reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
Here is Donald Trump’s rape accuser E. Jean Carroll that the left won’t stop talking about. She doesn’t appear to know what rape means: “I think most people think of rape as being sexy.” “The word ‘rape’ carries so many sexual connotations, this was not sexual.” Even Anderson Cooper was appalled with these answers.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker clarifies that they don't feel like a victim and that the incident they experienced was not sexual, although it did hurt. They mention that rape is often associated with sexual connotations and violence, but they emphasize that it was not an assault. The speaker suggests taking a short break and mentions the topic of fantasies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't feel like a victim? I was not thrown on the ground and ravished, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotation. This was not this was not sexual. It just it it hurt. It just what it just you know?
I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent Assault. It is not assault. Think most people think of rape as being sexy. Let's take a short break. Think of the fantasies.
Mhmm. We're just gonna take a quick break. If you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side. You're fascinating to talk to.
@Sharpcut - Political World Network
BREAKING NEWS: Here is the full 2016 testimony of a girl who claimed she was raped by Donald Trump (with Jeffrey Epstein) when she was 13 years old. It is explicit. Please watch the entire video. If you believe her, please share. https://t.co/tnhybi8tPz
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes her encounters with Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein at parties organized by Epstein. She was 13 years old at the time and was coerced into performing sexual acts on Trump. She also reveals Trump's racist and derogatory comments towards Epstein and others. The speaker expresses her fear of Trump and her belief that he is unfit to be president. She shares her decision to come forward with her story to expose the kind of person Trump is. The speaker discusses the lasting impact of the traumatic experiences on her self-esteem and ability to trust men.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I came to this interview on my free will. No. There was nothing promised to me for doing this interview. Excellent. Yes.
Everything that I say at this interview will be the truth. I met Donald Trump, at some parties I attend, that I was working, for mister Jeffrey Epstein. There was about 3 or 4 times that I, had encounters with Donald Trump. I was 13. The first time that I met Donald Trump, was at, a party at Jeffrey Epstein's mansion.
We were he was there was an orgy going on, and he was kind of watching off in the distance. And and he basically asked if I could come over and give him give him a hand job. And at first, I wasn't very comfortable with it. This was, like, my first or second, you know, first party, and I I didn't, you know, I didn't think that that was my responsibility, but my recruiter told me that I needed to do it, so I agreed to. And, then he, you know, I I said I said began to sorry.
This is, a little difficult, but before I gave him a hand job, he kind of slapped my hand away and said, you need to use a glove. And the recruiter, he ran over and handed me a glove and said, no 1 touches mister Trump's penis without a glove. So I needed to use a glove. I gave him a hand job and then immediately after he had an orgasm, he left and I didn't see him again at that party. Jeffrey Epstein, is a billionaire friend of Donald Trump's that, was responsible for throwing the sex parties.
There was I originally came to New York trying to be a model, and, in my travels, I met a girl named Tiffany there, who was very interested in me and said that, you know, she that's what she did is that she helped girls, you know, get what they wanted, and and and she could help me get in get into modeling, that she knew a lot of, people that were that were higher ups and that it would be no problem. And so that's why, you know, she but I would just basically have to come model, at a couple of events and meet some people. People, there'd be no sweat. So, of course, I went, you know, that sounded like no big deal, and she was recruiting the girls to come to these parties, and and they all looked I mean, most of them were, know, my age. There was, you know, maybe a couple girls that were maybe 14 or 15, but it seemed to me like we were all very young.
So Okay. Jeffrey Epstein knew that I was, 13 years old. When he interviewed me, he asked me to get down to my bra my just my panties. And I thought that was weird, but I mean modeling, maybe it was something about my figure. And he asked that I give him a massage.
So he and then he asked me my age. He asked me and I told him, you know, told him that I was 13. I told him why I was there, and and he basically said, well, you'll do. You know, I'm sure that you'll you'll fit pretty nicely here. And then he he tried to, basically slip himself inside of me and I pushed him away and I said, you know, I'm I'm because at that point in time, I still believed that there was models and then there was the girls that did that.
Like, I thought there was a separation. So, you know, I I told him that I wasn't interested in that, but he said that I would do. And as far as Donald Trump, he knew that I was 13, and I believe that Tiffany told him he seemed to take a liking to me because I was I was so young, and, I was also a virgin. So I don't know. He's it seemed like he wasn't really into having, having girls that that were liked by the other guys.
He kind of, you know, the whole glove. He kind of liked things to be his first, you know, if that for lack of, you know, better term, but he was the 1 who wanted to, get to get to a girl before everyone else did. Donald Trump knew that I was 13, because, the first the first night that I was there, Tiffany actually suggested that, and she had a whole bunch of different wigs and I expressed interest in them and I always told her that I would love love to walk around with blue hair and so I tried some on and, there was a blonde wig that that she said that looked great on me. So I wore that wig, and Donald Trump had specifically asked about me because I remind him of his daughter, and she said, well, she's 13 as well. So he knew the first time that he saw me, but he took a liking to me because I look like his daughter.
The reason I'm coming out now, is when it happened originally, I just wanted to forget about the whole whole incident. And when I saw that he was running for president, I felt it was my responsibility to come out and tell our country, what kind of man this person is. I don't think that he should even be the dog catcher, let alone running the greatest country in the world. After I met Tiffany at the bus station, she took me to basically, we went to her house, her apartment and got ready. I put on a blonde wig because it seemed fun to be so indifferent, but we went to the party that I was basically interviewing for, and Jeffrey Epstein was the 1 that was running the party.
He had a quick meeting with everyone that was employed there, and then, he had, a private interview with me. The first time that I met Jeffrey Epstein, he did try to force himself, inside of me without getting the go ahead or anything. And then, on the it was probably about the 3rd or 4th party is when, he basically forced it was it was another massage and it was basically like it wasn't sex, but it was there was penetration and I told him that I didn't want that, but, he kind of got a little irritated. So I don't know. There is something about him that, I guess I kind of, held him, like, I held a lot of resentment towards him.
By that time that that happened, I I kind of already started catching on that maybe I wasn't there for modeling and maybe I was just getting used for things and I felt that I kind of held him responsible. I did receive money to go to these parties. After every, party, I was paid by mister mister Epstein. There wasn't out of all the girls that were there with me, I never I've most of them were 13, 14. I think the oldest 1 might have been 16 just but just turned 16.
I mean, she'd been there for a while. K. It was actually it was Tiffany. He was he was he he liked to watch other people have sex. III mean, it was must he he's a germ doesn't like germs.
So he rather than partaking, he just watches. So, Tiffany had informed him that I was the virgin, and so he was I was basically, sorry. III so it was Tiffany who introduced us. Okay. 2nd time that I saw mister Trump, was same scenario.
He was on looking, so an orgy. And, Tiffany came over to me and and said that Donald Donald Trump had requested that I perform oral sex on him. And and never I'd never done something like that with anybody, so I was a little nervous. So I walked up to him, and he was standing sitting there very proud, like, and I just kind of moved in that direction and he's kinda slapped me away and said, what are you doing? You know?
And you need to put a condom on. Like, I was some, like, dirty filter or something without a condom. Tiffany ran over, and handed him a con you know, gave me a condom and apologized, you know, profusely and said that would never happen again, that that and she looked at me and and scolded me basically like a child and said that, you know, that's not how you know, Donald Trump always, you know, know, anytime he touch touches penis, it needs to have a condom on or a glove, you know, you owe and especially when it comes to performing oral sex. So, I apologize and then, I performed oral sex on him. And once again, once he was done, he hopped up and that's the last I saw of him at that party.
It's like once he's done, he's out. Mhmm. So Okay. K. Sometimes before the some of the things that I noticed that were weird with him was sometimes before the parties he would come over, and him Jeffrey Epstein and himself would kinda banter back and forth and he was very, Donald Trump was very racist.
He said a lot of racist things, like, there was, there was a lot of comments, towards mister Epstein about, you know, being Jewish, and called him a Jew bastard, you know, so that he was cheap and there was some words I didn't even understand something about, his his you know, the shave of his penis, being directly related to his mole or I mean, I'm I'm not too familiar with the Jew you know, the Jewish traditions. So but I'm pretty sure that whatever he was saying wasn't very nice. Also referred to, you know, people of Hispanic or, you know, Hispanic names, they can call them spicks, was that was around the first time that the World Trade Center had gotten the bond in the in the nineties. And he was, you know, talking about the towel heads and how, you know, we would just be better off if we, you know, didn't let him in or, you know, basically got rid of everyone every single 1 that was already here, and I thought I just that was it made me really uncomfortable, really, really uncomfortable. He also loved to to call black people, niggas and he, Arabic people, he called sand niggas.
The only time that, that he tried to give me some money was the last our last encounter together, where he acted out a rape fantasy. I just, I was forced to I was forced to give that money back because Jeffrey Epstein paid us, after the party. So but he just gave me the money. I I don't even know why he gave it to me. Maybe to make me me feel more cheap, but it was, it was a pretty I I it was a rape fantasy to him, but I do I wasn't playing.
So there was those there was those 2 times, and then there was after and the next the next thing that was that Tiffany approached me with was that he had a fantasy where he walked in on his maids. Maids basically making out and that he it was some type of fantasy for him. So she asked I mean, I was at that point, I was like, I don't wanna be involved with anything that has to do with him, but she's like, you were just basically the the other 1. So there's nothing that you will have to do. Just don't, you know, just he wants he's requesting you to be involved.
So, I reluctantly I mean, I don't I I felt like I didn't have a choice there, but, it was basically he's walking and his 2 maids I was 1 of the maids. I was the white maid. And there was, a Spanish girl, Maria who was a Hispanic maid and we were making out and he walks in and he gets really angry and threatens to send call immigration on Maria if she doesn't come over and make things right and give him a blow job. So while she is over there giving him a blow job, I am just look trying to, you know, I'm supposed to look scared like, oh, 0, no. You know?
And, you know, cleaning trying to clean up things and pretending, like, I'm trying to go back to my job as a maid. And then he he's being so rude to Maria. I felt so bad for her. Even though, I guess, it just didn't seem like a fantasy. It didn't it didn't seem like it's the weirdest fantasy as far as that.
You know, threatening to call immigration on her, you know, so that she didn't know how to, you know, she went to she wasn't even near going down to give him, perform oral sex on him before he slapped her away and said, you know, what are you doing? You know you need to put a condom on and and she's trying to you know, I'm I'm so sorry. And he's like, you can't even can't even understand what you're saying, you know, and just, you know, speak English, you know. He just called her derogatory, comments. And then he's like, you know what?
You don't know what you're doing. Have her come over and show you how it's done. And so I, again, I I said that I didn't, you know, I had to go over there or else he was going to call immigration on Maria. I didn't know if it was true or not, but I felt that, you know, he said that if I wasn't if I didn't show her how to perform oral sex on him then he was going to call immigration on her and then get rid of us both. You know, it it was.
Anything that was in relation to him getting off or being satisfied or happy had to do with him being in power, but extreme power and it's it's very it's very hard to even it was it was always intimidating when he was like that. It was always you didn't really know if it was true or I mean, it's like if you refuse to play along, would he really call immigration on Maria? Would he really get rid of us both? And I didn't even want to know what that meant. You know, I always didn't it wasn't a game.
It just felt like it wasn't a game. Yep. The 1 night that I had the blonde wig on, he mentioned that I looked, like, you know, I looked like to, you know, that I reminded him of his daughter. And actually the the the maid spin fantasy, I didn't have a blonde wig on. I was trying to stay away from blonde wigs at the time, but he actually requested told Tiffany that that's what he wanted me to wear.
Like, he wanted it and he's and anytime I put it on anytime I had it on and he'd see me, he would say, oh, man. You look and just and it wasn't like a, oh, you remind me of my daughter. It was this sick evil, like, you remind me of my daughter. It was just this weird pleasure, sick smile, like I I don't even wanna know what he was thinking about. I I could imagine what he was thinking about.
After the parties would end, we were to report to mister Epstein and basically tell him everything that happened, with who, what they liked, what they disliked, if there was any requests, if there was any, talk about anything. That's what, you know, we told mister Epstein everything. And then he paid us, and then we got to go home. And most of the time with me, you know, I would either, you know, I normally got taken taken to the airport, you know, so to go back home. The fact that Trump has a chance to be the next president makes me feel disgusting inside.
I've always been proud to be an American. I think we live in a beautiful country, but I just see him ruining everything. He's a horrible what he portrays on the outside isn't even that great, but people don't even know the half of how evil, how sick and twisted that man is. I have a friend that's been my friend ever since the school year that I stopped going, you know, the the 8th grade. I confided her and she knows all about it.
She knows everything. I mean, I I destroyed everything of, like, you know, any planes to I didn't I couldn't risk my my dad finding out, And now I think I'm old enough to where I think I don't think, you know, I at that point, I didn't wanna not be his little girl, you know. I didn't wanna lose my dad. Basically, I I any I would never, as far as keeping proof of any of the trips, the only person I never told my parents, you know, I there would be no happy, you know, there would be no good outcome of telling my parents. You know, they would have grounded me.
I would have never been allowed out of the house. You know, my my father would have come unglued. I did tell a friend, my best she's still my best friend to this day. She knows everything. She knows it all.
I'm prepared to do whatever it takes to save the country that I believe that we have. I know what he does behind public, like, closed doors. Like, if it if that's all I'm willing to sacrifice my life to put our country back to in the right, like, going maybe in some type of positive direction. Not even there's no right or wrong, but a positive direction. This guy is not gonna take us anywhere positive.
You know, as far as, my life changing by coming out with this information, I've thought long and hard about, whether or not I should, and I've gone back and forth. But I think that I I can't I think that the American people need to know what kind of man this person is. And if my life changes because of that, then so be it. But the American people need to know what they're dealing with. If I had the chance to talk to Donald Trump, I would run the other way.
I'm scared of him like I've never been scared of anything else in my entire life. III can't I can't explain it to you, but I just the fear of him even being in the next room make I have a panic I would have I have a panic attack. The last encounter that I had with Donald Trump, Tiffany approached me about, a rape scene that was is supposed to be played out, and I didn't like the sound of that at all, but, Tiffany promptly has ensured me that it wasn't gonna be if I if there was anything I wasn't comfortable with, we could stop, that she would be right there and that, it wouldn't get out of hand and that, it was just it was a fantasy, like, it wasn't really gonna happen. And so she I told her that I would. She she basically I mean, Tiffany was always nice to me.
She wasn't that I felt I trusted her, also, you know, and I wouldn't always trusted her or done what she asked me to, but, she was there. And, he came in, and I was basically tied to a bed, with pantyhose. And he tied them it was so tight. I couldn't it hurt to even, like, lay there, and I tried to, you know, try to say something. It was like, you know, you just, you know, shut up, man.
Shut up, bitch. You know? This is it was basically like he was he was being really, really rough, and and I understand. I don't I mean, it just didn't seem like a fantasy, and I started to get scared and and he was, you know, basically, like, ripping my clothes off and and I was actually I started I got freaked out. I told him that I don't wanna do this.
I was, you know, I screamed over for Tiffany and she was like, mister Trump, she's only, you know, she's not she's this is scaring her and he's like, oh, you shut up too. He just turned into this animal. It was like a completely different, completely different person. It was like everyone in the room was scared of him and I was,
Speaker 1: it was like
Speaker 0: I couldn't do anything about it. And he ripped off all my clothes, and he started to basically have sex with me, and I was screaming because I had never had sex before. It was my first time. And Tiffany was yelling at him too. She she was saying that I was a virgin, and he told us to just shut the fuck up and just basically took my virginity while I was crying and telling him to stop.
And that's basically begging for him to just stop. And I don't I Tiffany was didn't know what else to do either. She no 1 was there to help us or me. And so so after the fact, he he he basically finishes it. You know, it didn't it didn't take that long, all.
I mean, it but it was just it felt like it
Speaker 1: was, like, 5 and a
Speaker 0: half hours. It was an eternity. Like, I don't even know how long it was, but, he was done and I was crying and Tiffany was consulting me and she was, you know, apologizing. She told me that she would never she didn't she just never put me in that situation again. But, he comes over mad because I was crying so that I should be thankful that someone like Donald Trump took my virginity.
Rosie basically didn't say took my virginity. He said, I should be glad that someone like Donald Trump popped my cherry and not some pimply little 14 year old. And I just was like, what if I I and I said, what if I get pregnant? And I'm not even talking to him. I didn't wanna talk to him.
I was talking to Tiffany. And he said, well, you'll get an abortion then, bitch, and then just walked away. When III asked III went I told Tiffany I needed to go home. I never went back again. I guess, I guess it's for you to decide.
You know? I mean, if I don't have any kids myself, because I'm afraid to have kids because I and who knows what kind of damage they can get into, but if you have a 13 year old daughter and you're I mean, would you be okay with the person who's running our country doing that to your little girl? And I just I don't know. I just want people to know. I think that I I have I have a faith in our in our society that we'll make the right choice.
He seemed to be taking, great pleasure and, like, dominance and control and and just the more I screamed, the more I got scared, the more he was enraged and, like, power enraged with power and and it was like he was just charged with it. It was scary. My experience, with Donald Trump has made it to where, I I can't be in a healthy relationship much less I can't be in a relationship without, without myself sabotaging it. I don't, I don't do well I mean, I I've I've been in I've been in a couple of relationships. I mean, they're never of interest to me normally, but 1 in particular that was a wonderful he was a wonderful man, and I completely knowing III had like, subconsciously, I couldn't even control myself.
It was like I had to get him out of my life because, you know, I don't I don't know why. It was like anytime anyone loves me, I don't feel worth it or, you know, I've, I mean, I've I don't even know how to explain it. Like, I can't. Friends I can have acquaintance, you know, guys that are acquaintances, but I just, you know, anytime it's maybe someone expressed anything else besides that, I can't I take some type of pleasure, not some type of I don't take pleasure in it, but subconsciously whether I mean to or not, sometimes I've meant to. It's like I've I've I've purposely hurt their feelings, just so they'll never talk to me again.
Like, I make sure that it's not ever a possibility. Donald Trump Donald Trump destroyed my feeling of self worth and my self esteem beef when it was so like, when it was when it just bloomed. I hadn't even had a chance to experience anything. I have I have only spoken to to 1 therapist about this just recently, actually. I for a long time, I just really just tried to forget about it.
Just tried very hard. But, I've been in counseling for other things, and I went to counseling for, previous the previous relationship that I was sabotaging and my counselor said something has happened to you that where you are just you need to deal with that. That's actually what kinda was like, he knew that there was something that had happened where I was self self or, you know, sabotaging these relationships, but, you know, he said that it was my responsibility to deal with it, of course. This this situation with Donald Trump has has left it has destroyed my self esteem and and it's made it to where I feel like it's destroyed part of my life. I haven't the only healthy relationship I've completely demolished, and I love to choose the dysfunctional ones that I know I can just push away.
He after what happened with him, I can't trust a man ever again. I thinking about it just makes me sick to my stomach. So when when something so traumatic happens to someone that's so young, you never ever really get over it.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
This is the TOTALLY INSANE woman who made unfounded accusations against Trump the NY court believed. https://t.co/knaCNqWOYF
Video Transcript AI Summary
I call this place the mouse house because distinguished mice live here. I have a shed with books that influenced me, and a list of my dogs on the door. I painted rocks blue to show where rivers once flowed. I started painting trees and ended up creating a whole forest. The best advice I've given is to eat, drink, and be merry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I called the mouse house because some very distinguished, mice live here. Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taburski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Marquee, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry. And, it's so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I've done this whole forest.
Oh my god. What's the best piece of advice I've ever given? What a horrible question to ask an advice to. Oh my god. Hang on.
Eat, drink, and be merry. That's it. That's my advice.
@_BruceBane - Brüce Bane (Pu/to)🇺🇸
This guy is a fucking liar! https://t.co/XHYM5qv0y5
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the Capitol incident, a law enforcement officer recounts being attacked and called a traitor. Another person claims that the officer was actually an FBI plant, not in uniform, and carrying a Confederate flag. They believe the narrative is unraveling and demand the release of FBI files to reveal the true culprits.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because I was among the vastly outnumbered group of law enforcement officers protecting the capital and the people inside it, I was grabbed, beaten, tased, all while being called a traitor to my country.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That guy. Well, that guy was actually not in uniform And he was not there as a Capitol police officer. He was there as an FBI plant. The dude was there Carrying a Confederate flag.
You can't make this shit up. It's him, and he thought he was gonna get away with it. Once again, unraveling of the narrative because the narrative wasn't strong because it wasn't true. So we can try again, Try try again. But guess what, guys?
Release the FBI files, and you will see who's really guilty.
@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸
@CollinRugg E. Jean Carroll is a nut job. This is the woman that accused Trump of rape. Complete looney tune. https://t.co/9w8IHkri8M
Video Transcript AI Summary
I call this place the Mouse House where distinguished mice like Kahneman and Taburski live. My shed holds books that influenced me. The door lists my dogs' names. I painted rocks blue to show where rivers once flowed. I painted trees and a forest. The best advice I've given is to eat, drink, and be merry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I called the mouse house because some very distinguished, mice live here. Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taburski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Marquee, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry. And, it's so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I've done this whole forest.
Oh my god. What's the best piece of advice I've ever given? What a horrible question to ask an advice to. Oh my god. Hang on.
Eat, drink, and be merry. That's it. That's my advice.
@TimRunsHisMouth - Tim Young
Just a reminder that Trump's accuser E. Jean Carroll once told Anderson Cooper that rape is "sexy" and a "fantasy." ...and it creeped him out so much that he cut her off and threw to commercial. https://t.co/KU9Ir6KJ2u
Video Transcript AI Summary
I didn't feel like a victim. It wasn't a sexual assault, just hurtful. Rape isn't sexy, it's violent. Let's take a break and talk more later. You're interesting to talk to.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't feel like a victim? I was not thrown on the ground and ravished, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotation. This was not this was not sexual for it just it it hurt. It just what it just, you know I think most people think rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault. It is not I think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Let's take a short break. Think of the fantasies. Mhmm. We're just gonna take a quick break. Or if you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side.
You're fascinating to talk to.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Do you think E. Jean Carroll is credible? https://t.co/gHwQ9JR7cY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump is accused of inappropriate behavior towards women. The speaker finds it disrespectful to women who are victims of rape. They recall a past encounter with Trump involving lingerie. The speaker expresses anger and panic, mentioning death threats. They ponder the possibility of DNA evidence on the lingerie. The conversation shifts to Trump's statement about the accuser not being his type. The speaker challenges the perception of rape as sexy. The discussion pauses briefly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Charge against Donald Trump for this. Why not?
Speaker 1: I would find it disrespectful to the women who are down on the border, who are being raped around the clock down there. But for the women down there and for the women, actually, around the world And it was all fairly playful. Oh, it was charming. It was excite remember what Donald Trump was like in 95, 90 6. On the counter were these fancy lingerie boxes that they used to have back in the nineties.
Yeah. You wore lingerie in the nineties, I'll bet you. But He didn't suggest it. He shouted it. He shouted it.
Lingerie. Lingerie. He may have shouted underwear. I Yeah. Okay.
Speaker 0: Were you scared? Were you No.
Speaker 1: I'm too angry? I was too panicked to be scared.
Speaker 0: Too panicked to be scared. Okay.
Speaker 1: Totally. And I put my life on the line. Do you think that you're go well, hold on a second. What do you mean you put your life on the line? Well, people have told me I have to be careful.
You've gotten death threats. I am not looking at death threats. I have the idea that I'm gonna make him put it on over his pants. That was my idea. Mhmm.
You see how funny that would be to make him put that on? I guess my question is is could there be any DNA on there? Idea. I do not know if the president ejaculated. Have no idea.
Lawrence, I wish I had said I wish. I said, I'll tell you my age if you show me your tax returns.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Yeah. It would've been would've been up
Speaker 1: in that. Well, so I'm holding my handbag like the the only reason I know I'm holding my handbag is because I discovered it in my hand when I got to the street.
Speaker 0: The statement that he said, which he's just made, which is she's not my type number. Well, that was the number one thing.
Speaker 1: Love that I'm not his type. I'm an archer. I have bows and arrows. You know? Yeah.
Fine. I think there's just too never mind. Never mind.
Speaker 0: I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault. It is not a I
Speaker 1: think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Speaker 0: Let's take a short break.
Speaker 1: Think of the fantasies.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. We're just gonna take a quick break. Or if you can stick around,
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm E Jean Carroll, the woman who accused Trump of sexual assault. Leftists believe me, but some question their sincerity. Do they truly believe or is it politically motivated?
@MrReaganUSA - Mr Reagan 🇺🇸
This is E Jean Carroll, the woman that the left believes has "credibly" accused Trump of sexual assault in the dressing room of the Bergdorf Goodman Department store. 😳 https://t.co/QZ0A44NmAm
Video Transcript AI Summary
I live in a place called the mouse house, where distinguished mice like Kahneman and Taburski reside. I have a shed filled with books that influenced me. On the door, I have a list of my dogs' names. I once painted rocks blue to represent a dried-up river. Then I started painting trees and eventually created a whole forest. When asked for the best advice I've given, I replied, "Eat, Drink, and be merry."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I called the mouse house because some very distinguished, mice live here. Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taburski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Marquee, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, tits, bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry. And, it's so horrified me that I came out and started Painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just Sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon I've done this whole forest.
Oh my god. What's the best piece of advice I've ever given? What a horrible question to ask an advice to all. Oh my god. Hang on.
Eat, Drink and be merry. That's it. That's my advice.
@MrReaganUSA - Mr Reagan 🇺🇸
It's amazing how many gullible leftists claim to actually believe the E Jean Carroll sham. I wonder if they really believe it or if they're just pretending because it's politically convenient. 🤔
@almostjingo - Rosie Memos
E. Jean Carroll is a whack job and was one before @realDonaldTrump it’s not his fault she lives in the woods by herself, names mice, has dogs named “tits” and “bloody”, destroys rivers and trees by painting them and manically paints all over her house. The list goes on… https://t.co/WreJNYDul9
Video Transcript AI Summary
I enjoy staying up late and waking up around noon, appreciating my child-free life. My mornings are spent reading letters from readers, and I often reflect on my long-standing obsession with my college ex. I worry about those who write in, feeling the weight of my words. Living in New York would overwhelm me with dating, so I retreat to the woods to find clarity. I call my home The Mouse House, where I share space with distinguished mice. My childhood books and a list of my dogs adorn my shed. Inspired by a dry riverbed, I began painting the rocks blue, eventually transforming the entire forest around me. When asked for advice, I simply say: eat, drink, and be merry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh my god. Thank god that's not me. I like to stay up late. I like to sleep late, and I like to live like 90 in between. I get up around noon, and and I stagger outside out the store and I throw open my arms, I thank God I don't have children.
Then I go back in, stagger into my office, and start reading a stack of Askingine letters. I never thought much went on in the morning anyway. Women have facials in the morning. They have their hair done. Not me.
I like getting up at noon. My personal life is fascinating. I am so tormented and confused by my obsession with my ex boyfriend from college. Here's to the last line. It's been 22 years since we broke up.
I understand you. She and I have a lot in common. Oh, we do not wanna look at our emails. That was a bad idea. Oh.
I worry so much about the people who write in. I am so real. See these eyes? Look. Look at the bags under my eyes.
I worry at night when I'm in bed because, you know, a line from me can change your life. Now, whether it changes for the better or for the worse, I don't know. As you see, I have stacks of bells here and there and everywhere. I get sent one every month. Sometimes, if I'm very good, they send me 2.
I could not answer the questions coming into the Ask Eugene column if I was in New York City. You can't think in New York if you're dating 16 people, which I would be doing if I were in New York. You go to the woods to find out who you are, and then you find out who you are, and you're even happier than when you came. It's wonderful. I called The Mouse House because some very distinguished, mice live here.
Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taborski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up. On the door are the list of my dogs, Marky, Fortuna de las Funky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn.
The streams and the rivers were dry. And, it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I've done this whole forest. Oh my god.
What's the best piece of advice I've ever given? What a horrible question to ask an advice to. Oh my god. Hang on. Eat, drink, and be merry.
That's it. That's my advice.
@mrddmia - 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸
🚨 Looks like Jean Carroll illegally destroyed evidence in her latest bogus case against Trump. https://t.co/vF8ixCMp4z
reSee.it AI Summary
The first post highlights various aspects of the woman accusing Trump of sexual assault, including her dog's names, comments about rape, living in a cabin called the "Mouse House," painting rocks and trees, and aligning her allegation with an SVU episode. The post questions her credibility, contrasting it with the Left's belief in believing all women. The second post shares a video of E. Jean Carroll discussing rape, making Anderson Cooper uncomfortable. The third post showcases Carroll's unconventional "Mouse House" in the forest with painted rocks and trees.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
The woman who is accusing Trump of sexual assault: -named her dog “Tits” & “Vagina” -told Anderson Cooper that rape is “sexy” -lives in a cabin in the woods called the “Mouse House” -paints trees and rocks blue -lined up her entire allegation with the plot of an SVU episode -called sluts “sexual geniuses” -tweeted about learning sex tips from her dog The Left says we should believe all woman, but this woman does not seem stable. Do you believe E. Jean Carroll?
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Here is E. Jean Carroll calling rape “sexy” and making Anderson Cooper so uncomfortable that he went to commercial break. https://t.co/OTA8oeHJbl
Video Transcript AI Summary
I didn't feel like a victim. It wasn't a sexual assault, but it did hurt. People often associate rape with violence, not realizing it can be seen as sexy in fantasies. Let's take a short break and continue our conversation later. You're really interesting to talk to.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't feel like a victim? I was not thrown on the ground and ravished, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotation. This was not this was not sexual for it just it it hurt. It just what it just, you know? I think most people think rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault.
It is not a violent assault. I think most people think of rape as being sexy. Let's take a short break. Think of the fantasies. Mhmm.
We're just gonna take a quick break. Or if you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side. You're fascinating to talk to.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Here is E. Jean Carroll’s bizarre “Mouse House” in the middle of the forest with painted rocks and trees around it. https://t.co/dDPWRPESaY
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker introduces their home and the mice that live there. They mention their shed and the books that influenced them. The speaker also lists the names of their dogs on the door. They talk about how the streams and rivers were dry, which horrified them. To indicate the presence of a river, they painted the rocks blue. They then started painting trees and eventually painted the entire forest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because some very distinguished, mice live here. Connerman lives in the kitchen. Taberski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Marquee, Fortuna de la sponky, Heidi, tits, bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry. And I it's so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon I've done this whole forest.
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to remind everyone that E. Jean Carroll once said on CNN that "rape is sexy," and her accusation against Trump resembles a plot from a 2012 Law & Order SVU episode. When questioned, she claimed it was a coincidence, and her lawyers sought to instruct jurors about the episode's existence.
@greg_price11 - Greg Price
I just want to remind everyone that in addition to once saying on CNN that "rape is sexy," E. Jean Carroll's accusation against Trump is an exact plot line from a 2012 Law & Order SVU episode. She claimed that this was a complete coincidence when asked about it. Her lawyers also tried to get the judge to instruct jurors that there's no evidence in the record that the episode "actually exists."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 recalls a scene set in a public place where one moment was plain and not the other person’s fantasy, describing it as his own. He notes that 'World play' occurred in the dressing room of Bergdorf, where the woman was trying on lingerie and he would burst in. The exchange pauses for a moment as he confirms details: 'When did you and she have your date?' The answer is approximately six weeks ago, 'Six weeks ago, maybe,' followed by, 'She wrote.' The account centers on a private, intimate moment in Bergdorf dressing room tied to a date roughly six weeks prior, ending with an incomplete remark from the other person.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a public place. Yes. There was one a bit plain, and it was not her fantasy. It was mine. K.
Yeah. World play took place in the dressing room of Bergdorf. While she was trying on lingerie, I would burst in. Hold on. Mhmm.
When did you and she have your date? Six weeks ago, maybe. She wrote
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
The E. Jean Carroll verdict is PURE BULLSHIT coming from a pure BAT SHIT CRAZY LUNATIC in a pure BAT SHIT CRAZY & CORRUPT JURISDICTION. Everyone knows it. Call this shit out already.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the verdict in the E Jean Carroll defamation case against Donald Trump. They criticize the outcome, calling it unjust and politically motivated. They highlight Carroll's lack of evidence and questionable motives. The speaker also criticizes the media's biased coverage of the trial and expresses concern about the corrupt judicial system. They argue that this case sets a dangerous precedent for using the court system as a political tool. The speaker concludes by urging people to be aware of the potential consequences and to protect themselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. I wasn't going to do a vlog today, but, the news broke. The verdict in the E Jean Carroll second defamation case. If anybody thinks this is justice, you are idiots, pure and simple. If anybody likes this just because of the political consequences, you are scoundrels, pure and simple.
E Jean Carroll, the woman who is, in my humble view, batshit crazy, names her cat after a venereal disease, vagina t fireball, fabricates a story out of whole cloth that occurred two and a half decades ago, has no physical evidence of it, says that she would not file charges for the assault, because when you listen to her justification, it's gonna blow your mind and you're gonna realize you're dealing with a crazy person.
Speaker 1: Would you consider, bringing a a rape charge against Donald Trump for this?
Speaker 0: Why not?
Speaker 2: I would find it disrespectful To the women who are down on the border, who are being raped around the clock down there. But for the women down there and for the women, actually,
Speaker 0: Around the world. Says she's not gonna file criminal charges, but sues Donald Trump civilly in New York, possibly one of the most corrupt jurisdictions in the world, wins in the first trial, and then sues for defamation in the second trial because Trump took to truth social to post how she's Crazy how he never met her before, how the story is a total lie, and she sues it for defamation again. Oh, yeah. I forgot to say after the first jury found that Trump did not rape her in the Bergdorf changing room two and a half decades ago, but sexually assaulted her, such that when he denied it, it was defamation and awarded her damages for the alleged assault and the defamation, and then she sued him a second time when he continued to deny it and protest his innocence. They had a trial.
And when I say that the mainstream media is the enemy of the people, it's only because they are the enemy of the people. He had a trial in which the guilt was already a foregone conclusion. And quite literally, the trial was only to adjudicate on how much he would have to pay her, and that amount came down today. But before we get there, NBC News was reporting that Trump, testified, and he testified briefly. The headline reads, Trump testifies briefly in the trial.
And then it's only when you go into the article and read why he testified briefly that you realize The system is corrupt, the media is corrupt, and they are the enemy of the people. He testified briefly because the judge largely restricted what Trump could say in his own defense in court. So you head into a trial in which your guilt is already determined only to adjudicate on the damage in which you are limited in what you can say in your own defense in which the judge literally says you cannot say certain things include protesting your innocence, and then you come down with a jury verdict. And, oh my goodness, watching a journalist from NBC News in real time waiting for the news, announcing the news with orgiastic glee, Like, the winning lottery numbers of this political lottery just came down, and she's reading it in real time. $83,300,000 awarded to bat Shit crazy.
E Jean Carroll. I think it's, like, 7 a half 1000000 compensatory damages. 11,000,000 to, like, this, defamation rehabilitation program. I don't know what that is exactly. And $65,000,000 in punitive damages, which from what I understand, would survive bankruptcy, not that Trump's gonna go bankrupt anyhow.
Not that I think these judgment verdicts are gonna stand after appeal. In any event, $83,300,000. And this NBC journalist is like, oh, that's not as much as they wanted, but nothing to what did she say bad enough? I forget what she said. It's idiotic.
You just gotta watch it.
Speaker 3: We do have a verdict. E Jean Carroll did suffer more than nominal damages as a result of mister Trump's publication of these two June 2019 statements. The first amount for compensatory damages for her emotional pain and anguish is 7,300,000. The amount For the compensatory damages for the Reputation Repair Program is $11,000,000. We're now moving on to the questions about whether Trump Active with malice.
Remember, the questions have to be answered in the affirmative to get to a question of punitive damages. It's yeah. We are still waiting for that answer. As you wait for those
Speaker 2: answers that
Speaker 3: mister Trump acting with malice. I'm sorry. Mister Trump acting with malice in making the first of those statements. That's the June 21, 2019 statement at 5:17 PM in which he denied it for the first time. And Similarly, we are waiting to hear weather and making that yes.
Yes. Yes. Yes. Oh. In June 22, 2019, he did also act maliciously or out of hatred or ill will in defaming her on that day.
And here comes punitive damages award of $65,000,000 Alicia. Yes.
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes.
Speaker 3: So $65,000,000 in punitives, $11,000,000 in the Reputation Repair Program, and $7,300,000 in I'm sorry. And the emotional harm for a total of $83,300,000. That's a high eight Figure award. I had predicted we'd be high 8 figures or early a 100,000,000, certainly less money, I think, that E Jean Carroll's lawyers had hoped. But $83,300,000 is nothing to sneeze up.
Speaker 0: And people take Twitter to rejoice in this decision, to celebrate in this verdict. You got Jen Psaki who was once upon a time literally the propagandist for the government now turned MSM propagandist mouthpiece for the government saying, oh my goodness. This is justice. The only question is gonna be, I don't know. It's idiotic.
You can see the tweets for yourself. People rejoicing in this are scoundrels or mourns. Pure and simple. This is literally kangaroo court Banana Republic level madness where they can find a bat Shit crazy person. And by the way, everybody in the media knows that she's batshit crazy.
I'll play to you a compilation, a montage put together by Gravian. Everybody knows this woman is batshit crazy, but she's an easy tool for the media to exploit. Anderson Cooper. I dare Anderson Cooper not to say pokey. He thinks this woman is crazier than a loon.
Speaker 2: And it was all fairly playful. Oh, it was charming. It was excite remember what Donald Trump was like in 95, 96? On the counter were these fancy lingerie boxes that they used to have back in the nineties? Yeah.
You wore lingerie in the nineties. I'll bet you I But he didn't suggest that he shouted it. He Lingerie. Lingerie. He may have shouted underwear.
I Yep. You know? Okay.
Speaker 1: Were you scared? Were you
Speaker 2: No. I'm too angry? I was too panicked to be scared.
Speaker 1: Too panicked to be You're okay.
Speaker 2: Totally. And I put my life on the line. Do you think that you're go well, hold on a second. What do you mean you put your life on the line? Well, people have told me I have to be careful.
You've gotten death threats. I am not looking at death threats. I have the idea That I'm gonna make him put it on over his pants. That was my idea. Mhmm.
You see how funny that would be to They can put that on. I guess my question is is could there be any DNA on there? Idea. I do not know If the president ejaculated. Have no idea.
Lawrence, I wish I had said I wish. I said, I'll tell you my age if you show me your tax returns.
Speaker 1: Mhmm. Yeah. It would have been it would have been up
Speaker 2: in that. Well, so I'm holding my handbag like The the only reason I know I'm holding my handbag is because I discovered it in my hand when I got to the street.
Speaker 1: The statement that he said, which he's just made, which is she's not my type number. Well, that was the number one thing.
Speaker 2: Love that I'm not his type. I'm an archer. I have bows and arrows. You know? Yeah.
Fine. I think they're just too never mind. Never mind.
Speaker 1: I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent Assault. It is not a sexual assault.
Speaker 2: I think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Speaker 1: Let's take a short break.
Speaker 2: Think of the fantasies.
Speaker 1: We've just gotta take a quick break. If you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side.
Speaker 2: You're fascinating to talk to.
Speaker 0: They will use her and exploit her for all their political purposes. They can put her in front of a jury in New York. They would convict a hand sandwich if you told them it republican, and this really illustrates how historically, back in eras that were governed by prejudice, you could go to any jurisdiction that was deeply racist, deeply prejudiced. Find anybody to level any charges against a specific person or a group of person, and you knew that you would find a jury to convict just based on prejudices. Racial prejudices of decades ago has now been replaced with political prejudices of today, and it's just as broken a system.
So anybody celebrating this, we know how you would have been ruling on verdicts back in the day. 83 point $3,000,000 to E. Jean Carroll, $65,000,000 punitive damages. And from what I understand, Trump is going to appeal. But from what I understand, he would nonetheless have to put up $83,300,000 in court pending his appeal or get a bond and secure a portion of that, pay interest on the loan or whatever in order to post that pending appeal.
This is how the government seizes private property, uses lawfare In order to target, find an individual, fabricate a crime, and then basically steal the assets of that individual. You see it happening in New York under Alvin Bragg. You see it happening in New York under Leticia James. You see it happening in New York under this judge, Kaplan. In this case, it is plain.
It's in your face, and this is how empires Oh, you think this ends at Trump? Anybody in New York should flee New York. You think now it's gonna be limited to politics. If you are politically unfavored, If you are just socially disfavored, they will do it to you because they're getting away with it now. They started with these bogus guilty before the trial verdicts with Alex Jones.
They did it to Donald Trump in the Judge Angra and Leticia James case. They did it to him here, and they just issue awards like confetti. Outrageous, insane monetary awards for damages that nobody has sustained. 7 and a half $1,000,000 reputational damages? I'm sorry.
No way. $65,000,000 in punitive damages. Just something that you know will survive a bankruptcy so that you know he'll have to pay it. If this does not get overturned in appeal, at some point, the judicial system is gone. Pack up your bike, get out of New York, and find a that is not totally corrupt to the core.
And just one thing that I found particularly interesting because as I was looking into this, I found an article which by the headline referred to E. Jean Carroll as Jewish American columnist, E Jean Carroll sued Donald Trump for alleged rape. And I was like, oh, well, that's a very bizarre headline for this article. And I click on it, and the article itself only refers to E Jean Carroll as a columnist. The article is from the Jerusalem Post from 2019, and I noticed that it happened to have been updated in January 2024, 5 years after the article was first published, four and a half, 5 years later, and I had to go back to the way back machine and just make I'm not going crazy.
And for some reason, and I can think of 2 possibilities. The Jerusalem Post, which once upon a time took Pride in identifying E Jean Carroll as a Jewish American journalist maybe now is not quite so proud of this batshit crazy lady who secured a ridiculous decision out of New York. There might be other reasons even more nefarious. I won't go there. I just thought it was very curious.
But the bottom line, this is a joke, but it's not funny. It's a bloody tragedy, and it's showing how the court system can be used as political tools. This is nothing shy of election interference, full stop. E Jean Carroll exploits a newly amended law which extended the statute of limitations for civil claims for such alleged conduct. She had a pivotal role in lobbying for that legislative change.
She then exploits that being funded by highly political financiers to take this case to a politically partisan hack corrupt state like New York so that she could get a verdict, so that they could run the headlines that Trump is a rapist, so that they can then get ridiculous damages on alleged defamation for a man merely protesting his innocence, saying she's crazy. I never even met her. This is communist level crap. And if you don't understand it, you are part of the problem at this point in time. That is the latest.
It's bullcrap. It's gonna go to appeal. If it doesn't get turned over in appeal, Get out of New York, find a state where you might be better protected, and make sure to protect yourself nonetheless because they're gonna come for everybody. This is going to be the go to tool to bankrupt people, to destroy people, and more importantly to silence people. Alright, people.
Now I gotta go eat dinner. Now you know your vlog. Peace out.
reSee.it AI Summary
The E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was deemed bogus due to several inconsistencies and lack of evidence. Carroll couldn't recall important details, never mentioned the incident before, and her description of the events didn't match the reality. Her lawsuit was supported by a Democrat mega-donor, and a law was created to enable her case. Carroll has a history of false accusations and has made controversial statements about rape.
@JohnLeFevre - John LeFevre
I thought everyone knew the E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was bogus, until I heard my mother's (late 60s Republican) uninformed take on the verdict after watching ABC Nightly News. It's hard to find on Google, so here's what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed "inadmissible" by the judge: - She couldn't recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened - She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality - The dress she claims to have been wearing didn't exist at the time - Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible - Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman - Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed - Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her "favorite shows") - Trump's Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows - She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves - She told Anderson Cooper, "most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies." - She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat Vagina
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
This isn’t some random woman. This is E. Jean Carroll, the woman who sued Trump for defamation and won over $83 million. https://t.co/i6mcA7c8zf
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree. And then pretty soon, I'd done this whole forest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I'd done this whole forest.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
This isn’t some random woman. This is E. Jean Carroll, the woman who sued Trump for defamation and won over $83 million. Does she seem reliable, or sane to you? They used to institutionalize people like this instead of awarding them for their delusions. https://t.co/pJI9NlQ3UR
Video Transcript AI Summary
"I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here." "Conneman lives in the kitchen." "Tversky lives in the bedroom." "This is my shed." "And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up." "On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn." "The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here." "And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree." "And then pretty soon I'd done this whole forest."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon I'd done this whole forest.
reSee.it AI Summary
Listen closely to E. Jean Carroll's claims against Donald Trump. Defending him from the legal system is something I'm proud of. Carroll may have been defamed, but she's a self-righteous, lying drug user who won't get the $83 million from Trump's counter suit.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
If you seen and heard it already, then LISTEN TO HER AGAIN 😱 CLOSELY Defending Donald Trump from this bullshit legal system is the PROUDEST THING I’VE EVER DONE 😲 E. Jean Carroll says she was “defamed” 🤔. We’ll here’s is a little more… E. Jean Carroll is a self righteous, lying POS druggie & she will NEVER get the $83 million after Trumps Counter Suit 😎. Save the post 👊🏻
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses unwavering support for President Trump but criticizes the courtroom proceedings in New York. They claim that the judge limited their ability to present a defense and highlight the lack of evidence against their client. The speaker also accuses the opposing side of unethical behavior, including paying a witness. They argue that this is a violation of the justice system and emphasizes their commitment to fighting for everyone's right to speak and defend themselves. The speaker denies any fear on the part of the former president and states that he will continue to fight for Americans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. No. I'm glad you asked me that question. No. I'm not having any second thoughts about representing president Trump.
It is the proudest thing I could ever do. What I am having second thoughts about is the license that I stand here with that the people in there are supposed to have. I have not spoken because I respect my ethics while I'm on trial. But let me now speak about what has happened. I have sat on trial after trial for months in this state.
The state of New York, attorney general Leticia James, and now this. Weeks. Weeks. Why? Why?
Because president Trump is leading in the polls, and now we see what you get in New York. So don't get it twisted, whoever asked me that question. I I'm so proud to stand with president president Trump, but I am not proud to stand with what I saw in that courtroom.
Speaker 1: Miss Oliver is
Speaker 0: I'm not finished. Let me just finish, and I'll take questions, please. Before I walked into court, that judge decided that every single defense president Trump had, we were not allowed to raise in front of the jury. It is in writing, and I encourage the the real journalist to take the minute to look at his orders. There was no proof, and I I couldn't prove that she didn't bring in the dress.
There was no DNA. There was no expert. My experts were denied. Side. 2 of them 2 of them were denied to come in.
They didn't bring let me bring up that Reid sex. Been funded, miss Kaplan. And you know what we got in there? That my witness, who was her friend, who said that she is a drug addict, And the drug addict is herself. That friend, I found out in there was paid for by miss Kaplan's firm, and that is disgusting.
That is a violation of everything I stand for, and that is why I stand with Trump. And that is why so many Americans are sec. So proud that he is running again and so excited to run to the ballot box, but don't get it twisted. We are seeing a violation of our justice system. Ladies and gentlemen, sec You are not allowed to be stripped of every defense that you have.
You are not allowed to be told that you can't bring it up and imagine a point where a judge tells the lawyer before your client, the former President of the United States, the leading candidate and obvious nigh nominee for the Republican Party. Before he He takes the stand to defend himself. Miss Haba, tell me the questions you're going to ask in open court, and tell me exactly what he's going to respond. And then my questions, edited the response he was allowed to give. And guess what my client did?
He took the stand. He by the rules of this corrupt system that I have seen, we will immediately appeal. We will set aside that ridiculous jury. And I just wanna remind you all of one thing. I will continue with president Trump to fight for everybody's first amendment right to speak.
Everybody's a right to defend themselves when they are wrongfully accused and to be able to say, I didn't do it, and to double and triple and quadruple sit down and say this is wrong. This is wrong. But we are in the state of New York. We are in a New York jury, and that is why we are seeing these witch hunts, these hoaxes, as he calls them, and this is another one of them, be brought in New York, in states sites where they know they will get juries like this. It will not deter us.
We fighting, and I you. We didn't want today, but we will that was made in there. And the behavior I saw in there, some of which was reported widely today, gave us the most perfect record on appeal and even if I to it, which I don't. We were stripped of every defense, every single defense before we walked in there. And I am proud to stand with president Trump because he showed up, he stood up, he took this in, and he faced this judge.
And you know what? I'll continue to do so with him. Yes. Sense. Of course, I've spoken with the president.
Miss Hopper, is the
Speaker 1: former president scared now the consequences of his actions?
Speaker 0: The former does not live his life in fear as you've seen every single day. The former president and probably future president will continue to fight for Americans. Thank you very much, everybody.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
It's so obvious that E Jean Carrol is lying. Rape victims don't act like this and everyone knows it. She admitted George Conway put her up to this. https://t.co/RySKQz6h9Q
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's no longer about individual interests; the focus is on reclaiming our future and rights. Plans include using funds from Trump to support women's rights. There's humor in discussing extravagant purchases, but the serious matter is the ongoing legal battles against Trump.
The cases are interconnected, with insights from one case benefiting another. For instance, evidence from Trump's depositions can influence jury decisions on punitive damages. In court, Trump is less intimidating without his usual fanfare; he can be controlled by strong judges and competent lawyers. Ultimately, he is just a person, not the larger-than-life figure portrayed in the media.
Thanks to E. Jean Carroll, Robbie Kaplan, and Sean Crowley for their efforts in these historic legal battles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it's really not about me anymore. We have moved beyond me. And as you say, the fight now is really to take back our future. This is a man who stacked the supreme court, took away women's rights over their own bodies. We would like to be a part of turning, our eyes to the future and taking back our rights.
Speaker 1: You've talked about using some of Trump's money that you're about to get, to help shore up women's rights. Do you know what that might be? What that might look like
Speaker 0: or Rachel. Yes. Tell me. I had such such great ideas for all the good I'm gonna do with this money. First thing, Rachel, you and I are gonna go shopping.
We're gonna get completely new wardrobes, new shoes, motorcycle for crawling, new fishing rod for Robbie. Rachel, what do you want? A penthouse? It's yours, Rachel. Penthouse and, France.
You want France? You wanna go fishing in France? No? Oh, alright.
Speaker 2: Alright. Okay. That's a joke.
Speaker 1: Although, if if me fishing in France could do something for women's rights, I would take the hint. You know? I would obviously take one for the team. Alright. Let me let me as if as if you need persuasion in that regard.
Let me let me finish with a final question. And, again, this is both for you, Sean, and and for you, Robbie, and you guys can divide up responsibility here. But there are multiple cases here involving Trump that are that are coming up. Obviously, most eyes are on the federal January 6th case. Having been up against Trump in the courtroom, I'm wondering if you 2 have have any advice in terms of what it's like to go up against him and his legal team in terms of the way that he approaches his defense as part of it.
But I also wanna know if this big what everybody's expecting potentially to be a very large judgment against him and his company changed anything about the way that you approached the asked to the jury, the way that you presented evidence, the way that you're planning on making sure this money is in fact extracted from Trump's wallet? I mean, how much do all of these different cases interact with each other if at all? And can various lawyers involved in various in these various cases learn from each other's experience?
Speaker 3: So the the short answer to to the cases all interact with each other is absolutely all the time. To give you just one good example, in our case, we played at the end of our case, not only the deposition that I took of Donald Trump in this case, but we played the deposition that the New York attorney general took in their case. Because in that deposition, Trump is bragging about how his his brand alone is worth more than $10,000,000,000. He has $400,000,000 cash on hand. And the reason that was so relevant is in assessing how much money to work for punitive damages, the jury is not only allowed to, but supposed to think of the wealth of the defendant.
So when we said when Sean said, give him enough give enough to Eugene to make him stop, they had to think what enough would be for Donald Trump. So the cases in in kinds of predictable ways and unpredictable ways are are kind of talking to each other all the time.
Speaker 2: On on the first question, you know, I think that one thing that I I maybe wasn't prepared for, coming into this trial is that when when Donald Trump is stripped of, you know, all of the press and not at a rally, and there's no TV cameras, and he sort of has a small group of supporters around him, he's not that scary.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 2: And he also can be controlled. You know, I mean, his antics in the courtroom, we've talked about them. But at the end of the day, he did kind of follow the rules. Robbie Cross examined him. He was in he was in the witness chair, and he only got to answer 3 questions, I think.
And he pretty much stayed within the bounds. I think when you have a strong judge like judge Kaplan who enforces the rules of his courtroom, and you have real lawyers, you really can get him to behave, sort of. And when he is stripped of all of the rallies and the truth socials, he's just a guy. I think PG called him, the emperor with no clothes. That's not my quote, but he definitely is.
He's not the guy that you see on TV. He's just a guy, sometimes acting like a petulant toddler, but, just a guy.
Speaker 1: An American bound by the law just as every American is bound by the law. Writer E. Jean Carroll, attorney Robbie Kaplan, attorney Sean Crowley, you guys have made history a couple of times now.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: And you also have meant a lot, and continue to mean a lot. You have, been lighting the way, I think, for a lot of people in terms of both moral clarity and strategic acumen. And I really, really wanna thank each of you for making the time to come talk to us, and I want I I wish you all, safety and rest. Thank you
Speaker 0: for your time. Rachel.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Alright.
Speaker 3: We'll be right back. Stay with us.
reSee.it AI Summary
I've investigated the family of E Jean Carroll, who claims to be a rape victim. Some have called her "certifiable." Part 1 introduces Andrew Gray Switzer, her nephew. There are more interesting characters and connections to come.
@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer
EXCLUSIVE I’ve been looking into the family of self identifying “rape victim” E Jean Carroll. Many people have referred to E Jean Carroll as “certifiable”. As a wise man once said, the apple doesn’t fall too far from the tree. Meet The Family of E. Jean Carrol Part 1: Andrew Gray Switzer, the nephew. 👇🏻 This is only part 1. A lot of colorful characters and connections in her family.
@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver
@Travis_4_Trump The psychopath admitted LIVE on CNN that her allegations were a fraud, and the judge wouldn’t allow the footage to be used in court. https://t.co/acMBbqCIib
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that they do not feel like a victim because they were not thrown on the ground and ravished. They clarify that the experience, while hurtful, was not sexual. The speaker believes that most people associate rape with sexual acts, and even fantasies, but for them, it was a violent assault, not a sexual one.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't feel like a victim? I was not thrown on the ground and ravished, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotation. This was nuts this was not sexual for it just it it hurt. It just what it just, you know I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault. It is not I think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Let's take a short break. Think of the fantasies. Mhmm. We've just gotta take a quick break. Or if you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side.
You're fascinating to talk to.
@ArtCandee - Art Candee 🍿🥤
Here’s Donald Trump’s totally unhinged entire full press conference today at Trump Tower defaming E. Jean Carroll even more, babbling about his incompetent lawyers, and rambling about other women who are accusing him of sexual assault. This was a total train wreck. 😳😳😳😳😳 https://t.co/KDXZa37xF5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The election system is facing unprecedented challenges. Recent trials, including an appeal regarding a defamation case involving E. Jean Carroll, highlight a deeply flawed judicial process. The case revolves around false accusations made by Carroll, who lacks corroborating evidence and has a history of political motivations. The judges involved are perceived as hostile, and the legal proceedings are seen as politically motivated attacks against a leading presidential candidate. Job numbers are also concerning, with significant job losses for native-born Americans. The current administration's handling of these issues is criticized as an abuse of the legal system, aiming to undermine Trump's campaign. Despite the challenges, there is a belief that public awareness of these injustices may bolster support for Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Election system. Nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening. Now I understand yesterday, they're bringing up Russia, Russia, Russia again, that they've done for years. Never found any anything. Yep.
But they should be looking at China, China, China, Iran, Iran, and lots of other places. I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years. They know that, but it's a scam. But it all goes back to the DOJ because, we had a trial today. It's an appeal of, a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met.
I don't know. I have no idea who she is. She wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up. She put it in her book, and we're now appealing the decision. We had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton, very good friends of Clinton.
I guess he married, presided over the marriage ceremony of 1 of the lawyers on the case against us. And, very sad. Judge Lewis Kaplan, angry man. He was so angry. I went to the trial.
I've been in a lot of litigation over the years. I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw 1 of our attorneys in jail who threatened her with jail. Nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing. Nobody's ever I've never seen such anger, but all of our judges, I mean, we had a a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida. I think we have another judge who's very fair.
I just asked for fair. I don't want anything different from anybody else. I just asked for fairness. We have another judge or a couple of judges that I think are fair. Then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace.
The, case that we met on today, and then we're gonna talk about, job numbers, which are horrible, by the way, horrible, like, really bad. And you know that. I'm sure you won't report on it, but the job numbers are terrible. We're gonna talk about the appeal today. We had a great appellate lawyer go down representing us, and, I think John did a very good job.
You have a a matter of minutes to speak. It's a very complex thing because it was a setup, a rig deal. They had 2 witnesses. And before I start, I have no idea who this woman is. They have a picture from, they say, about forty years ago, a picture.
And the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity. I was been a celebrity for a long time. And they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people. Nobody even knows where it is. The problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident.
She doesn't know when. She doesn't know was it in the Could it have been further than that? She has no idea when. And people do that because you don't wanna give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe. So they tend to do that.
They take long periods so that this way hopefully, he was in New York at that time. But this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of The United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again. And this is being worked with the DOJ, Department of Justice, as are all of these cases. They all come out. Atlanta, Fannie, that is all Department of Justice.
Nobody knew that. The case with Judge Angouren, the most overturned judge in the state, that is very close because they sent their team from the DOJ to help him. The district attorney, Alvin Bragg, that was all worked with again, they sent a top operative from the department from the DOJ, Department of I call it the Department of Injustice, because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign. These cases are disgraceful. Now they're brought, for the most part, in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get 3 or 4%, like Downtown Manhattan, in front of very hostile judges, like hostile like you wouldn't believe.
Judge Mershon, Judge Angouren, and Judge Kaplan. All of them, hostile areas and, very, very hostile judges. I've never seen anything like it. And very bad thing in this case, New York. Very bad thing for New York.
Businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge Angora. I can tell you that. And probably the rest of them also. But this case involved a woman who wrote a book, and I guess she said something in the book. That's when I first heard about it.
I first heard about it in the White House. And, of course, I denied the story because it's not true. I have no idea who the woman is, and I never met her. Now I don't know about a picture that was taken forty years ago with her husband on a celebrity line, so I don't think that counts. But as far as I know, I never met her.
I never touched her. I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way, shape, or form. Her husband was a news anchor, actually. John Johnson, a very nice guy. She called him horrible things.
We weren't allowed to say that in the trial. She said horrible things about him. I guess they're since divorced. He's a very nice guy, African American, and she said very bad things. We weren't allowed to use that in the trial, which surprised a lot of people.
But she made up a story and fabricated a % that I attacked her at Bergdorf Goodman. You know, it's very interesting. I don't think they were allowed to use this either. Her favorite show is Law and Order, and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department, so I don't know if they used the name of the store. But that's her favorite show, Law and Order.
She said that. And, anyway, this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her words because I told the truth. We were called. I was in the White House, and I said, no. It never happened.
I didn't even know what they were talking about. This was I think I was in the Oval Office. Sir, do you know anything about this? And this had to do with the book, and she had a few pages in a book making this claim. By the way, there was never a claim.
There was never a police report. There was never anything mentioned. There was never publicity thirty or forty years ago whenever it took place. Nobody knows. She doesn't know when it took place.
When did it take place? She has no idea. She thinks it was in the She thinks it was in the And the judge we had 2 trials. We asked for a consolidation. He said no.
The reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me. Very bad because I'm running for president, and this is not the kind of publicity you like. And whether it's true or not, it's horrible. And in this case, it's so false. It's a made up, fabricated story by somebody.
I think initially just looking to promote a book. And when they called me, I denied the story. I got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right. I should be suing her for defamation. So that's where it is.
Now, there were 2 witnesses. 1 is a woman who's followed me for years. She said in 1979, I was in an airplane with her, commercial flight, and we became very intimate. I just sat down. I I think I had the book, The Art of the Deal.
I was famous then too. I've been famous for a long time. And we're sitting in first class according to her. Never happened, by the way. Totally made up story.
She's a Clinton person too, by the way. Big Clinton person. She made up the story. And so many years ago, and I think it would be 1979, 01/00 of my many people behind me could correct it, but I think she said 1979. That's a long time ago.
And I sat down. I believe I had some pretty big success then, and I was being talked about a lot. Maybe the art of the deal was out, you know, sometime after that. I'm not sure. But I was well known.
And passengers are coming into the plane. And she said I was making out with her, and then after fifteen minutes, and then she changed her story a couple of times, maybe it was quicker, that I grabbed her at a certain part, and that was when she
Speaker 1: Alright. It does appear that that feed of Trump just went out. We are gonna work to get that back right here. We should have it up in just a few minutes, but we were pulling in from Fox, and it appears that they've, done some switching around there. But we'll be right back after this quick two minute commercial break.
Speaker 0: Since she did this, since she ever made in a life, she gets paid a lot of money to go talk bad things about me. So remember this, this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with, with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because he can't talk, of Harris and Joe Biden. This was election interference. It all is. It's all fabricated, but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them.
If you get a jury, it's very hard to win in a jury. We have 3 or 4 or 5% Republican votes. Very, very tough, actually. 2 witnesses. 1 is named Jessica Leeds, so she she was up again.
She can't get rid of her. She was up. She said I was in an airplane doing that. A couple of things. You have a an armrest in planes back in those days.
Oh, by the way, she didn't know anything about the flight, where we were going, where I've I was in very few flights. I was a New York guy building New York building. I was at very few airplanes, I will tell you, in those days. I think. It's a long time ago.
But you had the armrest, and in the old days, they didn't move. Okay? But she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane, and that was the end of the story, I think. And this story has followed me for years. But just to finish with her, Jessica Leeds, no police reports, no witnesses, no corroboration of any kind, no criminal suggestions, no nothing.
Then you have another 1, and this 1 is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice. She came to Mar A Lago, and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen. It was a love story about Melania and myself, a love story in People magazine, and that was it. It was a cover, I think, but it was a beautiful story. You would everybody would love to have that marriage.
She said the nicest things about me, about Melania. You have the story. I mean, you can read the story. And her name was whoever. Let's see.
Her name was who? Swornoff. Yeah. I don't have it. Whatever her name was.
I don't know the lady, so perhaps it's much better that way, but I really don't know the lady. So she wrote this beautiful story. And about, I don't know, years later no police reports, no anything. Years later, the same person they called up, did you attack at Mar A Lago this woman, this writer, whatever her name is, and she was a witness in a case. Her and Leeds were the 2 witnesses.
There are only 2 witnesses. Did you attack her? I said, who is she? And they said, she writes for People Magazine. I said, I don't know anything about the lady.
I if I had a story long ago, years before about People, but it was very nice story. So I don't know. It has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about. It turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her. Now think of this.
Oh, and she said the butler knew everything. The old expression, the butler did it. Right? Very famous in crime stories. Well, the butler was Tony Senechal, worked for me for a long time.
He was at he was retired at that time. That was years later. He retired. He was at retired when this hoax came out. And what happened is he totally confirmed my story, and he didn't even work for me anymore.
He passed away a couple of years ago, a good man. He said, the woman was crazy. It never happened. I was the 1 that served her whatever they she was drinking, and I was there, and nothing ever happened. But you don't need the butler.
All you have to do is read the story. Think of this. A woman comes into Mar A Lago, interviews me about a love story, story about my wife and myself. And during that interview, I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently. Okay?
And then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story. A perfect story. She doesn't mention the event. Again, there's nothing on file at all. 0.
There was no complaints. There were no complaints to People magazine. There was no witness. There was nothing. Yeah.
Well, there was a witness, the butler, and he's already said everything. He's already told this story. Because this story, likewise, like Leeds, this story has followed me around. I could go through many many other stories outside of this. You know, it's very funny.
When you're rich and famous, you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories. But you're writers, and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't. Some of you are fake news and some of you are real news, but put yourself in my position. I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out. And they have fake cases, and they report back to DOJ.
And you have Lisa Monaco, one of the people at DOJ who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia hoax. And yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew, who should be sued by the way, because they're not a charity. All they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years. I mean, he's a sick person that runs that too. But Lisa Monaco is in the Department of Justice, but she's a, Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years.
So far, he's failed, and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls. I guess if you look at the, Nate Silver, very respected guy. I don't know him, but he has me up by a lot. So let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference. I'm in the races between 2 people, but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk.
And, they're not gonna skate through it. We're not gonna have a Marxist president. The people are getting it. So we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam. And all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture, which could have been AI generated.
I don't know. Showed up out of nowhere, but it's fine. Nice picture with her, her husband, and lots of other people are online. It's a celebrity line. But never met her, never touched her, never had anything to do with her.
The other thing is I was very famous then. If I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman, the department store that she said, everybody would have said, oh, there's Trump. And it would have been, at that time, on page 6. Page 6 was the equivalent of today's Internet. And it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store, gone into a dressing room, and supposedly you know what to her.
Never happened. Never happened. Total phony story. And I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it. I have all this legal talent, but legal talent cannot overcome rigged judges.
They can't overcome a 4% Republican area, and I'm disappointed in my legal talent, I'll be honest with you. They're good. They're good people. They're talented people. Today at the, trial, they didn't mention the the dress.
So the Monica Lewinsky type dress was a big part of the trial. Big, big part of the trial. I said, why didn't you mention that? And I heard there was a dress involved, and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with her. Never never touched this woman, saw this woman, knew had no idea who she was.
But they have a dress, sir. I said, so what? Well, sir, it's very they used that dress to try and intimidate me. They used that dress with the public. That dress was such a famous dress.
It was Monica Lewinsky, part 2, the dress. And the judge wanted it for trial, and it was gonna go into trial. And then they found out there was nothing on the dress, which I knew. And then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used. So they used it as a cudgel.
They used it as a hammer over my head. And then the judge, when he heard that it was it showed totally negative, totally negative. The judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial. Then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially, no, he didn't rape me. She was selling her book.
She wrote a book. The book would have been a total failure. Probably was anyway. They'll probably sold more recently. Again, there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with the stuff about me, and that's happened to others too, by the way.
She's not the only 1. But they have the Anderson Cooper tape. And in the Anderson Cooper tape, it's an interview of her. And Cooper says something to the effect, did he rape you? Did he rape you?
He was so happy. Oh, did he rape you? And she gave a very good answer for me, but a bad answer for CNN, for Anderson. And he said, we're going to commercial break right now. We're going.
Then she came back from commercial break, and she was much more hostile. But this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper, questions having to do with the tape. Wouldn't let us the judge. Judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used. We wanted to get the outtakes.
In other words, what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately? Where do you see this? I mean, some of you have seen it. Some of you haven't. We're going to commercial break right now.
And so what happened is we weren't able to use it. The other thing is we had not 1 trial, we had 2 trials. Nobody understands why. We asked for a consolidation, and I wanted to show up to the trial, to the first trial. My lawyer, who's not up here, not with us any longer, sir, you should not show up.
You're the former president or the president. I don't even know when when the trial was, but you're the president of The United States, sir. This is beneath you. I've got this a %. The dress is negative, but he wasn't able to use it.
Sir, it's beneath you to show up. I said, but wouldn't that be bad for a jury? Wouldn't that be sort of bad for a jury if I don't show up? He said, sir, you don't have to show up. I've got this.
You shouldn't do it. It's beneath you. It's beneath the office of the president. I understood what he meant by that, and so I didn't show up. And I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen, touched, or in any way was involved with, nor would I wanna be.
I would not wanna be. My people said, please don't say that. I would not wanna be involved with her. And that's where we are. So we're appealing it, and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments, but you'll look that up yourself.
But I hope they understand this is the office of the president of The United States, and there has to be fairness shown. Our court system is looking so bad. If you're a Democrat, these are all Democrat appointed people. Biden, Clinton, I think others, 3 people. They seem very good today and, I mean, they seem absolutely fine, but, I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel, but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels.
I don't get friendly panels. But where we've had fair judges, where we've had brilliant judges, frankly, I I don't know the judge in Florida, Judge Cannon. Don't know her at all. But, I think she's a brilliant woman. I think she handled a scam.
It's a scam case. That's the documents case. That's the case where Biden, who had 10 times more documents, took all this stuff for years, fifty years, and he was exonerated. Of course, they said he was incompetent, so he wasn't fit. So he was exonerated based on that.
But me, I don't get exonerated so easily. And I had a thing called the Presidential Records Act, which exonerates me. But we won that trial, and the other side plays the ref. Crew and, Weissman and all these people, And again, Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years, and now she's like the second person at the DOJ. But she's with all these people.
And they're playing the ref, and they say terrible things about judges. They do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're gonna intimidate them. I think it should be illegal. That's what the DOJ should look into, the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them. It's called playing the ref.
Nobody did it better than the late great Bobby Knight basketball coach. He would play he would scream at those refs and everything. He said they say, Bobby, you're not gonna get the decision overturned. Yep. But the next 1, I will.
And he was right. He was a great basketball coach. Last coached to have an undefeated season. Last coach in basketball to have an many years ago, he also endorsed me, but he played the ref. These people are playing the ref when they are allowed to call for recusal, impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way.
And for some reason, the other side doesn't do that. They don't do that. The other side is much softer. Republicans play it a lot softer, but they're they play it legitimately. So I'm gonna ask, if I might, Will Scharf to come up, just say a couple of words about what took place today.
1 of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case. Remember, it never happened. It was made up for political reasons, and the DOJ is behind everything, every one of these cases. It's political interference. It's a witch hunt just like the fake Russia, Russia, Russia scam was a witch hunt.
And just like they wanna start that scam all over again by announcing that Russia, Russia, Russia we're talking about. And you know what they do when they do that? They intimidate people from having a fair election. They intimidate poll workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election, and it's a it's a disgrace. Our country's in serious trouble.
Our judicial system is in very serious trouble. Will, please come up. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Good morning, y'all. My name is Will Scharf. I'm 1 of president Trump's attorneys. Today, we presented oral argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the second circuit in 1 of 2 cases brought against president Trump by E. Jean Carroll.
Now it's really important to remember that E. Jean Carroll's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said, she said story. There is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about president Trump. There are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to. There is not confirmatory DNA.
No police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident. She was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently. No surveillance evidence or witnesses have ever, been found or come forward confirming any aspect of E. Jean Carroll's story. In light of that, in light of the utter implausibility of the story that E.
Jean Carroll was attempting to sell to the jury in this case, her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom. Utterly, in insane, efforts to introduce propensity witnesses. Jessica Leeds and Natasha Steinhoff, most notably, in an unfair and improper effort to buttress E. Jean Carroll's failed attempt, to assault president Trump. Jessica Leeds' story is instructive here.
This is a woman who claims, that in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979, president Trump assaulted her. Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from, where it went to, the date of the flight in question, making our efforts to disprove her testimony, extremely difficult. Under the federal rules of evidence, this story should have never been allowed to be presented, to the jury in this case. The same is true of Natasha Stoynoff's story, which again lacks any indicia of reliability, any sort of credibility, any sort of, confirmatory, testimony from other witnesses, or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened. So on the 1 hand, you have a judge who allowed in, this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in.
In our view, that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury, of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should, should not have been considering. And we think that absent that propensity evidence, no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case. And as a result, we believe, that this verdict needs to be overturned. But there's more than that. In addition to this improper propensity evidence, president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross examining E.
Jean Carroll and other witnesses on crucial issues. Crucial issues in particular relating, to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit. This is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway, a long time political foe and adversary of president Trump. This is a lawsuit that was funded by Reid Hoffman, a key political ally of the Biden Harris administration and a major Democrat donor. We were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts.
We were prevented from cross examining E. Jean Carroll on aspects of that that dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit, and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict. I think this political coordination point is particularly important though. It's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully, unconstitutionally interfere with president Trump's core first amendment right to run for president. That is a right guaranteed to him by the constitution.
That is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him. We have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives, have underlay what should be sir excuse me, serious legal proceedings. And I think when you look at this situation in TOTA, when you look at what the left, when you look at what the Biden Harris administration is attempting to do to president Trump, this is insane. This is an absolute abuse of our legal system. It's an absolute abuse of the rule of law.
It should be deeply offensive, not just to political supporters of president Trump, but to each and every American. With respect to today's appeal, we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here. We we are hopeful that the second circuit, understands what occurred during this trial, which was an improper use of evidence to buttress E. Jean Carroll's entirely meritless claims on the 1 hand, and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit, and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict. Thank you.
Speaker 3: Good afternoon. I've done this 1 too many times. Actually, too many times for the last three and a half years while president Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back. And I wanna speak to the American women, and I wanna speak to the people that need to get out and vote Nov. 5.
I have sat with president Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges, AGs, NDAs who have specifically run-in this city and others on getting Trump. The Trump administration will fix this problem. We will stop Kamala Harris's regime because she was there. Let's not forget that, and she still is. Of using officials from the White House, putting them in DA's offices, in AG's offices, and attacking your political opponent, and this country deserves better than this.
We do. We should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this. We did this in 2016, and every woman had no reports. They come out when it's election time. And as a woman who has stood with president Trump, who has spent extensive time with president Trump and with his beautiful family, I will tell you, that is not president Trump, and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person, his family, and the Trump organization that we stand in right now.
You must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney, as a woman, as a mother, our future of this country depends on it, and we need to stop this from happening. The DOJ is supposed to help our country and protect us, not attack us because you cannot win in the polls. Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you very much both. And, just in finishing this, we have numerous other trials that are also, very much in coordination with the DOJ. They actually took just about their top person and they put them into the offices of the attorney general of New York. And then also the office of the DA, DA Bragg's office, to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent. And it's a shame.
It's a shame. Businesses will not come to New York because of it. They actually, in the case of, Angouren, they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this. And not only were my numbers correct, and again, this was a generality. All you need is a general, but I I had really good numbers, but they were very conservative, very very much on the low side.
And the judge knew that, and the judge ruled a fine against me, the likes of which has never even been heard of. Businesses will never come to this state as long as that is able to be held up, because we won that trial so conclusively. We had an expert witness said that president Trump's financial this was an expert witness from the Stern School of Business, one of the most, highly respected people in the country as an expert witness. He said, to the best of my remembering, it's a big statement, but he said, this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen. But the judge made me pay, like, a $400,000,000 fine.
This is a consumer fraud statement. Think of it. Consumer frauds, case that they made it in. The judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things, and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever. The judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount.
And I said, I I'm not gonna settle. I didn't do anything wrong, but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount. He wanted to settle it for a much more. We had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave. That was 1 of the interesting things.
I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for, which was a very small number by comparison. And then he just came out with this number. This was a coordination with the DOJ. And the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about, which is same kind of a thing, also in coordination, is the Bragg case, and they actually wanted to put them together in New York. They wanted to put the d 8 case together with the attorney general case, but they both wanted credit.
They couldn't understand, you know, they they both wanted credit, so they had their own cases. And it's very corrupt in New York and very, very corrupt. It's a very corrupt place and doing very badly. But when people see what happened and when they see oh, I've had so many calls from business people saying, this is just terrible. Today, there was a story about somebody in Southern District who's highly respected, knocking the hell out of both of those cases.
Say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought. And I'm gonna write out a list of things from Alan Dershowitz, Andrew McCarthy, Greg Jarrett, the some of the the greatest people, all legal all legal scholars, great people, Jonathan Turley, like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that, quote, Calabresi, judge Calabresi, that, quote, on cases. And they I mean, shockingly, they can't even believe it. They said this case should not have been allowed to be brought. And that's about pretty much both cases, but it's about the case that we have in front of judge Mershon.
That case is a disgrace. Should have never been allowed. I did nothing wrong. And he took a nonexistent expired, long expired by the statute of limitations, misdemeanor. He made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony.
Nobody can even believe it over nothing. And if you look at that case, he wouldn't allow it. That whole thing was done by an attorney. I had nothing to do with it. That was done by an attorney, a sleazebag named Michael Cohen.
And he did the whole thing, and you're allowed to have reliance on attorney. It's called reliance on attorney. You have a reliance on attorney. Attorney's allowed to do things. And all it was is a nondisclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened, by the way.
I might add that. If you don't mind, I'll add that. We have a statement. Nothing happened, and he got a nondisclosure agreement. He did it on his own, and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense, the attorney client defense, which is very standard.
Other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it, but he's the 1 that did it because I was running for president and running the country. He's the 1 that did it. So all of these cases are a disgrace, But the case that we had today, downtown, I wish we could have mentioned the dress. Again, got the idea from Monica Lewinsky, but it was negative. Was it allowed to be used?
I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things, and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outtakes, what's called the outtakes. What did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial? I'd love to find that out. So that's where we are. We have a very corrupt system of laws, but in that system, we have some very good judges also.
And I think in the end, the good judges will prevail. And I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story, probably out of
Speaker 1: Alright. It appears that Fox did lose that feed once again coming in from Trump Tower. What you were listening to, though, was former president Trump as he was speaking after that appeals hearing in the case that took place a bit earlier on this morning. It was an appeal in the e g Carroll case that we've talked a lot about. It looks like they did get that feedback, so let's pop up the audio.
Speaker 0: Choose 2 sets of lawyers to everything It's really, really very disgraceful. Let me talk about, job numbers because as you know, they just came out and they're a basic disaster. They are really they are really bad. You had numbers that are shocking. Native born Americans, we lost 1300000.0 jobs, while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs.
So foreigners coming in illegally, largely illegally, into our country took the jobs of native born Americans. And I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country, many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums, traffickers, human traffickers, women traffickers, sex traffickers, which, by the way, that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at because it's horrible. And it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experienced. If you look at Aurora, Colorado, they're taking over the place. They took over buildings and they're this is just the beginning.
You haven't seen anything yet. You haven't seen any. They've allowed well over 20000000 people in my opinion. I the other people say, well, it's only 13. No.
No. It's much more than 20. I think it's much more than 20. Our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Kamala that doesn't wanna do 1 interview. She may does 1 softball interview with CNN.
Couldn't have been nicer. Dana Bash, you know what? I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with Sleepy Joe, I thought they were very fair, actually. I was surprised they were very fair. I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC, George Slopadopoulos, and that group.
And ABC, I think, is the worst of everybody. I think they're the worst. They're the nastiest. They're as as bad as you can be. They're worse than NBC, which is saying a lot, and we have something coming.
And the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only 1 that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News, and her husband's best friend is married to that 1. So and Donna Brazile is there. You remember the famous Donna Brazile? She gave Hillary Clinton the questions. You remember that?
That was a little embarrassing. She got fired, I assume, for that. But now she's working at ABC. So I said, I'll do it anyway. Because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions, I don't think she'll be very good.
And this is not what our country wants, and I feel I have an obligation to do it. And she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system. This is the weaponization of justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before. We've never seen it. You see it in third world countries.
You see it in Banana Republics, but you don't see it in The United States Of America, and it's a very sad thing. And I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because, you know, it came out with a indictment from the district attorney, which again, just revealed today, and I hope you're gonna do a story because it's a big story. The Southern District Of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people. He said it was a disgrace that that case was brought. It was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of Meershon.
The case is a disgrace. Should have never been brought. Should have never been brought. And the case in front of judge Angouren, just in terms of the case itself, we had 4 or 5 overturns in the appellate division. I only hope the appellate division for the good of New York, Otherwise, you just say, God save the state.
For the good of New York, I hope that the appellate division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam. But every single 1 of these cases that I'm mentioning, they're all hoaxes and scams. No different than Russia, Russia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine. The impeachment hoax number 1, impeachment hoax number 2. All these things that we won, we won them all.
But it takes time, it takes effort, and they're at it again. But this time, what they're doing is they're hitting us, as hard as possible. You know, it's very interesting. It just brings to light, the lawyer on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with E. Jean Carroll.
She said, the way to defeat Trump is go after him civilly as often as possible. Make his life miserable, sue him all the time, keep him in court, and let him spend a fortune. That's the lawyer I have in the E. Jean Carroll case, and that's exactly what they've done. The only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands.
And my poll numbers, I believe, are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax, it's a scam, it's a political witch hunt, and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves. Thank you very much, everybody.
@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy
Charlie Kirk explains that E. Jean Carroll LIED and he makes perfect sense. The simplest explanation usually is the correct one. https://t.co/aNggubULZS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they will be politically incorrect and issues a trigger warning. They question the claim that a wealthy man, married to a supermodel, would sexually assault E. Jean Carroll in a Tiffany's store. The speaker highlights that the alleged incident occurred at the height of the man's career, with no prior accusations for twenty years, and only surfaced when he ran for president. The speaker dismisses the accusation as "complete rubbish and political nonsense."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I'm gonna be politically incorrect. Is that okay? Alright. Trigger warning. Okay.
So let me let me understand this. Here is the world's wealthiest man. One of the world's wealthiest men worth like $10,000,000,000. He's got a show on the NBC apprentice. He's literally married to a supermodel.
He can have any woman on the world. And I'm I'm supposed to believe at 2PM at in a Tiffany store, he walks in and Eugene Carroll, who is not exactly a supermodel, and risks his entire fortune of which there is no accusation for twenty years, but he pops up and runs for the president. And all of a sudden, says, this guy me, even though I can't remember the day, the month, the year, 2PM in a department store at Tiffany's while he was at the height of his career. I'm sorry. That's complete rubbish and political nonsense.
@atensnut - Juanita Broaddrick
THIS is the real E. Jean Carroll. She is a delusional pervert!! https://t.co/fA91WnkcPu
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
E. Jean Carroll said she didn't believe she was a victim of her "3-minute" encounter she claims to have had with Donald Trump. "I think most people think of rape as sexy. They think of the fantasies." Let's hope the Supreme Court overturns the civil verdict in this case, too. https://t.co/M1qGku6Hfb
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a dressing room, "the minute I was in there, he shut the door and pushed me up against the wall and bang bang my head on the wall and kissed me." She laughed to cope: "You started laughing?" It turned serious as he "pulled down the tights" with one hand, and it was "a fight" against her will; she notes he is "six three" and she was "about six one in the massive heels." She confirms "Yes" to penetration and says, "That's the definition" of rape, though she prefers calling it "the fight" and says, "I was not the victim." She adds, "Sexual violence is in every country, in every strata of society" and that her incident was short—"three minutes in this little dressing room"—and she "got out. I'm moving on."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The minute I was in there, he shut the door and pushed me up against the wall and bang bang my head on the wall and kissed me. I just it was so shocking. I couldn't of course, I started laughing again because
Speaker 1: You started laughing?
Speaker 0: Of course.
Speaker 1: What what why? Well, why, of course?
Speaker 0: Because it was a way of if it was at all ironic in his part, it would if a man is laughed at, it usually will make him and he put his shoulder against me to hold me against the wall. And at that point, I realized that I was in a very difficult situation.
Speaker 1: Did he say anything?
Speaker 0: No. No. It was just like, we're gonna do this thing. We're just so hot for each other. Or I don't why would I even try to think what he was thinking?
Anyway, so he put me you know, he pushed me held me with his shoulder, and I was wearing a a coat dress and tights, and he pulled down the tights. And so that's
Speaker 1: He pulled it with he pulled it with both hands, with one hand?
Speaker 0: One. That was when it turned serious. I realized that this was this was this was a fight. And even though I can talk about it now and put words to it, at the time the adrenaline is pouring through me and all I wanna do right.
Speaker 1: How would you describe what were you you you said you were you were obviously Fighting. Surprised, fighting. Right. Were you scared? Were you No.
I was too
Speaker 0: I was too panicked to be scared.
Speaker 1: Too panicked to be scared. Okay.
Speaker 0: You know
Speaker 1: Is it and you said adrenaline was pumping?
Speaker 0: I assume it was. Right. Because I got strong enough. He's six three. Apparently, I've looked it up.
I was about six one in the massive heels I was wearing. And so we were even almost even in height. And down go the tights, and it was against my will, and it hurt, and it was a fight.
Speaker 1: And this is not a question I would normally ask. And if if you don't wanna answer, totally understand. But given the prior accusations, which have all been of forms of assault or harassment, you you're saying there was actual penetration?
Speaker 0: Yes. Did you
Speaker 1: which is puts it into a different category of any of these other any of the other act women who have come forward. I think techno I mean, that that is that is the definition of of rape. One definition.
Speaker 0: That's the definition. Yes. How long? Brief. Mhmm.
Brief. Because when a woman is stamping her feet mean
Speaker 1: And what you were doing? You started stamping I her
Speaker 0: always think back and think, I that was the stupidest thing I've ever done. I should never have done it. Then I didn't behave
Speaker 1: When you say I should have never done it, you mean
Speaker 0: That was just a dumb thing to go into a dressing room with a man that I hardly know and have him shut the door and then be unable to stop him. And, I was a competitive athlete, so I wasn't like a I didn't freeze. I I rose to the occasion, and, it did not last long. And that's why I don't use the word you just used. I use the word fight.
Speaker 1: You don't use the word rape?
Speaker 0: Sexual violence is in every country, in every strata of of society, and I just feel that so many women are undergoing sexual violence. Mine was short. I got out. I'm happy now. I'm, moving on.
And I think of all the women who are enduring constant sexual violence. So this one instant, this one, what, three minutes in this little dressing room, I just say it's the fight. That way, I'm not the victim. Right? I'm not the victim.
Speaker 1: You don't feel like a victim?
Speaker 0: I was not thrown on the ground in ravish, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotation. This was not this was not sexual. For it just it it hurt. It just what it just you know?
Speaker 1: But I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault. It is not
Speaker 0: I think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Speaker 1: Let's take a short break.
Speaker 0: Think of the fantasies.
Speaker 1: Mhmm. We've just gotta take a quick break. If you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side.
Speaker 0: You're fascinating to talk to.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m astonished that many Democrats don’t see that E. Jean Carroll’s ability to file charges against Trump was funded by wealthy Democrats who pushed for a temporary law. Carroll was the first to use it, but it expired after a year. She also lied under oath about her legal fees, facing no consequences. The main witness, Carol Martin, even called Carroll a drug addict in a text. It’s baffling that a true victim would behave this way. Many believe Carroll's claims are fabricated and politically motivated, with no evidence presented to support her allegations.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
I can’t believe how many democrats still don’t realize that the only reason E. Jean Carroll was allowed to file charges against Trump was because democrat billionaires funded her effort to get a one year temporary law added just so she could. She was the first person in the state to file under the new temporary law. 12 months later the law expired.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
Carroll also lied and testified under oath that she wasn’t having her legal fees paid for by someone else and faced no repercussions when it was exposed as a lie. https://t.co/OW6eGMMZic
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
👇👇
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
The so-called "witness" who backed Carroll's outlandish claims in court? Well, emails from 2017 between her and Carroll expose the truth. In September of that year, Carol Martin sent E. Jean Carroll an article mocking Trump, referring to him as "Orange Crush," and urged, "this has to stop." She suggested, "as soon as we’re both well enough to scheme, we must both do our patriotic duty." Carroll eagerly replied, "TOTALLY!!! I have something special for you when we meet." Fast forward 15 months, and Carroll conveniently releases a book accusing Trump of assault. Martin didn’t want to be involved at first saying Carroll made the lawsuit a “lifestyle”.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
The main witness, Carol Martin, texted her daughter that E. Jean Carroll was a drug addict and that the drug was herself. https://t.co/STSYNr5sPR
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
And the thing I find strangest of all…. What true victim of the crime she claimed would post a question like this? https://t.co/4bSZSvkLV9
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
For the people asking why Trump didn’t give his DNA https://t.co/A8I9YSritt
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@MxCl74613523 YUP
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@AngelLee2194 If only she had evidence.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@AndrewLBElms A claim like that requires proof. She has yet to present any.
@lamps_apple - Apple Lamps
@KaostheDog2 If this would true she would have had went against him criminally. If it was true she would have had evidence Democrats are disgusting and support false rape claims as long as it’s against their opponent..