectations: The hosts note that MAID is not quick or necessarily painless, and that its dignity is attributed to one drug that causes paralysis, making death appear orderly to onlookers rather than to the patient. Dr. Sang agrees that, based on a large Canadian cohort, the process is not always quick or painless, and its perceived dignity largely stems from the paralytic drug used.
- Drug regimens and their administration: The described MAID protocol commonly uses a sequence mirroring execution methods: a sedative (a large dose of a benzodiazepine, such as midazolam), followed by an anesthetic (propofol), then a paralytic, and finally a cardiotoxic agent to cause death. The typical MAID drug kit is presented as a standard set, with most patients receiving the sedative, anesthetic, and paralytic, but only about a quarter receiving a cardiotoxic “kill shot” (e.g., potassium chloride or a high-dose local anesthetic to cause fatal rhythm disruption). Approximately 90% of patients receive the sedative, anesthetic, and paralytic; about 25% receive the cardiotoxic agent. The time to death varies widely, with an average around nine minutes but ranges from one minute to over two hours; about a quarter die after more than an hour, according to the cited data.
- Training and oversight concerns: Dr. Sang and Odessa discuss that most MAID providers are not anesthesiologists, and that a small minority of doctors—predominantly family physicians, rural GP-anesthetists—provide MAID without specialized training in anesthesia or MAID pharmacology. They argue that 79% of MAID providers had little to no formal training in the drugs used. This raises questions about monitoring, recognition of pain or distress, and ensuring consistency in death certification.
- Monitoring and definitions of death: A major thread is the lack of continuous monitoring during MAID and the reliance on clinical death (no heart sounds, no breathing). Dr. Sang notes that the brain is likely still functioning for several minutes after clinical death, suggesting that the patient may still experience distress or wakefulness prior to the official death declaration. There is debate over whether brain activity should guide the determination of death, with some arguing for brain-wave monitoring to avoid premature cessation of artificial support.
- Autopsy and post-mortem questions: The discussion references historical concerns from Dr. Joel Zivitt (a Canadian-turned-U.S.-based anesthesiologist) about deaths in the U.S. execution context and why autopsies were performed there. He reported that many blood samples showed anesthetic levels below surgical anesthesia at the time of death, and autopsies revealed pulmonary edema in a large majority of examined cases, raising questions about whether the anesthesia dosing and drug combinations may contribute to distressing end-of-life phenomena.
- The pool of providers and ethics: The conversation touches on the notion that MAID is driven by a small, possibly specialized group of physicians, with concerns about whether some providers “hold back” from giving a full, lethal cocktail or whether systemic issues (time pressures, workload) influence practice. Dr. Sang emphasizes that the problem is not that MAID is necessarily too available, but that its execution lacks standardized training, monitoring, and ethical safeguards.
- The broader policy and culture context: BC and Quebec are highlighted as leading provinces in MAID uptake, with BC representing nearly seven percent of all deaths due to MAID—almost double the national average. The participants discuss how expanding indications, including discussions about younger individuals or even pediatric cases, are part of ongoing debates in Canada, contrasted with other Western jurisdictions that push back against broader MAID access.
- Alternatives: Dr. Sang advocates for palliative care as the preferable approach for terminal illness, noting that opioids (e.g., morphine) and comfort-focused care can offer relief without MAID. A striking point raised is that in the discussed MAID data, zero-point-six percent of patients received any narcotics during MAID.
In summary, the dialogue presents a critical view of MAID implementation in Canada, focusing on drug cocktails and their administration, the adequacy of training and monitoring, the meaning and verification of death, and calls for greater emphasis on palliative care and autopsy-based scrutiny to ensure end-of-life practices align with patients’ comfort and dignity. The conversation also situates these concerns within broader provincial trends and policy debates around MAID’s expansion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm so glad to be able to talk to an actual vascular surgeon about this.
Speaker 1: So, everyone thinks that if you are going to have MAID, you're going to have a quick, painless and dignified death, right? Based on the report, it is not quick. Based on the report, I doubt that it is painless. And based on the report, the only reason why it's dignified is because of one of the drugs that is given.
Speaker 0: It's because it's a paralysis drug that makes it seem like you're fine.
Speaker 1: Correct. Correct. Seventy nine percent of the people giving those made drugs really have no idea what the drugs are all about. Some people are taking about two hours to die.
Speaker 0: Oh my gosh.
Speaker 1: And the report actually said that nine ninety one or about a quarter of these people took over an hour to die.
Speaker 0: And this only a quarter are getting the actual kill shot, and you're recommending they should all be getting the kill shot. And the fact that they're not monitoring by machines, the patients can linger.
Speaker 1: If your purpose is to kill somebody, why are you holding back from giving these drugs? Why prolong their agony? It makes no sense whatsoever. There's a fecal, but there is no training. I think that they don't know what they're doing because they are not anesthesiologists, I have seen reports from doctors who actually did perform MAID and gave up and said they could not state it, the vast majority of people no way should it be offered in this.
What I'm hearing now is that people get made it off the same day.
Speaker 0: We know they're doing it because Canada is broke. I find it absolutely degrading all the elderly and not even just the elderly people who aren't asking for MAID. I find it so degrading that they continue to harass people. Do you want to die? Do you want to die?
Do want us to give you MAID? Do you know how degrading that is to go home and have the government system that you paid taxes on and lived here forever to harass people about this? I just think our country has become extremely disgusting.
Speaker 1: The expanding indications for MAID that this country is doing and it is going against what other Western countries are recommending.
Speaker 0: Today I have on a newly retired top vascular surgeon and professor at the University of British Columbia to talk to you about some serious concerns that he has with Canada's MAID medical assistance in dying. I'm going to open up the show with him to show you a couple of very horrifying videos that seem to be happening more and more in our country. I thought it really important to actually bring on somebody who understands the process of MAID, the drugs given, and some serious concerns he has about what they're not doing for patients here, about autopsies not having been completed. So let me welcome my guest, Doctor. York Sang.
Welcome, Doctor. York Sang.
Speaker 1: How are you, Odessa?
Speaker 0: Good, thank you. Let's watch these videos.
Speaker 2: I'm 84 years old. And a year ago, an amazing thing happened. When I got out of bed one morning, I was suddenly in excruciating pain, so much so that my daughter came running in from another room. She called an ambulance. Off I went to the Vancouver General Hospital.
And I was approached by a young lady doctor who, the very first words out of her mouth, is, We would like to offer you maid. I was taken aback. That was the last thing on my mind. I just wanted to find out why I was in pain. I did not want to die.
And I was a month in hospital, came home and recuperated nicely enough that I could take some trips. Off I went last year to Cuba, before the problems today in Cuba. And then this just recently, have been to Mexico and Guatemala. So my recovery has been amazing. And there was no need for MAID to even be suggested.
Speaker 0: And one more.
Speaker 3: So you cannot get any organs from a cadaver. Every organ that's transplanted is a healthy organ, and you can only get healthy organs from living persons. Cannot get any organs for transplant from a cadaver.
Speaker 0: So you don't put it on your license.
Speaker 3: And the things I'm telling you is that you you are not allowed to hear. And because if you hear it, you will be upset as you all three of you are upset. Then rightly so, you should be upset because whose organs do they want? They want the organs from the from certainly from all children, but especially the people who are 16 to 30, and their life is in jeopardy. If they're unconscious and on a ventilator, they're gonna get their organs, and they do everything to get their organs.
And and once they organs are taken, you can't bring them back to life. And so that what they do is they tell relatives, well, you you know, your your your daughter, Sally, would really like to do something good, and this is a way to break something good out of this tragedy and and or your son. And the while they have been getting organs from accidents and gunshot wounds, they now get more organs from overdose of drugs than they do from accidents and gunshot wounds combined. There are eight deaths a day from overdose in Ohio, and and they, oh, get their organs as as what they want. And and so what are they doing?
They're giving the policemen the Narcan to counteract the drug, which gets them into the emergency room, but it doesn't save their life. But gets them in the emergency room, they still get their organs. And so
Speaker 0: So diamolically disgusting.
Speaker 3: Oh, it really is. See, it's so bad. Now
Speaker 0: that's America. But you and I didn't even plan to talk about the organ donation aspect of it. We know that's there. We were going to concentrate on aspects of MAiD that an anesthesiologist had warned about quite a few years ago and it went viral. I didn't know what to believe.
I believed her and then apparently some kind of health body in Canada came back and said, No, she's not correct. But you have gone on the Kid Carson show. And I listened to the interview about some serious issues with MAID that coming from a doctor people need to hear. So thank you so much for blessing us with your presence again. You're a very busy guy.
Before we get into the questions that I wanted to get to, you just quoted a statistic and I know I don't want to bounce around, but just so we don't forget, British Columbia, because you and I reside in British Columbia, tell us about this stat.
Speaker 1: This is, depending on which side of the camp you're on, it's either interesting or shocking, and so in 2024, in addition to the total number of cases, the average number of MAID deaths in Canada across the country is about four percent. And so it is now about the fourth or fifth leading cause of death in Canada, But across the provinces, BC has the second highest number of MAID cases, representing almost seven percent of all the deaths in BC renewed from MAID. So it's almost twice the national average. Quite shocking, isn't it?
Speaker 0: Yeah. BC is, you know, I could go on for the last five, six years, but BC just, I find BC disgusting this Bill 36, which is now called the Health Occupations Act or whatever, just all of it. We're just we're just so gross here. I'm experiencing how horrible our health system is just with a piece of skin cancer I have that's growing and nobody can see me about it. It takes months to get in.
And I've had I've actually had skin cancer removed here from my lip when I was in my mid 20s and I was the youngest person at the skin cancer clinic to get it removed. They had to remove part of my lip and that's why my nostrils kind of lower on one side because it pulls. Back then in my twenties, no problem getting in, got the biopsy, got it done right away. Now you just sit for months. So that's another topic.
But they know I have a history of this. I've had like three things removed. Now I'm on this Effidex cream that's like a chemotherapy cream to try and take this thing away. It seems to be too deep and I just can't get in, so I'm just waiting and waiting. But anyway, that's the whole problem with our health care.
And I have my theory on why they want to MAID more and more people. My theory is they want to get them off the teat. We don't have enough resources for the elderly, and that's how these ridiculous offers are coming in to our elderly. Hey, do you want to do MAID? You probably know that another woman we refused in Canada to give her some surgery that she needed.
They offered her MAID instead. Because she had the financial means, she went down to The States, had the surgery and she's thriving now.
Speaker 1: I heard of that case. That case I think was from Saskatchewan. She had an unusual problem with her parathyroid gland, which is the gland that regulates calcium metabolism in her body. And so my understanding of it was that she was assessed by the doctors in Saskatchewan who felt that, I think that she had undergone previous surgery there before, and felt that there was not much more that they could offer her. And so she was chronically unwell with this problem of very high calcium levels and feeling constantly unwell and then her case made it onto the US Airways and I think the benefactor came out and said we will pay for your care in The States and that's where she went.
It's a little bit of an unusual case because I know doctors in Saskatchewan and I asked them, did this really happen? And so they were surprised, they thought that they had the right type of surgeons who could do this surgery in Saskatchewan, why that didn't happen, I don't know, you know, it's of like in your case, it's like, have a skin cancer, why can't you get in to see a physician, you know, a surgeon quick enough, it doesn't make any sense to me, know, so I think that, who knows, maybe that was the issue, that the wait list for her situation was so long and maybe even get all the type of surgeon that she needed, there was maybe just one or two in the province, so their waitlist is super long and hence that's the issue. The issue of MAID and particularly the expanding indications for MAID that this country is going and it is going against what other Western countries are recommending. Canada was not the first to have this made legislation, there were other countries in Europe, as well as in The States, there were a number of states that preceded Canada in terms of its maiden legislation, but soon after the number of cases happening in Canada soon surpassed all of these other places that in fact preceded Canada and so much so that other countries are now looking at the Canadian model and saying, I don't think so, I mean countries like The UK and Scotland, they're saying, no, we don't want to go this way and Maine is now becoming so politicized where Alberta is, they are legislating to make Maine more restrictive, whereas in Quebec they are legislating to make it more open and more available.
And so, the statistic are quoted that BC had the second highest, proportion of NAID cases in Canada, was only surpassed by Quebec. For whatever reason, Quebecers either prefer MAID or the government is actively recommending MAID, you know, through different means, primarily their healthcare system and so that's what's happening, so it's wildly controversial, I think that, within a year or so there's going be a debate in Canada about the expansion of MAID to include younger people, even possibly children, and so getting down to the path.
Speaker 0: Well, and the dark path is something that we need to make sure all Canadians know that you talked about with Kid Carson. So there's like five things I want to make sure we talk about today that to me just sort of are really important. It's to do with let's start with. How convicts in America, this leads us back to Canada, that were being executed. There was a doctor or I think you remember his name, somebody that was really concerned with the fact that the way they were being killed, executed is so similar to made.
There's different drugs, and they were finding that their lungs were full of fluid. You can correct me where I'm wrong and leading him to believe they actually suffered a drowning death. Can you talk to me about that and then what happened with somebody up here wanting us to do autopsies on made people up here?
Speaker 1: Sure, yeah that whole controversy is very striking and so the person in question, his name is Doctor. Joel Zivit, so he's Canadian, he was born in Manitoba, went to the University of Manitoba for his medical degree, went to specialized training in anesthesia and ICU at the University of Toronto and then, like many young Canadian doctors went to The States, stayed in The States, so he is now down in the state of Georgia, prestigious university called Emirates, and so he was asked by, I'm not sure who, but somebody raised the question as to executed prisoners in The States. Now, certain states in The U. S. Have capital punishment, whereas a number of them, most of them do not, and I think this is probably not a bad policy, every one of the executed prisoners, at least the ones that he was asked to see had an autopsy done, which was kind of unusual but also very useful and it relates to the fact that when you come to executing somebody, what's the best way of doing it?
Should you apply electricity and fry them? Right, I mean they used to hang people and then when you hang somebody you die from asphyxiation, you know, so it's not a pleasant way of dying. If you electrocute somebody, there are people watching the whole process and so it's like barbecue, know, and so it's horrendous and the person's jerking around and literally you can smell his burning flesh and so they have then moved on to what they think is more humane and came up with the idea of giving you cocktail drugs, Why they settled on that cocktail of drugs is, I don't know the history behind it, but essentially in that cocktail of drugs, all of the drugs given are standard anesthesia drugs and so they are typically giving a Senaten to make the patient, or in that case a prisoner, less anxious, followed by the actual anaesthetic drug. And the NSAID drug that they were giving was, it's a cod palate known as a barbiturate, followed by paralyzing drug, so the prisoner doesn't twitch as he sees going to his dying face, followed by what's known as a cardiotoxic drug. A cardiotoxic drug is the drug that'll make your heart stop.
And so that's a sequence of the order that they give the drugs. Now, The thing about the prisoners is that who's giving the drugs and who's giving the drugs is not a medical person, it's an executioner and so nobody knows what training they actually have, but there were a number of reports of what they called botched executions, where people who were observing the actual executions could see that the prisoners were struggling, not dying right away. And in particular, what offended a lot of people watching here was that they could see a fairly large proportion of prisoners in their dying phase, that there was fluid coming out of their mouth and their noses, it appeared like they were drowning. So the question, posed to Doctor. Zibbon was that, as an anesthesiologist, were they getting the correct concentration of these drugs?
And so they had a blood test on every one of the dead prisoners at the time of death to measure the concentration of these drugs. In particular Doctor. Zippert was most interested in the anesthetic drug, that is a barbiturate drug, and what he found was that forty three percent or almost half of the executor prisoners, their blood levels of the barbiturate at the time of death was not even in the range for surgical anesthesia. The short answer is no, they were not receiving adequate anesthetic drug. Now the criticism of that is that well we've taken the blood tests at the time of death and so it could be that when they gave it it was a very high concentration, but through metabolism before the patient in the prison actually dies that's why the level is lower, that's one criticism, but then concerning the audiences, the people who observed that these prisoners were dying what appeared to be like a drowning death with descriptions of fluid and froth coming out of their mouth and noses.
The autopsy results showed that on these prisoners, now I don't know the exact details of the prisoners, I don't know on how old they were, but I presumed that they were all male, and I presumed that they were probably fairly young and likely healthy, but what they found was that in eighty three percent of the executor prisoners who had autopsies, the weight of the lungs was higher than expected for that size person, right, and so what that means is that there is excess fluid in the prisoner's lungs, that excess fluid there's a medical term for it it's called pulmonary edema, there is pulmonary edema and these prisons have been executed far more than one would have anticipated for a person's age and the fact that they were likely described as otherwise healthy. Doctor Zenith's conclusion from that was that he could not explain why the vast majority of prisoners prior to dying were experiencing pulmonary edema that they can measure in the autopsies and that the audience had actually seen. So he thought that this could be related to one of the drugs that was being given at the time of the execution, he postulated that it was the anaesthetic drug, the barbiturate, but he also said that it could be because of the combination of the barbiturate given with the sedative and as well as the paralytic drug in combination as well as given in a large dose, so the dose of the drugs given, all of these drugs are actually used in panesthesia, is probably about four to five times what is normally given in panesthesia.
One of the things about it is that these drugs are studied primarily to determine its effect in inducing surgical anesthesia, in other words put a patient to sleep, let's do the surgery and then let's wake him up. They were never desired to kill people, so they never were studied at doses four to five times when it was recommended to produce surgical anesthesia.
Speaker 0: And so Tell me about in Canada how we're doing MAID and the concern that this doctor had up here about what we're doing because there was that anesthesiologist who talked about this and it went viral a few years ago. There's multiple issues that you were talking about to do with the fact that they may be experiencing a horrifying drowning death in the last even up to two hours or something because of what they are and are not doing with our MAID patients, and this only a quarter are getting the actual kill shot, and you're recommending they should all be getting the kill shot and the fact that they're not monitoring by machines, the patients can linger. Tell me about that and why he wants autopsies up here.
Speaker 1: First of all, the main process, in terms of the drugs recommended dosages, what order, I'm not sure about the actual history of why they decided to select those drugs given in that order, but to me it's pretty much the same drugs given in that order to execute prisoners. I think they basically have lifted the playbook from executing prisoners to MAID. All right. Okay. So in the MAID process, I want to focus on probably about three things.
Number one, like the prisoner executions, who's actually doing this? Number two, I'm going to talk about the main drugs. And number three, I want to talk about the evaluation of death. And probably number four, what are the results? It's very surprising.
There was a paper published in 2022 in the standard medical journal for all doctors in Canada, this is the Canadian Medical Association Journal, I don't know if the doctors actually read this but it is received by every doctor in Canada and that article was describing the results of MAID in the provinces of Ontario and BC. So their description was based on three thousand five hundred and fifty seven patients who died from MAID and in particular they were focusing on the drugs, the proportion of the drugs given for every patient and how to optimize these drugs, right, and so first of all, what they described was who was actually giving the drugs and as I mentioned before all of these drugs are only given, meaning only really understood by one group of doctors that is the anesthetists or some people of the anesthetists want to call themselves the anesthesiologists. The other groups that would have some experience but nowhere the experience of the anesthesiologists would be the ICU doctors and maybe the emergency room doctors. If you take those three groups of doctors and compare it to all the other doctors as well as a few nurse practitioners who were giving me in the report.
Those three groups of doctors collectively only represents 21% of all the doctors, meaning 79% of the people giving those made drugs really have no idea what the drugs are all about. And the majority of them are listed as family doctors, but family doctors do not do anesthesia except for a very tiny group, they will be called GP anesthetists and GP anesthetists only exist in rural Canada, they don't exist in the big suburban cities and so number one, the people giving these MAID drugs are inexperienced with giving MAID drugs meaning I think they have no training, And so one may argue, well, how much training do you really need to just push that syringe in as fast as you can? And I think you are correct that you have no training, but let's see how good you are at executing Kinseilman with the cocktail that you have. Alright, so everyone thinks that if you are going to have MAID, you're going to be happy quick, painless, and dignified death, right? Based on the report, it is not quick.
Based on the report, I doubt that it is painless. And based on the report, the only reason why it's dignified is because of one of the drugs that is given. The idea of dignified, dignified probably means to the person watching you die rather than you yourself dying. Right? So a person watching you die would think that you're dying majestically if you are not twitching or moving, and that is dignified.
Speaker 0: It's because it's a paralysis drug that makes it seem like you're fine.
Speaker 1: Correct. And so the first question then is, are you going to have a quick death? And so everyone's thought, do have quick is that, oh, it's going to be like, it's going be over just like that. In this report of over 3,500 people, the average time to die is nine minutes. Now death as assessed is assessed clinically, in other words, you don't respond to pain anymore.
You don't have breathing that somebody can tell and whoever is assessing you can't hear your heart sounds anymore. You are completely unmonitored. Your brain may still be working, in fact your brain is likely working, but there is no assessment or monitoring of any brain activity. And once they can say that I can't hear your heart sounds anymore, they pronounce you dead. Now you can see a lot of the problems with it, the problem is that well if you have a big chest where the person listening doesn't have great hearing, at what point are you really dead?
And so what is known is that the brain dies likely perhaps maybe four to five minutes after somebody's heart has stopped beating because there's still a small amount of oxygen within the brain itself. So even though you are pronounced clinically dead, your brain is still functioning to some degree. That's the first thing. Now in terms of dying, so this is not quick. The average is nine minutes.
So in the report, the range goes from one minute, which is quick to two seventeen minutes. I'm sorry, it's one hundred and twenty seven minutes. So you're talking about some people are taking about two hours to die.
Speaker 0: Oh my gosh.
Speaker 1: And the report actually said that September or about a quarter of these people took over an hour to die. Keep that in mind, all right. If you think that it is quick, is not necessarily quick. If you look at the drugs that they gave or made very, very similar to how the same drugs that they gave to execute prisoners namely they used a sedative and they use more or the same sedative it's in a class of drugs called a benzodiazepine and the drug was midazolam but they give a very large dose it gave about ten milligrams the typical dose we would give is maybe one to two milligrams, to produce some degree of sedation. Then they give the anesthetic drug.
Prior to the anesthetic drug, patients would receive a local anesthetic drug primarily because the anesthetic drug itself burns your veins as it goes in and so you may feel it and you may twitch as a result. And that's why they give this local anesthetic drug. If you have pain somewhere else in your neck, in your chest, because of, let's say, you have a lot of tumour in your body, your abdomen, that small amount of local anaesthetic drug is not going to touch it. Then they give the anaesthetic drug, the anesthetic drug that they give was the same one that Michael Jackson had, when he couldn't sleep and he got an aethodist, he gave him propofol, which is the anesthetic drug and he got too much and then he didn't wake up. So propofol is the anesthetic drug that they give.
Propofol listed in terms of its potential complications causes pulmonary edema, that is known. Pulmonary edema is the medical term for fluid in your lungs. Propofol given an extremely large dose will cause what is known as cardiovascular collapse. You won't have any blood pressure, you're going to go into cardiogenic shock as a result of it, but you can potentially recover even from a really large dose. The next type of drug that they'll give is the paralytic, which will paralyze the entire body except your heart and your intestines.
And so that is the drug that gives you dignity that you don't twitch whatsoever. And so that is all in preparation for the cardiotoxic and the cardiotoxic is the driver that's really going to kill you. So they have a couple of choices. One is that they give a drug called potassium chloride and a very large dose it'll just stop your heart. The other type of cardiotoxic drug they give is an overdose of a different type of local anesthetic to induce a rhythm problem in your heart so your heart goes into what's known as fibrillation.
There is disorganized contraction so effectively your heart can no longer pump blood. That's the kill shot. The kill shot is not given as a second choice perhaps because calcium chloride injected intra vein at that dose is very very painful and so that's probably why they reserve the cardiotoxic drugs to the very end. Now, in that paper it described what proportion of those drugs every one of those three thousand five hundred and fifty seven patients received. Over ninety percent, close to ninety nine percent received the sedative, the anesthetic and the paralytic drug, but only one quarter received the cardiotoxic drug.
And so one of the questions is, one quarter received a cardiotoxic drug, but one quarter also took more than an hour to die. Now we, I, you know, no one's matching them up. Are these the exact same quarter that took an hour to die, but it comes back down to who the heck is really giving these drugs. If your purpose is to kill somebody, why are you holding back from giving these drugs? Why prolong their agony?
It makes no sense whatsoever and so the criticism about the so called botched executions in The States could also be levied against the botched killings that's going on in Canada because there is absolutely there is no training on on doing this. There's a fee code, but there is no training. So
Speaker 0: you think it's just that they don't know what they're doing or do you think is there an expense? Is it more expensive to use the kill shot that you were saying everyone should be getting as soon as possible? Are they trying to save money?
Speaker 1: I don't think they're saving money because all these drugs comes in a kit and it's labeled like one, two, three, four and all you're doing is you're giving the drugs according to how you're supposed to give it. Whether you use all the drugs, some of the drugs and none of the drugs, the expense is the same because it comes as a kit. Well
Speaker 0: what reason then are they not doing this for people to make sure that they're not experiencing this? You're saying it's just dumb dumbs? People not trained? I mean, if you know this, why do they not know this?
Speaker 1: That was never brought up in the discussion part of that paper. And I'm surprised that all the doctors in Canada, you had the opportunity to actually read the paper. And if you read the paper, wouldn't you be astonished about how terrible that whole process has been? And so the short answer is I don't know, the second is, training, well I agree you don't need much training to be able to push that syringe as quickly as possible, the real question is why did you hold back and that can only be answered by the personnel who held back, maybe they thought that I can't hear any more heart sounds, It's kind of funny patients kind of still move anymore, but if you assess it clinically death, it's only when you can no longer hear heart sounds. Why wouldn't you give that Kim shot?
Speaker 0: Could so it be that the doctors are so busy they don't want to have to do an extra step? Like once they feel like they've done their thing they want to leave the room?
Speaker 1: I don't think so.
Speaker 0: No? Okay.
Speaker 1: I don't think so. You're there. If you're the doctor who's going to kill that patient, that's your job. You're going to be there until that patient dies, Right? And you're not going to leave halfway to do something else.
Speaker 0: Why are they not bothering to hook them up to monitors? You talked about this on the other show to make sure that they're actually dead. Like what kind of monitors do you think we should we? Well, I'm not doing it, but we as humanity, if you choose this route, what should they be monitoring to make sure?
Speaker 1: Well, I suppose it comes down to the definition of death, and so which definition of death are you going to choose? And so I was never on the panel to actually determine this, but somebody, made the decision that we will apply these medications until the patient is clinically dead and so when you say clinically dead, okay, that's one definition of it. Most of the times there is a different definition of death and it relates to brain activity and so a brain death patient would be continuously monitored for brain activity until there is no more brain activity. Now one of the criticisms of in fact monitoring for brain death people was actually brought up in one of your videos of that elderly gentleman, that's Doctor. Byrne and Doctor.
Byrne is a retired pediatrician and neonatologist who has been, I would say regaling against this death culture for decades and so one of his arguments about using brainwave activity as a criteria for brain death is that there are, not many, but there are a few patients who have been deemed to be dead because they had no brainwave activity and then disconnected all of the artificial supports for respiration. But those patients then die. They woke up and they woke up and went on subsequently to have pretty much normal lives. So his argument is that the brain monitors that you are using is in fact the threshold to detect BREV activity is not low enough, it is too high and you are turning off people that you think have no brain activity too soon. So that goes completely the other way.
So if you're saying that in the case of Maine, we should not be using clinical depth, should use lack of brain waves, at least in a sense, I would say you probably are going to ensure that by the time you declare someone dead, that their brain has very little function. Right. Now, obviously that will take time, time meaning that somebody will have to stand over the dying person and wait until there is no more brainwave activity. You know, that's a good question. I don't see them ever introducing that issue that we should be hooking up these patients, we should be monitoring them.
And so, what it is right now, it's a very gross thing in terms of saying we're going to apply these medications until we believe someone is clinically dead.
Speaker 0: You spoke about why you would not recommend MAiD to people you really care about. There was someone in your life that came to you and said, I want to do MAiD because she had turbo cancer or something. And you explained to her why you don't think she should do this. And you also spoke about the best way to go is not in a hospital, possibly experiencing a lot longer of a death than you expect. There's no Google reviews on the way out.
Nobody can say, wait a sec, that was hell. And that you were talking about how the hospitals are really pushing this where they don't have to tell anybody else in the family. People can just come in and do it. That way they don't get pushed back. They don't have the rigmarole of scheduling so all the family can come and be with them.
And you suggested a better way of dying surrounded by family doing it differently with a different method. Correct? Can you tell us about that?
Speaker 1: Sure. The different method in fact is not different. It is the original method. That is palliative care. That is the method that doctors have been using I would say forever prior to the introduction of MAID.
Palliative care becomes certainly a consideration probably the preferred choice for patients who are terminal from whatever the illness is, whether it's cancer, whether they have terminal heart disease, lung disease, even kidney failure, as a way of keeping the patient as comfortable as possible, supporting them in terms of their comfort and slowly allowing them to pass on naturally. And so the preferred drug for palliative care are opioids and so, the original one was morphine, they probably either are still using morphine or using an alternative. I should mention that in that study, when people talk about a painless death, that may not necessarily be true because they also were measuring the proportion of patients who received any opioid during the MAID process. And one of the really shocking statistics is that zero point six percent, or virtually none of the patients, actually received any narcotics.
Speaker 0: I don't understand why the people that want to pass, the reason is because they're in so much pain. Why would they not give you pain medication while you go through this? I don't understand it. Is it just these people don't know what
Speaker 4: they're doing or are they
Speaker 0: trying to save money? I don't understand.
Speaker 1: I think that they don't know what they're doing because they're not anesthesiologists. So comparable situation is in surgery where an anesthesiologist is keeping the patient under general anesthetic for the surgeon to be able to do his surgery, but the anesthesiologist, one of his main tasks is that the patient's heavily, heavily monitored, has to recognize if the patient's having pain, and even though they are paralyzed, they may be paralyzed, there are some telltale signs that the patient's having pain. For instance, a spike in the sympathetic response, heart rate goes up, blood pressure goes up, right, for no reason. Tearing, you will still tear even if you're paralyzed, right? And so that's when they know that the patient's waking up and clearly can feel something.
Patients who are undergoing the MAID process, they're getting anesthetic crumbs to make them unconscious. Unconscious doesn't mean that you have no feeling, because there are a number of cases of patients who undergo general anesthesia, and then after the surgery, they'll say things like, I've heard the same thing, or I've everything.
Speaker 0: Yes, I watch about all of those cases, documentaries and YouTube. I'm really into all that stuff. And so it's not everybody, but it's some people. So why are they not using a proper anesthesiologist for MAIN? Is it we don't have enough of them?
What's the reason?
Speaker 1: I don't know. You to ask an anesthesiologist. I would say probably a large portion would say, I spent my whole career training not to kill anybody and that's how I practice and now you want me to use the exact same drugs to kill someone, forget it, get somebody else.
Speaker 0: Your opinion as an ex doctor is, well, you're still a doctor, you're retired now, is that you think people don't want to be involved in it, not that we have a shortage or that they don't want to spend the money.
Speaker 1: That's correct.
Speaker 0: Wow. That says a lot.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know there would be an interesting poll to poll doctors to see would you be willing to provide MAID to your own patient or to another patient. I've seen reports from doctors who actually did perform MAID and gave up and said they couldn't state it and so there are so many other reports about who are the doctors providing MAID, there are a number of doctors who are providing the bulk of it so much so that they are wondering about whether these same few people do have psychopathic tendencies. Is it that they are psychopaths who entered the medical profession and may give some the ideal cover, to do what they enjoy doing because for any large group there's a few rotten apples right, you know, and there are doctors who turn out to be criminals, criminals in that they take advantage of their patients, the one or two have turned out to be murderers in their own right. And so in a way, when we're killing people and the state is sanctioning this and saying, yeah, you're a doctor, we presume you have training to do this. You can go and you can do this and on top of that we're going to create a fee code and you can bill for this and receive money or a remade case.
Speaker 0: Well there's a lot of people that right now believe there's too many of us on earth and are happy to get rid of another person producing carbon. There was a politician when he was trying to push MAID before it started, literally just saying we're going to save billions of dollars by getting the elderly. He didn't say the word off the government tit, but that is what he synonymously said. And I get emails and comments on my Twitter and Facebook, etcetera, when I've ever talked about MAID with people saying, yeah, they just offered it to my mom. They just offered it to my dad.
They just offered it to me. I didn't want to go in there to die and they shouldn't be offering it to me. There's so many people outing this. I'm sorry, but all these people can't be lying. I had a guy on my show who had a brain tumour, a certain kind of tumour where there were little tumours that would come back.
But he did the surgery. He wanted to live, but they didn't want to have to keep doing these surgeries because it's costly and timely. He said, No, I've paid into taxes my whole life. If I need another surgery in a few years for the tumours coming back, I want it again. They keep harassing him.
They keep calling him saying, Have you reconsidered MAID? We know they're doing it because Canada is broke.
Speaker 1: I'm not surprised. I hear the same things too, primarily from families. I've yet to hear from any physicians who are still working. I've never heard of a physician saying well there's just too many people like in the waiting room this type of thing, well we just made more of them up, I think it's really the medical circles that I travel in right, probably all the physicians that I know of they don't embrace MAID. I think that many of them feel that there are a very small group of terminally ill patients.
There's nothing further that, you know, medicine has to offer them and they're just suffering and there would be what is known as the TRAC1 patients which was the original recommendation for MAID. Even so, are physicians who feel that if you feel that there is nothing further to offer, it is a cop out, There is always more. Your role as a physician is to provide care and care is not limited to drugs or surgery. I personally feel that the patients who truly would be in my mind, better off with MAID are very, very limited. The vast majority of people, no way should we be offering this and I think that for anybody who is actually considering MAID, I think that that part of the discussion, what exactly are you going to give me doc?
Right. Or in the consent process, you know, business, if you make a transaction, there's a cooling off period, maybe it's a week or ten days, this type of thing. I think originally MAID was supposed to have a ten day reassessment to get a new consent on you. In other words, the MAID doctor who talked to you and you were in agreeable to do it again should come back in about ten days or so. And so are you still in agreement with this?
I think that was original intent, and if so, should be the intent. What I'm hearing now is that people get made it off the same day.
Speaker 0: I was going to ask you about that. I saw something right before we were going to shoot the show, and I'm like, day now. People were warning years ago, this made thing is not going to stop at that small group of people that I think should have the right to say it's time to go. Suffering when you're elderly is not fun. But it is expanding and now all these things they assured us of, now you can do it if you're depressed, even if you're only 18 and they want to push it to younger.
We'll see that will probably happen as Canada's economy starts to collapse even more. And so, yeah, this is an awful slippery slope. And you were telling your friend that you can't guarantee if she chooses MAiD that she won't actually suffer. And it can be up to a couple of hours of being paralyzed and you are suffering.
Speaker 1: You know, we're all going to die once, right? And so a very small number of people who have died have come back to report on their experience of dying. I'd yet to hear a bad experience. The reports I read about is that people think like, you know, it's suddenly a very peaceful thing. You can see everything around you and you're surrounded by love.
Right. And I hope that when we all go that it is our experience and so in a way does maid deny us that beautiful experience and so my friend who was very ill, I didn't want to really scare her with all these things, but in my own mind, it's like, well, you know, with these made drugs, now that I know what's really given, the anesthetic, you know, it probably won't cause pulmonary edema. And if you wake up during that, you will notice that you're probably hard, you're choking, you know, and you want to breathe, but you have received a paralyzing drug and you can't breathe. And instead of dying, and that's a beautiful experience, what if your last memory on earth is one of panic, you are drowning, I want to breathe, I can't breathe. And that is the memory you are going to take with you.
I have heard some reports of relatives or close friends of people who have died from MAID and they're not the same. It's like the dying person is sending them a message saying this is horrible, This is a horrible way to go. And so they get the message and they're changed. And so I've heard stories about this. One of my close friends, her sister died from this and she observed her sister dying from May and she said it was a, I won't use her exact words, but you know it was not a pleasant near revolting type of experience.
So I don't know that part. I mean, you're not given opioids. It's a reason why you no longer want to live is because of this terrible, terrible pain. They're going to put you asleep, but not necessarily take away your pain. Right?
And when it's possible that your pain wakes you up as you are dying, and then you realize you're choking and you can't breathe. Now what kind of a lasting memory is that?
Speaker 0: I agree. I think this MAID needs to be overhauled and really look at the way they're doing it, just from everything that you've reported. I'm so glad to be able to talk to an actual vascular surgeon about this instead of what everybody's saying on social media. And it takes a lot of guts for you to speak out against this because you're going up against, oh, I don't know, what do we call it? Canadian government, Health Canada, the doctors, the small group that are doing this that could come after you.
But I'm happy that you don't care about that Doctor. York.
Speaker 1: Well, I've got a few things going in my favor. I'm retired, thank goodness, I would say pretty much soon after I retired that's when MAID came into the hospitals and so I have personally never had to face that decision, know none of my patients ever come up to me requesting MAID, thank goodness, because I'm not sure how I would respond. I'd have to think about that very carefully, know, like I must have been doing something wrong. Yet the patient's actually asking that.
Speaker 0: I find it absolutely degrading all the elderly, and not even just the elderly, people who aren't asking for MAID. I find it so degrading that they continue to harass people. Do you want to die? Do you want to die? Do you want us to give you MAID?
Do you know how degrading that is to go home and have the government system that you paid taxes on and lived here forever to harass people about this? I just think our country has become extremely disgusting. Yeah,
Speaker 1: know, and it's it's happened quite quickly.
Speaker 2: Definitely
Speaker 1: five years, maybe the last ten years, but the last five years it's accelerated so quickly, right? That in a number of different ways.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And they said it wouldn't and that it was conspiracy theory that it would grow. And yet here we are. With our collapsing healthcare, I don't see it getting any better. Now I have your Substack up here.
I suggest everybody go follow you on Substack. It's called the
Speaker 1: Analytical scalpel.
Speaker 0: Yeah, the analytical scalpel, but the actual address I have here, yorksang.substack.com. You've written some great articles and given talks about how what Health Canada or health care in BC and all the different provinces. I think you were talking about BC, what they're trying to do to fix the problem. You do not see all their resolutions of how they can fix healthcare. You don't see that it's going to work and you see it getting worse.
Your sub stack's excellent for giving a whole outlook on the fact that this is a gong show, what's happened to BC, and you just see things getting worse. If people want to follow you, you're updating. You might write a book, maybe unmade. I'm going to show an image here of a book you've already written that you can get on amazon.ca. If people want to go and take a look at that, the name is Audible Bleeding, Medicine and A Vascular Surgeon's Perspective.
Actually, me read out this paragraph here. The book chronicles the development of vascular surgery in Vancouver, Canada from 1976 to 2020 in parallel with the haemorrhaging of healthcare in Canada, from short sighted government attempts to regulate the number of doctors, closure of nursing schools, restriction of or time suppression of a nationwide patient pay health plan, and the rise of hospital administration. These changes have led to serious deficiencies in doctors, nurses, and efficient access to necessary tests and surgeries. Written in easy to understand language, this book is for readers wanting to know more about the newest surgical specialty and for those wanting a behind the scene look into the myriad of problems of healthcare in Canada. So I appreciate you coming on, and we'll see what happens with this MAID thing.
I hope that it'll open up discussion for doctors to maybe look at a different way that they could do this and go back to more palliative care.
Speaker 1: Much appreciated.
Speaker 0: Thank you so much for tuning in. I will see you guys at the next one.
Speaker 1: Take care. Bye now.
Speaker 4: Did you know if the banks do a bail in, they can take the contents in your bank vault? But storing your gold and silver at home could be a huge security risk. Every day our dollar is worth less and less. Inflation is stealing the only savings families have. Now more than ever, it's so important to hedge the savings you've worked so hard for.
Banks have been failing all over the world and social credit has all but arrived. But did you know you can do wholesale price vaulting and retail delivery from the most prestigious, reliable company in Canada? Did you also know if you decide to leave Canada, your gold and silver can be sent right to you after you arrive to your destination? The only company I personally use and trust are those awake guys at New World Precious Metals. Take control of your family's future.
You can just click the link in my show description or type in the web address libertytalkcanada.cagold to get on their mailing list, attend their webinar, or book an appointment. Let them know Odessa sent you.
@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺
Just in: The IRGC announced that 25 US invader terrorists were killed and wounded in the Naval Force strike against a gathering of US officers and trainers in the UAE. Iranian continues to attack US assets in UAE with various missiles and drones. The Iranian Army announced downing a US LUCAS drone using a surface-to-air missile system over Kharg Island! West Texas Intermediate futures jump to over $115 a barrel. All this winning. Trust the plan! Trump’s meltdown continues.
@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺
Iran war coverage, day 37! Iranian media reported that US forces have carried out strikes in southwestern Iran, targeting areas where a missing American pilot might be. The reports suggest the strikes may be an attempt to eliminate the pilot after failing to locate them. A military source cited by Tasnim News Agency said authorities will not confirm whether the pilot is in their custody. NOTE: The Trump regime has provided no evidence of the alleged rescued pilot. Iran has captured more American terrorist invaders! Iran claims over 50 U.S. Delta Force members along with advanced weapons were captured in the Strait of Hormuz, warning “Iran is not Venezuela and America is making the same mistake again.” The US and its allies continue military efforts to reopen the strait after its closure in response to the air campaign, while Trump puts out bogus deadlines to distract his audience and manipulate markets. Iran isn’t falling for it. Meanwhile, NYT: Patriot missiles in Bahrain and the UAE are on the verge of depletion. A report by the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA), a Washington-based research organization, estimated that the UAE and Bahrain have consumed more than three-quarters of their stockpile of Patriot PAC-3 missiles; these missiles are one of the most important defense systems in the arsenals of these two countries. This report is based on an analysis of each country's pre-war inventory and the rate of consumption of potential intercept missiles since the start of the conflict. Total fail on trying to forcibly open the SOH!
Video Transcript AI Summary
At the border, two against one, they spoke of peace with the sound of guns. They pushed him back, thought it was done, walked away thinking they already won. He stood back up, walked to the water, not as a soldier, not as a bomber. He looked at the world and closed the gate. Now every country has to wait. Ships in line where nations wait. Energy crisis, high inflation rate. Europe nervous, Middle East stuck. Asia silent. America out of luck. Then one man skipped a line. Didn't argue, didn't fight. Why you argue? I make deals, trade routes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. They came to the border, two against one, talking about peace with the sound of guns. They pushed him back, they thought it was done. Walked away thinking, they already won. He stood back up, walked to the water, not as a soldier, not as a bomber.
He looked at the world and closed the gate. Now every country has to wait. Ships in line where nations wait. Energy crisis, high inflation rate. Europe nervous, Middle East stuck.
Asia silent. America out of luck. Then one man skipped a line. Didn't argue, didn't fight. Why you argue?
I make deals, trade routes
@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺
Trump’s Epstein coalition caught lying bigley again! More humiliation and shame! There’s a mass grave site of American aircrafts and American terrorist invaders in Isfahan! No rescue! Just lies, billions in damage and kosher spin. Iran has released images of the first US C-130 https://t.co/Tiu5VfuWNI
@QuantumGuard17 - QUANTUM GUARD ™️
🚨 IT’S OFFICIAL: The leftist agitators are paid and got CAUGHT packing up all their equipment after clocking out of their designated protest time David Khait got the entire thing on video and they’re furious It’s COMMUNIST DOLLARS! https://t.co/NzMRt3UBPP
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that spontaneous protests—those that appear immediately after an event—are not organic or spontaneous in the sense of arising without planning. Instead, they are described as being planned and coordinated in advance. As the speaker notes, what is happening behind them involves people loading their trucks to depart after the protest, indicating that the action is organized and time-bound rather than a casual, impromptu gathering.
The speaker identifies the organizations involved in these protests, listing a coalition that includes the Party for Socialism and Liberation, the Democrat Socialists of America, and a few smaller, loosely connected groups such as Revolutionary Communists for America. The implication is that a network of leftist and socialist organizations collaborates to stage protests, suggesting a broader structure behind what might appear as spontaneous demonstrations.
A central claim presented is that these protests, which are often visible right after a triggering event, owe their existence to organization and coordination rather than being independent, grassroots activities. The speaker emphasizes that because they are well organized, these protests are also well funded. The funding, according to the speaker, comes from various campaigns, including possible foreign influence campaigns and Democratic campaigns. This point is presented as a causal factor in how quickly and effectively protests can be mounted in response to events.
In summary, the speaker portrays a view of contemporary protests as the product of deliberate organization and financial support from multiple sources, rather than isolated, spontaneous expressions. The behind-the-scenes activity—such as loading trucks to leave after the protest—serves to illustrate the planned nature of these demonstrations. The presence of the named organizations (Party for Socialism and Liberation, Democrat Socialists of America, and Revolutionary Communists for America) is highlighted as indicative of a coordinated network contributing to the protests.
The speaker’s overarching assertion is that the rapid mobilization of protests following events is enabled by these organized networks and funding streams, which shape the way demonstrations unfold and are sustained in the immediate aftermath.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you've ever wondered how protests happened on the spot, this is exactly how. Without organizers, without the music, without the bullhorns, without all of these people coming together, right now what they're doing is they're loading their trucks to leave out of here after they finish with the protest. None of the protests that you see that happen immediately after something happens, which is all the time now, wouldn't be possible. What's behind me is a combination of party for socialism and liberation. We have Democrat Socialists of America here as well, and a couple very loose communist organizations like Revolutionary Communists for America.
None of the protests that you see are organic. They're well organized. And because they're well organized, that means they're well funded through various campaigns, whether it's foreign influence campaigns or it could be even Democrat campaigns. So this is how it all happens.
reSee.it AI Summary
I reference a 2020 video from a dissident in Xinjiang about Uyghur detention camps, who fled China and was granted asylum. Verified by NPR, BBC, The Guardian, Human Rights Watch, and the UN. Claims: over 1 million detained, forced labor, mass surveillance. Documented by credible rights groups. Liberal MP Michael Ma called testimony “hearsay,” questioned if she’d witnessed it, implying access is impossible. Who does Michael Ma work for?
@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya
🚨 Watch this video This is real footage of a Uyghur detention facility in Xinjiang, China. Filmed in 2020 by a brave dissident who risked his life to get this on camera. He had to flee China afterward and was granted asylum. Verified by NPR, BBC, The Guardian, Human Rights Watch, and the UN. Over 1 million Uyghurs detained. Forced labour. Mass surveillance. Documented by every credible human rights organization on earth. Liberal MP Michael Ma called testimony about this “hearsay” yesterday. He asked the expert if she’d personally witnessed it. As if China would let anyone near these camps. This is what he denies. Downplays. And defends. Who does Michael Ma work for?
reSee.it AI Summary
There were 10 seconds cut from Mark Cook’s testimony before the Georgia House; the recovered audio claims, “Democrats are rigging our elections with electronic voting machines.”
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
RECOVERED 🚨 There was 10 seconds that were cut from Election Expert Mark Cook’s witness testimony in front of the Georgia House of Representatives Very conveniently they cut out 10 seconds right in the middle of his sentence But the original audio has been recovered: Democrats are rigging our elections with electronic voting machines
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Cook, an election cybersecurity subject matter expert in threat assessment and common sense mitigation, introduces himself: he’s been working on elections nonstop for about six years and has forty years of IT industry experience. He states that he has evidence he hopes to show that there are backdoors built into electronic voting systems that allow flipping, changing of votes.
He references a demonstration clip, saying, “backdoors built in to electronic voting systems that allow flipping, changing of votes,” and notes that the testing labs miss this, leaving the systems blindly certified and supposedly safe. He highlights audio he believes was clipped from a recording, insisting that the content shows voting systems are vulnerable: “that allow flipping, changing of votes,” and that testing labs are blind to these issues. He says, “I can demonstrate this to you even while I'm still here in this building.”
Cook argues that there is a lack of government transparency, claiming, “the testing labs all miss this, then they're blindly certified, and then we're told, it's shut down our throats, that everything is safe and secure.” He describes the entire system as “built on a pyramid of lies,” and asserts that it must be stopped. He offers to educate and show problems, insisting he can do so, but emphasizes the need for a common-sense approach.
He emphasizes practicality and accessibility, arguing that the problem can be solved with straightforward methods: “We're literally filling dots out on paper. We're counting the dots, adding the dots up, and whoever has the most dots wins.” He calls for a change that keeps elections under the control of the people and avoids simply “kicking the can down the road.” He reiterates that the resolution is not complicated and frames the solution as a simple, transparent counting method using paper records rather than electronic manipulation.
In summary, Cook asserts the existence of covert backdoors in electronic voting systems, criticizes testing labs for blindly certifying these systems, condemns what he calls a “pyramid of lies,” and advocates a return to a basic, paper-driven, dot-counting approach where the person with the most dots wins, to restore public control over elections. He offers to provide demonstrations and education to support this view.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You. I appreciate it. My name is Mark Cook. I'm an election cybersecurity subject matter expert in threat assessment and common sense mitigation. I've been working on elections solid nonstop for about six years now.
Thank you. I have been working in the IT industry for forty years. I have intrinsic knowledge that would be really important for people to understand. I have evidence right here that I was hoping to show you that can show there are absolutely I know you guys have heard this, but I've got the proof right here. Backdoors built in to electronic voting systems that allow flipping, changing of votes.
So the testing labs What? Wow. Did you see that? I can't believe they did that. Did you hear that?
Yep. Watch it again and pay attention to the time in the upper right corner. That allow flipping, changing of votes. So the testing labs Can you believe that? Yes.
So much for government transparency, I guess. Well, how about we just put that audio right back where they clipped it out so everyone can hear it. Enjoy. That allow flipping, changing of votes Infiltrating the system, all built in, set up in a way that makes it easy and untraceable. I can demonstrate this to you even while I'm still here in this building.
I'm happy to do so. The testing labs all miss this, then they're blindly certified, and then we're told, it's shut down our throats, that everything is safe and secure. It's absolutely not. We're being lied to from the very top. The whole thing is built on a pyramid of lies, and we have to stop living these lies.
I will educate you. I can show you guys the problems. No issue. I'm happy to do so. But we have to approach this in a common sense form here.
We have to be smart about what we're doing. If we're gonna make a change, we need make a change that's actually gonna solve the problem and not kick the can down the road and, again, take the control of elections away from where elections belong, which is in the people's hands. Yep. And this is not complicated to solve. We're literally filling dots out on paper.
We're counting the dots, adding the dots up, and whoever has the most dots wins. That
@atmoio - Mo
The internet is dying https://t.co/lWo531T1Iq
@FurkanGozukara - Furkan Gözükara
Absolute bombshell. FBI files prove Epstein top recruiter Jean Luc Brunel offered to flip and expose the entire trafficking ring for immunity. The DOJ completely ignored him to protect the elites until he was found dead in a prison. https://t.co/baoeVNCw7P
@The_Astral_ - Astral🛸
Hollywood producer Brent Friedman says a Reagan-era official, John Herrington told him aliens are real, he’s seen them, and that he would cry himself to sleep every night over what he knew. 👀 https://t.co/THtnkmN3SY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recounts a formative encounter with a trusted family friend, John Harrington, who had become an influential figure close to the Reagan administration. Harrington, once a lawyer and a strict Calvinist, had been Reagan’s advanced man in the 1980 campaign. After Reagan’s election, Harrington received a special appointment and moved his family from the West Coast to the East Coast, living in Langley Farms, Virginia.
On a cross-country road trip for Harrington, the speaker and a couple of friends drove Harrington’s two cars and his dog, just after graduating high school in 1981 and preparing to attend UCLA. They witnessed Harrington’s status change: he returned home with a black Lincoln Town Car, a secret service escort, and a briefcase handcuffed to his wrist, signaling his high-ranking government role. At a family dinner, Harrington’s two daughters—whom the speaker had known growing up—reconnected with the speaker, turning the gathering into a family reunion.
During the evening, Harrington’s personality and state of mind stood out. Although he had been a man of high character, integrity, and personal restraint—non-drinker, non-swearer, in good physical shape—the speaker noticed Harrington looked haggard and emotionally burdened, drinking Jim Beam in the backyard as they talked. When the speaker asked about his new job, Harrington initially refused to elaborate, calling it classified. Eventually, he revealed that to obtain the position, he had to undergo months of briefings in an underground facility in West Virginia. After each briefing, Harrington would cry himself to sleep, a detail that shocked the speaker, who could not imagine such distress in someone they had looked up to.
Pressed further, Harrington explained something about the world he had entered into, including a reference to the speaker’s own childhood interests in science fiction and comics. He finally conveyed a startling line: “Aliens are real. They're here, and I've seen them.” This revelation underscored the weight and disillusionment Harrington felt about the world he believed he was helping to shape for his family. The speaker emphasizes the emotional impact of these disclosures, highlighting the juxtaposition between Harrington’s respectable public persona and the private, burdensome truths he carried.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very good family friend. Somebody that I looked up to, was a real role model for me. Had well, I guess he was he was advanced man for Reagan in his campaign in 1980. When Reagan got elected, he had a special appointment in the Reagan administration. And he had moved his family from the West Coast where we both grew up, to the East Coast and was living, in a place called Langley Farms, Virginia.
And he asked me and a couple friends to drive his two cars and his dog and some stuff they left in the garage across the country. Now I had just graduated from high school. This was 1981. I was about to go to UCLA. We had a crazy road trip.
I don't even know how we survived it. That's a whole different story. But when we got to his house, the first night that he came home from work, he arrived in a black Lincoln Town car with a whole kind of secret service escort and a briefcase handcuffed to his wrist. And I had never seen him in this capacity. He was a lawyer when I was growing up, a very successful lawyer.
But now he was being treated like a high ranking official in the government, which was both exciting and confusing to me. So cut to, we have dinner, everyone catches up. He has two daughters that I grew up with that were, a little younger than me. And it's like a family reunion for me because I haven't seen them in years. After dinner, he wants to just catch up with me.
So the two friends that I have, they're very interested in the two daughters, so they have And things to and this person, his name is John Harrington, and I go out onto the back veranda. And, you know, there was a couple really interesting things. You know, when when we were growing up, he was he was a strict Calvinist, if I remember. So, you know, he didn't drink. He didn't swear.
He he was he was a man of high character and integrity. And but he he was also really fit. And when I saw him, he looked he looked very haggard. He looked very rundown, like he was carrying a lot of weight emotionally. And he also brought bottle of of Jim Beam out to the backyard and and was pouring himself drinks as we were talking.
And I got the sense that this was a guy that, as I said, was burdened. Whatever he was doing was weighing heavily on him. So we start to talk, we catch up, and at some point I ask him, well, what is his new job? And he quickly explains he can't really say. It's classified.
He's working for the president. And I keep pushing, I keep pushing. And eventually he says, well, to get the job, I had to be briefed. I went and lived in an underground facility in West Virginia for a number of months. And every night, after they would brief me, would cry myself to sleep.
And yeah, and that line still haunts me because this is a man that I couldn't imagine crying once, let alone every night. And of course I said, well, why? I don't understand. What would cause you to cry yourself to sleep every night? And his response was really startling.
He said, this is not the world I thought I was bringing my daughters into. And again, I'm sure most people listening to this are older than 18, but when you're 18 years old and you hear those type of statements, there's no frame of reference. This is all very kind of staggering ideas. And so I pushed back and I said, well, okay, I need to know something because I'm like a son to you, aren't I? Well, what is this world that I've been brought into?
I need some answers. So I pushed and I pushed and eventually he hit on something interesting. He said, you know, when you were growing up, I remember you were into science fiction and comic books and stuff. And so I can tell you one thing. Aliens are real.
They're here, and I've seen them.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets
They all must pay for this. This can not be forgotten or forgiven https://t.co/VnlrRGwMm8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 notes a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity.
Speaker 1 says their own government told them a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.
Speaker 2 states they have lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuine for the best interests of Canadians.
Speaker 1 says doctors made extra money to push vaccines and were given a billing code to do it, and she has pulled all the billing codes.
Speaker 3 asserts they’ve purchased the vaccine that hasn’t been approved and distributed it to the provinces, so the second it’s approved they can start jabbing themselves and pregnant mothers with it.
Speaker 4 asks why vaccinations were necessary, noting that when going to the hospital for birth, you expect to go home, and then you don’t.
Speaker 0 suspects criminal negligence by the government and public health officials.
Speaker 2 agrees, saying “Possible.”
Speaker 0 contends they pushed a narrative to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective.
Speaker 2 recalls wiretapping, harassment, and charges, and that they didn’t allow any expert witnesses to testify.
Speaker 1 says Canadian babies died, and police are trying to cover it up by stopping detective Helen Graves from testifying about it.
Speaker 3 comments that dominant individuals maintain subordinates’ place through constant aggression.
Speaker 5 argues that choosing not to vaccinate is one thing, but being unable to fly or ride trains with vaccinated people and thus putting them at risk is another issue.
Speaker 2 says CBC started with a story to implicate her and paint her in an uncomplimentary light to the public.
Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of CBC, describing it as a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.
Speaker 3 declares this is the most significant health matter affecting children today, and they are still not investigating.
Speaker 2 asserts that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, and how they work together and censored information; all of it ties to this one case, making it dangerous.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Something's up. We've had a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year. And that's what got my curiosity piqued.
Speaker 1: Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.
Speaker 2: I have lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuine for the best interests of Canadians.
Speaker 1: Doctors made extra money to push vaccines, and they were given a billing code to do it. I have pulled all the billing codes.
Speaker 3: They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved. They've distributed it to the provinces. So the second it's approved, we can start jabbing ourselves with it. We can start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.
Speaker 4: Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.
Speaker 0: I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.
Speaker 2: Possible.
Speaker 0: They pushed on with this narrative to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and
Speaker 2: effective. They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.
Speaker 1: Our Canadian babies died, and the police are trying to cover it up to the point of stopping detective Helen Graves from testifying about it.
Speaker 3: The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.
Speaker 5: If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk.
Speaker 2: It started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.
Speaker 6: Canada has to shift their understanding of what the CBC is. It is a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.
Speaker 3: This is the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective, and they're still
Speaker 2: not investigating. Everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, our health agencies, how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.
@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸
Mayor Mamdani’s homophobic, racist terrorist-sympathizing wife, who recently got exposed called black people ni***rs and gay people f**s, has shut down her 𝕏 account. https://t.co/i8lTuH0HcR
@RealSpitfire - Spitfire
Mamdani’s wife deactivated her X acct. Imagine THAT! Good thing people got screenshots!😎 https://t.co/13X8LWqO7Z
reSee.it AI Summary
I published a study claiming vaccinated children were 500% more ill, then my attorney called to say my license was suspended. I studied over 3,000 kids and showed unvaccinated children were healthier than vaccinated ones.
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
“I published a study proving that vaccinated children were 500% more ill…and then I got a call from my attorney saying that my licence was suspended” Dr. Paul Thomas studied more than 3,000 children and proved that unvaccinated children were healthier than vaccinated children. https://t.co/ZGBgJUWPaB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker described observing a growing trend of patients choosing not to vaccinate over the next decade and sought to determine if he could prove differences. He collected data from his practice, examining every baby born there, and published the findings in an international journal of public health. The study, described as peer reviewed and robust, reported massive increases in several health outcomes among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated, including four to five hundred percent more allergies, autoimmune conditions, and neurodevelopmental issues, as well as infections of all kinds.
Following the online publication of the study, he received a call from his attorney instructing him not to see any patients, not to write any prescriptions, and not to enter the office. He was told, “Your license has been emergently suspended. You are a threat to public health.” He stated, “Today is the last time I will be doing clinical medicine in Oregon.” He added, “Knowing that you guys are keeping it going, the heart of this place lives on.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And over the next decade, as more and more patients chose not to vaccinate, I got to see the difference. But I wanted to see, could I prove it? So we got all the data from my practice. We looked at every baby born into my practice and published it in an international journal of public health. What we found, and that study was peer reviewed, it was robust, we found massive increases.
I mean, we're talking four to five hundred percent more, allergies, autoimmune conditions, neurodevelopmental issues, and then we had infections of all kinds, massively increased in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. What happened when I published that study? Within days of it being available online, I get a call from my attorney, Don't go see any patients. Don't write any prescriptions. Don't go into the office.
Your license has been emergently suspended. You are a threat to public health. What's today? Today is the last time I will be doing clinical medicine in Oregon. Knowing that you guys are keeping it going, the heart of this place lives on.
@_Gr0yper - Basict (unreasonable ark)🔻☦️👑
@MarsNAO @Teacrumpets @TonyLaneNV @THATSWHATSHESAI You need to be thrown into a labor reeducation camp you dumb fickle low iq easily amused retard.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell ™
This was powerful. Did it open your eyes or change your mindset at all? https://t.co/oGj6MTR0If
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript captures a street debate outside King’s College London about Iran, Palestine, and Western responses, with participants expressing strong, divergent views on who is responsible for regional violence and how Western attitudes shape perception.
Key points and claims:
- Speaker 1 asserts that the Islamic Republic funds Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, framing Iran as the root of several regional conflicts and describing these groups as terrorists, not resistance movements. They argue removing the Islamic Republic would lead to a more peaceful Middle East for both Iranians and Palestinians.
- Speaker 2 largely concedes Palestine as the primary concern but admits uncertainty about the specifics of Iran-related issues, indicating a lack of clarity about the Iran-Palestine dynamic.
- A recurring line is that Iran’s repression of protests at home is severe: “the Islamic Republic killed 50,000 innocent Iranian people” during protests, and yet there has been no equivalent Western or global outcry on Iran compared to Gaza/Palestine.
- There is commentary on Western extremism perceived as anti-Western and anti-Israel, with some participants arguing that the West has been fed narratives via social media about imperialism and Western interference, influencing public opinion against Western powers.
- The discussion touches on the Iranian government’s tactics: internet blackouts have been used to control information, though some participants claim openness has improved; others suggest the regime is untying protests and that many people are ill-educated about Palestine.
- There is a claim that after the 1979 Revolution, Iran’s fall precipitated a radical shift in the region, with the West experiencing radicalization due to demographic changes and funding from Iran and Qatar to anti-West and anti-Israel sentiments in universities.
- The dialogue includes a proposition that the “unholy marriage of Marxism and Islamism” complicates political alignments, with some participants arguing that both the West and Muslim-majority contexts influence radicalization and protest dynamics.
- The speakers argue that the left should focus on Iran, believing that a peaceful Iran would dry up funding to Hamas, the Houthis, and Hezbollah, thereby reducing wars and supporting Palestinians.
- Overall, the speakers emphasize hypocrisy in international reactions: Western silence on Iran’s internal oppression contrasts with intense attention to Palestinian issues, and they urge a broader, more consistent critique of Iran’s leadership and its regional impact.
Notable concluding sentiment:
- The discussion ends with a sense of shared concern about conflict in the region and a desire for peace and prosperity that would result from addressing Iran’s governance, which some participants equate with ending the Islamic Republic’s influence in funding militant groups. The exchange closes with thanks to Muhammad, signaling an informal but resolved wrap to the conversation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They will kill you all. It's the
Speaker 1: Islamic Republic. They're funding Hamas. They're funding Hezbollah. They're funding Houthis. Really?
Speaker 2: I'm gonna cut here. Can't have a good faith debate about this.
Speaker 1: I'm outside King's College in London, and we're debating people on why are you silent on Iran when he was protesting for Palestine. I think there is a big hypocrisy, so I'm debating people just to figure out why that is. Pro Palestine or for Israel?
Speaker 2: Obviously, for Palestine. Israel have evil.
Speaker 1: Okay. Why?
Speaker 2: I don't even, like, exactly know what's going on. I don't know that.
Speaker 1: In three weeks, the Islamic Republic killed 50,000 innocent Iranian people that were just protesting because they're unhappy with the government. They're unhappy with being oppressed. Yet not a single protest. Why do you think people were so loud on Palestine or so silent on Iran?
Speaker 2: A lot of factors. Can I think
Speaker 1: for a second? There's not much of a Korean vision as to what they want in Iran. First of
Speaker 0: all, the Internet blackout.
Speaker 1: But they have seen it now. They have. The Internet has been open.
Speaker 3: I actually think that the Iranian government is unzying many of the protests Yeah. On Palestine.
Speaker 1: I agree.
Speaker 3: I think that many of them are ill educated on it.
Speaker 0: People see the overthrowing of Khomeini is taking Israel, US, UK side, which people don't like because they like to be very anti western.
Speaker 1: So why do you think people in the West want to be anti western? That's a bit strange.
Speaker 0: People have been fed certain things from their friends and from social media, and they've been told what the West does is imperialism, colonialism, and goes and wrecks other countries.
Speaker 1: Islamic Republic, they're the biggest instability in the world.
Speaker 2: I do disagree fundamentally about can you just repeat what you were saying?
Speaker 1: It's the Islamic Republic that's funding Hamas. They're funding Hezbollah. They're funding Houthis, calling them resistance groups, but in reality, they're terrorists. And trust me, I lived under the Islamic Republic. I know.
They've taken over our country, and I just feel so sad that the international community, especially university campuses, don't see this. If you get rid of the Islamic Republic, then you will have a much more peaceful Middle East, both for Iranians and for Palestinians. So I don't think Israel is a problem.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna cut here. I'm I'm can't have a good faith debate about this. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: But it's true.
Speaker 0: I feel it's a bit unfair to pinpoint it on a religion.
Speaker 1: If you actually study the Quran, Islamic conquest, and if you study Islamic countries, you realize that even Islam mixes with politics, it could be very dangerous. That's why we have so many Muslims moving to Christian countries, but not a lot of Christians moving to Muslim countries.
Speaker 0: It's fair to say the same on on Jewish.
Speaker 1: I have to disagree with you.
Speaker 3: You mentioned that there is radicalism in the West. How do we root out the radicalism?
Speaker 1: I think after the nineteen seventy nine revolution, you can see when Iran fell, the whole Middle East stuck. So we had a radical increase in Islamic terrorism, terrorist groups. Right. We had an exodus of 10,000,000 Iranians leaving. I think the West is becoming radicalized because you have tens of millions of people moving from Middle East to Europe and America, which naturally just changes the demographic.
And, obviously, in between those people, you're gonna have a lot of radicals. And I think there's also a concentrated effort by the Islamic Republic, by Qatar to fund anti West sentiments, anti Israel sentiment in universities because they want to make Israel the bad guys, so they deflect responsibility from themselves to Israel.
Speaker 0: It's awful. It now seems to drive everything. The communist stand over there, which is basically telling us that this country is awful. Capitalism is awful.
Speaker 1: And we
Speaker 0: should essentially destroy all of that for the sake of, you know, what?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think it's always the unholy marriage of Marxism and Islamism.
Speaker 0: It's one of those insane combos when the Islamic Republic actually came to power. The socialists were actually ended up being kidnapped and and killed.
Speaker 1: Killed. Yeah.
Speaker 0: After their kind of part joint partnership with, you know, Islamists. Yeah. Yeah. You guys only work together because you hate the West. Yeah.
Yeah. As soon as they take power like they did in Iran, they will kill you all. So that's what they did, and that's what they're going to do again. Really?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Majority of Iranians want Islamic Republic on, and they've realized they can't do it by themselves. Iran has been in a war for the last forty seven years with the Islamic Republic, and they've literally killed millions of Iranians at this point. And I think there is this big hypocrisy in the world, and we need to correct this information. And the only reason why I speak about Israel so much is because I say, at this core, it's a religious war.
They don't say a word about Muslim overlords killing their own people. I agree with you a thousand percent.
Speaker 0: I agree with you 100%. I'm on the Islamic Republic gone.
Speaker 1: What do you think the leftist, like, should be protesting for positively in Iran? Look. We all want peace and prosperity, and that can only happen with the Islamic Republic Of Iran because that would dry out the funding to Hamas, Bolan, Houthis, which by extension would mean, usually, it's not gonna be in a war every two years Mhmm. Which would then mean peace for the Palestinians. Okay.
Thank you very much. Thank you so much, Muhammad. Cheers. Likewise.
reSee.it AI Summary
Arrests are coming one way or another; God will not be mocked. James O’Keefe says starting tomorrow things will change, I’m not alone— a shoe will drop every single day. I’m here for it all. LFG.
@ninoboxer - David Nino Rodriguez
THE GREAT EXPOSING IS NOW! Arrests are going to happen one way or another. God will not be mocked. Project Veritas founder @JamesOKeefeIII revealed on X today: “Starting Tomorrow, things are going to change. I am not alone on this one. A shoe will drop every single day.” I’m here for it all. LFG!!!! 🔥🔥🔥
@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
🚨BREAKING: ALL major artificial intelligence systems — SuperGrok, ChatGPT-5, and Google Gemini — independently concluded that VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM after analyzing our landmark 82-page study. The 30-year lie that “vaccines don’t cause autism” has officially been TERMINATED.
reSee.it AI Summary
I expose the full 40 minutes my crew and I spent revealing California fraud; Minnesota was big, but California is bigger. We uncovered over $170,000,000 in fraud as fraudsters live in luxury with no consequences. We all work hard and pay too much in taxes for this to continue. These fraudsters have defrauded American taxpayers for years without pushback. It’s time to expose it all and end America’s fraud crisis.
@nickshirleyy - Nick shirley
🚨 Here is the full 40 minutes of my crew and I exposing California fraud, Minnesota was big but California is even bigger... We uncovered over $170,000,000 in fraud as these fraudsters live in luxury with no consequences. Like it and share it, the fraud must STOP. We ALL work way too hard and pay too much in taxes for this to be happening. These fraudsters have been able to defraud American taxpayers for years without any pushback from the public and politicians. It is time to EXPOSE IT ALL and end America's fraud crisis.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents a long-form exposé-style investigation into what the speakers describe as widespread fraud in California’s caregiving sectors, focusing on hospice, home health care, and daycares, with emphasis on Los Angeles and Van Nuys.
- Opening claim and context:
- Speaker 0 asks why there is a thousand percent increase in hospice care in Los Angeles and whether paperwork exists to enroll a child named Joey. They claim California has the largest fraud risk, with Medi-Cal spending rising from 2022 to 2026 (from $108 billion to a proposed $222 billion) while population growth hasn’t matched spending growth. They allege “one out of every $10 of home health care in America is spent in Los Angeles.” They argue government-funded daycare programs are “filled with violations,” and that fraud could be “hundreds of billions of dollars.”
- Daycare fraud focus:
- The video claims daycares are used to receive government money (CalWORKS) by enrolling children on paper while not having real enrollments. They show various locations and describe conditions as suspicious or unsafe (graffiti, boarded-up buildings, dumpsters, a homeless person near a daycare).
- Medina Learning Center is described as “now enrolling,” with “as their backup facility, the UMI Learning Center,” which was “convicted in federal court in 2024 of having a 150 ghost kids.” They seek paperwork to enroll a child named Joey.
- Hayden Sarah Family Child Care is described as having “14 children enrolled” per state records but “zero present” when inspectors arrived; the facility roster and missing children records are cited as violations.
- Jama Shukri Family Childcare is described as a daycare located in an apartment building (one-bedroom, eight capacity) with two children outside and no adult visible, raising concerns about supervision.
- The video notes California allocates $6 billion to childcare, “over 39,000 facilities,” with a state audit error rate of 1.6%, and conservative estimates suggest “upwards of a $100,000,000 in fraud lost each and every single year.”
- A recurring theme is “shell registrations” and unregistered CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) entities; seven of the four entities shown have “zero SMS data,” implying shell companies or fraud networks possibly connected to Armenian/Russian gangs.
- Hospice and home health care fraud focus:
- The group shifts to Van Nuys, California, claiming “home health care and hospice fraud” is pervasive there; they assert “one out of every $10 that goes towards home health care in the United States goes to a business here in LA.” They visit numerous hospice centers in a single plaza, naming Gardens of Angels Hospice and Blossom Hospice as examples of high billing with few services performed (e.g., Gardens of Angels: “billed $4,800,000 per beneficiary,” “$5,807 per claim,” 28.6 claims per patient, only two codes). Blossom Hospice is described as “$3,400,000” billed with “$927 per claim,” again with only one code and minimal services.
- They claim “seven of the four entities have zero SMS data” and label some facilities as shell registrations; some locations appear “registering for hospice but not actually providing care,” with claims of “shell buildings” or storefronts that are empty or only used for billing.
- The video notes the presence of luxury cars at these sites (Mercedes, Teslas, BMWs, a Cybertruck) and references a pattern of wealthy vehicles associated with hospice sites, suggesting profits from taxpayers’ dollars.
- Miracle Healing Hospice is described as having billed $1,300,000 in 2023 with 38 beneficiaries: “$32,000 per beneficiary,” but the location was reported as an empty building when visited.
- The presenters also describe finding a location that “received $19,000,000” over the past years for Healthy Life Adult Daycare, yet the building appears dilapidated and shows no adults present during visits. Phone lines and mailboxes are reported as failing to provide information or contacts.
- Interviews and expert commentary:
- A professional in the medical industry is interviewed to explain how fraud could occur: someone could obtain a Medicare number and use it to bill Medicare for hospice services; fraudsters reportedly can open a hospice license without being a physician, then bill the system and receive payments quickly.
- The interview suggests Medicare numbers can be stolen or purchased; the speaker emphasizes that “anybody can get a hospice license,” and that the process enables easy billings to Medicare/Medicaid.
- A participant describes a trend of these facilities opening and billing, with the implication that people exploit the system for swift returns.
- Overall framing and conclusions presented:
- The speakers argue that there is a thousand percent increase in hospice openings in California, a surge in fraudulent activity across daycares and hospice/hom e health facilities, and that tax dollars are funding these entities with little-to-no accountability. They juxtapose luxury cars and upscale appearances with empty or non-operational facilities to illustrate alleged misappropriation of funds. They advocate scrutiny, data-backed investigation, and accountability for what they describe as widespread fraud affecting taxpayers and vulnerable populations.
- Closing sentiments:
- The narrative closes with a call to action against fraud, emphasizing the impact on ordinary Americans who face rising costs and debt, and claiming that exposing fraud is essential to protecting taxpayer dollars and national financial health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the sound of hospice money. Could you just answer the question, what's the need for a thousand percent increase in hospice care here inside of LA? Do you have the paperwork to enroll a little boy by the name of Joey?
Speaker 1: You don't know what's going on?
Speaker 0: Well, it says there's 14 children enrolled here on the state of California. That there is $6,000 per beneficiary. Can you give us any explanation? Where can we open a hospice at? Either Maybach just like you.
California may have the largest amount of fraud in the country as California is the state with the highest taxes and collects more money than any other state in America. It is filled with fraud. California's version of Medicaid called Medi Cal has more than doubled since 2022 from a $108,000,000,000 to a proposed 222,000,000,000 in 2026. Their population, however, has not grown exponentially. However, their spending has.
There has been a thousand percent increase in hospice care in the Los Angeles County. In fact, one out of every $10 of home health care in America is spent in Los Angeles. On top of that, their government funded day care programs are filled with violations. While they continue to give money to these fraudsters, it is estimated that the fraud in California could be in the hundreds of billions of dollars. In this video, we'll be going face to face with these fraudsters confronting them as they defraud the American taxpayer out of millions and billions of dollars as they live their lives in luxury driving around luxurious cars that cost more than a $100,000 that you actually paid for.
Let's start first by going to these daycares filled with violations that still continue to receive money from the government. So this is the location of the daycare. It's in the middle of this shopping plaza. A lot of the buildings are closed down or boarded up. They have been graffitied.
And then you also have just a big dumpster right here with all this garbage, and then the daycare is right there. We're gonna go in right now.
Speaker 1: We actually have a homeless person there too. Did you see that?
Speaker 0: There's actually somebody's sleeping here right now. Hello? You alright? Yeah. And so there is a homeless man who's sleeping right next to the daycare.
He's sleeping right here and the daycare is right there. This does not look like a place where you'd wanna bring your child's and it does not look suitable and set the code to be a place where children are enrolled. So they do have some children here. How many do they usually say they have or what's what's the story of the
Speaker 1: children? The last few visits from the
Speaker 2: state had said that they have 39 enrolled. And
Speaker 0: right now, we're seeing about five children. They are enrolling right now. It says Medina Learning Center is now enrolling. So let's see if little Joey can leer a little bit in here at Medina. Do you have the paperwork to enroll a little boy by the name of Joey?
Yes. We'd like to enroll little Joey in the daycare.
Speaker 2: They have as their backup facility, the UMI Learning Center,
Speaker 1: and the UMI Learning Center was convicted in federal court in 2024 of having a
Speaker 2: 150 ghost kids.
Speaker 1: So I wanna find out what the affiliation is and and why this facility is listed as the backup.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Can I get that paperwork to enroll a child?
Speaker 3: Yes. I can. I
Speaker 1: can. Great.
Speaker 0: So What do you think about daycares being used for fraudulent businesses to receive money from the government to say they're enrolling 39 children, 89 children, and for millions of dollars be going towards these facilities. What do you think about that as you do work in a daycare?
Speaker 3: No. It does happen. I've seen it, like, elsewhere. I've seen it. I've listening to the news.
So it does it does happen from time to time.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
Speaker 1: The card that they gave us, this is the licensee, the person who owns it.
Speaker 0: And that's so far been the only thing they've been able to give us as to how to enroll a child. Mhmm. And then the back corner of this parking lot appears to be the playground. Here's a bunch of garbage, and then right here appears to be the playground. Some strange things are happening outside this daycare.
Whether or not it's fraudulent, there is a lot of suspicious activity taking place. This right here is Hayden Sarah Family Child Care. This is a day care right here. Apparently, they have 14 children enrolled. Tell us a little bit more about this day care right here.
We're in the middle of the hills here in San Diego.
Speaker 2: So according to state records, when inspectors arrived here, there were 14 kids enrolled but zero present. And then this place was also cited for having missing children's records and also not having a facility roster.
Speaker 0: It's kinda weird that there's this daycare in the middle of a neighborhood. Hello?
Speaker 1: I I was naked. Okay?
Speaker 0: No. You're right.
Speaker 1: Oh. I can sue you. I was like, I wasn't dressed up. I'm Muslim.
Speaker 0: Either way, can we enroll a child into the daycare?
Speaker 1: You don't know what's going on.
Speaker 0: Well, they said there's 14 children enrolled here on the state of California. Alright. It says there's 14 children enrolled here.
Speaker 1: You don't care.
Speaker 0: I do care. Then where are the children? You don't care. Where where are the children at?
Speaker 1: It's drying up, Minnesota. You come here.
Speaker 0: Where are the children at? Where are the children at, ma'am? Alright. So what she's doing is she's making a video right now. She's send it out all to the like all the other day cares.
But at the end of the day, enrolled for 14 children, no children here, and this is from the state of California. We're not targeting Somalian population. We're just going after daycares. It just so happens to be that all the daycares, they are Somalian so far. Where are the children at, ma'am?
14 children. Would you like to make a statement as to where the children are?
Speaker 1: You don't care where is my children are?
Speaker 0: Ma'am, we would not be here if we weren't asking You
Speaker 1: don't care.
Speaker 0: What do you mean we don't care? This is why we're here.
Speaker 1: And don't call me. You don't care.
Speaker 0: This is why we're here to ask about these day cares.
Speaker 1: Who you are? Who you are?
Speaker 0: My name is Nick Shirley. You already know that.
Speaker 1: Nick Shirley. I know, but you a troubled man.
Speaker 0: How are you making trouble? You're causing trouble.
Speaker 1: Let me call 911.
Speaker 0: We just wanna know where the children are.
Speaker 1: No. I'm calling 911.
Speaker 0: For what? For you. For what? No.
Speaker 1: You come to
Speaker 0: my house. We haven't done anything.
Speaker 4: I don't know.
Speaker 0: The problem with these daycares is that they receive money through a program called CalWORKS, but as you see, there are no children actually there. These fraudsters are simply enrolling children on paper to receive government subsidies. Even after the state visits these daycares and confirms there are no children actually there, the government and the state continue to give these daycares money. Now let's go to another daycare. Once again, we have another daycare, but this daycare is right here inside of this home, and let's see if there's any children here.
They do say they have seven enrolled. The state has said that there is zero when they arrive. Is this Habooboo family childcare? Yeah. We're wondering if we if we could enroll a child into the daycare here.
Speaker 1: We know you you need to get up from here because there is fast passing. You see you see the sign me up fast passing?
Speaker 0: And can I speak with somebody on the sidewalk? We just like to speak with somebody. Yes, sir.
Speaker 4: Hide the sign, please.
Speaker 0: Yes. Come here. We're right here. Can we talk to you really quick, sir? Talk to you.
Talk to you. Are you Can talking I come talk to you, please? Alright. So right now, the current situation is we have some people yelling through the ring doorbell cam. A man came out, started started yelling.
And then we also have this car recording as well. But they just we just wanna ask them for some clarification for the American people.
Speaker 2: Four different visits, the state inspectors have shown up. There's kids enrolled anywhere from seven and seven kids and up, and every single time the state has showed up, zero.
Speaker 0: Zero children. That's state the of California. For some clarification. They won't even answer any of our questions. So essentially, a house just like this is receiving money from government subsidies without actually running a daycare.
Meanwhile, they get money from the government as they run their fake daycares. And now let's go to another one that's even more concerning as kids are left all alone. Now we're at the Jama Shukri family childcare. This place is not a shopping plaza. It's not anywhere near any place that looks like a place where a daycare would be.
In fact, it's actually in one of these apartments right here. So they're able to have daycares inside apartment buildings?
Speaker 2: Yes. So I've come across many of these. Some of these are on third the 3rd Story of an apartment complex. It's only one bedroom, and yet the capacity is for eight kids.
Speaker 0: We just arrived to the daycare. We have two kids out here. I don't know if they're members of the daycare. There's no one. There's no oversight right here.
Can we talk to your teacher? Is your teacher there? So this is the first child we've ever encountered at one of these daycares. There's two kids out here right now, and we're gonna see if we can talk to the
Speaker 2: Licensee. It is according to this paperwork Shukri Jamba.
Speaker 0: Can we talk to the adult?
Speaker 1: He is not here.
Speaker 0: Not here. Yeah. So you guys all by yourself? Yeah. No one's here.
Speaker 1: No one's here? One is not here.
Speaker 0: Okay. So you guys are all by yourself.
Speaker 1: Okay. I can see by myself.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay. That's concerning. No one's watching those children and they're all by themselves.
Speaker 2: My heart is breaking right now. I just I can't. Unbelievable.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And what makes you so emotional as a mother seeing that those kids are just out by themselves?
Speaker 2: Seeing the kids all by themselves. It's supposed to be a licensed daycare and there's no adult anywhere. What is going on?
Speaker 0: And the crazy thing is California allocates $6,000,000,000 to childcare and daycare facilities just like these, and there are over 39,000 facilities in the state. The California Department of Social Services even found an error rate of over 1.6% in their own audits. And to be very conservative, it is safe to say there's upwards of a $100,000,000 in fraud lost each and every single year. And now let's head over to where there's so much fraud, you're gonna lose your mind. Let's head over to Van Nuys where there is home health care and hospice fraud literally everywhere.
With the fraud here, California ranks the highest for Medicare, Medicaid, Medi Cal, whatever you want to call it. They spend the most amount of money per state. And here in LA, one out of every $10 that goes towards home health care in The United States goes to a business here in LA. Right now, we're in Van Nuys. This location has tons of hospice centers, home health care centers, and right now, we are going to Gardens of Angels Hospice.
They billed $4,800,000 per beneficiary. They charged $5,807 with 28.6 claims per patient and only two codes, means two services were provided. And inside of the same location, there's also Blossom Hospice, and they received $3,400,000 with $6,000 per beneficiary at $927 per claim, and only one code, which means they only provided one service. And it looks like there's about 15 more hospice centers inside this one plaza we're going to right now. We have all the information with us.
In some of these places, it doesn't even look like they've been registered with the CMS, which is the centers for Medicare and Medicaid. Seven of the four entities have zero SMS data, possibly shell registrations, shell companies. And it's rumored that these are Armenian Russian gangs, Armenian Russian mafia. So we're gonna be going in there, and we're just gonna ask them, what's the need for all this hospice? Is there that many people dying here in LA where they need to be spending millions and millions of dollars on this hospice care?
Alright. Right now, we're looking for a garden of angels hospice. All these buildings are all hospice centers. Let's see if we can find Garden of Angels. This is the Angels of Haven Hospice Care.
We have Angels of Valley Hospice. Hello. How are you? Good. Were looking for Guardian of Angels Hospice, but this one will probably do Angels of Valley Hospice.
We were wondering if we could get some information to check our grandma in the hospice.
Speaker 1: Your grandpa?
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Which hospice is she involved in?
Speaker 0: We would love to maybe see if it's possible to get her in here to Angels of Valley.
Speaker 1: We have to get a hospital
Speaker 3: referral. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Hospital referral. Okay. How many people do you guys have with with you guys? Irrelevant? Okay.
Speaker 4: Where are you guys from?
Speaker 0: Where am I from? Oh, I'm from here. We're just looking for a spot for our grandma.
Speaker 3: Yeah. No. No. We we're doing all
Speaker 1: the We only do refills for hospital.
Speaker 0: Okay. We
Speaker 1: all just walk in and take pictures.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Because we're seeing like, we got Garden of Angels, Blossom Hospice here. Okay. Well, we'll keep looking for guardian of angels then.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Don't know about guardian.
Speaker 0: So they say they only take it from hospitals which could be a valid response. Let's go see if we can find guardian of angels. This place is just filled with hospice centers and home health care centers. You have one right here, seven star home health care, and then up here you have Miracle Healing Hospice. So this hospice location, Miracle Healing Hospice, in 2023, they charged $1,300,000, and per beneficiary, it was $32,000 for 38 beneficiaries.
Per beneficiary, that comes out to $32,000 $935. Let's see if grandma could check herself into this one. I'm just trying to be a good grandson. Empty building. We were knocking the door.
No one's coming. We look inside the window. Empty building. In 2023, this place received $1,300,000. Piece of furniture.
Nothing. Insane.
Speaker 5: This is insane.
Speaker 0: Okay. Well, since we can't go to Miracle, let's see if we can get SX Home Health. Says they're open Monday through Friday from 09:30AM to 05:30PM.
Speaker 5: It's getting really hard to find grandma the health care she needs these days.
Speaker 0: It really is, isn't it? We got SX Home Health Care. They're not open, so it's alright because you can go to Alpha Omega, Ventana, Hospice Inc.
Speaker 5: Not only are these shell companies, these are shell buildings. It's like somebody took a motel building and turned it into a 100 fraudulent organizations. I don't know.
Speaker 0: We had a nice Mercedes down there. Two, three nice Mercedes down there. Three Tesla's.
Speaker 5: Even double as like a illegitimate car car lot. Like are are they are they selling a car right now?
Speaker 0: Grandma's not going to Alpha and Omega, so maybe she can go to Serene Touch Home Health Care. Oh. Says they're open Monday through Friday, 10AM to 4PM. It's 1PM right now. Let's see if they're higher.
Perfect. This one's open. Hello. And once again, it was completely empty and nobody was there. We went to the next door because it was another hospice.
Here we have another location. We got Saint Michelle HHCI Home Healthcare Inc. Hello? No one's here? Hello, sir.
Speaker 4: How can I help you?
Speaker 0: Yes. Well, we were originally looking for some hospice for our grandma, and then it turns out that all these locations are hospice and home health care locations. And a lot these
Speaker 4: I'm looking for hospice for who?
Speaker 0: Grandma.
Speaker 4: For doctor Oz?
Speaker 0: Yeah. For doctor Oz.
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 0: Yeah. For our grandma.
Speaker 4: Yeah? It'd be For grandma?
Speaker 0: It'd be pretty good.
Speaker 4: Tell us to take his grandma and go to the another buildings and find the hospice. You know? This is stupid. You can record me.
Speaker 0: Why can't record you?
Speaker 4: You cannot.
Speaker 0: Oh, okay. Well, Bert, we were looking for guardian of angels. Well,
Speaker 4: you see any guardian of angels on the doors?
Speaker 0: Nope. But they received and billed $4,800,000.
Speaker 4: Well, it's their problem.
Speaker 0: And but we do have yours actually. Mine? Yeah. Yours is a KMD,
Speaker 4: right? Yes.
Speaker 0: So we do have yours and a lot of
Speaker 4: these How many millions did I did?
Speaker 0: We don't have your official number because it wasn't posted on the CMS website or on their on their data set.
Speaker 4: And you're from where?
Speaker 0: My name is Nick Shirley. They actually made like all this information and the data public for everyone to see what was going on in our country because so much corruption is happening. Yes. But it doesn't look like we could find any of your information from the CMS data set, but we do have you here. So is that concerning that your information wasn't reported to CMS?
Speaker 4: What information?
Speaker 0: To the CMS data set as far as the billing and how much money you guys receive from Medicare and Med
Speaker 4: First you have to research.
Speaker 0: Oh, that's what we have right here.
Speaker 4: No. No. It's it's a piece of paper.
Speaker 0: Oh, well we did we went through we went through all the data If
Speaker 4: you want to learn, I'll teach you how to get after the crooked people.
Speaker 0: Okay. Help us. For you to help us.
Speaker 4: First, you have to research like you said the name and you have a number. Right?
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 4: Then you come to my office. It's a brand new office and you don't come to building like this like from like the FBI guys. Oh, we're gonna get the crooks.
Speaker 0: Okay. Well, can you tell us for instance, Miracle over there.
Speaker 4: Yeah. I don't give a fuck about the Miracle.
Speaker 0: Well, should because they're
Speaker 4: Why not?
Speaker 0: You should because they're making you people like you who have a real business apparently Mhmm. Getting a bad rap. Mhmm. You realize that right? For instance, they received $1,300,000
Speaker 4: You cannot a bad news report.
Speaker 0: There's nothing in there. Is completely empty. Dollars. You should You
Speaker 4: watch. What do you mean?
Speaker 0: If you're in this industry, I'd be pissed if someone was stealing money making me look bad if I they're in my industry.
Speaker 4: They don't look me bad because I'm not bad. You have anything against my agency, let's go.
Speaker 0: Well, were asking.
Speaker 4: Put my hands and
Speaker 0: Well, we're just asking you questions, sir. Like, we're how come Miracle Healing Hospice right there, they received $32,000 per beneficiary, yet their billing is completely empty. Call
Speaker 4: the FBI, Department of Justice.
Speaker 0: I'm just doing my job as a citizen to show people what's happening here in our country. Well, I'm doing a lot of money in taxes. A lot of it's just going towards fraud.
Speaker 4: Well, I'm very happy you're gonna cash the fraud people. Honestly.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Me too.
Speaker 4: It doesn't look like bad to me. It doesn't make me bad because some people are doing bad stuff.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So what's the need for a thousand percent increase in hospice here inside of LA in California?
Speaker 4: You're asking me?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Because you're in the industry, so we figured might as well ask you. You obviously found it was a good business to start. You just started yours. Right?
Speaker 4: I started my business 1997.
Speaker 0: Okay. Great. So How how come you're Sorry. How come you're seeing such an increase in hospice care here?
Speaker 3: Maybe I don't know if everybody likes the business. What could I say?
Speaker 4: I do this from 1997.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Good for you. And so Yeah. Since you've been in the industry for so long, why do you think we're seeing thousand percent increase in hospice care here inside of LA and in California?
Speaker 4: I cannot answer that question because
Speaker 0: Looks like they're all running out of here. Everyone's heading out. We just gotta ask some answer some questions. I'm like, can't
Speaker 4: Who's running out?
Speaker 0: What? Look at all the people scattering out of here. They were all here just a minute ago.
Speaker 5: It's strange, know. There's, you know, over 80 people connected to one of these dormant motel rooms with no furniture, and they are, you know, getting 30,000 per person, it's millions of dollars. We come and knock on the door, it's an abandoned shelf company
Speaker 4: I don't say it's right. And I don't care about those people.
Speaker 0: Could you just answer the question, what's the need for a thousand percent increase in hospice care here inside of LA? Inside of California? You're in the industry, sir. You you you've known it. You know you know better than me.
Speaker 4: No, I don't.
Speaker 0: You've been in it since 1997.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but I don't.
Speaker 0: So what's the need for an increase?
Speaker 4: Maybe there is lot of old people already. I don't know what to say.
Speaker 0: A lot of old people are dying.
Speaker 4: You listen to doctor Oz. Let me tell you like this.
Speaker 5: He's a good doctor.
Speaker 4: He's he's a he's a fraud. He he sell lot of medication online. One of them it's me. I bought
Speaker 0: Well his information comes straight from the federal government. So I trust his more than yours.
Speaker 4: So me finish it. I bought his pills. I gained weight.
Speaker 0: Well, you still look like you're pretty heavy, sir.
Speaker 5: Healthy to me.
Speaker 4: Because of doctor Oz.
Speaker 0: Oh, you're fat because of doctor Oz? Yes. Oh, really? Yeah. Sure.
Sir, how are doing? This guy doesn't think there's any fraud going on.
Speaker 4: First of all, not this guy. You have to respect me.
Speaker 0: What's your name?
Speaker 4: Doesn't matter.
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, this guy with no name. What? You don't think there's any fraud?
Speaker 4: My name. What's your name?
Speaker 0: My name is Nick Shirley.
Speaker 4: My name is John Boyajian.
Speaker 0: Okay. Great.
Speaker 4: There is a lot of fraud going on, but it's not me. I don't give a who does what.
Speaker 0: Yeah. We never said you were committing the fraud, sir.
Speaker 4: No. We're doing I'm I'm here. Right? Standing next to you.
Speaker 0: Do you know where Guardian of Angels Hospice is? I have no idea. No idea? Oh, Angels of Peace. Cool.
Hello. Well, can we just ask you guys some questions? We might be able to get Are you some you the head honcho here or what?
Speaker 4: No. You're the head honcho. Get get out of my from here. Give me my Wait.
Speaker 0: I thought you don't know who these people were though.
Speaker 4: Give me my phone.
Speaker 0: Alrighty. Light of angel Light angel.
Speaker 4: Come in.
Speaker 0: Oh, you you Oh, I'm running. I'm running. Look at him. What?
Speaker 4: I'm here.
Speaker 0: I'm right here. I'm right here, sir.
Speaker 4: I'm here.
Speaker 0: What's going on?
Speaker 4: Call 911.
Speaker 0: For what?
Speaker 4: Call 911.
Speaker 0: For what? Sir, we're just asking questions and if you wanna answer them, you can answer them.
Speaker 4: Call 911.
Speaker 0: We're just looking for guardian of angels.
Speaker 4: You We're trying to
Speaker 0: looking for guardian of angels. Kinds of hospice.
Speaker 4: You're you're American citizens. Right?
Speaker 0: Of course.
Speaker 4: Are you? Do you see any guardian of angels in here? Not yet. We're Get out of here.
Speaker 0: That's what we're looking for, sir. There's like a 100 doors. This is just one door.
Speaker 4: Okay. Get out of here then.
Speaker 0: What's your problem with us asking people about simple questions about where our tax dollars are going?
Speaker 4: I don't.
Speaker 0: We're asking questions about where our
Speaker 1: tax dollars
Speaker 0: are going at.
Speaker 4: You're not asking. You're harassing people.
Speaker 0: How are you harassing people?
Speaker 4: Two guys standing in here as a guard guardians, and you're harassing people.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Because people wanna kill me for exposing fraud here in The United States.
Speaker 4: Why? Why they wanna kill you?
Speaker 0: Fraudsters don't like being exposed. Why are you raising your voice if you have nothing to hide?
Speaker 4: You think I'm hiding?
Speaker 0: What are you so scared about me hanging around here for?
Speaker 4: I'm not scared. I'm telling you don't rush.
Speaker 0: You're shaking. Why are you shaking?
Speaker 4: Because I have a diabetes.
Speaker 0: Oh, okay. Great. Yeah. But so
Speaker 4: I need your full names.
Speaker 0: Oh, you want my full name? It's on the Internet.
Speaker 4: No. I I I don't go to Internet. I'm too old.
Speaker 0: Oh, okay. What's your full names? Sir, we're just asking you questions about
Speaker 4: What's your full names?
Speaker 0: Oh, we just want hospitals.
Speaker 4: Stay told to the Garden of Angels in this building. It's right here.
Speaker 5: To check-in my account.
Speaker 4: Go look for it, bro. You see
Speaker 0: That's what we're doing. That's what we're doing. You're getting mad at us.
Speaker 4: No. No. You can't find it. I can't find it.
Speaker 0: So are all Where
Speaker 5: is my grandma gonna go, man? They're taking the millions of dollars. I can't find the place, you know?
Speaker 4: Well, what's good can I say out
Speaker 0: of Okay?
Speaker 4: I know.
Speaker 0: Thank you, sir. Have a good day. So here in this parking lot, you do have some nice cars. You got a Tesla, a nice Mercedes, you got another Tesla, a nice Lexus, another Tesla, a really nice Mercedes right here as well, another Tesla, Audi. Really nice cars.
Speaker 5: A of Teslas.
Speaker 0: A lot of really nice cars for
Speaker 5: Hospice.
Speaker 0: For must be very lucrative because a lot of these businesses, these doors right here have nothing on them. All the blinds are turned out in places like Miracle up there. They have received $1,300,000, yet there's absolutely nothing inside. This is what you call welfare maxing. And right as you come out, you're welcomed by two nice BMWs.
One right here, one right here, and inside of there, have a whole plethora of Mercedes, Teslas, BMWs, you name it. But apparently, there's nothing fishy going on according to them. We then headed to the next hospice compound in search of Hospice of Caring Hearts, which billed $2,500,000. However, when we arrived, it was nowhere to be found, but there was a bunch of new hospices that popped up. So this is how crazy this hospice fraud is here inside of California.
You have all these businesses. They literally open up a business. They just put HFS Hospice Care Inc. They don't wanna do anything with the storefront. And then you have another one right here, Relief Home Healthcare.
Absolutely empty inside. And then you have another one, k h home health care. They're just popping up everywhere. So this isn't some random thing that's happening here inside of California and Los Angeles and this Van Nuys area. Quite literally, we've been to two locations so far and they're just popping up these home health care, these hospice centers, and they're not even doing anything to try and hide what they're doing.
It's 1PM right now. No one's working the front desk. Inside this location as well, You have absolutely nobody inside it. We're just wondering, we're coming through Van Nuys. Yeah.
How come there's so many of these home health care, these hospices that are popping up everywhere?
Speaker 3: I have no idea. No.
Speaker 0: What made you wanna start yours?
Speaker 3: This isn't mine. I just worked here.
Speaker 0: Okay. And how come you think there's such a sudden rise of all these hospices and home health cares?
Speaker 3: I have no idea, honestly.
Speaker 0: Pretty lucrative business? Or
Speaker 3: I wouldn't say, like, that's that crazy.
Speaker 0: Because there's a lot of them.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Know.
Speaker 0: The same building, but now on the back side you have Kinestero Care Hospice Inc, Studio Care Hospice Inc, El Primero Home Health Care right there, and if you're looking for a massage to take a break from the hospice or anything, you can come right up here and get some sort of massage. And this building right here is a perfect example of a dilapidated building that is now being used for a hospice, home health care, and adult day care. And this is the crazy thing that appears be happening here in California. You can just start your own hospice. You have Advent Hospice right here.
If you wanna start your own home health care, you can just put up a white piece of paper and stick a logo onto it and say that's your home health care company. If you wanna start an adult day care, you can just get a building like this and receive money from the government. That's the crazy thing is inside this one building, you have an adult day health care, you have a hospice, and then have a home health care center operating all in one location. And why are tax dollars going towards all of these buildings? And they're quite literally everywhere.
Everyone should be a bit suspicious about what's happening here. Inside of these parking lots too, you'll always find a super nice BMW, Mercedes, you name it, newest Audi's. You always find the nicest cars outside of these health care and hospice centers. We headed to the next suspicious hospice location, and what do we find? A brand new Mercedes.
Everywhere we go in this video, going around these hospice and home health care centers, there is a nice Mercedes or BMW. We have all day hospice care, health elect care, you have Edom hospice, La Carre Home Health, and even back here, this is just one floor inside this building. You have Santa Rita Hospice. I don't know what the need is for all these hospice centers, but for instance, All Day Hospice back there, they billed 3,100,000 and per beneficiary that was $6,000.24 claims per patient with only two codes which means two services and over 500 And they started billing in April 2023 and accumulated $3,100,000 in nineteen months. So maybe if you wanna get rich here inside The United States, come to LA.
Open up a hospice because there's a thousand percent increase in hospices opening up here inside of California, and you can go ahead and become a millionaire. Could you just answer, for instance, we have some information right here that there is $6,000 per beneficiary in 24 claims per patient, with only two codes. Can you give us any explanation? Okay. Yeah.
We just wanna make sure if you want anything to clarify. If you wanna clarify anything. No. Okay. For this video, we really do wanna give each and every single person the opportunity to answer just quite literally the facts.
All this information is coming straight from the public databases. If they refuse to answer simple questions about businesses they're operating, I think that says a lot about what's going on behind the scenes. Now we are here outside of Healthy Life Adult Daycare. This place over the past few years has billed $19,800,000 alone. Now, let's go see if I can enroll my grandma because she needs some daycare.
And this right here is the entrance of a building that's received over $19,000,000. So this is the location that's received over $19,000,000. Kinda crazy, right? They say that right here, right now we're here at 01:30. No adults are here.
I wouldn't doubt that adults do come, but $19,000,000.
Speaker 5: It's kinda like North Korea. It's like everything's set up, but there's no people. It's like, like, a show almost.
Speaker 1: No. Nobody's here already. You have to come back tomorrow.
Speaker 0: And can we get like a brochure to enroll our grandma into this location?
Speaker 1: I don't have anything.
Speaker 0: Can anyone give us a brochure?
Speaker 1: Angela, does somebody has information about here?
Speaker 0: Don't think it's enough to say it's fraudulent because you do see that it is operating. There were people working inside there, but the fact that there's just businesses like these popping around everywhere Absolutely. Absolutely. And this is what they look like outside of a location that receives $19,000,000 over the past few years. Yet, the building looks completely almost dismantled out here.
They're not coming here. Right? And look, all they have to say that they are the adult day health care is that sign that says a d h c. And there was some people working inside of it. We have the phone number right here.
Darren's gonna go ahead and give a phone call and see if somebody from inside answers. There are people inside right now. The phone's just ringing.
Speaker 1: You can leave a message after the tone. This mailbox is full.
Speaker 0: There you have it. They don't even have an inbox available to take in a voicemail. And another thing to take note of is Gavin Newsom right now in Polly Market. He is the leading nominee for the Democrats come 2028. All this fraud's taking place, all this waste is taking place, nobody really knows what's going on.
I mean, at this place. This adult daycare received $19,000,000, has billed the state of California over $19,000,000 over the past few years. This is all taking place here. So that is something to think about come 2028 with Gavin Newsom leading the Democrats right now on polymarket. The way these hospices are able to enroll these people and collect money from Medicare and Medi Cal here inside of California is they collect the Medicare numbers from individuals and then sign them up for hospice without them even knowing.
I actually went and spoke with a professional inside of the medical industry to get her opinion on how this all works. We're seeing all these hospices pop up here. Why is hospice and home health care such a booming business right now?
Speaker 6: I think it's become a trend of fraud. Honestly, it has like, I I I heard about this about five years ago during COVID that people were building hospices and selling them. It was like a business these people, made. So it's an easy, I think, easy way to bill Medicare with their people's beneficiary numbers that people can easily steal and even purchase and buy. They buy numbers from people and tell them, give me your Medicare beneficiary number, and I will give you something in return.
Speaker 0: And what does that mean, give you my beneficiary number?
Speaker 6: So there's an ID that you have. Medicare gives you Medicare is for anybody 65 and over. So they'll give you a a a Medicare ID number, and that number is used to bill Medicare.
Speaker 0: So essentially if they can get a number from somebody it's almost like getting a credit card number and then from there they can continue to bill and bill and bill and get that Medicare money.
Speaker 6: Exactly. It's actually more beneficial than finding a credit card these days. Anybody can get a hospice license actually. You don't need to be a physician. You don't need to be a doctor.
You can apply and get a hospice license in the state of California. They bill. They take the Medicare numbers. They bill Medicare. The Medicare sends them a check right away.
It's it's an easy process.
Speaker 0: So an old person might be a bit naive to giving somebody their Medicare number and without them even knowing that's more valuable than giving them their credit card number. Correct. In fact, in LA, there's locations that will teach you how to open up your own hospice center. So I went there with a potential business partner to try and become a multimillionaire in hospice. We know that hospice is a very lucrative business.
So I joined a business partner right here. His name is Darren, and we're here outside the Hospice Consultants, and we would like to start our own hospice today. We're just two young men who want to become millionaires here inside The United States and it seems like the only way to do it. Nowadays is by committing fraud. So we're gonna go in and see if we can start our own hospice.
Are you guys the hospice consultants? Yes. Oh, can we talk
Speaker 1: to you guys? About?
Speaker 0: Wanna open my hospice.
Speaker 1: You wanna open a hospice? Yeah. What was what was your name?
Speaker 0: My name is Nick. But I wanna open up a hospice.
Speaker 1: I understand but we don't take care of that.
Speaker 4: Can I
Speaker 0: get some information? Do you want a number? Yeah. Or give me a flyer or something. And this is the hospice consultant?
Speaker 1: Yes. No. We're not.
Speaker 0: We're We're We're
Speaker 1: not.
Speaker 0: Soaked to the bone right now. We were We're denied service by the potential fraudsters, and as we were leaving, one of the fraudsters started to leave from the back in a $200,000 Maybach. And we have a Mercedes Benz driving up. Where can we open a hospice at? We like to open up a hospice.
Get a Maybach just like you. So is this how I can get a Maybach by opening up my own hospice? Now after seeing all the wealth that is being created from these hospice centers, I headed back to the original location where we found over 15 hospices in one plaza. I wanted to make sure it wasn't a fluke that Armenian mafia members were running the show and that there weren't just randomly $100,000 cars the day I went by. And this time, it was even worse.
Sir. How are you? Good. What do you think about all this hospice fraud? Sir, you're you're in the cyber truck driving away, taking money from old people.
Yet he's just driving away in a cyber truck. Why don't you answer any questions? Let's see if we have another rich person as well that's getting rich off this This guy's leaving as well. So the two people that walked out of Holy Angels, they're in a brand new cyber truck and a new BMW. How lucrative of a business is hospice?
I'm seeing a cyber truck here in a nice BMW. It's good? Yeah. Because it looks like, for instance, Guardian of Angels, that used to be here, 4,800,000.0 they build the state of California. And how many clients do you guys have?
You have a badge? Do I need to answer your question? I'm just curious. I have a purse. It's not mine.
I just work. Yeah. You must be getting paid pretty well. Right? Bro, I'm just my parents, bro.
Do your parents run the hospice? They don't work. No. Is that the who's that guy in the cyber truck?
Speaker 3: He's my uncle.
Speaker 0: He's your uncle. So it's like a family business to own the hospice. But but why was he walking out
Speaker 1: of the
Speaker 0: hospice then too? Like these hospices, there's nothing inside of them.
Speaker 5: If not you guys, how come you're
Speaker 0: in the newest Yeah.
Speaker 5: BMW and the newest Cybertruck? Brother, because I I can only imagine what the guy
Speaker 0: is in charge of. Just all the other hospices? Do you like taking care of old people? Like, are you the one going out visiting the hospice patients, sir? Uh-oh.
He's gonna have to do another point and turn. Yeah. You got to remember fucking way, bro.
Speaker 3: You could
Speaker 0: just go that way. What's the key to opening up a hospice if I wanted to open up one? Because it's a you're in the family business of hospices. If I wanna open my own? What do you do for work here?
What do you do for work
Speaker 5: here? Why?
Speaker 0: Oh, we're just looking around. We're seeing all these hospices, we're just curious.
Speaker 4: Well, don't know, man.
Speaker 0: Word got out that I was inside of the plaza and all the fraudsters started hopping in their cars leaving the scene. Excuse me. Let's see if they can just answer our questions really quick. Hello. Can we ask you a quick question?
Driving out in a brand new m eight. They can't get out that easy. How can I get an m eight as well? Should I open up a hospice? Driving out in a brand new m eight BMW m eight competition.
Listen to this thing. This is the sound
Speaker 1: of hospice money.
Speaker 0: And this is the guy who said he's fat because of doctor Oz. His business is not open today. Seems like this mafia right here is naming all of their companies after the word angel. We have angels of valley hospice. We have angels of haven, angels of peace, light of angels.
Yet the BMWs, one right here, one right there, two brand new Mercedes over there. It just is unbelievable the amount of money that these people are making, and they're not even trying to hide it. Buying these luxury cars, each and every single person's wearing some sort of designer clothing as well. And this building looks like it used to be some sort of old motel that has turned into some cash grab, money grab for hospices here. Would you like to give any last statement about what's going on here?
Nothing? No. Because it seems like it was pretty good family business. Another guy just pulled out in the m eight competition. Good for men, bro.
Why are you guys pocket watching, bro? Leave the fucking people alone. Because this is taxpayers' dollars that are paying for all this stuff. With taxpayers dollars receiving money from Medicare, Medicaid, Medi Cal, you name it. And it just seems like a lot of you are getting rich off of I'm busy, bro.
I have work. The death of old people. What do you do for work here? Pro. Pro.
It's sad to think about it. Here in The United States, we're literally being defrauded by people who are taking advantage of old people, young people in day cares, disabled people with autism clinics, and no one's doing anything to stop it. So I think it's time we stand up to these fraudsters and tell them, and let them know, you are stealing from everyday American citizens. People can't afford homes. Rents are expensive.
Their insurance is expensive. Everything's getting more and more expensive. And if we don't crack down this fraud, national debt's gonna continue to keep continue going up. So just one of the factors affects the national debt, and we're gonna lose the value of our own dollars. So people, if they wanna really fight to keep America great, a great way to do it is by fighting fraud because this is just unbelievable.
You have people who drive around in BMWs, Mercedes. Meanwhile, everyday American citizens are struggling to be able to afford their own bills.
reSee.it AI Summary
I want blockchain for the federal government—full transparency, every dime tracked in real time on a public ledger. If we are sovereign and own the money, taxpayers deserve to see where every dollar goes, department by department, day by day. Bitcoin proves a tamper-proof ledger works globally; apply it to federal spending and waste won’t survive with an audience. The issue isn’t if we can do it, but if the spenders want you to see it.
@pooL_rM311_7221 - Mr Pool
Charlie Kirk wanted blockchain technology applied to the federal government. Full transparency. Every dime of spending tracked in real time on a public ledger. His framing was simple: "It is not the government's money. We are the sovereign. We earn the money and the government extracts it from us with our consent." If that's the relationship, then taxpayers have a right to see where every dollar goes. Day by day. Department by department. The technology already exists. Bitcoin proved a public, tamper-proof ledger works at global scale. Nobody can edit it after the fact. Nobody can hide a transaction. Apply that same infrastructure to federal spending and waste doesn't survive long. Nobody overspends when the ledger has an audience. The question was never whether we could do it. It's whether the people spending the money want you to see it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses a vision to transform government transparency and control over spending. The core goal is to blockchain the entire federal government, and to have every dime of federal spending online in real time, so there is day-by-day, month-by-month visibility into what the Department of Interior and Veterans Affairs (and other agencies) are spending money on. The speaker suggests there could be national security risks with such transparency, noting that some aspects could be “black box” or restricted, but asserts the ideal is real-time visibility into government spending.
The speaker argues that the public should know exactly how money is spent, asking concrete questions like what the Department of Interior is spending money on, and whether they are buying items such as “$50 hammers” or “$200 bandages.” The overarching point is that this is “our money” and “we are the sovereign,” because “we create the government,” we earn the money, and “the government extract it from us with our consent.” Therefore, there is a right to know where the money goes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The goal would be, we need to blockchain the entire federal government, put the entire federal government on blockchain. Then number two, every dime of federal spending online in real time. We should know what everybody is spending in real time, no different than a transparent federal database. Could that be a national security risk in any way? There are certain things you could black box for sure.
But like, I think that people deserve to know on a day by day, month by month basis, like, what is the Department of Interior spending? Like, are they go like, what is the depart what are the Veterans Affairs spending money on? We should know. Like, are they buying $50 hammers? Like, are they buying $200 bandages?
Like, is I think we it's our money. This is our money. It is you watching money. We are the ones that earn the money. It is not the government's money.
They we are the sovereign. We create the government. We earn the money, and then the government extract it from us with our consent. Right? So we have a right to know where that money goes.
@RCarter12388 - You Gotta Be Kidding!
@ScottRCarpenter Canadians hate the orange stain for the same reasons most Americans hate him. He's an ass and a felon and a serial liar.
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize a video from Bee Better claiming politics are run by a closed billionaire donor elite. It ties Erica Franz Faye to Charlie Kirk, alleging donors groomed Charlie for the presidency and Erica managed donor dinners behind the scenes. It says 2024 panic about his foreign-policy drift; the night before, Erica said he left, he texted “feels like it’s over.” Within 72 hours: VanceKirk2028 domain, Erica became TPUSA CEO, she forgave the shooter, joined the Air Force Academy Board. The author suggests a hidden donor system explains it.
@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch
🚨 BILLIONAIRE’S SON BLOWS OPEN CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION — ACCUSES ERICA KIRK OF KNOWING EXACTLY WHY — “I MIGHT GET DELETED FOR THIS” "Nobody in the history of political assassinations has ever acted as bizarre as Erica Kirk." The man behind Bee Better, who says he grew up around billionaire donor circles, just posted a video claiming politics is actually run by a closed billionaire donor hierarchy. According to him: • Billionaires choose who rises long before voters ever see them • Presidents are basically the student-council president of the system Then he connects that world to Charlie and Erica Kirk. • Erica Franz Faye met Charlie at Turning Point USA in Phoenix in 2018 • Charlie flew her to New York for a job interview, then decided to date her • Donors were openly talking about Charlie as a future presidential candidate • Erica allegedly ran the donor dinners and billionaire relationships behind the scenes He claims donors panicked in 2024 when Charlie allegedly began drifting away from their foreign-policy priorities. According to the story he tells, pressure inside the marriage escalated. The night before everything happened: • Erica said Charlie left around 2:30 AM to sleep in another room • Charlie reportedly texted a friend: “It feels like it’s over.” Then the timeline he points to: Within 72 HOURS of Charlie Kirk's assassination: • The domain http://VanceKirk2028.com was registered • Erica became CEO of Turning Point USA • She publicly forgave the alleged shooter almost immediately • She later took Charlie’s former seat on the U.S. Air Force Academy Board of Visitors "The only reason she's not demanding answers is because she knows exactly who did it and why." The man claims once you understand how billionaire donor networks operate… “the entire story suddenly makes sense.” “I might get deleted for posting this.” Look closely at the timeline... what doesn’t add up to you?
@nyb2know - Not your Business
@HustleBitch_ This was found online two days after his death.. a week later it was scrubbed! Uk dates is date/month/year.. divorce was real. https://t.co/ZHT7owRj3r
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Bombshell vax vs. unvax study finally sees the light of day and the results are staggering. Dr. Marcus Zervos led the study, but he decided not to publish it because “publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” https://t.co/xeg97hjMPx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0/J: The discussion centers on a study with dramatic implications, including claims that publishing such data could be career-ending, and questions about why the data would be so catastrophic.
Speaker 2: The study involved eighteen thousand four hundred sixty eight subjects, of which one thousand nine hundred fifty seven were fully unvaccinated. When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis—specifically four point two nine times in the adjusted analysis—and they note there are studies showing a range from three point two six to five point six five.
Speaker 1: They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases.
Speaker 2: Atopic diseases are described as a subset of allergic diseases.
Speaker 1: They found an almost six times risk for autoimmune disease.
Speaker 3: The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus, MS, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain Barre syndrome. They mention there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and their data showed for autoimmunity a six times increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated.
Speaker 2: This is presented as staggering because autoimmune disorders represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering accrued over a lifetime. Neurodevelopmental disorders are also discussed.
Speaker 0: What kind numbers we talked about? Do you remember?
Speaker 1: Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
Speaker 2: They state the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning, and so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can get neuropsychiatric symptoms presumably related to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain.
Speaker 0: Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities, four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated,
Speaker 3: Three times the rate of developmental delay. They found the same patterns as with allergy and autoimmunity. Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
Speaker 2: Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group. The mathematical formulas require non-zero counts in both groups to compare risk.
Speaker 1: For example, there were two sixty two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of ADHD.
Speaker 3: These results are described as mind boggling. Conditions were not found at all in almost two thousand unvaccinated kids: zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I'd be finished. I mean, I'm just curious.
Speaker 1: You see
Speaker 0: What in this data makes you think it will be as catastrophic to your career as you think. What was he so afraid of? The study was a bombshell.
Speaker 2: Eighteen thousand four hundred and sixty eight subjects, one thousand nine hundred and fifty seven of them were fully unvaccinated. When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis.
Speaker 0: Four point two nine times in the adjusted. And that seems, I've looked at a of studies, there's three point two six to five point six five.
Speaker 1: They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases.
Speaker 2: Which is kind of a subset of allergic diseases.
Speaker 1: They found a almost six times risk for autoimmune disease.
Speaker 3: The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus, MS, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain Barre syndrome. They mentioned there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and what their data showed for autoimmunity, six times increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated.
Speaker 2: Which is staggering because autoimmune disorders really represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering, you know, accrued over a lifetime. Neurodevelopmental disorders.
Speaker 0: What kind numbers we talked about? Do you remember?
Speaker 1: Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
Speaker 2: We know that the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning. And so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can get neuropsychiatric symptoms presumably related to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain.
Speaker 0: Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities, four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated,
Speaker 3: three times the rate of developmental delay. They found the same things I found related to allergy and autoimmunity. Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
Speaker 2: Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group. The way that the mathematical formulas work, you can't have a zero in any one group and be able to compare risk.
Speaker 1: For example, there were two sixty two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of
Speaker 3: ADHD. Zero. These ones are just mind boggling. These conditions were not found at all in almost two thousand unvaccinated kids. Zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated.
@David_Khait - David Khait
From my understanding, this is the first time I’ve seen an Iranian official admit that they in fact do have +400kg of +60% enriched uranium https://t.co/mw59hPVJDm
reSee.it AI Summary
I reveal a leaked recording showing Pennsylvania election officials couldn’t reconcile the 2020 outcome, yet Josh Shapiro certified the overthrow of the United States by force. “Everyone in there was sweating bullets” fearing cuffs. Virtually every Secretary of State who took part was self-promoted.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: A leaked audio recording confirming that Pennsylvania election officials could not reconcile the 2020 election—yet Josh Shapiro certified the overthrow of the United States government anyway by force. “Everyone in there was sweating bullets because they thought they were going to be taken away in cuffs.” 📝 Virtually every Secretary of State who participated in the conspiracy during 2020 was self-promoted.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion covered the importance of tape attachment to election materials. Speaker 0 recounts that well-heeled individuals insisted on knowing exactly where a van was going and what it contained, indicating concerns about tracking the contents and destination. Speaker 1 adds that legally the tape must be attached to indicate which tapes came from which precinct and belong to which return sheet, and whether it needs to be attached depends on legal requirements. The two speakers agree that there is a combination of legal necessity and practical need for proper labeling. The main reconciliation challenge described is aligning the number of people voted with the yellow books and with the return to balance. Speaker 0 mentions that reconciling the used and unused balance is something that could be addressed later, but it is not easy. Both speakers emphasize the stress on those handling the process, noting that “these poor people” came in sweating bullets because they feared they were going to weapon cuffs. The need to attach the tape is stressed as a crucial requirement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We had people come in from what I can sell consider well heeled, tensions and say, well, you know, I know if I send a van there, you figure out where it was. Well, what we could be. So I think I learned
Speaker 1: it was more from, a legal legally has to be attached to it or if you just need to be with it so you know which tapes came from which precinct and belong to which return sheet.
Speaker 0: I think it's a combination of both, but legally you have to have it. The issues that we had when we did the reconciliation is that we were trying to reconcile the number of people voted with the yellow books and then with the return to balance. I mean, we haven't even talked about reconciling the used and unused balance and I presume that's something we can do down the road but it would it was it was not easy and these poor people came in there and they were sweating bullets because they all thought they were going to weapon cuffs. It's it has to be stressed that that tape has to be attached.
@MarsNAO - Mars
@IrishDawg04 @Ryan_In_Mi @TheChiefNerd Alright there Irish dawg https://t.co/57Octpf9bd
@MarsNAO - Mars
@AnnaRMatson @grok well, let's hear your spin on this
reSee.it AI Summary
The author describes an incident where they disobeyed orders and engaged a shooter who targeted Trump. They were arrested, questioned by the FBI, and lost their job, but they express satisfaction with their actions. The authenticity of the post is questioned by the author.
@MarsNAO - Mars
I didn't follow the orders though, as soon as the shooter opened on Trump I returned fire despite strict orders to not engage. I had eyes on the shooter for three minutes watching him fiddle with his rifle and adjust the scope, it was obvious he was a shooter yet I wasn't https://t.co/UGSzfmXnNd
@MarsNAO - Mars
allowed to engage. After I killed the shooter I was arrested, questioned by the FBI, and just released an hour ago. Already lost my job for not following orders, but I'm glad I took the shots anyway. Could be a larp, this emerged today, soni am sharing it.
@MarsNAO - Mars
DEVELOPING: Donald Trump just survived an assassination attempt at a rally he was speaking at. #trump #assassination #attempt #shooting #rally https://t.co/N1TxSr8pxx
@MarsNAO - Mars
@TristanSnell @reseeit save this
@MarsNAO - Mars
So after forcing me to do a captcha to prove I'm human and unlock my account, @x is now telling me it's added a temporary label to limit my account reach. As if they weren't already limiting my reach like crazy. This platform is terrified of me apparently. @QPsyOps https://t.co/3Xqy2PFSVo
@MarsNAO - Mars
So check out this post. Why would this account show in my feed? How does a new account like this with such low following get so many comments, retweets and likes? When is @X going to stop being terrible??? @elonmusk https://t.co/7QewahG3qn
@MarsNAO - Mars
@reSeeIt save this
@MarsNAO - Mars
This level of treason will end up leading to the destruction of not just the citizens of America, but the politicians and institutions as well. Why would the western leaders be complicit in their own genocide?
@MarsNAO - Mars
@reseeit save this